Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Hybrid Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch/Woven Kenaf Fabric-Reinforced Epoxy Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects on the Properties after Addition of Lithium Salt in Poly(ethylene oxide)/Poly(methyl acrylate) Blends
Previous Article in Journal
High-Barrier Polyimide Containing Carbazole Moiety: Synthesis, Gas Barrier Properties, and Molecular Simulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solid–Liquid Europium Ion Extraction via Phosphonic Acid-Functionalized Polyvinylidene Fluoride Siloxanes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/polym12092051
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Two-Step Dopamine-to-Polydopamine Modification of Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane for Enhancing Anti-Fouling and Ultraviolet Resistant Properties

by
Sri Mulyati
1,*,
Syawaliah Muchtar
1,
Nasrul Arahman
1,
Yanna Syamsuddin
1,
Normi Izati Mat Nawi
2,
Noorfidza Yub Harun
2,
Muhammad Roil Bilad
2,*,
Yuliar Firdaus
3,
Ryosuke Takagi
4 and
Hideto Matsuyama
4
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
3
Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering (PSE), KAUST Solar Center (KSC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
4
Research Center for Membrane and Film Technology, Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Kobe University, Rokkodai-Cho 1-1, Nadaku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(9), 2051; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092051
Submission received: 19 June 2020 / Revised: 1 August 2020 / Accepted: 7 August 2020 / Published: 9 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymeric Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polydopamine has been widely used as an additive to enhance membrane fouling resistance. This study reports the effects of two-step dopamine-to-polydopamine modification on the permeation, antifouling, and potential anti-UV properties of polyethersulfone (PES)-based ultrafiltration membranes. The modification was performed through a two-step mechanism: adding the dopamine additive followed by immersion into Tris-HCl solution to allow polymerization of dopamine into polydopamine (PDA). The results reveal that the step of treatment, the concentration of dopamine in the first step, and the duration of dipping in the Tris solution in the second step affect the properties of the resulting membranes. Higher dopamine loadings improve the pure water flux (PWF) by more than threefold (15 vs. 50 L/m2·h). The extended dipping period in the Tris alkaline buffer leads to an overgrowth of the PDA layer that partly covers the surface pores which lowers the PWF. The presence of dopamine or polydopamine enhances the hydrophilicity due to the enrichment of hydrophilic catechol moieties which leads to better anti-fouling. Moreover, the polydopamine film also improves the membrane resistance to UV irradiation by minimizing photodegradation’s occurrence.

1. Introduction

Polydopamine (PDA) has been known as an important biocomponent in the medical field, material coating, and an effective additive for membrane fabrication [1,2,3]. PDA is bio-inspired material that can be easily formed under mild conditions (i.e., room temperature) [4] on almost all inorganic and organic substrates [1,5]. The abundant functional groups from catechol on PDA allow it to be a versatile platform for further adhesion of other components with the desired function [6].
The introduction of the PDA as a material modifier was inspired by the mussel foot with a strong adhesive ability [5,7]. PDA is imposed onto a substrate via surface coating thanks to the rapid formation of the PDA layer through polymerization, triggered by an autooxidation reaction using a basic precursor [8]. Such a polymerization mechanism is favored as the other components that can be functionalized on the PDA-layer adhered strongly to the substrate [8,9,10,11].
By its attractive and beneficial characteristics, PDA has been progressively used in many fields [12,13]. PDA has been used as an additive in membrane fabrication [5,14,15,16], thanks to its very high degree of hydrophilicity attributed to the amine and hydroxyl-rich groups. Incorporation of PDA in a membrane matrix then increases the hydrophilic trait that is beneficial for inhibiting the membrane fouling [14,17,18].
In membrane fabrication, numerous surface modification techniques such as surface patterning [19,20,21], polymer blending [17,22,23,24], and surface coating [25] have been applied to enhance the membrane properties in reducing its fouling propensity. The surface coating method is popular to fabricate membranes used in a photocatalytic reactor, in which PDA can act as a medium for binding photocatalyst components that otherwise cannot be deposited directly on the membrane surface [26]. In addition, the presence of a PDA layer on the photocatalytic membrane protects the membrane against UV radical attacks and minimizes the photodegradation [26,27,28]. Nonetheless, PDA’s incorporation also decreases permeation due to blocking the pore surface by the PDA layer [28]. Meanwhile, if the PDA blended with the polymer, the photocatalytic efficacy diminishes because the photocatalysis occurs only on the surface [27]. Another employed a simple dip-coating in an aqueous solution of dopamine and utilized dopamine self-polymerization to form thin surface-adherent polydopamine films onto various materials in which secondary reactions can be used to create a variety of ad-layer [29]. Recent reviews on surface functionalization’s, including for membrane modifications, have been reported elsewhere [30,31].
In our previous work [32], we adopted a new technique for modifying PDA on PDVF through a combination of blending and polymerization that resulted in high permeation, humic acid (HA) rejection, and antifouling performance. As an additive, dopamine acts as a pore former, which synergistically promoted the water flux without rejection trade-off. However, direct PDA coating resulted in membranes with a rather poor permeability. The dopamine blending approach was explored to utilize its pore forming role that enhances permeability and hydrophilicity. Coating of the membrane directly with PDA would require additional pore former. Therefore, a combination of the both methods was expected to simultaneously improve membrane filterability, antifouling, and anti UV performance. With the intention of further investigating dopamine modification techniques, herein, the same modification method is attempted on the PES membrane but with more variations in the concentration of dopamine, and it is aimed at the resistance of the membrane to deeper UV exposure. Anti-UV studies of PDA-modified membranes through this technique are reported for the first time in this work. It is expected that the proposed fabrication technique not only resulted in membranes with outstanding permeability, selectivity, and antifouling performances, but also excellent UV resistance; as such, it can be further applied as a photocatalytic membrane. The presence of the PDA layer on the membrane surface can be used to functionalize semiconductor photocatalyst particles such as TiO2 and so on. This study focuses on the role of PDA additive as an anti-fouling agent and anti UV degradation agent and high filtration performance. Such properties are important for membrane materials used in photocatalytic membrane reactors because the presence of the PDA layer can be functionalized with semiconductor photocatalytic particles.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Polyethersulfone (PES, BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany) was used as a base polymer for membrane materials. N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP, Merck, Hohenbrun, Germany) was used as a solvent. Dopamine hydrochloride (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) and Tris (2-Amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol) (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) were employed as an additive and buffer solutions, respectively. HA (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) was used as a foulant model for the filtration experiments. Distillate water was used as a non-solvent for membranes, solvent for the Tris-buffer preparation, and as the feed for the pure water filtration experiments.

2.2. Preparation of Membrane

The membrane preparation utilized the phase inversion technique, illustrated in Figure 1. The dope solutions were prepared by dissolving PES with the dopamine of varied concentrations (0.5(a); 2(b); and 4(c)%) in the NMP. The mixtures were stirred until homogeneous at room temperature. Once homogeneous, the solution was cast on top of a glass plate at a wet thickness of 2 mm thick film by using the knifing stick. The formation of the membrane sheet occurred after the cast film was immersed in a water container. Some of the membranes that were ready were coded as P-D0 and kept in DI water until used further. The remaining membranes were dipped into a base Tris-HCl solution (pH: 8.5) with a varying dipping duration of 5, 24, and 36 h. Pristine PES membrane (P) without the addition of dopamine and dipping treatment was also prepared as the control. The summary of dope solution formulations for all membrane samples is given in Table 1.

2.3. Membrane Characterization

Several characterizations were conducted to study the effect of the modification on the resulting membranes. The FTIR Spectrophotometer was employed to distinguish the change in chemical groups of the membranes (Thermo Scientific iD5 ATR-Nicolet iS5, Tokyo, Japan). A field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JSF-7500F, Jeol Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was employed to observe the structural morphologies after modification and after UV irradiation. The membranes’ mechanical strength was measured by pulling the membrane sample in a dumbbell shape with dimensions of 4 mm width × 40 mm long using Autograph AGS-J (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). The hydrophilicity degree of the membranes was investigated by measuring the surface water contact-angle measurement using Drop Master 300 (Kyowa Interface Science Co., Niiza-City, Japan). The thickness and porosity of the membrane samples were measured using a micrometer and dry/wet method, respectively. Due to the dense nature of the resulting membranes, the pore size was estimated based on the molecular size of the HA applied in this study as reported elsewhere [33].

2.4. UV Irradiation Test

A membrane piece was put on flat glass and irradiated by a UV lamp (22 W, 254 nm SUV-16, AS ONE, Nishi-ku, Japan) with a membrane-to-lamp gap of 5 cm. The irradiation experiment was conducted in a tightly closed box for a total of 7 days.

2.5. Filtration Test

The filtration tests were conducted using a UF cell at a pressure of 1.5 bar. This experiment was done using two feeds (DI water and 50 ppm HA solution) to evaluate the performance of membranes in terms of pure water flux (PWF), HA solution flux, and rejection of HA solution. This experiment’s procedure was carried out in one set by changing feed from DI water to HA solution followed by membrane cleaning. It continued with replacing the feed with DI water again to obtain the data for antifouling assessment. The detailed information on this experimental procedure has been described in our earlier works [28].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Residual Dopamine or Polydopamine

The FTIR results in Figure 2 confirm that the residual dopamine presented in the membrane matrix. The analysis shown here is only for pristine PES (P), the membrane with low dopamine concentration and short polymerization time (P-D5-a), high dopamine concentration and short polymerization time (P-D5-c), and high concentration and long polymerization time (P-D36-c). It is distinguished by the catechol-amine moiety, specific to dopamine, appearing at the spectrum range of 3300–3600 cm−1. They arise due to the stretching effect of the NH bond as well as from the hydroxyl group of alcohol [34]. Though weaker in intensity, another peak transmission is also detected in the spectra of modified membranes, a wavenumber of 1640 cm−1 [28,32,34]. The emergence of this peak is the sign of NH vibration from dopamine/polydopamine.

3.2. Hydrophilicity

Water contact angle data in Figure 3 demonstrate that the addition of dopamine at higher concentrations and longer dipping times improves the hydrophilicity of the resulting membranes, as can be seen from the decrement of the water contact angle. The hydrophilic membrane has an excellent wetting characteristic indicated by the better spreading of the water droplet on the membrane surface and forming a low water contact angle [35]. The improved hydrophilicity of these membranes was greatly influenced by the presence of catecholamine groups (N-H and O-H) in the PDA layer, which helped weaken the interaction between the surface and the foulants to impose anti-fouling properties [8,36]. Moreover, the addition of hydrophilic dopamine particles could have improved the pore characteristics of the modified membranes, as demonstrated in our earlier report [29].

3.3. Hydraulic Performance

The PWF data of the prepared membranes are shown in Figure 4. It shows that the non-modified PES membrane (P) poses a low PWF of 15 L/m2.h because of the membrane’s non-porous and hydrophobic nature. For P-D5-a, P-D5-b, and P-D5-c membranes, the PWF improves by threefold, presumably attributable to the enhancement of membrane characteristics in terms of porosity. However, if the membrane polymerized for more than 24 h, the overgrowing of the PDA film via auto-oxidation triggered by the alkaline Tris-HCl solution leads to a decrease in PWF. Although beneficial in terms of hydrophilicity, the PDA film blocks the membrane pores, especially those on the surface, which adds hydraulic resistance that lowers water flux [37].
Figure 5 shows that an increase in the flux of HA solution is observed in almost all modified membranes. The influences of dopamine addition at various concentrations and dipping times to the water flux and rejection of HA solution were monitored through the ultrafiltration test. This increase is generally caused by an increase in membrane porosity, as detailed in our earlier report [29]. In contrast, a very slim decrease in water flux is detected in the HA water flux of the P-D36-a membrane as the dopamine concentration is relatively low (0.5%), resulting in almost no effect on the pore formation. Moreover, 36 h of dipping in the Tris solution allowed the thicker PDA layer growth on the membrane, which mostly covered the surface of the P-D36-a membrane.
The pore size of the membrane samples could not be detected by the capillary flow porometer because, for a pressure limit of maximum 200 bar, correspond ing to minimum pore size of about 0.05 µm. By considering the HA rejection, we concluded that all of the membarnes samples were tight UF. The conclusion was made by estimating the minimum size of the HA, which could be very well rejected by all membrane samples (with humic acid rejection of >60%). The applied HA had a molecular weight of 226 Da, corresponding to a minimum diameter of 0.8 nm. From a relatively small variation of HA rejection, all membranes seem to have a similar pore size, suggesting that dopamine concentration and polymerization time did not significantly affect the pore size.
For HA rejection, generally, it is seen that the dopamine-blended membranes generate a permeate with a slightly lower rejection than that of the pristine PES membrane. The pristine PES membrane poses the highest HA rejection of 87% due to its dense structure. The decrease in HA rejection value is attributed to the increase of surface porosity and pore size of the membrane, which is discussed later. Allegedly, some HA particles whose size is in the nanometer scale escape through the membrane pores. However, the polymerized P-D24 and P-D36 membranes at dopamine concentrations of 0.5%, 2%, and 4% experience a slight increase in rejection because the membrane surface is coated by PDA film due to polymerization that partly retained the HA particles.

3.4. Fouling Resistance

Figure 6 demonstrates that dopamine-modified membranes exhibit better antifouling properties than the pure PES membrane in terms of total flux loss due to fouling (Rt), recoverable flux (Rr), and non-recoverable flux (Rir). The pure PES membrane has denser pore characteristics as confirmed by the surface SEM images and high HA rejection results. The dense surface of the membrane causes the HA particle to easily accumulate on the membrane surface, resulting in a total flux loss (Rt) of 50.3%. Membrane cleaning could only recover 5.3% of those flux-loss due to the strong interactions between the hydrophobic HA particles and the surface of the PES membrane [28,32]. The modified membranes, especially those polymerized at shorter duration, suffer higher total flux loss than those with higher dopamine concentration and more extended dipping periods. This is because the presence of dopamine and PDA layer increases the membrane hydrophilicity (Figure 3), which improves the membrane cleaning effectivity as observed from the Rr and Rir data in Figure 6.

3.5. UV Resistance Performance

The SEM images in Figure 7 indicate a degree of the protective effect of polymerization on the resistivity of the membrane upon exposure to UV-irradiation. The dopamine concentration and polymerization time have a positive impact on protecting the membrane from UV radiation. This can be observed through changes in membrane surface morphology obtained from analysis using SEM. To investigate the influences of modifications and their variables on the membrane resistance to UV irradiation, the UV irradiation test was carried out following the previously reported method [28]. SEM analysis was carried out on membranes P, P-D5-a, P-D5-c, and P-D36-c without UV exposure and after seven days of radiation to UV.
Figure 7 shows that, after seven days of UV exposure, the pure PES membrane was severely damaged due to radical-induced photodegradation. Almost no part of the surface retained the dense top layer of the membrane. After modification using dopamine at low concentrations and short polymerization times, the damage is still visibly bad but slightly better if compared to that of the radiated pristine PES membrane. By increasing dopamine and polymerization time, damage to the membrane surface is seen to be reduced. This is because, at high dopamine concentrations and long polymerization times, the PDA layer formed on the membrane due to the polymerization triggered by the Tris-HCl solution is also getting thicker. The PDA layer formed on the membrane surface reduces the morphological damage caused by UV radiation, as reported in our previous research [28], even though the results are not as excellent as the membrane modified with a surface coating. It is worth noting the test was done under extreme exposure to accelerate the degradation process. In the real application, the UV intensity and duration may be less and the damage would not be as severe as demonstrated in Figure 7. It is worth noting that SEM images pose inherent limitations because of the small area of the imaging. However, the findings in Figure 7 are representative of images from homogeneous surface properties over a few samples. Nontheless, we include the mechanical properties results which confirm the SEM findings regarding the membrane stability after treatment (Figure 8 and Figure 9). We believe that the prolonged duration or too-high intensity of the UV exposure led to less demonstrative findings from the SEM image.

3.6. Effects on Mechanical Strength

The mechanical properties of the membrane were evaluated in terms of tensile strength as shown in Figure 8. In general, there is a decrease in tensile strength in all dopamine-modified membranes, most likely due to a more porous structure rich with macro-void as detailed elsewhere [38,39]. However, immersing the blended membrane in the alkaline solution brings back the tensile strength of the membrane. This is attributed to the adhesive property of the PDA film, which strengthens the membrane structure altogether [32,40].
The tensile strength measurements were taken before and after UV radiation to investigate the effect of UV irradiation on the mechanical strength of all membranes. UV radiation was carried out for a week where the data of tensile strength were taken on the first day (24 h of radiation), the third day (72 h of radiation), and the seventh day (120 h of radiation). The measurement results are presented in Figure 9.
The tensile strength is also affected by the membrane thickness and porosity. Increasing dopamine concentration in the dope solution resulted in an increase in membrane porosity and a decrease in thickness, in which P, P-D0-a, P-D0-b, and P-D0-c had porosity of 2.42 ± 0.24, 8.87 ± 0.33, 10.02 ± 0.17, and 18.63 ± 0.29%, while the thicknesses of 1.2, 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5 mm.
After exposure to UV radiation from the pristine membrane and after modification, the mechanical strength was compared with the nonradiated membranes in the form of retention. In Figure 10, the vertical axis shows the retention of the tensile strength (%), which is the tensile strength after UV exposure divided by tensile strength before UV exposure. Data in Figure 10 demonstrate that pristine PES membranes experienced a significant decrease after UV radiation, losing up to 65% of the initial tensile strength after seven days of exposure. A similar occurrence is also seen in dopamine-blended membranes without polymerization (P-D0-a; P-D0-b; P-D0-c). On these membranes, the decrease in tensile strength is even more significant than that of the original PES membrane, especially for the ones with the addition of high concentrations of dopamine. This significant decrease is due to the porous morphological influence of the membrane, which makes the membrane matrix weaker and more easily degraded due to radiation [41]. The mechanical degradation of the membrane is caused by the morphological damage of the membrane by free radicals from UV radiation. Through several stages, it degrades the polymer structure of the membrane through abstraction of the H atom to the cutting of the main polymer chain [41,42]. Significant mechanical strength is maintained by membranes after polymerization, even for the most prolonged UV exposure (90%), demonstrating the effectiveness of the polydopamine in providing UV resistant property on the membrane.

3.7. Free Radical Scavenging Mechanism of Polydopamine

By adapting the schematic diagram of the stabilization mechanism using a phosphite antioxidant reported by Voigt and Todesco [43], Figure 11 presents the proposed mechanism of UV protection by PDA. In more detail, the mechanism of free radical scavenging by PDA is as follows: a polymer (RH), when exposed to radiation (UV light), will form radicals (R•). These radicals then react with O2 (existing in the environment) to generate peroxy radicals (ROO•). This peroxy radical is unstable and subtracts hydrogen atoms from the polymer chains (RH) to form hydroperoxides (ROOH) and more polymer radicals (R•). This is the stage where the photodegradation starts occurring and causes the scission of polymer chains, which yield to the change in chemical membrane components and morphological structure [44].
Polydopamine consists of a long chain of catecholamine rich in hydroxyl (-OH) and amine (-NH) groups. Both functional groups are electron-donating. Immersing the dopamine-blended membrane into Tris-solution triggered a thin polydopamine layer on the membrane surface. The layer then protects the polymer matrix from being photo-degraded by quenching/deactivating the UV-induced polymer free radicals through the electron donor process. During the propagation stage of photo-degradation (abstraction of a hydrogen atom from polymer chains by radicals to form ROOH), the radicals obtain hydrogen by reacting with the phenolic rings from the polydopamine instead of snatching the hydrogen from the polymer chain (RH). The formed ROOH reacts further with the scavenger groups from polydopamine and breaks down as inactive compounds such as ROH and H2O. These scavenging activities stop the radicals from abstracting the hydrogen from the polymer chain leading to stabilization, which eventually restricts photodegradation of the polymer [45].

4. Conclusions

The two-step dopamine-to-polydopamine modification on the PES-based ultrafiltration membranes has proven to increase the fouling and UV-irradiation resistance of the resulting membranes. The treatment step, concentration of dopamine, and duration of dipping in Tris solution affect the properties of the resulting membranes. Blending dopamine at a higher concentration improves PWF by more than threefold that of the original PES membrane (15 vs. 50 L/m2.h). However, extended dipping in Tris alkaline buffer solution triggers an overgrowth of the polydopamine layer on the membrane surface that covers surface pores, leading to the decline of CWF. The presence of polydopamine enhances the hydrophilicity due to the enrichment of hydrophilic catechol moieties, which leads to better anti-fouling performance, as seen from the resulting FRR of 96%. Moreover, the polydopamine film simultaneously improves the membrane resistance to UV by minimizing the occurrence of photodegradation, as proven by the retention of tensile strength.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, N.A. and Y.S.; conceptualization, S.M. (Sri Mulyati) and N.A.; methodology, S.M. (Syawaliah Muchtar); validation, S.M. (Syawaliah Muchtar); formal analysis, M.R.B., Y.F.; investigation, S.M. (Syawaliah Muchtar); resources, S.M. (Syawaliah Muchtar) and N.I.M.N.; data curation, S.M. (Syawaliah Muchtar) and N.I.M.N.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M. (Sri Mulyati) and S.M. (Syawaliah Muchtar); writing—review and editing, M.R.B., R.T., H.M., Y.F. and N.Y.H.; visualization, S.M. (Syawaliah Muchtar); supervision, R.T. and H.M.; project administration, S.M. (Syawaliah Muchtar); funding acquisition, S.M. (Sri Mulyati) All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was conducted as part of the Grand Research of Thesis Magister in 2019 and supported by grant Penelitian Calon Profesor dari Universitas Syiah Kuala. The APC was funded by Yayasan Universiti Teknologi Petronas (Grant number: 015LC0-210).

Acknowledgments

Our appreciation for the Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, Q.; Chen, J.; Liu, M.; Huang, H.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y. Polydopamine-based functional materials and their applications in energy, environmental, and catalytic fields: State-of-the-art review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 387, 124019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tao, C.; Yang, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Surface modification of diamond-like carbon films with protein via polydopamine inspired coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 256, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zheng, Q.; Lin, T.; Wu, H.; Guo, L.; Ye, P.; Hao, Y.; Guo, Q.; Jiang, J.; Fu, F.; Chen, G. Mussel-inspired polydopamine coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles as pH-sensitive nanocarriers for controlled release. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 463, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, Y.; Ai, K.; Lu, L. Polydopamine and its derivative materials: Synthesis and promising applications in energy, environmental, and biomedical fields. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 5057–5115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, H.-C.; Luo, J.; Lv, Y.; Shen, P.; Xu, Z.-K. Surface engineering of polymer membranes via mussel-inspired chemistry. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 483, 42–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Faure, E.; Falentin-Daudré, C.; Jérôme, C.; Lyskawa, J.; Fournier, D.; Woisel, P.; Detrembleur, C. Catechols as versatile platforms in polymer chemistry. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 236–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kord Forooshani, P.; Lee, B.P. Recent approaches in designing bioadhesive materials inspired by mussel adhesive protein. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 9–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ho, C.-C.; Ding, S.-J. Structure, properties and applications of mussel-inspired polydopamine. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2014, 10, 3063–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ding, Y.H.; Floren, M.; Tan, W. Mussel-inspired polydopamine for bio-surface functionalization. Biosurf. Biotribol. 2016, 2, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xi, Z.-Y.; Xu, Y.-Y.; Zhu, L.-P.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, B.-K. A facile method of surface modification for hydrophobic polymer membranes based on the adhesive behavior of poly (DOPA) and poly (dopamine). J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 327, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arena, J.T.; McCloskey, B.; Freeman, B.D.; McCutcheon, J.R. Surface modification of thin film composite membrane support layers with polydopamine: Enabling use of reverse osmosis membranes in pressure retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, M.; Zeng, G.; Wang, K.; Wan, Q.; Tao, L.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y. Recent developments in polydopamine: An emerging soft matter for surface modification and biomedical applications. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 16819–16840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lynge, M.E.; Schattling, P.; Städler, B. Recent developments in poly (dopamine)-based coatings for biomedical applications. Nanomedicine 2015, 10, 2725–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Fan, G.; Ding, A.; Liang, H.; Li, G.; Ren, N.; Van der Bruggen, B. Mussel-inspired polydopamine modification of polymeric membranes for the application of water and wastewater treatment: A review. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2020, 157, 195–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wei, H.; Ren, J.; Han, B.; Xu, L.; Han, L.; Jia, L. Stability of polydopamine and poly (DOPA) melanin-like films on the surface of polymer membranes under strongly acidic and alkaline conditions. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 110, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, R.; Ren, P.-F.; Yang, H.-C.; Xu, Z.-K. Fabrication of antifouling membrane surface by poly (sulfobetaine methacrylate)/polydopamine co-deposition. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 466, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marbelia, L.; Bilad, M.R.; Vankelecom, I.F. Gradual PVP leaching from PVDF/PVP blend membranes and its effects on membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 213, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meirisa, F.; Muchtar, S.; Arahman, N.; Mulyati, S. Fouling resistance study of poly (ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membrane which in-situ polymerized with polydopamine. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1402, 055004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mat Nawi, N.I.; Bilad, M.R.; Zolkhiflee, N.; Nordin, N.A.H.; Lau, W.J.; Narkkun, T.; Faungnawakij, K.; Arahman, N.; Mahlia, T.M.I. Development of A Novel Corrugated Polyvinylidene difluoride Membrane via Improved Imprinting Technique for Membrane Distillation. Polymers 2019, 11, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Osman, A.; Nawi, M.; Izati, N.; Samsuri, S.; Bilad, M.R.; Shamsuddin, N.; Khan, A.L.; Jaafar, J.; Nordin, N.A.H. Patterned Membrane in an Energy-Efficient Tilted Panel Filtration System for Fouling Control in Activated Sludge Filtration. Polymers 2020, 12, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Barambu, N.U.; Bilad, M.R.; Wibisono, Y.; Jaafar, J.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Khan, A.L. Membrane Surface Patterning as a Fouling Mitigation Strategy in Liquid Filtration: A Review. Polymers 2019, 11, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mulyati, S.; Muchtar, S.; Yusuf, M.; Arahman, N.; Sofyana, S.; Rosnelly, C.M.; Fathanah, U.; Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, H.; Shamsuddin, N. Production of High Flux Poly (Ether Sulfone) Membrane Using Silica Additive Extracted from Natural Resource. Membranes 2020, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Arahman, N.; Mulyati, S.; Fahrina, A.; Muchtar, S.; Yusuf, M.; Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, H.; Nordin, N.A.H.; Bilad, M.R. Improving Water Permeability of Hydrophilic PVDF Membrane Prepared via Blending with Organic and Inorganic Additives for Humic Acid Separation. Molecules 2019, 24, 4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mavukkandy, M.O.; Bilad, M.R.; Giwa, A.; Hasan, S.W.; Arafat, H.A. Leaching of PVP from PVDF/PVP blend membranes: Impacts on membrane structure and fouling in membrane bioreactors. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 4328–4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, S.; Yao, G.; Dong, B.; Zhu, H.; Peng, X.; Liu, J.; Liu, M.; Gao, C. Improving fouling resistance of thin-film composite polyamide reverse osmosis membrane by coating natural hydrophilic polymer sericin. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 118, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Feng, K.; Hou, L.; Tang, B.; Wu, P. A self-protected self-cleaning ultrafiltration membrane by using polydopamine as a free-radical scavenger. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 490, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, H.; Liu, Y.; Mao, L.; Jiang, C.; Ang, J.; Lu, X. Doping polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane with TiO2-PDA nanohybrid for simultaneous self-cleaning and self-protection. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 532, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Muchtar, S.; Wahab, M.Y.; Fang, L.-F.; Jeon, S.; Rajabzadeh, S.; Takagi, R.; Mulyati, S.; Arahman, N.; Riza, M.; Matsuyama, H. Polydopamine-coated poly (vinylidene fluoride) membranes with high ultraviolet resistance and antifouling properties for a photocatalytic membrane reactor. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, H.; Dellatore, S.M.; Miller, W.M.; Messersmith, P.B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 2007, 318, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhou, J.; Lin, Z.; Ju, Y.; Rahim, M.A.; Richardson, J.J.; Caruso, F. Polyphenol-Mediated Assembly for Particle Engineering. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, C.; Wu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, F.; Liu, W.; Wang, Z. Mussel-inspired hydrogels: From design principles to promising applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3605–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Muchtar, S.; Wahab, M.Y.; Mulyati, S.; Arahman, N.; Riza, M. Superior fouling resistant PVDF membrane with enhanced filtration performance fabricated by combined blending and the self-polymerization approach of dopamine. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 28, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Erickson, H.P. Size and shape of protein molecules at the nanometer level determined by sedimentation, gel filtration, and electron microscopy. Biol. Proced. Online 2009, 11, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zangmeister, R.A.; Morris, T.A.; Tarlov, M.J. Characterization of Polydopamine Thin Films Deposited at Short Times by Autoxidation of Dopamine. Langmuir 2013, 29, 8619–8628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Geng, Z.; Yang, X.; Boo, C.; Zhu, S.; Lu, Y.; Fan, W.; Huo, M.; Elimelech, M.; Yang, X. Self-cleaning anti-fouling hybrid ultrafiltration membranes via side chain grafting of poly (aryl ether sulfone) and titanium dioxide. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 529, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, W.; Yang, F.K.; Han, Y.; Gaikwad, R.; Leonenko, Z.; Zhao, B. Surface and Tribological Behaviors of the Bioinspired Polydopamine Thin Films under Dry and Wet Conditions. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tripathi, B.P.; Das, P.; Simon, F.; Stamm, M. Ultralow fouling membranes by surface modification with functional polydopamine. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 99, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, J.-H.; Zhu, L.-P.; Zhang, H.-T.; Zhu, B.-K.; Xu, Y.-Y. Improved hydrodynamic permeability and antifouling properties of poly (vinylidene fluoride) membranes using polydopamine nanoparticles as additives. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 457, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hong, J.; He, Y. Effects of nano sized zinc oxide on the performance of PVDF microfiltration membranes. Desalination 2012, 302, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, H.; Li, W.; Wen, W.; Luo, B.; Liu, M.; Ding, S.; Zhou, C. Mechanical properties and osteogenic activity of poly (l-lactide) fibrous membrane synergistically enhanced by chitosan nanofibers and polydopamine layer. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 81, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rånby, B. Photodegradation and photo-oxidation of synthetic polymers. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 1989, 15, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, M.J.; Ong, C.S.; Lau, W.J.; Ng, B.C.; Ismail, A.F.; Lai, S.O. Degradation of PVDF-based composite membrane and its impacts on membrane intrinsic and separation properties. J. Polym. Eng. 2016, 36, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wypych, G. Handbook of UV Degradation and Stabilization; ChemTec Publishing: Toronto, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rabek, J.F. Polymer Photodegradation: Mechanisms and Experimental Methods; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yen, G.-C.; Hsieh, C.-L. Antioxidant Effects of Dopamine and Related Compounds. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1646–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Polymers 12 02051 g001 550
Figure 1. Illustration of membrane fabrication method showing the step of membrane fabrication including dopamine polymerization.
Figure 1. Illustration of membrane fabrication method showing the step of membrane fabrication including dopamine polymerization.
Polymers 12 02051 g001
Polymers 12 02051 g002 550
Figure 2. The changes in chemical functional groups of PES membranes before and after modification.
Figure 2. The changes in chemical functional groups of PES membranes before and after modification.
Polymers 12 02051 g002
Polymers 12 02051 g003 550
Figure 3. Water contact angle of the prepared membranes. The data are presented as average ± standard deviation from n = 10.
Figure 3. Water contact angle of the prepared membranes. The data are presented as average ± standard deviation from n = 10.
Polymers 12 02051 g003
Polymers 12 02051 g004 550
Figure 4. PES membrane pure water flux performance before and after modification with dopamine at various concentrations and dipping times.
Figure 4. PES membrane pure water flux performance before and after modification with dopamine at various concentrations and dipping times.
Polymers 12 02051 g004
Polymers 12 02051 g005 550
Figure 5. Humic acid solution water flux and rejection performances of the PES membrane without and with dopamine modification at various concentrations and dipping times.
Figure 5. Humic acid solution water flux and rejection performances of the PES membrane without and with dopamine modification at various concentrations and dipping times.
Polymers 12 02051 g005
Polymers 12 02051 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of modification on membrane antifouling performance in terms of (top) Rr, Rt, Rir, and (bottom) the FRR.
Figure 6. Effect of modification on membrane antifouling performance in terms of (top) Rr, Rt, Rir, and (bottom) the FRR.
Polymers 12 02051 g006
Polymers 12 02051 g007 550
Figure 7. Morphological change of original and modified PES membranes before (top row) and after (bottom row) seven days of UV exposure.
Figure 7. Morphological change of original and modified PES membranes before (top row) and after (bottom row) seven days of UV exposure.
Polymers 12 02051 g007
Polymers 12 02051 g008 550
Figure 8. Tensile strength of original PES membranes and dopamine modified PES membranes at various concentrations and polymerization times. The data are presented as average ± standard deviation from n = 5.
Figure 8. Tensile strength of original PES membranes and dopamine modified PES membranes at various concentrations and polymerization times. The data are presented as average ± standard deviation from n = 5.
Polymers 12 02051 g008
Polymers 12 02051 g009 550
Figure 9. Tensile strength of original and modified membranes before and after UV exposure: (a) pristine PSF, (b) 0.5% dopamine loading at different polymerization times, (c) 2.0% dopamine loading at different polymerization times, and (d) 4.0% dopamine loading at different polymerization times. The data are presented as average±standard deviation from n = 5.
Figure 9. Tensile strength of original and modified membranes before and after UV exposure: (a) pristine PSF, (b) 0.5% dopamine loading at different polymerization times, (c) 2.0% dopamine loading at different polymerization times, and (d) 4.0% dopamine loading at different polymerization times. The data are presented as average±standard deviation from n = 5.
Polymers 12 02051 g009
Polymers 12 02051 g010 550
Figure 10. Retention of tensile strength of membranes before and after UV exposure.
Figure 10. Retention of tensile strength of membranes before and after UV exposure.
Polymers 12 02051 g010
Polymers 12 02051 g011 550
Figure 11. Proposed scavenging mechanism of a UV-induced radical by PDA: (left) photodegradation mechanism of the polymer and (right) proposed mechanism of free-radical scavenging by polydopamine.
Figure 11. Proposed scavenging mechanism of a UV-induced radical by PDA: (left) photodegradation mechanism of the polymer and (right) proposed mechanism of free-radical scavenging by polydopamine.
Polymers 12 02051 g011
Table
Table 1. Composition of polymer solution for membrane fabrication.
Table 1. Composition of polymer solution for membrane fabrication.
No.Membrane IDConcentration (%)Polymerization Time (hour)
PESNMPDopamine
1P17.582.500
2P-D0-a17.5820.50
3P-D5-a17.5820.55
4P-D24-a17.5820.524
5P-D36-a17.5820.536
6P-D0-b17.580.520
7P-D5-b17.580.525
8P-D24-b17.580.5224
9P-D36-b17.580.5236
10P-D0-c17.578.540
11P-D5-c17.578.545
12P-D24-c17.578.5424
13P-D36-c17.578.5436

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mulyati, S.; Muchtar, S.; Arahman, N.; Syamsuddin, Y.; Mat Nawi, N.I.; Yub Harun, N.; Bilad, M.R.; Firdaus, Y.; Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, H. Two-Step Dopamine-to-Polydopamine Modification of Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane for Enhancing Anti-Fouling and Ultraviolet Resistant Properties. Polymers 2020, 12, 2051. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092051

AMA Style

Mulyati S, Muchtar S, Arahman N, Syamsuddin Y, Mat Nawi NI, Yub Harun N, Bilad MR, Firdaus Y, Takagi R, Matsuyama H. Two-Step Dopamine-to-Polydopamine Modification of Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane for Enhancing Anti-Fouling and Ultraviolet Resistant Properties. Polymers. 2020; 12(9):2051. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mulyati, Sri, Syawaliah Muchtar, Nasrul Arahman, Yanna Syamsuddin, Normi Izati Mat Nawi, Noorfidza Yub Harun, Muhammad Roil Bilad, Yuliar Firdaus, Ryosuke Takagi, and Hideto Matsuyama. 2020. "Two-Step Dopamine-to-Polydopamine Modification of Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane for Enhancing Anti-Fouling and Ultraviolet Resistant Properties" Polymers 12, no. 9: 2051. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092051

APA Style

Mulyati, S., Muchtar, S., Arahman, N., Syamsuddin, Y., Mat Nawi, N. I., Yub Harun, N., Bilad, M. R., Firdaus, Y., Takagi, R., & Matsuyama, H. (2020). Two-Step Dopamine-to-Polydopamine Modification of Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane for Enhancing Anti-Fouling and Ultraviolet Resistant Properties. Polymers, 12(9), 2051. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop