Next Article in Journal
Comparing Liver Venous Deprivation and Portal Vein Embolization for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Is It Time to Shift the Focus to Hepatic Functional Reserve Rather than Hypertrophy?
Next Article in Special Issue
Conditional Knockout of N-WASP Enhanced the Formation of Keratinizing Squamous Cell Carcinoma Induced by KRasG12D
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Sidedness on the Efficacy of Anti-EGFR-Based First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients in Real-Life Setting—A Nation-Wide Retrospective Analysis (RACER)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Global Tanning Bed Advertising: A Comparison of Legal Regulations on Three Continents

Cancers 2023, 15(17), 4362; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174362
by Sonja Mathes 1,†, Karla S. Lindwedel 2,†, Lill Tove Nilsen 3, Isabelle Kaiser 2, Annette B. Pfahlberg 2 and Olaf Gefeller 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2023, 15(17), 4362; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174362
Submission received: 12 August 2023 / Revised: 29 August 2023 / Accepted: 30 August 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Skin Cancer: Risk Factors and Prevention)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. Shorten the title by removing the phrase "to combat the skin cancer epidemics"

2. Mention the fact that the WHO classifies tanning beds as class 1 carcinogens (like cigarettes!) in the Introduction. It IS in the discussion. 

Some changes to grammar needed. Otherwise OK. 

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the positive evaluation of the merits of our work and the remarks on specific aspects of our manuscript.

Point-by-point reply:

  1. Shorten the title by removing the phrase "to combat the skin cancer epidemics"

    Answer: We have changed the title as requested.

  2. Mention the fact that the WHO classifies tanning beds as class 1 carcinogens (like cigarettes!) in the Introduction. It IS in the discussion.

    Answer: We added the information that artificial UV radiation from tanning beds has been classified as carcinogenic by the WHO in an abridged version in the introduction (see lines 62-63) and further elaborated on it in the discussion (see lines 301ff).

  3. Some changes to grammar needed. Otherwise OK. 

    Answer: The manuscript has been revised grammatically and linguistically by a native speaker who made substantial changes and corrections to the text.

Reviewer 2 Report

The study conducted by Mathes and colleagues is a very important contribution comparing legal regulations on sunbed use. It is very thorough and well conducted.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the positive evaluation of the merits of our work. Since no changes have been requested by the reviewer, we do not provide a poinbt-by-point reply.

Back to TopTop