Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of Poly(vinyl Alcohol) (PVA) Based Composites Integrated with Green Synthesized Al3+-Metal Complex: Structural, Optical, and Localized Density of State Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Aliphatic Polyurethane Elastomers Quaternized with Silane-Functionalized TiO2 Nanoparticles with UV-Shielding Features
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/polym13081315
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The II–I Phase Transition Behavior of Butene-1 Copolymers with Hydroxyl Groups

by
Yuanyuan Li
1,
Tao Li
1,
Wei Li
1,
Yahui Lou
1,
Liyuan Liu
2,* and
Zhe Ma
1,*
1
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Composite and Functional Materials and School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Center for Terahertz Waves and College of Precision Instrument and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(8), 1315; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081315
Submission received: 22 March 2021 / Revised: 8 April 2021 / Accepted: 14 April 2021 / Published: 16 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Physics and Theory)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The crystallization and II–I phase transition of functionalized polybutene-1 with hydroxyl groups were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. The results show that the incorporated hydroxyl groups increase the nucleation density but decrease the growth rate in melt crystallization. Interestingly, for the generated tetragonal form II, the presence of polar hydroxyl groups can effectively accelerate the phase transition into the thermodynamically stable modification of trigonal form I, especially with stepwise annealing and high incorporation. Using stepwise annealing, II–I phase transition was enhanced by an additional nucleation step performed at a relatively low temperature, and the optimal nucleation temperature to obtain the maximum transition degree was ‒10 °C, which is independent from the content of hydroxyl groups. Furthermore, the accelerating effect of hydroxyl groups on the II–I transition kinetics can be increased by reducing the crystallization temperature when preparing form II crystallites. These results provide a potential molecular design approach for developing polybutene-1 materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polyolefin has many outstanding properties such as good chemical resistance, light weight, easy processing ability, strong mechanical strength, and low cost. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the functionalization of polyolefin to obtain diverse molecular structures and to improve the performance of polyolefin materials.
For this purpose, incorporating additional polar functional groups into the original nonpolar polyolefin chains is a very effective strategy [1,2,3,4]. Yuan et al. synthesized functionalized polypropylenes containing hydroxyl groups and found that the dielectric constant was greatly improved owing to the alignment of polarizable pendant hydroxyl groups under an electric field [5,6,7,8]. Dai et al. prepared and studied a thermoplastic elastomer of polar functionalized polyethylene. It was found that the presence of polar monomers improved the surface performance, adhesion, and compatibility without significantly decreasing the elastic recovery [9]. Recently, Shang et al. successfully synthesized amino-containing polypropylene. Their results show that the presence of the amino groups improved the surface properties and thermal stability of the materials [10]. Although there have been efforts to modify the ultimate structure, the correlation between the polar functional groups and the crystallite structure is still far from conclusive. Clarity is urgently required for efficient design of the molecular structure and ultimate physical properties.
Polybutene-1 (PB-1) is an important type of polyolefin material that possesses some excellent mechanical properties such as high toughness and creep resistance [11]. As a polymorphic polymer, PB-1 chains can be packed into three types of crystalline modifications with different helix conformations, which determine the final mechanical performance [11,12,13,14,15,16]. When the polymer undergoes regular melt crystallization, the metastable tetragonal form II with 11/3 helix is preferentially formed because of the significant kinetic advantage. However, the most thermodynamically stable modification is the trigonal phase with 3/1 helix [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. This means that the initial tetragonal form II crystallites spontaneously transform into the more stable trigonal phase, referred to as form I. After the occurrence of such a solid II–I phase transition, the melting temperature rises and some mechanical properties such as the modulus also improve significantly [26,27,28,29,30,31], but the sample volume decreases [32,33]. Although PB-1 may also crystallize into orthorhombic form III with 4/1 helix directly from a dilute solution [34], the phase transition from form II to form I is a crucial issue in the processing and use of polybutene-1 materials. The practical kinetics of the phase transition is slow, such that the production cost increases. Therefore, control of the phase transition is crucial for the development of polybutene-1 materials.
It has been found that the phase transition can be regulated by the incorporation of certain comonomers. For example, Zheng et al. synthesized a series of butene-1/4-methyl-1-pentene (4M1P) random copolymers. When the 4M1P incorporation exceeds 3.4 mol%, 4M1P branches are high enough to completely impede the II–I phase transition, even when the aging time is as long as four months [35]. The phase transition can also be accelerated by physical and chemical approaches, such as high pressure [36], pressurized CO2 [37,38,39], external or thermal stress [40,41,42,43], and even co-units [29,31,44,45,46]. Qiao et al. found that the PB-1 samples were isothermally crystallized into metastable form II crystalline modification followed by annealing at a lower temperature and subsequently at a higher temperature to promote the polymorphic transition from form II to form I. They found that annealing at low temperatures benefits nucleation due to the internal stress induced by the unbalanced shrinkage of amorphous and crystalline phases with different thermal expansion coefficients [47]. An et al. synthesized polybutene-1 ionomers and pointed out that ions tend to aggregate to form clusters as additional intercrystalline links to enhance II–I phase transition [48]. In addition to ionic interaction, polar groups have been reported to be usable for the regulation of crystallization behaviors. Gupta et al. recently found that the introduction of hydroxyl groups into polypropylene and polyethylene could increase the nucleation density [7]. Thus, it is conjectured that polar hydroxyl groups could provide a potential approach to tuning phase transition. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no study of functionalized polybutene-1 with hydroxyl groups yet, so the correlation between II–I phase transition with the hydroxyl groups remains unknown.
In this work, butene-1 copolymers with polar hydroxyl groups were successfully prepared and the influences of hydroxyl groups on crystallization and phase transition were explored with differential scanning calorimetry. It is interesting to find that the presence of hydroxyl groups, especially at a high incorporation of 1.31 mol%, significantly accelerated the phase transition kinetics. For nucleation in the phase transition, the optimal temperature was ‒10 °C, independent from the incorporation. Moreover, the accelerating effect of hydroxyl groups on the kinetics of II–I phase transition increased with the decreasing crystallization temperature of form II crystallites.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

The polymers studied in this work were functionalized polybutene-1 with and without hydroxyl groups. All synthetic experiments involving air- and/or moisture-sensitive compounds were carried out in a MBraun glovebox, filled with nitrogen and using the standard Schlenk technique. The diemethyl (pyridylamido) hafnium pre-catalyst and the 6-iodo-1-hexene comonomers were synthesized according to [49,50]. The toluene used was purified by an Etelux solvent treatment system. Butene-1 gas and ultrahigh-purity nitrogen were obtained from Tianjin Liufang Industrial Gas Distribution Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Triisobutylaluminum (Al(iBu)3, 1.1 mol/L in toluene), the tritytetrakis (pentauorophenyl) borate ([Ph3C] [B(C6F5)4]) cocatalyst, trimethylamine, 1-propanethiol, and monothioglycerol were purchased from J&K China Chemical, Ltd. (Beijing, China) and used without further purification. The synthetic routes of the butene-1/6-iodo-1-hexene copolymers and functional polybutene-1 are shown in Scheme 1.

2.2. Copolymerization of Butene-1 with 6-Iodo-1-Hexene

The copolymers were synthesized following the method described in [48]. The obtained copolymers needed to be redissolved in toluene at 100 °C and precipitated in ethanol dropwise to wash off the excess comonomers and the residual catalyst decomposition products. Finally, the butene-1/6-iodo-1-hexene copolymers were dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 24 h. The incorporation of comonomers can be measured by 1H NMR (Figure S1a).

2.3. Synthesis of Functionalized Polybutene-1

The obtained copolymers were dissolved in 30 mL of decalin at 90 °C. After cooling to room temperature, N,N-dimethylformamide, thioglycerol, and trimethylamine were added to the reaction system. The mixture was reacted at 70 °C for 50 h. The obtained butene-1 copolymers with hydroxyl groups were precipitated out by pouring the reaction mixture into a large amount of ethanol. The polymers were washed repeatedly with acetone. After drying under a vacuum at 40 °C for 24 h, the functionalized polybutene-1 with hydroxyl groups was obtained [51]. In addition, thioglycerol was substituted by 1-propyl mercaptan in the same way to prepare the reference polymer with a similar branch length but no hydroxyl group (Scheme 1). 1H NMR results show that the reaction was complete (Figure S1b,c). The obtained polymers with and without hydroxyl groups were referred to as PBHY-2 and PBHY-0, respectively, for which the number in the sample code corresponds to the number of hydroxyl groups in each branch (see Table 1).

2.4. Methods

The nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) characterizations were performed with a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany). All samples were measured at 120 °C with C2D2Cl4 as a solvent. The molecular weights and molecular weight distributions of the copolymers were measured at 150 °C in 1,2,4-C6Cl3H3 versus polystyrene standards using an Agilent PL-GPC 220 high-temperature gel permeation chromatography, as summarized in Table 1.
The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) experiments were carried out with Discovery DSC25 (TA instrument, DE, USA) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The sample was first annealed at 180 °C for 10 min to erase the thermal history. Then, both the dynamic cooling crystallization and the isothermal crystallization were studied. The dynamic cooling experiments were carried out at a rate of 10 °C/min. Considering the various crystallization abilities of the copolymers, broad crystallization temperature ranges of 80‒95 °C and 65‒77 °C were chosen for 0.38 and 1.31 mol%, respectively. In the isothermal experiments, a much higher cooling rate of 50 °C/min was employed to prevent crystallization before reaching the desired temperature.
Moreover, DSC was employed to apply different thermal protocols to prepare the crystallites for subsequent phase transition. Scheme 2a shows the formation of form II with the DSC dynamic cooling protocol and the transformation from form II to form I at room temperature (25 °C). Scheme 2b shows that the formation of form II is the same as in Scheme 2a, followed by annealing at a low temperature (Tlow) between ‒60 °C and 25 °C for 30 min and sequentially at 25 °C for 50 or 120 h (for 0.38 and 1.31 mol%, respectively). With respect to Scheme 2b, Scheme 2c shows that annealing at low temperature is fixed at ‒10 °C for 30 min and that at high temperature is fixed at 25 °C for different durations. Scheme 2d shows that form II was obtained by isothermal crystallization, which then was annealed using the protocol in Scheme 2c. The last step of all the thermal protocols was heating from 25 °C to 180 °C at 10 °C/min to assess the contents of transformed form I.
The polarized optical microscopy experiments were performed with a Nikon ECLIPSE LV100N POL microscope (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an external hot stage. After cleaning the thermal histories at 180 °C, the polymers were cooled to the desired isothermal temperatures to monitor spherulite growth: 95 °C and 77 °C for the incorporations of 0.38 and 1.31 mol%, respectively.
The wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) method was employed to verify that the crystal modification after cooling at 10 °C/min to 25 °C was form II. The WAXD measurements were carried with the Bruker D8 Discovery X-ray setup (Karlsruhe, Germany), where the wavelength of X-ray used was 1.54 Å. The sample-to-detector distance was 56 mm. The measurement time of each frame was 1 min.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Influence of the Hydroxyl Groups on Crystallization

Figure 1 shows the DSC cooling and heating curves of functional polybutene-1 with hydroxyl groups for two distinct incorporations of 0.38 and 1.31 mol%. It can be seen that, when the incorporation is only 0.38 mol%, the cooling crystallization temperatures are very close between the copolymers with and without hydroxyl groups. As the incorporation increased to 1.31 mol%, the cooling crystallization temperature of PBHY131-0 with more branches decreased with respect to the aforementioned copolymer PBHY038-0. Interestingly, the crystallization of corresponding copolymer PBHY131-2 with hydroxyl groups further decreased to 52.3 °C versus 61.3 °C in PBHY131-0 for the dynamic cooling process at 10 °C/min. Moreover, although the crystallization kinetics may vary due to the incorporation of branches and hydroxyl groups, the crystallites generated were always tetragonal form II, which is the kinetically favored phase of polybutene-1 (WAXD results given in Figure S2).
In addition to the dynamic cooling experiments, the isothermal crystallization behaviors were explored at higher temperatures, which were chosen within 80‒95 °C and 65‒77 °C for incorporations of 0.38 and 1.31 mol%, respectively. In Figure 2a,b, the solid and dashed lines present the crystallization of copolymers with and without hydroxyl groups, respectively. It was observed that, for the low incorporation at 0.38 mol%, the presence of hydroxyl groups seemed not to obviously influence the crystallization kinetics at the relatively low temperature of 80 °C, consistent with the comparable cooling crystallization that occurs within approximately 60–80 °C. However, slowed crystallization kinetics by hydroxyl groups is observed with an elevation in isothermal temperature and an increase in incorporation. Figure 2c displays the quantified half-crystallization time (t1/2) as a function of isothermal temperature. For example, the presence of hydroxyl groups at the incorporation of 1.31 mol% can increase t1/2 from 730 to 2250 s for the isothermal crystallization at 77 °C. It is known that by both the nuclei density and the linear growth rate contributed to the crystallization kinetics [52,53,54,55]. In order to gain insight into the variation in crystallization kinetics with the hydroxyl groups, the crystallization process was monitored by polarized optical microscopy. From Figure 3a,b, it can be seen that the nuclei density of PBHY038-2 was significantly higher than that of PBHY038-0, which was consistent with the results observed for 1.31 mol% (Figure S3). However, the linear growth rates that were determined from the corresponding POM images decreased from 0.24 μm/min in PBHY038-0 to 0.08 μm/min in PBHY038-2. It was indicated that, for 0.38 mol% incorporation, the distinct crystallization kinetics of PBHY038-2 with respect to PBHY038-0 is because of the increase in nuclei density and the decrease in linear growth rate. In this case, it could be inferred that the much slower crystallization kinetics of PBHY131-2 is probably due to the further increase in nuclei density not compensating for the decrease in linear growth rate.

3.2. Influence of the Hydroxyl Groups in Phase Transition

Although the crystallization temperatures were dependent on the incorporation and type of functionalized groups, the resulting crystallites were all of thermally metastable tetragonal form II (Figure S2), which tends to spontaneously transform into the more stable trigonal form I. To study the influence of hydroxyl groups on the phase transition from tetragonal form II to trigonal form I, the generated form II crystallites were aged at 25 °C for various durations and then heated to determine the fraction of transformed form I in the total crystallites, since form I has a higher melting temperature than form II. Figure 4a first shows the DSC heating curves of polymer PBHY038-0 after annealing at 25 °C for different times. It was seen that, without annealing, only a single endothermic peak of form II was observed in the heating curve. However, after annealing for 10 h, one additional distinct endothermic peak appears, which corresponds to melting of the transformed form I [48,56]. As the annealing period was further extended, the endothermic peak of the transformed form I increased whereas that of the residual form II decreased correspondingly. The fraction of transformed form I can be quantified from the DSC results with the following equation: f I = A I / Δ H I 0 A I / Δ H I 0 + A II / Δ H II 0 , where A I and A II represent areas of endothermic peaks during melting of form I and form II, respectively, and Δ H I 0 and Δ H II 0 are the crystal melting enthalpies of pure forms I and II, 141 and 62 J/g, respectively [28]. Figure 4b,c compare the evolution of fractions of transformed form I with and without hydroxyl groups for two distinct incorporations of 0.38 and 1.31 mol%, respectively. When the incorporation is low, only 0.38 mol%, the kinetics of the phase transition with hydroxyl groups are comparable with those without hydroxyl groups (Figure 4b). As the incorporation increased to 1.31 mol%, the II–I phase transition with hydroxyl groups is higher than that without hydroxyl groups and the difference increases with the phase transition. It was indicated that the presence of hydroxyl groups could accelerate phase transition for the high incorporation of 1.31 mol%.

3.3. The Relationship between Phase Transition and Transition Temperatures

It has been recognized that solid II–I phase transition is implemented as a two-step process, triggered by nucleation and subsequently implemented by the growth of form I within the initial lamellae [57,58]. Moreover, it has been reported that the kinetics of II–I phase transition is determined by the nucleation step [56,59,60,61]. In this case, the kinetics of the phase transition is strongly dependent on the nucleation temperature. The lowered temperature could increase the temperature difference between crystallization and nucleation, which increases the internal thermal stress originating from the various thermal expansion coefficients between the crystal and amorphous regions, and might also decrease the critical nuclei size for the newly appeared phase. To examine the relationship between phase transition kinetics and the transition temperature, the form II crystallites were cooled to various temperatures for a fixed duration of 30 min to allow for nucleation and were subsequently aged at 25 °C for the transition. Due to the different kinetics, the transition periods were chosen as 50 and 120 h for 0.38 and 1.31 mol%, respectively. From Figure 5, it can be clearly seen that, irrespective of the presence of hydroxyl groups, the maximum peak of transformed form I is observed at ‒10 °C, indicating an identical optimal temperature for nucleation. In addition, this optimal temperature remains unchanged when increasing the incorporation from 0.38 to 1.31 mol%, which is the same as for the nucleation temperature in polybutene-1 homopolymer [56].
With the aforementioned optimal nucleation temperature of ‒10 °C, the solid II–I phase transition was monitored and the evolution of the transformed form I was as shown in Figure 6. We notice that, compared to the phase transition behavior at 25 °C, the annealing at ‒10 °C for 30 min in advance can greatly accelerate the phase transformation. Moreover, the accelerating influence of hydroxyl groups in II–I phase transition was also confirmed for the relatively low incorporation of 0.38 mol%.

3.4. The Relationship between Crystallization Temperature and Phase Transition

The above results focus on the influence of transition conditions on the transition kinetics. It should be noticed that the structural characters of the initial form II that are transformed are strongly dependent on the crystallization process from amorphous melting to the ultimate solid. It was recently reported that the temperature used to prepare the initial crystallites not only determines the transition conditions to influence the internal stress but may also vary the number of intercrystalline links, which plays an important role in the stress transport between lamellae [47]. Note that the initial form II crystallites studied in the above sections were all prepared by a cooling process, where there is a difference in the crystallization temperature between PBHY131-0 and PBHY131-1 (Figure 1). To know the dependence of II–I transition on the crystallization temperature, the form II crystallites to be transformed were prepared at various temperatures. Figure 7 shows the fractions of transformed form I as a function of isothermal temperature of form II preparation. It was observed that the fraction of transformed form I increases slightly with decreasing temperature for a low incorporation of 0.38 mol% (PBHY038-0 and PBHY038-2, shown in Figure 7a) and a high concentration of 1.31 mol% without a hydroxyl group (PBHY131-0, shown in Figure 7b). However, PBHY131-2 with substantial hydroxyl groups shows increased transformed form I when lowering the form II preparation temperature. This means that the influence of hydroxyl groups on II–I transition kinetics becomes weaker at elevated temperatures. The increase in transition kinetics with lowering crystallization temperature was also observed in polybutene-1 ionomers with the physical ion aggregates [48]. It was indicated that the hydroxyl groups may form some hydrogen-bonded nanoclusters, similar to ion aggregates, which act as additional physical crosslinks to enhance internal stress to the lamellae for form I nucleation within form II. In summary, in the presence of polar hydroxyl groups, the solid II–I phase transition could be more efficiently accelerated by lowering the crystallization temperature of preparing form II.

4. Conclusions

In this work, functionalized polybutene-1 copolymers with hydroxyl groups at distinct incorporations of 0.38 and 1.31 mol% were synthesized. The crystallization kinetics of tetragonal form II and the subsequent phase transition into trigonal form I were studied with differential scanning calorimetries. The influence of the hydroxyl groups on crystallization and phase transition is dependent on the incorporation. For a low incorporation of only 0.38 mol%, the introduced hydroxyl groups do not significantly affect the kinetics of the dynamic cooling crystallization or the isothermal crystallization at temperatures below 85 °C, which are associated with increased nucleation density but a decreased growth rate. Differently, when the incorporation was increased to 1.31 mol%, the presence of hydroxyl groups significantly decreased the crystallization temperature.
More importantly, the solid phase transition from form II to I could be accelerated by the presence of hydroxyl groups. The results show that the influence of hydroxyl groups on II–I phase transition is increased when increasing the incorporation from 0.38 to 1.31 mol%. In addition, the phase transition exhibits a nonmonotonic dependence on temperature and the optimal nucleation temperature to obtain a maximum transition degree at ‒10 °C, independent from the content of hydroxyl groups. Furthermore, the accelerating influence of hydroxyl groups on phase transition further increases when lowering the crystallization temperature of preparing form II.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym13081315/s1, Figure S1: NMR results; Figure S2: WAXD results; Figure S3: POM results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. (Yuanyuan Li) and Z.M.; Data curation, Y.L. (Yuanyuan Li), W.L., Y.L. (Yahui Lou), L.L. and Z.M.; Formal analysis, Y.L. (Yuanyuan Li), W.L. and Z.M.; Investigation, Y.L. (Yuanyuan Li), L.L. and Z.M.; Resources, Y.L. (Yuanyuan Li) and T.L.; Writing-original draft, Y.L. (Yuanyuan Li); Writing-review and editing, Y.L. (Yuanyuan Li), L.L. and Z.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 52022065 and 51873151).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Zou, C.; Zhang, H.; Tan, C.; Cai, Z. Polyolefins with intrinsic antimicrobial properties. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zou, C.; Chen, C.L. Polar-functionalized, crosslinkable, self-healing, and photoresponsive polyolefins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Walsh, D.J.; Su, E.; Guironnet, D. Catalytic synthesis of functionalized (polar and non-polar) polyolefin block copolymers. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 4703–4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Na, Y.; Chen, C.L. Catechol-functionalized polyolefins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 7953–7959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuan, X.P.; Matsuyama, Y.; Chung, T.C.M. Synthesis of functionalized isotactic polypropylene dielectrics for electric energy storage applications. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 4011–4015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gupta, S.; Yuan, X.P.; Chung, T.C.M.; Kumar, S.; Cakmak, M.; Weiss, R.A. Effect of hydroxyl-functionalization on the structure and properties of polypropylene. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 5455–5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gupta, S.; Yuan, X.P.; Chung, T.C.M.; Cakmak, M.; Weiss, R.A. Isothermal and non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of hydroxyl-functionalized polypropylene. Polymer 2014, 55, 924–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Misra, M.; Agarwal, M.; Sinkovits, D.W.; Kumar, S.K.; Wang, C.; Pilania, G.; Ramprasad, R.; Weiss, R.A.; Yuan, X.P.; Chung, T.C.M. Enhanced polymeric dielectrics through incorporation of hydroxyl groups. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 1122–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dai, S.Y.; Li, S.K.; Xu, G.Y.; Chen, C.L. Direct synthesis of Polar functionalized polyethylene thermoplastic elastomer. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 2539–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shang, R.; Gao, H.; Luo, F.L.; Li, Y.L.; Wang, B.; Ma, Z.; Pan, L.; Li, Y.S. Functional isotactic polypropylenes via efficient direct copolymerizations of propylene with various amino-functionalized α-olefins. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 9280–9290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luciani, L.; Seppälä, J.; Löfgren, B. Poly-1-butene: Its preparation, properties and challenges. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1988, 13, 37–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miller, R.L.; Holland, V.F. On transformations in isotactic polybutene-1. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Lett. 1964, 2, 519–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boor, J.; Youngman, E.A. Polymorphsim in poly-1-butene: Appearent direct formation of mofification I. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Lett. 1964, 2, 903–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Turner-Jones, A.; Aizlewood, J.M. Crystalline form of polypentene-1. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Lett. 1963, 1, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Y.T.; Liu, P.R.; Lu, Y.; Men, Y.F. Mechanism of polymorph selection during crystallization of random butene-1/ethylene copolymer. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2016, 34, 1014–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xin, R.; Zhang, J.; Sun, X.L.; Li, H.H.; Ren, Z.J.; Yan, S.K. Polymorphic behavior and phase transition of poly(1-butene) and its copolymers. Polymers 2018, 10, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Natta, G.; Corradini, P.; Bassi, I.W. Crystal structure of isotactic poly-alpha-butene. Nuovo Cim. 1960, 15, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, B.; Yang, D.C.; Yan, S.K. Direct formation of form I poly(1-butene) single crystals from melt crystallization in ultrathin films. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2002, 40, 2641–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Su, F.M.; Li, X.Y.; Zhou, W.M.; Zhu, S.S.; Ji, Y.X.; Wang, Z.; Qi, Z.; Li, L.B. Direct formation of isotactic poly(1-butene) form I crystal from memorized ordered melt. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 7399–7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ji, Y.X.; Su, F.M.; Cui, K.P.; Huang, N.D.; Qi, Z.M.; Li, L.B. Mixing assisted direct formation of isotactic poly(1-butene) form I′ crystals from blend melt of isotactic poly(1-butene)/polypropylene. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 1761–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Rosa, C.; Auriemma, F.; Ruiz de Ballesteros, O.; Esposito, F.; Laguzza, D.; Di Girolamo, R.; Resconi, L. Crystallization properties and polymorphic behavior of isotactic poly(1-Butene) from metallocene catalysts: The crystallization of form I from the melt. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 8286–8297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cavallo, D.; Zhang, L.; Sics, I.; Alfonso, G.C.; Dumas, P.; Marco, C.; Ellis, G. The morphology and polymorphism of self-nucleated trigonal isotactic poly(1-butene) studied by synchrotron IR microspectroscopy. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2016, 18, 816–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Androsch, R.; Hohlfeld, R.; Frank, W.; Nase, M.; Cavallo, D. Transition from two-stage to direct melt-crystallization in isotactic random butene-1/propene copolymers. Polymer 2013, 54, 2528–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Y.P.; Guo, Z.X.; Xue, M.; Yan, S.K. Epitaxial recrystallization of iPBu in Form II on an oriented iPS film initially induced by oriented form I iPBu. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 4232–4239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, J.; Tashiro, K. Time-resolved imaging of the phase transition in the melt-grown spherulites of isotactic polybutene-1 as detected by the two-dimensional polarized IR imaging technique. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 4689–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Azzurri, F.; Flores, A.; Alfonso, G.C.; Calleja, F.J.B. Polymorphism of isotactic poly(1-butene) as revealed by microindentation hardness. 1. Kinetics of the transformation. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 9069–9073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Azzurria, F.; Flores, A.; Alfonso, G.C.; Sicsc, I.; Hsiao, B.S.; Calleja, F.J.B. Polymorphism of isotactic polybutene-1 as revealed by microindentation hardness. Part II: Correlations to microstructure. Polymer 2003, 44, 1641–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rubin, I.D. Relative stabilities of polymorphs of polybutene-1 obtained from the melt. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Lett. 1964, 2, 747–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Z.; Dong, X.; Cavallo, D.; Müller, A.J.; Wang, D. Promotion of self-nucleation with latent form I nuclei in polybutene-1 and its copolymer. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 6037–6046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Danusso, F.; Gianotti, G. Isotactic polybutene-1: Formation and transformation of modification 2. Die Makromol. Chem. 1965, 88, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tarallo, O.; Ruiz de Ballesteros, O.; Bellissimo, A.; Scoti, M.; Malafronte, A.; Auriemma, F.; De Rosa, C. Crystallization and mechanical properties of metallocene made 1-butene-pentene and 1-butene-hexene isotactic copolymers. Polymer 2018, 158, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tashiro, K.; Hu, J.; Wang, H.; Hanesaka, M.; Saiani, A. Refinement of the crystal structures of forms I and II of isotactic polybutene-1 and a proposal of phase transition mechanism between Them. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 1392–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qiao, Y.N.; Wang, H.; Men, Y.F. Retardance of form II to form I transition in polybutene-1 at late stage: A proposal of a new mechanism. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 2232–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lotz, B.; Thierry, A. Spherulite morphology of form III isotactic poly(1-butene). Macromolecules 2003, 36, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zheng, L.R.; Liu, L.; Shao, C.G.; Wang, W.; Wang, B.; Pan, L.; Li, Y.S.; Ma, Z. Phase transition from tetragonal form II to hexagonal form I of butene-1/4-Methyl-1-pentene random copolymers: Molecular factor versus stretching stimuli. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 1188–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nakafuku, C.; Miyaki, T. Effect of pressure on the melting and crystallization behavior of isotactic polybutene-1. Polymer 1983, 24, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, Y.; Liu, T.; Li, L.; Li, D.C.; Yuan, W.K.; Zhao, L. Controlling crystal phase transition from form II to I in isotactic poly-1-butene using CO2. Polymer 2012, 53, 6102–6111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shi, J.Y.; Wu, P.Y.; Li, L.; Liu, T.; Zhao, L. Crystalline transformation of isotactic polybutene-1 in supercritical CO2 studied by in-situ fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Polymer 2009, 50, 5598–5604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, L.; Liu, T.; Zhao, L.; Yuan, W.K. CO2-induced crystal phase transition from form II to form I in isotactic poly-1-butene. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 2286–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.P.; Cui, K.P.; Tian, N.; Zhou, W.Q.; Meng, L.P.; Li, L.B.; Ma, Z.; Wang, X.L. Stretch-induced crystal–crystal transition of polybutene-1: An in situ synchrotron radiation wide-angle x-ray scattering study. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 2764–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tanaka, A.; Sugimoto, N.; Aasada, T.; Onogi, S. Orientation and crystal transformation in polybutene-1 under stress relaxation. Polym. J. 1975, 7, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, W.; Li, X.Y.; Li, H.L.; Su, F.M.; Zhou, W.; Li, L.B. Deformation-induced crystal–crystal transition of polybutene-1: An in situ FTIR imaging study. J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 48, 4925–4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cavallo, D.; Kanters, M.J.W.; Caelers, H.J.M.; Portale, G.; Govaert, L.E. Kinetics of the polymorphic transition in isotactic poly(1-butene) under uniaxial extension. New insights from designed mechanical histories. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 3033–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Lou, Y.H.; Liao, Y.L.; Pan, L.; Wang, B.; Li, Y.S.; Ma, Z. Effect of linear and ring-like co-units on the temperature dependence of nucleation and growth in II-I phase transition of butene-1 copolymers. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2018, 36, 1269–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gianotti, G.; Capizzi, A. Butene-1/propylene copolymers. Influence of the comonomerie units on polymorphism. Die Makromol. Chem. 1969, 124, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De Rosa, C.; Scoti, M.; Ruiz de Ballesteros, O.; Di Girolamo, R.; Auriemma, F.; Malafronte, A. Propylene–butene copolymers: Tailoring mechanical properties from isotactic polypropylene to polybutene. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 4407–4421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qiao, Y.N.; Men, Y.F. Intercrystalline links determined kinetics of form II to I polymorphic transition in polybutene-1. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 5490–5497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. An, C.B.; Lou, Y.H.; Li, Y.L.; Wang, B.; Pan, L.; Ma, Z.; Li, Y.S. Unusual II–I phase transition behavior of polybutene-1 ionomers in the presence of long-chain branch and ionic functional groups. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 4634–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, X.Y.; Long, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Li, Y.S. Insights into propylene/ω-halo-α-alkenes copolymerization promoted by rac-Et(Ind)2 ZrCl2 and (pyridyl-amido)hafnium catalysts. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 3421–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, X.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Shi, X.C.; Liu, J.Y.; Chen, C.L.; Li, Y.S. Syntheses of well-defined functional isotactic polypropylenes via efficient copolymerization of propylene with ω-halo-α-alkenes by post-metallocene hafnium catalyst. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, X.Y.; Li, Y.G.; Mu, H.L.; Pan, L.; Li, Y.S. Efficient synthesis of diverse well-defined functional polypropylenes with high molecular weights and high functional group contents via thiol–halogen click chemistry. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 1150–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, S.J.; Han, J.R.; Gao, Y.; Guo, B.H.; Reiter, G.; Xu, J. Determination of the critical size of secondary nuclei on the lateral growth front of lamellar polymer crystals. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 7439–7447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhuravlev, E.; Schmelzer, J.W.P.; Abyzov, A.S.; Fokin, V.M.; Androsch, R.; Schick, C. Experimental test of tammann’s nuclei development approach in crystallization of macromolecules. Cryst. Growth Des. 2015, 15, 786–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cheng, S.Z.D. Chapter 2: Thermodynamics and kinetics of phase transitions. In Phase Transitions in Polymers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 17–59. [Google Scholar]
  55. Androsch, R.; Schick, C.; Rhoades, A.M. Application of tammann’s two-stage crystal nuclei development method for analysis of the thermal stability of homogeneous crystal nuclei of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Macromolecules 2015, 48, 8082–8089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Qiao, Y.N.; Wang, Q.; Men, Y.F. Kinetics of nucleation and growth of form II to I polymorphic transition in polybutene-1 as revealed by stepwise annealing. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 5126–5136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Deboer, J.H. Molecular mechanism of rate processes in solids. C. Steady-State Processes Involving Lattice Re-Arrangement Introductory Paper. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1957, 23, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Burgers, W.G.; Groen, L.J. Mechanisim and kinetics of the allotropic transformation of tin. Faraday Soc. 1957, 23, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
  59. Powers, J.; Hoffman, J.D.; Week, J.J.; Quinn, F.A. Crystallization kinetics and polymorphic transformations in polybutene-1. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. A 1965, 69A, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gohil, R.M.; Miles, M.J.; Petermann, J. On the molecular mechanism of the crystal transformation (tetragonal-hexagonal) in polybutene-1. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2006, 21, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Maruyama, M.; Sakamoto, Y.; Nozaki, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Kajioka, H.; Toda, A.; Yamada, K. Kinetic study of the II–I phase transition of isotactic polybutene-1. Polymer 2010, 51, 5532–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 01315 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The synthetic routes of the butene-1/6-iodo-1-hexene copolymers and functional polybutene-1.
Scheme 1. The synthetic routes of the butene-1/6-iodo-1-hexene copolymers and functional polybutene-1.
Polymers 13 01315 sch001
Polymers 13 01315 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Schematic illustrations of the thermal protocols applied in this work to study (a) phase transition kinetics at room temperature, (b) dependence of phase transition on nucleation temperature, (c) phase transition kinetics with the optimized nucleation step, (d) dependence of phase transition on the form II crystallization temperature.
Scheme 2. Schematic illustrations of the thermal protocols applied in this work to study (a) phase transition kinetics at room temperature, (b) dependence of phase transition on nucleation temperature, (c) phase transition kinetics with the optimized nucleation step, (d) dependence of phase transition on the form II crystallization temperature.
Polymers 13 01315 sch002
Polymers 13 01315 g001 550
Figure 1. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (a) cooling and (b) heating curves of the butene-1 copolymers with and without hydroxyl groups.
Figure 1. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (a) cooling and (b) heating curves of the butene-1 copolymers with and without hydroxyl groups.
Polymers 13 01315 g001
Polymers 13 01315 g002 550
Figure 2. The DSC isothermal curves of copolymers with incorporations of (a) 0.38 and (b) 1.31 mol% at different temperatures. (c) The determined half-crystallization time (t1/2) as a function of isothermal temperatures.
Figure 2. The DSC isothermal curves of copolymers with incorporations of (a) 0.38 and (b) 1.31 mol% at different temperatures. (c) The determined half-crystallization time (t1/2) as a function of isothermal temperatures.
Polymers 13 01315 g002
Polymers 13 01315 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative POM images of (a) PBHY038-0 without hydroxyl groups and (b) PBHY038-2 with hydroxyl groups at a crystallization temperature of 95 °C. (c) The change in spherulite radius measured with POM during isothermal crystallization at 95 °C and the determined growth rates.
Figure 3. Representative POM images of (a) PBHY038-0 without hydroxyl groups and (b) PBHY038-2 with hydroxyl groups at a crystallization temperature of 95 °C. (c) The change in spherulite radius measured with POM during isothermal crystallization at 95 °C and the determined growth rates.
Polymers 13 01315 g003
Polymers 13 01315 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) DSC melting curves of PBHY038-0 and the quantified fraction of transformed form I after aging at 25 °C for different durations in (b) PBHY038 and (c) PBHY131. The thermal protocol was illustrated by Scheme 2a.
Figure 4. (a) DSC melting curves of PBHY038-0 and the quantified fraction of transformed form I after aging at 25 °C for different durations in (b) PBHY038 and (c) PBHY131. The thermal protocol was illustrated by Scheme 2a.
Polymers 13 01315 g004
Polymers 13 01315 g005 550
Figure 5. Fraction of transformed form I as a function of annealing temperature in (a) PBHY038 and (b) PBHY131. The thermal protocol was illustrated by Scheme 2b.
Figure 5. Fraction of transformed form I as a function of annealing temperature in (a) PBHY038 and (b) PBHY131. The thermal protocol was illustrated by Scheme 2b.
Polymers 13 01315 g005
Polymers 13 01315 g006 550
Figure 6. The fractions of the form I transformed at room temperature after initial nucleation at −10 °C for 30 min in (a) PBHY038 and (b) PBHY131. The thermal protocol was illustrated by Scheme 2c.
Figure 6. The fractions of the form I transformed at room temperature after initial nucleation at −10 °C for 30 min in (a) PBHY038 and (b) PBHY131. The thermal protocol was illustrated by Scheme 2c.
Polymers 13 01315 g006
Polymers 13 01315 g007 550
Figure 7. The fractions of transformed form I in copolymers of (a) PBHY038 and (b) PBHY131 prepared at different isothermal crystallization temperatures. The thermal protocol was illustrated by Scheme 2d.
Figure 7. The fractions of transformed form I in copolymers of (a) PBHY038 and (b) PBHY131 prepared at different isothermal crystallization temperatures. The thermal protocol was illustrated by Scheme 2d.
Polymers 13 01315 g007
Table
Table 1. Molecular characteristics of the butene-1 copolymers.
Table 1. Molecular characteristics of the butene-1 copolymers.
Sample CodeIncorp.
(mol%)		Number of Hydroxyl Groups in Each BranchMw
(105 Da)		Mw/Mn
PBHY038-00.3806.92.02
PBHY038-20.3826.92.02
PBHY131-01.3105.22.23
PBHY131-21.3125.22.23
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Li, T.; Li, W.; Lou, Y.; Liu, L.; Ma, Z. The II–I Phase Transition Behavior of Butene-1 Copolymers with Hydroxyl Groups. Polymers 2021, 13, 1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081315

AMA Style

Li Y, Li T, Li W, Lou Y, Liu L, Ma Z. The II–I Phase Transition Behavior of Butene-1 Copolymers with Hydroxyl Groups. Polymers. 2021; 13(8):1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuanyuan, Tao Li, Wei Li, Yahui Lou, Liyuan Liu, and Zhe Ma. 2021. "The II–I Phase Transition Behavior of Butene-1 Copolymers with Hydroxyl Groups" Polymers 13, no. 8: 1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081315

APA Style

Li, Y., Li, T., Li, W., Lou, Y., Liu, L., & Ma, Z. (2021). The II–I Phase Transition Behavior of Butene-1 Copolymers with Hydroxyl Groups. Polymers, 13(8), 1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop