Next Article in Journal
Promoting Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation on Ti-Doped Fe2O3 Nanowires Photoanode by O2 Plasma Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Zirconium-Doped Chromium IV Oxide Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Characterization, and Photocatalysis towards the Degradation of Organic Dyes
Previous Article in Journal
Biojet Fuel Production from Waste of Palm Oil Mill Effluent through Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Decarboxylation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Degradation of the Light Sensitive Organic Dyes: Methylene Blue and Rose Bengal by Using Urea Derived g-C3N4/ZnO Nanocomposites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bismuth Oxyhalides for NOx Degradation under Visible Light: The Role of the Chloride Precursor

by
Francesca Tessore
1,*,
Federico Galli
2,
Dalma Schieppati
2,
Daria C. Boffito
2,
Alessandro Di Michele
3,
Francesco Demartin
1,
Giuseppina Cerrato
4,* and
Claudia L. Bianchi
1
1
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milano, Italy
2
Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnique Montréal, C.P. 6079, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada
3
Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Via Pascoli, 06123 Perugia, Italy
4
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(1), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010081
Submission received: 19 December 2020 / Revised: 30 December 2020 / Accepted: 4 January 2021 / Published: 8 January 2021

Abstract

:
Photocatalysis is a green technology for tackling water and air contamination. A valid alternative to the most exploited photocatalytic material, TiO2, is bismuth oxyhalides, which feature a wider bandgap energy range and use visible radiation to attain photoexcitation. Moreover, their layered structure favors the separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs, with an enhancement in photocatalytic activity. Controlled doping of bismuth oxyhalides with metallic bismuth nanoparticles allows for further boosting of the performance of the material. In the present work, we synthesized Y%Bi-doped BiO(Cl0.875Br0.125) (Y = 0.85, 1, 2, 10) photocatalysts, using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide as the bromide source and varying the chloride source to assess the impact that both length and branching of the hydrocarbon chain might have on the framing and layering of the material. A change in the amount of the reducing agent NaBH4 allowed tuning of the percentage of metallic bismuth. After a thorough characterization (XRPD, SEM, TEM, UV-DRS, XPS), the photocatalytic activity of the catalysts was tested in the degradation of NOx under visible light, reaching a remarkable 53% conversion after 3 h of illumination for the material prepared using cetylpyridinium chloride.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Water and air pollution has become a worldwide concern as it affects humans, flora, and fauna. Air pollution kills about 3 million people a year [1]. Water pollution accounts for unknown long- and short-term effects on both aquatic life and human health [2] and restricted access to safe water causes more than 1.6 million deaths annually [3].
In the last 20 years, photocatalysis has been applied to a wide variety of fields, from the environment [4,5,6], to the building industry [7], and energy-related areas [8] to biomedical specialties. The absorption of a photon of proper energy by a semiconductor promotes an electron from the valence band to the conduction band, which in turn creates an electron vacancy (hole) in the valence band. The electron–hole pairs can either recombine or take part in a chemical reaction that involves surface-adsorbed species.
Photocatalysis has proven to be a valid technology for tackling water and air contamination [9]. Indeed, it is adequate for air purification, especially in indoor environments, as the concentration of pollutants is low and no saturation of the surface of photocatalysts can occur.
Because of its optimal physicochemical properties, titanium dioxide (TiO2) is the most exploited photocatalytic material in almost every field of application. It is chemically stable, nontoxic, and cheap. In particular, Degussa P25 features great performance in both aqueous [10,11] and air environments [12]. However, its nanometric particle size limits its application as it poses serious threats when it comes to dermal and pulmonary exposure [13]. Moreover, pollutant conversion kinetics by TiO2 is not fast enough to comply with environmental needs. Bianchi et al., for instance, reported total elimination of ethanol and acetaldehyde in 60 min [14].
In fact, TiO2 has wide bandgap energy (3.2 eV for the anatase phase and 3.0 eV for the rutile phase) [15] and it is active only in the ultraviolet region [16], which is less than 10% of the overall solar radiation. TiO2 doped with silver species exhibits tiny to significant increases in photocatalytic activity if, for instance, we consider acetone abatement, as reported by Stucchi et al. [9]: they observed a 3–11% increase after 6 h of reaction and 24% of acetone converted into oxidized products.
A valid alternative to TiO2 is represented by bismuth oxides, which feature a wider bandgap energy range and use visible radiation to attain photoexcitation.
Specifically, bismuth oxyhalides (BiOX, with X = F, Cl, Br, I) exhibit a layered structure wherein halides line up between [Bi2O2] layers. This arrangement elicits the formation of an internal electric field between positive [Bi2O2]2+ layers and the negative halogen ones [17]. This induces a beneficial separation of the photogenerated electron–hole pairs, thus enhancing the photocatalytic activity of the material [18].
Wang et al. synthetized xBiOI-(1 − x)BiOCl [17] and xBiOBr-(1 − x)BiOI [19] catalysts with high photocatalytic activity under visible light for the degradation of methyl orange (MO), reaching a 92% degree of photodegradation of MO after 5 h of reaction with BiOBr0.75I0.25.
Sasson et al. reported the synthesis of several BiO(ClxBr1−x) photocatalysts by hydrothermal method using hydrohalic acids and they proved excellent activity for Rhodamine B and Acetophenone degradation in an aqueous environment [20].
They also optimized the synthetic protocol for the preparation of BiO(ClxBr1−x) through the use of quaternary ammonium salts, namely cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) and bromide (CTAB) (Figure 1), in acidic aqueous conditions at room temperature, to create 3D flowerlike nanostructures with enhanced activity under visible radiation [21]. A controlled doping of these mixed oxyhalides with metallic bismuth nanoparticles allowed novel Y%Bi-doped BiOClxBr1−x heterojunction solid solutions to be obtained with a more effective electron–hole pair separation, further boosting the photocatalytic performances towards degradation of common organic pollutants in water under visible light illumination [22] or solar irradiation [23].
Bismuth halides and metal bismuth are reported to be very effective towards the photodegradation of NOx, which the World Health Organization (WHO) ranks among the major air pollutants [24].
Metallic bismuth showed itself in plasmonic photocatalysis. Under 280 nm light radiation, 0.1 g of 100 nm Bi nanoparticles oxidized 45% NO (initial concentration of 600 ppb) [25]. Metallic bismuth also activates amorphous bismuth oxide under visible light: 15 mL min−1 of a NO stream (550 ppb) was oxidized with 55% conversion [26].
Zhang et al. degraded NO with bismuth oxyhalides (with Cl, Br, and I) [27]. Their bandgap and thermal stability decrease with the increase in atomic number of the halide. BiOBr showed higher oxidative power for NO2 than BiOCl and BiOI, with an exit-to-feed removal rate of 21%.
In the present work, we synthesized Y%Bi-doped BiO(Cl0.875Br0.125) (Y = 0.85, 1, 2, 10) photocatalysts, setting CTAB as the main bromide source, since BiOBr species have been reported to be more photocatalytically active than bare TiO2 [19] and more active than other oxyhalides [27]. Instead, we varied the chloride source (dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DTAC), cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC), cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and benzyltrimethylammonium chloride (BTAC), see Figure 1) to assess the effect that both the length and branching of the hydrocarbon chain may elicit on (i) framing and layering of the material and (ii) the final photocatalytic activity.
A synopsis of all the investigated photocatalysts is reported in Table 1.
The choice of the Cl/Br ratio was due to the exceptional photocatalytic performances reported for the BiO(Cl0.875Br0.125) composite, capable of completely abating 15 mg L−1 of Rhodamine B aqueous solution in 120 s under visible light irradiation [21].
Moreover, by tuning the amount of the reducing agent, NaBH4, we partially reduced the amount of Bi3+ species present on the catalyst to metallic Bi to exploit its plasmonic band to increase the photocatalytic effect.
Since the main participant of ambient pollution is ozone, as it forms through the photochemical oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and carbon monoxide (CO) in the presence of nitrogen oxides (NOx) [28], we investigated the activity of our catalysts by degrading NOx under visible light, reaching a remarkable 53% conversion after 3 h of illumination for the catalyst prepared using CPC. Indeed, to the best of our knowledge, no data for these catalysts are available for the gas phase degradation of NOx.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. XRPD and SEM

All the XRPD patterns (Figures S1–S8 in the Supplementary Materials) can be indexed according to the tetragonal P4/nmm space group of the BiOX phases and are similar to those of the BiOClxBr(1−x) family, with the same broadening of the peaks observed by other authors [21,22]. We did not identify the characteristic peaks of the Bi0 particles probably because of their low content and high dispersion. We can safely assume that Bi0 particles are deposited only on the surface [22].
The relative intensity of the peaks in the BiOClxBr(1−x) patterns is affected by the morphology of the composite catalyst. In particular, samples 4, 7, and 8 show an increase in intensity of the (001) reflection at 2θ ~ 12°, which is the most intense reflection in the pattern, due to the preferred orientation of the catalyst particles along that direction.
This feature matches the SEM observations (Figure 2), which evidenced 2D-lamellar aggregates for the same samples, similar to the ones obtained starting from ammonium chloride as the Cl precursor and Bi(NO3)3 [29,30].
On the other hand, the preferential orientation, and consequently, the (001) reflection, are less intense for samples 1, 2, 3, and 6, which, accordingly, exhibit a spherical flowerlike 3D morphology.
Sample 5 appears as an exception, since it presents an intense (001) reflection in the XRPD pattern, but an undefined morphology, more similar to a flowerlike aggregate, even if TEM analysis also evidences the presence of lamellar aggregates. However, its crystallinity is low (see Figure S5), which presumably is the origin of this anomaly.
We can tentatively correlate the XRPD patterns and SEM observations with both the nature of the chloride precursor and the amount of NaBH4 added. Indeed, trimethylammonium salts, such as DTAC, CTAC, and BTAC, produce flowerlike aggregates, with apparently no perceivable effect of the length of the alkyl chain and of the amount of NaBH4 added. On the other hand, the more sterically hindered pyridinium derivative CPC leads to sheet-like morphologies. Moreover, we also observe an effect of the amount of NaBH4, since an enhancement of the latter from 0.85 eq. (sample 2) to 1.2–10 eq. (samples 4, 7, and 8) seems to favor a lamellar morphology.
Therefore, we conclude that both the nature of the reagents providing the chloride for the composite catalyst and the amount of NaBH4 added are critical for determining the final morphology of the composite.
Shenawi-Khalil et al., to verify Vegard’s law for the BiOClxBr(1−x) solid solutions, derived the following linear relation between the unit-cell c parameter and the Cl/Br ratio: c = 8.099 − 0.7386x [20]. The composition computed using the values of unit cell c parameter for all our prepared samples gave x values in the 0.83–0.90 range, with the only exception of sample 7, which gave x = 0.98.

2.2. HRTEM

As for the investigation carried out by means of HRTEM, all the samples that were investigated exhibit variable morphological features, ranging from extended thin layers with no defined contours to aggregates of small particles with more roundish contours (see Figure 3). Occasionally, it is possible to observe the presence of crystallinity, witnessed by large patches of fringe patterns.
If the investigation is carried out at higher magnification, again for all the samples, similar features are present (see Figure 4), even though for sample 5 (Figure S11 in the Supplementary Materials) it was hard to identify nanoparticles highly interacting with one another: the material is mainly composed of lamellar aggregates, confirming the FE-SEM results.
Both d(hkl) = (011) with distances of ca. 0.34 nm and d(hkl) = (110) with distances of ca. 0.27 nm (similar to the one measured by Yan et al. on pristine BiOCl nanoplates [30]) are observed as major components of bismuth oxide chloride (bismoclite) (see ICDD card n. 01-073-2060). The high crystalline nature of the samples is also witnessed by the FFT analyses of the direct images, obtaining in all cases diffraction patterns confirming the assignments to the above families of crystal planes. The presence of black fringes in the bottom-left part of Figure 4b ascribes to the thickness or Moiré’s fringes generated by the superimposition of crystalline particles with similar fringe patterns.

2.3. DRS

The UV–vis DRS spectra of the photocatalysts (Figure S9 in Supplementary Materials) show an intense absorption centered in the ultraviolet region (220–390 nm), and are comparable regardless of the chloride source involved in the synthesis, with the only exception of sample 7, which presents a broader band extending through the visible.
The Kubelka–Munk model [31] allowed the determination of the bandgap of the photocatalysts through a Tauc plot [32]. The values of (Ahν)1/2 were plotted versus photoenergy (Figure S10 in Supplementary Materials), estimating bandgaps (Eg) from the intercept of the tangent to the plots (Table 2) [27].
The bandgaps are in the range 2.81–3.07 eV, in reasonable agreement with the values reported for pure BiOBr and BiOCl (2.76 and 3.20 eV, respectively) [27].

2.4. XPS

XPS analysis allowed us to ascertain the amount of metallic bismuth on the surface of our samples. We analyzed the BiO 4f7/2 and 4f5/2 peaks and deconvoluted them, considering a slit of 5.31 eV and Bi0 peaks to be at 156.9 and 162.3 eV, and calculating the area ratio between Bi0 and Bi3+ peaks (Figure 5).
While the amount of Bi0 on the surface of all the samples is in the range 4.6–7.5%, for samples 2 and 6, a higher percentage (22% and 30%, respectively) was found (Table 2). For sample 6, this might be due to the different preparation, since the chloride precursor was added to the reaction mixture using a 25% wt. aqueous solution of CTAC, instead of the solid surfactant as in the other syntheses.
On the other hand, the 22% metallic bismuth found for sample 2 is quite surprising, but nicely correlates with its enhanced ability to convert NOx.
The Br atomic percentage in the surface of all samples is between 2 and 6%. On the other hand, the Cl atomic percentage varies between 13% and 29% (Table 2).

2.5. Catalytic Tests

Most samples converted a maximum of 20% NOx in 3 h: this result is comparable to the result obtained with the micrometric anatase/rutile heterojunction (Kronos 1077) [33]. Sample 2 exceptionally converted 53% of NOx (see Figure 6). Li et al. tested bismuth oxide for the same reaction, employing an LED light with 10 times higher power (150 vs. 16.8 W in this work). In addition, the NO concentration they employed was about 10 times the one of this work [26]. In another work, Wang et al. obtained a fast NO oxidation using a 150 W lamp and a continuous reactor configuration, reaching a peak oxidation of 35 % after 5 min, which decreased because of NOx- deposition on the catalyst’s active sites [34], a phenomenon that we also observed in the long-run NOx photodegradation reaction [5]. Considering pseudo-first order kinetics and a direct proportion between the rate constant and the LED power applied (which is valid in the case of NOx degradation, as we obtained the same dependence in another research [5]), sample 2 results 4 times faster compared to bismuth oxide for this reaction under LED light (rate constant of 0.07 versus 0.02 h−1g−1cm−2W−1). Compared with bismuth oxyhalides nanolayers, our catalysts showed lower performances [27]. However, the nanoplates deactivated because of NO3- deposition on their surface, resulting in a very low catalyst stability (less than 5 min) [27]. Moreover, the dimension of the particles in the nanometric range poses health concerns. Sample 2 shows similar performances to Ag nanoparticles-doped micrometric titania [34] prepared in basic conditions with a PVP/Ag molar ratio of 1 or 50, but the reaction kinetics are not comparable with the sample prepared with a PVP/Ag molar ratio of 3 [34]. Further improvements are necessary to enhance the reaction kinetics of the bismuth oxyhalides, which however remain a component with no nanoparticles deposited on them, i.e., intrinsically safer for health. Gnayem et al. studied the photodegradation of various recalcitrant organic contaminants in the aqueous phase and concluded that bismuth oxyhalides are stable after many catalytic cycles [22]. Considering that (1) we studied a gas phase reaction, characterized by lower mechanical attrition on the catalyst’s surface due to no stirring and lower medium viscosity and (2) we employed lower energy (LED) light compared to UV, we assume that catalysts are stable at the operative conditions.
Concerning the photodegradation of the NOx mechanism, we speculate that it proceeds through the adsorption of NO on the surface of the catalyst, followed by its reduction to N2O by the electrons photopromoted to the valence band of our catalysts. Eventually, N2O decomposes to dinitrogen, while the oxygen reacts to another adsorbed oxygen to give dioxygen. Xu et al. proposed the same mechanism for Ag-doped TiO2 [35]. However, we refrain from speculating on the electron–hole pair formation mechanism (plasmonic resonance of Bi(0), heterojunction created by Bi oxyhalides, or main bandgap promotion) since we do not possess enough information to make such a claim.
The content of metallic bismuth on the surface correlates with the final NOx conversion (R2 = 0.53, see Figure 7) except for sample 6, which was prepared starting from an aqueous solution of the chloride precursors, instead of adding the surfactant directly to the reaction mixture. The same trend was reported for the liquid phase discoloration of RhB solution [30].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis

All the reagents were purchased by Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany).
The synthesis of Y%Bi-doped BiO(Cl0.87Br0.13) (Y = 0.85, 1, 2, 10; Table 1) was achieved through the reported protocol [22]. In the typical procedure, we placed ground Bi(NO3)3∙5H2O into a 50 mL round-bottom flask. We added deionized water (7 mL) and glacial acetic acid (4 mL). The mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature until a clear and transparent solution formed.
In the meantime, we prepared a second solution in a 100 mL round-bottom flask by dissolving CTAB (0.125 eq.) and the selected chloride precursor (0.875 eq.) in deionized water (10 mL).
We then dropped the Bi(NO3)3∙5H2O solution into the surfactant solution in 30 min under vigorous stirring. Eventually, we added variable amounts of NaBH4 (0.85–10 eq. with respect to Bi(NO3)3∙5H2O) to reduce Bi3+ to Bi0. After 1 h of vigorous stirring at room temperature, we recovered the precipitate upon filtration and washed it with EtOH (2 × 5 mL) and deionized water (2 × 20 mL). It was then dried overnight at room temperature. The final product was a white powder.

3.2. Characterization

3.2.1. X-ray Powder Diffraction

A Philips PW3020 diffractometer (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a 0.25° divergence slit, 0.04 rad soller slits, and a 0.2 mm receiving slit determined the crystallinity of our samples. The source of X-ray radiation was a graphite monochromated CuKα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) with the following measurement conditions: tube voltage of 40 kV, tube current of 40 mA, step scan mode with a step size of 0.02°, and counting time of 1s per step.
A background quartz sample held the sample. The instrument recorded the diffraction pattern between 10° and 70° at room temperature.

3.2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy

A Field Emission Electron Scanning Microscope (FE-SEM) LEO 1525 ZEISS (Jena, Germany) determined the samples’ morphology. The samples were deposited on conductive carbon adhesive tape and metalized with chromium.
A high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM JEOL 3010-UHR, Tokyo, Japan) inspected the micro- and nanostructure of all the samples (acceleration potential: 300 kV; LaB6 filament). Samples were dry dispersed on Cu grids covered with Lacey carbon Cu grids.

3.2.3. UV–vis Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

A double beam UV–vis–NIR scanning spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-3600 plus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a diffuse reflectance accessory (integrating sphere from BIS-603) recorded the diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of the photocatalysts in the wavelength range 220–2600 nm. The finely ground powder sample was uniformly pressed in a circular disk (with an external diameter of 0.5 cm) included in the sample holder; the latter was inserted in a special quartz cuvette and then fixed on a window of the integrating sphere for the reflectance measurements. BaSO4 was the reflectance reference compound.

3.2.4. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

An M-probe apparatus (XPS –M-Probe, Surface Science Instruments, Mountainview, CA, USA) recorded the XPS spectra. The instrument is equipped with a monochromatic Al anode and is calibrated using C1s peak at 284.6 eV.

3.2.5. Photocatalytic Tests

To prepare the sample, we suspended 50 mg of ground powder in a beaker with 5 mL of isopropanol. An ultrasonic bath sonicated the solution to obtain a uniform dispersion. Successively, we deposited the dispersion on a clean glass support (117 × 33 mm). We let the solvent evaporate and we repeated the deposition step two more times.
All coated glass supports were then stored in a sealed, dry, and dark environment for a maximum of 48 h before tests.
The reactor is a cylindrical glass reactor (20 L capacity) with an LED lamp (MW mean well, 350 mA, 9–48 V 16.8 W, emission range: 400–700 nm) placed on top at a distance so that the intensity of the radiation on the sample is equal to 1000 lux. A stirring bar homogenized the composition inside the reactor. Chemiluminescence (AC32-ENVEA, Verano Brianza, Italy) measured NOx concentration. Each test lasted 3 h.

4. Conclusions

We synthesized a series of metallic bismuth-doped bismuth oxyhalides and varied the chloride source to tune surface Cl species content. Our synthesis produced pristine compounds whose morphology depends on the chloride source. In particular, trimethylammonium salts favor flowerlike aggregates, whereas the more sterically hindered pyridinium salt CPC leads to sheet-like morphologies when coupled with amounts of added NaBH4 higher than 1 eq. XRD and HRTEM confirmed the structure of the samples. XPS analyses individuated a correlation between the metallic Bi content on the catalyst’s surface with the final conversion of NOx, and we individuated this trend for the first time in a gas phase reaction. The highest performing photocatalyst among the series is the one prepared using CPC as the chloride source and 0.85 eq. of added NaBH4, which produced a remarkable 53% conversion of NOx after 3 h of visible light irradiation. This active sample is composed of crystalline nanoparticles, which feature a flowerlike morphology. The mechanism of action for this catalyst is still unclear for the oxidation of NOx and it will be the object of future works.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/11/1/81/s1, Figure S1: XRPD pattern of sample 1, Figure S2: XRPD pattern of sample 2, Figure S3: XRPD pattern of sample 3, Figure S4: XRPD pattern of sample 4, Figure S5: XRPD pattern of sample 5, Figure S6: XRPD pattern of sample 6, Figure S7: XRPD pattern of sample 7, Figure S8: XRPD pattern of sample 8, Figure S9: DRS spectra of samples 1-8, Figure S10: (Ahν)1/2 vs photoenergy for samples 1-8, Figure S11: TEM-HRTEM images of sample 5.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.T. and C.L.B.; Investigation, F.T., F.G., A.D.M., F.D., G.C.; Writing-original draft, F.T. and F.G.; Writing-review and editing, F.T., F.G., D.S., D.C.B., A.D.M., F.D., G.C. and C.L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Schwarzenbach, R.P.; Egli, T.; Hofstetter, T.; von Gunten, U.; Wehrli, B. Global Water Pollution and Human Health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 2010, 35, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stevens, G.; Mascarenhas, M.; Mathers, C. Global health risks: Progress and challenges. Bull. World Health Organ. 2009, 87, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Elfiad, A.; Boffito, D.C.; Khemassia, S.; Galli, F.; Chegrouche, S.; Meddour-Boukhobza, L. Eco-friendly synthesis from industrial wastewater of Fe and Cu nanoparticles over NaX zeolite and activity in 4-nitrophenol reduction. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 96, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bianchi, C.L.; Pirola, C.; Galli, F.; Vitali, S.; Minguzzi, A.; Stucchi, M.; Manenti, F.; Capucci, V. NOx degradation in a continuous large-scale reactor using full-size industrial photocatalytic tiles. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Galli, F.; Compagnoni, M.; Vitali, D.; Pirola, C.; Bianchi, C.L.; Villa, A.; Prati, L.; Rossetti, I. CO2 photoreduction at high pressure to both gas and liquid products over titanium dioxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 200, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pirola, C.; Boffito, D.C.; Vitali, S.; Bianchi, C.L. Photocatalytic coatings for building industry: Study of 1 year of activity in the NO x degradation. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2012, 9, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ostad, M.I.; Shahrak, M.N.; Galli, F. Photocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction to methanol catalyzed by ZnO, Pt, Au, and Cu nanoparticles decorated zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 101373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stucchi, M.; Galli, F.; Bianchi, C.L.; Pirola, C.; Boffito, D.C.; Biasioli, F.; Capucci, V. Simultaneous photodegradation of VOC mixture by TiO2 powders. Chemosphere 2018, 193, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Das, A.; Patra, M.; Wary, R.R.; Gupta, P.; Nair, R.G. Photocatalytic performance analysis of Degussa P25 under various laboratory conditions. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 377, 012101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ragaini, V.; Selli, E.; Bianchi, C.L.; Pirola, C. Sono-photocatalytic degradation of 2-chlorophenol in water: Kinetic and energetic comparison with other techniques. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2001, 8, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bianchi, C.L.; Pirola, C.; Galli, F.; Cerrato, G.; Morandi, S.; Capucci, V. Pigmentary TiO2: A challenge for its use as photocatalyst in NOx air purification. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 261, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sayes, C.M.; Wahi, R.; Kurian, P.A.; Liu, Y.; West, J.L.; Ausman, K.D.; Warheit, D.B.; Colvin, V.L. Correlating Nanoscale Titania Structure with Toxicity: A Cytotoxicity and Inflammatory Response Study with Human Dermal Fibroblasts and Human Lung Epithelial Cells. Toxicol. Sci. 2006, 92, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bianchi, C.L.; Pirola, C.; Galli, F.; Stucchi, M.; Mofrandi, S.; Cerrato, G.; Capucci, V. Nano and micro-TiO2 for the photodegradation of ethanol: Experimental data and kinetic modelling. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 53419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Linsebigler, A.L.; Lu, G.; Yates, J.T. Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schieppati, D.; Galli, F.; Peyot, M.L.; Yargeau, V.; Bianchi, C.L.; Boffito, D.C. An ultrasound-assisted photocatalytic treatment to remove an herbicidal pollutant from wastewaters. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 54, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, W.; Huang, F.; Lin, X. xBiOI–(1−x)BiOCl as efficient visible-light-driven photocatalysts. Scr. Mater. 2007, 56, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, K.; Liu, C.; Huang, F.; Zheng, C.; Wang, W. Study of the electronic structure and photocatalytic activity of the BiOCl photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2006, 68, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, W.; Huang, F.; Lin, X.; Yang, J. Visible-light-responsive photocatalysts xBiOBr–(1−x)BiOI. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shenawi-Khalil, S.; Uvarov, V.; Kritsman, Y.; Menes, E.; Popov, I.; Sasson, Y. A new family of BiO(ClxBr1−x) visible light sensitive photocatalysts. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gnayem, H.; Sasson, Y. Hierarchical nanostructured 3D flowerlike BiOClxBr1-x semiconductors with exceptional visible light photocatalytic activity. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gnayem, H.; Sasson, Y. Nanostructured 3D Sunflower-like Bismuth Doped BiOClxBr1-x Solid Solutions with Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity as a Remarkably Efficient Technology for Water Purification. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 19201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dandapat, A.; Horovitz, I.; Gnayem, H.; Sasson, Y.; Avisar, D.; Luxbacher, T.; Mamane, H. Solar Photocatalytic Degradation of Trace Organic Pollutants in Water by Bi(0)-Doped Bismuth Oxyhalide Thin Films. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 10858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. World Health Organization. Ambient (Outdoor) Air Pollution; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dong, F.; Xiong, T.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Feng, X.; Wu, Z. A semimetal bismuth element as a direct plasmonic photocatalyst. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 10386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, X.; Sun, Y.; Xiong, T.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Dong, F. Activation of amorphous bismuth oxide via plasmonic Bi metal for efficient visible-light photocatalysis. J. Catal. 2017, 352, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Dong, F. Visible-light photocatalytic removal of NO in air over BiOX (X = Cl, Br, I) single-crystal nanoplates prepared at room temperature. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 6740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jacob, D.J. Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, W.; Xu, Y.; Dong, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, M.; Fu, Q.; Wu, M.; Lei, Y. Bismuth oxychloride nanoflake assemblies as a new anode for potassium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 6507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yan, Y.; Yang, H.; Yi, Z.; Xian, T. NaBH4-reduction induced evolution of Bi nanoparticles from BiOCl nanoplates and construction of promising Bi@BiOCl hybrid photocatalysts. Catalysts 2019, 9, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Murphy, A.B. Band-gap determination from diffuse reflectance measurements of semiconductor films, and application to photoelectrochemical water-splitting. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2007, 91, 1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tauc, J. Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous Ge and Si. Mater. Res. Bull. 1968, 3, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cerrato, G.; Galli, F.; Boffito, D.C.; Operti, L.; Bianchi, C.L. Correlation preparation parameters/activity for microTiO2 decorated with SilverNPs for NOx photodegradation under LED light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 253, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, L.; Xu, K.; Cui, W.; Lv, D.; Wang, L.; Ren, L.; Xu, X.; Dong, F.; Dou, S.-X.; Hao, W.; et al. Monolayer epitaxial heterostructures for selective visible-light-driven photocatalytic NO oxidation. Adv. Func. Mater. 2019, 29, 1808084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xu, M.; Wang, Y.; Geng, J.; Jing, D. Photodecomposition of NOx on Ag/TiO2 composite catalysts in a gas phase reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chloride and bromide sources considered in the present work.
Figure 1. Chloride and bromide sources considered in the present work.
Catalysts 11 00081 g001
Figure 2. FE-SEM images of samples 1–8 at Mag 50.00 KX.
Figure 2. FE-SEM images of samples 1–8 at Mag 50.00 KX.
Catalysts 11 00081 g002aCatalysts 11 00081 g002b
Figure 3. TEM image at medium magnification of sample 1.
Figure 3. TEM image at medium magnification of sample 1.
Catalysts 11 00081 g003
Figure 4. HRTEM images at high magnification of (a) sample 1 and (b) sample 2.
Figure 4. HRTEM images at high magnification of (a) sample 1 and (b) sample 2.
Catalysts 11 00081 g004
Figure 5. XPS spectrum of sample 2.
Figure 5. XPS spectrum of sample 2.
Catalysts 11 00081 g005
Figure 6. NOx degradation for sample 1–8 versus time.
Figure 6. NOx degradation for sample 1–8 versus time.
Catalysts 11 00081 g006
Figure 7. NOx degradation as a function of metallic bismuth on the surface.
Figure 7. NOx degradation as a function of metallic bismuth on the surface.
Catalysts 11 00081 g007
Table 1. Synopsis of the Y%Bi-doped BiO(Cl0.875Br0.125) photocatalysts studied in this work.
Table 1. Synopsis of the Y%Bi-doped BiO(Cl0.875Br0.125) photocatalysts studied in this work.
SampleChloride SourceNominal Percentage of Metallic Bi
1DTAC0.85
2CPC0.85
3CTAC1.0
4CPC1.2
5BTAC1.1
6CTAC 25% water1.2
7CPC2.0
8CPC10
Table 2. Synopsis of XPS, bandgap, and catalytic activity for samples 1–8. For the atomic surface, the remaining component is oxygen.
Table 2. Synopsis of XPS, bandgap, and catalytic activity for samples 1–8. For the atomic surface, the remaining component is oxygen.
SampleChloride SourceBi Atomic %% Br% ClEg (eV)NOx Conv
(t = 3 h)
1DTAC65293.0317
2CPC226252.9853
3CTAC7.53153.0134
4CPC5.74162.9513
5BTAC6.94233.0511
6CTAC 25% water302133.0712
7CPC5.42152.8120
8CPC4.63153.0017
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tessore, F.; Galli, F.; Schieppati, D.; Boffito, D.C.; Di Michele, A.; Demartin, F.; Cerrato, G.; Bianchi, C.L. Bismuth Oxyhalides for NOx Degradation under Visible Light: The Role of the Chloride Precursor. Catalysts 2021, 11, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010081

AMA Style

Tessore F, Galli F, Schieppati D, Boffito DC, Di Michele A, Demartin F, Cerrato G, Bianchi CL. Bismuth Oxyhalides for NOx Degradation under Visible Light: The Role of the Chloride Precursor. Catalysts. 2021; 11(1):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tessore, Francesca, Federico Galli, Dalma Schieppati, Daria C. Boffito, Alessandro Di Michele, Francesco Demartin, Giuseppina Cerrato, and Claudia L. Bianchi. 2021. "Bismuth Oxyhalides for NOx Degradation under Visible Light: The Role of the Chloride Precursor" Catalysts 11, no. 1: 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010081

APA Style

Tessore, F., Galli, F., Schieppati, D., Boffito, D. C., Di Michele, A., Demartin, F., Cerrato, G., & Bianchi, C. L. (2021). Bismuth Oxyhalides for NOx Degradation under Visible Light: The Role of the Chloride Precursor. Catalysts, 11(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop