Next Article in Journal
Preparation of a Fast Water-Based UV Cured Polyurethane-Acrylate Wood Coating and the Effect of Coating Amount on the Surface Properties of Oak (Quercus alba L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Thermal Properties and Decomposition Mechanism of Poly(Ethylene Vanillate) Polyester
Previous Article in Journal
Functionalized Poly(arylene ether nitrile) Porous Membrane with High Pb(II) Adsorption Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication and Properties of a Bio-Based Biodegradable Thermoplastic Polyurethane Elastomer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/polym11091413
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Toughened Poly(lactic acid)/BEP Composites with Good Biodegradability and Cytocompatibility

by
Qingguo Wang
1,2,*,
Yongxuan Li
1,
Xue Zhou
1,
Tongyao Wang
1,
Liyan Qiu
1,
Yuanchun Gu
1 and
Jiabing Chang
1
1
Key Laboratory of Rubber-Plastics of Ministry of Education, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
2
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Rubber-Plastics, Qingdao 266042, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(9), 1413; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091413
Submission received: 27 July 2019 / Revised: 22 August 2019 / Accepted: 26 August 2019 / Published: 28 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Condensation Polymers and their Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Using novel biodegradable elastomer particles (BEP) prepared by the technologies of melt polycondensation, emulsification, and irradiation vulcanization, we successfully prepared advanced poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/BEP composites with higher toughness, higher biodegradability, and better cytocompatibility than neat PLA by means of the melt blending technology. The experimental results revealed that the elongation at break of the PLA/BEP composites containing 8 parts per hundred rubber (phr) by weight BEP increased dramatically from 2.9% of neat PLA to 67.1%, and the notched impact strength increased from 3.01 to 7.24 kJ/m2. Meanwhile, the biodegradation rate of the PLA/BEP composites increased dramatically in both soil environment and lipase solution, and the crystallization rate and crystallinity of the PLA/BEP composites increased significantly compared to those of neat PLA. The methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay also showed that the viability of L929 cells in the presence of extracts of PLA/BEP composites was more than 75%, indicating that the PLA/BEP composites were not cytotoxic and had better cytocompatibility than neat PLA. Research on advanced PLA/BEP composites opens up new potential avenues for preparing advanced PLA products, especially for advanced biomedical materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA), a bio-based biodegradable thermoplastic aliphatic polyester derived from biomass resources such as corn and sugarcane [1], has attracted a lot of attention from researchers interested in environmentally friendly materials, especially in biomedical materials. PLA has been developed for many different applications in biomedicine, including bioabsorbable screws [2,3], tissue engineering [4], stents [5,6,7,8], dental materials [9], resorbable sutures [10,11] and drug delivery systems [12,13], because of its biocompatibility, biodegradability, low immunogenicity, high strength and modulus [14,15,16]. However, its excessive brittleness and slow crystallization rate and biodegradation rate severely limit its further applications, especially for some specific products which require high toughness, short manufacture time, and good biocompatibility [17,18,19].
Therefore, some techniques have been developed to improve the performance and further applications of PLA. For instance, blending with vulcanized elastomers (such as poly (styrene-butadiene-styrene) (SBS) [20], nitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR) [21,22], thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) [23], and polyurethane (PU) [24]), nanoscale inorganic fillers (such as graphene [25,26], carbon nanotubes [27], clay [28,29], fibers [30,31]), and plasticizers (such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) [32], polypropylene glycol (PPG) [33], and acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC) [34]) is commonly considered to improve the toughness and crystallization rate of PLA. Unfortunately, vulcanized elastomers have poor dispersion in a PLA matrix and have poor interface compatibility with it, decreasing the crystallization property of PLA. Inorganic fillers can enhance the stiffness obviously, although they only marginally improve the toughness or even decrease it. Low-molecular-weight plasticizers toughen PLA, but this is obtained at the cost of losing stiffness. Meanwhile, the above vulcanized elastomers, inorganic fillers, and plasticizers are not biodegradable and can deteriorate the valuable biodegradability and biocompatibility of PLA. Therefore, it is very important to find the suitable materials which can increase not only the toughness of PLA but also its crystallization rate, while not sacrificing its valuable biodegradability and biocompatibility.
In our previous work, using some bio-based monomers, such as propanediol, butanediol, succinic acid, sebacic acid, itaconic acid, and fumaric acid, we successfully fabricated novel biodegradable elastomer particles (BEP) by technologies based on melt polycondensation of aliphatic unsaturated polyester, polyester emulsified, and electron beam irradiation vulcanization [35]. It is worth noting that micro-nanoscale BEP are biodegradable due to the ester group in the macromolecular chains of the aliphatic polyester. Also, BEP has a low glass transition temperature of approximately −50 °C, controllable crosslinking density, and good compatibility with PLA, which makes it possible that BEP can be dispersed well in a PLA matrix, imparting some excellent properties to the PLA.
In this work, the novel BEP were used for the first time to prepare PLA/BEP composites. This paper focuses on the effects of BEP on toughness, crystallization, biodegradation, and cytocompatibility of PLA/BEP composites in order to obtain some advanced PLA composites that can be used for biomedical materials, food packaging, 3D printing, and more environmentally friendly products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

BEP with particle size of about 200 nm and gel content of 85% were fabricated in Qingdao University of Science and Technology (Qingdao, China); PLA (4032D) was supplied by NatureWorks LLC. (Minnetonka, MN, USA); hydrolytic stabilizer (HMV-8CA) was supplied by Nisshinbo Industries Inc. (Tokyo, Japan); lipase, 20000 U/g, was supplied by Xinyu Food Additives Co., Ltd. (Wuxi, China); mixed phosphate (pH buffer), was supplied by Shanghai INESA Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); the mouse fibroblastic L929 cells was supplied by the type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China); Dulbecco′s modified eagle′s medium (DMEM) was supplied by Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA); fetal bovine serum (FBS), endotoxin level ≤10 EU/mL, was supplied by Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA); penicillin-streptomycin solution (penicillin: 10000 units/mL, streptomycin: 10 mg/mL) was supplied by Biological Industries (Beit Haemek, Israel); methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT), purity 98%, was supplied by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), analytical reagent (AR), was supplied by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Preparation of PLA/BEP Composites

Firstly, PLA and BEP were placed in a vacuum-drying oven at 80 °C for 2 h, then PLA, BEP, and the hydrolytic stabilizer (HMV-8CA) (listed in Table 1) were mixed in a torque rheometer (RM-200C, Harbin Hapro Electric Technology Co., Ltd., Harbin, China) at a temperature of 175 °C for 13 min and a rotor speed of 50 r/min. PLA and PLA/BEP composite test specimens were prepared with the help of a mini-injection molder.

2.3. Characterization

2.3.1. Mechanical Properties

Tensile tests of the PLA and PLA/BEP composites were performed using a universal testing machine (UTM; GT-TCS-2000, Gotech Testing Machines Inc., Taichung, China) according to ISO 527-2-2012 at room temperature. The specimens were shaped with total length of 75 mm, gauge length of 20 mm, and thickness of 2 mm. The crosshead speed was 5 mm/min. An notched Izod impact test was performed using a pendulum impact tester (GT-7045-MDH, Gotech Testing Machines Inc., Taichung, China) according to ISO 180-2000 at room temperature. The size of the impact test specimen was 80 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm, and the radius of the notch base was 0.25 ± 0.05 mm.

2.3.2. Surface Morphology of the Tensile Specimens and the Notched Impact Specimens

The neck region surface of the tensile specimens and the fracture surface of the tensile specimens and notched impact specimens were observed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM; S-4800, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the surfaces were sputter-coated with a thin gold layer before observation.

2.3.3. Crystallization Behavior and Isothermal Crystallization Kinetics

An isothermal crystallization test was performed by a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC; 2041F1, Netzsch Group, Selb, Germany). Samples of about 10 mg of PLA or PLA/BEP composites were heated from room temperature to 200 °C at a rate of 50 °C/min and kept at 200 °C for 3 min to eliminate their thermal history. Then, the samples were rapidly cooled to 115 °C. After the crystallization process was completed, the measurement was performed during a second heating from 115 to 200 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. The Tm, ΔHm, and tm were calculated from the DSC melting thermograms, and the crystallinity of PLA and PLA/BEP composites was calculated by Equation (1), where ΔH0 is the fusion enthalpy of perfectly crystallized PLA:
Crystallinity (%) = ΔHm/ΔH0 × 100%
The heat flow data of isothermal crystallization DSC curves were converted into a fraction relative to the final crystallinity level according to the Avrami kinetic model (Equation (2)):
X t = 1 − exp ( − K t n )
where Xt is the relative crystallinity, K is the crystallization rate constant, and n is the Avrami exponent. In order to estimate the values of n and K, the double-logarithmic Equation (3) was employed to analyze the crystallization kinetics of the PLA and PLA/BEP composites.
ln[−ln(1 − Xt)] = nlnt + lnK
The half time of crystallization (t1/2) is defined as the time required to attain the Xt = 0.5, which is calculated by Equation (4):
t 1 / 2 = ( ln 2 K ) 1 n

2.3.4. Crystallization Morphology

Firstly, PLA and PLA/BEP composite specimens were prepared on glass slides at 185 °C. Then, they were heated from room temperature to 200 °C at a heating rate of 50 °C/min and kept at 200 °C for 3 min. Finally, the specimens were cooled from 200 to 115 °C at a rate of 100 °C/min, and their crystallization morphology was observed on a polarizing microscope (POM; BX51, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3.5. X-ray Diffraction Test

X-ray diffraction patterns of PLA and PLA/BEP composite films annealed at 115 °C for 90 min were obtained in the reflection mode by using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD; Ultima IV, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation wavelength (λ = 1.54 Å), 40 kV, 40 mA. Scattered radiation was detected in the angular range of 10°–30° (2θ) at a scanning rate of 5 °/min.

2.3.6. Biodegradation Test

Biodegradation Test in Soil

The dried PLA and PLA/BEP composite samples with size of 15 mm × 15 mm × 1 mm were weighed, and their corresponding weights were denoted as W0; then, they were buried in soil. Four months later, the above samples were cleaned and dried in a vacuum-drying oven to a constant weight, which was denoted as Wt. Finally, the mass loss rate was calculated using Equation (5):
Mass loss rate (100%) = (W0 − Wt)/W0 × 100%

Biodegradation Test in Lipase Solution

The dried PLA and PLA/BEP composite samples with size of 10 mm × 10 mm × 1 mm were weighed, and their corresponding weights were denoted as W0; then, they were placed into separate sampling tubes, and 10 mL of a lipase solution (5 mg/mL, pH 6.8) was added into each sampling tube at the temperature of 37 °C. The samples were incubated for 10 days. Finally, the samples in lipase solution were cleaned and dried in a vacuum-drying oven to a constant weight, which was denoted as Wt, and the mass loss rate was calculated using Equation (5) too.

2.3.7. Surface Morphology of PLA and PLA/BEP Composites after Biodegradation

The surface morphology of various biodegraded PLA and PLA/BEP composite samples was observed by a stereo microscope (SMZ1500, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3.8. Cytocompatibility Analysis

Cell Culture

The mouse fibroblastic L929 cells were cultured in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C using DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. For the MTT assay, the cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates at a density of 5000 cells per well. Then, 100 μL of extracts of PLA and PLA/BEP composites at different concentrations (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 mg/mL) was added to the culture medium. Meanwhile, 100 μL phenol (0.5%) was used as a positive control, and 100 μL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) was used as a negative control. Non-treated control cells (blank) were analyzed to compare the growth inhibition. The entire plate was observed in an inverted microscope (CKX41, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) after 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation.

MTT Assay

After 24, 48 and 72 h of incubation with extracts medium, 10 μL of MTT solution with 5 mg/mL was added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2/air for 4 h. Next, the medium was removed, and 150 μL of DMSO was added to each wells. The optical density (OD) was measured in an absorbance microplate reader (ELx800, BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) at 490 nm. All experiments were repeated three times. Finally, cell viability was calculated using the Equation (6):
Cell   viability = OD experiment − OD blank OD negative − OD blank

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of BEP on the Toughness of PLA/BEP Composites

Figure 1 presents the relationship between BEP content and the toughness of the PLA/BEP composites. With the increase of BEP concentration, the impact strength and elongation at break of the PLA/BEP composites increased significantly. The elongation at break of the PLA/BEP composites containing 8 phr BEP increased dramatically from 2.9% of the neat PLA to 67.1%, and the notched impact strength increased from 3.01 to 7.24 kJ/m2. These phenomena can be explained by the multiple crazing theory [36]. On the one hand, the well-dispersed BEP in the PLA matrix have an effect on stress concentration during the tensile process, inducing the initiation and extension of crazing in the PLA matrix. Both crazing initiation and crazing extension can consume energy. Accordingly, the polymer absorbs a high amount of energy and avoids a highly localized strain process, which leads to higher elongation at break and impact strength [37,38]. On the other hand, crazing extension will terminate when they meet with some other BEPs, thereby preventing the generation of cracking in the PLA matrix and increasing the toughness of the PLA/BEP composites [39]. However, when BEP loading increases to 10 phr, elongation at break and impact strength of the PLA/BEP composites slowly decrease because excessive BEP tend to aggregate in the PLA matrix, thus weakening crazing initiation and crazing extension in the PLA matrix.
Figure 2 shows some SEM micrographs of the impact fracture surfaces of neat PLA and PLA-8 composites. In Figure 2a, the impact fracture surface of neat PLA is smooth, and there is no plastic deformation, indicating that a brittle fracture process occurred in neat PLA. However, there are some voids and a certain roughness on the impact fracture surface of the PLA-8 composites (Figure 2b), which indicates that a ductile fracture process occurred in the PLA-8 composites. The above results show that BEP dispersed in the PLA matrix can absorb the impact energy and prevent further fractures in the PLA matrix.
Figure 3 shows some SEM micrographs of the tensile neck region surface of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites. In Figure 3a, the tensile neck region surface of neat PLA is smooth, whereas the tensile neck region surface of the PLA/BEP composites exhibits the stress whitening phenomenon (in Figure 3b,c), which indicates that the crack propagation paths were highly bifurcated and crack propagation absorbed a considerable amount of strain energy before the PLA matrix was completely destroyed.
Figure 4 shows some SEM micrographs of tensile fracture surface of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composite specimens, indicating a large plastic deformation of the PLA matrix in the PLA/BEP composites, while the fracture surface of neat PLA is smooth, which confirms the above conclusions that BEP in the PLA matrix have the effect of absorbing energy and causing a ductile fracture process in the PLA matrix.
On the basis of the above SEM micrographs, we inferred that BEP toughen PLA by forming large interfaces; strong interfacial interactions between the PLA matrix and BEP deform the PLA matrix and increase the absorption of energy until the PLA matrix breaks. Thus, the impact strength and elongation at break of the PLA/BEP composites increase considerably with increasing BEP loading.

3.2. Effects of BEP on the Crystallization Properties of PLA/BEP Composites

The isothermal crystallization kinetic parameters of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites are listed in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the t1/2 of PLA-8 is 41% faster than that of neat PLA, while the crystallinity increases of 50.6%, which means that BEP can accelerate the crystallization rate and increase the crystallinity of PLA. The n values of the PLA/BEP composites are higher than that of neat PLA, indicating that the PLA/BEP composites present more extensive three-dimensional crystal growth than neat PLA during the crystallization process. The K value of PLA-8 also increases of 59.6% compared to that of neat PLA. Therefore, BEP act as an effective nucleating agent and accelerate the crystallization rate of PLA by providing nucleation sites and facilitating crystal growth.
Figure 5 shows the melting DSC thermograms curves of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites. Interestingly, the PLA/BEP composites have two melting peaks at about 160 and 167 °C, while the neat PLA has only one melting peak at 165.4 °C, which indicates that two kinds of crystal forms appeared in the PLA/BEP composites crystallization process [40]. As is well known, the α crystal form of PLA, which grows during melting or cold crystallization, is its most common and stable crystal form. Zhang et al. found that the α′ crystal form coexists with the α crystal form when Tc is between 100 and 120 °C [41]. It can be speculated that BEP in the PLA matrix accelerated the formation of the α′ crystal form and that 160 °C is the melting point of the α′ crystal form, while 167 °C is the melting point of the α crystal form.
Figure 6 shows some XRD patterns of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites. Two strong diffraction peaks appeared at 16.92° and 19.22° in the XRD patterns of neat PLA, which correspond to two kinds of diffractions of the (200)/(110) crystal plane and (203) crystal plane, respectively [42]. However, the diffraction peaks of the (200)/(110) crystal plane in the XRD patterns of PLA-4 and PLA-8 composites shifted to low 2θ, from 16.92° to 16.82° and 16.76°, respectively. These shifts were observed during the formation of the α and α′ crystal phases in the range from 100 to 120 °C. In addition, BEP in the PLA matrix increased the intensity of the XRD patterns, indicating that BEP had the effect of improving the crystallinity of PLA.
Figure 7 presents some polarizing optical micrographs of neat PLA and PLA-8 composites with various isothermal crystallization times at 115 °C. It can be seen that no crystal of neat PLA (Figure 7a) was observed during 5 min of isothermal crystallization, and a small number of crystals grew at a slow crystallization rate after 10 min of isothermal crystallization. Meanwhile, the number of those crystals did not increase, whereas the size of the spherulites increased after 15 min of isothermal crystallization. However, many small spherulites of PLA-8 composites with a morphology different from that of neat PLA grew after 5 min of crystallization, and the spherulites radius of PLA-8 was smaller than that of neat PLA (Figure 7b), which possibly can be explained by the fact that the twisting of lamellae resulted in varied crystalline structures of PLA [43]. After 10 min of isothermal crystallization, the number of spherulites of PLA-8 increased rapidly, and after 15 min, the spherulites of PLA-8 nearly covered the entire field. It can be inferred that BEP act as a nucleating agent in the PLA crystallization process and accelerate PLA crystallization rate.

3.3. Effects of BEP on the Biodegradation of PLA/BEP Composites

In general, the soil burying test and composting test are performed to evaluate the biodegradability of plastics in natural environments [44,45]. The degradation of PLA in soil or compost occurs through the following process. During the initial phases of degradation, PLA chains with high molecular weight are hydrolyzed to form chains with lower molecular weight, and this reaction can be accelerated by acids or bases and is also affected by temperature and moisture [46]. Also, some microorganisms in the compost catalyze the degradation, probably through the hydrolytic scission of ester groups into an acid and an alcohol. This process enables the conversion of the chains with low molecular weights to CO2, water, and humus.
Figure 8 shows some stereo microscope images of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites degraded in soil for 4 months. The surface of neat PLA after degradation remained smooth and clean. However, extensive mildew was observed on the surfaces of the PLA/BEP composites, among which the PLA-8 sample had the most extensive mildew growth, indicating that the amount of mildew increased significantly on the PLA/BEP composites with increasing BEP loading.
Figure 9 presents the mass loss of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites after 4 months in soil. With increasing BEP loading, the mass loss of the PLA/BEP composites markedly increased, and the mass loss of the PLA-10 increased 3.6 times (from 0.31 % to 1.44 %).
Pranamuda et al. found that microorganisms which can degrade PLA are rare in soil, and only one strain of such microorganisms (Amycolatopsis sp.) was isolated [47]. Therefore, neat PLA has a low degradation rate in soil. However, the PLA/BEP composites presented a better degradability than neat PLA, which indicates that BEP exhibit good degradability and produce some low-molecular-weight aliphatic acids and aliphatic alcohols in the degradation process [35]. Thereby, the presence of BEP in the PLA matrix increase the degradation rates of the PLA/BEP composites.
Figure 10 presents the mass loss of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites degraded in a lipase solution for 10 days. With the increase of BEP loading, the mass loss of the PLA/BEP composites significantly increased, and the mass loss of PLA-10 increased 1.46 times (from 1.3% to 3.2%) compared to that of neat PLA. In order to explain this phenomenon, we present a degradation schematic of the PLA/BEP composites in lipase solution (Figure 11). The large specific surface area of BEP can increase the contact area between the PLA/BEP composites and the lipase solution, making the PLA/BEP composites more susceptible to biodegrade by hydrolysis and enzymatic activity. Meanwhile, BEP are readily exposed to enzymes, and enzymes can easily break apart the ester bonds in BEP. Therefore, BEP easily degrade into acids and alcohols. As a catalyst, the H+ in the acid accelerates the degradation process of the PLA matrix, and the voids and gaps formed after BEP degradation can also facilitate the penetration of the lipase solution into the PLA matrix [48]. Thus, the degradation rates of the PLA/PEP composites increases.

3.4. Effects of BEP on the Cytocompatibility of PLA/BEP Composites

Figure 12 presents the results of the MTT assay which was conducted to check cell viability after 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation with different concentrations of extracts. Cell viability in the presence of extracts of the PLA/BEP composites was higher than in the presence of extracts of neat PLA (more than 75% in the presence of all the PLA/BEP composite extracts). At the time point of 72 h, the viability of cells cultured in the presence of all extracts of the PLA/BEP composites was higher than that measured at 24 h for the corresponding extracts. Figure 13 presents microscopic images of the control groups and the experiment groups treated with 2 mg/mL of extracts of the PLA/BEP composites. The cell morphologies were determined on the basis of cell distribution and mean cell aspect ratio, with L929 cells having an aspect ratio greater than 1.5 [49]. The addition of extracts did not cause considerable changes in the morphology of the cells, such as rounding or shrinking, and all the images are more or less identical to that of the negative control. So, it can be concluded that the PLA/BEP composite extracts at the tested concentration do not exert cytotoxic effects on cell proliferation, and the PLA/BEP composites have better cytocompatibility than PLA, which makes them a potential material for biomedicine.

4. Conclusions

Using micro-nanoscale BEP prepared by melt polycondensation, emulsification, and irradiation vulcanization, we successfully prepared advanced PLA/BEP composites by a simple melt blending technology. Elongation at break of the PLA/BEP composites containing 8 phr BEP increased dramatically from 2.9% of neat PLA to 67.1%, and the notched impact strength increased from 3.01 to 7.24 kJ/m2. The crystallization rate and crystallinity of the PLA/BEP composites were higher than those of neat PLA. Meanwhile, two kinds of crystal forms were formed in the PLA/BEP composites crystallization process. It is worth noting that BEP had the effect of improving the biodegradation rate of the PLA/BEP composites in both soil environment and lipase solution. Also, the PLA/BEP composites showed better cytocompatibility. This research is very important for preparing some advanced PLA products which meet the requirements of high toughness, high biodegradability, good cytocompatibility, and short manufacturing time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.W.; Formal analysis, Q.W., Y.L., X.Z., T.W., L.Q., Y.G., and J.C.; Writing—original draft, Y.L. and X.Z.; Writing—review & editing, Q.W.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 51773104, 51373085); and the Key Research and Development Project in Shandong Province of China (grant number 2017GGX20138).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nampoothiri, K.M.; Nair, N.R.; John, R.P. An overview of the recent developments in polylactide (PLA) research. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8493–8501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Felfel, R.M.; Ahmed, I.; Parsons, A.J.; Rudd, C.D. Bioresorbable composite screws manufactured via forging process: Pull-out, shear, flexural and degradation characteristics. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 18, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sakaguchi, M.; Kobayashi, S. Effect of extrusion drawing and twist-orientation on mechanical properties of self-reinforced poly(lactic acid) screws. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2016, 25, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Manavitehrani, I.; Fathi, A.; Wang, Y.W.; Maitz, P.K.; Dehghani, F. Reinforced poly(propylene carbonate) composite with enhanced and tunable characteristics, an alternative for poly(lactic acid). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22421–22430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhao, N.; Lv, Z.R.; Ma, J.; Zhu, C.W.; Li, Q. Fabrication of hydrophilic small diameter vascular foam scaffolds of poly(ε-caprolactone)/polylactic blend by sodium hydroxide solution. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 110, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, M.H.; Firoozi, N.; Tsai, C.T.; Wallace, M.B.; Kang, Y.Q. 3D-printed flexible polymer stents for potential applications in inoperable esophageal malignancies. Acta Biomater 2019, 83, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wiebe, J.; Nef, H.M.; Hamm, C.W. Current Status of Bioresorbable Scaffolds in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 2014, 64, 2541–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mi, H.Y.; Salick, M.R.; Jing, X.; Jacques, B.R.; Crone, W.C.; Peng, X.F.; Turng, L.S. Characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/polylactic acid (TPU/PLA) tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by microcellular injection molding. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2013, 33, 4767–4776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tomlin, E.M.; Nelson, S.J.; Rossmann, J.A. Ridge preservation for implant therapy: A review of the literature. Open Dent 2014, 8, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maharana, T.; Mohanty, B.; Negi, Y.S. Melt-solid polycondensation of lactic acid and its biodegradability. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 99–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jain, R.A. The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) devices. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 2475–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Langer, R. Drug delivery and targeting. Nature 1998, 392, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Peres, C.; Matos, A.I.; Conniot, J.; Sainz, V.; Zupančič, E.; Silva, J.M.; Graça, L.; Gaspar, R.S.; Préat, V.; Florindo, H.F. Poly(lactic acid)-based particulate systems are promising tools for immune modulation. Acta Biomater. 2017, 48, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Anderson, J.M.; Shive, M.S. Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lasprilla, A.J.R.; Martinez, G.A.R.; Lunelli, B.H.; Jardini, A.L.; Maciel, R. Poly-lactic acid synthesis for application in biomedical devices - A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nagarajan, V.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M. Perspective on Polylactic Acid (PLA) based Sustainable Materials for Durable Applications: Focus on Toughness and Heat Resistance. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2899–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Anderson, K.S.; Schreck, K.M.; Hillmyer, M.A. Toughening Polylactide. Polym. Rev. 2008, 48, 85–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saeidlou, S.; Huneault, M.A.; Li, H.B.; Park, C.B. Poly (lactic acid) crystallization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1657–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Murariu, M.; Dubois, P. PLA composites: From production to properties. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 107, 17–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Zhu, X.M.; Wang, H.T. Shape memory polymer hybrids of SBS/dl-PLA and their shape memory effects. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 137, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maroufkhani, M.; Katbab, A.; Liu, W.C.; Zhang, J.W. Polylactide (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) blends: The effect of ACN content on morphology, compatibility and mechanical properties. Polymer 2017, 115, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Talbamrung, T.; Kasemsook, C.; Sangtean, W.; Wachirahuttapong, S.; Thongpin, C. Effect of Peroxide and Organoclay on Thermal and Mechanical Properties of PLA in PLA/NBR Melted Blend. Energy Procedia 2016, 89, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zaman, H.U.; Song, J.C.; Park, L.S.; Kang, I.K.; Park, S.Y.; Kwak, G.; Park, B.S.; Yoon, K.B. Poly (lactic acid) blends with desired end-use properties by addition of thermoplastic polyester elastomer and MDI. Polym. Bull 2011, 67, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Raja, M.; Ryu, S.H.; Shanmugharaj, A.M. Thermal, mechanical and electroactive shape memory properties of polyurethane (PU)/poly (lactic acid) (PLA)/CNT nanocomposites. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 3492–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pinto, A.M.; Cabral, J.; Tanaka, D.A.P.; Mendes, A.M.; Magalhães, F.D. Effect of incorporation of graphene oxide and graphene nanoplatelets on mechanical and gas permeability properties of poly (lactic acid) films. Polym. Int. 2013, 62, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fu, Y.; Liu, L.S.; Zhang, J.W. Manipulating Dispersion and Distribution of Graphene in PLA through Novel Interface Engineering for Improved Conductive Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 14069–14075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Seligra, P.G.; Lamanna, M.; Famá, L. PLA-fMWCNT Bionanofilms with High Modulus and Great Properties to Apply in Packaging and Biomedicine. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2015, 8, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Darie, R.N.; Pâslaru, E.; Sdrobis, A.; Pricope, G.M.; Hitruc, G.E.; Poiatǎ, A.; Baklavaridis, A.; Vasile, C. Effect of Nanoclay Hydrophilicity on the Poly (lactic acid)/Clay Nanocomposites Properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 7877–7890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, Y.H.; Lei, L.; Yang, B.; Li, J.B.; Ren, J. Preparation of PLA-based nanocomposites modified by nano-attapulgite with good toughness-strength balance. Polym. Test 2017, 60, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ding, W.D.; Jahani, D.; Chang, E.; Alemdar, A.; Park, C.B.; Sain, M. Development of PLA/cellulosic fiber composite foams using injection molding: Crystallization and foaming behaviors. Comp. Part A 2016, 83, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hossain, K.M.Z.; Ahmed, I.; Parsons, A.J.; Scotchford, C.A.; Walker, G.S.; Thielemans, W.; Rudd, C.D. Physico-chemical and mechanical properties of nanocomposites prepared using cellulose nanowhiskers and poly(lactic acid). J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 2675–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arrieta, M.P.; López, J.; Rayón, E.; Jiménez, A. Disintegrability under composting conditions of plasticized PLA-PHB blends. Polym. Degrad. Stab 2014, 108, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Piorkowska, E.; Kulinski, Z.; Galeski, A.; Masirek, R. Plasticization of semicrystalline poly(L-lactide) with poly(propylene glycol). Polymer 2006, 47, 7178–7188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Courgneau, C.; Ducruet, V.; Avérous, L.; Grenet, J.; Domenek, S. Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(lactide)-effect of plasticizers and nucleating agent. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2013, 53, 1085–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Q.G.; Zai, Y.Y.; Yang, D.J.; Qiu, L.Y.; Niu, C.Q. Bio-based elastomer nanoparticles with controllable biodegradability. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 102142–102148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bucknall, C.B.; Smith, R.R. Stress-whitening in high-impact polystyrenes. Polymer 1965, 6, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mat Desa, M.S.Z.; Hassan, A.; Arsad, A.; Arjmandi, R. Effect of core–shell rubber toughening on mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of poly (lactic acid)/multiwalled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, Y.; He, C. Biodegradable “core–shell” rubber nanoparticles and their toughening of poly (lactides). Macromolecules 2013, 46, 9625–9633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bucknall, C.B.; Clayton, D.; Keast, W.E. Rubber-toughening of plastics. 2. creep mechanisms in HIPS/PPO blends. J. Mater. Sci. 1972, 7, 1443–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Murariu, M.; Dechief, A.L.; Ramy-Ratiarison, R.; Paint, Y.; Raquez, J.M.; Dubois, P. Recent advances in production of poly (lactic acid) (PLA) nanocomposites: A versatile method to tune crystallization properties of PLA. Nanocomposites 2015, 1, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, J.M.; Duan, Y.X.; Sato, H.; Tsuji, H.; Noda, I.; Yan, S.; Ozaki, Y. Crystal Modifications and Thermal Behavior of Poly (l-lactic acid) Revealed by Infrared Spectroscopy. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 8012–8021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nam, J.Y.; Ray, S.S.; Okamoto, M. Crystallization Behavior and Morphology of Biodegradable Polylactide/Layered Silicate Nanocomposite. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 7126–7131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nitta, K.H.; Takayanagi, M. Tensile yield of isotactic polypropylene in terms of a lamellar-cluster model. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 2000, 38, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar]
  44. Karamanlioglu, M.; Houlden, A.; Robson, G.D. Isolation and characterization of fungal communities associated with degradation and growth on the surface of poly(lactic) acid (PLA) in soil and compost. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 95, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Karamanlioglu, M.; Robson, G.D. The influence of biotic and abiotic factors on the rate of degradation of poly(lactic) acid (PLA) coupons buried in compost and soil. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 2063–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ho, K.L.G.; Pometto, A.L.; Gadea-Rivas, A.; Briceño, J.A.; Rojas, A. Degradation of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Plastic in Costa Rican Soil and Iowa State University Compost Rows. J. Environ. Polym. Degrad. 1999, 7, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tokiwa, Y.; Calabia, B.P. Biodegradability and biodegradation of poly(lactide). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 72, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.H.; Han, Y.K.; Kim, Y.H. Synthesis and Degradation of End-Group-Functionalized Polylactide. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 2001, 39, 973–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. VandeVord, P.J.; Matthew, H.W.T.; DeSilva, S.P.; Mayton, L.; Wu, B.; Wooleyl, P.H. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 59, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 11 01413 g001 550
Figure 1. Impact strength and elongation at break of PLA/BEP composites with various BEP amounts.
Figure 1. Impact strength and elongation at break of PLA/BEP composites with various BEP amounts.
Polymers 11 01413 g001
Polymers 11 01413 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of the impact fracture surface of neat PLA and PLA-8 composites, (a1) PLA (1k magnification); (b1) PLA-8 (1k magnification); (a2) PLA (10k magnification); (b2) PLA-8 (10k magnification).
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of the impact fracture surface of neat PLA and PLA-8 composites, (a1) PLA (1k magnification); (b1) PLA-8 (1k magnification); (a2) PLA (10k magnification); (b2) PLA-8 (10k magnification).
Polymers 11 01413 g002
Polymers 11 01413 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the neck regions of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites at 1k magnification, (a) PLA; (b) PLA-4; (c) PLA-8.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the neck regions of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites at 1k magnification, (a) PLA; (b) PLA-4; (c) PLA-8.
Polymers 11 01413 g003
Polymers 11 01413 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the tensile fracture surface of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites at 2k magnification, (a) PLA; (b) PLA-4; (c) PLA-8.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the tensile fracture surface of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites at 2k magnification, (a) PLA; (b) PLA-4; (c) PLA-8.
Polymers 11 01413 g004
Polymers 11 01413 g005 550
Figure 5. Melting DSC thermograms curves of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites.
Figure 5. Melting DSC thermograms curves of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites.
Polymers 11 01413 g005
Polymers 11 01413 g006 550
Figure 6. XRD patterns of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composite films annealed at 115 °C for 90 min.
Figure 6. XRD patterns of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composite films annealed at 115 °C for 90 min.
Polymers 11 01413 g006
Polymers 11 01413 g007 550
Figure 7. Polarizing optical micrographs of the spherulitic morphology of neat PLA and PLA-8 composites, (a) PLA; (b) PLA-8.
Figure 7. Polarizing optical micrographs of the spherulitic morphology of neat PLA and PLA-8 composites, (a) PLA; (b) PLA-8.
Polymers 11 01413 g007
Polymers 11 01413 g008 550
Figure 8. Stereo microscope photos of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites after 4 months of degradation in soil, (a) PLA; (b) PLA-4; (c) PLA-8.
Figure 8. Stereo microscope photos of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites after 4 months of degradation in soil, (a) PLA; (b) PLA-4; (c) PLA-8.
Polymers 11 01413 g008
Polymers 11 01413 g009 550
Figure 9. Mass loss of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites after degradation in soil for 4 months.
Figure 9. Mass loss of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites after degradation in soil for 4 months.
Polymers 11 01413 g009
Polymers 11 01413 g010 550
Figure 10. Mass loss of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites after degradation in lipase solution for 10 days.
Figure 10. Mass loss of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites after degradation in lipase solution for 10 days.
Polymers 11 01413 g010
Polymers 11 01413 g011 550
Figure 11. Degradation schematic of the PLA/BEP composites in a lipase solution.
Figure 11. Degradation schematic of the PLA/BEP composites in a lipase solution.
Polymers 11 01413 g011
Polymers 11 01413 g012 550
Figure 12. Cell viability of L929 cells in the presence of extracts of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites at different concentrations and incubation times: (a) 24 h; (b) 48 h; (c) 72 h.
Figure 12. Cell viability of L929 cells in the presence of extracts of neat PLA and PLA/BEP composites at different concentrations and incubation times: (a) 24 h; (b) 48 h; (c) 72 h.
Polymers 11 01413 g012
Polymers 11 01413 g013 550
Figure 13. Micrograph of L929 cells at 100 magnification: (a) 24 h PLA-10; (b) 48 h PLA-10; (c) 72 h PLA-10; (d) negative control, after 24 h; (e) positive control, after 24 h.
Figure 13. Micrograph of L929 cells at 100 magnification: (a) 24 h PLA-10; (b) 48 h PLA-10; (c) 72 h PLA-10; (d) negative control, after 24 h; (e) positive control, after 24 h.
Polymers 11 01413 g013
Table
Table 1. Composition of various poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/biodegradable elastomer particles (BEP) composites. Phr: parts per hundred rubber.
Table 1. Composition of various poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/biodegradable elastomer particles (BEP) composites. Phr: parts per hundred rubber.
Sample NumbersPLAPLA-2PLA-4PLA-6PLA-8PLA-10
PLA/phr100100100100100100
BEP/phr0246810
HMV-8CA/phr00.060.120.180.240.3
Table
Table 2. Isothermal crystallization kinetic parameters of various PLA/BEP composites.
Table 2. Isothermal crystallization kinetic parameters of various PLA/BEP composites.
Sample Numberst1/2/minnKTm/°CΔHm/J·g−1Crystallinity/%tm/min
PLA12.072.690.047165.428.4130.5516
PLA-410.222.810.051159.7, 167.040.6745.4814
PLA-87.112.890.075160.3, 167.339.6246.0110

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, T.; Qiu, L.; Gu, Y.; Chang, J. Toughened Poly(lactic acid)/BEP Composites with Good Biodegradability and Cytocompatibility. Polymers 2019, 11, 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091413

AMA Style

Wang Q, Li Y, Zhou X, Wang T, Qiu L, Gu Y, Chang J. Toughened Poly(lactic acid)/BEP Composites with Good Biodegradability and Cytocompatibility. Polymers. 2019; 11(9):1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091413

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Qingguo, Yongxuan Li, Xue Zhou, Tongyao Wang, Liyan Qiu, Yuanchun Gu, and Jiabing Chang. 2019. "Toughened Poly(lactic acid)/BEP Composites with Good Biodegradability and Cytocompatibility" Polymers 11, no. 9: 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091413

APA Style

Wang, Q., Li, Y., Zhou, X., Wang, T., Qiu, L., Gu, Y., & Chang, J. (2019). Toughened Poly(lactic acid)/BEP Composites with Good Biodegradability and Cytocompatibility. Polymers, 11(9), 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091413

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop