Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Outlooks
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Preparation and Characteristics of Nanocellulose Aerogels
2.1. Isolation of Nanocellulose
2.2. Purification of Nanocellulose
2.3. Various Kinds of Nanocellulose
2.4. Fabrication Steps for Nanocellulose Aerogels
2.4.1. Preparation of Nanocellulose Polymer Dispersion
2.4.2. Sol–Gel Transition
2.4.3. Gel-Drying
3. Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in BTE
3.1. Microstructure of Bone ECM
3.2. Nanocellulose Aerogel Alone
3.3. Nanocellulose-Based Composite Aerogels
3.3.1. HA–Nanocellulose Aerogel
3.3.2. Bioactive Glasses–Nanocellulose Aerogel
3.3.3. Collagen–Nanocellulose Aerogel
3.3.4. Chitosan–Nanocellulose Aerogel
3.3.5. PVA–Nanocellulose Aerogel
3.3.6. SF–Nanocellulose Aerogel
4. Nanocellulose Aerogels-Based Controlled Releasing System for BTE
4.1. Antibiotic, Growth Factors, and Chinese Herbal Medicine Delivery
4.2. Smart Drug Delivery System
4.3. Modification of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels
4.3.1. Enhancement of Mechanical Properties
4.3.2. Enhancement of Their Osteogenic Ability
4.3.3. Improvement in Hydrophilicity
5. Challenges and Outlook
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ko, H.F.; Sfeir, C.; Kumta, P.N. Novel synthesis strategies for natural polymer and composite biomaterials as potential scaffolds for tissue engineering. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2010, 368, 1981–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ho-Shui-Ling, A.; Bolander, J.; Rustom, L.E.; Johnson, A.W.; Luyten, F.P.; Picart, C. Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives. Biomaterials 2018, 180, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weinstein, A.M.; Rome, B.N.; Reichmann, W.M.; Collins, J.E.; Burbine, S.A.; Thornhill, T.S.; Wright, J.; Katz, J.N.; Losina, E. Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2013, 95, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waldrop, R.; Cheng, J.; Devin, C.; McGirt, M.; Fehlings, M.; Berven, S. The Burden of Spinal Disorders in the Elderly. Neurosurgery 2015, 77, S46–S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Keefe, R.J.; Mao, J. Bone tissue engineering and regeneration: From discovery to the clinic—An overview. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2011, 17, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitriou, R.; Jones, E.; McGonagle, D.; Giannoudis, P.V. Bone regeneration: Current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myeroff, C.; Archdeacon, M. Autogenous bone graft: Donor sites and techniques. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2011, 93, 2227–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopper, R.A.; Ettinger, R.E.; Purnell, C.A.; Dover, M.S.; Pereira, A.R.; Tuncbilek, G. Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced? Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2020, 145, 1073e–1088e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moraschini, V.; de Almeida, D.C.F.; Calasans-Maia, M.D.; Kischinhevsky, I.C.C.; Louro, R.S.; Granjeiro, J.M. Immunological response of allogeneic bone grafting: A systematic review of prospective studies. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2020, 49, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, D.J.; Scott, K.M.; Kulkarni, A.N.; Wayne, J.S.; Boyan, B.D.; Schwartz, Z. Acellular mineralized allogenic block bone graft does not remodel during the 10 weeks following concurrent implant placement in a rabbit femoral model. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2020, 31, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diallo, A.M.; Rota, S.; Boissiere, M.; Bardonnet, R.; Pauthe, E.; Petite, H.; Benoist, H.M.; Bensidhoum, M.; Anagnostou, F. Osteoformation potential of an allogenic partially demineralized bone matrix in critical-size defects in the rat calvarium. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 127, 112207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wu, G. Slowly Delivered Icariin/Allogeneic Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Promote the Healing of Calvarial Critical-Size Bone Defects. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 1416047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sordi, M.B.; Cruz, A.; Fredel, M.C.; Magini, R.; Sharpe, P.T. Three-dimensional bioactive hydrogel-based scaffolds for bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 124, 112055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roseti, L.; Parisi, V.; Petretta, M.; Cavallo, C.; Desando, G.; Bartolotti, I.; Grigolo, B. Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 78, 1246–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirkhalaf, M.; Men, Y.; Wang, R.; No, Y.; Zreiqat, H. Personalized 3D printed bone scaffolds: A review. Acta Biomater. 2022, 156, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Xue, K.; Kong, N.; Liu, K.; Chang, J. Silicate bioceramics enhanced vascularization and osteogenesis through stimulating interactions between endothelia cells and bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 3803–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dubey, S.; Mishra, R.; Roy, P.; Singh, R. 3-D macro/microporous-nanofibrous bacterial cellulose scaffolds seeded with BMP-2 preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells exhibit remarkable potential for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 934–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziegler, C.; Wolf, A.; Liu, W.; Herrmann, A.K.; Gaponik, N.; Eychmuller, A. Modern Inorganic Aerogels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 13200–13221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J.; Su, B.L.; Xia, H.; Zhao, S.; Gao, C.; Wang, L.; Ogbeide, O.; Feng, J.; Hasan, T. Printed aerogels: Chemistry, processing, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 3842–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Gonzalez, C.A.; Budtova, T.; Duraes, L.; Erkey, C.; Del Gaudio, P.; Gurikov, P.; Koebel, M.; Liebner, F.; Neagu, M.; Smirnova, I. An Opinion Paper on Aerogels for Biomedical and Environmental Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Shafiq, M.; Sun, B.; Wu, J.; Wang, W.; El-Newehy, M.; El-Hamshary, H.; Morsi, Y.; Ali, O.; Khan, A.U.R.; et al. Composite Superelastic Aerogel Scaffolds Containing Flexible SiO2 Nanofibers Promote Bone Regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022, 11, e2200499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, D.; Yuen, P.Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Liu, N.; Dauskardt, R.H.; Cui, Y. A Silica-Aerogel-Reinforced Composite Polymer Electrolyte with High Ionic Conductivity and High Modulus. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1802661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pircher, N.; Carbajal, L.; Schimper, C.; Bacher, M.; Rennhofer, H.; Nedelec, J.M.; Lichtenegger, H.C.; Rosenau, T.; Liebner, F. Impact of selected solvent systems on the pore and solid structure of cellulose aerogels. Cellular 2016, 23, 1949–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, C.; Jiao, Y.; Wei, S.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Li, J. Functional nanocomposites from sustainable regenerated cellulose aerogels: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 359, 459–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dos Santos, D.M.; Correa, D.S.; Medeiros, E.S.; Oliveira, J.E.; Mattoso, L.H.C. Advances in Functional Polymer Nanofibers: From Spinning Fabrication Techniques to Recent Biomedical Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 45673–45701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Pang, B.; Xu, W.; Duan, G.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, K. Recent Progress on Nanocellulose Aerogels: Preparation, Modification, Composite Fabrication, Applications. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2005569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, S.; Siddique, R.; Huanfei, D.; Shereen, M.A.; Nabi, G.; Bai, Q.; Manan, S.; Xue, M.; Ullah, M.W.; Bowen, H. Perspective Applications and Associated Challenges of Using Nanocellulose in Treating Bone-Related Diseases. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 616555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budtova, T. Cellulose II aerogels: A review. Cellulose 2019, 26, 81–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Bashir Yahya, E.; Jummaat, F.; Adnan, A.S.; Olaiya, N.G.; Rizal, S.; Abdullah, C.K.; Pasquini, D.; Thomas, S. Biopolymers based aerogels: A review on revolutionary solutions for smart therapeutics delivery. Progress Mater. Sci. 2023, 131, 101014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sehaqui, H.; Zhou, Q.; Berglund, L.A. High-porosity aerogels of high specific surface area prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC). Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 1593–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kontturi, E.; Laaksonen, P.; Linder, M.B.; Nonappa; Groschel, A.H.; Rojas, O.J.; Ikkala, O. Advanced Materials through Assembly of Nanocelluloses. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1703779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia-Gonzalez, C.A.; Sosnik, A.; Kalmar, J.; De Marco, I.; Erkey, C.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Aerogels in drug delivery: From design to application. J. Control. Release 2021, 332, 40–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.; Ghosh, B.; Sarkar, K. Nanocellulose as sustainable biomaterials for drug delivery. Sens. Int. 2022, 3, 100135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamel, R.; Mabrouk, M.; El-Sayed, S.A.M.; Beherei, H.H.; Abouzeid, R.E.; Abo El-Fadl, M.T.; Mahmoud, A.A.; Maged, A. Nanofibrillated cellulose/glucosamine 3D aerogel implants loaded with rosuvastatin and bioactive ceramic for dental socket preservation. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 616, 121549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.; Shafiq, M.; Liu, M.; Morsi, Y.; Mo, X. Advanced fabrication for electrospun three-dimensional nanofiber aerogels and scaffolds. Bioact. Mater. 2020, 5, 963–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Chen, F.; Liu, H.; Wu, P.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Su, J.; Cai, L.; Zhang, Y. Bioinspired sandwich-like hybrid surface functionalized scaffold capable of regulating osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and osteoclastogenesis for robust bone regeneration. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 17, 100458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.J.; Shi, H.H.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, H.; Cha, Y.Y.; Ruan, H.X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.C. A new cancellous bone material of silk fibroin/cellulose dual network composite aerogel reinforced by nano-hydroxyapatite filler. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 182, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosgrove, D.J. Re-constructing our models of cellulose and primary cell wall assembly. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 22, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abitbol, T.; Rivkin, A.; Cao, Y.; Nevo, Y.; Abraham, E.; Ben-Shalom, T.; Lapidot, S.; Shoseyov, O. Nanocellulose, a tiny fiber with huge applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 39, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, N.; Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 59, 302–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trache, D.; Tarchoun, A.F.; Derradji, M.; Hamidon, T.S.; Masruchin, N.; Brosse, N.; Hussin, M.H. Nanocellulose: From Fundamentals to Advanced Applications. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zulaikha, W.; Hassan, M.Z.; Ismail, Z. Recent development of natural fibre for nanocellulose extraction and application. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 66, 2265–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.-B.; Fu, Y. Hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose by solid acid catalysts. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1095–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales-dela Rosa, S.; Campos-Martin, J.M.; Fierro, J.L.G. Optimization of the process of chemical hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose. Cellulose 2014, 21, 2397–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surendran, G.; Sherje, A. Cellulose nanofibers and composites: An insight on basics and biomedical applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 75, 103601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojas, J.; Bedoya, M.; Ciro, Y. Current Trends in the Production of Cellulose Nanoparticles and Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications. Cellulose: Fundamental Aspects and Current Trends; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2015; pp. 193–228. [Google Scholar]
- Hirota, M.; Tamura, N.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A. Oxidation of regenerated cellulose with NaClO2 catalyzed by TEMPO and NaClO under acid-neutral conditions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 78, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasir, M.; Hashim, R.; Sulaiman, O.; Asim, M. Nanocellulose. In Cellulose-Reinforced Nanofibre Composites; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 261–276. [Google Scholar]
- Patil, T.V.; Patel, D.K.; Dutta, S.D.; Ganguly, K.; Santra, T.S.; Lim, K.T. Nanocellulose, a versatile platform: From the delivery of active molecules to tissue engineering applications. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 9, 566–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salimi, S.; Sotudeh-Gharebagh, R.; Zarghami, R.; Chan, S.Y.; Yuen, K.H. Production of Nanocellulose and Its Applications in Drug Delivery: A Critical Review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15800–15827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J.; Wu, T.; Dai, Y.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5298–5415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavoine, N.; Bergström, L. Nanocellulose-based foams and aerogels: Processing, properties, and applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 16105–16117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revin, V.V.; Liyaskina, E.V.; Parchaykina, M.V.; Kuzmenko, T.P.; Kurgaeva, I.V.; Revin, V.D.; Ullah, M.W. Bacterial Cellulose-Based Polymer Nanocomposites: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, F.; Hsieh, Y.L. Chemically and mechanically isolated nanocellulose and their self-assembled structures. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 95, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De France, K.; Zeng, Z.; Wu, T.; Nystrom, G. Functional Materials from Nanocellulose: Utilizing Structure-Property Relationships in Bottom-Up Fabrication. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2000657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, X.; Biswas, S.K.; Han, J.; Tanpichai, S.; Li, M.C.; Chen, C.; Zhu, S.; Das, A.K.; Yano, H. Surface, and Interface Engineering for Nanocellulosic Advanced Materials. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2002264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Adnan, A.S.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.G.; Safrida, S.; Hossain, M.S.; Balakrishnan, V.; Gopakumar, D.A.; Abdullah, C.K.; Oyekanmi, A.A.; et al. A Review on Plant Cellulose Nanofibre-Based Aerogels for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, L.Y.; Weng, Y.X.; Wang, Y.Z. Cellulose Aerogels: Synthesis, Applications, and Prospects. Polymers 2018, 10, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganesan, K.; Budtova, T.; Ratke, L.; Gurikov, P.; Baudron, V.; Preibisch, I.; Niemeyer, P.; Smirnova, I.; Milow, B. Review on the Production of Polysaccharide Aerogel Particles. Materials 2018, 11, 2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, F.; Liu, W.; Dong, Z.; Deng, Y. Underwater superoleophobicity cellulose nanofibril aerogel through regioselective sulfonation for oil/water separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 330, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.; Lee, D.; Shin, S.; Hyun, J. Effect of negatively charged cellulose nanofibers on the dispersion of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Coll. Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 130, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Zheng, Q.; Zhu, J.; Li, J.; Cai, Z.; Chen, L.; Gong, S. Mechanically strong fully biobased anisotropic cellulose aerogels. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 96518–96526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oryan, A.; Kamali, A.; Moshiri, A.; Baharvand, H.; Daemi, H. Chemical crosslinking of biopolymeric scaffolds: Current knowledge and future directions of crosslinked engineered bone scaffolds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osorio, D.A.; Lee, B.E.J.; Kwiecien, J.M.; Wang, X.; Shahid, I.; Hurley, A.L.; Cranston, E.D.; Grandfield, K. Cross-linked cellulose nanocrystal aerogels as viable bone tissue scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2019, 87, 152–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghavami Nejad, A.; Ashammakhi, N.; Wu, X.Y.; Khademhosseini, A. Crosslinking Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Polymeric Hydrogels. Small 2020, 16, e2002931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mirkhalaf, M.; Dao, A.; Schindeler, A.; Little, D.G.; Dunstan, C.R.; Zreiqat, H. Personalized Baghdadite scaffolds: Stereolithography, mechanics and in vivo testing. Acta Biomater. 2021, 132, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodin, M.; Li, J.; Kuckling, D. Dually cross-linked single networks: Structures and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8147–8177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, R.A.; Runge, T.; Ostertag, T.W.; Tang, S.; Dziubla, T.D.; Hilt, J.Z. Development of temperature-responsive polymeric gels with physical crosslinking due to intermolecularinteractions. Polym. Int. 2021, 71, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobs, A.; Renaudin, G.; Forestier, C.; Nedelec, J.M.; Descamps, S. Biological properties of copper-doped biomaterials for orthopedic applications: A review of antibacterial, angiogenic and osteogenic aspects. Acta Biomater. 2020, 117, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jodati, H.; Yilmaz, B.; Evis, Z. In vitro and in vivo properties of graphene-incorporated scaffolds for bone defect repair. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 29535–29549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, X.; Hu, Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, X.; Jiang, Y.; Su, J. Fabrication of physical and chemical crosslinked hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 12, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teixeira, L.S.; Feijen, J.; van Blitterswijk, C.A.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Karperien, M. Enzyme-catalyzed crosslinkable hydrogels: Emerging strategies for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1281–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, D.J. Cross-Linking Agents for Electrospinning-Based Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campodoni, E.; Heggset, E.B.; Rashad, A.; Ramirez-Rodriguez, G.B.; Mustafa, K.; Syverud, K.; Tampieri, A.; Sandri, M. Polymeric 3D scaffolds for tissue regeneration: Evaluation of biopolymer nanocomposite reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 94, 867–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Yang, H.; Yang, X.; Ma, Q. Tannic acid: A crosslinker leading to versatile functional polymeric networks: A review. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 7689–7711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sahin, I.; Ozbakir, Y.; Inonu, Z.; Ulker, Z.; Erkey, C. Kinetics of Supercritical Drying of Gels. Gels 2017, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, R.; Wang, J.; Du, Y.; Liao, J.; Zhang, X. Phase-separation induced synthesis of superhydrophobic silica aerogel powders and granules. J. Solid-State Chem. 2019, 279, 120971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, X.; Li, H.; Mi, H.-Y.; Liu, Y.-J.; Tan, Y.-M. Fabrication of fluffy shish-kebab structured nanofibers by electrospinning, CO2 escaping foaming and controlled crystallization for biomimetic tissue engineering scaffolds. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 372, 785–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, X.; Li, H.; Mi, H.-Y.; Liu, Y.-J.; Tan, Y.-M. Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Fluffy Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering via Electrospinning and CO2 Escaping Foaming. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 9412–9421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udeni Gunathilake, T.M.S.; Ching, Y.C.; Chuah, C.H. Enhancement of Curcumin Bioavailability Using Nanocellulose Reinforced Chitosan Hydrogel. Polymers 2017, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dervin, S.; Pillai, S.C. An Introduction to Sol-Gel Processing for Aerogels. In Sol-Gel Materials for Energy, Environment and Electronic Applications; Pillai, S.C., Hehir, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Maleki, H.; Durães, L.; Portugal, A. An overview on silica aerogels synthesis and different mechanical reinforcing strategies. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2014, 385, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchtová, N.; Pradille, C.; Bouvard, J.-L.; Budtova, T. Mechanical properties of cellulose aerogels and cryogels. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 7901–7908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dilamian, M.; Joghataei, M.; Ashrafi, Z.; Bohr, C.; Mathur, S.; Maleki, H. From 1D electrospun nanofibers to advanced multifunctional fibrous 3D aerogels. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 22, 100964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Grishkewich, N.; Liu, L.; Wang, C.; Tam, K.C.; Liu, S.; Mao, Z.; Sui, X. Construction of functional cellulose aerogels via atmospheric drying chemically cross-linked and solvent exchanged cellulose nanofibrils. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 366, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, G.; Zhang, T.; Chen, M.; Yao, K.; Huang, X.; Zhang, B.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z. Bone physiological microenvironment and healing mechanism: Basis for future bone-tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 4110–4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yi, S.; Ding, F.; Gong, L.; Gu, X. Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Curr. Stem Cell Res. 2017, 12, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hing, K.A. Bone repair in the twenty-first century: Biology, chemistry, or engineering? Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2004, 362, 2821–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reznikov, N.; Bilton, M.; Lari, L.; Stevens, M.M.; Kroger, R. Fractal-like hierarchical organization of bone begins at the nanoscale. Science 2018, 360, eaao2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Luo, D.; Wang, T. Hierarchical Structures of Bone and Bioinspired Bone Tissue Engineering. Small 2016, 12, 4611–4632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reznikov, N.; Shahar, R.; Weiner, S. Bone hierarchical structure in three dimensions. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 3815–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ressler, A. Chitosan-Based Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications: A Short Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morouco, P.; Lattanzi, W.; Alves, N. Four-Dimensional Bioprinting as a New Era for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, S.; Castro, N.; Nowicki, M.; Xia, L.; Cui, H.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, W.; Lee, S.J.; Sarkar, K.; Vozzi, G.; et al. 4D printing of polymeric materials for tissue and organ regeneration. Mater Today 2017, 20, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Li, D.; Chen, X.; Jiang, L. Biomimetic cuttlebone polyvinyl alcohol/carbon nanotubes/hydroxyapatite aerogel scaffolds enhanced bone regeneration. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2022, 210, 112221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Wang, S.; Wang, N.; Yu, J.; Liu, Y.T.; Ding, B. From 1D Nanofibers to 3D Nanofibrous Aerogels: A Marvellous Evolution of Electrospun SiO2 Nanofibers for Emerging Applications. Nanomicro Lett. 2022, 14, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rosen, T.; Hsiao, B.S.; Soderberg, L.D. Elucidating the Opportunities and Challenges for Nanocellulose Spinning. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2001238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ao, C.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, X.; He, X.; Zhang, W.; Lu, C. Fabrication, and characterization of electrospun cellulose/nano-hydroxyapatite nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 97, 568–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Tang, X.; Ge, J.; Ding, B. Ultralight nanofibre-assembled cellular aerogels with superelasticity and multifunctionality. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Yin, C.; Cheng, Y.; Huang, X.; Liu, K.; Cheng, G.; Li, Z. Electrospinning Nanofiber-Reinforced Aerogels for the Treatment of Bone Defects. Adv. Wound Care 2020, 9, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pryadko, A.S.; Botvin, V.V.; Mukhortova, Y.R.; Pariy, I.; Wagner, D.V.; Laktionov, P.P.; Chernonosova, V.S.; Chelobanov, B.P.; Chernozem, R.V.; Surmeneva, M.A.; et al. Core-Shell Magnetoactive PHB/Gelatin/Magnetite Composite Electrospun Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, Z.; Ye, Z.; Natan, A.; Ma, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Wan, L.; Aparicio, C.; Zhu, H. Bone-Inspired Mineralization with Highly Aligned Cellulose Nanofibers as Template. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 42486–42495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; He, J.; Xiong, S.; Xiao, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Ding, F.; Ji, H.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z. Construction and Nanostructure of Chitosan/Nanocellulose Hybrid Aerogels. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 3216–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuyama, K.; Morotomi, K.; Inoue, S.; Nakashima, M.; Nakashima, H.; Okuyama, T.; Kato, T.; Muto, H.; Sugiyama, H. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of Ag nanoparticle-loaded cellulose nanofiber aerogels prepared by supercritical CO2 drying. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 143, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, H.; Sharma, S.; Liu, W.; Mu, W.; Liu, W.; Zhang, X.; Deng, Y. Aerogel microspheres from natural cellulose nanofibrils and their application as cell culture scaffold. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 2540–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, T.; Li, Q.; Chen, W.; Yu, H. Composite aerogels based on dialdehyde nanocellulose and collagen for potential applications as wound dressing and tissue engineering scaffold. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 94, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, V.C.; Dunn, C.K.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, Y.; Qi, H.J. Direct Ink Write (DIW) 3D Printed Cellulose Nanocrystal Aerogel Structures. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poursamar, S.A.; Lehner, A.N.; Azami, M.; Ebrahimi-Barough, S.; Samadikuchaksaraei, A.; Antunes, A. The effects of crosslinkers on physical, mechanical, and cytotoxic properties of gelatin sponge prepared via in-situ gas foaming method as a tissue engineering scaffold. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016, 63, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Cheng, X.; Pan, Y.; Li, C.; Gong, L. Mechanical performance, and thermal stability of polyvinyl alcohol–cellulose aerogels by freeze drying. Cellulose 2018, 26, 1747–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.; Shi, Q.; Guo, W.; Terrell, L.; Qureshi, A.T.; Hayes, D.J.; Wu, Q. Electrospun bio-nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by cellulose nanocrystals reinforcing maleic anhydride grafted PLA. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 3847–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Oh, S.; Han, Y.; Lee, S.; Jeong, H.S.; Hong, H.J. Modified cellulose nanofibril aerogel: Tunable catalyst support for treatment of 4-Nitrophenol from wastewater. Chemosphere 2021, 285, 131448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleki, H.; Duraes, L.; Garcia-Gonzalez, C.A.; Del Gaudio, P.; Portugal, A.; Mahmoudi, M. Synthesis, and biomedical applications of aerogels: Possibilities and challenges. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 236, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.; Hao, N.; Bhagia, S.; Li, M.; Meng, X.; Pu, Y.; Yong, Q.; Ragauskas, A.J. Porous artificial bone scaffold synthesized from a facile in situ hydroxyapatite coating and crosslinking reaction of crystalline nanocellulose. Materialia 2018, 4, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matinfar, M.; Mesgar, A.S.; Mohammadi, Z. Evaluation of physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties of chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose reinforced with multiphasic calcium phosphate whisker-like fibers for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 100, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, D.; Liu, W.; Tang, A.; Guo, F.; Xie, W. A new PEGDA/CNF aerogel-wet hydrogel scaffold fabricated by a two-step method. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 8092–8101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.J.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, H.; Shi, H.H.; Zhang, X.C.; Liu, B. Mineralized self-assembled silk fibroin/cellulose interpenetrating network aerogel for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 134, 112549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizal, S.; Yahya, E.B.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Abdullah, C.K.; Marwan, M.; Ikramullah, I.; Muksin, U. Preparation and Characterization of Nanocellulose/Chitosan Aerogel Scaffolds Using Chemical-Free Approach. Gels 2021, 7, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, A.; Ji, J.; Li, J.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Li, Q. Nanocellulose/PEGDA Aerogels with Tunable Poisson’s Ratio Fabricated by Stereolithography for Mouse Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Culture. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, B.; Luo, Z.; Wang, D.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, H. In vitro and in vivo Repair Effects of the NCF-Col-NHA Aerogel Scaffold Loaded with SOST Monoclonal Antibody and SDF-1 in Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 825231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Cao, H.; Jia, L.; Liu, W.; Liu, P. Characterization of antibacterial aerogel based on varepsilon-poly-l-lysine/nanocellulose by using citric acid as crosslinker. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 291, 119568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, D.; Liu, W.; Tang, A.; Zhou, F. Tuning the Poisson’s ratio of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate/cellulose nanofibril aerogel scaffold precisely for cultivation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2022, 111, 502–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ressler, A.; Žužić, A.; Ivanišević, I.; Kamboj, N.; Ivanković, H. Ionic substituted hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration applications: A review. Open Ceram. 2021, 6, 100122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bharadwaz, A.; Jayasuriya, A.C. Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 110, 110698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Family, R.; Solati-Hashjin, M.; Namjoy Nik, S.; Nemati, A. Surface modification for titanium implants by hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. CasJ Intern. Med. 2012, 3, 460–465. [Google Scholar]
- Yahya, E.B.; Amirul, A.A.; HPS, A.K.; Olaiya, N.G.; Iqbal, M.O.; Jummaat, F.; AK, A.S.; Adnan, A.S. Insights into the Role of Biopolymer Aerogel Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Polymers 2021, 13, 1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landis, W.J.; Silver, F.H. Mineral deposition in the extracellular matrices of vertebrate tissues: Identification of possible apatite nucleation sites on type I collagen. Cells Tissues Organs 2009, 189, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Tang, K.; Li, X.; Wang, F.; Liu, J.; Zou, F.; Yang, M.; Li, M. A porous collagen-carboxymethyl cellulose/hydroxyapatite composite for bone tissue engineering by bi-molecular template method. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saravanan, S.; Sameera, D.K.; Moorthi, A.; Selvamurugan, N. Chitosan scaffolds containing chicken feather keratin nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- LogithKumar, R.; KeshavNarayan, A.; Dhivya, S.; Chawla, A.; Saravanan, S.; Selvamurugan, N. A review of chitosan and its derivatives in bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cataldi, A.; Rigotti, D.; Nguyen, V.D.H.; Pegoretti, A. Polyvinyl alcohol reinforced with crystalline nanocellulose for 3D printing application. Mater. Today Commun. 2018, 15, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, A.; Medina, L.; Berglund, L.A. High-Strength Nanocomposite Aerogels of Ternary Composition: Poly (vinyl alcohol), Clay, and Cellulose Nanofibrils. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 6453–6461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omenetto, F.G.; Kaplan, D.L. New opportunities for an ancient material. Science 2010, 329, 528–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, G.; Chen, J.; Wang, Q.; Yang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Li, Z.; Tu, H.; Deng, H.; Li, Z. Promoting osteogenic differentiation in pre-osteoblasts and reducing tibial fracture healing time using functional nanofibers. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 3658–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oest, M.E.; Dupont, K.M.; Kong, H.J.; Mooney, D.J.; Guldberg, R.E. Quantitative assessment of scaffold and growth factor-mediated repair of critically sized bone defects. J. Orthop. Res 2007, 25, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tatara, A.M.; Mikos, A.G. Tissue Engineering in Orthopaedics. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2016, 98, 1132–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Janmohammadi, M.; Nazemi, Z.; Salehi, A.O.M.; Seyfoori, A.; John, J.V.; Nourbakhsh, M.S.; Akbari, M. Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 20, 137–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, C.; Jiao, Y.; Sun, Q.; Li, J. Preparation, characterization, and antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles embedded into cellulose aerogels. Polym. Compos. 2016, 37, 1137–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esquivel-Castro, T.A.; Ibarra-Alonso, M.C.; Oliva, J.; Martinez-Luevanos, A. Porous aerogel and core/shell nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 96, 915–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saini, A.; Yadav, C.; Sethi, S.K.; Xue, B.L.; Xia, Y.; Li, K.; Manik, G.; Li, X. Microdesigned Nanocellulose-Based Flexible Antibacterial Aerogel Architectures Impregnated with Bioactive Cinnamomum cassia. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 4874–4885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, S.; He, S.; Su, C.; Jiang, L.; Wen, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Shao, W. Morphological, Release and Antibacterial Performances of Amoxicillin-Loaded Cellulose Aerogels. Molecules 2018, 23, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundu, K.; Jaswandkar, S.V.; Katti, D.R.; Katti, K.S. Initial upsurge of BMPs enhances long-term osteogenesis in in-vitro bone regeneration. Materialia 2022, 26, 101576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- INFUSE(R) Bone Graft; Medtronic: Dublin, Ireland, 2016.
- Carragee, E.J.; Hurwitz, E.L.; Weiner, B.K. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: Emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011, 11, 471–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, A.W.; LaChaud, G.; Shen, J.; Asatrian, G.; Nguyen, V.; Zhang, X.; Ting, K.; Soo, C. A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2016, 22, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, G.; Yin, C.; Tu, H.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Xing, X.; Xie, C.; Shi, X.; Du, Y.; et al. Controlled Co-delivery of Growth Factors through Layer-by-Layer Assembly of Core-Shell Nanofibers for Improving Bone Regeneration. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 6372–6382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madl, C.M.; Mehta, M.; Duda, G.N.; Heilshorn, S.C.; Mooney, D.J. Presentation of BMP-2 mimicking peptides in 3D hydrogels directs cell fate commitment in osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, L.; Boda, S.K.; Wang, H.; Teusink, M.J.; Shuler, F.D.; Xie, J. Novel 3D Hybrid Nanofiber Aerogels Coupled with BMP-2 Peptides for Cranial Bone Regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, e1701415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, J.V.; Choksi, M.; Chen, S.; Boda, S.K.; Su, Y.; McCarthy, A.; Teusink, M.J.; Reinhardt, R.A.; Xie, J. Tethering peptides onto biomimetic and injectable nanofiber microspheres to direct cellular response. Nanomedicine 2019, 22, 102081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- John, J.V.; McCarthy, A.; Wang, H.; Luo, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, F.; Zhang, Y.S.; Xie, J. Freeze-Casting with 3D-Printed Templates Creates Anisotropic Microchannels and Patterned Macrochannels within Biomimetic Nanofiber Aerogels for Rapid Cellular Infiltration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, e2100238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seyedi, Z.; Amiri, M.S.; Mohammadzadeh, V.; Hashemzadeh, A.; Haddad-Mashadrizeh, A.; Mashreghi, M.; Qayoomian, M.; Hashemzadeh, M.R.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Taghavizadeh Yazdi, M.E. Icariin: A Promising Natural Product in Biomedicine and Tissue Engineering. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, S.; Yuan, Y.; Lin, Q.; Zhou, H.; Tang, B.; Liu, Y.; Huang, H.; Liang, B.; Mao, Y.; Liu, K.; et al. Antiosteoporosis effect of tanshinol in osteoporosis animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 937538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baur, J.A.; Sinclair, D.A. Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: The in vivo evidence. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qin, L.; Zhao, X.; He, Y.; Wang, H.; Wei, H.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, T.; Qin, Y.; Du, A. Preparation, Characterization, and In vitro Evaluation of Resveratrol-Loaded Cellulose Aerogel. Materials 2020, 13, 1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yan, M.; Yu, Q.F.; Yang, P.F.; Zhang, H.D.; Sun, Y.H.; Zhang, Z.F.; Gao, Y.F. Puerarin Prevents LPS-Induced Osteoclast Formation and Bone Loss via Inhibition of Akt Activation. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 39, 2028–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, L.; Chen, B.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Li, Y.; Liao, Y.; Yeung, K.W.K.; Liu, X. Puerarin@Chitosan composite for infected bone repair through mimicking the bio-functions of antimicrobial peptides. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 21, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emam, H.E.; Shaheen, T.I. Design of a dual pH and temperature responsive hydrogel based on esterified cellulose nanocrystals for potential drug release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 278, 118925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Wang, L.; He, H.; Wang, S. Biocompatible smart cellulose nanofibres for sustained drug release via pH and temperature dual-responsive mechanism. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 249, 116876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panja, S.; Maji, S.; Maiti, T.K.; Chattopadhyay, S. A Smart Magnetically Active Nanovehicle for on-Demand Targeted Drug Delivery: Where van der Waals Force Balances the Magnetic Interaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 24229–24241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Senapati, S.; Mahanta, A.K.; Kumar, S.; Maiti, P. Controlled drug delivery vehicles for cancer treatment and their performance. Signal. Transduct. Target Ther. 2018, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naznin, A.; Dhar, P.K.; Dutta, S.K.; Chakrabarty, S.; Karmakar, U.K.; Kundu, P.; Hossain, M.S.; Barai, H.R.; Haque, M.R. Synthesis of Magnetic Iron Oxide-Incorporated Cellulose Composite Particles: An Investigation on Antioxidant Properties and Drug Delivery Applications. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ge, Y.W.; Chu, M.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Ke, Q.F.; Guo, Y.P.; Zhang, C.Q.; Jia, W.T. Nacre-inspired magnetically oriented micro-cellulose fibres/nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan layered scaffold enhances pro-osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 16, 100439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, L.; Wu, T.; Zhou, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Sun, L.; Guo, J.; Fan, X.; Ta, D. Study on synergistic effects of carboxymethyl cellulose and LIPUS for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 286, 119278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cherian, R.M.; Tharayil, A.; Varghese, R.T.; Antony, T.; Kargarzadeh, H.; Chirayil, C.J.; Thomas, S. A review on the emerging applications of nano-cellulose as advanced coatings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 282, 119123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunha, A.G.; Lundahl, M.; Ansari, M.F.; Johansson, L.S.; Campbell, J.M.; Rojas, O.J. Surface Structuring and Water Interactions of Nanocellulose Filaments Modified with Organosilanes toward Wearable Materials. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 5279–5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, N.; Kim Do, H.; Kovacik, P.; Sojoudi, H.; Wang, M.; Gleason, K.K. Polymer Thin Films and Surface Modification by Chemical Vapor Deposition: Recent Progress. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2016, 7, 373–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Malfait, W.J.; Guerrero-Alburquerque, N.; Koebel, M.M.; Nystrom, G. Biopolymer Aerogels and Foams: Chemistry, Properties, and Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 7580–7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ganesan, K.; Barowski, A.; Ratke, L.; Milow, B. Influence of hierarchical porous structures on the mechanical properties of cellulose aerogels. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, C.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, H.; Yang, S.; Guo, Z.X.; Qiu, T.; Tuo, X. Macroscopic-Scale Preparation of Aramid Nanofiber Aerogel by Modified Freezing-Drying Method. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 10000–10009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krishnakumar, G.S.; Sampath, S.; Muthusamy, S.; John, M.A. Importance of crosslinking strategies in designing smart biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: A systematic review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 96, 941–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iglesias-Mejuto, A.; Garcia-Gonzalez, C.A. 3D-Printed, Dual Crosslinked and Sterile Aerogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2022, 14, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Lu, C.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X. Polyethylenimine-grafted cellulose nanofibril aerogels as versatile vehicles for drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 2607–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tortorella, S.; Vetri Buratti, V.; Maturi, M.; Sambri, L.; Comes Franchini, M.; Locatelli, E. Surface-Modified Nanocellulose for Application in Biomedical Engineering and Nanomedicine: A Review. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 9909–9937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirdogen, R.E.; Kilic, D.; Emen, F.M.; Aşkar, Ş.; Karaçolak, A.İ.; Yesilkaynak, T.; Ihsan, A. Novel antibacterial cellulose acetate fibers modified with 2-fluoropyridine complexes. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1204, 127537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, H.; Anguilano, L.; Fan, M. Microstructural architecture, and mechanical properties of empowered cellulose-based aerogel composites via TEMPO-free oxidation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 298, 120117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isogai, A.; Hänninen, T.; Fujisawa, S.; Saito, T. Review: Catalytic oxidation of cellulose with nitroxyl radicals under aqueous conditions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 86, 122–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isogai, A.; Saito, T.; Fukuzumi, H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, T.; Clemons, C.M.; Pilla, S. Grafting PEG on cellulose nanocrystals via polydopamine chemistry and the effects of PEG graft length on the mechanical performance of composite film. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 271, 118405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, G.; Zhang, L.; Qi, B.; Luo, J.; Wan, Y. Cellulose esterification with carboxylic acid in deep eutectic solvent pretreatment inhibits enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 380, 129085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hadimani, S.; Supriya, D.; Roopa, K.; Soujanya, S.K.; Rakshata, V.; Netravati, A.; Akshayakumar, V.; De Britto, S.; Jogaiah, S. Biodegradable hybrid biopolymer film based on carboxy methyl cellulose and selenium nanoparticles with antifungal properties to enhance grapes shelf life. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 237, 124076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osorio, M.; Ortiz, I.; Ganan, P.; Naranjo, T.; Zuluaga, R.; van Kooten, T.G.; Castro, C. Novel surface modification of three-dimensional bacterial nanocellulose with cell-derived adhesion proteins for soft tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 100, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tetik, H.; Zhao, K.; Shah, N.; Lin, D. 3D freeze-printed cellulose-based aerogels: Obtaining truly 3D shapes, and functionalization with cross-linking and conductive additives. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 68, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holzwarth, J.M.; Ma, P.X. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 9622–9629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajdary, R.; Huan, S.; Zanjanizadeh Ezazi, N.; Xiang, W.; Grande, R.; Santos, H.A.; Rojas, O.J. Acetylated Nanocellulose for Single-Component Bioinks and Cell Proliferation on 3D-Printed Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 2770–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlacchio, R.; Zuppolini, S.; Cruz-Maya, I.; Pragliola, S.; Borriello, A.; Guarino, V.; Fittipaldi, R.; Lettieri, M.; Venditto, V. Polydopamine-Coated Poly-Lactic Acid Aerogels as Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Dellatore, S.M.; Miller, W.M.; Messersmith, P.B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 2007, 318, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, F.; Wang, Z.; Shen, Y.; Tang, L.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Huang, B.; Lu, B. Natural skin-inspired versatile cellulose biomimetic hydrogels. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 26442–26455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, K.; Lin, H.; Tang, Y.; Xiang, S.; Xue, J.; Yin, W.; Tan, J.; Peng, H.; Alexander, P.G.; Tuan, R.S.; et al. Injectable BMP-2 gene-activated scaffold for the repair of cranial bone defect in mice. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2020, 9, 1631–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, C.H.; Chang, Y.H.; Lin, S.Y.; Li, K.C.; Hu, Y.C. Recent progresses in gene delivery-based bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 1695–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Maciel, D.; Rodrigues, J.; Shi, X.; Tomas, H. Biodegradable Polymer Nanogels for Drug/Nucleic Acid Delivery. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 8564–8608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Crosslinking | Crosslinker | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Physical | Hydrogen linkages, electrostatic interaction, ionic crosslinking, p–p stacking, dehydration heat treatment, and ultraviolet treatment [68,71] | Safe, cheap, small tissue response | Low degree of crosslinking, difficult to control the crosslinking reaction, time-consuming |
Chemical | GA, CA, GP [73], HMDA [74], TA [75] | Forming a strong covalent bond | Cytotoxic |
Enzymatic | H2O2, horseradish peroxidase, transglutaminase, tyrosinase [72] | Controlled by temperature, pH, or ionic strength | Expensive price, substrate specificity |
Composite | Preparation Method | Porosity or Pore Size | Mechanical Properties | Seeding Cell | Results | Year | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HA–CNC | Esterification reaction and freeze-drying | 91% | Compressive strength: 41.8 MPa | Biodegradable, non-toxic, low immunogenicity, and biocompatibility flexible-shaped ability | 2018 | [113] | |
CNC | Hydrazone crosslinking and CO2 supercritical drying | 98.8–99.3% | Young’s modulus: 25–65 KPa | Osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells | High porosity and effective bone growth promotion osteoconduction | 2019 | [64] |
HA–BC | Freeze-drying (cryogels) and scCO2 drying(aerogels) | 30–80 nm | Elastic modulus: 10.91 ± 3.26 G Pa, hardness of 0.37 ± 0.18 G Pa. | - | Excellent mechanical strength | 2019 | [102] |
Gelatin–CNF | HMDA crosslinking | 94–95% | 35.2–54.7 KPa | L929 fibroblasts | Suitable for cell adhesion and growth | 2019 | [74] |
Freeze-drying | 300 μm | ||||||
CS–CMC | GA crosslinking and freeze-drying | 82 ± 5% | Strength: 2.51 GPa modulus: 139 MPa | MG63 | The cell viability increased significantly | 2019 | [114] |
Mesoporous: >100 μm | |||||||
Micropore: <50 μm | |||||||
PEGDA–CNF | SLA and freeze-drying | Average pore size: 46–69 μm | The elastic deformation was 35 KPa under 30% stress | BMSC | Suitable for cell adhesion and growth | 2019 | [115] |
PCL–CS-cellulose acetate | Electrospinning and freeze-drying | - | The compression modulus can reach 0.31 MPa modulus of compression: 45 ± 6 Kpa | MC3T3-E1 | Improve cell adhesion, infiltration, and osteogenic differentiation | 2020 | [100] |
SF–cellulose | Chemical crosslinking and freeze-drying | - | Tensile strength: 7.73 MPa | HEK-293 T cells | Excellent mechanical strength | 2021 | [116] |
Strength of bending: 25.91 MPa | |||||||
CS–CNF | Freeze-drying | 97.20% | Young’s modulus: 0.28 MPa | - | Excellent mechanical properties | 2021 | [117] |
SF–n–HA–cellulose | Chemical crosslinking and freeze-drying | 99.20% | Young’s modulus: 12.7–22.4 MPa | HEK-293T cells | Controllable degradation rate; | 2021 | [37] |
Good mineralization ability; | |||||||
PEGDA–CNF | Stereolithography and freeze-drying | Mesoporous: 400–800 um | Young’s modulus: 2.94 MPa | Mouse BMSC | Controllable pore structure | 2021 | [118] |
Micropore size: 20~100 µm | Adjustable Poisson’s ratio | ||||||
CS–CNC | Chemical crosslinking and CO2 supercritical drying | 20–60 nm | Compressive strength was 0.13 MPa at 3% strain | - | Reduce the gel shrinkage | 2021 | [103] |
BC | Freeze-drying and seeded with BMP2 | Macropores: >100 | - | BMSC | Excellent osteoconduction | 2021 | [17] |
μm, micropores: <100 μm, nanopores: <100 nm | Osteoinduction | ||||||
COL–n–HA–CNF | Thermal crosslinking | 90% | The elastic modulus was (12.95 ± 4.77) MPa, and the compressibility was (0.4067 ± 0.084) MPa. | Rabbit BMSC and human vascular endothelial cells | Control releasing ability; osteogenesis and vascularization abilities. | 2022 | [119] |
and freeze-drying | 75 ± 18 µm | ||||||
ɛ-poly-l-lysine-TEMPO CNF | Esterification, crosslinking with CA and freeze-drying | ≥85.05% | Tensile strength: 22 MPa | - | Antibacterial property and degradable | 2022 | [120] |
PEGDA/cellulose | SLA and freeze-drying | 20–50 μm | 0.58 ± 0.0222 MPa | BMSC | Dynamic Poisson’s ratio promotion differentiation at different stages of BMSC | 2022 | [121] |
Derivatization/Modification Method | Introduced Functional Groups | Advantages | Surface Property | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Esterification | -COOR | Enhanced hydrophobicity and mechanical strength. Reduced water uptake. The specific surface area of cellulose increased. | FTIR confirmed the occurrence of carboxylic esterification on hydroxyl groups. The particle size decreased by 25–35 µm DY11 compared to the original cellulose, while the adsorption amount increased by 20–30 mg/g | [178] |
Etherification | -OR | | Enhanced hydrophobicity, mechanical strength, and thermal stability. Improved hydrophilicity. | The FTIR spectra results indicate the presence of carboxyl characteristic peaks. TGA analysis shows higher thermal stability. | [179] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, Y.; Jiang, S.; Xu, D.; Li, Z.; Guo, J.; Li, Z.; Cheng, G. Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Outlooks. Polymers 2023, 15, 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102323
Zhang Y, Jiang S, Xu D, Li Z, Guo J, Li Z, Cheng G. Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Outlooks. Polymers. 2023; 15(10):2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102323
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Yaoguang, Shengjun Jiang, Dongdong Xu, Zubing Li, Jie Guo, Zhi Li, and Gu Cheng. 2023. "Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Outlooks" Polymers 15, no. 10: 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102323
APA StyleZhang, Y., Jiang, S., Xu, D., Li, Z., Guo, J., Li, Z., & Cheng, G. (2023). Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Outlooks. Polymers, 15(10), 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102323