Next Article in Journal
Reaction of Glycerol with Trimethyl Orthoformate: Towards the Synthesis of New Glycerol Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal Deactivation of Rh/α-Al2O3 in the Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Iso-Octane: Effect of Flow Rate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bismuth Oxide Faceted Structures as a Photocatalyst Produced Using an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet

1
Laboratory of Laser and Plasma Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Von-Ossietzky-Str. 99, 37085 Göttingen, Germany
2
Institute of Materials Physics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2019, 9(6), 533; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060533
Submission received: 5 June 2019 / Revised: 11 June 2019 / Accepted: 12 June 2019 / Published: 14 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Photocatalysis)

Abstract

:
The photocatalyst bismuth oxide, which is active under visual light, was deposited using an atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ). Sixteen different samples were generated under different parameters of the APPJ to investigate their catalytic activity. The prepared samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), laser scanning microscopy (LSM), and UV–vis diffuse reflectance absorption spectroscopy. The measured data, such as average sample thickness, coverage ratio, phase fraction, chemical composition, band gap, and photocatalytic performance were used for comparing the samples. The XRD analysis showed that the deposition process produced a mixed phase of monocline Bi2O3 and tetragonal Bi2O2.33. Using the Rietveld refinement method, phase fractions could be determined and compared with the XPS data. The non-stoichiometric phases were influenced by the introduction of nitrogen to the surface as a result of the deposition process. The band gap calculated from the diffuse absorption spectroscopy shows that Bi2O2.33 with 2.78 eV had a higher band gap compared to the phases with a high proportion of Bi2O3 (2.64 eV). Furthermore, it was shown that the band gap was dependent on the thickness of the sample and oxygen vacancies or loss of oxygen in the surface. All coatings had degraded methyl orange (MO) under irradiation by xenon lamps.

1. Introduction

The two main objectives of semiconductor photocatalysts are the photolysis of water for storing energy in chemical bonds, for example in the form of hydrogen and oxygen, and the catalytic degradation of pollutants [1]. In addition to the well-known photocatalysts, such as titanium or zinc oxide, bismuth oxide is becoming increasingly important. Bismuth oxide is a polymorphic oxide with six different crystal phases [2,3]. In addition to the stoichiometric phases, non-stoichiometric phases, such as Bi2O2.33, are also known [4]. All phases have different crystal structures and various optical, electrical, and mechanical properties [5], which are all important for the practical application of a photocatalyst. However, certain phases of this semiconductor, as reported in the literature, are characterized by desirable properties such as a narrow energy band gap [6], high refractive index [7], and photoconductivity and photoluminescence properties [8].
The high band gap of bismuth oxide allows for the generation of electron–hole pairs if the photocatalyst is irradiated with photons of higher photon energy. This can lead to the formation of free radicals that promote chemical reactions to break down pollutants from the environment [9]. It has been shown that bismuth oxides can be used for the degradation of model pollutants, like methyl orange (MO) [10], methylene blue [11], or rhodamine B [12].
In general, the photocatalytic performance depends on the physicochemical properties of the metal oxide [13]. The crystal structure, morphology, and microstructure, as well as the phase fractions and chemical composition, play key roles [14,15]. An atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) was chosen because it allows these parameters to be modified, making it possible to study the influence on the catalytic effect.
Previous research has shown that an APPJ system can be used to generate crystalline bismuth oxide samples. The generation of crystalline phases using a plasma jet was confirmed and a mixed phase of stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric bismuth oxide was generated [16].
The influence and given correlations of layer thickness, cover ratio, phase fraction, chemical composition, band gap, and photocatalytic performance of different coatings produced using an APPJ are presented in this publication. The process parameters that have an influence on the measured quantities will be presented in a future publication.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Average Thickness and Cover Ratio

In order to determine the surface characteristics of the bismuth oxide coatings, laser scanning microscopy (LSM) measurements were carried out. As shown in Köhler et al. [16], the bismuth oxide particles melted in the plasma torch and formed lenticular structures on impact with the substrate surface. In layers with a higher degree of coverage, the structures overlap and a kind of lamellar structure is formed [17]. The layer thus created can be described as a faceted structure (FS). The average thickness of the FS was 0.16–2.4 µm and the degree of coverage was 19.3–98.5% (see Figure 1a,b).

2.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD measurements were conducted to evaluate the crystal structures of the coatings. Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns normalized to the respective main reflex in a range of 35−50°. The deposited layers showed two kinds of crystal structures: the non-stoichiometric Bi2O2.33 (PDF-Nr.: 00-027-0051) and monoclinic bismuth oxide (PDF-Nr.: 03-065-2366). The main reflex of non-stoichiometric Bi2O2.33 was detected at 43.8° (107). The reflexes at 41.3° (120) and 42.2° (012) were assigned to the monoclinic phase. The Rietveld refinement method was used to determine the phase fractions of the deposited layer. The results are shown in Figure 2. All samples contained a proportion of non-stoichiometric Bi2O2.33; this may be due to the coating process. The tetragonal non-stoichiometric bismuth oxide phase was able to be generated by bulk crystal defects [18] or interstitials defects [19] during the deposition process.

2.3. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

The FS surfaces were also investigated using XPS measurements in order to determine the elemental composition and binding states. The spectra consisted of four elements: bismuth, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon; depending on the coverage of the layer, silicon was detected from the substrate. The atomic concentrations are shown in Table 1.
For an exemplary representation, the detailed spectra of oxygen, bismuth, and nitrogen of one FS with a high amount of Bi2O2.33, Bi2O3, and a mix of both are compared to each other in Figure 3.
The O 1s peak could be divided into three structures and is shown in Figure 3a–c. The main peak at 529.2–529.7 eV with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 1.4 could be attributed to lattice oxygen [20]. The second structure at 530.6 eV (FWHM 1.3) could be attributed to a high binding energy component (HBEC) developed by the increasing loss of oxygen or creation of oxygen vacancies, in comparison to the literature [21,22,23]. The peak at 532.7 eV (FWHM 1.9) could be assigned to a low binding energy component (LBEC) [22] like OH species [24]; physisorbed water [25]; nitrate groups [26]; and in the case of a non-closed FS, to SiOx [27].
The detailed bismuth spectra consisted of a doublet corresponding to the Bi 4f7/2 and Bi 4f5/2 peaks with a splitting of 5.32 eV (Figure 3d). The binding energy values of the Bi 4f7/2 were from 158.6 eV up to 159.1 eV, which indicated a Bi3+ oxidation state [28,29,30].
The peak position of nitrogen at 406.5 eV is shown in Figure 3e, which indicated the existence of highly oxidized nitrogen [26]. Liu et al. [31] describe the core level N 1s peak as a nitryl bond.
The binding energy displacement of the lattice oxygen peak and the bismuth peak could be related to the phase fraction, which is shown in Figure 4. Both displacements show a dependency on the phase fraction. An increase of the phase fraction of Bi2O2.33 shows a shift to higher binding energies. Cheng et al. [32] described the shift of stoichiometric bismuth oxide of the oxygen and bismuth peak as a result of the presence of different crystal structures.
For a comparison of the phase fraction and the oxygen/bismuth ratio of the XPS measurement, the part of the O 1s peak of lattice oxygen and the HBEC must be added together (see Figure 5). It is shown that the O/Bi ratio shifted from 1.5 to 1.24 with increasing non-stoichiometric phase proportions.
The non-stoichiometry of bismuth oxide could have several reasons. Sun et al. [33] showed that non-stoichiometric bismuth oxide can occur in connection with nitrogen. Wang et al. [34] described a sintering process in which the substitution of oxygen atoms by nitrogen atoms (like metal nitride) leads to the formation of defects. Hajra et al. [35] showed the modification of oxygen-deficient bismuth oxides due to the presence of nitrogen in the metal oxide.
Figure 6 shows the O/Bi ratio in comparison to the nitrogen, HBEC, and LBEC concentration. It can be seen that a higher proportion of nitrogen in the samples resulted in a higher proportion of non-stoichiometric bismuth oxide. This could be due to the fact that nitrogen was built into the surface, which could lead to an imbalance in the crystal phase. With an increasing concentration of Bi2O2.33, the HBEC concentration decreased. It could be suggested that there were more oxygen vacancies or loose oxygen in the monoclinic phase of bismuth oxide than in the tetragonal phase of non-stoichiometric bismuth oxide. The increase of LBEC in the FSs could have several reasons. Since the non-stoichiometric FSs have a lower degree of coverage than the stoichiometric FSs, the SiOx content in the samples increased. As the nitrogen was present on the surface as a nitryl group, the proportion of oxygen increased with the proportion of nitrogen. The non-stoichiometric bismuth oxide seemed to be generated by the presence of nitrogen, which could be included as an interstitial defect rather than through the presence of oxygen vacancies.

2.4. Optical Characterization

To calculate the energy band gap of the bismuth oxide films, the optical absorption spectra were determined at room temperature and measured using UV-vis spectroscopy. To determine the direct band gap from the absorbance, the Tauc-plot method was used with the following equation [36,37]:
( α h ν ) 2 = A ( h ν E g ) ,
where Eg is the energy of the band gap, α the absorption coefficient, A is a constant, and is the photon energy. The optical band gap can be determined via the extrapolation of the plot (αhν)2 versus (), where α = 0 is set; an example is shown in Figure 7a. The band gap of the FSs ranged from 2.64 eV up to 2.78 eV, which indicates a good visible light absorption (Figure 7b).
In the literature, a shift in the band gap of bismuth oxide is described using the variation of the layer thickness, and the crystal structure and size [38,39,40]. Gujar et al. [41] explained that an increase in the band gap is due to changes in the crystallite size and the phase fraction of bismuth oxide. Furthermore, a reduction of defects or an increase in stoichiometric composition leads to an increase of the energy band gap [42,43].
Figure 8 shows the influences of the FS thickness, atomic concentration of the HBECs, and the oxygen/bismuth ratio on the band gap. The band gap decreased with an increase in HBECs and coating thickness. There was a recognizable tendency that the ratio of oxygen to bismuth also had an influence on the band gap; by reducing the ratio, the band gap rose. An influence of nitrogen on the band surface could not be determined.

2.5. Photocatalytic Performance Test

To determine the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of the bismuth oxide FSs, the following equation was used [44]:
photocatalytic   efficiency = ( C 0 C t / C 0 ) × 100
where C0 corresponds to the initial concentration of MO after an initial time of 30 min without irradiation, and Ct is the concentration at the illumination after time t. The photocatalytic degradation efficiency as a function of irradiation time is shown in Figure 9a. All degradation efficiencies of the samples after 480 min are shown in Figure 9b. The MO degradation rates ranged from 25.5% up to 76.7%. The reference was MO without a catalyst, showing a degradation of 5% after the total irradiation time; it can therefore be assumed as stable under irradiation from the xenon lamps.
Hou et al. [45] explained that morphology, phase component, shape, and size play a role in photocatalytic efficiency. Iyyapushpam et al. [46] showed an increase of the degradation efficiency of bismuth oxide samples with a higher crystallinity. However, a direct influence of the phase fraction, band gap, or FS thickness on the degradation efficiency could not be determined. Only the chemical composition of the LBEC gave a tendency for the degradation of MO and is shown in Figure 10. A higher degradation rate was achieved with a lower atomic concentration of LBEC. The composition of the LBEC was assigned to OH species, nitrate groups, physisorbed water, and partially to SiOx. This makes it more difficult to draw conclusions about the degradation performance of MO.
In addition, the degree of coverage and the FS thickness of the substrates vary in part by an order of magnitude. This can lead to different interaction areas of the catalyst with the environment, which in turn can affect the active reaction centers. A correlation of the different factors that influence the degradation cannot be excluded.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Coating Process

The layers were produced by an APPJ system (Plasmadust, Reinhausen Plasma GmbH, Regensburg, Germany). The APPJ was composed of a high-voltage power supply, a brush disperser (RBG 2000, Palas GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany), and a self-developed spray nozzle as an electrode. A cross-section of the electrode assembly group is shown in previous research [47].
To generate the plasma torch, an arc was ignited between the high voltage electrode and the grounded spraying nozzle, which was expelled using compressed air. The arc was ignited using a pulsed high voltage of 15 kV (effective voltage 2–3 kV) and a pulse repetition frequency of 50 kHz with a pulse period of 5–10 µs. The input power of the APPJ was 2 kW.
In the resulting plasma jet, bismuth oxide powder (grain size < 4 µm) (bismuth (III)-oxide, Asalco GmbH, Lüneburg, Germany) was injected using compressed air via the brush disperser. The particles melted using the plasma werere deposited on borosilicate glass (26 × 76 × 1 mm3) (NEXTERION® glass B, SCHOTT Technical Glass Solutions GmbH, Jena, Germany), which traversed in meander-shaped paths a distance of 20 mm from the ground electrode.
The parameters that were changed for the experiments were plasma input power (PP), volumetric flow rate of the expelled air to generate the plasma torch (qP), traversing speed (v), powder feed rate of the brush disperser (qD), and the feed speed of the disperser (vD); these parameters are displayed in Table 2.

3.2. Characterization

To determine the phase information, X-ray diffraction (XRD) diffractograms were measured using a Siemens D5000 diffractometer (Siemens AG, München, Germany) with Cr-Kα radiation (λ = 2.28976 Å), operated in Bragg Brentano alignment at 30 mA and 40 kV in the 2θ angular range of 30° to 100° with a scan interval of 0.02° and 4.0 s per step. The diffraction patterns were calculated using the Rietveld refinement method [48] and refined using the GSAS-II software [49] (UChicago Argonne, LLC, Chicago, IL, USA).
The chemical surface composition was investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements on a PHI 5000 Versa Probe II (ULVAC-PHI, Osaka, Japan) using monochromatic Al-Kα radiation with a photon energy of 1486.6 eV. The detector resolution measured at the Ag 3d5/2 peak was 0.6 eV at a pass energy of 23.5 eV. Detailed spectra of carbon (C 1s), oxygen (O 1s), bismuth (Bi 4f), and silicon (Si 2p) were recorded with a spot size of 200 µm, a pass energy of 46.95 eV, and a step size of 0.1 eV. To avoid charging effects, the measurements were carried out using neutralizing sample charging. All spectra were shifted to the main C 1s peak at 284.8 eV.
The UV-vis diffuse transmission spectra were recorded using a PerkinElmer 650 (PerkinElmer, Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) with an integrating sphere module in the range of 200–900 nm with a velocity of 10.5 nm/s and a gap width of 5 nm.
The layer thickness was determined using a laser scanning microscope (LSM) (VK-X100, KEYENCE Deutschland GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany) with a lens with 100× magnification.

3.3. Photocatalytic Test

The catalytic degradation tests were carried out in a self-developed reactor. In the metal surrounded-reactor, four internal 35 W xenon lamps were arranged 550 mm above the catalytic samples. The samples were placed in Petri dishes and filled with a pollutant solution of 25 mL distilled water, 245 µL methyl orange (1 g/L) (MO) (AppliChem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), and 264 µL ascorbic acid (200 g/L) (VWR International GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). To ensure a permanent mixing of the liquids, the samples were mounted on a shaker. The degradation of the solution was measured using absorption spectroscopy of the pollutant solution depending on the irradiation time of 0–480 min with a TriStar2 S LB 942 (BERTHOLD TECHNOLOGIES GmbH & Co. KG, Bad Wildbad, Germany).

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, it was shown that different amounts of crystal structures of tetragonal non-stoichiometric bismuth oxide and monoclinic bismuth oxide could be produced using an APPJ.
The amount of the different crystal phases was calculated using the Rietveld refinement method. The non-stoichiometric part of the oxide could be generated via the presence of nitrogen at the surface.
The XPS obtained data of the position of the bismuth and lattice oxygen peak showed a shift to higher binding energies as the non-stoichiometric phase fraction increased.
All FSs produced had a photon absorption of 2.64 eV to 2.78 eV. The shift in the band gap could be explained by the loss of oxygen or the creation of oxygen vacancies at the surface, coating thickness, and the amount of crystal phases.
The degradation of methyl orange was shown in all samples during irradiation with xenon lamps. A conclusion on the photocatalytic efficiency due to phase fraction, band gap, or FS thickness was not possible. Only an influence of the LBEC could be shown. Further investigations, such as surface area using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method and photoluminescence emission spectroscopy could provide a conclusion to the photocatalytic degradation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K.; Methodology, R.K., D.S. and L.K.; Validation, R.K., D.S., L.K., G.O. and W.V.; Investigation, R.K., D.S. and L.K.; Resources, G.O. and W.V.; Writing—Original Draft, R.K., D.S. and L.K.; Writing—Review and Editing, R.K., D.S., L.K., G.O. and W.V.

Funding

This research was funded by Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (03XP0015A/B).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the provision of the XPS. We thank Helmut Klein from the department of Crystallography, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, for support with the X-ray diffraction analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schlesinger, M.; Weber, M.; Schulze, S.; Hietschold, M.; Mehring, M. Metastable β-Bi2O3 Nanoparticles with Potential for Photocatalytic Water Purification Using Visible Light Irradiation. ChemistryOpen 2013, 2, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Drache, M.; Roussel, P.; Wignacourt, J.-P. Structures and oxide mobility in Bi-Ln-O materials: Heritage of Bi2O3. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ho, C.-H.; Chan, C.-H.; Huang, Y.-S.; Tien, L.-C.; Chao, L.-C. The study of optical band edge property of bismuth oxide nanowires α-Bi2O3. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 11965–11972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ambare, R.C.; Shinde, P.; Nakate, U.T.; Lokhande, B.J.; Mane, R.S. Sprayed bismuth oxide interconnected nanoplate supercapacitor electrode materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 453, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Iljinas, A.; Burinskas, S.; Dudonis, J. Synthesis of Bismuth Oxide Thin Films Deposited by Reactive Magnetron Sputtering. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2011, 120, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, Y.; Dong, F.; Jin, S. (Eds.) Bismuth—Advanced Applications and Defects Characterization; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78923-262-2. [Google Scholar]
  7. Qiu, Y.; Yang, M.; Fan, H.; Zuo, Y.; Shao, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yang, X.; Yang, S. Nanowires of α- and β-Bi2O3: Phase-selective synthesis and application in photocatalysis. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 1843–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, Z.; Tabata, I.; Hirogaki, K.; Hisada, K.; Wang, T.; Wang, S.; Hori, T. Nontraditional template synthesis of microjagged bismuth oxide: A highly efficient visible light responsive photocatalyst. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 397–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oudghiri-Hassani, H.; Rakass, S.; Al Wadaani, F.T.; Al-ghamdi, K.J.; Omer, A.; Messali, M.; Abboudi, M. Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of α-Bi2O3 nanoparticles. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2018, 9, 508–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iyyapushpam, S.; Nishanthi, S.T.; Pathinettam Padiyan, D. Synthesis of room temperature bismuth oxide and its photocatalytic activity. Mater. Lett. 2012, 86, 25–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ratova, M.; Marcelino, R.; de Souza, P.; Amorim, C.; Kelly, P. Reactive Magnetron Sputter Deposition of Bismuth Tungstate Coatings for Water Treatment Applications under Natural Sunlight. Catalysts 2017, 7, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yan, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Qiu, L.; Gao, C.; Zhou, J. Template-free fabrication of α- and β-Bi2O3 hollow spheres and their visible light photocatalytic activity for water purification. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014, 605, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khan, M.M.; Adil, S.F.; Al-Mayouf, A. Metal oxides as photocatalysts. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015, 19, 462–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, G.; Li, S.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Feng, Z.; Li, C. Controllable synthesis of α-Bi2O3 and γ-Bi2O3 with high photocatalytic activity by α-Bi2O3 → γ-Bi2O3 → α-Bi2O3 transformation in a facile precipitation method. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 689, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, R.; Shen, Z.-R.; Wang, H.; Zhou, H.-J.; Liu, Y.-P.; Ding, D.-T.; Chen, T.-H. Fabrication of mesh-like bismuth oxide single crystalline nanoflakes and their visible light photocatalytic activity. J. Alloy. Compd. 2011, 509, 2588–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Köhler, R.; Ohms, G.; Militz, H.; Viöl, W. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Coating of Bismuth Oxide Circular Droplets. Coatings 2018, 8, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ilschner, B.; Haefer, R.A. Oberflächen- und Dünnschicht-Technologie; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1987; ISBN 978-3-540-16723-5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Medina, J.C.; Bizarro, M.; Gomez, C.L.; Depablos-Rivera, O.; Mirabal-Rojas, R.; Monroy, B.M.; Fonseca-Garcia, A.; Perez-Alvarez, J.; Rodil, S.E. Sputtered bismuth oxide thin films as a potential photocatalytic material. Catal. Today 2016, 266, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumari, L.; Lin, J.-H.; Ma, Y.-R. One-dimensional Bi(2)O(3) nanohooks: Synthesis, characterization and optical properties. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2007, 19, 406204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Uchida, K.; Ayame, A. Dynamic XPS measurements on bismuth molybdate surfaces. Surf. Sci. 1996, 357–358, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.; Qin, J.; Xue, Y.; Yu, P.; Zhang, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, R. Effect of aspect ratio and surface defects on the photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanorods. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ishfaq, M.; Rizwan Khan, M.; Bhopal, M.F.; Nasim, F.; Ali, A.; Bhatti, A.S.; Ahmed, I.; Bhardwaj, S.; Cepek, C. 1.5 MeV proton irradiation effects on electrical and structural properties of TiO2/n-Si interface. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 174506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ansari, S.A.; Khan, M.M.; Ansari, M.O.; Kalathil, S.; Lee, J.; Cho, M.H. Band gap engineering of CeO2 nanostructure using an electrochemically active biofilm for visible light applications. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 16782–16791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dharmadhikari, V.S.; Sainkar, S.R.; Badrinarayan, S.; Goswami, A. Characterisation of thin films of bismuth oxide by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1982, 25, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wittstock, G.; Strübing, A.; Szargan, R.; Werner, G. Glucose oxidation at bismuth-modified platinum electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 444, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abdullah, E.A.; Abdullah, A.H.; Zainal, Z.; Hussein, M.Z.; Ban, T.K. Bismuth Basic Nitrate as a Novel Adsorbent for Azo Dye Removal. E-J. Chem. 2012, 9, 1885–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, S.Y.; Liu, L.; Jia, Z.X.; Fu, W.W.; Jia, D.M.; Luo, Y.F. Study on the structure-properties relationship of natural rubber/SiO2 composites modified by a novel multi-functional rubber agent. Express Polym. Lett. 2014, 8, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Alessio Verni, G.; Long, B.; Gity, F.; Lanius, M.; Schüffelgen, P.; Mussler, G.; Grützmacher, D.; Greer, J.; Holmes, J.D. Oxide removal and stabilization of bismuth thin films through chemically bound thiol layers. Rsc Adv. 2018, 8, 33368–33373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Barrera-Mota, K.; Bizarro, M.; Castellino, M.; Tagliaferro, A.; Hernández, A.; Rodil, S.E. Spray deposited β-Bi2O3 nanostructured films with visible photocatalytic activity for solar water treatment. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2015, 14, 1110–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, J.-J.; Chen, M.-D.; Fu, D.-G. Preparation of bismuth oxide/titania composite particles and their photocatalytic activity to degradation of 4-chlorophenol. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2011, 21, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Huang, B.; Zhang, X.; Qin, X.; Dai, Y. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants over basic bismuth (III) nitrate/BiVO4 composite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 348, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cheng, H.; Huang, B.; Lu, J.; Wang, Z.; Xu, B.; Qin, X.; Zhang, X.; Dai, Y. Synergistic effect of crystal and electronic structures on the visible-light-driven photocatalytic performances of Bi(2)O(3) polymorphs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 15468–15475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, A.; Xiao, C.; Li, S.; Huang, F.; Shen, Y. An ordered and porous N-doped carbon dot-sensitized Bi2O3 inverse opal with enhanced photoelectrochemical performance and photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 13974–13980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Chen, J.; Liu, F.; Lai, Y. Realization of nanostructured N-doped p-type Bi2O3 thin films. Mater. Lett. 2017, 193, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hajra, P.; Shyamal, S.; Mandal, H.; Sariket, D.; Maity, A.; Kundu, S.; Bhattacharya, C. Synthesis of oxygen deficient bismuth oxide photocatalyst for improved photoelectrochemical applications. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 299, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, X.; Lian, X.; Liu, S.; Jiang, C.; Tian, J.; Wang, G.; Chen, J.; Wang, R. Visible light photoelectrochemical properties of β-Bi2O3 nanoporous films: A study of the dependence on thermal treatment and film thickness. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 282, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Akaltun, Y.; Yıldırım, M.A.; Ateş, A.; Yıldırım, M. The relationship between refractive index-energy gap and the film thickness effect on the characteristic parameters of CdSe thin films. Opt. Commun. 2011, 284, 2307–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Selvamani, T.; Anandan, S.; Granone, L.; Bahnemann, D.W.; Ashokkumar, M. Phase-controlled synthesis of bismuth oxide polymorphs for photocatalytic applications. Mater. Chem. Front. 2018, 2, 1664–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sirota, B.; Reyes-Cuellar, J.; Kohli, P.; Wang, L.; McCarroll, M.E.; Aouadi, S.M. Bismuth oxide photocatalytic nanostructures produced by magnetron sputtering deposition. Thin Solid Films 2012, 520, 6118–6123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Iyyapushpam, S.; Nishanthi, S.T.; Pathinettam Padiyan, D. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange by gamma Bi2O3 and its kinetics. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014, 601, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gujar, T.P.; Shinde, V.R.; Lokhande, C.D. The influence of oxidation temperature on structural, optical and electrical properties of thermally oxidized bismuth oxide films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 4186–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salim, E.T.; Al-Douri, Y.; Al Wazny, M.S.; Fakhri, M.A. Optical properties of Cauliflower-like Bi2O3 nanostructures by reactive pulsed laser deposition (PLD) technique. Sol. Energy 2014, 107, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Iljinas, A.; Marcinauskas, L. Formation of bismuth oxide nanostructures by reactive plasma assisted thermal evaporation. Thin Solid Films 2015, 594, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Al-Kahtani, A.A. Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B Dye in Wastewater Using Gelatin/CuS/PVA Nanocomposites under Solar Light Irradiation. J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 8, 66–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Hou, J.; Yang, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Jiao, S.; Zhu, H. In situ synthesis of α–β phase heterojunction on Bi2O3 nanowires with exceptional visible-light photocatalytic performance. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 142–143, 504–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Iyyapushpam, S.; Nishanthi, S.T.; Pathinettam Padiyan, D. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange using α-Bi2O3 prepared without surfactant. J. Alloy. Compd. 2013, 563, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wallenhorst, L.M.; Loewenthal, L.; Avramidis, G.; Gerhard, C.; Militz, H.; Ohms, G.; Viöl, W. Topographic, optical and chemical properties of zinc particle coatings deposited by means of atmospheric pressure plasma. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 410, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rietveld, H.M. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1969, 2, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Toby, B.H.; von Dreele, R.B. GSAS-II: The genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2013, 46, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Average thickness (a) and cover ratio (b) of the FSs (N = 4 and SD).
Figure 1. Average thickness (a) and cover ratio (b) of the FSs (N = 4 and SD).
Catalysts 09 00533 g001
Figure 2. (a) Normalized XRD plot of parameter set and (b) phase fraction of layers with tetragonal non-stoichiometric Bi2O2.33 and monoclinic Bi2O3.
Figure 2. (a) Normalized XRD plot of parameter set and (b) phase fraction of layers with tetragonal non-stoichiometric Bi2O2.33 and monoclinic Bi2O3.
Catalysts 09 00533 g002
Figure 3. Detailed XPS spectra of (ac) oxygen, (d) bismuth, and (e) nitrogen.
Figure 3. Detailed XPS spectra of (ac) oxygen, (d) bismuth, and (e) nitrogen.
Catalysts 09 00533 g003
Figure 4. Peak displacement of lattice oxygen (a) and bismuth (b) depending on the phase fraction.
Figure 4. Peak displacement of lattice oxygen (a) and bismuth (b) depending on the phase fraction.
Catalysts 09 00533 g004
Figure 5. O/Bi ratio of XPS measurements vs. phase fraction.
Figure 5. O/Bi ratio of XPS measurements vs. phase fraction.
Catalysts 09 00533 g005
Figure 6. Phase fraction of non-stoichiometric bismuth oxide vs. atomic concentration of nitrogen, LBEC, and HBEC.
Figure 6. Phase fraction of non-stoichiometric bismuth oxide vs. atomic concentration of nitrogen, LBEC, and HBEC.
Catalysts 09 00533 g006
Figure 7. (a) Plot of (αhν)2 vs. () to determine the direct band gap; (b) direct band gap of coatings (N = 4 with SD).
Figure 7. (a) Plot of (αhν)2 vs. () to determine the direct band gap; (b) direct band gap of coatings (N = 4 with SD).
Catalysts 09 00533 g007
Figure 8. Direct band gap plots vs. (a) coating thickness, (b) atomic concentration of HBEC, and (c) oxygen/bismuth ratio.
Figure 8. Direct band gap plots vs. (a) coating thickness, (b) atomic concentration of HBEC, and (c) oxygen/bismuth ratio.
Catalysts 09 00533 g008
Figure 9. (a) Photocatalytic efficiency as a function of irradiation time, and (b) degradation efficiencies of coatings.
Figure 9. (a) Photocatalytic efficiency as a function of irradiation time, and (b) degradation efficiencies of coatings.
Catalysts 09 00533 g009
Figure 10. Atomic concentration of LBEC in atom-% vs. the photocatalytic efficiency.
Figure 10. Atomic concentration of LBEC in atom-% vs. the photocatalytic efficiency.
Catalysts 09 00533 g010
Table 1. Atomic concentration of the FS in atom-%.
Table 1. Atomic concentration of the FS in atom-%.
SampleC 1sN 1sO 1sSi 2pBi 4f
129.61.343.03.223.0
222.51.348.93.024.3
332.61.642.10.023.7
420.91.851.06.519.8
516.72.453.24.822.9
622.45.049.91.820.9
722.34.149.34.320.1
823.43.746.90.725.3
924.12.447.50.025.9
1025.40.346.20.028.1
1127.00.843.71.427.2
1221.51.247.10.629.7
1327.82.545.82.122.0
1426.91.945.60.525.1
1526.71.845.42.823.3
1628.11.945.25.219.7
Table 2. Different coating parameters of the APPJ.
Table 2. Different coating parameters of the APPJ.
Sample No.PP (%)qP (L/min)v (mm/s)qD (m3/h)vD (mm/h)
180301002.250
2100601002.250
310030402.250
48060402.250
580601004.350
68030404.350
7100301004.350
810060404.350
910060402.2100
108030402.2100
11100301002.2100
1280601002.2100
1310030404.3100
148060404.3100
15100601004.3100
1680301004.3100

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Köhler, R.; Siebert, D.; Kochanneck, L.; Ohms, G.; Viöl, W. Bismuth Oxide Faceted Structures as a Photocatalyst Produced Using an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet. Catalysts 2019, 9, 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060533

AMA Style

Köhler R, Siebert D, Kochanneck L, Ohms G, Viöl W. Bismuth Oxide Faceted Structures as a Photocatalyst Produced Using an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet. Catalysts. 2019; 9(6):533. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060533

Chicago/Turabian Style

Köhler, Robert, Dominik Siebert, Leif Kochanneck, Gisela Ohms, and Wolfgang Viöl. 2019. "Bismuth Oxide Faceted Structures as a Photocatalyst Produced Using an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet" Catalysts 9, no. 6: 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060533

APA Style

Köhler, R., Siebert, D., Kochanneck, L., Ohms, G., & Viöl, W. (2019). Bismuth Oxide Faceted Structures as a Photocatalyst Produced Using an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet. Catalysts, 9(6), 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060533

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop