Next Article in Journal
Soybean Nutrition in a Novel Single-Nutrient Source Hydroponic Solution
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity of Leaf Cuticular Transpiration and Growth Traits in Field-Grown Wheat and Aegilops Genetic Resources
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interactive Effects of Gibberellic Acid and Nitrogen Fertilization on the Growth, Yield, and Quality of Sugar Beet
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Application of Plant Growth Promoting Microorganism and Plant Growth Regulators in Agricultural Production and Research

Department of Agronomy, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Agronomy 2021, 11(3), 524; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030524
Submission received: 23 February 2021 / Accepted: 10 March 2021 / Published: 11 March 2021
Plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM) are rhizosphere microorganisms that colonize the root environment. Some of them are beneficial rhizobacteria while others are fungi that efficiently colonize roots and rhizosphere [1,2]. These microorganisms are capable of improving agriculture production and can also be used as biofertilizers under stressful environmental conditions. Continuous yield losses due to abiotic stresses are one of the important reasons for socio economic imbalance. As abiotic stresses decrease the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments, plant biomass and yield and negatively impact physiological and biochemical mechanisms, and eventually reduce plant growth and yield. The yield damages due to abiotic stresses vary from 50–82% [3]. The modern cultivation methods play an important role for good agricultural and horticultural practices. These methods include the use of cover crops, living mulches, PGPM, plant growth regulators (PGR) and other biostimulants that can protect the soil degradation and phytopathogens and improve the tolerance of plants to stress [4]. One of the utmost common stress tolerance plans in plants is the overproduction of diverse types of low molecular weight and non-toxic compatible organic solutes. They protect plants from unfavourable environmental conditions by different means like, adjustment of osmotic stress, detoxifying reactive oxygen species, membrane stabilization and protecting the structure of enzymes and proteins [5].
It has been suggested that tolerance mechanisms, such as leaf hydration, increased intrinsic water use efficiency, reduced oxidative damage or improved nutritional status, can explain the contribution of PGPR to the stress resistance of host plants. The use of PGPR and other symbiotic microorganisms, may play an important role in developing strategies to assist water conservation in plants. More precisely, the soil-borne Pseudomonads and Paecilomyces variotii have received a particular attention because of their metabolic flexibility, excellent root-colonising ability and competence to produce a wide range of enzymes and metabolites that benefit the plant in water conservation and enable them to endure diverse biotic and abiotic stresses [3,6].
Rhizosphere microorganisms as well as plant secondary metabolites are well-known for their role in improving growth patterns of roots as they result in rhizosheaths formation around the roots and protecting them from desiccation, pollutant degradation, maintenance of primary cellular functions and from antimicrobial activity of various predators. Many mechanisms have been described for the action of PGPR [7]. Some strains produce metabolites such as hydrogen cyanide, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol; antibiotics, and volatile compounds that motivate plant growth. Other strains are responsible for siderophores production and thus play a critical role in sequestering iron for plants, delay senescence, improve biological control, and produce phytohormones which influence plant physiological processes. Some inoculants enter inside root and establish endophytic populations with compliance to the niche and paybacks to the host plants while some enhance surface area of root, thus attract nutrients uptake, and in turn, tempt plant productivity [8,9]. The application of PGPR alone or in combination with chitosan play an important role in combating salinity stress by maintaining higher chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant enzymes activity [10]. Noshin et al. [11] isolated the halo-tolerant bacterial species and evaluated their ability to improve seed germination, plant growth, and phytohormones content in plants grown under saline stress conditions. Similarly, Ahmad et al. [12] noted the synergistic effects of PGPR and biochar on the growth and yield of maize grown under semi-arid climate. The beneficial effects of the fungal strains aggressivum f. europaeum Tae52481 and T. saturnisporum Ca1606 were also evident on the growth and yield of pepper and tomatoes [13].
One of the major benefits of PGPR is to produce effective antibacterial compounds that can be used against certain plant pathogens and pests. Moreover, PGPR arbitrates biological control not directly by eliciting induced systemic resistance against a large number of plant diseases [14]. Allelopathic rhizosphere bacteria also improve the wheat growth as they act as biocontrol agents to control the weeds in wheat growing areas [15]. Whereas, He et al. [16] reported the nematicidal activities of A. japonicas against root knot nematodes. These microorganisms are also an essential part of the soil phosphorus (P) cycle as they are concerned in a series of processes that have an effect on the transformation of soil P. Particularly, soil microorganisms are efficient in the release of P from inorganic and organic pools of total soil P by the process of mineralization and solubilisation. Shortage and fixation of P in alkaline calcareous soils initiate a decrease in crop production. The impact of rock phosphate and chemical fertilizers were evaluated in a two year field experiment both individually and in combination with PGPR on the growth and yield of wheat and on physico-chemical properties of soil. The study revealed substantial increases in wheat growth and yield treated with Pseudomonas sp. + poultry litter. Whereas, all other treatments i.e., rock phosphate + poultry litter + Proteus sp.; rock phosphate and poultry litter; half dose inorganic P from Single Super Phosphate-SSP with 18% P2O5 and poultry litter alone were useful for maintaining the soil biological and biochemical properties [17]. It was also reported that mechanical pot seedling transplanting together with deep nitrogen (N) fertilization significantly improves the yield and antioxidant enzymes activities in rice thus may also play an important role in improving the stress tolerance in test plants [18].
PGPR also assists in phytoremediation and microbial based phytoremediation is one of the utmost developing and environmentally friendly methods used for the purification of pollutants from the soil. The PGPR S. aureus K1 revealed to regulate the plant growth and antioxidant enzyme activities by decreasing oxidative stress and chromium (Cr) toxicity by converting Cr6+ to Cr3+ and the accumulation of Cr6+ was significantly reduced in wheat plants inoculated with S. aureus K1. This shows that the application of S. aureus K1 could be an effective approach to lessen the Cr toxicity in wheat and other crop plants [19]. Various free-living rhizosphere bacteria that promote the growth of plants can be applied in heavy metal polluted soils to alleviate lethal effects of heavy-metals on the flora. These beneficial microbes either entirely inhibit metal ions by inhabiting different metabolic activities or enhance the plant tolerance mechanism to high concentration of heavy metals [20].
Plant growth regulators (PGR) are chemical compounds that play a significant role in plant growth and yield. They are involved in plant’s intercellular communication and particularly present in the actively growing tissues of plants [21]. PGR associated with the control of cell division, root formation, embryogenesis, fruit development and ripening, and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses [22]. Plant growth regulators are designated in the literature as taking a significant part in acquiring crop management of modern agriculture in conditions of abiotic and biotic stressors. Plant growth regulators may improve the antioxidant activity in plants. Foliar application of GA3 significantly improved both root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights/plant, and root and foliage yields/ha increased with the incremental level of nitrogen and/or GA3 concentration [23]. Oxalic acid (OA) is an important calcium regulator and plays an important role in fruit yield and quality. In this special issue Benítez García, et al. [24] studied the PGR present in the seaweeds and evaluated their plant growth promoting abilities. Whereas, García-Pastor et al. [25] pointed out the effects of preharvest oxaloacetic acid (OA) treatments on pomegranate trees. They reported an increase in the respiration rate, fruit size, fruit quality and crop yield. The OA treatment was also augmenter to sugars and organic acids content, as well as to bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity. They authors also noted a stimulation in the fruit ripening process, increase in the number of fruits with improved quality. Nawaz et al. [26] studied the effects of seed priming with SA on the growth, pigmentation and mineral concentrations of maize (Zea mays L.) grown under B toxicity. The findings suggested that the exogenously applied SA moderates the reaction of plants grown under the boron toxicity, and therefore could be used as a plant growth regulator to motivate plant growth and augment mineral nutrient uptake under B-stressed conditions. Ali et al. [27] studied the effects of α-Tocopherol foliar spray on the growth, photosynthetic pigments, nutrient uptake, and drought tolerance in maize. They reported that α-Tocopherol is important in improving water stress tolerance in maize, and its foliar application was found to be effective in decreasing the adverse effects of water-stress on growth by modulating the metabolic activities of plants.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published editorial.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ALKahtani, M.D.F.; Fouda, A.; Attia, K.A.; Al-Otaibi, F.; Eid, A.M.; Ewais, E.E.-D.; Hijri, M.; St-Arnaud, M.; Hassan, S.E.-D.; Khan, N.; et al. Isolation and Characterization of Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Bacteria from Desert Plants and Their Application as Bioinoculants for Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Asghar, W.; Kondo, S.; Iguchi, R.; Mahmood, A.; Kataoka, R. Agricultural Utilization of Unused Resources: Liquid Food Waste Material as a New Source of Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes. Agronomy 2020, 10, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khan, N.; Ali, S.; Tariq, H.; Latif, S.; Yasmin, H.; Mehmood, A.; Shahid, M.A. Water Conservation and Plant Survival Strategies of Rhizobacteria under Drought Stress. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Patkowska, E.; Mielniczuk, E.; Jamiołkowska, A.; Skwaryło-Bednarz, B.; Błażewicz-Woźniak, M. The Influence of Trichoderma harzianum Rifai T-22 and Other Biostimulants on Rhizosphere Beneficial Microorganisms of Carrot. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Naamala, J.; Smith, D.L. Relevance of Plant Growth Promoting Microorganisms and Their Derived Compounds, in the Face of Climate Change. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moreno-Gavíra, A.; Diánez, F.; Sánchez-Montesinos, B.; Santos, M. Paecilomyces variotii as A Plant-Growth Promoter in Horticulture. Agronomy 2020, 10, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shah, A.; Smith, D.L. Flavonoids in Agriculture: Chemistry and Roles in, Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses, and Microbial Associations. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ali, S.; Hayat, K.; Iqbal, A.; Xie, L. Implications of Abscisic Acid in the Drought Stress Tolerance of Plants. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shahid, M.A.; Sarkhosh, A.; Khan, N.; Balal, R.M.; Ali, S.; Rossi, L.; Gómez, C.; Mattson, N.; Nasim, W.; Garcia-Sanchez, F. Insights into the Physiological and Biochemical Impacts of Salt Stress on Plant Growth and Development. Agronomy 2020, 10, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. ALKahtani, M.D.F.; Attia, K.A.; Hafez, Y.M.; Khan, N.; Eid, A.M.; Ali, M.A.M.; Abdelaal, K.A.A. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters and Antioxidant Defense System Can Display Salt Tolerance of Salt Acclimated Sweet Pepper Plants Treated with Chitosan and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ilyas, N.; Mazhar, R.; Yasmin, H.; Khan, W.; Iqbal, S.; Enshasy, H.E.; Dailin, D.J. Rhizobacteria Isolated from Saline Soil Induce Systemic Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) against Salinity Stress. Agronomy 2020, 10, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahmad, M.; Wang, X.; Hilger, T.H.; Luqman, M.; Nazli, F.; Hussain, A.; Zahir, Z.A.; Latif, M.; Saeed, Q.; Malik, H.A.; et al. Evaluating Biochar-Microbe Synergies for Improved Growth, Yield of Maize, and Post-Harvest Soil Characteristics in a Semi-Arid Climate. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sánchez-Montesinos, B.; Diánez, F.; Moreno-Gavíra, A.; Gea, F.J.; Santos, M. Role of Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum as Plant-Growth Promoter in Horticulture. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kousar, B.; Bano, A.; Khan, N. PGPR Modulation of Secondary Metabolites in Tomato Infested with Spodoptera litura. Agronomy 2020, 10, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abbas, T.; Zahir, Z.A.; Naveed, M.; Abbas, S.; Alwahibi, M.S.; Elshikh, M.S.; Mustafa, A. Large Scale Screening of Rhizospheric Allelopathic Bacteria and Their Potential for the Biocontrol of Wheat-Associated Weeds. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, Q.; Wang, D.; Li, B.; Maqsood, A.; Wu, H. Nematicidal Evaluation and Active Compounds Isolation of Aspergillus japonicus ZW1 against Root-Knot Nematodes Meloidogyne incognita. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Billah, M.; Khan, M.; Bano, A.; Nisa, S.; Hussain, A.; Dawar, K.M.; Munir, A.; Khan, N. Rock Phosphate-Enriched Compost in Combination with Rhizobacteria; A Cost-Effective Source for Better Soil Health and Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Productivity. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, L.; Zhang, Z.; Tian, H.; Mo, Z.; Ashraf, U.; Duan, M.; Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; Tang, X.; Pan, S. Roles of Nitrogen Deep Placement on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency, and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Mechanical Pot-Seedling Transplanting Rice. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zeng, F.; Zahoor, M.; Waseem, M.; Anayat, A.; Rizwan, M.; Ahmad, A.; Yasmeen, T.; Ali, S.; El-Sheikh, M.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; et al. Influence of Metal-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain K1 on the Alleviation of Chromium Stress in Wheat. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jabborova, D.; Wirth, S.; Kannepalli, A.; Narimanov, A.; Desouky, S.; Davranov, K.; Sayyed, R.Z.; El Enshasy, H.; Malek, R.A.; Syed, A.; et al. Co-Inoculation of Rhizobacteria and Biochar Application Improves Growth and Nutrientsin Soybean and Enriches Soil Nutrients and Enzymes. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Daniel, E.C.; Fabio, G. An Assessment of Seaweed Extracts: Innovation for Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cappellari, L.D.R.; Chiappero, J.; Palermo, T.B.; Giordano, W.; Banchio, E. Volatile Organic Compounds from Rhizobacteria Increase the Biosynthesis of Secondary Metabolites and Improve the Antioxidant Status in Mentha piperita L. Grown under Salt Stress. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leilah, A.A.A.; Khan, N. Interactive Effects of Gibberellic Acid and Nitrogen Fertilization on the Growth, Yield, and Quality of Sugar Beet. Agronomy 2021, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Benítez García, I.; Dueñas Ledezma, A.K.; Martínez Montaño, E.; Salazar Leyva, J.A.; Carrera, E.; Osuna Ruiz, I. Identification and Quantification of Plant Growth Regulators and Antioxidant Compounds in Aqueous Extracts of Padina durvillaei and Ulva lactuca. Agronomy 2020, 10, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. García-Pastor, M.E.; Giménez, M.J.; Valverde, J.M.; Guillén, F.; Castillo, S.; Martínez-Romero, D.; Serrano, M.; Valero, D.; Zapata, P.J. Preharvest Application of Oxalic Acid Improved Pomegranate Fruit Yield, Quality, and Bioactive Compounds at Harvest in a Concentration-Dependent Manner. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nawaz, M.; Ishaq, S.; Ishaq, H.; Khan, N.; Iqbal, N.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Alsahli, A.A.; Alyemeni, M.N. Salicylic Acid Improves Boron Toxicity Tolerance by Modulating the Physio-Biochemical Characteristics of Maize (Zea mays L.) at an Early Growth Stage. Agronomy 2020, 10, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ali, Q.; Tariq Javed, M.; Haider, M.Z.; Habib, N.; Rizwan, M.; Perveen, R.; Ali, S.; Nasser Alyemeni, M.; El-Serehy, H.A.; Al-Misned, F.A. α-Tocopherol Foliar Spray and Translocation Mediates Growth, Photosynthetic Pigments, Nutrient Uptake, and Oxidative Defense in Maize (Zea mays L.) under Drought Stress. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, N. Application of Plant Growth Promoting Microorganism and Plant Growth Regulators in Agricultural Production and Research. Agronomy 2021, 11, 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030524

AMA Style

Khan N. Application of Plant Growth Promoting Microorganism and Plant Growth Regulators in Agricultural Production and Research. Agronomy. 2021; 11(3):524. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030524

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Naeem. 2021. "Application of Plant Growth Promoting Microorganism and Plant Growth Regulators in Agricultural Production and Research" Agronomy 11, no. 3: 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030524

APA Style

Khan, N. (2021). Application of Plant Growth Promoting Microorganism and Plant Growth Regulators in Agricultural Production and Research. Agronomy, 11(3), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030524

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop