Next Article in Journal
Simultaneous Enhancement of Electrical Conductivity and Seebeck Coefficient of [6,6]-Phenyl-C71 Butyric Acid Methyl Ester (PC70BM) by Adding Co-Solvents
Next Article in Special Issue
Magnetic MOF for AO7 Removal and Targeted Delivery
Previous Article in Journal
Ba4[Mn3N6], a Quasi-One-Dimensional Mixed-Valent Nitridomanganate (II, IV)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Coordination Behavior of Bis-Imidazole and Various Carboxylate Ligands towards Zn(II) and Cd(II) Ions: Synthesis, Structure, and Photoluminescence Study

Key Laboratory of Eco-chemical Engineering, Ministry of Education, Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Applied Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2018, 8(6), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8060236
Submission received: 3 May 2018 / Revised: 24 May 2018 / Accepted: 24 May 2018 / Published: 25 May 2018

Abstract

:
Four coordination polymers (CPs) based on bis-imidazole ligands (1,2-bimb and 1,2-bmimb), namely, {[Zn(1,2-bimb)(2,5-dtpa)] H2O}n (1), {[Cd2(1,2-bimb)2(5-hipa)2] 2H2O} (2), {Zn2(1,2-bimb)(L)(CH3COO) DMF·2H2O}n (3) and {Cd(1,2-bmimb)(3-npa)}n (4), have been synthesized by solvothermal reactions (1,2-bimb = 1,2-bis((1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl)benzene, 1,2-bmimb = 1,2-bis((2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl)benzene, 2,5-H2dtpa = 2,5-diaminoterephthalic acid, 5-H2hipa = 5-hydroxyisophthalic acid, H3L= 3,3′,3′′-(2,4,6-trioxo-1,3,5-triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)tripropanoic acid, 3-H2npa = 3-nitrophthalic acid) and structurally verified by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses and further characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), elemental analyses and infrared spectroscopy (IR). Complex 1 and 2 show a dinuclear 2D layered structure. Complex 4 exhibits a two-dimensional network consisting of [Cd(3-npa)]n and [Cd(1,2-bmimb)]n chains. Both 1,2 and 4 display a 4-connected sql topology sheet, which can be further expanded into a 3D supramolecular network through π···π interaction between layers. Complex 3 features a 3D (3,6)-connected {42·6}·{44·610·8}-3,6T24 topology structure consisting of 2D bilayers. Structural comparison reveals that it is not only the substituents at different positions of ancillary ligands and the primary bis(imidazole) linkers that play crucial roles in the control of the final structures. Besides, the photoluminescence properties of 14 have been investigated in the solid state at room temperature.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The design and synthesis of new coordination polymers (CPs) have attracted enormous attention in recent years, not only for their intriguing structures and diverse topologies, but also for their potential applications in gas adsorption and separation, catalysis, magnetism, luminescent sensor and so on [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Among them, the luminescent properties of coordination polymers are widely studied. As we all know, the organic ligands often contain aromatic rings or conjugated groups that are subject to excitation, giving rise to photoluminescence (PL) upon irradiation. Moreover, the metal center also contributes to optical emission, such as lanthanides and inorganic cluster. Utilizing their emission properties, various types of sensors are being developed. Luminescent sensors for detecting cations, anions, small molecules, explosives and temperature have been applied to various fields [7,8]. Many researchers attempted to control the self-assembly process of CPs and expected to synthesize precise structures with specific properties. However, it is difficult to design and predict a new CP structure because of various factors, such as solvents, pH values, temperature, template, the structural characteristics of organic ligands, the nature of the metal ions, the counterions and other various experimental conditions [9,10,11,12,13]. Among these various factors, the selection of suitable organic ligands is more effective and is a prerequisite for controlling the synthesis of novel coordination materials [14].
An effective way to carry out the reaction is to use mixed ligands such as carboxylic acid ligands and N-containing ligands in the same system [15]. More and more CPs from 1D to 3D have already been synthesized by using polyimidazole ligands as spacers, such as 1,3,5-tris(1-imidazolyl)-benzene, 1,4-bis(imidazolyl)benzene in combination with various polycarboxylate ligands as linkers [16]. Furthermore, we have been striving to synthesize systematically mixed-ligand CPs by adjusting the carboxylic acid chain with different substituents and the flexible/rigid properties of N-containing ligands, and to explain the topological relationships of the CPs [17,18]. Previous studies showed that carboxylate auxiliary ligands can provide cooperative coordination together with the N-containing ligands to meet the requirements of the coordination geometries of the metal ions in the assembly process. Although many bis-imidazol ligands and different poly-acids have been widely used to synthesize new coordination polymers [19,20,21,22,23,24,25], there are relatively rare in exploring the effect of the introduction of substituents and different carboxylic acid positions on the structure.
To further expand our research the mixed-ligand CPs, 1,2-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene) (1,2-bimb) and 1,2-bis((2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl)benzene (1,2-bmimb) is chosen as the primary ligand, owing to its flexible coordination ability. Meanwhile, carboxyl groups of different substitution positions and different substituents dicarboxylate ligands have been introduced into the system to react with transition metal. Herein, four mixed-ligand CPs have been successfully synthesized (Scheme 1), namely {[Zn(1,2-bimb)(2,5-dtpa)]·H2O}n (1), {[Cd2(1,2-bimb)2(5-hipa)2]·2H2O}n (2), {Zn2(1,2-bimb)(L)(CH3COO)·DMF2H2O}n (3), and {Cd(1,2-bmimb)(3-npa)}n (4). Their synthesis crystal structures, topologies, thermal stabilities, photoluminescence properties are reported in this paper.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Physical Measurements

The ligands 1,2-bimb and 1,2-bmimb were prepared according to reported methods [26,27]. The auxiliary ligands and other materials were purchased from commercial sources and without further purification.
The FT-IR spectra were measured on a NEXUS 670 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) in the range of 600–4000 cm−1 using KBr pellets. Elemental analyses (EA) were carried out on a CE instruments EA 1110 elemental analyzer (Carlo-Erba Corporation, Sandwich, Italy). TGA were carried out on an SDT Q600 instrument (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) at a heating rate of 5 °C under a N2 atmosphere. The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) spectra of complexes 14 were measured on a Rigaku D/Max-2500 diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation. Fluorescence spectra were obtained by a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi Limited, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. {[Zn(1,2-Bimb)(2,5-dtpa)]·H2O}n (1)

A mixture of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (0.2 mmol, 0.0544 g), 1,2-bimb (0.1 mmol, 0.0238 g), 2,5-H2dtpa (0.1 mmol, 0.0196 g), KOH (0.1 mmol, 0.0056 g), N,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF) (5 mL), and H2O (5 mL) was added in a 18 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel, which was heated to 120 °C for 72 h and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 5 °C/h. Colorless block crystals of 1 were obtained in 56% yield (based on 1,2-bimb), washed with acetone, and dried in air. Anal. Calcd. for C22H22N6O5Zn (515.85): C, 51.26; H, 4.26; N, 16.28. Found: C, 51.22; H, 4.22; N, 16.23. IR (KBr pettlet, cm−1): 3436 (m), 3367 (m), 3234 (m), 2341 (w), 1621 (s), 1552 (s), 1527 (s), 1430 (s), 1385 (s), 1326 (m), 1308 (m), 1255 (m), 1109 (w), 1054 (m), 1011 (w), 942 (w), 897 (w), 851 (m), 830 (w), 769 (w), 739 (m), 645 (m), 623 (w), 574 (w), 525 (m).

2.2.2. {[Cd2(1,2-Bimb)2(5-hipa)2]·2H2O}n (2)

The same synthetic procedure as for complex 1 was used expect that 2,5-H2dtpa was replaced by 5-H2hipa. Colorless block crystals of 2 were obtained. Then, it was washed through ethanol and deionized water and dried in air. Yield 49% based on 1,2-bimb. Anal. Calcd. for C44H40Cd2N8O12 (1097.66): C, 48.10; H, 3.64; N, 10.20. Found: C, 48.05; H, 3.62; N, 10.15. IR (KBr pettlet, cm−1): 3588 (s), 3287 (s), 3109 (s), 2567 (s), 1709 (s), 1624 (s), 1566 (s), 1512 (s), 1383 (s), 1286 (s), 1235(s), 1104 (m), 1083 (s), 966 (w), 823 (w), 776(m), 721 (m), 661 (w).

2.2.3. {Zn2(1,2-Bimb)(L)(CH3COO)·DMF·2H2O}n (3)

A mixture of Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O (0.2 mmol, 0.0438 g), 1,2-bimb (0.1 mmol, 0.0238 g), H3L (0.1 mmol, 0.0345 g), KOH (0.2 mmol 0.0112 g), N,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF) (5 mL), and H2O (5 mL) was added in a 18 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel, which was heated to 120 °C for 72 h and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 5 °C/h. Colorless block crystals of 3 were obtained in 57% yield (based on 1,2-bimb), washed with acetone, and dried in air. Anal. Calcd. for C31H40N8O14Zn2 (879.45): C, 42.30; H, 4.55; N, 12.73. Found: C, 42.22; H, 4.53; N, 12.67. IR (KBr pettlet, cm−1): 3238 (s), 3100 (s), 2645 (s), 1732 (s), 1647 (s), 1547 (s), 1512 (s), 1388 (s), 1144(s), 1077 (s), 946 (w), 823 (w), 766 (m), 711 (m), 641 (w).

2.2.4. {Cd(1,2-Bmimb)(3-npa)}n (4)

A mixture of Cd(NO3)2·6H2O (0.2 mmol, 0.0492g), 1,2-bmimb (0.1 mmol, 0.0238 g), 3-H2npa (0.1 mmol, 0.0211 g), KOH (0.1 mmol, 0.0056 g), N,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF) (5 mL), and H2O (5 mL) was added in a 18 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel, which was heated to 120 °C for 72 h and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 5 °C/h. Colorless block crystals of 4 were obtained in 50% yield (based on 1,2-bimb), washed with deionized water, and dried in air. Anal. Calcd. for C24H21CdN5O6 (587.86): C, 49.06; H, 3.57; N, 11.92. Found: C, 48.68; H, 3.42; N, 12.03. IR (KBr pettlet, cm−1): 3422 (m), 1612 (s), 1517 (s), 1384 (s), 1352 (s), 1268 (w), 1112 (s),1058 (m), 944 (m), 843 (m), 822 (m), 740 (m), 655 (w), 609 (w).

2.3. X-ray Crystallography

Diffraction intensity date was carried out on a Siemens SMART diffractometer equipped with a CCD area detector using Mo-Kα monochromatic radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å Siemens Limited, Berlin, Germany). The absorption correction was based on multiple and symmetry-equivalent reflections in the date set using the program SADABS (Version 2.03) [28]. The structures were solved by direct methods with SHELXS-97 (Version 6.10) and refined with the full-matrix least-squares technique using the SHELXS-97 program [29]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically [30]. The hydrogen atoms attached to carbon and oxygen atoms were included in the structure factor calculations. Crystallographic date for complexes 14 are summarized in Table 1 and selected bond lengths and angles are listed in Tables S1–S4.
CCDC (1839112 for 1, 1839113 for 2, 1839114 for 3, 1840894 for 4) contains the supplementary crystallographic for this paper. There data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: +44-1223-336033; E-mail: [email protected]).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Structures of {[Zn(1,2-Bimb)(2,5-dtpa)]·H2O}n (1)

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that complex 1 crystallizes in the triclinic with space group P 1 . The asymmetric unit consists of one crystallographically independent ZnII ion, one 1,2-bimb ligand, one 2,5-dtpa anion and one lattice water molecule. As shown in Figure 1a, each ZnII ion located in a distorted [ZnO5N2] decahedron geometry, surrounded by five oxygen atoms of three 2,5-dtpa anions, two nitrogen atoms from two 1,2-bimb ligands. The bond lengths around the ZnII ions are in the range of 2.186(5)–2.566(4) Å. There are two coordination modes of 2,5-dtpa anions in complex 1. Both the two carboxylate group in 2.5-dtpa (mode I) anion ligated to four ZnII ions in µ22:η1 coordination mode, while the carboxylate groups in another 2,5-dtpa (mode II) adopt µ11:η1 coordination mode (Figure 1b). Two adjacent zinc atoms are connected by two oxygen atoms (O1, O2) from 2,5-dtpa anion forming one binuclear Zn cluster. Further, the structure is built around centrosymmetric Zn2O2 dimers with the Zn···Zn distances of 3.7786(9) Å. Then, the 2,5-dtpa anions and 1,2-bimb ligands further expanded the Zn2O2 dimers into a 2D layer (Figure 1c). As shown in Figure 1d, the π…π interactions between the benzene rings of 2,5-dtpa and 1,2-bimd ligands with distance of 3.753 Å play important role in the formation of three-dimensional network structure.
Topology analysis reveals that complex 1 is a 2D interpenetrated 4-connected sql net with point symbol of {44·62} by regarding the binuclear Zn cluster as 4-connected node, 2,5-dtpa anion and 1,2-bimb ligand as a 2-connected node, respectively (Figure 1e).

3.2. Crystal Structures of {[Cd2(1,2-Bimb)2(5-hipa)2]·2H2O}n (2)

Complex 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c. The asymmetric unit consists of two CdII ions, two 1,2-bimb ligands, two 5-hipa anions and two lattice water molecules. As shown in Figure 2a, Cd1 locates at the crystallographic center and is seven-coordinated by five carboxylate oxygen atoms from three 5-hipa anions, and four imidazole nitrogen atoms from two distinct 1,2-bimb ligands to give a {CdO5N2} decahedron coordination geometry. Cd2 is similar to that of Cd1. Two Cd atoms are connected by two carboxylate oxygen atoms(O7,O8) of 5-hipa anion forming one binuclear Cd cluster with the Cd…Cd distances of 3.8562(12) Å. The Cd-O/N bond lengths are in the range of 2.203(7)–2.794(6) Å. The bond angles around CdII ion are in the range of 49.77(17)°–171.6(3)°. In complex 2, the 5-hipa anion adopt a µ31:η2:η1:η1 coordination mode (Figure 2b). The binuclear Cd cluster connected by 5-hipa anions and 1,2-bimb ligands to form a 2D layer extended along c-axis (Figure 2c). The π···π interactions between the benzene ring of 5-hipa anions and 1,2-bimb ligands with a separation of 3.930 Å play a critical role in the formation of 3D supramolecular framework (Figure 2d).
Topologically, if the binuclear Cd cluster is viewed as four-connected nodes and each 1,2-bimb or 5-hipa serves as a two-connected spacer, complex 2 can be simplified as a 2D sql topology with a point symbol of {44·62} (Figure 2e).

3.3. Crystal Structures of {Zn2(1,2-Bimb)(L)(CH3COO)·DMF·2H2O}n (3)

Structural analysis reveals that complex 3 crystallizes in the triclinic system, P 1 space group. There are two ZnII ions, one H3L anion, one 1,2-bimb ligand, one coordinated acetate anion, one free DMF molecular, and two uncoordinated water molecules in the asymmetric unit. As shown in Figure 3a, the two ZnII ions are both located in a tetrahedron coordination geometry. Zn1 is coordinated by two oxygen atoms from two H3L anions, another oxygen atom from acetate anion, one nitrogen atom from one 1,2-bimb ligand. The coordination patterns of Zn1 and Zn2 are very similar except that one of the oxygen atoms is from the H3L ligand. The Zn-O/N bond lengths fall in the range of 1.928(2)–2.011(2) Å. Two ZnII ions are bridged by one carboxylates from one H3L anion with Zn1···Zn2 separation of 4.6985(7) Å. The large atomic radius of ZnII ion makes the deprotonated H3L anion ligand adopt a µ31:η1:η1:η1η0:η1 coordination mode (Figure 3b). The 3-connected H3L anion liagand link the ZnII ions forming a 2D [Zn(H3L)]n sheet (Figure 3c). The 1,2-bimb act as bridging linkers, and link neighboring 2D [Zn(H3L)]n sheets together into a 3D framework (Figure 3d).
Topologically, H3L ligand can be reduced to three-connected nodes owing to connecting five ZnII ions. Zn1 and Zn2 ions are considered as one node with six-connected, and each 1,2-bimb as the two-connected, respectively. The topology of the 3D network can be defined as a (3,6)-connected {42·6}·{44·610·8}-3,6T24 net (Figure 3e).

3.4. Crystal Structures of {Cd(1,2-Bmimb)(3-npa)}n (4)

Structural anaylsis reveals complex 4 crystallizes in the monoclinic system with P21/n space group. The asymmetric unit consists of one CdII ion, one 1,2-bmimb ligand and one 3-npa anion. As shown in Figure 4a, the central CdII ion is five-coordinated by three oxygen atoms [Cd-O: 2.160(3)–2.365(3) Å] from two different 3-npa anions, two nitrogen atoms [Cd-N: 2.196(3)–2.207(3) Å] originate from two 1,2-bmimb ligands, and the angle of N1-Cd1-N3 is 120.19(13)°. In complex 4, the two carboxyl groups of the 3-npa anion take different coordination mode. It can be expressed as µ21:η1:η0:η1 (Figure 4b). The 1,2-bmimb ligand bridges the CdII ions to generate a [Cd(1,2-bmimb)]n “Z” chain (Figure 4c). Similarly, the adjacent metal ions are connected by 3-npa anion to form one-dimensional [Cd(3-npa)]n chain structure (Figure 4d). These two types of single chains form a 2D layered network through cross-cutting (Figure 4e).
Topologically, if the central CdII ions are considered as 4-connected nodes and each 1,2-bmimb or 3-npa viewed as 2-connected spacer, complex 4 can be predigested as a 2D sql topology with a point symbol of {44∙66} (Figure 4f). The inter-sheet π···π interactions between different imidazole rings act as glue to assemble the adjacent sheets in an -ABA- fashion resulting in a 3D supramolecular framework (Figure 4g).

3.5. Structure Discussion

It is well known that carboxyl groups of different substitution positions or different substituents have a significant influence in terms of structure and function [31,32,33]. Regarding 1,2 and 4, the three kinds of dicarboxylate (para-substituted in 1, meta-substituted in 2, ortho-substituted in 4) with different coordination fashions and steric hindrances result in distinct architectures, respectively (Scheme 2). However, the structural analysis of complex 1,2 and 4 shows that the introduction of different substituents (–NH2, –OH, –NO2) has no effect on the formation of the final structure. Ignoring the effect of substituents, Complex 1,2 and 4 form a sql topology from dicarboxylate ligands with different substitution positions. As ancillary ligands, carboxylic acid ligands play an important linking role in the formation of structures.
Moreover, the primary ligand is indispensable in forming the structure. In the structures of 1 and 2, the primary ligand connects adjacent metals to form a bimetallic node, which is of great significance for the formation of a three-dimensional supramolecular structure. The π···π interaction between the primary and ancillary ligands reinforces the stability of the structure. In complex 4, the primary ligands not only connect the metal nodes to form a 1D “Z” chain, but also form a π···π stacking with adjacent primary ligands to build up a three-dimensional supramolecular structure.

3.6. X-ray Power Diffraction Analysis and Thermal Analysis

The PXRD patterns were obtained at room temperature to confirm that the crystal structures are truly representative of the bulk samples in the solid state. For complexes 14, the peak positions of the experimental PXRD patterns closely match the simulated one based on the single-crystal X-ray date, demonstrating the high phase purity of all complexes (Figures S1–S4).
To study the stabilities of CPs, thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis of complexes 14 were carried out under N2 atmosphere from 30 to 600 °C (Figure 5). In the care of complex 1, the weight loss of 3.71% from 100 to 150 °C is attributed to the loss of lattice water molecules (calc. 3.5%). The decomposition of the organic ligands starts at 200 °C, leaving a remaining residue of ZnO (obsd: 16.1%, calcd.: 15.7%). For complex 2, the lattice water molecules decompose around 110 °C. And then the organic ligands of the polymers begin to pyrolyze. Ultimately leads to thermal decomposition and produces CdO residues. For 3, the weight loss 12.6% occurs at 220 °C, which conforms to the loss of free DMF and H2O molecules (calcd.: 12.4%) followed by decomposition of the polymers. The final residue is ZnO. The TGA curve of 4 indicates it is stable up to about 210 °C, and then it begins to decompose upon further heating, leaving a remaining residue of CdO (obsed: 22.7%, calcd.: 21.8%).

3.7. Photoluminescence Properties

In general, the coordination polymers of d10 transition metal centers have been displayed photoluminescence application in luminescent materials and photochemical sensors [34,35,36,37]. Meanwhile, the luminescence properties are affected by the coordination pattern of organic ligands and different metal ions. The fluorescence properties of complexes 14, free 1,2-bimb and 1,2-bmimb ligand have been examined in the solid state at room temperature, as shown in Figure 6. The 1,2-bimb and 1,2-bmimb ligands display photoluminescent emissions at 483 and 447 nm upon excitation at 300nm, which may be attributed to π* → π transition. Under similar excitation condition, complexes 14 exhibit intense emission bands at 483 nm for 1, 464 nm for 2, 438 nm for 3, and 442 nm for 4, respectively. The measured luminescence quantum yields are 10.2% for 1, 15.9% for 2, 12.4% for 3 and 5.7% for 4. These broad emissions of complexes 14 could be regarded as arising from IL (intraligand) transitions or with the admixture of IL and MLCT (metal-to-ligand charge transfer) characters [38,39,40,41].

4. Conclusions

In summary, four coordination polymers based on the mixed ligand system have been synthesized and characterized. These complexes show fascinating 2D and 3D structures. The structural diversities of the complexes indicate that the primary and auxiliary ligands show remarkable effects on the formation of the final structures. Complexes 1, 2 and 4 exhibit the same 2D sql topology network, which further constructs a 3D supramolecular framework through π···π stacking interactions. Complex 3 shows a 3D {42·6}·{44·610·8}-3,6T24 topology net. Furthermore, photoluminescence measurements reveal that complexes 14 are potential photochemical materials, due to their intense luminescence emission. Meanwhile, this work prompted us to obtain more CPs by using a reliable synthetic route using the mixed ligand.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/8/6/236/s1, Figure S1: The PXRD data of 1; Figure S2: The PXRD data of 2; Figure S3: The PXRD data of 3; Figure S4: The PXRD data of 4; Table S1: Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for 1; Table S2: Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for 2; Table S3: Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for 3; Table S4: Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for 4.

Author Contributions

K.L. and L.D. conceived and designed the experiments; K.L. performed the experiments; Y.Z. and S.J. analyzed the data; L.W. supervised the work. All the authors have contributed to manuscript revision.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21601103, 21571112 and 51572136), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (No. ZR2016BP04), the Scientific and Technical Development Project of Qingdao (No. 17-1-1-78-jch) and the Taishan Scholars Program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eduardo, G.Z.; Ilich, A.I. CO2 capture under humid conditions in metal–organic frameworks. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 1471–1484. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, K.; Li, X.; Ma, D.X.; Han, Y.; Li, B.Y.; Shi, Z.; Wang, L. A microporous yttrium metal–organic framework of an unusual nia topology for high adsorption selectivity of C2H2 and CO2 over CH4 at room temperature. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 1982–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, F.L.; Bai, D.J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, D.H.; He, Y.B. A family of ssa-type copper-based MOFs constructed from unsymmetrical diisophthalates: Synthesis, characterization and selective gas adsorption. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 2283–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lide, O.A.; Tim, W.; Sun, X.H.; Freek, K.; Jorge, G. Metal organic frameworks as precursors for the manufacture of advanced catalytic materials. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 1709–1745. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, J.Y.; Shi, J.X.; Chen, L.Y.; Jia, Q.X.; Deng, W.; Gao, E.Q. N-donor auxiliary ligand-directed assembly of CoII compounds with a 2,2′-dinitro-biphenyl-4,4′-dicarboxylate ligand: Structures and magnetic properties. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 1738–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, D.X.; Li, B.Y.; Zhou, X.J.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, K.; Zeng, G.; Li, G.H.; Shi, Z.; Feng, S.H. A dual functional MOF as a luminescent sensor for quantitatively detecting the concentration of nitrobenzene and temperature. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hu, Z.C.; Deibert, B.J.; Li, J. Luminescent metal–organic frameworks for chemical sensing and explosive detection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5815–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, H.W.; Feng, X.; Guo, Y.X.; Chen, D.D.; Liu, R.; Ren, X.Q.; Jiang, X.; Dong, Y.P.; Wang, B. A malonitrile-functionalized metal-organic framework for hydrogen sulfide detection and selective amino acid molecular recognition. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Du, L.Y.; Shi, W.J.; Hou, L.; Wang, Y.Y.; Shi, Q.Z.; Zhu, Z. Solvent or temperature induced diverse coordination polymers of silver(I) sulfate and bipyrazole systems: Syntheses, crystal structures, luminescence, and sorption properties. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 14018–14027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yan, X.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Tang, Y.; Tan, M. Anions make the difference: Conversion from zero- to one-dimensional structures and luminescent properties of lanthanide-based complexes. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 4989–4996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, M.; Wang, Z.W.; Zhao, H.; Liu, C.S. Temperature-controlled structural diversity of two Cd(II) coordination polymers based on a flexible tripodal multicarboxylate ligand. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2014, 45, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Ju, W.; Xu, X.; Lv, Y.; Zhu, D.; Xu, Y. Two novel mixed Eu3+/Y3+ Ln MOFs: Influence of pH on the topology, Eu/Y ratio and energy transfer. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 5681–5688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cepeda, J.; Beobide, G.; Castillo, O.; Luque, A.; Pérez-Yáñez, S.; Román, P. Structure-Directing effect of organic cations in the assembly of anionic In(III)/diazinedicarboxylate architectures. Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Santanu, C.; Elahi, S.M.; Pal, A.; Das, M.C. A new set of Cd(II)-coordination polymers with mixed ligands of dicarboxylate and pyridyl substituted diaminotriazine: Selective sorption towards CO2 and cationic dyes. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 9901–9911. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, X.L.; Hou, L.L.; Zhang, J.W.; Zhang, J.X.; Liu, G.C.; Yang, S. Assembly and properties of coordination polymers modulated by substituted 1,3-benzenedicarboxylates. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 3936–3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fan, L.M.; Fan, W.L.; Li, B.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.T. Coligand syntheses, crystal structures, luminescence and photocatalytic properties of five coordination polymers based on rigid tetracarboxylic acids and imidazole linkers. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 9413–9422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, Y.; Sun, L.W.; Dong, G.L.; Wang, H.L.; Li, H.J.; Wang, L. Diverse architectures of hybrid materials induced by different mixed-ligands and applications in luminescence. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2017, 78, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, K.; Sun, Y.Y.; Deng, L.M.; Cao, F.; Han, J.H.; Wang, L. Cu(II) coordination polymers constructed by tetrafluoroterephthalic acid and varied imidazole-containing ligands: Syntheses, structures and properties. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 258, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sheng, X.L.; Xu, D.H.; Cai, B.; Liu, J.L. Poly [[bis{μ2-1,2-bis[(1H-imidazol-1-yl)meth-yl]benzene} (μ4-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-1,4,5,8-tetracarboxylato)dicobalt (II)] dihydrate]. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2013, 69, m136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, S.S.; Chen, L.J. Poly [[μ2-1,2-bis(1H-imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene-κ2O1:O4)zinc (II)]. Acta Cryst. 2010, 66, m1456. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, X.W.; Xing, P.Q.; Geng, X.J.; Sun, D.F.; Xiao, Z.Y.; Wang, L. Transition metal coordination polymers based on tetrabromoterephthalic and bis(imidazole) ligands: Syntheses, structures, topological analysis and photoluminescence properties. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 229, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, R.Q.; Zhao, N.; Yang, F.X.; Wang, A.R.; Liu, P.; An, C.X.; Lian, Z.X. Structures and enhanced third-order nonlinear optical performance of four complexes investigated by thin film Z-scan technique. Transit. Met. Chem. 2016, 41, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yan, Z.H.; Zhang, X.W.; Pang, H.D.; Zhang, Y.H.; Sun, D.F.; Wang, L. Solvothermal synthesis, crystal structure and photoluminescence properties of four Cd(II) coordination polymers with different topological structures. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 53608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zheng, T.; Cai, Z.S.; Nie, W.X.; Ren, M.; Bao, S.S.; Zhang, L.M. Modulating the microporosity of cobalt phosphonates via positional isomerism of co-linkers. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 8926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, J.; Ma, J.F.; Liu, Y.Y.; Ma, J.C.; Batten, S.R. A series of Cu(II) complexes based on different bis(imidazole) ligands and organic acids: Formation of water clusters and fixation of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8, 4383–4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fan, J.G.; Yee, T.; Wang, G.B.; Hanson, B.E. Syntheses, structures, and magnetic properties of inorganic−organic hybrid cobalt(II) phosphites containing bifunctional ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hoskins, B.F.; Robson, R.; Slizys, D.A.; Am, J. An infinite 2D polyrotaxane network in Ag2(bix)3(NO3)2 (bix = 1,4-Bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene). Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2952–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sheldrick, G.M. Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXTL, version 5.1; Bruker Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXL-97, PC version; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  31. Manasi, R.; Satirtha, S.; Sukhen, B.; Sudeshna, B.; Raju, M. Systematic study of mutually inclusive influences of temperature and substitution on the coordination geometry of Co(II) in a series of coordination polymers and their properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16, 3170–3179. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, H.; Yi, F.Y.; Dang, S.; Tian, W.G.; Sun, Z.M. Rational assembly of Co/Cd-MOFs featuring topological variation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, J.; Du, L.; Qiao, Y.F.; Hu, Y.; Li, B.; Li, L.; Wang, X.Y.; Yang, J.; Xie, M.J.; Zhao, Q.H. Intriguing architectures generated from 1,4-Bis(3- or 4-pyridyl)-2,3-diaza-1,3-butadiene with aromatic dicarboxylates: Syntheses, crystal structures, and properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cui, Y.J.; Yue, Y.F.; Qian, G.D.; Chen, B.L. Luminescent functional metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1126–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Qiu, Y.C.; Li, Y.H.; Peng, G.; Cai, J.B.; Jin, L.M.; Ma, L.; Deng, H.; Zeller, M.; Batten, S.R. Cadmium metal-directed three-dimensional coordination polymers: In situ tetrazole ligand synthesis, structures, and luminescent properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 1332–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jiang, H.L.; Liu, B.; Xu, Q. Rational assembly of d10 metal−organic Frameworks with helical nanochannels based on flexible v-shaped ligand. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ji, C.C.; Qin, L.; Li, Y.Z.; Guo, Z.J.; Zheng, H.G. Effect of different imidazole ancillary ligands on supramolecular architectures of a series of Zn(II) and Cd(II) complexes with a bent dicarboxylate ligand. Cryst. Growth Des. 2011, 11, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wen, L.; Lu, Z.; Lin, J.; Tian, Z.; Zhu, H.; Meng, Q. Syntheses, structures, and physical properties of three novel metal−organic frameworks constructed from aromatic polycarboxylate acids and flexible imidazole-based synthons. Cryst. Growth Des. 2007, 7, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, J.G.; Zang, S.Q.; Tian, Z.F.; Li, Y.Z.; Xu, Y.Y.; Zhu, H.Z.; Meng, Q.J. Metal–organic frameworks constructed from mixed-ligand 1,2,3,4-tetra-(4-pyridyl)-butane and benzene-polycarboxylate acids: Syntheses, structures and physical properties. CrystEngComm 2007, 9, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wen, L.; Li, Y.; Lu, Z.; Lin, J.; Duan, C.; Meng, Q. Syntheses and Structures of Four d10 Metal−Organic Frameworks Assembled with Aromatic Polycarboxylate and bix [bix = 1,4-Bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene]. Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 6, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Sun, D.; Sun, D. Novel metal–organic framework based on cubic and trisoctahedral supermolecular building blocks: Topological analysis and photoluminescent property. Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 2736–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Structures drawing of primary and auxiliary ligand, as well as introduction to self-assembly of complexes 14.
Scheme 1. Structures drawing of primary and auxiliary ligand, as well as introduction to self-assembly of complexes 14.
Crystals 08 00236 sch001
Figure 1. (a) The coordination environment of the ZnII ion in complex 1 (symmetry codes: #1 − X, −Y, −Z); (b) Two coordination modes of 2,5-dtpa ligand; (c) The 2D layered structure; (d) The 3D supramolecular structure by π…π interactions; (e) The sql topology of the complex 1 (cyan, Zn; blue, N; red, O; gray, C; light blue, H).
Figure 1. (a) The coordination environment of the ZnII ion in complex 1 (symmetry codes: #1 − X, −Y, −Z); (b) Two coordination modes of 2,5-dtpa ligand; (c) The 2D layered structure; (d) The 3D supramolecular structure by π…π interactions; (e) The sql topology of the complex 1 (cyan, Zn; blue, N; red, O; gray, C; light blue, H).
Crystals 08 00236 g001aCrystals 08 00236 g001b
Figure 2. (a) The coordination environment of the CdII ion in complex 2 (symmetry codes: #1 −1 − X, ½ + Y, −1/2 − Z); (b) The coordination mode of the 5-hipa ligand; (c) The 2D layered structure; (d) The sql topology of the complex 2; (e) The 3D supramolecular structure by π···π interactions (green, Cd; blue, N; red, O; gray, C; pink, H).
Figure 2. (a) The coordination environment of the CdII ion in complex 2 (symmetry codes: #1 −1 − X, ½ + Y, −1/2 − Z); (b) The coordination mode of the 5-hipa ligand; (c) The 2D layered structure; (d) The sql topology of the complex 2; (e) The 3D supramolecular structure by π···π interactions (green, Cd; blue, N; red, O; gray, C; pink, H).
Crystals 08 00236 g002
Figure 3. (a) The coordination environment of the ZnII ion in complex 3; (b) The coordination mode of the H3L ligand; (c) The 2D [Zn(H3L)]n sheet along the c direction; (d) The 3D framework of the complex 3 along the b direction; (e) The {42·6}·{44·610·8}-3,6T24 topology of the complex 3 (cyan, Zn; blue, N; red, O; gray, C; pink, H).
Figure 3. (a) The coordination environment of the ZnII ion in complex 3; (b) The coordination mode of the H3L ligand; (c) The 2D [Zn(H3L)]n sheet along the c direction; (d) The 3D framework of the complex 3 along the b direction; (e) The {42·6}·{44·610·8}-3,6T24 topology of the complex 3 (cyan, Zn; blue, N; red, O; gray, C; pink, H).
Crystals 08 00236 g003aCrystals 08 00236 g003b
Figure 4. (a) The coordination environment of the CdII ion in complex 4; (b) The coordination mode of the 3-npa ligand; (c) The 1D [Cd(1,2-bmimb)]n “Z” chain; (d) The 1D [Cd(3-npa)]n chain structure; (e) The 2D layered structure; (f) The sql topology of the complex 4; (g) The 3D supramolecular structure by π···π interactions (green, Cd; blue, N; red, O; gray, C; pink, H).
Figure 4. (a) The coordination environment of the CdII ion in complex 4; (b) The coordination mode of the 3-npa ligand; (c) The 1D [Cd(1,2-bmimb)]n “Z” chain; (d) The 1D [Cd(3-npa)]n chain structure; (e) The 2D layered structure; (f) The sql topology of the complex 4; (g) The 3D supramolecular structure by π···π interactions (green, Cd; blue, N; red, O; gray, C; pink, H).
Crystals 08 00236 g004aCrystals 08 00236 g004b
Scheme 2. The diverse coordination modes of auxiliary ligands of complexes 1, 2 and 4.
Scheme 2. The diverse coordination modes of auxiliary ligands of complexes 1, 2 and 4.
Crystals 08 00236 sch002
Figure 5. TGA curves for complexes 14.
Figure 5. TGA curves for complexes 14.
Crystals 08 00236 g005
Figure 6. Photoluminescence of free ligand complexes 14.
Figure 6. Photoluminescence of free ligand complexes 14.
Crystals 08 00236 g006
Table 1. Crystallographic date and structure refinement results for complexes 14.
Table 1. Crystallographic date and structure refinement results for complexes 14.
Complex1234
Empirical formulaC22H22N6O5ZnC44H40N8O12Cd2C31H40N8O14Zn2C24H21N5O6Cd
Formula weight515.851097.66879.45587.86
T/K293 (2)293 (2)293 (2)293 (2)
Crystal systemtriclinicmonoclinictriclinicmonoclinic
Space groupP 1 P21/cP 1 P21/n
a/Å10.0751 (6)14.631 (4)9.3223 (5)7.464 (6)
b/Å10.2040 (5)18.462 (5)13.1795 (5)19.816 (15)
c/Å11.4148 (5)15.946 (4)16.5396 (10)16.031 (12)
α/°100.519 (4)9092.650 (4)90
β/°95.060 (4)98.955 (4)105.391 (5)103.46
γ/°106.233 (5)90102.938 (4)90
V/Å31095.68 (10)4255 (2)1897.38 (18)2306 (3)
Z2424
Dc/Mg·cm−31.5641.7141.5391.693
µ/mm−11.1691.0751.3401.000
F(000)5322208.09081184.0
Reflections collected/independent7339/386021,299/742313,632/666911,646/4045
R(int)0.02790.06320.03660.1034
GOF on F21.0871.0601.0261.073
Final R indexes R1 (wR2) [I ≥ 2σ (I)]0.0882 (0.2545)0.0634 (0.1799)0.0432 (0.0839)0.0371 (0.0919)
Final R indexes R1 (wR2) (all data)0.1035 (0.2773)0.0861 (0.1916)0.0700 (0.0956)0.0433 (0.0965)
Largest diff. peak/hole/e Å−31.33/−0.872.17/−1.870.37/−0.500.56/−1.27

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, K.; Deng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Jiao, S.; Geng, Y.; Wang, L. Coordination Behavior of Bis-Imidazole and Various Carboxylate Ligands towards Zn(II) and Cd(II) Ions: Synthesis, Structure, and Photoluminescence Study. Crystals 2018, 8, 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8060236

AMA Style

Liu K, Deng L, Zhang Y, Jiao S, Geng Y, Wang L. Coordination Behavior of Bis-Imidazole and Various Carboxylate Ligands towards Zn(II) and Cd(II) Ions: Synthesis, Structure, and Photoluminescence Study. Crystals. 2018; 8(6):236. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8060236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Kang, Liming Deng, Yaowen Zhang, Shaoshao Jiao, Yanling Geng, and Lei Wang. 2018. "Coordination Behavior of Bis-Imidazole and Various Carboxylate Ligands towards Zn(II) and Cd(II) Ions: Synthesis, Structure, and Photoluminescence Study" Crystals 8, no. 6: 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8060236

APA Style

Liu, K., Deng, L., Zhang, Y., Jiao, S., Geng, Y., & Wang, L. (2018). Coordination Behavior of Bis-Imidazole and Various Carboxylate Ligands towards Zn(II) and Cd(II) Ions: Synthesis, Structure, and Photoluminescence Study. Crystals, 8(6), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8060236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop