Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Image Processing—A Review
1. Introduction
- −
- Image segmentation—identification and delineation of specific structures or regions of interest within medical images;
- −
- Disease detection and diagnosis—identification of abnormalities by highlighting potential areas of concern; early detection and diagnosis of various medical conditions by analyzing medical images regardless of imaging modality;
- −
- Image preprocessing—enhancing the quality of medical images and reconstructing from incomplete or noisy data to improve their overall clarity and diagnostic value;
- −
- Personalized treatment planning—tailoring treatment plans based on individual patient characteristics and response to therapy;
- −
- Predictive analytics—analysis of medical imaging data along with other clinical information to predict disease progression, treatment response, and potential complications, enabling better-informed decision-making;
- −
- Quality control—maintaining the quality of medical images by detecting artifacts, ensuring that images used for diagnosis are of the highest quality;
- −
- Monitoring and follow-Up—assisting in the continuous monitoring of disease progression and treatment response over time, enabling timely adjustments to the treatment plan.
2. Review of AI Applications in Medical Imaging
2.1. Deep Learning for Detecting Brain Metastases on MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2.2. Extended Reality in Diagnostic Imaging—A Literature Review
2.3. Redefining Radiology: A Review of Artificial Intelligence Integration in Medical Imaging
3. Modality: X-ray
3.1. Key-Point Detection Algorithm of Deep Learning Can Predict Lower Limb Alignment with Simple Knee Radiographs
3.2. Dynamic Chest Radiograph Simulation Technique with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Proof-of-Concept Study
3.3. Chest X-ray Foreign Objects Detection Using Artificial Intelligence
4. Modality: MRI
4.1. A Comparative Study of Automated Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Prostate MRI
4.2. A Deep Learning Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Two-Center Study
4.3. Radiologic vs. Segmentation Measurements to Quantify Wilms Tumor Volume on MRI in Pediatric Patients
4.4. Textural Features of MR Images Correlate with an Increased Risk of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients with High PSA Levels
4.5. ‘Earlier than Early’ Detection of Breast Cancer in Israeli BRCA Mutation Carriers Applying AI-Based Analysis to Consecutive MRI Scans
4.6. Deep Learning Algorithm for Differentiating Patients with a Healthy Liver from Patients with Liver Lesions Based on MR Images
4.7. Performance of Fully Automated Algorithm Detecting Bone Marrow Edema in Sacroiliac Joints
4.8. Effects of Path-Finding Algorithms on the Labeling of the Centerlines of Circle of Willis Arteries
4.9. Retrospective Motion Artifact Reduction by Spatial Scaling of Liver Diffusion-Weighted Images
4.10. Generating Synthetic Radiological Images with PySynthMRI: An Open-Source Cross-Platform Tool
5. Modality: SPECT
Convolutional Neural Networks to Classify Alzheimer’s Disease Severity Based on SPECT Images: A Comparative Study
6. Modality: CT
6.1. COVID-19 and Cancer: A Complete 3D Advanced Radiological CT-Based Analysis to Predict the Outcome
6.2. Using Deep-Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Technique to Automatically Evaluate the Collateral Status of Multiphase CTA in Acute Ischemic Stroke
6.3. Sinogram Inpainting with Generative Adversarial Networks and Shape Priors
6.4. A Deep Learning Approach for Rapid and Generalizable Denoising of Photon-Counting Micro-CT Images
6.5. Segmentation of Portal Vein in Multiphase CTA Image Based on Unsupervised Domain Transfer and Pseudo Label
6.6. Deep Learning-Based vs. Iterative Image Reconstruction for Unenhanced Brain CT: A Quantitative Comparison of Image Quality
6.7. Image Quality Improvement in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction of Head Computed Tomography Examination
7. Modality: Ultrasonography
Use of Automated Machine Learning for Classifying Hemoperitoneum on Ultrasonographic Images of Morrison’s Pouch: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
8. Modality: Mammography
8.1. Avoiding Tissue Overlap in 2D Images: Single-Slice DBT Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks
8.2. Automated Computer-Assisted Medical Decision-Making System Based on Morphological Shape and Skin Thickness Analysis for Asymmetry Detection in Mammographic Images
9. Other Imaging Techniques (Histological Analyses, Comparative Studies)
9.1. DBE-Net: Dual Boundary-Guided Attention Exploration Network for Polyp Segmentation
9.2. Application of Deep Learning Methods in a Moroccan Ophthalmic Center: Analysis and Discussion
9.3. Deep Learning- and Expert Knowledge-Based Feature Extraction and Performance Evaluation in Breast Histopathology Images
9.4. Deep-Learning-Based Dose Predictor for Glioblastoma–Assessing the Sensitivity and Robustness for Dose Awareness in Contouring
9.5. Exploration and Enhancement of Classifiers in the Detection of Lung Cancer from Histopathological Images
9.6. Towards Realistic 3D Models of Tumor Vascular Networks
9.7. Combining State-of-the-Art Pre-Trained Deep Learning Models: A Noble Approach for Skin Cancer Detection Using Max Voting Ensemble
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
No. | Objective | Localization | Imaging | Methods | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | A systematic review of the performance of DL models that use MRI to detect BMs in cancer patients | Brain | MRI | 25 DL algorithms | Deep learning algorithms effectively detect BMs with a pooled sensitivity of 89% |
2 | Outcome prediction for cancer patients infected with COVID-19 | Lung | CT | 3D radiometric analysis | COVID-19 infection may have further detrimental effects on the lungs of cancer patients |
3 | Prediction of the weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio using simple knee radiographs | Knee | X-ray | CNN | Proposed method for predicting lower limb alignment demonstrated comparable accuracy to that of direct measurement using whole-leg radiographs |
4 | Breast cancer detection using digital breast tomosynthesis | Breast | Digital breast tomosynthesis | CNN | Accuracy of 93.2%; sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score of 92%, 94%, 94%, and 94%, respectively |
5 | Comparative study of different models for prostate segmentation | Prostate | MRI | Various segmentation deep networks | nnUNet gives most accurate segmentation results |
6 | New approach for polyp segmentation | Polyp | Endoscopic images | Dual boundary-guided attention exploration network (DBE-Net) for polyp segmentation | mDice of the proposed model reaches 82.4% and 80.6% for 2 datasets |
7 | Construction of a nomogram based on multiparametric MR images for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer | Cervix | MRI | Extraction of hand-selected (including texture) and DL-based radiomics features. | DL features slightly overlap with hand-selected ones in response prediction |
8 | Testing various CNN architectures to assess Alzheimer’s disease severity | Brain | SPECT | MobileNet V2, NASNetMobile, VGG16, Inception V3, and ResNet | Good results for all networks; the best was Resnet, with an average accuracy 65% |
9 | Using an artificial intelligence (AI) technique to develop an automatic AI prediction model for the collateral status of mCTA | Brain | Multiphase CTA | CNN | Prediction model reached an accuracy of 0.746 ± 0.008 |
10 | Application of deep learning to evaluate Wilms tumor volume | Brain | MRI | nnUnet for tumor segmentation compared to manual segmentation | nnUnet: median Dice of 0.90, median HD95 of 7.2 mm. Deep learning shows potential to replace manual segmentation |
11 | Estimation of PSA level based on MR prostate image texture | Prostate | MRI | Classical texture analysis | Multiparametric classification using MIL-SVM: 92% accuracy |
12 | Detection of both exudates and hemorrhages in color fundus images | Eye | Non-mydriatic retinal camera | Unet for exudate and hemorrhage segmentation, YOLO5 for detection | Segmentation: Dice 85%; detection: 100% |
13 | Assessment of ER applications in the field of diagnostic imaging | All | USG, X-ray, CT | ER technologies | ER has significant potential to improve accuracy and efficiency in diagnostic imaging procedures and enhance the patient experience |
14 | Evaluation of three feature extraction methods and their performance in breast cancer diagnosis | Breast | Histopathology images | Three feature extraction methods: basic CNN transfer learning, VGG16, and a knowledge-based approach. All tested on standard classifiers | Accuracy: CNN: 85%, VGG16: 86%, knowledge-based (geometrical, directional, intensity features): 98% |
15 | More accurate classification of enhancing foci in MRIs of BRCA PV carriers for early breast cancer detection | Breast | MRI | CNN for tumor and non-tumor ROI detection | Correct classification of ~65% of tumors at an early time point |
16 | Multiclass segmentation and classification of liver images into lesions (6?) and normal tissue | Liver | Multiparametric MRI | nnUnet for segmentation, image registration, final UNet segmentation | Healthy liver/lesion classification: AUC ROC: 0.85, sensitivity and specificity: 0.79 |
17 | Reducing image artefacts by inferring missing measurements using shape priors | Phantoms | CT | Deep convolutional GAN (DCGAN) architecture combining limited acquisition data and shape information | Improvement of reconstructed image quality by 7 dB Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio compared to other methods |
18 | Classification of presence or absence of hemoperitoneum in USG images of Morrison’s pouch | Peritoneum | USG | Open-source DL provided by Google (https://teachablemachine.withgoogle.co, accessed on 1 March 2023) | External validation: sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC were 94%, 99%, and 0.97, respectively. |
19 | Denoising weighted filtered backprojection (wFBP) reconstructions | Phantom images, mouse scans | Photon-counting CT | Deep learning (UnetU) model for iterative reconstruction estimation from weighted filtered backprojection | UnetU provides higher SSIM PSNR when compared to classical ME NLM approach |
20 | Segmentation of liver portal veins from unlabeled H-phase and E-phase images by using the label of P-phase | Liver portal veins | CTA | Portal vein segmentation network (PVSegNet) applied to multiphase images | Portal vein segmented from H-phase and E-phase images achieved DSC 0.76 and 0.86 and Jaccard 0.61 and 0.76, respectively |
21 | Detection of active inflammation in the form of bone marrow edema (BME) in iliac and sacral bones | Sacroiliac joints | MRI | Own segmentation algorithm based on joint morphology | The Dice coefficient for automated bone segmentations with respect to reference manual segmentations was 0.9820 |
22 | Comparison of the performance of path-finding algorithms for vessel labeling | Brain | 3D TOF MRA | Three path-finding methods: depth-first search, Dijkstra’s, and A* algorithm | The best accuracy was observed using Dijkstra’s method |
23 | Quality comparison of two reconstruction algorithms of brain CT images | Brain | CT | DLIR (deep learning image reconstruction) and iterative reconstruction ASIR-V algorithms | DLIR shows superiority in both subjective and objective (SNR, CNR) assessments of image quality improvement |
24 | Building a 3D dose prediction model for glioblastoma VMAT treatment and testing its robustness and sensitivity for the purpose of quality assurance of automatic contouring | Brain | CT | Two-level cascaded 3D U-net trained for dose prediction | Improvement in dose and DVH score values, improvement in the spatial distribution of the predicted dose in the updated models at exactly the locations of concern |
25 | Overview of AI in radiology | All | All | Classical and deep ML | AI in radiology improves the quality of healthcare; however, several limitations exist |
26 | Quality comparison of two reconstruction algorithms of brain CT images | Brain | CT | Iterative (AIDR-3D) and deep learning-based (AiCE) reconstruction algorithms | AIDR-3D: lower artifact index, AiCE: higher CNR, lower median image noise, dependence on brain area |
27 | Object detection in chest X-ray images | Chest | Chest X-ray | YOLO v3 deep network | Average precision for 4 object classes: 0.815, APR: 0.987 |
28 | Development of software tool for generation of MR synthetic images (various sequences) | Brain | MRI T1, T2, T2*, PD | Algorithm that modifies sequence parameters of input images | Qualitative visual assessment |
29 | Mitigation of motion-induced signal loss in liver DWI images | Liver | MRI DWI | Algorithm based on spatial scaling of average diffusion-weighted images | Reduced ADC bias, improved homogeneity of liver DWIs |
30 | Detection of lung cancer using histopathological images (LC25000 Dataset: Benign Lung tissue and Lung Adenocarcinomas) | Lungs | Optical histopathological images of lung and colon cancer cases | Kernel Fuzzy C-Means segmentation, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Grey Wolf Optimization for feature extraction/selection; classification based on classical ML models | Overall accuracy of 91.57% (in classifying benign and adenocarcinoma classes) |
31 | Reconstruction of a 3D tumor vascular network from histologic slices | Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | Microscopic images of histological samples | Image registration (Fiji, Improved CWR), own vessel segmentation algorithm, 3D reconstruction by interpolation | Visual quality assessment of the obtained vascular network |
32 | Asymmetry detection in mammographic images for skin cancer detection support | Breast | Mammography | Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) for shape analysis; Growing Seed Region (GSR) method for breast skin segmentation | Accuracy of asymmetry detection: 83%, accuracy of skin segmentation: 66.7–90.5% |
33 | Simulation of respiratory lung motion and extraction of information for early diagnosis of lung cancer | Lungs | Chest X-ray | Combination of U-Net and a long short-term memory (LSTM) network for image generation and sequential prediction | prediction of respiratory motion: average Dice 0.96 |
34 | Skin cancer classification (malignant vs. benign) in available datasets | Skin | Dermoscopic images | Ensemble of deep networks with different architectures | Classification accuracy: 93.18%, AUC: 0.932 |
References
- Ozkara, B.; Chen, M.; Federau, C.; Karabacak, M.; Briere, T.; Li, J.; Wintermark, M. Deep Learning for Detecting Brain Metastases on MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2023, 15, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmanuddin, S.; Jamil, A.; Chaudhry, A.; Seto, T.; Brase, J.; Motarjem, P.; Khan, M.; Tomasetti, C.; Farwa, U.; Boswell, W.; et al. COVID and Cancer: A Complete 3D Advanced Radiological CT-Based Analysis to Predict the Outcome. Cancers 2023, 15, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, H.; Park, S.; Ho, J.; Park, S.; Cho, J.; Lee, Y. Key-Point Detection Algorithm of Deep Learning Can Predict Lower Limb Alignment with Simple Knee Radiographs. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mendes, J.; Matela, N.; Garcia, N. Avoiding Tissue Overlap in 2D Images: Single-Slice DBT Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Tomography 2023, 9, 398–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodrigues, N.; Silva, S.; Vanneschi, L.; Papanikolaou, N. A Comparative Study of Automated Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Prostate MRI. Cancers 2023, 15, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, H.; Xu, C.; Nie, C.; Han, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, C. DBE-Net: Dual Boundary-Guided Attention Exploration Network for Polyp Segmentation. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Wu, C.; Xiao, Z.; Lv, F.; Liu, Y. A Deep Learning Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Two-Center Study. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lien, W.; Yeh, C.; Chang, C.; Chang, C.; Wang, W.; Chen, C.; Lin, Y. Convolutional Neural Networks to Classify Alzheimer’ Disease Severity Based on SPECT Images: A Comparative Study. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.; Chiang, H.; Hsieh, C.; Chou, C.; Jhou, Z.; Hou, T.; Shaw, J. Using Deep-Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Technique to Automatically Evaluate the Collateral Status of Multiphase CTA in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Tomography 2023, 9, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buser, M.; van der Steeg, A.; Wijnen, M.; Fitski, M.; van Tinteren, H.; van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M.; Littooij, A.; van der Velden, B. Radiologic versus Segmentation Measurements to Quantify Wilms Tumor Volume on MRI in Pediatric Patients. Cancers 2023, 15, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibala, S.; Obuchowicz, R.; Lasek, J.; Schneider, Z.; Piorkowski, A.; Pociask, E.; Nurzynska, K. Textural Features of MR Images Correlate with an Increased Risk of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients with High PSA Levels. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farahat, Z.; Zrira, N.; Souissi, N.; Benamar, S.; Belmekki, M.; Ngote, M.; Megdiche, K. Application of Deep Learning Methods in a Moroccan Ophthalmic Center: Analysis and Discussion. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kukla, P.; Maciejewska, K.; Strojna, I.; Zapał, M.; Zwierzchowski, G.; Bąk, B. Extended Reality in Diagnostic Imaging-A Literature Review. Tomography 2023, 9, 1071–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kode, H.; Barkana, B. Deep Learning- and Expert Knowledge-Based Feature Extraction and Performance Evaluation in Breast Histopathology Images. Cancers 2023, 15, 3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anaby, D.; Shavin, D.; Zimmerman-Moreno, G.; Nissan, N.; Friedman, E.; Sklair-Levy, M. ‘Earlier than Early’ Detection of Breast Cancer in Israeli BRCA Mutation Carriers Applying AI-Based Analysis to Consecutive MRI Scans. Cancers 2023, 15, 3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skwirczyński, M.; Tabor, Z.; Lasek, J.; Schneider, Z.; Gibała, S.; Kucybała, I.; Urbanik, A.; Obuchowicz, R. Deep Learning Algorithm for Differentiating Patients with a Healthy Liver from Patients with Liver Lesions Based on MR Images. Cancers 2023, 15, 3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Valat, E.; Farrahi, K.; Blumensath, T. Sinogram Inpainting with Generative Adversarial Networks and Shape Priors. Tomography 2023, 9, 1137–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeong, D.; Jeong, W.; Lee, J.; Park, S. Use of Automated Machine Learning for Classifying Hemoperitoneum on Ultrasonographic Images of Morrison’s Pouch: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nadkarni, R.; Clark, D.; Allphin, A.; Badea, C. A Deep Learning Approach for Rapid and Generalizable Denoising of Photon-Counting Micro-CT Images. Tomography 2023, 9, 1286–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, G.; Xie, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Yao, D.; Chen, S.; Shi, Y. Segmentation of Portal Vein in Multiphase CTA Image Based on Unsupervised Domain Transfer and Pseudo Label. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ożga, J.; Wyka, M.; Raczko, A.; Tabor, Z.; Oleniacz, Z.; Korman, M.; Wojciechowski, W. Performance of Fully Automated Algorithm Detecting Bone Marrow Edema in Sacroiliac Joints. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, S.; Kim, Y. Effects of Path-Finding Algorithms on the Labeling of the Centerlines of Circle of Willis Arteries. Tomography 2023, 9, 1423–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pula, M.; Kucharczyk, E.; Zdanowicz, A.; Guzinski, M. Image Quality Improvement in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction of Head Computed Tomography Examination. Tomography 2023, 9, 1485–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poel, R.; Kamath, A.; Willmann, J.; Andratschke, N.; Ermiş, E.; Aebersold, D.; Manser, P.; Reyes, M. Deep-Learning-Based Dose Predictor for Glioblastoma-Assessing the Sensitivity and Robustness for Dose Awareness in Contouring. Cancers 2023, 15, 4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najjar, R. Redefining Radiology: A Review of Artificial Intelligence Integration in Medical Imaging. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cozzi, A.; Cè, M.; De Padova, G.; Libri, D.; Caldarelli, N.; Zucconi, F.; Oliva, G.; Cellina, M. Deep Learning-Based Versus Iterative Image Reconstruction for Unenhanced Brain CT: A Quantitative Comparison of Image Quality. Tomography 2023, 9, 1629–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kufel, J.; Bargieł-Łączek, K.; Koźlik, M.; Czogalik, Ł.; Dudek, P.; Magiera, M.; Bartnikowska, W.; Lis, A.; Paszkiewicz, I.; Kocot, S.; et al. Chest X-ray Foreign Objects Detection Using Artificial Intelligence. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peretti, L.; Donatelli, G.; Cencini, M.; Cecchi, P.; Buonincontri, G.; Cosottini, M.; Tosetti, M.; Costagli, M. Generating Synthetic Radiological Images with PySynthMRI: An Open-Source Cross-Platform Tool. Tomography 2023, 9, 1723–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raspe, J.; Harder, F.; Rupp, S.; McTavish, S.; Peeters, J.; Weiss, K.; Makowski, M.; Braren, R.; Karampinos, D.; Van, A. Retrospective Motion Artifact Reduction by Spatial Scaling of Liver Diffusion-Weighted Images. Tomography 2023, 9, 1839–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shanmugam, K.; Rajaguru, H. Exploration and Enhancement of Classifiers in the Detection of Lung Cancer from Histopathological Images. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindemann, M.; Glänzer, L.; Roeth, A.; Schmitz-Rode, T.; Slabu, I. Towards Realistic 3D Models of Tumor Vascular Networks. Cancers 2023, 15, 5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bayareh-Mancilla, R.; Medina-Ramos, L.; Toriz-Vázquez, A.; Hernández-Rodríguez, Y.; Cigarroa-Mayorga, O. Automated Computer-Assisted Medical Decision-Making System Based on Morphological Shape and Skin Thickness Analysis for Asymmetry Detection in Mammographic Images. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, D.; Huang, Y.; Li, B.; Cai, J.; Ren, G. Dynamic Chest Radiograph Simulation Technique with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Cancers 2023, 15, 5768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hossain, M.; Hossain, M.; Arefin, M.; Akhtar, F.; Blake, J. Combining State-of-the-Art Pre-Trained Deep Learning Models: A Noble Approach for Skin Cancer Detection Using Max Voting Ensemble. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strzelecki, M.; Badura, P. Machine Learning for Biomedical Application. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piórkowski, A.; Obuchowicz, R.; Urbanik, A.; Strzelecki, M. Advances in Musculoskeletal Imaging and Their Applications. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strzelecki, M.; Kociołek, M.; Strąkowska, M.; Kozłowski, M.; Grzybowski, A.; Szczypiński, P.M. Artificial intelligence in the detection of skin cancer: State of the art. In Clinics in Dermatology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayerhoefer, M.E.; Materka, A.; Langs, G.; Häggström, I.; Szczypiński, P.; Gibbs, P.; Cook, G. Introduction to Radiomics. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Obuchowicz, R.; Kruszyńska, J.; Strzelecki, M. Classifying median nerves in carpal tunnel syndrome: Ultrasound image analysis. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 41, 335–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurzynska, K.; Piórkowski, A.; Strzelecki, M.; Kociołek, M.; Banyś, R.P.; Obuchowicz, R. Differentiating age and sex in vertebral body CT scans–Texture analysis versus deep learning approach. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng. 2024, 44, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Obuchowicz, R.; Strzelecki, M.; Piórkowski, A. Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Image Processing—A Review. Cancers 2024, 16, 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101870
Obuchowicz R, Strzelecki M, Piórkowski A. Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Image Processing—A Review. Cancers. 2024; 16(10):1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101870
Chicago/Turabian StyleObuchowicz, Rafał, Michał Strzelecki, and Adam Piórkowski. 2024. "Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Image Processing—A Review" Cancers 16, no. 10: 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101870
APA StyleObuchowicz, R., Strzelecki, M., & Piórkowski, A. (2024). Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Image Processing—A Review. Cancers, 16(10), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101870