Next Article in Journal
Valorization of Starch to Biobased Materials: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Performance and Structure Evaluation of Gln-Lys Isopeptide Bond Crosslinked USYK-SPI Bioplastic Film Derived from Discarded Yak Hair
Previous Article in Journal
An Efficient Technique for Ammonia Capture in the Haber–Bosch Process Loop—Membrane-Assisted Gas Absorption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bacteriostatic and Cytotoxic Properties of Composite Material Based on ZnO Nanoparticles in PLGA Obtained by Low Temperature Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Bio-Functionalized Ultra-Thin, Large-Area and Waterproof Silicone Membranes for Biomechanical Cellular Loading and Compliance Experiments

Polymers 2022, 14(11), 2213; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112213
by Karya Uysal 1, Till Creutz 1, Ipek Seda Firat 1, Gerhard M. Artmann 1, Nicole Teusch 2 and Aysegül Temiz Artmann 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Polymers 2022, 14(11), 2213; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112213
Submission received: 28 April 2022 / Revised: 25 May 2022 / Accepted: 27 May 2022 / Published: 30 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Functional Biological Polymer Membranes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Caption of Fig 1. is confusing, where are cells (enlarged inset) in Fig 1b, more elaboration of Fig 1c is needed. What is the info revealed from this Fig 1c?

More discussion of the importance to fabricate the ultra-thin membranes is needed in the introduction.

Scale bar for Fig 2. and Fig 6. is needed.

Cross-section SEM images of  PDMS membrane is highly suggested for the verification of the thickness measurement.

Photos of the intact membranes are needed.

More discussion and supportive data are needed to highlight how to fabricate the membrane with reproducible thickness.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript entitled "Bio-functionalized ultra-thin, large-area and waterproof Silicone membranes for biomechanical cellular loading and compliance experiments" is a nice contribution in the field of silicones for biomedical applications.

Overall, the paper is well written and the novelty and originality of methods are also confirmed. Sufficient data are presented in the Introduction section referring to the silicone as membranes highlighting the main characteristics for such applications: mechanical properties, surface biocompatibilization, thickness, flexibility, etc. The originality of the work consisted in the development of a membrane production procedure coupled with standard quality protocols to prepare well defined membranes.

In the Materials and Methods section, the Materials part is missing and this must be added. In Membrane fabrication section the authors mentioned a PDMS elastomer kit. They should add some details regarding the elastomer characteristics (molar mass, viscosity, functionality, etc ). Did authors try to produce similar elastomers in the lab? Did these ones be applied in this membrane protocols? The membrane functionalization procedure was realized by authors? or is a general procedure to optimize PDMS. I consider that some details about PDMS functionality should be added in this section. The same observation is for biological functionalization. If these procedures were made by authors the confirmation analysis supporting these structural changes on surface must be added.

Overall, the paper is of interest and suitable for publication after provided the above mentioned information. I recommend the acceptance after minor revision.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed the comments properly, it can be accepted in present form.

Back to TopTop