Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Functionalization of Cotton Fabrics with Nanotechnology
Previous Article in Journal
Collagen Alignment via Electro-Compaction for Biofabrication Applications: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermo-Sensitive Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-polyacrylamide) Hydrogel for pH-Responsive Therapeutic Delivery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Novel Approach in Biodegradation of Synthetic Thermoplastic Polymers: An Overview

by
Raja Venkatesan
,
Madhappan Santhamoorthy
,
Krishnapandi Alagumalai
,
Rajesh Haldhar
,
Chaitany Jayprakash Raorane
,
Vinit Raj
* and
Seong-Cheol Kim
*
School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2022, 14(20), 4271; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14204271
Submission received: 8 September 2022 / Revised: 23 September 2022 / Accepted: 9 October 2022 / Published: 12 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Polymer-Based Drug Delivery Complexes against Microorganisms)

Abstract

:
Biodegradation is necessary for water-soluble or water-immiscible polymers because they eventually enter streams which can neither be recycled nor incinerated. It is important to consider the microbial degradation of natural and synthetic polymers in order to understand what is necessary for biodegradation and the mechanisms involved. Low/high-density polyethylene is a vital cause of environmental pollution. It occurs by choking the sewer line through mishandling, thus posing an everlasting ecological threat. Environmental pollution due to the unscrupulous consumption of synthetic polymers derived from petroleum has an adverse impact on the environment since the majority of plastics do not degrade, and the further incineration of synthetic plastics generates CO2 and dioxin. This requires understanding the interactions between materials and microorganisms and the biochemical changes involved. Widespread studies on the biodegradation of plastics have been carried out in order to overcome the environmental problems associated with synthetic plastic waste. Awareness of the waste problem and its impact on the environment has awakened new interest in the area of degradable polymers through microbes viz., bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes. The microbial degradation of plastics is caused by certain enzymatic activities that lead to a chain cleavage of polymers into oligomers and monomers. This review focuses on the biodegradation rate of plastics by fungal and bacterial communities and the mode of action of biodegradation.

1. Introduction

The word plastic derives from the Greek word “plastikos” which means ”moldable into many shapes” [1]. Polyethylene (PE) is the most prevalent polymer in plastics, and it is formed from ethylene monomers (CH2=CH2). Figure 1 shows the 3D structure of ethylene and polyethylene. Polyethylene is not biodegradable in its natural state. India had 4.3 million tons of plastic demand in 2001–2002. That demand more than doubled by 2021–2022, climbing to 8.4 million tons per annum [2]. The plastic with the greatest demand in India in the year 2020 was polyethylene, at 33%. Polypropylene was second, with a 32% share of the demand [3]. Worldwide, the use of polyethylene is increasing at a rate of 12% per year, with the manufacturing of synthetic polymers reaching around 140 million tons per year [4]. With such a big amount of polyethylene accumulating in the environment, plastic-waste environmental issues arise [5]. These polymers are one of the most serious environmental hazards [6,7]. The most often used synthetic polymers are high-density (HDPE) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) [8,9]. Plastics are disposed of, in many nations, through open, uncontrolled burning and landfilling [10,11]. Open burning emits toxins into the atmosphere, which can lead to a variety of health issues. Furthermore, burning plastics produces persistent organic pollutants, which have been linked to a number of negative impacts in humans. Municipal officials confirmed that carry bags are the major cause of clogged sewers as these prevent municipal solid waste from being burnt, which leads to an accumulation of waste, sludge, and rubbish. They discharge hazardous compounds into the environment, contaminating food [12,13]. The global production of plastic waste is estimated to be around 57 million tons per year [14]. To address the environmental issues related to synthetic plastic waste, numerous studies on the biodegradation of plastics have been conducted. Any physical or chemical change in the polymer as a result of environmental variables such as light, heat, moisture, chemical conditions, or biological activity is classified as the degradation of plastics. The term “biodegradation” describes the biological degradation of materials in natural environments, including synthetic polymers [15,16,17,18]. Fungi are commonly utilized in bioremediation because of their hardiness and abundance of enzymes. Phanerochaete chrysosporium, commonly known as white-rot fungus, is one of the most widely reported fungi, and its strong enzymes allow it to break down a wide spectrum of persistent pollutants and xenobiotics in nutrient-limited conditions. The capacity to breakdown low-density polyethylene (LDPE) used in widely available plastic carry bags was nearly 8% [19]. Since synthetic polymers are regarded as practically inert, efforts to isolate specific bacteria capable of exploiting them were discussed in this review [20,21].

2. Plastics

According to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D6098-16, a plastic is any of a wide range of diverse materials that can be molded into useful shapes and designs that are completely or mainly organic in nature [22]. Whether individually or together, pressure and heat are applied.

2.1. Plastics and Their Properties

Plastics are polymers, or solid materials, that become flexible if heated and may thus be placed into molds. They are resistant to microbial attack and do not easily decompose in the environment [23,24] due to their excessive molecular mass, large number of aromatic rings, special bonds, or halogen substitutions. HDPE and LDPE are the synthetic polymers which are used the most often [8]. Because of its versatility and effectiveness, LDPE has been widely employed in this context. LDPE has more branching (on roughly 2% of the carbon atoms), weaker intermolecular interactions, lower tensile strength, and higher resilience. LDPE is still the slowest degrading sample [25,26]. Its obstinacy stems from its complicated three-dimensional structure and hydrophobic properties [27]. It possesses good resistance to aldehydes, ketones, and vegetable oils, as well as dilute and concentrated acids, alcohols, bases, and esters. As a result, they may survive for a long time in the environment without deteriorating [28].

2.2. Types of Plastics and Their Uses

Thermoplastics or thermosetting plastics are the two types of plastics [29]. The distinction between these two types of plastics is that thermoplastics can be melted and molded repeatedly, but thermosetting plastics can be heated and shaped only once and are, therefore, not generally recyclable. Polyurethane (PU) and polyester, including polyethylene terephthalate (PET), are two of the most common thermosetting plastics [30]. The most commonly used thermoplastic polymers are HDPE, LDPE, linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS). HDPE and LDPE are the most commonly used synthetic polymers [31]. Plastic films for carry bags, mugs, packaging, rubbish bags, and other applications are currently made from polyolefin-derived plastics such as polyethylene [32]. Food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, detergents, and chemicals all benefit from synthetic plastic packaging. The many types of polymers and their applications are listed in Table 1.

2.3. Production and Disposal of Plastics

Plastic is a flexible synthetic material formed from ethylene and a semi-crystalline high-molecular-weight polymer. Basic materials obtained from oil, coal, and natural gas are used to produce plastics [33,34,35,36,37]. Roughly 15.46 tons of plastic waste is processed in India every day, only 40% of which can be recycled, and the remaining 60% is impossible to dispose of, according to a 2003 survey. It is estimated that there has been 5.6 million tons of post-consumer plastic trash annually from the years 2008–2009 [38]. India uses 5.8 kg of plastic per person, which is a remarkably low level. The total amount of plastic used in India may have increased from 7.5 to 15.0 million tons by 2015, making it the third-largest consumer of plastics in the world. Around 12.75 million tons of plastics were required commercially in India in 2012. The amount of plastic waste has substantially increased due to the shortage of available landfill space [39]. The cost for the disposal of solid waste has increased as a result. Plastic pollution in the environment has become a major concern that can lead to long-term issues with the environment, the economy, and waste management. The term “white pollution” describes the grave threats posed by waste plastic in the environment [40,41]. Long-term plastic waste disposal in the soil decreases water penetration, reduces soil fertility, and limits plant growth, causing environmental issues [33]. The physical recycling of these materials has been shown to be inefficient and typically undesired [42] as biological molecules often infect plastic trash. The best option for the disposal of plastics seems to be utilizing plastics that can re-enter the biological life cycle through biodegradation [43].

2.4. Uses and Hazards of Plastics

Plastic materials have been used for a wide range of applications in recent years [44,45]. Plastic has become a part of modern life and is used in many different sectors. Plastics are extensively used in the packaging of products such as food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, detergents, and chemicals. Each year, millions of plastic bags adulterate the environment due to their improper disposal [46]. Plastic bags, being resistant to bacterial degradation, inevitably become a major threat to the environment despite their commercial success. A plastic bag takes an average of one thousand years to decompose completely. During this time, it breaks into small pieces which remain embedded in the soil. The possibility of the material breaking down and mixing with the soil increases with the thickness, which adversely affects both marine life and the soil itself [47]. Those that emit harmful chemicals contaminate food [48]. Plastic waste threatens a lot of hazards to marine life due to its buoyancy, long-term persistence, and ubiquity in the marine environment [49]. In many countries, plastic waste is disposed of through landfilling and uncontrolled, open burning [50]. Open pruning emits air contaminants which may contribute to a number of health issues. Chemicals used in the manufacturing of vinyl, such as ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride, are believed to cause cancer. They may also cause damage to the liver, kidneys, or nervous system, among many other health issues. One of the most significant and persistent changes in the environment is the development of fragmented polymers, or PE [51,52]. Since the start of industrial production, plastic pollution has accumulated in both terrestrial and marine environments in just a few decades [53,54]. Many marine animals may eat these particles by mistaking them for plankton. As a result, it is possible that ingested plastic debris will enter and accumulate in the food chain, exerting multiple hazards [55]. With the amount of polyethylene which has accumulated in the environment, it will take thousands of years for the polyethylene to degrade completely [56]. The world faces a major problem when it comes to the use of plastics, most notably those used for packaging [57,58].

3. Biodegradation

Biodegradation is the deformation of a substance into new compounds through biochemical reactions or the actions of microorganisms such as bacteria or fungi; alternatively, biodegradation is the process by which microbial organisms transform to alter (through metabolic or enzymatic action) the structure of chemicals introduced into the environment [59,60,61,62]. Figure 2 shows polymer degradation under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

3.1. Biodegradation of Plastic by Microbes

Biodegradation is a natural and complex process of decomposition facilitated by biochemical mechanisms and the successive mineralization of the polymer material. Biodegradable plastics open the way for new waste management strategies since these materials are designed to degrade under environmental conditions or in municipal and industrial biological waste treatment facilities [63]. Bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes are of particular interest in the biodegradation of natural and synthetic polymers. Many species or types of microorganisms are found broadly in nature [64]. Microorganisms are highly adaptive to their environment and secrete both endoenzymes and exoenzymes that attack the substrate and cleave the molecular chains into segments [65]. The biological degradation of these polyethylene films has been reported in pure culture studies with various microorganisms such as Staphylococcus sp., Streptococcus sp. [66], Phanerochaete sp. [67], and Bacillus sp. [68]. Mergaert et al. investigated the polymer-degrading isolates [69], actinomycetes, and fungal isolates which were able to degrade polyhydroxy butyrate, bionolle, and polycaprolactone. Orhan et al. investigated the PE biodegradation process by using fungal isolates [70], Phanerochaete chrysosporium, and their extracellular polymers such as polysaccharides which can help to colonize the polymer surface [71]. Clutario et al. showed the physical evidence of the colonization of polyethylene strips by Xylaria sp. isolated from a termite comb. Xylaria sp. can utilize polyethylene plastic as a co-carbon source, thereby degrading them into usable forms for self-substance [72]. Saminathan et al. isolated a strain identified as P. putida by performing appropriate degradation on disposable plastic items [73]. Thilagavathy et al. reported that Xylaria sp. from the fungal garden variety of termite could degrade 20 µm thicknesses of LDPE plastics to 25% in a period of 50 days of incubation at 25 °C [74]. Though the fungi survived in the environments with poor nutrient supply, pH, and moisture availability, they could degrade the plastic successfully to the appreciable value. The faster growth of fungal biomass compared to bacteria, the growth extension, and the penetration into other locations in the plastic are possible through the distribution of hyphae. The distribution and penetration ability of their fungal hyphae was an added advantage [29].

3.2. Mechanism of Biodegradation

The general mechanism of plastic biodegradation is shown in Figure 3. In biological force, the growth of many fungi can cause small-scale swelling and bursting, as the fungi penetrate the polymer solids [75]. Plastics are potential substrates for heterotrophic microorganisms [76]. The microbes excrete extracellular enzymes which depolymerize the polymers outside the cells. Physical forces, such as heating, cooling, freezing, and drying can cause mechanical damage such as the cracking of polymeric materials [77]. When exposed to soil, natural polymers such as starch, cellulose, and proteins are destroyed by a microbiological process [78]. The microbial colonization of a polymer surface is the first requirement for its biodegradation [79]. During degradation, exoenzymes from microorganisms break down complex polymers, yielding smaller molecules of short chains, e.g., oligomers, dimers, and monomers that are small enough to pass the semi-permeable outer bacterial membranes and then be utilized as carbon and energy sources. The process is called depolymerization. The end products are CO2, H2O, and CH4, and the degradation is called mineralization [80,81]. To facilitate the biodegradation of these polymers, a preliminary step of photo-oxidation or thermo-oxidation has routinely been employed. This oxidation of the polymer results in the formation of carbonyl residues that can be consumed by non-specific microbial populations [82]. The results change in the bond scission, chemical transformation, and formation of new functional groups [83]. Very small variation in the chemical structure of polymer could lead to large changes in their biodegradability. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a useful imaging approach for the visualization of different polymers because it provides a consistent picture of the polymer morphology as a non-uniform structure characterized by variable thickness and variable polymer density. Akutsu et al. illustrated the surface topography of polymers with high resolution [84]. The morphological changes in PUR during the enzyme reaction were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Ikada et al. obtained information about the degradation mechanism; the observations can be made using either scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or atomic force microscopy (AFM) [85]. Clutario et al. observed the mycelia of fungus on polythene after sufficient adaption to the lab condition [73]; the Xylaria fungus penetrated into the plastic material of LDPE. After that, some chemical reaction must have taken place since evidence of bio-corrosion by the mycelium was observed through the SEM, including the tearing, pitting, and striating of the plastic strip incubated with fungus. Physico-mechanical properties have also been determined before and after the degradation of film in order to understand the rate as well as the mechanism of degradation [86,87]. SEM images of Xylaria over the LDPE film are shown in Figure 4.

3.3. Enzymatic Degradation of Plastic

The biodegradation of polymers is catalyzed by extracellular, degradative enzymes that produce water-soluble, low-molecular-weight products from the macromolecular substrates. These products are water-soluble and can diffuse into the surrounding aqueous environment to be taken up by the cells of the microorganisms and used as nutrients. Mergaert et al. reported various natural polyesters, such as polyhydroxybutirate and polycaprolactone, that can also be degraded and assimilated by various microbial populations [70]. Webb et al. have studied how the biodegradation of polythene begins with the attachment of microbes in the surface of the polymer [89]. The microbes such as bacteria (Streptomyces viridosporusT7A, Streptomyces badius252, and Streptomyces setonii75Vi2) and wood-degrading fungi produced some extracellular enzymes which led to the degradation of polythene. Polythene-cleaving enzymes belong to the group of hydrolases, which catalyze the hydrolytic cleavage of the C-O and C-N- bonds. Hydrolases include lipase and esterase enzymes. Tokiwa et al. revealed that the various esterases and lipases produced were hydrolyzing the PCL.
Particularly, the lipases of Rhizopusdelemar and R. arrhizus were used in the hydrolysis of polymers. Thilagavathy et al. identified that Xylaria sp. of termite fungal comb was able to degrade 20 µm of thickness of LDPE plastics through their secretion of depolymerizers (Figure 5) [74]. The oxidized polymer helps in the adhesion of microorganisms (due to probable changes in the hydrophobicity of the polymer surface), which is a prerequisite for biodegradation. Johnson et al. investigated how the microorganism growing on plastic material may either utilize the plasticizer molecule of starch cellulose or the other polymer [90]. Fungi are able to degrade a wide variety of polymers through the production of several enzymes such as cellulase and amylase [91,92,93]. The active enzymes have been grouped as esterases, lipases, proteases, and ureases which degrade the polyurethane substrate by cleaving the ester bonds [94]. The enzyme reacts with solid polyester PU to hydrolyze the ester bounds of PU (Table 2). The hydrolysis of esters bound in PU is postulated to be a mechanism of PU biodegradation (Figure 6). Prema et al. studied and purified enzyme protease that was involved in the degradation of PLA [95]. Biological processes by both microbial and enzymatic activities are currently considered to be sustainable recycling methods in the biodegradation of plastics.

4. Future Prospects

Use of biodegradable polymers in specific applications, such as packaging, agriculture, and the health industry, is the most innovative and environmentally safe way to deal with issues related to the disposal of plastic waste produced from different sources. If it is used, bio- and fossil-based biodegradable polymers efficiently decompose in the environment, in cells, or in well-maintained industrial applications. The environment is currently highly affected by non-biodegradable petrochemical materials used in the manufacture of plastics, particularly in the absence of waste disposal facilities and littering controls. In certain applications, the demand for eco-friendly polymers is still increasing. Future progress should concentrate on the use of these materials, especially for the manufacture of packaging materials, food item packaging, and disposable medical aid. Introducing biodegradable plastics in agricultural film, fishing nets, pharmaceuticals, surgical frameworks, and sterile goods is also beneficial for the environment. Furthermore, it is suggested to use biodegradable plastics in scenarios in which there is a great risk of diffusion into the environment or when it is difficult to distinguish the waste. However, in order to profit from certain polymers in the community, efficient waste management and littering avoidance should be in action. For specific application, the new generation of bio-based biodegradable plastics will promise to foster a more environmentally friendly society. In addition, for these plastics to be reusable afterwards, materials should also be biodegraded and recycled in a balanced way. For this, it is essential to have a thorough understanding of the structure of biomass production in nature in order to manufacture new biodegradable plastic polymers by making small structural reforms. Organisms, synthetic scientists, process engineers, and bioenergy researchers should all collaborate in order to develop environmentally friendly goods that will increase society’s sustainability.

5. Conclusions

This review has covered the major concerns about the synthetic polymers, their types, uses, and degradability. It has looked at the disposal method and the standards used in evaluating polymer degradation. The biodegradation of plastic is an innovative means of solving the plastic disposal problem from the standpoint of developing new techniques. Based on the literature survey, it can be concluded that polythene is very useful in our day-to-day life to meet our desired needs. It can be used to package goods, food, medicine, scientific instruments, and other materials. Its use is increasing daily as a result of its exceptional value. However, one of the greatest hazards to the environment is plastic. Two main efforts have usually been explored to minimize the environmental impact of plastic waste: one is to manufacture biodegradable plastics, and the other is to isolate specific microorganisms to biodegrade plastic wastes. Microorganisms, especially bacteria or fungi, play a crucial role in biological degradation of polymers. Biodegradation causing various types of structural and chemical changes in the polymer has to be reduced. To handle the problems of plastic waste, the enzymatic biodegradation of plastic will enhance the biodegradation rate. In the near future, these microorganisms can be used to reduce the quantity of solid waste, which is rapidly accumulating in the natural environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.V., K.A., and C.J.R.; methodology, R.V.; software, M.S.; validation, K.A., R.V. and V.R.; formal analysis, R.V.; investigation, R.H.; resources, S.-C.K.; data curation, V.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.V.; writing—review and editing, C.J.R.; visualization, V.R.; supervision, S.-C.K.; project administration, S.-C.K.; funding acquisition, S.-C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National search Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2020R1I1A3052258). In addition, the work was also supported by the Technology Development Program (S3060516) funded by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea) in 2021.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Joel, F.R. Polymer Science and Technology. Introduction to Polymer Science; 3rd, Ed.; Prentice Hall PTR, Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1995; pp. 4–9. [Google Scholar]
  2. King, S.; Locock, K.E.S. A circular economy framework for plastics: A semi-systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 364, 132503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shanker, R.; Khan, D.; Hossain, R.; Islam, M.T.; Locock, K.; Ghose, A.; Sahajwalla, V.; Schandl, H.; Dhodapkar, R. Plastic waste recycling: Existing Indian scenario and future opportunities. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ferreira, T.; Mendes, G.A.; de Oliveira, A.M.; Dias, C.G.B.T. Manufacture and characterization of polypropylene (PP) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) blocks for potential use as masonry component in civil construction. Polymers 2022, 14, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, R.; Verma, A.; Shome, A.; Sinha, R.; Sinha, S.; Jha, P.K.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, P.; Shubham, D.S.; Sharma, P.; et al. Impacts of plastic pollution on ecosystem services, sustainable development goals, and need to focus on circular economy and policy interventions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bahl, S.; Dolma, J.; Singh, J.J.; Sehgal, S. Biodegradation of plastics: A state of the art review. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 39, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, J.-C.; Shetty, A.S.; Wang, M.-S. Biodegradable plastics: A review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 1990, 10, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yutaka, T.; Calabia, B.P.; Ugwu, C.U.; Aiba, S. Biodegradability of plastics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2004, 10, 3722–3724. [Google Scholar]
  9. Teleky, B.-E.; Vodnar, D.C. Recent advances in biotechnological itaconic acid production, and application for a sustainable approach. Polymers 2021, 13, 3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Siddiqua, A.; Hahladakis, J.N.; Al-Attiya, W.A.K.A. An overview of the environmental pollution and health effects associated with waste landfilling and open dumping. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 58514–58536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lange, J.-P. Managing plastic waste-sorting, recycling, disposal, and product redesign. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 15722–15738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thakali, A.; MacRae, J.D. A review of chemical and microbial contamination in food: What are the threats to a circular food system? Environ. Res. 2021, 194, 110635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Iravanian, A.; Ravari, S.O. Types of contamination in landfills and effects on the environment: A review study. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 614, 012083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bollag, W.B.; Jerzy, D.; Bollag, J.M. Biodegradation & Encyclopaedia of Microbiology; Lederberg, J., Ed.; Academic: Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2000; Volume 65, pp. 461–471. [Google Scholar]
  15. Folino, A.; Karageorgiou, A.; Calabrò, P.S.; Komilis, D. Biodegradation of wasted bioplastics in natural and industrial environments: A Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Adamcová, D.; Zloch, J.; Brtnický, M.; Vaverková, M.D. Biodegradation/disintegration of selected range of polymers: Impact on the compost quality. J. Polym. Environ. 2019, 27, 892–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Poznyak, T.I.; Oria, I.C.; Poznyak, A.S. Biodegradation. In Ozonation and Biodegradation in Environmental Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 353–388. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hatti-Kaul, R.; Nilsson, L.J.; Zhang, B.; Rehnberg, N.; Lundmark, S. Designing biobased recyclable polymers for plastics. Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 50–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raaman, N.; Rajitha, N.; Jayshree, A.; Jegadeesh, R. Biodegradation of plastic by Aspergillus spp. isolated from polythene polluted sites around Chennai. J. Acad. Indus. Res. 2012, 6, 313–316. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dalton, B.; Bhagabati, P.; DeMicco, J.; Padamati, R.B.; O’Connor, K. A review on biological synthesis of the biodegradable polymers polyhydroxyalkanoates and the development of multiple applications. Catalysts 2022, 12, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lear, G.; Kingsbury, J.M.; Franchini, S.; Gambarini, V.; Maday, S.D.M.; Wallbank, J.A.; Weaver, L.; Pantos, O. Plastics and the microbiome: Impacts and solutions. Environ. Microbiome 2021, 16, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. ASTM D6098–16; Standard Classification System and Basis for Specification for Extruded and Compression Molded Shapes from Thermoplastic Polymers. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
  23. Alexander, M. Biodegradation of chemicals of environmental concern. Science 1981, 21, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pires, J.R.A.; Souza, V.G.L.; Fuciños, P.; Pastrana, L.; Fernando, A.L. Methodologies to assess the biodegradability of bio-based polymers-current knowledge and existing gaps. Polymers 2022, 14, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chielinli, E.; Corti, A.; Antone, S.D. Oxo-biodegradable full carbon backbone polymers biodegradation behavior of thermally oxidized polyethylene in an aqueous m condition. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006, 91, 2739–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gu, J.D. Biodegradability of plastics: The issues, recent advances, and future perspectives. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 1278–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Filiciotto, L.; Rothenberg, G. Biodegradable plastics: Standards, policies, and impacts. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 56–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hadad, D.; Geresh, S.; Sivan, A. Biodegradation of polyethylene by the thermophilic bacterium Brevibacillus borstelensis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, D.Y.; Rhee, H.Y. Biodegradation of microbial and synthetic polyesters by fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 61, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alauddin, M.; Choudkury, I.A.; Baradieand, M.A.; Hashmi, M.S.J. Plastics and their machining: A review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1995, 54, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Avella, M.; Bonadies, E.; Martuscelli, E.; Rimedio, R. European current standardization for plastic packaging recoverable through composting and biodegradation. Polym. Test. 2001, 20, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tokiwa, Y.; Calabia, B.P. Degradation of microbial polyesters. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 26, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vijaya, C.H.; Reddy, R.M. Impact of soil composting using municipal solid waste on biodegradation of plastics. Int. J. Biotec. 2008, 7, 235–239. [Google Scholar]
  34. Varyan, I.; Tyubaeva, P.; Kolesnikova, N.; Popov, A. Biodegradable polymer materials based on polyethylene and natural rubber: Acquiring, investigation, properties. Polymers 2022, 14, 2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zia, J.; Paul, U.C.; Heredia-Guerrero, J.A.; Athanassiou, A.; Fragouli, D. Low-density polyethylene/curcumin melt extruded composites with enhanced water vapor barrier and antioxidant properties for active food packaging. Polymers 2019, 175, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Teleky, B.-E.; Vodnar, D.C. Biomass-derived production of itaconic acid as a building block in specialty polymers. Polymers 2019, 11, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Pascuta, M.S.; Varvara, R.-A.; Teleky, B.-E.; Szabo, K.; Plamada, D.; Nemeş, S.-A.; Mitrea, L.; Martău, G.A.; Ciont, C.; Călinoiu, L.F.; et al. Polysaccharide-based edible gels as functional ingredients: Characterization, applicability, and human health benefits. Gels 2022, 8, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Seymour, R.B. Polymer science before and after 1899: Notable developments during the lifetime of maurtis dekker. J. Macromol. Sci. Chem. 1989, 26, 1023–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mohana Jeya Valli, V.P.; Gnanavel, G.; Thirumarimurugan, M.; Kannadasan, D.T. A Review of alternate fuel from synthetic plastics waste. Elixir Chem. Eng. 2013, 54, 12215–12218. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mukai, K.; Doi, Y. Microbial degradation of polyesters. Prog. Ind. Microbiol. 1995, 32, 189–204. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kathiresan, K. Polyethylene and plastic degrading microbes in an Indian mangrove soil. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2003, 51, 629–634. [Google Scholar]
  42. Jeyasekara, R.; Harding, I.; Bowater, I.; Lornergan, G. Biodegradability of selected range of polymers and polymer blends and standard methods for assessment of biodegradation. J. Polym. Environ. 2005, 13, 231–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. El-Naggar, M.M.A.; Farag, M.G. Physical and biological treatments of polyethylene–rice starch plastic films. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 176, 878–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. de Sousa, F.D.B. The role of plastic concerning the sustainable development goals: The literature point of view. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 3, 100020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Geyer, R.; Jambeck, J.R.; Law, K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Chamas, A.; Moon, H.; Zheng, J.; Qiu, Y.; Tabassum, T.; Jang, J.H.; Abu-Omar, M.; Scott, S.L. Suh. S. Degradation rates of plastics in the environment. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 3494–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Scalenghe, R. Resource or waste? A perspective of plastics degradation in soil with a focus on end-of-life options. Heliyon 2018, 4, e00941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Sivan, A. New perspectives in plastic biodegradation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Barrow, G.I.; Feltham, R.K.A. Cowan and Steel’s Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mihai, F.-C.; Gündoğdu, S.; Markley, L.A.; Olivelli, A.; Khan, F.R.; Gwinnett, C.; Gutberlet, J.; Reyna-Bensusan, N.; Llanquileo-Melgarejo, P.; Meidiana, C.; et al. Plastic pollution, waste management issues, and circular economy opportunities in rural communities. Sustainability 2022, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Andrady, A.L. Persistence of plastic litter in the oceans. In Marine Anthropogenic Litter; Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kaandorp, M.L.A.; Dijkstra, H.A.; van Sebille, E. Modelling size distributions of marine plastics under the influence of continuous cascading fragmentation. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 054075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thushari, G.G.N.; Senevirathna, J.D.M. Plastic pollution in the marine environment. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wayman, C.; Niemann, H. The fate of plastic in the ocean environment–A minireview. Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts 2021, 23, 198–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Spear, L.B.; Ainley, D.G.; Ribic, C.A. Incidence of plastic in seabirds from the tropical Pacific l984–1991: Relation with distribution of species, sex, age, season, year and body weight. Mar. Environ. Res. 1995, 40, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Frias, J.P.; Sobral, P.; Ferreira, A.M. Organic pollutants in microplastics from two beaches of the Portuguese Coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. Portugal. 2010, 60, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Usha, R.; Sangeetha, T.; Palaniswamy, M. Screening of polyethylene degrading microorganisms from garbage soil. Int. J. Libyan. Agri. Res. Cent. 2011, 2, 200–204. [Google Scholar]
  58. Jung, B.-N.; Jung, H.-W.; Kang, D.-H.; Kim, G.-H.; Shim, J.-K. A Study on the Oxygen Permeability Behavior of Nanoclay in a Polypropylene/Nanoclay Nanocomposite by Biaxial Stretching. Polymers 2021, 13, 2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kubowicz, S.; Booth, A.M. Biodegradability of plastics: Challenges and misconceptions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 12058–12060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Varyan, I.; Kolesnikova, N.; Xu, H.; Tyubaeva, P.; Popov, A. Biodegradability of polyolefin-based compositions: Effect of natural rubber. Polymers 2022, 14, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zeenat; Elahi, A.; Bukhari, D.A.; Shamim, S.; Rehman, A. Plastics degradation by microbes: A sustainable approach. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Di Mauro, E.; Rho, D.; Santato, C. Biodegradation of bio-sourced and synthetic organic electronic materials towards green organic electronics. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Marciniak, P.; Możejko-Ciesielska, J. What Is New in the Field of Industrial Wastes Conversion into Polyhydroxyalkanoates by Bacteria? Polymers 2021, 13, 1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Witt, U.; Muller, R.J.; Deckwer, W.D. Biodegradation behaviour and material properties of aliphatic/aromatic polyesters of commercial importance. J. Environ. Poly. Degrad. 1997, 15, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chandra, R.; Rustgi, R. Biodegradable Polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1998, 23, 1273–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Albinas, L.; Loreta, L.; Dalia, P. Micromycetes as deterioration agents of polymeric materials. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegra. 2003, 52, 233–242. [Google Scholar]
  67. Lee, B.; Pometto, A.L.; Fratzke, A.; Bailey, T.B. Biodegradation of degradable plastic polyethylene by Phanerochaete and Streptomyces species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 678–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Muhammad, I.A.; Perveen, Q.; Ahmad, B.; Javed, I.; Razi-Ul-Hussnain, R.; Andleeb, S.; Atique, N.; Ghumro, P.; Ahmed, S.; Hameed, A. Studies on biodegradation of cellulose blended polyvinyl chloride films. Int. J. Agriculture. Biol. 2009, 57, 9–175. [Google Scholar]
  69. Gupta, S.B.; Amrita, G.; Chowdhury, T. Isolation and selection of stress tolerant plastic loving bacterial isolates from old plastic wastes. World. J. Agri. Sci. 2010, 6, 138–140. [Google Scholar]
  70. Mergaert, J.; Swings, J. Biodeversity of microorganisms that degrade bacterial and synthetic polyesters. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1996, 17, 463–469. [Google Scholar]
  71. Orhan, Y.; Buyukgungor, H. Enhancement of biodegradability of disposable polyethylene in controlled biological soil. Int. Biodeter. Biodegrad. 2000, 45, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Volke-Sepulveda, T.; Castaneda, G.S.; Rojas, M.G.; Manzur, A.; Torres, E.F. Thermally treated low density polyethylene biodegradation by Penicillium pinophilum and Aspergillus niger. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 83, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Clutario, T.P.; Cuevus, V.C. Colonization of plastic by Xylaria sp. Phili. J. Sci. 2001, 130, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  74. Thilagavathy, S.S.; Gomathi, V. Isolation of Decomposing Fungi with Plastic Degrading Ability. M.Sc Dissertation, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  75. Griffin, G.L. Synthetic polymers and the living environment. Pure Appl. Chem. 1980, 52, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Saminathan, P.; Sripriya, A.; Nalini, K.; Sivakumar, T.; Thangapandian, V. Biodegradation of plastics by pseudomonas putida isolated from garden soil samples. J. Adv. Bot. Zoolo. 2014, 1, 2348–7313. [Google Scholar]
  77. Glass, J.E.; Swift, G. Agricultural and Synthetic Polymers, Biodegradation and Utilization; ACS Symposium Series, 433; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1989; Volume 37, pp. 9–64. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kamal, M.R.; Huang, B. Natural and artificial weathering of polymers. In Handbook of Polymer Degradation; Hamid, S.H., Ami, M.B., Maadhan, A.G., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1992; Volume 36, pp. 68–127. [Google Scholar]
  79. Johnson, K.E.; Pometto, A.L.; Nikolov, Z.L. Degradation of degradable starch polythene plastics in a compost environment. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 1255–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Yabannavar, A.; Bartha, R. Biodegradability of some food packaging materials in soil. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 1993, 25, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hamilton, J.D.; Reinert, K.H.; Hogan, J.V.; Lord, W.V. Polymers as solid waste in municipal landfills. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1995, 43, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Frazer, A.C. O-methylation and other transformations of aromatic compounds by acetogenicbacteria. In Acetogenesis; Drake, H.L., Ed.; Chapman & Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1994; Volume 120, pp. 445–483. [Google Scholar]
  83. Shah, A.A.; Hasan, F.; Hameed, A.; Ahmed, S. Biological degradation of plastics: A comprehensive review. Biotech. Adv. 2008, 26, 246–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pospisil, J.; Nespurek, S. Highlights in chemistry and physics of polymer stabilization. Macromol. Symp. 1997, 115, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Akutsu, Y.; Nakajima-Kambe, T.; Nomura, N.; Nakahara, T. Purification and properties of a polyester polyurethane-degrading enzyme from Comamonas acidovorans TB-35. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Ikada, E. Electron microscope observation of biodegradation of polymers. J. Environ. Polym. Degrad. 1999, 7, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Prabhat, S.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Vishal, V.; Kalyan, R.K.; Vijai, K.; Pandey, K.N.; Singh, M. Studies on isolation and identification of active microorganisms during degradation of polyethylene/starch film. Int. Res. J. Environment Sci. 2013, 2, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  88. Mueller, R.-J. Biological degradation of synthetic polyesters—Enzymes as potential catalysts for polyester recycling. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 2124–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Webb, E.C. Enzyme Nomenclature: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzymes; Academic Press Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 1992; Volume 7, pp. 1192–1194. [Google Scholar]
  90. Tokiwa, Y.; Suzuki, T. Hydrolysis of polyesters by lipases. Nature 1977, 270, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sethuraman, A.; Akin, D.; Erikson, K. Plant-cell-wall-degrading enzymes produced by the white-rot fungus Ceriporiopsis subvermispora. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 1998, 27, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Francis, D.V.; Thaliyakattil, S.; Cherian, L.; Sood, N.; Gokhale, T. Metallic nanoparticle integrated ternary polymer blend of PVA/Starch/Glycerol: A promising antimicrobial food packaging material. Polymers 2022, 14, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chien, H.-L.; Tsai, Y.-T.; Tseng, W.-S.; Wu, J.-A.; Kuo, S.-L.; Chang, S.-L.; Huang, S.-J.; Liu, C.-T. Biodegradation of PBSA films by elite aspergillus isolates and farmland soil. Polymers 2022, 14, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Friné, V.-C.; Hector, A.-P.; Sergio Manuel, N.-D.; Estrella, N.-D.; Antonio, G.J. Development and characterization of a biodegradable PLA food packaging hold monoterpene–cyclodextrin complexes against Alternaria alternata. Polymers 2019, 11, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Prema, S.; Uma Maheswari Devi, P. Degradation of poly lactide plastic by mesophilic bacteria isolated from compost. Int. J. Rese. Pure. App. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The 3D structures of ethylene and polyethylene.
Figure 1. The 3D structures of ethylene and polyethylene.
Polymers 14 04271 g001
Figure 2. Scheme of polymer degradation under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.
Figure 2. Scheme of polymer degradation under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.
Polymers 14 04271 g002
Figure 3. General mechanism of plastic biodegradation under aerobic conditions, adopted from [88] with permission from Elsevier through copyright clearance center.
Figure 3. General mechanism of plastic biodegradation under aerobic conditions, adopted from [88] with permission from Elsevier through copyright clearance center.
Polymers 14 04271 g003
Figure 4. (a) SEM images of Xylaria over the LDPE, (b) cavities/cracks formed on the surface of LDPE. The LDPE surface is shown by the red color arrows. The Xylaria is depicted by the violet-colored arrows above the LDPE.
Figure 4. (a) SEM images of Xylaria over the LDPE, (b) cavities/cracks formed on the surface of LDPE. The LDPE surface is shown by the red color arrows. The Xylaria is depicted by the violet-colored arrows above the LDPE.
Polymers 14 04271 g004
Figure 5. Enzyme-catalyzed degradation processes.
Figure 5. Enzyme-catalyzed degradation processes.
Polymers 14 04271 g005
Figure 6. Hydrolysis activity of Xylaria sp in LDPE. Secretion of depolymerise in the GYP medium by Xylaria sp (xtc 1) when grown on media containing (a) cellulase; (b) caesinase; (c) lipase and (d) gelatinase respectively, as seen by the zones of clearing.
Figure 6. Hydrolysis activity of Xylaria sp in LDPE. Secretion of depolymerise in the GYP medium by Xylaria sp (xtc 1) when grown on media containing (a) cellulase; (b) caesinase; (c) lipase and (d) gelatinase respectively, as seen by the zones of clearing.
Polymers 14 04271 g006
Table 1. Main plastics and their applications.
Table 1. Main plastics and their applications.
PlasticsApplications
LDPE, LLDPE, and PVCFilms and Packaging
PET, PVC, and HDPEBottles, Tubes, Pipes, and Insulation Molding
PS, PP, and PVCTanks, Jugs, and Containers
LDPE and LLDPEBags
PUCoating, Insulation, Paints, and Packing
Table 2. Enzymatic activity of Xylaria isolates in biodegradation plastics.
Table 2. Enzymatic activity of Xylaria isolates in biodegradation plastics.
IsolatesEnzyme Activity (IUml-1)
40th DAI
CellulaseAmylaseLipaseProtease
Xtc10.54 ± 0.020.27 ± 0.012.91 ± 0.351.28 ± 0.12
Xtc40.46 ± 0.040.15 ± 0.022.84 ± 0.410.89 ± 0.10
Xtc80.34 ± 0.030.23 ± 0.011.75 ± 0.200.76 ± 0.08
Xtc120.42 ± 0.020.17 ± 0.022.80 ± 0.291.01 ± 0.13
Xtc200.39 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.032.37 ± 0.310.99 ± 0.10
MTCC 36690.48 ± 0.020.31 ± 0.022.78 ± 0.251.14 ± 0.12
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Venkatesan, R.; Santhamoorthy, M.; Alagumalai, K.; Haldhar, R.; Raorane, C.J.; Raj, V.; Kim, S.-C. Novel Approach in Biodegradation of Synthetic Thermoplastic Polymers: An Overview. Polymers 2022, 14, 4271. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14204271

AMA Style

Venkatesan R, Santhamoorthy M, Alagumalai K, Haldhar R, Raorane CJ, Raj V, Kim S-C. Novel Approach in Biodegradation of Synthetic Thermoplastic Polymers: An Overview. Polymers. 2022; 14(20):4271. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14204271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Venkatesan, Raja, Madhappan Santhamoorthy, Krishnapandi Alagumalai, Rajesh Haldhar, Chaitany Jayprakash Raorane, Vinit Raj, and Seong-Cheol Kim. 2022. "Novel Approach in Biodegradation of Synthetic Thermoplastic Polymers: An Overview" Polymers 14, no. 20: 4271. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14204271

APA Style

Venkatesan, R., Santhamoorthy, M., Alagumalai, K., Haldhar, R., Raorane, C. J., Raj, V., & Kim, S. -C. (2022). Novel Approach in Biodegradation of Synthetic Thermoplastic Polymers: An Overview. Polymers, 14(20), 4271. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14204271

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop