Next Article in Journal
Methods for Overcoming Chemoresistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Keeping the Focus on Cancer Stem Cells, a Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Outcome and Survival Analysis of Multicenter Lung Metastasectomy for Primary Liver Tumor with Pulmonary Metastasis
Previous Article in Journal
Correlation of Immunomodulatory Cytokines with Tumor Volume and Cerebrospinal Fluid in Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Treatment Strategies for Locoregional Recurrence in Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma: An Updated Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inverse Correlation between pks-Carrying Escherichia coli Abundance in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases and the Number of Organs Involved in Recurrence

1
Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR), 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
2
Division of Pathology, Cancer Institute, JFCR, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
3
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, JFCR, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
4
Department of Clinical Chemotherapy, Cancer Chemotherapy Center, JFCR, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
5
Graduate School of Engineering, Chiba Institute of Technology, 2-17-1 Tsudanuma, Narashino, Chiba 275-0016, Japan
6
Department of Pathology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780 Komuro, Ina, Kita-adachi-gun, Saitama 362-0806, Japan
7
Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, JFCR, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
8
Pathology Project for Molecular Targets, Cancer Institute, JFCR, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
9
Division of Tumor Pathology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0431, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 3003; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173003
Submission received: 1 August 2024 / Revised: 26 August 2024 / Accepted: 28 August 2024 / Published: 29 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue “Cancer Metastasis” in 2023–2024)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study explores whether Escherichia coli carrying the polyketide synthetase (pks) gene cluster in colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis tissues influence immune responses and cancer recurrence patterns. Analyzing tissues from 239 patients, we found that pks+ E. coli was present in 66.7% of liver metastasis cases. Higher levels of pks+ E. coli were associated with lower levels of the serum C-reactive protein, fewer densities of CD4+ cells and CD163+ cells in the tumor microenvironment, and a reduction in the number of organs affected by recurrent metastasis. These findings suggest that pks+ E. coli may influence both systemic and local immune responses, potentially reducing the diversity of affected metastatic organs.

Abstract

Colibactin, a genotoxin produced by Escherichia coli strains harboring the polyketide synthetase (pks) gene cluster, causes DNA damage and somatic mutations. pks+ E. coli is enriched in primary colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with clonal driver mutations, but its role in CRC liver metastasis is unclear. We assessed the association of pks+ E. coli in CRC liver metastasis tissues with systemic and local immune responses and the number of organs involved in recurrence using specimens and clinicopathological data from 239 patients with CRC liver metastasis who underwent metastasectomy. The levels of pks+ E. coli in fresh-frozen specimens were quantified as “very low” (<50th percentile), “low” (50th to 75th percentiles), and “high” (>75th percentile) using a digital PCR. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells was performed using tissue microarrays. Systemic inflammation was evaluated using serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. pks+ E. coli was detected in 66.7% (157 of 239) liver metastasis tissues. Higher levels of pks+ E. coli were associated with decreased serum CRP levels and reduced densities of CD4+ cells and CD163+ cells in the tumor-immune microenvironment. The “high” pks+ E. coli group had fewer metastatic organs involved than the “very low” pks+ E. coli group (mean number of organs: 1.00 vs. 1.23). These findings suggest that pks+ E. coli play a modulating role in CRC metastasis.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide and is a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality. Liver metastasis develops in approximately 20–30% of patients during the course of CRC [1], and has a 5-year survival rate of less than 5% in cases in which curative surgery is not possible [2,3,4]. Even in patients undergoing curative-intent resection for liver metastases, recurrence is a major concern, occurring in 80–85% of cases [5,6,7]. Therefore, the factors contributing to the metastatic progression of CRC, especially factors within the hepatic microenvironment, need to be clarified.
Escherichia coli strains of the B2 phylotype commonly harbor a pathogenicity gene cluster termed polyketide synthases (pks) that encodes enzymes for colibactin biosynthesis [8,9,10]. Experimental studies have shown that colibactin can alkylate DNA, induce DNA double-strand breaks, and cause specific somatic mutations in human cells [11,12,13]. Previous studies found that the primary CRC increased numbers of adherent E. coli compared with non-neoplastic colonic mucosa, and the presence of pks+ E. coli is associated with an increase in clonal driver mutations and lower disease stages [14,15]. In addition, evidence suggests that pks+ E. coli suppresses the host immune response in the tumor-immune microenvironment (TIME) of the primary site [16]. However, the role of pks+ E. coli in the TIME of liver metastasis tissues and its effect on recurrence patterns are unclear.
The hepatic TIME provides premetastatic niches that support CRC cell implantation and proliferation [17,18]. Concurrently, systemic inflammation promotes CRC progression and metastasis by inducing angiogenesis and increasing vascular permeability [19]. Elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have been identified as an adverse prognostic indicator in CRC liver metastasis [20]. Additionally, the prognosis in metastatic CRC is associated with the number of organs with metastases [21]. Despite these insights into the complex interplay between the hepatic TIME, systemic inflammation, and CRC liver metastasis, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear and require investigation.
This study evaluated the association of pks+ E. coli in CRC liver metastasis tissues with systemic and local immune responses and the diversity of metastatic organs involved in recurrence. Using fresh-frozen samples to quantify pks DNA levels, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens for evaluating the TIME and clinical data of serum CRP levels and metastatic organs involved in recurrence after R0 metastasectomy were used to explore the potential role of pks+ E. coli in the complex dynamics of CRC liver metastasis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Specimens

Specimens from surgical resection were collected from a series of patients diagnosed with CRC who underwent R0 liver metastasectomy at the Cancer Institute Hospital in Tokyo, Japan, between January 2005 and December 2015. These specimens, sourced from metastatic liver sites, were then segregated and conserved as fresh-frozen samples and in FFPE blocks. The inclusion criteria included having ample fresh-frozen and FFPE samples available in addition to comprehensive pathological reports. Detailed clinicopathological information, including age, sex, preoperative blood tests, tumor site, the number of liver metastases, chemotherapy history, and the number of organs involved at the time of relapse, was collated from digital medical records. The organs evaluated as sites of metastasis and recurrence include the brain, lungs, liver, adrenal glands, peritoneum, spleen, bones, and lymph nodes. The medical history of each patient was carefully reviewed by the research team. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (approval number: 2016-1087), and the requirement for informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of the investigation.

2.2. Pathological Analysis

Sections of tissue, 4 μm thick each, derived from FFPE samples, were subjected to staining with hematoxylin and eosin. The diagnosis of CRC liver metastasis was validated by two pathologists (Y.S. and K.I.) based on the criteria of the 5th edition of the World Health Organization guidelines [22].

2.2.1. Tissue Microarray

To immunohistochemically assess the tumor and associated tumor-infiltrating cells, a tissue microarray was constructed using FFPE tumor samples as previously described [23]. Specifically, the targeted areas were cored from the donor paraffin blocks using a 2 mm needle, and these samples were subsequently arranged into a recipient block using a KIN-1 manual tissue arrayer (Azumaya, Tokyo, Japan). For each tumor, three core samples that best represented the predominant histological features were selected. The tumor microarray sections, each 4 µm thick, were prepared for immunohistochemical analysis, as described below.

2.2.2. Immunohistochemistry

Immune cell infiltrations in the TIME were evaluated using anti-CD8 (1:3; clone C8/144B; catalog number 413201; Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan), anti-CD4 (1:2; clone 4B12; catalog number 413951; Nichirei), anti-CD20 (1:800; clone L26; catalog number NCL-L-CD20-L26; Leica Biosystems, Newcastle, UK), anti-FOXP3 (1:100; clone 236A/E7; catalog number ab20034; Abcam, MA, USA), anti-CD163 (1:1200; clone 10D6; catalog number CD163-L-CE; Leica Biosystems), and anti-CD68 (1:1000, clone KP-1; DAKO, catalog number M0814; Glostrup, Denmark) mouse monoclonal antibodies. For the CD68 antigens, a 5 min incubation with a 200-fold dilution of protease K was performed. Other antigens were activated by heating at 100 °C for 20 min in an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-surfactant buffer (pH 9.0). Non-cancerous liver tissue in the same tissue microarray section, including hepatocytes, bile ducts, lymphocytes, and nerves, was used as positive and negative controls. Immunostaining was performed using a Bond-III automated staining system (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA), and antigens were detected using a Bond Polymer Refine Detection Kit (Leica Microsystems).

2.2.3. Evaluation of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Variables in Tissue Microarrays

To quantify the number of immune cells infiltrating tumors, immunostained sections were digitized and analyzed as previously described [24,25]. Briefly, immunostained sections at ×40 magnification were scanned with a NanoZoomer Digital Pathology System (Hamamatsu Photonics KK, Shizuoka, Japan) at a resolution of 0.55 pixel/μm. The images were semiautomatically digitized using the proprietary NanoZoomer Digital Pathology Image file format. Fiji, an open-source platform for biological-image analysis [26], was used to quantify the number of immune cells within the tumors. A representative microscopic field from each tissue core was chosen from the scanned tumor microarray images, and Fiji was used for the analysis. Three tissue cores were analyzed per tumor, and the mean number of immune cells was calculated to represent the immune cell infiltration in the tumor.

2.3. DNA Extraction and Digital PCR to Quantify Polyketide Synthase (pks)

Genomic DNA was isolated from fresh-frozen CRC liver metastasis tissue specimens using the NucleoSpin Tissue Kit (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) and quantified using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). The initial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted using 25 μL of the sample solution comprising 100 ng of extracted DNA and specific primers designed to detect polyketide synthase (pks)-specific sequences (Table S1). The initial PCR assay for pks involved an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles with denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, followed by annealing at 57 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. For quantification, the initial PCR product of pks was diluted 106-fold and subjected to an EvaGreen-based Droplet Digital PCR using 1 μL of the diluted sample. To determine the relative amount of pks DNA in a sample based on the quantity of gDNA input, an EvaGreen-based Droplet Digital PCR was performed on samples comprising 10 ng of gDNA with specific primers for the reference human gene SLCO2A1 (Table S1). The EvaGreen-based Droplet Digital PCR conditions for pks included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles with denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, followed by annealing at 57 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and SLCO2A1 included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles with denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, followed by annealing and extension at 60 °C for 1 min. The Droplet Digital PCR was performed using the QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and EvaGreen assays. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of pks DNA quantification, we adhered to the recommended contamination control guidelines for low-biomass microbiome research [27].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using R software version 4.2.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). For analysis, cases were categorized into high, low, and very low groups according to the pks DNA levels. Welch’s t-test was used to assess the differences in mean values between the two groups, whereas one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparisons among the three groups. Differences in the median values among the three groups were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. To account for multiple comparisons and reduce the risk of a type I error, Bonferroni correction was applied to the P values obtained from the pairwise comparisons. The chi-squared test was employed to evaluate the relationship between the categorized number of metastatic sites and the different pks+ E. coli groups. Ordinal logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between pks+ E. coli DNA quantities in liver metastases (as an ordinal independent variable) and the density of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, with statistical significance set as two-sided p values less than 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Detection of pks+ E. coli in CRC Liver Metastasis Tissues

We examined liver metastasis tissues from 239 patients with CRC and detected pks+ E. coli DNA in 159 cases (66.7%). To assess the relationship between pks+ E. coli abundance and clinicopathological features, we stratified the cases into three groups based on the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA present in the liver metastasis tissue: “very low” (below the 50th percentile; N = 201), “low” (between the 50th and 75th percentiles; N = 19), and “high” (above the 75th percentile; N = 19). Patients’ age, sex, and primary tumor location did not differ significantly according to the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA present (Table S2).

3.2. Systemic Immune Responses

The level of CRP, an indicator of systemic inflammation, was inversely associated with the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA in CRC liver metastasis tissues (Ptrend = 0.007; Figure 1). The “high” pks+ E. coli group showed lower CRP levels than the “very low” pks+ E. coli group (median: 0.07 vs. 0.10 mg/dL; p = 0.013). Within the “Very low” group, no comorbidities known to substantially influence CRP levels were observed, aside from the patients’ primary diseases. In a secondary analysis, we separated the “Very low” group into “None” (N = 80) and “Detectable low” (N = 121) groups. The analysis across the four groups—”None”, “Detectable low”, “Low”, and “High”—revealed similar trends (Figure S1). These data indicate an inverse association between the presence of pks+ E. coli at metastatic sites and systemic inflammation.

3.3. Tumor-Immune Microenvironment (TIME)

Within the tissue microarray tissue cores, tumor-infiltrating immune cells showed relatively consistent patterns and were characterized as either dispersed or clustered. Immunohistochemical characterization identified these cells as CD8+, CD4+, CD20+, FOXP3+, CD163+, or CD68+ cells, and the density of each cell type in the tumor-immune microenvironment (TIME) was quantified (Figure S2). The densities of CD4+ and CD163+ cells decreased with an increase in pks+ E. coli DNA in CRC liver metastasis tissues (Ptrend = 0.047 for CD4+ cells and Ptrend = 0.014 for CD163+ cells; Figure 2). Compared with the “very low” pks+ E. coli group, the “high” pks+ E. coli group had fewer CD4+ cells (p = 0.033) and CD163+ cells (p = 0.023) in the TIME. Conversely, no significant trends or differences were observed in the densities of other immune cell types, such as CD8+, CD20+, FOXP3+, or CD68+ cells, between groups stratified by pks+ E. coli DNA levels. The secondary analysis, with “Very low” split into “None” and “Detectable low”, revealed similar trends across the four groups in tumor-infiltrating immune cells, with the CD163 category maintaining statistical significance (Figure S3).

3.4. Diversity of Metastatic Organs Involved in Recurrence

To assess the likelihood of recurrent extracolonic metastasis following R0 resection with hepatic metastasectomy in patients who experienced recurrence, we evaluated the number of organs involved in 152 such cases. The distribution of cases among the “very low”, “low”, and “high” pks+ E. coli groups was 128, 13, and 11, respectively. A significant inverse association was observed between the amount of pks+ E. coli present in liver metastasis tissue and the number of metastatic organs involved in recurrence (p = 0.034; Table 1). Specifically, the “high” pks+ E. coli group had a significantly lower number of metastatic organs involved than the “very low” pks+ E. coli group, with metastasis confined to the liver in all 11 cases of recurrent metastasis following R0 resection with hepatic metastasectomy in the “high” pks+ E. coli group (mean number of organs: 1.00 vs. 1.23 in the “high” vs. “very low” pks+ E. coli groups; Welch’s t-test, p < 0.00001; and Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.00001). A secondary analysis that subdivided the “Very low” group into “None” and “Detectable low” categories showed similar trends (Table S3).

4. Discussion

This study provides new insights into the complex associations between pks+ E. coli DNA levels in CRC liver metastasis tissues and systemic immune responses, the TIME, and patterns of metastatic recurrence. Using a highly sensitive method to detect pks+ E. coli DNA, we confirmed its presence in liver metastatic sites. By categorizing the samples into three groups based on the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA present in metastasis tissue, we found associations with both systemic and local immune responses. Specifically, higher amounts of pks+ E. coli DNA were associated with reduced systemic inflammation, as indicated by lower serum CRP levels and alterations in the TIME and by the reduced numbers of CD4+ and CD163+ cells. Additionally, the number of metastatic organs involved in recurrence was inversely associated with the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA present. These associations suggest that pks+ E. coli may modulate immune responses, thereby contributing to a decreased diversity of metastatic organs in CRC metastatic tumors harboring pks+ E. coli. Our findings provide a new perspective on the interplay between pks+ E. coli and host immunity in the complex dynamics of CRC metastasis.
The intratumoral microbiota can influence metastatic tropism partly by modulating the TIME [28,29,30]. Specifically, by inducing innate immune cells, including macrophages, intratumoral microbiota contributes to the formation of a premetastatic niche, a favorable microenvironment for metastatic cell implantation and proliferation [28]. In this study, the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA present in CRC liver metastases was inversely associated with the number of organs affected by recurrent metastases. This finding suggests that a high load of pks+ E. coli may influence metastatic behavior, potentially limiting the spread to fewer organs. Additionally, a high abundance of pks+ E. coli was associated with reduced densities of CD4+ T cells and CD163+ M2-type macrophages in metastatic tissues. Interestingly, similar patterns were noted for other lymph cell types, including CD8+ cells, implying that a reduction in CD4+ cells may indirectly contribute to this effect. CD163+ M2-type macrophages promote tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Furthermore, a recent study using mouse models found that intratumoral E. coli reduces the density of M2-type macrophages in the TIME via the Toll-like receptor 4 pathway [31]. Emerging evidence has also shown that CD163+ M2-type macrophages play a role in creating an immunosuppressive, pro-angiogenic, and pro-invasive TIME [32,33,34]. The observed decrease in these cell types may indicate a shift toward an immunocompetent TIME, potentially hindering metastatic spread. The potential effect of TIME modulation by pks+ E. coli on metastatic trophism warrants further investigation.
The evaluation of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, FOXP3+ regulatory T cells, CD20+ B cells, CD68+ macrophages, and CD163+ macrophages provides valuable insights into the TIME that may influence patient outcomes [35,36,37,38]. The integration of these markers, like in studies with immunoscore-metastatic and immunoscore-macrophage models, has consistently shown a better prognostic stratification, emphasizing their collective influence compared to individual markers alone [37]. While the exact mechanisms by which pks+ E. coli modulates the TIME remain unclear, this represents a promising avenue for future research, potentially uncovering novel therapeutic targets and strategies to enhance anti-tumor immunity.
Intratumoral microbiota modulates systemic immune responses [29,39,40], which may influence metastatic trophism. For example, a study using CRC mouse models showed that intratumoral Fusobacterium nucleatum upregulates several inflammatory cytokines in serum [39]. In this study, we found an inverse association between the abundance of pks+ E coli and serum CRP levels. This finding suggests that pks+ E. coli may suppress tumor-induced tissue destruction and progression, potentially limiting metastatic spread to fewer organs. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether and how pks+ E. coli modulates immune responses and influences metastatic organ tropism. Insights from such studies could help develop potential strategies that target pks+ E. coli and related immune pathways, thereby advancing the management of metastatic CRC.
This study has several limitations. First, this is a retrospective analysis and, thus, cannot establish causality. Second, pks+ E. coli DNA was quantified using fresh-frozen specimens obtained from one liver metastasis per patient. Although this method might not reflect the full variability across all metastatic lesions, efforts were made to reduce sampling bias by using tissues from the largest metastatic lesion for analysis. Third, the use of tissue microarrays for immunohistochemical analysis has inherent limitations owing to intra-tissue heterogeneity, which may not accurately represent the entire tumor. To mitigate this, we examined three tissue cores per tumor to capture a wider spectrum of the TIME. Fourth, the mechanisms underlying the observed associations remain unclear and require further investigation. Fifth, although we acknowledge the limitation of not directly assessing pks gene expression, the significant findings observed, despite the potential for underestimation due to non-expressing pks gene, highlight the importance of the association between pks+ E. coli and clinicopathological features of CRC liver metastasis. Future investigations incorporating expression analysis could further refine our understanding of the role of pks+ E. coli in CRC liver metastasis. Sixth, our study primarily focused on characterizing the T cell, B cell, and M2-type macrophage populations within the TIME. Future studies incorporating other immune cell types, including neutrophils and M1-type macrophages, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the association between pks+ E. coli and the immune landscape in CRC liver metastasis. Seventh, the observed heterogeneity in immune cell populations within the “Very low” pks+ E. coli group warrants further investigation to fully elucidate the complex interplay between the microbiome, tumor cells, and host immune responses that shape the TIME. Finally, because our cohort was derived from a single cancer hospital in Japan, the generalizability of our findings to other populations is uncertain. Therefore, larger prospective studies are required to validate our findings.

5. Conclusions

This study identified an inverse association between the abundance of pks+ E. coli in CRC liver metastases and the number of metastatic organs involved in recurrence. These findings suggest that this association may be influenced by the modulation of the TIME in metastatic sites and systemic immune responses. Further research is required to understand the clinical implications of these findings and the potential for developing targeted treatment strategies for the management of metastatic CRC.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers16173003/s1. Table S1: Primer sequences of pks (polyketide synthases) and SLCO2A1; Table S2: Clinical features based on the amount of pks+ E. coli in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis; Table S3. Recurrent organ diversity associated with pks+ E. coli in colorectal cancer liver metastasis: A four-group analysis; Figure S1: Box plots demonstrating the trend in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels stratified by pks+ E. coli DNA abundance, with the “Very low” group further subdivided into “None” and “Detectable low”; Figure S2: Representative histologic images of immune cell markers. Immunohistochemical staining of tumor-infiltrating immune cells for CD4, CD163, CD8, CD20, FOXP3, and CD68; Figure S3: Box plots demonstrating the distribution of immune cell markers stratified by pks+ E. coli DNA levels, further subdividing the “Very low” group into “None” and “Detectable low”.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S. and K.I.; methodology, Y.S., R.S., H.K., Y.T. and K.I.; formal analysis, Y.S. and R.S.; investigation, Y.S., R.S. and K.I.; resources, Y.T.; data curation, Y.S. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S., R.S. and K.I.; writing—review and editing, Y.S., R.S., H.K., Y.T., K.T., S.T. and K.I.; supervision, K.T., S.T. and K.I.; project administration, K.I.; funding acquisition, Y.S. and K.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant numbers JP22H02930 and JP23K18246 to K.I., and JP23K14491 to Y.S.) and the Yakult Bio-Science Foundation (to K.I.). None of the funding sources had a role in the study design, data collection/analysis, interpretation of data, or writing of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (reference number: 2016-1087).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective design of this study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Motoyoshi Iwakoshi, Shuhei Ishii, Reimi Asaka, and Hiroko Nagano for their kind assistance with sample preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Manfredi, S.; Lepage, C.; Hatem, C.; Coatmeur, O.; Faivre, J.; Bouvier, A.M. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. 2006, 244, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Thirion, P.; Wolmark, N.; Haddad, E.; Buyse, M.; Piedbois, P. Survival impact of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver: A re-analysis of 1458 non-operable patients randomised in 22 trials and 4 meta-analyses. Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Ann. Oncol. 1999, 10, 1317–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wagner, J.S.; Adson, M.A.; Van Heerden, J.A.; Adson, M.H.; Ilstrup, D.M. The natural history of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. A comparison with resective treatment. Ann. Surg. 1984, 199, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Scheithauer, W.; Rosen, H.; Kornek, G.V.; Sebesta, C.; Depisch, D. Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ 1993, 306, 752–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Choti, M.A.; Sitzmann, J.V.; Tiburi, M.F.; Sumetchotimetha, W.; Rangsin, R.; Schulick, R.D.; Lillemoe, K.D.; Yeo, C.J.; Cameron, J.L. Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann. Surg. 2002, 235, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nordlinger, B.; Guiguet, M.; Vaillant, J.C.; Balladur, P.; Boudjema, K.; Bachellier, P.; Jaeck, D. Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver. A prognostic scoring system to improve case selection, based on 1568 patients. Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Cancer 1996, 77, 1254–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fong, Y.; Cohen, A.M.; Fortner, J.G.; Enker, W.E.; Turnbull, A.D.; Coit, D.G.; Marrero, A.M.; Prasad, M.; Blumgart, L.H.; Brennan, M.F. Liver resection for colorectal metastases. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997, 15, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nougayrède, J.-P.; Homburg, S.; Taieb, F.; Boury, M.; Brzuszkiewicz, E.; Gottschalk, G.; Buchrieser, C.; Hacker, J.; Dobrindt, U.; Oswald, E. Escherichia coli Induces DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Eukaryotic Cells. Science 2006, 313, 848–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arthur, J.C.; Perez-Chanona, E.; Mühlbauer, M.; Tomkovich, S.; Uronis, J.M.; Fan, T.-J.; Campbell, B.J.; Abujamel, T.; Dogan, B.; Rogers, A.B.; et al. Intestinal Inflammation Targets Cancer-Inducing Activity of the Microbiota. Science 2012, 338, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xue, M.; Kim, C.S.; Healy, A.R.; Wernke, K.M.; Wang, Z.; Frischling, M.C.; Shine, E.E.; Wang, W.; Herzon, S.B.; Crawford, J.M. Structure elucidation of colibactin and its DNA cross-links. Science 2019, 365, eaax2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pleguezuelos-Manzano, C.; Puschhof, J.; Rosendahl Huber, A.; van Hoeck, A.; Wood, H.M.; Nomburg, J.; Gurjao, C.; Manders, F.; Dalmasso, G.; Stege, P.B.; et al. Mutational signature in colorectal cancer caused by genotoxic pks+ E. coli. Nature 2020, 580, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dziubańska-Kusibab, P.J.; Berger, H.; Battistini, F.; Bouwman, B.A.M.; Iftekhar, A.; Katainen, R.; Cajuso, T.; Crosetto, N.; Orozco, M.; Aaltonen, L.A.; et al. Colibactin DNA-damage signature indicates mutational impact in colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wilson, M.R.; Jiang, Y.; Villalta, P.W.; Stornetta, A.; Boudreau, P.D.; Carrá, A.; Brennan, C.A.; Chun, E.; Ngo, L.; Samson, L.D.; et al. The human gut bacterial genotoxin colibactin alkylates DNA. Science 2019, 363, eaar7785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, B.; Ramazzotti, D.; Heide, T.; Spiteri, I.; Fernandez-Mateos, J.; James, C.; Magnani, L.; Graham, T.A.; Sottoriva, A. Contribution of pks+ E. coli mutations to colorectal carcinogenesis. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arima, K.; Zhong, R.; Ugai, T.; Zhao, M.; Haruki, K.; Akimoto, N.; Lau, M.C.; Okadome, K.; Mehta, R.S.; Väyrynen, J.P.; et al. Western-Style Diet, pks Island-Carrying Escherichia coli, and Colorectal Cancer: Analyses from Two Large Prospective Cohort Studies. Gastroenterology 2022, 163, 862–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lopès, A.; Billard, E.; Casse, A.H.; Villéger, R.; Veziant, J.; Roche, G.; Carrier, G.; Sauvanet, P.; Briat, A.; Pagès, F.; et al. Colibactin-positive Escherichia coli induce a procarcinogenic immune environment leading to immunotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 146, 3147–3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Inamura, K.; Hamada, T.; Bullman, S.; Ugai, T.; Yachida, S.; Ogino, S. Cancer as microenvironmental, systemic and environmental diseases: Opportunity for transdisciplinary microbiomics science. Gut 2022, 71, 2107–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El Tekle, G.; Garrett, W.S. Bacteria in cancer initiation, promotion and progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2023, 23, 600–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tuomisto, A.E.; Makinen, M.J.; Vayrynen, J.P. Systemic inflammation in colorectal cancer: Underlying factors, effects, and prognostic significance. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 4383–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hamilton, T.D.; Leugner, D.; Kopciuk, K.; Dixon, E.; Sutherland, F.R.; Bathe, O.F. Identification of prognostic inflammatory factors in colorectal liver metastases. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rumpold, H.; Niedersuss-Beke, D.; Heiler, C.; Falch, D.; Wundsam, H.V.; Metz-Gercek, S.; Piringer, G.; Thaler, J. Prediction of mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-life population: A multicenter explorative analysis. BMC Cancer 2020, 20, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nagtegaal, I.D.; Odze, R.D.; Klimstra, D.; Paradis, V.; Rugge, M.; Schirmacher, P.; Washington, K.M.; Carneiro, F.; Cree, I.A.; the WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology 2020, 76, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shigematsu, Y.; Inamura, K.; Yamamoto, N.; Mise, Y.; Saiura, A.; Ishikawa, Y.; Takahashi, S.; Kanda, H. Impact of CDX2 expression status on the survival of patients after curative resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shigematsu, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Amori, G.; Kanda, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Takazawa, Y.; Takeuchi, K.; Inamura, K. Potential involvement of oncostatin M in the immunosuppressive tumor-immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma with vessels encapsulating tumor clusters. Hepatol. Res. 2023, 54, 368–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shigematsu, Y.; Amori, G.; Tanaka, K.; Kitahama, K.; Kanda, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Takazawa, Y.; Takeuchi, K.; Inamura, K. MHC class I loss is associated with biliary/progenitor cell features and “cold” tumor-immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2023, 483, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Salter, S.J.; Cox, M.J.; Turek, E.M.; Calus, S.T.; Cookson, W.O.; Moffatt, M.F.; Turner, P.; Parkhill, J.; Loman, N.J.; Walker, A.W. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 2014, 12, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bertocchi, A.; Carloni, S.; Ravenda, P.S.; Bertalot, G.; Spadoni, I.; Lo Cascio, A.; Gandini, S.; Lizier, M.; Braga, D.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Gut vascular barrier impairment leads to intestinal bacteria dissemination and colorectal cancer metastasis to liver. Cancer Cell 2021, 39, 708–724.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cullin, N.; Azevedo Antunes, C.; Straussman, R.; Stein-Thoeringer, C.K.; Elinav, E. Microbiome and cancer. Cancer Cell 2021, 39, 1317–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wong, S.H.; Yu, J. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 690–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, W.; Xu, L.; Zhang, X.; Xu, J.; Jin, J.O. Escherichia coli adhesion portion FimH polarizes M2 macrophages to M1 macrophages in tumor microenvironment via toll-like receptor 4. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1213467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mantovani, A.; Schioppa, T.; Porta, C.; Allavena, P.; Sica, A. Role of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor progression and invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006, 25, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lin, Y.; Xu, J.; Lan, H. Tumor-associated macrophages in tumor metastasis: Biological roles and clinical therapeutic applications. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bingle, L.; Brown, N.J.; Lewis, C.E. The role of tumour-associated macrophages in tumour progression: Implications for new anticancer therapies. J. Pathol. 2002, 196, 254–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahluwalia, P.; Mondal, A.K.; Ahluwalia, M.; Sahajpal, N.S.; Jones, K.; Jilani, Y.; Gahlay, G.K.; Barrett, A.; Kota, V.; Rojiani, A.M.; et al. Clinical and molecular assessment of an onco-immune signature with prognostic significance in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Med. 2022, 11, 1573–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nestarenkaite, A.; Fadhil, W.; Rasmusson, A.; Susanti, S.; Hadjimichael, E.; Laurinaviciene, A.; Ilyas, M.; Laurinavicius, A. Immuno-Interface Score to Predict Outcome in Colorectal Cancer Independent of Microsatellite Instability Status. Cancers 2020, 12, 2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kwak, Y.; Koh, J.; Kim, D.W.; Kang, S.B.; Kim, W.H.; Lee, H.S. Immunoscore encompassing CD3+ and CD8+ T cell densities in distant metastasis is a robust prognostic marker for advanced colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 81778–81790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ito, S.; Koshino, A.; Komura, M.; Kato, S.; Otani, T.; Wang, C.; Ueki, A.; Takahashi, H.; Ebi, M.; Ogasawara, N.; et al. Characterization of colorectal cancer by hierarchical clustering analyses of five immune cell markers. Pathol. Int. 2024, 74, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, Y.; Weng, W.; Peng, J.; Hong, L.; Yang, L.; Toiyama, Y.; Gao, R.; Liu, M.; Yin, M.; Pan, C.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum Increases Proliferation of Colorectal Cancer Cells and Tumor Development in Mice by Activating Toll-like Receptor 4 Signaling to Nuclear Factor-kappaB, and Up-regulating Expression of MicroRNA-21. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 851–866.e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shigematsu, Y.; Saito, R.; Amori, G.; Kanda, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Takeuchi, K.; Takahashi, S.; Inamura, K. Fusobacterium nucleatum, immune responses, and metastatic organ diversity in colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Cancer Sci. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Box plots illustrating the trend in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels grouped by the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA present. (A) The box plots indicate a trend in preoperative serum CRP levels across the different pks+ E. coli DNA groups (Ptrend = 0.007), suggesting a negative association between the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA in colorectal cancer liver metastasis tissues and systemic inflammation. (B) An enlarged view of the CRP range 0–1.0 mg/dL highlights the differences between the pks+ E. coli DNA groups. The short horizontal line within each box plot represents the mean value. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Box plots illustrating the trend in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels grouped by the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA present. (A) The box plots indicate a trend in preoperative serum CRP levels across the different pks+ E. coli DNA groups (Ptrend = 0.007), suggesting a negative association between the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA in colorectal cancer liver metastasis tissues and systemic inflammation. (B) An enlarged view of the CRP range 0–1.0 mg/dL highlights the differences between the pks+ E. coli DNA groups. The short horizontal line within each box plot represents the mean value. * indicates p < 0.05.
Cancers 16 03003 g001
Figure 2. Box plots illustrating the density of various immune cell markers stratified by the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA. The boxplots depict the distribution of six different immune cell markers (CD4, CD163, CD8, CD20, FOXP3, and CD68) across three distinct groups of pks+ E. coli DNA (“very low”, “low”, and “high”). The horizontal axis represents the groups categorized by the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA in colorectal cancer liver metastasis tissues, whereas the vertical axis represents the density of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Box plots illustrating the density of various immune cell markers stratified by the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA. The boxplots depict the distribution of six different immune cell markers (CD4, CD163, CD8, CD20, FOXP3, and CD68) across three distinct groups of pks+ E. coli DNA (“very low”, “low”, and “high”). The horizontal axis represents the groups categorized by the amount of pks+ E. coli DNA in colorectal cancer liver metastasis tissues, whereas the vertical axis represents the density of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. * indicates p < 0.05.
Cancers 16 03003 g002
Table 1. Number of organs with metastases according to the level of pks+ E. coli present in colorectal cancer liver metastasis tissues.
Table 1. Number of organs with metastases according to the level of pks+ E. coli present in colorectal cancer liver metastasis tissues.
Number of Organs InvolvedAmount of pks+ E. coli DNAp
Very Low (N = 128)Low (N = 13)High (N = 11)
1105 (82.0)10 (76.9)11 (100)0.034
217 (13.3)1 (7.7)0 (0)
36 (4.7)1 (7.7)0 (0)
40 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
50 (0)1 (7.7)0 (0)
Data presented as N (%).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shigematsu, Y.; Saito, R.; Kanda, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Takeuchi, K.; Takahashi, S.; Inamura, K. Inverse Correlation between pks-Carrying Escherichia coli Abundance in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases and the Number of Organs Involved in Recurrence. Cancers 2024, 16, 3003. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173003

AMA Style

Shigematsu Y, Saito R, Kanda H, Takahashi Y, Takeuchi K, Takahashi S, Inamura K. Inverse Correlation between pks-Carrying Escherichia coli Abundance in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases and the Number of Organs Involved in Recurrence. Cancers. 2024; 16(17):3003. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shigematsu, Yasuyuki, Rumiko Saito, Hiroaki Kanda, Yu Takahashi, Kengo Takeuchi, Shunji Takahashi, and Kentaro Inamura. 2024. "Inverse Correlation between pks-Carrying Escherichia coli Abundance in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases and the Number of Organs Involved in Recurrence" Cancers 16, no. 17: 3003. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173003

APA Style

Shigematsu, Y., Saito, R., Kanda, H., Takahashi, Y., Takeuchi, K., Takahashi, S., & Inamura, K. (2024). Inverse Correlation between pks-Carrying Escherichia coli Abundance in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases and the Number of Organs Involved in Recurrence. Cancers, 16(17), 3003. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop