Next Article in Journal
Polyurethane Adhesives Based on Oxyalkylated Kraft Lignin
Next Article in Special Issue
Fiber Orientation and Strain Rate-Dependent Tensile and Compressive Behavior of Injection Molded Polyamide-6 Reinforced with 20% Short Carbon Fiber
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure and Shear Behaviour of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu Composite Solder Pastes Enhanced by Epoxy Resin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ballistic Limit of UHMWPE Composite Armor under Impact of Ogive-Nose Projectile
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 23
10.3390/polym14235304
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Efficiency Carbon Fiber Recovery Method and Characterization of Carbon FIBER-Reinforced Epoxy/4,4′-Diaminodiphenyl Sulfone Composites

by
Yong-Min Lee
1,2,
Kwan-Woo Kim
1,* and
Byung-Joo Kim
3,*
1
Convergence Research Division, Korea Carbon Industry Promotion Agency, Jeonju 54852, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Carbon Convergence and Composite Materials Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Carbon-Nanomaterials Engineering, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(23), 5304; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235304
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 1 December 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 4 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites: Mechanical Properties and Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Globally, the demand for carbon fiber-reinforced thermosetting plastics for various applications is increasing. As a result, the amount of waste from CFRPs is increasing every year, and the EU Council recommends recycling and reuse of CFRPs. Epoxy resin (EP) is used as a matrix for CFRPs, and amine hardeners are mainly used. However, no research has been conducted on recycling EP/4,4’-diaminodiphenyl sulfone (DDS)-based CFRP. In this study, the effect of steam and air pyrolysis conditions on the mechanical properties of re-cycled carbon fiber (r-CF) recovered from carbon fiber-reinforced thermosetting (epoxy/4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone) plastics (CFRPs) was investigated. Steam pyrolysis enhanced resin degradation relative to N2. The tensile strength of the recovered r-CF was reduced by up to 35.12% due to oxidation by steam or air. However, the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) tended to increase by 9.18%, which is considered to be due to the increase in functional groups containing oxygen atoms and the roughness of the surface due to oxidation. The recycling of CFRP in both a steam and an air atmosphere caused a decrease in the tensile strength of r-CF. However, they were effective methods to recover r-CF that had a clean surface and increased IFSS.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Carbon fiber-reinforced plastics (CFRPs) are high-performance composite materials composed of carbon fibers and thermosetting or thermoplastic polymer matrices [1,2,3]. A global goal is to achieve net-zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2050 [4]. Therefore, studies on improving fuel efficiency have been conducted in the fields of aerospace [5,6], ships [7,8], and automobiles [9,10] by building vehicle bodies and parts with CFRP, which is light, high intensity, and high elasticity for light weight [11,12,13]. As CFRP can replace metals due to the properties mentioned above, as well as the advantages of excellent corrosion resistance [14,15] and durability [16], demand has also increased in structural applications such as renewable energy [17,18], sports [19], and civil engineering and architecture [20,21,22]. As the production of and demand for CFRP increases, the amount of waste also increases yearly [23,24,25]. In the European Union, automobiles generate 8-9 million tons of waste each year at the end of their lifespan. Accordingly, the European Parliament and the Council adopted a directive on end-of-life vehicles in 1997 to address this issue. This directive requires that waste be reused and recovered. Thus, giving priority to reuse and recycling is the basic principle of the directive [26]. Meanwhile, delivery of approximately 40,000 aircraft is expected by 2038, with an annual air traffic growth rate of at least 4.3%. Of these aircraft, 56% are expected to accommodate market growth, and the remaining deliveries are expected to replace approximately 75% of current aircraft over the next 20 years. This will result in the retirement of approximately 19,000 commercial aircraft over the next 18 years. Due to regulations, OEMs consider the end of life of an aircraft at the design stage, and research on aircraft recycling is underway in industry and academia [27]. CFRP is used in 53% of the Airbus a350 XWB, and in 50% of the Boeing 787 [28]. The recent launch of clean aviation to achieve climate neutrality has driven the goal of replacing 75% of existing civil aircraft with hydrogen- and electric-powered aircraft [29]. By 2050, the aviation industry is expected to collect approximately 500,000 tons of end-of-life (EOL) waste from CFRP [30]. CFRP has been disposed of by landfill in the past. However, disposal by landfill is restricted or prohibited because it causes environmental problems due to the lifespan of polymers [31,32,33]. Therefore, various recycling methods for CFRP have recently been developed. There are three typical recycling methods for CFRP: mechanical, chemical, and thermal. Mechanical recycling is the simple process of physically crushing CFRP. However, CF and resin are not separated during the crushing, which is a drawback, and long fibers are broken during the grinding process, which results in poor physical properties [34]. The chemical method is a method that uses a solvent to decompose important chemical bonds of the used thermosetting resin. Acids [35,36,37], hydrogen peroxide [34,38], and supercritical fluids [39,40,41] are used as solvents. However, acids take a long time to decompose CFRP, and hydrogen peroxide is difficult to manage due to its high reactivity. In addition, although supercritical fluids have a high CF recovery rate and can recover CF with a clean surface and excellent physical properties, high temperatures and high-pressure conditions are required, and the cost of r-CF recovery is high. In addition, large-capacity and continuous processes are difficult, and environmental problems may occur due to processing with solvents. Conventional thermal recycling is a simple and continuous process that decomposes resin and recovers CF at a high temperature of approximately 500 °C or higher in N2 or air atmosphere. However, a large amount of energy is consumed, and undecomposed impurities generated during the process are adsorbed on the CF surface, leaving a residue. In addition, pyrolysis produces CO and CO2, which can lead to environmental problems [42]. To compensate for these shortcomings, Kim et al. suggested a decomposition method using superheated steam in 2017 [23]. Superheated steam can uniformly apply heat to CFRP and penetrate the resin to decompose rapidly. In addition, unlike other pyrolysis methods, it is possible to recover in the form of tar and thus generate less CO2. Epoxy is the most commonly used thermosetting resin in CFRP production, and amine curing agents are used primarily for epoxy curing. Among the commonly used 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl methane (DDM) and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone (DDS), many studies have been conducted on recycling methods of EP/DDM-based CFRP, but EP/DDS-based CFRP recycling methods have not been studied. In this study, EP/DDS-based CFRPs were pyrolysis in steam and air atmosphere. The temperature conditions in each atmosphere were essential to remove the residual epoxy on the CF surface. Optimal process conditions such as atmosphere gas type, temperature, and holding time were derived, and the mechanical properties of the recovered r-CF were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

For the CFRPs used in this study, polyacrylonitrile-based unidirectional carbon fiber (CF, T700, Toray, Tokyo, Japan) was used as a reinforcing material, and an amine curing agent (4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone, DDS, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, AHEW of 62.08 g/eq, Tm of 172–175 °C) and a bifunctional epoxy resin (EP, diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A, Kukdo Chem., Seoul, Republic of Korea, YD-128, EEW of 184–190 g/eq, a viscosity of 11,500–13,500 cps at 25 °C) were mixed in an equivalent ratio and then impregnated using the hand lay-up method. At this time, the impregnated EP was 35 ± 2 wt.%. Curing was performed at 190 °C (10 °C/min) for 1 h based on the differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) results shown in Figure 1. The structures of EP and DDS are shown in Figure 2.

2.1. CFRP Pyrolysis

A quartz tube furnace (length of 950 mm, inner diameter of 8 mm) was used for the CFRP pyrolysis. The fabricated CFRP was placed on an alumina crucible and loaded into a quartz tube. The heating steam was generated at 170 °C using triple-distilled water (5 cc/min) in a pre-heater. CFRP was heated to 500–600 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and pyrolyzed for 180 min, followed by post-treatment at 500–600 °C for 10 min with air (O2-21% under N2; 200 cc/min). Finally, recycled carbon fiber (r-CF) was recovered after cooling to room temperature. The nomenclature for r-CF according to the pyrolysis conditions is shown in Table 1.

2.2. Fixed Pyrolysis Conditions

The curing temperature of the EP/DDS mixture used as a matrix was measured using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC, DSC 3, Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA). Approximately 7 mg of the mixture was placed in a 100 μL aluminum pan and heated from 30 °C to 300 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min under an N2 atmosphere (50 cc/min).
The thermal decomposition temperatures of the CF and EP were measured using a simultaneous thermal analyzer (STA, TGA/DSC 3+, Mettler Toledo). Approximately 4 mg of the samples were placed in a 70 μL aluminum pan and heated from room temperature to 500, 550, and 600 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min under an N2 and air atmosphere (50 cc/min).

2.3. Physical Properties

The tensile properties of a single fiber of Ar-CF and r-CF were measured using a universal testing machine (UTM, Seron, Seoul, Republic of Korea) according to ASTM D3379. At this time, the gauge length of the CF was set to 10 mm, and the draw-off clamp speed was set to 1 mm/min. After placing the CF between the grips of the UTM, both sides of the sample window were cut at the midpoint of the gauge. For each sample, at least 50 CFs were measured; a schematic diagram of the CF tensile strength sampling is shown in Figure 3a. In the tensile test, an error may occur if the carbon fiber is placed diagonally rather than in the center of the window.
The interfacial shear strength (IFSS) between the Ar-CF and r-CF and the EP resin was also measured using UTM. A single fiber was placed at the center of a paper window and adhered with an EP bond, and EP droplets with a diameter of approximately 100–200 µm were placed using a sharp needle. The EP droplet is a difunctional epoxy (EP, diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A, Kukdo Chem., YD-128, EEW of 184–190 g/eq, a viscosity of 11,500–13,500 cps at 25 °C) and an amine curing agent (4,4′-diaminodiphenyl methane, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, AHEW of 49.565 g/eq, Tm of 89 °C) was used. It was mixed for 20 min on a hot plate at 80 °C, and the temperature was maintained during the droplet operation. EP droplets were cured at 150 °C (10 °C/min) for 1 h. At least 25 CFs were measured for each sample, and the schematic diagram for the IFSS sampling of CFs is shown in Figure 3b. The IFSS test can be considered a failure if the carbon fiber is located diagonally to the window or if the epoxy bond is not fully cured and the carbon fiber rather than the EP droplet is pulled out.

2.4. Component Analysis

Functional groups on the Ar-CF and r-CF surfaces were detected in the 400–4000 cm−1 range using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Nicolet iS10, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). FT-IR samples were prepared as discs by grinding CF and potassium bromide (KBr, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) together and applying a clamp force of 7 tons for 2 min using a hydraulic press (CrushIR, PIKE Technologies, Madison, Wisconsin, WI, USA).
The surface properties of Ar-CF and r-CF were observed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Ar-CF and r-CF were fixed in the SEM sample holder using carbon tape, and all images were obtained at 104 magnifications at 1.0 × 10−5 torr and an acceleration voltage of 15 kV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Pyrolysis Conditions of EP/DDS and Carbon Fiber

CF and cured EP/DDS thermal decomposition behaviors were measured by STA under a gas (N2 or air) atmosphere, and the thermal decomposition behavior under a steam atmosphere was measured by a self-made TGA furnace. The results are shown in Figure 4, and a schematic diagram is shown in Figure 5. The mass of CF was decreased by 2.81% (N2), 4.58% (steam), and 7.62% (air) at 600 °C. In addition, EP showed a mass reduction of 71.09% (N2), 85.40% (steam), and 96.64% (air) at 600 °C. The mass loss was the least under N2 atmosphere and the degree of damage to the CF was therefore also small. On the other hand, the degree of damage to CF was large under the air atmosphere because the mass loss was the highest. Under the steam atmosphere, the decrease in mass was between that of N2 and air. Even though the amount of EP char remaining after treatment showed a slight difference (approximately 14.31%) between N2 and steam, it exerted a significant influence during the post-treatment (air) time. The post-treatment can have a significant impact on CF damage. In conclusion, it is considered that the CF damage can be minimized by shortening the duration of air post-treatment because EP char can be quickly generated under steam.

3.2. Morphology of the r-CF

The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the surface morphology of Ar-CF and r-CF are shown in Figure 6. In steam pyrolysis at 500–600 °C, the EP of CFRP did not completely decompose. Therefore, some EP remained on the CF surface. However, an increase in the pyrolysis temperature affected the EP decomposition. Then, air pyrolysis induced the complete removal of EP on the CF surface within a short time. However, air pyrolysis at 500 °C did not completely remove the EP char on the r-CF and remained in the form of crumbs. On the other hand, air pyrolysis at 550 °C completely removed the EP char on the r-CF surface, and the degree of etching on the surface was small. Air pyrolysis at 600 °C also completely removed the EP char on the CF surface. However, the r-CF surface was etched, and a curve was formed due to excessive air treatment. Based on the results above, the conditions of the 50-55-10 sample were effective for EP/DDS-based CFRP recycling.

3.3. Mechanical Properties of the r-CF

The tensile strength of the recovered r-CF is shown in Figure 7a. Equation (1) was used to calculate the tensile strength.
S t r e n g t h = F / A
where F is the force at the break of the fiber, and A is the average cross-sectional area of the fiber.
The tensile strength of r-CF was decreased as the pyrolysis temperature increased. In the case of Ar-CF, the tensile strength decreased from 4.67 GPa to 3.03 GPa (60-60-10). As the temperature increased to 500–600 °C, the tensile strength of r-CF tended toward 22.48% (4.49 to 3.62 GPa) in the case of the sample that only underwent steam pyrolysis. It is considered that the EP on the CF surface was decomposed by steam to form EP char, and thus the tensile strength was reduced as the CF was oxidized. The tensile strength of the 50-50-10 sample, which was subjected to air post-treatment after steam pyrolysis at 500 °C, was reduced by 11.99% (4.11 GPa), and the error rate was calculated to be large compared with that of the other samples. The EP char formed by steam was not completely decomposed in the air atmosphere and remained on the surface in the form of crumbs, which reduced the tensile strength and seemed to be the cause of the large error rate. The tensile strength of the sample subjected to secondary pyrolysis at 550–600 °C was reduced by up to 35.12% (3.85–3.03 GPa). Short air pyrolysis at temperatures above 550 °C induced a decrease in tensile strength due to oxidation and etching of the r-CF surface. However, the EP char on the CF surface was completely removed.
The IFSS of the recovered r-CF is shown in Figure 7b. Equation (2) was used to calculate the IFSS.
I F S S = F / π D L
where F is the equipment force when the fiber breaks, D is the droplet size, and L is the diameter of the carbon fiber.
The IFSS of Ar-CF was 56.09 MPa. The IFSS of r-CF recovered under steam pyrolysis conditions was lower than the IFSS of Ar-CF, regardless of temperature conditions. However, the IFSS of r-CF after air treatment at 500–550 °C was calculated as 46.42 MPa (82.76%) and 49.95 MPa (89.05%), respectively, compared to Ar-CF. As steam-air pyrolysis proceeded, EP char debris was formed on the surface of r-CF, and EP droplets did not completely adhere to CF but instead formed on the EP char. Meanwhile, the IFSS of the r-CF after air treatment at 600° C for 10 min was calculated as 59.14 MPa (105.44%), 59.45 MPa (105.99%), and 61.24 MPa (109.18%), respectively, compared with Ar-CF. As shown in the SEM images in Figure 5, the specific surface area increased due to the curvature of the r-CF surface. In addition, it is thought that the improvement in the IFSS was caused by the increase in functional groups containing oxygen atoms on r-CF by air.

3.4. Functional Group of r-CF

Figure 8 shows the FT-IR analysis that was done to identify the change in functional groups containing oxygen atoms in Ar-CF and r-CF. The hydroxyl (-OH) group on the CF was observed at 3431 cm−1 [43,44]. The peaks corresponding to the sp2 C-H bond (=CH) and sp3 C-H bond (-CH) were observed at 2920 cm−1 and 2851 cm−1 [43,44,45], respectively. In addition, the peak for the C=C bond was observed at 1575 cm−1 [43,44,45], and the peaks for the ketone (C=O) and C-O bond were observed at 1638 cm−1 and 1100 cm−1 [43,44,45], respectively.
The FT-IR spectra of r-CF were similar to those of Ar-CF. As the steam-air heat treatment proceeded, the peaks corresponding to the -OH, C=O, and C-O groups increased, and the peaks corresponding to the -CH, =CH, and C=C bonds decreased, suggesting that steam and air heat treatment converted -CH, =CH, and C=C bonds to functional groups containing oxygen atoms. Therefore, it is considered that the introduction of functional groups containing oxygen atoms improved the interfacial bonding interaction between CF and EP.

4. Conclusions

In this study, CFRPs were prepared using epoxy (EP) and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone (DDS) as a curing agent. The prepared CFRPs were pyrolyzed under steam and air atmospheres to recover r-CF, and the structural and mechanical properties of the r-CF were evaluated. As the pyrolysis temperature increased, r-CF was oxidized, and the tensile strength was reduced by up to 64.88% relative to that of Ar-CF. As the thermal decomposition temperature increased, r-CF was oxidized and the tensile strength decreased by up to 64.88% compared to Ar-CF, but the IFSS tended to increase by 9.18% due to the increase in oxygen functional groups. In conclusion, a short-duration air post-treatment after steam pyrolysis had the effect of the complete removal of the residual EP char on the CF surface. Based on these results, clean r-CF was recovered from EP/DDS-based CFRP after air post-treatment. Although the tensile strength decreased, the IFSS improved. Therefore, the r-CF with improved IFSS has advantageous for manufacturing high-quality CFRP because of its excellent interfacial bonding with EP.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.-J.K.; methodology, B.-J.K.; validation, Y.-M.L.; formal analysis, Y.-M.L.; investigation, Y.-M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-M.L.; writing—review and editing, K.-W.K.; visualization, Y.-M.L.; supervision, K.-W.K., B.-J.K.; project administration, K.-W.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the “Industrial Core Technology Development Program” (no. 20012817). The development of functional parts manufacturing technology, which reduced the cost by more than 15% by upcycling carbon fiber and intermediate materials, was funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy, Republic of Korea. This study was supported by the Material Parts Technology Development Project (Project No. 20015733) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy (MOTIE), Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hernandez, T.P.A.; Mills, A.R.; Yazdani Nezhad, H.Y. Shear driven deformation and damage mechanisms in High-performance carbon Fibre-reinforced thermoplastic and toughened thermoset composites subjected to high strain loading. Compos. Struct. 2021, 261, 113289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, J.; Chevali, V.S.; Wang, H.; Wang, C.H. Current status of carbon fibre and carbon fibre composites recycling. Compos. B Eng. 2020, 193, 108053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rao, P.S.; Hardiman, M.; O’Dowd, N.P.; Sebaey, T.A. Comparison of progressive damage between thermoset and thermoplastic CFRP composites under in-situ tensile loading. J. Compos. Mater. 2020, 55, 1473–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. EUR. L.Ex. 12 April 2022. Available online: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022D0591 (accessed on 6 April 2022).
  5. Kupski, J.; Teixeira de Freitas, S.T.D. Design of adhesively bonded lap joints with laminated CFRP adherends: Review, challenges and new opportunities for aerospace structures. Compos. Struct. 2021, 268, 113923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morioka, K.; Tomita, Y.; Takigawa, K. High-temperature fracture properties of CFRP composite for aerospace applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2001, 319, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Petrakli, F.; Gkika, A.; Bonou, A.; Karayannis, P.; Koumoulos, E.P.; Semitekolos, D.; Trompeta, A.-F.; Rocha, N.; Santos, R.M.; Simmonds, G.; et al. End-of-Life Recycling Options of (Nano)Enhanced CFRP Composite Prototypes Waste—A Life Cycle perspective. Polymers 2020, 12, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shi, J.; Bao, L. Optimum decomposition conditions for glass fiber reinforced plastic recycling by superheated steam. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 50, 01AJ01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bere, P.; Dudescu, M.; Neamțu, C.; Cocian, C. Design, manufacturing and test of CFRP front hood concepts for a light-weight vehicle. Polymers 2021, 13, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fragassa, C.; Pavlovic, A.; Minak, G. On the structural behaviour of a CFRP safety cage in a solar powered electric vehicle. Compos. Struct. 2020, 252, 112698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jeong, J.S.; Kim, K.W.; An, K.-H.; Kim, B.-J. Fast recovery process of carbon fibers from waste carbon fibers-reinforced thermoset plastics. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 247, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Berger, D.; Brabandt, D.; Bakir, C.; Hornung, T.; Lanza, G.; Summa, J.; Schwarz, M.; Herrmann, H.-G.; Pohl, M.; Stommel, M. Effects of defects in series production of hybrid CFRP lightweight components—Detection and evaluation of quality critical characteristics. Measurement 2017, 95, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, J. Zhou, P.; Guan, C.; Liu, T.Q.; Kang, W.-H.; Feng, P.; Gao, Shuoqi. An ultra-lightweight CFRP beam-string structure. Compos. Struct. 2021, 257, 113149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wong, D.W.Y.; Lin, L.; McGrail, P.T.; Peijs, T.; Hogg, P.J. Improved fracture toughness of carbon fibre/epoxy composite laminates using dissolvable thermoplastic fibres. Compos. A 2010, 41, 759–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El-Tahan, M.; Galal, K.; Hoa, V.S. New thermoplastic CFRP bendable rebars for reinforcing structural concrete elements. Compos. B Eng. 2013, 45, 1207–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Miyano, Y.; Nakada, M.; Ichimura, J.; Hayakawa, E. Accelerated testing for long-term strength of innovative CFRP laminates for marine use. Compos. B Eng. 2008, 39, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alam, P.; Robert, C.; Ó Brádaigh, C.M.Ó. Tidal turbine blade composites—A review on the effects of hygrothermal aging on the properties of CFRP. Compos. B Eng. 2018, 149, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, W.-X.; Matsubara, T.; Hu, J.; Odahara, S.; Nagai, T.; Karasutani, T.; Ohya, Y. Experimental investigation into the influence of the flanged diffuser on the dynamic behavior of CFRP blade of a shrouded wind turbine. Renew. Energy 2015, 78, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Taniguchi, N.; Nishiwaki, T.; Kawada, H. Tensile strength of unidirectional CFRP laminate under high strain rate. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2007, 16, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mechtcherine, V.; Michel, A.; Liebscher, M.; Schneider, K.; Großmann, C. Mineral-impregnated carbon fiber composites as novel reinforcement for concrete construction: Material and automation perspectives. Autom. Constr. 2020, 110, 103002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Firmo, J.P.; Roquette, M.G.; Correia, J.R.; Azevedo, A.S. Influence of elevated temperatures on epoxy adhesive used in CFRP strengthening systems for civil engineering applications. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2019, 93, 102333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Danilov, A.I. Some aspects of CFRP steel structures reinforcement in civil engineering. Procedia Eng. 2016, 153, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, K.W.; Lee, H.M.; An, J.H.; Chung, D.C.; An, K.-H.; Kim, B.-J. Recycling and characterization of carbon fibers from carbon fiber reinforced epoxy matrix composites by a novel super-heated-steam method. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vo Dong, P.A.; Azzaro-Pantel, C.; Cadene, A.-L. Economic and environmental assessment of recovery and disposal pathways for CFRP waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 133, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Liu, W.; Huang, H.; Zhu, L.; Liu, Z. Integrating carbon fiber reclamation and additive manufacturing for recycling CFRP waste. Compos. B Eng. 2021, 215, 108808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. EUR. L.Ex. 21 October 2000. Available online: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32000L0053 (accessed on 18 September 2000).
  27. Maaß, S. Aircraft Recycling—A Literature Review; Hamburg University of Applied Sciences: Hamburg, Germany, 2020; pp. 8–23. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gopalraj, S.K. Impacts of Recycled Carbon Fibre and Glass Fibre as Sustainable Raw Materials for Thermosetting Composites. Ph.D. Thesis, Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantensis, Lappeenranta, Finland, 2022; pp. 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  29. Meng, F.; McKechnie, J.; Turner, T.A.; Pickering, S.J. Energy and environmental assessment and reuse of fluidised bed recycled carbon fibres. Compos. A 2017, 100, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khalil, Y.F. Comparative environmental and human health evaluations of thermolysis and solvolysis recycling technologies of carbon fiber reinforced polymer waste. Waste Manag. 2018, 76, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tapper, R.J.; Longana, M.L.; Hamerton, I.; Potter, K.D. A closed-loop recycling process for discontinuous carbon fibre polyamide 6 composites. Compos. B Eng. 2019, 179, 107418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thomas, C.; Borges, P.H.R.; Panzera, T.H.; Cimentada, A.; Lombillo, I. Epoxy composites containing CFRP powder wastes. Compos. B Eng. 2014, 59, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Obunai, K.; Fukuta, T.; Ozaki, K. Carbon fiber extraction from waste CFRP by microwave irradiation. Compos. A 2015, 78, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, Q.; An, L.; Li, C.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, J.; Li, Y. Environment-friendly recycling of CFRP composites via gentle solvent system at atmospheric pressure. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 224, 109461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hanaoka, T.; Arao, Y.; Kayaki, Y.; Kuwata, S.; Kubouchi, M. Analysis of nitric acid decomposition of epoxy resin network structures for chemical recycling. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2021, 186, 109537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hanaoka, T.; Ikematsu, H.; Takahashi, S.; Ito, N.; Ijuin, N.; Kawada, H.; Arao, Y.; Kubouchi, M. Recovery of carbon fiber from prepreg using nitric acid and evaluation of recycled CFRP. Compos. B. Eng. 2022, 231, 109560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Feraboli, P.; Kawakami, H.; Wade, B.; Gasco, F.; DeOto, L.; Masini, A. Recyclability and reutilization of carbon fiber fabric/epoxy composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 1459–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, P.; Li, J.; Ding, J. Chemical recycling of carbon fibre/epoxy composites in a mixed solution of peroxide hydrogen and N,N-dimethylformamide. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 82, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Okajima, I.; Sako, T. Recycling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic using supercritical and subcritical fluids. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2017, 19, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Okajima, I.; Hiramatsu, M.; Shimamura, Y.; Awaya, T.; Sako, T. Chemical recycling of carbon fiber reinforced plastic using supercritical methanol. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 91, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Okajima, I.; Sako, T. Recycling fiber-reinforced plastic using supercritical acetone. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 163, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Meyer, L.O.; Schulte, K.; Grove-Nielsen, E. CFRP-recycling following a pyrolysis route: Process optimization and potentials. J. Compos. Mater. 2009, 43, 1121–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Deng, Z.; Xu, L.; Zhang, L.; Peng, J.; Guo, S.; Liu, J.; Koppala, S. Recycling of Carbon Fibers from CFRP Waste by Microwave Thermolysis. Processes 2019, 7, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Deng, Z.; Yue, J.; Huang, Z. Solvothermal degradation and reuse of carbon fiber reinforced boron phenolic resin composites. Compos. B. Eng. 2021, 221, 109011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huang, Z.; Deng, Z.; Dong, C.; Fan, C.; Ren, Y. A close-loop recycling process for carbon fiber reinforced vinyl ester resin composite. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 05304 g001 550
Figure 1. Curing temperature of epoxy/4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone mixture using differential scanning calorimetry.
Figure 1. Curing temperature of epoxy/4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone mixture using differential scanning calorimetry.
Polymers 14 05304 g001
Polymers 14 05304 g002 550
Figure 2. Chemical structures of epoxy and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of epoxy and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone.
Polymers 14 05304 g002
Polymers 14 05304 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematics of physical properties test; (a) tensile strength and (b) interfacial shear strength.
Figure 3. Schematics of physical properties test; (a) tensile strength and (b) interfacial shear strength.
Polymers 14 05304 g003
Polymers 14 05304 g004 550
Figure 4. TGA and DTG graphs of as-received carbon fiber and epoxy resin pyrolysis under gas atmosphere: (a) cured epoxy/4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone and (b) carbon fiber.
Figure 4. TGA and DTG graphs of as-received carbon fiber and epoxy resin pyrolysis under gas atmosphere: (a) cured epoxy/4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone and (b) carbon fiber.
Polymers 14 05304 g004
Polymers 14 05304 g005 550
Figure 5. Weight loss of as-received carbon fiber and epoxy resin pyrolysis under gas atmosphere: (a) N2, (b) steam, and (c) air.
Figure 5. Weight loss of as-received carbon fiber and epoxy resin pyrolysis under gas atmosphere: (a) N2, (b) steam, and (c) air.
Polymers 14 05304 g005
Polymers 14 05304 g006 550
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy images of the as-received and recycled carbon fibers under varying pyrolysis conditions; (a) Ar-CF, (b) 50, (c) 55, (d) 60, (e) 50-50-10, (f) 50-55-10, (g) 50-60-10, (h) 55-60-10, and (i) 60-60-10.
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy images of the as-received and recycled carbon fibers under varying pyrolysis conditions; (a) Ar-CF, (b) 50, (c) 55, (d) 60, (e) 50-50-10, (f) 50-55-10, (g) 50-60-10, (h) 55-60-10, and (i) 60-60-10.
Polymers 14 05304 g006
Polymers 14 05304 g007 550
Figure 7. Physical properties of the as-received and recycled carbon fibers under varying pyrolysis conditions: (a) tensile strength and (b) interfacial shear strength.
Figure 7. Physical properties of the as-received and recycled carbon fibers under varying pyrolysis conditions: (a) tensile strength and (b) interfacial shear strength.
Polymers 14 05304 g007
Polymers 14 05304 g008 550
Figure 8. Fourier-transform infrared spectra of the as-received and recycled carbon fibers with varying pyrolysis conditions.
Figure 8. Fourier-transform infrared spectra of the as-received and recycled carbon fibers with varying pyrolysis conditions.
Polymers 14 05304 g008
Table
Table 1. Nomenclature for recycled carbon fibers and carbon fiber-reinforced plastics pyrolysis conditions.
Table 1. Nomenclature for recycled carbon fibers and carbon fiber-reinforced plastics pyrolysis conditions.
SampleStep 1Step 2
Temperature
(°C)		Heating Rate
(°C/min)		Hold Time
(min)		Steam
(cc/min)		Temperature
(°C)		Heating Rate
(°C/min)		Hold Time
(min)		Air
(cc/min)
Ar-CF--------
50500101805----
55550
60600
50-50-105001018055001010200
50-55-10550
50-60-10600
55-60-105501018056001010200
60-60-10600
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, Y.-M.; Kim, K.-W.; Kim, B.-J. High-Efficiency Carbon Fiber Recovery Method and Characterization of Carbon FIBER-Reinforced Epoxy/4,4′-Diaminodiphenyl Sulfone Composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 5304. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235304

AMA Style

Lee Y-M, Kim K-W, Kim B-J. High-Efficiency Carbon Fiber Recovery Method and Characterization of Carbon FIBER-Reinforced Epoxy/4,4′-Diaminodiphenyl Sulfone Composites. Polymers. 2022; 14(23):5304. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Yong-Min, Kwan-Woo Kim, and Byung-Joo Kim. 2022. "High-Efficiency Carbon Fiber Recovery Method and Characterization of Carbon FIBER-Reinforced Epoxy/4,4′-Diaminodiphenyl Sulfone Composites" Polymers 14, no. 23: 5304. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235304

APA Style

Lee, Y. -M., Kim, K. -W., & Kim, B. -J. (2022). High-Efficiency Carbon Fiber Recovery Method and Characterization of Carbon FIBER-Reinforced Epoxy/4,4′-Diaminodiphenyl Sulfone Composites. Polymers, 14(23), 5304. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop