Next Article in Journal
Crystal Structure of the Substrate-Binding Domain from Listeria monocytogenes Bile-Resistance Determinant BilE
Next Article in Special Issue
Review of the Magnetocaloric Effect in RMnO3 and RMn2O5 Multiferroic Crystals
Previous Article in Journal
Structural and Spectral Properties of Deterministic Aperiodic Optical Structures
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 6
Issue 12
10.3390/cryst6120163
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ferroelastic Domain Boundary-Based Multiferroicity

by
Ekhard K. H. Salje
1,2,* and
Xiangdong Ding
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi’an Jiao Tong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2
Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2016, 6(12), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6120163
Submission received: 16 September 2016 / Revised: 17 November 2016 / Accepted: 3 December 2016 / Published: 9 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiferroics Crystals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Domain boundary engineering endeavors to develop materials that contain localized functionalities inside domain walls, which do not exist in the bulk. Here we review multiferroic devices that are based on ferroelectricity inside ferroelastic domain boundaries. The discovery of polarity in CaTiO3 and SrTiO3 leads to new directions to produce complex domain patterns as templates for ferroic devices.

1. Introduction

Arguably, the greatest progress in ferroic device designs during the last decade is related to the idea that the ferroic (or transport/conductivity) properties are related to interfaces and surfaces and not to the bulk. This means that high memory capacities and electrical wiring on a much finer scale than achievable with bulk technologies may be possible when only domain boundaries contain the desired functionalities [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. This is not only the case for ferroelectricity or ferromagnetism, but also for electrical conductivity. Domain boundaries were already found to carry high currents, and it was the discovery of superconducting twin boundaries [16] that opened a wide field of applications in “domain boundary engineering”, where the domain boundary is the device and where the design of the device materials depends largely on tailoring appropriate domain boundaries [4,5]. Furthermore, electric dipole moments were observed inside ferroelastic domain walls so that switchable ferroelectricity is potentially confined to domain walls and cannot interfere with depolarization fields and additional switching of domains in the bulk. The length scale of the active device is then restricted to the size of domain walls or to even smaller features, such as Bloch walls, inside domain walls [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. For many applications, the aim is to produce high wall concentrations. The highest concentration of “domain boundaries” was predicted for a tweed structure, which is a densely interwoven network of domain walls [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Tweed has another property: it can form a domain glass with a nonergodic response to external forcing. Domain glass [29,30] can contain polar nanoregions, which are known to exist in relaxor materials [31,32,33,34]. Complex domain structures, including tweed, may be stabilized by defects, while dynamic tweed [26] exists also for very low defect concentrations [35]. It was then argued that tweed structures are polar, either via the flexoelectric effect or via bilinear coupling between the strain and local dipole moments [36,37,38,39,40,41]. Recently, Salje et al. [42] reported the first experimental evidence for piezoelectricity of a tweed structure in LaAlO3, where the uniform parent structure is centrosymmetric and shows no bulk polarity.
Nanoscale-generated (multi-) ferroic materials are different from bulk ferroics, which are a well-known class of anisotropic, nonlinear solids that develop a spontaneous order parameter, usually passing through a symmetry-lowering transition point. Ferroics are classified according to their primary order parameters, which include strain ε (ferroelastic), polarization P (ferroelectric), and magnetization M (ferromagnetic), where the term “ferro” designates the uniform alignment of the spontaneous moments in neighboring unit cells. Ferri- and antiferro-phases exist when the order parameter is locally rotated against a crystallographic axis, or when the relevant wavevector (or wavevectors) associated with the structural instability occur(s) at special points at the surface of the Brillouin zone. Incommensurable phase transitions require a complex order parameter with a repetition unit that is not commensurate with the underlying crystal structure. In both of these cases, the translation invariance of the order parameter (incommensurate or commensurate) is preserved throughout the crystal. There are classic textbooks on ferroics [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54], and numerous recent reviews and research articles on multiferroics [4,5,29,55,56,57,58,59]. Incommensurate phases represent a borderline between the bulk ferroic behavior and the ferroicity of the modulation, and they may represent a new class of ferroic materials that have not yet been explored [60].
Unlike nanoscale-generated multiferroics, domain boundary based ferroics are equivalent to bulk ferroics in lower dimensional subspaces (as predicted by symmetry arguments by Janovec and collaborators [61,62,63,64,65]), such as two-dimensional twin boundaries, and one-dimensional Bloch lines and vortex dots. These subspaces are mostly defined by another bulk ferroic property, namely the ferroelastic twin patterns. Bulk ferroelasticity generates the twin walls which then can become ferroelectric, superconducting, magnetic, and so forth. Only these latter properties are used in the anticipated device applications.
Much research has been dedicated to surfaces, but any practical applications are unlikely to be confined to surfaces because the total number of particles involved in functionalities will simply be too small (unless the grain size becomes very small). This problem can be overcome when we consider parallel twin boundaries where the number of atoms inside the twin boundaries is much larger than in surface layers. From the Kittel formula for ultrathin films [4], concentrations that are much larger than 4% of the domain wall material can be estimated, and, indeed, twin domains as small as 5 nm have been observed in TbMnO3 [66], suggesting that the number of atoms inside twin walls can be close to 50%. Meanwhile, in ferroelectric superlattices, Yadav et al. [67] have reported similarly small domains, showing also that the walls between these domains are fully chiral, forming vortices. This is an important result, as it not only shows that the fraction of domain wall material can be very large, but also shows the association between walls and chirality. This concentration is large enough to anticipate applications such as memory devices, heat regulators, and elastic dampers [59]. In addition, templates such as twin boundaries are mobile under fields and can form dynamic tweed and domain glasses [29,30]. One may then ask: Is it possible to arrange twin boundaries topologically in ways so that the macroscopic use of the material as conductors, switches, or heat regulators can be optimized? The answer is affirmative and leads to the development of domain structures, with a high degree of complexity [65,66,67,68,69]. This does not mean, however, that all domain walls, which are symmetry-allowed to display ferroic properties, do so in a measurable way. Careful measurements have shown that many materials with very high densities of domain walls and highly complex nanostructures did not show multiferroic properties [70,71,72,73,74,75] although they were counted as archetypal candidates for ferroelectricity. We now describe specific cases where ferroic domain boundaries were proven to exist.

2. CaTiO3

The first example for a polar domain wall was found in CaTiO3 [17,19,20]. As shown in Figure 1, two lines of research came together in this material. First, it was shown that twin and antiphase boundaries represent sinks for oxygen vacancies. The stabilization energy for oxygen vacancies was predicted to be ca. 0.7 eV with a repulsive interaction between vacancies [76,77,78,79]. It is expected, therefore, that oxygen vacancies are rather uniformly distributed within twin walls and depleted in the bulk [78]. The second prediction is based on the inherent instability of regular TiO6 octahedra. Even an oxygen cage with cubic symmetry and of sufficient size will lead to off-centering of the Ti position so that it is probable that distorted octahedra will contain Ti located slightly off the geometrical midpoint of the octahedra [20]. Such geometrical configurations contain electric dipole moments, which, depending on the nature of the dipole–dipole interaction, will lead to ferroelectric or ferrielectric local centers. Numerical calculations have shown that domain boundaries in CaTiO3 are mainly ferrielectric with maximum dipole moments at the wall [20]; a small ferroelectric dipole moment was found perpendicular to the wall with alternating (antiferroelectric) dipoles between neighboring walls. The same tendency for polar layers in CaTiO3 (e.g., near surfaces) was also predicted for CaTiO3/BaTiO3 interfaces [80]. In CaTiO3 the resulting polarity of the domain wall was observed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy [17], which represented the first proof that such wall-related polar structures exist in ferroelastic materials.
Details of the symmetry of the polar vector were subsequently determined by Yokota et al. [19] using second harmonic generation (SHG) techniques. Three-dimensional SHG images of samples with the pseudocubic (110) and (1–11) planes confirmed that both crystallographically prominent types of twin boundaries (W plane) and nonprominent twin boundaries (W’ plane) are SHG active and, consequently, polar. The directions of the electric polarization P were determined from the anisotropy of SHG intensities. In the W’ plane, the SHG polar diagrams are well fitted using the point-group symmetry 2, which reveals that the P directions are parallel to the twofold axis. They do not lie in the W′ plane, but are tilted from it. In the W plane, the P direction lies in the mirror plane of the point-group symmetry m. These studies are probably the most precise SHG investigations ever undertaken in domain boundary engineering and demonstrate the power of this technique. The resonant piezoelectric effect in CaTiO3 was recently reported by Salje et al. [81].

3. SrTiO3

SrTiO3 is an incipient ferroelectric, so it is not surprising that ferroic properties emerge near defects, surfaces, and domain boundaries [82]. This is in contrast to CaTiO3, which is not an incipient ferroelectric, although the detailed mechanisms of the off-centering of Ti in SrTiO3 and CaTiO3 are almost identical. Energy minimization of empirical potentials [18] show reduced tilts of the TiO6 octahedra (Figure 2) near the twin boundary and, again in contrast with CaTiO3, a shift of both cations, namely Ti and Sr (Figure 3) from the center of symmetry. The polar properties are still dominated by Ti with the underlying ferroelastic twin structures being extremely sensitive to external forces.
The great mobility of twin walls in SrTiO3 was documented by Kityk et al. [83,84], and the high density of twin walls and dislocations near the crystal surface was shown by X-ray diffraction [85] and optical microscopy [86]. Wall polarity was observed by resonant piezoelectric spectroscopy (RPS) [13,21] at temperatures well below the ferroelastic phase transition [87]. Fontcuberta et al. [88] have shown that electric tuning of ferroelastic domain walls in SrTiO3 also leads to dramatic changes of the magnetic domain structure of a neighboring magnetic layer (La1/2Sr1/2MnO3) epitaxially clamped on a SrTiO3 substrate. They showed that the properties of the magnetic layer are intimately connected to the existence of polar regions at twin boundaries of SrTiO3 that can be electrically modulated. These findings illustrate that by exploiting the responsiveness of domain walls (DWs) to external stimuli—even in absence of any domain contribution—prominent and adjustable macroscopic reactions of neighboring layers can be obtained. Domain walls can hence be used to trigger tunable magnetic responses and may lead to new ways for the manipulation of emerging multiferroic properties.
The new aspect of polarity inside domain walls in SrTiO3 relates to the high degree of isotropy of this weakly distorted structure. While in CaTiO3 the direction of the electric dipole is always oriented towards the apex of the twin structure, all indications in SrTiO3 are that the energy required to reverse the dipole is small and comparable with the thermal energy. This means that dipole configurations such as that shown in Figure 4 are rather common. An indirect proof for such polar structures stems from the observation of resonance structures at cryogenic temperatures [13], which coincide with the results of simulations [18].
These local reversals constitute local vortex structures, where the dipole rotates out of the twin plane and have been investigated in [89,90]. RPS studies in [21] evidenced field-induced deformations, which were attributed to local piezoelectricity inside domain walls.
Theoretical arguments lead to the conclusion that vortex structures are expected to exist [68,69] although no direct domain observations were yet reported. Nevertheless, the results of Zhao et al. [69] were directly inspired by the simulations in SrTiO3 [18] and may yet be the strongest evidence that such flicker vortex states may be observable in SrTiO3. Despite the short lifetime of each vortex, these authors reported that the vortex density of the sample remains constant and can be modulated with weak electric fields. It is the local instability of the vortex state that makes it possible to switch vortices locally and also change the global vortex density. These bulk effects are mirrored by domain wall vortices, even if these vortices do not exist in the bulk. The first clear indication of this effect came from molecular dynamics studies [18,69,85,91]. It was shown that the orientation of the polar vectors in the wall could invert if the anisotropy energy is sufficiently small. Simulated polar patterns in the domain walls with rotations of the dipoles out of the wall are shown in Figure 4. The rotation leads to Bloch-like states in the wall, where the dipole is oriented perpendicular to the wall (Figure 5). Interestingly, this result is almost identical to analytical predictions [39,92].
Usually, polarity in twin walls is ferrielectric, whereas vortex excitations lead to true ferroelectricity on a very local scale. As a result, in-plane electric fields can selectively stabilize one of the vortex polarization states and enhance the ability of the walls to move. For nanoscale ferroelectric memory devices, one envisages a precisely controllable device, where a desired domain wall pattern is manipulated by shifting the vortex position electrically or mechanically. Molecular dynamics simulations mimic this situation, where a constant electric field acts as an external force individually applied to the charged atoms or dipoles along the direction of the field. To characterize the local response of the vortex polarization to the field, Zykova-Timan and Salje tuned the initial experimental input to the specifications of the atomistic model (e.g., dielectric permittivity of SrTiO3, system size, etc.). The application of high electric fields above 0.007 V/Å along [–101] induced a rotation of the Ti-dipoles near the twin boundary and in the bulk structure. Thus, the vortex deformed and became unstable. In the range from −0.004 to 0.004 V/Å, the twin boundary stabilized and a spontaneous switchable polarization of the vortex, aligned with the field, dominated over the initial state [81].
We show Bloch lines inside the twin plane (−101) in Figure 5 and mark the two possible dipole directions in [–101] as red and along [10–1] as blue. Two switching processes can be envisaged in this geometry. The first is to apply a vertical field along the dipole direction. This field will move Bloch lines by expanding or shrinking the larger domains. The macroscopic polarization in this direction directly reflects the volume proportion of the up-and-down domains. Depending on the geometrical distribution of Bloch lines, we expect the changes of the macroscopic polarization to be continuous or abrupt (the latter happens when Bloch lines jam [41], similar to jamming of ferroelastic domains).
The second switching mechanism relates to fields perpendicular to the twin plane. In this case, there is little interaction with the dipoles in each subdomain besides some weak dipole canting. The field couples directly with the dipoles, which are orthogonal to the twin plane (red and blue in Figure 5). This may happen by switching dipoles in segments of Bloch lines into the opposite directions. This local switching does not involve the shift of Bloch points, as indicated by green segments in Figure 5, and is hence fast. Simulations of complex ferroelastic structures found switching times only slightly longer than the phonon times [93,94]. A much slower movement can be envisaged when the Bloch points shift and thereby change the ratio of red and blue domains inside the Bloch walls. This sliding of Bloch points is similar to the sliding of kink excitations in ferroelastic materials and requires ca. 50 phonon times to pass a diameter of 10 nm [95]. The total bit density of such a Bloch-line ferroelectric vertex memory can be very high [22]; we estimate that distances between twin boundaries are as small as 50 nm and that Bloch lines can form with densities of 100 Bloch lines in an area of 100 × 100 nm2, giving a bit density of 1016/m2. This may be compared with a maximum bit density of 1.0 Tbit/sq.in. (the unusual mixed units favored in the magnetic memory industry), and it offers potentially one order of magnitude higher density than is currently attainable. The problems of access remain; however, these can be addressed by nanolithography with e-beam writing. A separate question is one of write speed, but in the present case this is not limited by domain wall mobility, which in the low-field regime is ca. 1 nm/s [22,96,97].

4. Domain Glass and Complex Structures

Increasing the densities of domain boundaries, and hence smaller domains, leads to quantitatively new effects. The highest wall concentration was predicted for a tweed structure, which is a densely interwoven network of domain walls [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Domain glass [29,30] is vaguely akin to relaxors [31,32,33] although the local domain wall structures may be much better preserved. Spatially heterogeneous states like tweed depend crucially on the elastic anisotropy, while detailed stability simulations showed that tweed structures are omnipresent in any ferroelastic precursor pattern [34]. These arguments indicate that tweed is stabilized by defects while dynamic tweed also exists for very low defect concentrations [35]. It was argued that tweed structures are polar, either via the flexoelectric effect or via bilinear coupling between the strain and local dipole moments [36,37,38,40], although such polarity has never been observed. More generally, it was then shown that all complex ferroelastic patterns show polarity, including tweed patterns [98]. Experimentally, Salje et al. [42] reported the first direct evidence for piezoelectricity of a tweed structure in LaAlO3, where the uniform parent structure is centrosymmetric and shows no polarity [99].
The importance of the flexoelectric effect for the formation of such polarity in complex structures was first found by computer simulation [98]. The study of an atomistic toy model showed the interplay of ferroelastic twin patterns and electrical polarization. Molecular dynamics simulation reproduced the polarity in straight twin walls and, by making contact with continuum theory, it was demonstrated that the effect is governed by linear flexoelectricity. Complex twin patterns, with very high densities of kinks and/or junctions [100,101], produced winding structures in the dipolar field, which are reminiscent of polarization vortices. By means of a “cold shearing” technique, patches with high vortex densities were generated.
These patterns unexpectedly show a net macroscopic polarization, even if neither the original sample nor the applied mechanical perturbation breaks inversion symmetry by itself. These results explain puzzling experimental observations of “parasitic” polarity by Garten et al. [100] and Biancoli et al. [101]. It also connects with the idea that domain boundary-related multiferroic switching is not necessarily related to the switching on individual domain boundaries, but to patches of several domain boundaries [11]. This approach may become necessary because it may not be possible to address individual domain walls in a device but to cover several boundaries collectively. The memory structure would then not relate to simple binary codes (such as up or down of the polar component) but to the number of up or down of all domain boundaries in the patch. If one has, on average, 10 boundaries in a patch, one could potentially access all possible combinations between “all up” (+10) and “all down” (−10), which greatly increase the bit-density of the device.

5. Conclusions

Domain boundary engineering is an emerging field of research, which has had already great success in magnetic devices using the racetrack technology [102]. Memory devices based on ferroelectricity have not yet been developed, while the essential elements are known: namely local polarization and switchable nanostructures. Developing the device materials needs then to be accompanied by an equivalent evolution of the logical structure of the computation. It is very unlikely that binary computation will be the optimal way to use nanoscale memory device materials. Other developments, such as the memistor device, may lead to some blueprint for applications. Another previous development, such as relaxor materials for devices requiring high dielectric responses, may equally lead to some inspiration for the application of domain boundary ferroics.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to NSFC (51320105014, 51621063) for their support. EKHS is grateful to EPSRC (EP/K009702/1) and the Leverhulme Trust (EM-2016-004).

Author Contributions

Ekhard K. H. Salje wrote the first manuscript, Xiangdong Ding and Ekhard K. H. Salje revised the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Daraktchiev, M.; Catalan, G.; Scott, J.F. Landau theory of domain wall magnetoelectricity. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 224118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lajzerowicz, J.J.; Niez, J.J. Phase transition in a domain wall. J. Phys. Lett. 1979, 40, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wojdeł, J.C.; Íñiguez, J. Ferroelectric transitions at ferroelectric domain walls found from first principles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 247603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Salje, E.K.H. Multiferroic domain boundaries as active memory devices: Trajectories towards domain boundary engineering. Chemphyschem 2010, 11, 940–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Salje, E.K.H.; Zhang, H. Domain boundary engineering. Phase Transit. 2009, 82, 452–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Seidel, J.; Martin, L.W.; He, Q.; Zhan, Q.; Chu, Y.-H.; Rother, A.; Hawkridge, M.E.; Maksymovych, P.; Yu, P.; Gajek, M.; et al. Conduction at domain walls in oxide multiferroics. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Catalan, G.; Seidel, J.; Ramesh, R.; Scott, J.F. Domain wall nanoelectronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012, 84, 119–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Schilling, A.; Byrne, D.; Catalan, G.; Webber, K.G.; Genenko, Y.A.; Wu, G.S.; Scott, J.F.; Gregg, J.M. Domains in ferroelectric nanodots. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3359–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Farokhipoor, S.; Noheda, B. Conduction through 71 degrees Domain Walls in BiFeO3 Thin Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 127601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Catalan, G.; Janssens, A.; Rispens, G.; Csiszar, S.; Seeck, O.; Rijnders, G.; Blank, D.H.; Noheda, B. Polar domains in lead titanate films under tensile strain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Viehland, D.D.; Salje, E.K.H. Domain boundary-dominated systems: Adaptive structures and functional twin boundaries. Adv. Phys. 2014, 63, 267–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, D.W.; Salje, E.K.H.; Mi, S.B.; Jia, C.; Bellaiche, L. Multidomains made of different structural phases in multiferroic BiFeO3: A first-principles-based study. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 134107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Scott, J.F.; Salje, E.K.H.; Carpenter, M.A. Domain Wall Damping and Elastic Softening in SrTiO3: Evidence for Polar Twin Walls. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Salje, E.K.H.; Safarik, D.J.; Modic, K.A.; Gubernatis, J.E.; Cooley, J.C.; Taylor, R.D.; Mihaila, B.; Saxena, A.; Lookman, T.; Smith, J.L.; et al. Tin telluride: A weakly co-elastic metal. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Seidel, J.; Maksymovych, P.; Batra, Y.; Katan, A.; Yang, S.Y.; He, Q.; Baddorf, A.P.; Kalinin, S.V.; Yang, C.H.; Yang, J.C.; et al. Domain Wall Conductivity in La-Doped BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Aird, A.; Salje, E.K.H. Sheet superconductivity in twin walls: Experimental evidence of WO3-x. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1998, 10, L377–L380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Van Aert, S.; Turner, S.; Delville, R.; Schryvers, D.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Salje, E.K. Direct Observation of ferrielectricity at ferroelastic domain boundaries in CaTiO3 by electron microscopy. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Zykova-Timan, T.; Salje, E.K.H. Highly mobile vortex structures inside polar twin boundaries in SrTiO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yokota, H.; Usami, H.; Haumont, R.; Hicher, P.; Kaneshiro, J.; Salje, E.K.H.; Uesu, Y. Direct evidence of polar nature of ferroelastic twin boundaries in CaTiO3 obtained by second harmonic generation microscope. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goncalves-Ferreira, L.; Redfern, S.A.; Artacho, E.; Salje, E.K. Ferrielectric twin walls in CaTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Salje, E.K.H.; Aktas, O.; Carpenter, M.A.; Laguta, V.V.; Scott, J.F. Domains within Domains and Walls within Walls: Evidence for Polar Domains in Cryogenic SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Salje, E.K.H.; Scott, J.F. Ferroelectric Bloch-line switching: A paradigm for memory devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bratkovsky, A.M.; Marais, S.C.; Heine, V.; Salje, E.K.H. The theory of fluctuations and texture embryos in structural phase transitions mediated by strain. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1994, 6, 3679–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Parlinski, K.; Heine, V.; Salje, E.K.H. Origin of tweed texture in the simulation of a cuprate superconductor. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1999, 5, 497–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aktas, O.; Salje, E.K.H.; Crossley, S.; Lampronti, G.I.; Whatmore, R.W.; Mathur, N.D.; Carpenter, M.A. Ferroelectric precursor behavior in PbSc0.5Ta0.5O3 detected by field-induced resonant piezoelectric spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Salje, E.K.H. Tweed, twins, and holes. Am. Mineral. 2015, 100, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aktas, O.; Carpenter, M.A.; Salje, E.K.H. Polar precursor ordering in BaTiO3 detected by resonant piezoelectric spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 2011–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kartha, S.; Krumhansl, J.A.; Sethna, J.P.; Wickham, L.K. Disorder-driven pretransitional tweed pattern in martensitic transformations. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 52, 803–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salje, E.K.H.; Ding, X.; Aktas, O. Domain glass. Phys. Status Solidi 2014, 251, 2061–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Salje, E.K.H.; Carpenter, M.A. Domain glasses: Twin planes, Bloch lines, and Bloch points. Phys. Status Solidi 2015, 252, 2639–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cross, L.E. Piezoelectricity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 114, pp. 131–155. [Google Scholar]
  32. Viehland, D.; Wuttig, M.; Cross, L.E. The glassy behavior of relaxor ferroelectrics. Ferroelectrics 1991, 120, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kleemann, W. The relaxor enigma—Charge disorder and random fields in ferroelectrics. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lloveras, P.; Castán, T.; Planes, A.; Saxena, A. Disorder and Strain-Induced Complexity in Functional Materials; Kakeshita, T., Fukuda, T., Saxena, A., Planes, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 227–247. [Google Scholar]
  35. Salje, E.K.H.; Ding, X.; Zhao, Z.; Lookman, T. How to generate high twin densities in nano-ferroics: Thermal quench and low temperature shear. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zubko, P.; Catalan, G.; Tagantsev, A.K. Flexoelectric Effect in Solids. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2013, 43, 387–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Catalan, G.; Lubk, A.; Vlooswijk, A.H.G.; Snoeck, E.; Magen, C.; Janssens, A.; Rispens, G.; Rijnders, G.; Blank, D.H.A.; Noheda, B. Flexoelectric rotation of polarization in ferroelectric thin films. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 963–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Conti, S.; Müller, S.; Poliakovsky, A.; Salje, E.K.H. Coupling of order parameters, chirality, and interfacial structures in multiferroic materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2011, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Houchmandzadeh, B.; Lajzerowicz, J.; Salje, E.K.H. Order prameter coupling and chirality of domain-walls. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1991, 3, 5163–5169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stengel, M. Flexoelectricity from density-functional perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Salje, E.K.H.; Ding, X.; Zhao, Z.; Lookman, T.; Saxena, A. Thermally activated avalanches: Jamming and the progression of needle domains. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salje, E.K.; Alexe, M.; Kustov, S.; Weber, M.C.; Schiemer, J.; Nataf, G.F.; Kreisel, J. Direct observation of polar tweed in LaAlO3. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Salje, E.K.H. Phase Transitions in Ferroelastic and Co-Elastic Crystals; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bhattacharya, K. Microstructure of Martensite: Why It Forms and How It Gives Rise to Shape Memory Effects; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sidorkin, A.S. Domain Structure in Ferroelectrics and Related Materials; Cambridge International Science Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lines, M.; Glass, A. Principles and Applications of Ferroelectrics and Related Materials; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  47. Khachaturyan, A.G. The Theory of Structural Transformations in Solids; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  48. Scott, J.F. Ferroelectric Memories; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  49. Rabe, K.M.; Triscone, J.M.; Ahn, C.H. Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jiles, D. Introduction to Magnetism and Magnetic Materials; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cullity, B.D.; Graham, C.D. Introduction to Magnetic Materials, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pavarini, E.; Koch, E.; Schollwock, U. (Eds.) Emergent Phenomena in Correlated Matter; Forschungszentrum Julich: Julich, Germany, 2013.
  53. Dawber, M.; Rabe, K.M.; Scott, J.F. Physics of thin-film ferroelectric oxides. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2005, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Weiss, P. The variation of ferromagnetism with temperature. Comptes Rendu 1906, 143, 1136. [Google Scholar]
  55. Eerenstein, W.; Mathur, N.D.; Scott, J.F. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials. Nature 2006, 442, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Spaldin, N.; Fiebig, M. The renaissance of magnetoelectric multiferroics. Science 2005, 309, 391–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fiebig, M. Revival of the magnetoelectric effect. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, R123–R152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kadomtseva, A.; Popov, Y.; Pyatakov, A.; Vorob’ev, G.; Zvezdin, A.K.; Viehland, D. Phase transitions in multiferroic BiFeO3 crystals, thin-layers, and ceramics: Enduring potential for a single phase, room-temperature magnetoelectric ‘holy grail’. Phase Transit. 2006, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Salje, E.K.H. Ferroelastic Materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2012, 42, 265–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Salje, E.K.H. Modulated minerals as potential ferroic materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2015, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hlinka, J.; Privratska, J.; Ondrejkovic, P.; Janovec, V. Symmetry Guide to Ferroaxial Transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Litvin, D.B.; Janovec, V. Spontaneous Tensor Properties for Multiferroic Phases. Ferroelectrics 2014, 461, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Janovec, V.; Litvin, D.B. Scanning of magnetic space groups and the analysis of non-magnetic domain walls. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2007, 63, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Janovec, V. A symmetry approach to domain structures. Ferroelectric 1976, 12, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Janovec, V. Symmetry and structure of domain walls. Ferroelectric 1981, 35, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Daumont, C.J.M.; Mannix, D.; Venkatesan, S.; Rubi, D.; Catalan, G.; Kooi, B.J.; de Hosson, J.T.M.; Noheda, B. Epitaxial TbMnO3 thin films on SrTiO3 substrates: A structural study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Yadav, A.K.; Nelson, C.T.; Hsu, S.L.; Hong, Z.; Clarkson, J.D.; Schlepütz, C.M.; Damodaran, A.R.; Shafer, P.; Arenholz, E.; Dedon, L.R.; et al. Observation of polar vortices in oxide superlattices. Nature 2016, 530, 198–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Poettker, H.; Salje, E.K.H. Flexoelectricity, incommensurate phases and the Lifshitz point. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2016, 28, 075902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhao, Z.; Ding, X.; Salje, E.K.H. Flicker vortex structures in multiferroic materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Aktas, O.; Carpenter, M.A.; Salje, E.K.H. Elastic softening of leucite and the lack of polar domain boundaries. Am. Mineral. 2015, 10, 2159–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Aktas, O.; Salje, E.K.H.; Carpenter, M.A. Resonant ultrasonic spectroscopy and resonant piezoelectric spectroscopy in ferroelastic lead phosphate, Pb3(PO4)2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2013, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Dove, M.T.; Cool, T.; Palmer, D.C.; Putnis, A.; Salje, E.K.H.; Winkler, B. On the role of Al-Si ordering in the cubic-tetragonal phase transition of leucite. Am. Mineral. 1993, 78, 486–492. [Google Scholar]
  73. Salje, E. Thermodynamics of plagioclases I: Theory of the I1¯−P1¯ phase transition in anorthite and Ca-rich plagioclases. Phys. Chem. Miner. 1987, 14, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Salje, E.K.H.; Wruck, B. Specific-heat measurements and critical exponents of the ferroelastic phase transition in Pb3(PO4)2 and Pb3(P1-xAsxO4)2. Phys. Rev. B 1983, 28, 6510–6518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Salje, E.; Devarajan, V.; Bismayer, U.; Guimaraes, D.M.C. Phase transitions in Pb3(P1-xAsxO4)2: Influence of the central peak and flip mode on the Raman scattering of hard modes. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1983, 16, 5233–5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Calleja, M.; Dove, M.T.; Salje, E.K.H. Trapping of oxygen vacancies on twin walls of CaTiO3: A computer simulation study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2003, 15, 2301–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Goncalves-Ferreira, L.; Redfern, S.A.T.; Artacho, E.; Salje, E.K.H.; Lee, W.T. Trapping of oxygen vacancies in the twin walls of perovskite. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, W.T.; Salje, E.K.H.; Goncalves-Ferreira, L.; Daraktchiev, M.; Bismayer, U. Intrinsic activation energy for twin-wall motion in the ferroelastic perovskite CaTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 214110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lee, W.T.; Salje, E.K.H.; Bismayer, U. Influence of point defects on the distribution of twin wall widths. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wu, X.F.; Rabe, K.M.; Vanderbilt, D. Interfacial enhancement of ferroelectricity in CaTiO3/BaTiO3 superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Salje, E.K.H.; Aktas, O.; Ding, X. Functional Topologies in (Multi-) Ferroics: The Ferroelastic Template. Topological Structures in Ferroic Materials; Springer Series in Materials Science; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 228, pp. 83–101. [Google Scholar]
  82. Tagantsev, A.K.; Courtens, E.; Arzel, L. Prediction of a low-temperature ferroelectric instability in antiphase domain boundaries of strontium titanate. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kityk, A.V.; Schranz, W.; Sondergeld, P.; Havlik, D.; Salje, E.K.H.; Scott, J.F. Low-frequency superelasticity and nonlinear elastic behavior of SrTiO3 crystals. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 946–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kityk, A.V.; Schranz, W.; Sondergeld, P.; Havlik, D.; Salje, E.K.H.; Scott, J.F. Nonlinear elastic behaviour of SrTiO3 crystals in the quantum paraelectric regime. Europhys. Lett. 2000, 50, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chrosch, J.; Salje, E.K.H. Near-surface domain structures in uniaxially stressed SrTiO3. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1998, 10, 2817–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Buckley, A.; Rivera, J.P.; Salje, E.K.H. Twin structures in tetragonal SrTiO3: The ferroelastic phase transition and the formation of needle domains. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 1653–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Salje, E.K.H.; Gallardo, M.C.; Jimenez, J.; Romero, F.J.; del Cerro, J. The cubic-tetragonal phase transition in strontium titanate: Excess specific heat measurements and evidence for a near-tricritical, mean field type transition mechanism. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1998, 10, 5535–5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fontcuberta, J.; Skumryev, V.; Laukhin, V.; Granados, X.; Salje, E.K.H. Polar domain walls trigger magnetoelectric coupling. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Hlinka, J.; Stepkova, V.; Marton, P.; Ondrejkovic, P. Ferroelectric Domain Walls and their Intersections in Phase-Field Simulations. In Topological Structures in Ferroic Materials: Domain Walls, Vortices and Skyrmions; Springer Series in Materials Science; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 228, pp. 161–180. [Google Scholar]
  90. Stepkova, V.; Marton, P.; Hlinka, J. Ising lines: Natural topological defects within ferroelectric Bloch walls. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 094106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Prosandeev, S.; Malashevich, A.; Gui, Z.; Louis, L.; Walter, R.; Souza, I.; Bellaiche, L. Natural optical activity and its control by electric field in electrotoroidic systems. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Conti, S.; Weikard, U. Interaction between free boundaries and domain walls in ferroelastics. Eur. Phys. J. B 2004, 41, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Salje, E.K.H.; Zhao, Z.; Ding, X.; Sun, J. Mechanical spectroscopy in twinned minerals: Simulation of resonance patterns at high frequencies. Am. Mineral. 2013, 98, 1449–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Zhang, L.; Salje, E.K.H.; Ding, X.; Sun, J. Strain rate dependence of twinning avalanches at high speed impact. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Salje, E.K.H.; Wang, X.; Ding, X.; Sun, J. Simulating acoustic emission: The noise of collapsing domains. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Tybell, T.; Paruch, P.; Giamarchi, T.; Triscone, J.M. Domain Wall Creep in Epitaxial Ferroelectric Pb(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3 Thin Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Chang, L.W.; Nagarajan, V.; Scott, J.F.; Gregg, J.M. Self-Similar Nested Flux Closure Structures in a Tetragonal Ferroelectric. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 2553–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Salje, E.K.H.; Li, S.; Stengel, M.; Gumbsch, P.; Ding, X. Flexo-electricity and the polarity of complex ferroelastic twin patterns. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hayward, S.A.; Morrison, F.D.; Redfern, S.A.T.; Salje, E.K.H.; Scott, J.F.; Knight, K.S.; Tarantino, S.C.; Glazer, A.M.; Shuvaeva, V.; Daniel, P.; et al. Transformation processes in LaAlO3: Neutron diffraction, dielectric, thermal, optical, and Raman studies. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Garten, L.M.; Trolier-McKinstry, S. Enhanced flexoelectricity through residual ferroelectricity in barium strontium titanate. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Biancoli, A.; Fancher, C.M.; Jones, J.L.; Damjanovic, D. Breaking of macroscopic centric symmetry in paraelectric phases of ferroelectric materials and implications for flexoelectricity. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Parkin, S.; Yang, S.H. Memory on the racetrack. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Crystals 06 00163 g001 550
Figure 1. Image of a twin wall in CaTiO3 with polar shifts of Ti positions inside the wall and two adjacent layers of Ti shifts towards the wall center [17].
Figure 1. Image of a twin wall in CaTiO3 with polar shifts of Ti positions inside the wall and two adjacent layers of Ti shifts towards the wall center [17].
Crystals 06 00163 g001
Crystals 06 00163 g002 550
Figure 2. A snapshot of the TiO6 octahedral tilts in the vicinity of the twin wall (vertical red line). Notice the change of the tilting angles across the boundary [18].
Figure 2. A snapshot of the TiO6 octahedral tilts in the vicinity of the twin wall (vertical red line). Notice the change of the tilting angles across the boundary [18].
Crystals 06 00163 g002
Crystals 06 00163 g003 550
Figure 3. The variation of the Sr–Sr and Ti–Ti nearest-neighbor distances in the bulk and near the twin wall against the distance perpendicular to the wall [18].
Figure 3. The variation of the Sr–Sr and Ti–Ti nearest-neighbor distances in the bulk and near the twin wall against the distance perpendicular to the wall [18].
Crystals 06 00163 g003
Crystals 06 00163 g004 550
Figure 4. Vortex structure of Ti-displacements at an inversion point inside a twin wall in SrTiO3 [18]. The view is perpendicular to the twin wall, which is pointing inside the plane of view. All Ti-displacements from the octahedral midpoints are small inside the two adjacent domains, but large inside the pink domain wall. The rotation of the displacement vectors inside the domain wall constitutes a Bloch wall [22] and is indicated in red.
Figure 4. Vortex structure of Ti-displacements at an inversion point inside a twin wall in SrTiO3 [18]. The view is perpendicular to the twin wall, which is pointing inside the plane of view. All Ti-displacements from the octahedral midpoints are small inside the two adjacent domains, but large inside the pink domain wall. The rotation of the displacement vectors inside the domain wall constitutes a Bloch wall [22] and is indicated in red.
Crystals 06 00163 g004
Crystals 06 00163 g005 550
Figure 5. Twin plane with local dipole moments in the up and down direction. Bloch lines limit the domains within the twin wall where the dipole direction is either out of the plane (red) or into the plane (blue). Bloch vortex points, where two Bloch lines with different polarity join, are indicated in green [22].
Figure 5. Twin plane with local dipole moments in the up and down direction. Bloch lines limit the domains within the twin wall where the dipole direction is either out of the plane (red) or into the plane (blue). Bloch vortex points, where two Bloch lines with different polarity join, are indicated in green [22].
Crystals 06 00163 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salje, E.K.H.; Ding, X. Ferroelastic Domain Boundary-Based Multiferroicity. Crystals 2016, 6, 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6120163

AMA Style

Salje EKH, Ding X. Ferroelastic Domain Boundary-Based Multiferroicity. Crystals. 2016; 6(12):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6120163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salje, Ekhard K. H., and Xiangdong Ding. 2016. "Ferroelastic Domain Boundary-Based Multiferroicity" Crystals 6, no. 12: 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6120163

APA Style

Salje, E. K. H., & Ding, X. (2016). Ferroelastic Domain Boundary-Based Multiferroicity. Crystals, 6(12), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6120163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop