Next Article in Journal
Elaiophylin Inhibits Tumorigenesis of Human Lung Adenocarcinoma by Inhibiting Mitophagy via Suppression of SIRT1/Nrf2 Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
Moving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors to Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 23
10.3390/cancers14235813
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effects of Long Non-Coding RNAs Induced by the Gut Microbiome on Regulating the Development of Colorectal Cancer

by
Shiying Fan
1,
Juan Xing
1,
Zhengting Jiang
1,
Zhilin Zhang
1,
Huan Zhang
1,
Daorong Wang
2 and
Dong Tang
2,*
1
Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China
2
Department of General Surgery, Institute of General Surgery, Clinical Medical College, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(23), 5813; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235813
Submission received: 27 October 2022 / Revised: 16 November 2022 / Accepted: 19 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Cancers: Colorectal Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The gut microbiome can regulate the long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) expression, which subsequently impacts the host transcriptome to change the expression of downstream target molecules, ultimately resulting in the development and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). We focused on the important role of the microbiome in CRC and their effects on CRC-related lncRNAs. The aim of our study was to illustrate the mechanisms by which the gut microbiome mediated the occurrence and progression of CRC through the regulation of lncRNAs, because the regulatory role of the gut microbiome-induced lncRNAs in CRC has great potential and may serve as the foundation for future clinical CRC treatment, such as probiotic supplements and lncRNAs intervention.

Abstract

Although an imbalanced gut microbiome is closely associated with colorectal cancer (CRC), how the gut microbiome affects CRC is not known. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) can affect important cellular functions such as cell division, proliferation, and apoptosis. The abnormal expression of lncRNAs can promote CRC cell growth, proliferation, and metastasis, mediating the effects of the gut microbiome on CRC. Generally, the gut microbiome regulates the lncRNAs expression, which subsequently impacts the host transcriptome to change the expression of downstream target molecules, ultimately resulting in the development and progression of CRC. We focused on the important role of the microbiome in CRC and their effects on CRC-related lncRNAs. We also reviewed the impact of the two main pathogenic bacteria, Fusobacterium nucleatum and enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis, and metabolites of the gut microbiome, butyrate, and lipopolysaccharide, on lncRNAs. Finally, available therapies that target the gut microbiome and lncRNAs to prevent and treat CRC were proposed.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide and the third most prevalent cancer [1]. The etiology of CRC is complex; nonetheless, ecological dysbiosis of the gut microbiome has been proven to play a significant role in the disease’s progression [2,3]. The human gut contains a variety of bacteria called the gut microbiome, which is crucial to the host’s immune system and metabolism [4]. The gut microbiome breaks down indigestible dietary components, synthesizes vitamins and other nutrients, detoxifies metabolic metabotypes, regulates the immune response, sends signals for the maintenance of mucosal integrity and renewal of epithelial cells, and secretes antimicrobial substances, which is helpful for the normal function of the colon [5]. Disorders of the immune system and metabolism lead to discomfort and even diseases. Therefore, dysbiosis of the gut microbiome may lead to the physiological functions of the organism malfunctioning and hence cause disease [6]. However, the processes through which the gut microbiota mediates the initiation and progression of CRC are not yet fully understood.
Recent studies have revealed that abnormal expressions of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides and without the ability to code for proteins, are linked to the occurrence, progression, recurrence, metastasis, and chemoresistance of CRC, which can assist in diagnosis, determining prognosis, and providing therapeutic targets in CRC [7,8,9,10]. The lncRNAs are often expressed at lower levels but show more cell type-specific expression patterns than protein-coding genes [11]. The lncRNAs regulate many key cellular activities, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and metabolism [12]. In addition, lncRNAs regulate physiological and pathological processes such as cell cycle and DNA damage repair, whose disruption can result in the progression of malignant tumors [13,14]. Furthermore, lncRNAs can control the pathogenesis of CRC from a variety of angles, primarily involving the tumor microenvironment (TME) that includes inflammation, immune evasion and exosome secretion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), stemness maintenance, and angiogenesis of tumor, thus allowing them to control the occurrence, development, and treatment of CRC [15].
One study found only low levels of overlap in the expressions of lncRNAs in the colon of mice colonized with specific different gut microbes compared to germ-free mice, and most of the changed lncRNAs were type-specific, revealing that the expression of lncRNAs was altered differently depending on the type of bacterial colonization [16]. This finding raised the possibility of the influence of the gut microbiome on the expressions of lncRNAs, which in turn can target their downstream genes and activate signaling pathways, like Wnt and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB), thereby influencing the course of CRC development [8,17]. However, due to limited knowledge about the connections between the multiple distinct lncRNAs and the gut microbiota, it is difficult to study all potential pairwise regulatory interactions between lncRNAs and the gut microbiome. There is a need to research the regulatory relationship between the gut microbiota and lncRNAs since potential associations between different lncRNAs and the gut microbiome of CRC patients may be candidates for functional inspection. In this review, we outlined the mechanisms by which the gut microbiome mediated the occurrence and progression of CRC through the regulation of lncRNAs, thus raising the idea that CRC might be treated and prevented by applying probiotics and fecal transplantation as preventative measures. The processes of gut microbes and their metabolites influencing the development of CRC through the control of lncRNAs are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

2. Biogenesis and the Mode of Action of lncRNAs

Most lncRNAs are transcriptionally regulated by RNA polymerase II (Pol II), demanding the insertion of a 3’ end poly (A) tail and a 5’ end m7G cap [18,19]. Most lncRNAs are exported and localized in the cytoplasm, except a small number is kept in the nucleus [20]. Due to the limited number of exons contained in the sequence, the export of lncRNAs mainly depends on the nuclear RNA export factor 1 (NXF1) pathway [21]. The lncRNAs can exist in various forms and perform appropriate activities once they enter the cytoplasm [20]. Previous studies have confirmed that the mode of action of lncRNAs can be divided into four categories: signal, decoy, guide, and scaffold [22,23] (Figure 1). The signal mode means that some lncRNAs are specifically transcribed under different activation conditions and signaling pathways, and they subsequently participate in specific signaling pathways as signaling molecules; the decoy mode refers to a certain type of lncRNAs that are transcribed and bind directly to protein targets but are inactive, thus inhibiting the function of the molecule and the signaling pathway; the guidance mode means that certain lncRNAs, when bound to proteins, can target ribonucleoprotein complexes to specific targets, thereby regulating the transcription of downstream molecules; the scaffolding mode describes how some lncRNAs act as a “central platform” to bring multiple proteins together to form ribonucleoprotein complexes, enabling the intersection and integration of information between various signaling pathways and facilitating the rapid feedback and regulation of the body or cell to external signals and stimuli. Of note, a single lncRNA may accord with several prototypes, and as such, each prototype is not intended to be mutually exclusive [22]. Thus, it is evident that lncRNAs have a complex mode of action and that their abnormal expressions will change several crucial cellular processes.
Overall, the expression of lncRNAs is tightly regulated in normal cells; however, abnormal expression of lncRNAs is present in tumor cells. A growing body of evidence states that numerous lncRNAs with aberrant expression, including HOTAIR, CCAT1, and LINC0065, are found in CRC [24,25,26]. Based on the aforementioned complex biogenesis and molecular regulation mechanisms, the abnormally expressed lncRNAs play a significant role in regulating many signaling pathways, such as Wnt and NF-κB, thus affecting various aspects of CRC occurrence, development, diagnosis, and prognosis [8,27]. The various pathophysiological mechanisms of CRC mediated by aberrantly produced lncRNAs offer a fresh viewpoint for research on the disease.

3. The Development of CRC Promoted by the Disturbance of the Gut Microbiome

Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is associated with various illnesses, including autoimmune, metabolic, and neurological disorders and cancer [28]. Enrichment of pathogenic bacteria in the gut can cause DNA damage, promote inflammation, induce tumor cell proliferation, and shield the tumor from immune attack [29]. Intestinal ecological dysregulation has been identified in several macrogenomic studies on CRC as a crucial risk factor for the development of colorectal malignancies [30,31,32]. The Alpha-bugs and the bacterial driver-passenger models are widely accepted theories for how dysregulated gut microbiota triggers the development and progression of CRC [33,34]. According to the Alpha-bugs model, on the one hand, the gut microbiome directly causes intestinal epithelial cell carcinogenesis through the secretion of toxic proteins, and on the other, changes in the gut microbiome cause abnormal mucosal immune responses that allow the accumulation of cancerous intestinal epithelial cells, and subsequently CRC [33]. According to the bacterial driver-passenger model, pathogenic bacteria are called “bacterial drivers”. Bacterial drivers cause DNA damage, induce inflammation in the intestinal epithelium, and are the first to change the intestinal microenvironment as CRC initiators, making it possible for opportunistic bacteria (bacterial passengers) to have a survival advantage in the microenvironment and promote CRC development [34,35]. Nevertheless, the fundamental mechanism is not well understood.
The underlying processes by which the gut microbiome contributes to CRC have been the subject of various research, which have shown that numerous pathogenic bacteria and metabolites of the gut microbiome can affect the progression of CRC by controlling the expression of lncRNAs [17,36,37]. By upregulating LINC00152, a gene associated with intestinal inflammation, cancer cell migration, and invasion, Wang et al. discovered that Salmonella typhimurium infection affected the lncRNAs expression in intestinal epithelial cells [36]. According to Chen et al., Fusobacterium nucleatum infection upregulates the lncRNAs Keratin7-antisense (KRT7-AS) and Keratin7 (KRT7) by triggering the NF-κB pathway to promote CRC metastasis [17]. Conversely, the gut microbiome metabolite butyrate-induced lncRNA LncLy6C suppressed intestinal inflammation, thus lowering the risk of CRC, according to the research by Gao et al. [37]. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that gut microbiome disorders can influence CRC development via mediating lncRNAs. These studies stated the mechanisms by which a dysfunctional gut microbiome promotes CRC and the influence of the gut microbiome on the expression of lncRNAs, thus suggesting that lncRNAs play a non-negligible role in CRC induced by the dysfunctional gut microbiome.

4. Microbial Regulation of CRC Mediated by lncRNAs

4.1. Fusobacterium Nucleatum (F. nucleatum) Promotes CRC Metastasis as Well as Enhances Drug Resistance by Regulating lncRNAs

F. nucleatum is an oral anaerobic opportunistic pathogen considered a risk factor for CRC [3]. A recent study showed that the endogenous retroviral-associated adenocarcinoma lncRNA (EVADR) was specifically upregulated in metastatic CRC tissues infected by F. nucleatum, further conjecturing and confirming that F. nucleatum can promote the translation of Snail, Slug, and ZEB1 mRNAs through the lncRNA EVADR-YBX1 axis, thus inducing EMT [38] (Figure 2). EMT is the process by which epithelial cells transform into a migratory and invasive mesenchymal phenotype [39]. During this transformation, cells develop loose cell–cell connections and become motile, which results in cancer cell metastasis [40]. EMT is triggered by the dysregulation of the core EMT transcription factors (EMT-TFs), Snail, Slug, and ZEB1, which are essential for maintaining normal epithelial structure [41,42]. A protein called YBX1 regulates mRNA transcription and splicing by binding to DNA/RNA, and it can stimulate the translation of EMT-TFs [43,44]. In summary, EVADR directs RNA-binding protein (RBP) YBX1 to recruit its mRNA partners, including Snail, Slug, and ZEB1, to polyribosomes, thereby inducing EMT, ultimately facilitating CRC metastasis. In addition, Chen et al. discovered that F. nucleatum infection promoting CRC metastasis could be achieved by upregulating KRT7-AS/KRT7 [17] (Figure 2). The lncRNAs KRT7-AS have been linked to the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells in earlier research, and the current study further verified this connection with the metastasis of CRC [17,45]. A downstream target of KRT7-AS that regulates CRC metastasis is KRT7, a type II cytokeratin that can preserve cellular structural integrity and may also increase motile activity [17,46,47]. F. nucleatum infection activates the NF-κB pathway, a key regulator of immunity and inflammation whose improper regulation is linked to cancer; activated NF-κB P-p65 (activated NF-κB subunit) may upregulate KRT7-AS by increasing the transcriptional activity of KRT7-AS [17,48]. In conclusion, lncRNAs can potentially mediate the role of F. nucleatum in promoting CRC metastasis, and these novel mechanisms by which F. nucleatum promotes CRC metastasis may offer fresh perspectives on how to treat patients with metastatic CRC.
In addition, F. nucleatum can also increase CRC glycolysis by targeting lncRNA enolase1-intronic transcript 1 (ENO1-IT1) and KAT7 histone modification axis, and the activation of glycolysis is one of the causes of chemotherapy failure [49,50,51] (Figure 2). The specific mechanism is that F. nucleatum upregulates the binding efficiency of the transcription factor SP1 to the promoter region of lncRNA ENO1-IT1 to activate the transcription of lncRNA ENO1- IT1 and subsequently direct the histone acetyltransferase KAT7 to mediate histone modifications on lncRNA ENO1-IT1 target genes, including ENO1, thereby altering the biological function of CRC, including increasing lactate production, glucose uptake, and cell proliferation that is dependent on glycolysis [49]. KAT7 is a major member of the MYST family of histone acetyltransferases and plays an important role in DNA replication, gene transcription, and embryonic development [52,53,54]. ENO1 can regulate the process related to glycolysis as a key enzyme in the glycolytic pathway [55]. Therefore, targeting ENO1 might improve the sensitivity to chemotherapy and reduce the resistance to oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by inhibiting F. nucleatum-induced glycolysis in CRC patients [49]. Given that the combination of oxaliplatin and 5-FU can inhibit DNA synthesis and transcription, thus leading to apoptosis, it is effective to target ENO1 to treat patients with advanced CRC with high levels of F. nucleatum [49,56,57]. However, it is still important to determine if, in addition to the enhancement of tumor glycolysis, the method by which F. nucleatum upregulates ENO1 to increase drug resistance is connected to other potential processes. Everything considered, F. nucleatum activates glycolysis in CRC via targeting the lncRNA ENO1- IT1, which promotes the development of CRC and chemotherapeutic drug resistance in CRC patients, resulting in a poor prognosis.

4.2. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides Fragilis (ETBF) Induces CRC Cells Growth, Proliferation, and Metastasis by Regulating lncRNAs

Bacteroides fragilis is an anaerobic bacterium found in the gastrointestinal flora of humans and livestock that produce Bacteroides fragilis toxin (BFT), also known as ETBF [58]. The bft gene, which encodes BFT, is the main source of pathogenicity for ETBF, which is closely linked to CRC [59,60,61]. In addition to bacterial toxins, researchers have looked into the relationship between lncRNAs and ETBF. A study by Bao et al. reported that B. fragilis-associated lncRNA1 (BFAL1) found in CRC tissues was involved in the process of ETBF-induced CRC carcinogenesis by the following mechanism: BFAL1 competes with miR-155-5p and miR-200a-3p, thus impeding the inhibitory effect of miR-155-5p and miR-200a-3p on the Ras homolog enriched in brain (RHEB), which upregulates the target RHEB mRNA expression, leading to the activation of the mTOR pathway for the reason that RHEB is the MTORC1 binding/mammalian target of the rapamycin (RHEB/mTOR) pathway, and ultimately promoting ETBF-induced CRC cells growth [62] (Figure 3). Therefore, BFAL1 may be a promising therapeutic target for ETBF-induced CRC as a mediator of CRC cells growth. Notably, miR-155-5p can encourage the activation of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) that can promote tumor progression, thus changing the secretory phenotype of CAFs and promoting EMT and metastasis of CRC [63]. In addition, human antigen R (HuR) has been demonstrated to enhance cancer cell growth and migration, while miR-155-5p further positively regulates HuR mRNA expression and cytoplasmic localization in CRC cells, which promotes CRC migration [64]. However, the upregulation of miR-200a-3p inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion of CRC cells by negatively regulating the forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1) expression [65]. The various functions of miR-155-5p and miR-200a-3p in CRC are based on their regulatory effects on different downstream molecules. This suggested that the gut microbiome-induced lncRNAs may have the potential to synergize or antagonize miR-155-5p and miR-200a-3p, targeting various downstream molecules to carry out their regulatory roles in CRC, which may become one of the future research directions.
Moreover, there is another potential way by which ETBF might affect CRC. ETBF can also increase the levels of jumonji domain-containing protein 2B (JMJD2B), a potential oncoprotein in the development and progression of CRC [66,67]. In addition, JMJD2B can induce the expression of lncRNA AERRIE, which induces the expression of sulfatase 1 (SULF1) [68]. SULF1 can remove sulfate groups from proteoglycans, and proteoglycan modifications are important for protein interactions and cytokine signaling [69,70]. The activation of the canonical Wnt pathway by SULF1 overexpression has been demonstrated to promote the proliferation and metastasis of CRC cells [8,71] (Figure 3). In summary, ETBF can upregulate JMJD2B to induce lncRNA AERRIE expression and subsequently activate SULF1, thus contributing to CRC cell proliferation and metastasis. This indicated that ETBF holds great promise for research on how it affects CRC by modulating the expression of lncRNAs.

5. The Gut Microbiome Metabolic Regulation of CRC Mediated by lncRNAs

5.1. Butyrate as the Metabolite of the Gut Microbiome Inhibits the Intestinal Inflammation to Lower the Risk of CRC by Regulating lncRNAs

In addition to the gut microbiome, which can directly regulate lncRNAs to influence CRC progression, the gut microbiome metabolite butyrate can likewise control the expression of lncRNAs and thus play a significant role in CRC development [37]. Butyrate is a major metabolite produced by the fermentation of dietary fiber bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. It can help maintain intestinal homeostasis by preventing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and regulating the function of intestinal macrophages by inhibiting histone deacetylases [72,73,74]. The lncRNA LncLy6C, induced by the microbiota metabolite butyrate, binds to the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ) and several lysine methyltransferases of H3K4me3, specifically encouraging the enrichment of C/EBPβ and H3K4me3 marks on the promoter region of Nr4A1, nuclear subfamily 4 (NR4A) receptor, which is overexpressed in CRC and plays a central role in controlling cell proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis [37,75]. This causes the upregulated expression of Nr4A1, promoting the differentiation of Ly6Chigh inflammatory monocytes into Ly6Cint/neg resident macrophages [37] (Figure 4). Ly6Chigh inflammatory monocytes and Ly6Cint/neg resident macrophages represent classical and non-classical macrophages, respectively. Macrophages have been reported to play an important role in intestinal inflammation immunity, EMT and tumor development, and in contrast to Ly6Chigh macrophages, Ly6Cint/neg macrophages are crucial in inhibiting inflammation [37,76,77]. In acutely inflamed colonic tissue, Ly6Chigh monocytes can migrate to the site of injury, respond to bacterial products, and produce pro-inflammatory effector cells that secrete interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-23, thereby severely promoting colitis [78]. These pro-inflammatory cytokines, produced by inflammatory macrophages, control the activity of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) by affecting their migration and proliferation, and create a microenvironment conducive to epithelial transformation and tumor development, thus promoting colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC) [79]. Therefore, the gut microbiome metabolite butyrate inhibits intestinal inflammation through the pathways mentioned above to lower the risk of CRC.

5.2. The Gut Microbiome-Derived Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Promotes Cancer Cells Migration and Invasion by Regulating lncRNAs

LPS, a characteristic component of the cell wall of gram-negative bacteria, is a typical activator of inflammasomes involved in the development and progression of several diseases, including CRC [80]. A recent study showed that LPS could upregulate the expression of LINC00152, and the overexpression of LINC00152 promotes the migration and invasion of CRC cells [36] (Figure 5). Lactate is a compound produced during the Warburg effect, and lactate-derived histone lysine lactylation has been demonstrated to act as a novel epigenetic modification [81,82]. Histone lactylation can directly stimulate gene transcription from chromatin, which is closely correlated to many pathophysiological processes, including infection and cancer [83]. YY1 is a transcription factor that has been shown to play an important role in the development of cancer, and there is mounting evidence that YY1 is significantly linked to the growth of CRC cells and can be used to predict prognosis in CRC patients [84,85]. It has been demonstrated that YY1 binds to LINC00152 and inhibits its transcription [86]. Therefore, the gut microbiome metabolite LPS introduces histone lactonization on the promoter of LINC00152 and reduces the binding efficiency of YY1 to LINC00152, thus upregulating the expression of LINC00152 [36]. LINC00152, a lncRNA, can promote tumor growth, increase CRC cells migration and invasion, and significantly antagonize 5-FU-induced apoptosis to make CRC cells more resistant to the drug 5-FU by sponging miR-139-5p [87,88,89]. Concludingly, the gut microbiome-derived LPS can upregulate the expression of LINC00152 through the mechanism mentioned above, which negatively influences the development of CRC by encouraging cancer cell invasion and migration.

6. Strategies of Preventing and Controlling CRC Based on the Regulatory Role of the Gut Microbiome on lncRNAs

Given the key role of the gut microbiome in CRC development by regulating lncRNAs, some prevention and treatment strategies targeting the gut microbiome have been reported. Among the currently available new therapeutic approaches: traditional probiotics, next-generation probiotics (NGP), and postbiotics can help build healthy gut microbiota in humans as prevention and complementary therapy [90]. Therefore, traditional probiotics can limit the growth of cancer cells by inducing apoptotic pathways (both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways) and can also secrete short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that play an active role in improving intestinal barrier function, thereby limiting CRC progression [91,92]. Candidates for NGP in CRC prevention and treatment are bacteria that produce SCFAs, particularly butyrate, capable of exhibiting anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties [90]. Inducing apoptosis in CRC cells, limiting pathogen translocation, repairing the gut barrier, controlling the immune response to inflammation, inhibiting pathogenic bacterial enzymes, exhibiting antimutagenic and antioxidant effects, and lowering intestinal pH and moderating signaling pathways linked to the carcinogenic process are all possible effects of postbiotics [93]. For instance, in cancer immunotherapy, a method for microbe–host interactions involves directly stimulating dendritic cells in lymph nodes via the gut probiotic Akkermansia muciniphila to enhance the antitumor activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in an IL-12-dependent manner [94]. Hence, using probiotics to treat CRC is currently an effective method.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as an emerging therapeutic strategy for gastrointestinal illnesses has recently gained popularity. In order to restore intestinal homeostasis, FMT requires introducing healthy gut microbiota into a dysregulated gut microbiome. This is done by transferring feces from a healthy donor into the patient’s gastrointestinal tract [95,96,97]. However, experimental data on the effectiveness of FMT mostly focuses on Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment, whereas its use in other gastrointestinal illnesses, particularly in CRC, remains under-investigated, so researchers should focus more on the clinical application in CRC.
Considering that lncRNAs are significant in CRC, we could not dismiss the treatment strategy for CRC that involves controlling lncRNAs. Numerous studies have proved that various lncRNAs, such as WASH5P and CKMT2-AS1, have been available to be potential biotherapeutic targets for CRC, thus limiting the progression of CRC [98,99,100]. The lncRNAs, as emerging biotherapeutic targets for CRC, still have many unanswered questions to be explored, including their role in CRC development and their particular regulatory mechanisms.

7. Conclusions

The gut microbes and their metabolites can affect CRC cell growth, proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance in CRC patients by regulating lncRNAs due to lncRNAs’ significant roles in many key cellular processes, including apoptosis, proliferation, and differentiation. These findings have great potential in standard clinical trials. First, alterations in the gut microbiome might indicate the development or prognosis of CRC, so there are current approaches, such as probiotic supplements, to improve the gut microbiome to prevent and treat CRC. Second, lncRNAs could be potential targets for CRC diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment, so lncRNAs intervention holds promise as a method to prevent and treat CRC.
However, current studies on the effects of the lncRNAs-mediated gut microbiome and their metabolites on CRC are limited, and the impacts of multiple gut microbes’ interactions on CRC have not been reported, which should be an explicit topic of interest for future research. Moreover, the interaction of the gut microbiome-induced lncRNAs with other non-coding RNAs, such as microRNAs and circRNAs, in the regulation of CRC also deserves the attention of scientists. Resultantly, it might be possible to develop more methods for CRC prevention and treatment by researching the mechanisms by which lncRNAs mediate the effects of the gut microbiome on CRC. Overall, the regulatory role of the gut microbiome-induced lncRNAs in CRC has great potential and may serve as the foundation for future clinical CRC treatment.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers14235813/s1, Table S1: Mechanisms by which gut microbes and their metabolites impact the development of CRC through the regulation of lncRNAs.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Training Project of Key Talents of Youth Medicine in Jiangsu province, China (No. QNRC2016330) and Graduate Research-Innovation Project in Jiangsu province (SJCX22_1816), the Key Disease Standardization Diagnosis and Treatment Project in Jiangsu province (No. BE2015664), the Academic Science and Technology Innovation Fund for College Students (No. x20180714) the Social Development-Health Care Project of Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province (No. YZ2018087), the Social Development Project of Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province (No. YZ2021075), the Graduate Research and Practice Innovation Plan of Graduate Education Innovation Project in Jiangsu Province (No. SJCX211644), and High-level talent “six one projects” top talent scientific research project of Jiangsu Province (No. LGY2019034), Social development project of key R & D plan of Jiangsu Provincial Department of science and technology (BE2022773). The funding bodies had no role in writing the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The Figure was created by BioRender (Biorender.Com).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

CRCColorectal cancer
lncRNAslong non-coding RNAs
TMEtumor microenvironment
EMTepithelial mesenchymal transition
NF-κBnuclear factor kappa-B
Pol IIRNA polymerase II
NXF1nuclear RNA export factor 1
TFstranscription factors
KRT7-ASKeratin7-antisense
KRT7Keratin7
F. nucleatumFusobacterium nucleatum
EVADRendogenous retroviral-associated adenocarcinoma lncRNA
EMT-TFsEMT transcription factors
RBPRNA-binding protein
ENO1-IT1enolase1-intronic transcript 1
5-FU5-fluorouracil
ETBFEnterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis
BFTBacteroides fragilis toxin
BFAL1B. fragilis-associated lncRNA1
RHEBRas homolog enriched in brain
CAFscancer-associated fibroblasts
HuRhuman antigen R
FOXA1forkhead box protein A1
JMJD2Bjumonji domain-containing protein 2B
SULF1sulfatase 1
C/EBPβCCAAT/enhancer binding protein β
NR4Anuclear subfamily 4
ILinterleukin
IECsintestinal epithelial cells
CACcolitis-associated colorectal cancer
LPSlipopolysaccharide
NGPnext-generation probiotics
SCFAsshort-chain fatty acids
FMTfecal microbiota transplantation
CDIClostridium difficile infection

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gilbert, J.A.; Blaser, M.J.; Caporaso, J.G.; Jansson, J.; Lynch, S.V.; Knight, R. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, N.; Fang, J.-Y. Fusobacterium nucleatum, a key pathogenic factor and microbial biomarker for colorectal cancer. Trends Microbiol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Jia, H.; Cai, X.; Zhong, H.; Feng, Q.; Sunagawa, S.; Arumugam, M.; Kultima, J.R.; Prifti, E.; Nielsen, T.; et al. Supporting data for the paper: “An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome”. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Song, M.; Chan, A.T.; Sun, J. Influence of the Gut Microbiome, Diet, and Environment on Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 322–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hamada, T.; Nowak, J.A.; Milner, D.A., Jr.; Song, M.; Ogino, S. Integration of microbiology, molecular pathology, and epidemiology: A new paradigm to explore the pathogenesis of microbiome-driven neoplasms. J. Pathol. 2019, 247, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chen, Q.; Zhou, L.; De Ma, D.; Hou, J.; Lin, Y.; Wu, J.; Tao, M. LncRNA GAS6-AS1 facilitates tumorigenesis and metastasis of colorectal cancer by regulating TRIM14 through miR-370-3p/miR-1296-5p and FUS. J. Transl. Med. 2022, 20, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, L.; Jiang, J.; Huang, Z.; Jin, P.; Peng, L.; Luo, M.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Xie, N.; Gao, W.; et al. Hypoxia-induced lncRNA STEAP3-AS1 activates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling to promote colorectal cancer progression by preventing m(6)A-mediated degradation of STEAP3 mRNA. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, J.; Ji, Y.; Chen, N.; Wang, H.; Fang, C.; Yin, X.; Jiang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Zhu, D.; Fu, J.; et al. A specific upregulated long noncoding RNA in colorectal cancer promotes cancer progression. JCI Insight 2022, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chu, J.; Fang, X.; Sun, Z.; Gai, L.; Dai, W.; Li, H.; Yan, X.; Du, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, L.; et al. Non-Coding RNAs Regulate the Resistance to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Colorectal Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2022, 11, 801319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beermann, J.; Piccoli, M.-T.; Viereck, J.; Thum, T. Non-coding RNAs in Development and Disease: Background, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Approaches. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 1297–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kong, M.; Yu, X.; Zheng, Q.; Zhang, S.; Guo, W. Oncogenic roles of LINC01234 in various forms of human cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 154, 113570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. da Silveira, W.A.; Renaud, L.; Hazard, E.S.; Hardiman, G. miRNA and lncRNA Expression Networks Modulate Cell Cycle and DNA Repair Inhibition in Senescent Prostate Cells. Genes 2022, 13, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ketley, R.F.; Gullerova, M. Jack of all trades? The versatility of RNA in DNA double-strand break repair. Essays Biochem. 2020, 64, 721–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, L.; He, M.; Zhang, M.; Sun, Q.; Zeng, S.; Zhao, H.; Yang, H.; Liu, M.; Ren, S.; Meng, X.; et al. The Role of non-coding RNAs in colorectal cancer, with a focus on its autophagy. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 226, 107868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liang, L.; Ai, L.; Qian, J.; Fang, J.-Y.; Xu, J. Long noncoding RNA expression profiles in gut tissues constitute molecular signatures that reflect the types of microbes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, S.; Su, T.; Zhang, Y.; Lee, A.; He, J.; Ge, Q.; Wang, L.; Si, J.; Zhuo, W.; Wang, L. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal cancer metastasis by modulating KRT7-AS/KRT7. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 511–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Derrien, T.; Johnson, R.; Bussotti, G.; Tanzer, A.; Djebali, S.; Tilgner, H.; Guernec, G.; Martin, D.; Merkel, A.; Knowles, D.G.; et al. The GENCODE v7 Catalog of Human Long Noncoding RNAs: Analysis of Their Gene Structure, Evolution, and Expression. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 1775–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nojima, T.; Proudfoot, N.J. Mechanisms of lncRNA biogenesis as revealed by nascent transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Li, J.; Hou, S.; Ye, Z.; Wang, W.; Hu, X.; Hang, Q. Long Non-Coding RNAs in Pancreatic Cancer: Biologic Functions, Mechanisms, and Clinical Significance. Cancers 2022, 14, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zuckerman, B.; Ron, M.; Mikl, M.; Segal, E.; Ulitsky, I. Gene Architecture and Sequence Composition Underpin Selective Dependency of Nuclear Export of Long RNAs on NXF1 and the TREX Complex. Mol. Cell 2020, 79, 251–267.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, K.C.; Chang, H.Y. Molecular Mechanisms of Long Noncoding RNAs. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 904–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Marchese, F.P.; Raimondi, I.; Huarte, M. The multidimensional mechanisms of long noncoding RNA function. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Huang, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, D. HOTAIR regulates colorectal cancer stem cell properties and promotes tumorigenicity by sponging miR-211-5p and modulating FLT-1. Cell Cycle 2021, 20, 1999–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saus, E.; Brunet-Vega, A.; Iraola-Guzmán, S.; Pegueroles, C.; Gabaldón, T.; Pericay, C. Long Non-Coding RNAs As Potential Novel Prognostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer. Front. Genet. 2016, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhou, L.; Li, J.; Tang, Y.; Yang, M. Exosomal LncRNA LINC00659 transferred from cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes colorectal cancer cell progression via miR-342-3p/ANXA2 axis. J. Transl. Med. 2021, 19, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, B.; Zheng, L.; Ye, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, J.; Huang, Q.; Guo, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, P.; Liu, S.; et al. CREB1 contributes colorectal cancer cell plasticity by regulating lncRNA CCAT1 and NF-kappaB pathways. Sci. China Life Sci. 2022, 65, 1481–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, F.; Aschenbrenner, D.; Yoo, J.Y.; Zuo, T. The gut mycobiome in health, disease, and clinical applications in association with the gut bacterial microbiome assembly. Lancet Microbe 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kendong, S.M.A.; Ali, R.A.R.; Nawawi, K.N.M.; Ahmad, H.F.; Mokhtar, N.M. Gut Dysbiosis and Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction: Potential Explanation for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 744606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhu, Y.; Ma, L.; Wei, W.; Li, X.; Chang, Y.; Pan, Z.; Gao, H.; Yang, R.; Bi, Y.; Ding, L. Metagenomics analysis of cultured mucosal bacteria from colorectal cancer and adjacent normal mucosal tissues. J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 71, 001523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, R.; Xia, K.; Wu, M.; Zhong, H.; Sun, J.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, L.; Wu, X.; Yin, L.; Yang, R.; et al. Alterations of Gut Mycobiota Profiles in Adenoma and Colorectal Cancer. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 839435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Coker, O.O.; Liu, C.; Wu, W.K.K.; Wong, S.H.; Jia, W.; Sung, J.J.Y.; Yu, J. Altered gut metabolites and microbiota interactions are implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis and can be non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers. Microbiome 2022, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sears, C.L.; Pardoll, D.M. Perspective: Alpha-Bugs, Their Microbial Partners, and the Link to Colon Cancer. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Tjalsma, H.; Boleij, A.; Marchesi, J.R.; Dutilh, B.E. A bacterial Driver–passenger model for colorectal cancer: Beyond the usual suspects. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xing, J.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, H.; Tang, D.; Wang, D. Bacterial driver–passenger model in biofilms: A new mechanism in the development of colorectal cancer. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2022, 24, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Q.; Ni, C.; Zhen, Y.; Xu, R.; Liu, Q.; et al. Enterobacterial LPS-inducible LINC00152 is regulated by histone lactylation and promotes cancer cells invasion and migration. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 913815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Qi, H.; Wei, J.; Yang, Y.; Yue, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, R. LncRNA lncLy6C induced by microbiota metabolite butyrate promotes differentiation of Ly6C(high) to Ly6C(int/neg) macrophages through lncLy6C/C/EBPbeta/Nr4A1 axis. Cell Discov. 2020, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lu, X.; Xu, Q.; Tong, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Dun, G.; Feng, Y.; Tang, J.; Han, D.; Mao, Y.; Deng, L.; et al. Long non-coding RNA EVADR induced by Fusobacterium nucleatum infection promotes colorectal cancer metastasis. Cell Rep. 2022, 40, 111127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thiery, J.P.; Acloque, H.; Huang, R.Y.J.; Nieto, M.A. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease. Cell 2009, 139, 871–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lv, C.; Yu, H.; Wang, K.; Chen, C.; Tang, J.; Han, F.; Mai, M.; Ye, K.; Lai, M.; Zhang, H. ENO2 Promotes Colorectal Cancer Metastasis by Interacting with the LncRNA CYTOR and Activating YAP1-Induced EMT. Cells 2022, 11, 2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Puisieux, A.; Brabletz, T.; Caramel, J. Oncogenic roles of EMT-inducing transcription factors. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pavlič, A.; Hauptman, N.; Boštjančič, E.; Zidar, N. Long Non-Coding RNAs as Potential Regulators of EMT-Related Transcription Factors in Colorectal Cancer—A Systematic Review and Bioinformatics Analysis. Cancers 2022, 14, 2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kwon, E.; Todorova, K.; Wang, J.; Horos, R.; Lee, K.K.; Neel, V.A.; Negri, G.L.; Sorensen, P.H.; Lee, S.W.; Hentze, M.W.; et al. The RNA-binding protein YBX1 regulates epidermal progenitors at a posttranscriptional level. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. El-Naggar, A.M.; Veinotte, C.J.; Cheng, H.; Grunewald, T.G.; Negri, G.L.; Somasekharan, S.P.; Corkery, D.P.; Tirode, F.; Mathers, J.; Khan, D.; et al. Translational Activation of HIF1α by YB-1 Promotes Sarcoma Metastasis. Cancer Cell 2015, 27, 682–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Huang, B.; Song, J.H.; Cheng, Y.; Abraham, J.M.; Ibrahim, S.; Sun, Z.; Ke, X.; Meltzer, S.J. Long non-coding antisense RNA KRT7-AS is activated in gastric cancers and supports cancer cell progression by increasing KRT7 expression. Oncogene 2016, 35, 4927–4936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Communal, L.; Roy, N.; Cahuzac, M.; Rahimi, K.; Köbel, M.; Provencher, D.; Mes-Masson, A.-M. A Keratin 7 and E-Cadherin Signature Is Highly Predictive of Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma Prognosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Helfand, B.T.; Chang, L.; Goldman, R.D. Intermediate filaments are dynamic and motile elements of cellular architecture. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Capece, D.; Verzella, D.; Flati, I.; Arboretto, P.; Cornice, J.; Franzoso, G. NF-kappaB: Blending metabolism, immunity, and inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2022, 43, 757–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hong, J.; Guo, F.; Lu, S.-Y.; Shen, C.; Ma, D.; Zhang, X.; Xie, Y.; Yan, T.; Yu, T.; Sun, T.; et al. F. nucleatum targets lncRNA ENO1-IT1 to promote glycolysis and oncogenesis in colorectal cancer. Gut 2020, 70, 2123–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, G.; Wang, J.; Yin, P.; Xu, K.; Wang, Y.; Shi, F.; Gao, J.; Fu, X. New strategies for targeting glucose metabolism–mediated acidosis for colorectal cancer therapy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 234, 348–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ganapathy-Kanniappan, S.; Geschwind, J.-F.H. Tumor glycolysis as a target for cancer therapy: Progress and prospects. Mol. Cancer 2013, 12, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Lan, R.; Wang, Q. Deciphering structure, function and mechanism of lysine acetyltransferase HBO1 in protein acetylation, transcription regulation, DNA replication and its oncogenic properties in cancer. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sapountzi, V.; Côté, J. MYST-family histone acetyltransferases: Beyond chromatin. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 68, 1147–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kim, M.S.; Cho, H.I.; Park, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Chai, Y.G.; Jang, Y.K. The histone acetyltransferase Myst2 regulates Nanog expression, and is involved in maintaining pluripotency and self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huppertz, I.; Perez-Perri, J.I.; Mantas, P.; Sekaran, T.; Schwarzl, T.; Russo, F.; Ferring-Appel, D.; Koskova, Z.; Dimitrova-Paternoga, L.; Kafkia, E.; et al. Riboregulation of Enolase 1 activity controls glycolysis and embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol. Cell 2022, 82, 2666–2680.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fakhr, E.; Zare, F.; Azadmanesh, K.; Teimoori-Toolabi, L. LEF1 silencing sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and irinotecan. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 143, 112091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kim, S.T.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, J.; Yun, S.H.; Kim, H.C.; Lee, W.Y.; Kim, T.W.; Hong, Y.S.; Lim, S.; Baek, J.Y.; et al. Oxaliplatin (3 months v 6 months) With 6 Months of Fluoropyrimidine as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Stage II/III Colon Cancer: KCSG CO09-07. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40, 3868–3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zamani, S.; Taslimi, R.; Sarabi, A.; Jasemi, S.; Sechi, L.A.; Feizabadi, M.M. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis: A Possible Etiological Candidate for Bacterially-Induced Colorectal Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 9, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Toprak, N.U.; Yagci, A.; Gulluoglu, B.M.; Akin, M.L.; Demirkalem, P.; Celenk, T.; Soyletir, G. A possible role of Bacteroides fragilis enterotoxin in the aetiology of colorectal cancer. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2006, 12, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Boleij, A.; Hechenbleikner, E.M.; Goodwin, A.C.; Badani, R.; Stein, E.M.; Lazarev, M.G.; Ellis, B.; Carroll, K.C.; Albesiano, E.; Wick, E.C.; et al. The Bacteroides fragilis Toxin Gene Is Prevalent in the Colon Mucosa of Colorectal Cancer Patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 60, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Haghi, F.; Goli, E.; Mirzaei, B.; Zeighami, H. The association between fecal enterotoxigenic B. fragilis with colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Bao, Y.; Tang, J.; Qian, Y.; Sun, T.; Chen, H.; Chen, Z.; Sun, D.; Zhong, M.; Chen, H.; Hong, J.; et al. Long noncoding RNA BFAL1 mediates enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-related carcinogenesis in colorectal cancer via the RHEB/mTOR pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Song, Y.; Si, M.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Cui, S.; Qu, X.; Yu, X. Exosomal miR-146a-5p and miR-155-5p promote CXCL12/CXCR7-induced metastasis of colorectal cancer by crosstalk with cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Al-Haidari, A.; Algaber, A.; Madhi, R.; Syk, I.; Thorlacius, H. MiR-155-5p controls colon cancer cell migration via post-transcriptional regulation of Human Antigen R (HuR). Cancer Lett. 2018, 421, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Di, Z.; Di, M.; Fu, W.; Tang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Lei, P.; Gu, X.; Liu, T.; Sun, M. Integrated Analysis Identifies a Nine-microRNA Signature Biomarker for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Liu, Q.-Q.; Li, C.-M.; Fu, L.-N.; Wang, H.-L.; Tan, J.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Sun, D.-F.; Gao, Q.-Y.; Chen, Y.-X.; Fang, J.-Y. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis induces the stemness in colorectal cancer via upregulating histone demethylase JMJD2B. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1788900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, Y.; Zheng, P.; Liu, Y.; Ji, T.; Liu, X.; Yao, S.; Cheng, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.; Xiao, Z.; et al. An epigenetic role for PRL-3 as a regulator of H3K9 methylation in colorectal cancer. Gut 2013, 62, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pham, T.P.; van Bergen, A.S.; Kremer, V.; Glaser, S.F.; Dimmeler, S.; Boon, R.A. LncRNA AERRIE Is Required for Sulfatase 1 Expression, but Not for Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Morimoto-Tomita, M.; Uchimura, K.; Werb, Z.; Hemmerich, S.; Rosen, S.D. Cloning and Characterization of Two Extracellular Heparin-degrading Endosulfatases in Mice and Humans. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 49175–49185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Esko, J.D.; Lindahl, U. Molecular diversity of heparan sulfate. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 108, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ai, X.; Do, A.-T.; Lozynska, O.; Kusche-Gullberg, M.; Lindahl, U.; Emerson, C.P., Jr. QSulf1 remodels the 6-O sulfation states of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans to promote Wnt signaling. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 162, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Miller, T.L.; Wolin, M.J. Pathways of acetate, propionate, and butyrate formation by the human fecal microbial flora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 1589–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Artis, D. Epithelial-cell recognition of commensal bacteria and maintenance of immune homeostasis in the gut. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chang, P.V.; Hao, L.; Offermanns, S.; Medzhitov, R. The microbial metabolite butyrate regulates intestinal macrophage function via histone deacetylase inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 2247–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Deng, S.; Chen, B.; Huo, J.; Liu, X. Therapeutic potential of NR4A1 in cancer: Focus on metabolism. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 972984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Bain, C.C.; Mowat, A.M. Macrophages in intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Immunol. Rev. 2014, 260, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Li, Y.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, G.; Xiang, L.-X.; Luo, D.-C.; Shao, J.-Z. Occurrences and Functions of Ly6C(hi) and Ly6C(lo) Macrophages in Health and Disease. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 901672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zigmond, E.; Varol, C.; Farache, J.; Elmaliah, E.; Satpathy, A.T.; Friedlander, G.; Mack, M.; Shpigel, N.; Boneca, I.G.; Murphy, K.M.; et al. Ly6C hi monocytes in the inflamed colon give rise to proinflammatory effector cells and migratory antigen-presenting cells. Immunity 2012, 37, 1076–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wu, S.; Yuan, W.; Luo, W.; Nie, K.; Wu, X.; Meng, X.; Shen, Z.; Wang, X. MiR-126 downregulates CXCL12 expression in intestinal epithelial cells to suppress the recruitment and function of macrophages and tumorigenesis in a murine model of colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2022, 16, 3465–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wu, X.; Qian, S.; Zhang, J.; Feng, J.; Luo, K.; Sun, L.; Zhao, L.; Ran, Y.; Sun, L.; Wang, J.; et al. Lipopolysaccharide promotes metastasis via acceleration of glycolysis by the nuclear factor-kappaB/snail/hexokinase3 signaling axis in colorectal cancer. Cancer Metab. 2021, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Palsson-McDermott, E.M.; O’Neill, L.A.J. The Warburg effect then and now: From cancer to inflammatory diseases. BioEssays 2013, 35, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, D.; Tang, Z.; Huang, H.; Zhou, G.; Cui, C.; Weng, Y.; Liu, W.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Perez-Neut, M.; et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature 2019, 574, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Izzo, L.T.; Wellen, K.E. Histone lactylation links metabolism and gene regulation. Nature 2019, 574, 492–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Gordon, S.; Akopyan, G.; Garban, H.; Bonavida, B. Transcription factor YY1: Structure, function, and therapeutic implications in cancer biology. Oncogene 2006, 25, 1125–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Zhang, N.; Li, X.; Wu, C.W.; Dong, Y.; Cai, M.; Mok, M.T.S.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Ng, S.S.M.; Chen, M.; et al. microRNA-7 is a novel inhibitor of YY1 contributing to colorectal tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2013, 32, 5078–5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Shen, X.; Zhong, J.; Yu, P.; Zhao, Q.; Huang, T. YY1-regulated LINC00152 promotes triple negative breast cancer progression by affecting on stability of PTEN protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 509, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Song, M.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, B.; Bian, Z.; Quan, C.; Zhou, L.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Ni, S.; et al. MiR-139-5p inhibits migration and invasion of colorectal cancer by downregulating AMFR and NOTCH1. Protein Cell 2014, 5, 851–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Liu, H.; Yin, Y.; Hu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Bian, Z.; Yao, S.; Li, M.; You, Q.; Huang, Z. miR-139-5p sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil by targeting NOTCH-1. Pathol.-Res. Pract. 2016, 212, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Bian, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, M.; Feng, Y.; Yao, S.; Song, M.; Qi, X.; Fei, B.; Yin, Y.; Hua, D.; et al. Long non-coding RNA LINC00152 promotes cell proliferation, metastasis, and confers 5-FU resistance in colorectal cancer by inhibiting miR-139-5p. Oncogenesis 2017, 6, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Kvakova, M.; Kamlarova, A.; Stofilova, J.; Benetinova, V.; Bertkova, I. Probiotics and postbiotics in colorectal cancer: Prevention and complementary therapy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 28, 3370–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tripathy, A.; Dash, J.; Kancharla, S.; Kolli, P.; Mahajan, D.; Senapati, S.; Jena, M. Probiotics: A Promising Candidate for Management of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lee, S.Y.; Lee, D.Y.; Kang, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Jeong, J.W.; Kim, H.W.; Oh, D.H.; Yoon, S.H.; Hur, S.J. Relationship between gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: Probiotics as a potential strategy for prevention. Food Res. Int. 2022, 156, 111327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rad, A.H.; Aghebati-Maleki, L.; Kafil, H.S.; Abbasi, A. Molecular mechanisms of postbiotics in colorectal cancer prevention and treatment. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 61, 1787–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Cullin, N.; Cullin, N.; Antunes, C.; Straussman, R.; Stein-Thoeringer, C.; Elinav, E. Microbiome and cancer. Cancer Cell 2021, 39, 1317–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Smits, L.P.; Bouter, K.E.; de Vos, W.M.; Borody, T.J.; Nieuwdorp, M. Therapeutic Potential of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Gastroenterology 2013, 145, 946–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Khoruts, A. Can FMT Cause or Prevent CRC? Maybe, But There Is More to Consider. Gastroenterology 2021, 161, 1103–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Popov, J.; Caputi, V.; Nandeesha, N.; Rodriguez, D.A.; Pai, N. Microbiota-Immune Interactions in Ulcerative Colitis and Colitis Associated Cancer and Emerging Microbiota-Based Therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wei, S.; Hu, W.; Feng, J.; Geng, Y. Promotion or remission: A role of noncoding RNAs in colorectal cancer resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Cell Commun. Signal. 2022, 20, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wei, H.; Mao, T.; Zhang, Q.; Ren, K.; Qi, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, B.; Jin, Y.; Tian, Z.; Ren, L. The Novel LncRNA WASH5P Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Carcinogenesis via Targeting AKT Signaling Pathway. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 923425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhuang, B.; Ni, X.; Min, Z.; Wu, D.; Wang, T.; Cui, P. Long Non-Coding RNA CKMT2-AS1 Reduces the Viability of Colo-rectal Cancer Cells by Targeting AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway. Iran. J. Public Health 2022, 51, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 14 05813 g001 550
Figure 1. Biogenesis and the mode of action of lncRNAs. (A) Signal: some lncRNAs are specifically transcribed under different TFs and signaling pathways, and they subsequently participate in specific signaling pathways as signaling molecules. (B) Decoy: a certain type of lncRNAs are transcribed and bind directly to protein targets but are inactive, thus inhibiting the function of the molecule and the signaling pathway. (C) Guidance: certain lncRNAs, when bound to proteins, can direct the localization of ribonucleoprotein complex to specific targets (colored flags), thereby regulating the transcription of downstream molecules. (D) Scaffolding: some lncRNAs act as a “central platform” to bring multiple proteins together to form ribonucleoprotein complexes, enabling the intersection and integration of information between various signaling pathways and facilitating the rapid feedback and regulation of the body or cell to external signals and stimuli. (Created with BioRender.com). lncRNAs: long non-coding RNAs; TFs: transcription factors.
Figure 1. Biogenesis and the mode of action of lncRNAs. (A) Signal: some lncRNAs are specifically transcribed under different TFs and signaling pathways, and they subsequently participate in specific signaling pathways as signaling molecules. (B) Decoy: a certain type of lncRNAs are transcribed and bind directly to protein targets but are inactive, thus inhibiting the function of the molecule and the signaling pathway. (C) Guidance: certain lncRNAs, when bound to proteins, can direct the localization of ribonucleoprotein complex to specific targets (colored flags), thereby regulating the transcription of downstream molecules. (D) Scaffolding: some lncRNAs act as a “central platform” to bring multiple proteins together to form ribonucleoprotein complexes, enabling the intersection and integration of information between various signaling pathways and facilitating the rapid feedback and regulation of the body or cell to external signals and stimuli. (Created with BioRender.com). lncRNAs: long non-coding RNAs; TFs: transcription factors.
Cancers 14 05813 g001
Cancers 14 05813 g002 550
Figure 2. F. nucleatum promotes CRC metastasis as well as enhances drug resistance by upregulating EVADR, KRT7-AS, and ENO1-IT1. Elevated EVADR directs RBP YBX1 to recruit EMT-related factors, including Snail, Slug, and Zeb1, to polyribosomes, and enhances the translation of these EMT-related factors, thereby inducing EMT, ultimately facilitating colorectal cancer metastasis. F. nucleatum infection activates the NF-κB pathway, and activated NF-κB P-p65 (activated NF-κB subunit) may upregulate KRT7-AS by increasing the transcriptional activity of KRT7-AS, then activating the downstream target of KRT7-AS, KRT7, which regulates CRC metastasis. F. nucleatum upregulates the binding efficiency of the transcription factor SP1 to the promoter region of lncRNA ENO1-IT1 to activate the transcription of lncRNA ENO1- IT1 and subsequently recruit KAT7 to the promoter of the ENO1 gene to regulate ENO1 transcription via epigenetic modulation, thereby activating CRC glycolysis, which enhances the drug resistance. (Created with BioRender.com). F. nucleatum: Fusobacterium nucleatum; EVADR: endogenous retroviral-associated adenocarcinoma lncRNA; KRT7-AS: Keratin7-antisense; ENO1-IT1: enolase1-intronic transcript 1; RBP: RNA-binding protein; KRT7: Keratin7; EMT: epithelial mesenchymal transition; lncRNA: long non-coding RNA.
Figure 2. F. nucleatum promotes CRC metastasis as well as enhances drug resistance by upregulating EVADR, KRT7-AS, and ENO1-IT1. Elevated EVADR directs RBP YBX1 to recruit EMT-related factors, including Snail, Slug, and Zeb1, to polyribosomes, and enhances the translation of these EMT-related factors, thereby inducing EMT, ultimately facilitating colorectal cancer metastasis. F. nucleatum infection activates the NF-κB pathway, and activated NF-κB P-p65 (activated NF-κB subunit) may upregulate KRT7-AS by increasing the transcriptional activity of KRT7-AS, then activating the downstream target of KRT7-AS, KRT7, which regulates CRC metastasis. F. nucleatum upregulates the binding efficiency of the transcription factor SP1 to the promoter region of lncRNA ENO1-IT1 to activate the transcription of lncRNA ENO1- IT1 and subsequently recruit KAT7 to the promoter of the ENO1 gene to regulate ENO1 transcription via epigenetic modulation, thereby activating CRC glycolysis, which enhances the drug resistance. (Created with BioRender.com). F. nucleatum: Fusobacterium nucleatum; EVADR: endogenous retroviral-associated adenocarcinoma lncRNA; KRT7-AS: Keratin7-antisense; ENO1-IT1: enolase1-intronic transcript 1; RBP: RNA-binding protein; KRT7: Keratin7; EMT: epithelial mesenchymal transition; lncRNA: long non-coding RNA.
Cancers 14 05813 g002
Cancers 14 05813 g003 550
Figure 3. ETBF induces CRC cells growth, proliferation, and metastasis by regulating BFAL1 and AERRIE. BFAL1 competes with miR-155-5p and miR-200a-3p, thus impeding the inhibitory effect of miR-155-5p and miR-200a-3p on RHEB, which upregulates the target RHEB mRNA expression. RHEB can bind directly to the mTOR complex and regulate the mTOR-signaling pathway by phosphorylating the p70 S6K, leading to the activation of the mTOR pathway, thus promoting ETBF-induced CRC cells growth. ETBF can also increase the levels of JMJD2B, and then induce the expression of lncRNA AERRIE, which in turn induces the expression of SULF1. Elevated SULF1 can activate the canonical Wnt pathway, which has been demonstrated to promote the proliferation and metastasis of CRC cells. (Created with BioRender.com). ETBF: Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis; BFAL1: B. fragilis-associated lncRNA1; RHEB: Ras homolog enriched in brain; S6K: S6 Kinase; JMJD2B: Jumonji domain-containing protein 2B; lncRNA: long non-coding RNA; SULF1: sulfatase 1.
Figure 3. ETBF induces CRC cells growth, proliferation, and metastasis by regulating BFAL1 and AERRIE. BFAL1 competes with miR-155-5p and miR-200a-3p, thus impeding the inhibitory effect of miR-155-5p and miR-200a-3p on RHEB, which upregulates the target RHEB mRNA expression. RHEB can bind directly to the mTOR complex and regulate the mTOR-signaling pathway by phosphorylating the p70 S6K, leading to the activation of the mTOR pathway, thus promoting ETBF-induced CRC cells growth. ETBF can also increase the levels of JMJD2B, and then induce the expression of lncRNA AERRIE, which in turn induces the expression of SULF1. Elevated SULF1 can activate the canonical Wnt pathway, which has been demonstrated to promote the proliferation and metastasis of CRC cells. (Created with BioRender.com). ETBF: Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis; BFAL1: B. fragilis-associated lncRNA1; RHEB: Ras homolog enriched in brain; S6K: S6 Kinase; JMJD2B: Jumonji domain-containing protein 2B; lncRNA: long non-coding RNA; SULF1: sulfatase 1.
Cancers 14 05813 g003
Cancers 14 05813 g004 550
Figure 4. Butyrate as the metabolite of the gut microbiome inhibits the intestinal inflammation to lower the risk of CRC by regulating lncRNA LncLy6C. Butyrate-induced LncLy6C binds to the C/EBPβ and H3K4me3, specifically encouraging the enrichment of C/EBPβ and H3K4me3 marks on the promoter region of Nr4A1, thus promoting the expression of Nr4A1. This promotes the differentiation of Ly6Chigh inflammatory monocytes into Ly6Cint/neg resident macrophages, leading to the inhibition of inflammation. As a result, the risk of developing CAC goes down. (Created with BioRender.com). lncRNA: long non-coding RNA; C/EBPβ: CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β; CAC: colitis-associated colorectal cancer.
Figure 4. Butyrate as the metabolite of the gut microbiome inhibits the intestinal inflammation to lower the risk of CRC by regulating lncRNA LncLy6C. Butyrate-induced LncLy6C binds to the C/EBPβ and H3K4me3, specifically encouraging the enrichment of C/EBPβ and H3K4me3 marks on the promoter region of Nr4A1, thus promoting the expression of Nr4A1. This promotes the differentiation of Ly6Chigh inflammatory monocytes into Ly6Cint/neg resident macrophages, leading to the inhibition of inflammation. As a result, the risk of developing CAC goes down. (Created with BioRender.com). lncRNA: long non-coding RNA; C/EBPβ: CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β; CAC: colitis-associated colorectal cancer.
Cancers 14 05813 g004
Cancers 14 05813 g005 550
Figure 5. The gut microbiome-derived LPS promotes cancer cells migration and invasion by regulating LINC00152. The bacteria-derived LPS introduces histone lactonization on the promoter of LINC00152 and reduces the binding efficiency of YY1 to LINC00152, thus upregulating the expression of LINC00152. The LPS-induced overexpression of LINC00152 was associated with cancer cells migration and invasion. (Created with BioRender.com). LPS: lipopolysaccharide.
Figure 5. The gut microbiome-derived LPS promotes cancer cells migration and invasion by regulating LINC00152. The bacteria-derived LPS introduces histone lactonization on the promoter of LINC00152 and reduces the binding efficiency of YY1 to LINC00152, thus upregulating the expression of LINC00152. The LPS-induced overexpression of LINC00152 was associated with cancer cells migration and invasion. (Created with BioRender.com). LPS: lipopolysaccharide.
Cancers 14 05813 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, S.; Xing, J.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, D.; Tang, D. Effects of Long Non-Coding RNAs Induced by the Gut Microbiome on Regulating the Development of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 5813. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235813

AMA Style

Fan S, Xing J, Jiang Z, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Wang D, Tang D. Effects of Long Non-Coding RNAs Induced by the Gut Microbiome on Regulating the Development of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers. 2022; 14(23):5813. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235813

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Shiying, Juan Xing, Zhengting Jiang, Zhilin Zhang, Huan Zhang, Daorong Wang, and Dong Tang. 2022. "Effects of Long Non-Coding RNAs Induced by the Gut Microbiome on Regulating the Development of Colorectal Cancer" Cancers 14, no. 23: 5813. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235813

APA Style

Fan, S., Xing, J., Jiang, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, D., & Tang, D. (2022). Effects of Long Non-Coding RNAs Induced by the Gut Microbiome on Regulating the Development of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers, 14(23), 5813. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235813

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop