Next Article in Journal
Novel Liver Stiffness-Based Nomogram for Predicting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection Initiating Antiviral Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Hypoxia and Its Influence on Radiotherapy Response of HPV-Positive and HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Bayesian Networks to Support Decision-Making for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade in Recurrent/Metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role and Clinical Utility of Cancer/Testis Antigens in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 13
Issue 23
10.3390/cancers13235889
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Immunotherapy Approaches in HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer

by
Ricklie Julian
,
Malvi Savani
and
Julie E. Bauman
*
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2021, 13(23), 5889; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13235889
Submission received: 19 September 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 20 November 2021 / Published: 23 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Associated Head and Neck Cancers: From Basic Biology to Clinical Challenges)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents a distinct entity with molecular, pathological, and clinical features that lead to an improved response to standard therapy and a favorable prognosis compared to HPV-negative HNSCC. In this review we expound on the developing role of immunotherapy in HPV-positive HNSCC and highlight the clinical rationale and ongoing trials investigating novel therapeutic approaches.

Abstract

Immunotherapy approaches for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are rapidly advancing. Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been identified as a causative agent in a subset of oropharyngeal cancers (OPC). HPV-positive OPC comprises a distinct clinical and pathologic disease entity and has a unique immunophenotype. Immunotherapy with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors has exhibited improved outcomes for patients with advanced HNSCC, irrespective of HPV status. To date, the clinical management of HPV-positive HNSCC and HPV-negative HNSCC has been identical, despite differences in the tumor antigens, immune microenvironment, and immune signatures of these two biologically distinct tumor types. Numerous clinical trials are underway to further refine the application of immunotherapy and develop new immunotherapy approaches. The aim of this review is to highlight the developing role of immunotherapy in HPV-positive HNSCC along with the clinical evidence and preclinical scientific rationale behind emerging therapeutic approaches, with emphasis on promising HPV-specific immune activators that exploit the universal presence of foreign, non-self tumor antigens.

1. Introduction

In the United States, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) constitutes approximately 3% of all malignancies. The estimated annual incidence of HNSCC is 54,010 and HNSCC is projected to result in 10,850 deaths in 2021 [1]. Along with the known environmental risk factors, including exposure to tobacco, betel quid, and alcohol, myriad molecular and epidemiologic studies have supported the causal association between oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers (OPC) [2,3]. Despite a decrease in the incidence of alcohol- and tobacco-related HNSCC, coincident with declining tobacco use, the incidence of OPC has continuously risen since the 1980s. This is ascribed to an epidemic of oral HPV infection in the United States and worldwide [4,5]. While more than 220 HPV genotypes have been established, HPV16 is the predominant genotype responsible for greater than 90% of HPV-positive OPC [6,7,8].
HPV-positive HNSCC represents a distinct disease entity with molecular, pathological, and clinical features that lead to an improved response to standard therapy and a favorable prognosis compared to HPV-negative HNSCC. Weinberger and colleagues initially identified an OPC molecular profile associated with favorable prognosis: specifically, the presence of HPV16 DNA and overexpression of p16. The latter implies functionally relevant HPV; conventional thinking is that p16 is upregulated as a consequence of retinoblastoma (Rb) degradation by the oncoprotein E7 [9]. Alternately, McLaughlin-Drubin et al. have shown that p16 upregulation is Rb-independent but indeed E7-dependent, as E7 drives the upregulation of KDM6B histone demethylase [10]. Ultimately, HPV status and tobacco history were identified as the two most important prognostic factors in OPC [11], and in 2017 the American Joint Commission on Cancer codified a new staging system for p16-positive OPC to improve hazard discrimination.
Patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HPV-positive HNSCC have superior survival than those with HPV-negative R/M HNSCC, despite treatment with similar regimens [4,12]. Immune checkpoint inhibitors against PD-1 have been developed agnostic to HPV status. In 2016, the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), pembrolizumab and nivolumab, were U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for platinum-resistant, second line, R/M HNSCC. The KEYNOTE-048 trial later demonstrated superiority of pembrolizumab versus cetuximab when combined with a platinum-5-fluorouracil doublet and administered in first line R/M HNSCC [13,14,15]. KEYNOTE-048 also introduced pembrolizumab as an appropriate monotherapy for first-line treatment in the setting of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive R/M HNSCC [14]. Despite the exciting progress in systemic therapy represented by this new class of therapeutics, for both HPV-positive and HPV-negative disease, overall survival (OS) remains dismal following failure of platinum and anti-PD-1 mAb [16,17].
These poor outcomes have driven increased research into novel immunotherapeutic and targeted approaches in HNSCC. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic avenue in HPV-positive HNSCC as HPV-driven carcinogenesis is propelled by loss of immunologic control with chronic viral infection resulting in a unique, non-self, antigenic target [18]. In this review, we highlight the role of immunotherapy as an established standard of care, as well as explore emerging immunotherapies including novel checkpoint inhibitors, antibodies and fusion protein constructs, vaccines, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in HPV-positive HNSCC (Figure 1).

2. Primary Prevention of HPV-Positive HNSCC

HPV is a double-stranded DNA virus that infects the epidermal and mucosal surfaces of the oropharynx, genital, and anal regions and is an established causative agent in oropharynx, cervical, vulvar, anal, and penile cancers. HPV infection is common and occurs through mucosal surface contact with an infected sexual partner [19]. Three prophylactic HPV vaccinations are currently approved by the FDA including the quadrivalent HPV vaccine, Gardasil, a bivalent HPV vaccine, Cervarix, and a nine-valent vaccine, Gardasil 9, with the latter providing protection against HPV-6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 53, and 58 [19]. Each vaccine is recommended for a specific sex and age group. HPV vaccination for all individuals aged 9–26 years is recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Additionally, the FDA has approved HPV vaccination for all individuals aged 27–45 years who have not been adequately vaccinated previously [20]. The indications for these prophylactic HPV vaccinations were established based on impact on anogenital HPV infections. However, the effectiveness against oral HPV infection specifically has only been analyzed retrospectively but was shown to have 88–93% efficacy [21]. HPV vaccinations are only effective for primary prevention with the primary mechanism of action involving the induction of anti-L1 capsid antibodies, effectively blocking the initial step of viral entry. Although numerous epidemiological studies have shown an association between oral HPV DNA detection or anti-HPV16 E6 seropositivity and consequent risk of developing OPC, no validated screening test analogous to the Papanicolaou smear exists for HPV-positive HNSCC [22].

3. Immune Microenvironment in HPV Driven HNSCC

HPV-positive OPC comprises a distinct molecular and pathologic entity with different clinical outcomes compared to HPV-negative OPCs [23]. Patients with HPV-related HNSCC are generally younger and often lack the classic risk factors including tobacco and alcohol exposure and associated medical comorbidities compared to those with HPV-negative tumors [24]. Numerous HPV genotypes cause infection, some benign and others with malignant potential. The majority of HPV-associated HNSCC in the United States can be attributed to the high-risk genotype 16, with rare accounts of HPV-18, 33, and others reported as causal [25]. High-risk HPV strain DNA can integrate into the cellular genome resulting in the subsequent overexpression of viral oncogenes E6 and E7. E6 and E7 target several intracellular signaling pathways pertinent in the cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, apoptosis, and maintenance of genomic integrity [26]. E6 binds the cell cycle regulatory protein p53 and leads to its degradation. Similarly, E7 binds the Rb tumor suppressor leading to its degradation, and consequent p16 over-expression. Together, these molecular aberrancies result in uncontrolled tumor cell growth and proliferation [27].
Additionally, HPV-driven HNSCC has a distinct immune microenvironment compared to non-HPV-driven HNSCC. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the immune evasion in these tumors including upregulation of cytokines, interference with antigen presentation, differences in immune checkpoint receptor interaction, and modulation of gene transcription [28]. HPV-positive HNSCC has increased CD8+ T-cell activation and additional markers of immune infiltration compared to HPV-negative HNSCC [29]. HPV-positive tumors also express higher levels of perforin and granzyme A and B, reflecting cytotoxic CD8+ T cell immune activation [30].
An important step in pathogenesis of HPV-driven HNSCC is escape from cell cycle regulation. Various mechanisms contribute to this aberrancy including evolution of T-cell tolerance to HPV infection, the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines, diminutive regulation by interferon gamma, and reduced or unbalanced signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1 and 3 pathway signaling [31].
Other features unique to the immune microenvironment in HPV-driven HNSCC include increased expression of PD-L1 compared to that of HPV-negative HNSCC and normal oropharyngeal tissue. The downregulation of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) expression in HPV-driven HNSCC may also lead to decreased antigen recognition and presentation. HPV-positive HNSCC is also associated with higher expression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), an immune checkpoint receptor, and higher regulatory T cells (Tregs) [23].
Investigation of 280 HNSCC tumors profiled by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) analyzed transcriptome data to comprehensively characterize the immune landscape. Notably, immune infiltration differed by HPV status: HPV associated tumors possessed increasing levels of infiltrating Tregs and CD8+ T cells, and heightened expression of the immuno-inhibitory receptor CTLA-4 compared with HPV-negative HNSCC [30]. Another TCGA study included 522 HNSCC tumors and analyzed the immune pathway-related gene expression profile using RNA sequencing. Approximately 40% of the analyzed HNSCC tumors showed an active immune signature characterized by an enhanced inflammatory response, robust cytolytic activity, and constitutive interferon-γ signaling (all, p < 0.001) versus an exhausted immune signature. Tumors in the oropharynx (p < 0.001) and HPV infection (63% versus 13% by p16 status, p < 0.001; 51% versus 0% by in situ hybridization status, p < 0.001) were characterized by this active immune signature [32]. More recently, it has been shown that HNSCC tumors that express genes predictive of T cell infiltrates (or “hot tumors”) using the TCGA portend a superior prognosis compared to tumors lacking such expression (or “cold tumors”) irrespective of tumor expression of immune inhibitory genes [33].

4. Immunotherapy Standard of Care Regimens in HPV-Positive HNSCC

The HPV-positive tumor microenvironment is distinct in its notable infiltration of Tregs and PD-1 positive T-cells [34]. Expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2, the ligands of the T-cell suppressive immune checkpoint receptor, PD-1, has been implicated in immune evasion resulting in recurrence or metastasis of HNSCC. Ferris and colleagues introduced the fully humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 mAb nivolumab in CheckMate 141, an open-label, phase III trial including 361 patients with R/M HNSCC who had progressed within 6 months of receiving platinum-based chemotherapy [35]. Compared to investigator’s choice, which included single-agent chemotherapy (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab), patients who received nivolumab exhibited a significantly longer OS (hazard ratio 0.7; 97.73%CI, 0.51 to 0.96; p = 0.01) with limited grade 3 or 4 toxicity as compared to standard therapy (13.1% vs 35.1%). Sixty-three of 240 (26%) patients in the nivolumab cohort were HPV-positive and 29 out of 121 (24%) patients in the investigator’s choice cohort were HPV-positive. Subgroup analysis confirmed an OS benefit irrespective of HPV status, where median OS was 8.8 months in both p16-positive and -negative subjects with PD-L1 ≥ 1% versus 3.9 and 5.6 months for p16-positive and -negative subjects with PD-L1 ≥ 1%, exposed to investigator’s choice therapy).
Two-year follow-up CheckMate 141 showed a sustained OS advantage in individuals treated with nivolumab compared to investigator’s choice, with a median OS of 7.7 vs. 5.1 months [36]. Sustained benefit in long-term (2 years) OS with nivolumab was achieved in patients irrespective of HPV status. A 40% reduction in the risk of death was noted in both the HPV-positive (HR 0.6 (95% CI 0.37–0.97)) and HPV-negative subgroups (HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.38–0.92)). An analysis stratified by both PD-L1 and HPV status found that all subgroups derived an OS benefit with nivolumab compared to investigator’s choice. However, the group positive for both HPV and PD-L1 expression sustained the highest OS benefit from nivolumab (HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.18–0.81)).
The KEYNOTE-040 trial similarly was an international, randomized, phase III trial that demonstrated the safety and efficacy of another anti-PD-1 mAb, pembrolizumab, compared to investigator’s choice single-agent therapy including methotrexate, docetaxel or cetuximab in patients with R/M HNSCC who had progressed during or within 6 months of receiving platinum-based therapy [37]. Of the 495 patients enrolled, the median OS in the pembrolizumab cohort was 8.4 months (95% CI 6.4–9.4) vs. 6.9 months in the investigator’s cohort (95% CI 5.9–8.0). Approximately 25% and 23% of patients in the pembrolizumab and standard cohorts, respectively, had p16-positive OPC; HPV-positive subjects had similar OS benefit as the overall cohort in stratified analysis.
More recently, KEYNOTE-048, a randomized phase III trial, evaluated the use of pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus platinum-5-fluorouracil, or the standard first-line EXTREME regimen (cetuximab plus platinum-5-fluorouracil) among 882 patients with R/M HNSCC across 200 sites and 37 countries [14]. In patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥ 20, pembrolizumab alone showed a benefit in median OS compared to EXTREME (14.9 months vs 10.7 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.61 (95% CI 0.45–0.83), p = 0.0007). In patients with CPS ≥ 1, median OS was once again superior to EXTREME (12.3 months vs 10.3 months, HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.64–0.96), p = 0.0086). Finally, the combination of pembrolizumab and platinum-5-fluorouracil was superior to EXTREME as first-line treatment for PD-L1 unselected, R/M HSNSCC. As KEYNOTE-048 included both HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients, with p16-positive OPC balanced across arms, the new first-line standards of care for R/M HNSCC remain agnostic to HPV status.

5. Meta-Analysis of PD-1 Inhibition in HNSCC

In an effort to further understand the impact of HPV status on response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy, recent meta-analyses have been conducted. In a meta-analysis assessing results from 11 clinical trials including 1860 patients evaluating immunotherapy in R/M HNSCC, patients with HPV-positive HNSCC demonstrated an improved risk ratio (1.29, p = 0.24) and OS (11.5 vs. 6.3 months) in comparison to patients with HPV-negative disease [38]. The most common immunotherapy agents across the trials were anti-PD1 agents (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 inhibitors (durvalumab and atezolizumab). Of note, motolimod, a Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)-8 agonist, was assessed in two trials and monalizumab, a natural killer group 2 member A (NKG2A) inhibitor, was used in one. The data also found PD-L1 to be predictive in evaluating response to immunotherapy. The best outcomes to immunotherapy were observed in patients who had tumors expressing both HPV and PD-L1.
In another recent meta-analysis, data from 7 studies including 814 patients with R/M HNSCC were analyzed. This meta-analysis was restricted to patients treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors as single agents. The objective response rate (ORR) of patients with HPV-positive HNSCC was significantly greater than that of their HPV-negative counterparts (OR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.14–2.74; p = 0.01). The odds ratio (OR) was more impressive for the pooled anti-PD-L1 trials (OR = 2.66; 95% CI = 1.16–6.11; p = 0.02) in comparison to the pooled anti-PD-1 trials (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 0.90–2.54; p = 0.12). Patients with HPV-positive HNSCC also were noted to have a lower risk of death in comparison to patients with HPV-negative HNSCC (HR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.60–0.99; p = 0.04) [39].
Possible mechanisms underlying clinical benefit, including ORR and OS, in HPV-positive HNSCC treated with immunotherapy relates to the unique tumor microenvironment of HPV-positive tumors. Chiefly, the HPV-specific T-cells, type I-oriented CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, dendritic cells, and dendritic-like macrophages, as well as the synthesis of E6 and E7 oncoproteins, induce the immune system to detect tumor cells [38]. Chakravarthy and colleagues have shown a difference in the tumor infiltrating lymphocyte levels between HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPC, reinforcing the hypothesis that a difference in immune response between the two groups may contribute to the observed survival benefit [40].

6. Novel Immune Therapies

Emerging immunotherapies in HPV-positive HNSCC include novel immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations, therapeutic vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, and gene editing approaches. Current clinical trials are summarized in Table 1.

6.1. Checkpoint Inhibitor Combinations with Standard Therapies

The further elucidation of tumor immunology in the context of HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC led to the hypothesis that anti-PD1 mAb may synergize with standard cytotoxic therapies, including chemotherapy and radiation, leveraging the immune response to immunogenic cell death. As observed in KEYNOTE-048, the efficacy of combining an anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor with cytotoxic chemotherapy displaced the then-standard of care, the EXTREME regimen. Platinum-5-fluorouracil is hypothesized increase tumor antigen presentation, immunogenic cell death, infiltration of CD8+ T-cells, and ultimately an antitumor immune response [41]. Moreover, tumor upregulation of PD-L1 expression is a consequence of chemotherapy, and is associated with worse clinical outcomes, making PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in addition to cytotoxic chemotherapy a rational therapeutic approach [42].
The combination of pembrolizumab plus the chimeric mouse IgG1 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAb, cetuximab, was investigated in a phase II trial in patients with platinum-resistant or -ineligible R/M HNSCC; at 6 months, the ORR was 45% (95% CI 28–62) with serious treatment-related adverse events noted in 5 of 33 (15%) participants [43]. Approximately 33% of patients enrolled in this study had HPV-positive OPC with no statistically significant disparity noted in relation to HPV status and OS or progression-free survival (PFS), although the study was not powered to detect this association.
Several clinical trials are currently underway to establish the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor combinations with curative-intent chemoradiotherapy in HNSCC. The anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb), durvalumab, is being assessed in combination with cetuximab and radiotherapy in locally advanced HNSCC in an ongoing phase I/II trial, including both HPV-positive and HPV-negative subjects (DUCRO; NCT03051906). A phase II/III trial in the ECOG-ACRIN oncology cooperative group is evaluating the efficacy of maintenance nivolumab after the completion of standard cisplatin chemoradiation for intermediate risk, HPV-positive OPC (EA 3161; NCT03811015). A phase II trial of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and radiation therapy in locally advanced HPV-positive OPC is currently recruiting (NCT03799445).
A recent phase III, multicenter trial assessed the treatment outcomes of unresected locally advanced HNSCC with the addition of the PD-L1 inhibitor, avelumab, to standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone [44]. Of the 697 patients enrolled in the study, 121 (35%) of patients in the avelumab cohort were HPV-positive while 117 (34%) in the standard cohort were HPV-positive. No statistically significant difference in OS or 2-year PFS was noted between the avelumab and standard cohorts, which were stratified by HPV status. The authors hypothesized that radiation therapy depletes T cells within the tumor microenvironment, negatively impacting the capability of the immune system to control micrometastatic disease.

6.2. Novel Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Beyond PD-1, T-cell exhaustion markers including CTLA-4, T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3), and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) have been identified as candidate targets for immune checkpoint blockade [45]. Like PD-1, these targets are upregulated in HPV-positive HNSCC compared to HPV-negative samples, likely due to the stimulus of chronic infection. Gameiro and colleagues showed a survival benefit in patients with HPV-positive HNSCC with higher expression of these exhaustion markers while no survival advantage was noted in HPV-negative HNSCC with similar elevated expression of these markers [45].
Early immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations have included anti-PD-1/L1 inhibitors with mAb targeting CTLA-4. The anti-PD-L1 mAb durvalumab was compared to investigator’s choice standard chemotherapy in the randomized phase III EAGLE trial including 736 patients with R/M HNSCC and did not improve survival as a single agent or in combination with the CTLA-4 inhibitor, tremelimumab. Although the study was not intended to evaluate OS among immunotherapies, the addition of tremelimumab did not enhance the activity of durvalumab. Moreover, HPV status did not appear to impact OS with either regimen on subgroup analysis [46].
CheckMate 651 is a phase III, randomized, multicenter trial studying nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 inhibitor, versus EXTREME as first-line therapy in R/M HNSCC (NCT02741570). The trial has completed accrual; a recent press release from Bristol Myers Squibb expressed that the study did not reach its primary endpoints including OS and PFS although a positive trend was noted in OS in a subgroup of patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 with a CPS ≥ 20 [47].
Novel mAb are currently being investigated in combination with PD-1/L1 inhibitors. Tiragolumab, a human anti-TIGIT mAb, is being compared to placebo in combination with atezolizumab as first-line treatment for R/M, PD-L1 positive HNSCC (SKYSCRAPER-09) (NCT04665843). Relatlimab, an anti-LAG-3 mAb, is being studied in combination with nivolumab for the treatment of R/M HNSCC (NCT04326257).
TIM-3 is an immune checkpoint coreceptor present on activated T-cells and mediates reduced proliferation and production of effector cytokines and apoptosis of effector T-cells [48]. A recent study examined expression of TIM-3 in 80 HNSCC specimens and its correlation with clinical and pathological outcomes [48]. Increased TIM-3-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlated with worse OS (p < 0.001). On multivariate cox regression analysis, high TIM-3 positive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes was noted as an independent prognostic marker for poor clinical outcome (HR 2.066 (95% CI 2.832–12.230); p < 0.001). Several clinical trials are underway to further investigate the safety and efficacy of TIM-3 targeting including a phase I trial evaluating TSR-022, a TIM-3 mAb in advanced solid tumors (NCT02817633). MBG453 is a high-affinity, humanized IgG4 antibody targeting TIM3 that is under investigation alone or in combination with PDR001, an anti-PD1, in patients with advanced solid malignancies including HNSCC (NCT02608268).

6.3. Costimulatory T Cell Receptor Agonists

Costimulatory receptors constitute a repertoire of second signaling molecules that propagate T cell receptor signaling, and include CD137 (4-1BB), OX40, and CD40. Sparse data exist with regards to the emerging role of costimulatory T cell receptor agonists in the context of HPV status in the treatment of HNSCC. However, in mouse models, CD137 agonists are synergistic with cisplatin and radiation therapy in inhibiting tumor growth in HPV-positive HNSCC [49]. As such, several costimulatory agonists are currently under investigation to establish their safety and therapeutic utility in HNSCC.
Results of safety analysis of the agonist of the CD137 mAb, urelumab, which included 10 patients with HNSCC showed favorable safety profile as well as pharmacodynamic activity by inducing IFN-inducible genes and cytokines [50]. Other trials are evaluating safety and efficacy of urelumab including a phase Ib trial examining urelumab in combination with cetuximab for advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer and HNSCC (NCT02110082). In this phase Ib trial combining cetuximab with urelumab in R/M HNSCC, the expression of CD137 on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes was investigated. The trial showed enhancement of cetuximab-activated NK cell persistence, tumor antigen cross-presentation and dendritic cell maturation with the addition of urelumab [51]. The study showed that HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors possessed a high expression of CD137 on tumor infiltrating NK cells in vivo while peripheral NK cells after cetuximab administration showed higher expressions of CD137 in HPV-positive HNSCC signifying improved outcomes of HPV-positive HNSCC treated with combination cetuximab and urelumab. Interestingly, cetuximab is an anti-EGFR, human-murine chimeric IgG1 isotype mAb and has been approved for the treatment of HNSCC in combination with chemotherapy in the R/M setting and with radiation therapy in the curative setting, although was shown to be inferior to standard cisplatin-radiation therapy in low-risk HPV-positve OPSCC [52]. In addition to EGFR signaling blockade, cetuximab has an immune mechanism of action where its IgG1 stem binds the CD16 fragment crystallizable (Fc) receptors on natural killer (NK) cells and triggers antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). In turn, the immunogenic tumor cell death caused by ADCC can result in cross-priming of CD8+ T cells with epitope spread, suggesting a possible new role for an old therapy: synergizing with novel immunotherapies [53,54].
Utomilumab (PF-05082566), also a human mAb agonist of CD137, was also studied in combination with a humanized mAb targeting CCR4, mogamulizumab, in a phase Ib study of patients with advanced solid tumors. The study demonstrated a favorable safety profile and included 11 patients with HNSCC of which 7 had disease refractory to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy [55]. Utomilumab was also evaluated in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors including HNSCC in KEYNOTE-036, a phase 1b trial that has been completed (NCT02179918). Another phase Ib/II multicenter trial, JAVELIN Medley, is evaluating the safety of avelumab in combination with utomilumab (NCT02554812).
Early phase studies include both HPV-positive and HPV-negative subjects. MEDI6469, a murine anti-human OX40 agonist antibody was studied in a phase Ib trial with 17 patients with locally advanced HNSCC prior to definitive surgical resection [56]. Two weeks after administration of MEDI6469, there was increased proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Tumor biopsies prior to and following surgery also confirmed an increase in CD4+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (NCT02274155). Another clinical trial is investigating PF-04518600, an OX40 agonist, alone or in combination with the 4-1BB (CD137) agonist PF-05082566 (NCT02315066) in patients with select advanced or metastatic carcinoma including HNSCC.
The CD40 ligand is present on antigen presenting cells and serves as a key mediator for cellular and humoral immune response. Activation of CD40 results in augmented antigen presentation and apoptosis induction [57]. CP-870,8893, an agonistic anti-CD40 mAb that can activate CD40, is under study in a phase I trial in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT02225002). A favorable safety profile and biological and clinical response has been identified with the use of CP-870,8893 coupled with carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with advanced solid tumors [57].

6.4. Novel Antibodies and Fusion Protein Constructs

Reinforcing the innate immune system to mediate anti-tumor activity by augmenting NK cell antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity is a strategy that is increasingly under consideration [58]. Monalizumab, a mAb targeting NKG2A, is currently under investigation in HNSCC [58,59]. The NKG2A heterodimeric receptor is a prominent NK inhibitory receptor. Monalizumab prevents binding of the HLA E ligand, often overexpressed in HNSCC, to NKG2A resulting in increased cytotoxic activity [58]. The relevance of HPV status for the activity of monalizumab is currently unknown. In a Phase 1b/2 trial presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2019 congress, the combination of monalizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks and cetuximab showed an acceptable safety profile and a response rate of 27.5% (36% and 17% in anti-PD1 immunotherapy-naïve, n = 22, and immunotherapy-pretreated patients, n = 18, respectively) in 40 patients who had progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy and had received ≤2 prior lines of therapy [60]. The Phase II expansion cohort evaluating monalizumab and cetuximab in immunotherapy-pretreated patients affirmed an ORR of 20% across 40 patients enrolled [61]. A phase III clinical trial of monalizumab plus cetuximab compared to placebo plus cetuximab is currently underway in R/M HPV-positive and negative HNSCC following progression on standard platinum and anti-PD1 immunotherapy (NCT04590963).
The presence of HPV16 oncoproteins, natural non-self antigens, in HPV-positive HNSCC raises the promise of developing HPV-specific immunotherapies. CUE-101, a novel fusion protein construct of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) HLA-A*0201 allele bound to an epitope from the HPV 16 E7 protein, is currently being studied in a phase I clinical trial. CUE-101 was developed to activate and expand tumor-specific T cells targeting HPV16-driven cancers. In preclinical murine models, selective binding and preferential activation and expansion of E7-specific T cells was achieved, with dose-dependent cytokine production, inhibition of tumor growth and increasing survival both as a monotherapy and in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody [62]. CUE-101 is currently under study in a phase I trial both as monotherapy in second line or later HPV-positive HNSCC and in dose-escalation and expansion in combination with pembrolizumab in the front-line metastatic stetting (NCT03978689).
Eftilagimod alpha (IMP-321) is a soluble LAG-3 fusion protein that mediates antigen presenting cell activation and CD8 T-cell activation by binding to a subset of MHC class II molecules. A phase II study (TACTI-002) evaluated the safety and efficacy of eftilagimod and pembrolizumab for second-line treatment of advanced HNSCC and non-small cell lung cancer. All 18 subjects with HNSCC were noted to have immune partial response. The study concluded safe and effective antitumor activity in the second-line setting for R/M HNSCC [63]. Eftilagimod Alpha is under phase II evaluation in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with R/M HNSCC (NCT03625323).

6.5. Vaccines

HPV-positive HNSCC contains promising non-self antigens, including E6 and E7, which are specific to HPV-infected cells and not healthy cells. The E6 and E7 oncoproteins are requisite for maintenance of the aberrant phenotype, and as foreign antigens will be recognized by the human immune system [64]. Enhancing anti-HPV T cell activity is the goal of several HPV-targeted therapeutic vaccines currently under investigation in HPV-positive HNSCC.
MEDI0457 is a DNA immunotherapeutic vaccine of HPV-16 and HPV-18 E6/E7 expressing plasmids coupled with IL-12 expressing plasmids [65]. In a phase Ib/II pilot study consisting of 21 patients with locally advanced, p16-positive HNSCC, MEDI0457 was dosed perioperatively or following completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. An increase in the tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T-cell: regulatory T-cell ratio was noted following MEDI0457 administration as was the presence of HPV-16-specific T-cells [65]. MEDI0457 was studied in combination with anti-PDL1 durvalumab in a phase Ib/IIa trial in patients with HPV-positive R/M HNSCC who had progressed on at least one prior regimen [66]. At interim analysis, ORR was 22.2% with 3 complete responses (CR) and 3 partial responses (PR). Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were noted in 77.1% of patients, predominantly grade 1–2. Fatigue (37.1%) and injection site pain (34.3%) were the most common AEs. No patients had a grade 4/5 treatment-related AE. An increase in both tumoral CD8+ T cells as well as peripheral HPV-specific T cells was shown.
ISA-101 is an HPV-16 vaccine comprised of HPV-E6 and E7 long peptides. These long peptides include cytotoxic-T lymphocyte epitopes and T-helper epitopes in order to effectively stimulate HPV-16-specific responses [67]. ISA-101 produced strong immune responses to HPV-16, but vaccination alone was not effective for invasive cancer treatment. A phase II trial further looked at the combination of ISA-101 and checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab, a PD-1 antibody, in patients in R/M HPV-16-positive cancers [68]. The ORR was 33%. The majority of patients, 22 of 24, had advanced OPC; among this cohort, the PR rate was 27% while the CR rate was 9%, and the disease control rate was 45%. The most prevalent AEs in the study encompassed injection site reactions, fever, diarrhea, and hepatotoxicity. ISA-101 is also under investigation with utomilumab, a CD-137 agonist, for patients with incurable HPV-16-positive OPC (NCT03258008) [69]. ISA-101 is also being studied in a phase II trial in combination with pembrolizumab and cisplatin-based chemoradiation for patients with newly diagnosed, locoregionally advanced, intermediate risk HPV-associated HNSCC (NCT04369937).
ADXS11-001 is a live-attenuated Listeria monocytogenes (LM) vaccine encoding a HPV16 E7 oncoprotein interconnected to LM listeriolysin O and is being evaluated in a neoadjuvant window of opportunity trial prior to robot-assisted resection of HPV-positive OPC. The co-primary endpoints are HPV-specific T cell response rate and safety. Preliminary results included a high rate (56%) of serious adverse events including one death (NCT02002182).
A modified vaccine virus Ankara (MVA) vector expressing HPV16 E6/E7 and IL-2, TG4001 (tipapkinogene sovacivec), was evaluated in combination with avelumab in patients with R/M HPV-16+ cancers in a phase 1b/2 trial [70]. At interim analysis, responses were noted with no dose-limiting toxicities or serious adverse events. TG4001 with avelumab was also shown to induce a shift from a “cold” tumor to a “hot” tumor gene signature with an increase of CD8 infiltration, a decrease in infiltrated Treg/CD8 ratio as well as an increase the proportion of PD-L1+ cells in low to moderate PD-L1 expressing tumors.
PRGN-2009 is a novel HPV adenovirus vaccine that includes multiple E6/E7 epitopes of HPV16 and HPV18. It is being evaluated in a phase I/II clinical trial alone or in combination with anti-PD-L1/TGFbeta trap (M7824) in patients with advanced or metastatic HPV+ malignancies including HPV+ OPC (NCT04432597).
AMV002, a therapeutic HPV DNA vaccine, has been investigated in a Phase I study for patients with prior treatment for HPV-positive OPSCC to evaluate safety and immunogenicity [71]. It was deemed to be tolerated at all dose levels and enhanced immunity to virus-derived tumor-specific antigens.
DPX-E7 is a synthetic peptide-based vaccine of HPV16 E711-19 currently being investigated in an open-label phase Ib/II trial including HLA-A*02-01 patients with HPV16-associated head and neck, anal, and cervical cancers (NCT02865135).

6.6. Adoptive T Cell Transfer

In adoptive cell-based therapies, dendritic cells, B cells and/or T cells are isolated from a patient, transduced ex vivo in order to express or target a specific antigen, then infused back to the same patient [72,73]. CAR-T cells are engineered T cells that express a single-chain fragment variable, which can in turn recognize a tumor-specific antigen. CD3-related components and costimulatory domains are also often included. MHC class I molecules process and present epitopes from E6 and E7 and may be optimal targets for T cell receptor (TCR) gene engineered T cells [73]. An E6-specific anti-PD1 engineered TCR T cell is under evaluation in a phase I study for patients with HPV-positive HNSCC or cervical cancer (NCT03578406). An E7 TCR-engineered T cell is being investigated in a phase I/II clinical trial in HPV16-associated cancers including OPCs (NCT02858310).

7. Conclusions

The field of immuno-oncology has progressed rapidly. This new treatment paradigm has emerged with better understanding of the interaction between the tumor, tumor microenvironment, and the immune system. Recent advances in immune checkpoint inhibition have positively changed the outcomes in both HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC. While representing a major advance, first generation anti-PD1 mAb are non-specific immunotherapies and do not leverage the tumor antigen specificity represented by HPV infection. Progressive insight into the tumor microenvironment of HPV-positive HNSCC, including the unique interplay between chronic foreign antigen stimulation by HPV oncoproteins and T cell exhaustion, is inspiring new immunotherapeutic agents and combinations. Most promising, the advent of HPV-specific immune activators, such as novel fusion proteins, anti-HPV therapeutic vaccinations, and HPV-specific adoptive T cells that exploit the universal presence of foreign viral antigens, blazes a trail toward precision immunotherapy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.E.B. and R.J.; writing—original draft preparation, R.J., M.S. and J.E.B.; writing—review and editing, M.S. and J.E.B.; supervision, J.E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported in part by the University of Arizona Cancer Center Support Grant from the U.S. National Institute of Health National Cancer Institute (P30CA023074).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kreimer, A.R.; Clifford, G.M.; Boyle, P.; Franceschi, S. Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: A systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2005, 14, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Van Houten, V.M.; Snijders, P.J.; van den Brekel, M.W.; Kummer, J.A.; Meijer, C.J.; van Leeuwen, B.; Denkers, F.; Smeele, L.E.; Snow, G.B.; Brakenhoff, R.H. Biological evidence that human papillomaviruses are etiologically involved in a subgroup of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer 2001, 93, 232–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dang, R.P.; Le, V.H.; Miles, B.A.; Teng, M.S.; Genden, E.M.; Bakst, R.L.; Gupta, V.; Zhang, D.Y.; Demicco, E.G.; Posner, M.R.; et al. Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Human Papilloma Virus-positive Head and Neck Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 1703–1709. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chaturvedi, A.K.; Engels, E.A.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Hernandez, B.Y.; Xiao, W.; Kim, E.; Jiang, B.; Goodman, M.T.; Sibug-Saber, M.; Cozen, W.; et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 4294–4301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tumban, E. A Current Update on Human Papillomavirus-Associated Head and Neck Cancers. Viruses 2019, 11, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. De Martel, C.; Plummer, M.; Vignat, J.; Franceschi, S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 141, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. McCusker, M.G.; Orkoulas-Razis, D.; Mehra, R. Potential of Pembrolizumab in Metastatic or Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Evidence to Date. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 3047–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Weinberger, P.M.; Yu, Z.; Haffty, B.G.; Kowalski, D.; Harigopal, M.; Brandsma, J.; Sasaki, C.; Joe, J.; Camp, R.L.; Rimm, D.L.; et al. Molecular classification identifies a subset of human papillomavirus--associated oropharyngeal cancers with favorable prognosis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 736–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McLaughlin-Drubin, M.E.; Crum, C.P.; Munger, K. Human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein induces KDM6A and KDM6B histone demethylase expression and causes epigenetic reprogramming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2130–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ang, K.K.; Harris, J.; Wheeler, R.; Weber, R.; Rosenthal, D.I.; Nguyen-Tan, P.F.; Westra, W.H.; Chung, C.H.; Jordan, R.C.; Lu, C.; et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N. Engl J. Med. 2010, 363, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Fakhry, C.; Zhang, Q.; Nguyen-Tan, P.F.; Rosenthal, D.; El-Naggar, A.; Garden, A.S.; Soulieres, D.; Trotti, A.; Avizonis, V.; Ridge, J.A.; et al. Human papillomavirus and overall survival after progression of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 3365–3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Szturz, P.; Vermorken, J.B. Translating KEYNOTE-048 into practice recommendations for head and neck cancer. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Burtness, B.; Harrington, K.J.; Greil, R.; Soulieres, D.; Tahara, M.; de Castro, G., Jr.; Psyrri, A.; Baste, N.; Neupane, P.; Bratland, A.; et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2019, 394, 1915–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vermorken, J.B.; Mesia, R.; Rivera, F.; Remenar, E.; Kawecki, A.; Rottey, S.; Erfan, J.; Zabolotnyy, D.; Kienzer, H.R.; Cupissol, D.; et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 1116–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Leon, X.; Hitt, R.; Constenla, M.; Rocca, A.; Stupp, R.; Kovacs, A.F.; Amellal, N.; Bessa, E.H.; Bourhis, J. A retrospective analysis of the outcome of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck refractory to a platinum-based chemotherapy. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 17, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lala, M.; Chirovsky, D.; Cheng, J.D.; Mayawala, K. Clinical outcomes with therapies for previously treated recurrent/metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC): A systematic literature review. Oral. Oncol. 2018, 84, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cramer, J.D.; Burtness, B.; Ferris, R.L. Immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: Recent advances and future directions. Oral Oncol. 2019, 99, 104460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cheng, L.; Wang, Y.; Du, J. Human Papillomavirus Vaccines: An Updated Review. Vaccines 2020, 8, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meites, E.; Szilagyi, P.G.; Chesson, H.W.; Unger, E.R.; Romero, J.R.; Markowitz, L.E. Human Papillomavirus Vaccination for Adults: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2019, 68, 698–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Herrero, R.; Quint, W.; Hildesheim, A.; Gonzalez, P.; Struijk, L.; Katki, H.A.; Porras, C.; Schiffman, M.; Rodriguez, A.C.; Solomon, D.; et al. Reduced prevalence of oral human papillomavirus (HPV) 4 years after bivalent HPV vaccination in a randomized clinical trial in Costa Rica. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Taberna, M.; Mena, M.; Pavon, M.A.; Alemany, L.; Gillison, M.L.; Mesia, R. Human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 2386–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature 2015, 517, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bauman, J.; Wirth, L. Human Papillomavirus and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Growing Epidemic. Adolesc. Med. State Art. Rev. 2014, 25, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Vigneswaran, N.; Williams, M.D. Epidemiologic trends in head and neck cancer and aids in diagnosis. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 26, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moody, C.A.; Laimins, L.A. Human papillomavirus oncoproteins: Pathways to transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Johnson, D.E.; Burtness, B.; Leemans, C.R.; Lui, V.W.Y.; Bauman, J.E.; Grandis, J.R. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Grinnell, M.; Krishnan, M.; Ganti, A.K. HPV and the Immune System in Head and Neck Cancers: Therapeutic Considerations. Oncology 2020, 34, 139–143. [Google Scholar]
  29. Solomon, B.; Young, R.J.; Bressel, M.; Urban, D.; Hendry, S.; Thai, A.; Angel, C.; Haddad, A.; Kowanetz, M.; Fua, T.; et al. Prognostic Significance of PD-L1(+) and CD8(+) Immune Cells in HPV(+) Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2018, 6, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mandal, R.; Senbabaoglu, Y.; Desrichard, A.; Havel, J.J.; Dalin, M.G.; Riaz, N.; Lee, K.W.; Ganly, I.; Hakimi, A.A.; Chan, T.A.; et al. The head and neck cancer immune landscape and its immunotherapeutic implications. JCI Insight 2016, 1, e89829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gildener-Leapman, N.; Ferris, R.L.; Bauman, J.E. Promising systemic immunotherapies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2013, 49, 1089–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Chen, Y.P.; Wang, Y.Q.; Lv, J.W.; Li, Y.Q.; Chua, M.L.K.; Le, Q.T.; Lee, N.; Colevas, A.D.; Seiwert, T.; Hayes, D.N.; et al. Identification and validation of novel microenvironment-based immune molecular subgroups of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Implications for immunotherapy. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Budhwani, M.; Turrell, G.; Yu, M.; Frazer, I.H.; Mehdi, A.M.; Chandra, J. Immune-Inhibitory Gene Expression is Positively Correlated with Overall Immune Activity and Predicts Increased Survival Probability of Cervical and Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 622643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Badoual, C.; Hans, S.; Merillon, N.; Van Ryswick, C.; Ravel, P.; Benhamouda, N.; Levionnois, E.; Nizard, M.; Si-Mohamed, A.; Besnier, N.; et al. PD-1-expressing tumor-infiltrating T cells are a favorable prognostic biomarker in HPV-associated head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ferris, R.L.; Blumenschein, G., Jr.; Fayette, J.; Guigay, J.; Colevas, A.D.; Licitra, L.; Harrington, K.; Kasper, S.; Vokes, E.E.; Even, C.; et al. Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1856–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ferris, R.L.; Blumenschein, G., Jr.; Fayette, J.; Guigay, J.; Colevas, A.D.; Licitra, L.; Harrington, K.J.; Kasper, S.; Vokes, E.E.; Even, C.; et al. Nivolumab vs investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression. Oral Oncol. 2018, 81, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cohen, E.E.W.; Soulieres, D.; Le Tourneau, C.; Dinis, J.; Licitra, L.; Ahn, M.J.; Soria, A.; Machiels, J.P.; Mach, N.; Mehra, R.; et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2019, 393, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Galvis, M.M.; Borges, G.A.; Oliveira, T.B.; Toledo, I.P.; Castilho, R.M.; Guerra, E.N.S.; Kowalski, L.P.; Squarize, C.H. Immunotherapy improves efficacy and safety of patients with HPV positive and negative head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2020, 150, 102966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Xu, Y.; Zhu, G.; Maroun, C.A.; Wu, I.X.Y.; Huang, D.; Seiwert, T.Y.; Liu, Y.; Mandal, R.; Zhang, X. Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1-Axis Blockade in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stratified by Human Papillomavirus Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 645170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chakravarthy, A.; Henderson, S.; Thirdborough, S.M.; Ottensmeier, C.H.; Su, X.; Lechner, M.; Feber, A.; Thomas, G.J.; Fenton, T.R. Human Papillomavirus Drives Tumor Development Throughout the Head and Neck: Improved Prognosis Is Associated With an Immune Response Largely Restricted to the Oropharynx. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 4132–4141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Suresh, T. Burtness Barbara Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Squamos Cell Cancer. Am. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 13, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, P.; Ma, Y.; Lv, C.; Huang, M.; Li, M.; Dong, B.; Liu, X.; An, G.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J.; et al. Upregulation of programmed cell death ligand 1 promotes resistance response in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 1563–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sacco, A.G.; Chen, R.; Worden, F.P.; Wong, D.J.L.; Adkins, D.; Swiecicki, P.; Chai-Ho, W.; Oppelt, P.; Ghosh, D.; Bykowski, J.; et al. Pembrolizumab plus cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An open-label, multi-arm, non-randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, N.Y.; Ferris, R.L.; Psyrri, A.; Haddad, R.I.; Tahara, M.; Bourhis, J.; Harrington, K.; Chang, P.M.; Lin, J.C.; Razaq, M.A.; et al. Avelumab plus standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gameiro, S.F.; Ghasemi, F.; Barrett, J.W.; Koropatnick, J.; Nichols, A.C.; Mymryk, J.S.; Maleki Vareki, S. Treatment-naive HPV+ head and neck cancers display a T-cell-inflamed phenotype distinct from their HPV- counterparts that has implications for immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2018, 7, e1498439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ferris, R.L.; Haddad, R.; Even, C.; Tahara, M.; Dvorkin, M.; Ciuleanu, T.E.; Clement, P.M.; Mesia, R.; Kutukova, S.; Zholudeva, L.; et al. Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, 942–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bristol Myers Squibb. Bristol Myers Squibb Provides Update on CheckMate-651 Trial Evaluating Opdivo (Nivolumab) plus Yervoy (Ipilimumab) Versus EXTREME Regimen as First-Line Treatment for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Press Release, Bristol Myers Squibb Corporate News. 16 July 2021. Available online: https://news.bms.com/news/corporate-financial/2021/Bristol-Myers-Squibb-Provides-Update-on-CheckMate--651-Trial-Evaluating-Opdivo-nivolumab-Plus-Yervoy-ipilimumab-Versus-EXTREME-Regimen-as-First-Line-Treatment-for-Squamous-Cell-Carcinoma-of-the-Head-and-Neck/default.aspx (accessed on 16 July 2021).
  48. Yang, F.; Zeng, Z.; Li, J.; Ren, X.; Wei, F. TIM-3 and CEACAM1 are Prognostic Factors in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 619765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lucido, C.T.; Vermeer, P.D.; Wieking, B.G.; Vermeer, D.W.; Lee, J.H. CD137 enhancement of HPV positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumor clearance. Vaccines 2014, 2, 841–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Segal, N.H.; Logan, T.F.; Hodi, F.S.; McDermott, D.; Melero, I.; Hamid, O.; Schmidt, H.; Robert, C.; Chiarion-Sileni, V.; Ascierto, P.A.; et al. Results from an Integrated Safety Analysis of Urelumab, an Agonist Anti-CD137 Monoclonal Antibody. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 1929–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Srivastava, R.M.; Trivedi, S.; Concha-Benavente, F.; Gibson, S.P.; Reeder, C.; Ferrone, S.; Ferris, R.L. CD137 Stimulation Enhances Cetuximab-Induced Natural Killer: Dendritic Cell Priming of Antitumor T-Cell Immunity in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mehanna, H.; Robinson, M.; Hartley, A.; Kong, A.; Foran, B.; Fulton-Lieuw, T.; Dalby, M.; Mistry, P.; Sen, M.; O’Toole, L.; et al. Radiotherapy plus cisplatin or cetuximab in low-risk human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (De-ESCALaTE HPV): An open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019, 393, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Baysal, H.; De Pauw, I.; Zaryouh, H.; De Waele, J.; Peeters, M.; Pauwels, P.; Vermorken, J.B.; Smits, E.; Lardon, F.; Jacobs, J.; et al. Cetuximab-induced natural killer cell cytotoxicity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines: Investigation of the role of cetuximab sensitivity and HPV status. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 123, 752–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Trivedi, S.; Srivastava, R.M.; Concha-Benavente, F.; Ferrone, S.; Garcia-Bates, T.M.; Li, J.; Ferris, R.L. Anti-EGFR Targeted Monoclonal Antibody Isotype Influences Antitumor Cellular Immunity in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 5229–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Cohen, E.E.W.; Pishvaian, M.J.; Shepard, D.R.; Wang, D.; Weiss, J.; Johnson, M.L.; Chung, C.H.; Chen, Y.; Huang, B.; Davis, C.B.; et al. A phase Ib study of utomilumab (PF-05082566) in combination with mogamulizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Duhen, R.; Ballesteros-Merino, C.; Frye, A.K.; Tran, E.; Rajamanickam, V.; Chang, S.C.; Koguchi, Y.; Bifulco, C.B.; Bernard, B.; Leidner, R.S.; et al. Neoadjuvant anti-OX40 (MEDI6469) therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma activates and expands antigen-specific tumor-infiltrating T cells. Nat. Commun 2021, 12, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vonderheide, R.H.; Burg, J.M.; Mick, R.; Trosko, J.A.; Li, D.; Shaik, M.N.; Tolcher, A.W.; Hamid, O. Phase I study of the CD40 agonist antibody CP-870,893 combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Oncoimmunology 2013, 2, e23033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Andre, P.; Denis, C.; Soulas, C.; Bourbon-Caillet, C.; Lopez, J.; Arnoux, T.; Blery, M.; Bonnafous, C.; Gauthier, L.; Morel, A.; et al. Anti-NKG2A mAb Is a CheckpoInt. Inhibitor that Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity by Unleashing Both T and NK Cells. Cell 2018, 175, 1731–1743.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Borel, C.; Jung, A.C.; Burgy, M. Immunotherapy Breakthroughs in the Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cohen, R.B.; Posner, G.L.M.R.; Bauman, J.R.; Salas, S.; Even, C.; Saada-Bouzid, E.; Seiwert, T.; Colevas, D.; Calmels, F.; Zerbib, R.; et al. Monalizumab in combination with cetuximab in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck cancer (SCCHN) previously treated or not with PD-(L)1 inhibitors (IO): 1-year survival data. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, v460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cohen, R.B.; Bauman, J.R.; Salas, S.; Colevas, A.D.; Even, C.; Cupissol, D.; Posner, M.R.; Lefebvre, G.; Saada-Bouzid, E.; Bernadach, M.; et al. Combination of monalizumab and cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 inhibitors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38 (Suppl. 15), 6516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Quayle, S.N.; Girgis, N.; Thapa, D.R.; Merazga, Z.; Kemp, M.M.; Histed, A.; Zhao, F.; Moreta, M.; Ruthardt, P.; Hulot, S.; et al. CUE-101, a Novel E7-pHLA-IL2-Fc Fusion Protein, Enhances Tumor Antigen-Specific T-Cell Activation for the Treatment of HPV16-Driven Malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 1953–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Peguero, J.A.; Carcereny, E.B.P.; Clay, T.D.; Doger, B.; Enriqueta, F.; Krebs, M.; Forster, M.; Aix, S.P.; Roxburgh, P.; Triebel, F. A multicenter, phase II study of soluble LAG-3 (Eftilagimod alpha) in combination with pembrolizumab (TACTI-002) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, TPS2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Peng, S.; Ferrall, L.; Gaillard, S.; Wang, C.; Chi, W.Y.; Huang, C.H.; Roden, R.B.S.; Wu, T.C.; Chang, Y.N.; Hung, C.F. Development of DNA Vaccine Targeting E6 and E7 Proteins of Human Papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) and HPV18 for Immunotherapy in Combination with Recombinant Vaccinia Boost and PD-1 Antibody. mBio 2021, 12, e03224-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Aggarwal, C.; Cohen, R.B.; Morrow, M.P.; Kraynyak, K.A.; Sylvester, A.J.; Knoblock, D.M.; Bauml, J.M.; Weinstein, G.S.; Lin, A.; Boyer, J.; et al. Immunotherapy Targeting HPV16/18 Generates Potent Immune Responses in HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Aggarwal, C.; Saba, N.F.; Algazi, A.P.; Sukari, A.; Seiwer, T.; Haigentz, M.; Porosnicu, M.; Bonomi, M.; Boyer, J.; Durham, N.; et al. Gasco Hernandez, Safety and efficacy of MEDI0457 plus durvalumab in patients (pts) with human papillomavirus-associated recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ R/M HNSCC). Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, S661–S662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Welters, M.J.; Kenter, G.G.; Piersma, S.J.; Vloon, A.P.; Lowik, M.J.; Berends-van der Meer, D.M.; Drijfhout, J.W.; Valentijn, A.R.; Wafelman, A.R.; Oostendorp, J.; et al. Induction of tumor-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell immunity in cervical cancer patients by a human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 long peptides vaccine. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Massarelli, E.; William, W.; Johnson, F.; Kies, M.; Ferrarotto, R.; Guo, M.; Feng, L.; Lee, J.J.; Tran, H.; Kim, Y.U.; et al. Combining Immune CheckpoInt. Blockade and Tumor-Specific Vaccine for Patients With Incurable Human Papillomavirus 16-Related Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 5, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Chester, C.; Sanmamed, M.F.; Wang, J.; Melero, I. Immunotherapy targeting 4-1BB: Mechanistic rationale, clinical results, and future strategies. Blood 2018, 131, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Le Tourneau, C.; Delord, J.-P.; Cassier, P.; Loirat, D.; Tavernaro, A.; Bastien, B.; Bendjama, K. Phase Ib/II trial of TG4001 (Tipapkinogene sovacivec), a therapeutic HPV-vaccine, and Avelumab in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HPV-16+ cancers. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, v494–v495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chandra, J.; Woo, W.P.; Finlayson, N.; Liu, H.Y.; McGrath, M.; Ladwa, R.; Brauer, M.; Xu, Y.; Hanson, S.; Panizza, B.; et al. A phase 1, single centre, open label, escalating dose study to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of a therapeutic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA vaccine (AMV002) for HPV-associated head and neck cancer (HNC). Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2021, 70, 743–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fesnak, A.D.; June, C.H.; Levine, B.L. Engineered T cells: The promise and challenges of cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 566–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Jin, B.Y.; Campbell, T.E.; Draper, L.M.; Stevanovic, S.; Weissbrich, B.; Yu, Z.; Restifo, N.P.; Rosenberg, S.A.; Trimble, C.L.; Hinrichs, C.S. Engineered T cells targeting E7 mediate regression of human papillomavirus cancers in a murine model. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e99488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 13 05889 g001 550
Figure 1. Mechanisms of Standard and Novel Immunotherapies in HPV-Positive HNSCC. The schema is a simplified illustration of the sites of action of novel immunotherapies within the tumor microenvironment of HPV-positive HNSCC. Monalizumab (A) is an anti-NKG2A mAb that augments the cytotoxic activity of NK cells. The Fc tail of cetuximab (B) and other IgG1 mAb can bind CD16 (the Fc receptor) on NK cells, triggering antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Tiragolumab (C) is a human anti-TIGIT mAb that prevents TIGIT from binding with its ligand, CD155, on dendritic and tumor cells. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are mAb directed against the PD-1 receptor, while durvalumab and atezolizumab are mAb directed against its ligand, PD-L1 (D). Ipilimumab and tremelimumab (E) are mAb directed against CTLA-4. Urelumab and utomilumab (F) are mAb agonists of CD137. CP-870,8893 (G) is an agonist anti-CD40 mAb that activates CD40. MEDI6469 (H) is a murine-human OX40 agonist mAb. MBG453 (I) is a high-affinity, humanized IgG4 antibody targeting TIM-3. Eftilagimod alpha (J) is a is a soluble LAG-3 fusion protein that mediates antigen presenting cell activation and CD8 T-cell activation by binding to a subset of MHC class II molecules. Immunotherapeutic vaccines including MEDI0457, ISA-101, ADXS11-001 and TG4001 (K) incorporate HPV16 E6 and E7 antigens.
Figure 1. Mechanisms of Standard and Novel Immunotherapies in HPV-Positive HNSCC. The schema is a simplified illustration of the sites of action of novel immunotherapies within the tumor microenvironment of HPV-positive HNSCC. Monalizumab (A) is an anti-NKG2A mAb that augments the cytotoxic activity of NK cells. The Fc tail of cetuximab (B) and other IgG1 mAb can bind CD16 (the Fc receptor) on NK cells, triggering antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Tiragolumab (C) is a human anti-TIGIT mAb that prevents TIGIT from binding with its ligand, CD155, on dendritic and tumor cells. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are mAb directed against the PD-1 receptor, while durvalumab and atezolizumab are mAb directed against its ligand, PD-L1 (D). Ipilimumab and tremelimumab (E) are mAb directed against CTLA-4. Urelumab and utomilumab (F) are mAb agonists of CD137. CP-870,8893 (G) is an agonist anti-CD40 mAb that activates CD40. MEDI6469 (H) is a murine-human OX40 agonist mAb. MBG453 (I) is a high-affinity, humanized IgG4 antibody targeting TIM-3. Eftilagimod alpha (J) is a is a soluble LAG-3 fusion protein that mediates antigen presenting cell activation and CD8 T-cell activation by binding to a subset of MHC class II molecules. Immunotherapeutic vaccines including MEDI0457, ISA-101, ADXS11-001 and TG4001 (K) incorporate HPV16 E6 and E7 antigens.
Cancers 13 05889 g001
Table
Table 1. Clinical trials evaluating novel immunotherapies in HPV-positive HNSCC.
Table 1. Clinical trials evaluating novel immunotherapies in HPV-positive HNSCC.
TreatmentIndicationClinical Trial ID
Anti-PD-1/L1 Checkpoint Inhibitor Plus Standard of Care Combinations
Durvalumab (anti-PD-L1), cetuximab (anti-EGFR), and radiation therapyLocally advanced HNSCCNCT03051906
Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4), nivolumab (anti-PD1), and radiation therapyHPV-positive advanced OPCsNCT03799445
Maintenance cemiplimab (anti-PD1)Locally advanced HNSCCNCT04831450
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared to the standard of care (EXTREME Regimen)First-line R/M HNSCCNCT02741570
Nivolumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel HPV-positive OPCNCT03342911
Nivolumab plus paclitaxelR/M HNSCCNCT04282109
Novel Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) plus tiragolumab (anti-TIGIT)R/M PD-L1 positive HNSCCNCT04665843
Nivolumab plus relatlimab (anti-LAG-3)R/M HNSCC progressed on prior immunotherapyNCT04326257
TSR-022 (anti-TIM-3)Advanced solid tumorsNCT02817633
MBG453 (anti-TIM-3) ± PDR001 (anti-PD1)Advanced solid tumorsNCT02608268
T Cell Receptor Costimulatory Agonists
Anti-OX40 Antibody (OX40 agonist)Head and neck cancersNCT02274155
PF-04518600 (OX40 agonist) alone/or in combination with PF-05082566 (4-1BB agonist)Advanced or metastatic carcinomaNCT02315066
PF-05082566 plus pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) Advanced solid tumorsNCT02179918
Avelumab (anti-PD-L1)in combination with utomilumab (4-1BB agonist)locally advanced or metastatic solid tumorsNCT02554812
Urelumab (4-1BB agonist) and cetuximabAdvanced/metastatic head and neck cancers NCT02110082
CP-870,893 (CD40 agonist)Advanced solid tumorsNCT02225002
Novel Antibodies and Fusion Proteins
Monalizumab (NK cell NKG2A inhibitor) plus cetuximabR/M HNSCCNCT04590963
CUE-101 (HPV-16 E7 T cell activator)HPV-positive R/M HNSCCNCT03978689
Eftilagimod alpha (soluble LAG3 protein) and pembrolizumabR/M HNSCCNCT03625323
PDS0101 (liposomal multipeptide vaccine targeting HPV-16 E6 and E7) + NHS-IL12 (Interleukin-12) + M7824 (bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1)HPV-positive cancersNCT04287868
Vaccines
Utomilumab and ISA101b vaccine (synthetic long HPV16 E6/E7 peptides vaccine)HPV-positive OPCsNCT03258008
ISA101b and pembrolizumab plus cisplatin HPV-positive HNSCCNCT04369937
ADX 11-001 Vaccine (live attenuated Listeria monocytogenes bacterium)HPV-positive OPCNCT02002182
PRGN-2009 Vaccine (novel gorilla adenovirus vaccine) alone or in combination with M7824 (anti-PDL1/TGF-beta trap)HPV-positive cancersNCT04432597
DPX-E7 Vaccine (synthetic peptide-based vaccine of HPV16 E711-19)HPV-positive OPC, cervical and anal cancersNCT02865135
BNT113 Vaccine (RNA-lipoplex (RNA-LIP)-based mRNA vaccine encoding HPV-16 E6 and E7) plus pembrolizumab HPV-positive and PD-L1 expressing HNSCCNCT04534205
PDS0101 plus pembrolizumabHPV-positive HNSCCNCT04260126
Adoptive T-cell Transfer
RPTR-168 (Autologous IL-12/multi-targeted primed T cells)HPV-positive HNSCC, cervical and melanoma NCT04762225
E7 TCR T cellsHPV-positive cancersNCT02858310
T Cell Receptor Immunotherapy Targeting HPV-16 E6 HPV-positive cancersNCT02280811
Abbreviations: CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; EXTREME indicates cetuximab/platinum/5-fluorouracil; HPV, human papillomavirus; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; IL, interleukin; OPC, 1oropharyngeal cancer; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; R/M, recurrent/metastatic.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Julian, R.; Savani, M.; Bauman, J.E. Immunotherapy Approaches in HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 5889. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13235889

AMA Style

Julian R, Savani M, Bauman JE. Immunotherapy Approaches in HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers. 2021; 13(23):5889. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13235889

Chicago/Turabian Style

Julian, Ricklie, Malvi Savani, and Julie E. Bauman. 2021. "Immunotherapy Approaches in HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer" Cancers 13, no. 23: 5889. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13235889

APA Style

Julian, R., Savani, M., & Bauman, J. E. (2021). Immunotherapy Approaches in HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers, 13(23), 5889. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13235889

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop