Next Article in Journal
Influence of Silanization Treatment of Sponge Gourd (Luffa cylindrica) Fibers on the Reinforcement of Polyester Composites: A Brief Report
Next Article in Special Issue
Functional Polymer Materials for Advanced Lithium Metal Batteries: A Review and Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Titanium–Silica Oxide on Degradation Behavior and Antimicrobial Activity of Poly (Lactic Acid) Composites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 16
10.3390/polym14163312
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Diluted Electrolyte for Long-Life Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile-Based Anode-Free Li-S Batteries

by
Ting Ma
1,2,
Xiuyun Ren
3,
Liang Hu
4,
Wanming Teng
1,2,
Xiaohu Wang
2,5,
Guanglei Wu
3,
Jun Liu
2,
Ding Nan
1,2,*,
Baohua Li
6 and
Xiaoliang Yu
4,*
1
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
2
Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Graphite and Graphene for Energy Storage and Coating, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
3
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Research Institute for Smart Energy, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
5
Rising Graphite Applied Technology Research Institute, Chinese Graphite Industrial Park-Xinghe, Ulanqab 013650, China
6
Shenzhen Key Laboratory on Power Battery Safety and Shenzhen Geim Graphene Center, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School (SIGS), Shenzhen 518071, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(16), 3312; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163312
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 10 August 2022 / Published: 15 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Battery Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lithium-metal batteries have attracted extensive research attention because of their high energy densities. Developing appropriate electrolytes compatible with lithium-metal anodes is of great significance to facilitate their practical application. Currently used electrolytes still face challenges of high production costs and unsatisfactory Coulombic efficiencies of lithium plating/stripping. In this research, we have developed a diluted electrolyte which is compatible with both lithium-metal anode and sulfurized polyacrylonitrile cathode. It presents a very high Li plating/stripping Coulombic efficiency of 99.3% over prolonged cycling, and the as-assembled anode-free Li-S battery maintains 71.5% of the initial specific capacity after 200 cycles at 0.1 A g−1. This work could shed light on designing a low-cost and high-performance liquid electrolyte for next-generation high-energy batteries.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used in portable electronic devices and electric vehicles due to advantages such as low cost, high performance, and environmental friendliness [1]. However, limited by the low theoretical capacity of traditional lithium-ion battery commercial cathodes (LiCoO2 [2], LiFePO4 [3], LiNixCoyMn1-x-yO2 [4]) and graphite anodes [5], the energy densities of current lithium-ion batteries struggle to meet the requirements of emerging industries such as electric vehicles [6]. Therefore, the development of energy storage systems with higher energy density is urgently required [7]. Metallic lithium possesses a high theoretical capacity (3865 mAh g−1) and a low electrode potential (−3.040 V versus standard hydrogen electrode) [8,9]. Therefore, lithium-metal batteries have become attractive candidates for next-generation batteries with high energy densities [10,11,12].
The practical application of lithium-metal batteries still faces two huge challenges. First, lithium metal has an ultra-high activity, which can irreversibly react with most electrolytes, consuming lithium ions and reducing Coulombic efficiency (CE) [13,14]. Second, lithium plating/stripping is uneven during the charging and discharging process [15,16], which leads to the growth of lithium dendrites, pierces the separator, and causes safety problems such as short circuiting of battery cells. To regulate Li deposition and suppress Li dendrite growth, researchers have developed various strategies, including current collector modification, electrolyte engineering, artificial solid electrolyte layer (SEI), and solid-state electrolytes. The modification of the current collector mainly reduces the lithium nucleation resistance by improving the affinity of the collector, and reduces current density and volume expansion by designing a 3D structure [17,18,19,20]. Electrolyte engineering mainly introduces some components of an electrolyte into SEI to improve certain physical and chemical properties of SEI [21,22]. Artificial SEI is an artificially designed protective film on Li metal with good properties identified by in/ex situ methods [23,24,25]. The solid electrolyte can reduce the risk of short circuit caused by lithium dendrite penetrating the separator, and thus greatly improve the safety of the battery [26,27].
The formation of robust SEI is a prerequisite for stable cycling and high CE of Li metal batteries [28,29]. The composition of SEI is closely related to that of the electrolyte [30,31,32]. Electrolyte engineering includes electrolyte additives [33,34,35], high-concentration electrolytes [36,37], and local high-concentration electrolytes [38,39,40]. Zhang et al. used fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) as electrolyte additive to form LiF in SEI [41]. Zhang’s group achieved ultra-high CE (99.1%) with 4 M lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) high-concentration electrolyte [42]. Although high-concentration electrolytes have achieved ultra-high CE values in lithium-metal batteries, the high viscosity, poor wettability, and high cost of high-concentration electrolytes hinder practical application. In order to solve the problem of high viscosity of high-concentration electrolyte, the concept of local high-concentration electrolyte was proposed, which used a non-solvated diluent to reduce the concentration of electrolyte [43]. For instance, Chen et al. designed 1.2 M lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide in a mixture of flame-retardant triethyl phosphate/bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) ether (1:3 by mol) localized high-concentration electrolyte, which led to a high CE of 99.2% in lithium-metal batteries [44]. However, the localized high-concentration electrolyte still had the disadvantages of high concentration and high cost, and CE still could not meet the actual application requirements in practical applications.
Lithium–sulfur (Li-S) batteries have a high theoretical capacity (1675 mAh g−1) and are an excellent choice for the next generation of lithium batteries [45]. However, the insulating properties of S and Li2S and the shuttle effect caused by the dissolution of intermediate polysulfides during cycling of Li-S batteries hinder the development of Li-S batteries [46]. Researchers composite S and C to form a cathode material (S@C) to enhance the conductivity of S and suppress the shuttle effect [47]. Composite cathodes prepared from a mixture of sulfur and pyrolytic polyacrylonitrile (S@pPAN) have attracted extensive research attention. Compared with S@C cathodes, S@pPAN can more effectively inhibit the dissolution of polysulfides, and enables good compatibility with carbonate electrolytes and little self-discharge [48]. However, S@pPAN did not perform well in ether-based electrolytes due to the slower reaction kinetics leading to partial dissolution of polysulfides [49]. Previously reported research works have introduced Se, an element of the same main group as S with a higher conductivity, into S@pPAN to improve the conversion reaction kinetics of the cathode [50,51].
In this work, we used lithium bisfluorosulfonimide (LiFSI) as lithium salt, 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) as solvent, lithium nitrate as additive, and the diluent 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropylether (TTE) as a diluent, to prepare a diluted electrolyte, namely 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3). A schematic illustration of the diluted electrolyte is shown in Figure 1a. The diluent has excellent chemical stability and will not change the original solvated structure of the lithium salt when added to the electrolyte. Therefore, diluting the electrolyte reduces the lithium salt concentration, thereby reducing viscosity and cost. Li-Cu half-cell using diluted electrolyte exhibited an ultra-high lithium plating/stripping CE of 99.3% at a current density of 0.5 mA cm−2. The diluted electrolyte also showed good compatibility with the pyrolyzed polyacrylonitrile and selenium disulfide composite cathode (pPAN/SeS2). The assembled anode-free lithium-sulfur battery delivered an ultra-high capacity-retention rate of 71.5% after 200 cycles. Therefore, this diluted electrolyte provides a new strategy for advancing the practical application of lithium-sulfur batteries.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of Materials

2.1.1. Materials

Anhydrous lithium nitrate (LiNO3, 99.9% Alfa Aesar), (lithium bisfluorosulfonimide (LiFSI), 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropylether (TTE), and 1,2-dimethyl ether oxyethane (DME)) were all purchased from TCI. Selenium disulfide (SeS2) and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) were both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Lithium foil (Li), aluminum foil (Al), copper foil (Cu), separator (Celgard 2400), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), and carbon black SUPER C45 (SP) were purchased from Shenzhen Branch Crystal Materials Technology Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China)

2.1.2. Preparation of pPAN/SeS2

The PAN and SeS2 powders (1:4 w/w) were mixed and ground for 30 min before being sealed in a glass vessel and heat-treated at 380 °C for 8 h. The samples were then placed in a porcelain boat and kept at 350 °C for 6 h under a N2 protective atmosphere to remove excess sulfur and selenium elements, and then naturally cooled to obtain pPAN/SeS2 powder.

2.1.3. Diluted Electrolyte Configuration

The purchased LiFSI was weighed and heated in a glove box at 60 °C for 4 h to remove traces of water. Solvent DME and diluent TTE were dewatered with molecular sieves for 48 h. Then, for electrolyte configuration, LiFSI and anhydrous lithium nitrate were first dissolved in DME, and stirred magnetically for 4 h. After the lithium salt was completely dissolved, TTE was added and stirred for 2 h.

2.2. Characterizations

The XRD patterns were collected using a Rigaku Smart Lab diffractometer (Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å) in a scan range (2θ) of 10–80°. SEM images and EDS of pPAN/SeS2 powder were obtained by HITACHI-SU8220 (Japan) type field emission scanning electron microscope.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

CR2032 coin cells were assembled in a glove box filled with argon, with both O2 and H2O below 0.1 ppm. Cu (φ16 mm) and Li foil (φ15.5 mm) were applied to prepare Li-Cu half-cell, for evaluating Li plating/stripping efficiency. The cells were first cycled for 5 times at 50 μA in the voltage range of 0–1 V (vs Li+/Li) to remove copper foil surface impurities. Then, they were cycled at a current density of 0.5 mA cm−2 and a lithium deposition capacity of 1 mAh cm−2 for long cycling. In Li||pAN/SeS2 half-cell, the cathode is composed of a mixture of pPAN/SeS2, SP, and CMC/SBR in a mass ratio of 8:1:1, respectively, and the mass loading of the cathode is ~2 mg cm−2. Li||pPANSeS2 half-cells were cycled at a current density of 0.1 A g−1 in the voltage range of 1–3 V. The anode-free lithium-sulfur battery was assembled by first deeply lithiating the pPANSeS2 cathode through 2 mAh g−1, and then assembling it with copper foil to form a Cu||pPANSeS2 battery. The mass loading of the cathode is 4~6 mg cm−2. The Cu||pPANSeS2 cells were cycled at a current density of 0.1 A g−1 with a voltage interval of 1–3 V.

3. Results and Discussion

In this work, the effect of lithium salt concentration in the electrolyte on the electrochemical performance was first studied. Different concentrations of electrolytes nM LiFSI 1%wt LiNO3 in DME/TTE (1:2, v:v), (n = 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.33) were configured and Li||Cu batteries were assembled to evaluate the compatibility of different electrolytes with lithium-metal anode. The result is shown in Figure 1a. The average CE of Li-Cu cells using a 0.33 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3) electrolyte was 98.8% under test conditions of 0.5 mA cm−2 current density and 1 mAh cm−2 deposition amount, and the cells failed after 130 cycles. When the lithium salt concentration is increased to 0.67 M and 1 M, the average Coulombic efficiency is significantly increased to approximately 99.3% and the cycle life is also extended (about 200 cycles). With a continued increase of the electrolyte concentration to 1.33 M, the CE drops to 98.8%, and the CE value fluctuates significantly during the cycle, accompanied by a shortened cycle life. The batteries with 0.67 M and 1 M electrolytes showed similar CE and cycling stability. The CE value of Li plating/stripping in a certain electrolyte and cycling stability are mainly dependent on the component and microstructure of as-generated SEI. It can be deduced that 0.67 M and 1 M electrolytes benefit formation of SEI, with favorable properties such as good mechanical strength, uniform composition distribution, and smooth ion diffusion through SEI [52]. Considering the cost, the 0.67 M electrolyte was chosen as the optimal electrolyte. We further investigated the plating/stripping curves of Li-Cu cells with 0.67 M diluted electrolyte. The deposition overpotential of Li metal was 45 mV and remained stable during cycling (Figure 1c), further indicating that changing the diluted electrolyte could promote the stable electroplating/stripping of Li metal. We also tested the ionic conductivity and wettability of 0.67 M diluted electrolyte. As can be seen from Figures S1 and S2, it has a moderate ionic conductivity of 2.78 × 10−4 S cm−1 and also a good wetting capability in relation to copper foil, lithium foil, and the separator.
To reveal the effect of diluent TTE on the electrochemical properties of Li metal anodes, we prepared 2 M LiFSI in DME (1% LiNO3) and 0.67 M LiFSI in DME (1% LiNO3) electrolytes without diluent. The stable CE of the battery assembled with 2 M LiFSI in DME (1% LiNO3) electrolyte is about 98.5%. The CE fluctuates significantly after 100 cycles, and the battery fails at nearly 200 cycles. By contrast, the CE of the battery with diluted electrolyte 0.67 M LiFSI in DME (1% LiNO3) remained stable during 200 cycles (Figure 1d). We compared this electrochemical performance with those reported references in terms of electrolyte concentration, Coulombic efficiency, cycle number, and current density, as summarized in Table 1.
We further explored the effect of lithium nitrate on the electrochemical performance of the electrolyte. From the CE test results of the Li||Cu half-cell, the CE and cycling stability of the two electrolytes are generally similar in the initial 100 cycles (Figure 2a). Over prolonged cycling, the CE of the Li||Cu half-cell with 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (0% LiNO3) electrolyte fluctuates greatly, and the battery fails at the 130th cycle. The CE fluctuation over prolonged cycling mainly originates from increased internal resistances in the battery system. In contrast, the batteries with 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3) electrolyte showed stable cycling. Next, we assembled Li||pPAN/SeS2 half-cells and tested the electrochemical performance of pPAN/SeS2 cathodes in the two electrolytes. Composition analysis and morphological characterization of pPAN/SeS2 were carried out. As can be seen in Figure S3, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) demonstrates uniform distribution of C, S, and Se elements, and the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern reveals an amorphous phase of pPAN/SeS2 (Figure S4). As shown in Figure 2b, the stability of the Li||pPAN/SeS2 half-cells assembled with the two electrolytes differs considerably at low active material loadings (the first discharge is not included in the figure, the first cycle in the figure corresponds to the second cycle). Specifically, the initial capacities of the two electrolytes are 541 mAh g−1 (0% LiNO3) and 540 mAh g−1 (1% LiNO3). The first 10 cycles show the same trend. As the cycle continued, the capacity of the electrolyte with 0% LiNO3 decreased significantly, and only 331 mAh g−1 remained after 200 cycles, corresponding to the capacity retention rate of 61.1%. As a comparison, the capacity of the diluted electrolyte with 1% LiNO3 remained stable during cycling, with a capacity of 535 mAh g−1 remaining after 200 cycles, and the capacity retention rate was as high as 99%. The galvanostatic charge–discharge curve results indicate that batteries applying the diluted electrolyte with 1% LiNO3 show almost no change in the charge–discharge plateau at 50th, 100th, and 200th, indicating a slight internal polarization (Figure 2c). On the contrary, with the progress of the cycle, the distance between charge and discharge platforms increases and the polarization is serious for the battery with 0% LiNO3 electrolyte, which is consistent with the cycling performance results.
For practical applications, we tested the cycling stability of Li||pPAN/SeS2 half-cells under high mass loading and lean electrolyte conditions, using a diluted electrolyte of 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3). As can be seen in Figure 3a, an obvious capacity activation phenomenon can be observed. The second discharge capacity of the pPAN/SeS2 cathode is 489 mAh g−1, which increased slightly to 502 mAh g−1 after 50 cycles. After that, the specific capacity remained stable over prolonged cycling. The relatively lower specific capacity in the second cycle is because of the harsh testing conditions of lean electrolyte and high mass loading, which result in very difficult wetting of the electrode by the electrolyte. The active materials did not participate fully in the reaction during the initial few cycles. As the cycling progress continues, the pPAN/SeS2 cathode is activated and gradually wetted by the electrolyte. Thus, the specific capacity increases in the initial 15 cycles. After that, the quite stable cycling stability indicates the high lithium storage reversibility of the pPAN/SeS2 cathode in the diluted electrolyte. The galvanostatic current charge–discharge curves show that the charge–discharge voltage plateaus almost do not change over prolonged cycling, as shown in Figure 3b. It confirms that the internal resistance and thus voltage polarization of the Li-S battery cell is very small, which is consistent with the cycling performance results. The above results indicate that the diluted 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3) electrolyte can enable good operation of Li-S cell even under harsh testing conditions of high cathode mass loading and lean electrolyte.
In order to maximize the energy density of the battery, we assembled an anode-free lithium-sulfur battery using the above diluted electrolyte. The pPAN/SeS2 cathode was first discharged to 0.28 V, followed by deep lithiation of Li-Al alloying reaction with a specific capacity of 2 mAh cm−2. After that, the lithiated cathode (pPAN/SeS2) was assembled with a bare Cu foil as the anode to form a Cu||pPAN/SeS2 anode-free cell. Figure 4a shows the cycling performance of the anode-free Li-S battery. It can be seen that the first discharge capacity of the Cu||pPAN/SeS2 full battery is 466 mAh g−1, which maintains 333 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles, with a capacity retention rate of 71.5%. The average CE is as high as 99.9% excluding the initial cycle. Here, we compare the electrochemical performances of our anode-free Li-S cell with those previously reported. As summarized in Table 2, we can see that our cycling stability is superior to those reported in other studies. It can be seen from the galvanostatic charge–discharge curves that the voltage platform only increases slightly with the cycle, indicating that the internal resistance of the anode-free cell is very small (Figure 4b).

4. Conclusions

In summary, a diluted electrolyte 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3) was prepared for an advanced sulfurized polyacrylonitrile-based anode-free Li-S battery. At the anode side, the diluted electrolyte demonstrates a good compatibility with the lithium-metal anode, and thus it enables highly reversible Li plating/stripping with a high average CE of 99.3% over prolonged cycling. At the cathode side, it can effectively suppress dissolution and shuttling of intermediate polysulfides even under harsh testing conditions of high cathode mass loading and lean electrolyte. As a result, the fabricated Li-S battery maintains 71.5% capacity after 200 cycles at 0.1 A g−1, which is superior to those of previously reported anode-free Li-S cells. This work thus elucidates designing a low-cost diluted-liquid electrolyte towards next-generation long-life and high-energy batteries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym14163312/s1, Figure S1: EIS spectra of symmetrical cells (stainless steel/separator/stainless steel) using 0.67 M LiFSI–DME/TTE (LiNO3); Figure S2: Optical images showing wettability of 0.67 M LiFSI-DME/TTE (LiNO3) on lithium foil (a), separator (b), and copper foil (c); Figure S3: EDS elemental mapping images of the pPAN/SeS2 composite for (b) sulfur, (c) carbon and (d) selenium; Figure S4: XRD of pPAN/SeS2 (black), PAN (red), SeS2 (green).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing—original draft, T.M., D.N. and X.Y.; writing—review and editing, X.R., L.H., W.T., G.W., X.W., J.L. and B.L.; project administration, D.N. and X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (ZZLM, YY4V, YY5K), the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (No. 2019MS05068), the Inner Mongolia Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation Project (No. CGZH2018132), the Inner Mongolia Major Science and Technology Project (No. 2020ZD0024), the Alashan League’s Project of Applied Technology Research and Development Fund (No. AMYY2020-01), and the Local Science and Technology Development Fund Project of Central Guidance—Development and Industrialization Pilot Test of Microcrystalline Graphite-based Silicon/Carbon Composites.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, M.; Lu, J.; Chen, Z.; Amine, K. 30 years of lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lyu, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, K.; Feng, Z.; Cheng, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, R.; Xu, L.; Zhou, J. An overview on the advances of LiCoO2 cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2000982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, J.; Ma, Z.-F. Past and present of LiFePO4: From fundamental research to industrial applications. Chem 2019, 5, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. de Biasi, L.; Schwarz, B.; Brezesinski, T.; Hartmann, P.; Janek, J.; Ehrenberg, H. Chemical, structural, and electronic aspects of formation and degradation behavior on different length scales of Ni-rich NCM and Li-rich HE-NCM cathode materials in Li-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1900985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fan, L.; Ma, R.; Zhang, Q.; Jia, X.; Lu, B. Graphite anode for a potassium-ion battery with unprecedented performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 131, 10610–10615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheng, X.-B.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, C.-Z.; Zhang, Q. Toward safe lithium metal anode in rechargeable batteries: A review. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 10403–10473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, J.; Lin, C.; Liang, Q.; Zhou, G.; Liu, J.; Liang, G.; Wang, M.; Li, B.; Hu, L.; Ciucci, F.; et al. Sodium-rich NASICON-structured cathodes for boosting the energy density and lifespan of sodium-free-anode sodium metal batteries. InfoMat 2022, 4, e12288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fang, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, F.; Lee, J.Z.; Lee, M.-H.; Alvarado, J.; Schroeder, M.A.; Yang, Y. Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries. Nature 2019, 572, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tarascon, J.-M.; Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. In Materials for Sustainable Energy: A Collection of Peer-Reviewed Research and Review Articles from Nature Publishing Group; CO-PUBLISHED WITH World Scientific Publishing Comp: Singapore, 2011; pp. 171–179. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, J.; Bao, Z.; Cui, Y.; Dufek, E.J.; Goodenough, J.B.; Khalifah, P.; Li, Q.; Liaw, B.Y.; Liu, P.; Manthiram, A. Pathways for practical high-energy long-cycling lithium metal batteries. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xia, C.; Kwok, C.; Nazar, L. A high-energy-density lithium-oxygen battery based on a reversible four-electron conversion to lithium oxide. Science 2018, 361, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fang, R.; Zhao, S.; Sun, Z.; Wang, D.W.; Cheng, H.M.; Li, F. More reliable lithium-sulfur batteries: Status, solutions and prospects. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yan, K.; Lu, Z.; Lee, H.-W.; Xiong, F.; Hsu, P.-C.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Chu, S.; Cui, Y. Selective deposition and stable encapsulation of lithium through heterogeneous seeded growth. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, R.; Cheng, X.B.; Zhao, C.Z.; Peng, H.J.; Shi, J.L.; Huang, J.Q.; Wang, J.; Wei, F.; Zhang, Q. Conductive nanostructured scaffolds render low local current density to inhibit lithium dendrite growth. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2155–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, R.; Li, N.W.; Cheng, X.B.; Yin, Y.X.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, Y.G. Advanced micro/nanostructures for lithium metal anodes. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lorandi, F.; Liu, T.; Fantin, M.; Manser, J.; Al-Obeidi, A.; Zimmerman, M.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Whitacre, J.F. Comparative performance of ex situ artificial solid electrolyte interphases for Li metal batteries with liquid electrolytes. iScience 2021, 24, 102578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, D.; Liu, Y.; Liang, Z.; Lee, H.-W.; Sun, J.; Wang, H.; Yan, K.; Xie, J.; Cui, Y. Layered reduced graphene oxide with nanoscale interlayer gaps as a stable host for lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 626–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pu, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, T.; Li, C.; Ma, H.; Zhu, J.; Braun, P.V.; Lu, J.; Zhang, H. Conductivity and lithiophilicity gradients guide lithium deposition to mitigate short circuits. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, J.; Zhao, J.; Lei, L.; Li, P.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, D. Dynamic intelligent Cu current collectors for ultrastable lithium metal anodes. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 3403–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zheng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Xu, W.; Xie, Q.; Cai, Y.; Ma, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Luo, Q.; Lin, J. 3D lithiophilic–lithiophobic–lithiophilic dual-gradient porous skeleton for highly stable lithium metal anode. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ren, X.; Zou, L.; Jiao, S.; Mei, D.; Engelhard, M.H.; Li, Q.; Lee, H.; Niu, C.; Adams, B.D.; Wang, C. High-concentration ether electrolytes for stable high-voltage lithium metal batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 896–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jiao, S.; Ren, X.; Cao, R.; Engelhard, M.H.; Liu, Y.; Hu, D.; Mei, D.; Zheng, J.; Zhao, W.; Li, Q. Stable cycling of high-voltage lithium metal batteries in ether electrolytes. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, W.; Liu, P.; Mitlin, D. Review of emerging concepts in SEI analysis and artificial SEI membranes for lithium, sodium, and potassium metal battery anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2002297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Hu, R.; Zhang, D.; Liu, J.; Liu, F.; Cui, J.; Lin, Z.; Wu, J.; Zhu, M. Constructing Li-Rich artificial SEI layer in alloy–polymer composite electrolyte to achieve high ionic conductivity for all-solid-state lithium metal batteries. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2004711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhu, J.; Li, P.; Chen, X.; Legut, D.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, R.; Lu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Q. Rational design of graphitic-inorganic Bi-layer artificial SEI for stable lithium metal anode. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 16, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tan, J.; Matz, J.; Dong, P.; Shen, J.; Ye, M. A growing appreciation for the role of LiF in the solid electrolyte interphase. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2100046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wood, K.N.; Steirer, K.X.; Hafner, S.E.; Ban, C.; Santhanagopalan, S.; Lee, S.-H.; Teeter, G. Operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of solid electrolyte interphase formation and evolution in Li2S-P2S5 solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hope, M.A.; Rinkel, B.L.; Gunnarsdóttir, A.B.; Märker, K.; Menkin, S.; Paul, S.; Sergeyev, I.V.; Grey, C.P. Selective NMR observation of the SEI–metal interface by dynamic nuclear polarisation from lithium metal. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ramasubramanian, A.; Yurkiv, V.; Foroozan, T.; Ragone, M.; Shahbazian-Yassar, R.; Mashayek, F. Stability of Solid-Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) on the Lithium Metal Surface in Lithium Metal Batteries (LMBs). ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2020, 3, 10560–10567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, J.; Ihsan-Ul-Haq, M.; Chen, Y.; Kim, J.-K. Understanding solid electrolyte interphases: Advanced characterization techniques and theoretical simulations. Nano Energy 2021, 89, 106489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, X.Q.; Li, T.; Li, B.Q.; Zhang, R.; Shi, P.; Yan, C.; Huang, J.Q.; Zhang, Q. A sustainable solid electrolyte interphase for high-energy-density lithium metal batteries under practical conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 132, 3278–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tikekar, M.D.; Choudhury, S.; Tu, Z.; Archer, L.A. Design principles for electrolytes and interfaces for stable lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, X.Q.; Chen, X.; Cheng, X.B.; Li, B.Q.; Shen, X.; Yan, C.; Huang, J.Q.; Zhang, Q. Highly stable lithium metal batteries enabled by regulating the solvation of lithium ions in nonaqueous electrolytes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5301–5305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. May, R.; Fritzsching, K.J.; Livitz, D.; Denny, S.R.; Marbella, L.E. Rapid interfacial exchange of Li ions dictates high Coulombic efficiency in Li metal anodes. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 1162–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dai, H.; Xi, K.; Liu, X.; Lai, C.; Zhang, S. Cationic surfactant-based electrolyte additives for uniform lithium deposition via lithiophobic repulsion mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 17515–17521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Suo, L.; Xue, W.; Gobet, M.; Greenbaum, S.G.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Yang, W.; Li, Y.; Li, J. Fluorine-donating electrolytes enable highly reversible 5-V-class Li metal batteries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 1156–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, J.; Yamada, Y.; Sodeyama, K.; Chiang, C.H.; Tateyama, Y.; Yamada, A. Superconcentrated electrolytes for a high-voltage lithium-ion battery. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, L.; Chen, S.; Lee, H.; Zhang, L.; Engelhard, M.H.; Li, Q.; Jiao, S.; Liu, J.; Xu, W.; Zhang, J.-G. A localized high-concentration electrolyte with optimized solvents and lithium difluoro (oxalate) borate additive for stable lithium metal batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cao, X.; Zou, L.; Matthews, B.E.; Zhang, L.; He, X.; Ren, X.; Engelhard, M.H.; Burton, S.D.; El-Khoury, P.Z.; Lim, H.-S. Optimization of fluorinated orthoformate based electrolytes for practical high-voltage lithium metal batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 34, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ren, X.; Zhang, X.; Shadike, Z.; Zou, L.; Jia, H.; Cao, X.; Engelhard, M.H.; Matthews, B.E.; Wang, C.; Arey, B.W. Designing advanced in situ electrode/electrolyte interphases for wide temperature operation of 4.5 V Li||LiCoO2 batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.Q.; Cheng, X.B.; Chen, X.; Yan, C.; Zhang, Q. Fluoroethylene carbonate additives to render uniform Li deposits in lithium metal batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qian, J.; Henderson, W.A.; Xu, W.; Bhattacharya, P.; Engelhard, M.; Borodin, O.; Zhang, J.-G. High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zheng, J.; Chen, S.; Zhao, W.; Song, J.; Engelhard, M.H.; Zhang, J.-G. Extremely stable sodium metal batteries enabled by localized high-concentration electrolytes. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, S.; Zheng, J.; Yu, L.; Ren, X.; Engelhard, M.H.; Niu, C.; Lee, H.; Xu, W.; Xiao, J.; Liu, J. High-efficiency lithium metal batteries with fire-retardant electrolytes. Joule 2018, 2, 1548–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seh, Z.W.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cui, Y. Designing high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5605–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, G.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Chen, Z.; Lu, J. Revisiting the role of polysulfides in lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ji, X.; Lee, K.T.; Nazar, L.F. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Lu, Y.; Lou, X.W. A pyrolyzed polyacrylonitrile/selenium disulfide composite cathode with remarkable lithium and sodium storage performances. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Luo, C.; Zhu, Y.; Wen, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, C. Carbonized polyacrylonitrile-stabilized SeSx cathodes for long cycle life and high power density lithium ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4082–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, W.; Li, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Xie, J. Insight into sulfur-rich selenium sulfide/pyrolyzed polyacrylonitrile cathodes for Li–S batteries. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 3588–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, N.; Liu, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, L.; Guo, S.; Li, D.; Xu, J. One-step in situ preparation of polymeric selenium sulfide composite as a cathode material for enhanced sodium/potassium storage. ACS. Appl. Mater. Inter. 2019, 11, 29807–29813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, H.; Jia, H.; Wang, C.; Zhang, J.G.; Xu, W. Recent progress in understanding solid electrolyte interphase on lithium metal anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kang, D.W.; Moon, J.; Choi, H.-Y.; Shin, H.-C.; Kim, B.G. Stable cycling and uniform lithium deposition in anode-free lithium-metal batteries enabled by a high-concentration dual-salt electrolyte with high LiNO3 content. J. Power Sources 2021, 490, 229504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fu, J.; Ji, X.; Chen, J.; Chen, L.; Fan, X.; Mu, D.; Wang, C. Lithium nitrate regulated sulfone electrolytes for lithium metal batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 132, 22378–22385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lin, S.; Zhao, J. Functional electrolyte of fluorinated ether and ester for stabilizing both 4.5 V LiCoO2 cathode and lithium metal anode. ACS. Appl. Mater. Inter. 2020, 12, 8316–8323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fan, X.; Chen, L.; Ji, X.; Deng, T.; Hou, S.; Chen, J.; Zheng, J.; Wang, F.; Jiang, J.; Xu, K. Highly fluorinated interphases enable high-voltage Li-metal batteries. Chem 2018, 4, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jung, Y.; Park, S.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, M.; Kang, B. Toward achieving high kinetics in anodeless Li2S battery: Surface modification of Cu current collector. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2109759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nanda, S.; Gupta, A.; Manthiram, A. A lithium–sulfur cell based on reversible lithium deposition from a Li2S cathode host onto a hostless-anode substrate. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, J.; Xiang, J.; Chen, X.; Yuan, L.; Li, Z.; Huang, Y. Li2S-based anode-free full batteries with modified Cu current collector. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 30, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 03312 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the solvate structures of high–concentration electrolyte (top) and diluted electrolyte (bottom), with LiFSI, DME, and TTE as salt, solvent, and diluent, respectively; (b) CE test of Li||Cu half–cells electrolytes with different lithium salt concentration (0.5 mA cm−2, 1 mAh cm−2); (c) The galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3); (d) CE test of Li||Cu half–cells with different ratios of diluents.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the solvate structures of high–concentration electrolyte (top) and diluted electrolyte (bottom), with LiFSI, DME, and TTE as salt, solvent, and diluent, respectively; (b) CE test of Li||Cu half–cells electrolytes with different lithium salt concentration (0.5 mA cm−2, 1 mAh cm−2); (c) The galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3); (d) CE test of Li||Cu half–cells with different ratios of diluents.
Polymers 14 03312 g001
Polymers 14 03312 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) CE testing of Li||Cu half–cells with diluted electrolytes of varying lithium nitrate content; (b) Cycling stability of Li||pPAN/SeS2 half–cells with diluted electrolytes of different lithium nitrate contents. The galvanostatic current charge–discharge curves; (c) 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3); (d) 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (0% LiNO3).
Figure 2. (a) CE testing of Li||Cu half–cells with diluted electrolytes of varying lithium nitrate content; (b) Cycling stability of Li||pPAN/SeS2 half–cells with diluted electrolytes of different lithium nitrate contents. The galvanostatic current charge–discharge curves; (c) 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (1% LiNO3); (d) 0.67 M LiFSI in DME/TTE (0% LiNO3).
Polymers 14 03312 g002
Polymers 14 03312 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Cycling stability; (b) Galvanostatic current charge–discharge curves of high mass loading and lean electrolyte Li||pPAN/SeS2 half−cells.
Figure 3. (a) Cycling stability; (b) Galvanostatic current charge–discharge curves of high mass loading and lean electrolyte Li||pPAN/SeS2 half−cells.
Polymers 14 03312 g003
Polymers 14 03312 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Cycling stability; (b) Galvanostatic current charge–discharge curves of moderate mass loading and lean electrolyte Cu||pPAN/SeS2 half–cells.
Figure 4. (a) Cycling stability; (b) Galvanostatic current charge–discharge curves of moderate mass loading and lean electrolyte Cu||pPAN/SeS2 half–cells.
Polymers 14 03312 g004
Table
Table 1. Electrochemical performance of LMBs in various electrolytes.
Table 1. Electrochemical performance of LMBs in various electrolytes.
ElectrolyteConcentrationLi Plating/Stripping CERef.
LiFSI-DME/TTE0.67 M99.3%, 200 cycles,0.5 mA cm−2, 1 mAh cm−2This work
LiFSI-DME4 M98.5%, 300 cycles, 1 mA cm−2, 1 mAh cm−2[42]
LiNO3 + LiFSI-DME4 M98.5%, 400 cycles, 0.5 mA cm−2, 0.5 mAh cm−2[53]
LiTFSI-SL1.3 M96.6%, 100 cycles, 0.5 mA cm−2, 1 mAh cm−2[54]
LiPF6 + LiDFOB- FEC/DMC/HFE1.2 M98%, 200 cycles, 1 mA cm−2, 1 mAh cm−2[55]
LiFSI-DMC10 M99.2%, 200 cycles, 0.2 mA cm−2, 2.5 mAh cm−2[56]
Table
Table 2. Performance comparison of anode-free Li-S batteries between this and reported work.
Table 2. Performance comparison of anode-free Li-S batteries between this and reported work.
Battery ChemistryCycling StabilityLoadingRef.
Cu||pPAN/SeS271.5% retention over 200 cycles at 0.1 A g−14–6 mg cm−2This work
ATCu||Li2S64.8% retention over 120 cycles at 1.166 A g−14.5 mg cm−2[57]
Cu||Li2S70% retention over 100 cycles at 0.1166 A g−14 mg cm−2[58]
Au/Cu||Li2S69.5% retention over 150 cycles at 0.1 C4 mg cm−2[59]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, T.; Ren, X.; Hu, L.; Teng, W.; Wang, X.; Wu, G.; Liu, J.; Nan, D.; Li, B.; Yu, X. A Diluted Electrolyte for Long-Life Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile-Based Anode-Free Li-S Batteries. Polymers 2022, 14, 3312. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163312

AMA Style

Ma T, Ren X, Hu L, Teng W, Wang X, Wu G, Liu J, Nan D, Li B, Yu X. A Diluted Electrolyte for Long-Life Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile-Based Anode-Free Li-S Batteries. Polymers. 2022; 14(16):3312. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163312

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Ting, Xiuyun Ren, Liang Hu, Wanming Teng, Xiaohu Wang, Guanglei Wu, Jun Liu, Ding Nan, Baohua Li, and Xiaoliang Yu. 2022. "A Diluted Electrolyte for Long-Life Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile-Based Anode-Free Li-S Batteries" Polymers 14, no. 16: 3312. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163312

APA Style

Ma, T., Ren, X., Hu, L., Teng, W., Wang, X., Wu, G., Liu, J., Nan, D., Li, B., & Yu, X. (2022). A Diluted Electrolyte for Long-Life Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile-Based Anode-Free Li-S Batteries. Polymers, 14(16), 3312. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163312

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop