Next Article in Journal
Inhibitory Effect of pH-Responsive Nanogel Encapsulating Ginsenoside CK against Lung Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal Mending of Electroactive Carbon/Epoxy Laminates Using a Porous Poly(ε-caprolactone) Electrospun Mesh
Previous Article in Journal
Ultrafast Room Temperature Synthesis of Porous Polythiophene via Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Polymerization Technique and Its Application to NO2 Gas Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Study Using Microstructure Based Finite Element Modeling of the Onset of Convective Heat Transfer in Closed-Cell Polymeric Foam
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Two-Dimensional Magnetostrictive Fillers of CoFe2O4-Intercalated Graphene Oxide Sheets in 3-2 Type Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Magnetoelectric Films

Department of Chemical Engineering (BK21 FOUR Graduate Program), Dong-A University, Busan 49315, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(11), 1782; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111782
Submission received: 19 April 2021 / Revised: 26 May 2021 / Accepted: 26 May 2021 / Published: 28 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Multifunctional Polymer-Matrix Composites)

Abstract

:
In the last decade, magnetoelectric (ME) polymer films have been developed by including zero-dimensional or one-dimensional magnetostrictive fillers in a piezoelectric polymer matrix. Existing reports on ME polymer films reveal that the shape of the magnetostrictive fillers is a critical determinant of the polymeric phase conformation, strain transfer between the piezoelectric and magnetostrictive phases, and dipole alignment in the films. In this study, to investigate the effect of two-dimensional (2D) magnetostrictive fillers on piezoelectric, magnetic, and magnetoelectric responses, 3-2 type ME films were prepared using CoFe2O4-intercalated graphene oxide (CFO-i-GO) fillers and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) polymers. The 2D fillers of CFO-i-GO were hydrothermally synthesized by CFO intercalation into the interlayers of GO sheets with different lateral sizes, which were controlled by ultrasonication treatment. It was found that the large-lateral-size GO (LGO), medium-lateral-size GO (MGO), and small-lateral-size GO (SGO) fillers in the PVDF-based ME films exhibited a lateral size effect on CFO intercalation, polymeric phase conformation, dipole alignment, and magnetoelectric responses. A maximum ME coefficient (αME) of 3.0 mV/cm∙Oe was achieved with a strong linearity (r2) of 0.9992 at an off-resonance frequency (f) of 1 kHz and applied direct current (dc) magnetic field (Hdc) of ± 1000 Oe. The 3-2 type polymer-based ME films with reliable ME responses have potential for use in high-feasibility ME devices for biomedical sensing applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since 2000, magnetoelectric (ME) composites have gradually attracted significant interest because of their unique characteristics as well as piezoelectric and magnetostrictive properties, which can be used in various applications, such as high-sensitivity magnetic sensors, energy harvesters, memory devices, and even active cancer-targeting/drug-delivery systems [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The ME effect in multiphase composites was defined as an induced electric polarization in the piezoelectric phase owing to the mechanical stress caused by the shape change of the magnetostrictive phase under a magnetic bias field.
M E   e f f e c t = s t r a i n   c h a n g e m a g n e t i c   f i e l d × e l e c t r i c   p o l a r i z a t i o n s t r a i n   c h a n g e
Recently, polymer-based ME composites consisting of piezoelectric polymers and magnetostrictive materials have been developed using various structures, such as particulate composites with a 3-0 structure, laminate composites with a 2-2 structure, and electrospun nanofiber composites with porous structures. This is because piezoelectric polymers, such as poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF), exhibit high flexibility, light weight, easy shaping, low-temperature processing, and biocompatibility, leading to their high feasibility for ME applications. Some studies on polymer-based ME composites have been reported over the past decade.
According to the literature reports on the 3-0 ME polymer composites, the ME coefficient (αME) for poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) [P(VDF-TrFE)]/Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 composites was 1.35 mV/cm·Oe at a resonance frequency (fr) of 40 kHz, and that for PVDF/CoFe2O4 ME composites was 11.2 mV/cm·Oe at a resonance frequency of 50 kHz; the slope was linear; therefore, the composites were suitable for highly sensitive magnetic sensors [7,8]. For P(VDF-TrFE)/Fe3O4 ME composites, the αME value was 0.8 mV/cm·Oe at 6 kHz. Spray-printed P(VDF-TrFE)/CoFe2O4 ME composites exhibited a maximum αME value of 21.2 mV/cm·Oe at 20 kHz. However, there is a limitation to the enhancement of the ME responses at the off-resonance frequency for the feasible applications of the 3-0 ME composites [9].
According to the reported literature on the 2-2 ME polymer laminates, poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) [P(VDF-HFP)]/Metglas ME composites exhibited αME of 12 V/cm·Oe under a low bias magnetic field (Hbias) of 10 Oe [10]. By doping Al(NO3)3·9H2O in P(VDF-HFP)/Metglas ME laminates, ME responses were considerably improved via the induction of hydrogen bonds, with αME being 20 V/cm·Oe at Hbias of 4 Oe [11].
According to the reported literature on porous electrospun nanofiber ME composites, PVDF-HFP/Clay/NiFe2O4 ME composites exhibited an αME of 17 mV/cm·Oe with a filler content of 8 wt%. However, there is a limitation to applying a high electric field above 1 kV/cm during the electrical poling process, owing to the high leakage current of the magnetostrictive nanoparticles embedded in nanofibers [12].
In polymer ME films, PVDF has been commonly used as a piezoelectric phase with a strong dipole moment given by an electrically asymmetric β-phase with an all-trans (TTTT) configuration consisting of C–H and C–F bonds on opposite sides in the PVDF [13,14]. As a magnetostrictive phase in the polymer ME films, zero-dimensional (0D) or one-dimensional (1D) fillers have been used with spinel structure (AB2O4) compositions to enhance the β-phase in the piezoelectric phase [15,16,17]. The shape of the magnetostrictive fillers is a critical determinant of strain transfer to the piezoelectric phase, polymeric phase conformation, and leakage current, which directly affect the ME responses in polymer-based films [18,19].
In this study, as a 3-2 type polymer-based ME film, PVDF/CoFe2O4-intercalated graphene oxide (CFO-i-GO) films were designed as shown in Figure 1. Two-dimensional (2D) magnetostrictive fillers of CFO-i-GO were synthesized by CFO intercalation into the interlayer of GO sheets; afterward, different lateral sizes of the fillers were controlled by ultrasonication time. To investigate the effect of lateral size on the magnetic, piezoelectric, and magnetoelectric properties, CFO intercalation, polymeric phase conformation, dipole alignment, and magnetoelectric responses were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), piezoelectric, and ME characterizations.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of Graphene Oxide Sheets

GO sheets were synthesized from graphite flakes using a modified Hummer’s method [20]. Graphite flakes (1.5 g, 99%, Asbury Carbons Inc., Asbury Park, NJ, USA) were added to a mixed solution consisting of 180 mL of H2SO4 (98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and 20 mL of H3PO4 (85%, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) in 1L beaker for stable GO synthesis. Afterward, the mixed solution was stirred for 10 min. KMnO4 (9.0 g, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was slowly added to the solution in an ice bath at 5 °C. Thereafter, the solution was vigorously stirred for 12 h on a hot plate at 45 °C until the solution color became dark brown. After the reaction, the solution was cooled to room temperature. Subsequently, the solution was poured into 200 mL of deionized (DI) water and stirred for 10 min. H2O2 (28.2 g, 30%, Daejung Chemicals and Metals Co., Siheung, Korea) was added to the solution, and the resulting mixed solution was stirred for 30 min. As a washing process, the mixture was centrifuged using 1 M HCl (30%, Daejung Chemicals and Metals Co., Siheung, Korea) aqueous solution. To obtain the GO sheets with different lateral sizes, the GO aqueous solutions were ultrasonicated 6 h (medium lateral size GO, MGO), and 24 h (small lateral size GO, SGO). The sheets obtained from solutions that were not ultrasonicated were considered large-lateral-size GO (LGO) sheets.

2.2. Synthesis of CoFe2O4-Intercalated Graphene Oxide

To prepare 2D-magnetostrictive fillers, 0.02 g of LGO, MGO, and SGO were dispersed in 10 mL of DI water. As a CFO precursor solution, 0.0743 g of Co(NO3)2∙6H2O (98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and 0.2063 g of Fe(NO3)3∙9H2O (98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were dispersed in 10 mL of DI water. Thereafter, the GO solutions were added to the CFO precursor solution, and the resulting solution was stirred for 30 min. An aqueous solution of 10 M NaOH (98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was added to adjust the pH to 13, and the solution was stirred for 30 min. The mixed solutions were transferred into a 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave, and a hydrothermal process was conducted at 180 °C for 20 h. After the hydrothermal reaction, three types of CFO-i-GO were obtained after washing with ethanol and DI water [21].

2.3. Fabrication of Magnetoelectric Films

Initially, to prepare 20 wt% PVDF/CFO-i-GO solution for fabrication of ME films, 2.587 g of PVDF powder (Mw ~534,000 g/mol, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in 10.667 g of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, anhydrous, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Three types of CFO-i-GO fillers (0.08 g) were added to the PVDF solution while stirring it for 4 h. The PVDF/CFO-i-GO solutions were poured on a glass substrate and dried at room temperature for 12 h. After annealing the PVDF/CFO-i-GO at 200 °C for 10 min, hot pressing was conducted under 30 MPa at 150 °C for 1 h. The annealed PVDF/CFO-i-GO films exhibited an average thickness of 200 μm. Finally, electrical poling was conducted at 100 °C by applying a high electric field of 40 kV/mm for 3 h.

2.4. Characterization

The XRD patterns of graphite, LGO, MGO, SGO, CFO-i-GO, and PVDF/CFO-i-GO films were analyzed using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, MiniFlex600, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with CuKα (λ = 1.5406 Å) radiation. The morphologies of LGO, MGO, SGO, and CFO-i-GO were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, JSM-6700F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with EDX (JSM-6700F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The lateral sizes of the LGO, MGO, and SGO were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS, Multiscope, K-One Nano Ltd., Seoul, Korea) and FE-SEM analysis. The magnetic hysteresis loops of the LGO, MGO, and SGO were obtained using a VSM (Model 7407-S, Lake Shore Cryotronics Inc., Westerville, OH, USA) at room temperature. The FT-IR spectra of the PVDF/CFO-i-GO films were obtained using an FT-IR spectrometer (Nicolet 380, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) in attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode in the range of 700–1500 cm−1. The ferroelectric hysteresis loops of the PVDF/CFO-i-GO films were measured at 10 Hz using a ferroelectric tester (Precision LC II, Radiant Technology Inc., Columbus, OH, USA). The piezoelectric charge constant (d33) of the PVDF/CFO-i-GO films was measured using a d33 meter (Model YE2730A, APC Inc., Mackeyville, PA, USA) after electrical poling. αME was investigated using a lock-in amplifier (SR860, Stanford Research Systems Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and Helmholtz coil.

3. Results and Discussion

The XRD patterns of graphite, LGO, MGO, and SGO were investigated, as shown in Figure 2. The XRD pattern exhibited clear peaks of (002), (101), (004), and (100), which corresponded to the graphite (JCPDS, No. 41-1487) [22]. After the conversion of the LGO sheets from graphite, a new XRD peak of (001) occurred at 2θ = 10.0°, corresponding to the interlayer distance (0.90 nm) of the LGO sheets. This demonstrates that oxygen-containing functional groups were introduced into the graphite [23]. The MGO sheets exhibited a broad XRD peak of (001), indicating the beginning of the collapse in the well-ordered interlayer of the LGO sheets during the ultrasonication for 6 h [24]. After excessive ultrasonication for 24 h, the broken interlayer of the SGO sheets was confirmed by the unclear XRD peaks of (001) and (002) [25,26].
The morphology and lateral size of the GO sheets were investigated by FE-SEM and DLS analyses, as shown in Figure 3. The GO sheets exhibited a flake form with an average lateral size of 8.95 μm (LGO), 4.85 μm (MGO), and 2.37 μm (SGO), as observed from the inset box plots that were prepared by the size measurement of 20 specimens for each GO sheet. Notably, the average lateral size of the GO sheets and the size deviation decreased as the sonication time increased. The DLS analysis revealed that the sonicated GO sheets of MGO (6 h) and SGO (24 h) exhibited two peaks, illustrating sonication-dependent destruction, while the LGO sheets exhibited one peak without any destruction. As the sonication time increased, the peak split broadened, and the peak intensity at the small lateral sizes increased simultaneously. Furthermore, the LGO and SGO sheets respectively exhibited one lateral size of 15.34 μm and dominant lateral size of 0.145 μm; however, the MGO sheets were composed of two different lateral sizes: 1.31 and 10.5 μm.
After magnetostrictive CFO intercalation into the interlayer of the GO sheets, XRD patterns were investigated to confirm the spinel crystal structure (AB2O4) and magnetostrictive material intercalation, as shown in Figure 4. The magnetostrictive fillers of CFO-i-LGO, CFO-i-MGO, and CFO-i-SGO exhibited clear peaks of (111), (220), (311), (440), (422), (511), and (440), which represent the cubic spinel structure of CoFe2O4 (JCPDS, No. 22-1086). The XRD patterns of the CFO-i-LGO and CFO-i-MGO fillers revealed that the main peak of (001) in the LGO and MGO sheets disappeared, which was due to the successful CFO intercalation into the interlayer of the LGO and MGO sheets [27]. This suggests that Co2+ and Fe3+ ions were intercalated into the interlayer of the GO sheets owing to electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged GO and positively charged metal ions, resulting in the crystal growth of CFO particles into the interlayer of the GO sheets [28,29]. However, in the CFO-i-SGO fillers, there might be few CFO intercalations into the interlayer of the SGO sheets, which was attributed to the destructive interlayers (Figure 2d) due to excessive sonication.
The EDX analysis of CFO-i-LGO, CFO-i-MGO, and CFO-i-SGO fillers was performed to determine the CFO amount in each GO sheet by calculating the Co/C weight ratio (Table 1). The magnetostrictive fillers exhibited Co/C weight ratios of 3.26 (CFO-i-LGO), 1.756 (CFO-i-MGO), and 0.319 (CFO-i-SGO). A high weight ratio of Co/C was achieved from CFO-i-LGO owing to sufficient CFO intercalation into the interlayer of the LGO sheets and CFO growth on the large sheet surface, as shown in the schematic illustration in Figure 5a. A medium weight ratio of Co/C was achieved from CFO-i-MGO owing to insufficient CFO intercalation into the small collapsed interlayer (Figure 2c) of the MGO sheets, as shown in the schematic illustration in Figure 5b. A low weight ratio of Co/C was achieved from CFO-i-SGO by a dominant CFO coating onto the SGO sheets with few CFO intercalations due to the almost destroyed interlayer (Figure 2d) of the SGO sheets, as shown in the schematic illustration of Figure 5c. The results implied that the CFO-intercalated GO fillers would provide effective magnetostriction along the z-axis direction in the ME films owing to the minimization of strain transfer loss between the magnetostrictive filler and piezoelectric polymer [30].
The M-H loops of CFO-i-LGO, CFO-i-MGO, and CFO-i-SGO fillers were investigated with saturation magnetization (Ms), remnant magnetization (Mr), and coercive field (Hc), as shown in Figure 6. Table 2 shows slight differences of ∆Ms = 5.7% and ∆Mr = 3.1% from the three types of fillers because there might be independent CFO particles, except for the CFO in the GO interlayer and the CFO on the GO sheet surface. Conversely, with a decrease in the lateral size of the fillers, Hc continuously decreased with ∆Hc = 12.85%, from 1256.81 Oe (CFO-i-LGO) to 1095.28 Oe (CFO-i-SGO), which might be caused by the free spin movement from the independent CFO particles compared to the intercalated CFO in the GO sheets [31].
After preparing the ME films consisting of 3 wt% 2D-magnetostrictive fillers in a piezoelectric polymer matrix, the crystalline phases of PVDF and CFO-i-GO were investigated by XRD analysis, as shown in Figure 7. The ME films of PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO exhibited α-phase conformation from the (020), (110), and (021) peaks and β-phase conformation from the (110) and (200) peaks. [32,33,34] The XRD patterns showed weak peaks of (220), (311), (400), (511), and (440), representing a small amount of CFO in all the ME films.
To calculate the β-phase content, the FT-IR spectra of the ME films were characterized in the range of 700–1500 cm−1, as shown in Figure 8. All the ME films exhibited prominent β-phase peaks at 840, 1275, and 1431 cm−1, while the α-phase peaks at 763, 795, 975, 1209, and 1383 cm−1 were not visible [35]. The following equation was introduced for the quantitative analysis of the β-phase content of the ME films [36]:
F β = A β ( K β K α ) A α + A β × 100 %
where Fβ is the β-phase content in the ME films; Kβ (7.7 × 10−4 cm2 × mol−1) and Kα (6.1 × 10−4 cm2 × mol−1) are the absorption coefficients at wavenumbers of 840 and 763 cm−1, respectively. Aβ and Aα are the absorbances at wavenumbers of 840 and 763 cm−1, respectively.
As shown in Table 3, all ME films exhibited high β-phase contents above 74.59%. This was due to a sufficient hot-press effect on the β-phase conformation by a distance extension between the F–C–H groups in the piezoelectric polymer chain [37]. Furthermore, a slight β-phase deviation of 2.94% was confirmed with a maximum β-phase of 77.53 in the PVDF/CFO-i-MGO films with the proper confinement effect to suppress the shrinkage of the polymer chain and for the good dispersion of the 2D-fillers in the PVDF matrix [18,38]. The PVDF/CFO-i-LGO films exhibited a β-phase content of 75.63% due to the locally dispersed 2D-fillers in the PVDF matrix, resulting in a low active area on the confinement effect, even though a strong confinement effect can be expected from the large lateral size of the CFO-i-LGO fillers [39,40]. The PVDF/CFO-i-SGO films exhibited a β-phase content of 74.59%, as a result of the weak confinement effect owing to the small lateral size of the CFO-i-SGO fillers, although a large active confinement area was formed owing to the considerable dispersion of the 2D-fillers in the PVDF matrix.
The P-E loops of the ME films were investigated using saturation polarization (Ps), remnant polarization (Pr), and coercive field (Ec) under an applied electric field of ± 200 kV/cm, as shown in Figure 9. Table 4 shows that the values of Ps, Pr, and Ec decreased as the lateral size of the magnetostrictive fillers decreased. A high Ps of 0.3333 μC/cm2 was achieved for the PVDF/CFO-i-LGO films, even though the PVDF/CFO-i-MGO films exhibited the maximum β-phase content, representing the active piezoelectric phase. This demonstrates that leakage current should be considered for high piezoelectric properties in the ME films because strong dipole alignment can be achieved under an intact electric field with a low leakage current [41,42]. Therefore, the PVDF/CFO-i-LGO films exhibited a small leakage current, which might induce high dipole alignment in the PVDF matrix. Furthermore, a low Ps of 0.2394 μC/cm2 was achieved from the PVDF/CFO-i-SGO films with a high leakage current and minimum β-phase content.
The effect of leakage current was critical during the direct poling at 100 °C under applied high direct current (dc) electric fields for 3 h. The electric strength and d33 of the ME films are listed in Table 5. With a decrease in the lateral size of the 2D-fillers, the allowable applied dc voltage decreased from 40 kV/mm (PVDF/CFO-i-LGO) to 25 kV/mm (PVDF/CFO-i-SGO); thus, the electric strength decreased, determining the piezoelectric properties of d33. The low electric strength of the PVDF/CFO-i-MGO and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO films might be limited by the independently existent small CFO particles (Figure 5a,b) in the films. Therefore, a maximum d33 of 14 pC/N was achieved from the PVDF/CFO-i-LGO film, illustrating a high electric strength of 40 kV/mm, high Ps of 0.3333 μC/cm2, and medium β-phase content of 75.63%.
To investigate the ME responses of the films, the αME was measured by applying an alternating current (ac) magnetic field (Hac) of 1 Oe at an off-resonance frequency (f) of 1 kHz under a dc magnetic field (Hdc) of ± 1000 Oe, as shown in the inset of Figure 10a. As shown in Table 5, the ME values of αME are 3.0 mV/cm∙Oe (PVDF/CFO-i-LGO), 1.4 mV/cm∙Oe (PVDF/CFO-i-MGO), and 2.13 mV/cm∙Oe (PVDF/CFO-i-SGO). The results illustrate that a maximum αME of 3.0 mV/cm∙Oe was achieved from the PVDF/CFO-i-LGO films with effective strain transfer and high piezoelectric properties. The αME value of 2.14 mV/cm∙Oe for the PVDF/CFO-i-SGO films shows that the considerable dispersion of the magnetostrictive fillers in the piezoelectric matrix is important for high ME responses in the particulate ME films. Even though the PVDF/CFO-i-SGO films were found to exhibit relatively low values of β-phase, Ps, electric strength, and d33 compared to those in the PVDF/CFO-i-MGO films, relatively high αME values were obtained owing to the enlarged active area (Figure 1i) in the PVDF/CFO-i-SGO films. In particular, the 3-2 type polymer-based ME films exhibited proportional ME responses with a linear behavior under an applied Hdc of ± 1000 Oe. To determine the sensing capability, the linearity of the ME films was calculated, and the r2 values were 0.9992 (PVDF/CFO-i-LGO), 0.9978 (PVDF/CFO-i-MGO), and 0.9981 (PVDF/CFO-i-SGO), greater than those reported in the literature [43]. Therefore, the 3-2 type polymer-based ME films with reliable ME responses have a high feasibility and can be used in ME devices for biomedical-sensing applications.

4. Conclusions

In this study, polymer-based ME PVDF/CFO-i-GO films with high feasibility were prepared as 3-2 type particulate ME films. In particular, different lateral size fillers of LGO, MGO, and SGO were prepared to investigate the effect of lateral size on CFO intercalation, polymeric phase conformation, dipole alignment, and magnetoelectric responses. The films exhibited maximum ME αME values of 3.0 mV/cm∙Oe (PVDF/CFO-i-LGO), 1.4 mV/cm∙Oe (PVDF/CFO-i-MGO), and 2.13 mV/cm∙Oe (PVDF/CFO-i-SGO) at 1 kHz. The maximum αME was achieved from the PVDF/CFO-i-LGO by optimizing the lateral size effect, resulting in effective strain transfer and high piezoelectric properties. Furthermore, the ME films exhibited linear ME behavior with strong r2 values of 0.9992 (PVDF/CFO-i-LGO), 0.9978 (PVDF/CFO-i-MGO), and 0.9981 (PVDF/CFO-i-SGO). The results suggest that the 3-2 type polymer-based ME films can be used in potential applications, such as non-contact biomedical sensors, for real-time health monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.B. and S.-C.Y.; methodology, G.B. and S.-C.Y.; software, G.B. and S.-C.Y.; validation, S.-C.Y.; formal analysis, G.B.; investigation, G.B. and S.-C.Y.; resources, S.-C.Y.; data curation, G.B. and S.-C.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B.; writing—review and editing, S.-C.Y.; visualization, G.B.; supervision, S.-C.Y.; project administration, S.-C.Y.; funding acquisition, S.-C.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2019R1F1A1056786).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2019R1F1A1056786).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhadra, D.; Masud, M.G.; De, S.K.; Chaudhuri, B.K. Large magnetoelectric effect and low-loss high relative permittivity in 0–3 CuO/PVDF composite films exhibiting unusual ferromagnetism at room temperature. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2012, 45, 485002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, Y.; Yang, S.C.; Apo, D.J.; Maurya, D.; Priya, S. Tunable self-biased magnetoelectric response in homogenous laminates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 232905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Abdelazim, H. Magneto-electric nanocarriers for drug delivery: An overview. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2017, 37, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, M.; Matyushov, A.; Dong, C.; Chen, H.; Lin, H.; Nan, T.; Qian, Z.; Rinaldi, M.; Lin, Y.; Sun, N.X. Ultra-sensitive NEMS magnetoelectric sensor for picotesla DC magnetic field detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 143510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Noh, B.-I.; Yang, S.C. Individually free-standing piezoelectric nanotubes-based BaTiO3/CoFe2O4 magnetoelectric thin films. Mater. Lett. 2019, 242, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, P.P.; Shen, J.X.; Shang, D.S.; Sun, Y. Nonvolatile Memory and Artificial Synapse Based on the Cu/P(VDF-TrFE)/Ni Organic Memtranstor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 4673–4677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Martins, P.; Moya, X.; Phillips, L.C.; Kar-Narayan, S.; Mathur, N.D.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Linear anhysteretic direct magnetoelectric effect in Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4/poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) 0-3 nanocomposites. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 482001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Martins, P.; Moya, X.; Caparrós, C.; Fernandez, J.; Mathur, N.D.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Large linear anhysteretic magnetoelectric voltage coefficients in CoFe2O4/polyvinylidene fluoride 0–3 nanocomposites. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2013, 15, 1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martins, P.L.A.; Kolen’Ko, Y.V.; Rivas, J.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Tailored Magnetic and Magnetoelectric Responses of Polymer-Based Composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15017–15022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lu, S.G.; Jin, J.Z.; Zhou, X.; Fang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Q.M. Large magnetoelectric coupling coefficient in poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene)/Metglas laminates. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 104103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jin, J.; Zhao, F.; Han, K.; Haque, M.A.; Dong, L.; Wang, Q. Multiferroic Polymer Laminate Composites Exhibiting High Magnetoelectric Response Induced by Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 24, 1067–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chacko, S.K.; Rahul, M.T.; Raneesh, B.; Kalarikkal, N. Enhanced magnetoelectric coupling and dielectric constant in flexible ternary composite electrospun fibers of PVDF-HFP loaded with nanoclay and NiFe2O4 nanoparticles. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 11356–11364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martins, P.; Lasheras, A.; Gutierrez, J.; Barandiaran, J.M.; Orue, I.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Optimizing piezoelectric and magnetoelectric responses on CoFe2O4/P(VDF-TrFE) nanocomposites. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 495303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Martins, P.; Costa, C.M.; Benelmekki, M.; Botelho, G.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. On the origin of the electroactive poly(vinylidene fluoride) β-phase nucleation by ferrite nanoparticles via surface electrostatic interactions. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 2807–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, J.; Chen, S.; Liu, W.; Fu, R.; Tu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, L.; Yan, B.; Gu, Y. High Performance Piezoelectric Nanogenerators Based on Electrospun ZnO Nanorods/Poly(vinylidene fluoride) Composite Membranes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 11378–11387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sasmal, A.; Patra, A.; Devi, P.S.; Sen, S. Hydroxylated BiFeO3 as efficient fillers in poly(vinylidene fluoride) for flexible dielectric, ferroelectric, energy storage and mechanical energy harvesting application. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 1824–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oh, W.J.; Lim, H.S.; Won, J.S.; Lee, S.G. Preparation of PVDF/PAR Composites with Piezoelectric Properties by Post-Treatment. Polymers 2018, 10, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Choi, M.H.; Yang, S.C. CoFe2O4 nanofiller effect on β-phase formation of PVDF matrix for polymer-based magnetoelectric composites. Mater. Lett. 2018, 223, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abdelhamid, E.H.; Jayakumar, O.D.; Kotari, V.; Mandal, B.P.; Rao, R.; Naik, V.M.; Naik, R.; Tyagi, A.K. Multiferroic PVDF–Fe3O4 hybrid films with reduced graphene oxide and ZnO nanofillers. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 20089–20094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zaaba, N.; Foo, K.; Hashim, U.; Tan, S.; Liu, W.W.; Voon, C. Synthesis of Graphene Oxide using Modified Hummers Method: Solvent Influence. Procedia Eng. 2017, 184, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xia, H.; Zhu, D.; Fu, Y.; Wang, X. CoFe2O4-graphene nanocomposite as a high-capacity anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 83, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sayah, A.; Habelhames, F.; Bahloul, A.; Nessark, B.; Bonnassieux, Y.; Tendelier, D.; El Jouad, M. Electrochemical synthesis of polyaniline-exfoliated graphene composite films and their capacitance properties. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 818, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feng, Z.; Jin, X.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, C.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Hu, J. An easy and eco-friendly method to prepare reduced graphene oxide with Fe(OH)2 for use as a conductive additive for LiFePO4 cathode materials. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 4408–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pan, S.; Aksay, I.A. Factors Controlling the Size of Graphene Oxide Sheets Produced via the Graphite Oxide Route. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4073–4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hidayah, N.M.S.; Liu, W.-W.; Lai, C.-W.; Noriman, N.Z.; Khe, C.-S.; Hashim, U.; Lee, H.C. Comparison on graphite, graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide: Synthesis and characterization. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 150002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gurzęda, B.; Buchwald, T.; Nocuń, M.; Bąkowicz, A.; Krawczyk, P. Graphene material preparation through thermal treatment of graphite oxide electrochemically synthesized in aqueous sulfuric acid. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 19904–19911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Liu, S.; Xie, J.; Fang, C.; Cao, G.; Zhu, T.; Zhao, X. Self-assembly of a CoFe2O4/graphene sandwich by a controllable and general route: Towards a high-performance anode for Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 19738–19743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tabit, R.; Amadine, O.; Essamlali, Y.; Dânoun, K.; Rhihil, A.; Zahouily, M. Magnetic CoFe2O4 nanoparticles supported on graphene oxide (CoFe2O4/GO) with high catalytic activity for peroxymonosulfate activation and degradation of rhodamine B. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 1351–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, N.; Zheng, M.; Chang, X.; Ji, G.; Lu, H.; Xue, L.; Pan, L.; Cao, J. Preparation of magnetic CoFe2O4-functionalized graphene sheets via a facile hydrothermal method and their adsorption properties. J. Solid State Chem. 2011, 184, 953–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fernandes, M.M.; Mora, H.; Barriga-Castro, E.D.; Luna, C.; Mendoza-Reséndez, R.; Ribeiro, C.; Lanceros-Mendez, S.; Martins, P. Improving Magnetoelectric Contactless Sensing and Actuation through Anisotropic Nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 19189–19196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sarkar, B.; Dalal, B.; Dev Ashok, V.; Chakrabarti, K.; Mitra, A.; De, S.K. Magnetic properties of mixed spinel BaTiO3-NiFe2O4 composites. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 123908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pramoda, K.; Mohamed, A.; Phang, I.Y.; Liu, T. Crystal transformation and thermomechanical properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/clay nanocomposites. Polym. Int. 2004, 54, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martins, P.; Lopes, A.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Electroactive phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride): Determination, processing and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 683–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ben Osman, C.; Nowak, S.; Garcia-Sanchez, A.; Charles, Y.; Ammar, S.; Mercone, S.; Mammeri, F. In situ monitored stretching induced α to β allotropic transformation of flexible poly(vinylidene fluoride)-CoFe2O4 hybrid films: The role of nanoparticles inclusion. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 84, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cai, X.; Lei, T.; Sun, D.; Lin, L. A critical analysis of the α, β and γ phases in poly(vinylidene fluoride) using FTIR. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 15382–15389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Jiang, S.; Wan, H.; Liu, H.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, G. High β phase content in PVDF/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites induced by DC magnetic fields. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 102904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bae, J.-H.; Chang, S.-H. Characterization of an electroactive polymer (PVDF-TrFE) film-type sensor for health monitoring of composite structures. Compos. Struct. 2015, 131, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gonçalves, R.; Martins, P.; Correia, D.M.; Sencadas, V.; Vilas, J.L.; León, L.M.; Botelho, G.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Development of magnetoelectric CoFe2O4/poly(vinylidene fluoride) microspheres. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 35852–35857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tienne, L.G.P.; De Abreu, T.B.; Gondim, F.F.; Cruz, B.D.S.M.D.; Martins, G.R.; Simão, R.A.; Marques, M.D.F.V. Low contents of graphite improving general properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride). Polym. Test. 2020, 91, 106790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sebastian, M.S.; Larrea, A.; Gonçalves, R.; Alejo, T.; Vilas, J.L.; Sebastian, V.; Martins, P.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Understanding nucleation of the electroactive β-phase of poly(vinylidene fluoride) by nanostructures. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 113007–113015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hwang, S.; Kim, C.L.; Kim, Y.; Song, M.G.; Lee, J.; Baeck, S.-H.; Shim, S.E.; Qian, Y. Filler size effect in graphite/paraffine wax composite on electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 37, 1623–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yuan, M.; Brokken-Zijp, J.C.M.; Huijbregts, L.J.; De With, G. Filler size effects on the conductivity of polymer nanocomposites: Semiconductive phthalocyanine nanoparticles in epoxy matrices. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2008, 46, 1079–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shi, D.; Zhang, Q.; Ye, Y.M.; Luo, L.; Cheng, E.K.-W.I.; Lin, D.; Lam, K.-H. High-frequency current sensor based on lead-free multiferroic BiFeO 3 -BaTiO 3 -based ceramics. Measurement 2017, 104, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagrams of the 3-2 type magnetoelectric (ME) films of (a) poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/CFO-i-LGO (CoFe2O4-intercalated large-lateral-size graphene oxides), (b) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO(CoFe2O4-intercalated medium-lateral-size graphene oxides), and (c) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO(CoFe2O4-intercalated small-lateral-size graphene oxides); induced-leakage current in (d) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (e) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (f) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO at a high electric field of 40 kV/mm; under an applied magnetic bias field (Hbias) and active areas of magnetostriction in (g) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (h) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (i) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO. (j) Conceptual illustration of z-axis magnetostriction in the 3-2 type ME films.
Figure 1. Schematic diagrams of the 3-2 type magnetoelectric (ME) films of (a) poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/CFO-i-LGO (CoFe2O4-intercalated large-lateral-size graphene oxides), (b) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO(CoFe2O4-intercalated medium-lateral-size graphene oxides), and (c) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO(CoFe2O4-intercalated small-lateral-size graphene oxides); induced-leakage current in (d) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (e) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (f) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO at a high electric field of 40 kV/mm; under an applied magnetic bias field (Hbias) and active areas of magnetostriction in (g) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (h) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (i) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO. (j) Conceptual illustration of z-axis magnetostriction in the 3-2 type ME films.
Polymers 13 01782 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) graphite, (b) LGO, (c) MGO, and (d) SGO.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) graphite, (b) LGO, (c) MGO, and (d) SGO.
Polymers 13 01782 g002
Figure 3. Representative scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the (a) LGO, (c) MGO, and (e) SGO sheets. Inset data; box plots of the lateral size of the LGO, MGO, and SGO sheets. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis of the lateral size distribution of the (b) LGO, (d) MGO, and (f) SGO sheets.
Figure 3. Representative scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the (a) LGO, (c) MGO, and (e) SGO sheets. Inset data; box plots of the lateral size of the LGO, MGO, and SGO sheets. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis of the lateral size distribution of the (b) LGO, (d) MGO, and (f) SGO sheets.
Polymers 13 01782 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the two-dimensional (2D) magnetostrictive fillers of (a) CFO-i-LGO, (b) CFO-i-MGO, and (c) CFO-i-SGO.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the two-dimensional (2D) magnetostrictive fillers of (a) CFO-i-LGO, (b) CFO-i-MGO, and (c) CFO-i-SGO.
Polymers 13 01782 g004
Figure 5. Schematic illustrations, representative SEM images, and EDX analysis of the 2D magnetostrictive fillers of (a) CFO-i-LGO, (b) CFO-i-MGO, and (c) CFO-i-SGO.
Figure 5. Schematic illustrations, representative SEM images, and EDX analysis of the 2D magnetostrictive fillers of (a) CFO-i-LGO, (b) CFO-i-MGO, and (c) CFO-i-SGO.
Polymers 13 01782 g005
Figure 6. M-H hysteretic curves of the 2D magnetostrictive fillers of (a) CFO-i-LGO, (b) CFO-i-MGO, and (c) CFO-i-SGO.
Figure 6. M-H hysteretic curves of the 2D magnetostrictive fillers of (a) CFO-i-LGO, (b) CFO-i-MGO, and (c) CFO-i-SGO.
Polymers 13 01782 g006
Figure 7. XRD patterns of the 3-2 type ME films of (a) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (b) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (c) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
Figure 7. XRD patterns of the 3-2 type ME films of (a) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (b) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (c) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
Polymers 13 01782 g007
Figure 8. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the 3-2 type ME films of (a) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (b) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (c) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
Figure 8. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the 3-2 type ME films of (a) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (b) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (c) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
Polymers 13 01782 g008
Figure 9. P-E hysteretic curves of the 3-2 type ME films of (a) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (b) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (c) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO, and (d) P-E comparison under an applied electric field of 200 kV/cm.
Figure 9. P-E hysteretic curves of the 3-2 type ME films of (a) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (b) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (c) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO, and (d) P-E comparison under an applied electric field of 200 kV/cm.
Polymers 13 01782 g009
Figure 10. (a) Comparison of the ME responses in the 3-2 type ME films of PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO as a function of the dc magnetic field (Hdc) under an applied ac magnetic field (Hac) of 1 Oe at an off-resonance frequency (f) of 1 kHz. Calculated ME linearity (r2) of (b) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (c) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (d) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
Figure 10. (a) Comparison of the ME responses in the 3-2 type ME films of PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO as a function of the dc magnetic field (Hdc) under an applied ac magnetic field (Hac) of 1 Oe at an off-resonance frequency (f) of 1 kHz. Calculated ME linearity (r2) of (b) PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, (c) PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and (d) PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
Polymers 13 01782 g010
Table 1. Amount of chemical composition in the 2D magnetostrictive fillers of CFO-i-LGO, CFO-i-MGO, and CFO-i-SGO confirmed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis.
Table 1. Amount of chemical composition in the 2D magnetostrictive fillers of CFO-i-LGO, CFO-i-MGO, and CFO-i-SGO confirmed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis.
2D-FillersChemical Composition (wt%)
CoFeOCOthers
CFO-i-LGO16.329.429.35.020.0
CFO-i-MGO15.831.028.49.015.8
CFO-i-SGO4.68.133.814.439.1
Table 2. Magnetic properties in the 2D magnetostrictive fillers of CFO-i-LGO, CFO-i-MGO, and CFO-i-SGO confirmed by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) measurement.
Table 2. Magnetic properties in the 2D magnetostrictive fillers of CFO-i-LGO, CFO-i-MGO, and CFO-i-SGO confirmed by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) measurement.
2D-FillersMs (emu/g)Mr (emu/g)Hc (Oe)
CFO-i-LGO60.3326.231256.81
CFO-i-MGO63.9826.731148.48
CFO-i-SGO63.0327.081095.28
Table 3. Calculated β-phase content in the 3-2 type ME films of PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
Table 3. Calculated β-phase content in the 3-2 type ME films of PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
ME Filmsβ-Phase Content (%)
PVDF/CFO-i-LGO75.63
PVDF/CFO-i-MGO77.53
PVDF/CFO-i-SGO74.59
Table 4. Electrical properties in the 3-2 type ME films of PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
Table 4. Electrical properties in the 3-2 type ME films of PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
ME FilmsPs (μC/cm2)Pr (μC/cm2)Ec (kV/cm)
PVDF/CFO-i-LGO0.33330.03219.50
PVDF/CFO-i-MGO0.25910.01210.73
PVDF/CFO-i-SGO0.23940.0129.94
Table 5. Electric strength, piezoelectric, and ME properties in the 3-2 type ME films of PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
Table 5. Electric strength, piezoelectric, and ME properties in the 3-2 type ME films of PVDF/CFO-i-LGO, PVDF/CFO-i-MGO, and PVDF/CFO-i-SGO.
ME FilmsElectric Strength (kV/mm)d33 (pC/N)αME (mV/cm·Oe)
PVDF/CFO-i-LGO40143.0
PVDF/CFO-i-MGO287.51.4
PVDF/CFO-i-SGO2562.13
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baek, G.; Yang, S.-C. Effect of the Two-Dimensional Magnetostrictive Fillers of CoFe2O4-Intercalated Graphene Oxide Sheets in 3-2 Type Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Magnetoelectric Films. Polymers 2021, 13, 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111782

AMA Style

Baek G, Yang S-C. Effect of the Two-Dimensional Magnetostrictive Fillers of CoFe2O4-Intercalated Graphene Oxide Sheets in 3-2 Type Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Magnetoelectric Films. Polymers. 2021; 13(11):1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baek, Geunryeol, and Su-Chul Yang. 2021. "Effect of the Two-Dimensional Magnetostrictive Fillers of CoFe2O4-Intercalated Graphene Oxide Sheets in 3-2 Type Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Magnetoelectric Films" Polymers 13, no. 11: 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111782

APA Style

Baek, G., & Yang, S. -C. (2021). Effect of the Two-Dimensional Magnetostrictive Fillers of CoFe2O4-Intercalated Graphene Oxide Sheets in 3-2 Type Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Magnetoelectric Films. Polymers, 13(11), 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111782

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop