Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Metal Ratio and Precipitation Agent on Highly Active Iron-Manganese Mixed Metal Oxide Catalysts for Propane Total Oxidation
Next Article in Special Issue
Progress in Developing LnBaCo2O5+δ as an Oxygen Reduction Catalyst for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Mixed-Phase Fe2O3 Derived from Natural Hematite Ores/C3N4 Z-Scheme Photocatalyst for Ofloxacin Removal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fluorine Anion-Doped Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-δ as a Promising Cathode for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells

1
School of Energy and Power, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
3
Microscopy and Microanalysis Facility (MMF), John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Catalysts 2023, 13(5), 793; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050793
Submission received: 23 March 2023 / Revised: 20 April 2023 / Accepted: 20 April 2023 / Published: 23 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Electrocatalysts for Fuel Cells and Metal–Air Batteries)

Abstract

:
The widespread application of protonic ceramic fuel cells is limited by the lack of oxygen electrodes with excellent activity and stability. Herein, the strategy of halogen doping in a Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-δ (BSCFN) cathode is discussed in detail for improving cathode activity. Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-x-δFx (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1) cathode materials are synthesised by a solid-phase method. The XRD results show that fluorine anion-doped BSCFN forms a single-phase perovskite structure. XPS and titration results reveal that fluorine ion doping increases active oxygen and surface adsorbed oxygen. It also confines chemical bonds between cations and anions, which enhances the cathode’s catalytic performance. Therefore, an anode-supported single cell with the configuration of Ni-BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3-δ (BZCYYb)|BZCYYb|Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-0.1-δF0.1 (BSCFN-F0.1) achieved a high peak power density of 630 mW cm−2 at 600 °C. Moreover, according to the symmetrical cell test, the BSCFN-F0.1 electrode demonstrated a superb stability for nearly 400 h at 600 °C. This work focuses on the influence of fluorine anion incorporation upon the performance of cathode materials. It also analyses and discusses the effects of different fluorine ion incorporation amounts to occupy different oxygen positions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The development of new materials and new technologies is a key step towards solving the energy crisis [1,2,3,4,5]. Fuel cells are favoured because they can directly convert the chemical energy of fuels to clean electricity with high efficiency [6,7,8,9]. Protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs) have very bright prospects for application within the domain of intermediate and low temperatures for fast proton conduction and low proton activation energy [10,11,12,13,14]. In comparison to typical solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) on the basis of oxygen ion conduction (O-SOFCs), PCFCs have two unique advantages. Firstly, the lower activation energy for PCFCs leads to lower operating temperatures than for O-SOFCs, which can improve the operational stability and reduce the complexity and cost of the system. Secondly, during operation, the water formation reaction takes place on the cathode side of the PCFC to avoid fuel dilution, which can not only improve fuel utilisation but also reduce the possibility of nickel anodic oxidation [15,16,17]. Nevertheless, the key point hindering the development of intermediate- and low-temperature PCFCs is the insufficiency of catalytic activity for oxygen reactions at the oxygen electrode [18,19,20]. Accordingly, in-depth research and exploration of new high-performance oxygen electrodes makes sense for PCFCs.
To obtain higher power density at a lower temperature range, many promising oxygen electrodes have been investigated [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. For example, Ba0.95Fe0.7Co0.2Sc0.1O3-δ [28], La1.6Sr0.4Cu0.6Ni0.4O4+δ [29], PrBaCo1.92Zr0.08O5+δ [30], Pr0.2Ba0.2Sr0.2La0.2Ca0.2CoO3-δ [31] and other materials applied in the development of PCFCs have attracted extensive attention in recent years because of their outstanding electrochemical activity under intermediate and low temperatures. What these studies have in common is the application of highly active cathode materials due to elemental doping or cationic defects at the A and B sites of perovskite materials, which have good stability for PCFCs [32,33]. In recent years, oxygen site doping of halogen elements in perovskite oxides has become one of the most effective strategies to boost the catalytic performance of materials [34,35,36,37,38]. For example, Xia et al. proposed doping BaCe0.8Sm0.2O3 with chlorine ions to improve the chemical stability of the proton conductor electrolyte and then enhance the oxygen incorporation kinetics of the cathode at medium and low temperatures, thereby improving the catalytic performance [39]. It provided a good reference for the developmental direction of proton conductor fuel cell cathodes. Subsequently, Shao et al. demonstrated that anion doping can boost the electrocatalytic activity of perovskite cathodes at an intermediate temperature range. They developed the fluorine ion doping of SrFeO3-δ, and found that the area specific resistance (ASR) of SrFeO2.95-δF0.05 was 0.393 Ω cm2 at 600 °C, which is much smaller than that of SrFeO3-δ and can be attributed to enhanced bulk diffusion and surface exchange [40].
Herein, we employ the anion-doped Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-δ (BSCFN) strategy, which can significantly promote oxygen reduction activity and mobility, to further explore the development of perovskite cathode materials for PCFC applications. In this work, fluorine ion-doped BSCFN materials, Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-x-δFx (BSCFN-Fx, x = 0.05, 0.1), have been developed as potential oxygen electrodes for PCFCs with a BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3-δ (BZCYYb) electrolyte. Compared with BSCFN, the ASR of the BSCFN-F0.1 electrode at 600 °C decreased by nearly 50% (0.23 vs. 0.44 Ω cm2), and the peak power density of a PCFC with a BSCFN-F0.1 cathode was also increased by 47% (632 vs. 429 mW cm−2). Meanwhile, under a steady current density of 0.16 A cm−2, the PCFC with the BSCFN-F0.1 cathode showed an excellent durability of ~130 h.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structure of Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-x-δFx (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1)

We investigated the phase structure of cathode materials at room temperature using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). As shown in Figure 1a, the crystal diffraction peaks of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.10) are piercing and pointed, indicating their high crystallinity. The extra small peak at 27.5° is a Kβ peak. Based on Rietveld refinement calculations (Figure 1b–d), the materials are cubic perovskite crystal structures with a Pm-3m space group. The calculated lattice parameter of BSCFN is a = b = c = 4.007(1) Å. The lattice parameters, χ2 values, Rwp and Rp are derived from the refinement results and displayed in Table 1, and they further confirm the reliability of the Rietveld method (χ2 < 3; Rwp, Rp < 10). Compared to the lattice parameter of BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1 have smaller lattice parameters, which are in accordance with a very small lattice shrinkage [34]. In addition, the X-ray density of the sample was calculated according to the following formula:
ρx = n·Mw/NA·V
where n is the number of atoms per unit cell, Mw is the molecular weight of the sample, V is the volume of the unit cell and NA is Avogadro’s number. The values of the estimated density increased slightly from 8.7328 to 8.7522 g/cm3 (Table 2). This increasing can be attributed to the decreasing of the volume of the unit cell as reported before. The crystallinity is increased and the number of crystals per unit volume is increased.
The morphology and phase composition of BSCFN-F0.1 was observed using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) and high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping, as shown in Figure 2. The lattice spacing of the anion-doped catalyst is about 0.285 nm (Figure 2a), which corresponds to the BSCFN-F0.1 (110) lattice width, confirming the formation of the anion-doped BSCFN-F0.1 phase structure. The corresponding fast Fourier transformed (FFT) pattern (Figure 2b) indicates the cation-ordering reflections of BSCFN-F0.1. The EDS mapping images of all elements of BSCFN-F0.1 are shown in Figure 2c, in which the uniform distribution of Ba, Sr, Co, Fe, Nb, O and F further reveals that the fluorine anion has been successfully doped into the BSCFN-F0.1 perovskite lattice.

2.2. Properties of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx

The chemical states and surface elemental compositions of the samples were obtained by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey. Figure 3a shows the measured XPS spectra of BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1. The signal peaks of Ba, Sr, Co, Fe, Nb and O can be clearly identified on the surface of the sample. As shown in Figure 3b, the characteristic peak of F is located at 683 eV, indicating that the fluorine ion was successfully incorporated into BSCFN. Before peak splitting and fitting of the full spectrum from the XPS, the spectra of all elements were calibrated by the C 1s peak at 284.80 eV, which clearly shows the corresponding peaks of cobalt (Co 2p), iron (Fe 2p) and oxygen (O 1s).
The XPS spectra of the Co 2p levels of the prepared samples with different compositions are shown in Figure 4a. As can be seen from the image, the Co 2p spectrum consists of two prominent intensity peaks. The peak at low binding energy is confirmed as the Co 2p3/2 fraction, while the high binding energy fraction is Co 2p1/2 [41]. The Gaussian method was used to fit the XPS survey curve, and the different characteristic peaks that were obtained after fitting represent the different valence states of cobalt. The Co 2p spectrum shows a doublet, a low-energy band (Co 2p3/2) at around 779.81 eV and a high-energy band (Co 2p1/2) at around 794.99 eV. The energy difference between Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 is approximately 15.00 eV. In addition, the satellite peak is found around 788.01 eV, indicating that Co2+ ions are present in cobalt-containing oxide materials [42]. The XPS binding energies of Fe 2p3/2 are between 706.00 and 720.02 eV, as shown in Figure 4b. Fe 2p3/2 can be further split into four bands, the binding energy from low to high corresponds to Fe2+, Fe3+, Fe4+ and satellite peaks, respectively.
Binding energy is the energy required for orbital electrons to escape from atoms. The easier the process of electron detachment, the lower its binding energy is. Co4+ ions have a more significantly positive charge and lower electron cloud density than Co3+ and Co2+ ions, so Co4+ ions should have far greater 2p electron binding energy. Similarly, the binding energy of Fe4+ is also higher than Fe3+ and Fe2+. Counter to that trend, the trivalent cobalt ion is more unstable than the divalent cobalt ion, and its binding energy is also naturally smaller than that of the divalent cobalt ion [43]. Therefore, the characteristic peaks at 778.15/793.55 eV, 778.22/794.12 eV and 778.15/793.38 eV can be attributed to Co3+ ions, the peaks at 780.10/803.50 eV, 779.73/804.06 eV and 780.15/803.96 eV can be attributed to Co4+ ions and the peaks at 779.43/794.9 eV, 779.43/795.06 eV and 779.51/794.89 eV can be assigned to Co2+ ions. The multivalent states of Co and Fe lead to them mainly existing on the surface in the form of oxides, which plays an essential role in ORR. At the same time, the content of Fe ions on the surface of BSCFN is very low; therefore, Co ions play a vital role in the oxygen reaction processes of the oxygen electrode.
According to the charge compensation mechanism, the doping of fluorine ions can inevitably affect the valence state of the B-site ions. The results of Gaussian fitting of the curve of Co 2p are shown in Table 3, and it can be seen that the valence state of surface Co ions changes with the amount of doped fluorine ions. Among them, when the doping ratio of fluorine ions reaches 0.05, the average valence of Co ions in BSCFN increases from 2.81 to 2.93, indicating that fluorine ions have been mainly doped in oxygen vacancies and interstitial vacancies in BSCFN at this time. When the doping ratio is 0.10, the average valence state of Co ions is reduced to 2.80. At this time, fluorine ions have replaced oxygen ions, resulting in a decrease in B-site ions’ valence states. These valence state changes show that the introduction of fluorine ions can generate oxygen vacancies [44]. According to the XPS fitting results, the valence states of B-site transition metal ions on the surface of the samples can be estimated. The average valence states of B-site transition metal ions in the bulk phase of samples were determined by titration method. As can be seen from Figure 5, the average valence states of cations for B-site transition metals cobalt and iron in BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1 samples were 2.61, 2.72 and 2.66, respectively. The results showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, which was consistent with the XPS fitting results and proved the reliability of the experimental results.
The cathodic reaction kinetics of the samples can be investigated in depth using the O 1s XPS spectra in Figure 6. The O 1s spectra of the BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1 samples all contain four overlapping bands, corresponding to (in order of binding energy from low to high) lattice oxygen O2− (Oα) at ~529.31 eV, active oxygen O22− or O (Oβ) at ~530.72 eV, hydroxyl or surface adsorbed oxygen -OH or O2 (Oγ) at ~531.38 eV, caused by the surface defect, and chemisorbed or physisorbed molecules such as water or carbonate (H2O or CO32−) (Oε) at ~532.39 eV [45,46]. The results after peak fitting of the XPS pattern of O 2p are shown in Table 4. It is obvious that, with the incorporation of fluorine ions, both Oβ and Oγ increase by varying degrees. Primarily, the proportion of Oγ increased from 20.40 in BSCFN to 29.60 in BSCFN-F0.1, which means that more surface defects, such as oxygen vacancies, are generated in the BSCFN-F0.1 sample. Active oxygen (Oβ) has high mobility and is a highly active species during chemical reactions. Therefore, the enhancement of Oβ in BSCFN-F0.1 plays a vital role in ORR catalytic activity [46]. In addition, the lattice oxygen of BSCFN-F0.1 (area ratio of Oα = 15.70%) is lower than that of BSCFN (area ratio of Oα = 45.00%). It is demonstrated that, as the number of fluorine ions increases further, they occupy lattice oxygen sites in the BSCFN structure, which is consistent with the previous conclusion.
The electrical conductivity of the BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.10) in the range of 300–900 °C was evaluated by the four-probe test method. As shown in Figure 7a, all samples show the same trend of change. With the increase in temperature, they show semiconductor conduction behaviour; that is, the electrical conductivity always shows an upward trend. In the test temperature range, the highest electrical conductivities of BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1 oxides were 14.78, 16.67 and 8.74 S cm−1, respectively, at 900 °C. According to the charge compensation mechanism, fluorine ion doping will change the valence state of the B-site, and the change of the B-site valence state depends on the doping position of the fluorine ion. When the mole number of the fluorine ion doping ratio reaches 0.05, fluorine ions occupy oxygen vacancies and interstitial sites, resulting in an increase in the valence state of the Co ions [34], resulting in more charge carriers being generated, as well as enhanced electrical conductivity. The difference is that, when the doping ratio reaches 0.1, fluorine ions begin to occupy the positions of oxygen ions, which in turn leads to a lower valence state of Co ions and a larger radius, thereby reducing the number of carriers.
The electron conduction mechanism of the perovskite material below 450 °C is the jump of p-type small polarons, which is related to the change of valence of trivalent and quadrivalent Co and Fe ions. In this case, charge transfer is controlled by temperature, which can be explained by the small polaron conduction equation:
σ = A T exp ( E a k T )
A represents the material related constant containing carrier concentration phase, T is the absolute temperature, E a is the activation energy and k is the Boltzmann’s constant. Figure 7b shows the relationship between Log (σT) and 1/ T . In the range of 300–450 °C, the activation energy of the sample is related to the valence states of Co and Fe ions. When the fluorine ion doping rate is 0.05, it is conducive to electron conduction, high conductivity, low activation energy, high electron hole concentration and high concentration of B-site tetravalent ions, that is, fluorine ions occupy the oxygen vacancy and oxygen interstitial site. It can be expressed by a quasi-chemical equation:
M ( C o , F e ) x + 2 V O + 1 2 F 2 ( g ) M ( C o , F e ) + F O + O O x + 2 h
3 F 2 ( g ) + 2 O i 6 F i + O 2 ( g ) + 2 h
On the contrary, when the doping ratio reaches 0.1, it is not conducive to electron conduction, and the concentration of B-site tetravalent ions is low, that is, fluorine ions replace oxygen ions.
M ( C o , F e ) + O O x + F 2 ( g ) + 2 h M ( C o , F e ) x + 1 2 O 2 ( g ) + 2 F O
M ( C o , F e ) x represents the B-site metal elements Fe and Co in low valence state, V O is the oxygen vacancy, M ( C o , F e ) represents the B-site metal elements Fe and Co in high valence state, O O x is oxygen ion, F O is lattice fluorine occupying oxygen site, h represents the electron hole [47], O i is oxygen interstitial site and F i represents F on interstitial sites.

2.3. Cell Performance and Durability

EIS can directly assess the ORR activity of the BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) electrodes in a humid air atmosphere. The tested cell configuration was a BZCYYb-supported symmetric cell. The electrolyte layer thickness of three cells was around 0.5 mm, and the electrode layer thickness of all the cells is around 17 μm. Based on the EIS of all electrode materials, we can find that the BSCFN-F0.1 electrode exhibited the best performance at all temperatures (Figure 8a). For example, an ASR value of 0.11 Ω cm2 at 650 °C was achieved, much lower than that of BSCFN, and lower than some other high-performance Co-containing cathode materials. Figure 8a shows the Arrhenius plots of the ASR values of BSCFN-Fx on symmetric cells at different temperatures. The cathodic activation energies (Ea) of BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1 are 104.0, 102.8 and 104.6 kJ mol−1, respectively.
Figure 8b shows the EIS diagrams of the three components at 600 °C, which intuitively reflects the greatly improved electrochemical performance with the introduction of fluorine, by which the ASR value of BSCFN-F0.1 is only half that of BSCFN (0.23 vs. 0.44 Ω cm2). The data table obtained by fitting the BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) EIS values is listed in Table 5, which shows the fitted plot for system analysis. The value of the total area specific resistance (ASR) comes from the sum of RE1 and RE2. RE1 and RE2 represent the charge transfer process and the oxygen surface process, respectively [48]. This is based on capacitance and relaxation frequency calculations of the charge transfer process:
C = R Q 1 / n R
f = R Q 1 / n 2 Π
The capacitance and relaxation frequencies at high frequency are calculated by the above formulas (Table 6). The capacitance and relaxation frequencies of all three samples are in the range of 10–100 mF cm−2 and 10–1000 Hz, both of which are within the characteristic range of electron transfer. This also confirms that the high frequency end is the electron transfer resistance of the oxygen reduction process. The experimental data are in accordance with the fitting results. RE1 and RE2 were significantly reduced in BSCFN-F0.1, and the cathode exhibits fantastic ORR activity, indicating that the introduction of fluorine ions promotes electron transfer and electrode surface ion diffusion.
To attain a profound understanding of the cathodic ORR process, we used the distribution of relaxation time (DRT) technique to process and analyse the obtained EIS data [49]. Figure 8c shows the DRT curves corresponding to the EIS of BSCFN and BSCFN-F0.1 at 600 °C. High frequency peak (P1) at the frequency range of 103–104 Hz is related to proton diffuse process. It is assigned to the transfer of protons through the electrolyte and electrode interface. The intensity of P1 decreased significantly, indicating that the proton conductivity in the electrode of BSCFN-F0.1 increased significantly. Proton conduction in perovskite oxides is mainly through hydroxide defects, which are produced by dissociation and adsorption of water in oxygen vacancies [50]. The P2 and P3 in the frequency range 101–103 Hz were identified as charge transfer processes, including oxygen ion transfer at the cathode/electrolyte interface and electron transfer during oxygen reduction, which was caused by the use of wet air in the proton-conducting symmetric cell test. Water in the air would be adsorbed in the oxygen vacancy of the electrode, thus inhibiting the charge transfer of oxygen ions [51]. P4 in the frequency range 100–101 Hz was the cathode oxygen surface reaction process. It is the main speed control step in the reaction process. For the low frequency peak (P5), the gas diffusion process in the porous anode does not play a key role in electrode performance. We can know that the peaks of each frequency segment have been reduced by a great degree, indicating that the corresponding process has been optimised. In addition, the performance of the electrode on the proton conductor mainly depends on the ORR activity and the proton conductivity of the electrode. The performance of the BSCFN-F0.1 electrode is better than that of BSCFN, which is mainly due to the increase in proton conductivity in the electrode. Figure 8d presents the stability results for the symmetrical cell with the BSCFN-F0.1 electrode at 600 °C in an air atmosphere with 3% humidity. It can be seen that the symmetrical cell remained stable for nearly 400 h. These facts show that the doping of fluorine ions in BSCFN is suitable for the development of intermediate- and low-temperature SOFC cathode materials.
In order to more comprehensively estimate the ORR catalytic activity of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) cathodes on single cells, we prepared single cells with the configuration of NiO-BZCYYb|BZCYYb|cathodes and accomplished I–V tests on the single cells. The cathode and electrolyte layers’ thickness of these three cells were around 18 and 20 μm, respectively. Figure 9a–c shows the I−V−P curves of a single PCFC with BSCFN or BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) cathode at 450–700 °C. The obtained OCV values are in perfect agreement with the theoretical Nernst voltage (1.01 V at 600 °C), which indicates that the sealed cells are acceptable. In the range of 450–700 °C, with 50 °C steps, the single cell made with the BSCFN-F0.1 cathode exhibited the best electrochemical properties, and its maximum power densities were 335, 430, 527, 633, 720 and 840 mW cm−2, respectively. This is higher than many other halogen-doped cathodes (Table 7). Figure 9d compares the peak power densities of PCFCs when different components are used as cathodes. It shows that, in the test temperature range, the performances of BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05 and 0.1) were better than that of BSCFN at each temperature, especially in the case of BSCFN-F0.1; there is a particularly obvious improvement within the low temperature environment, where the peak power density reached 335 mW cm−2 at 450 °C, 145% higher than for BSCFN. To accurately measure the cell stability, a new single cell with a silver mesh brush on the cathode surface (in the same batch as the single cell performance test) was tested with an OCV value of 1.013 V at 600 °C. As shown in Figure 10a, the BSCFN-F0.1 cathode shows high durability of ~120 h at a current density of 0.16 A cm−2. A cross-sectional image of the fuel cell after the test, observed by SEM, is shown in Figure 10b. The micrograph demonstrates that the porous electrodes adhered closely to the compact electrolyte. No obvious microcracks or delamination were found. The joints of each component are in good contact and have good structural stability. It also can be seen from the Figure 10b that the electrolyte is dense, while the cathode and anode are loose and porous. The porous microstructure of the fuel electrode facilitates hydrogen and oxygen transport and electrochemical reactions, resulting in lower electrode polarisation resistance and higher power density.

3. Experimental

3.1. Materials Preparation

BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) were fabricated via the solid-phase method by dissolving BaCO3, SrCO3, CoO4, Fe3O4, Nb2O5 and SrF2 within a ball mill in a certain proportion, with ethanol as a solvent. The mixture was ball-milled for 24 h and placed in a Petri dish to dry. The resultant dried solids were ground into a powder and heated at 900 °C for 10 h. The cathode powder was put into a mould, pressed into a disc shape and then calcined at 1100 °C for a further 10 h. These tablets were then ground into a powder to obtain the BSCFN cathode material.
BZCYYb was synthesised by a traditional sol-gel process [56,57]. Ba(NO3)2, Zr(NO3)2·5H2O, Ce(NO3)3·6H2O, Y(NO3)3·6H2O, Yb(NO3)3·5H2O were mixed in deionised water and stirred until transparent. Certain proportions of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid (CA) and ammonia (n metal ions: n EDTA: n CA: n ammonia solution = 1:1:2:10) were introduced to the nitrate solution as a complex agent. The solution was heated and stirred to form a gel, followed by heating at 250 °C for 6 h to acquire the BZCYYb precursor, and then the BZCYYb precursor was calcined at 1000 °C for 5 h to obtain the BZCYYb electrolyte material.

3.2. Cell Fabrication and Test

Symmetrical cells with BSCFN (or BSCFN-Fx)|BZCYYb|BSCFN (or BSCFN-Fx) configurations were assembled for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements. A weighed amount of the prepared BZCYYb powder was formed into a dense BZCYYb electrolyte pellet via the dry pressing method; the radius of each pellet was about 7.5 mm. The pressed electrolyte pellets were calcined at 1450 °C for 5 h. The electrode slurry was prepared by ball-milling after mixing the electrode powder and dispersant; a spray gun was used to uniformly spray the porous cathode slurry onto both sides of the BZCYYb electrolyte pellets, which were then placed on a zirconia plate and calcined in air at 800 °C for 2 h to obtain the symmetrical cells. In this paper, the polarization impedance of the test electrode is measured using a Prinston impedance analyser, and the measurement frequency is 1 MHz–0.01 Hz. To test the single cell performance, anode-supported PCFCs with BSCFN (or BSCFN-Fx)|BZCYYb|NiO-BZCYYb configuration were fabricated using the dry pressing method reported previously [58]. The NiO-BZCYYb anode was composed of nickel oxide powder and BZCYYb powder in a weight ratio of 70:30 mixed with a pore-forming agent, binding agent and ethanol. Half-cells were obtained by calcining the bilayer pellets at 1450 °C for 10 h. The area of the cathode is ~0.48 cm2. For the cell performance test, wet H2 (3% H2O) and air were used as the fuel and the oxidant, respectively. Their flow rates were 80 and 120 mL min−1, respectively. The current-voltage data of the single cells were collected using a Keithley 2440 digital sourcemeter.

3.3. Characterisations

A German Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (German Bruker brand) was used to identify the crystal structures of materials. The phase composition of the sample was measured by XRD and quantitative analysis of the phase content was obtained by Rietveld full spectrum refinement. The morphology of the PCFC was surveyed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM Quanta-2000, Hitachi Corporation of Japan). The morphology, structure and elemental distribution of the cathode powder was examined by HR-TEM, HAADF-STEM and EDS mapping using an FEI Titan G2 80-200 (FEI Corporation of the United States). The element valence and binding energy information of samples were obtained from XPS measurements using Al K rays (1486.60 eV) on a Thermo ESCALAB 250 instrument (Thermo manufacturer in the United States).
The electrical conductivity of the electrode was measured in ambient air by means of a four-probe test. The electrode material was first prepared into a bar, and calcined at 1100 °C for 5 h. A Keithley 2420 sourcemeter (American Tektronix company)was used to record the voltage when a constant current was passed through the electrode. The titration test began by placing 0.1 g of the powder under test in an iodine bottle, and excess KI powder was added to cover the powder under test. Then, 2 mL solution of 6 mol L−1 HCl was added and placed in a dark place for about 0.5 h. After the powder was dissolved, 30 mL deionized water was added to dilute the solution. Finally, 0.01 mol L−1 Na2S2O3 solution was used for titration, and an appropriate amount of starch solution was added as an indicator near the end of titration.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have identified fluorine ion-doped BSCFN with a cubic perovskite structure as a promising perovskite cathode material. BSCFN-F0.1 has a higher concentration of oxygen vacancies at operating temperature, which accelerates the reaction kinetics of oxygen incorporation and the oxygen ion diffusion rate, making the BSCFN-F0.1 cathode perform better than BSCFN. The performance of the PCFCs with the structure of Ni-BCZYYb|BCZYYb|BSCFN (or BSCFN-Fx) further reflects the application prospects of the BSCFN-F0.1 cathode material, with an open circuit potential of 1.03 V and a peak power density of 632.11 mW cm2 at 600 °C. In addition, the symmetric cell fabricated with BSCFN-F0.1 as the electrode maintained a stable performance for nearly 400 h at 600 °C in an air atmosphere. Above all, fluorine ions doping strategies can be used to explore high-performance PCFC cathode materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J. and C.S.; data curation, Y.L.; formal analysis, H.Q. and W.W.; funding acquisition, C.S.; investigation, Y.L. and S.J.; methodology, Y.L.; project administration, C.S.; supervision, C.S.; validation, H.Q.; visualization, Y.L.; writing—original draft, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, E.M. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, grant number KL21-05.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Program for Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professors. The authors are also grateful for the support of the Instrumental Analysis Center, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, S.; Liu, Y.; Qiu, H.; Su, C.; Shao, Z. High Selectivity Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction and Anti-Chlorine Corrosion Strategies in Seawater Splitting. Catalysts 2022, 12, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Y.; Tao, R.; Yang, Z.; Fan, Y.; Bian, T.; Fan, X.; Su, C.; Shao, Z. Cuprous Oxide Single-Crystal Film Assisted Highly Efficient Solar Hydrogen Production on Large Ships for Long-Term Energy Storage and Zero-Emission Power Generation. J. Power Sources 2022, 527, 231133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zeng, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, D.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Lin, B. A Zn-Doped Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ Perovskite Cathode with Enhanced ORR Catalytic Activity for SOFCs. Catalysts 2020, 10, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aksenova, T.V.; Mysik, D.K.; Cherepanov, V.A. Crystal Structure and Properties of Gd1-xSrxCo1-yFeyO3-δ Oxides as Promising Materials for Catalytic and SOFC Application. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Su, C.; Liu, Y.; Luo, Z.; Veder, J.P.; Zhong, Y.; Jiang, S.; Shao, Z. Defects-Rich Porous Carbon Microspheres as Green Electrocatalysts for Efficient and Stable Oxygen-Reduction Reaction over A Wide Range of PH Values. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 126883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Y.; Chen, B.; Guan, D.; Xu, M.; Ran, R.; Ni, M.; Zhou, W.; O’Hayre, R.; Shao, Z. Thermal-Expansion Offset for High-Performance Fuel Cell Cathodes. Nature 2021, 591, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Peng, L.; Li, Q.; Sun, L.; Zhao, H. An Effective Strategy to Enhance the Electrocatalytic Activity of Ruddlesden-Popper Oxides Sr3Fe2O7-δ Electrodes for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, G.; Su, C.; Shi, H.; Zhu, Y.; Song, Y.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Toward Reducing the Operation Temperature of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Our Past 15 Years of Efforts in Cathode Development. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 15169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, M.; Du, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H. Progress of Perovskites as Electrodes For Dymmetrical Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 13081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choi, S.; Kucharczyk, C.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Takeuchi, I.; Ji, H.; Haile, S.M. Exceptional Power Density and Stability at Intermediate Temperatures in Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duan, C.; Kee, R.J.; Zhu, H.; Karakaya, C.; Chen, Y.; Ricote, S.; Jarry, A.; Crumlin, E.J.; Hook, D.; Braun, R.; et al. Highly Durable, Coking and Sulfur Tolerant Fuel-Flexible Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Nature 2018, 557, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Bello, I.T.; Guo, M.; Yu, N.; Zhu, M.; Ni, M. Direct Ammonia Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cell: A Modelling Study Based on Elementary Reaction Kinetics. J. Power Sources 2023, 556, 232505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Venkataraman, V.; Perez-Fortes, M.; Wang, L.; Hajimolana, Y.S.; BoiguesMunoz, C.; Agostini, A.; McPhail, S.J.; Marechalc, F.; Herle, J.V.; Aravind, P.V. Reversible Solid Oxide Systems for Energy and Chemical Applications-Review & Perspectives. J. Energy Storage 2019, 24, 100782. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hua, B.; Yan, N.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Etsell, T.; Sarkar, P.; Luo, J. Anode-Engineered Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cell with Excellent Performance and Fuel Compatibility. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, M.; Su, C.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, H.; Ge, L. Composite Cathodes for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells: Rationales and Materials. Compos. B Eng. 2022, 238, 109881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, S.; Wu, H.; Puleo, F.; Liotta, L.F. B-Site Metal (Pd, Pt, Ag, Cu, Zn, Ni) Promoted La1−xSrxCo1−yFeyO3–δ Perovskite Oxides as Cathodes for IT-SOFCs. Catalysts 2015, 5, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cao, J.; Ji, Y.; Shao, Z. Perovskites for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells: A Review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, J.; Lu, Y.; Mushtaq, N.; Yousaf, M.; Rauf, S.; Lund, P.D.; Asghar, M.I. Novel LaFe2O4 Spinel Structure with A Large Oxygen Reduction Response Towards Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cell Cathode. J. Rare Earths 2023, 41, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lv, X.; Chen, H.; Zhou, W.; Li, S.; Shao, Z. A CO2-Tolerant SrCo0.8Fe0.15Zr0.05O3-δ Cathode for Proton-Conducting Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 11292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Teketel, B.S.; Beshiwork, B.A.; Tian, D.; Zhu, S.; Desta, H.G.; Kashif, K.; Chen, Y.; Lin, B. Promoted Performance of Layered Perovskite PrBaFe2O5+δ Cathode for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells by Zn Doping. Catalysts 2022, 12, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, Y.; Huang, X.; Yuan, M.; Gao, J.; Wang, Z.; Abdalla, A.M.; Azad, A.K.; Xu, L.; Lv, Z.; Wei, B. A SrCo0.9Ta0.1O3-δ Derived Medium-Entropy Cathode with Superior CO2 Poisoning Tolerance for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J. Power Sources 2022, 540, 231661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, M.; Dong, J.; Chen, Z.; Huang, K.; Xiong, K.; Li, R.; Rao, M.; Chen, C.; Ling, Y.; Lin, B. Excessive Na-Doped La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Fe0.4Cu0.1O3-δ Perovskite as An Additional Internal Reforming Catalyst for Direct Carbon Dioxide-Ethanol Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tarutina, L.R.; Kasyanova, A.V.; Starostin, G.N.; Vdovin, G.K.; Medvedev, D.A. Electrochemical Activity of Original and Infiltrated Fe-Doped Ba(Ce,Zr,Y)O3-Based Electrodes to Be Used for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, J.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, S.; Zhao, L.; Ai, N.; Wang, X.; Shao, Y.; Guan, C.; Fang, H.; Luo, Y.; et al. Promotional Role of BaCO3 on the Chromium–Tolerance of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ Cathodes of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 321, 122080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, N.; Tang, C.; Du, L.; Zhu, R.; Xing, L.; Song, Z.; Yuan, B.; Zhao, L.; Aoki, Y.; Ye, S. Advanced Cathode Materials for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells: Recent Progress and Future Perspectives. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2201882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Zang, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Wei, Z.; Zheng, Q. BaZr0.1Fe0.9-xNixO3-δ Cubic Perovskite Oxides for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cell Cathodes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 9395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pan, J.; Ye, Y.; Zhou, M.; Sun, X.; Ling, Y.; Yashiro, K.; Chen, Y. Improving the Activity and Stability of Ni-Based Electrodes for Solid Oxide Cells through Surface Engineering: Recent Progress and Future Perspectives. Mater. Rep. Energy 2021, 1, 100025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, Z.; Ye, Q.; Zhang, B.; Yang, W.; Dong, F.; Ni, M.; Lin, Z. A Highly Efficient and Robust Bifunctional Perovskite-Type Air Electrode with Triple-Conducting Behavior for Low-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2209054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, J.; Pan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y. A Sr and Ni Doped Ruddlesden-Popper Perovskite Oxide La1.6Sr0.4Cu0.6Ni0.4O4+δ as a Promising Cathode for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. J. Power Sources 2021, 509, 230369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, X.; Song, R.; Huan, D.; Zhu, K.; Li, X.; Han, H.; Xia, C.; Peng, R.; Lu, Y. Surface Self-Assembly Protonation Triggering Triple-Conductive Heterostructure with Highly Enhanced Oxygen Reduction for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Small 2022, 18, 2205190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. He, F.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, T.; Xu, Y.; Hou, M.; Zhu, F.; Liu, D.; Zhang, H.; Xu, K.; Liu, M.; et al. An Efficient High-Entropy Perovskite-Type Air Electrode for Reversible Oxygen Reduction and Water Splitting in Protonic Ceramic Cells. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2209469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hossain, S.; Abdalla, A.M.; Jamain, S.N.B.; Zaini, J.H.; Azad, A.K. A Review on Proton Conducting Electrolytes for Clean Energy and Intermediate Temperature-Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 79, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Su, C.; Wang, W.; Shao, Z. Cation-Deficient Perovskites for Clean Energy Conversion. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 2, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Xu, X.; Veder, J.P.M.; Shao, Z. Recent Advances in Anion-Doped Metal Oxides for Catalytic Applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 7280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, H.; Dai, L.; Jia, L.; Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, L. Effect of Fluorine, Chlorine and Bromine Doping on the Properties of Gadolinium Doped Barium Cerate Electrolytes. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 8980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, W.; Yang, Y.; Huan, D.; Wang, L.; Shi, N.; Xia, C.; Peng, R.; Lu, Y. An Excellent OER Electrocatalyst of Cubic SrCoO3-δ Prepared by a Simple F-Doping Strategy. J. Mater. Chem. 2019, 7, 12538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, Y.; Lin, Q.; Wang, Z.; Qi, D.; Yin, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Shao, Z.; Wang, H. Chlorine-Anion Doping Induced, Multi-Factor Optimization in Perovskties for Boosting Intrinsic Oxygen Evolution. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 52, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Y.; Shao, Z.; Mori, T.; Jiang, S. Development of Nickel Based Cermet Anode Materials in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells-Now and Future. Mater. Rep. Energy 2021, 1, 100003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, T.; Chen, F.; Xia, C. Improving the Chemical Stability of BaCe0.8Sm0.2O3−δ Electrolyte by Cl Doping for Proton-Conducting Solid Oxide Fuel Cell. Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 28, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Anion Doping: A New Strategy for Developing High-Performance Perovskite-Type Cathode Materials of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Wan, Y.; Xie, Y.; Zhu, J.; Pan, H.; Xia, C. Perovskite Oxyfluoride Electrode Enabling Direct Electrolyzing Carbon Dioxide with Excellent Electrochemical Performances. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Su, C.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y.; Yang, G.; Xu, X.; Tadé, M.O.; Shao, Z. SrCo0.9Ti0.1O3−δ As A New Electrocatalyst for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Electrolyte with Stable Performance. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 17663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xu, J.; Wu, J.; Luo, L.; Chen, X.; Qin, H.; Dravid, V.; Mi, S.; Jia, C. Co3O4 Nanocubes Homogeneously Assembled on Few-Layer Graphene for High Energy Density Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 274, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lu, Y.; Chen, L.; Lu, C.; Ni, Y.; Xu, Z. Effects of Oxygen Defects on Structure and Properties of Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3-δ Annealed in Different Atmospheres. J. Rare Earths 2013, 31, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Knížek, K.; Hejtmánek, J.; Maryško, M.; Novák, P.; Šantavá, E.; Jirák, Z.; Naito, T.; Fujishiro, H. Spin-State Crossover and Low-Temperature Magnetic State in Yttrium-Doped Pr0.7Ca0.3CoO3. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 224412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zan, J.; Wang, S.; Zheng, D.; Li, F.; Chen, W.; Pei, Q.; Jiang, L. Characterization and Functional Application of PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ Cathode Material for IT-SOFC. Mater. Res. Bull. 2021, 137, 111173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xie, Y.; Nai, S.; Huan, D.; Tan, W.Z.; Zhu, J.F.; Zheng, X.S.; Pan, H.B.; Peng, R.; Xia, C. New Stable and Efficient Cathode For F-Containing Proton Conducting Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, D.; Ran, R.; Zhang, K.; Wang, J.; Shao, Z. Intermediate-Temperature Electrochemical Performance of A Polycrystalline PrBaCo2O5+δ Cathode on Samarium-Doped Ceria Electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2009, 188, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wan, T.; Saccoccio, M.; Chen, C.; Ciucci, F. Influence of the Discretization Methods on the Distribution of Relaxation Times Deconvolution: Implementing Radial Basis Functions with DRTtools. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 184, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ren, R.; Wang, Z.; Xu, C.; Sun, W.; Qiao, J.; Rooney, D.; Sun, K. Tuning the Defects of the Triple Conducting Oxide BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-δ Perovskite toward Enhanced Cathode Activity of Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 18365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shi, H.; Su, C.; Xu, X.; Pan, Y.; Yang, G.; Ran, R.; Shao, Z. Building Ruddlesden-Popper and Single Perovskite Nanocomposites: A New Strategy to Develop High-Performance Cathode for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Small 2021, 17, 2101872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhang, L.; Yang, S.; Zhang, S. A Novel Perovskite Oxychloride as A High Performance Cathode for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. J. Power Sources 2019, 440, 227125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, Z.; Cui, J.; Zou, M. Novel Twin-Perovskite Nanocomposite of Ba-Ce-Fe-Co-O as A Promising Triple Conducting Cathode Material for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. J. Power Sources 2020, 450, 227609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Guo, Y. Engineering Anion Defect in Perovskite Oxyfluoride Cathodes Enables Proton Involved Oxygen Reduction Reaction for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 290, 120844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hu, D.; Kim, J.; Niu, H.; Daniels, L.; Manning, T.; Chen, R.; Rosseinsky, M. High-Performance Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cell Cathode Using Protophilic Mixed Ion and Electron Conducting Material. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jiang, S.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Qiu, H.; Su, C.; Chen, D. Highly Active and Durable Triple Conducting Composite Air Electrode for Low-Temperature Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Nano Res. 2023, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qiu, H.; Jiang, S.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Pang, Y.; Su, C. Thickness Dependent High-Performance Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ Cathode. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 17, e2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. He, F.; Teng, Z.; Yang, G.; Zhou, C.; Guan, D.; Chen, S.; Ran, R.; Wang, W.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Manipulating Cation Nonstoichiometry Towards Developing Better Electrolyte for Self-Humidified Dual-Ion Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J. Power Sources 2020, 460, 228105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of the synthesised BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.10) samples. Refined XRD profiles of (b) BSCFN, (c) BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05) and (d) BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.10) samples.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of the synthesised BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.10) samples. Refined XRD profiles of (b) BSCFN, (c) BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05) and (d) BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.10) samples.
Catalysts 13 00793 g001
Figure 2. (a) HR-TEM image of BSCFN-F0.1 sample and (b) corresponding FFT pattern. (c) HAADF-STEM image of BSCFN-F0.1 and corresponding EDS mapping images showing element distribution.
Figure 2. (a) HR-TEM image of BSCFN-F0.1 sample and (b) corresponding FFT pattern. (c) HAADF-STEM image of BSCFN-F0.1 and corresponding EDS mapping images showing element distribution.
Catalysts 13 00793 g002
Figure 3. (a) XPS survey spectra of BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1. (b) XPS spectrum of F 1s for BSCFN-F0.1 (the red box area in Figure 3a).
Figure 3. (a) XPS survey spectra of BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1. (b) XPS spectrum of F 1s for BSCFN-F0.1 (the red box area in Figure 3a).
Catalysts 13 00793 g003
Figure 4. XPS spectra of (a) Co 2p and (b) Fe 2p for BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1.
Figure 4. XPS spectra of (a) Co 2p and (b) Fe 2p for BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1.
Catalysts 13 00793 g004
Figure 5. Oxygen vacancy concentration and average valence states of cations for B-site transition metals cobalt and iron of BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1.
Figure 5. Oxygen vacancy concentration and average valence states of cations for B-site transition metals cobalt and iron of BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1.
Catalysts 13 00793 g005
Figure 6. XPS spectra of O 1s signal for BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1 powers.
Figure 6. XPS spectra of O 1s signal for BSCFN, BSCFN-F0.05 and BSCFN-F0.1 powers.
Catalysts 13 00793 g006
Figure 7. (a) Electrical conductivities and (b) Arrhenius plots of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) cathode materials at 300–900 °C in air.
Figure 7. (a) Electrical conductivities and (b) Arrhenius plots of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) cathode materials at 300–900 °C in air.
Catalysts 13 00793 g007
Figure 8. (a) Arrhenius plots of ASR values of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) electrodes. (b) EIS Nyquist plots and (c) corresponding DRT analysis of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) at 600 °C. The test frequency has been marked in the graph and the unit is Hz. (d) Stability of the BSCFN-F0.1 electrode based on the configuration of symmetric cell.
Figure 8. (a) Arrhenius plots of ASR values of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) electrodes. (b) EIS Nyquist plots and (c) corresponding DRT analysis of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) at 600 °C. The test frequency has been marked in the graph and the unit is Hz. (d) Stability of the BSCFN-F0.1 electrode based on the configuration of symmetric cell.
Catalysts 13 00793 g008
Figure 9. I–V and I–P curves of single cells with (a) BSCFN, (b) BSCFN-F0.05 and (c) BSCFN-F0.1 cathodes at 450–700 °C. (d) PPD comparison chart for BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1).
Figure 9. I–V and I–P curves of single cells with (a) BSCFN, (b) BSCFN-F0.05 and (c) BSCFN-F0.1 cathodes at 450–700 °C. (d) PPD comparison chart for BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1).
Catalysts 13 00793 g009
Figure 10. (a) Single-cell stability test results for the fuel cell with BSCFN-F0.1 cathode at 600 °C and (b) the cross-sectional SEM image of this cell after the stability test.
Figure 10. (a) Single-cell stability test results for the fuel cell with BSCFN-F0.1 cathode at 600 °C and (b) the cross-sectional SEM image of this cell after the stability test.
Catalysts 13 00793 g010
Table 1. Refined XRD profiles of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.10) samples.
Table 1. Refined XRD profiles of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.10) samples.
SamplesSpace
Group
a = b = c (Å)χ2RwpRp
BSCFNPm-3m4.007(1)2.6537.765.33
BSCFN-F0.05Pm-3m4.005(8)2.1646.904.87
BSCFN-F0.1Pm-3m4.005(9)1.9496.474.76
Table 2. The X-ray density of the sample is calculated as a table of values.
Table 2. The X-ray density of the sample is calculated as a table of values.
SampleVolume Density (ρ) (g/cm3)
BSCFN8.7328
BSCFN-F0.058.7471
BSCFN-F0.18.7522
Table 3. The Gaussian fitting results of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) of XPS spectra for Co 2p.
Table 3. The Gaussian fitting results of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) of XPS spectra for Co 2p.
SamplesCo2+Co3+Co4+
B.E/eVArea/%B.E/eVArea/%B.E/eVArea/%
BSCFN779.43/804.0647.90778.15/793.3823.50780.10/803.5028.60
BSCFN-F0.05779.43/795.0644.40778.22/794.1217.30779.73/804.0638.30
BSCFN-F0.1779.51/794.8953.20778.15/793.5513.20780.15/803.9633.60
Table 4. The Gaussian fitting results of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) of XPS spectra for O 1s.
Table 4. The Gaussian fitting results of BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) of XPS spectra for O 1s.
SamplesOαOβOγ
B.E/eVArea/%B.E/eVArea/%B.E/eVArea/%B.E/eVArea/%
BSCFN529.321.50530.718.10531.3820.40532.3940.00
BSCFN-F0.0552923.10530.6923.90531.2121.60531.831.40
BSCFN-F0.1528.8615.70530.5230.50531.1229.60531.8134.20
Table 5. Results from fitting the BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) EIS data.
Table 5. Results from fitting the BSCFN and BSCFN-Fx (x = 0.05, 0.1) EIS data.
Rohm
Ω cm2
RE1
Ω cm2
CPE1-TCPE1-PRE2
Ω cm2
CPE2-TCPE2-PASR
Ω cm2
BSCFN2.400.260.100.620.450.570.600.71
BSCFN-F0.053.040.280.120.610.370.420.430.64
BSCFN-F0.12.840.170.130.710.210.740.580.38
Table 6. The capacitance and relaxation frequencies of the charge transfer process for the three samples.
Table 6. The capacitance and relaxation frequencies of the charge transfer process for the three samples.
C1 (mF cm−2)f1 (Hz)
BSCFN11.0057.37
BSCFN-F0.0513.6841.58
BSCFN-F0.127.2434.39
Table 7. The peak power densities of PCFCs with single-phase cobalt-containing cathodes at 600 °C as reported in the literature.
Table 7. The peak power densities of PCFCs with single-phase cobalt-containing cathodes at 600 °C as reported in the literature.
CathodeElectrolytePPD
(mW cm−2)
References
BaFe0.6Co0.3Ce0.1O2.95-δCl0.05BZCYYb593[52]
BaCe0.4Fe0.4Co0.2O3-δBZCYYb237[53]
La1.6Sr0.4Cu0.6Ni0.4O4+δBZCYYb272[29]
PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5.84-δF0.16BZCYYb510[54]
Ba0.5Sr0.5(Co0.7Fe0.3)0.6875W0.3125O3−δBZCYYb582[55]
BSCFN-F0.1BZCYYb633This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Jiang, S.; Qiu, H.; Wang, W.; Miller, E.; Su, C. Fluorine Anion-Doped Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-δ as a Promising Cathode for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Catalysts 2023, 13, 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050793

AMA Style

Liu Y, Jiang S, Qiu H, Wang W, Miller E, Su C. Fluorine Anion-Doped Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-δ as a Promising Cathode for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Catalysts. 2023; 13(5):793. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yang, Shanshan Jiang, Hao Qiu, Wei Wang, Elaine Miller, and Chao Su. 2023. "Fluorine Anion-Doped Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-δ as a Promising Cathode for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells" Catalysts 13, no. 5: 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050793

APA Style

Liu, Y., Jiang, S., Qiu, H., Wang, W., Miller, E., & Su, C. (2023). Fluorine Anion-Doped Ba0.6Sr0.4Co0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-δ as a Promising Cathode for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Catalysts, 13(5), 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop