Next Article in Journal
Search for the Microwave Nonthermal Effect in Microwave Chemistry: Synthesis of the Heptyl Butanoate Ester with Microwave Selective Heating of a Sulfonated Activated Carbon Catalyst
Next Article in Special Issue
Iridium- and Palladium-Based Catalysts in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Carbon Nitride Quantum Dots Modified TiO2 Inverse Opal Photonic Crystal for Solving Indoor VOCs Pollution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Selective Oxofunctionalization of Cyclohexene over Titanium Dioxide-Based and Bismuth Oxyhalide Photocatalysts by Visible Light Irradiation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/catal11040465
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Alkene Epoxidations Mediated by Mn-Salen Macrocyclic Catalysts

by
Andrea Pappalardo
1,2,
Francesco P. Ballistreri
1,
Rosa Maria Toscano
1,
Maria Assunta Chiacchio
3,
Laura Legnani
3,
Giovanni Grazioso
4,
Lucia Veltri
5 and
Giuseppe Trusso Sfrazzetto
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
2
Research Unit of Catania, National Interuniversity Consortium for Materials Science and Technology (I.N.S.T.M.), 95125 Catania, Italy
3
Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125 Catania, Italy
4
Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via L. Mangiagalli 25, 20133 Milan, Italy
5
Laboratory of Industrial and Synthetic Organic Chemistry (LISOC), Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technologies, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci 12/C, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(4), 465; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11040465
Submission received: 17 March 2021 / Revised: 30 March 2021 / Accepted: 31 March 2021 / Published: 2 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards the Transition Metal Catalysis in Organic Synthesis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Three new chiral Mn macrocycle catalysts containing 20 or 40 atoms in the macrocycle were synthetized and tested in the enantioselective epoxidation of cis-β-ethyl-styrene and 1,2-dihydronathalene. The effect of the presence of a binaphtol (BINOL) compound in the catalyst backbone has been evaluated, including by Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Asymmetric epoxidation of unfunctionalized prochiral olefins catalyzed by chiral (salen)Mn(III) complexes has proven to be one of the most useful reactions in organic synthesis since it generates chiral epoxides containing two new stereocenters, which can be easily transformed into a large variety of compounds useful in industrial, biological, pharmaceutical and agricultural fields [1]. The origins of high enantioselectivity in this reaction have been extensively studied [2] but, until now, not fully elucidated. A possible electronic effect of the 5,5′-substituents in the salen ligand is invoked [3,4], but the most common explanation is attributed to the directions of approach of the alkene to the manganese active site (manganese-oxo) [5]. The side-on approach where the double bond of the alkene is parallel to the salen ligand is generally accepted, but four main directions to the Mn-oxo [6,7] moiety have been proposed in the literature (Figure 1).
Katsuki et al. hypothesized that the substrate approaches the catalyst along the Mn–N bond (Figure 1, path A) [8,9,10]. In addition, Jacobsen assumed that (salen)Mn=O has a planar conformation and steric bulk at the 3,3′- and 5,5′-positions, thus forcing the substrate to approach over the ethylenediamine backbone (Figure 1, path B) [11,12,13,14,15]. Furthermore, Katsuki also proposed an approach direction by pathway C, along the 5,5′-position [16,17]. It is generally accepted that the increase of steric bulkiness in the 3,3′-positions of the salen ligand enhances enantioselectivity, suggesting that the alkene does not approach from this direction to the metal center (Figure 1, path D) [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
More recently, a new justification about the origin of enantioselectivity was proposed by Corey et al. [14,15]. They asserted that none of these explanations seem to be plausible when the mechanism is represented in three dimensions. They proposed that the pre-transition state geometry could be stabilized by electrostatic interaction between a partial positive charge localized in the benzylic carbon atom of alkene and the partial negative charge of phenoxy oxygen of the catalyst (Figure 2a). In this hypothesis, the transition state assembly is slightly similar to a [3 + 2] cycloaddition.
A geometric consequence of the canted arrangement of the salen rings due to the configuration of the chiral diimine bridge is that the neighboring t-butyl groups in the ortho position to the coordinated phenolic oxygens occupy spaces on opposite faces of the N–Mn–O plane (Figure 2b). Considering Corey’s hypothesis, the orientation of substrates, in particular of aromatic conjugate alkenes, in the (salen)Mn-oxo complex avoids unfavorable steric repulsion with the t-butyl groups, taking advantage of stabilizing π-stacking of the aromatic ring of the alkene and the aryloxy group of the catalyst (Figure 2a).

2. Results and Discussion

To better understand the importance of the approach direction as well as the importance of bulkiness in the 3,3′-positions, we report here three new chiral Mn macrocycle catalysts based on the classic Jacobsen’s salen catalyst bearing an (R)-(+)-BINOL unit in the 3,3′-position of the salen backbone (see Chart 1). These catalysts differ in the size of the macrocycle, having 20 members (in the case of Mn-M20) or 40 members (in the case of Mn-M40-DiPh and Mn-M40-Cycl) in the macrocycle. In addition, their activity towards epoxidation by using two alkene models (cis-β-methyl-styrene and 1,2-dihydronaphtalene) was evaluated.
Mn catalysts reported in Chart 1 were obtained starting from the corresponding macrocycle ligands (M20 and M40) [16,17] by complexation with manganese(III) acetate in ethanol [18]. Compounds were collected by filtration and characterized by ESI–MS (Electrospry Ionization-Mass Spectrometry) measurements. The chiral diimine bridge of Mn-M20 and Mn-M40-DiPh is (1R,2R)-diphenyl-ethyl group, while Mn-M40-Cycl leads a (1R-trans)-cyclohexyl group.
Table 1 shows epoxidation results in terms of conversions, epoxide yields and enantiomeric excess (EE). The results clearly show a different epoxidation rate based on the nature of the alkene: reactions with 1,2-dihydronathalene (Table 1, entries 7–12) are faster than reactions with cis-β-methyl-styrene (Table 1, entries 1–6) [19,20,21]. Moreover, the presence of PPNO (4-phenyl-pyridine N-oxide) as a coligand increases reaction rates, conversions and enantiomeric excesses, suggesting a favorable electronic effect to the manganese metal center [22].
Although these macrocycle catalysts possess different chiral diimine bridges (diphenyl or cyclohexyl) and, consequently, different steric hindrances to the Mn-oxo group along approach directions A and B (reported in Figure 1), the enantiomeric excess values were similar. These data suggest that steric restrictions closer to the active catalyst site do not play a primary role in the determination of the enantioselectivity values. Furthermore, the different size of the macrocycles and the different steric hindrance along pathway D represented in Figure 1 did not lead to different EE values. The lower EE values obtained with these macrocycles with respect to other Mn-salen catalysts should have been due to the presence of the chiral (R)-(+)-BINOL compound that can reduce the efficiency of the enantioselective oxygen transfer.

Theoretical Calculations

In order to rationalize the enantiomeric excess results, DFT studies were performed on the simplest catalyst. First, our attention was focused on Mn-M20 that was optimized and the obtained 3D plots together with the corresponding activated forms containing the Mn=O species formed in the presence of NaClO are reported in Figure 3.
The catalyst and its activated form showed overlapping structures characterized by the steric hindrances of BINOL groups.
In order to rationalize the enantioselectivity of the reaction, the two transition states leading to the two possible enantiomeric epoxides were located by using DFT calculations [23,24,25,26]. The computational study was carried out on the epoxidation reaction involving Mn-M20 in its activated form as a catalyst and cis-β-methyl-styrene, which seems to be a good compromise between the size of the system and the accuracy of the calculation.
The located transition state (TS) present the expected imaginary frequencies on the O transfer (see Supporting Information). In Figure 4, the formation bond distances are shown. The favored (2S,3R)-TS (Figure 4A) had the bond less formed (1.77 Å) than the (2R,3S)-TS (Figure 4B) (1.74 Å).
Calculations supported the enantiomeric excess experimental results. The calculated activation energies were comparable in the two cases with values of about 7 and 8 kcal/mol in vacuo for the transition states leading to the (2S,3R) epoxide and the (2R,3S) epoxide, respectively (Figure 4). Considering the free energy values, the reaction was slower due to energy barriers of about 21 and 22 kcal/mol for the transition states leading to the (2S,3R) epoxide and the (2R,3S) epoxide, respectively. Thus, the transition state related to the (2S,3R) epoxide was favored (1.18 kcal/mol), probably due to the π–π stacking interactions between the aromatic ring of the alkene and the salicylaldehyde ring of the catalyst, as well as the CH–π interaction with the BINOL compound (showed by green arrows in Figure 4A). If the alkene attacks the Mn=O with the opposite face (Figure 4B) leading to the (2R,3S) epoxide, these interactions cannot be found.
The ratio between the two enantiomers on the basis of the transition state energies was 78:22 with a theoretical enantiomeric excess of 56% in vacuo. Considering methanol as a solvent, the energy barriers resulted in 10.62 and 11.02 kcal/mol for the transition states related to the (2S,3R) and (2R,3S) epoxides, respectively, with a ratio between the two enantiomers of 66:34 and a theoretical EE value of 32%, which was in line with the experimental one (Table 1, entry 2).
Taking into account these results and considerations, substituents in the 3,3′-positions play a crucial role in the determination of the enantioselectivity values. Their fundamental importance is probably ascribed to the stabilizing/destabilizing effect of the transition state, as showed in Figure 2a and Figure 4A.

3. Materials and Methods

GC analyses of the epoxidation reaction were performed with a GC-FID (Flame Ionization Detector) instrument. The EE values were estimated and calculated by using a proper chiral column DMePeBETACDX (25 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm film) for 1,2-dihydronaphthalene (isotherm 150 °C) and DMeTButiSililBETA (25 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm film) for cis-β-methyl-styrene (column conditions: 50 °C (0 min) to 120 °C (1 min) at 2 °C/min). The injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 250 °C for both columns. As an internal standard, n-decane was used throughout. ESI mass spectra were obtained by employing an ES–MS equipped with an ion trap analyzer. The absolute configurations of (1R,2S)-1,2-epoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene and of (1R,2S)-1,2-epoxy-1-phenylpropane were determined by measuring the optical rotations with a polarimeter. Commercial reagents were used as received without further purification. All the calculations were performed using the Gaussian 16 program package [27]. Optimizations were done in the gas phase at the b3lyp/6-31g(d) level [28,29] for all atoms, while the b3lyp/def2svp was used for Mn to correctly describe the electronic properties of the systems. The solvent effects (CH3OH) were considered by single-point calculations at the same level as above using the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) method based on the polarizable continuum solvent model (PCM) [30,31,32]. Vibrational frequencies were computed at the same level of theory to verify that the optimized structures were minimal. Thermodynamics at 298.15 K allowed the Gibbs free energies to be calculated.

3.1. Synthesis of Mn Macrocycle Catalysts

The absolute ethanol solution of the given macrocycle salen-ligand was stirred overnight at room temperature with 1.5 equivalents of manganese(III) acetate in the case of M20 or with three equivalents of manganese(III) acetate in the case of M40. When the starting ligand was completely converted (checked by thin layer chromatography TLC analysis), the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Then, 5 mL CH2Cl2 was added to the remaining crude solid to dissolve the Mn complex. The residual precipitate (not reacted manganese (III) acetate) was removed and the CH2Cl2 solution was concentrated in vacuo thus giving the corresponding catalyst with nearly quantitative yield.
Mn-M20: ESI-MS: detected m/z, 895 [M]+ (expected, 895.3); analytically calculated values for C58H52MnN2O4: C, 77.75; H, 5.85; Mn, 6.13; N, 3.13; O, 7.14; values as measured: C, 77.71; Mn, 6.09; N, 3.10; O, 7.11.
Mn-M40-DiPh: ESI-MS: detected m/z, 895 [M]2+ (expected, 895.8); analytically calculated values for C116H104Mn2N4O8: C, 77.75; H, 5.85; Mn, 6.13; N, 3.13; O, 7.14; values as measured: C, 77.68; Mn, 6.07; N, 3.12; O, 7.10.
Mn-M40-Cycl: ESI-MS: detected m/z, 797 [M]2+ (expected, 797.8); analytically calculated values for C100H100Mn2N4O8: C, 75.27; H, 6.32; Mn, 6.89; N, 3.51; O, 8.02; values as measured: C, 75.17; Mn, 6.82; N, 3.48; O, 7.98.

3.2. General Procedure for Epoxidation Reactions

A dichloromethane solution of the substrate (0.35 mmol), chiral macrocycle catalyst (5%) and 4-phenylpyridine N-oxide (4-PPNO, 50%), buffered at pH 11.2 with a phosphate buffer, was stirred at 25 °C with bleach. The reaction was monitored using GC analysis by using n-decane as an internal quantitative standard. When the starting material was consumed, the organic phase was removed, dried with Na2SO4 and purified by preparative layer chromatograpy (PLC) (SiO2, cyclohexane/EtOAc (15:1, v/v). Absolute configurations were compared with literature data [33,34].

3.3. Computational Methods

Optimizations were done in the gas phase at the b3lyp/6-31g(d) level [28,29] for all atoms, while the b3lyp/def2svp was used for Mn to correctly describe the electronic properties of the systems. The solvent effects (CH3OH) were considered by single-point calculations at the same level as above using the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) method based on the polarizable continuum solvent model (PCM) [30,31,32]. Vibrational frequencies were computed at the same level of theory to verify that the optimized structures were minimal. Thermodynamics at 298.15 K allowed the Gibbs free energies to be calculated. The ΔE values and the percentages of the TS were calculated applying the Boltzmann equation. Using the obtained percentages, the EE values were calculated using the following equation: EE% = [% major compound − % minor compound] / [% major compound + % minor compound] × 100.

4. Conclusions

Three new chiral Mn macrocycle catalysts containing 20 or 40 atoms in the macrocycle were synthetized and tested in the enantioselective epoxidation of cis-β-ethyl-styrene and 1,2-dihydronathalene. Reaction rates depend on the nature of the alkene and the presence of a coligand (PPNO) increases reaction rates, conversions and enantiomeric excesses. Despite the presence of a BINOL compound in the 3,3′ position of the catalyst scaffolds, the enantioselectivities observed were, in general, low, probably due to the distance of these substituent with respect to the metal center. DFT calculations support this hypothesis. In particular, the calculated activation energies of the transition states related to the formation of the enantiomeric epoxides confirm the enantiomeric excesses obtained by experimental measurements.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal11040465/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.P.B. and G.T.S.; syntheses and epoxidation reactions, A.P. and R.M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, G.T.S.; conceived, designed, and supervised the computational study, M.A.C. and L.L.; performed the computational simulations and analyzed the in silico data, G.G. and L.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the University of Catania for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mc Garrigle, E.M.; Gilheany, D.G. Chromium- and Manganese-salen Promoted Epoxidation of Alkenes. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1563–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jacobsen, E.N.; Zhang, W.; Guler, M.L. Electronic tuning of asymmetric catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6703–6704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Katsuki, T. Catalytic asymmetric oxidations using optically active (salen) manganese(III) complexes as catalysts. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995, 140, 189–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Houk, K.N.; De Mello, N.C.; Condroski, K.; Fennen, J.; Kasuga, T. Origins of enantioselection in Jacobsen epoxidations. In Proceedings of the Electronic Conference on Heterocyclic Chemistry (ECHET96), London, UK, 24 June–22 July 1996. [Google Scholar]
  5. La Paglia Fragola, V.; Lupo, F.; Pappalardo, A.; Trusso Sfrazzetto, G.; Toscano, R.M.; Ballistreri, F.P.; Tomaselli, G.A.; Gulino, A. A surface-confined O=MnV(salen) oxene catalyst and high turnover values in asymmetric epoxidation of unfunctionalized olefins. J. Mat. Chem. 2012, 22, 20561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hosoya, N.; Hatayama, A.; Yanai, K.; Fujii, H.; Irie, R.; Katsuki, T. Asymmetric epoxidation with optically active (salen) manganese(III) complexes: From which direction does the olefin approach the metal- oxo bond? Synlett 1993, 9, 641–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hamada, T.; Irie, R.; Katsuki, T. How does chiral oxo(salen) manganese(V) complex discriminate the enantioface of simple olefins? Scope and limitation of salen- catalyzed epoxidation. Synlett 1994, 7, 479–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jacobsen, E.N.; Zhang, W.; Muci, A.R.; Ecker, J.R.; Deng, L. Highly enantioselective epoxidation catalysts derived from 1, 2- diaminocyclohexane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7063–7064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pospisil, P.J.; Carsten, D.H.; Jacobsen, E.N. X- ray structural studies of highly enantioselective Mn(salen) epoxidation catalysts. Chem. A Eur. J. 1996, 2, 974–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hashihayata, T.; Punniyamurthy, T.; Irie, R.; Katsuki, T.; Akita, M.; Moro-oka, Y. Conformational analysis of cationic (R, S)- and (R, R)-(salen) manganese complexes possessing axial chirality as a chiral element based on x-ray crystallography: An explanation of the effect of apical ligand on enantioselection by (salen) manganese catalyst. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 14599–14610. [Google Scholar]
  11. Katsuki, T. Chiral metallosalen complexes: Structures and catalyst tuning for asymmetric epoxidation and cyclopropanation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, W.; Loebach, J.L.; Wilson, S.R.; Jacobsen, E.N. Enantioselective epoxidation of unfunctionalized olefins catalyzed by salen manganese complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2801–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jacobsen, H.; Cavallo, L. A possible mechanism for enantioselectivity in the chiral epoxidation of olefins with [Mn(salen)] catalysts. Chem. A Eur. J. 2001, 7, 800–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kurti, L.; Blewett, M.M.; Corey, E.J. Origin of Enantioselectivity in the Jacobsen Epoxidation of Olefins. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4592–4595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brown, M.K.; Blewett, M.M.; Colombe, J.R.; Corey, E.J. Mechanism of the Enantioselective Oxidation of Racemic Secondary Alcohols Catalyzed by Chiral Mn(III)-Salen Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11165–11170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Amato, M.E.; Ballistreri, F.P.; Pappalardo, A.; Sciotto, D.; Tomaselli, G.A.; Toscano, R.M. Synthesis and conformational aspects of 20- and 40-membered macrocyclic mono and dinuclear uranyl complexes incorporating salen and (R)-BINOL units. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9751–9757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Amato, M.E.; Ballistreri, F.P.; Gentile, S.; Pappalardo, A.; Tomaselli, G.A.; Toscano, R.M. Recognition of Achiral and Chiral Ammonium Salts by Neutral Ditopic Receptors Based on Chiral Salen-UO2 Macrocycles. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1437–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Patti, A.; Pedotti, S.; Ballistreri, F.P.; Trusso Sfrazzetto, G. Synthesis and Characterization of Some Chiral Metal-Salen Complexes Bearing a Ferrocenophane Substituent. Molecules 2009, 14, 4312–4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Trusso Sfrazzetto, G.; Millesi, S.; Pappalardo, A.; Toscano, R.M.; Ballistreri, F.P.; Tomaselli, G.A.; Gulino, A. Olefin epoxidation by a (salen)Mn(III) catalyst covalently grafted on glass beads. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ballistreri, F.P.; Toscano, R.M.; Amato, M.E.; Pappalardo, A.; Gangemi, C.M.A.; Spidalieri, S.; Puglisi, R.; Trusso Sfrazzetto, G. A New Mn–Salen Micellar Nanoreactor for Enantioselective Epoxidation of Alkenes in Water. Catalysts 2018, 8, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zammataro, A.; Gangemi, C.M.A.; Pappalardo, A.; Toscano, R.M.; Puglisi, R.; Nicotra, G.; Fragalà, M.E.; Tuccitto, N.; Trusso Sfrazzetto, G. Covalently functionalized carbon nanoparticles with a chiral Mn-Salen: A new nanocatalyst for enantioselective epoxidation of alkenes. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 5255–5258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ballistreri, F.P.; Gangemi, M.A.; Pappalardo, A.; Tomaselli, G.A.; Toscano, R.M.; Trusso Sfrazzetto, G. (Salen)Mn(III) Catalyzed Asymmetric Epoxidation Reactions by Hydrogen Peroxide in Water: A Green Protocol. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Legnani, L.; Iannazzo, D.; Pistone, A.; Celesti, C.; Giofrè, S.; Romeo, R.; Di Pietro, A.; Visalli, G.; Fresta, M.; Bottino, P.; et al. Functionalized polyhedral oligosilsesquioxane (POSS) based composites for bone tissue engineering: Synthesis, computational and biological studies. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 11325–11334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Legnani, L.; Puglisi, R.; Pappalardo, A.; Chiacchio, M.A.; Trusso Sfrazzetto, G. Supramolecular recognition of phosphocholine by an enzyme-like cavitand receptor. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 539–542. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chiacchio, M.A.; Legnani, L.; Caramella, P.; Tejero, T.; Merino, P. Revealing carbocations in highly asynchronous concerted reactions: The ene-type reaction between dithiocarboxylic acids and alkenes. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 5627–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chiacchio, M.A.; Legnani, L.; Caramella, P.; Tejero, T.; Merino, P. Pivotal Neighboring-Group Participation in Substitution versus Elimination Reactions—Computational Evidence for Ion Pairs in the Thionation of Alcohols with Lawesson’s Reagent. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 14, 1952–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  28. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Cances, E.; Mennucci, B.; Tomasi, J. A new integral equation formalism for the polarizable continuum model: Theoretical background and applications to isotropic and anisotropic dielectrics. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3032–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cossi, M.; Barone, V.; Cammi, R.; Tomasi, J. Ab initio study of solvated molecules: A new implementation of the polarizable continuum model. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 255, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Tomasi, J. Geometry optimization of molecular structures in solution by the polarizable continuum model. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 404–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sasaki, H.; Irie, R.; Hamada, T.; Suzuki, K.; Katsuki, T. Rational design of Mn-salen catalyst. 2: Highly enantioselective epoxidation of conjugated cis-olefins. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11827–11838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Irie, R.; Noda, K.; Ito, Y.; Matsumoto, N.; Katsuki, T. Catalytic asymmetric epoxidation of unfunctionalized olefins using chiral (salen) manganese(III) complexes. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1991, 2, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 11 00465 g001 550
Figure 1. Proposed directions of approach to the active Mn-oxo moiety of (salen)Mn.
Figure 1. Proposed directions of approach to the active Mn-oxo moiety of (salen)Mn.
Catalysts 11 00465 g001
Catalysts 11 00465 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Pre-transition state geometry invoked by Corey; (b) spatial arrangement of the salen catalyst.
Figure 2. (a) Pre-transition state geometry invoked by Corey; (b) spatial arrangement of the salen catalyst.
Catalysts 11 00465 g002
Catalysts 11 00465 ch001 550
Chart 1. Chemical structures of Mn macrocycle catalysts.
Chart 1. Chemical structures of Mn macrocycle catalysts.
Catalysts 11 00465 ch001
Catalysts 11 00465 g003 550
Figure 3. 3D-plots of Mn-M20 (A) and the corresponding activated structure (B) minimized at the b3lyp/def2svp level for Mn and b3lyp/6-31 g(d) for all other atoms.
Figure 3. 3D-plots of Mn-M20 (A) and the corresponding activated structure (B) minimized at the b3lyp/def2svp level for Mn and b3lyp/6-31 g(d) for all other atoms.
Catalysts 11 00465 g003
Catalysts 11 00465 g004 550
Figure 4. Three-dimensional plots of the two enantiomeric transition states for the epoxidation of cis-β-methyl-styrene with Mn-M20 leading to the (2S,3R) (A) and the (2R,3S) (B) epoxides, respectively. The green arrow highlights the CH–π interaction between the alkene and the aromatic ring of the BINOL compound.
Figure 4. Three-dimensional plots of the two enantiomeric transition states for the epoxidation of cis-β-methyl-styrene with Mn-M20 leading to the (2S,3R) (A) and the (2R,3S) (B) epoxides, respectively. The green arrow highlights the CH–π interaction between the alkene and the aromatic ring of the BINOL compound.
Catalysts 11 00465 g004
Table
Table 1. Enantioselective epoxidation of alkenes with NaClO catalyzed by Mn macrocycle catalysts a.
Table 1. Enantioselective epoxidation of alkenes with NaClO catalyzed by Mn macrocycle catalysts a.
AlkeneEntryCatalystTime (min)Conv. b (%)Yield b (%)EE b (%)
cis-β-methyl-styrene1 cMn-M20300808816
2Mn-M20240908827
3 cMn-M40-DiPh420788417
4Mn-M40-DiPh300878231
5 cMn-M40-Cycl420778512
6Mn-M40-Cycl300898430
1,2-dihydro-naphthalene7 cMn-M2060929323
8Mn-M2030959438
9 cMn-M40-DiPh90909125
10Mn-M40-DiPh30888935
11 cMn-M40-Cycl90809329
12Mn-M40-Cycl30909936
a In all the experiments, alkene = 0.14 M, catalyst = 0.007 M, coligand = 4-PPNO = 0.07 M, NaClO = 0.14 M, Na2HPO4 = 0.05 M, buffered at pH = 11.2. In all the cases, configuration of epoxides is determined by measuring the optical rotation. b Determined by GC on chiral columns. c No coligand added.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pappalardo, A.; Ballistreri, F.P.; Toscano, R.M.; Chiacchio, M.A.; Legnani, L.; Grazioso, G.; Veltri, L.; Trusso Sfrazzetto, G. Alkene Epoxidations Mediated by Mn-Salen Macrocyclic Catalysts. Catalysts 2021, 11, 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11040465

AMA Style

Pappalardo A, Ballistreri FP, Toscano RM, Chiacchio MA, Legnani L, Grazioso G, Veltri L, Trusso Sfrazzetto G. Alkene Epoxidations Mediated by Mn-Salen Macrocyclic Catalysts. Catalysts. 2021; 11(4):465. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11040465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pappalardo, Andrea, Francesco P. Ballistreri, Rosa Maria Toscano, Maria Assunta Chiacchio, Laura Legnani, Giovanni Grazioso, Lucia Veltri, and Giuseppe Trusso Sfrazzetto. 2021. "Alkene Epoxidations Mediated by Mn-Salen Macrocyclic Catalysts" Catalysts 11, no. 4: 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11040465

APA Style

Pappalardo, A., Ballistreri, F. P., Toscano, R. M., Chiacchio, M. A., Legnani, L., Grazioso, G., Veltri, L., & Trusso Sfrazzetto, G. (2021). Alkene Epoxidations Mediated by Mn-Salen Macrocyclic Catalysts. Catalysts, 11(4), 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11040465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop