Next Article in Journal
Multi-Physics Modeling in Curved Surface Laser Cladding: Impact of Scanning Trajectories and Cladding Parameters on Temperature Field and Coating Thickness
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation Analysis of Laser Ultrasonic Detection of Defects in Silicon Carbide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Preparation and Optical Properties of Ce3+ Doped GdAlO3 Nanoparticles by Co-Precipitation Method

Liaoning Provincial Engineering Research Center for High-Value Utilization of Magnesite, Yingkou Institute of Technology, Yingkou 115014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2025, 15(2), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15020126
Submission received: 25 December 2024 / Revised: 17 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 24 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Crystalline Materials)

Abstract

:
Nanoparticles of GdAlO3:Ce were synthesized with sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS) as the dispersant and ammonia as the precipitant by co-precipitation reaction to prepare precursors under different conditions. The phase composition of the precursors and the particle morphology were characterized by thermogravimetry-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The excitation and emission spectra of the resultant samples were analyzed using a photoluminescence spectroscope (PL). The results showed that the as-prepared, well-dispersed, nano-sized GdAlO3:Ce powder displayed spherical morphology at the initial concentration of metallic salt in liquor of 0.3 mol/L; the synthesized temperature was 0 °C, and it was calcined at 1300 °C for 2 h. The relative intensity of the photoluminescence peak had the maximum value when the Ce3+ dopant content was 0.9 mol% (mole fraction). The concentration quench occurred when the Ce3+ dopant content exceeded 0.9 mol%, and the peak of the excitation spectrum appeared at a wavelength of 381 nm.

1. Introduction

GdAlO3 is a remarkable rare earth aluminate luminescent matrix material. It exhibits excellent physical, chemical, and optical stability [1,2,3]. It can improve the optical properties by doping a small number of rare earth ions, such as Eu3+ and Tb3+. Chen [4] employed the co-precipitation method to synthesize (Gd0.97–xEuxTb0.03)AlO3 (GdAP:Tb/Eu). Subsequently, the effects of different calcination temperatures and doping amounts on its luminescence properties were investigated. (Gd0.97–xEuxTb0.03)AlO3 (x = 0.005–0.07) phosphors were synthesized with the co-precipitation method using ammonium bicarbonate as the precipitant. At the optimal excitation wavelength of 275 nm, the phosphors with good dispersion exhibited strong red emission at 617 nm. The emission intensity varied with the amount of Eu3+, and the quenching concentration was about 5 at%. The phosphors prepared in this research can be widely used in solid-state displays and light-emitting devices. Teng [5] synthesized the precursor by carbonate precipitation and obtained a powder of (Gd1–xTbx)3Al5O12 (GdAG:Tb3+) solid solution by calcination at 1500 °C. Low Tb3+ doping could stabilize the crystal structure of GdAG garnet and prevent its thermal decomposition. GdAG:Tb3+ phosphors exhibited a series of 5D47FJ transitions of Tb3+ under UV excitation at 277 nm, with the strongest green emission around 544 nm. The quenching concentration of GdAG:Tb3+ was about 10 at%. Maintaining the optimal Tb3+ content at around 10 at%, the (Gd0.9Tb0.1), AG fluorescent powder exhibited high internal and external quantum efficiencies of 88.7% and 73.6%, respectively, under excitation at 277 nm. The developed (Gd1–xTbx) AG garnet phosphor has the potential to be used as a novel luminescent material. Ce3+ has small optical electronegativity, so it can realize the complete transition from orbit 5d to 4f, and the luminescence attenuation time is less than 100 ns. Therefore, it has attracted much attention as an activated ion of scintillator ceramics [6,7,8]. Shilpa [9] prepared GdAlO3:Ce phosphors using the solution combustion method. Due to the 5D3/27FJ transition (J = 7/2 and 5/2) of Ce3+, the photoluminescence emission spectrum shows a broad peak centered at 466 nm. Photometric properties confirmed that the prepared samples emit a cyan color with high color purity. Using its high sensitivity and high resolution, the fingerprint details can be clearly collected on hydrophilic and hydrophobic substrates, and it is expected to be used in forensic research and anti-counterfeiting applications.
The co-precipitation process is simple; its synthetic products have high purity and good morphology. It is widely used in the preparation of luminescent powder [10,11,12]; however, there are few reports on the preparation of GdAlO3:Ce powder using the co-precipitation method. In this study, we successfully prepared GdAlO3:Ce nanopowder using the co-precipitation method. In order to understand the properties of the powder and the influencing factors in the preparation process, we used TG-DTA, XRD, SEM, and other analysis methods. Through these analytical methods, we conducted a detailed investigation into the effects of different calcination temperatures and dispersant dosages on phase changes and morphology during the synthesis of GdAlO3:Ce powder. At the same time, we also investigated the influence of the Ce3+ doping concentration on the excitation and emission spectra of the powder. On this basis, we further analyzed the nucleation mechanism of GdAlO3:Ce, aiming to identify the optimal preparation process conditions. This research outcome will provide a solid experimental basis and theoretical foundation for the application of GdAlO3:Ce nanopowder, and the research results are expected to promote its widespread use in fields such as luminescent materials and scintillators.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials and Synthesis Process

As materials, we used Gd2O3 (99.9%), Al(NO3)3·9H2O (99%), Ce(NO3)3 (99.9%), C18H29NaO3S (90.0%), NH3·9H2O (28%), and HNO3 (68%), which were all purchased from China Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The samples were tested using a TG-DTA analyzer (HCT-3), a powder X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku D/max−2500Pc, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), a HITACHI S-3500N model scanning electron microscope (Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and a photoluminescence spectroscope (Hitachi F-4600, Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), etc.
The GdAlO3:Ce powder was prepared using Gd2O3, Al(NO3)3·9H2O, and Ce(NO3)3 as starting materials with the co-precipitation method. A 500 mL mixed solution was prepared, which had a cation concentration of 0.3 mol/L and contained Gd3+ and Al3+ in stoichiometric amounts with a Gd:Al molar ratio of 1:1. Ce(NO3) was added to the solution, and its mole fraction was adjusted within the range from 0.3 mol% to 1.1 mol%. A dispersant, C18H29NaO3S (1–3%), was added to the solution. Then, the solution was titrated using 0.5 mol/L NH3·H2O as a precipitant with a titration rate of 3 mL/min; the temperature of the reaction system was 0 °C, and the titration endpoint pH was adjusted to 10. The solution was stirred at a constant temperature for 5 h until white flocculent precipitation was formed. The obtained precursor precipitate was washed three times with deionized water and anhydrous ethanol successively and then dried in a vacuum drying oven. Finally, the dried precursor was ground and calcined at 1100–1400 °C for 2 h with a heating rate of 5 °C/min, and thus GdAlO3:Ce was obtained.

2.2. Characterization

The crystallization process of the GdAlO3:Ce precursor was analyzed using a TG-DTA analyzer (HCT-3, Beijing Hengjiu Experimental Equipment Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The phase composition of the samples was examined using an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku D/max−2500Pc) in continuous scanning mode, covering a 2θ range from 20° to 70°. The morphology and size of the GdAlO3:Ce particles were characterized using a HITACHI S-3500N scanning electron microscope. The excitation and emission spectra of GdAlO3:Ce samples were analyzed using a photoluminescence spectroscope (Hitachi F-4600) with a PMT voltage of 700 V and a scanning rate of 240 nm/min.

3. Results

3.1. TG-DTA Analysis of Precursors

As depicted in Figure 1, the TG-DTA curve of the precursor precipitate with 0.9 mol% Ce3+ doping and 2% SDBS dispersant addition illustrated its weight loss process, which was primarily divided into three stages. The initial weight loss stage occurred between 0 and 275 °C, with the sample losing 9.30% of its weight. A small endothermic peak appeared at 196.31 °C, which was attributed to the evaporation of residual and crystalline water in the precursor. The second weight loss stage took place from 275 to 550 °C, resulting in a 27.19% weight loss. Three endothermic peaks were observed at 311.27 °C, 325.28 °C, and 476.78 °C, corresponding to the thermal decomposition of Al(OH)3 and Gd(OH)3 in the precursor to release H2O. The exothermic peak at 476.78 °C was due to the combustion of the dispersant SDBS in the precursor. The third weight loss stage occurred between 550 and 1000 °C, with a weight loss of only 2.90%. An exothermic peak at 682.61 °C indicated a crystal transformation of GdAlO3 at this temperature, transitioning from an amorphous to a crystalline state. At this temperature, the precursor shifted from an amorphous disordered structure to a crystalline ordered structure and from a high-energy state to a low-energy state, resulting in an exothermic phenomenon. In summary, the reaction formula during the calcination process can be encapsulated as follows.
Gd ( OH ) 3 · x H 2 O + Al ( OH ) 3 · y H 2 O + Ce ( OH ) 3 · z H 2 O     0   ° C 275   ° C Gd ( OH ) 3 + Al ( OH ) 3 + Ce ( OH ) 3     275   ° C 550   ° C Gd 2 O 3 + Al 2 O 3 + Ce 2 O 3     550   ° C 1000   ° C   Gd Al O 3 : Ce

3.2. Influence of Phase and Morphology of GdAlO3:Ce by Calcination Temperature

Figure 2 presents the XRD pattern of precursor precipitates doped with 0.9 mol% Ce3+ and calcined at various temperatures for 2 h. It was evident that the XRD spectra of the samples calcined at temperatures ranging from 1100 to 1400 °C were largely identical, with the diffraction peaks aligning closely with those in the GdAlO3 standard PDF#46-0395. This was due to the small doping amount of Ce3+, which was not enough to affect the crystal structure of matrix GdAlO3. By comparing the curves of four samples, it could be seen that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak was directly proportional to the crystallinity. As illustrated in Figure 2 and Table 1, when the temperature was at 1100 °C, the XRD peak intensity of the calcined sample was relatively low, and the FWHM was broad. However, as the temperature rose to 1200 °C, the peak intensity of the calcined sample intensified, and the FWHM narrowed. Comparatively, it could be seen that the XRD diffraction peaks of the sample obtained at a calcination temperature of 1300 °C exhibited the best FWHM and peak values, indicating its superior crystallinity. As the calcination temperature increased to 1400 °C, the impurity peak started to emerge in the XRD pattern of the resulting sample.
Figure 3 presents the SEM images of GdAlO3:Ce powder subjected to various calcination temperatures. It was evident that when the calcination temperature was 1100 °C, only a small part of the grains in the sample were nearly spherical, and the grains were not completely grown. When the calcination temperature reached 1200 °C, the spherical morphology of grains could be seen obviously, but the grain boundaries were still difficult to distinguish. After calcination at 1300 °C, the sample clearly showed the grain morphology and grain boundary. At 1400 °C calcination, the grain size of the sample grew significantly, and the agglomeration phenomenon was severe. The appearance of large particle agglomeration on the SEM images was a manifestation of the macroscopic aggregation state of materials. During the material preparation process, multiple grains aggregated due to physical effects such as van der Waals forces, electrostatic attraction, and precipitation rates, forming these larger solid units.
Using the Scherer formula, the grain size, lattice parameters, and cell volume of GdAlO3:Ce at various calcination temperatures were calculated, with the results presented in Table 2.
The grain sizes recorded in Table 2 were focused on a single crystal unit and accurately reflect the size of the smallest periodic structural unit in which the atoms inside the crystal are arranged in an ordered manner. As observed in Table 2, the grain size of GdAlO3:Ce expanded from 116.4 nm to 489.2 nm with a rise in calcination temperature from 1100 °C to 1400 °C. The grain size of GdAlO3:Ce powder gradually increased with the increase in temperature, suggesting that grain growth tended toward completion, and all grains remained in the nanometer range. When the temperature hit 1300 °C, the lattice parameters of the powder neared the standard values, leading to the conclusion that this temperature represents the optimal calcination condition.

3.3. The Impact of Dispersant Concentration on GdAlO3:Ce

Figure 4 presents the XRD pattern of the precursor precipitate synthesized by incorporating varying amounts of dispersant with subsequent calcination at 1300 °C for 2 h. It was evident that when the dispersant content was 1%, the XRD spectrum of the sample exhibited high peak intensity and precise peak positions. The peak shapes were essentially regular, featuring moderate half-height widths, and there were additional impurity peaks present in the spectrum. However, there were some weak heteropeaks in the spectrum. Compared with the XRD spectra of the samples with 1% and 2% dispersant addition, the intensity of the characteristic peaks of the sample XRD spectra with 3% dispersant addition was slightly weak; there was a deviation in the positions of the peaks, with some miscellaneous peaks. It was obvious that the diffraction peak of impurity Ce0.8Gd0.2O2−x appeared at the 2θ = 33.026° position and the diffraction peak of impurity Gd3Al5O12 appeared at the 2θ = 52.749° position. Gd3Al5O12 was a body-centered cubic structure in a cubic system, while GdAlO3 had to face-centered cubic structure, indicating that the doping of Ce3+ and the high calcination temperature changed the crystal structure of GdAlO3. Compared with the XRD spectra of the samples with 1% and 3% dispersant, the samples with 2% dispersant had the strongest characteristic peak and the narrowest FWHM, and all the diffraction peaks on the spectra completely corresponded to the standard card diffraction peaks.
Figure 5 shows the SEM morphology of GdAlO3:Ce powder prepared with different dispersant contents. It was evident that when the dosage of the dispersant reached 1%, a few near-spherical grains appeared, but the grains were not dispersed, and the agglomeration was obvious. When the amount of dispersant was 2%, the grains of the sample were well-dispersed, the nearly spherical grains and grain boundaries could be clearly seen, and the composition was relatively uniform. The grain and the grain boundary of the sample with a dispersant content of 3% were not obvious. Some other substances that were quite different from the main phase grain could be observed, which was due to the impurities contained in the sample. Hence, the ideal quantity of dispersant was ascertained to be 2%.

3.4. Effect of Ce3+ Dopant Content on GdAlO3:Ce Nanoparticles

Figure 6a presents the XRD pattern of samples doped with varying Ce3+ dopant concentrations following calcination at 1300 °C for 2 h. It appeared that the characteristic peak intensity of the 0.3 mol% Ce3+ dopant sample was high, and the FWHM was narrow. The sample with 0.5 mol% Ce3+ had the weakest diffraction peak, an irregular peak type, and multiple heteropeaks. Although the intensity of the characteristic peak of the doped 0.7 mol% Ce3+ sample was moderate and the spectrum showed no impurity peak, the FWHM was wide. Compared with other doping concentration samples, the diffraction peak intensity of doped 0.9 mol% Ce3+ samples was the highest; the FWHM was narrow, and there was no impurity peak. When the Ce3+ doping concentration increased to 1.1 mol%, the diffraction peak intensity of the sample was weak, and the peak shape was irregular and accompanied by heteropeaks. At the same time, comparing the diffraction peaks of samples with different Ce3+ dopant content, it can be seen in Figure 6b that the main peak in the diffraction spectrum tended to shift to the left side with an increase in doping concentration.

3.5. Effect of Ce3+ Dopant Content on Luminescence Characteristics

Figure 7 shows the excitation spectra of GdAlO3:Ce samples prepared with different Ce3+ dopant contents. GdAlO3:Ce had strong excitation bands at 381 nm and 437 nm, corresponding to the transition absorption from the Ce3+ 4f to 5d energy levels. Since Ce3+ had only one electron in 4f, spin orbit coupling decomposed 4f into two levels: 2F5/2 and 2F7/2. When Ce3+ entered the lattice position of Gd3+, 4f was less affected by the crystal field due to the shielding of the outside 5s25p6 electrons, and still retains the LS coupling energy level characteristics of free ions [13,14,15]. Because the 5d energy level was affected by the crystal field and was under the condition of low symmetry, the 5d energy level was divided into multiple sub-levels [16,17,18].
Figure 8 shows the emission spectra of different Ce3+ doped GdAlO3:Ce samples excited at a 381 nm wavelength. Due to the influence of its own energy transfer and cross-relaxation mechanism, the sample had a wide luminescence spectrum in the wavelength range of 460–570 nm. The emission spectrum had maximum peaks at the wavelengths of 491 nm and 553 nm, corresponding to the 5d → 2F5/2 and 5d → 2F7/2 luminescence transitions of doped Ce3+ [19,20,21]. Under the excitation of the 381 nm wavelength, the fluorescence intensity reached the peak when the doping amount of Ce3+ was 0.9 mol%. When the doping amounts of Ce3+ were 0.7 mol%, 0.5 mol%, and 0.3 mol%, the emission spectral intensity decreased in turn. When the doping amount of Ce3+ increased to 1.1 mol%, the fluorescence intensity of the emission peak decreased significantly. Since Ce3+ was the light-emitting center in GdAlO3:Ce crystal, with an increased Ce3+ dopant content, the number of light-emitting centers also increased and the transition intensity improved, which increased the peak intensity of the emission spectrum [22,23,24]. When the concentration of Ce3+ reached a certain value, the probability of non-radiation transition increased, so the luminous efficiency decreased and concentration quenching occurred [25,26].

4. Conclusions

In this study, GdAlO3:Ce was effectively produced using the co-precipitation technique. By characterizing and analyzing the resulting powder, the optimal synthesis process and the fluorescence characteristics of the GdAlO3:Ce were identified.
  • Nano GdAlO3:Ce powder exhibiting excellent dispersion and an almost spherical shape could be synthesized via the co-precipitation technique. In this process, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate was utilized as a dispersant at a mass fraction of 2%, and ammonia served as the precipitant. The resulting powder was then calcined at 1300 °C for a duration of 2 h.
  • Ce3+ doping caused GdAlO3 lattice distortion, but it did not change its crystal structure. When the Ce3+ dopant content was 0.9 mol%, the emission spectral intensity of GdAlO3:Ce was the strongest after excitation. Concentration quenching occurred when the Ce3+ dopant content exceeded this concentration.
  • In the spectral analysis, GdAlO3:Ce had two wide excitation spectra, and the highest peaks were located at wavelengths of 381 nm and 431 nm. The formation mechanism of GdAlO3:Ce luminescence due to the transition of 5d → 2F5/2 and 5d → 2F7/2 luminescence energy bands after doping Ce3+ was excited.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Q.; formal analysis, G.W.; methodology, G.L.; validation, S.L. and Y.L.; investigation, Y.L. and P.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Liaoning Provincial Engineering Research Center for High-Value Utilization of Magnesite (LMNZ2024020102), the Scientific Research Fund of Liaoning Provincial Education Department (JYTMS20230064), and the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2023-MSLH-316).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tamrakar, R.K.; Tiwari, S.; Upadhyay, K.; Robinson, C.S. Synthesis, structural and luminescent properties of Eu2+/ Dy3+ activated GdAlO3 phosphors by solid state reaction method under nitrogen atmosphere. Optik 2019, 181, 1158–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ku, A.; Rkt, B. Enhancement in photoluminescence behaviour of GdAlO3: Eu3+ phosphor by alkali metal codoping-ScienceDirect. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2019, 7, 100357. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qi, P.Y.; Cong, Y.; Yu, L.H.; Fu, X.W.; Ge, X.M.; Hao, C.L.; He, L.J. Effect of co-precipitation synthesis parameters on gadolinium aluminate nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 2023, 341, 134163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Q.; Li, J.K.; Wang, W.Z. Synthesis and luminescence properties of Tb3+/Eu3+ co-doped GdAlO3 phosphors with enhanced red emission. J. Rare Earths 2018, 9, 924–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Teng, X.; Li, J.; Duan, G.B.; Liu, Z.M. Development of Tb3+ activated gadolinium aluminate garnet (Gd3Al5O12) as highly efficient green-emitting phosphors. J. Lumin. 2016, 179, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mareš, J.A.; Nikl, M.; Pedrini, C.; Bouttet, D.; Dujardin, C.; Moine, B.; Verweij, J.W.M.; Kvapil, J. Further results on GdAlO3:Ce scintillator. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 2006, 135, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qi, P.Y.; Zhong, J.Y.; Dai, S.Y.; Jiang, L.L. Hydrothermal-solid state synthesis of gadolinium aluminate nano whiskers with alkaline mineralizer. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 035021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Karpyuk, P.V.; Ermakova, L.V.; Dubov, V.V.; Lelekova, D.E.; Saifutyarov, R.R.; Zhdanov, P.A.; Malozovskaya, M.S.; Komendo, I.Y.; Sokolov, P.S.; Bondarau, A.G. Effect of phosphorus-containing dispersant on the microstructure and optical properties of scintillation ceramic (Gd,Y)3(Al,Ga)5O12:Ce with garnet structure. J. Surf. Investig. X-ray 2024, 18, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shilpa, C.J.; Basavaraj, R.B.; Darshan, G.P.; Premkumar, H.B.; Sharma, S.C.; Nagabhushana, H. New insights into the rapid deposition and visualization of latent fingerprints: Cyan light emitting GdAlO3:Ce3+ nano fluorescent probe. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2019, 376, 288–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Siddique, M.N.; Ahmed, A.; Riyajuddin, S.K.; Faizan, M.; Tripathi, P. Exploring the Ce3+ ions doping effect on optical and magnetic properties of NiO nanostructures. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 12, 166323. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lila, D.L.; Jethva, H.O.; Modi, K.B.; Joshi, H.H. Co-existence of disordered fluorite and ordered pyrochlore phases in high energy mechanically milled Gd2Zr2O7 nanoparticulates. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 22989–23011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Solodov, A.N.; Zimin, K.; Gataullina, R.M.; Zagidullin, A.A.; Leontyev, A.V.; Shmelev, A.G.; Nurtdinova, L.A.; Nikiforov, V.G.; Khasanov, O.K.; Amirova, L.M. Fluorescent polymer composites based on core-shell NaYF4:Yb/Er@NaGdF4:Ce/Tb structures for temperature monitoring and anti-counterfeiting protection. Opt. Mater. 2025, 159, 116511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Feng, J.; Gao, Y.; Ren, H.B. Red-shift of the photoluminescent emission and enhancement of the internal quantum efficiency by co-doping Gd3+ in Tb3Al5O12: Ce3+ phosphors for warm WLEDs. J. Solid State Chem. 2025, 341, 125042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, Y.L.; Yang, Z.Z.; Zhao, Y.M.; Qi, X.Y.; Lin, S.S.; Wu, L.; Zeng, L.W.; Lu, L.L.; Wang, Z.C.; Chen, X.Z. New phase-construction phosphors ceramics for warm-white solid-state lighting: Orange-yellow-emitting (Lu,Gd)3(Sc,Al)5O12:Ce3+. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 49643–49651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ge, X.Y.; Zeng, Q.F.; Li, W.P.; Luo, L.H.; Du, P. Tailoring of spectral behaviors in Ce3+ activated Ba2Gd8(SiO4)6O2 cyan emitting phosphors via site substitution engineering for plant growth and full-spectrum white light-emitting diodes. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 23837–23848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, Z.G.; Chen, Z.Y.; Wang, M.Y.; Lu, B. Production and optical properties of Ce3+-activated and Lu3+-stabilized transparent gadolinium aluminate garnet ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Inkrataite, G.; Zabiliute-Karaliune, A.; Aglinskaite, J.; Vitta, P.; Kristinaityte, K.; Marsalka, A.; Skaudzius, R. Study of YAG:Ce and polymer composite properties for application in LED devices. ChemPlusChem 2020, 85, 1504–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sefiane, N.; Hamroun, M.S.E.; Bélaid, Z.H.; Harek, Y.; Touahra, F.; Chebout, R.; Bachari, K. Effect of Gd3+ ion substitution on the structural and luminescence properties of Ce3+ doped YAG phosphors. J. Electron. Mater. 2024, 53, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.T.; Li, Y.J.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.J.; Zeng, F.; Lin, H.L.; Sun, Z.M.; Mahadevan, C. Structural, mechanical, thermal and optical properties of NaCl:Ce3+ single crystals grown in large size by the czochralski method. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 849, 156592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, B.; Jiang, B.; Fan, J. Mn ions-activated Gd3(Al,Ga)5O12 garnet solid-solution ceramics: Cation substitution for dual wavelength red-emission. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 1, 513–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yildirim, B.; Dalmis, R.; Ertekin, K.; Birlik, I.; Azem, F.A. Enhancing optical properties of Lu3Al5O12:Ce3+ by cost-effective silica-based photonic crystals. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 10267–10278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Y.Q.; With, G.D.; Hintzen, H.T. Luminescence properties of Ce3+ activated alkaline earth silicon nitride M2Si5N8 (M = Ca, Sr, Ba) materials. J. Lumin. 2006, 116, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, J.L.; Wang, C.C.; Shi, J.P.; Yu, P.H.; Zhang, Z.F. Porous GdAlO3: Cr3+, Sm3+ drug carrier for real-time long afterglow and magnetic resonance dual-mode imaging. J. Lumin. 2018, 199, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ji, Y.M.; Jiang, D.Y.; Wu, Z.H.; Feng, T.; Shi, J.L. Combustion synthesis and photoluminescence of Ce3+ activated MHfO3 (M = Ba, Sr, or Ca). Mater. Res. Bull. 2005, 40, 1521–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baranov, V.; Davydov, Y.I.; Mkrtchian, M.; Vasilyev, I.I. Optical properties of YAG:Ce and GGG:Ce scintillation crystals irradiated with a high fluence proton beam. Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 2020, 17, 878–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jisha, P.K.; Prashantha, S.C.; Nagabhushana, H. Luminescent properties of Tb doped gadolinium aluminate nanophosphors for display and forensic applications. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Dev. 2017, 2, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TG–DTA curves of the precursor precipitate.
Figure 1. TG–DTA curves of the precursor precipitate.
Crystals 15 00126 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of precursor precipitates after calcination at various temperatures for 2 h.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of precursor precipitates after calcination at various temperatures for 2 h.
Crystals 15 00126 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of GdAlO3:Ce particles prepared at various temperatures for 2 h: (a) 1100 °C, (b) 1200 °C, (c) 1300 °C, and (d) 1400 °C.
Figure 3. SEM images of GdAlO3:Ce particles prepared at various temperatures for 2 h: (a) 1100 °C, (b) 1200 °C, (c) 1300 °C, and (d) 1400 °C.
Crystals 15 00126 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the precursor precipitates synthesized by different dispersant content.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the precursor precipitates synthesized by different dispersant content.
Crystals 15 00126 g004
Figure 5. SEM of GdAlO3:Ce particles synthesized with varying dispersant concentrations: (a) 1wt%, (b) 2wt%, and (c) 3wt%.
Figure 5. SEM of GdAlO3:Ce particles synthesized with varying dispersant concentrations: (a) 1wt%, (b) 2wt%, and (c) 3wt%.
Crystals 15 00126 g005
Figure 6. (a) XRD patterns of samples with different Ce3+ dopant content; (b) amplified diffraction peaks of (112) plane.
Figure 6. (a) XRD patterns of samples with different Ce3+ dopant content; (b) amplified diffraction peaks of (112) plane.
Crystals 15 00126 g006
Figure 7. Excitation spectra of GdAlO3:Ce powders doped with different Ce3+ mole fractions.
Figure 7. Excitation spectra of GdAlO3:Ce powders doped with different Ce3+ mole fractions.
Crystals 15 00126 g007
Figure 8. Emission spectra of GdAlO3:Ce powders doped with different Ce3+ mole fractions excited at 381 nm.
Figure 8. Emission spectra of GdAlO3:Ce powders doped with different Ce3+ mole fractions excited at 381 nm.
Crystals 15 00126 g008
Table 1. FWHM and peak intensity of (112) plane diffraction peaks at different calcination temperatures.
Table 1. FWHM and peak intensity of (112) plane diffraction peaks at different calcination temperatures.
Temperature/°CFWHMPeak Intensity
11000.21616190
12000.20598234
13000.19570240
14000.20014229
Table 2. The grain size, lattice parameters, and unit cell volume of GdAlO3:Ce derived from precursors calcined at various temperatures for 2 h.
Table 2. The grain size, lattice parameters, and unit cell volume of GdAlO3:Ce derived from precursors calcined at various temperatures for 2 h.
Temperature/°CGrain Size/nmLattice Parameters/ÅUnit Cell Volume/Å3
abc
1100116.45.25345.30077.4498207.4523
1200138.85.25745.30157.4441207.4827
1300143.35.24965.30757.4563207.7493
1400489.25.24505.30627.4762208.0702
In PDF#46-0395, the values are as follows: a = 5.2511 Å; b = 5.3017 Å; c = 7.4450 Å.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qi, P.; Wang, G.; Li, G.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, P. Study on the Preparation and Optical Properties of Ce3+ Doped GdAlO3 Nanoparticles by Co-Precipitation Method. Crystals 2025, 15, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15020126

AMA Style

Qi P, Wang G, Li G, Li S, Liu Y, Zhu P. Study on the Preparation and Optical Properties of Ce3+ Doped GdAlO3 Nanoparticles by Co-Precipitation Method. Crystals. 2025; 15(2):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15020126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qi, Pengyuan, Gang Wang, Gang Li, Shuai Li, Yang Liu, and Pengfu Zhu. 2025. "Study on the Preparation and Optical Properties of Ce3+ Doped GdAlO3 Nanoparticles by Co-Precipitation Method" Crystals 15, no. 2: 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15020126

APA Style

Qi, P., Wang, G., Li, G., Li, S., Liu, Y., & Zhu, P. (2025). Study on the Preparation and Optical Properties of Ce3+ Doped GdAlO3 Nanoparticles by Co-Precipitation Method. Crystals, 15(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15020126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop