Next Article in Journal
Successive Harvests Affect Yield, Quality and Metabolic Profile of Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of MIKC-Type MADS-Box Gene Family in Punica granatum L.
Previous Article in Journal
Unraveling Ecophysiological Mechanisms in Potatoes under Different Irrigation Methods: A Preliminary Field Evaluation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of TALE Gene Family in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)

1
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(6), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060829
Submission received: 1 May 2020 / Revised: 5 June 2020 / Accepted: 9 June 2020 / Published: 11 June 2020

Abstract

:
The three-amino-acid-loop-extension (TALE) gene family is a pivotal transcription factor that regulates the development of flower organs, flower meristem formation, organ morphogenesis and fruit development. A total of 17 genes of pomegranate TALE family were identified and analyzed in pomegranate via bioinformatics methods, which provided a theoretical basis for the functional research and utilization of pomegranate TALE family genes. The results showed that the PgTALE family genes were divided into eight subfamilies (KNOX-Ⅰ, KNOX-Ⅱ, KNOX-Ⅲ, BELL-Ⅰ, BELL-Ⅱ, BELL-Ⅲ, BELL-Ⅳ, and BELL-Ⅴ). All PgTALEs had a KNOX domain or a BELL domain, and their structures were conservative. The 1500 bp promoter sequence had multiple cis-elements in response to hormones (auxin, gibberellin) and abiotic stress, indicating that most of PgTALE were involved in the growth and development of pomegranates and stress. Function prediction and protein-protein network analysis showed that PgTALE may participate in regulating the development of apical meristems, flowers, carpels, and ovules. Analysis of gene expression patterns showed that the pomegranate TALE gene family had a particular tissue expression specificity. In conclusion, the knowledge of the TALE gene gained in pomegranate may be applied to other fruit as well.

1. Introduction

A homeobox (HB) encodes the transcriptional regulatory factors with homeodomain, which play considerable roles in the development of plants and animals [1]. A typical homeobox domain consists of 60 amino acids, to form three-helix regions, the first and second helixes form a loop structure, and the second and third helices form a helix-corner-helical structure [2]. Plant homeobox genes have been divided into distinct subgroups, Bharathan et al. [3] divided them into seven classes, including KNOTTED-like homeobox (KNOX/KNAT), BEL1-like homeobox (BELL/BLH), Zea mays homeobox (ZM-HOX), homeobox from Arabidopsis thaliana 1 (HAT1), homeobox from A. thaliana 2 (HAT2), A. thaliana homeobox 8 (ATHB8) and GL2. Mukherjee et al. [4] classified them into 14 classes, containing homeodomain-leucine zipper I to IV (HD-ZIP I to IV), BELL, KNOX, plant zinc finger (PLINC), wuschel homeobox (WOX), plant homeodomain (PHD), DDT, nodulin homeobox genes (NDX), luminidependens (LD), SAWADEE and PINTOX. While Burglin and Affolter [5] classified them into 11 classes, including HD-ZIP I to IV, WOX, NDX, PHD, PLINC, LD, DDT, SAWADEE, PINTOX, KNOX and BELL. In PlantTFDB, the homeobox genes consist of five families: HD-ZIP, TALE, WOX, HB-PHD, and HB-other [6].
Based on protein sequence and evolution, BELL and KNOX belong to the TALE gene family [7,8]. Except for some homeobox genes, TALE encodes an atypical structure forming two helices and three additional amino acid residues (P-Y-P) [9,10,11]. The TALE family plays a vital role in regulating plant growth and development [12,13,14,15], regulating the sporophyte program [16], the formation of plant meristems [7], and the maintenance of organ morphology [17], organ position [18], hormone regulation [19], signal transduction [20] and tuber formation [21]. Studies have shown that BELL and KNOX proteins specifically recognize and bind to form the BELL-KNOX heterodimer protein [22], which is essential for the nuclear localization of two transcription factor proteins and the activity of binding target gene [23,24]. TALE can form complexes to regulate ovule development [25]. After binding to the OVATE family protein (OFP), the BELL-KNOX dimer protein is reversely transferred from the nucleus to the cytoplasm to negatively regulate ovule development [26]. BELL proteins comprise two highly conserved domains: a POX domain (POX is composed of SKY and BEL) and homeodomain. The BELL plays essential roles in ovule development, frond development and fruit development [27,28]. BEL1 is expressed in the ovule and controlled the ovule integument identity. The dimer formed by the A. thaliana homeobox 1 (ATH1) protein and the shoot meristemless (STM) protein participates in the development of plant meristems [29], while the dimer formed by the ATH1 protein and the KNOTTED-like from A. thaliana 2 (KNAT2) protein regulates the development of plant inflorescence tissue [30]. The interaction of BLH6 and KNAT7 affects the development of secondary cell walls [31]. The KNOX gene family contains KNOX1, KNOX2, ELK and homeodomain, except for a novel gene KNATM without the homeodomain [32,33]. In addition, KNOX1 and KNOX2 domains merge to form a MEINOX domain. KNOX1 is expressed in the meristem, which is necessary for meristem development and maintenance. Studies have shown that the KNOX2 gene is involved in regulating the secondary growth of plant cell walls and plays a crucial regulatory role in the development of roots, stems, seed coats and heartwood [30,34,35,36].
Myrtales, the myrtle order of flowering plants, is placed in the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV) botanical classification system [37]. Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) is a considerable economic fruit tree of the Lythraceae family and widely cultivated worldwide. It was that pomegranate and the related species Eucalyptus grandis H., belonging to the order Myrtales, shared the paleotetraploidy event [38]. Studying the function and regulatory mechanism of TALE genes in pomegranate helps regulate pomegranate growth patterns, flower and fruit development. The completion of pomegranate genome data provided momentous data support for the study of pomegranate gene function [38,39,40]. In this study, the members of the TALE gene family were identified based on the genome sequence of ‘Taishanhong’, and their physical and chemical properties, protein structure, cis-elements, phylogenetic relationship, and gene tissue expression were analyzed. Through the systematic identification of PgTALE, the result lays a foundation for further study of the function of TALE genes in pomegranate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genome and Transcriptome Data Sources

Pomegranate genome sequences (ASM286412v1), protein sequences and transcriptome data were downloaded from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), and the A. thaliana TALE protein sequence was downloaded from the A. thaliana database (http://www.arabidopsis.org), E. grandis, Populus trichocarpa, Malus domestica, Vitis vinifera and Solanum lycopersicum TALE protein sequence were downloaded from the PlantTFDB database (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn) [6] (Fasta file S1, Table S1).

2.2. Identification and Sequence Analysis of PgTALE Gene Family Members

The hidden Markov model file of the TALE family (E-value < 1 × 10−5) was constructed by using TALE (PF00046) in the Pfam database [41] (https://pfam.xfam.org/) and hmmsearch program in HMMER 3.0 software package (Virginia, USA) [42]. The candidate PgTALE protein conserved domains were searched, and the BELL domains (POX, homeodomain) or KNOX domains (KNOX1, KNOX2, ELK, homeodomain) were TALE gene family conserved. At the same time, using the published ‘Taishanhong’ protein sequences [38] and the TALE family protein sequences of 6 species (A. thaliana, E. grandis, P. trichocarpa, M. domestica, V. vinifera and S. lycopersicum) as baits to make a local BLASTP alignment (E-value < 1e−5, identity >50%), the repetition was removed, the candidate TALE protein sequences were screened. In addition, A. thaliana contains a member of the TALE gene family KNATM without homeodomain, we added a pomegranate gene homologous to KNATM [32], and then the target protein domains were detected by SMART and CDD [43,44]. The sequences without the TALE domain were removed. The online tool ExPASy Proteomics Server (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/) was used to predict the physical and chemical properties of PgTALE protein, such as amino acid sequence length, molecular weight, isoelectric point, grand average of hydropathicity [45]. Signal peptide of the PgTALE proteins was performed by SignalP 5.0 Sever (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services / SignalP). Subcellular localization of the PgTALE proteins was performed using CELLO (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/) [46].

2.3. Construction of Phylogenetic tree of PgTALE Gene Family

Multiple sequence alignments of candidate proteins with A. thaliana, E. grandis, P. trichocarpa and V. vinifera TALE gene family proteins were performed using MAFFT [47]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by using RA × ML -NG [48] with Bootstrap 1000 repeats and the best model of JTT + F + I + G4 selected by ModelFinder [49]. Then, the phylogenetic tree was beautified by using the online software tool EvolView (http://www.evolgenius.info/) [50].

2.4. Analysis of PgTALE Conserved Motifs and Gene Structure

The motif type and sequence of the PgTALE family were analyzed by MEME (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme) [51], and the motif characteristics of PgTALE were obtained. According to the protein sequence and gene sequence of the PgTALE gene, the gene structure information of pomegranate TALE was obtained by Perl script (Perl file S1), including intron, exon and upstream and downstream sequence. In addition, a combined figure of phylogenetic tree, conserved motifs and gene structure was drawn by TBtools [52].

2.5. Analysis of PgTALE Protein Structure

Protein sequence similarity of more than 35% as a template, the tertiary structure and homologous modelling of PgTALE proteins were analyzed using the SWISS-MODEL (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/) [53], and Ramachandran Plots were used to display protein properties.

2.6. Analysis of Cis-elements and Protein-protein Interaction Network of PgTALE Gene Family

To analyze the cis-elements of the promoter region, the 1500 bp sequence upstream of the start codon was obtained from the pomegranate genome sequence by Perl script (Perl file S2), and the sequence was searched by PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) [54]. The protein–protein interaction network of the TALE family was analyzed by String (https://string-db.org/) [55].

2.7. Expression Analysis of PgTALE Gene Family

RNA-Seq data of tissues and organs closely related to pomegranate were downloaded from the NCBI database (Table 1). Subsequently, Kallisto version 0.44.0 software (California, USA) [56] was used to index the sequence with the ‘Taishanhong’ transcriptome file to calculate further and analyze gene expression. The corresponding expression levels (TPM values) of the TALE family members were obtained, and the obtained TPM values were converted by Log2 (TPM + 1). Finally, a heat map of the TALE gene was drawn by using the R package heatmap.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Sequence Analysis of PgTALE Gene Family Members

In this study, 74 homebox gene family members were identified by using the hmmsearch method. The homebox family consists of five families (HD-ZIP, TALE, WOX, HB-PHD, and HB-other), and they share a PF number (PF00046). As TALE encodes an atypical structure forming two helices and three additional amino acid residues, 16 candidate members of the TALE gene family were identified, and all candidate proteins were identified to belong to the TALE protein family. 23 candidate members of the TALE gene family were identified by BLASTP. While Pg001623.1, Pg009439.1, Pg011532.1, Pg017964.1, Pg017965.1, Pg022249.1 and Pg027515.1 were removed because they did not contain TALE conserved domain. Our result showed that there were 17 members of the TALE gene family in pomegranate (Table S2). PgTALE gene family was renamed, the results as shown in Table 2.
The physical and chemical properties of the PgTALEs was analyzed using the ExPASy online tool. The results showed that the length of the 17 PgTALE gene coding regions ranged from 465 bp (PgTALE17) to 2400 bp (PgTALE16). The amino acid length of the TALE protein ranged from 154 aa (PgTALE17) to 799 aa (PgTALE16), and the protein molecular weight ranged from 17605.66 Da (PgTALE17) to 87381.25 Da (PgTALE16). The pI ranged from 5.13 (PgTALE7) to 8.78 (PgTALE16). Among them, the pI of three PgTALE proteins were higher than 7, suggesting that proteins were slightly alkaline; the other 14 PgTALEs were acidic proteins. The grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) was between −0.969 to −0.449, suggesting that PgTALEs are all hydrophilic proteins. The number of exons of the PgTALEs was 3–6. Besides, the signal peptide prediction showed that there were no signal peptides in all PgTALE proteins, which belonged to non-secreted proteins. Subcellular localization prediction suggested that all PgTALE proteins were distributed on the nucleus.

3.2. Phylogenetic Tree Analysis of PgTALE Gene Family

To clarify the evolutionary relationship and possible biological functions of members of the PgTALE gene family, the phylogenetic tree of the TALE gene was constructed based on the amino acid sequences of the pomegranate, A. thaliana, E. grandis, P. trichocarpa and V. vinifera (Figure 1). Based on the classification of A. thaliana TALE gene family (BELL and KNOX family), the pomegranate BELL proteins were classified into five subfamilies: BELL-Ⅰ (one member), BELL-Ⅱ (two), BELL-Ⅲ (one), BELL-Ⅳ (two) and BELL-Ⅴ (three), and KNOX proteins were classified into 3 subfamilies: KNOX-Ⅰ (five), KNOX-Ⅱ (two), KNOX-Ⅲ (five). In each clade, there are branches from the same species, which may be caused by gene duplications [59].

3.3. Analysis of Conserved Motifs and Gene Structures of PgTALE Gene Family

The conserved motifs of PgTALE were identified. 10 conserved motifs (Figure 2), in which Motif 1 represents the homeodomain (homeobox domain, HOX), Motif 4 represents the ELK domain, and Motif 7 represents SKY domain. The location information of the PgTALE protein domain was analyzed. The results showed that the six members of KNOX subfamily contained KNOX1, KNOX2, ELK and HOX domains, and only PgTALE17 did not contain HOX domains. BELL subfamily all contained POX and HOX domains.
Structural analysis showed that the gene structure of PgTALE was a similarity, and there were little differences in the number of exons and introns among PgTALE genes. The number of exons and introns of the PgTALE genes were 3–6 and 2–5, respectively (Figure 2). Members of the same subfamily of PgTALE showed similar gene structure and protein conserved motif distribution. For example, five members of KNOX group (PgTALE2, PgTALE5, PgTALE7, PgTALE9 and PgTALE12) contained five exons and four introns, and only one member (PgTALE17) contained 3 exons and 2 introns. Seven members of BELL group (PgTALE1, PgTALE3, PgTALE4, PgTALE6, PgTALE8, PgTALE10 and PgTALE14) contained four exons and three introns. The above results indicated that the PgTALE gene family had a certain degree of conservation regardless of its genetic structure or protein conserved motifs.

3.4. Protein Structure Analysis and Protein Interaction Networks of Pomegranate TALE Gene Family

The spatial structure of proteins plays a role in the biological function of proteins. The tertiary structure of the protein was analyzed, which found that the structure of the PgTALE family members was similar (Figure 3), except for PgTALE17 without a template (protein sequence similarity of less than 35%) that we cannot predict protein tertiary structure. The protein is a multi-chain folded protein, mainly α-helix. The calculation test showed that the Ramachandran Favoured value of the PgTALE family was above 90%, and PgTALE2 and PgTALE15 reached 100%, except PgTALE9 was only 87.27%. The results showed that the PgTALE protein had a stable spatial structure.
Protein function prediction suggested that PgTALE2, PgTALE7 and PgTALE15 played roles in meristem function (Figure 4), contributing to the shoot apical meristem (SAM) maintenance and organ separation. They may also be involved in maintaining cells in a meristematic state. In addition, PgTALE14 might involve in the regular pattern of organ initiation. PgTALE11 may be required for SAM formation in embryogenesis. PgTALE12 may be involved in secondary cell wall biosynthesis. PgTALE13 might be required for the SAM to respond appropriately to floral inductive signals.
The protein-protein interaction of PgTALE was analyzed for predicting its potential function, signal transduction and metabolic pathways. It was predicted that there were interactions between PgTALE14 and AG, SEP3, KNAT1, INO and other proteins to regulate ovule development. In addition, BEL1 can form heterodimers with KNAT1, it predicted that PgTALE14 (BELL family) may interact with PgTALE5 (KNOX family) to form heterodimers. PgTALE8 might interact with STM and KNAT6 and enhance the apical meristem of these genes.
From the figure of gene co-expression (Figure 4), we can see the level of co-expression of KNAT1/KNAT3/KNAT6/STM/BEL1/BLH6/ATH1 and other genes. Among them, KNAT1 and KNAT6, KNAT1 and STM were higher than that of other genes. They may participate in or respond to a biological or abiotic stress process, and it may be inferred that PgTALE2/PgTALE5/PgTALE11 may also have similar functions.

3.5. Analysis of Cis-elements of PgTALE Gene Family

In this study, the upstream 1500 bp sequence of PgTALE gene was extracted, the possible cis-elements in the promoter region were found (Table S3). 13 cis-elements related to abiotic stress were found, which were ABRE, ARE, AuxRR-core, CAAT-box, CGTCA-motif, GARE-motif, LTR, MBS, P-box, TATC-box, TCA-element, TGA-element and TGACG-motif (Figure 5; Table S4). AuxRR-core and TGA-element are auxin-responsive elements. CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif are MeJA-responsiveness elements, while GARE-motif, P-box and TATC-box are gibberellin response elements. The PgTALE genes contain the enhancer response element CAAT-box. 64.7% of the PgTALE genes contain ABA response element ABRE and the cold stress response element LTR. 70.6% of the PgTALE genes contain the antioxidant response element ARE. 41.2% of the PgTALE gene contains MeJA-responsiveness response elements CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif, the salicylic acid response element TCA-element, 29.4%, 23.5%, 35.3% of the PgTALE genes contain gibberellin response elements GARE-motif, P-box, TATC-box, 29.4% of the PgTALE genes contain the drought stress response element MBS. Besides, only the PgTALE8 gene contains the auxin response element AuxRR-core, and PgTALE12 and PgTALE13 contain the auxin response element TGA-element.

3.6. Expression Analysis of PgTALE Gene Family

To further analyze the characteristics and function of the PgTALE genes, the tissue-specific expression of the TALE gene was analyzed (Figure 6; Table S5). The results showed that the vast majority of PgTALE genes were expressed in different tissues, but PgBLH8 was expressed in trace or no expression in all tissues.
PgTALE5, PgTALE12, and PgTALE15 are expressed during functional male flower development, indicating that these genes may be involved in the female and male organ differentiation; PgTALE1 and PgTALE9 are higher expressed in leaves, bisexual and functional male flower, indicating that they may be related to the differentiation of male and female organs of pomegranate flowers and regulating leaf development. There are also differences in the expression of different PgTALE genes in different tissue, such as PgTALE2 is not expressed in the inner seed coat, outer seed coat and pericarp. The expression of PgTALE9 is the highest in the functional male flower (5.1 m–13.0 mm), and the expression of PgTALE10 is the highest in the pericarp. However, there are some differences in the expression of different PgTALE genes in different pomegranate varieties, such as PgTALE7 and PgTALE14 in the varieties of ‘Dabenzi’, ‘Tunisia’ and ‘Baiyushizi’. In the same pomegranate variety ‘Dabenzi’, there are also significant differences in tissue expression between leaves and outer seed coat. For example, the expression of PgTALE16 is higher in leaves, but the lowest in the outer seed coat.

4. Discussion

The TALE gene family is found in plant meristems and is related to the differentiation and signal transduction of meristems, for example, it can inhibit the expression of the critical enzyme gene ga20ox1 in the GA pathway [60]. In other important fruits belonging to the Rosaceae family, TALE are involved in the rootstock responding to apple cold stress [61], the cherry anthesis [62]. In addition, it regulated tomato fruit development [28]. Currently, the TALE gene family has been found in many plants: 33 AtTALE genes in A. thaliana, 40 LjTALE genes in Lotus japonicas K. [63], 46 GaTALE genes in Gossypium arboretum L., 47 GrTALE genes in G. raimondii L., 88 GbTALE genes in G. barbadense L., 94 GhTALE genes G. hirsutum L. [8], and 35 PtTALE genes in poplar [64], 7 VsTALE genes in Vandenboschia speciose G. [16]. Therefore, the copy number of the TALE gene family in different species is different. At present, the genomic data of three pomegranate varieties have been released in China, but there are no reports on the identification and analysis of pomegranate TALE family genes. In this study, for the first time, 17 TALE genes were identified in the pomegranate. Through the analysis of the physicochemical properties of the protein (Table 1), it was found that pomegranate TALE proteins are all hydrophilic proteins that are consistent with studies in Popular and L. japonicas [63,64]. Domain differences may represent the regulatory effects of promoting or inhibiting. In addition, the PgTALE genes are divided into eight subfamilies (Figure 1), which is consistent with the A. thaliana and cotton TALE gene subfamily classification [8].
The cis-elements exist at the gene promoter site and specifically binds transcription factors to regulate gene transcription. This study found that the PgTALE promoter sequence contained multiple cis-elements related to hormonal response and abiotic stress, which are rich in methyl jasmonate response element, abscisic acid response element and gibberellin response element, which is similar to antecedent studies [8]. It indicated that the promoter of the TALE gene has a certain conservative. Previous studies have found that ABRE is associated with plant drought, ABA induction, and high salt stress in plants [31,65]. In addition, there are a series of elements related to stress, such as ARE, MBS and LTR. The results indicate that PgTALE plays a role in pomegranate abiotic stress. Gene function prediction and protein-protein network analysis also show that the PgTALE family plays a significant role in regulating ovule and inflorescence development. Gene functional prediction and protein-protein network analysis also showed that there are some interactions between PgTALE14, AG and KNAT1 in floral organs; the results were consistent with the previous study [7,25].
The tissue expression analysis of the PgTALE found that most of them were expressed in diverse tissues and varieties, but diverse PgTALE genes were expressed in different tissue varieties and showed specific differences. It was similar to the results of TALE genes in A. thaliana [66]. It can be speculated that the TALE family of pomegranate has similar functions to this family in other plants. According to the function of BEL1 in A. thaliana, we speculated that its homologous gene PgTALE14 has important regulatory significance in the development of pomegranate ovules [67,68]; PgTALE8, as the homologous gene of ATH1, controls inflorescence development [69,70]. The specificity of tissue and variety expression is speculated to be closely related to its gene function. For example, PgTALE1, PgTALE6, PgTALE9, PgTALE10, PgTALE12 and PgTALE14 had high expression levels in the functional male flowers, bisexual flowers, and fruit tissues. It is predicted that PgTALE may have roles in maintaining flower organ and fruit development. However, due to the inconsistency of some sequencing platforms (Illumina and 454) in RNA-seq data, to a certain extent, it may lead to the uneven sequencing depth among tissue samples and the gap in reading length, which has a certain impact on the analysis results, while the difference in pomegranate varieties also has a certain error on the expression analysis results. After the normalization of RNA-seq data, the error may be reduced.

5. Conclusions

In this study, 17 PgTALE members were identified in pomegranate and explored their phylogenetic relationships. The PgTALE gene structure of all members of the subfamily is very similar. PgTALE may participate in the apical meristems, flower organ and fruit development, and the subfamily genes may have the same expression pattern. These conclusions are the foundation for the function research of the PgTALE gene and provide a reference for exploring its evolutionary process.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/6/829/s1, Fasta file S1: TALE sequences of 6 species as baits, Perl file S1: Gene structure, Perl file S2: Promoter, Table S1: IDs of TALE sequences of 6 species, Table S2: Domains of 17 PgTALE, Table S3: All cis-elements of 17 PgTALE, Table S4: 13 cis-elements related to abiotic stress of 17 PgTALE, Table S5: RNA-seq data of 17 PgTALE.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W. and Z.Y.; methodology, Y.W. and Y.Z.; formal analysis, Y.W.; investigation, Y.W., Y.Z. and M.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.W., Y.Z., M.Y., H.Z., X.Z. and Z.Y.; supervision, Z.Y.; funding acquisition, Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Initiative Project for Talents of Nanjing Forestry University [GXL2014070, GXL2018032], the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu High Education Institutions [PAPD], the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180768].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AbbreviationsFull Name
TALEthree-amino-acid-loop-extension
KNOX/KNATKNOTTED-like homeobox
BELL/BLHBEL1-like
HBhomeobox
ZM-HOXZea mays homeobox
HAT1homeobox from Arabidopsis thaliana 1
HAT2homeobox from A. thaliana 2
ATHB8A. thaliana homeobox 8
HD-ZIPhomeodomain-leucine zipper
PLINCplant zinc finger
WOXwuschel homeobox
PHDplant homeodomain
NDXnodulin homeobox genes
LDluminidependens
OFPOVATE family protein
ATH1A. thaliana homeobox 1
STMshoot meristemless
KNAT2KNOTTED-like from A. thaliana 2
APG IVAngiosperm Phylogeny Group IV
HOXhomeobox domain
SAMshoot apical meristem

References

  1. Di Giacomo, E.; Iannelli, M.A.; Frugis, G. TALE and shape: How to make a leaf different. Plants 2013, 2, 317–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Billeter, M.; Qian, Y.Q.; Otting, G.; Müller, M.; Gehring, W.; Wüthrich, K. Determination of the nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of an Antennapedia homeodomain-DNA complex. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 234, 1084–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bharathan, G.; Janssen, B.J.; Kellogg, E.A. Did homeodomain proteins duplicate before the origin of angiosperms, fungi, and metazoa? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 13749–13753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Mukherjee, K.; Brocchieri, L.; Bürglin, T.R. A Comprehensive classification and evolutionary analysis of plant homeobox genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26, 2775–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Bürglin, T.R.; Affolter, M. Homeodomain proteins: An update. Chromosoma 2016, 125, 497–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Jin, J.; Tian, F.; Yang, D.; Meng, Y.; Kong, L.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. PlantTFDB 4.0: Toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Arnaud, N.; Pautot, V.R. Ring the BELL and tie the KNOX: Roles for TALEs in gynoecium development. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, Q.; Wang, N.; Hao, P.; Sun, H.; Yu, S. Genome-wide identification and characterization of TALE superfamily genes in cotton reveals their functions in regulating secondary cell wall biosynthesis. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chen, H.; Rosin, F.M.; Prat, S.; Hannapel, D.J. Interacting transcription factors from the three-amino acid loop extension superclass regulate tuber formation. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 1391–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hay, A.; Tsiantis, M. KNOX genes: Versatile regulators of plant development and diversity. Development 2010, 137, 3153–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bertolino, E.; Reimund, B.; Wildtperinic, D.; Clerc, R.G. A novel homeobox protein which recognizes a TGT core and functionally interferes with a retinoid-responsive motif. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 31178–31188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mahajan, A.; Bhogale, S.; Kang, I.H.; Hannapel, D.J.; Banerjee, A.K. The mRNA of a Knotted1-like transcription factor of potato is phloem mobile. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 79, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sakakibara, K.; Ando, S.; Yip, H.K.; Tamada, Y.; Hiwatashi, Y.; Murata, T.; Deguchi, H.; Hasebe, M.; Bowman, J.L. KNOX2 genes regulate the haploid-to-diploid morphological transition in land plants. Science 2013, 339, 1067–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lin, T.; Sharma, P.; Gonzalez, D.H.; Viola, I.L.; Hannapel, D.J. The impact of the long-distance transport of a BEL1-Like Messenger RNA on development. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 760–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Furumizu, C.; Alvarez, J.P.; Sakakibara, K.; Bowman, J.L. Antagonistic roles for KNOX1 and KNOX2 genes in patterning the land plant body plan following an ancient gene duplication. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ruiz-Estévez, M.; Bakkali, M.; Martinblazquez, R.; Garridoramos, M.A. Identification and characterization of TALE homeobox genes in the endangered fern Vandenboschia speciosa. Genes 2017, 8, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Belles-Boix, E.; Hamant, O.; Witiak, S.M.; Morin, H.; Traas, J.; Pautot, V. KNAT6: An Arabidopsis homeobox gene involved in meristem activity and organ separation. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1900–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Aida, M.; Ishida, T.; Tasaka, M. Shoot apical meristem and cotyledon formation during Arabidopsis embryogenesis: Interaction among the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON and SHOOT MERISTEMLESS genes. Development 1999, 126, 1563. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shani, E.; Yanai, O.; Ori, N. The role of hormones in shoot apical meristem function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cnops, G.; Neyt, P.; Raes, J.; Petrarulo, M.; Nelissen, H.; Malenica, N.; Luschnig, C.; Tietz, O.; Ditengou, F.A.; Palme, K. The TORNADO1 and TORNADO2 genes function in several patterning processes during early leaf development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 852–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kondhare, K.R.; Vetal, P.V.; Kalsi, H.S.; Banerjee, A.K. BEL1-like protein (StBEL5) regulates CYCLING DOF FACTOR1 (StCDF1) through tandem TGAC core motifs in potato. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 241, 153014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bhatt, A.M.; Etchells, J.P.; Canales, C.; Lagodienko, A.; Dickinson, H.G. VAAMANA-a BEL1-like homeodomain protein, interacts with KNOX proteins BP and STM and regulates inflorescence stem growth in Arabidopsis. Gene 2004, 328, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, D.; Cho, Y.; Ryu, H.; Kim, Y.; Kim, T.; Hwang, I. BLH1 and KNAT3 modulate ABA responses during germination and early seedling development in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013, 75, 755–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Smith, H.M.; Boschke, I.; Hake, S. Selective interaction of plant homeodomain proteins mediates high DNA-binding affinity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9579–9584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Brambilla, V.; Battaglia, R.; Colombo, M.; Masiero, S.; Bencivenga, S.; Kater, M.M.; Colombo, L. Genetic and molecular interactions between BELL1 and MADS Box factors support ovule development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2544–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hackbusch, J.; Richter, K.; Muller, J.; Salamini, F.; Uhrig, J.F. A central role of Arabidopsis thaliana ovate family proteins in networking and subcellular localization of 3-aa loop extension homeodomain proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 4908–4912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Byrne, M.E.; Groover, A.; Fontana, J.R.; Martienssen, R.A. Phyllotactic pattern and stem cell fate are determined by the Arabidopsis homeobox gene BELLRINGER. Development 2003, 130, 3941–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Meng, L.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, C.; Gao, Y.; Deng, Y.; Zhu, B.; Zhu, H.; Chen, J.; Shan, W. BEL1-LIKE HOMEODOMAIN 11 regulates chloroplast development and chlorophyll synthesis in tomato fruit. Plant J. 2018, 94, 1126–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rutjens, B.; Bao, D.; Van Eckstouten, E.; Brand, M.; Smeekens, S.; Proveniers, M. Shoot apical meristem function in Arabidopsis requires the combined activities of three BEL1-like homeodomain proteins. Plant J. 2009, 58, 641–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, E.; Bhargava, A.; Qiang, W.; Friedmann, M.; Forneris, N.; Savidge, R.; Johnson, L.; Mansfield, S.; Ellis, B.; Douglas, C. The Class II KNOX gene KNAT7 negatively regulates secondary wall formation in Arabidopsis and is functionally conserved in Populus. New Phytol. 2012, 194, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, P.; Yu, S.; Shen, J.; Li, Q.; Li, D.; Li, D.; Zheng, C.; Shu, H. The transcriptional response of apple alcohol acyltransferase (MdAAT2) to salicylic acid and ethylene is mediated through two apple MYB TFs in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 85, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Magnani, E.; Hake, S. KNOX lost the OX: The Arabidopsis KNATM gene defines a novel class of KNOX transcriptional regulators missing the homeodomain. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 875–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Hamant, O.; Pautot, V. Plant development: A TALE story. C. R. Biol. 2010, 333, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhong, R.; Lee, C.; Zhou, J.; Mccarthy, R.L.; Ye, Z.H. A battery of transcription factors involved in the regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2763–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bhargava, A.; Mansfield, S.D.; Hall, H.; Douglas, C.J.; Ellis, B.E. MYB75 functions in regulation of secondary cell wall formation in the Arabidopsis inflorescence stem. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 1428–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Li, E.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Douglas, C.J. OVATE FAMILY PROTEIN4 (OFP4) interaction with KNAT7 regulates secondary cell wall formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2011, 67, 328–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Byng, J.W.; Chase, M.W.; Christenhusz, M.J.M.; Fay, M.F.; Judd, W.S.; Mabberley, D.J.; Sennikov, A.N.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S.; Stevens, P.F.; et al. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 181, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yuan, Z.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Fei, Z.; Han, F.; Liu, C.; Liu, M.; Xiao, W.; Zhang, W.; Wu, S. The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genome provides insights into fruit quality and ovule developmental biology. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1363–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Qin, G.; Xu, C.; Ming, R.; Tang, H.; Guyot, R.; Kramer, E.M.; Hu, Y.; Yi, X.; Qi, Y.; Xu, X. The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genome and the genomics of punicalagin biosynthesis. Plant J. 2017, 91, 1108–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ophir, R.; Sherman, A.; Rubinstein, M.; Eshed, R.; Sharabi Schwager, M.; Harel-Beja, R.; Bar-Ya’Akov, I.; Holland, D. Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism markers from De-Novo assembly of the pomegranate transcriptome reveal germplasm genetic diversity. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. El-Gebali, S.; Mistry, J.; Bateman, A.; Eddy, S.R.; Luciani, A.; Potter, S.C.; Qureshi, M.; Richardson, L.J.; Salazar, G.A.; Smart, A.; et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D427–D432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Finn, R.D.; Clements, J.; Eddy, S.R. HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Schultz, J.; Milpetz, F.; Bork, P.; Ponting, C.P. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: Identification of signaling domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 5857–5864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Bo, Y.; Han, L.; He, J.; Lanczycki, C.J.; Lu, S.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R.; et al. CDD/SPARCLE: Functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D200–D203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Artimo, P.; Jonnalagedda, M.; Arnold, K.; Baratin, D.; Csardi, G.; De Castro, E.; Duvaud, S.; Flegel, V.; Fortier, A.; Gasteiger, E. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yu, C.; Lin, C.; Hwang, J. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins for Gram-negative bacteria by support vector machines based on n-peptide compositions. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1402–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. A simple method to control overalignment in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 1933–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kozlov, A.M.; Darriba, D.; Flouri, T.; Morel, B.; Stamatakis, A. RAxML -NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 1–4453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Subramanian, B.; Gao, S.; Lercher, M.J.; Hu, S.; Chen, W.H. Evolview v3: A webserver for visualization, annotation, and management of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W270–W275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bailey, T.L.; Bodén, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, C.; Xia, R.; Chen, H.; He, Y. TBtools, a Toolkit for Biologists integrating various HTS-data handling tools with a user-friendly interface. BioRxiv 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Waterhouse, A.; Bertoni, M.; Bienert, S.; Studer, G.; Tauriello, G.; Gumienny, R.; Heer, F.T.; de Beer, T.A.P.; Rempfer, C.; Bordoli, L.; et al. SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W296–W303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Lescot, M.; Dhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Peer, Y.V.; Rouz, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Lyon, D.; Junge, A.; Wyder, S.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Doncheva, N.T.; Morris, J.H.; Bork, P.; et al. STRING v11: Protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D607–D613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Bray, N.; Pimentel, H.; Melsted, P.; Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Niu, J.; Xue, H.; Liu, B.; Wang, Q.; Luo, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, D.; et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals candidate genes for female sterility in pomegranate flowers. Front Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ono, N.N.; Britton, M.T.; Fass, J.N.; Nicolet, C.M.; Lin, D.; Tian, L. Exploring the transcriptome landscape of pomegranate fruit peel for natural product biosynthetic gene and SSR marker discovery. J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 2011, 53, 800–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, T.; Liu, C.; Huang, X.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, Z. Land-plant phylogenomic and pomegranate transcriptomic analyses reveal an evolutionary scenario of CYP75 genes subsequent to whole genome duplications. J. Plant Biol. 2019, 62, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, H.; Banerjee, A.K.; Hannapel, D.J. The tandem complex of BEL and KNOX partners is required for transcriptional repression of ga20ox1. Plant J. 2004, 38, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, H.; Cheng, L.; He, P.; Chang, Y.; Li, L. Identification of genes encoding transcription factors of apple cold-resistant dwarfing rootstock in response to cold stress. Plant Physiol. J. 2017, 53, 1468–1478. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wen, B.; Song, W.; Sun, M.; Chen, M.; Mu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Q.; Chen, X.; Gao, D.; Wu, H. Identification and characterization of cherry (Cerasus pseudocerasus G. Don) genes responding to parthenocarpy induced by GA3 through transcriptome analysis. BMC Genet. 2019, 20, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Qiu, R.; Zhang, T.; Yang, S.; Song, L.; Zhao, D. Genome-wide identification and bioinformatics analysis of TALE transcription factor family in Lotus japonicas. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2019, 20, 466–475. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhao, K.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, Z.; Yao, W.; Li, R.; Jiang, T.; Zhou, B. Comprehensive analysis of the three-amino-acid-loop-extension gene family and its tissue-differential expression in response to salt stress in poplar. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2019, 136, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hundertmark, M.; Hincha, D.K. LEA (Late Embryogenesis Abundant) proteins and their encoding genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Liberman, L.M.; Sparks, E.E.; Morenorisueno, M.A.; Petricka, J.J.; Benfey, P.N. MYB36 regulates the transition from proliferation to differentiation in the Arabidopsis root. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015, 112, 12099–12104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ray, A.; Robinsonbeers, K.; Ray, S.; Baker, S.C.; Lang, J.D.; Preuss, D.; Milligan, S.B.; Gasser, C.S. Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene BELL (BEL1) controls ovule development through negative regulation of AGAMOUS gene (AG). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 5761–5765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Bencivenga, S.; Simonini, S.; Benkova, E.; Colombo, L. The transcription factors BEL1 and SPL are required for cytokinin and auxin signaling during ovule development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2886–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Gómez-Mena, C.; Sablowski, R. ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA HOMEOBOX GENE1 establishes the basal boundaries of shoot organs and controls stem growth. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2059–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Proveniers, M.; Rutjens, B.; Brand, M.; Smeekens, S. The Arabidopsis TALE homeobox gene ATH1 controls floral competency through positive regulation of FLC. Plant J. 2007, 52, 899–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of the three-amino-acid-loop-extension (TALE) gene family in pomegranate, A. thaliana, E. grandis, P. trichocarpa and V. vinifera. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by RA × ML -NG with Bootstrap 1000 repeats and the best model of JTT + F + I + G4. Pomegranate, A. thaliana, E. grandis, P. trichocarpa and V. vinifera TALE proteins are marked with a solid red star, solid green star, red check, blue triangle and blue circle, respectively.
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of the three-amino-acid-loop-extension (TALE) gene family in pomegranate, A. thaliana, E. grandis, P. trichocarpa and V. vinifera. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by RA × ML -NG with Bootstrap 1000 repeats and the best model of JTT + F + I + G4. Pomegranate, A. thaliana, E. grandis, P. trichocarpa and V. vinifera TALE proteins are marked with a solid red star, solid green star, red check, blue triangle and blue circle, respectively.
Agronomy 10 00829 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree, conserved motifs and gene structures of the PgTALE gene family. (A) The phylogenetic tree of 17 PgTALE proteins. (B) Conserved motifs in the TALE proteins. The motifs were identified by the MEME Suite. Different conserved motifs, numbers 1–10, are displayed in different colored boxes. (C) Gene structures of the TALE genes. The intron/exon structure was mapped by TBtools. The black dotted line represents introns. (D) Sequence logos of 10 conserved motifs were identified.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree, conserved motifs and gene structures of the PgTALE gene family. (A) The phylogenetic tree of 17 PgTALE proteins. (B) Conserved motifs in the TALE proteins. The motifs were identified by the MEME Suite. Different conserved motifs, numbers 1–10, are displayed in different colored boxes. (C) Gene structures of the TALE genes. The intron/exon structure was mapped by TBtools. The black dotted line represents introns. (D) Sequence logos of 10 conserved motifs were identified.
Agronomy 10 00829 g002
Figure 3. Tertiary structure and Ramachandran plot of PgTALE protein. The tertiary structure of the protein was analyzed through the online SWISS-MODEL.
Figure 3. Tertiary structure and Ramachandran plot of PgTALE protein. The tertiary structure of the protein was analyzed through the online SWISS-MODEL.
Agronomy 10 00829 g003
Figure 4. Protein-protein interaction network and co-expression of PgTALE proteins was analyzed by String online software.
Figure 4. Protein-protein interaction network and co-expression of PgTALE proteins was analyzed by String online software.
Agronomy 10 00829 g004
Figure 5. Cis-elements analysis of PgTALE genes. Note: ABRE involved in the abscisic acid responsiveness; ARE involved in anaerobic responsiveness; AuxRR-core and TGA-element involved in auxin responsiveness; CAAT-box involved in promoter and enhancer regions; CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif involved in the MeJA-responsiveness; GARE-motif, P-box and TATC-box involved in gibberellin-responsiveness; LTR involved in low-temperature responsiveness; MBS involved in drought-inducibility; TCA-element involved in salicylic acid responsiveness.
Figure 5. Cis-elements analysis of PgTALE genes. Note: ABRE involved in the abscisic acid responsiveness; ARE involved in anaerobic responsiveness; AuxRR-core and TGA-element involved in auxin responsiveness; CAAT-box involved in promoter and enhancer regions; CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif involved in the MeJA-responsiveness; GARE-motif, P-box and TATC-box involved in gibberellin-responsiveness; LTR involved in low-temperature responsiveness; MBS involved in drought-inducibility; TCA-element involved in salicylic acid responsiveness.
Agronomy 10 00829 g005
Figure 6. Heatmap of PgTALE gene expression in different tissues. Note: S1: Root; S2: Flesh leaf; S3: Flower; S4: Inner seed coat of ‘Dabenzi’ (50 days after pollination); S5: Outer seed coat (50 days after pollination); S6: Pericarp (50 days after pollination); S7: Functional male flowers (13.1–25.0 mm); S8: Functional male flowers (5.1–13.0 mm); S9: Functional male flowers (3.0–5.0 mm); S10: Female sterility (13.1–25.0 mm); S11: Female sterility (5.1–13.0 mm); S12: Female sterility (3.0–5.0 mm); S13: Inner seed coat of ‘Tunisia’ (50 days after pollination); S14: Inner seed coat of ‘Baiyushizi’ (50 days after pollination); S15: Pericarp of ‘Wonderful’; S16: Mix of leaves, flowers, fruit and roots of ‘nana’; S17: Mix of leaves, flowers, fruit and roots of ‘Black127’ (cultivars S1–S6 are ‘Dabenzi’, cultivars S7–S13 are ‘Tunisia’).
Figure 6. Heatmap of PgTALE gene expression in different tissues. Note: S1: Root; S2: Flesh leaf; S3: Flower; S4: Inner seed coat of ‘Dabenzi’ (50 days after pollination); S5: Outer seed coat (50 days after pollination); S6: Pericarp (50 days after pollination); S7: Functional male flowers (13.1–25.0 mm); S8: Functional male flowers (5.1–13.0 mm); S9: Functional male flowers (3.0–5.0 mm); S10: Female sterility (13.1–25.0 mm); S11: Female sterility (5.1–13.0 mm); S12: Female sterility (3.0–5.0 mm); S13: Inner seed coat of ‘Tunisia’ (50 days after pollination); S14: Inner seed coat of ‘Baiyushizi’ (50 days after pollination); S15: Pericarp of ‘Wonderful’; S16: Mix of leaves, flowers, fruit and roots of ‘nana’; S17: Mix of leaves, flowers, fruit and roots of ‘Black127’ (cultivars S1–S6 are ‘Dabenzi’, cultivars S7–S13 are ‘Tunisia’).
Agronomy 10 00829 g006
Table 1. RNA-Seq data of pomegranate.
Table 1. RNA-Seq data of pomegranate.
Accession No.CultivarsSample TypeLibraryPlatformReferenceNote
SRR5279396‘Dabenzi’rootPaired endIllumina HiSeq 4000[39]
SRR5279397‘Dabenzi’leafPaired endIllumina HiSeq 4000[39]
SRR5279395‘Dabenzi’flowerPaired endIllumina HiSeq 4000[39]
SRR5279391‘Dabenzi’Inner seed coat (50 days after pollination)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 4000[39]
SRR5279388‘Dabenzi’Outer seed coat (50 days after pollination)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 4000[39]
SRR5279394‘Dabenzi’Pericarp (50 days after pollination)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 4000[39]
SRR5446598‘Tunisia’flower (3.0–5.0 mm)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 2500[57]Functional male flower
SRR5446595‘Tunisia’flower (5.1–13.0 mm)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 2500[57]Functional male flower
SRR5446592‘Tunisia’flower (13.1–25.0 mm)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 2500[57]Functional male flower
SRR5446607‘Tunisia’flower (3.0–5.0 mm)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 2500[57]Female sterility
SRR5446604‘Tunisia’flower (5.1–13.0 mm)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 2500[57]Female sterility
SRR5446601‘Tunisia’flower (13.1–25.0 mm)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 2500[57]Female sterility
SRR5678820‘Tunisia’Inner seed coat (50 days after pollination)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 4000[39]
SRR5678819‘Baiyushizi’ Inner seed coat (50 days after pollination)Paired endIllumina HiSeq 4000[39]
SRR080723‘Wonderful’pericarpPaired endIllumina HiSeq 2000[58]
SRR1055290‘nana’Mixed samples of leaves, flowers, fruit and rootsSingle end454 GS FLX Titanium[40]
SRR1054190‘Black127’Mixed samples of root,
leaf, flower and fruit
Single end454 GS FLX Titanium[40]
Table 2. The basic information of the TALE gene family in pomegranate.
Table 2. The basic information of the TALE gene family in pomegranate.
Gene NameGene IDLocationExonNo.CDSAAMW(Da)pIGRAVYSubcellular Localization
PgTALE1Pg002952.1scaffold11:2366550:23692654209769875,172.937.80−0.538Nuclear
PgTALE2Pg005682.1scaffold13:4182457:41889435103534438,810.155.25−0.795Nuclear
PgTALE3Pg009001.1scaffold17:1307284:13128004195965270,713.746.51−0.557Nuclear
PgTALE4Pg011533.1scaffold2:5274088:52777804193264370,086.666.33−0.566Nuclear
PgTALE5Pg014946.1scaffold26:1035323:10398745106535440,403.906.15−0.969Nuclear
PgTALE6Pg015766.1scaffold29:588196:5907124190563470,031.465.87−0.717Nuclear
PgTALE7Pg022248.1scaffold49:1377908:13861815106535439,800.275.13−0.751Nuclear
PgTALE8Pg024529.1scaffold6:3685906:36882284156352058,385.626.10−0.449Nuclear
PgTALE9Pg024817.1scaffold6:2019598:20223765127542446,087.055.94−0.635Nuclear
PgTALE10Pg026506.1scaffold7:1735075:17377464210370076,325.217.82−0.647Nuclear
PgTALE11Pg027513.1scaffold73:612910:6170194102334037,775.806.53−0.534Nuclear
PgTALE12Pg028434.1scaffold8:2877271:2880879590930233,829.166.27−0.635Nuclear
PgTALE13Pg028770.1scaffold81:128287:1328015213671178,483.786.54−0.513Nuclear
PgTALE14Pg029909.1scaffold9:754612:7578234185161668,481.096.27−0.707Nuclear
PgTALE15Pg030082.1scaffold9:3730507:37338076120340045,378.595.30−0.730Nuclear
PgTALE16Pg030621.1scaffold96:200629:2188776240079987,381.258.78−0.549Nuclear
PgTALE17Pg005241.1scaffold13:2266264:2268869346515417,605.665.18−0.730Nuclear

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, M.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, Z. Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of TALE Gene Family in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060829

AMA Style

Wang Y, Zhao Y, Yan M, Zhao H, Zhang X, Yuan Z. Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of TALE Gene Family in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Agronomy. 2020; 10(6):829. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060829

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yuying, Yujie Zhao, Ming Yan, Honglian Zhao, Xinhui Zhang, and Zhaohe Yuan. 2020. "Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of TALE Gene Family in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)" Agronomy 10, no. 6: 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060829

APA Style

Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Yan, M., Zhao, H., Zhang, X., & Yuan, Z. (2020). Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of TALE Gene Family in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Agronomy, 10(6), 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060829

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop