Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Biobased and Hybrid Polyurethane Xerogels from Bacterial Polyester for Potential Biomedical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Review of Recent Developments of Glass Transition in PVC Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Tough and Transparent Ultra-Extensible Nanocomposite Elastomers Based on Poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) and Their Switching between Plasto-Elasticity and Viscoelasticity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 23
10.3390/polym13234255
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual Transient Networks of Polymer and Micellar Chains: Structure and Viscoelastic Synergy

by
Sébastien Roland
1,
Guillaume Miquelard-Garnier
1,
Andrey V. Shibaev
2,
Anna L. Aleshina
2,
Alexis Chennevière
3,
Olga Matsarskaia
4,
Cyrille Sollogoub
1,
Olga E. Philippova
2,* and
Ilias Iliopoulos
1,*
1
Laboratoire PIMM, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, CNRS, Cnam, HESAM Universite, 75013 Paris, France
2
Physics Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
4
Institut Laue-Langevin, 38042 Grenoble, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(23), 4255; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234255
Submission received: 19 November 2021 / Accepted: 30 November 2021 / Published: 4 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamic Polymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dual transient networks were prepared by mixing highly charged long wormlike micelles of surfactants with polysaccharide chains of hydroxypropyl guar above the entanglement concentration for each of the components. The wormlike micelles were composed of two oppositely charged surfactants potassium oleate and n-octyltrimethylammonium bromide with a large excess of anionic surfactant. The system is macroscopically homogeneous over a wide range of polymer and surfactant concentrations, which is attributed to a stabilizing effect of surfactants counterions that try to occupy as much volume as possible in order to gain in translational entropy. At the same time, by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) combined with ultrasmall-angle neutron scattering (USANS), a microphase separation with the formation of polymer-rich and surfactant-rich domains was detected. Rheological studies in the linear viscoelastic regime revealed a synergistic 180-fold enhancement of viscosity and 65-fold increase of the longest relaxation time in comparison with the individual components. This effect was attributed to the local increase in concentration of both components trying to avoid contact with each other, which makes the micelles longer and increases the number of intermicellar and interpolymer entanglements. The enhanced rheological properties of this novel system based on industrially important polymer hold great potential for applications in personal care products, oil recovery and many other fields.

1. Introduction

Viscoelastic surfactants are able to self-assemble into very long wormlike micelles (WLMs) [1,2,3]. These micellar chains can entangle with each other forming a transient network that exhibits a viscoelastic behavior. Since WLMs are “living” objects that continuously break and reassemble, they easily change their structure to adapt to the variation of the external conditions. This makes their viscoelastic properties easily tunable by many triggers including temperature, shear, and different additives [4,5,6,7,8]. Responsive viscoelasticity of WLM solutions is widely used in a diverse range of applications from personal care products to oil recovery [1,2,3,9,10,11,12,13].
For some uses it is desirable to enhance the viscoelastic properties of WLMs while keeping their responsiveness. This can be done by mixing WLMs with polymeric chains [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Many combinations of polymers and WLMs have been studied up to now. Most often polymers binding to WLMs through electrostatic [16,19,20,25] or hydrophobic [14,15,17,18,22,23] interactions or both [21] were used. For instance, the addition of cationically modified cellulose to WLMs of anionic surfactants sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate or sodium dodecylethoxysulfate was shown to induce a very pronounced increase of viscosity by few orders of magnitude resulting from electrostatic attractive interactions between the components [19]. However, oppositely charged polymer-surfactant mixture usually have a strong tendency for phase separation [16,19]. Alternative to electrostatic forces, one can exploit hydrophobic interactions between polymer and micellar chains using water-soluble polymers bearing few hydrophobic side [14,15,22,23] or end [17,18] groups. For instance, the addition of hydrophobically modified guar to WLMs of cationic surfactant erucyl bis(hydroxyethyl)methylammonium chloride was shown to increase the viscosity by few orders of magnitude [14]. This effect was attributed to cross-linking of the WLMs by polymer through intercalation of its hydrophobic side groups into the micellar core.
Multiple attempts to enhance the viscosity of WLMs by adding water-soluble polymers without oppositely charged or hydrophobic groups were ineffective [26,27,28,29]. They either did not produce any appreciable impact on viscosity [26,29] or even reduced it [26,27,29]. The latter effect was observed for such polymers as poly(propylene oxide) or poly(vinyl methyl ether), which adsorbed on the surface of WLMs thereby destroying them [26,27,29].
Recently it was found that even widely available water-soluble polymers that do not interact with micellar chains can enhance the viscoelasticity of WLMs, if they form their own network in the whole volume of the solution independently of the network of entangled WLMs [30,31]. In this system containing non-interacting components it is important to ensure the phase compatibility. This can be done by using strongly charged WLMs, since demixing is highly unfavorable for their counterions, which need to move over the entire system in order to gain translational entropy. It was demonstrated that addition of uncharged synthetic polymer-poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)-to the solution of highly charged mixed WLMs of potassium oleate and n-octyltrimethylammonium bromide C8TAB containing large excess of anionic surfactant can induce a 100-fold increase of viscosity [30,31].
A synergistic enhancement of viscosity upon mixing polymer and micellar chains gives the possibility to significantly reduce the amount of chemicals required to achieve a desired rheological profile, thereby lowering both cost and environmental impact. When considering the pertinence of such systems for oil recovery, it is important to check the applicability of this approach to polymers commonly used in this field. These polymers comprise polyacrylamide derivatives and various polysaccharides like xanthan, hydroxyethylcellulose, guar gum [32,33,34] and so on. Since the oil industry must meet the demand for environmental sustainability [35], the use of polymers from renewable sources (of which polysaccharides are a part) is preferable.
Among different polysaccharides applied in the petroleum industry, guar gum and its derivatives are of particular interest, since they account for possibly 90% of all gelled fracturing fluids in oil recovery [36]. Guar gum, produced from the seeds of Cyamopsis tetragonalobus plant native to India and Pakistan, is a nonionic polysaccharide with a backbone consisting of β-(1–4)-d-mannose residues to which α-(1–6)-d-galactopyranosyl units are attached as side groups [37]. This is a biocompatible, biodegradable, and non-toxic polymer [38]. To improve the hydration of guar gum at ambient temperatures, it can be chemically modified yielding various better water-soluble derivatives [39,40]. Among them, hydroxypropyl guar (HPG) is the most widely available [41] and, therefore, represents one of the most promising candidates for the preparation of the mixed systems with WLMs.
The aim of the present paper is to elaborate the dual transient networks in which HPG chains form their own network in the whole volume of the solution in addition to the network of entangled WLMs. The WLMs were composed of anionic surfactant potassium oleate mixed with a small amount of a cationic surfactant C8TAB so that the micelles were highly negatively charged. It was shown that despite the high molecular weight of the polymer the system does not phase separate in a wide range of concentrations of both polymer and surfactants. At the same time, the structural studies by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) and ultrasmall-angle neutron scattering (USANS) revealed the microphase separation leading to locally concentrating the components in polymer-rich and surfactant-rich domains, which is responsible for the synergistic enhancement of the rheological properties. Such behavior makes these systems promising for various applications, for instance, in personal care products or for the creation of novel fracturing fluids for oil recovery.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

HPG (Jaguar® HP-105) was kindly provided by Solvay and used without further purification. Its chemical structure is presented in Figure 1. The molar mass (Mw) of HPG was estimated as 1,600,000 g/mol from the value of intrinsic viscosity [η] in water ([η] = 12.7 dL/g) using Mark-Houwink-Sakurada relationship with K = 1.72 × 10−4 dL/g and a = 0.785 according to [41]. The relative proportion of galactose to mannose units was determined from 1H NMR spectra by integrating the peaks corresponding to galactose (5.02 ppm) and mannose (4.73 ppm) protons [37]. It was found that the sample contains on average 0.7 galactose side groups per one mannose unit of the backbone. The molar degree of substitution (the average number of moles of hydroxypropyl substituents per mole of saccharide units) was equal to 0.91 as estimated by 1H NMR from the peak integral of hydroxypropyl group methylene protons (1.15 ppm) divided by a sum of diether (–O–CH–O–) proton signals of mannose and galactose saccharide units (4.73–5.18 ppm). The incorporation of hydroxypropyl groups can occur at any of the hydroxyl groups on the chain, either on the backbone or on the side group [40]. It blocks some of the hydrogen bonding sites in macromolecules and thereby reduces the attractive interactions between polysaccharide chains, which improves their water solubility.
Potassium oleate from TCI (purity > 98%), C8TAB from ABCR (purity > 98%) and potassium hydroxide from Acros (purity > 98%) were used as received. The solutions were prepared using distilled deionized water. For SANS measurements D2O (99.96% isotopic purity) supplied by Sigma-Aldrich was used as a solvent.

2.2. Preparation of Samples

First, stock solutions of HPG (3 wt%), potassium oleate (15 wt%) and C8TAB (5 wt%) were prepared by dissolving the reagents in water. HPG and surfactants stock solutions were mixed by a magnetic stirrer for at least 24 and 12 h, respectively. Both solutions were perfectly transparent. Then, pH of all stock solutions was adjusted to 11.0 by adding 5 M KOH. High pH value is necessary to ensure the formation of cylindrical micelles in the final samples, which occurs only when a significant amount of oleate molecules are deprotonated [42] (pKa of oleic acid is equal to 9.85 [43]). The stock solutions were mixed in appropriate quantities to obtain the HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB samples, 0.001 M KOH in water being used as a solvent. The [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] ratio was always fixed at 2.5.

2.3. Phase Behavior

The partial phase diagram of HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB/water system was constructed at 25 °C by visual inspection of the samples 5 days after preparation.

2.4. Small-Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS)

SANS experiments were performed on the PAXY facility at the Laboratoire Léon Brillouin (LLB) in Saclay and at the instrument D11 [44] of the Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) in Grenoble, France. The samples in D2O were prepared at pD = 11.0 ± 0.2. Samples with low viscosity were examined in 2 mm quartz cells (Hellma, Germany). Viscous samples were studied in dismountable cells consisting of two round quartz windows separated by 1.45- or 2-mm teflon spacers.
At LLB, three different sample-to-detector distances of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m were used together with a neutron wavelength of 4 Å, 5 Å and 8.5 Å, respectively. The q range available was thus 0.006–0.6 Å−1. Standard corrections were applied for sample volume, neutron beam transmission, empty cell signal, and detector efficiency to the raw signal to obtain scattering spectra in absolute units [45].
At ILL, a q range of 7.63 × 10−4–0.65 Å−1 was covered by three sample-to-detector distances: 1.7 m, 16 m and 38 m. The wavelengths used were 4.6 Å at 1.7 m and 16 m and 13 Å at 38 m, with a full width-half maximum (FWHM) wavelength spread of 9%. Scattered neutrons were detected using a multitube 3He gas detector having a pixel size of 4 × 8 mm2. Calibration to absolute scale was performed using attenuated direct beam measurements. Raw data were saved in the nxs (NeXuS) format [46]. All data were corrected for transmission and background scattering.
The scattering length densities (SLD) of surfactant alkyl tails and D2O are equal to −0.3 × 10−6 Å−2 and 6.36 × 10−6 Å−2, respectively. The SLD of HPG can be estimated as 1.1 × 10−6 Å−2, but it may increase up to 4 × 10−6 Å−2 due to the substitution of the hydroxyl group protons by deuterium [47].
Fitting of the scattering curves was performed by the program SasView (http://www.sasview.org/; accessed on 7 April 2021). For fitting, only a part of the curve at q higher than the structure peak position q* (q > 0.06 Å−1) was used, and then the fit was reconstructed in the whole q-range. Two fitting parameters were used: radius and background. The length of the cylinder was set at a very large value (10,000 Å) much larger than the length scales in the accessible q-range.

2.5. Rheology

Rheological measurements were carried out on a stress-controlled rotational rheometer Anton Paar Physica MCR 301 (Graz, Austria) with cone-plate geometry (diameter of 50 mm, cone angle 1°) and a solvent trap to prevent water evaporation. Temperature was maintained at 20.00 + 0.05 °C by Peltier elements. The samples were equilibrated for 10–30 min in the measurement cell prior to investigation. The details of the measurements are described elsewhere [48,49,50].
In steady shear experiments, the dependences of viscosity on shear rate (flow curves) were measured in the range of shear rates from 0.001 to 200 s−1. In oscillatory shear experiments, the angular frequency dependences of the storage G′ (ω) and loss G″ (ω) moduli were measured in the linear viscoelastic regime, which was determined preliminarily by amplitude sweep tests.

2.6. NMR Spectroscopy

1H NMR measurements were carried out on a Bruker AV-600 spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA) at 70 °C in D2O as a solvent at pD = 11.3 [51]. 1H chemical shifts were referenced to the HOD signal at 4.30 ppm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Critical Concentrations of HPG and Surfactants Solutions

First, HPG solutions without WLMs were studied. Figure 2 shows the concentration dependence of the zero-shear specific viscosity ηsp of these solutions. Three regimes can be identified according to the values of exponents of power law dependence of ηsp on the polymer concentration C. At small HPG concentrations, a power law dependence ηsp ~ C1 is consistent with that expected for dilute solutions (ηsp ~ C1 [52]). The second (ηsp ~ C1.3) and third (ηsp ~ C3.9) regimes have the exponents matching the theoretical predictions (1.3 and 3.9 [52]) for unentangled and entangled semi-dilute solutions of uncharged polymer in good solvent, respectively. These exponents are close to those previously determined experimentally for HPG solutions in water: 1.25 [39] (second regime) and 3.12 [39], 4.3 [53], 4.5 [54] (third regime). Figure 2 allows determining critical concentrations of HPG solutions: the overlap concentration corresponding to the transition from dilute to semidilute regime C* = 0.03 wt.% and the entanglement concentration corresponding to the transition from unentangled to entangled semidilute regime Ce = 0.2 wt%.
The overlap concentration C*WLM of the WLMs formed by potassium oleate/C8TAB surfactant mixture (at [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] molar ratio equal to 2.5) is ca. 2 wt% (comprising 1.5 wt% potassium oleate and 0.5 wt% C8TAB) as was determined previously [30] from the sharp rise on the concentration dependence of zero-shear viscosity of the surfactant solutions. Above C*WLM the solution contains long WLMs (their length goes up to a few micrometers [55]) entangled with each other.
Further experiments were performed at polymer and surfactants concentrations corresponding to a semidilute entangled regime to ensure the formation of a transient network of entanglements by each of the components of the dual HPG/surfactants network.

3.2. Phase Behavior of HPG/Surfactant System

The partial phase diagram of HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB/water system is presented in Figure 3. It covers the range of HPG concentrations from 0.2 to 4 wt% (0.0027–0.054 monomol/L) corresponding to an entangled semi-dilute regime of pure polymer solution. The total concentration of both surfactants was varied from 1.6 to 10.5 wt% lying also mostly in the semi-dilute regime.
From the phase diagram (Figure 3) one can see that the solutions are homogeneous in a wide range of studied polymer and surfactant concentrations. Most probably, this is related to the presence of highly charged WLMs that try to avoid macrophase separation and occupy most of the volume of the system in order to gain in the translational entropy of their counterions.
Surprisingly, the 1-phase region in the present system is as wide as in the corresponding system containing PVA (Mw = 27,000 g/mol) [30] instead of HPG, although Mw of HPG is 60-fold greater. At the same time, it was established [56] that the compatibility of polymer blends decreases with increasing chain length of polymers, since it reduces the entropy of mixing. One could suggest that in the present system, the good compatibility may be related to some specific interactions occurring between HPG and WLMs. To check this suggestion the 1H NMR spectra of HPG/surfactant system were compared with those of its components taken separately (Figure 4). No differences in the chemical shifts of the signals (Figure 4) or their integrals (Table 1) were detected indicating that in the mixture HPG and the WLMs do not reside in close proximity to each other.
Most probably, a better compatibility of HPG with WLMs in aqueous medium as compared to PVA/WLMs/water system is related to a better water solubility of HPG. Indeed, HPG exhibits a lower Huggins coefficient in water (kH = 0.32 [41]) than PVA (kH = 0.51 [57]). Thus, in aqueous medium HPG has a weaker tendency to interchain interactions than PVA and therefore, it is less prone to the segregative phase separation. A large range of compatibility in HPG/surfactant system is very favorable for their potential applications.

3.3. Structure of HPG/Surfactant System

The structure of the HPG/surfactant systems was studied by SANS. To enhance the contrast, D2O was used as a solvent (at pD = 11.0 ± 0.2 adjusted by addition of KOH). In this solvent, the surfactant micelles mainly contribute to the scattering when they are mixed with polymer chains [30], as shown in Figure 5a.
Figure 5 allows us to examine the evolution of the SANS curves with increasing surfactant concentration (at fixed polymer content). The higher-q part of the scattering curves can be well fitted by a form-factor of cylinder (solid line, Figure 5b) with a radius of 19.2 Å, which is close to the length of oleate tail (19 Å [6,58]). Therefore, HPG does not affect the local cylindrical structure of micellar aggregates.
The SANS curves of the HPG/surfactant system have a peak (Figure 5), which may be assigned to positional correlations arising from electrostatic repulsion between similarly charged micelles [59]. The position of the structure peak q* is more evident on a Holtzer or bending rod plot given by I(q)q ~ q dependence [60] (Figure 6a). It is seen that, with increasing surfactant concentration, the peak becomes more pronounced and shifts to higher q values indicating that the micelles come closer to each other.
Figure 6b shows the log-log dependence of the position of the correlation peak q* on the surfactant concentration. It is seen that q* scales as Csurf0.36 in the presence of HPG and as Csurf0.34 in its absence. These dependences are rather close to the power law expected for local hexagonal arrangement of the cylindrical micelles q* ~ Csurf0.5 [61].
Note that in the presence of HPG the q* values are always higher than in pure surfactant solution (Figure 6). This indicates that polymer forces the WLMs to approach closer to each other. Similar behavior was previously observed upon addition of PVA to the same surfactant solution [30] and was explained by the microsegregation of polymer and micellar components resulting in the formation of polymer-rich and surfactant-rich domains. The expulsion of WLMs from polymer-rich regions leads to local increase in concentration of micelles in regions enriched by surfactants which is reflected in a decrease of the mean intermicellar distance (2π/q*) upon adding polymer to the solution. Similar reasons are valid for the present system as well.
The microphase separation can arise from a competition between (i) the tendency for segregation of polymer and surfactant components at a small scale resulting in the gain in energy of interactions and (ii) the long-range compatibilizing effect of micellar counterions that tend to displace in the whole volume of the system in order to gain in the translational entropy.
Now let us consider the evolution of the SANS curves with increasing polymer concentration (at a constant number of surfactants). From Figure 7a we observe that the higher-q parts of the scattering curves coincide with each other confirming that the WLMs keep their local cylindrical structure intact despite the presence of polymer. At the same time, the added polymer shifts the peak position of the intermicellar correlation to higher q values (Figure 7b) meaning that the micelles approach each other (although the total concentration of surfactant does not change). As was discussed above, this is due to the expulsion of surfactants from the area occupied by polymer indicating the microphase separation.
Figure 7a shows that the most pronounced effect of polymer is observed in the low-q region, where HPG induces a sharp increase in the scattering intensity that becomes more pronounced with increasing polymer concentration [62]. It represents one more indication of the formation of microphase separated structures. The q4 dependency in the low-q part of the scattering curve can be the Porod scattering from these structures. Similar behavior was observed for the aggregates of micelles of block-copolymers [63]. A strong upturn of the scattered intensity at low q (slope > 3) has been reported for various micro-heterogeneous systems as, for instance, polymer melts [64], percolated nanoemulsion colloidal gels [65], and bi-continuous nanoparticle gels obtained by solvent segregation [66,67].
Thus, the SANS/USANS data show that added polymer does not disturb the local cylindrical structure of WLMs, but induces a microphase separation with the formation of surfactant-rich and polymer-rich domains.

3.4. Rheological Properties

Figure 8a,b presents the typical results of the measurements of rheological properties for the HPG/surfactant system and its components. Note that each of the components at the concentration under study forms a transient network as ascertained by the presence of a plateau on the frequency dependencies of the storage modulus G′(ω) (Figure 8b), which is characteristic of entangled solutions [14]. Therefore, the stress relaxation in all three systems is controlled by the chain reptation.
From Figure 8a,b one can see a clear synergistic effect of the mixing of polymer and surfactant solutions. Thus, the zero-shear viscosity η0 of the HPG/surfactant system is 6700 Pa.s, whereas η0 of polymer and surfactants alone is 22 and 37 Pa·s, respectively (Figure 8a). The plateau modulus equals 65 Pa for the mixed system and only 12 Pa for surfactants and 27 Pa for HPG solution taken separately (Figure 8b). The longest relaxation time, estimated as the inverse value of frequency at which G′ = G″, is 130 s for the mixed system and only 0.2 s and 2 s for polymer and surfactant components, respectively. Therefore, the most pronounced effect of mixing is produced on the viscosity and longest relaxation time: 180-fold and 65-fold increase in comparison with the components taken separately. This can be attributed to microphase separation leading to increasing local concentration of the components in each of the microphases, which produces more interpolymer and intermicellar entanglements. Moreover, in the case of WLMs, the local increase of surfactant concentration should induce the elongation of the micelles, since the length of micelles L augments with surfactant concentration Csurf as L ~ Csurf0.5 [68]. Longer WLMs and larger number of entanglements within both polymer and surfactant microphases slow down the reptation thereby increasing both relaxation time and viscosity.
To reveal the impact of the local concentration of polymer and surfactant components, we compared the rheological properties of HPG/surfactants systems with those of its components (HPG and surfactants potassium oleate/C8TAB) taken separately at concentrations that are 2× higher than in the mixture. This concentration was chosen roughly assuming that the polymer and surfactant microphases occupy equal volumes (50% of the whole volume, each containing only polymer or surfactant). It was observed (Figure 8c,d) that the rheological characteristics of 2× concentrated polymer and surfactant solutions become close to the mixed HPG/surfactant system. This result counts in favor of our hypothesis that this is the concentrating of each of the components of HPG/surfactant system in the corresponding microphases, which is mainly responsible for the enhancement of the rheological properties. Note that the zero-shear viscosity and the longest relaxation time of the 2× concentrated polymer and surfactant solutions are still somewhat lower than those of mixture in contrast to the plateau modulus, which is somewhat higher. These data are also consistent with our hypothesis, since the microphase separation restricts the number of entanglements between different components (polymer and micellar chains) which is reflected in somewhat smaller plateau modulus. Note that our assumption of pure polymer and surfactant microphases overestimates the extent of segregation.
Thus, simple mixing of WLMs and polymer solutions induces a large synergistic enhancement of the viscosity and relaxation time, which can be attributed to the increase in local concentration of polymer and surfactants within the microphase separated domains.

4. Conclusions

For the first time, binary transient networks composed of a network of entangled long wormlike surfactant micelles and a network of entangled polysaccharide chains were prepared. The WLMs forming the micellar network were composed of a mixture of anionic (potassium oleate) and cationic (C8TAB) surfactants with a large excess of anionic surfactant, that is they were highly negatively charged. The polymer network was formed by very long chains of uncharged industrially important polysaccharide HPG. By 1H NMR spectroscopy it was shown that there are no attractive interactions between the polymer and surfactant components, since the chemical shifts of the peaks in the spectra of the dual networks do not differ from those of its individual components taken separately. The dual network system demonstrates a good compatibility in a wide range of polymer and surfactant concentrations. This may be due to highly charged WLMs which prevent macrophase separation, because it will decrease the translational entropy of their counterions when they will be confined in a small volume of one of the phases. At the same time, by SANS combined with USANS, a microphase separation was detected. It is manifested in a sharp upturn of the scattering curves at ultra-small angles (q < 0.003 Å−1) and in the shift of the peak arising from intermicellar correlations at ca. 0.04–0.05 Å−1 to smaller q values upon addition of polymer. The upturn suggests the appearance of large inhomogeneities, whereas the shift of the peak indicates the decrease of the mean distances between the WLMs, when polymer is added. Meanwhile, the polymer does not affect the local cylindrical structure of the WLMs. These data suggest the expulsion of the surfactant from the area occupied by polymer and its concentrating in the surfactant-rich microdomains.
One of the most important findings of this study is the observation of the synergistic enhancement of the rheological properties upon mixing of polymer and WLM solutions resulting in a 180-fold increase of viscosity and a 65-fold increase of the longest relaxation time in comparison with the individual components. This behavior was attributed to local concentration of polymer and surfactants within polymer-rich and surfactant-rich microphases inducing the elongation of WLMs and the increase of intermicellar and interpolymer entanglements. A synergistic enhancement of rheological characteristics permits to reduce significantly the amount of polymer and surfactants required to achieve the desired rheological properties, which is profitable from both economical and ecological points of view. Taking into account the wide industrial application interest of the polymer under study, these findings pave a promising way for developing various new commercial formulations, for instance, new fracturing fluids for oil recovery or new personal care products with improved properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.I. and O.E.P.; methodology, I.I.; investigation, S.R., G.M.-G., A.V.S., A.L.A., A.C., O.M. and C.S.; resources, I.I. and O.E.P.; writing-original draft preparation, A.V.S. and O.E.P.; writing-review and editing, A.V.S., I.I. and O.E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was funded by RFBR and CNRS according to the research projects No. 19-53-15012 and PCR2325.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available. ILL data are curated under DOI: 10.5291/ILL-DATA.9-11-2009.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Laboratoire Léon Brillouin (Saclay, France) and the Institute Laue-Langevin (Grenoble, France, ILL proposal 9-11-2009) for the allocated neutron beam time and Solvay for providing HPG sample (Jaguar HP105) as a generous gift. O.E.P. would like to express her sincere thanks to all colleagues of the laboratory PIMM (Arts et Métiers, Paris, France) for their perfect hospitality and many inspiring discussions during her visit to the laboratory as an invited professor.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zana, R.; Kaler, E.W. Giant Micelles: Properties and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Feng, Y.; Chu, Z.; Dreiss, C.A. Smart Wormlike Micelles: Design, Characteristics and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dreiss, C.A.; Feng, Y. Wormlike Micelles: Advances in Systems, Characterisation and Applications; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chu, Z.; Dreiss, C.A.; Feng, Y. Smart wormlike micelles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7174–7203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Molchanov, V.S.; Philippova, O.E.; Khokhlov, A.R.; Kovalev, Y.A.; Kuklin, A.I. Self-assembled networks highly responsive to hydrocarbons. Langmuir 2007, 23, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shibaev, A.V.; Tamm, M.V.; Molchanov, V.S.; Rogachev, A.V.; Kuklin, A.I.; Dormidontova, E.E.; Philippova, O.E. How a viscoelastic solution of wormlike micelles transforms into a microemulsion upon absorption of hydrocarbon: New insight. Langmuir 2014, 30, 3705–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fu, H.; Duan, W.; Zhang, T.; Xu, K.; Zhao, H.; Yang, L.; Zheng, C. Preparation and mechanism of pH and temperature stimulus-responsive wormlike micelles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 624, 126788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Q.; Lv, D.; Zhang, J.; Huang, C.; Yin, B.; Wei, X.; Li, J. Triple-responsive wormlike micelles based on cationic surfactant and sodium trans-o-methoxycinnamic acid. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 324, 114680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, J. Viscoelastic wormlike micelles and their applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 7, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Philippova, O.E.; Khokhlov, A.R. Smart polymers for oil production. Pet. Chem. 2010, 50, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, J.; Fan, J.; Mao, J.; Yang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, W. High performance clean fracturing fluid using a new tri-cationic surfactant. Polymers 2018, 10, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Shibaev, A.V.; Aleshina, A.L.; Arkharova, N.A.; Orekhov, A.S.; Kuklin, A.I.; Philippova, O.E. Disruption of cationic/anionic viscoelastic surfactant micellar networks by hydrocarbon as a basis of enhanced fracturing fluids clean-up. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gong, L.; Liao, G.; Luan, H.; Chen, Q.; Nie, X.; Liu, D.; Feng, Y. Oil solubilization in sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate micelles: New insights into surfactant enhanced oil recovery. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 569, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Couillet, I.; Hughes, T.; Maitland, G.; Candau, F. Synergistic effects in aqueous solutions of mixed wormlike micelles and hydrophobically modified polymers. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5271–5282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shashkina, J.A.; Philippova, O.E.; Zaroslov, Y.D.; Khokhlov, A.R.; Pryakhina, T.A.; Blagodatskikh, I.V. Rheology of viscoelastic solutions of cationic surfactant. Effect of added associating polymer. Langmuir 2005, 21, 1524–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nakamura, K.; Shikata, T. Anionic hybrid threadlike micelle formation in an aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 24802–24805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yoshida, T.; Taribagil, R.; Hillmyer, M.A.; Lodge, T.P. Viscoelastic synergy in aqueous mixtures of wormlike micelles and model amphiphilic triblock copolymers. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 1615–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ramos, L.; Ligoure, C. Structure of a new type of transient network: Entangled wormlike micelles bridged by telechelic polymers. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 1248–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hoffmann, I.; Heunemann, P.; Prévost, S.; Schweins, R.; Wagner, N.J.; Gradzielski, M. Self-aggregation of mixtures of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes and surfactants studied by rheology, dynamic light scattering and small-angle neutron scattering. Langmuir 2011, 27, 4386–4396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Oikonomou, E.; Bokias, G.; Kallitsis, J.K.; Iliopoulos, I. Formation of hybrid wormlike micelles upon mixing cetyl trimethylammonium bromide with poly(methyl methacrylate-co-sodium styrene sulfonate) copolymers in aqueous solution. Langmuir 2011, 27, 5054–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mei, Y.; Han, Y.; Wang, H.; Xie, L.; Zhou, H. Electrostatic effect on synergism of wormlike micelles and hydrophobically modified polyacrylic acid. J. Surf. Deterg. 2014, 17, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, F.; Wu, Y.; Wang, M.; Zha, R. Self-assembly networks of wormlike micelles and hydrophobically modified polyacrylamide with high performance in fracturing fluid application. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2015, 293, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jiang, G.; Jiang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Z.; Ni, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, C. Supramolecular-structure-associating weak gel of wormlike micelles of erucoylamidopropyl hydroxy sulfobetaine and hydrophobically modified polymers. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 4780–4790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sharma, H.; Dormidontova, E.E. Polymer-threaded and polymer-wrapped wormlike micelle solutions: Molecular dynamics simulations. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 7016–7027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shibaev, A.V.; Mityuk, D.Y.; Muravlev, D.A.; Philippova, O.E. Viscoelastic solutions of wormlike micelles of a cationic surfactant and a stiff-chain anionic polyelectrolyte. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2019, 61, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brackman, J.C.; Engberts, J.B.F.N. Influence of polymers on the micellization of cetyltrimethylammonium salts. Langmuir 1991, 7, 2097–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, X.; Lin, Z.; Cai, J.; Scriven, L.E.; Davis, H.T. Polymer-induced microstructural transitions in surfactant solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 10865–10878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, Z.; Eads, C.D. Polymer-induced structural transitions in oleate solutions: Microscopy, rheology, and nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Langmuir 1997, 13, 2647–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Francisco, K.R.; Da Silva, M.A.; Sabadini, E.; Karlsson, G.; Dreiss, C.A. Effect of monomeric and polymeric co-solutes on cetyltrimethylammonium bromide wormlike micelles: Rheology, cryo-TEM and small-angle neutron scattering. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 345, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shibaev, A.V.; Abrashitova, K.A.; Kuklin, A.I.; Orekhov, A.S.; Vasiliev, A.L.; Iliopoulos, I.; Philippova, O.E. Viscoelastic synergy and microstructure formation in aqueous mixtures of nonionic hydrophilic polymer and charged wormlike surfactant micelles. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shibaev, A.V.; Makarov, A.V.; Kuklin, A.I.; Iliopoulos, I.; Philippova, O.E. Role of charge of micellar worms in modulating structure and rheological properties of their mixtures with nonionic polymer. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Castro, R.H.; Llanos, S.; Rodriguez, J.; Quintero, H.I.; Manrique, E. Polymers for EOR application in high temperature and high viscosity oils: Rock–fluid behavior. Energies 2020, 13, 5944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davarpanah, A. Parametric study of polymer-nanoparticles-assisted injectivity performance for axisymmetric two-phase flow in EOR processes. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bai, Y.; Liu, S.; Liang, G.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Bao, Y.; Shen, Y. Wormlike micelles properties and oil displacement efficiency of a salt-tolerant C22-tailed amidosulfobetaine surfactant. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2021, 39, 1057–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Farajzadeh, R.; Kahrobaei, S.; Eftekhari, A.A.; Mjeni, R.A.; Boersma, D.; Bruining, J. Chemical enhanced oil recovery and the dilemma of more and cleaner energy. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hasan, A.M.A.; Abdel-Raouf, M.E. Applications of guar gum and its derivatives in petroleum industry: A review. Egypt. J. Pet. 2018, 27, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crescenzi, V.; Dentini, M.; Risica, D.; Spadoni, S.; Skjåk-Bræk, G.; Capitani, D.; Mannina, L.; Viel, S. C(6)-Oxidation followed by C(5)-epimerization of guar gum studied by high field NMR. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xia, S.; Zhang, L.; Davletshin, A.; Li, Z.; You, J.; Tan, S. Application of polysaccharide biopolymer in petroleum recovery. Polymers 2020, 12, 1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Risica, D.; Barbetta, A.; Vischetti, L.; Cametti, C.; Dentini, M. Rheological properties of guar and its methyl, hydroxypropyl and hydroxypropyl-methyl derivatives in semidilute and concentrated aqueous solutions. Polymer 2010, 51, 1972–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Szopinski, D.; Kulicke, W.-M.; Luinstra, G.A. Structure–property relationships of carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar gum in water and a hyperentanglement parameter. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 119, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheng, Y.; Brown, K.M.; Prud’homme, R.K. Characterization and intermolecular interactions of hydroxypropyl guar solutions. Biomacromolecules 2002, 3, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lu, H.; Shi, Q.; Huang, Z. pH-Responsive anionic wormlike micelle based on sodium oleate induced by NaCl. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 12511–12517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kanicky, J.R.; Shah, D.O. Effect of degree, type, and position of unsaturation on the pKa of long-chain fatty acids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 256, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lieutenant, K.; Lindner, P.; Gähler, R. A new design for the standard pinhole small-angle neutron scattering instrument D11. J. Appl. Cryst. 2007, 40, 1056–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brûlet, A.; Lairez, D.; Lapp, A.; Cotton, J.-P. Improvement of data treatment in small-angle neutron scattering. J. Appl. Cryst. 2007, 40, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Könnecke, M.; Akeroyd, F.A.; Bernstein, H.J.; Brewster, A.S.; Campbell, S.I.; Clausen, B.; Cottrell, S.; Hoffmann, J.U.; Jemian, P.R.; Männicke, D.; et al. The NeXus data format. J. Appl. Cryst. 2015, 48, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Schmidt, I.; Cousin, F.; Huchon, C.; Boué, F.; Axelos, M.A.V. Spatial structure and composition of polysaccharide−protein complexes from small angle neutron scattering. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 1346–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Philippova, O.E.; Shibaev, A.V.; Muravlev, D.A.; Mityuk, D.Y. Structure and rheology of solutions and gels of stiff polyelectrolyte at high salt concentration. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 6031–6040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shibaev, A.V.; Muravlev, D.A.; Muravleva, A.K.; Matveev, V.V.; Chalykh, A.E.; Philippova, O.E. pH-dependent gelation of a stiff anionic polysaccharide in the presence of metal ions. Polymers 2020, 12, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ospennikov, A.S.; Gavrilov, A.A.; Artykulnyi, O.P.; Kuklin, A.I.; Novikov, V.V.; Shibaev, A.V.; Philippova, O.E. Transformations of wormlike surfactant micelles induced by a water-soluble monomer. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 602, 590–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Glasoe, P.K.; Long, F.A. Use of glass electrodes to measure acidities in deuterium oxide. J. Phys. Chem. 1960, 64, 188–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Colby, R.H. Structure and linear viscoelasticity of flexible polymer solutions: Comparison of polyelectrolyte and neutral polymer solutions. Rheol. Acta 2010, 49, 425–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Aubry, T.; Moan, M. Rheological behavior of a hydrophobically associating water soluble polymer. J. Rheol. 1994, 38, 1681–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lapasin, R.; De Lorenzi, L.; Pricl, S.; Torriano, G. Flow properties of hydroxypropyl guar gum and its long-chain hydrophobic derivatives. Carbohydr. Polym. 1995, 28, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Raghavan, S.R.; Fritz, G.; Kaler, E.W. Wormlike micelles formed by synergistic self-assembly in mixtures of anionic and cationic surfactants. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3797–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Robeson, L. Historical perspective of advances in the science and technology of polymer blends. Polymers 2014, 6, 1251–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lewandowska, K.; Staszewska, D.U.; Miloslav Bohdanecký, M. The Huggins viscosity coefficient of aqueous solution of poly(vinyl alcohol). Eur. Polym. J. 2001, 37, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shibaev, A.V.; Molchanov, V.S.; Philippova, O.E. Rheological behavior of oil-swollen wormlike surfactant micelles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 15938–15946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Stradner, A.; Sedgwick, H.; Cardinaux, F.; Poon, W.C.K.; Egelhaaf, S.U.; Schurtenberger, P. Equilibrium cluster formation in concentrated protein solutions and colloid. Nature 2004, 432, 492–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sommer, C.; Pedersen, J.S.; Egelhaaf, S.U.; Cannavacciuolo, L.; Kohlbrecher, J.; Schurtenberger, P. Wormlike micelles as “equilibrium polyelectrolytes”: Light and neutron scattering experiments. Langmuir 2002, 18, 2495–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gamez-Corrales, R.; Berret, J.F.; Walker, L.M.; Oberdisse, J. Shear-thickening dilute surfactant solutions: Equilibrium structure as studied by small-angle neutron scattering. Langmuir 1999, 15, 6755–6763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shibaev, A.; Gervais, M.; Iliopoulos, I.; Matsarskaia, O.; Miquelard-Garnier, G.; Philippova, O.; Roland, S.; Sollogoub, C. Microphase Separation in Double Networks Comprised of Polymer and Micellar Chains; Institute Laue-Langevin (ILL): Grenoble, France, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sharp, M.A.; Pranzas, P.K.; Schreyer, A. Going ultra: How we can increase the length scales studied in small-angle neutron scattering. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2009, 11, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Wignall, G.D.; Alamo, R.G.; Londono, J.D.; Mandelkern, L.; Stehling, F.C. Small-angle neutron scattering investigations of liquid-liquid phase separation in heterogeneous linear low-density polyethylene. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 5332–5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Helgeson, M.E.; Gao, Y.X.; Moran, S.E.; Lee, J.K.; Godfrin, M.; Tripathi, A.; Bose, A.; Doyle, P.S. Homogeneous percolation versus arrested phase separation in attractively-driven nanoemulsion colloidal gels. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 3122–3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Xi, Y.Y.; Lankone, R.S.; Sung, L.P.; Liu, Y. Tunable thermo-reversible bicontinuous nanoparticle gel driven by the binary solvent segregation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xi, Y.Y.; Leao, J.B.; Ye, Q.; Lankone, R.S.; Sung, L.P.; Liu, Y. Controlling bicontinuous structures through a solvent segregation-driven gel. Langmuir 2021, 37, 2170–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dreiss, C.A. Wormlike micelles: Where do we stand? Recent developments, linear rheology and scattering techniques. Soft Matter 2007, 3, 956–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 04255 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structure of HPG.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of HPG.
Polymers 13 04255 g001
Polymers 13 04255 g002 550
Figure 2. Dependence of the zero-shear specific viscosity on HPG concentration at 25 °C. C* denotes the overlap concentration, Ce is the entanglement concentration corresponding to the transition from the unentangled to entangled semi-dilute solution.
Figure 2. Dependence of the zero-shear specific viscosity on HPG concentration at 25 °C. C* denotes the overlap concentration, Ce is the entanglement concentration corresponding to the transition from the unentangled to entangled semi-dilute solution.
Polymers 13 04255 g002
Polymers 13 04255 g003 550
Figure 3. Partial phase diagram for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB/water system at 25 °C. The open symbols denote transparent homogeneous 1-phase systems, semi-filled symbols–2-phase systems. The [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] ratio was fixed at 2.5.
Figure 3. Partial phase diagram for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB/water system at 25 °C. The open symbols denote transparent homogeneous 1-phase systems, semi-filled symbols–2-phase systems. The [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] ratio was fixed at 2.5.
Polymers 13 04255 g003
Polymers 13 04255 g004 550
Figure 4. 1H NMR spectra of (a) HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system and its components: (b) HPG and (c) potassium oleate/C8TAB mixture. Concentrations: 0.7 wt% HPG, 1.25 wt% potassium oleate, 0.395 wt% C8TAB (molar ratio [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] = 2.5). Solvent: D2O. Temperature: 70 °C. Peak assignments were made according to the data reported in [40] and on www.chemicalbook.com (accessed on 1 April 2021) (SpectrumEN_143-18-0_1HNMR and SpectrumEN_2083-68-3_1HNMR).
Figure 4. 1H NMR spectra of (a) HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system and its components: (b) HPG and (c) potassium oleate/C8TAB mixture. Concentrations: 0.7 wt% HPG, 1.25 wt% potassium oleate, 0.395 wt% C8TAB (molar ratio [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] = 2.5). Solvent: D2O. Temperature: 70 °C. Peak assignments were made according to the data reported in [40] and on www.chemicalbook.com (accessed on 1 April 2021) (SpectrumEN_143-18-0_1HNMR and SpectrumEN_2083-68-3_1HNMR).
Polymers 13 04255 g004
Polymers 13 04255 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) SANS curves for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB systems in D2O containing 1 wt% HPG and different total surfactant concentrations C: 0 (grey circles), 1.6 (cyan circles), 3.3 (blue circles), 4.6 (green circles) and 6.6 wt% (red circles) at fixed molar ratio [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] = 2.5. (b) SANS curves normalized by total surfactant concentration I/C vs. q. The solid line represents a fit by a form-factor of a cylinder with R = 19.2 Å.
Figure 5. (a) SANS curves for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB systems in D2O containing 1 wt% HPG and different total surfactant concentrations C: 0 (grey circles), 1.6 (cyan circles), 3.3 (blue circles), 4.6 (green circles) and 6.6 wt% (red circles) at fixed molar ratio [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] = 2.5. (b) SANS curves normalized by total surfactant concentration I/C vs. q. The solid line represents a fit by a form-factor of a cylinder with R = 19.2 Å.
Polymers 13 04255 g005
Polymers 13 04255 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) The SANS curves represented by a Holtzer plot, I·q vs. q, for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB systems in D2O containing 1 wt% HPG and different total concentrations of the surfactants: 1.6 (cyan circles), 3.3 (blue circles), 4.6 (green circles) and 6.6 wt% (red circles) at fixed [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] molar ratio equal to 2.5. (b) Position of the correlation peak, q*, as a function of surfactant concentration for the HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system containing 1 wt% HPG and for the corresponding potassium oleate/C8TAB system without polymer ([potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] molar ratio equal to 2.5).
Figure 6. (a) The SANS curves represented by a Holtzer plot, I·q vs. q, for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB systems in D2O containing 1 wt% HPG and different total concentrations of the surfactants: 1.6 (cyan circles), 3.3 (blue circles), 4.6 (green circles) and 6.6 wt% (red circles) at fixed [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] molar ratio equal to 2.5. (b) Position of the correlation peak, q*, as a function of surfactant concentration for the HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system containing 1 wt% HPG and for the corresponding potassium oleate/C8TAB system without polymer ([potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] molar ratio equal to 2.5).
Polymers 13 04255 g006
Polymers 13 04255 g007 550
Figure 7. USANS curves in (a) I vs. q and (b) I·q vs. q (Holtzer plot) representations for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB systems in D2O containing 2.5 wt% potassium oleate, 0.8 wt% C8TAB and different concentrations of the HPG: 0 (red circles), 1 (grey squares), and 2 wt% (green diamonds).
Figure 7. USANS curves in (a) I vs. q and (b) I·q vs. q (Holtzer plot) representations for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB systems in D2O containing 2.5 wt% potassium oleate, 0.8 wt% C8TAB and different concentrations of the HPG: 0 (red circles), 1 (grey squares), and 2 wt% (green diamonds).
Polymers 13 04255 g007
Polymers 13 04255 g008 550
Figure 8. (a,b) Flow curves (a) and frequency dependencies of storage G′ and loss G″ moduli (b) for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system (black squares) containing 1 wt% HPG, 2.5 wt% potassium oleate, 0.8 wt% C8TAB and its components: 1 wt% HPG (orange triangles) and surfactant solution with 2.5 wt% potassium oleate and 0.8 wt% C8TAB (blue circles) at 20 °C. (c,d) Flow curves (c) and frequency dependencies of storage G′ and loss G″ moduli (d) for the same HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system (black squares) containing 1 wt% HPG, 2.5 wt% potassium oleate, 0.8 wt% C8TAB in comparison with 2 wt% HPG (violet circles) and surfactant solution with 5 wt% potassium oleate and 1.6 wt% C8TAB (green triangles) at 20 °C. Arrows in (d) indicate G′, G″ crossover (G′ = G″).
Figure 8. (a,b) Flow curves (a) and frequency dependencies of storage G′ and loss G″ moduli (b) for HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system (black squares) containing 1 wt% HPG, 2.5 wt% potassium oleate, 0.8 wt% C8TAB and its components: 1 wt% HPG (orange triangles) and surfactant solution with 2.5 wt% potassium oleate and 0.8 wt% C8TAB (blue circles) at 20 °C. (c,d) Flow curves (c) and frequency dependencies of storage G′ and loss G″ moduli (d) for the same HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system (black squares) containing 1 wt% HPG, 2.5 wt% potassium oleate, 0.8 wt% C8TAB in comparison with 2 wt% HPG (violet circles) and surfactant solution with 5 wt% potassium oleate and 1.6 wt% C8TAB (green triangles) at 20 °C. Arrows in (d) indicate G′, G″ crossover (G′ = G″).
Polymers 13 04255 g008
Table
Table 1. Table of integrals in 1H NMR spectra of HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system and its components: HPG and potassium oleate/C8TAB mixture *.
Table 1. Table of integrals in 1H NMR spectra of HPG/potassium oleate/C8TAB system and its components: HPG and potassium oleate/C8TAB mixture *.
Peak **Position, ppmIntegral
HPG/Potassium Oleate/C8TABHPGPotassium Oleate/C8TAB
18, 8′0.85–0.897.06 7.01
HPG hydroxypropyl1.153.322.92
3′–7′, 4–7, 12–171.26–1.2942.09 42.21
31.523.48 3.57
2′1.721.32 1.39
8, 112.006.65 6.68
22.103.42 3.44
N-CH33.106.13 6.17
1′3.251.38 1.37
HPG CH2 CH3.45–4.1110.7210.73
HPG m14.730.600.60
HPG g15.010.400.39
HPG g15.180.090.07
9, 105.323.31 3.31
* Concentrations: 0.7 wt% HPG, 1.25 wt% potassium oleate, 0.395 wt% C8TAB (molar ratio [potassium oleate]/[C8TAB] = 2.5). Solvent: D2O. Temperature: 70 °C. ** Peak assignments are indicated in Figure 4.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roland, S.; Miquelard-Garnier, G.; Shibaev, A.V.; Aleshina, A.L.; Chennevière, A.; Matsarskaia, O.; Sollogoub, C.; Philippova, O.E.; Iliopoulos, I. Dual Transient Networks of Polymer and Micellar Chains: Structure and Viscoelastic Synergy. Polymers 2021, 13, 4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234255

AMA Style

Roland S, Miquelard-Garnier G, Shibaev AV, Aleshina AL, Chennevière A, Matsarskaia O, Sollogoub C, Philippova OE, Iliopoulos I. Dual Transient Networks of Polymer and Micellar Chains: Structure and Viscoelastic Synergy. Polymers. 2021; 13(23):4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234255

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roland, Sébastien, Guillaume Miquelard-Garnier, Andrey V. Shibaev, Anna L. Aleshina, Alexis Chennevière, Olga Matsarskaia, Cyrille Sollogoub, Olga E. Philippova, and Ilias Iliopoulos. 2021. "Dual Transient Networks of Polymer and Micellar Chains: Structure and Viscoelastic Synergy" Polymers 13, no. 23: 4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234255

APA Style

Roland, S., Miquelard-Garnier, G., Shibaev, A. V., Aleshina, A. L., Chennevière, A., Matsarskaia, O., Sollogoub, C., Philippova, O. E., & Iliopoulos, I. (2021). Dual Transient Networks of Polymer and Micellar Chains: Structure and Viscoelastic Synergy. Polymers, 13(23), 4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234255

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop