Next Article in Journal
Multidimensional Analysis of Diversity in DH Lines and Hybrids of Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving Germination Rate of Coastal Glehnia by Cold Stratification and Pericarp Removal
Previous Article in Journal
Bioherbicidal Properties of Parthenium hysterophorus, Cleome rutidosperma and Borreria alata Extracts on Selected Crop and Weed Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effective Propagation of Selaginella tamariscina through Optimized Medium Composition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Yield and Quality of Inflorescences in the Zantedeschia albomaculata (Hook.) Baill. ‘Albomaculata’ after the Treatment with AMF and GA3

1
Department of Phytopathology, Seed Science and Technology, Faculty of Agronomy, Horticulture and Bioengineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland
2
Department of Ornamental Plants, Dendrology and Pomology, Faculty of Agronomy, Horticulture and Bioengineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(4), 644; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040644
Submission received: 27 January 2021 / Revised: 24 March 2021 / Accepted: 25 March 2021 / Published: 27 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A New Decade of Horticultural and Medicinal Plants Cultivation)

Abstract

:
This study was conducted to assess the influence of gibberellic acid (GA3) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on the flowering and quality of Zantedeschia albomaculata (Hook.) Baill ‘Albomaculata’ plants. Before planting, the rhizomes were soaked in water or an aqueous solution of GA3 at a concentration of 150 mg dm−3 for 30 min. A mixture of AMF was applied to the rhizomes a week after planting. The AMF treatment increased the yield of inflorescences of the ‘Albomaculata’ cultivar by 100%. AMF and GA3 had a favourable effect on the quality of inflorescences, expressed by the length of peduncles, whereas AMF individually positively affected the length of the spathes. AMF and GA3 had no effect on the level of macroelements in calla lily leaves, with the exception of calcium (Ca). The leaves of mycorrhized plants had a high content of sodium (Na) and micronutrients, except for iron (Fe). The results of the study showed that GA3 could be replaced by mycorrhizal inoculation when applied to Zantedeschia plants.

1. Introduction

Calla lilies—Zantedeschia—are African plants of the Araceae family. They are mostly grown for cut flowers and they rank thirteenth in the flower trade in The Netherlands. Due to unsatisfactory flower harvests mainly because of the high prices of rhizomes produced abroad, Calla lilies are not so popular among Polish producers. Even though the flower yield can be increased with the application of gibberellic acid (GA3) [1,2,3,4,5,6], the risk of contamination via fertilizer solution, such as Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum [7], a pathogen bacteria associated with soft rot, is high and could seriously limit the production.
Therefore, it is advisable to seek other methods to improve the flowering of Zantedeschia cultivars as efficiently as with GA3. According to Matysiak [8], arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) stimulates flowering, because it produces growth regulators, including gibberellin. AMF are in symbiotic relationships with most wild and cultivated terrestrial plants except species belonging to the Brassicaceae and Chenopodiaceae families [9]. Mycorrhizal fungi facilitate the uptake of micro- and macronutrients in exchange for photosynthetic products [9].
In addition, AMF facilitates the completion of biogeochemical cycles, increases plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses [10], and increases the phytochemical content of health-promoting compounds [11,12]. Fungal spores germinate at the right humidity, temperature, and pH. However, their vitality is limited [13]. The morphogenesis of fungal spores takes place when they encounter host plants [14,15]. Fungal hyphae penetrate the root cells and form arbuscules, through which nutrients can be exchanged between the fungi and the plant [16,17]. AMF acquires nutrients for plants, in particular phosphorus in poor environments. In return, the fungi receive the necessary carbohydrates [18].
In this study, we assessed the effects of AMF and GA3 on the flowering and quality of Zantedeschia albomaculata ‘Albomaculata’ plants. The content of micro- and macronutrients in the leaves was assessed. The assumption was that mycorrhizal fungi would establish a symbiotic relationship with plants and, thus, increase the flower yield and intensify the uptake of nutrients.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plants

This study was conducted to assess the influence of gibberellic acid (GA3) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on the flowering and quality of Zantedeschia albomaculata (Hook.) Baill. ‘Albomaculata’ plants. For three consecutive years of research, on 16 May, rhizomes of more than 20 cm in circumference, with leaf buds of 0.5–1.5 cm in length, were planted into 20-cm pots with a substrate consisting of peat (pH 6.2) enriched with a slow-release fertilizer Osmocote Plus (3–4 M) (15 + 11 + 13 ± 2 MgO + microelements) at an amount of 3 g·dm−3 and mixed with fresh, shredded pine bark at a 3:1 ratio (v/v).
Before planting, the rhizomes were soaked in water (control plants) or an aqueous solution of gibberellic acid (GA3) at a concentration of 150 mg·dm−3 for 30 min. Earlier research by Janowska and Andrzejak [5], Janowska [6], Janowska and Schroeter [19], and Kozłowska et al. [20] showed that this concentration of GA3 was optimal for the ‘Albomaculata’ cultivar.
The plants were also treated with a commercial product containing a mixture of AMF: Rhizophagus aggregatus (N.C. Schenck and G.S. Sm.), Funneliformis mosseae (T.H. Nicolson & Gerd.) C. Walker & A. Schüßler, Rhizophagus intraradices (N.C. Schenck and G.S. Sm.) C. Walker and A. Schüßler, Rhizophagus clarus (T.H. Nicolson and N.C. Schenck) C. Walker and A. Schüßler, Claroideoglomus etunicatum (W.N. Becker and Gerd.) C. Walker and A. Schüßler, and Gigaspora margerita W.N. Becker and I.R. Hall. One week after the planting, the fungi were applied in the form of spores at an amount of 100 propagation units per plant—2 g of the product per plant. Each treatment involved five plants in three replications.

2.2. Cultivation

The plants were grown in a greenhouse. Fertilization started in the fifth week of cultivation. We applied 0.2% solutions of Peters Professional (20:20:20) or Brown Superba (14–10–25 + microelements) fertilizers every 10–14 days. At the beginning of vegetation, when the leaves were fully developed, 0.2% calcium saltpetre was applied foliarly once.
The lengths of the peduncles and spathes were measured, and the yield of inflorescences developing from a single rhizome was determined.

2.3. Chemical Analysis

Leaves were dried at a temperature of 45–50 °C and then ground. To determine the total content of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg), these leaves were mineralized in concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4). The following methods were used to measure the content of the nutrients: total N—by Kjeldahl digestion with distillation in a Parnas—Wagner apparatus, P—the colorimetric method employing ammonium molybdate (after Schillak), and K, Ca, and Mg—atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).
To determine the total iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu), the leaves were mineralized in a mixture of nitric (HNO3) and perchloric acids (HClO4) (3:1, v/v), and for sodium (Na), in concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4) [21]. After the mineralization, the Na, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu contents were determined using the AAS method (on a Carl Zeiss Jena apparatus).

2.4. Root Colonisation

The method described by Phillips and Hayman [22] was used to stain the root mycorrhizas. Root colonization was expressed as the percentage of colonized root lengths versus observed root lengths. The soil hyphal length was measured with the method described by Bethlenfalvay and Ames [23].

2.5. Data Analysis

Three-way analysis of variance and the Statistica 8.0 software were used for statistical analysis of the results. The means were grouped with the the Newman–Keuls test.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Root Colonisation

In the three consecutive years of the study the AMF colonization, measured as the percentage of root lengths colonized by hyphae, amounted to 31.2%, 32.0%, and 30.7% in the plants not treated with GA3, whereas, in those treated with GA3, the AMF colonization was 29.9%, 31.1%, and 30.4%. The results of the study showed that GA3 did not affect the root colonization by AMF. According to Eloise et al. [24], endogenous levels of gibberellins (GA) influence the formation of arbuscules in mycorrhizated pea roots. The authors suggested that GA suppresses the formation of arbuscules in pea roots; however, exogenous treatment does not enable distinction between occurrences taking place in the rhizosphere and those inside the root cells.

3.2. Yield and Quality of Flowers

The yield of flowers significantly depended on mycorrhization only. When the plants were treated with AMF, their average yield of flowers was 100% greater than that of the non—mycorrhized plants (Table 1). The comparison of interactions showed that the most flowers developed on the mycorrhized plants, irrespective of whether or not their rhizomes had been soaked in GA3. The soaking of rhizomes in GA3 without mycorrhiza boosted the yield of flowers; however, their number was significantly smaller compared with the mycorrhized plants.
The soaking of rhizomes in GA3 is increasingly popular in large-scale production because it improves the flowering of Zantedeschia cultivars [1,2,3,4,5,6,25]. The study showed that GA3 could be replaced with mycorrhiza, which proved to be more effective than the soaking of rhizomes in GA3. Janowska et al. [26] observed that mycorrhization increased the yield of flowers of Zantedeschia albomaculta ‘Albomaculata’ cultivated in a greenhouse. According to Janowska et al. [27], the mycorrhization of Syningia speciosa cultivars affected only the number of flower buds. After mycorrhization, both the ‘Defiance’ and ‘Blanche de Meru’ cultivars yielded significantly more buds (66.7% and 57%, respectively) compared with the control plants.
The addition of mycorrhizal fungi to the substrate stimulated flower bud induction, likely because mycorrhizal fungi produce growth regulators, including those from the gibberellin group [7,8]. According to Nowak [28], mycorrhization had no effect on the abundance of Callistephus chinensis flowers. Lovato et al. [29] noted that mycorrhized miniature roses and chrysanthemums were better-branched, and, as a result, they flowered more abundantly. According to Janowska and Andrzejak [30], Tagetes patula ‘Yellow Boy’ plants treated with mycorrhiza produced more inflorescence buds, whereas Salvia splendens ‘Saluti Red’ developed more flowers per inflorescence.
The study showed that mycorrhization and GA3 had favourable effects on the quality of flowers, expressed by the length of peduncles. Regarding the spathes, only the symbiosis with fungi was found to be effective (Table 1). The length of peduncles and spathes in calla lilies is largely a cultivar-related trait. GA3 treatment has been shown to modify it in certain cultivars, e.g., ‘Black Eyed Beauty’, ‘Cameo’, and ‘Treasure’ as was observed by Janowska and Zakrzewski [31]. On the other hand, Janowska and Krause [25], found that GA3 was detrimental to the quality of inflorescences, finding that double and triple spathes tended to develop.
This effect was not observed in our study, either in the mycorrhized plants or those treated with GA3. According to Janowska et al. [26], Zantedeschia albomaculata inflorescences had longer peduncles after AMF treatment. Nowak and Nowak [32] found that AMF and carbon dioxide (CO2) enrichment increased the number of leaves as well as the fresh and dry weights of Osteospermum ecklonis shoots.

3.3. Content of Macroelements

AMF and GA3 had no effect on the content of macroelements in the leaves of the ‘Albomaculata’ cultivar, with the exception of Ca. Ca is a structurally and functionally essential element in plant physiology. The majority of plant Ca can be found in the cell walls and in the in the vacuoles; however, it is also a key component regulating the functions of the plasma membrane. Ca additionally controls the activity of various key metabolic enzymes [33]. There was a significantly higher Ca content in the leaves of the plants treated with AMF and GA3. The leaves of the non-mycorrhized plants whose rhizomes had been soaked in the GA3 had a lower Ca content (Table 2).
Janowska et al. [26] found that the leaves of mycorrhized Zantedeschia albomaculata ‘Albomaculata’ plants contained: N—5.35–5.55% d.w., P—0.44% and 0.53% DW, K—3.89% and 4.41% DW, Ca—0.78% and 0.80% d.w., and Mg—0.22% and 0.23% DW. The mycorrhization had no effect on the content of Ca and Mg in Zantedeschia leaves. Nowak [28], observed a slightly elevated P level in the leaves of mycorrhized Callistephus chinensis plants.
However, the mycorrhization did not affect the N, K, or Ca content in this species. Available scientific publications do not provide information how GA3 affects the levels of macroelements in Zantedeschia albomaculata leaves. Janowska et al. [34] noted that all GA3 treatments stimulated the Ca uptake in Gladiolus hybridus ‘Black Velvet’; however, they had no effect on the uptake of other macronutrients. Another study conducted by the same authors [35] showed that benzyladenine (BA) applied at 100–600 mg·dm−3 stimulated the Ca uptake in this cultivar but had no effect on the uptake of other macronutrients.

3.4. Content of Microelements

Mycorrhization had a favourable effect on the content of the Na and other microelements, with the exception of Fe (Table 3). Micronutrients as essential components for plant life were discovered in the 1920s and 1930s. Their role is limited to the regulation of biochemical processes taking place in plants during the growing season. This means that plants have a low demand for these components [36]. Microelements have a direct and indirect influence on the flowering and quality of flowers in ornamental plants.
The accumulation of microelements, except for Zn, in Zantedeschia leaves is a favourable occurrence, as it may result in more abundant inflorescences of higher quality. Janowska et al. [34] found that all GA3 treatments increased the Mn content but did not affect the Cu content in the leaves of Gladiolus hybridus ‘Black Velvet’. GA3 concentrated at 600 mg·dm−3 stimulated the uptake of Fe and B, but lower GA3 concentrations inhibited the uptake of both microelements.
The Zn uptake was stimulated at 100 mg·dm−3; however, it was inhibited at a higher concentration. Janowska et al. [35] observed that another growth regulator—BA—applied at 600 mg·dm−3, stimulated the uptake of Mn and Zn in G. hybridus ‘Black Velvet’, whereas, at concentrations ranging from 100 to 600 mg·dm−3, it stimulated the B uptake but inhibited the Cu uptake. Walker et al. [37] observed a similar phenomenon in Betula lenta leaves. Janowska et al. [26] found that mycorrization only affected the Mn content in Zantedeschia albomaculata leaves but had no effect on the content of Na and other microelements. Nowak [28] noted elevated levels of Mg in the leaves of Callistephus chinensis after the treatment with mycorrhizal fungi.

4. Conclusions

AMF increased the yield of Zantedeschia albomaculata ‘Albomaculata’ inflorescences by 100%.AMF and GA3 had a favourable effect on the quality of inflorescences, expressed by the length of peduncles, whereas mycorrhization on its own positively affected the length of the spathes. AMF and GA3 had no effect on the level of macroelements in calla lily leaves, with the exception of calcium. The leaves of mycorrhized plants had a high content of Na and micronutrients, except for Fe. The results of the study showed that GA3 could be replaced by mycorrhiza when applied to Zantedeschia plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing, R.A. and B.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The publication was co-financed within the framework of Ministry of Science and Higher Education programme as “Regional Initiative Excellence” in years 2019–2022, Project No. 005/RID/2018/19, financing amount 12 000 000 PLN.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Funnell, K.A.; Tjia, B.O. Effect of storage temperature, duration and gibberellic acid on the flowering of Zantedeschia elliottiana and Z. ‘Pink Satin’. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1988, 113, 860–863. [Google Scholar]
  2. Corr, B.E.; Widmer, R.E. Paclobutrazol, gibberellic acid and rhizome size affect growth and flowering of Zantedeschia. HortScience 1991, 26, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Funnell, K.A.; Mackay, B.R.; Lawoko, C.R.O. Comparative effects of promalin and ga3 on flowering and development of Zantedeschia ‘galaxy’. Acta Hort. 1992, 292, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dennis, D.; Doreen, D.J.; Ohteki, T. Effect of a gibberellic acid ‘quick-dip’ and storage on the yield and quality of blooms from hybrid Zantedeschia tubers. Sci. Hortic. 1994, 57, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Janowska, B.; Andrzejak, R. Effect of gibberellic acid spraying and soaking of rhizomes on the growth and flowering of calla lily (Zantedeschia Spreng.). Acta Agrob. 2010, 63, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Janowska, B. Effect of growth regulators on flower and leaf yield of the Calla lily (Zantedeschia Spreng.). Hort. Sci. 2013, 40, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ravensdale, M.; Blom, T.J.; Gracia-Garza, J.A.; Svirce, A.M.; Smith, R.J. Bacteriophages and the control of Erwinia carotovora subsp. Carotovora. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2007, 29, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Matysiak, B. Effect of endomycorrhizal inocula during propagation on the growth following transplanting of Ilex x meserveae ‘Blue Boy’ cutting. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 2009, 539, 499–506. [Google Scholar]
  9. Feijen, F.A.A.; Vos, R.A.; Nuytinck, J.; Merckx, V.S.F.T. Evolutionary dynamics of mycorrhizal symbiosis in land plant diversification. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Gianinazzi, S.; Gollotte, A.; Binet, M.N.; van Tuinen, D.; Redecker, D.; Wipf, D. Agroecology the key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in ecosystem services. Mycorrhiza 2010, 20, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sbrana, C.; Avio, L.; Giovannetti, M. Beneficial mycorrhizal symbionts affecting the production of health-promoting phytochemicals. Electrophoresis 2014, 35, 1535–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Avio, L.; Turrini, A.; Giovannetti, M.; Sbrana, C. Designing the ideotype mycorrhizal symbionts for the production of healthy food. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Giovannetti, M.; Sbrana, C.; Avio, L.; Citernesi, A.S.; Logi, C. Differential hyphal morphogenesis in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during pre-infection stages. New Phytol. 1993, 125, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Akiyama, K.; Matsuzaki, K.I.; Hayashi, H. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 2005, 435, 824–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sbrana, C.; Giovannetti, M. Chemotropism in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Mycorrhiza 2005, 15, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, Y.; Wang, W.; Xie, Q.; Liu, N.; Liu, L.; Wang, D.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.; Chen, X.; Tang, D.; et al. Plants transfer lipids to sustain colonization by mutualistic mycorrhizal and parasitic fungi. Science 2017, 356, 1172–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Luginbuehl, L.H.; Menard, G.N.; Kurup, S.; Van Erp, H.; Radhakrishnan, G.V.; Breakspear, A.; Oldroyd, G.E.D.; Eastmond, P.J. Fatty acids in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are synthesized by the host plant. Science 2017, 356, 1175–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Maillet, F.; Poinsot, V.; André, O.; Puech-Pagès, V.; Haouy, A.; Gueunier, M.; Cromer, L.; Giraudet, D.; Formey, D.; Niebel, A.; et al. Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nature 2011, 469, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Janowska, B.; Schroeter, A. The influence of gibberellic acid on flowering of Zantedeschia elliottiana (W. Wats.) Engl. ‘Black Magic’. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 2002, 483, 93–99. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kozłowska, M.; Rybus-Zając, M.; Stachowiak, J.; Janowska, B. Changes in carbohydrate contents of Zantedeschia leaves under gibberellin-stimulated flowering. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2007, 29, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamińska, W.; Kardasz, T.; Strahl, A.; Bałucka, T.; Walczak, K.; Filipek, P. The Methods of Analisis in Chemical-Agricultural Station. Part II. Analisis of Plants; IUNG: Puławy, Poland, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  22. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bethlenfalvay, G.J.; Ames, R.N. Comparison of two methods for quantifying extraradical mycelium of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1987, 51, 834–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eloise, F.; Ross, J.J.; Jones, W.T.; Reid, J.B. Plant hormones in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: An emerging role for gibberellins. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Janowska, B.; Krause, J. The influences of tuber treatment by gibberellic acid on the flowering of Zantedeschia. Rocz. AR Pozn. Ogrodn. 2001, 33, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  26. Janowska, B.; Andrzejak, R.; Kosiada, T.; Trelka, T.; Frąszczak, B. Effect of mycorrhization on the flowering of the Zantedeschia albomaculata /Hook./ Baill. cv. Albomaculata. Hort. Sci. 2013, 40, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Janowska, B.; Rybus-Zając, M.; Horojdko, M.; Andrzejak, R.; Siejak, D. The effect of mycorrhization on the growth, flowering, content of chloroplast pigments, saccharides and protein in leaves of Sinningia speciosa (Lodd.) Hiern. Acta Agroph. 2016, 23, 213–223. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nowak, J. Effects of mycorrhization and phosphorus nutrition on nutrient uptake, growth and flowering of China aster (Callistephus chinensis /L./ Nees) cultivated on ebb-and-flow benczes. Acta Agrob. 2009, 62, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lovato, P.E.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V.; Trouvelot, A.; Gianinzzi, S. The state of art of mycorrhizas and micropropagation. Adv. Hort. Sci. 1996, 10, 46–52. [Google Scholar]
  30. Janowska, B.; Andrzejak, R. Effect of mycorrhizal inoculation on development and flowering of Tagetes patula L. ‘Yellow Boy’ and Salvia splendens Buc’hoz ex Etl. ‘Saluti Red’. Acta Agrob. 2017, 70, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Janowska, B.; Zakrzewski, P. The effect of gibberellic acid and rhizome treatment on flowering of calla lily (Zantedeschia Spreng.). Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 2006, 510, 223–233. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nowak, J.; Nowak, J.S. CO2 enrichment and mycorrhizal effects on cutting growth and some physiological traits of cuttings during rooting. Acta Sci. Pol. Hort. Cult. 2013, 12, 67–75. [Google Scholar]
  33. Medaj, A.; Piechura, K.; Skrobot, K.; Sokulski, S. Determination of assimilable calcium for plants in the soil of the Kluczwoda Valley by atomic absorption spectrometry. Analit 2017, 3, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  34. Janowska, B.; Andrzejak, R.; Kosiada, T.; Kwiatkowska, M.; Smolińska, D. The flowering and nutritional status of Gladiolus hybridus ‘Black Velvet’ following gibberellin treatment. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 45, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Janowska, B.; Andrzejak, R.; Kosiada, T.; Kwiatkowska, M.; Smolińska, D. The flowering and nutritional status of Gladiolus hybridus cv. Black Velvet following a cytokinin treatment. J. Element. 2018, 23, 1119–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Spiak, Z. Microelements in agriculture. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 2000, 471, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  37. Walker, R.F.; Mclaughlin, S.B.; Amundsen, C.C. Interactive Effects of mycorrhization and fertilization on growth, nutrition and water relation of Sweet Birch. J. Sustain. Forest. 2003, 17, 55–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. The yield and quality of the inflorescences of Zantedeschia albomaculata ‘Albomaculata’ plants after the treatment with AMF and GA3. The means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
Table 1. The yield and quality of the inflorescences of Zantedeschia albomaculata ‘Albomaculata’ plants after the treatment with AMF and GA3. The means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
YearMycorrhizationGA3 (150 mg·mg−3)Mean for Mycorrhization
NoYes
Yield of flowers
Ino2.2 a3.5 b2.8 a
II1.9 a4.0 b
III2.1 a3.0 b
Iyes5.8 c5.0 c5.6 b
II6.2 c5.8 c
III5.4 c5.2 c
Mean for GA33.9 a4.4 a
Flower peduncle length (cm)
Ino36.0 a40.7 b39.0 a
II38.0 a41.3 b
III37.8 a40.0 b
Iyes43.2 c45.5 d44.3 b
II44.0 c43.7 c
III43.2 c46.0 d
Mean for GA340.4 a42.9 b
Spathe length (cm)
Ino10.0 a10.0 a10.3 a
II10.4 a10.6 a
III10.2 a10.4 a
Iyes12.2 b11.5 b11.7 b
II12.0 b12.0 b
III11.6 b11.0 b
Mean for GA311.0 a10.9 a
Table 2. The effect of AMF and GA3 (% DW) on the content of macroelements in the leaves of the Zantedeschia albomaculata ‘Albomaculata’ plants. The means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
Table 2. The effect of AMF and GA3 (% DW) on the content of macroelements in the leaves of the Zantedeschia albomaculata ‘Albomaculata’ plants. The means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
YearMycorrhizationGA3 (150 mg·mg−3)Mean for Mycorrhization
NoYes
N
Ino5.19 a4.79 a4.93 a
II4.90 a4.70 a
III5.00 a4.99 a
Iyes4.77 a5.11 a4.92 a
II4.91 a4.99 a
III4.71 a5.00 a
Mean for GA34.91 a4.93 a
P
Ino0.43 a0.42 a0.43 a
II0.44 a0.40 a
III0.45 a0.44 a
Iyes0.42 a0.42 a0.41 a
II0.39 a0.41 a
III0.43 a0.39 a
Mean for GA30.43 a0.41 a
K
Ino3.91 a3.96 a3.91 a
II3.87 a4.00 a
III3.84 a3.86 a
Iyes3.68 a4.15 a3.88 a
II3.76 a3.97 a
III3.80 a3.92 a
Mean for GA33.81 a3.98 a
Ca
Ino0.76 b0.66 a0.70 a
II0.75 b0.64 a
III0.76 b0.62 a
Iyes0.73 b0.85 c0.80 b
II0.75 b0.90 c
III0.71 b0.87 c
Mean for GA30.74 a0.76 a
Mg
Ino0.22 a0.24 a0.23 a
II0.25 a0.22 a
III0.24 a0.26 a
Iyes0.25 a0.30 a0.28 a
II0.27 a0.26 a
III0.24 a0.29 a
Mean for GA30.25 a026 a
Table 3. Effect of the of AMF and GA3 (mg∙kg−1 in DW) on the content of microelements and sodium in the leaves of the Zantedeschia albomaculata ‘Albomaculata’. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
Table 3. Effect of the of AMF and GA3 (mg∙kg−1 in DW) on the content of microelements and sodium in the leaves of the Zantedeschia albomaculata ‘Albomaculata’. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
YearMycorrhizationGA3 (150 mg∙dm−3)Mean for Mycorrhization
NoYes
Fe
Inon43.68 a42.20 a43.14 a
II43.56 a43.42 a
III42.99 a43.01 a
Iyes43.88 a42.75 a43.36 a
II43.85 a43.21 a
III42.89 a43.56 a
Mean for GA343.48 a43.03 a
Mn
Inon61.00 a60.15 a60.66 a
II60.88 a61.26 a
III59.79 a60.88 a
Iyes70.53 c65.15 b67.62 b
II69.73 c64.83 b
III69.99 c65.51 b
Mean for GA365.32 a62.96 a
Zn
Inon31.60 a30.05 a30.85 a
II30.99 a31.16 a
III30.56 a30.78 a
Iyes35.13 b34.28 b35.04 b
II34.87 b35.56 b
III35.15 b35.26 b
Mean for GA333.05 a32.84 a
Cu
Inon6.73 a6.91 a6.54 a
II6.36 a6.71 a
III6.16 a6.36 a
Iyes7.24 b7.10 b7.25 b
II7.31 b7.53 b
III7.41 a7.29 b
Mean for GA36.80 a6.98 a
Na
Inon0.05 a0.04 a0.05 a
II0.05 a0.06 a
III0.04 a0.05 a
Iyes0.05 a0.06 a0.05 a
II0.05 a0.04 a
III0.05 a0.05 a
Mean for GA30.05 a0.05 a
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andrzejak, R.; Janowska, B. Yield and Quality of Inflorescences in the Zantedeschia albomaculata (Hook.) Baill. ‘Albomaculata’ after the Treatment with AMF and GA3. Agronomy 2021, 11, 644. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040644

AMA Style

Andrzejak R, Janowska B. Yield and Quality of Inflorescences in the Zantedeschia albomaculata (Hook.) Baill. ‘Albomaculata’ after the Treatment with AMF and GA3. Agronomy. 2021; 11(4):644. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040644

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andrzejak, Roman, and Beata Janowska. 2021. "Yield and Quality of Inflorescences in the Zantedeschia albomaculata (Hook.) Baill. ‘Albomaculata’ after the Treatment with AMF and GA3" Agronomy 11, no. 4: 644. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040644

APA Style

Andrzejak, R., & Janowska, B. (2021). Yield and Quality of Inflorescences in the Zantedeschia albomaculata (Hook.) Baill. ‘Albomaculata’ after the Treatment with AMF and GA3. Agronomy, 11(4), 644. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040644

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop