Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Hybrid Alginate-Chitosan Aerogel as Potential Carriers for Pulmonary Drug Delivery
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Half-Titanocene Complexes Containing π,π-Stacked Aryloxide Ligands, and Their Use as Catalysts for Ethylene (Co)polymerizations
Previous Article in Journal
Chitosan-Grafted Halloysite Nanotubes-Fe3O4 Composite for Laccase-Immobilization and Sulfamethoxazole-Degradation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anion-Dominated Copper Salicyaldimine Complexes—Structures, Coordination Mode of Nitrate and Decolorization Properties toward Acid Orange 7 Dye
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/polym12102222
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Structures, and Water Adsorption of Two Coordination Polymers Constructed by M(II) (M = Ni (1) and Zn (2)) with 1,3-Bis(4-Pyridyl)Propane (bpp) and 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylate (BT4−) Ligands

by
Chih-Chieh Wang
1,*,
Wei-Cheng Yi
1,
Zi-Ling Huang
1,
Tsai-Wen Chang
1,
Wen-Chi Chien
1,
Yueh-Yi Tseng
1,
Bo-Hao Chen
2,
Yu-Chun Chuang
2,* and
Gene-Hsiang Lee
3
1
Department of Chemistry, Soochow University, Taipei 11102, Taiwan
2
National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Hsinchu 30076, Taiwan
3
Instrumentation Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(10), 2222; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102222
Submission received: 31 August 2020 / Revised: 23 September 2020 / Accepted: 25 September 2020 / Published: 27 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coordination Polymer II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Two coordination polymers (CPs), with chemical formulas {[Ni2(bpp)2(BT)(H2O)6] 1.5(EtOH) 1.5H2O}n (1) and [Zn(bpp)(BT)0.5]·5H2O (2) (bpp = 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane, and BT4− = tetraanion of 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylic acid), have been synthesized and structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. In compound 1, the coordination environments of two crystallographically independent Ni(II) ions are both distorted octahedral bonded to two nitrogen donors from two bpp ligands and four oxygen donors from one BT4- ligand and three water molecules. Both bpp and BT4− act as bridging ligands with bis-monodentate and 1,4-bis-monodentate coordination modes, respectively, connecting the Ni(II) ions to form a 2D layered metal-organic framework (MOF). Adjacent 2D layers are then arranged orderly in an ABAB manner to complete their 3D supramolecular architecture. In 2, the coordination environment of Zn(II) ion is distorted tetrahedral bonded to two nitrogen donors from two bpp ligands and two oxygen donors from two BT4− ligands. Both bpp and BT4- act as bridging ligands with bis-monodentate and 1,2,4,5-tetrakis-monodentate coordination modes, respectively, connecting the Zn(II) ions to form a 3D MOF. The reversible water de-/adsorption behavior of 1 between dehydrated and rehydrated forms has been verified by cyclic Thermogravimetric (TG) analyses through de-/rehydration processes. Compound 1 also exhibits significant water vapor hysteresis isotherms.

1. Introduction

Coordination compounds with open two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) polymeric metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [1,2] containing guest solvent molecules are attractive research fields, owing not only to their designable structure with unusual flexibilities but also to their tunable functional application [3,4,5,6,7,8], which provide the possibility for developing advanced functional materials for assemblies of guest molecules in confined spaces [9,10]. In particular, 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid (H4BT) and its de-protonated form of BT4− appear attractive as building blocks with template capacity for the construction of 1D, 2D and 3D extended coordination polymers (CPs) [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. In the relevant approach, BT4−, which possesses a rigid aromatic multi-carboxylate structure, has been used as a poly-functional ligand, including as a bridging ligand with various coordination modes to build up many CPs or MOFs with novel extended networks and also as a hydrogen bonding acceptor in the stabilization of extended 3D supramolecular networks [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The combination of BT4− and additional rigid or flexible N-based co-ligands in such synthetic systems can generate interesting polymeric frameworks with different structural topologies [19,20,21,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. In this regard, bi-pyridyl-type ligand, 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane (bpp), is a flexible bifunctional ligand [31] that can adopt different conformations (TT, TG, GG, GG’; T = trans and G = gauche, as shown in Scheme 1) via the rotation of aliphatic chain [−CH2−CH2−CH2−] between two pyridyl rings to obtain different structural topologies in polymeric structures [34]. Several crystal structures containing transition metal ions and bpp ligands show the formation of 1D, 2D and 3D networks [30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. However, the polymeric structures constructed by transition metal ions with BT4− and bpp ligands are rare and only a few polymeric networks have been reported in the literature [19,20,21]. Focusing on this approach, we report here the synthesis and structural characterization of two CPs, {[Ni2(bpp)2(BT)(H2O)6] 1.5(EtOH) 1.5H2O}n (1) and [Zn(bpp)(BT)0.5]·5H2O (2), in which the BT4− ligands act as the bridging ligands with two kinds of coordination modes, 1,4-bis-monodentate in 1 and 1,2,4,5-tetrakis-monodentate in 2 (shown in Scheme 2), and the bpp acts as a bridging ligand with bis-monodentate coordination mode, connecting the M(II) ions to generate 2D layered and 3D MOFs, respectively. The thermal stability, reversible de-/adsorption of the guest water molecules and water vapor ad-/desorption isotherms are the focus of this study.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. General Procedures

All chemicals were used as commercially obtained. Elemental analyses were conducted with a Perkin-Elmer 2400 elemental analyzer. IR spectra (KBr disk) were recorded on a Nicolet FT IR, MAGNA-IR 500 spectrometer. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a Perkin-Elmer 7 Series/UNIX TGA7 analyzer. Single-phased powder samples were loaded into alumina pans and heated with a ramp rate of 5 °C/min from room temperature to 700 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. The water vapor adsorption isotherm at 298 K was measured in the gaseous state by using BELSORP-max volumetric adsorption equipment from BEL, Osaka, Japan. The adsorbent sample (~100–150 mg), which was prepared at 150 °C and 10−2 Pa for around 24 h, was placed into the sample cell, and then the change in pressure was monitored and the degree of adsorption was determined by the decrease in pressure at equilibrium state.

2.2. Synthesis of {[Ni2(bpp)2(BT)(H2O)6] 1.5(EtOH) 1.5H2O}n (1)

An ethanol/H2O solution (1:1, 3 mL) of 1,2,4,5-benzene-tetracarboxylic acid (H4BT) (0.02 mmol) was added to an ethanol/water (1:1, 6 mL) solution of NiCl2 (0.04 mmol) and 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane (0.04 mmol) at RT. After standing for one week, blue block crystals of 1 (yield, 53.53%) were obtained. The resulting crystals were filtrated and then washed several times with distilled water. Anal. calc. for (1), C39H54N4O17Ni2: C 48.37, N 5.78, H 5.58; found: C 48.91, N 5.77, H 5.69. IR: ν = 3417 (vs, br), 1620 (vs), 1571 (vs), 1433 (s), 1414 (s), 1375 (vs), 1324 (m), 1222 (m), 1137 (w), 1072 (m), 1031 (s), 823 (s), 620 (m), 518 (m) cm−1.

2.3. Synthesis of [Zn(bpp)(BT)0.5]·5H2O (2)

An ethanol/H2O solution (1:1, 3 mL) of 1,2,4,5-benzene-tetracarboxylic acid (H4BT) (0.0050g, 0.02 mmol) was added to an ethanol/water (1:1, 6 mL) solution of ZnF2 (0.0041g, 0.04 mmol) and 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane (0.0079 g, 0.04 mmol) at RT. After standing for several days, colorless needle-like crystals of 2 (yield, 55.8%) were obtained. The resulting crystals were filtrated and then washed several times with distilled water. Anal. calc. for (2), C18H25N2O9Zn: C 45.15, N 5.84, H 5.22; found: C 45.14, N 5.85, H 5.34. IR: ν = 3358 (vs, br), 1620 (s), 1571 (s), 1484 (m), 1431 (s), 1378 (vs), 1332 (m), 1226 (w), 1137 (w), 1071 (w), 922 (w), 839 (m), 805 (m),683 (m), 666 (m), 585 (m), 531 (m) cm−1.

2.4. X-ray Crystallography and Refinements

The diffraction data for compounds 1 and 2 were collected on a Siemens SMART diffractomer with Mo radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 150 K. Cell parameters were retrieved using SMART [37] software and refined with SAINT [38] on all observed reflections. Data reduction was performed with the SAINT [39] software and corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. Absorption corrections were applied with the program SADABS [39]. Direct phase determination and subsequent difference Fourier map synthesis yielded the positions of all atoms. The final full-matrix, least-squares refinement on F2 was applied for all observed reflections [I > 2σ(I)]. All calculations were performed by using the SHELXTL-PC V 5.03 software package [40]. Crystal data and details of the data collection and structure refinements for 1 and 2 are summarized in Table 1. CCDC-2022795 and 2,022,797 for 1 and 2, respectively, contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper (Figures S1 and S2). These data can be obtained free of charge from www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (internat.) +44-1223/336-033; email: [email protected].

2.5. In Situ X-ray Powder Diffraction

The powder X-ray diffraction measurement of compounds 1 and 2 was performed at the BL01C2 beamline of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC) in Taiwan. The X-ray energy was selected at 1.0332 Å. The diffraction pattern was recorded with a Mar345 imaging-plate detector and typical exposure duration of 2 min. The one-dimensional powder diffraction profile was converted with GSAS-II program [41]. The diffraction angles were calibrated according to Bragg positions of lanthanum boride (SRM660b) standards.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and IR Spectroscopy

Compounds 1 and 2 were synthesized by direct mixing of M(II) salts, bpp and H4BT with a molar ratio of 2:2:1 to obtain blue rod-like crystals of 1 and colorless needle-like crystals of 2, respectively. The synthetic representation is shown in Scheme 3. The most relevant IR features are those associated with the BT4− and bpp ligands [19,20]. Absorption bands in the range of 1400–1700 cm−1 can be related to the carboxylate groups of BT4− ligand and bpp ligand, since the main vibrational frequencies of the two ligands appear in the same spectral region. However, a strong band centered at around 1571 cm−1 in the spectrum can be attributed to vibrational modes representing the C–C and C–N mixing stretching motions and is in agreement with the characteristics of the bpp ligand. Additional broad bands appear in the range of 3100–3500 cm−1 in 1 and 2, indicating the presence of the O–H stretching vibration from water molecules.

3.2. Structural Characterization of {[Ni2(bpp)2(BT)(H2O)6] 1.5(EtOH)·1.5H2O}n (1)

Compound 1 is iso-structural with that of {[Co2(bpp)2(BT)(H2O)6]·2H2O}n [20] and crystallizes in the monoclinic Cc space group, in which the asymmetric unit is composed of two Ni(II) centers, two bpp, one BT4− ligand, six coordinated H2O molecules and one and a half solvated H2O and C2H5OH molecules. The molecular structures of 1 are shown in Figure 1a, in which two crystallographically independent Ni(II) ions are both six coordinate bonded to four oxygen donors of one BT4− ligand and three H2O molecules and two nitrogen donors of two bpp ligands located at the cis position, forming a distorted octahedral geometry. Bond lengths and angles around the Ni(II) ions are listed in Table S1 (included in the Supporting Information). In 1, two crystallographically independent bpp ligands, adopting TT and TG conformations, respectively, both act as bridging ligands with bis-monodentate coordination mode connecting the Ni(II) ions to form one-dimensional (1D) zigzag chains (Figure 1b). Adjacent chains are inter-linked via the connectivity between Ni(II) ions and BT4− ligands with 1,4-bis-monodentate coordination mode [20] to generate a 2D layered MOF (Figure 1b). The Ni(II)⋅⋅⋅Ni(II) separations via TT-, TG-bpp and BT4− bridges are 12.922(3), 12.203(3) and 11.220(1) Å, respectively. Adjacent 2D layers are then arranged orderly in an ABAB parallel manner to build up their 3D supramolecular architectures (Figure 1c). It is important to note that intra- and inter-layer O–H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonding interactions between the coordinated H2O molecules and uncoordinated oxygen atoms of BT4− ligands, with O⋅⋅⋅O distances in the range of 2.675(1)–3.170(2) Å, provide extra stabilization energies for the construction of its 3D structures. Furthermore, guest solvent molecules, 1.5 EtOH and 1.5 H2O, which are located at the vacant spaces in the 3D supramolecular architecture, are reinforced by intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions between O–H groups of guest molecules and oxygen atoms of coordinated H2O molecules and BT4− ligands. Relevant parameters of hydrogen bonds are summarized in Table S2 (included in the Supporting Information).
The thermal stability and temperature-dependent structural variation for 1 were studied by thermogravimetric (TG) analysis and in situ powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) measurements, respectively. During the heating process, the TG analysis of 1 displayed a two-step weight loss (Figure 2a), while the first weight loss of 20.3% corresponded to the weight losses of six coordinated water molecules, 1.5 guest ethanol and 1.5 water molecules (calc. 21.1%), occurring in the range of approximately 33.9–156.9 °C and then remaining thermally stable up to 198.4 without any weight loss. On further heating, these samples decomposed. It is important to note that, during the heating processes, crystals in 1 were accompanied by morphological changes. The simultaneous and gradual color changes of the crystals were followed by optical microscopy, as shown in Figure 2a, during the de-solvation processes at some specific temperatures. A well-formed blue crystal of 1 was obtained. As the temperature was raised, the colors of dried crystals gradually turned from blue to pale-blue, and many chaps with random cracks on the crystal surface were observed. In order to gain more structural information, in situ temperature-dependent synchrotron PXRD patterns of 1 were collected from 25 °C to 410 °C, and the results at some specific temperatures are shown in Figure 2b. The PXRD patterns of as-synthesized samples 1 at RT matched well with the simulated one based on the single crystal structures. As the temperature increased, solvent de-solvation processes were initialized at 100 °C for 1 and converted to a meta-stable phase before entire structure collapse. However, due to the poor long-range ordering of PXRD data, the unit cells of dehydrated form 1 could not be determined directly by using synchrotron PXRD data. The temperature-dependent PXRD results are consistent with the TGA results and morphological changes.

3.3. Structural Description of {[Zn(bpp)(BT)0.5]·5H2O}n (2)

Compound 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic P 21/c space group, in which the asymmetric unit is composed of one Zn(II) ion, one bpp, half of a BT4− ligand and five guest water molecules. The coordination geometry of Zn(II) ion in 2 is distorted tetrahedral (Figure 3a) bonded to two oxygen donors from two BT4− ligands and two nitrogen donors from two bpp ligands. Relevant bond lengths and angles around the Zn(II) ion are listed in Table S3 (included in the Supporting Information). In 2, BT4− acts as a bridging ligand with 1,2,4,5-tetrakis-monodentate coordination mode [28,29] connecting the Zn(II) ions to form a 2D sinusoidal-like [Zn2(BT)]n layered framework (Figure 3b). Adjacent layers are inter-linked via the connectivity between Zn(II) ions and bpp ligands with bis-monodentate coordination mode to complete its 3D MOF (Figure 3c), in which five guest water molecules are located at the vacant sites (Figure 3d, right). The Zn(II)⋅⋅⋅Zn(II) separation via the TG-bpp bridge is 10.681(1) Å and via BT4− bridges is 6.170(1), 9.208(1), 11.111(3), 11.057(2) Å (Figure 3c, right), respectively. It is noteworthy that five guest water molecules are assembled together to generate a 2D sinusoidal-like hydrogen-bonded water layer (Figure 3d, left and middle), which is built up by two water cluster units—one is a (H2O)6 chair-like water ring and the other is a (H2O)18 water ring (Figure 3d, left)—via the intermolecular O–H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonding interactions with the O⋅⋅⋅O distances in the range of 2.725(1)–2.818(1) Å. Importantly, synergistic O−H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonding interactions between guest H2O molecules in the 2D water layer and carboxylate groups of BT4− ligands in two [Zn2(BT)]n layers (Figure 3d, right) provide significant stabilization energy to maintain the accumulation of 2D water layers in the 3D MOF. Relevant parameters for hydrogen bonds are summarized in Table S4 (included in Supporting Information).
During the heating process, the TG analysis (see Figure 4a) revealed that 2 underwent a two-step weight loss, while the first weight loss of 18.1% corresponded to the loss of five guest H2O molecules (calc. 18.8%), occurring in the range of approximately 30.6–64.3 °C, and then remaining thermally stable up to 291.7 °C without any weight loss. On further heating, the sample decomposed. It is important to note that, during the heating processes, crystal 2 was accompanied by morphological changes. The simultaneous and gradual changes of the crystals were followed by optical microscopy, as shown in Figure 4a, during the dehydration process at some specific temperatures. A well-formed colorless crystal of 2 was obtained. As the temperature was raised, the color of the crystals gradually turned from colorless to white and many chaps with random cracks on the crystal surface were observed. To gain more information on the temperature-dependent structural variation, in situ synchrotron PXRD patterns of 2 were collected from 25 °C to 410 °C, and the results at some specific temperatures are shown in Figure 4b. The PXRD patterns of as-synthesized sample 2 matched well with the simulated pattern based on the single crystal structure. As the temperature increased, a new phase was transformed at 110 °C and could be sustained up to 320 °C. According to the cell refinement results, the cell volume reduced from 2078.88 Å3 to 1847.39 Å3, roughly a 12% reduction. The symmetry was kept in monoclinic lattice, and corresponding cell parameters of hydrated and dehydrated forms were a = 12.5099 Å, b = 14.7892 Å, c = 10.8858 Å, β = 113.469° and a = 10.6860 Å, b = 16.5976 Å, c = 12.4611 Å, β = 109.845°, respectively. The temperature-dependent PXRD results are consistent with the TGA results and morphological changes.

3.4. Water De-/Adsorption Behaviors of CPs 1 and 2 by Cyclic TG Analysis

In order to certify the reversibility of water de-/adsorption behaviors in 1 and 2 under water vapor, cyclic TG measurements were performed under de-/rehydration procedures by heating/cooling processes. Compound 1 showed a 20.0% weight decrease, corresponding to the losses of six coordinated H2O molecules, 1.5 guest EtOH and 1.5 H2O molecules, to obtain a dehydrated form of 1 after heating up to 120 °C (Figure 5a). When the dehydrated samples 1 were exposed to the water vapor and gradually cooled down to RT, the dehydrated samples showed a weight-increasing of 9.3%, approximately equal to 5.0 H2O molecules, to form the rehydration ones. Such heating and cooling processes were repeated for five times (Figure 5a), showing almost equally weighted increasing/decreasing percentages in the range of 9.3~10.1%, to prove the stable reversibility of the water de-/rehydration behavior. On the contrary, compound 2 shows irreversible water de-/adsorption behavior during the cyclic TG measurements shown in Figure 5b, in which a 20.0% weight decrease was found in the first cycle, corresponding to the losses of five guest H2O molecules, to obtain the dehydrated form 2 after heating up to 150 °C (Figure 5b). When the dehydrated samples 2 were exposed to the water vapor and cooled down to RT, the water molecules could not be re-adsorbed. The results described above show reversible water de-/adsorption behaviors between dehydrated and rehydrated forms, but 2 shows irreversible water de-/adsorption behavior. The poor water adsorption ability of dehydrated 2 may be attributed to the structural change of the dehydrated form, which may prevent the re-adsorption of water molecules via the synergistic hydrogen bonding interactions between water molecules and [Zn2(BT)]n layers.

3.5. Water Sorption Studies of CP 1

According to cyclic TG analyses, compound 1 shows the reversible de-/adsorption behavior of approximately five water molecules. In order to explore the water adsorption ability of 1, water vapor sorption isotherms of pre-treated dehydrated form 1 were measured at 298K. The isotherm curve (Figure 6) of dehydrated 1 shows a steady increase in adsorbed water vapor at 0 < relative P/P0 < 0.89, with maximum value of 210.7 cm3 g−1 at relative P/P0 equal to 0.89, approximately equal to 8.20 H2O molecules, indicating six coordinated and two guest H2O molecules in 1 being re-adsorbed. It is worth noting that the desorption curve did not trace the adsorption curve, exhibiting a significant hysteresis loop with a value of 148.5 cm3 g−1, approximately equal to 5.8 H2O molecules at lower relative P/P0 equal to 0.22. The water ad-/desorption isotherms of dehydrated form 1 reveal that the vacant sites of Ni(II) ions provide the opportunity for bond re-formation with water molecules as the dehydrated samples being exposed to water vapor. Recently, MOFs with high porosity have been examined for their water capture properties and found to be highly promising materials [42,43,44]. However, water capture properties applied to 3D supramolecular architectures assembled via CPs or MOFs are seldom detected and only a few cases have been investigated [45,46,47]. The water sorption isotherm with large hysteresis loops found in 1 is interesting and may be exploited as a water harvesting material.

4. Conclusions

Two coordination polymeric frameworks, {[Ni2(bpp)2(BT)(H2O)6] 1.5(EtOH)·1.5H2O}n (1) and [Zn(bpp)(BT)0.5]·5H2O (2), have been structurally investigated. In compound 1, the 3D supramolecular architecture is built up via the assembly of 2D MOFs, which are constructed through the bridges of Ni(II) with 1,4-bis-monodentate bpp and BT4− ligands. Compound 2 is a 3D MOF constructed through the bridges of Zn(II) with bis-monodentate bpp and 1,2,4,5-tetrakis-monodentate BT4− ligands. Interestingly, the guest water molecules in 2 are assembled together to generate a 2D sinusoidal-like hydrogen-bonded water layer, which is built up by two water cluster units—one is a (H2O)6 chair-like water ring and the other is a (H2O)18 water ring—via the intermolecular O–H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonding interactions. Notably, compound 1 exhibits interesting water hysteresis isotherms and undergoes reversible water de-/adsorption behavior between the dehydrated and rehydrated species during thermal re-/dehydration processes. Water capture uptake observed in 1 displayed significant hysteresis loops in water ad-/desorption isotherms, which may be developed for potential application as a water harvesting material.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/10/2222/s1, Figure S1: (a) TG measurement of 1, (b) PXRD patterns at RT and selected temperatures and their simulation from single-crystal diffraction data of 1, Figure S2: (a) TG measurement of 2, (b) PXRD patterns at RT and selected temperatures and their simulation from single-crystal diffraction data of 2, Table S1: Bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) around Ni(II) ions in 1, Table S2: Related parameters of hydrogen bonds in 1, Table S3: Bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) around Zn(II) ion in 2, Table S4: Related parameters of hydrogen bonds in 2.

Author Contributions

C.-C.W. designed the experiments; W.-C.Y., Z.-L.H., W.-C.C., T.-W.C. and Y.-Y.T. completed the experiments, including synthesis, structural characterization, EA, IR, TG analysis, and water ad/desorption measurements; G.-H.L. contributed to the single-crystal X-ray data collection and structural analysis; B.-H.C. and Y.-C.C. contributed to the PXRD measurements by synchrotron radiation light source; C.-C.W. and Y.-C.C. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology and Soochow University, Taiwan for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Batten, S.R.; Champness, N.R.; Chen, X.-M.; Garcia-Martinez, J.; Kitagawa, S.; Öhrström, L.; O’Keeffe, M.; Suh, M.P.; Reedijk, J. Coordination polymers, metal–organic frameworks and the need for terminology guidelines. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 3001–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Terminology of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Coordination Polymers. Chem. Int. 2013, 35, 1715–1724. [CrossRef]
  3. Li, B.; Chrzanowski, M.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, S. Applications of metal-organic frameworks featuring multi-functional sites. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 307, 106–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Hu, Z.; Wang, G.; Uvdal, K. Coordination polymers for energy transfer: Preparations, properties, sensing applications, and perspectives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 284, 206–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bradshaw, D.; Claridge, J.B.; Cussen, E.J.; Prior, T.J.; Rosseinsky, M.J. Design, Chirality, and Flexibility in Nanoporous Molecule-Based Materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 38, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silva, P.; Vilela, S.M.F.; Tome, J.P.C.; Paz, F.A.A. Multifunctional metal–organic frameworks: From academia to industrial applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 6774–6803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Li, S.; Huo, F. Metal–organic framework composites: From fundamentals to applications. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 7482–7501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Janiak, C.; Vieth, J.K. MOFs, MILs and more: Concepts, properties and applications for porous coordination networks (PCNs). New J. Chem. 2010, 34, 2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. He, Y.; Li, B.; O’Keeffe, M.; Chen, B. Multifunctional metal–organic frameworks constructed from meta-benzenedicarboxylate units. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5618–5656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, Z.-J.; Lu, J.; Hong, M.; Cao, R. Metal–organic frameworks based on flexible ligands (FL-MOFs): Structures and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5867–5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jia, H.P.; Li, W.; Ju, Z.F.; Zhang, J. Co5(μ3-OH)2(btec)2(bpp)]n: A three-dimensional homometallic molecular metamagnet built from the mixed hydroxide/carboxylate-bridged ferromagnetic-like chains. Dalton Trans. 2007, 33, 3699–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, E.-C.; Liu, Z.-Y.; Liu, T.-Y.; Li, L.-L.; Zhao, X.-J. Co-ligand-directed structural and magnetic diversities in an anisotropic CoII–triazolate system. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 8132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, L.M.; Li, H.H.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, S.Y.; Zhang, Z.J.; Shi, W.; Cheng, P.; Liao, D.Z.; Yan, S.P. Synthesis, crystal structures, and magnetic properties of Mn(II), Co(II), and Zn(II) coordination polymers containing 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid and 4,4′-azobispyridine. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 13, 1983–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fabelo, O.; Canñadillas-Delgado, L.; Pasaán, J.; Delgado, F.S.; Lloret, F.; Cano, J.; Julve, M.; Ruiz-Pérez, C. Study of the Influence of the Bridge on the Magnetic Coupling in Cobalt(II) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 11342–11351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fabelo, O.; Pasán, J.; Cañadillas-Delgado, L.; Delgado, F.S.; Yuste, C.; Lloret, F.; Julve, M.; Ruiz-Pérez, C. Novel cobalt(II) coordination polymers based on 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid and extended bis-monodentate ligands. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cheng, D.; Khan, M.A.; Houser, R.P. Novel Sandwich Coordination Polymers Composed of Cobalt(II), 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylato Ligands, and Homopiperazonium Cations. Cryst. Growth Des. 2002, 2, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, D.; Zhang, N.; Luo, G.; Xu, Q.-J.; Huang, R.-B.; Zheng, L.-S. Assembly of silver(I) coordination polymers incorporating pyromellitic acid and N-heterocyclic ligands. Polyhedron 2010, 29, 1842–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ren, C.; Hou, L.; Liu, B.; Yang, G.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Shi, Q.-Z. Distinct structures of coordination polymers incorporating flexible triazole-based ligand: Topological diversities, crystal structures and property studies. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, G.; Wu, S.-H.; Zhao, Q.-H.; Li, D.; Xiao, Z.-J.; Dai, J.-C. Water helicate (H2O)5 hosted by a novel 2D CoII-coordination framework with left- and right-handed helical units. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2012, 20, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Correa, C.C.; Diniz, R.; Janczak, J.; Yoshida, M.I.; De Oliveira, L.F.; Machado, F.C. High dimensional coordination polymers based on transition metals, 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylate anion and 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane nitrogen ligand. Polyhedron 2010, 29, 3125–3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Atria, A.M.; Corsini, G.; Garland, M.T.; Baggio, R. Poly[4,40-(propane-1,3-diyl)dipyridinium bis{tetraaquabis(μ2-5-carboxybenzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylato)bis[μ2-1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane]dicobalt(II)}pentahydrate]. Acta Cryst. 2011, 67, m367–m370. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jeremias, F.; Khutia, A.; Janiak, C.; Henninger, S.K. MIL-100(Al, Fe) as water adsorbents for heat transformation purposes—A promising application. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 10148–10151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cañadillas-Delgado, L.; Fabelo, O.; Ruiz-Pérez, C.; Delgado, F.S.; Julve, M.; Hernandez-Molina, M.; Laz, M.M.; Lorenzo-Luis, P.A. Zeolite-like Nanoporous Gadolinium Complexes Incorporating Alkaline Cations. Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 6, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Majumder, A.; Gramlich, V.; Rosair, G.M.; Batten, S.R.; Masuda, J.D.; El Fallah, M.S.; Ribas, J.; Sutter, J.P.; Desplanches, C.; Mitra, S. Five New Cobalt(II) and Copper(II)-1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylate Supramolecular Architectures: Syntheses, Structures, and Magnetic Properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 6, 2355–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Y.; Hao, N.; Lu, Y.; Wang, E.; Kang, Z.; Hu, C. New Two-Dimensional Metal−Organic Networks Constructed from 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylate and Chelate Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 3119–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fabelo, O.; Pasán, J.; Lloret, F.; Julve, M.; Ruiz-Pérez, C. 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylate- and 2,2′-Bipyrimidine-Containing Cobalt(II) Coordination Polymers: Preparation, Crystal Structure, and Magnetic Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 3568–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Halim, R.A.; Bhatt, P.M.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Shkurenko, A.; Adil, K.; Barbour, L.J.; Eddaoudi, M. A Fine-Tuned Metal–Organic Framework for Autonomous Indoor Moisture Control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10715–10722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Massoud, S.S.; Mautner, F.A.; Louka, F.R.; Demeshko, S.; Dechert, S.; Meyer, F. Diverse coordination of polynuclear copper(II) complexes constructed from benzene tetracarboxylates. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2011, 370, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mautner, F.A.; Albering, J.H.; Vicente, R.; Andrepont, C.; Gautreaux, J.G.; Gallo, A.A.; Massoud, S.S. Synthesis, structure and magnetic investigations of polycarboxylato-copper(II) complexes. Polyhedron 2013, 54, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, X.-J.; Cao, R.; Bi, W.-H.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, X. Three interpenetrated frameworks constructed by long flexible N,N′-bipyridyl and dicarboxylate ligands. Polyhedron 2005, 24, 2955–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, T.-W.; Lau, J.P.-K.; Wong, W.-T. Synthesis and characterization of coordination polymers of Zn(II) with 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane and 4,4′-pyridine ligands. Polyhedron 2004, 23, 999–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Correa, C.C.; Diniz, R.; Chagas, L.H.; Rodrigues, B.L.; Yoshida, M.I.; Teles, W.M.; Machado, F.C.; De Oliveira, L.F.C. Transition metal complexes with squarate anion and the pyridyl-donor ligand 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane (BPP): Synthesis, crystal structure and spectroscopic investigation. Polyhedron 2007, 26, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Plater, M.J.; Foreman, M.R.S.; Gelbrich, T.; Hursthouse, M.B. One-dimensional structures of nickel(II) and cobalt(II) coordination complexes {[ML2(H2O)2]·L·H2O·(ClO4)2} (M = Co or Ni; L = 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane) Inorg. Chim. Acta 2001, 318, 171–174. [Google Scholar]
  34. Maw-Cherng, S.; Chan, Z.K.; Chen, J.D.; Wang, J.C.; Hung, C.H. Syntheses and structures of three new coordination polymers generated from the flexible 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane ligand and zinc salts. Polyhedron 2006, 25, 2325–2332. [Google Scholar]
  35. Carlucci, L.; Ciani, G.; Proserpio, D.M.; Rizzato, S. New polymeric networks from the self-assembly of silver(i) salts and the flexible ligand 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane (bpp). A systematic investigation of the effects of the counterions and a survey of the coordination polymers based on bpp. CrystEngComm 2002, 4, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gao, E.-Q.; Xu, Y.-X.; Cheng, A.-L.; He, M.-Y.; Yan, C.-H. Copper(II) and cobalt(II) coordination polymers with azido ions and 1,3-bis(4′-pyridyl)propane. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2006, 9, 212–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. SMART V 4.043 Software for CCD Detector System; Siemens Analytical Instruments Division: Madison, WI, USA, 1995.
  38. SAINT V 4.035 Software for CCD Detector System; Siemens Analytical Instruments Division: Madison, WI, USA, 1995.
  39. Sheldrick, G.M. Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structures; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  40. SHELXTL 5.03 (PC-Version), Program Liberary for Structure Solution and Molecular Graphics; Siemens Analytical Instruments Division: Madison, WI, USA, 1995.
  41. Toby, B.H.; Von Dreele, R.B. GSAS-II: The genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2013, 46, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yilmaz, G.; Peh, S.B.; Zhao, D.; Ho, G.W. Atomic- and Molecular-Level Design of Functional Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and Derivatives for Energy and Environmental Applications. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Rieth, A.J.; Wright, A.M.; Skorupskii, G.; Mancuso, J.L.; Hendon, C.H.; Dincă, M. Diverse π–π stacking motifs modulate electrical conductivity in tetrathiafulvalene-based metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 13858–13866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Furukawa, H.; Gándara, F.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Jiang, J.; Queen, W.L.; Hudson, M.R.; Yaghi, O.M. Water Adsorption in Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks and Related Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4369–4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, C.C.; Ke, S.Y.; Chen, K.T.; Sun, N.K.; Liu, W.F.; Ho, M.L.; Lu, B.J.; Hsieh, Y.T.; Lee, G.H.; Huang, S.Y.; et al. Sponge-Like Water De-/Ad-Sorption versus Solid-State Structural Transformation and Colour-Changing Behavior of an Entangled 3D Composite Supramolecuar Architecture, [Ni4(dpe)4(btc)2(Hbtc)(H2O)9]⋅3H2O. Polymers 2018, 10, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Ke, S.Y.; Chang, Y.F.; Wang, H.Y.; Yang, C.C.; Ni, C.W.; Lin, G.Y.; Chen, T.T.; Ho, M.L.; Lee, G.H.; Chuang, Y.C.; et al. Self-Assembly of Four Coordination Polymers (CPs) in A 3D Entangled Architecture Showing Reversible Dynamic Solid-State Structural Transformation and Color-Changing Behaviour by Thermal De-/Re-hydration. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 4011–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fukushima, T.; Horike, S.; Inubushi, Y.; Nakagawa, K.; Kubota, Y.; Takata, M.; Kitagawa, S. Solid Solutions of Soft Porous Coordination Polymers: Fine-Tuning of Gas Adsorption Properties. Angw. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4820–4824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 12 02222 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Possible conformations of 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane (a) TT, (b) TG, (c) GG, (d) GG’; T = trans and G = gauche.
Scheme 1. Possible conformations of 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane (a) TT, (b) TG, (c) GG, (d) GG’; T = trans and G = gauche.
Polymers 12 02222 sch001
Polymers 12 02222 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Coordination modes of (a) 1,4-bis-monodentate, (b) 1,2,4,5-tetrakis-monodentate of BT4− ligand used in 1 and 2, respectively.
Scheme 2. Coordination modes of (a) 1,4-bis-monodentate, (b) 1,2,4,5-tetrakis-monodentate of BT4− ligand used in 1 and 2, respectively.
Polymers 12 02222 sch002
Polymers 12 02222 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthetic representation of 1 and 2.
Scheme 3. Synthetic representation of 1 and 2.
Polymers 12 02222 sch003
Polymers 12 02222 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Coordination environments of two Ni(II) ions with atom labeling scheme (ORTEP drawing, 30% thermal ellipsoids). The solvents, ethanol and water molecules and H atoms are omitted for clarity. (b) A 2D layered metal-organic framework (MOF) constructed by bpp (blue) and BT4− (red) bridges. Coordinated water molecules and guest ethanol and water molecules are omitted for clarity. (c) The 3D supramolecular architecture. The solvents, ethanol and water molecules and H atoms are omitted for clarity.
Figure 1. (a) Coordination environments of two Ni(II) ions with atom labeling scheme (ORTEP drawing, 30% thermal ellipsoids). The solvents, ethanol and water molecules and H atoms are omitted for clarity. (b) A 2D layered metal-organic framework (MOF) constructed by bpp (blue) and BT4− (red) bridges. Coordinated water molecules and guest ethanol and water molecules are omitted for clarity. (c) The 3D supramolecular architecture. The solvents, ethanol and water molecules and H atoms are omitted for clarity.
Polymers 12 02222 g001
Polymers 12 02222 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Thermogravimetric (TG) measurement associated with morphological changes at selected temperatures of 1. (b) Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of 1 at RT and selected temperatures and its simulation from single-crystal diffraction data associated with morphological changes at selected temperatures of 1. The baselines for each temperature were shifted for clarity.
Figure 2. (a) Thermogravimetric (TG) measurement associated with morphological changes at selected temperatures of 1. (b) Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of 1 at RT and selected temperatures and its simulation from single-crystal diffraction data associated with morphological changes at selected temperatures of 1. The baselines for each temperature were shifted for clarity.
Polymers 12 02222 g002
Polymers 12 02222 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Distorted tetrahedral geometry of Zn(II) ion in 2 with atom labeling scheme (ORTEP drawing, 30% thermal ellipsoids). H atoms and guest water molecules are omitted for clarity. (b) A 2D sinusoidal-like layered framework built up via the bridges of Zn(II) ions and BT4− ligands, viewed along the a axis (left) and c axis (right), respectively. (c) A 3D MOF built up via the bridges of 2D [Zn2–BT] layers (orange-red) and bpp ligands (green) viewed along the a axis (left) and c axis (middle). Right: the Zn⋅⋅⋅Zn distances via BT4− ligand bridges. (d) Left: the sinusoidal-like water layer viewed along the a axis. Middle: the sinusoidal-like water layer viewed along the c axis. Right: the synergistic interactions between 2D water hydrogen-bonded layer and two [Zn2(BT)]n layers.
Figure 3. (a) Distorted tetrahedral geometry of Zn(II) ion in 2 with atom labeling scheme (ORTEP drawing, 30% thermal ellipsoids). H atoms and guest water molecules are omitted for clarity. (b) A 2D sinusoidal-like layered framework built up via the bridges of Zn(II) ions and BT4− ligands, viewed along the a axis (left) and c axis (right), respectively. (c) A 3D MOF built up via the bridges of 2D [Zn2–BT] layers (orange-red) and bpp ligands (green) viewed along the a axis (left) and c axis (middle). Right: the Zn⋅⋅⋅Zn distances via BT4− ligand bridges. (d) Left: the sinusoidal-like water layer viewed along the a axis. Middle: the sinusoidal-like water layer viewed along the c axis. Right: the synergistic interactions between 2D water hydrogen-bonded layer and two [Zn2(BT)]n layers.
Polymers 12 02222 g003
Polymers 12 02222 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis of 2 associated with morphological changes at selected temperatures. (b) Powder X-ray diffraction patterns at RT and selected temperatures and its simulation from single-crystal diffraction data associated with morphological changes at selected temperatures of 2. The baselines for each temperature were shifted for clarity.
Figure 4. (a) Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis of 2 associated with morphological changes at selected temperatures. (b) Powder X-ray diffraction patterns at RT and selected temperatures and its simulation from single-crystal diffraction data associated with morphological changes at selected temperatures of 2. The baselines for each temperature were shifted for clarity.
Polymers 12 02222 g004
Polymers 12 02222 g005 550
Figure 5. TG measurements of (a) 1 and (b) 2 during the cyclic de-/rehydration processes, which were repeated five times. Solid red line: the variation in weight loss with time; blue dash-dot line: the variation in temperature with time.
Figure 5. TG measurements of (a) 1 and (b) 2 during the cyclic de-/rehydration processes, which were repeated five times. Solid red line: the variation in weight loss with time; blue dash-dot line: the variation in temperature with time.
Polymers 12 02222 g005
Polymers 12 02222 g006 550
Figure 6. Water vapor ad-/desorption isotherms of dehydrated 1 at 298 K.
Figure 6. Water vapor ad-/desorption isotherms of dehydrated 1 at 298 K.
Polymers 12 02222 g006
Table
Table 1. Crystal data and refinement details of compounds 1 and 2.
Table 1. Crystal data and refinement details of compounds 1 and 2.
12
empirical formulaC39H54N4Ni2O17C18H25N2O9Zn
formula mass (g mol−1)968.28478.77
crystal systemMonoclinicMonoclinic
space groupCcP 21/c
a (Å)9.9430(4)10.5868(5)
b (Å)19.3122(7)16.5965(7)
c (Å)23.3965(8)12.3099(5)
α (deg)9090
β (deg)98.8698(12)109.2795(13)
γ (deg)9090
V (Å3)4438.9(3)2041.60(15)
Z44
T (K)150(2)150(2)
Dcalcd (g cm−3)1.4491.558
μ (mm−1)0.9241.257
θ range (deg)2.29–27.522.38–27.48
total no. of collected data 1665617257
no. of unique data93804684
no. of obsd data (I > 2σ(I))86894329
Rint0.01810.0158
refine params570311
R1, wR21 (I > 2σ(I))0.0359, 0.09480.0217, 0.0550
R1, wR21 (all data)0.0410, 0.09780.0247, 0.0564
GOF 21.0421.054
1R1 = Σ||Fo − Fc||/Σ|Fo|; wR2(F2) = [Σw|Fo2 − Fc2|2/Σw(Fo4)]1/2. 2 GOF = {Σ[w|Fo2 − Fc2|2]/(n − p)}1/2.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.-C.; Yi, W.-C.; Huang, Z.-L.; Chang, T.-W.; Chien, W.-C.; Tseng, Y.-Y.; Chen, B.-H.; Chuang, Y.-C.; Lee, G.-H. Synthesis, Structures, and Water Adsorption of Two Coordination Polymers Constructed by M(II) (M = Ni (1) and Zn (2)) with 1,3-Bis(4-Pyridyl)Propane (bpp) and 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylate (BT4−) Ligands. Polymers 2020, 12, 2222. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102222

AMA Style

Wang C-C, Yi W-C, Huang Z-L, Chang T-W, Chien W-C, Tseng Y-Y, Chen B-H, Chuang Y-C, Lee G-H. Synthesis, Structures, and Water Adsorption of Two Coordination Polymers Constructed by M(II) (M = Ni (1) and Zn (2)) with 1,3-Bis(4-Pyridyl)Propane (bpp) and 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylate (BT4−) Ligands. Polymers. 2020; 12(10):2222. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Chih-Chieh, Wei-Cheng Yi, Zi-Ling Huang, Tsai-Wen Chang, Wen-Chi Chien, Yueh-Yi Tseng, Bo-Hao Chen, Yu-Chun Chuang, and Gene-Hsiang Lee. 2020. "Synthesis, Structures, and Water Adsorption of Two Coordination Polymers Constructed by M(II) (M = Ni (1) and Zn (2)) with 1,3-Bis(4-Pyridyl)Propane (bpp) and 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylate (BT4−) Ligands" Polymers 12, no. 10: 2222. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102222

APA Style

Wang, C. -C., Yi, W. -C., Huang, Z. -L., Chang, T. -W., Chien, W. -C., Tseng, Y. -Y., Chen, B. -H., Chuang, Y. -C., & Lee, G. -H. (2020). Synthesis, Structures, and Water Adsorption of Two Coordination Polymers Constructed by M(II) (M = Ni (1) and Zn (2)) with 1,3-Bis(4-Pyridyl)Propane (bpp) and 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylate (BT4−) Ligands. Polymers, 12(10), 2222. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102222

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop