Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of SiC-on-Insulator (SiCOI) Layers by Chemical Vapor Deposition of 3C-SiC on Si-in-Insulator Substrates at Low Deposition Temperatures of 1120 °C
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Creep Lifetime of Aluminum through Severe Plastic Deformation
Previous Article in Journal
Growth, Structure, Spectroscopy, and Laser Operation of a “Mixed” Yb:(Y,Lu)3Al5O12 Garnet Crystal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Uniaxial Tensile Strain on Mechanical Properties of Al6MgNb: A First-Principles Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/cryst13111589
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Nickel Addition on Solidification Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Cast 7075 Aluminum Alloy

by
Kai Wang
1,*,
Haoran Qi
1,
Simu Ma
1,
Linrui Wang
1,
Naijun He
1,* and
Fuguo Li
2
1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
2
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwest Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2023, 13(11), 1589; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13111589
Submission received: 31 August 2023 / Revised: 25 October 2023 / Accepted: 30 October 2023 / Published: 17 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micro-Structure and Mechanical Properties of Alloys)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In order to explore the casting technology of a high–strength aluminum alloy, the effects of nickel on the solidified microstructure and tensile properties of a 7075 aluminum alloy were studied. 7075 aluminum alloys without nickel and with 0.6% and 1.2% nickel were prepared by a casting method. The results showed that the increase of Ni content in the 7075 alloys increased the liquidus temperatures, primary α (Al) grains were refined significantly, and the divorced eutectic structure was gradually formed among α (Al) grains with the preformation of the Al3Ni phase. In comparison, the 7075 alloy with 0.6% nickel content had less intergranular shrinkage porosity, and its elongation and ultimate tensile strength was enhanced 45% and 105% higher than those of the as-cast 7075 aluminum alloy, respectively. When the Ni content was increased to 1.2%, the eutectic phases of the alloy became much coarser compared to the other two alloys, and the mechanical properties obviously reduced too.

1. Introduction

To achieve climate neutrality, it is urgent to reduce transport emissions and increasingly develop lightweight technologies. Aluminum alloys are the best choice as a lightweight material in terms of weight reduction effect and price [1]. It is well known that Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys have high strength, excellent fracture toughness, and good corrosion resistance, and they are widely used in aerospace areas [2,3,4,5,6,7]. However, Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys usually show a high cast cracking tendency and poor mold-filling behavior [8,9]. Traditionally, these alloys were used for manufacturing using plastic deformation methods, which caused high manufacturing cost and long production cycle. In order to achieve low-cost manufacturing of high-performance complex structural parts, many researchers tried to improve the hot cracking resistance of these high-strength aluminum alloys. On the one hand, the mechanical properties of traditionally cast aluminum alloys were enhanced by alloying technologies [6,9]. On the other hand, high-strength alloys can also be manufactured by special casting methods such as controlled diffusion solidification [10].
Alloying is an efficient method to improve the comprehensive properties of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys [11,12]. The addition of Zr and Sc to Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys can promote the formation of equiaxed grains and coherent Al3(Zr,Sc) particles in solidification structure, which led to improved mechanical properties [12,13,14,15] and a superior hydrogen embrittlement resistance [16]. It was well known that both equiaxed grains and large eutectic amount in solidification structure can reduce the pressure drop of the intergranular channel and subsequently improve the intergranular feeding ability [17]. When the grain morphology changed from developed dendrite to equiaxed in solidification structure [10,12], it caused a decrease in the dendrite coherency point (DCP) temperature and an improvement in intergranular feeding ability. The research on eutectic solidification of AA7068 aluminum alloys showed that the residual liquid phase tended to attach to the Mg(ZnCuAl)2 phase to form a lamellar eutectic structure [18], while both the inhibition of α(Al) secondary nucleation and the promotion of divorced eutectic tended to reduce the hot cracking tendency of the alloy. It was generally believed that eutectic composition solidifies had lower DCP temperature, better heat crack resistance, and flow ability [19]. Therefore, some researchers added small amounts of elements to control eutectic solidification behavior of the Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy to enhance feeding ability. During the non-equilibrium solidification, the residual liquid phase of nominally single-phase Al–Zn–Mg–Cu aluminum alloy in the last stage of solidification formed eutectic phases [18]. Obviously, eutectic nucleation and growth during solidification also affects the pressure drop of the intergranular feeding channel in the solidified alloy. The addition of nickel in alloys can reduce the thermal expansion coefficient of the alloy, improve the heat resistance, and eliminate the harmful effects of impurities iron in aluminum alloys [20]. Usually, nickel element forms an Al–Al3Ni eutectic phase in aluminum alloy [12,21], and the Al3Ni compound has low solid solubility in the matrix and high thermal stability, which can prevent dislocation movement and grain boundary slip and effectively improve the high temperature mechanical strength [22]. Previous studies showed that the addition of Ni to Al–Zn–Mg–Cu (7xxxx) alloy reduced the intergranular shrinkage defects and the hot cracking tendency. A reasonable amount of nickel addition in the Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy can also improve its strength, elongation, and other properties comparatively [6,23]. However, tensile fracture of the alloy was mainly composed of grain boundary cracks. It was analyzed that intergranular discontinuities may be connected with the eutectic structure during solidification, but the interaction between solidification microstructure and mechanical properties is still lacking.
In order to develop cast high strength alloys, the eutectic solidification behavior and its effects on mechanical properties should be studied more. In this study, the influence of nickel element on the solidification structure of a 7075 aluminum alloy was studied first, then the non-equilibrium solidification behavior and solidification microstructural evolution were discussed. Finally, the effects of nickel addition on the microstructure and tensile strength of a 7075 aluminum alloy were described.

2. Experimental Materials and Methods

Due to a large solidification temperature range and high-strength properties, the 7075 alloy was chosen for this study. The raw materials for the casting process were 7075 aluminum alloy ingots and Al–20 wt% Ni master alloy. Based on previous research results [6], casting samples of 7075 aluminum alloy without nickel and with 0.6 wt% and 1.2 wt% nickel by weight percentage were prepared. The 7075 aluminum alloy with additional 0.6% and 1.2 wt% nickel is abbreviated as 7075 Al–0.6 Ni and 7075 Al–1.2 Ni hereafter. The three types of aluminum alloy samples were prepared by the same melt casting processes. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the three types of aluminum alloys.
These alloys ingots were produced by the following procedures. Firstly, 7075 aluminum ingots were melted in a graphite crucible at 760 °C by using a 3.5 KW electric resistance furnace (SG-G10123, Tianjin Zhonghuan Electric Furnace Co., LTD, Tianjin, China). Secondly, the Al–20 wt% Ni master alloy was added into 7075 alloy melts contained in the graphite crucible to achieve 7075 Al–0.6 Ni and 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloys, and then the alloy melt was heated to 780 °C. After 30 min holding time, the melt was refined at this temperature by using hexachloroethane (C2Cl6). After that, the Al–5Ti–B alloy with 0.3% mass ratio was added to the molten aluminum to refine grains while stirring thoroughly and maintaining the temperature for 30 min to ensure the homogeneity of the composition. Finally, the alloy melt was held at 735 ± 5 °C for 15 min, and then it was poured into a cylindrical steel mold and a triangular steel mold preheated to 200 °C, respectively. The cylindrical mold with dimensions of Φ40 mm × 60 mm was used for the investigation of the solidification behavior, and the triangular mold together with a gating and feeder system was used to produce triangular cast ingots for the preparation of tensile specimens. The dimensions of the triangular cast ingot were 60 mm in length, 30 mm in height, and 25 mm in thickness.
In order to achieve the cooling curves during solidification of these alloys, a K-type thermocouple (abbreviated as TC) was fixed in the center of the cylindrical mold cavity, as shown in Figure 1. During solidification, temperature data were recorded every 100 ms using high-speed data acquisition equipment, and the cooling curves were plotted in Origin software. Important parameters in liquidus and eutectic nucleation regions were calculated using the first derivative cooling curves. Samples used for metallographic preparation were sectioned from the region surrounding the thermocouple tip for these cast billets.
Tensile test specimens were extracted from these cast ingots produced through the triangular mold, and the gauge length, width, and thickness of the static tensile specimen were 13 mm, 4 mm, 2.5 mm, respectively. According to ASTM E8/E8M [24], the tensile properties of the cast alloys were conducted at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min on a universal testing machine. Elongation of these specimens was obtained by fitting the specimen back together after facture and measuring the change in length. The tensile tests were carried out three times for each of these cast aluminum alloys. After the metallographic samples were cut from the cast billets, these metallographic samples were ground, polished, and etched in Keller solution (2.5% HNO3 + 1.5% HCL + 1% HF + 95% Distilled water). The metallographic microstructures were observed by optical microscope (ZEISS Axioskop 40, ZEISS Group, Göttingen, Germany), and the primary phase size or the grain boundary intersection of the solidified structure was measured by a line intercept method according to ASTM E112-12 [25]. The detailed microstructures were detected by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with EDS (Hitachi TM4000plus, Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Empyrean, Malvern Panalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands). An electron probe microanalysis (EPMA, JXA-8530F plus, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze the element distribution of the different alloys. In addition, PanPhaseDiagram, which is a phase diagram calculation module of Pandat software, was used to calculate the multicomponent phase equilibria and precipitation sequence of these alloys.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructure

The optical microstructures of the as-cast alloys are shown in Figure 2, in which the white primary α–Al phases were cellular dendrites, and microstructure in dark grey contrast between primary grains was considered as intermetallic phases and eutectic phases. The grain boundary intersection of the cast 7075 alloy was determined as 58 ± 4.1 µm. Comparing with the solidification microstructure of the 7075 aluminum alloy (Figure 2a), the primary grain size of the Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys decreased significantly due to the addition of nickel, while the distribution of primary grains was more uniform. Statistically, the grain boundary intersection of the 7075 Al–0.6 Ni alloy and the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloy was determined as 50 ± 6.2 µm and 44 ± 6.8 um, respectively. Once the mass fraction of Ni increased from 0.6% to 1.2% (Figure 2b,c), more equiaxed primary grains were also observed in the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloy (Figure 2c).
Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns obtained from these three alloys. In addition to α–Al and MgZg2 in these three alloys, the Al3Ni compound phase was found in the Ni–containing 7075 alloys due to the exothermic reaction between Al and added Ni in 7075 aluminum alloy. These results were consistent with the previous research [6,20], indicating that the addition of Ni in the 7075 aluminum alloy did not cause changes in other phases in the alloy. Based on the Al–Ni phase diagram, it has been known that several intermetallic compounds (IMCs) including Al3Ni, Al3Ni2, Al4Ni3, AlNi, Al3Ni5, and AlNi3 can exist in an Al–Ni system compound depending on the nickel content in this alloy, and the formation of Al3Ni in these Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys can be attributed to a low Ni content of 1.2% in the 7075 alloy.
Figure 4 shows the intergranular microstructure of these three alloys, showing eutectic phases, discontinuous defects (marked by the white arrows), and a small amount of shrinkage porosity (marked by white circles), mainly distributed among α–Al primary grains. With the increase of nickel content in the 7075 aluminum alloy, the amount of intergranular phases increased obviously. It was worth noting that some differences including porosity and crack can be observed in the 7075 aluminum alloy, and that there were more porosities at triple grain boundaries in the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloy than in the other two alloys.
Table 2 shows the EDS results of the labeled regions in Figure 4. According to previous research [6,18], a regular lamellar eutectic structure was formed in the 7075 Al alloy, which consisted of alternate grey α–Al and bright MgZn2 (η phase) lamellae (Figure 5a). It has been reported that Mg(Zn, Al, Cu)2 (σ phase) and Al2CuMg (S phase) are common in 7xxx series aluminum alloys with low Cu: Mg ratio [26,27]. The EDS results shown in Table 2 indicate that the phase marked at B was S phase [24]. In addition, the EDS results shown in Table 2 indicate that the phase marked at C contained much higher Fe (10.63 wt%) than any other areas, and Cu in the 7075 alloy chemically combined with Al and Fe to form tetragonal Al7Cu2Fe constituent particles during solidification [28]. Therefore, Fe–containing phase in those alloys may be Al7Cu2Fe intermetallic, and the intermetallic compound Al7Cu2Fe mixed with Al3Ni in the Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys. The lamellar eutectic among α–Al primary phases in the 7075 Al alloy was predominantly replaced by dispersed block or striped coarser and blocked MgZn2, Al2CuMg, Al3Ni, and Al7Cu2Fe particles in the Ni–containing 7075 Al alloys, which dispersed among grains and was regarded as divorced eutectic phases (Figure 5b,c). With the increase of nickel content in the 7075 Al alloy, the amounts of intergranular phases increased, but the amount of Al2CuMg phase did not decrease significantly. The α–Al primary grain refining in the Ni–containing 7075 alloys was related to the pinning effects, in which a large number of intergranular compounds at grain boundaries hindered the movement of the grain boundaries.
In order to identify the characteristics of intergranular phases further, EPMA technology was used to detect the distribution of alloy elements. The EPMA results of 7075 Al, 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, and 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloys are shown in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively, and the following phenomena can be found: (1) Mg and Zn were mainly distributed inside the α–Al primary grains; it was believed that most of Mg and Zn dissolved in Al Matrix; (2) Cu, Fe, and other elements were mainly concentrated at the intergranular areas, and there were much more Fe elements at the intergranular areas in the as-cast 7075 alloy (Figure 6); (3) there was obvious Cu segregation to the grain boundaries with the dissolution of Mg, which verified that Al2CuMg phases formed in these alloys [27]; (4) in the Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, the Ni element was also mainly segregated at the primary grain boundaries, and it was close to the aggregation areas of the Fe element.
Figure 9 shows the measured cooling curves of these three alloys and the calculated first derivative curve obtained from the cooling curves. During primary phase precipitation, a large amount of latent heat was released, which caused a rapid drop in temperature. In the process of secondary phase precipitation, a small amount of latent heat was released, thus a solid-state region occurred. Derivation curves allowed to identify the phase changes of the alloys that happened during the solidification period. According to previous research on solidification behavior [29,30,31], alloy solidification starts from the nucleation of primary grains, and the nucleation temperature was determined as TN,α. The nucleation temperatures, solidus temperatures, and eutectic reaction temperatures of the experimental alloys are shown in Table 3. It can be seen that the nucleation temperature and eutectic reaction temperature of the 7075 alloy increased with the increase of Ni content in the alloy.

3.2. Mechanical Property

Figure 10 shows the ultimate tensile strength and elongation of 7075 Al, 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, and 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloys at room temperature. The strength and elongation of the as-cast 7075 alloy were determined as 144 MPa 0.95%, respectively. When the mass fraction of Ni in the 7075 alloy was 0.6%, the ultimate strength and elongation of the 7075 Al–0.6 Ni alloy increased to 209 MPa and 1.95%, respectively. When the mass fraction of Ni was 1.2%, the ultimate tensile strength of the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloy decreased to 187 MPa, although the elongation of the sample increased a little compared with that of the 7075 Al–0.6 Ni alloy.
Figure 11 shows the fracture appearance of the studied alloys, and the overall fracture surface was perpendicular to the tensile axis. The fracture surface of the 7075 Al alloy presented intergranular shrinkage porosity and separated α(Al) grains, exhibiting brittle intergranular failure. It should be noted that the microstructure of the studied alloys also showed many intergranular shrinkage porosities and other discontinuities (Figure 4). In contrast, a few separated α(Al) grains, some cleavage planes, and slight intergranular shrinkage porosities can be observed on the fracture surface of the 7075 Al–0.6 Ni alloy, which is believed is a mixed mode fracture. However, there were much more intergranular shrinkage porosities and less cleavage planes in the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloy compared with these in the 7075 Al–0.6 Ni alloy.

4. Discussion

The results showed that the addition of nickel in 7075 aluminum alloy changed the morphology of the primary phase and intergranular structure significantly, so that the mechanical properties also changed greatly. The change of as-cast microstructure also depended on the solidification behavior of the alloys.

4.1. Microstructure Characteristics of Studied Alloys

In the investigation, a commercial 7075 aluminum alloy was used, in which the Fe element in the 7075 Al alloy mainly formed Al7Cu2Fe, while the Cu element in this alloy mainly formed Al2CuMg. Compared with the 7075 aluminum alloy, only Al3Ni compound was found in the Ni–containing 7075 alloys due to the low addition levels of nickel, which is consistent with the reported research [21]. Al7Cu2Fe, Al2CuMg, andMgZn2 together with Al3Ni formed as intergranular phases in 7075 Al–0.6 Ni and 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloys. Because of limited solubility of Ni in solid Al, Ni may form IMCs in aluminum alloys even at its low contents, such as Al3Ni, Al3Ni2, etc. [32]. Furthermore, the Al–Al3Ni eutectic structure can be formed in the aluminum nickel eutectic alloy [33]. According to the microstructural results, when the Ni content in the 7075 alloy increased from 0.6% to 1.2%, the amount of Al3Ni intermetallic compounds increased, and its distribution among primary grains became more intensive. According to existing research, the amount of MgZn2 and Al2CuMg in Ni–containing 7075 alloys stayed constant [21].
Combining the microstructures shown in Figure 5 with the given element distribution shown in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, it can be found that the Al2CuMg phase in the 7075 aluminum alloy and the eutectic Al form the coupled eutectic structure with lamellar morphology, and the Al7Cu2Fe phase was a large block. In the Ni–containing 7075 alloy, intermetallic compounds (IMCs) Al7Cu2Fe and Al3Ni were in coarse ribbons, and Al2CuMg and MgZn2 were scattered among them to form an intergranular mixture, which was considered as a kind of divorced eutectic [21].
The refined grains in all three alloys can be attributed to the following reasons. Firstly, the Al–Ti–B master alloy was added in the melting process of these alloys, which promoted the heterogeneous nucleation during solidification. Only cellular dendrites with relatively little size can be observed even in the as-cast 7075 alloy. Secondly, the addition of Ni in the 7075 alloy decreased the grain size furthermore, and some equiaxed grains were found in the Ni–containing 7075 alloys from Figure 2. It suggested that the solidification behavior in Ni–containing 7075 alloys changed. According to the statistical results in Table 2, the initial solidification temperatures of Ni–containing alloys increased several degrees Celsius owing to the increase Ni content in 7075 alloys. The higher liquidus temperature for solidified alloy means greater undercooling during solidification process, which promoted nucleation. Thirdly, the growth behavior can be affected by the diffusion of solute elements in alloys. It can be seen from Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 that the segregation content of intergranular Cu of the Ni–containing 7075 Al alloy was much higher than that of the 7075 Al alloy, and the gradient distribution of the Cu element from the intragranular to grain boundary was more obvious. The grain boundary segregation of Cu was similar to prior studies [34,35]; it was reported that Cu in a 7075 aluminum alloy resulted in an ordered parallel array in substitutional core sites [34]. In fact, there was a strong correlation among the concentrations of Mg, Zn, and Cu at the grain boundary for an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy [35]. Considering the additional Ni in the 7075 alloy, it was analyzed that the activities of Cu and other alloy elements in the melt of the 7075 aluminum alloy decreased due to the interaction of nickel with other alloying elements, resulting in a decrease in the diffusion coefficient of alloy elements in the 7075 aluminum alloy melt. As a result, the grain growth process controlled by element diffusion slowed down.
Compared with the microstructure of convenient cast aluminum alloys, the as-cast 7075 alloy was composed of a large number of α–Al solid solutions surrounded by a small amount of eutectic structures. It is well known that solidification behavior seriously affects internal crack formation in the liquid–solid phase region [6]. According to the experimental results, the additional 0.6% Ni in the 7075 Al alloy decreased intergranular discontinuities and shrinkage porosity from Figure 4, which may be partly attributed to the fine and equiaxed grains preformed prior to the eutectic solidification. Fine-equiaxed grains in the solidification process helped to decrease DCP temperature and enhanced the feeding ability. Meanwhile, the added Ni element in the 7075 alloy existed as an intergranular Al3Ni phase, and it was an allotropic eutectic phase formed after the primary phase grew continuously. What is more, the Al3Ni phase increased with the increase of Ni content, and it was formed as a eutectic phase in the final stage of solidification. Hence, the addition of Ni element was conducive to the release of stress and the reduction of intergranular discontinuities.

4.2. Effect of Ni Element on Solidification Behavior of Alloy

Figure 12 shows the results of thermodynamic calculations. The phases in the experimental alloys such as α(Al), Al–Cu–Mg phase, Fe–rich IMCs, MgZn2, and Al3Ni had an obvious precipitation sequence, in which Fe–rich IMCs was firstly formed at the first stage of eutectic solidification, and Al–Cu–Mg and MgZn2 phases formed at the last stage of the whole solidification. From Figure 12, the precipitation temperature of Al13Fe4 was higher than that of Al3Ni in 7075 Al–0.6 Ni alloy, while Al3Ni was formed in the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloy followed by the formation of α(Al) primary grains. The metastable phase formation has higher thermodynamic energy than the stable phase [36,37,38], and Al7Cu2Fe preferred to form by Cu substitution of Al in Fe13Al4 with increasing Cu concentration [39]. Based on the thermodynamic calculations, Al7Cu2Fe can be regarded as a kind of metastable Fe–rich phase, which formed prior to the Fe13Al4 in non-equilibrium solidification. Al2CuMg may have a similar solidification sequence with Al3CuMg in this alloy. In the eutectic formation temperature range, the calculated eutectic temperature of the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloy was higher by 5 °C than that of the 7075 Al–0.6 Ni alloy, which indicated that the increase of Ni content in the 7075 alloy led to the increase of the eutectic temperature. Accordingly, the solidification sequence of the as-cast 7075 in this study was determined as Liq → Liq + α–Al→ Liq + α–Al + Al7Cu2Fe → α–Al + Al2CuMg + MgZn2, and the solidification sequence of the as-cast Ni–containing 7075 alloys was determined as Liq → Liq + α–Al → L + α–Al + Al7Cu2Fe → L + α–Al + Al7Cu2Fe + Al3Ni → α–Al + Al7Cu2Fe + Al3Ni Al2CuMg + MgZn2.
The development of microstructure during alloy casting processes can be understood by nucleation and dendritic growth in cooling alloy melts. Compared with eutectic growth, the formation and early growth of eutectic nuclei are very difficult to observe [18]. Eutectic nucleation mainly depends on solidification conditions and alloy composition [40], which is mainly manifested in three modes [41]: (1) Nucleation by adhering to the tip of primary dendrite, (2) independent nucleation between primary dendrites, (3) nucleation in reverse thermal gradient direction.
The coupled lamellar eutectic phases in the as-cast 7075 aluminum alloy were caused by the growth behavior of the secondary α(Al) phase. According to the adsorption process at the liquid/substrate interface of heterogeneous nucleation [18], a rough interface at the atomic level was formed between the α(Al) and liquid phases during solidification. The rough interface formed a small plane through the adsorption of Al atoms, and then the Al2CuMg phase grew up through the spiral dislocation on the surface of Al phase. It can also be found from the cooling curve in Figure 9a that multiple peaks and troughs in the eutectic solidification stage were in response to the continuous nucleation and growth of coupled eutectic phases.
However, Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys consisted of a typical divorced eutectic structure. These intergranular phases in this investigation were identified as Al7Cu2Fe, Al3Ni, MgZn2, and Al2CuMg, and Fe–rich and Ni–rich IMCs such as Al7Cu2Fe and Al3Ni were formed from residual liquids with high solute concentration due to the low solid solubility of Fe and Ni in Al. Combined with elements distribution of intergranular phases in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, it was suggested that the Al7Cu2Fe and Al3Ni were firstly nucleated in the center of residual liquids and grew towards each other. Al2CuMg was located between the primary phase and these two IMCs in this study. Combined with the thermodynamically calculated results shown in Figure 12, it was considered that Al2CuMg attached to Al7Cu2Fe or Al3Ni to nucleate, and its growth was controlled by the diffusion behavior of alloy elements. It can be seen from Figure 9b,c, that several troughs of cooling curves were related to the multiple IMCs phases evolution during solidification, which indicated that the solidification path changed when nickel was added in 7075 alloy.

4.3. Effect of Nickel on Mechanical Properties of As-Cast 7075 Alloy

The mechanical properties of the experimental alloys depended on the grain size, the morphology, and distribution of strengthening phases, as well as the characteristics of defects. Compared with 7075 aluminum alloy, Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys exhibited improved mechanical properties. Although the grain size of Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys decreased with the increase of nickel content, it did not achieve continuously increasing tensile strength and elongation when nickel content in the 7075 aluminum alloy was added up to 1.2%. The Al3Ni phase had an extremely high tensile strength (216 MPa) and Young’s modulus (116–152 GPa) [42], and these Al3Ni particles were located at the intergranular region in nickel-containing 7075 alloys. It can be deduced that these Al3Ni particles inhibited the movement of dislocations to a large extent so that Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys achieved high strength.
The intergranular structure in the as-cast 7075 Al alloy consisted of coupled eutectic phases, while the intergranular structure in as-cast Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys was made up of IMCs like Al7Cu2Fe, Al3Ni, and Al2CuMg. Owing to the differences in the amount and the formation mechanisms of intergranular phases, the as-cast 7075 aluminum alloy had more internal porosities than those in as-cast Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys. The higher the nickel content in the 7075 alloy was, the higher the amount that the intergranular Al3Ni phase had. Although the Al3Ni phase had a negative impact on the elongation, the decreased defects and refined grains were helpful for the increasing of the elongation. When the nickel content in the 7075 alloy increased from 0 to 0.6 wt%, both the elongation and strength were improved. While the nickel content in the 7075 alloy changed from 0.6 wt% to 1.2 wt%, the strength slightly decreased while the elongation basically remained unchanged. This may be attributed to the coarsening and aggregation of the strengthening Al3Ni phase (as shown in Figure 4c).
From the fracture morphology in Figure 8, it can be seen that there were many intergranular shrinkages in the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni aluminum alloy. According to the analysis of the intergranular shrinkage area of the fracture surface, there was also a positive correlation between the tensile strength of the alloy sample and the size of the intergranular shrinkage porosity area. The 7075 Al–0.6 Ni aluminum alloy had the highest strength among these three alloys, and it had the least intergranular shrinkages.
The tensile strength model of materials with holes can be expressed as follows:
σ = σ 0 1 − p k
where p is the porosity fraction, k is the stress concentration factor, and σ0 is the tensile strength at zero porosity, which depends on the mechanical properties of matrix and strengthening phase.
If the k value of spherical porosity is 1, the tensile strength of the material is inversely proportional to the porosity content. It should be noted that even if the open porosity on fracture surface for the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni aluminum alloy increased significantly, its mechanical properties only decreased slightly. It was suggested that other microstructural factors affected the mechanical properties based on Equation (1). For Ni–containing 7075 aluminum alloys, the intergranular bonding strength between primary grains was enhanced by a eutectic mixture such as Al3Ni, which improved the mechanical performance of the alloy matrix significantly. On the contrary, the continuous distribution of coarsening intergranular phases along the grain boundaries of the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloy also determined the intergranular mechanic behavior between primary phases because the fracture happened near the grain boundaries due to the stress concentration. It was analyzed that both the intergranular shrinkage defects and the bonding strength between primary grains affected the tensile properties of the experimental alloys.

5. Conclusions

The solidification microstructure of the 7075 alloy without and with different Ni contents and its influence on tensile properties were studied comparatively.
(1)
The Ni addition in the 7075 alloy can refine the solidification grains and even cause equiaxed primary grains in the solidification, which enhanced the intergranular feeding ability. Al3Ni formed as an intergranular phase after the solidification of primary α–Al grains, which increased the eutectic amount. Both the refined α–Al grains and increased eutectic phase led to the decrease of intergranular porosities.
(2)
The 7075 Al alloy solidified as a regular lamellar eutectic structure, while the intergranular phases in the 7075 Al–0.6 Ni alloy and the 7075 Al–1.2 Ni alloy consisted of multiple intermetallic compounds including Al3Ni, Al7Cu2Fe, MgZn2, and Al3CuMg. Al3Ni solidified followed by the solidification of primary α–Al and Al7Cu2Fe. Finally, the Al2CuMg phase and MgZn2 phase were sequentially precipitated from the residual liquid.
(3)
The as-cast Ni–containing 7075 alloys showed enhanced tensile strength and elongation compared with the as-cast 7075 alloy. In addition, 0.6% Ni addition in the 7075 alloy can get optimal mechanical properties. Too much Ni addition produced coarsening Al3Ni phase and led to premature brittle fracture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.W., N.H. and F.L.; methodology, K.W., N.H. and L.W., Writing—original draft, K.W., H.Q. and L.W.; Writing—review and editing, K.W., H.Q. and N.H.; Investigation, S.M., H.Q. and L.W.; Software, L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing in NPU, (Grant No. SKLSP201910) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51974050).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Yang ZHOU for their assistance with EMPA analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, Y. The Use of Aluminum Alloys in Structures: Review and Outlook. Structures 2023, 57, 105290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Heinz, A.; Haszler, A.; Keidel, C.; Moldenhauer, S.; Benedictus, R.; Miller, W.S. Recent Development in Aluminium Alloys for Aerospace Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2000, 280, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miller, W.S.; Zhuang, L.; Bottema, J.; Wittebrood, A.J.; De Smet, P.; Haszler, A.; Vieregge, A. Recent Development in Aluminium Alloys for the Automotive Industry. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2000, 280, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ghiaasiaan, R.; Amirkhiz, B.S.; Shankar, S. Quantitative Metallography of Precipitating and Secondary Phases after Strengthening Treatment of Net Shaped Casting of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu (7000) Alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 698, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, H.; Watson, D.; Wang, Y.; Ji, S. Effect of Nickel on the Microstructure and Mechanical Property of Die-Cast Al–Mg–Si–Mn Alloy. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 8412–8422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, F.; Zhu, X.; Ji, S. Effects of Ni on the Microstructure, Hot Tear and Mechanical Properties of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloys under as-Cast Condition. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 821, 153458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dursun, T.; Soutis, C. Recent Developments in Advanced Aircraft Aluminium Alloys. Mater. Des. 2014, 56, 862–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shin, J.; Kim, T.; Kim, D.; Kim, K. Castability and Mechanical Properties of New 7xxx Aluminum Alloys for Automotive Chassis/Body Applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 698 (Suppl. C), 577–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.R.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Li, H.X.; Katgerman, L.; Zhang, J.S.; Zhuang, L.Z. Effect of Main Elements (Zn, Mg, and Cu) on Hot Tearing Susceptibility During Direct-Chill Casting of 7xxx Aluminum Alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2019, 50, 3603–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pourgharibshahi, M.; Saghafian, H.; Divandari, M.; Timelli, G. Controlled Diffusion Solidification Pathway of an Aa 7xxx Series Aluminum Alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2019, 50, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peng, Y.-H.; Liu, C.-Y.; Wei, L.-L.; Jiang, H.-J.; Ge, Z.-J. Quench Sensitivity and Microstructures of High-Zn-Content Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloys with Different Cu Contents and Sc Addition. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2021, 31, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, Y.; Tan, P.; Sui, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, R. Influence of Zr Content on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of as-Cast Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 867, 158920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, Y.; Luo, Y.; Pan, Q.; Liu, B.; Long, L.; Wang, W.; Ye, J.; Huang, Z.; Xiang, S. Effect of Sc Content on Microstructure and Properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr Alloy. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 26, 101899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zheng, H.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, Y.; Xu, Y. Research on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Rheological Die Forging Parts of Al-6.54zn-2.40cu-2.35mg-0.10zr(-Sc) Alloy. Materials 2020, 13, 5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, P.Z.; Tsuchida, T. Effect of Fabrication Conditions and Cr, Zr Contents on the Grain Structure of 7075 and 6061 Aluminum Alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 499, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Safyari, M.; Moshtaghi, M.; Hojo, T.; Akiyama, E. Mechanisms of Hydrogen Embrittlement in High-Strength Aluminum Alloys Containing Coherent or Incoherent Dispersoids. Corros. Sci. 2022, 194, 109895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sheykh-Jaberi, F.; Cockcroft, S.L.; Maijer, D.M.; Phillion, A. Meso-Scale Modelling of Semi-Solid Deformation in Aluminum Foundry Alloys: Effects of Feeding and Microstructure on Hot Tearing Susceptibility. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2020, 279, 116551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pourgharibshahi, M.; Divandari, M.; Saghafian, H.; Timelli, G. Eutectic Nucleation in 7xxx Series Aluminum Alloys from a Non-Classical Viewpoint. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2020, 51, 4572–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kakitani, R.; Reyes, R.V.; Garcia, A.; Spinelli, J.E.; Cheung, N. Relationship between Spacing of Eutectic Colonies and Tensile Properties of Transient Directionally Solidified Al-Ni Eutectic Alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 733, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Op, A.R.N.; Arul, S. Effect of Nickel Reinforcement on Micro Hardness and Wear Resistance of Aluminium Alloy Al7075. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 24, 1042–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fan, Y.; Makhlouf, M.M. The Al-Al3ni Eutectic Reaction: Crystallography and Mechanism of Formation. Metall. Mater. Trans. Part A 2015, 46, 3808–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Frederick, A.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Allard, L.; Koehler, M.; Shin, S.; Hu, A.; Feng, Z. In-Situ Formation of Al3ni Nano Particles in Synthesis of Al 7075 Alloy by Friction Stir Processing with Ni Powder Addition. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2023, 311, 117803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lucia, L.; Maria, D.G.; Maverick, G.; Fortini, A.; Merlin, M.; Casari, D.; Sabatino, M.D.; Cerri, E.; Garagnani, G.L. Room Temperature Mechanical Properties of A356 Alloy with Ni Additions from 0.5 Wt to 2 Wt %. Met. Open Access Metall. J. 2018, 8, 224. [Google Scholar]
  24. ASTM E8/E8M-21; Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  25. ASTM E112-13; Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  26. Styles, M.; Bastow, T.; Gibson, M.; Hutchinson, C. Substitution of Cu and/or Al in H Phase (Mgzn2) and the Implications for Precipitation in Al–Zn–Mg–(Cu) Alloys. Intermetallics 2014, 49, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mondal, C.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K. On the Nature of T(Al2mg3zn3) and S(Al2cumg) Phases Present in as-Cast and Annealed 7055 Aluminum Alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 391, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, L.L.; Pan, Q.L.; Wang, X.D.; Xiong, S. The Effects of Aging Treatments on Mechanical Property and Corrosion Behavior of Spray Formed 7055 Aluminium Alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 735, 261–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Malekan, M.; Shabestari, S.G. Computer-Aided Cooling Curve Thermal Analysis Used to Predict the Quality of Aluminum Alloys. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2011, 103, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shabestari, S.G.; Malekan, M. Thermal Analysis Study of the Effect of the Cooling Rate on the Microstructure and Solidification Parameters of 319 Aluminum Alloy. Can. Metall. Q. 2005, 44, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yavari, F.; Shabestari, S.G. Effect of Cooling Rate and Al Content on Solidification Characteristics of Az Magnesium Alloys Using Cooling Curve Thermal Analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 129, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Okamoto, H. Al-Ni (Aluminum-Nickel). J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. 2004, 25, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Apel, M.; Boussinot, G.; D Ring, M.; Schmidt, M. Eutectic Solidification in Al-Ni for L-Pbf Conditions: A Phase-Field Simulation Study. Procedia CIRP 2020, 94, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Parajuli, P.; Mendoza-Cruz, R.; Hurtado-Macias, A.; Santiago, U.; Yacamán, M.J. A Direct Observation of Ordered Structures Induced by Cu Segregation at Grain Boundaries of Al 7075 Alloys. Phys. Status Solidi 2018, 215, 1800240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moshtaghi, M.; Safyari, M.; Hojo, T. Effect of Solution Treatment Temperature on Grain Boundary Composition and Environmental Hydrogen Embrittlement of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloy. Vacuum 2021, 184, 109937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luo, S.; Castany, P.; Thuillier, S. Microstructure, Thermo-Mechanical Properties and Portevin-Le Chatelier Effect in Metastable Β Ti-Xmo Alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 756, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ashkani, O.; Tavighi, M.R.; Karamimoghadam, M.; Moradi, M.; Bodaghi, M.; Rezayat, M. Influence of Aluminum and Copper on Mechanical Properties of Biocompatible Ti-Mo Alloys: A Simulation-Based Investigation. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rezayat, M.; Karamimoghadam, M.; Ashkani, O.; Bodaghi, M. Characterization and Optimization of Cu-Al2o3 Nanocomposites Synthesized Via High Energy Planetary Milling: A Morphological and Structural Study. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fang, C.; Souissi, M.; Que, Z.; Fan, Z. Crystal Chemistry and Electronic Properties of the Al-Rich Compounds, Al2cu, Ω-Al7cu2fe and Θ-Al13fe4 with Cu Solution. Metals 2022, 12, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dahle, A.K.; Nogita, K.; McDonald, S.D.; Zindel, J.W.; Hogan, L.M. Eutectic Nucleation and Growth in Hypoeutectic Al-Si Alloys at Different Strontium Levels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2001, 32, 949–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, L.; Nogita, K.; Mcdonald, S.D.; Dahle, A.K. Eutectic Solidification and Its Role in Casting Porosity Formation. JOM 2004, 56, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fukui, Y.; Okada, H.; Kumazawa, N.; Watanabe, Y. Near-Net-Shape Forming of Al-Al3ni Functionally Graded Material over Eutectic Melting Temperature. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2000, 31, 2627–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Crystals 13 01589 g001
Figure 1. Dimensions of the steel mold used for the measurement of cooling curves.
Figure 1. Dimensions of the steel mold used for the measurement of cooling curves.
Crystals 13 01589 g001
Crystals 13 01589 g002
Figure 2. Optical microstructure of the 7075 aluminum alloy with different Ni content, (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Figure 2. Optical microstructure of the 7075 aluminum alloy with different Ni content, (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Crystals 13 01589 g002
Crystals 13 01589 g003
Figure 3. XRD analysis of as-cast 7075 aluminum alloys with different Ni contents.
Figure 3. XRD analysis of as-cast 7075 aluminum alloys with different Ni contents.
Crystals 13 01589 g003
Crystals 13 01589 g004
Figure 4. SEM images showing the cast microstructure of three alloys, (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Figure 4. SEM images showing the cast microstructure of three alloys, (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Crystals 13 01589 g004
Crystals 13 01589 g005
Figure 5. SEM images of three alloys (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Figure 5. SEM images of three alloys (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Crystals 13 01589 g005
Crystals 13 01589 g006
Figure 6. Secondary electron image and elemental plane distribution of as-cast 7075 alloy by EPMA. (a)—Secondary electron image, (b)—Al, (c)—Zn, (d)—Mg, (e)—Cu, (f)—Fe.
Figure 6. Secondary electron image and elemental plane distribution of as-cast 7075 alloy by EPMA. (a)—Secondary electron image, (b)—Al, (c)—Zn, (d)—Mg, (e)—Cu, (f)—Fe.
Crystals 13 01589 g006
Crystals 13 01589 g007
Figure 7. Secondary electron image and elemental plane distribution of the as-cast 7075 Al–0.6 Ni by EPMA. (a)—Secondary electron image, (b)—Al, (c)—Zn, (d)—Mg, (e)—Cu, (f)—Fe, (g)—Ni.
Figure 7. Secondary electron image and elemental plane distribution of the as-cast 7075 Al–0.6 Ni by EPMA. (a)—Secondary electron image, (b)—Al, (c)—Zn, (d)—Mg, (e)—Cu, (f)—Fe, (g)—Ni.
Crystals 13 01589 g007
Crystals 13 01589 g008
Figure 8. Secondary electron image and elemental plane distribution of as-cast 7075 Al–1.2 Ni by EPMA. (a)—Secondary electron image, (b)—Al, (c)—Zn, (d)—Mg, (e)—Cu, (f)—Fe, (g)—Ni.
Figure 8. Secondary electron image and elemental plane distribution of as-cast 7075 Al–1.2 Ni by EPMA. (a)—Secondary electron image, (b)—Al, (c)—Zn, (d)—Mg, (e)—Cu, (f)—Fe, (g)—Ni.
Crystals 13 01589 g008
Crystals 13 01589 g009
Figure 9. Cooling curve and its first derivative curve, with major points labeled for three alloys, (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Figure 9. Cooling curve and its first derivative curve, with major points labeled for three alloys, (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Crystals 13 01589 g009
Crystals 13 01589 g010
Figure 10. Tensile mechanical properties of as-cast alloys at room temperature (ultimate tensile strength and elongation).
Figure 10. Tensile mechanical properties of as-cast alloys at room temperature (ultimate tensile strength and elongation).
Crystals 13 01589 g010
Crystals 13 01589 g011
Figure 11. SEM fractographs of the fracture surface for alloy tensile samples, (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Figure 11. SEM fractographs of the fracture surface for alloy tensile samples, (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni.
Crystals 13 01589 g011
Crystals 13 01589 g012aCrystals 13 01589 g012b
Figure 12. Phase fraction versus temperature (100–700 °C) of 7075 aluminum alloy with (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, and (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni contents calculated by Pandat software.
Figure 12. Phase fraction versus temperature (100–700 °C) of 7075 aluminum alloy with (a) 7075 Al, (b) 7075 Al–0.6 Ni, and (c) 7075 Al–1.2 Ni contents calculated by Pandat software.
Crystals 13 01589 g012aCrystals 13 01589 g012b
Table 1. Chemical composition of aluminum alloy samples (Wt%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of aluminum alloy samples (Wt%).
AlloyElements
ZnMgCuCrSiFeNiAl
7075 Al5.62.51.60.230.40.50Bal.
7075 Al–0.6 Ni5.322.371.540.220.380.470.6Bal.
7075 Al–1.2 Ni5.062.261.450.210.370.461.2Bal.
Table 2. Chemical composition of the labeled regions in Figure 5, (wt%).
Table 2. Chemical composition of the labeled regions in Figure 5, (wt%).
PointZnMgCuSiFeNiAl
A2.411.560.4600095.55
B3.561.4327.640.250.05067.02
C1.920.845.142.5610.63078.09
D1.730.692.030.264.457.1883.04
Table 3. Initial nucleation temperatures and eutectic reaction peak temperatures of these three alloys, (°C).
Table 3. Initial nucleation temperatures and eutectic reaction peak temperatures of these three alloys, (°C).
AlloyTN,α, Nucleation Temperature Ts, Solidus TemperatureEutectic Reaction
7075 Al633440605
7075 Al–0.6 Ni635457625
7075 Al–1.2 Ni640459629
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, K.; Qi, H.; Ma, S.; Wang, L.; He, N.; Li, F. Effect of Nickel Addition on Solidification Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Cast 7075 Aluminum Alloy. Crystals 2023, 13, 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13111589

AMA Style

Wang K, Qi H, Ma S, Wang L, He N, Li F. Effect of Nickel Addition on Solidification Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Cast 7075 Aluminum Alloy. Crystals. 2023; 13(11):1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13111589

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Kai, Haoran Qi, Simu Ma, Linrui Wang, Naijun He, and Fuguo Li. 2023. "Effect of Nickel Addition on Solidification Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Cast 7075 Aluminum Alloy" Crystals 13, no. 11: 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13111589

APA Style

Wang, K., Qi, H., Ma, S., Wang, L., He, N., & Li, F. (2023). Effect of Nickel Addition on Solidification Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Cast 7075 Aluminum Alloy. Crystals, 13(11), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13111589

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop