Next Article in Journal
Annealing Induced Saturation in Electron Concentration for V-Doped CdO
Previous Article in Journal
Processing and Characterization of BCZT-Modified BiFeO3-BaTiO3 Piezoelectric Ceramics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/cryst11091078
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Al/SiC/TiO2 Hybrid Nanocomposites Developed by Microwave Sintering

by
Manohar Reddy Mattli
1,†,
Penchal Reddy Matli
2,†,
Adnan Khan
1,
Rokaya Hamdy Abdelatty
1,
Moinuddin Yusuf
1,
Abdulla Al Ashraf
1,
Rama Gopal Kotalo
2 and
Rana Abdul Shakoor
1,*
1
Center of Advanced Materials (CAM), Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
2
Department of Physics, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapur 515003, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Authors with equal contribution.
Crystals 2021, 11(9), 1078; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11091078
Submission received: 5 August 2021 / Revised: 29 August 2021 / Accepted: 2 September 2021 / Published: 6 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Crystalline Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aluminum hybrid metal matrix nanocomposites (Al/SiC/TiO2) were synthesized through a microwave-assisted powder metallurgy process, and their evolved microstructure and mechanical properties were investigated. The Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites were prepared by reinforcing aluminum (Al) matrix with a fixed amount of silicon carbide (SiC) nanoparticles (5 wt.%) and varying concentrations of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (3, 6, and 9 wt.%). The morphology results revealeda uniform distribution of SiC and TiO2 reinforcements in the aluminum matrix. An increase in the hardness and compressive strength of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites was noticed with the increasein TiO2 nanoparticles. The Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites that had an optimum amount of TiO2 nanoparticles (9 wt.%) showcased the best mechanical properties, with maximum increments of approximately 124%, 90%, and 23% of microhardness (83 ± 3 HV), respectively, yield strength (139 ± 8 MPa), and ultimate compression strength (375 ± 6 MPa) as compared to that of pure Al matrix. The Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites exhibited the shear mode of fracture during their deformation process.

1. Introduction

In recent years, hybrid composites have been attractive because of their multifunctional characteristics and specific properties, such as low cost, lightweight, low density, high strength to weight ratio, and ease of fabrication. Hybrid matrix composites (HMCs) are developed by the combination of two or more reinforcements incorporated into a suitable matrix to allow for a superposition of their properties. HMCs provide a combination of unique properties that cannot be realized in conventional composite materials. HMCs are highly efficient and demonstrate promising properties, and thus, their rapid utility in various applications [1,2]. The important criteria for the use of hybrid composites are based on high strength, crack propagation resistance, and plasticity exhibited at high loads. The selection of materials is of key importance in designing and producing the components that conform to the end-user requirements. The possibility of mixing different reinforcements into the hybrid composite usually leads to enhanced structural, mechanical, electrical, and thermal characteristics, making them attractive for many applications, such as automobile, aerospace, aeronautical, marine, and other engineering applications [3,4].
Aluminum hybrid matrix composites (AHMCs) show better properties than conventional alloys [5]. AHMCs are the new HMC combination of at least two different types of reinforcements incorporated into an aluminum matrix. Different reinforcements are added into the aluminum matrix to meet the industrial requirements, such as low cost, good machinability, high strength and hardness, high ductility, good corrosion and wear resistance, and low density. Due to their tempting properties, AHMCs are most frequently used in automobile, aerospace, electrical, and some other engineering industries [6,7,8,9,10,11].
Aluminum-based hybrid composites have been developed through many processes, such as powder metallurgy (PM), forging, stir casting, spark plasma, and conventional sintering methods [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Among these processes, the PM method is simple and cost-effective and exhibits better results than the other synthesis processes. The powder metallurgy process is a combination of different steps, including blending, compaction, and sintering. Sintering is an important step that ensures the final hybrid composites’ desired physical, microstructural, and mechanical properties. Many methods can conduct the sintering process; however, the microwave sintering (MWS) technique has salient advantages over the conventional sintering process. The MWS process is attractive due to its salient features, including high efficiency, rapid and volumetric heating, uniform heating of the material, and balancing the radiant and microwave heating effects [18,19,20,21,22,23].
Different types ofreinforcing ceramics used in AHMCs are SiC [24], TiC [25], Al2O3 [26], Y2O3 [27], TiO2 [28], ZrO2 [29], B4C [30], Si3N4 [31], and more. Among these, SiC and TiO2 are selected as reinforcements in aluminum matrix composites due to their appealing properties. Silicon carbide (SiC) contributes to high hardness, high flexural strength, and good thermal conductivity [32,33]. Similarly, titania (TiO2) is advantageous because of its high density, high wear resistance, thermal expansion, and electrical resistance [34,35]. The final properties of the hybrid composites are sensitive to the processing parameters, composition, and post-treatment [11,36].
This study was carried out to verify the innovation of the microwave sintering technique and powder metallurgy process in developing Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites by examining their viability through material characterization assessments. The focus of this study was directed to the exploration of the effect of TiO2 nanoparticles’ concentrations on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there has been no report on Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites prepared through the microwave sintering process.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Selection of Raw Materials

Pure Al, SiC, and TiO2 were used as matrices and reinforcements, respectively, in the development of Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. The specifications of Al, SiC, and TiO2 nanoparticles are presented in Table 1. The five compositions, fabricated under similar conditions, were A1—pure Al, A2—Al/5SiC, A3—Al/5SiC/3TiO2, A4—Al/5SiC/6TiO2, and A5—Al/5SiC/9TiO2.

2.2. Preparations of Hybrid Nanocomposite Samples

To synthesize the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites, the stoichiometric amounts of precursor materials were weighed carefully by an analytical balance. The weighed powders were blended through a planetary ball mill PM 200 at a speed of 200 rpm for 2 h. The blended powder of approximately 1 gm was taken and compacted into cylindrical pellets with an applied pressure of 50 MPa for 60 s. The compacted green pallets were then sintered using a microwave sintering furnace (VB ceramic furnace, VBCC/MF/1600 °C/14/15, Chennai, India) at a temperature of 550 °C for 30 min, with a heating rate of approximately 10 °C/min. The sintered samples were further used for different characterizations. The samples were polished and ultrasonically cleaned in an alcoholic solution. A schematic representation of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites is shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Characterization

The density and porosity of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites were measured using Archimedes’ principle. XRD analysis was performed on the polished microwave sintered samples using PANalyticalX’pert pro.
The SEM micrographs of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites were carried out using a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM-FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 FE-SEM, Hillsboro, OR, USA) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (Bruker SDD-EDS, Coventry, UK). The surface roughness of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites was carried out using an atomic force microscope (MFP-3D Nanoindenter, Columbia, SC, USA).
The Vickers microhardness of the developed Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites was measured on a Vickers microhardness tester (MKV-h21) at a load of 50 gf for 10 s. The nanohardness of the hybrid nanocomposites was examined using the MFP-3D Nanoindenter system at a load of 100 mN. For microhardness testing, 4-sided pyramid tips were used, while for nanoindentation, 3-sided pyramid tips were employed. Both micro- and nanohardness experiments were conducted at room temperature (RT), and the reported results are an average of five indentations that were taken for each sample.
The compression strength and yield strength of the developed Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites were measured on a universal testing machine (Lloyd-Ametek LR50K Plus) at room temperature under compression loading according to ASTM E9-89a. The average of the 3 samples was taken for each test. The fractured surfaces of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites were studied using an SEM-FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 FE-SEM scanning electron microscope.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Density and Porosity

Figure 2 illustrates the measured density and porosity results of the pure aluminum and its hybrid nanocomposites. It can be seen that the density of the hybrid nanocomposites increased with the increase in the amount of TiO2. However, the density of the hybrid nanocomposites was higher than that of the base aluminum matrix due to the presence of higher density reinforcements SiC (3.21 g/cc) and TiO2 (4.23 g/cc) in the Al matrix (2.7 g/cc). The higher density of the microwave sintered samples influenced the structural, hardness, and strength of the hybrid nanocomposites [14]. It can also be noticed from Figure 2 that the porosity increased with an increase in the contents of TiO2 nanoparticles in the aluminum matrix. This can be ascribed to the effect of agglomeration at high reinforcement content and pore nucleation formation at the particle reinforcement surface [37,38,39].

3.2. Phase Identification

Figure 3 shows the XRD (X-ray diffraction) results of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. The XRD analysis results confirm the presence of SiC [40] and TiO2 [41] nanoparticles in the Al matrix [42]. The sharp diffraction peaks of Al were at the 2θangles of 38.6° (111), 44.8° (200), 65.2° (220), and 78.3° (311), very weak peaks of SiC were at the 2θangles of 35.7° (111) and 60.2° (220), and TiO2 peaks were at the 2θangles of 25.3° (101), 48.2° (004), 54.2° (200), and 55.2° (211). The XRD results confirm that there were no other peaks or impurities present. The presence of a small portion of reinforcements was hard to detect in the XRD spectra. However, the intensity of these peaks increased with an increasing number of reinforcements.

3.3. Microstructure Behavior

The SEM-EDS analysis was performed on the pure Al and its hybrid nanocomposites. Figure 4 shows the SEM micrographs of the pure Al and Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. The SEM micrographs of the specimens clearly show that the SiC and TiO2 reinforcements were uniformly distributed throughout the aluminum matrix. The light grey surface can beobserved, representing the aluminum matrix, while the dark grey and white spots confirm the presence of SiC and TiO2 particles, respectively. The selection of suitable ball milling parameters, such as milling speed, time, powder to weight ratio, and so forth, and appropriate microwave sintering parameters, such as sintering temperature, time, power, holding time, and so forth, contributed to producing the compacts with uniform distribution reinforcements. Usually, an increasing percentage in reinforcement leads to an increase in the porosity of the composites, as reflected in Figure 2 [43,44].
The EDS (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy) analysis of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites is depicted in Figure 5. The EDS spectrum in Figure 5A3–A5 confirms the presence of Al, Si, C, Ti, and O within the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. Furthermore, Figure 5A5 presents the elemental mapping, which shows that Si (purple), C (blue), Ti (red), and O (yellow) elements were uniformly distributed throughout the Al matrix (green). Consequently, the uniform distribution of Si, C, Ti, and O elements within the Al matrix was successfully achieved.

3.4. Surface Roughness

Figure 6 shows the 2D and 3D AFM images of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites, together with an average surface roughness value. From the AFM analysis, the average surface roughness (Ra) of pure aluminum was 21.793 nm. The average roughness (Ra) of the hybrid nanocomposites increased from 21.793 nm to 34.640 nm with an increase in TiO2. The average roughness (Ra) of the hybrid nanocomposites is shown in Figure 7. The increase in average roughness (Ra)of Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites can be regarded as the effect of insoluble and hard ceramic particles and is consistent with the already reported studies [45,46]. The Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites show the varying number of protrusions (hills) and valleys along with the topographic surface, providing an idea about the surface morphology.

3.5. Vickers Microhardness

Figure 8 shows the Vickers microhardness results and micrographs of the microhardness indentation of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. The corresponding data are summarized in Table 2. The microhardness results show that the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites exhibited higher hardness results than the pure aluminum. Moreover, the hardness of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites increased with the increasing amount of TiO2 nanoparticles into the aluminum matrix [47]. The maximum hardness (83 ± 3 HV) of the hybrid nanocomposites was achieved at 9 wt.% of TiO2. The improvement in the hardness of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites can be attributed to the load transfer mechanism. The presence of the hard reinforcements (SiC and TiO2) in the aluminum matrix offers more resistance to plastic deformation, leading to increased strength and hardness of the hybrid nanocomposite and an increase in the load-bearing capacity of the hybrid nanocomposites [48].
The Vickers microhardness can be determined by the following equation [49]:
HV = 1.854 F/d2
where F is the load in Kgf and d is the athematic mean of d1 and d2 diagonals in mm.
d = (d1 + d2)/2

3.6. Nanohardness

The load-displacement curves and nanohardness results in the microwave sintered Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites containing varying amounts of TiO2 nanoparticles are shown in Figure 9.
It can be noticed from the displacement curves in Figure 9A that the penetration depth of the hybrid nanocomposites decreased with the increasing amount of TiO2 nanoparticles. The decrease in penetration depth indicates the increase in the nanohardness of the hybrid nanocomposites, which agrees with our microhardness results (Figure 8). The lower penetration depth rate is attributed to the higher resistance offered by the aluminum matrix incorporated with hard ceramic nanoparticles. The Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites containing 9 wt.% TiO2 exhibited the best performance, reaching ahardness value of 7.91 GPa.

3.7. Compression and Yield Strength

Figure 10 shows the compressive stress/strain curves and results (yield and compression strength) of the microwave-sintered pure Al and Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. For a clear comparison, the corresponding mechanical data is also shownin Table 2. It can be noticed that Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites demonstrated higher strength when compared to the aluminum matrix. Furthermore, the strength of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites increased with the increasing amount of TiO2 nanoparticles in the aluminum matrix. The Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposite containing a 9 wt.% of TiO2 nanoparticles showed a significant improvement in compressive strength (UCS_375 ± 6 MPa) and a 0.2% offset compressive yield strength (CYS_139 ± 8 MPa) as compared to the aluminum matrix.
The improvements in strength and hardness of the hybrid nanocomposites can be attributed to many strengthening mechanisms, as reported in the literature [50,51,52,53]. In this present study, the improvements in strength and hardness of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites were mainly due to the load transfer mechanism, dispersion hardening effect, and Orowan strengthening mechanisms [54,55]. The load transfer mechanism is the most accepted strengthening mechanism that takes place due to the transfer of load (Equation (3)) from weaker matrix material to the harder reinforcements through their interface [56].
Δσload = 0.5 fσm
where f is the volume fraction of reinforcements and σm is the YS of the matrix (MPa).

3.8. Fractography

Figure 11 shows the fractography images of the pure aluminum and its hybrid nanocomposites fractured under compression loadings at room temperature. A close comparison suggests a shear mode fracture in the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. The compressive deformations obtained in the base matrix and hybrid nanocomposites weredifferent due to the dispersion hardening effect. The aluminum matrix’s shear fracture was less than the hybrid nanocomposites because the reinforcements in the aluminum matrix acted as secondary phases that restricted the plastic deformation in the aluminum matrix.

4. Conclusions

Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites have been successfully synthesized using a combination of powder metallurgy (blending and compaction) and microwave sintering (MWS) techniques. The effects of the concentration of TiO2 nanoparticles on microstructural and mechanical properties of the developed Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites wereinvestigated. The SEM results indicate a uniform distribution of SiC and TiO2 reinforcements in the aluminum matrix. The nanohardness of the nanocomposites increased from 3.91 ± 0.3 GPa for pure Al to 7.91 ± 0.7 GPa for the Al/5SiC/9TiO2 nanocomposite. Al/SiC/TiO2 nanocomposites containing 9 wt.% of TiO2 nanoparticles demonstrated superior hardness (83 ± 3 Hv), yield strength (139 ± 8 MPa), and compressive strength (375 ± 6 MPa) when compared to pure Al. Finally, the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites underwent a shear mode of fracture during their plastic deformation instead of a brittle fracture mode.

Author Contributions

M.R.M. wrote the main part of the manuscript and developed the planning of the experiment. R.H.A., M.Y. and A.A.A. performed characterization of the microstructure and mechanical studies of the samples. A.K. and M.R.M. carried out the preparation of different composite materials and tested physical properties. P.R.M., R.G.K. and R.A.S. supervised the materials preparation process and modified the manuscript draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Penchal Reddy Matli is thankful to the CSIR, New Delhi, India, for financial support under CSIR-SRA (Scientist’s Pool Scheme-13(9188-A)/2021-Pool).The authors are also grateful to the Central Laboratory Unit (CLU) Qatar University for the SEM/EDX analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Perov, B.V.; Khoroshilova, I.P. Hybrid Composite Materials BT—Polymer Matrix Composites; Shalin, R.E., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 269–304. ISBN 978-94-011-0515-6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yamada, A.; Sasabe, H.; Osada, Y.; Shiroda, Y. Concept of hybrid materials, hybrid materials-concept and case studies. ASM Int. 1989, 18. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chavhan, G.R.; Wankhade, L.N. Improvement of the mechanical properties of hybrid composites prepared by fibers, fiber-metals, and nano-filler particles—A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 27, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vieira, C.A.B.; Susin, S.B.; Freire, E.; Amico, S.C.; Zattera, A.J. Characterization of hybrid composites produced with mats made using different methods. Mater. Res. 2009, 12, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pitchayyapillai, G.; Seenikannan, P.; Raja, K.R.; Chandrasekaran, K. Al6061 Hybrid Metal Matrix Composite Reinforced with Alumina and Molybdenum Disulphide. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2016, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bodunrin, M.O.; Alaneme, K.K.; Chown, L.H. Aluminium matrix hybrid composites: A review of reinforcement philosophies; Mechanical, corrosion and tribological characteristics. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2015, 4, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ahamed, H.; Senthilkumar, V. Hybrid Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites and Reinforcement Materials: A Review. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2016, 5, 6284–6288. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rino, J.J.; Chandramohan, D.; Sucitharan, K.S. An Overview on Development of Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites with Hybrid Reinforcement. IJSR India Online ISSN 2012, 1, 2319–7064. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhatia, R.S. An Experimental Analysis of Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Al2O3/B4C/Gr Particles. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. 2017, 8, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mavhungu, S.T.; Akinlabi, E.T.; Onitiri, M.A.; Varachia, F.M. Aluminum Matrix Composites for Industrial Use: Advances and Trends. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 7, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Singh, J.; Chauhan, A. Characterization of hybrid aluminum matrix composites for advanced applications—A review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2016, 5, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kanthavel, K.; Sumesh, K.R.; Saravanakumar, P. Study of tribological properties on Al/Al2O3/MoS2 hybrid composite processed by powder metallurgy. Alex. Eng. J. 2016, 55, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Murthy, K.V.S.; Girish, D.P.; Varol, T.; Koppad, G.P. Mechanical and thermal properties of AA7075/TiO2 /Fly ash hybrid composites obtained by hot forging. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2017, 27, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sambathkumar, M.; Navaneethakrishnan, P.; Ponappa, K.; Sasikumar, K.S.K. Mechanical and Corrosion Behavior of Al7075 (Hybrid) Metal Matrix Composites by Two Step Stir Casting Process. Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 2016, 14, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Matli, P.R.; Fareeha, U.; Shakoor, R.A.; Mohamed, A.M.A. A comparative study of structural and mechanical properties of Al-Cu composites prepared by vacuum and microwave sintering techniques. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2018, 7, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghasali, E.; Pakseresht, A.; Rahbari, A.; Eslami-shahed, H.; Alizadeh, M.; Ebadzadeh, T. Mechanical properties and microstructure characterization of spark plasma and conventional sintering of Al–SiC–TiC composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 666, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, A.; Matli, P.R.; Nawaz, M.; Mattli, M.R. Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of Hot Extruded Aluminum/Tin-Bismuth Composites Produced by Powder Metallurgy. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Oghbaei, M.; Mirzaee, O. Microwave Versus Conventional Sintering: A Review of Fundamentals, Advantages and Applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 494, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chandrasekaran, S.; Ramanathan, S.; Basak, T. Microwave material processing—A review. AIChE J. 2012, 58, 330–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Matli, P.; Shakoor, R.; Amer Mohamed, A.; Gupta, M. Microwave Rapid Sintering of Al-Metal Matrix Composites: A Review on the Effect of Reinforcements, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties. Metals 2016, 6, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Fliflet, A.W.; Bruce, R.W.; Kinkead, A.K.; Fischer, R.P.; Lewis, D.; Rayne, R.; Bender, B.; Kurihara, L.K.; Chow, G.-M.; Schoen, P.E. Application of microwave heating to ceramic processing: Design and initial operation of a 2.45-GHz single-mode furnace. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1996, 24, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Agarwal, D. Microwave sintering of ceramics, composites and metallic materials, and melting of glasses. Trans. Ind. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 65, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Matli, P.R.; Manakari, V.; Parande, G.; Mattli, M.R.; Shakoor, R.A.; Gupta, M. Improving Mechanical, Thermal and Damping Properties of NiTi (Nitinol) Reinforced Aluminum Nanocomposites. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Reddy, M.P.; Shakoor, R.A.; Parande, G.; Manakari, V.; Ubaid, F.; Mohamed, A.M.A.; Gupta, M. Enhanced performance of nano-sized SiC reinforced Al metal matrix nanocomposites synthesized through microwave sintering and hot extrusion techniques. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2017, 27, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Karantzalis, A.E.; Wyatt, S.; Kennedy, A.R. The mechanical properties of Al-TiC metal matrix composites fabricated by a flux-casting technique. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1997, 237, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hossein-Zadeh, M.; Razavi, M.; Mirzaee, O.; Ghaderi, R. Characterization of properties of Al–Al2O3 nano-composite synthesized via milling and subsequent casting. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 2013, 25, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mattli, M.R.; Shakoor, A.; Matli, P.R.; Mohamed, A.M.A. Microstructure and compressive behavior of Al–Y2O3 nanocomposites prepared by microwave-assisted mechanical alloying. Metals 2019, 9, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ravichandran, M.; Meignanamoorthy, M.; Dineshkumar, S. Microstructure and Properties of Hot Extruded Al-TiO2 Powder Metallurgic Composites. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2016, 852, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parveen, A.; Chauhan, N.; Suhaib, M. Mechanical and Tribological Behaviour of Al-ZrO2 Composites: A Review. In Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 217–229. [Google Scholar]
  30. Moradi, M.R.; Moloodi, A.; Habibolahzadeh, A. Fabrication of Nano-composite Al-B 4 C Foam via Powder Metallurgy-Space Holder Technique. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2015, 11, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mattli, M.; Matli, P.; Shakoor, A.; Amer Mohamed, A. Structural and Mechanical Properties of Amorphous Si3N4 Nanoparticles Reinforced Al Matrix Composites Prepared by Microwave Sintering. Ceramics 2019, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Järrendahl, K.; Davis, R.F. Chapter 1 Materials Properties and Characterization of SiC. In Semiconductors and Semimetals; Soo Park, Y.B.T.-S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998; Volume 52, pp. 1–20. ISBN 0080-8784. [Google Scholar]
  33. Choyke, W.J.; Pensl, G. Physical Properties of SiC. MRS Bull. 1997, 22, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Goodfellow Titanium Dioxide—Titania (TiO2). Available online: http://www.goodfellow.com/E/Titanium-Dioxide.html (accessed on 5 August 2021).
  35. Kusior, A.; Banas, J.; Trenczek-Zajac, A.; Zubrzycka, P.; Micek-Ilnicka, A.; Radecka, M. Structural properties of TiO2 nanomaterials. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1157, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Prabu, S.B.; Karunamoorthy, L.; Kathiresan, S.; Mohan, B. Influence of stirring speed and stirring time on distribution of particles in cast metal matrix composite. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2006, 171, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Elango, G.; Raghunath, B.K. Tribological behavior of hybrid (LM25Al + SiC+ TiO2) metal matrix composites. Procedia Eng. 2013, 64, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Nassar, A.E.; Nassar, E.E. Properties of aluminum matrix Nano composites prepared by powder metallurgy processing. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 2017, 29, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Reddy, M.P.; Ubaid, F.; Shakoor, R.A.; Parande, G.; Manakari, V.; Mohamed, A.M.A.; Gupta, M. Effect of reinforcement concentration on the properties of hot extruded Al-Al2O3 composites synthesized through microwave sintering process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 696, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cheng, H.; Tu, R.; Zhang, S.; Han, M.; Goto, T.; Zhang, L. Preparation of highly oriented β-SiC bulks by halide laser chemical vapor deposition. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xing, J.; Li, Y.H.; Jiang, H.B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H.G. The size and valence state effect of Pt on photocatalytic H2 evolution over platinized TiO2 photocatalyst. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 1237–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Krishna, M.V.; Xavior, M.A. Experiment and Statistical Analysis of End Milling Parameters for Al/SiC Using Response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2015, 7, 2274–2285. [Google Scholar]
  43. Suarsana, K.; Astika, I.M.; Sunu, P.W. Properties of thermal conductivity, density and hardness of aluminium matrices with reinforcement of sicw/Al2O3 hybrid after sintering process. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 539, 012016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mokhtar, N.M.; Lau, W.J.; Ismail, A.F.; Ng, B.C. The physicochemical study of polyvinylidene fluoride-Cloisite15A® composite membranes for membrane distillation application. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 63367–63379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Thiagarajan, R.; Palanikumar, K.; Arumugam, S. Synthesis and characterization of sintered hybrid aluminium matrix composites reinforced with nanocopper oxide particles and microsilicon carbide particles. Compos. Part. B Eng. 2014, 59, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ghanaraja, S.; Dileep Kumar, D.J.; Ravikumar, K.S.; Madhusudan, B.M. Mechanical Properties of Hot Extruded Al (Mg)-MnO2 Composites. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015, 813–814, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohapatra, S.; Mishra, D.K.; Mishra, G.; Roy, G.S.; Behera, D.; Mantry, S.; Singh, S.K. A study on sintered TiO2 and TiO2/SiC composites synthesized through chemical reaction based solution method. J. Compos. Mater. 2013, 47, 3081–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Z.; Chen, D.L. Contribution of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 483–484, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Denry, I.L.; Holloway, J.A. Elastic constants, Vickers hardness, and fracture toughness of fluorrichterite-based glass-ceramics. Dent. Mater. 2004, 20, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gladman, T. Precipitation hardening in metals. Mater. Sci. Technol. 1999, 15, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. DeGarmo, E.P.; Black, J.T.; Kohser, A.R. Materials and Processes in Manufacturing, 10th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; ISBN 9780470055120. [Google Scholar]
  52. Taya, M. Strengthening Mechanisms of Metal Matrix Composites. Mater. Trans. JIM 1991, 32, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kim, J.G.; Enikeev, N.A.; Seol, J.B.; Abramova, M.M.; Karavaeva, M.V.; Valiev, R.Z.; Park, C.G.; Kim, H.S. Superior Strength and Multiple Strengthening Mechanisms in Nanocrystalline TWIP Steel. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Callister, W.D.; Rethwisch, D.G. Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000; ISBN 9780470125373. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ardell, A.J. Precipitation hardening. Metall. Trans. A 1985, 16, 2131–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nardone, V.C.; Prewo, K.M. On the strength of discontinuous silicon carbide reinforced aluminum composites. Scr. Metall. 1986, 20, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Crystals 11 01078 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the developed Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the developed Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Crystals 11 01078 g001
Crystals 11 01078 g002 550
Figure 2. Density and porosity of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Figure 2. Density and porosity of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Crystals 11 01078 g002
Crystals 11 01078 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD pattern of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites (inset: magnification image of the pure Al, Al-5SiC, and Al-5SiC-9TiO2 scale from 20° to 62°).
Figure 3. XRD pattern of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites (inset: magnification image of the pure Al, Al-5SiC, and Al-5SiC-9TiO2 scale from 20° to 62°).
Crystals 11 01078 g003
Crystals 11 01078 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the (A1) pure Al, (A2) Al/5SiC, (A3) Al/5SiC/3TiO2, and (A5) Al/5SiC/9TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the (A1) pure Al, (A2) Al/5SiC, (A3) Al/5SiC/3TiO2, and (A5) Al/5SiC/9TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Crystals 11 01078 g004
Crystals 11 01078 g005 550
Figure 5. EDX spectra images of (A3) Al/5SiC/3TiO2, (A4) Al/5SiC/6TiO2, and (A5) EDX spectra, and elemental mapping of Al/5SiC/9TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Figure 5. EDX spectra images of (A3) Al/5SiC/3TiO2, (A4) Al/5SiC/6TiO2, and (A5) EDX spectra, and elemental mapping of Al/5SiC/9TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Crystals 11 01078 g005
Crystals 11 01078 g006 550
Figure 6. 2D and 3D surface images of (A1) pure Al, (A2) Al/5SiC, (A3) Al/5SiC/3TiO2, and (A5) Al/5SiC/9TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Figure 6. 2D and 3D surface images of (A1) pure Al, (A2) Al/5SiC, (A3) Al/5SiC/3TiO2, and (A5) Al/5SiC/9TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Crystals 11 01078 g006
Crystals 11 01078 g007 550
Figure 7. Surface roughness (Ra) data for AFM images of the developed Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites with their X profiles.
Figure 7. Surface roughness (Ra) data for AFM images of the developed Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites with their X profiles.
Crystals 11 01078 g007
Crystals 11 01078 g008 550
Figure 8. Vickers microhardness of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites and micrographs of the area indenter by the Vickers hardness tester in samples A2, A3, A4, and A5.
Figure 8. Vickers microhardness of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites and micrographs of the area indenter by the Vickers hardness tester in samples A2, A3, A4, and A5.
Crystals 11 01078 g008
Crystals 11 01078 g009 550
Figure 9. Nanoindentation analysis of Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites; (A) load/unload-displacement curves and (B) nanohardness results.
Figure 9. Nanoindentation analysis of Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites; (A) load/unload-displacement curves and (B) nanohardness results.
Crystals 11 01078 g009
Crystals 11 01078 g010 550
Figure 10. (A) Compressive stress/strain curves, (B) compressive strength of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Figure 10. (A) Compressive stress/strain curves, (B) compressive strength of the Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Crystals 11 01078 g010
Crystals 11 01078 g011 550
Figure 11. Fracture surface images of the (A1) pure Al, (A2) Al/5SiC, (A3) Al/5SiC/3TiO2, and (A5) Al/5SiC/9TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Figure 11. Fracture surface images of the (A1) pure Al, (A2) Al/5SiC, (A3) Al/5SiC/3TiO2, and (A5) Al/5SiC/9TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Crystals 11 01078 g011
Table
Table 1. Specifications of matrix and reinforcement particles.
Table 1. Specifications of matrix and reinforcement particles.
S. No:ParticlesPurity (%)Particle SizeDensity (g/cc)Suppliers
1Al99.57–15 µm2.70Alfa Aesar
2SiC (b-phase)---44–55 nm3.21Alfa Aesar
3TiO2 (anatase)99.715 nm4.23Alfa Aesar
Table
Table 2. Hardnesses and compressive properties of Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
Table 2. Hardnesses and compressive properties of Al/SiC/TiO2 hybrid nanocomposites.
SpecimensCompositionsMicrohardness (Hv)Nanoindentation (GPa)UCS
(MPa)		CYS
(MPa)		Failure Strain
(%)
A1Al37 ± 33.91 ± 0.3305 ± 673 ± 5>63
A2Al/5SiC64 ± 44.83 ± 0.2330 ± 389 ± 6>63
A3Al/5SiC/3TiO270 ± 55.54 ± 0.4346 ± 5117 ± 5>63
A4Al/5SiC/6TiO275 ± 66.12 ± 0.5359 ± 4126 ± 6>63
A5Al/5SiC/9TiO283 ± 37.91 ± 0.7375 ± 6139 ± 8>63
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mattli, M.R.; Matli, P.R.; Khan, A.; Abdelatty, R.H.; Yusuf, M.; Ashraf, A.A.; Kotalo, R.G.; Shakoor, R.A. Study of Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Al/SiC/TiO2 Hybrid Nanocomposites Developed by Microwave Sintering. Crystals 2021, 11, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11091078

AMA Style

Mattli MR, Matli PR, Khan A, Abdelatty RH, Yusuf M, Ashraf AA, Kotalo RG, Shakoor RA. Study of Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Al/SiC/TiO2 Hybrid Nanocomposites Developed by Microwave Sintering. Crystals. 2021; 11(9):1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11091078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mattli, Manohar Reddy, Penchal Reddy Matli, Adnan Khan, Rokaya Hamdy Abdelatty, Moinuddin Yusuf, Abdulla Al Ashraf, Rama Gopal Kotalo, and Rana Abdul Shakoor. 2021. "Study of Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Al/SiC/TiO2 Hybrid Nanocomposites Developed by Microwave Sintering" Crystals 11, no. 9: 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11091078

APA Style

Mattli, M. R., Matli, P. R., Khan, A., Abdelatty, R. H., Yusuf, M., Ashraf, A. A., Kotalo, R. G., & Shakoor, R. A. (2021). Study of Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Al/SiC/TiO2 Hybrid Nanocomposites Developed by Microwave Sintering. Crystals, 11(9), 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11091078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop