Next Article in Journal
Development of Nickel-BTC-MOF-Derived Nanocomposites with rGO Towards Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Methanol and Its Product Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing the Aromatic Product Distribution from Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass Using Hydrothermally Synthesized Ga-MFI Zeolites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Water Disinfection under Solar Irradiation by d-Glucose-Modified Titania
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Nanomaterials for Environmental Purification and Energy Conversion

by
Ewa Kowalska
1,*,
Agata Markowska-Szczupak
2 and
Marcin Janczarek
3
1
Institute for Catalysis (ICAT), Hokkaido University, N21 W10, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
2
Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 70-322 Szczecin, Poland
3
Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2019, 9(10), 855; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100855
Submission received: 10 October 2019 / Accepted: 12 October 2019 / Published: 14 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials for Environmental Purification and Energy Conversion)
Nanomaterials, engineered structures of which a single unit is sized (in at least one dimension) between 1 to 100 nm, are probably the fastest growing market in the world. Although, nanotechnology is still a new discipline (proposed by Richard Feynman’s talk “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” in 1959; and named by Norio Taniguchi in 1974), nanomaterials have already been commercialized for various purposes, including medicine, food, cosmetics, technology, and industry, as well as human and environmental health. A lot of studies on the preparation of more efficient, stable, and safe nanomaterials have been performed each year, as clearly shown by the growing number of published papers (Figure 1). Although, nanomaterials are extremely important for industrial and household purposes, it should be pointed out that properties of nanomaterials differ substantially from those of bulk materials of the same composition, resulting in high reactivity. Accordingly, possible undesirable effects might cause harmful interactions with the environment, living organisms, and humans and their parts (e.g., influence on structural integrity and functions of essential proteins, enzymes, and DNA), and thus have the potential to generate toxicity [1,2]. Therefore, possible negative impacts of novel materials (toxicity) must be also considered in the design of efficient, but also safe products. It is believed that most importantly, for future human development, nanomaterials/nanotechnology could be used to solve three of the top ten of humanity’s problems (proposed by Prof. Smalley [3]), i.e., environment, water, and energy (which is critical for the rest of the problems). It is known that nanomaterials might be used for purification of water and air [4,5,6], wastewater treatment [7,8,9,10], microorganisms’ inactivation [11,12,13], and energy conversion to the electricity and fuels [14,15,16].
Therefore, the special issue of Catalysts has been announced to discuss the progress of recent research on synthesis, properties, and applications of nanomaterials for environmental purification and energy conversion. This Special Issue was mainly dedicated as a platform for the contributions from The Symposium on Nanomaterials for Environmental Purification and Energy Conversion (SNEPEC), which was held in Sapporo, Japan in February 2018 (http://www.cat.hokudai.ac.jp/icat-nepec/). The contributions from those who could not attend SNEPEC were also welcomed. The Symposium covered a broad range of topics focusing on the exceptional role of catalytic nanomaterials in solving environmental and energy problems of modern societies. Accordingly, the Special Issue “Nanomaterials for Environmental Purification and Energy Conversion” is a collection of 17 papers, including 16 research papers and one review. Eleven papers present heterogeneous photocatalysis for efficient degradation of organic pollutants (phenol [17,18], 2-propanol [19], dyes [20,21,22], humic acid [23]), inactivation of microorganisms (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis [24], Bacillus subtilis, and Clostridium sp. [18]), H2 evolution [25], and CO2 reduction [26,27]. Six other papers focus on conventional catalysis (“dark” reactions), reporting efficient H2 production [28,29], synthesis of ethanol and butanol [30], direct conversion of CO2 and methanol to dimethyl carbonate [31], water purification [32], and advanced characterization of catalysts by X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy [33]. The majority of studies have been performed with particulate catalysts (nanoparticles (NPs)), but organized nanostructures, such as nanotubes (TiO2/CuxOy [18], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [30,32]) and nanowires (CeO2 [31]) have also been used.
Fu et al. prepared CeO2 nanowires by the advanced solvothermal method for direct catalytic synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from CO2 and methanol [31]. They found that the surface reduction under H2 atmosphere formed acidic/alkaline sites on the catalyst surface, and thus significantly improved catalytic activity, reducing the activation energy barrier from 74.7 to 41.9 kJ/mol. Complex catalytic studies were performed by Hafizi and Rahimpour for catalytic H2 production [28]. The effect of alumina and Mg-Al spinel as the support for the formation of Fe2O3 catalyst was investigated. The Fe2O3–MgAl2O4 with narrowed mesopore-sized (2.3 nm) was successfully synthesized as an ultra-pure lattice oxygen transport medium. Furthermore, Daneshmand-Jahromi et al. analyzed the role of yttrium promoted Ni/SBA-16 as an oxygen carrier in steam methane reforming [29]. The reaction temperature, Y and Ni loading, steam/carbon molar ration, and lifetime of the oxygen carrier were investigated. The best catalytic activity was obtained for mesoporous silica (SBA-16) modified with 25 wt% Ni and 2.5 wt% Y, resulting in 99.83% CH4 conversion and 85.34% H2 production.
The synthesis of ethanol and butanol from synthesis gas on multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) functionalized with salicylic acid and impregnated with copper–cobalt catalyst was proposed by Zou et al. [30]. It was found that salicylic acid did not only functionalize carbon nanotubes, but also promoted the synthesis of ethanol and butanol, instead of methanol. Moreover, the surface properties of MWCNTs were crucial for efficient alcohol synthesis, i.e., the best activity was obtained with MWCNTs of 30 nm diameter. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were also used for efficient water purification by Li et al. [32]. The conductive cotton filter anodes were fabricated by a facile dying method to incorporate CNTs as filters. The developed filtration device achieved physical adsorption of organic compounds (ferrocyanide, methyl orange dye, and antibiotic tetracycline), and additionally, an application of external potential resulted in chemical oxidation of pollutants. The CNTs amount, total cell potential, and surfactant were key parameters affecting the electrochemical oxidation. It was proposed that the conductive cotton filter might be efficiently used for low-cost and energy-saving water purification. This very important research was reported by Wakisaka et al. who demonstrated the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy as an efficient technique to characterize Pt–Au fuel cell catalysts [33]. Previously, range-extended EXAFS was only achieved in high-energy resolution fluorescence detected XAFS (HERFD-XAFS). The presented results confirmed the feasibility of the range-extended EXAFS using the bent crystal Laue analyzer (BCLA) for fuel cells models containing Pt and Au.
Most papers discussed photocatalytic reactions on nanomaterials (heterogeneous photocatalysis). Titania (titanium(IV) oxide, TiO2) is one of the most well-known and widely studied photocatalysts, due to its advantages, such as high activity, stability, low-cost, and nontoxicity (excluding toxicity of nanomaterials), as also confirmed in this issue (seven papers [17,18,19,21,24,26,27]). However, titania has two main shortcomings, i.e., recombination of charge carriers (typical for all semiconductors) and inactivity under visible light irradiation (due to wide bandgap). Therefore, various studies have been performed to improve photocatalytic performance of titania. The comprehensive review by Giovannetti et al. on recent advances in graphene-based TiO2 nanocomposites for synthetic dye degradation shows the increasing potential of titania photocatalysts based on graphene matrix, in the field of extending the light absorption of TiO2 from UV into the visible light range of radiation [21]. In this regard, the idea of titania modification is strongly present in the papers collected in the issue, e.g., titania surface modification with copper oxides (Cu2O [19] and CuxOy [18]), organic compounds (glucose [24] and urea [19]), polymers (polydopamine [27]), graphene [21], carbon/nitrogen [17], and titania doping (self-doped or hydrogenated) [34]. All kinds of modifications resulted in enhanced activity under either UV, visible light or solar radiation. Guan et al. prepared and characterized the colored core-shell structure of TiO2@TiO2-x [26]. They reported visible light activity of this material towards CO2 reduction under a simulated flue gas system. Visible light-induced photoreduction of CO2 was also conducted with polydopamine-sensitized TiO2 by Wang et al. [27]. The successful titania modifications with D-glucose was achieved by Markowska-Szczupak et al. [24], where the photocatalytic activities of suspended and immobilized photocatalysts were compared. In this study, it was shown for the first time that titania modification with monosaccharides could be efficient for water disinfection, and the immobilization of the photocatalyst on the concrete discs might be a prospective method for public water supplies and water storage tanks (as exemplified for a home aquarium in Figure 2a). The synergistic effect was observed by Janczarek et al. for titania bi-modification with urea (formed poly(amino-s-triazine) [35]) and Cu2O [19]. Two types of possible mechanisms of visible light activity were proposed, i.e., the type II heterojunction and Z-scheme. An important issue was the morphological form of the photocatalytic material based on titania. Golabiewska et al. prepared highly active microspheres in the presence of ionic liquid and Kozak et al. designed TiO2/CuxOy nanotubes with visible light activity in the degradation of organic pollutants and bacteria inactivation. It was proposed that these nanotubes could be efficiently used for environmental purification under natural solar radiation, as shown on the journal cover (Figure 2b).
It should be pointed that also other semiconductors have been used successfully for environmental applications, such as ZnO [36], graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) [37], WO3 [10], BiVO4 [38], and SrTiO3 [39], and some of them exhibited higher activity than that of titania even under UV irradiation [40,41,42]. Accordingly, the photocatalytic activity of other semiconductors has also been discussed in this special issue, such as ZnCr2O4 [23], TiOF2 (modified with NaOH) [20], SnO2 (fluorine-doped SnO2 (FTO), surface modified with Cu NPs) [25], and rectorite/Fe3O4/ZnO [22]. Wang et al. prepared rectorite/Fe3O4/ZnO composities with photocatalytic and magnetic properties enabling efficient photocatalyst separation after reaction [22]. Liu et al. obtained Cu/fluorine-doped tin oxide nanocomposites (Cu/FTO) dedicated to visible light-induced hydrogen production and photocurrent generation [25]. The high stability during recycling (24-h irradiation) should be considered as high advantage of this material. The nanosized ZnCr2O4 was synthesized by Dumitru et al. by thermolysis of a new Zn(II)–Cr(III) oxalate coordination compound [23]. The photocatalyst was much more efficient for humic acid degradation than simple photolysis (7%), reaching 60% degradation after 3 h of UV irradiation. Finally, TiOF2 modified with NaOH of network structure was prepared via a modified low-temperature solvothermal method by Hou et al., and efficiently used for Rhodamine B degradation [20].
In conclusion, the significant role of catalytic nanomaterials in environmental remediation, energy production, and chemical synthesis systems has been discussed in the collected papers. We do believe that the SNEPEC symposium and this associated Special Issue have provided further insights to this area. We are looking forward to seeing how things will be progressed at the next SNEPEC symposium (July 2020).
Finally, we thank all authors for their valuable contributions, without which this special issue would not have been possible. We would like to express our sincerest thanks also to the editorial team of Catalysts for their kind support, advice, and fast responses.

Acknowledgments

Institute for Catalysis (ICAT), Hokkaido University is highly acknowledged for excellent support in organizing and hosting the Symposium on Nanomaterials for Environmental Purification and Energy Conversion (SNEPEC), 20–21 February 2018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nel, A.; Xia, T.; Mädler, L.; Li, N. Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel. Science 2006, 311, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Nel, A.E.; Mädler, L.; Velegol, D.; Xia, T.; Hoek, E.M.V.; Somasundaran, P.; Klaessig, F.; Castranova, V.; Thompson, M. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 543–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Smalley, R.E. Nanotechnology, Energy and People; MIT Forum: River Oaks, TX, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hoffmann, M.R.; Martin, S.T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D.W. Environmental Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Verbruggen, S.W.; Keulemans, M.; Goris, B.; Blommaerts, N.; Bals, S.; Martens, J.A.; Lenaerts, S. Plasmonic ‘rainbow’ photocatalyst with broadband solar light response for environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 188, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alfano, O.; Bahnemann, D.; Cassano, A.; Dillert, R.; Goslich, R. Photocatalysis in water environments using artificial and solar light. Catal. Today 2000, 58, 199–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Herrmann, J.-M.; Disdier, J.; Pichat, P.; Malato, S.; Blanco, J. TiO2-based solar photocatalytic detoxification of water containing organic pollutants. Case studies of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyaceticacid (2,4-D) and of benzofuran. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1998, 17, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.-H.; Zhuang, Q.-X. Photocatalytic reduction of pollutant Hg(II) on doped WO3 dispersion. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 1993, 75, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li Puma, G.L.; Khor, J.N.; Brucato, A. Modeling of an Annular Photocatalytic Reactor for Water Purification: Oxidation of Pesticides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 3737–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abe, R.; Takami, H.; Murakami, N.; Ohtani, B. Pristine Simple Oxides as Visible Light Driven Photocatalysts: Highly Efficient Decomposition of Organic Compounds over Platinum-Loaded Tungsten Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7780–7781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guillard, C.; Bui, T.-H.; Felix, C.; Moules, V.; Lina, B.; Lejeune, P. Microbiological disinfection of water and air by photocatalysis. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2008, 11, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Markowska-Szczupak, A.; Wang, K.; Rokicka, P.; Endo, M.; Wei, Z.; Ohtani, B.; Morawski, A.W.; Kowalska, E. The effect of anatase and rutile crystallites isolated from titania P25 photocatalyst on growth of selected mould fungi. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Boil. 2015, 151, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Markowska-Szczupak, A.; Ulfig, K.; Morawski, A. The application of titanium dioxide for deactivation of bioparticulates: An overview. Catal. Today 2011, 169, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. O’Regan, B.; Graetzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal titanium dioxide films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abe, R. Recent progress on photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible light irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2010, 11, 179–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gołąbiewska, A.; Checa-Suárez, M.; Paszkiewicz-Gawron, M.; Lisowski, W.; Raczuk, E.; Klimczuk, T.; Polkowska, Ż.; Grabowska, E.; Zaleska-Medynska, A.; Łuczak, J. Highly Active TiO2 Microspheres Formation in the Presence of Ethylammonium Nitrate Ionic Liquid. Catalysts 2018, 8, 279. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kozak, M.; Mazierski, P.; Zebrowska, J.; Kobylański, M.; Klimczuk, T.; Lisowski, W.; Trykowski, G.; Nowaczyk, G.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Electrochemically Obtained TiO2/CuxOy Nanotube Arrays Presenting a Photocatalytic Response in Processes of Pollutants Degradation and Bacteria Inactivation in Aqueous Phase. Catalysts 2018, 8, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Janczarek, M.; Wang, K.; Kowalska, E. Synergistic Effect of Cu2O and Urea as Modifiers of TiO2 for Enhanced Visible Light Activity. Catalysts 2018, 8, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hou, C.T.; Liu, W.L.; Zhu, J.M. Synthesis of NaOH-Modified TiOF2 and Its Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance on RhB. Catalysts 2017, 7, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Giovannetti, R.; Rommozzi, E.; Zannotti, M.; D’Amato, C.A. Recent Advances in Graphene Based TiO2 Nanocomposites (GTiO2Ns) for Photocatalytic Degradation of Synthetic Dyes. Catalysts 2017, 7, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.; Zhou, P.; Guo, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, H.; Yuan, Y. Synthesis of Rectorite/Fe3O4/ZnO Composites and Their Application for the Removal of Methylene Blue Dye. Catalysts 2018, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dumitru, R.; Manea, F.; Păcurariu, C.; Lupa, L.; Pop, A.; Cioablă, A.; Surdu, A.; Ianculescu, A. Synthesis, Characterization of Nanosized ZnCr2O4 and Its Photocatalytic Performance in the Degradation of Humic Acid from Drinking Water. Catalysts 2018, 8, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Markowska-Szczupak, A.; Rokicka, P.; Wang, K.; Endo, M.; Morawski, A.W.; Kowalska, E. Photocatalytic Water Disinfection under Solar Irradiation by d-Glucose-Modified Titania. Catalysts 2018, 8, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, H.; Wang, A.; Sun, Q.; Wang, T.; Zeng, H. Cu Nanoparticles/Fluorine-Doped Tin Oxide (FTO) Nanocomposites for Photocatalytic H2 Evolution under Visible Light Irradiation. Catalysts 2017, 7, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guan, Y.; Xia, M.; Marchetti, A.; Wang, X.; Cao, W.; Guan, H.; Kong, X. Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 from Simulated Flue Gas with Colored Anatase. Catalysts 2018, 8, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, T.; Xia, M.; Kong, X. The Pros and Cons of Polydopamine-Sensitized Titanium Oxide for the Photoreduction of CO2. Catalysts 2018, 8, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hafizi, A.; Rahimpour, M.R. Inhibiting Fe–Al Spinel Formation on a Narrowed Mesopore-Sized MgAl2O4 Support as a Novel Catalyst for H2 Production in Chemical Looping Technology. Catalysts 2018, 8, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Daneshmand-Jahromi, S.; Rahimpour, M.R.; Meshksar, M.; Hafizi, A. Hydrogen Production from Cyclic Chemical Looping Steam Methane Reforming over Yttrium Promoted Ni/SBA-16 Oxygen Carrier. Catalysts 2017, 7, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zou, J.; Wang, L.; Ji, P. Promoting the Synthesis of Ethanol and Butanol by Salicylic Acid. Catalysts 2017, 7, 295. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  31. Fu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Li, Z.; Han, D.; Wang, S.; Xiao, M.; Meng, Y. Surface Reduced CeO2 Nanowires for Direct Conversion of CO2 and Methanol to Dimethyl Carbonate: Catalytic Performance and Role of Oxygen Vacancy. Catalysts 2018, 8, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, F.; Xia, Q.; Cheng, Q.; Huang, M.; Liu, Y. Conductive Cotton Filters for Affordable and Efficient Water Purification. Catalysts 2017, 7, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wakisaka, Y.; Kido, D.; Uehara, H.; Yuan, Q.; Takakusagi, S.; Uemura, Y.; Yokoyama, T.; Wada, T.; Uo, M.; Sakata, T.; et al. A Demonstration of Pt L3-Edge EXAFS Free from Au L3-Edge Using Log–Spiral Bent Crystal Laue Analyzers. Catalysts 2018, 8, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsang, C.H.A.; Li, K.; Zeng, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, T.; Zhan, Y.; Xie, R.; Leung, D.Y.; Huang, H. Titanium oxide based photocatalytic materials development and their role of in the air pollutants degradation: Overview and forecast. Environ. Int. 2019, 125, 200–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mitoraj, D.; Kisch, H. The Nature of Nitrogen-Modified Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysts Active in Visible Light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9975–9978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bandara, J.; Tennakone, K.; Jayatilaka, P. Composite tin and zinc oxide nanocrystalline particles for enhanced charge separation in sensitized degradation of dyes. Chemosphere 2002, 49, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maeda, K.; Wang, X.; Nishihara, Y.; Lu, D.; Antonietti, M.; Domen, K. Photocatalytic Activities of Graphitic Carbon Nitride Powder for Water Reduction and Oxidation under Visible Light. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4940–4947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kohtani, S.; Makino, S.; Kudo, A.; Tokumura, K.; Ishigaki, Y.; Matsunaga, T.; Nikaido, O.; Hayakawa, K.; Nakagaki, R. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-n-nonylphenol under irradiation from solar simulator: comparison between BiVO4 and TiO2 photocatalysts. Chem. Lett. 2002, 7, 660–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Niishiro, R.; Kudo, A. Development of Visible-Light-Driven TiO2 and SrTiO3 Photocatalysts Doped with Metal Cations for H2 or O2 Evolution. Solid State Phenom. 2010, 162, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shafaei, A.; Nikazar, M.; Arami, M. Photocatalytic degradation of terephthalic acid using titania and zinc oxide photocatalysts: Comparative study. Desalination 2010, 252, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khodja, A.A.; Sehili, T.; Pilichowski, J.-F.; Boule, P. Photocatalytic degradation of 2-phenylphenol on TiO2 and ZnO in aqueous suspensions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2001, 141, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lizama, C.; Freer, J.; Baeza, J.; Mansilla, H.D. Optimized photodegradation of Reactive Blue 19 on TiO2 and ZnO suspensions. Catal. Today 2002, 76, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Number of papers published annually on nanomaterials (searched in Web of Science using “nanomaterials”, 9 October 2019).
Figure 1. Number of papers published annually on nanomaterials (searched in Web of Science using “nanomaterials”, 9 October 2019).
Catalysts 09 00855 g001
Figure 2. Journal covers of Catalysts showing possible applications of (a) modified titania with D-glucose for water tanks; volume 8, issue 8 (https://res.mdpi.com/data/covers/catalysts/big_cover-catalysts-v8-i8.png) [24] and (b) TiO2/CuxOy nanotube arrays for environmental purification; volume 8, issue 6 (https://res.mdpi.com/data/covers/catalysts/big_cover-catalysts-v8-i6.png) [18].
Figure 2. Journal covers of Catalysts showing possible applications of (a) modified titania with D-glucose for water tanks; volume 8, issue 8 (https://res.mdpi.com/data/covers/catalysts/big_cover-catalysts-v8-i8.png) [24] and (b) TiO2/CuxOy nanotube arrays for environmental purification; volume 8, issue 6 (https://res.mdpi.com/data/covers/catalysts/big_cover-catalysts-v8-i6.png) [18].
Catalysts 09 00855 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kowalska, E.; Markowska-Szczupak, A.; Janczarek, M. Nanomaterials for Environmental Purification and Energy Conversion. Catalysts 2019, 9, 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100855

AMA Style

Kowalska E, Markowska-Szczupak A, Janczarek M. Nanomaterials for Environmental Purification and Energy Conversion. Catalysts. 2019; 9(10):855. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100855

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kowalska, Ewa, Agata Markowska-Szczupak, and Marcin Janczarek. 2019. "Nanomaterials for Environmental Purification and Energy Conversion" Catalysts 9, no. 10: 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100855

APA Style

Kowalska, E., Markowska-Szczupak, A., & Janczarek, M. (2019). Nanomaterials for Environmental Purification and Energy Conversion. Catalysts, 9(10), 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100855

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop