Next Article in Journal
MicroRNA Polymorphisms in Cancer: A Literature Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Deficiency of iPLA2β Primes Immune Cells for Proinflammation: Potential Involvement in Age-Related Mesenteric Lymph Node Lymphoma
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting RTK Signaling Pathways in Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 7
Issue 3
10.3390/cancers7030861
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Hepatocyte Growth Factor from a Clinical Perspective: A Pancreatic Cancer Challenge

by
Wasia Rizwani
1,
Amanda E. Allen
2 and
Jose G. Trevino
2,*
1
Department of Biochemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana 500007, India
2
Department of Surgery, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Rm 6175, P.O. Box 100109, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2015, 7(3), 1785-1805; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7030861
Submission received: 11 June 2015 / Revised: 7 August 2015 / Accepted: 17 August 2015 / Published: 3 September 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stress Responses in Tumors and The Tumor Microenvironment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and incidence rates are rising. Both detection and treatment options for pancreatic cancer are limited, providing a less than 5% five-year survival advantage. The need for new biomarkers for early detection and treatment of pancreatic cancer demands the efficient translation of bench knowledge to provide clinical benefit. One source of therapeutic resistance is the pancreatic tumor microenvironment, which is characterized by desmoplasia and hypoxia making it less conducive to current therapies. A major factor regulating desmoplasia and subsequently promoting chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer is hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), the sole ligand for c-MET (mesenchymal-epithelial transition), an epithelial tyrosine kinase receptor. Binding of HGF to c-MET leads to receptor dimerization and autophosphorylation resulting in the activation of multiple cellular processes that support cancer progression. Inhibiting activation of c-MET in cancer cells, in combination with other approaches for reducing desmoplasia in the tumor microenvironment, might significantly improve the success of chemotherapy. Therefore, HGF makes a potent novel target for developing therapeutic strategies in combination with existing drugs for treating pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of HGF and its promising potential as a chemotherapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer related deaths in the USA [1] with a five-year survival rate of only 7%. In 2014, American Cancer Society figures showed 46,420 people (23,530 men and 22,890 women) received a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and 39,590 people (20,170 men and 19,420 women) died of this disease (www.cancer.org), and these numbers show no sign of improving in the near future. Unfortunately, even while we have made strides in the management and stabilization of other solid organ tumors, the rate of pancreatic cancer diagnoses has been increasing over the past 10 years with pancreatic cancer-related deaths only second to lung cancer (www.cancer.org). Treatment options are limited; surgery remains the only chance for survival. However, potentially curative surgical intervention is offered to less than 20% of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, suggesting the aggressive nature of this disease upon clinical presentation. While current adjuvant therapies including chemotherapy and radiation have a modest effect on tumor growth, several recently investigated biological pathways associated with pancreatic cancer show promise as targeted therapies. This review will focus on the role of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), also referred to as scatter factor (SF), as a therapeutic target in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

2. HGF-the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

While twenty-five years have passed since HGF was discovered [2,3,4], its mitogenic role is still being explored. HGF is produced by stromal cells of mesenchymal origin and stimulates multiple cellular functions in various organs via tyrosine phosphorylation of its receptor, c-MET (Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition) [5]. The functions of HGF in organ morphogenesis, regeneration, repair, and cellular diseases have been comprehensively reviewed by Nakamura et al [6]. In utero, HGF-neutralization or c-MET gene silencing can lead to organ hypoplasia in fetal stages of many organs, indicating that HGF signals are essential for organ development [7]. While endogenous HGF is essential for self-repair of injured visceral organs, lungs and other tissues [8,9,10], HGF also exerts protective effects on epithelial and non-epithelial organs such as the heart and the brain by evading apoptosis and inflammation [11,12]. During exocrine pancreatic morphogenesis, HGF levels remain significantly increased and blocking HGF ligand activity resulted in accelerated tissue destruction in a murine model [13]. Additionally, insufficient production of HGF after organ development can lead to organ failure [6]. The emerging picture in entirety is that the physiologic balance of HGF secretion is necessary for homeostasis, and HGF supplementation may in some instances be therapeutic for pathological conditions.
Unfortunately, a variety of human malignancies can take advantage of the HGF ligand/c-Met pathway activation as a mechanism for tumor promotion. Specifically, the hyperactivation of this pathway through overexpression of the HGF ligand by cells from the tumor microenvironment and overexpression of the c-Met receptor on the cancer cell lead to significant upregulation of a variety of tumor promoting signaling pathways [14,15]. This phenomenon was demonstrated in pre-clinical studies, where patient-derived stromal tissues expressing HGF correlated with enhanced invasion of pancreatic cancer cells with only high expression of c-Met [16]. Additionally, HGF exerted a resistance to anoikis on pancreatic cancer cells by phosphorylating Akt and also promoting invasion and metastasis [17]. Current work from our group also demonstrates a similar effect when silencing of the c-Met receptor in pancreatic cancer cells co-cultured with human-derived pancreatic stromal elements expressing HGF ligand resulted in abrogation of proliferation, invasion, and metastasis These results established a relationship between stromal and cancerous elements with respect to the HGF/c-MET signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer pre-clinical studies. We propose that an in-depth analysis of the HGF/c-MET signaling system in pancreatic cancer could bridge the gap between basic biology and translational medicine.
Cancers 07 00861 g001 1024
Figure 1. Role of pancreatic stellate cells (PSC) in desmoplasia. In its quiescent state, the pancreatic stellate cell contains vitamin A-containing lipid droplets and serves as a reservoir for Vitamin A in the normal pancreas. Its activation from a quiescent to an activated state, including changes to its proliferation rate, morphology, and sensitivity to mitogenic factors, are all primary features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While the activation process is not yet fully understood, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) expression is one of the many signaling events leading to stellate cell activation. Following activation, the PSC loses its lipid droplets, undergoes morphological changes, and upregulates alpha smooth muscle actin and collagen. Intercellular signaling originating from multiple cell types, including tumor cells, endothelial cells and immune cells, contribute to this increased activation and proliferation of PSCs in the desmoplastic reaction. PSC-derived HGF can in turn activate cancer cells to promote tumorigenesis and endothelial cells to promote angiogenesis in tumors. HGF-Hepatocyte growth factor, MET-mesenchymal-epithelial transition.
Figure 1. Role of pancreatic stellate cells (PSC) in desmoplasia. In its quiescent state, the pancreatic stellate cell contains vitamin A-containing lipid droplets and serves as a reservoir for Vitamin A in the normal pancreas. Its activation from a quiescent to an activated state, including changes to its proliferation rate, morphology, and sensitivity to mitogenic factors, are all primary features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While the activation process is not yet fully understood, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) expression is one of the many signaling events leading to stellate cell activation. Following activation, the PSC loses its lipid droplets, undergoes morphological changes, and upregulates alpha smooth muscle actin and collagen. Intercellular signaling originating from multiple cell types, including tumor cells, endothelial cells and immune cells, contribute to this increased activation and proliferation of PSCs in the desmoplastic reaction. PSC-derived HGF can in turn activate cancer cells to promote tumorigenesis and endothelial cells to promote angiogenesis in tumors. HGF-Hepatocyte growth factor, MET-mesenchymal-epithelial transition.
Cancers 07 00861 g001

3. HGF and Desmoplasia

Pancreatic cancer is pathologically characterized by a strong desmoplastic reaction involving up to 90% of the tumor volume, suggesting a vital role in pancreatic tumor growth [18,19,20]. Not surprisingly, chronic pancreatitis, a risk factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), also shows marked desmoplasia further suggesting the important role of the pancreatic microenvironment as a tumor-promoting and supporting factor during inflammatory changes of the pancreas [21,22,23]. Pancreatic tumors undergo desmoplasia through proliferation of activated fibroblasts (referred to as myofibroblasts or pancreatic stellate cells), infiltration by immune cells and deposition of multiple ECM (extracellular matrix) components with a concomitant increase in interstitial fluid pressure [23] (Figure 1). These ECM components can be cellular and non-cellular and are regulated by many intrinsic and extrinsic biological pathways [24]. Cancer cells secrete TGF-β that induces quiescent fibroblasts to adopt a myofibroblastic phenotype by increasing the expression of α-smooth muscle actin, collagen, and fibronectin [25,26,27]. In turn, the myofibroblasts can produce factors like HGF that can promote malignant changes in epithelial cells through a variety of signaling mechanisms [25,28,29]. The signaling pathways that initiate tumorigenesis and subsequently a desmoplastic reaction need to be scrutinized as it is still uncertain whether early changes in the microenvironment promote malignant changes, or if epithelial cells with malignant transformation promote a supportive desmoplastic microenvironment. What is understood is that interactions between the epithelial cells and the stromal fibroblasts govern the normal functioning of an organ/tissue. With this in mind, it is plausible that deregulation of this balance might affect the “normal” function of the native tissue and/or surrounding tissue by autocrine or paracrine signaling leading to tumor formation.
Useful insights may be gained from examining what is known of related pathways in another cancer type. In colon cancer, it has been reported that both epithelial and stromal factors are responsible for intestinal transformation and progression to tumorigenesis. Initiation of colorectal cancer is associated with loss of paracrine hormones guanylin and uroguanylin, the endogenous ligands for the tumor suppressor guanylyl cyclase C (GUCY2C), which regulates epithelial cell dynamics and balance in proliferation, metabolism and differentiation at the crypt-surface axis of the intestine [30,31,32]. Whereas the presence of GUCY2C inhibits desmoplastic reaction in colon cancer cells, elimination of GUCY2C induces desmoplasia by promoting Akt-dependent TGF-β secretion, activation of fibroblasts, and Smad3 phosphorylation. These events lead to HGF secretion by fibroblasts, which in turn drive colon cancer cell proliferation through c-MET-dependent signaling [33]. Studies in pancreatic cancer revealed that inhibiting TGF-β production by cancer cells facilitates fibroblast-derived HGF-induced tumor cell invasion [34]. Treatment of pancreatic cancer cells with HGF stimulated cell growth by enhancing TGF-α level [35]. The importance of rising HGF in pancreatic cancer in vivo is suggested by studies that have demonstrated the rise of HGF serum levels as the disease advances [36,37]. However, its precise role in pancreatic desmoplasia is not fully understood. Upregulation of various growth factors like TGF-β [38], platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF, [39]) and pro-inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor α, and Interleukins-1 and 6 [40] have demonstrated promotion of proliferation and migration of pancreatic stellate cells, which support a strong desmoplastic reaction. While their association with HGF has not been fully elucidated in pancreatic cancer, what is understood is that the expression of IL-1α by pancreatic cancer cell lines promotes HGF production in stromal cells to facilitate tumor-promoting properties [41]. In other tissues such as human mesenchymal stem cells, TNF-α (which supports stromal desmoplastic changes) increases the mRNA levels of HGF and also of secretory HGF in conditioned media via p38MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways to enhance migration and autocrine production of HGF [42]. Similarly, IL-1α and IL-1β stimulation of cultured corneal fibroblasts (keratocytes) upregulates HGF and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), thereby facilitating healing of the wounded corneal epithelial cells by modulating proliferation, motility and differentiation [43]. In colonic epithelial cells, both HGF and KGF are enhanced in IL-1 stimulated production of IL-8 during mucosal inflammations, and IL-8 expression, although promoted as an angiogenic factor in pancreatic tumors, might be playing a significant role in supporting this tumor microenvironment [44,45,46,47,48]. So, although there is a suggested link between HGF and multiple cytokines that promote a desmoplastic reaction in the tumor microenvironment, the role of HGF through similar pathways in pancreatic cancer is a topic for future research endeavors.

4. HGF and Hypoxia

Desmoplasia and hypoxia are intertwined events leading to aggressive PDAC. Desmoplasia promotes a hypoxic environment in pancreatic cancers and limits cancer drug delivery due to decreased blood perfusion. Tumor hypoxia activates hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) that in turn activates a number of signaling pathways leading to stronger desmoplastic reaction. HIF-dependent pathways activate MET in pancreatic tumor cells, while stroma-secreted HGF facilitates cell motility from the hypoxic regions of the tumors to the oxygen-rich distant organs [49,50]. One of the prominent pathways that HIF-1α activates in pancreatic cancer cells is Sonic hedgehog signaling (SHH) that is responsible for increased fibrous tissue deposition. A positive loop of increased SHH ligand and HIF-1α production occurs that will continue to decrease blood flow and increase hypoxia [51]. It is well established that hypoxic tumors mediate angiogenesis, invasion, and malignancy in cultures [52,53,54] as well as in mouse models [55]. During hypoxia-induced angiogenesis, HGF facilitates cancer cell-endothelial cell contact through FAK (focal adhesion kinase) phosphorylation [56] and decreases endothelial occludin, a primary protein in endothelial tight junctions [57]. As a result of the tight junction morphological change, HGF increases permeability between vascular endothelial cells and promotes movement across an endothelial cell barrier into adjacent tissues. HGF-induced FAK phosphorylation simultaneously upregulates many matrix metalloproteinases like MMP-1, -9, and -14, through activation of the transcription factor Ets, in cancers of the gallbladder, prostate, and liver thereby facilitating cancer invasion [58,59,60]. Studies using pancreatic PK8 and fibroblast MRC5 cells demonstrated that hypoxia induces HGF production in culture media of MRC5 cells. PK8 cells exposed to conditioned media collected from HGF-expressing MRC5 cells showed a much higher increase in MMP-2, -7, MT1-MMP and c-MET levels, as well as a concomitant increase in c-MET phosphorylation leading to enhanced migration and invasion through the basement membrane [61].
Although PDACs are not highly vascularized tumors, several lines of evidence reveal a positive correlation between blood vessel density, tumor VEGF-A levels, and disease progression [62,63], highlighting a potential role in cancer progression. Pancreatic cancer cells themselves secrete a number of mitogenic factors with angiogenic properties, such as EGF, TGF-α, HGF, FGF-1, 2, and 5, and PDGF-β [64,65]. HGF by itself is a very potent angiogenic factor that promotes endothelial cell motility and growth via the MET receptor [52]. It has been shown in murine colon carcinoma CT6 cells that intracellular HGF increases VEGF-A mRNA levels through PI3K/Akt, MAPK, and STAT3 pathways, more so under hypoxic conditions [66]. These data reiterate the fact that a tumor-stroma interactive loop exists and facilitates tumor growth and metastasis. What remains to be explored is how similar these mitogenic and angiogenic signaling pathways work in a pancreatic environment using an orthotopic animal model of pancreatic cancer.

5. HGF and Acidic Environment

Physical properties of the tumor microenvironment also influence tumor progression [67]. Both hypoxia [68] and acidosis [69] can be cytotoxic, but tumor cells adapt to these stressful conditions, avoid apoptosis, [70] and survive to spread to distant sites [71]. Normal cells undergo a low rate of glycolysis followed by oxidation of pyruvate, [72] while cancer cells undergo the “Warburg effect” to produce energy by a high rate of glycolysis followed by lactic acid fermentation in the cytosol [73]. PDAC cell line PANC1 revealed alteration in metabolic pathways similar to the Warburg effect when compared to the proteome of normal pancreatic duct cells [74] via abnormal metabolism of glutamine. This suggests that glutamine is largely consumed as a nitrogen donor in nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis, further supporting current data that demonstrates pancreatic cancer cell growth is stimulated by a glutamine-associated KRAS dependent pathway [75]. Both extracellular pH (pHe) and cytoplasmic pH (pHi) are affected due to enhanced metabolism and glycolysis by tumor cells. The pH of the cells plays a regulatory role in many cellular processes like cell cycle, motility, membrane potential, intracellular homeostasis, and eventually malignant transformation [76,77,78]. Sodium-proton exchangers (NHEs) and other transporters maintain the pHi and expel protons outside the cells creating an acidic pHe [79] that aggravates invasive properties of transformed cells [71,80,81]. Among growth factors, HGF is known to activate NHE directly and lowers the pHe thereby inducing cathepsin-mediated trafficking of lysosomes to the cell periphery [82]. This process leads to enhanced ECM proteolysis, migration, and invasion. A study by Steffan et al. [83] in prostate cancer cells revealed that HGF induces lysosome trafficking to the cell periphery by phosphorylating MET receptor and activating kinase cascades like PI3K and Rho A GTPases. HGF treatment also resulted in increased microtubule accumulation at the cell surface protrusions coinciding with the lysosomes, NHE activity, and cathepsin B secretion; all these processes eventually lead to enhanced invasion by prostate tumor cells [83]. Again, such explicit evidence as is seen with prostate cancer is lacking in pancreatic tumor research, and whether the acidic environment can activate the HGF-c-MET pathway needs further investigation.

6. HGF and Inflammation

Inflammatory cells are an integral part of the desmoplastic reaction found in pancreatic cancer and contribute to the advancement of this disease. Chronic pancreatitis, or chronic inflammation of the pancreas, is a known risk factor for developing PDAC [84]. Inflammatory signals are implicated in both tumor initiation and tumor progression. Leukocytic infiltrates in PDAC are largely immunosuppressive and associated with reduced survival in humans [85,86]. Furthermore, pro-inflammatory markers, such as IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-1 receptor antagonist, are elevated in the serum of patients with pancreatic cancer, with IL-6 specifically being an indicator of poor prognosis [87]. IL-6 functions in pancreatic tumor progression by activating the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), as well as NF-κB in macrophages [88]. Inflammatory mediators also characterize pancreatic neoplasms that account for up to 10% of pancreatic malignancies and up to 30% of pancreatic resections. HGF was highly expressed in pancreatic inflammatory cystic fluid (PIC) and implicated in distinguishing PIC from mild branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms [89]. HGF expression can serve as a biomarker in such cases and its presence could be a possible early indicator of pancreatic malignancy.

7. HGF/c-MET as a Target

Desmoplasia is a contributing factor to chemoresistance, which remains a principal challenge in pancreatic cancer treatment. Pancreatic stellate cells enhance fibrosis, partly through HGF production, leading to sequestration of chemotherapeutic agents in the stromal compartment, impairing successful drug delivery to cancer cells [90,91,92]. Further studies to find novel therapeutic agents targeting the HGF-c-MET signaling axis will better help us understand the implications of HGF-c-MET signaling in malignancy. Existing agents can be explored based on their target components, whether it is HGF or c-MET.
It is well known that c-MET is deregulated in many human cancers including pancreatic cancer [93,94,95,96] and can be activated by genetic mutations, gene amplifications, protein overexpression, or a ligand-dependent autocrine/paracrine signaling loop [97,98,99]. HGF is the only known ligand for c-MET [94] and c-MET has clearly been associated with aggressive disease, poor prognosis, worse clinical outcomes, and chemoresistance in many cancers. Many ongoing clinical trials in phase I, II, and III, outlined in Table 1 below, employ MET kinase inhibitors or MET monoclonal antibodies (MAb), (Onartuzumab from Genentech) as a potent chemotherapeutic approach to tackle different cancers (www.vai.org/metclinicaltrials; [100]). Most advanced in clinical development among the c-MET targeted therapies in trial studies, Tivantinib (ARQ 197), a non-adenosine triphosphate-competitive c-MET inhibitor, is in phase III development for various malignancies [101]. Specifically for pancreatic cancer, it is under a randomized phase 2 study of ARQ 197 versus gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma [102]). Recent evidence with another c-MET inhibitor, INC280, demonstrated reduced motility of pancreatic cancer cells with a 30% lymph node involvement in the treatment group when compared to 60% involvement in the control group, suggesting potential suppression of metastasis [103]. Other notable results from the study include reduced motility of endothelial cells, impaired tumor growth in response to HGF, and improved gemcitabine efficacy when used in combination with the frequently prescribed nucleoside inhibitor [103].
Table
Table 1. Current HGF/cMET Target Therapies in Phase II/III clinical trials. To date, multiple therapies targeting the HGF/cMET pathway are showing promising results in median progression free survival when applied to a diverse range of neoplastic pathologies supporting further exploration of HGF as a potent medical therapy avenue yet to be fully exploited.
Table 1. Current HGF/cMET Target Therapies in Phase II/III clinical trials. To date, multiple therapies targeting the HGF/cMET pathway are showing promising results in median progression free survival when applied to a diverse range of neoplastic pathologies supporting further exploration of HGF as a potent medical therapy avenue yet to be fully exploited.
CategoryDrug NameTrial PhaseTarget NeoplasmMedian Progression Free SurvivalSide EffectsConclusionsSource
HGF/SF MabAMG102 (Rilotumumab) +BevacizumabIIRenal cell carcinoma3.7 months at 10 mg/kg and 2 months at 20 mg/kgEdema (45.9%)AMG102 is tolerated, but not definitively growth inhibitorySchoffski et al. [104]
Fatigue (37.7%)
Nausea(27.9%)
HGF/SF MabAMG 102 (Rilotumumab) vs. AMG 102 after previous Bevacizumab TherapyIIRecurrent Glioblastoma[AMG102 only] 4.1 weeks vs. [previous Bevacizumab] 4.3 weeksFatigue (38%), AMG 102 monotherapy not associated with statistically significant anti-tumor activityWen et al. [105]
Headache (33%)
Peripheral Edema (23%).
HGF/SF MabAMG 102 (Rilotumumab) plus mitoxantrone and prednisoneIICastration Resistant Prostate Cancer3.0 months [AMG 102] vs. 2.9 months [control]Pulmonary Embolism (6%)Addition of AMG 102 showed no efficacy improvementsRyan et al. [106]
Fatigue (3%)
Met Kinase InhibitorTivantinib plus Erlotinib versus Placebo plus ErlotinibIIINonsquamous, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer3.8 months [Erlotinib + Tivantinib] vs. 2.3 months for Erlotinib+PlaceboRashAddition of Tivantinib showed a significant delay in metastasis when compared to Erlotinib aloneScagliotti et al. [107]
Diarrhea
Fatigue
Vomiting
Dyspnea
Met Kinase InhibitorTivantinib vs. PlaceboIIHepatocellular Carcinoma1–6 months [Titantivib] vs. 1–4 months [Placebo]Neutropenia (14%) Beneficial second line treatment for c-MET-high advanced HCC.Santoro et al. [108]
Anemia (11%)
Met Kinase InhibitorTivantinibIIMicrophthalmia transcription factor (MITF)-associated (MiT) tumors3.6 months [overall] vs. 5.5 months [ASPS] vs. 1.9 months [CCS and tRCC]Anemia (4%)Safe and tolerable at doses of 360mg BID, with moderate antitumor responseWagner et al. [109]
Neutropenia (4%).
Thrombocytopenia
Deep vein thrombosis (6.4%)
Met Kinase InhibitorPF-02341066 (Crizotinib) vs. Pemetrexed or DocetaxelIIIALK+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer7.7 months [crizotinib] vs. 3.0 months [control]Visual disorder Crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy in terms of progression free survival, symptomology, and quality of lifeShaw et al. [110]
GI SE
Elevated liver aminotransferase levels
Met Kinase InhibitorCabozantinibIIIMedullary Thyroid Carcinoma11.2 months [cabozantinib] vs. 4.0 months [placebo]DiarrheaCabozantinib resulted in statistically significant increased progression free survival length of time.Elisei et al. [111]
Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia Decreased weight and appetite Nausea
Fatigue
Met Kinase InhibitorForetinibIIPapillary Renal Cell Carcinoma9.3 months [Foretinib] vs. 1.3 months [Sunitinib]Fatigue, Hypertension, Gastrointestinal toxicities Foretinib demonstrated a high response rate in cancers with known germline MET mutationsChoueiri et al. [112]
Pulmonary Emboli.
Met Kinase InhibitorForetinibIIGastric Cancer1.7 months vs. [no comparison]Hypertension (35%) Foretinib is an insufficient monotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancerShah et al. [113]
Elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (23%)
In addition to c-MET itself, the ligand HGF is an obvious therapeutic target considering its significant role in promoting tumorigenesis in cases exhibiting MET mutation [114]. Clinical trials with HGF/SF monoclonal antibody (MAb) in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs are currently in progress. HGF/SF Mab therapies under different phases of ongoing clinical trials for various cancers include Rilotumumab from Amgen, Ficlatuzumab from AVEO pharmaceuticals and HuL2G7 from Millennium pharmaceuticals (www.vai.org/metclinicaltrials; [100]). Another promising therapy, NK4, an intra-molecular fragment of HGF, has been shown to possess anti-growth, anti-metastasis, anti-angiogenic abilities in addition to showing reduction in ascites, thereby prolonging survival in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer [115,116].
It is composed of an N-terminal hairpin domain and 4-kringle domains (K1–K4) of HGF α-chain [117,118,119] and lacks 16 amino acids from the C-terminus of HGF, and has been shown to bind MET without activating the receptor signal transduction, as shown in Figure 2. The benefits of using NK4 as an HGF antagonist have been comprehensively discussed in the review by Mizuno et al. [120]. With such compelling evidence, NK4 is a plausible option to target HGF along with c-MET and other drugs currently in use for controlling pancreatic cancer.
While present knowledge of HGF/c-MET has supported clinical trials targeting various aspects of the biological mechanism, more mature studies addressing side effects and clinical outcomes specific to pancreatic cancer are lacking. Combining promising c-MET and HGF antagonists along with strategic utilization of current treatment regimens leave the pancreatic cancer community with an expectant outlook for the future of medical intervention.
Cancers 07 00861 g002 1024
Figure 2. The antagonistic role of NK4 in relationship to HGF. (A) The intramolecular fragment of HGF: NK4; (B) NK4 acting as a direct antagonist of HGF with receptor binding capability while simultaneously lacking C terminus amino acids necessary for the signal transduction.
Figure 2. The antagonistic role of NK4 in relationship to HGF. (A) The intramolecular fragment of HGF: NK4; (B) NK4 acting as a direct antagonist of HGF with receptor binding capability while simultaneously lacking C terminus amino acids necessary for the signal transduction.
Cancers 07 00861 g002

8. Conclusions

Pancreatic cancer remains a major unsolved problem, with inadequate medical therapies. HGF and its receptor counterpart are emerging as an attractive target to be exploited not only in early detection of pancreatic cancer, but also as a target for chemotherapy. Further study of these possibilities is motivated by increasing appreciation of the importance of associated pathways in other cancers and model systems. Available small-molecule and antibody-based therapeutics targeting these pathways should be investigated for utility in pancreatic cancer specific studies, and related biomarkers investigated for potential use as diagnostic tools. Additionally, focus beyond the molecular pathway’s direct consequences to include the tumor microenvironment and downstream effects on tumor behavior continue to keep HGF at the forefront of research focused on neoplastic invasion.

Acknowledgments

W.R. would like to acknowledge DST-WOS-A (Department of Science and Technology-Women Scientists Scheme-A), New Delhi, India.

Author Contributions

J.G.T. and W.R. participated in the conception and design of this manuscript. W.R. and A.A. participated in the acquisition of data, design and drafting of the manuscript. W.R. and A.A. participated in the acquisition and interpretation of data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Howe, H.L.; Wu, X.; Ries, L.A.; Cokkinides, V.; Ahmed, F.; Jemal, A.; Miller, B.; Williams, M.; Ward, E.; Wingo, P.A.; et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2003, featuring cancer among U.S. Hispanic/Latino populations. Cancer 2006, 107, 1711–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nakamura, T.; Nawa, K.; Ichihara, A. Partial purification and characterization of hepatocyte growth factor from serum of hepatectomized rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1984, 122, 1450–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nakamura, T.; Nishizawa, T.; Hagiya, M.; Seki, T.; Shimonishi, M.; Sugimura, A.; Tashiro, K.; Shimizu, S. Molecular cloning and expression of human hepatocyte growth factor. Nature 1989, 342, 440–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nakamura, T. Structure and function of hepatocyte growth factor. Prog. Growth Factor. Res. 1991, 3, 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gherardi, E.; Birchmeier, W.; Birchmeier, C.; vande Woude, G. Targeting MET in cancer: rationale and progress. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nakamura, T.; Mizuno, S. The discovery of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its significance for cell biology, life sciences and clinical medicine. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2010, 86, 588–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ohmichi, H.; Koshimizu, U.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) acts as a mesenchyme-derived morphogenic factor during fetal lung development. Development 1998, 125, 1315–1324. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Noji, S.; Tashiro, K.; Koyama, E.; Nohno, T.; Ohyama, K.; Taniguchi, S.; Nakamura, T. Expression of hepatocyte growth factor gene in endothelial and Kupffer cells of damaged rat livers, as revealed by in situ hybridization. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1990, 173, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yoshida, S.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Itami, S.; Yoshikawa, K.; Tabata, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T. Neutralization of hepatocyte growth factor leads to retarded cutaneous wound healing associated with decreased neovascularization and granulation tissue formation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2003, 120, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yamada, T.; Hisanaga, M.; Nakajima, Y.; Mizuno, S.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T.; Nakano, H. Enhanced expression of hepatocyte growth factor by pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000, 162, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yamamoto, K.; Morishita, R.; Hayashi, S.; Matsushita, H.; Nakagami, H.; Moriguchi, A.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T.; Kaneda, Y.; Ogihara, T. Contribution of Bcl-2, but not Bcl-xL and Bax, to antiapoptotic actions of hepatocyte growth factor in hypoxia-conditioned human endothelial cells. Hypertension 2001, 37, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Okunishi, K.; Dohi, M.; Nakagome, K.; Tanaka, R.; Mizuno, S.; Matsumoto, K.; Miyazaki, J.; Nakamura, T.; Yamamoto, K. A novel role of hepatocyte growth factor as an immune regulator through suppressing dendritic cell function. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 4745–4753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Anderson, R.M.; Delous, M.; Bosch, J.A.; Ye, L.; Robertson, M.A.; Hesselson, D.; Stainier, D.Y. Hepatocyte growth factor signaling in intrapancreatic ductal cells drives pancreatic morphogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Delitto, D.; Vertes-George, E.; Hughes, S.J.; Behrns, K.E.; Trevino, J.G. C-Met signaling in the development of tumorigenesis and chemoresistance: potential applications in pancreatic cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 8458–8470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Matsushita, A.; Gotze, T.; Korc, M. Hepatocyte growth factor-mediated cell invasion in pancreatic cancer cells is dependent on neuropilin-1. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 10309–10316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Qian, L.W.; Mizumoto, K.; Maehara, N.; Ohuchida, K.; Inadome, N.; Saimura, M.; Nagai, E.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T.; Tanaka, M. Co-cultivation of pancreatic cancer cells with orthotopic tumor-derived fibroblasts: fibroblasts stimulate tumor cell invasion via HGF secretion whereas cancer cells exert a minor regulative effect on fibroblasts HGF production. Cancer Lett. 2003, 190, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Watanabe, S.; Kishimoto, T.; Yokosuka, O. Hepatocyte growth factor inhibits anoikis of pancreatic carcinoma cells through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Pancreas 2011, 40, 608–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, J.; Wientjes, M.G.; Au, J.L. Pancreatic cancer: pathobiology, treatment options, and drug delivery. AAPS J. 2010, 12, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Neesse, A.; Michl, P.; Frese, K.K.; Feig, C.; Cook, N.; Jacobetz, M.A.; Lolkema, M.P.; Buchholz, M.; Olive, K.P.; Gress, T.M.; et al. Stromal biology and therapy in pancreatic cancer. Gut 2011, 60, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Michl, P.; Gress, T.M. Current concepts and novel targets in advanced pancreatic cancer. Gut 2013, 62, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Farrow, B.; Evers, B.M. Inflammation and the development of pancreatic cancer. Surg. Oncol. 2002, 10, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luttges, J.; Kloppel, G. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its precursors. Der Pathologe 2005, 26, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Yen, T.W.; Aardal, N.P.; Bronner, M.P.; Thorning, D.R.; Savard, C.E.; Lee, S.P.; Bell, R.H., Jr. Myofibroblasts are responsible for the desmoplastic reaction surrounding human pancreatic carcinomas. Surgery 2002, 131, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Whatcott, C.J.; Posner, R.G.; von Hoff, D.D.; Han, H. Desmoplasia and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. In Pancreatic Cancer and Tumor Microenvironment; Grippo, P.J., Munshi, H.G., Eds.; Transworld Research Network: Trivandrum, India, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kalluri, R.; Zeisberg, M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mueller, M.M.; Fusenig, N.E. Friends or foes—bipolar effects of the tumour stroma in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tomasek, J.J.; Gabbiani, G.; Hinz, B.; Chaponnier, C.; Brown, R.A. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hanahan, D.; Coussens, L.M. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 2012, 21, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bhowmick, N.A.; Neilson, E.G.; Moses, H.L. Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression. Nature 2004, 432, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, P.; Lin, J.E.; Chervoneva, I.; Schulz, S.; Waldman, S.A.; Pitari, G.M. Homeostatic control of the crypt-villus axis by the bacterial enterotoxin receptor guanylyl cyclase C restricts the proliferating compartment in intestine. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 171, 1847–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lin, J.E.; Li, P.; Snook, A.E.; Schulz, S.; Dasgupta, A.; Hyslop, T.M.; Gibbons, A.V.; Marszlowicz, G.; Pitari, G.M.; Waldman, S.A. The hormone receptor GUCY2C suppresses intestinal tumor formation by inhibiting AKT signaling. Gastroenterology 2010, 138, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pitari, G.M.; di Guglielmo, M.D.; Park, J.; Schulz, S.; Waldman, S.A. Guanylyl cyclase C agonists regulate progression through the cell cycle of human colon carcinoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 7846–7851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gibbons, A.V.; Lin, J.E.; Kim, G.W.; Marszalowicz, G.P.; Li, P.; Stoecker, B.A.; Blomain, E.S.; Rattan, S.; Snook, A.E.; Schulz, S.; et al. Intestinal GUCY2C prevents TGF-beta secretion coordinating desmoplasia and hyperproliferation in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 6654–6666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Oyanagi, J.; Kojima, N.; Sato, H.; Higashi, S.; Kikuchi, K.; Sakai, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Miyazaki, K. Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta signaling potentiates tumor cell invasion into collagen matrix induced by fibroblast-derived hepatocyte growth factor. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 326, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ohba, N.; Funatomi, H.; Seki, T.; Makino, R.; Mitamura, K. Hepatocyte growth factor stimulates cell growth and enhances the expression of transforming growth factor alpha mRNA in AsPC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells. J. Gastroenterol. 1999, 34, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ueda, T.; Takeyama, Y.; Hori, Y.; Nishikawa, J.; Yamamoto, M.; Saitoh, Y. Hepatocyte growth factor in assessment of acute pancreatitis: comparison with C-reactive protein and interleukin-6. J. Gastroenterol. 1997, 32, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kemik, O.; Purisa, S.; Kemik, A.S.; Tuzun, S. Increase in the circulating level of hepatocyte growth factor in pancreatic cancer patients. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2009, 110, 627–629. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Shek, F.W.; Benyon, R.C.; Walker, F.M.; McCrudden, P.R.; Pender, S.L.; Williams, E.J.; Johnson, P.A.; Johnson, C.D.; Bateman, A.C.; Fine, D.R.; et al. Expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 by pancreatic stellate cells and its implications for matrix secretion and turnover in chronic pancreatitis. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 160, 1787–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mahadevan, D.; von Hoff, D.D. Tumor-stroma interactions in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 1186–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mews, P.; Phillips, P.; Fahmy, R.; Korsten, M.; Pirola, R.; Wilson, J.; Apte, M. Pancreatic stellate cells respond to inflammatory cytokines: potential role in chronic pancreatitis. Gut 2002, 50, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Xu, D.; Matsuo, Y.; Ma, J.; Koide, S.; Ochi, N.; Yasuda, A.; Funahashi, H.; Okada, Y.; Takeyama, H. Cancer cell-derived IL-1alpha promotes HGF secretion by stromal cells and enhances metastatic potential in pancreatic cancer cells. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010, 102, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, A.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Xie, H.; Zhou, L.; Zheng, S. Mechanism of TNF-alpha-induced migration and hepatocyte growth factor production in human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2010, 111, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Weng, J.; Mohan, R.R.; Li, Q.; Wilson, S.E. IL-1 upregulates keratinocyte growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor mRNA and protein production by cultured stromal fibroblast cells: interleukin-1 beta expression in the cornea. Cornea 1997, 16, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Unger, B.L.; McGee, D.W. Hepatocyte growth factor and keratinocyte growth factor enhance IL-1-induced IL-8 secretion through different mechanisms in Caco-2 epithelial cells. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2011, 47, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Trevino, J.G.; Summy, J.M.; Gray, M.J.; Nilsson, M.B.; Lesslie, D.P.; Baker, C.H.; Gallick, G.E. Expression and activity of SRC regulate interleukin-8 expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells: implications for angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 7214–7222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Summy, J.M.; Trevino, J.G.; Lesslie, D.P.; Baker, C.H.; Shakespeare, W.C.; Wang, Y.; Sundaramoorthi, R.; Metcalf, C.A., III; Keats, J.A.; Sawyer, T.K.; et al. AP23846, a novel and highly potent Src family kinase inhibitor, reduces vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-8 expression in human solid tumor cell lines and abrogates downstream angiogenic processes. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005, 4, 1900–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Trevino, J.G.; Summy, J.M.; Lesslie, D.P.; Parikh, N.U.; Hong, D.S.; Lee, F.Y.; Donato, N.J.; Abbruzzese, J.L.; Baker, C.H.; Gallick, G.E. Inhibition of SRC expression and activity inhibits tumor progression and metastasis of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells in an orthotopic nude mouse model. Am. J. Pathol. 2006, 168, 962–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Trevino, J.G.; Gray, M.J.; Nawrocki, S.T.; Summy, J.M.; Lesslie, D.P.; Evans, D.B.; Sawyer, T.K.; Shakespeare, W.C.; Watowich, S.S.; Chiao, P.J.; et al. Src activation of Stat3 is an independent requirement from NF-kappaB activation for constitutive IL-8 expression in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Angiogenesis 2006, 9, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pennacchietti, S.; Michieli, P.; Galluzzo, M.; Mazzone, M.; Giordano, S.; Comoglio, P.M. Hypoxia promotes invasive growth by transcriptional activation of the met protooncogene. Cancer Cell 2003, 3, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kitajima, Y.; Ide, T.; Ohtsuka, T.; Miyazaki, K. Induction of hepatocyte growth factor activator gene expression under hypoxia activates the hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met system via hypoxia inducible factor-1 in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci. 2008, 99, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Spivak-Kroizman, T.R.; Hostetter, G.; Posner, R.; Aziz, M.; Hu, C.; Demeure, M.J.; von Hoff, D.; Hingorani, S.R.; Palculict, T.B.; Izzo, J.; et al. Hypoxia triggers hedgehog-mediated tumor-stromal interactions in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 3235–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bussolino, F.; di Renzo, M.F.; Ziche, M.; Bocchietto, E.; Olivero, M.; Naldini, L.; Gaudino, G.; Tamagnone, L.; Coffer, A.; Comoglio, P.M. Hepatocyte growth factor is a potent angiogenic factor which stimulates endothelial cell motility and growth. J. Cell. Biol. 1992, 119, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nakamura, Y.; Morishita, R.; Higaki, J.; Kida, I.; Aoki, M.; Moriguchi, A.; Yamada, K.; Hayashi, S.; Yo, Y.; Nakano, H.; et al. Hepatocyte growth factor is a novel member of the endothelium-specific growth factors: Additive stimulatory effect of hepatocyte growth factor with basic fibroblast growth factor but not with vascular endothelial growth factor. J. Hypertens. 1996, 14, 1067–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Patel, M.B.; Pothula, S.P.; Xu, Z.; Lee, A.K.; Goldstein, D.; Pirola, R.C.; Apte, M.V.; Wilson, J.S. The role of the hepatocyte growth factor/c-MET pathway in pancreatic stellate cell-endothelial cell interactions: antiangiogenic implications in pancreatic cancer. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 1891–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Laterra, J.; Nam, M.; Rosen, E.; Rao, J.S.; Lamszus, K.; Goldberg, I.D.; Johnston, P. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer enhances glioma growth and angiogenesis in vivo. Lab. Invest. 1997, 76, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Kubota, T.; Taiyoh, H.; Matsumura, A.; Murayama, Y.; Ichikawa, D.; Okamoto, K.; Fujiwara, H.; Ikoma, H.; Nakanishi, M.; Kikuchi, S.; et al. NK4, an HGF antagonist, prevents hematogenous pulmonary metastasis by inhibiting adhesion of CT26 cells to endothelial cells. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2009, 26, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Jiang, W.G.; Martin, T.A.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T.; Mansel, R.E. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor decreases the expression of occludin and transendothelial resistance (TER) and increases paracellular permeability in human vascular endothelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 1999, 181, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, H.; Shimura, H.; Aoki, Y.; Date, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T.; Tanaka, M. Hepatocyte growth factor stimulates the invasion of gallbladder carcinoma cell lines in vitro. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 1998, 16, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Nagakawa, O.; Murakami, K.; Yamaura, T.; Fujiuchi, Y.; Murata, J.; Fuse, H.; Saiki, I. Expression of membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) on prostate cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2000, 155, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jiang, Y.; Xu, W.; Lu, J.; He, F.; Yang, X. Invasiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines: contribution of hepatocyte growth factor, c-met, and transcription factor Ets-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 286, 1123–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ide, T.; Kitajima, Y.; Miyoshi, A.; Ohtsuka, T.; Mitsuno, M.; Ohtaka, K.; Koga, Y.; Miyazaki, K. Tumor-stromal cell interaction under hypoxia increases the invasiveness of pancreatic cancer cells through the hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met pathway. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 119, 2750–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Itakura, J.; Ishiwata, T.; Friess, H.; Fujii, H.; Matsumoto, Y.; Buchler, M.W.; Korc, M. Enhanced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human pancreatic cancer correlates with local disease progression. Clin. Cancer Res. 1997, 3, 1309–1316. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Seo, Y.; Baba, H.; Fukuda, T.; Takashima, M.; Sugimachi, K. High expression of vascular endothelial growth factor is associated with liver metastasis and a poor prognosis for patients with ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2000, 88, 2239–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Korc, M. Role of growth factors in pancreatic cancer. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 1998, 7, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Balaz, P.; Friess, H.; Buchler, M.W. Growth factors in pancreatic health and disease. Pancreatology 2001, 1, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Matsumura, A.; Kubota, T.; Taiyoh, H.; Fujiwara, H.; Okamoto, K.; Ichikawa, D.; Shiozaki, A.; Komatsu, S.; Nakanishi, M.; Kuriu, Y.; et al. HGF regulates VEGF expression via the c-Met receptor downstream pathways, PI3K/Akt, MAPK and STAT3, in CT26 murine cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 42, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Gatenby, R.A.; Gillies, R.J. A microenvironmental model of carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 2008, 8, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Riva, C.; Chauvin, C.; Pison, C.; Leverve, X. Cellular physiology and molecular events in hypoxia-induced apoptosis. Anticancer Res. 1998, 18, 4729–4736. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Williams, A.C.; Collard, T.J.; Paraskeva, C. An acidic environment leads to p53 dependent induction of apoptosis in human adenoma and carcinoma cell lines: implications for clonal selection during colorectal carcinogenesis. Oncogene 1999, 18, 3199–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Moellering, R.E.; Black, K.C.; Krishnamurty, C.; Baggett, B.K.; Stafford, P.; Rain, M.; Gatenby, R.A.; Gillies, R.J. Acid treatment of melanoma cells selects for invasive phenotypes. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2008, 25, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Alfarouk, K.O.; Shayoub, M.E.; Muddathir, A.K.; Elhassan, G.O.; Bashir, A.H. Evolution of tumor metabolism might reflect carcinogenesis as a reverse evolution process (dismantling of multicellularity). Cancers 2011, 3, 3002–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Warburg, O. On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science 1956, 124, 269–270. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Zhou, W.; Capello, M.; Fredolini, C.; Racanicchi, L.; Piemonti, L.; Liotta, L.A.; Novelli, F.; Petricoin, E.F. Proteomic analysis reveals Warburg effect and anomalous metabolism of glutamine in pancreatic cancer cells. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Son, J.; Lyssiotis, C.A.; Ying, H.; Wang, X.; Hua, S.; Ligorio, M.; Perera, R.M.; Ferrone, C.R.; Mullarky, E.; Shyh-Chang, N.; et al. Glutamine supports pancreatic cancer growth through a KRAS-regulated metabolic pathway. Nature 2013, 496, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Grinstein, S.; Rotin, D.; Mason, M.J. Na+/H+ exchange and growth factor-induced cytosolic pH changes. Role in cellular proliferation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1989, 988, 73–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Harguindey, S.; Orive, G.; Luis Pedraz, J.; Paradiso, A.; Reshkin, S.J. The role of pH dynamics and the Na+/H+ antiporter in the etiopathogenesis and treatment of cancer. Two faces of the same coin—one single nature. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1756, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Putney, L.K.; Denker, S.P.; Barber, D.L. The changing face of the Na+/H+ exchanger, NHE1: Structure, regulation, and cellular actions. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2002, 42, 527–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kaplan, D.L.; Boron, W.F. Long-term expression of c-H-ras stimulates Na-H and Na(+)-dependent Cl-HCO3 exchange in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 4116–4124. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Martinez-Zaguilan, R.; Seftor, E.A.; Seftor, R.E.; Chu, Y.W.; Gillies, R.J.; Hendrix, M.J. Acidic pH enhances the invasive behavior of human melanoma cells. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 1996, 14, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Paradiso, A.; Cardone, R.A.; Bellizzi, A.; Bagorda, A.; Guerra, L.; Tommasino, M.; Casavola, V.; Reshkin, S.J. The Na+-H+ exchanger-1 induces cytoskeletal changes involving reciprocal RhoA and Rac1 signaling, resulting in motility and invasion in MDA-MB-435 cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2004, 6, R616–R628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Kaneko, A.; Hayashi, N.; Tanaka, Y.; Horimoto, M.; Ito, T.; Sasaki, Y.; Fusamoto, H.; Kamada, T. Activation of Na+/H+ exchanger by hepatocyte growth factor in hepatocytes. Hepatology 1995, 22, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Steffan, J.J.; Williams, B.C.; Welbourne, T.; Cardelli, J.A. HGF-induced invasion by prostate tumor cells requires anterograde lysosome trafficking and activity of Na+-H+ exchangers. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lowenfels, A.B.; Maisonneuve, P.; Cavallini, G.; Ammann, R.W.; Lankisch, P.G.; Andersen, J.R.; Dimagno, E.P.; Andren-Sandberg, A.; Domellof, L. Pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Pancreatitis Study Group. N. Eng. J. Med. 1993, 328, 1433–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Clark, C.E.; Hingorani, S.R.; Mick, R.; Combs, C.; Tuveson, D.A.; Vonderheide, R.H. Dynamics of the immune reaction to pancreatic cancer from inception to invasion. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 9518–9527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. De Monte, L.; Reni, M.; Tassi, E.; Clavenna, D.; Papa, I.; Recalde, H.; Braga, M.; di Carlo, V.; Doglioni, C.; Protti, M.P. Intratumor T helper type 2 cell infiltrate correlates with cancer-associated fibroblast thymic stromal lymphopoietin production and reduced survival in pancreatic cancer. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 469–478. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ebrahimi, B.; Tucker, S.L.; Li, D.; Abbruzzese, J.L.; Kurzrock, R. Cytokines in pancreatic carcinoma: Correlation with phenotypic characteristics and prognosis. Cancer 2004, 101, 2727–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Scholz, A.; Heinze, S.; Detjen, K.M.; Peters, M.; Welzel, M.; Hauff, P.; Schirner, M.; Wiedenmann, B.; Rosewicz, S. Activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) supports the malignant phenotype of human pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 2003, 125, 891–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lee, L.S.; Banks, P.A.; Bellizzi, A.M.; Sainani, N.I.; Kadiyala, V.; Suleiman, S.; Conwell, D.L.; Paulo, J.A. Inflammatory protein profiling of pancreatic cyst fluid using EUS-FNA in tandem with cytokine microarray differentiates between branch duct IPMN and inflammatory cysts. J. Immunol. Methods 2012, 382, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Olive, K.P.; Jacobetz, M.A.; Davidson, C.J.; Gopinathan, A.; McIntyre, D.; Honess, D.; Madhu, B.; Goldgraben, M.A.; Caldwell, M.E.; Allard, D.; et al. Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 2009, 324, 1457–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Provenzano, P.P.; Cuevas, C.; Chang, A.E.; Goel, V.K.; Von Hoff, D.D.; Hingorani, S.R. Enzymatic targeting of the stroma ablates physical barriers to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 2012, 21, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jacobetz, M.A.; Chan, D.S.; Neesse, A.; Bapiro, T.E.; Cook, N.; Frese, K.K.; Feig, C.; Nakagawa, T.; Caldwell, M.E.; Zecchini, H.I.; et al. Hyaluronan impairs vascular function and drug delivery in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Gut 2013, 62, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Liu, X.; Yao, W.; Newton, R.C.; Scherle, P.A. Targeting the c-MET signaling pathway for cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2008, 17, 997–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Birchmeier, C.; Birchmeier, W.; Gherardi, E.; vande Woude, G.F. Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Di Renzo, M.F.; Olivero, M.; Martone, T.; Maffe, A.; Maggiora, P.; Stefani, A.D.; Valente, G.; Giordano, S.; Cortesina, G.; Comoglio, P.M. Somatic mutations of the MET oncogene are selected during metastatic spread of human HNSC carcinomas. Oncogene 2000, 19, 1547–1555. [Google Scholar]
  96. Ferracini, R.; Di Renzo, M.F.; Scotlandi, K.; Baldini, N.; Olivero, M.; Lollini, P.; Cremona, O.; Campanacci, M.; Comoglio, P.M. The Met/HGF receptor is over-expressed in human osteosarcomas and is activated by either a paracrine or an autocrine circuit. Oncogene 1995, 10, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Bean, J.; Brennan, C.; Shih, J.Y.; Riely, G.; Viale, A.; Wang, L.; Chitale, D.; Motoi, N.; Szoke, J.; Broderick, S.; et al. MET amplification occurs with or without T790M mutations in EGFR mutant lung tumors with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20932–20937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Schmidt, L.; Duh, F.M.; Chen, F.; Kishida, T.; Glenn, G.; Choyke, P.; Scherer, S.W.; Zhuang, Z.; Lubensky, I.; Dean, M.; et al. Germline and somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the MET proto-oncogene in papillary renal carcinomas. Nat. Genet. 1997, 16, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Houldsworth, J.; Cordon-Cardo, C.; Ladanyi, M.; Kelsen, D.P.; Chaganti, R.S. Gene amplification in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. 1990, 50, 6417–6422. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Clinical Trials Involving HGF/SF-Met Inhibitor. Available online: www.vai.org/metclinicaltrials (accessed on 21 July 2015).
  101. Sharma, N.; Adjei, A.A. In the clinic: ongoing clinical trials evaluating c-MET-inhibiting drugs. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2011, 3, S37–S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. A Randomized Phase 2 Study of ARQ 197 Versus Gemcitabine in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00558207 (accessed on 21 July 2015).
  103. Brandes, F.; Schmidt, K.; Wagner, C.; Redekopf, J.; Schlitt, H.J.; Geissler, E.K.; Lang, S.A. Targeting cMET with INC280 impairs tumour growth and improves efficacy of gemcitabine in a pancreatic cancer model. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Schoffski, P.; Garcia, J.A.; Stadler, W.M.; Gil, T.; Jonasch, E.; Tagawa, S.T.; Smitt, M.; Yang, X.; Oliner, K.S.; Anderson, A.; et al. A phase II study of the efficacy and safety of AMG 102 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2011, 108, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Wen, P.Y.; Schiff, D.; Cloughesy, T.F.; Raizer, J.J.; Laterra, J.; Smitt, M.; Wolf, M.; Oliner, K.S.; Anderson, A.; Zhu, M.; et al. A phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2011, 13, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ryan, C.J.; Rosenthal, M.; Ng, S.; Alumkal, J.; Picus, J.; Gravis, G.; Fizazi, K.; Forget, F.; Machiels, J.P.; Srinivas, S.; et al. Targeted MET inhibition in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A randomized phase II study and biomarker analysis with rilotumumab plus mitoxantrone and prednisone. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Scagliotti, G.V.; Novello, S.; Schiller, J.H.; Hirsh, V.; Sequist, L.V.; Soria, J.C.; von Pawel, J.; Schwartz, B.; von Roemeling, R.; Sandler, A.B. Rationale and design of MARQUEE: A phase III, randomized, double-blind study of tivantinib plus erlotinib versus placebo plus erlotinib in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic, nonsquamous, non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin. Lung Cancer 2012, 13, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Santoro, A.; Rimassa, L.; Borbath, I.; Daniele, B.; Salvagni, S.; Van Laethem, J.L.; van Vlierberghe, H.; Trojan, J.; Kolligs, F.T.; Weiss, A.; et al. Tivantinib for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wagner, A.J.; Goldberg, J.M.; Dubois, S.G.; Choy, E.; Rosen, L.; Pappo, A.; Geller, J.; Judson, I.; Hogg, D.; Senzer, N.; et al. Tivantinib (ARQ 197), a selective inhibitor of MET, in patients with microphthalmia transcription factor-associated tumors: results of a multicenter phase 2 trial. Cancer 2012, 118, 5894–5902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Shaw, A.T.; Kim, D.W.; Nakagawa, K.; Seto, T.; Crino, L.; Ahn, M.J.; De Pas, T.; Besse, B.; Solomon, B.J.; Blackhall, F.; et al. Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N. Eng. J. Med. 2013, 368, 2385–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Elisei, R.; Schlumberger, M.J.; Muller, S.P.; Schoffski, P.; Brose, M.S.; Shah, M.H.; Licitra, L.; Jarzab, B.; Medvedev, V.; Kreissl, M.C.; et al. Cabozantinib in progressive medullary thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 3639–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Choueiri, T.K.; Vaishampayan, U.; Rosenberg, J.E.; Logan, T.F.; Harzstark, A.L.; Bukowski, R.M.; Rini, B.I.; Srinivas, S.; Stein, M.N.; Adams, L.M.; et al. Phase II and biomarker study of the dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor foretinib in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Shah, M.A.; Wainberg, Z.A.; Catenacci, D.V.; Hochster, H.S.; Ford, J.; Kunz, P.; Lee, F.C.; Kallender, H.; Cecchi, F.; Rabe, D.C.; et al. Phase II study evaluating 2 dosing schedules of oral foretinib (GSK1363089), cMET/VEGFR2 inhibitor, in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Michieli, P.; Basilico, C.; Pennacchietti, S.; Maffe, A.; Tamagnone, L.; Giordano, S.; Bardelli, A.; Comoglio, P.M. Mutant Met-mediated transformation is ligand-dependent and can be inhibited by HGF antagonists. Oncogene 1999, 18, 5221–5231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Tomioka, D.; Maehara, N.; Kuba, K.; Mizumoto, K.; Tanaka, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T. Inhibition of growth, invasion, and metastasis of human pancreatic carcinoma cells by NK4 in an orthotopic mouse model. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 7518–7524. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Qian, L.W.; Mizumoto, K.; Inadome, N.; Nagai, E.; Sato, N.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T.; Tanaka, M. Radiation stimulates HGF receptor/c-Met expression that leads to amplifying cellular response to HGF stimulation via upregulated receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and MAP kinase activity in pancreatic cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 2003, 104, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Date, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Shimura, H.; Tanaka, M.; Nakamura, T. HGF/NK4 is a specific antagonist for pleiotrophic actions of hepatocyte growth factor. FEBS Lett. 1997, 420, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Date, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Kuba, K.; Shimura, H.; Tanaka, M.; Nakamura, T. Inhibition of tumor growth and invasion by a four-kringle antagonist (HGF/NK4) for hepatocyte growth factor. Oncogene 1998, 17, 3045–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Gherardi, E.; Sandin, S.; Petoukhov, M.V.; Finch, J.; Youles, M.E.; Ofverstedt, L.G.; Miguel, R.N.; Blundell, T.L.; Vande Woude, G.F.; Skoglund, U.; et al. Structural basis of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and MET signalling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 4046–4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Mizuno, S.; Nakamura, T. HGF-MET cascade, a key target for inhibiting cancer metastasis: The impact of NK4 discovery on cancer biology and therapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 888–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rizwani, W.; Allen, A.E.; Trevino, J.G. Hepatocyte Growth Factor from a Clinical Perspective: A Pancreatic Cancer Challenge. Cancers 2015, 7, 1785-1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7030861

AMA Style

Rizwani W, Allen AE, Trevino JG. Hepatocyte Growth Factor from a Clinical Perspective: A Pancreatic Cancer Challenge. Cancers. 2015; 7(3):1785-1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7030861

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rizwani, Wasia, Amanda E. Allen, and Jose G. Trevino. 2015. "Hepatocyte Growth Factor from a Clinical Perspective: A Pancreatic Cancer Challenge" Cancers 7, no. 3: 1785-1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7030861

APA Style

Rizwani, W., Allen, A. E., & Trevino, J. G. (2015). Hepatocyte Growth Factor from a Clinical Perspective: A Pancreatic Cancer Challenge. Cancers, 7(3), 1785-1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7030861

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop