Next Article in Journal
Structural Evolution in a Series of Isomorphous Rare Earth Compounds as Response of Lanthanide Contraction
Next Article in Special Issue
The Structure and Microwave Dielectric Properties of MgTi1−x(Mn1/3Nb2/3)xO3 Ceramics
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Laser Melting Procedure for the Specified Zone of the TC4 Titanium Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of LiF-Addition on Sintering Behavior and Dielectric Response of LaPO4 Ceramics at Microwave and Terahertz Frequency for LTCC Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phase Compositions and Microwave Dielectric Properties of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x Ceramics

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China
2
College of Chemistry and Materials, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, China
3
College of Materials Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2023, 13(7), 1042; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13071042
Submission received: 20 May 2023 / Revised: 21 June 2023 / Accepted: 27 June 2023 / Published: 30 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microwave Dielectric Ceramics)

Abstract

:
Microwave dielectric ceramics composed of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) were synthesized via a traditional solid-state reaction approach. The effects of non-stoichiometric Na on the crystal structures, phase compositions, chemical bond characteristics, and microwave dielectric properties of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics were systematically studied. All Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures consisted of a NaSrB5O9 solid-solution phase and a SrB2O4 phase. Appropriate excess Na could suppress the generation of the SrB2O4 phase, and the lowest content of the SrB2O4 phase was achieved at x = 0.075. The εr values of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics were primarily affected by the relative density and molecular polarization. The Q × f values showed a positive correlation with the lattice energy. The τf value was correlated to the SrB2O4 phase content, bond valence, and bond energy. Typically, the Na1.075SrB5O9.0375 ceramic sintered at 825 °C possessed good microwave dielectric properties of εr = 5.61, Q × f = 31, 937 GHz, and τf = −3.09 ppm/°C, which are suitable for high-frequency, low-temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCCs) substrate applications.

1. Introduction

In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the development of millimeter-wave wireless communications. In order to facilitate the effective utilization of 5G communication, it is imperative to develop innovative microwave dielectric materials that can facilitate the miniaturization and integration of passive electronic components [1,2,3]. Low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) technologies play a critical role in enabling the miniaturization and integration of communication equipment [4,5,6]. To satisfy the demands of low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) technologies, microwave dielectric ceramics must be sintered at temperatures below 961 °C. Additionally, low permittivity (εr) values contribute to improved signal transmission speeds and reduced latencies, while high quality factor (Q × f) values mitigate losses and broaden the bandwidth. Finally, near-zero temperature coefficients of resonance frequency (τf) values ensure system stability.
The development of low-temperature synthetic microwave dielectric ceramics has predominantly centered around molybdates, phosphates, vanadates, borates, and glass–ceramics [7,8,9,10,11]. Of these, borate ceramics have received substantial attention in recent years owing to their low raw prices, variable chemical structures, excellent dielectric properties, and straightforward preparation processes. Liu et al. [12] reported that LiMBO3 (M = Ca, Sr) ceramics could be densified at 800 °C with excellent dielectric properties (εr = 8.7, Q × f = 75,000 GHz, and τf = −150 ppm/°C and εr = 8.6, Q × f = 60,000 GHz, and τf = −39 ppm/°C) and could be chemically compatible with Ag. Zhou et al. [13] prepared dense Li6B4O9 microwave dielectric ceramics at 640 °C with microwave dielectric properties of εr = 5.95, Q × f = 41,800 GHz, and τf = −72 ppm/°C, and a prototype patch antenna was fabricated by exploiting the compatibility of Li6B4O9 with silver metallization using LTCC technology.
NaSrB5O9, a commonly studied borate due to its complex structural chemistry, has been utilized investigations of its photoluminescence properties [14,15,16]. Wu et al. [17] first reported the crystal structure of the NaSrB5O9 compound. The fundamental structural unit in NaSrB5O9 is the [B5O9]3− anionic group, which is constructed from three [BO3] triangles and two [BO4] tetrahedra. The Na and Sr atoms are encircled by eight O atoms and form trigonal dodecahedra. In our previous work, we reported that NaSrB5O9-based ceramics densified at 800 °C exhibited remarkable microwave dielectric properties of εr = 5.67, Q × f = 49,824 GHz, and τf = −18.28 ppm/°C [18]. Thus, the second phase of SrB2O4 was formed in all ceramics sintered at various temperatures and could potentially be attributed to the evaporation of Na and B. Yang et al. [19] found that an excess of B can suppress the formation of the second phase of SrB2O4, resulting in improvements in the uniform microstructures of NaSrB5+5xO9+7.5x ceramics. Similarly, Na elements are prone to volatility during the sintering process. However, research on the non-stoichiometric effects of Na on the phase composition and properties of NaSrB5O9-based ceramics has not been reported yet.
In this study, the sintering behaviors, phase compositions, microstructures, and microwave dielectric properties of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics fabricated via the solid-phase sintering method were thoroughly researched. The intrinsic mechanism responsible for the microwave dielectric properties was elucidated by utilizing the P-V-L bond theory.

2. Experimental Procedure

The analytical reagents, Na2CO3 (99.5%), SrCO3 (99%), and H3BO3 (≥99.5%), were utilized in the traditional solid-state reaction method to fabricate Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics. The powders were weighed according to the aforementioned chemical formulae and mixed with ZrO2 balls in a nylon jar for 4 h, using ethanol as the mixing medium. The resulting slurries were dried at 80 °C and pre-synthesized at 600 °C for 4 h to obtain the primary phase. The pre-synthesized powders were then re-milled for another 4 h and re-dried. The mixed powders were pressed into cylindrical samples with diameters of 10 mm and thicknesses of 6 mm, using a pressure of 150 MPa. A binder solution containing 5 wt.% of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was employed. The green samples were subsequently sintered at temperatures ranging from 750 °C to 850 °C for 4 h.
The phase compositions were analyzed via a powder X-ray diffractometer (Advanced D8, Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) with CuKα radiation. GSAS and EXPGUI software were utilized to refine the diffraction data to ensure accuracy in determining the crystal structures. The total lattice energy, bond valence, and bond energy were calculated via the P-V-L bond theory [20]. In the case of binary crystals (AmBn), the lattice energy (Utotal) of the ceramic was calculated as follows:
U t o t a l = U μ
U μ = U c μ + U i μ
U c μ = 2100 · m · ( Z + μ ) 1.64 ( d μ ) 0.75 · f c μ
U i μ = 1270 · m + n · Z + μ · Z μ d μ · ( 1 0.4 d μ ) · f i μ  
where U c μ and U i μ represent the covalent and ionic lattice energies of the μ bond, respectively, and Z + μ and Z μ are the valence states of the cations and anions that constitute the μ bonds, respectively.
The bond energy (ET) of the ceramic can be obtained as follows:
E T = E b μ
E b μ = t c E c μ + t i E i μ
E c μ = ( r C A + r C B ) d μ · ( E A A E B B ) 1 / 2
E i μ = 1389.088 d μ
where E c μ and E i μ represent the covalent and ionic parts of the bond energy, respectively, t c and t i represent the scale factors of the covalent and ionic parts, r C A and r C B are the covalent radii of the chemical bonds in A and B, respectively, and E A A and E B B are the homonuclear bond energies.
The bond valence (V) of the ceramic is calculated as follows:
V = j V i j / n
V i j = e x p ( R i j d i j b 0 )
where V i j is the bond valence of each bond, n is the number of bonds, R i j is the bond valence parameter (a fixed value), d i j is the bond length, and b 0 is a constant.
The microstructures of the samples were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S-3400 N. Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The Archimedes method was employed to determine the bulk densities of the ceramic samples. The microwave dielectric properties of the samples were evaluated using the Hakki–Coleman method [21] with a vector network analyzer (Agilent, N5244A, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Five specimens for each ceramic composition were tested, and the arithmetic means of the test results were taken. The resonance frequencies of the samples were measured at both 25 °C and 85 °C to estimate the temperature coefficients of the resonant frequencies (τf), which were determined as follows:
τ f = f 85 f 25 85 25 × 10 6   p p m / ° C
where f25 and f85 were the TE01δ resonant frequencies at 25 °C and 85 °C, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

The trend in the relative densities of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x microwave dielectric ceramics at different sintering temperatures is illustrated in Figure 1. The relative densities of ceramics with the same compositions initially increases and then decreases with an increase in the sintering temperature. When 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05, the optimum sintering temperature for the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics is 800 °C. When x ≥ 0.075, the optimum densification sintering temperature for the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics increased from 800 °C to 825 °C, indicating that an excessive amount of Na can increase the optimum sintering temperature for the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics. In addition, a suitable amount of Na can enhance the relative densities of the ceramics sintered at the optimum sintering temperature. Remarkably, the Na1.1SrB5O9.05 ceramic sintered at 825 °C has the maximum relative density of 98.9%, which is higher than the maximum relative density of the NaSrB5O9 ceramic.
Figure 2a displays the XRD patterns of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics at the optimum sintering temperature. The diffraction peaks of all the samples match well with the standard cards for NaSrB5O9 (ICDD-PDF 00-056-0415, monoclinic, space group P21/c) and SrB2O4 (ICDD-PDF 00-015-0779, orthorhombic, space group Pbcn). In addition, the diffraction peak intensity of the second phase, SrB2O4, in all ceramics is relatively low, which implies that an excessive amount of Na can reduce the formation of the second phase, SrB2O4, to a certain extent.
Crystal structure refinements were performed on powder samples using GSAS software. The calculated patterns of all samples closely fit those of measured, indicating that the refinement results are credible. The pattern following the refinement of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (x = 0.05) ceramics sintered at 800 °C is shown in Figure 2b. The lattice parameters and phase composition fractions are listed in Table 1. When 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.1, the unit cell volume of the NaSrB5O9 phase increases with an increase in x, probably due to the partial entry of Na+ ions into the interstitial sites, resulting in an enlargement of the unit cell volume of the NaSrB5O9 phase. When x continues to increase, the unit cell volume slightly decreases. It is noted that excessive Na can suppress the formation of the second phase, SrB2O4, and the minimum mass percentage of the SrB2O4 phase (content: 9.05 wt.%) was obtained at x = 0.075.
Figure 3 shows the microstructures of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures. It can be seen that the grains of all samples are tightly arranged with each other, but irregular polygonal grains appear with the increase in the Na content. When x ≥ 0.05, the grain size increases, the grain boundaries become blurred, and the morphologies of the grains change in the samples. The number of nearly equiaxed grains decreases significantly, while the number of polygonal grains increases, and there are also abnormally large grains in Figure 3f.
In order to analyze the elemental compositions of the polygonal grains in the ceramic samples, EDS testing was conducted on the labeled grains in Figure 3c, and the results are shown in Figure 4. The EDS elemental analysis results indicate that the elements contained in the two types of grains (A and B) are the same, including Na, Sr, B, and O, and their atomic ratios are similar, indicating that they belong to the same solid-solution phase.
The εr values of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics at different sintering temperatures are shown in Figure 5a. The εr values of all compositions increase first and then decrease with the increase in sintering temperature, which agrees well with the variation trend of the relative densities of the ceramics, indicating that the relative density is the main factor for εr values.
To further discuss the influence of the Na content on the εr values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures, the corrected dielectric constant (εrc) was obtained by correcting the measured dielectric constant (εr) of the ceramics for porosity, and the theoretical dielectric constant (εcal) and the actual molecular polarization (αobs) were calculated based on the refined results, as shown in Figure 5b. The values were determined as follows [22,23,24]:
ε r c = ε r ( 1 + 1.5 P )
ε c a l = 3 V m + 8 π α t h e o 3 V m 4 π α t h e o
α t h e o N a 1 + x S r B 5 O 9 + 0.5 x = 1 + x × α N a + + α S r 2 + + 5 α B 3 + + 9 + 0.5 x × α O 2  
α t h e o S r B 2 O 4 = α S r 2 + + 2 α B 3 + + 4 α O 2
ln ε c a l = i n V i ln ε i
where P is fractional porosity, Vm is the molecular volume, αtheo is the theoretical polarizability, and Vi represents the volume fraction of each phase: α(Na+) = 1.8 Å3, α(Sr2+) = 4.24 Å3, α(B3+) = 0.05 Å3, and α(O2) = 2.01 Å3 [25].
The Clausius–Mosotti equation can be utilized to determine the observed ionic polarizability, which is calculated as follows [26]:
α o b s = 3 V ( ε r 1 ) 4 π ( ε r + 2 )
where V is the volume of the unit cell.
The trend in the variation of εr values is consistent with those of εrc and αobs but inconsistent with that of εcal, indicating that relative density and molecular polarization are important factors influencing the εr values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics.
Figure 6 shows the Q × f values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at different temperatures. It can be seen that the Q × f values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics with the same composition first increase and then decrease with an increasing sintering temperature due to reductions in the extrinsic losses caused by decreases in pore and grain boundary defects. The maximum Q × f value is obtained at the optimal sintering temperature, after which the Q × f value decreases as the grain grows abnormally large. In addition, among all the compositions with excess Na, Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (x = 0.05, Ts = 800 °C) shows the highest Q × f value of 38,453 GHz, indicating that excess Na will deteriorate the dielectric properties of ceramics.
In To further understand the variation in the Q × f values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics, the total lattice energies (U) and atomic packing densities of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics were calculated. The atomic packing density is calculated as follows [27]:
A t o m   p a c k i n g   f r a c t i o n =   V o l u m e   o f   t h e   a t o m s   i n   t h e   c e l l V o l u m e   o f   u n i t   c e l l × Z = 4 π 3 × 4 × ( 1 + x ) ×   r N a 3 + r S r 3 + 5 r B 3 + ( 9 + 0.5 x ) ×   r O 3 a b c
where Z is the molecular number in a unit cell.
Typically, a higher lattice energy and atomic packing density lead to a reduction in the intrinsic loss and an enhanced quality factor of a ceramic material. As shown in Figure 6b, the variation trend of the Q × f values showed a positive correlation with U values and an inverse correlation with atomic packing density, implying that the lattice energy has a major impact on the Q × f value of a Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramic. The larger lattice energy corresponds to a more stable crystal structure with a minimum intrinsic loss due to non-harmonic lattice vibration.
The τf values of microwave dielectric ceramics are influenced by their phase compositions, bond energies, and bond valences. Generally, a higher bond valence (V) and bond energy (E) correspond greater strengths of the chemical bonds and a smaller |τf| value. Figure 7 depicts the τf values, bond valences, and bond energies of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures. When x ≤ 0.05, the τf values slightly increase, which is mainly related to the reduction in the second phase, SrB2O4, content. When x = 0.075, the ceramic sintered at 825 °C exhibits the maximum τf value of −3.09 ppm/°C, which is correlated to the lower second phase content and increases in the bond valence and bond energy. However, as the x value further increases, the τf values decrease due to the increase in the second phase content.
Table 2 lists the sintering temperatures and microwave dielectric properties of several borate ceramics. Generally, borate ceramics exhibit low sintering temperatures, low permittivity values, and high Q × f values, rendering them proficient for utilization in low-temperature co-fired ceramics. Compared to the CaAlB2O5.5 and Zn3B2O6 systems, the NaSrB5O9 system exhibits a lower sintering temperature and a τf value closer to zero. In comparison to the LiBO2 system, the NaSrB5O9 system has a higher Q × f value and a τf value that is closer to zero. Furthermore, the Na1.075SrB5O9.0375 ceramic has a τf value that is closer to zero than the NaSrB5O9 ceramic. In this work, the Na1.075SrB5O9.0375 ceramic exhibited a low densification temperature (825 °C), a near-zero τf value (−3.09 ppm/°C), a high Q × f value (31,937 GHz), and a low dielectric constant (5.61), making it suitable for LTCC applications.

4. Conclusions

Microwave dielectric ceramics composed of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) were synthesized via a traditional solid-state reaction approach. The samples sintered at optimum temperatures contained a Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x solid-solution phase and SrB2O4 phase. Excessive Na can suppress the formation of the second phase, SrB2O4, and the minimum mass percentage of the SrB2O4 phase (content: 9.05 wt.%) was obtained at x = 0.075. The εr values of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics were mainly related to the relative density and molecular polarization. The Q × f values showed a positive correlation with lattice energy. The τf value was dependent on the second phase content, bond valence, and bond energy. Temperature-stable microwave dielectric ceramics composed of Na1.075SrB5O9.0375 were obtained at 825 °C and exhibited good microwave dielectric properties of εr = 5.61, Q × f = 31,937 GHz, and τf = −3.09 ppm/°C, which are suitable for high-frequency LTCC substrate applications.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; methodology, X.L. and H.Y.; software, H.Y.; investigation, H.Y. and M.Y.; data curation, X.L. and P.W.; characterization, P.W.; supervision, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 51602145), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Educational Commission (NO. 22KJB430025), and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (NO. 2022J011151).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is unavailable due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 51602145), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Educational Commission (NO. 22KJB430025), and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (NO. 2022J011151).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lou, W.; Mao, M.; Song, K.; Xu, K.; Liu, B.; Li, W.; Yang, B.; Qi, Z.; Zhao, J.; Sun, S.; et al. Low permittivity cordierite-based microwave dielectric ceramics for 5G/6G telecommunications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 2820–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lan, X.; Li, J.; Zou, Z.; Xie, M.; Fan, G.; Lu, W.; Lei, W. Improved sinterability and microwave dielectric properties of [Zn0.5Ti0.5]3+-doped ZnAl2O4 spinel solid solution. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 5952–5957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hsu, T.H.; Huang, C.L. Low-loss microwave dielectric of novel Li1-2xMxVO3 (M = Mg, Zn) (x = 0–0.09) ceramics for ULTCC applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 5918–5923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chi, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Dong, C.; Luo, X.; Wang, D.; Liu, B.; Mao, M.; Shi, F.; Song, K. Mg3B2O6 microwave dielectric ceramics fabricated by combining cold sintering with post-annealing process. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 106, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yu, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, S. Ultra-low sintering temperature ceramics for LTCC applications: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 9414–9423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, W.; Zuo, R. Low temperature fired Ln2Zr3(MoO4)9 (Ln = Sm, Nd) microwave dielectric ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 17229–17232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fang, L.; Su, C.; Zhou, H.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, H.; Alford, N. Novel low-firing microwave dielectric ceramic LiCa3MgV3O12 with low dielectric loss. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 96, 688–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cho, I.S. Sintering behavior and dielectric properties of A3(PO4)2 compounds (A = Ca, Sr, Ba, Mg, Zn, Ni, Cu). Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 2022, 148, 106793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Choi, Y.J.; Park, J.H.; Ko, W.J.; Hwang, I.S.; Park, J.H.; Park, J.G.; Nahm, S. Co-firing and shrinkage matching in low- and middle- permittivity dielectric compositions for a low-temperature Co-fired ceramics system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yoon, S.H.; Kim, D.W.; Cho, S.Y.; Hong, K.S. Investigation of the relations between structure and microwave dielectric properties of divalent metal tungstate compounds. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 2051–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, H.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Z. Crystal structure, infrared spectra, and microwave dielectric properties of Ce2(Zr0.94Sn0.06)3(MoO4)9 ceramics with low sintering temperature. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Bian, J. Low temperature sintering and microwave dielectric properties of LiMBO3 (M = Ca, Sr) ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 6475–6479. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhou, D.; Pang, L.; Wang, D.; Qi, Z.; Reaney, I.M. High quality factor, ultralow sintering temperature Li6B4O9 microwave dielectric ceramics with ultralow density for antenna substrates. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 11138–11143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Dillip, G.R.; Ramesh, B.; Madhukar Reddy, C.; Mallikarjuna, K.; Ravi, O.; Dhoble, S.J.; Joo, S.W.; Deva Parasad Raju, B. X-ray analysis and optical studies of Dy3+ doped NaSrB5O9 microstructures for white light generation. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 615, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Raikwar, V.; Bhatkar, V.; Omanwar, S. Morphological and photoluminescence study of NaSrB5O9: Tb3+ nanocrystalline phosphor. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2018, 6, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dillip, G.R.; Mallikarjuna, K.; Dhoble, S.J.; Deva Prasad Raju, B. The luminescence and structural characteristics of Eu3+- doped NaSrB5O9 phosphor. J. Phys. Chem. Solid. 2014, 75, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Kong, Y.; Sun, T.; Xu, J.; Xu, Y. The Na2O-SrO-B2O3 diagram in the B-rich part and the crystal structure of NaSrB5O9. J Solid State Chem. 2007, 180, 1470–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Lu, X.; Xue, C.; Han, Z.; Li, X.; Yang, M. Synthesis of a new sodium strontium borate composite ceramic and its microwave dielectric properties. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 30980–30984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, M.; Zou, H.; Yang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, X.; Chen, M.; Liang, H.; Zhang, X. Phase composition and microwave dielectric properties of NaSrB5+5xO9+7.5x composite ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 43, 1964–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhong, M.; Tang, X.; Li, Y.; Jing, Y.; Su, H. Microwave dielectric properties, microstructure, and bond energy of Zn3-xCoxB2O6 low temperature fired ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 18667–18674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hakki, B.W.; Coleman, P.D. A dielectric resonant method of measuring inductive capacitance in the millimeter range. IRE Trans. Microwave Theory Technol. 1960, 8, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bosman, A.J.; Havinga, E.E. Temperature dependence of dielectric constants of cubic ionic compounds. Phys. Rev. 1963, 129, 1593–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shannon, R.D.; Rossman, G.R. Dielectric constants of silicate garnets and the oxide additivity rule. Am. Miner. 1992, 77, 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, Q.; Tang, X.; Li, Y.; Jing, Y.; Su, H. Influence of substituting Na+ for Mg2+ on the crystal structure and microwave dielectric properties of Mg1-xNa2xWO4 ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 4503–4508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shannon, R.D. Dielectric polarizabilities of ions in oxides and fluorides. J. Appl. Phys. 1993, 73, 348–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maex, K.; Baklanov, M.R.; Shamiryan, D.; Lacopi, F.; Brongersma, S.H.; Yanovitskaya, Z.S. Low dielectric constant materials for microelectronics. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 8793–8841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, X.; Zou, Z.; Lu, W.; Chen, T.; Ta, S.; Fu, Z.; Lei, W. Crystal structure, lattice energy and microwave dielectric properties of melilite-type Ba1-xSrxCu2Si2O7 solid solutions. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 835, 155340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, H.; Zhang, S.; Wen, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Li, E. Synthesis of CaAl2xB2O4+3x: Novel microwave dielectric ceramics with low permittivity and low loss. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 2596–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, X.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, D. Synthesis and microwave dielectric properties of Zn3B2O6 ceramics for substrate application. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 95, 1793–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, R.; Su, H.; Li, Y.; Lu, Y.; Yu, C.; Shi, L.; Chen, D.; Liao, B. Microstructure and microwave dielectric properties of Ni doped zinc borate ceramics for LTCC applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 868, 159006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yin, C.; Du, K.; Zhang, M.; Yang, J.; Wang, F.; Guo, Y.; Cheng, M.; Cai, Y.; Song, X.; Khaliq, J.; et al. Novel low-εr and lightweight LiBO2 microwave dielectric ceramics with good chemical compatibility with silver. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 4580–4586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Relative densities of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics sintered at various temperatures.
Figure 1. Relative densities of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics sintered at various temperatures.
Crystals 13 01042 g001
Figure 2. (a) The X-ray data of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics sintered at various temperatures; (b) Rietveld refinement pattern for the XRD data (x = 0.05 is taken as an example).
Figure 2. (a) The X-ray data of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics sintered at various temperatures; (b) Rietveld refinement pattern for the XRD data (x = 0.05 is taken as an example).
Crystals 13 01042 g002aCrystals 13 01042 g002b
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures: (a) x = 0, 800 °C; (b) x = 0.025, 800 °C; (c) x = 0.050, 800 °C; (d) x = 0.075, 825 °C; (e) x = 0.100, 825 °C; (f) x = 0.125, 825 °C.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures: (a) x = 0, 800 °C; (b) x = 0.025, 800 °C; (c) x = 0.050, 800 °C; (d) x = 0.075, 825 °C; (e) x = 0.100, 825 °C; (f) x = 0.125, 825 °C.
Crystals 13 01042 g003
Figure 4. EDS spectra of the grains in Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (x = 0.05) ceramics: (a) spot A; (b) spot B.
Figure 4. EDS spectra of the grains in Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (x = 0.05) ceramics: (a) spot A; (b) spot B.
Crystals 13 01042 g004
Figure 5. (a) εr values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at different temperatures; (b) εr, εrc, εcal, and αobs values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures.
Figure 5. (a) εr values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at different temperatures; (b) εr, εrc, εcal, and αobs values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures.
Crystals 13 01042 g005
Figure 6. (a) Q × f values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at different temperatures; (b) Q × f, U and packing fraction values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures.
Figure 6. (a) Q × f values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at different temperatures; (b) Q × f, U and packing fraction values of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures.
Crystals 13 01042 g006
Figure 7. Variations in the τf values, bond valences, and bond energies of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures.
Figure 7. Variations in the τf values, bond valences, and bond energies of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures.
Crystals 13 01042 g007
Table 1. Lattice and refinement data of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures.
Table 1. Lattice and refinement data of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.125) ceramics sintered at optimum temperatures.
xPhasea (Å)b (Å)c (Å)V3)wt. %RwpRpχ2
0NaSrB5O96.475513.92318.0265692.41281.385.86%4.36%2.78
SrB2O411.97704.32316.5811340.71418.62
0.025NaSrB5O96.495713.96988.0489698.87382.811.93%1.45%2.808
SrB2O412.06054.35816.6351348.75217.19
0.050NaSrB5O96.502413.98188.0543700.61485.042.36%1.85%3.274
SrB2O412.02674.34226.6080345.08414.96
0.075NaSrB5O96.503013.98408.0561700.97690.951.88%1.44%2.845
SrB2O412.03594.34506.6138345.8739.05
0.100NaSrB5O96.505813.99078.0601701.97988.771.89%1.34%2.972
SrB2O412.04884.35186.6235347.29911.23
0.125NaSrB5O96.500913.98248.0537701.46587.162.241.563.276
SrB2O412.02444.34486.6099345.32312.84
Rp—the reliability factor of patterns. Rwp—the reliability factor of weighted patterns. χ2—the goodness of fit indicator = chi.2.
Table 2. The sintering temperatures and microwave dielectric properties of some borate ceramics.
Table 2. The sintering temperatures and microwave dielectric properties of some borate ceramics.
CompoundsS. T. (°C)εrQ × f (GHz)τf (ppm/°C)Ref.
CaAlB2O5.59405.863,338−29[28]
Zn3B2O69256.758,500−58[29]
(Zn0.95Ni0.05)3 B2O69006.991,000−55.6[30]
LiBO26405.318,200−66.2[31]
NaSrB5O98505.6749,824−18.28[17]
NaSrB5.35O9.5258255.6857,173−14.83[18]
Na1.075SrB5O9.03758255.6131,937−3.09This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, X.; Wu, P.; Yang, H.; Yang, M.; Zheng, Y. Phase Compositions and Microwave Dielectric Properties of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x Ceramics. Crystals 2023, 13, 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13071042

AMA Style

Lu X, Wu P, Yang H, Yang M, Zheng Y. Phase Compositions and Microwave Dielectric Properties of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x Ceramics. Crystals. 2023; 13(7):1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13071042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Xuepeng, Peng Wu, Huimin Yang, Min Yang, and Yong Zheng. 2023. "Phase Compositions and Microwave Dielectric Properties of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x Ceramics" Crystals 13, no. 7: 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13071042

APA Style

Lu, X., Wu, P., Yang, H., Yang, M., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Phase Compositions and Microwave Dielectric Properties of Na1+xSrB5O9+0.5x Ceramics. Crystals, 13(7), 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13071042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop