Next Article in Journal
Influence of Supports on the Catalytic Activity and Coke Resistance of Ni Catalyst in Dry Reforming of Methane
Previous Article in Journal
Birds of a Feather—Asymmetric Organocatalysis Meets Asymmetric Transition Metal Catalysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduced Graphene Oxide Supported Cobalt-Calcium Phosphate Composite for Electrochemical Water Oxidation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Low-Dimensional BiFeO3 System for Photocatalytic Applications

1
Laboratory of Physics of Condensed Matter (LPMC), University of Picardie Jules Verne, Scientific Pole, 33 Rue Saint-Leu, CEDEX 1, 80039 Amiens, France
2
Université d’Artois, CNRS, Centrale Lille, ENSCL, Université de Lille, UMR 8181, Unité de Catalyse et Chimie du Solide (UCCS), 62300 Lens, France
3
Advanced Materials Research Center, Technology Innovation Institute, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 9639, United Arab Emirates
4
Laboratoire de Réactivité et de Chimie des Solides, UMR CNRS 7314, Hub de l’Énergie, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 80000 Amiens, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(2), 215; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020215
Submission received: 21 January 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2022 / Accepted: 9 February 2022 / Published: 12 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selective Catalysis for the Sustainable Energies)

Abstract

:
We report on the fabrication of sub-20 nm BiFeO3 (BFO) nanoparticles using a solid-state approach and preferential leching process. The nanoparticles were subsequently used to deposit, through spray pyrolysis, BFO thin films in a rhombohedral (R3c) crystallographic structure. Then, systematic investigations of the optical and the photocatalytic properties were conducted to determine the effects of the particles size, the microstructure and the increased surface area on their catalytic performances. Especially, improved optical properties were observed, with an optical bandgap energy of 2.20 eV compared to reported 2.7 eV for the bulk system. In addition, high optical absorption was obtained in the UV–visible light region reaching up to 90% at 400 nm. The photoelectrochemical measurements revealed a high photocurrent density under visible light irradiation. Besides, density functional theory calculations were performed on both bulk and thin film BFO structures, revealing an interesting comparison of the electronic, magnetic, ferroelectric and optical properties for bulk and thin film BFO systems. Both theoretical and experimental findings show that the alignment of the band edges of BFO thin film is coherent with good photocatalytic water splitting potential, making them desirable photoanode materials.

1. Introduction

Energy demand in recent years has shown significant growth owing to the world’s growing population and constant development of technology-based industries. Currently, fossil fuels constitute the most dominant energy consumption. Nevertheless, their carbon footprint and harmful gas emissions are at the forefront of environmentally impactful dangers both on peoples’ and the globe’s health [1,2]. To meet the world’s energy needs and support the energy transition to clean and sustainable energy consumption, it is necessary to focus on the development of alternative clean energy resources. Harnessing sunlight energy is perhaps one of the most straightforward and continuously available routes to produce energy on demand clean, sustainable and renewable. Among an important diversity of methods to exploit the solar energy, producing hydrogen through the splitting of water molecules into its constituent elements has recently attracted a lot of interest [3,4]. Nonetheless, a few essential conditions have to be fulfilled in order to produce an efficient Water Splitting (WS) device. The nature of the photocatalyst material is the first and main component to consider. In this context, several materials have been studied for their photocatalytic activity in the race for the optimal photocatalyst capable of generating a large quantity of hydrogen. Metal oxides were largely investigated as photocatalysts (ex: TiO2, SnO2, Fe2O3, ZnO) owing to their high stability, efficiency, and especially their low cost [5,6,7,8]. Since Fujishima and Honda (1972) brought to light the benefit of TiO2 single crystal for solar water splitting, many interesting findings were proposed by various researcher groups all over the world [9]. Despite their high potential, the light absorption of metal oxides is limited within the ultra-violet region, which reduces significantly their solar-to-hydrogen (STH) conversion efficiency. Nevertheless, surface modification using plasmonic materials has been reported to significantly enhance the visible light absorption of the photocatalyst [10,11,12,13,14] as well as improving the efficiency of the charge separation and amplification of the electron-hole (e–h) pairs. However, oxidation of the material with the aqueous solution remains a challenging drawback in this case [15].
Recently, perovskite materials (PMs) have emerged as potentially interesting photocatalysts owing to their high electrochemical and photophysical properties [16,17]. The exceptional structural flexibility of PMs allows the design of WS devices with high STH efficiency, thanks to the precise control of the composition, the electronic structure, and the morphology of this class of materials. Particularly, the ferroelectric properties present in PMs were found to promote the photocatalytic activities [18,19]. For instance, the PbTiO3 compound was reported to have an effective charge separation and good photocatalytic performance which were attributed to its ferroelectric properties [20]. Therefore, owing to their high photocatalytic potential, good stability, structural flexibility, ease of synthesis, and ferroelectric properties, PMs show a high potential for the development of more efficient future water splitting devices. Furthermore, the BFO photocatalyst has already been demonstrated for the degradation of organic compounds such as dyes [21,22,23], antibiotics [24], and antibacterials [25], as well as a photoanode for hydrogen production [26]. The BFO photocatalytic activity (band gap engineering and restriction of the recombination rate) was also found to be improved by the incorporation of doping agents such as La [27,28,29], Sm [30], co-catalyst [31], metallic nanoparticles such as gold [32] or silver [33] or by the production of n/p heterojunction [34,35,36].
This work is focused on the elaboration, characterization and the photocatalytic performances of low-dimensional BFO films deposited by means of spray pyrolysis. Besides, density functional theory is used to investigate the effect of the dimensionality on the optical and photocatalytic properties of the BFO system.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Thermal Analysis

Figure 1 presents the thermogravimetric (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of as-milled Bi2O3 and Fe2O3 mixture in the range of 40 °C to 1100 °C.
As can be seen, the formation of the BFO compound is a complex multi-step reaction process. It is worth noting that the bismuth oxide and the iron oxide are highly hygroscopic oxides prone the moisture uptake in the humid environment. Hence, the first step (40–200 °C) of the weight loss (~1%) could be attributed to the water evaporation along with ethanol solvent used to prepare the BFO powder by the high energy ball milling. At intermediate temperatures, the weight shows abrupt losses about ~2.7% and ~1.5% in the range 200–350 °C, and 350–460 °C, respectively. The first weight loss was reported by Maurya et al. [37] to be induced by the volatilization of bismuth, while the second weight loss is ascribed to the formation of intermediate compounds as reported earlier by Valant et al. [38]. These authors suggested that metallic bismuth compounds could be released, considering the melting point of bismuth oxide is 825 °C. Similar results were reported by Sharma et al. [39] who extensively investigated the formation of bismuth ferrite using a solid-state reaction by TGA/DSC technique. These authors reported that during the synthesis of the BFO compound, the formation of secondary phases, such as Bi2Fe4O9 and/or Bi25FeO40, might occur. Regarding the temperature region from 460 °C to 900 °C, no mass change was noticed, however, the DSC curve exhibits a large corresponding exothermic peak. This last response is a signature of the temperature of crystallization of the BFO system. Based on the TGA/DSC experiments, a temperature of 700 °C was selected for further BFO powder heat treatment. Furthermore, a strong endothermic peak is observed at 936 °C which could be attributed to the melting point of the BFO compound. The high mass loss observed above 1000 °C is most probably related to Bi2O3 evaporation, as previously reported by Palai et al. [40].

2.2. X-ray Diffraction

Figure 2 depicts the room temperature X-ray diffractogram of the BFO sample, as fabricated and leached ones at the most relevant diffracting windows for BFO (20° to 60°).
The red plot presents the calcined sample at 700 °C for 1 h. A typical rhombohedral structure is obtained along with a non-negligible secondary phase assigned to the Bi25FeO40 phase. To remove these impurities, two leaching steps were carried out using glacial acetic acid [41,42]. The second black curve shows the obtained BFO XRD spectra after the first leaching (24 h) which seems to drastically decrease the quantity of undesired phases. To achieve a complete removal of the Bi25FeO40 secondary phase, a second leaching (48 h) was done (blue curve), after which no impurity could be detected with a final pure R3c BFO structure. From the XRD pattern of the pure BFO system, we could extract the lattice parameters in the rhombohedral structure with a = 5.635 Å, and α = 59.3918°.

2.3. Raman Spectroscopy

To further confirm the phase purity of the prepared sample, a micro-Raman (Renishaw) spectrometer was used to examine the vibrational behavior of obtained the BFO structure. The energy excitation used for the analysis is a green laser (532 nm). Figure 3a presents the Raman spectrum of the leached BiFeO3 sample collected at room temperature from 50 to 550 cm−1.
The deconvoluted BFO Raman spectrum (Figure 3b) evidences well the presence of the 13 Raman modes, i.e., nine E modes, and four A1 modes, with the irreducible representation: Γ = 4A1 + 9E, of the rhombohedral (R3c) structure of pure BFO system [43,44,45]. Note that the low-frequency Raman modes, E (1) ~75 cm−1, E (2) ~110 cm−1, A1 (1) ~138 cm−1, A1 (2) ~171 cm−1 are assigned to bismuth vibrations and oxygen octahedral tilt in the R3c structure. On the other hand, the middle-frequency Raman modes, A1 (3), E (3), and E (4) correspond to the vibrations associated to iron atoms [46]. Regarding the high-frequency Raman modes, they are mainly correlated to the motion of oxygen atoms [47,48,49].

2.4. Microstructure Analysis

After obtaining high purity BFO powders, we investigated the effect of a second stage of a high energy ball milling step of the initial powder. Figure 4 shows the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images collected of the sprayed BiFeO3 films with different initially milled powders.
Figure 4a,b presents the BFO sample with no second milling at different magnifications. It can be observed that the surface is not homogenous with regions where grains are aggregated. From Figure 4b, the grain size was observed to vary from 200 to 400 nm. Figure 4c,d presents the sprayed BFO sample from an initial powder with a second 8 h high energy ball milling step. It can be observed that in this case grain size lower than 100 nm was achieved. The obtained results are beneficial to photocatalytic applications owing to the high surface area, high crystallinity confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and free of defects (dislocations), as shown in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigations given below. This allows low e-h recombination leading to higher water splitting activity.
TEM investigations were carried out on the BFO nanoparticles obtained after 8 h ball milling and a bright field low magnification micrograph is depicted in the Figure 5a. At this magnification, the particles appear as an aggregate set, while the high-resolution micrographs depicted in Figure 5b,c demonstrate the nanometric scale of the milled particles. The nanoparticle size distribution is extracted and provided in Figure 5d. The crystal size varies from few nm to few tens of nm, with an average size in the range of 5–10 nm.

2.5. Optical Properties

It should be noted that the absorption in the visible light region of materials is an important parameter to consider for water splitting applications where solar light needs to be mostly absorbed to improve the water splitting efficiency.
Figure 6a presents the absorption, transmittance, and reflectance response of BFO film with no second milling step, where the response of the glass substrate was subtracted.
The absorption curve of BFO shows two main peaks, a first dominant response (~75%) in the UV range, and a second one in the visible light region (~40%). The obtained response is very interesting and proves the potential of our prepared films to be good photocatalysts. We also investigated the optical band gap of the sample (shown in Figure 6b) using the Tauc relation: (αhν)n ∝ (hν—Eg) where n = 2 stand for a direct bandgap. Therefore, from the intersection of the extrapolated linear part of (αhν)2 versus energy with the energy axis, we could extract the bandgap energy of our sample. A direct band gap energy of 2.20 eV was found for the BFO sample. It is worth mentioning that the usually reported band gap value of the bulk BFO compound is ranging from 2.5 to 2.8 eV [50,51]. Note that Mocherla et al. [52] demonstrated that the bandgap energy value of the BFO system is directly related to the grain size, such that a lower band gap energy can be obtained for samples presenting smaller grain sizes.
Figure 6c presents the absorption, transmittance, and reflectance response of BFO film with a second milling of 8 h. An important increase in the absorption is noticed for wavelengths from 200 to 500 nm, achieving a maximum absorption of ~90% (400 nm). Especially, we can observe an increase in the absorption for wavelengths superior to 600 nm, reaching 15% of absorption at 600 nm instead of 4% for the sample with no second ball milling. The energy band gap of this sample (Figure 6d) was also found to be 2.20 eV.
Therefore, one can say that our original methodology permitted us to achieve high absorption in the UV and visible light region, with a corresponding band gap value of ~2.20 eV, making it an interesting candidate for photocatalysis.

2.6. Photoelectrochemical Measurements

In this section, the potential of the BFO sample for photocurrent generation is examined. Figure 7a present the Mott–Schottky plot 1/C2(E) of BFO film deposited on a Pt/Si substrate. From the resulting positive slope, we can conclude about an n-type semiconductor type with a flat band potential Efb = −0.38 V vs. Ag/AgCl or 0.231 V vs. RHE (at pH = 7). Potentials vs. Ag/AgCl were converted to potentials vs. RHE with following equation [53]:
E ( R H E ) = E ( A g / A g C l ) + E ( A g / A g C l ) ° + 0.0591 p H
where E ( A g / A g C l ) ° (reference electrode, saturated KCl) = 0.197 V vs. NHE at 25 °C.
In the depletion zone, a plateau is observed, slightly shifting the flat band potential. This offset may be due to the presence of electrically active defects in the surface (surface states) inducing a Helmholtz layer capacitance as reported [54]. The flat band potential reflects the position of the Fermi level as described [55]. For the n-type semi-conductor, the conduction band (CB) edge is expected to be located very close to 0.1 V of its flat band potential [56]. Therefore, knowing the band gap value, we could locate, respectively, conduction and valence band edges of processed BFO film at neutral pH at ECB ~ 0.131 V vs. NHE, and at EVB ~ 2.331 V vs. NHE.
To determine the transient photocurrent, a three-electrode cell, consisting of Ag/AgCl reference electrode, Pt wire as counter electrode, and the working electrode made of BFO film grown on Pt/Si substrate, is used and a solution 0.1 M of Na2SO4 is employed as an electrolyte. Figure 7b presents the transient photocurrent response of BFO film under different excitation wavelengths. One can observe the presence of a non-negligible photocurrent for low wavelengths of ~10 µA/cm2 (450 nm) under a light intensity of ϕ = 62 mW/cm2 using a bias potential of 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl. For the higher excitation wavelengths, the maximum photocurrent decreases but remains significant. For further investigations, in Figure 7c, the photocurrent response (Δj) is measured as a function of the light intensity (ϕ0 in mW·cm−2) for constant λ = 450 nm and Vbias = 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl.
The dependence of the photocurrent on the incident light intensity (Figure 7c) highlights a linear evolution for BFO films (Δj = Aϕ0 where A is a wavelength-dependent constant). Indeed, this linear behavior is also observed for other wavelengths (e.g., λ = 627 nm in Figure 7d). Theoretically, the evolution of the photocurrent as a function of the incident light intensity follows a power law of type Δj = Aϕ0n where A is a wavelength-dependent constant and n a constant (that determines the photosensitivity of the oxide and whose value is less or equal to 1 [57]. In our case, the exponent is equal to 1, which indicates that the process of generating e-h pairs takes place without the influence of trapping phenomena or recombination in unlit areas at this applied bias voltage [58,59]. This result is not surprising because in thin films, thus for small values of the thickness, the illumination is appreciably uniform and Δj varies linearly with ϕ0. When thickness increase, the absorption becomes non-uniform in thickness, hence the recombination in the unlit domain increases and the n exponent decreases, its value limit must be 0.5 for very large thicknesses [59].
Figure 7e presents a transient photocurrent response obtained under a solar simulator equivalent to 1 sun (100 mW/cm2, AM 1.5G) and for applied bias voltage of 0.6 V. It is observed the achievement of an important photocurrent density of 40 µA/cm2 within the BFO sample. It is worth noting that the notable photocurrent is generated from as low as an applied voltage of 0.1 V. Besides, a slight decrease of the photocurrent response (see arrow in Figure 7e) is observed, which could be attributed to the degradation of BFO due to the electrolyte. Indeed, BFO contains iron, which is a corrosive material in contact with Na2SO4 solution. The obtained photosensitivity (µA/W) of the BFO sample as a function of wavelength (Figure 7f) is in good accordance with the optical measurements presented above. The best efficiency is obtained for low wavelengths, but a photocurrent is produced over the entire visible spectral range. Finally, the position of the valence and conduction bands determined experimentally and the high photocurrent generated in the visible range suggest that the BFO thin film exhibits a great potential to be used as photoanodes within water-splitting photoelectrochemical systems.

2.7. Theoretical Calculations

2.7.1. Electronic Properties

Note that the magnetic properties of the BFO system were considered in our calculations, and both ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) configurations were studied. It was found that the lowest energy was obtained for the AFM configuration of the BFO system, which agrees well with the literature review [60,61]. In addition, we used two different approximations to ensure the accurate description of the electronic properties of the studied AFM bulk BFO system (Figure 8). We first considered the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) to consider the effect of gradients into the charge density, which is known to improve the calculation of the cohesive energy. From Figure 8, we can observe an extremely low band gap energy of 0.5 eV using the GGA approximation which is still far from the well-known band gap of BFO system (i.e., ~2.7 eV) [50,51].
In a view to correct the description of the electronic properties, we implemented our calculations with the Tran and Blaha modified Becke–Johnson (TB-mBJ) exchange potential. The TB-mBJ approximation yields particularly good electronic properties [62], with the achievement of an energy band gap of 2.5 eV, in good accordance with a literature review [63,64].
Figure 9 presents the band structure obtained using the different approximations. Interestingly, it can be seen from the figure that both the nature and the energy of the band gap are different depending on the used approximation. An indirect band gap is observed for the GGA approximation. However, a direct band gap of 2.5 eV can be observed for the GGA + TB-mBJ approximation. Note that several experimental articles reported a direct band gap for BiFeO3 system [65,66,67]. Therefore, our calculations permitted us to achieve Eg values closer to the experiment.
Figure 10a presents the total and partial density of electronic states of the BiFeO3 system calculated using the GGA + TB-mBJ approximation. It can be observed from the figure, that owing to the antiferromagnetic ordering considered in our calculations, the spin up and spin down channels are equal with a zero-net total magnetization. Note that both the valence band and the conduction band are constituted of oxygen 2p orbitals, iron 3d, and bismuth 6p orbitals, which reveal the strong Bi-O and Fe-O hybridization. In addition, we can conclude about a strong interaction between bismuth, iron and oxygen atoms, which is confirmed from the electronic density plot presented in Figure 10b. Indeed, Bi and Fe ions are observed to share covalent bonding with oxygen atoms.
Since the BFO system, in its rhombohedral structure, is known to present ferroelectric properties, we were also interested in the calculation of the polarization value using the BerryPI approach [68]. Our calculations showed a high polarization value of 83 μC/cm2 in the [111] direction for the bulk AFM BFO system. Note that the high polarization value observed in BFO is in part related to the lone pair effect (6s2) of bismuth atoms [69].
In a view to investigate the effect of dimensionality on BFO system, we also investigated the electronic properties of BiFeO3 in the thin film form. Figure 11a presents the total and partial density of electronic states of BFO thin film. On the contrary to the bulk system, we can note here that the spin up and spin down channels are not equal even though antiferromagnetic ordering was considered. Fact that resulted in a net non-zero magnetization of M = 2 µB in the BFO thin film. Remind that to simulate thin films we used a 10 Å vacuum in the z-direction. The induced degree of freedom in the z-direction may have resulted in canted/non-colinear arrangement of spins in the surface. Therefore, the enhanced magnetization in the BFO thin film can be attributed to the canting effect in the surface owing to the uncompensated magnetic moments of iron ions.
Indeed, several works reported on the influence of the magnetic field on hydrogen production via water splitting. For instance, Karatza et al. reported a non-negligible hydrogen generation of 0.229 mg from water through a magnetic pre-poling (M = 48.3 mT) of the Fe3O4 system [70]. The magnetic pre-poling was demonstrated to induce re-orientations of the magnetic poles of each grain making them behave like small magnets and results in the stabilization of the borders between grains [71]. Besides, the presence of both electric and magnetic properties in multiferroic materials permits the manipulation of the magnetism via electric fields and electricity via magnetic fields thanks to the magnetoelectric coupling [72].
Interestingly, the polarization was observed to increase to 93 μC/cm2 for BFO thin films in the [111] direction. The obtained polarization value matches well with reported experimental studies on BFO thin films [73,74]. We plotted in Figure 11b the charge density distribution of BFO thin film, in a view to investigate the origin of the increased ferroelectricity in the system.
Interestingly, a stronger Bi-O and Fe-O bonding (smaller bond length) can be observed in the BFO thin film compared to the bulk one, which can explain the enhanced polarization value obtained in the thin film. Figure 12a,b presents the spin up and spin down parts of the band structure of BiFeO3 thin film. Note that a direct band gap is observed in both figures with band gap values of 1.6 eV (up) and 2 eV (down). This feature is very interesting and implies that in such system a desired band gap can be promoted using appropriate excitation. In the view to investigate the absorption of the spin up and spin down of BFO system, we plotted in Figure 13a,b the Fe 2p X-ray absorption spectra (XAS), and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) of BiFeO3 system in both bulk and thin film form.
Regarding the XAS curves, we can observe from the figures two peak responses related to L3(2p3/2) and L2(2p1/2) states. The intensity ratio (I(L2)/I(L3)) of L2 and L3 is found to be ~0.73 for the bulk and ~0.67 for thin film BFO. The decreased intensity ratio indicates an enhanced effect of surface state for the thin film BFO system, as has been reported previously [75,76].
Besides, owing to the octahedral ligand field, the L2 and L3 peaks further split to t2g and eg states. Hence, through the deconvolution of the XAS curves we could extract the crystal-field splitting of the BFO system (i.e., energy difference between t2g and eg states). A crystal-field value of 1.24 and 1.02 eV was found for BFO thin film, and bulk, respectively, which indicates the presence of a different titanium octahedral environment. In addition, the use of circular polarized light in the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism study makes the absorption signal of the studied element (i.e., iron) sensitive to the magnetic moment. The blue line in Figure 13 illustrates the XMCD signal of Fe L2,3 edge which represents the difference value between the left and right circular polarized XAS spectra.

2.7.2. Optical Properties

In this part, we investigated the optical properties of BFO system in its bulk and thin film form using the mBJ approximation. Note that the absorption coefficient, α(ω), was calculated using the following equation:
α ( ω ) = 2 ω ε 1 2 ( ω ) + ε 2 2 ( ω ) ε 1 ( ω )
where ε1(ω) and ε2(ω) stand for the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric permittivity, respectively. Figure 14 illustrates the Tauc plots of the BFO system in its bulk and film form, extracted from DFT calculations. It is worth mentioning that in the last years there has been a great number of theoretical investigations reporting on the optical properties of bulk BFO system [77,78,79,80]. However, the reported band gap values, as recently demonstrated, are usually misestimated due to the used approximations (e.g., local density and generalized gradient approximations), leading to a truncated description of the strong Coulomb and exchange interactions in transition metal oxides [81]. For instance, using the local spin density approximation (LSDA), Neaton et al. [80] reported an underestimated band gap of 1.9 eV, whereas using the Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof (HSE) screened hybrid functional, Stroppa et al. overestimated the band gap of BFO system to 3.4 eV [79]. In this work, the use of the GGA + TB-mBJ approximation led us to approach quite well the experimental value [50,51], since we have found a direct optical band gap of 2.7 eV for the bulk BFO system (Figure 14a). Indeed, such approximation was previously demonstrated to reproduce rigorously the shape of the exact exchange potential for atoms [82]. In its thin film form, the band gap value of the BFO system was observed to decrease to 2.22 eV (Figure 14b), while keeping the direct band gap nature. Note that it is usually rather difficult to compare the theoretical results (e.g., band gap) of thin films to the experimental ones, since the properties are mainly dependent on various other parameters such as the particle size, morphology, and film thickness [81]. However, in our work the computed band gap value of BFO film appears to be in accordance with the experimental one. The decrease of the band gap in the film form is very interesting for photocatalytic applications, since it presents improved absorption in the visible light region.

2.7.3. Photocatalytic Properties

Remember that when a photocatalyst material is irradiated by an energy of incident light higher than its band gap, a charge separation occurs with an electron-hole pair separation causing H2 and O2 generation. Hence, the photoexcited electrons in the conduction band (CB) take part in the reduction of water molecules to form H2 gas (2H+ + 2e → H2), whereas the holes in the valence band (VB) are responsible for water oxidation and produce O2 gas (H2O + 2h+ → 2H+ + ½ O2). To efficiently split water molecules, the photocatalyst material should satisfy some basic criteria. First, the material must have a minimum band gap of 1.23 eV (λ = 1000 nm) to satisfy the redox potential of water. In addition to that, the potential of the top of the valence band (VB) should be higher than the redox potential O2/H2O (+1.23 V vs. NHE), and the bottom of the CB should be lower than the redox potential of H+/H2 (0 V vs. NHE) [83]. It has been largely reported that the adequate band gap value of the photocatalyst material should be in the range of 1.6–2.4 eV to efficiently satisfy the activation barrier of the multi-step water splitting reactions [83,84,85]. The conduction band minima, and valence band maxima of our systems (at pH = 0), were computed using Equations (3) and (4), and at specific pH using Equation (5) [86,87]:
E CB pH = 0 = 1 2 E g + χ BFO + E 0
E VB pH = 0 = + 1 2 E g + χ BFO + E 0
E ( CB , VB ) pH = E ( CB , VB ) pH = 0 0.05911 × pH
where E0 represents the scale factor used to link the absolute vacuum scale to the reference redox level (E0 = −4.5 eV) [86], Eg stands for the band gap energy, and χBFO is the absolute electronegativity of BiFeO3 system. Note that the absolute electronegativity of BFO is given by: χ BFO = ( χ Bi χ Fe χ O 3 ) 1 / 5 , where χBi = 4.69, χFe = 4.06, and χO = 7.54 are the absolute electronegativities of Bi, Fe, and O elements [88].
Figure 15 presents a comparison of the band alignment of BFO thin film computed using Equation (5) and the experimental one extracted from the Mott–Schottky plot at pH = 7. As shown in the figure, both valence and conduction band edges extracted theoretically and experimentally are observed to concord, where EVB is observed to be more positive than the reduction potential of water which allows the occurrence of the oxygen evolution reaction. Our results reveal the potential of reducing dimensionality in the BFO system and should motivate the development of low-dimensional BFO-based films as potential photocatalyst materials and photoanode for water splitting reaction.

3. Materials and Methods

As a first stage, a special focus was given to the elaboration of nanostructured transition metal oxide perovskite BiFeO3 with controlled grain size through a solid-state synthesis approach by means of the high energy ball milling system. The elaborated BFO powder was used to prepare a solution to be subsequently deposited on glass substrate by means of spray pyrolysis to obtain a neat BFO film. Details of the experimental setup are given in the following paragraph.
First, stoichiometric amounts of bismuth oxide (Bi2O3, 99.99%), and iron oxide (Fe2O3, 99.99%) were weighed and mixed in an ethanol media to be processed by high energy ball milling operating at 1000 rpm for 2 h (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany). The high applied rotation speed is expected to achieve BFO powders with small grain size, which would significantly affect the resulting physical properties in comparison with the bulk BFO system. Thereafter, the resulting dried powder was uniaxially pressed into pellets, and placed into a muffle furnace at 700 °C for 1 h at a corresponding cooling/heating rate of 5 °C/min. The resulting pellet was then crushed and pressed in an agate mortar.
The leaching of the powder was performed using glacial acetic acid (99%) to remove the secondary phases. The leached residue was therefore washed with a large volume of distilled water to neutralize the acidity. Both TGA and DSC experiments were performed on the prepared BFO powder using a heating rate of 5 °C/min, in an Argon atmosphere (Netzsch GmbH, Selb, Germany). The phase purity of the resulting powder was investigated using a Brucker X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (CuKα = 1.5406 Å).
A second-high energy ball milling step of 8 h at 1000 rpm was added to the pure powder to investigate the effect of grain size decrease on the physical properties of BFO system. Thence, spray pyrolysis technique was used to subsequently deposit BFO on a desired substrate. A glass substrate was used to characterize the optical properties, whereas a silicon substrate with a sputtered Pt coating was used to investigate the photoelectrochemical properties of BiFeO3 compound. Before deposition, we first prepared the precursor solution using a molar concentration of 0.1 M in ethanol. Therefore, the solution was stirred in an ultrasonic bath for 1 h until complete dilution. During the deposition process, the prepared BFO solution was pulverized onto the substrate maintained at 400 °C on a hot plate, using compressed air as carrier gas. The duration of the deposition was set to 1 h with a rate of 1 mL/min. The substrate was naturally cooled down to room temperature. The thickness of the deposited BFO film was investigated using a profilometer, and an average thickness of 700 nm was observed. To characterize the microstructure of the deposited film, we used the scanning electron microscope (SEM; Environmental Quanta 200 FEG, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Further, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigation was done on the BFO nanoparticles to investigate the crystallinity and crystal size of the particles. To prepare the TEM specimen, solution of the BFO powder was prepared and sonicated for 3 min and drop casted on a TEM grid (ultra-thin carbon support film, on lacey carbon) and dried. The TEM experiments were done at 300 kV using an image corrected TEM system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Titan G2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The optical properties were studied using a UV-visible-near IR spectrophotometer in the spectral range of 200–1000 nm operating in both reflective and transmission modes. Note that all the photoelectrochemical investigations were carried on BFO film obtained from the initial powder prepared by the second high energy ball milling process.
The photocurrents and Mott–Schottky plots were collected using an electrochemical device (Autolab PGSTAT204, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland) coupled to an LED module (LED Driver kit, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). LEDs (450, 470, 505, 590 and 627 nm) with low spectral dispersion are used. These LEDs are calibrated using a photodiode to determine the density of the luminous flux received by the sample. Three electrodes were used for the measurements, including Ag/AgCl and Pt wire acting as a reference electrode and counter electrode, respectively. The working electrode is made of the thin film with a contact fixed on the platinum layer. This connection is not in contact with the electrolyte (0.1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution). The Mott–Schottky curves were recorded at 1 kHz and the applied bias voltage was 0.6 V.
The theoretical calculations were performed using the ab-initio self-consistent full-potential linearized augmented plane wave (FLAPW) method based on the density functional theory (DFT), as implemented in the Wien2K code [89]. Besides, we used the modified generalized gradient (GGA) approximation. However, the GGA approach still underestimates the band gap value, therefore we supplement our calculations using the Tran and Blaha modified Beck–Johnson potential (TB-mBJ), which is known to be an accurate approach giving energy bandgaps values closer to the experimental ones [82,90]. The rhombohedral (R3c) structure was used for our calculations. The lattice parameters used for our calculations were directly extracted from the experimental work. Relaxation of the atomic positions was performed to achieve stable structure. Herein, calculations were performed on bulk and thin film BiFeO3 compounds. Besides, to simulate thin films, we used a vacuum of 10 Å in the z-direction to prohibit periodic conditions.

4. Conclusions

BiFeO3 nanoparticles were synthesized via a high energy ball milling technique and were subsequently deposited using spray pyrolysis method. BiFeO3 thin films were found to have a rhombohedral symmetry (R3c). Such good crystallinity was confirmed by X-ray diffraction and TEM investigations. The BiFeO3 system was found to exhibit 90% of optical absorption in the visible region, which is coherent with the high photocurrent density generated during the photoelectrochemical measurements. The very good catalytic performances achieved, are attributed to the low size of BiFeO3 (sub-20 nm), which in turn lowers the optical band gap and increases the total surface area. Furthermore, the band alignment edges of BiFeO3 thin films as demonstrated by both DFT calculations and experimental measurements suggest that low dimensional BiFeO3 could be used as high preforming photoanodes for water splitting reaction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B. and M.J.; Investigation, M.B., S.S., M.C., N.S.R., M.E.M. and M.J.; project administration, M.E.M. and M.J.; supervision, M.J.; validation, M.C., S.S., M.E.M. and M.J.; writing original draft, M.B. and M.J.; writing, review and editing, S.S., N.S.R. and M.E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the French Region Haut De France (HDF) (Contract # REG20002).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the French Region HDF “STARS” program. Authors are grateful to the University of Picardie Jules Verne Electron Microscopy facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nozik, A.J. Photoelectrochemistry: Applications to Solar Energy Conversion. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1978, 29, 189–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nocera, D.G. Personalized Energy: The Home as a Solar Power Station and Solar Gas Station. ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ni, M.; Leung, M.K.H.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Sumathy, K. A Review and Recent Developments in Photocatalytic Water-Splitting Using TiO2 for Hydrogen Production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 401–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moniruddin, M.; Kudaibergenov, S.; Nuraje, N. Hierarchical Nanoheterostructures for Water Splitting. In Green Photo-Active Nanomaterials: Sustainable Energy and Environmental Remediation; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2016; Chapter 7; pp. 142–167. ISBN 978-1-84973-959-7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Burda, C.; Lou, Y.; Chen, X.; Samia, A.C.S.; Stout, J.; Gole, J.L. Enhanced Nitrogen Doping in TiO2 Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1049–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Islam, S.Z.; Reed, A.; Wanninayake, N.; Kim, D.Y.; Rankin, S.E. Remarkable Enhancement of Photocatalytic Water Oxidation in N2/Ar Plasma Treated, Mesoporous TiO2 Films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 14069–14081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, J.H.; Kim, S.; Bard, A.J. Novel Carbon-Doped TiO2 Nanotube Arrays with High Aspect Ratios for Efficient Solar Water Splitting. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alexander, F.; AlMheiri, M.; Dahal, P.; Abed, J.; Rajput, N.S.; Aubry, C.; Viegas, J.; Jouiad, M. Water Splitting TiO2 Composite Material Based on Black Silicon as an Efficient Photocatalyst. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 180, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Iwase, A.; Kato, H.; Kudo, A. Nanosized Au Particles as an Efficient Cocatalyst for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Catal. Lett. 2006, 108, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, D.; Yang, S.; Jin, Y.; Chen, M.; Fan, W.; Luo, B.; Shi, W. Ag-Decorated ATaO3 (A = K, Na) Nanocube Plasmonic Photocatalysts with Enhanced Photocatalytic Water-Splitting Properties. Langmuir 2015, 31, 9694–9699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Abed, J.; Rajput, N.S.; Moutaouakil, A.E.; Jouiad, M. Recent Advances in the Design of Plasmonic Au/TiO2 Nanostructures for Enhanced Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rajput, N.S.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Li, X.-H.; Kim, S.-G.; Jouiad, M. Investigation of Plasmon Resonance in Metal/Dielectric Nanocavities for High-Efficiency Photocatalytic Device. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 16989–16999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abed, J.; Alexander, F.; Taha, I.; Rajput, N.; Aubry, C.; Jouiad, M. Investigation of Broadband Surface Plasmon Resonance of Dewetted Au Structures on TiO2 by Aperture-Probe SNOM and FDTD Simulations. Plasmonics 2019, 14, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, S.; Lewis, N.S.; Ager, J.W.; Yang, J.; McKone, J.R.; Strandwitz, N.C. Thin-Film Materials for the Protection of Semiconducting Photoelectrodes in Solar-Fuel Generators. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 24201–24228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nuraje, N.; Lei, Y.; Belcher, A. Virus-Templated Visible Spectrum Active Perovskite Photocatalyst. Catal. Commun. 2014, 44, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kudo, A.; Miseki, Y. Heterogeneous Photocatalyst Materials for Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grinberg, I.; West, D.V.; Torres, M.; Gou, G.; Stein, D.M.; Wu, L.; Chen, G.; Gallo, E.M.; Akbashev, A.R.; Davies, P.K.; et al. Perovskite Oxides for Visible-Light-Absorbing Ferroelectric and Photovoltaic Materials. Nature 2013, 503, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Young, S.M.; Rappe, A.M. First Principles Calculation of the Shift Current Photovoltaic Effect in Ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 116601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, H.; Zhu, J.; Wu, Q.; Zhuang, J.; Guo, H.; Ma, Z.; Ye, Y. Enhanced Photovoltaic Properties of PbTiO3-Based Ferroelectric Thin Films Prepared by a Sol-Gel Process. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 13063–13068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, F.; Chen, X.Y.; Yin, K.B.; Dong, S.; Ren, Z.F.; Yuan, F.; Yu, T.; Zou, Z.G.; Liu, J.-M. Visible-Light Photocatalytic Properties of Weak Magnetic BiFeO3 Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 2889–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Soltani, T.; Entezari, M.H. Photolysis and Photocatalysis of Methylene Blue by Ferrite Bismuth Nanoparticles under Sunlight Irradiation. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2013, 377, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ponraj, C.; Vinitha, G.; Daniel, J. A Review on the Visible Light Active BiFeO3 Nanostructures as Suitable Photocatalyst in the Degradation of Different Textile Dyes. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2017, 7, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mostafaloo, R.; Asadi-Ghalhari, M.; Izanloo, H.; Zayadi, A. Photocatalytic Degradation of Ciprofloxacin Antibiotic from Aqueous Solution by BiFeO3 Nanocomposites Using Response Surface Methodology. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2020, 6, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Daub, N.A.; Aziz, F.; Mohd Zain, N.A.; Lau, W.J.; Yusof, N.; Salleh, W.N.W.; Jaafar, J. Photocatalytic Disinfection of Bacteria under Visible Light Irradiation by BiFeO3 Photocatalyst. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1142, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Deng, J.; Banerjee, S.; Mohapatra, S.K.; Smith, Y.R.; Misra, M. Bismuth Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Photocatalyst for Solar Hydrogen Generation from Water. J. Fundam. Renew. Energy Appl. 2011, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lan, S.; Yu, C.; Sun, F.; Chen, Y.; Chen, D.; Mai, W.; Zhu, M. Tuning Piezoelectric Driven Photocatalysis by La-Doped Magnetic BiFeO3-Based Multiferroics for Water Purification. Nano Energy 2022, 93, 106792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nkwachukwu, O.V.; Muzenda, C.; Ojo, B.O.; Zwane, B.N.; Koiki, B.A.; Orimolade, B.O.; Nkosi, D.; Mabuba, N.; Arotiba, O.A. Photoelectrochemical Degradation of Organic Pollutants on a La3+ Doped BiFeO3 Perovskite. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dhanalakshmi, R.; Muneeswaran, M.; Shalini, K.; Giridharan, N.V. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of La-Substituted BiFeO3 Nanostructures on the Degradation of Phenol Red. Mater. Lett. 2016, 165, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, Z.; Chen, D.; Wang, S.; Zhang, N.; Qin, L.; Huang, Y. Facile Synthesis of Sm-Doped BiFeO3 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2017, 220, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiao, S.; Fakhri, A.; Janani, B.J. Synthesis of Spinel Tin Ferrite Decorated on Bismuth Ferrite Nanostructures for Synergetic Photocatalytic, Superior Drug Delivery, and Antibacterial Efficiencies. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 27, 101490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bera, S.; Ghosh, S.; Shyamal, S.; Bhattacharya, C.; Basu, R.N. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation Using Gold Decorated BiFeO3 Heterostructures as an Efficient Catalyst under Visible Light Irradiation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 194, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jaffari, Z.H.; Lam, S.-M.; Sin, J.-C.; Zeng, H. Boosting Visible Light Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Performance by Decoration of Silver on Magnetic Spindle-like Bismuth Ferrite. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019, 101, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Niu, F.; Chen, D.; Qin, L.; Zhang, N.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Huang, Y. Facile Synthesis of Highly Efficient p–n Heterojunction CuO/BiFeO3 Composite Photocatalysts with Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 3279–3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bargozideh, S.; Tasviri, M.; Shekarabi, S.; Daneshgar, H. Magnetic BiFeO3 Decorated UiO-66 as a p–n Heterojunction Photocatalyst for Simultaneous Degradation of a Binary Mixture of Anionic and Cationic Dyes. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 13083–13092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Duan, F.; Ma, Y.; Lv, P.; Sheng, J.; Lu, S.; Zhu, H.; Du, M.; Chen, X.; Chen, M. Oxygen Vacancy-Enriched Bi2O3/BiFeO3 p-n Heterojunction Nanofibers with Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Activity under Visible Light Irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 562, 150171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maurya, D.; Thota, H.; Nalwa, K.S.; Garg, A. BiFeO3 Ceramics Synthesized by Mechanical Activation Assisted versus Conventional Solid-State-Reaction Process: A Comparative Study. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 477, 780–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Valant, M.; Axelsson, A.-K.; Alford, N. Peculiarities of a Solid-State Synthesis of Multiferroic Polycrystalline BiFeO3. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 5431–5436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sharma, P.; Diwan, P.K.; Pandey, O.P. Impact of Environment on the Kinetics Involved in the Solid-State Synthesis of Bismuth Ferrite. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 233, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Palai, R.; Katiyar, R.S.; Schmid, H.; Tissot, P.; Clark, S.J.; Robertson, J.; Redfern, S.A.T.; Catalan, G.; Scott, J.F. β Phase and γ-β Metal-Insulator Transition in Multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 14110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hasan, M.; Islam, M.D.F.; Mahbub, R.; Hossain, M.D.S.; Hakim, M.A. A Soft Chemical Route to the Synthesis of BiFeO3 Nanoparticles with Enhanced Magnetization. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 73, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Achenbach, G.D.; James, W.J.; Gerson, R. Preparation of Single-Phase Polycrystalline BiFeO3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1967, 50, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hlinka, J.; Pokorny, J.; Karimi, S.; Reaney, I.M. Angular Dispersion of Oblique Phonon Modes in BiFeO3 from Micro-Raman Scattering. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 20101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hermet, P.; Goffinet, M.; Kreisel, J.; Ghosez, P.H. Raman and Infrared Spectra of Multiferroic Bismuth Ferrite from First Principles. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 220102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bielecki, J.; Svedlindh, P.; Tibebu, D.T.; Cai, S.; Eriksson, S.-G.; Börjesson, L.; Knee, C.S. Structural and Magnetic Properties of Isovalently Substituted Multiferroic BiFeO3: Insights from Raman Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 184422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Sinha, K.; Mascarenhas, A.; Horner, G.S.; Bertness, K.A.; Kurtz, S.R.; Olson, J.M. Raman Line-Shape Analysis of Random and Spontaneously Ordered GaInP2 Alloy. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 7509–7513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Belhadi, J.; Yousfi, S.; Bouyanfif, H.; El Marssi, M. Structural Investigation of (111) Oriented (BiFeO3)(1−x)Λ/(LaFeO3) Superlattices by X-Ray Diffraction and Raman Spectroscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 123, 154103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fukumura, H.; Harima, H.; Kisoda, K.; Tamada, M.; Noguchi, Y.; Miyayama, M. Raman Scattering Study of Multiferroic BiFeO3 Single Crystal. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 310, e367–e369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chang, L.-Y.; Tu, C.-S.; Chen, P.-Y.; Chen, C.-S.; Schmidt, V.H.; Wei, H.-H.; Huang, D.-J.; Chan, T.-S. Raman Vibrations and Photovoltaic Conversion in Rare Earth Doped (Bi0.93RE0.07)FeO3 (RE=Dy, Gd, Eu, Sm) Ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ramachandran, B.; Dixit, A.; Naik, R.; Lawes, G.; Rao, M.S.R. Charge Transfer and Electronic Transitions in Polycrystalline BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 12102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Catalan, G.; Scott, J.F. Physics and Applications of Bismuth Ferrite. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2463–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mocherla, P.S.V.; Karthik, C.; Ubic, R.; Ramachandra Rao, M.S.; Sudakar, C. Tunable Bandgap in BiFeO3 Nanoparticles: The Role of Microstrain and Oxygen Defects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 22910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Radmilovic, A.; Smart, T.J.; Ping, Y.; Choi, K.-S. Combined Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of N-Type BiFeO3 for Use as a Photoanode in a Photoelectrochemical Cell. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 3262–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Uosaki, K.; Kita, H. Effects of the Helmholtz Layer Capacitance on the Potential Distribution at Semiconductor/Electrolyte Interface and the Linearity of the Mott-Schottky Plot. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1983, 130, 895–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Basic Theories of Semiconductor Electrochemistry. In Electrochemistry of Silicon and Its Oxide; Zhang, X.G. (Ed.) Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2001; pp. 1–43. ISBN 978-0-306-47921-2. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kalanur, S.S. Structural, Optical, Band Edge and Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Properties of Tin-Doped WO3. Catalysts 2019, 9, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Huang, S.-M.; Huang, S.-J.; Yan, Y.-J.; Yu, S.-H.; Chou, M.; Yang, H.-W.; Chang, Y.-S.; Chen, R.-S. Highly Responsive Photoconductance in a Sb2SeTe2 Topological Insulator Nanosheet at Room Temperature. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 39057–39062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zheng, K.; Luo, L.-B.; Zhang, T.-F.; Liu, Y.-H.; Yu, Y.-Q.; Lu, R.; Qiu, H.-L.; Li, Z.-J.; Andrew Huang, J.C. Optoelectronic Characteristics of a near Infrared Light Photodetector Based on a Topological Insulator Sb2Te3 Film. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 9154–9160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Carles, D.; Lefrancois, G.; Vautier, C. Influence de l’intensite lumineuse sur la photoconduction des couches de selenium amorphe. Le J. De Phys. Colloq. 1982, 43, C9-327–C9-330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Diéguez, O.; González-Vázquez, O.E.; Wojdeł, J.C.; Íñiguez, J. First-Principles Predictions of Low-Energy Phases of Multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 94105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hatt, A.J.; Spaldin, N.A.; Ederer, C. Strain-Induced Isosymmetric Phase Transition in BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 54109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Koller, D.; Tran, F.; Blaha, P. Merits and Limits of the Modified Becke-Johnson Exchange Potential. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 195134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Ihlefeld, J.F.; Podraza, N.J.; Liu, Z.K.; Rai, R.C.; Xu, X.; Heeg, T.; Chen, Y.B.; Li, J.; Collins, R.W.; Musfeldt, J.L.; et al. Optical Band Gap of BiFeO3 Grown by Molecular-Beam Epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 142908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Moubah, R.; Schmerber, G.; Rousseau, O.; Colson, D.; Viret, M. Photoluminescence Investigation of Defects and Optical Band Gap in Multiferroic BiFeO3 Single Crystals. Appl. Phys. Express 2012, 5, 035802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sando, D.; Carrétéro, C.; Grisolia, M.N.; Barthélémy, A.; Nagarajan, V.; Bibes, M. Revisiting the Optical Band Gap in Epitaxial BiFeO3 Thin Films. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1700836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Khan, H.A.A.; Ullah, S.; Rehman, G.; Khan, S.; Ahmad, I. First Principle Study of Band Gap Nature, Spontaneous Polarization, Hyperfine Field and Electric Field Gradient of Desirable Multiferroic Bismuth Ferrite (BiFeO3). J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2021, 148, 109737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hasan, M.; Basith, M.A.; Zubair, M.A.; Hossain, M.D.S.; Mahbub, R.; Hakim, M.A.; Islam, M.D.F. Saturation Magnetization and Band Gap Tuning in BiFeO3 Nanoparticles via Co-Substitution of Gd and Mn. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 687, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ahmed, S.J.; Kivinen, J.; Zaporzan, B.; Curiel, L.; Pichardo, S.; Rubel, O. BerryPI: A Software for Studying Polarization of Crystalline Solids with WIEN2k Density Functional All-Electron Package. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2013, 184, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, F.; Li, M.; Li, L.; Wu, P.; Pradal-Velázquez, E.; Sinclair, D.C. Defect chemistry and electrical properties of sodium bismuth titanate perovskite. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 5243–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Karatza, D.; Konstantopoulos, C.; Chianese, S.; Diplas, S.; Svec, P.; Hristoforou, E.; Musmarra, D. Hydrogen Production through Water Splitting at Low Temperature over Fe3O4 Pellet: Effects of Electric Power, Magnetic Field, and Temperature. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 211, 106606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Changsheng, L.; Hao, W.; Tao, Z. Hard Magnetization Direction and Its Relation with Permeability of Conventional Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2016, 45, 1369–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kuzmenko, A.M.; Szaller, D.; Kain, T.H.; Dziom, V.; Weymann, L.; Shuvaev, A.; Pimenov, A.; Mukhin, A.A.; Ivanov, V.Y.; Gudim, I.A.; et al. Switching of Magnons by Electric and Magnetic Fields in Multiferroic Borates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 27203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. H’Mŏk, H.; Martínez Aguilar, E.; Antúnez García, J.; Ribas Ariño, J.; Mestres, L.; Alemany, P.; Galván, D.H.; Siqueiros Beltrones, J.M.; Raymond Herrera, O. Theoretical Justification of Stable Ferromagnetism in Ferroelectric BiFeO3 by First-Principles. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2019, 164, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Belhadi, J.; Ruvalcaba, J.; Yousfi, S.; el Marssi, M.; Cordova, T.; Matzen, S.; Lecoeur, P.; Bouyanfif, H. Conduction Mechanism and Switchable Photovoltaic Effect in (1 1 1) Oriented BiFe0.95Mn0.05O3 Thin Film. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2019, 31, 275701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Higuchi, T.; Liu, Y.-S.; Yao, P.; Glans, P.-A.; Guo, J.; Chang, C.; Wu, Z.; Sakamoto, W.; Itoh, N.; Shimura, T.; et al. Electronic Structure of Multiferroic BiFeO3 by Resonant Soft X-ray Emission Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 85106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Béa, H.; Bibes, M.; Fusil, S.; Bouzehouane, K.; Jacquet, E.; Rode, K.; Bencok, P.; Barthélémy, A. Investigation on the Origin of the Magnetic Moment of BiFeO3 Thin Films by Advanced X-ray Characterizations. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 20101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Bilc, D.I.; Orlando, R.; Shaltaf, R.; Rignanese, G.-M.; Íñiguez, J.; Ghosez, P.H. Hybrid Exchange-Correlation Functional for Accurate Prediction of the Electronic and Structural Properties of Ferroelectric Oxides. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 165107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Clark, S.J.; Robertson, J. Energy Levels of Oxygen Vacancies in BiFeO3 by Screened Exchange. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 022902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Stroppa, A.; Picozzi, S. Hybrid Functional Study of Proper and Improper Multiferroics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 5405–5416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Neaton, J.B.; Ederer, C.; Waghmare, U.V.; Spaldin, N.A.; Rabe, K.M. First-Principles Study of Spontaneous Polarization in Multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 14113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. McDonnell, K.A.; Wadnerkar, N.; English, N.J.; Rahman, M.; Dowling, D. Photo-Active and Optical Properties of Bismuth Ferrite (BiFeO3): An Experimental and Theoretical Study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 572, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tran, F.; Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K. Band Gap Calculations with Becke–Johnson Exchange Potential. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2007, 19, 196208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ismail, A.A.; Bahnemann, D.W. Photochemical Splitting of Water for Hydrogen Production by Photocatalysis: A Review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2014, 128, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kim, J.H.; Hansora, D.; Sharma, P.; Jang, J.W.; Lee, J.S. Toward Practical Solar Hydrogen Production-an Artificial Photosynthetic Leaf-to-Farm Challenge. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 1908–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chen, S.; Takata, T.; Domen, K. Particulate Photocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, C.; Jiang, N.; Xu, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Cheng, T.; Han, A.; Lv, H.; Sun, W.; Hou, Y. Towards High Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity in Rare Earth and N Co-Doped SrTiO3: A First Principles Evaluation and Prediction. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 16282–16289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Wang, G.-Z.; Chen, H.; Luo, X.-K.; Yuan, H.-K.; Kuang, A.-L. Bandgap Engineering of SrTiO3/NaTaO3 Heterojunction for Visible Light Photocatalysis. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2017, 117, e25424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pearson, R.G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 734–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Schwarz, K.; Blaha, P.; Madsen, G.K.H. Electronic Structure Calculations of Solids Using the WIEN2k Package for Material Sciences. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2002, 147, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tran, F.; Blaha, P. Accurate Band Gaps of Semiconductors and Insulators with a Semilocal Exchange-Correlation Potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 226401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Combined thermogravimetric (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results obtained on as-milled Bi2O3 and Fe2O3 mixture.
Figure 1. Combined thermogravimetric (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results obtained on as-milled Bi2O3 and Fe2O3 mixture.
Catalysts 12 00215 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of BiFeO3 compound for (red) as received sample, (black) after the first and (blue) second leaching with acetic acid. (*) indicates Bi25FeO40 picks positions.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of BiFeO3 compound for (red) as received sample, (black) after the first and (blue) second leaching with acetic acid. (*) indicates Bi25FeO40 picks positions.
Catalysts 12 00215 g002
Figure 3. (a) Raman spectrum of BiFeO3 system. (b) Deconvolution of the Raman spectrum.
Figure 3. (a) Raman spectrum of BiFeO3 system. (b) Deconvolution of the Raman spectrum.
Catalysts 12 00215 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of the sprayed BiFeO3 samples on a silicon substrate, with an initial powder with (a,b) no second milling, and (c,d) 8 h of second milling at different magnifications.
Figure 4. SEM images of the sprayed BiFeO3 samples on a silicon substrate, with an initial powder with (a,b) no second milling, and (c,d) 8 h of second milling at different magnifications.
Catalysts 12 00215 g004
Figure 5. TEM images of the BFO nanoparticles. (a) A bright field TEM image of a set of particles. (b,c) HRTEM images of nanoparticles with different shapes and sizes. (d) The size distribution of the BFO nanoparticles implying the dominant size in the range of 5–10 nm.
Figure 5. TEM images of the BFO nanoparticles. (a) A bright field TEM image of a set of particles. (b,c) HRTEM images of nanoparticles with different shapes and sizes. (d) The size distribution of the BFO nanoparticles implying the dominant size in the range of 5–10 nm.
Catalysts 12 00215 g005
Figure 6. Absorption, transmittance, and reflectance of BiFeO3 deposited on a glass substrate with (a) no second milling, (c) with 8 h of second milling of the initial powder. Their respective Tauc plots are illustrated in (b,d).
Figure 6. Absorption, transmittance, and reflectance of BiFeO3 deposited on a glass substrate with (a) no second milling, (c) with 8 h of second milling of the initial powder. Their respective Tauc plots are illustrated in (b,d).
Catalysts 12 00215 g006
Figure 7. (a) Mott–Schottky plot. (b) Transient photocurrent response under illumination and dark conditions of BFO thin film for various wavelengths ranging from 450 to 627 nm (ϕ = 62 mW/cm2). (c) Transient photocurrent response (On–Off cycles every 20 s) as a function of the incident light intensity (λ = 450 nm, and V = 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl). (d) The evolution of Δj (ϕ) for λ = 450 and 627 nm and the fit in dashed lines. (e) Transient photocurrent response registered for six cycles ON/OFF (every 20 s) and under constant solar simulator of 100 mW/cm2. (f) Photosensitivity of BFO thin film sample as a function of wavelength.
Figure 7. (a) Mott–Schottky plot. (b) Transient photocurrent response under illumination and dark conditions of BFO thin film for various wavelengths ranging from 450 to 627 nm (ϕ = 62 mW/cm2). (c) Transient photocurrent response (On–Off cycles every 20 s) as a function of the incident light intensity (λ = 450 nm, and V = 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl). (d) The evolution of Δj (ϕ) for λ = 450 and 627 nm and the fit in dashed lines. (e) Transient photocurrent response registered for six cycles ON/OFF (every 20 s) and under constant solar simulator of 100 mW/cm2. (f) Photosensitivity of BFO thin film sample as a function of wavelength.
Catalysts 12 00215 g007
Figure 8. Density of electronic states of the bulk BiFeO3 compound using three different approximations.
Figure 8. Density of electronic states of the bulk BiFeO3 compound using three different approximations.
Catalysts 12 00215 g008
Figure 9. Band structure of BiFeO3 computed using GGA, and GGA + TB-mBJ.
Figure 9. Band structure of BiFeO3 computed using GGA, and GGA + TB-mBJ.
Catalysts 12 00215 g009
Figure 10. (a) Total and partial density of electronic states, and (b) the charge density distribution (110 plan) of the bulk BiFeO3 compound.
Figure 10. (a) Total and partial density of electronic states, and (b) the charge density distribution (110 plan) of the bulk BiFeO3 compound.
Catalysts 12 00215 g010
Figure 11. (a) Total and partial density of electronic states, and (b) the charge density distribution (110 plan) of BiFeO3 in the thin film form.
Figure 11. (a) Total and partial density of electronic states, and (b) the charge density distribution (110 plan) of BiFeO3 in the thin film form.
Catalysts 12 00215 g011
Figure 12. (a) Spin up, and (b) spin down channel of the band structure of BiFeO3 thin film.
Figure 12. (a) Spin up, and (b) spin down channel of the band structure of BiFeO3 thin film.
Catalysts 12 00215 g012
Figure 13. Absorption spectra at the Fe L2,3 edges for right circular polarization (RP), left circular polarization (LP) of the exciting X-rays, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) and X-ray absorption spectra (XAS) in the (a) bulk, (b) thin film BiFeO3 compound.
Figure 13. Absorption spectra at the Fe L2,3 edges for right circular polarization (RP), left circular polarization (LP) of the exciting X-rays, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) and X-ray absorption spectra (XAS) in the (a) bulk, (b) thin film BiFeO3 compound.
Catalysts 12 00215 g013
Figure 14. Tauc plot (n = 2, direct band gap) of (a) bulk BFO, (b) BFO thin film extracted from DFT.
Figure 14. Tauc plot (n = 2, direct band gap) of (a) bulk BFO, (b) BFO thin film extracted from DFT.
Catalysts 12 00215 g014
Figure 15. Band alignment of BiFeO3 thin film extracted experimentally and computed theoretically.
Figure 15. Band alignment of BiFeO3 thin film extracted experimentally and computed theoretically.
Catalysts 12 00215 g015
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benyoussef, M.; Saitzek, S.; Rajput, N.S.; Courty, M.; El Marssi, M.; Jouiad, M. Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Low-Dimensional BiFeO3 System for Photocatalytic Applications. Catalysts 2022, 12, 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020215

AMA Style

Benyoussef M, Saitzek S, Rajput NS, Courty M, El Marssi M, Jouiad M. Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Low-Dimensional BiFeO3 System for Photocatalytic Applications. Catalysts. 2022; 12(2):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020215

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benyoussef, Manal, Sébastien Saitzek, Nitul S. Rajput, Matthieu Courty, Mimoun El Marssi, and Mustapha Jouiad. 2022. "Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Low-Dimensional BiFeO3 System for Photocatalytic Applications" Catalysts 12, no. 2: 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020215

APA Style

Benyoussef, M., Saitzek, S., Rajput, N. S., Courty, M., El Marssi, M., & Jouiad, M. (2022). Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Low-Dimensional BiFeO3 System for Photocatalytic Applications. Catalysts, 12(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020215

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop