Next Article in Journal
Girdling Effects on Fruit Maturity, Kernel Quality, and Nutritional Value of Walnuts (Juglans regia L.) alongside the Effects on Leaf Physiological Characteristics
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of the Effect of Slurry, Combined with Inorganic N Rate and Timing, on the Yield of Spring Barley Post Cover Crop of Stubble Turnips
Previous Article in Journal
Direct and Indirect Detoxification Effects of Humic Substances
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Correct Cover Crop Species Integrated with Slurry Can Increase Biomass, Quality and Nitrogen Cycling to Positively Affect Yields in a Subsequent Spring Barley Rotation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/agronomy11020199
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Do Fallow Season Cover Crops Increase N2O or CH4 Emission from Paddy Soils in the Mono-Rice Cropping System?

by
Jie Li
1,*,
Shuai Wang
1,2,
Yuanliang Shi
1,
Lili Zhang
1 and
Zhijie Wu
1
1
Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110164, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(2), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020199
Submission received: 24 December 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 19 January 2021 / Published: 21 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impacts of Cover Crop Management Strategies on Soil Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cover crop management during the fallow season may play a relevant role in improving crop productivity and soil quality, by increasing nitrogen (N) and soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation, but has the possibility of increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the soil. A year-long consistency experiment was conducted to examine the effects of various winter covering crops on annual nitrous oxide (N2O) together with methane (CH4) emissions in the mono-rice planting system, including direct emissions in the cover crop period and the effects of incorporating these crops on gaseous emissions during the forthcoming rice (Oryza Sativa L.) growing period, to improve the development of winter fallow paddy field with covering crops and to assess rice cultivation patterns. The experiment included three treatments: Chinese milk vetch-rice (Astragalus sinicus L.) with cover crop residue returned (T1), ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.)-rice with cover crop residue returned (T2), and rice with winter fallow (CK). Compared with CK, the two winter cover crop treatments significantly increased rice yield, soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) by 6.9–14.5%, 0.8–2.1% and 3.4–5.4%, respectively. In all cases, the fluxes of CH4 and N2O could increase with the incorporation of N fertilizer application and cover crop residues. Short-term peaks of these two gas fluxes were monitored after all crop residues were incorporated in the soil preparation period, the early vegetative growth period and the midseason drainage period. The winter cover crop residue application greatly enhanced CH4 and N2O cumulative emissions compared with CK (by 193.6–226.5% and 37.5–43.7%, respectively) during rice growing season and intercropping period. Meanwhile, the mean values of global warming potentials (GWPs) from paddy fields with different cropping crops were T2 > T1 > CK. Considering the advantages of crop productivity together with environmental safety and soil quality, Chinese milk vetch-rice with cover crop residue returned would be the most practicable and sustainable cultivation pattern for the mono-rice cropping systems.

1. Introduction

It is assumed that agricultural soils are a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) leading to Earth’s climate change, particularly nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4)—the most important long-lived GHGs [1]. The global warming potentials (GWPs) of N2O and CH4 are 298 and 25 times higher than that of carbon dioxide (CO2). Moreover, both gases are reactive chemicals, CH4 influences the atmospheric chemistry and oxidation capacity, and the increased N2O in the atmosphere affects ozone depletion in the stratosphere [2]. Rice is one of the most prominent cereal crops and plays an essential role in maintaining global food security [3]. However, rice fields account for 5–19% and 60% of global agricultural CH4 and N2O emissions, respectively [4]. In paddy fields, CH4 and N2O emissions mostly rely on crop/soil management practices, such as fertilization, irrigation, soil cultivation and organic farming. Thus, these changes in agricultural practices would also provide mitigation options [5]. CH4 is produced by the decomposition of organic materials in anoxic flooded paddy soils via methanogenesis. In addition, N2O is generated through nitrification/denitrification processes [6,7], and denitrification is a more effective N2O production process [8,9]. Therefore, effective measures to reduce greenhouse gases in paddy fields are urgent scientific and societal challenges [10,11].
The preservation and maintenance of soil quality is the key to securing the high yield and stable harvest of rice grains. Replacing bare fallow with cover crops (CCs) is considered one of the most effective solutions for increasing organic substances, avoiding erosion, improving soil physiochemical features, reducing soil nitrogen leaching, suppressing weeds and reducing disease incidence [12,13]. However, because of the water and N requirements of winter cover crops, the alterations in soil moisture as well as C and N pools can exist during the cover crop period in paddy fields, thereby affecting the GHG emission process [14,15]. Moreover, it has been indicated that recycling cover crop residues would be beneficial for improving the soil conditions, reducing the application of N fertilizers, and supporting sustainable rice production [16]. Therefore, winter cover crop recycling in rice cultivation systems has the possibility of improving rice production and reducing adverse influences on the environment. The incorporation of different cover crop residues with variable characteristics would also have different effects on the net GHG budget for growing systems. To date, extensive research has been performed to assess the influence of winter cover crop return on soil nutrients and physiochemical properties, greenhouse gas emissions and rice grain production [17,18]. However, there is limited research that simultaneously compares the influences of various winter cover crops during the intercropping period and the influence of returned cover crops for forthcoming rice growth on annual GHG emissions in the mono-rice cropping systems.
Thus, field experiments were conducted (a) to quantify the annual N2O and CH4 emissions from winter cover crops in the cover crop period and rice growth period, (b) to evaluate the impacts of different cover crops on the GWP and (c) to determine the most feasible and sustainable management practices that can reduce GHG emissions and increase crop productivity. The findings of this paper can provide sound information for winter cover crop development in the mono-rice cultivation system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Sites

Field experiments were conducted at Jingzhou Experimental Station in Hubei Province, China (29°98′ N, 111°66′ E). The annual rainfall is 1980 mm, and the average annual temperature is 17.5 °C. The soil is classified as fluvo-aquic soil, and the texture is silty loam. The experimental soils (0–20 cm) displayed the following characteristics: pH 7.2 (soil:water, 1:2.5); soil organic carbon (SOC), 29.89 g/kg; available P (Olsen extractable), 6.37 mg/kg; total N, 2.03 g/kg; total K, 2.81 g/kg; and soil bulk density, 1.19 g/cm3.

2.2. Experimental Design and Field Management

The treatment plots selected for this study included Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.)-rice (Oryza. Sativa L.) with cover crop residue returned (T1), ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.)-rice with cover crop residue returned (T2), and rice for winter fallow (CK). All treatments were applied according to a randomized block design and were repeated three times. The plot area was 25 m2 (5 × 5 m). The ridges of the blocks were wrapped with plastic mulch to ensure independent nutrient and water management. After harvesting the cover crops, parts of the crop residues were incorporated into the soils using a moldboard. The Chinese milk vetch, ryegrass and rice residue applied were 14,200, 14,200 and 7500 kg/ha, respectively. Before incorporation, the Chinese milk vetch, ryegrass and rice residue were weighed and cut into 2 to 3 cm pieces. The basal chemical fertilizers were urea, diammonium phosphate, and potassium sulfate, equivalent to approximately 160 kg/ha, 45 kg/ha P2O5, and 75 kg ha−1 K2O per year, respectively. N fertilizer was used in three applications: 50% as the basic fertilizer before transplanting, 25% at the tillering stage, and the remaining 25% in the panicle period. One-month-old seedlings (cv. Huaan 3) were transplanted at a hill spacing of 20 × 16.7 cm, and two plants were planted on each hill. The seeds of Chinese milk vetch and ryegrass were broadcast in late September each year, and the sown rates were 30 and 21 kg/ha, respectively. Detailed schedules of the field operations throughout the whole study are demonstrated in Figure 1 [19]. The daily precipitation and air temperature are presented in Figure 2.

2.3. Gas Sampling and Auxiliary Measurements

CH4 and N2O emissions were measured using the static chamber method (Li et al. 2018). The chamber (diameter 30 cm, height 50 cm) was made of a 5 mm PVC board and PVC base (diameter 30 cm, height 10 cm). The small fan was equipped on the chamber top to ensure that air in the chamber could be mixed evenly. The chamber base with a groove in the collar was inserted 5 cm into the soil to allow rice plants to grow inside the base. Gas sampling occurred 2–3 times per week during the land preparation and rice growing period and once per week during the cover crop period. The gas samples were collected using a 50 mL syringe and were transferred to a 100 mL gasbag at 0, 30 and 60 min for analysis. The temperature inside the chamber was recorded by the thermocouple 20 cm from the body top. Measurement of gas samples was carried out using a gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890B; Delaware, USA).
The emission fluxes of N2O and CH4 were calculated as follows [20]:
F = ρ × h × dc/dt × 273/(273 + T),
where F is the N2O flux (µg/m2/h) or the CH4 flux (mg/m2/h); ρ indicates the standard state density (N2O 1.964 kg/m3 and CH4 0.714 kg/m3); h represents the chamber height above the soil (m); dc/dt is the slope of the gas concentration curve; 273 is the gas constant; and T is the mean air temperature during gas sampling (°C).
The total emissions of N2O (kg N2O/ha) and CH4 (kg CH4/ha) over the measurement period were obtained by integrating the average of two adjacent measurement fluxes (Vitale et al. 2018). GWPs (kg CO2-eq ha−1 year−1) were determined according to a previously described equation [21] as follows:
GWP = 25 × CH4 + 298 × N2O

2.4. Soil Sampling and Measurement

After harvesting rice, the soil was sampled at the upper layer (0–20 cm). Soil pH in the 1:2.5 (v/v) soil:water suspension was measured. SOC was determined by wet digestion with H2SO4-K2Cr2O7. Total N was measured by semimicro Kjeldahl digestion with CuSO4, K2SO4 and Se. The available P was extracted with NaHCO3 (0.5 M) and determined using the molybdate colorimetric method. The available K was extracted with 1 M NH4OAc solution (1:10 v/v) and measured using a flame photometer (FP640).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical tests were performed using the SPSS software ver. 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data were tested by one-way variance analysis and Duncan’s test. The mean ± standard error (SE) and the least significant difference (LSD) at a significance level of 0.05 were calculated to compare treatment means.

3. Results

3.1. CH4 and N2O Emissions

In the period of land preparation, CH4 emissions increased slightly under all the treatments, and a small peak was observed at approximately seven days after land preparation. Afterward, in the rice growing period, the flux of CH4 reached a peak at two weeks after rice transplanting and then declined rapidly and returned to background levels. Moreover, the CH4 flux showed a small peak in all the treatments during the mid-season aeration stage. The CH4 flux remained relatively low and stabilized during the fallow period in winter. Throughout most of the growing season, the daily CH4 emissions between the T1 and T2 treatments had the same patterns, and both were higher than those in the fertilizer-only plots, following the sequence of T2 > T1 > CK (Figure 2). The total emissions of CH4 from paddy soils in the land preparation, rice growing and cover crop periods were 112.8, 331.3, and 368.5 kg CH4-C/ha, respectively. Among the fertilized treatments, the annual cumulative CH4 emissions followed the order T2 > T1 > CK (Table 1).
The patterns of N2O flux in paddy soil were similar to those of CH4 flux, prominent during the tillage and rice growing periods but negligible in the winter fallow season (Figure 1). Four N2O emission peaks were detected during soil preparation, fertilization, mid-season drainage and last drainage (rice harvest period). During the rice growing season, N2O flux reached a peak on day one after fertilization and then declined gradually (Figure 1). Most emissions occurred in the first seven days after being fertilized, and emissions were relatively low in the late rice-growing season. As seen in Table 1, the annual total N2O emission followed the sequence of T2 (1.61 kg N2O/ha) > T1 (1.54 kg N2O/ha) > CK (1.12 kg N2O/ha) for the rice-fallow cropping system. The N2O emissions from the rice growing period accounted for 43.5–54.4% of the annual total emissions, followed by the land preparation period and the cover crop period, accounting for 18.1–22.1% and 26.7–36.6% of the total annual emissions, respectively.

3.2. Rice Yield, Soil Properties and GWPs of CH4 and N2O

The rice grain production in the T1 and T2 treatments was increased by 6.9% and 14.5% compared with that in the CK (Table 2). Compared with CK, the addition of cover crops increased the SOC and total N content by 0.8–2.1% and 3.4–5.4%, with the highest SOC and total N occurring in T1. On the basis of GWPs, the contribution of CH4 from paddy fields to global warming is greater compared to that of N2O. According to the global warming potential, it accounted for 89.4–95.0% of the total GWP during the annual cycle (Table 2 and Figure 1). The GWPs of CH4 and N2O from the mono-rice cultivation system showed the trend T2 (9693 kg CO2/ha) > T1 (8742 kg CO2/ha) > CK (3155 kg CO2/ha). The per yield GWPs of T2 and T1 were also remarkably higher than those of CK treatment (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1. CH4 and N2O Emissions from Paddy Soils

It has been demonstrated that farming systems, crop residues, fertilization, fertilizer types and efficient irrigation in rice fields are the main driving forces of CH4 and N2O emissions [22,23]. In the present study, compared with CK, the addition of cover crops enhanced the CH4 fluxes (T1 and T2) seven to 14 days after land preparation and the early rice-growing period (Figure 2), which was consistent with previous research [24,25]. The high emission of CH4 following land preparation may be relevant to the increase in available organic matter, while the existence of intense reducing conditions in the rhizosphere caused by flooding may be attributable to the high emission of CH4 in the early rice-growing period [26]. During the same period, however, because of the lack of organic substances, less CH4 production occurred in the NPK-only plots. In the rice growing period, CH4 emissions rose gradually with organic substance decomposition and peaked at the tillering stage. However, the CH4 flux of T1 and T2 was maintained at much low levels after rice harvest in the winter cover crop growing period. This is likely related to the improvement of soil aeration in this period, the restricted methanogen activities, and the reduced physiological activities of rice plants, thus prohibiting the transport and emission of CH4 [27].
The annual total CH4 emission varied from 112.84 to 368.50 kg CH4-C/ha in our study (Table 1), which is consistent with prior works conducted on rice planting systems [28,29]. In the present study, the annual total CH4 emissions were greatly enhanced due to the addition of winter cover crops. Pandey et al. (2012) also showed that although straw return helped to improve soil fertility, it increased the emission of CH4 simultaneously [30]. The reasons for the increased CH4 emissions from paddy fields after application of organic materials would probably be attributed to the supply of available C and N sources for microbial activities and methanogenic substrates for accelerating soil oxygen consumption and decreasing soil redox potential (Eh), which increased CH4 emissions from paddy fields after incorporating winter cover crop residue into soil [24,26,31]. As a support, the application of cover crops favored SOC and total N accumulation by the increased N and C availability in this study (Table 2). The differences among the treatments suggested that CH4 emissions in rice fields were influenced by various winter cover crops. The highest total CH4 emissions were found in the T2 treatment, which might be associated with the different residue decomposition rates during the rice growth season.
It has been suggested that N2O production and emission in rice fields depend on temperature, oxygen, soil moisture, soil organic matter, and pH [32,33]. In our research, the N2O emission flux peaked at the early land preparation period, mid-season drainage and last drainage prior to rice harvesting (Figure 2). In the soil preparation period, alternate drying–wetting cycles of soil could promote the emission of N2O. In addition, the incorporation of winter cover crops during the soil preparation stage may also trigger microbial activity, and the rapid decomposition of organic substances provides a more available N source, thus leading to more N2O emissions [34]. Higher emissions of N2O were observed during mid-season and last drainage, due to N fertilization after panicle initiation, high temperature and anoxic environment (Figure 2). In this work, the emissions of N2O from both T2 and T1 treatments were higher than those from the CK. Petersen et al. (2011) also found that there was a large positive interaction between N2O emissions and chemical nitrogen fertilizer or green manure during the rice growing seasons [35]. This was probably attributed to (1) the increased level of soil N after fertilization and (2) the incorporation of residue providing microorganisms with more substrates for the soil nitrification/denitrification process [36]. The absence of N fertilization in the winter cover crop growth period could explain the low N2O flux determined in the two cover crop treatments (Figure 2).
In our study, the annual total N2O emission varied from 1.12 to 1.16 kg N2O-N/ha (Table 1). It has been reported that 60% of published studies indicated that the cultivation of cover crops could increase N2O emissions, while 40% demonstrated that the cultivation of cover crops could reduce N2O emissions [37]. The differences in the studies can be explained by different cover crop performances, soil properties, cultivation systems, cover crop incorporation methods and N2O sampling timings. The total N2O emissions from T1 and T2 increased by 37.5% and 43.7%, respectively, and those from T2 were higher than those from T1, which might be associated with the different rates of straw decomposition. Further research is needed to study the microprocesses related to N2O emissions in the soil after winter cover crop incorporation.

4.2. GWPs of CH4 and N2O

The GWPs in the two cover crop treatments were much higher than those in the fertilizer-only group (p < 0.05), which was in good agreement with the study of Zhu and co-workers (2012) [38]. Although the global warming impact of N2O was 12 times larger than that of CH4, the cumulative emission of CH4 was approximately 370 times higher than that of N2O (Table 2), leading to the majority of GWPs are made up of CH4. This is probably related to the fact that CH4 emission is a contributing factor for GWP in paddy fields [28], which accounts for >90% of the GWP in this study (Table 2). The cultivation of cover crops may offer more N and available C, increase the abundance of methanogens, and directly or indirectly offer more dissolve organic C, which is an important factor for CH4 production [39], thus leading to higher GWPs and per yield GWPs for T2 and T1 than the CK treatment.

5. Conclusions

Our results indicated that the paddy soil with cover crop residues was the main source of atmospheric CH4. Compared with CK, the CH4 emissions of T1 and T2 increased in the rice growing period and cover crop period. The GWPs of CH4 in the T1 and CK plots were markedly decreased compared to those in T2 (p < 0.05). The N2O emissions were susceptible to external influences and varied significantly in the rice growing season. Although the total emissions of T2 and T1 were greater than that of CK, the GWPs of N2O were noticeably lower than those of CH4. Thus, N2O emission represents a weak source of GHGs in paddy soils. Notably, the GWPs (on the basis of N2O and CH4) of T1 and CK treatments were lower compared to those of T2 treatment. Higher grain yield was recorded in the T2 and T1 treatments than in the plots treated with NPK alone. Therefore, considering the total experimental period (fallow + rice crop), T1 is the most promising way to enhance rice production, SOC and total N accumulation and stabilize GHG emission, indicating that Chinese milk vetch-rice with a cover crop residue returned cropping pattern is probably the most viable and sustainable choice for mono-rice cropped regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.; methodology, J.L.; software, J.L.; validation, L.Z., Z.W. and Y.S.; formal analysis, J.L. and S.W.; investigation, S.W.; resources, J.L.; data curation, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, J.L.; visualization, J.L.; supervision, Z.W. and Y.S.; project administration, J.L.; funding acquisition, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41807107). The National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2017YFD0200708, 2018YFD0200200).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. OECD. Environmental Indicators for Agriculture, Methods and Results, Executive Summary; OECD: Paris, France, 2000; Available online: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/0/9/1916629.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2001).
  2. Li, X.L.; Yuan, W.P.; Xu, H.; Cai, Z.C.; Yagi, K. Effect of timing and duration of midseason aeration on CH4 and N2O emissions from irrigated lowland rice paddies in China. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2011, 91, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, H.; Hussain, S.; Zheng, M.; Peng, S.; Huang, J.; Cui, K.; Nie, L. Dry direct-seeded rice as an alternative to transplanted-flooded rice in central China. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. IPCC. Climate change. In Synthesis Report of the Fourth Assessment Report of IPCC; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007; Chapter 3; p. 49. [Google Scholar]
  5. Haque, M.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Pramanik, P.; Kim, G.; Kim, P.J. Optimum application level of winter cover crop biomass as green manure under considering methane emission and rice productivity in paddy soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2013, 49, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wrage, N.; van Groenigen, J.W.; Oenema, O.; Baggs, E.M. A novel dual-isotope labelling method for distinguishing between soil sources of N2O. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 19, 3298–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Ma, Y.; Sun, L.; Xiong, Z.; Huang, Q.; Sheng, Q. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions as affected by organic–inorganic mixed fertilizer from a rice paddy in southeast China. J. Soils Sediments 2013, 13, 1408–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bateman, E.J.; Baggs, E.M. Contributions of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions from soils at different water-filled pore space. Biol. Fert. Soils 2005, 41, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ruser, R.; Flessa, H.; Russow, R.; Schmidt, G.; Buegger, F.; Munch, J.C. Emission of N2O, N2 and CO2 from soil fertilized with nitrate: Effect of compaction, soil moisture and rewetting. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tang, H.; Xiao, X.; Tang, W.; Wang, K.; Sun, J.; Li, W.; Yang, G. Effects of winter covering crop residue incorporation on CH4 and N2O emission from double-cropped paddy fields in southern China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 12689–12698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, D.L.; Suter, H.C.; Islam, A.; Robert, E. Influence of nitrification inhibitors on nitrification and nitrous oxide(N2O)emission from a clay loam soil fertilized with urea. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miguez, F.E.; Bollero, G.A. Review of corn yield response under winter cover cropping systems using meta-analytic methods. Crop Sci. 2005, 45, 2318–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Snapp, S.S.; Swinton, S.W.; Labarta, R.; Mutch, D.; Black, J.R.; Leep, R.; Nyiraneza, J.; O’Neil, K. Evaluating cover crops for benefits, costs and performance within cropping system niches. Agron. J. 2005, 97, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jantalia, C.P.; dos Santos, H.P.; Urquiaga, S.; Boddey, R.M.; Alves, B.J.R. Fluxes of nitrous oxide from soil under different crop rotations and tillage systems in the South of Brazil. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2008, 82, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gomes, J.; Bayer, C.; de Souza Costa, F.; de Ca’ ssia Piccolo, M.; Zanatta, J.A.; Vieira, F.C.B.; Six, J. Soil nitrous oxide emissions in long-term cover crops-based rotations under subtropical climate. Soil Till. Res. 2009, 106, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Aulakh, M.S.; Khera, T.S.; Doran, J.W.; Singh, K.; Singh, B. Yields and nitrogen dynamics in a rice–wheat system using green manure and inorganic fertilizer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000, 64, 1867–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Khaliq, A.; Gondal, M.R.; Matloob, A.; Ullah, E.; Hussain, S.; Murtaza, G. Chemical weed control in wheat under different rice residue management options. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 2013, 19, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hussain, S.; Peng, S.; Fahad, S.; Khaliq, A.; Huang, J.; Cui, K.; Nie, L. Rice management interventions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 3342–3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sanz-Cobena, A.; García-Marco, S.; Quemada, M.; Gabriel, J.L.; Almendros, P.; Vallejo, A. Do cover crops enhance N2O, CO2 or CH4 emissions from soil in Mediterranean arable systems? Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 466–467, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Li, J.L.; Li, Y.E.; Wan, Y.F.; Wang, B.; Waqas, M.A.; Cai, W.W.; Guo, C.; Zhou, S.H.; Su, R.S.; Qin, X.B.; et al. Combination of modified nitrogen fertilizers and water saving irrigation can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase rice yield. Geoderma 2018, 315, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xia, L.L.; Wang, S.W.; Yan, X.Y. Effects of long-term straw incorporation on the net global warming potential and the net economic benefit in a rice-wheat cropping system in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 197, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Le Mer, J.; Roger, P. Production, oxidation, emissions and consumption of methane by soils: A review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2001, 37, 25–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, Y.; Singh, B.; Timsina, J. Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-based cropping systems in the tropics. Adv. Agron. 2005, 85, 269–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, C.H.; Do Park, K.; Jung, K.Y.; Ali, M.A.; Lee, D.; Gutierrez, J.; Kim, P.J. Effect of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) as a green manure on rice productivity and methane emission in paddy soil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 138, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Das, S.; Adhya, T.K. Effect of combine application of organic manure and inorganic fertilizer on methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a tropical flooded soil planted to rice. Geoderma 2014, 213, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yao, Z.S.; Zheng, X.H.; Dong, H.B.; Wang, R.; Mei, B.L.; Zhu, J.G. A 3-year record of N2O and CH4 emissions from a sandy loam paddy during rice seasons as affected by different nitrogen application rates. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 152, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, X.X.; Shang, Q.Y.; Wu, P.P.; Liu, J.J.; Shen, Q.R.; Guo, S.W.; Xiong, Z.Q. Methane emissions from double rice agriculture under long-term fertilizing systems in Hunan, China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 137, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shang, Q.; Yang, X.; Gao, C.; Wu, P.; Liu, J.; Xu, Y.; Shen, Q.; Zou, J.; Guo, S. Net annual global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in Chinese double rice-cropping systems: A 3-year field measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 2196–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, B.; Pang, C.; Qin, J.; Liu, K.; Xu, H.; Li, H. Rice straw incorporation in winter with fertilizer-N application improves soil fertility and reduces global warming potential from a double rice paddy field. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2013, 49, 1039–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pandey, D.; Agrawal, M.; Bohra, J.S. Greenhouse gas emissions from rice crop with different tillage permutations in rice-wheat system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 159, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Linquist, B.A.; Adviento-Borbe, M.A.; Pittelkow, C.M.; Kessel, C.; Groenigen, K.J. Fertilizer management practices and greenhouse gas emissions from rice systems: A quantitative review and analysis. Field Crops Res. 2012, 135, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wassmann, R.; Neue, H.U.; Ladha, J.K.; Aulakh, M.S. Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from rice-wheat cropping systems in Asia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2014, 6, 65–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kallenbach, C.M.; Rolston, D.E.; Horwath, W.R. Cover cropping affects soil N2O and CO2 emissions differently depending on type of irrigation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 137, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zelenev, V.V.; Van Bruggen, A.H.C.; Semenov, A.A.M. Short-term wavelike dynamics of bacterial populations in response to nutrient input from fresh plant residues. Microb. Ecol. 2005, 49, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Petersen, S.O.; Frohne, P.S.; Kennedy, A.C. Dynamics of soil microbial community under spring wheat. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, Z.Q.; Xu, Z.H.; Chen, C.R. Effect of mulching on labile soil organic matter pools, microbial community functional diversity and nitrogen transformations in two hardwood plantations of subtropical Australia. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2008, 40, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Basche, A.D.; Miguez, F.E.; Kaspar, T.C.; Castellano, M.J. Do cover crops increase or decrease nitrous oxide emissions? A meta-analysis. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2014, 69, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhu, B.; Yi, L.X.; Hu, Y.G.; Zeng, Z.H.; Tang, H.M.; Yang, G.L.; Xiao, X.P. Effects of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) residue incorporation on CH4 and N2O emission from a double-rice paddy soil. J. Integr. Agric. 2012, 11, 1537–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, W.Z.; Sheng, R.; Zhang, M.M.; Xiong, G.Y.; Hou, H.J.; Li, S.L.; Wei, W.X. Effects of continuous manure application on methanogenic and methanotrophic communities and methane production potentials in rice paddy soil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 258, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 11 00199 g001 550
Figure 1. Field operations during the experimental period.
Figure 1. Field operations during the experimental period.
Agronomy 11 00199 g001
Agronomy 11 00199 g002 550
Figure 2. Average daily air temperature and precipitation (a), CH4 flux (b) and N2O flux (c) during the year 2018–2019 under different management practices. CK: Rice with winter fallow; T1: Chinese milk vetch-rice with cover crop residue returned; T2: Ryegrass-rice with cover crop residue returned.
Figure 2. Average daily air temperature and precipitation (a), CH4 flux (b) and N2O flux (c) during the year 2018–2019 under different management practices. CK: Rice with winter fallow; T1: Chinese milk vetch-rice with cover crop residue returned; T2: Ryegrass-rice with cover crop residue returned.
Agronomy 11 00199 g002
Table
Table 1. Cumulative CH4 and N2O emissions in the three treatment groups during land preparation, rice growing and winter fallow periods.
Table 1. Cumulative CH4 and N2O emissions in the three treatment groups during land preparation, rice growing and winter fallow periods.
TreatmentCH4 Emission (kg CH4-C/ha)N2O Emission (kg N2O-N/ha)
Land PreparationRice GrowingWinter FallowTotalLand PreparationRice GrowingWinter FallowTotal
CK13.20 ± 0.01 c85.32 ± 0.10 c14.32 ± 0.06 b112.84 ± 0.09 c0.21 ± 0.01 c0.61 ± 0.01 c0.30 ± 0.01 c1.12 ± 0.02 c
T154.06 ± 0.03 a245.14 ± 0.16 b32.10 ± 0.03 a331.30 ± 0.11 b0.34 ± 0.01 a0.67 ± 0.01 b0.53 ± 0.01 b1.54 ± 0.01 b
T232.93 ± 0.03 b301.25 ± 0.23 a34.32 ± 0.02 a368.50 ± 0.10 a0.29 ± 0.02 b0.73 ± 0.02 a0.59 ± 0.01 a1.61 ± 0.02 a
All data (n = 3) are expressed as mean ± SE. The values with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). CK, rice with winter fallow; T1, rice-ryegrass cropping system; T2, rice-Chinese milk vetch cropping system.
Table
Table 2. Mean grain yield, annual CH4 and N2O emissions, estimated global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) under different treatment.
Table 2. Mean grain yield, annual CH4 and N2O emissions, estimated global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) under different treatment.
TreatmentGrain Yield (t/ha)SOC (g kg−1)Total N (g kg−1)GWP of CH4 (kg CO2-eq/ha/y)GWP of N2O (kg CO2-eq/ha/y)GWPs of CH4 and N2O (kg CO2-eq/ha/y)GHGI (kg kg/y)
CK7.93 ± 0.06 c29.87 ± 0.11 b2.01 ± 0.01 b2821 ± 241 c334 ± 10 c3155 ± 236 c0.39 ± 0.01 c
T19.08 ± 0.11 a30.50 ± 0.09 a2.12 ± 0.02 a8283 ± 212 b459 ± 9 b8742 ± 235 b0.96 ± 0.02 b
T28.48 ± 0.10 b30.11 ± 0.06 ab2.08 ± 0.03 ab9213 ± 209 a480 ± 4 a9693 ± 214 a1.14 ± 0.02 a
All data (n = 3) are expressed as mean ± SE. The values with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). CK, rice with winter fallow; T1, rice-ryegrass cropping system; T2, rice-Chinese milk vetch cropping system.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Wang, S.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Z. Do Fallow Season Cover Crops Increase N2O or CH4 Emission from Paddy Soils in the Mono-Rice Cropping System? Agronomy 2021, 11, 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020199

AMA Style

Li J, Wang S, Shi Y, Zhang L, Wu Z. Do Fallow Season Cover Crops Increase N2O or CH4 Emission from Paddy Soils in the Mono-Rice Cropping System? Agronomy. 2021; 11(2):199. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020199

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jie, Shuai Wang, Yuanliang Shi, Lili Zhang, and Zhijie Wu. 2021. "Do Fallow Season Cover Crops Increase N2O or CH4 Emission from Paddy Soils in the Mono-Rice Cropping System?" Agronomy 11, no. 2: 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020199

APA Style

Li, J., Wang, S., Shi, Y., Zhang, L., & Wu, Z. (2021). Do Fallow Season Cover Crops Increase N2O or CH4 Emission from Paddy Soils in the Mono-Rice Cropping System? Agronomy, 11(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020199

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop