Next Article in Journal
Comparative Evaluation of the Asymmetric Synthesis of (S)-Norlaudanosoline in a Two-Step Biocatalytic Reaction with Whole Escherichia coli Cells in Batch and Continuous Flow Catalysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of an Ethanol Electroreforming Cell Based on a Pt1Ru1/C Catalyst at the Anode
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Synthetic 3D Interconnected Porous Carbon-Rich Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Boosting Visible Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production and Dye Contaminant Degradation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution on Gd1.0/Ndx (x = 0.5, 1.0, 3.0, and 6.0%)-Doped TiO2 Bimetallic Electrocatalysts
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Advanced Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction: From Single- to Multielement Materials

Catalysts 2023, 13(10), 1346; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101346
by América Higareda 1, Diana Laura Hernández-Arellano 2, Luis Carlos Ordoñez 1,*, Romeli Barbosa 1 and Nicolas Alonso-Vante 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Catalysts 2023, 13(10), 1346; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101346
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Revised: 21 September 2023 / Accepted: 2 October 2023 / Published: 5 October 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

See attached file.

Author Response

See attachement.

Reviewer 2 Report

In this work, the recent progress in the fundamentals and strategies for the design of advanced electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution, reaction mechanisms, and OER descriptors. The discussion on the elemental composition of the OER electrocatalysts from single to multi-elemental, as well as high entropy alloys. The effect of support materials on the electronic properties of the catalysts is also presented in this review. A good effort has been made to provide an overview of the current progress. Therefore, I recommend its publication after major revision.

The following comments are provided to further improve the quality of the manuscript:

1.        In the second part “2. Fundamentals of advanced electrocatalysts design for oxygen evolution reaction”, the authors present two mechanisms of the OER, including AEM and LOM. However, another mechanism named “oxide path mechanism (OPM) [Nature Catalysis, 2021, 4, 1012]” is ignored by the authors, and should be added to the manuscript.

2.        In the Abstract, the authors stated that the design of acid-stable electrocatalysts with low overpotential and excellent stability for OER constitutes an important activity in electrocatalysis. However, the summary in part “3. Oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts ” are mostly transition-metal based-electrocatalysts in alkaline media. More progress on the electrocatalysts in acid media should be added to the manuscript.

3.        This reviewer suggests the authors add some figures into part “3. Oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts ” from the representative works.

4.        The relationships between single-component, binary-component, ternary-component, quaternary-component, and multi-component should be clarified (the advantages and disadvantages).

5.        In part “4. Effect of supports”, this reviewer suggests the authors summarize the support materials from the perspective of their functions. For example, the interaction between the electrocatalyst and support improves the intrinsic activity, increases the number of active sites, and promotes the stability of the electrocatalyst.

Author Response

See attachement

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, the authors systematically reviewed Advanced Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction: From Single to Multi-Element Materials. The entire article is well comprehensive with consulting substantial references. It is worth mentioning that the author identified the critical limitations for the present singles catalysts and provided prospective outlooks. However, the insufficient descriptions of these limit the readers' interest and further exploration. There are also some other minor issues as following mentioned. Overall, the manuscript is recommended for publication in Catalysts after minor revisions.

 1.          Please check on Table 1, Equation should be more visible for authors. For example line 216-224.

 

 2.      There is only one figure in Figure 1, impairing the readability.  I would suggest splitting them to make the relative content close to the depicted figure.

 

 3.      The authors should give some examples to support this paper such as Nano Energy, vol. 73, pp. 104788-1 – 104788-8 (2020)

 

 4.      Graphic abstract (or commonly known as TOC graph) should have adequate resolution and clarity; Confirm that all text is legible at the final size.

 

 5.      More electrochemical characterizations descriptions are necessary to enable readers to better understand the performance of the catalysts.

 

  6.      Please improve the Figure 8 quality, tailoring the inappropriate or unnecessary parts.

 

 7. The author mentioned the advanced operando characterizations techniques used to probe the real catalytic mechanism behind it. These recently published relevant references should be cited (Trends in Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1065 – 1077 (2022).;

 

 Other literature

 

Enhanced oxygen reduction activity and stability of double-layer nitrogen-doped carbon catalyst with abundant Fe-Co dual-atom sites

 

A high-entropy phosphate catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction

 

Electrocatalysts for acidic oxygen evolution reaction: Achievements and perspectives

 Disclosure of Charge Storage Mechanisms in Molybdenum Oxide Nanobelts with Enhanced Supercapacitive Performance Induced by Oxygen Deficiency

 

good

Author Response

See attachement.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop