Next Article in Journal
Effect of Biochar on Soil CO2 Fluxes from Agricultural Field Experiments in Russian Far East
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing the Sustainability of Temperate Pasture Systems through More Diverse Swards
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Precision Coffee Growing Research: A Bibliometric Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Manure Source and Cropping System Affect Nutrient Uptake by Cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dyck)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Soil Microbial Activity and Biomass in Semiarid Agroforestry Systems Integrating Forage Cactus and Tree Legumes

by
Dayanne Camelo
1,
José Carlos Batista Dubeux, Jr.
2,*,
Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos
1,
Mario Andrade Lira, Jr.
3,
Giselle Gomes Monteiro Fracetto
3,
Felipe José Cury Fracetto
3,
Márcio Vieira da Cunha
1 and
Erinaldo Viana de Freitas
4
1
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, Recife 52171-900, PE, Brazil
2
North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 3925 Highway 71, Marianna, FL 32443, USA
3
Departamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, Recife 52171-900, PE, Brazil
4
Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco, Av. General San Martin, 1371, Bonji, Recife 50761-000, PE, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(8), 1558; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081558
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Revised: 26 July 2021 / Accepted: 3 August 2021 / Published: 5 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Paradigms in Sustainable Forage-Livestock Production Systems)

Abstract

:
Vegetation cover affects soil organic matter and activity of soil microorganisms. We investigated the intercropping effect of forage cactus with tree legumes on soil microbial biomass and organic matter in the semi-arid tropic, state of Pernambuco, Brazil. We assessed the following cropping systems: (i) Gliricidia sepium intercropped with cactus cv. IPA-Sertânia; (ii) Leucaena leucocephala intercropped with cactus cv. IPA-Sertânia; and (iii) Cactus cv. IPA-Sertânia in monoculture. Samples were collected during the dry and rainy seasons in the 0- to 0.10- and 0.10- to 0.20-m soil layers at 0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 m in a perpendicular gradient from tree legume rows. The following responses were determined: δ13C and δ15N, C and N, microbial activity and biomass, and metabolic, microbial, and mineralization quotient. δ13C and δ15N varied with the distance from the trees. In the dry season and beginning of the rainy season, the cropping systems showed similar values for C, N, microbial activity, carbon, and nitrogen in the microbial biomass. The presence of tree legumes at the end of the rainy season favored soil microbiota, which showed a reduced loss of C-CO2, with no indication of metabolic stress and greater microbial biomass and microbial quotient in relation to forage cactus in monoculture.

1. Introduction

Forage cactus is an important feed source for herds in semiarid regions. It is utilized throughout the year in the tropical semiarid region of Brazil and in other countries, as it adapts to the edaphoclimatic conditions of these regions. Although it is adapted to semiarid regions, the reduced fiber and crude protein concentrations of forage cactus leads to a need to balance the diet of livestock. Thus, one of the alternatives to balance the diet of livestock with proteins and fibers when feeding cactus is intercropping cactus with tree legumes [1]. In addition, tree legumes can enhance N input in the agroecosystem via biological N2 fixation.
Agroforestry systems are recognized for their potential to store large amounts of carbon and nitrogen in the soil [2]. Intercropping legumes with agricultural crops increases N availability to the system; this promotes greater deposition of litter, roots, and nodules of leguminous plants [3], favoring nutrient cycling by adding material with low C:N ratio and, therefore, rapid mineralization [4], and improving soil chemical, physical, and biological characteristics. Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala are important tree legume options for animal production in Northeastern Brazil. Both legume species are drought tolerant and nitrogen-fixers, and can be consumed (as a feed or hay) by ruminants, improving the diet of grazing animals and supplying high levels of protein [5,6]. Lira Junior et al. [7] observed that the intercropping between Urochloa decumbens and Gliricidia sepium led to soil organic matter increases, and of the soil C and N levels by around 37% and 82%, respectively, in comparison to Urochloa decumbens in monoculture. Given the importance of soil organic matter, its evaluation using isotopic techniques (δ13C and δ15N) is a good indicator of the type of existing vegetation and the cycling of organic matter [8].
Agroforestry systems are also modified by beneficiaries of soil microorganisms. Singh et al. [9] recommended the adoption of agroforestry systems as they provide greater carbon microbial biomass, soil microbial activity, and lower the metabolic quotient compared to monocultures. The soil microbial biomass is the active component of the soil organic pool, responsible for organic matter decomposition, mineralization, and, consequently, primary productivity in most biogeochemical processes in terrestrial ecosystems [10].
Microorganisms are good indicators of organic matter quality and the level of disturbance in edaphic systems [11]. Research shows that root exudates released from the intercropping between grasses and leguminous plants affect the microbial community [12], which is one of the main ways to incorporate microbial biomass carbon [13], especially in tropical environments after rainy seasons. Studies show that varieties of the same species affect the soil microbiota of tropical semiarid regions in different ways [9,14]. This proves that disturbances in vegetation cover and management are among the factors responsible for variations in the soil microbial community [15]. Recently, Lira Junior et al. [7] identified that microbial biomass also changes as it moves away from leguminous trees.
This study hypothesizes that intercropping between Cactus + Gliricidia and Cactus + Leucaena compared with cactus monoculture: (i) increases the estimate of soil microbial biomass; (ii) provides a more efficient degradation of organic matter by the microbiota; (iii) reduces possible microbial metabolic stresses; and (iv) influences seasonal effects, especially related to soil moisture, which have a marked effect on soil microbial responses. Therefore, we determined δ13C and δ15N levels, total C and N levels, microbial biomass, and respiration, as well as microbial and metabolic quotients, considering the local climate and the distance from leguminous trees in comparison with forage cactus in monoculture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Sampling Strategy

The study was conducted at the Caruaru Experimental Station, Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco-IPA (8°14′ S and 35°55′ W). According to FAO [16], the predominant soil in the experimental area is Regosol, and their main characteristics are reported in Table 1. The climate of the site is dry and hot semiarid (BSh) according to the Köppen classification, with average rainfall of 727.1 mm/year. Monthly rainfall data in the experimental period (October 2018 to July 2019) are shown in Figure 1, totaling 793.3 mm.
The following cropping systems were tested: (i) Cactus cv. IPA-Sertânia (Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dyck) intercropped with leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit.); (ii) Cactus cv. IPA-Sertânia intercropped with gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud); (iii) Cactus cv. IPA-Sertânia in monoculture. The experimental design was in randomized blocks with four replications, in a split-plot scheme. The main plot was formed by the different cropping systems (agroforestry and monoculture), and the subplot consisted of four distances from the tree legume row (0.0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 m).
The experiment was installed in March 2011, when the area was covered with typical Caatinga vegetation, a dry forest native to the region. Tree legumes were planted in three double rows per plot, spaced 9 × 1 × 0.5 m, with IPA-Sertânia cactus planted between the double rows and in monoculture, at a spacing of 1 × 0.25 m [19]. In the agroforestry plots, the density of tree legumes was 4000 plants/ha, and the cactus density was 32,000 plants/ha. In monoculture, the cactus density was 40,000 plants/ha. In June 2018, the experimental area was fertilized with cattle manure (O.M. = 412 g kg−1; N = 15 g kg−1; P = 4.9 g kg−1; K = 14.9 g kg−1) to supply 200 kg ha−1 N. Weeds were removed annually, and the material was used as mulch. The forage cactus was harvested every two years, and the tree legumes were not cut during the experiment.
Soil was collected in October 2018 (dry season) and in April (beginning of the rainy season) and July 2019 (end of the rainy season). In intercropped plots, single samples were collected in the 0- to 0.10- and 0.10- to 0.20-m layers, at 0.0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 m from the central row of tree legumes (Figure 2). Monoculture plots were sampled at just one point and at the same depths mentioned above. Samples were kept in a refrigerator until microbiological analysis.

2.2. Soil Analyses

For the analysis of isotopic composition, the samples of the 0- to 0.10-m layer were ground in an MM400 ball mill (Retsch, Newton, PA, USA) and sieved at 100 μm. The values of total organic C (TOC) and total N (TN) were determined by the Dumas dry combustion method, using the CHNS analyzer (Vario Micro Cube; Elementar, Hanau, Germany) coupled to an isotopic ratio mass spectrometer (IsoPrime 100, IsoPrime, Manchester, UK) to analyze δ13C and δ15N. The results of δ13C were expressed as delta δ13C (‰) relative to the international standard PDB (Belemnitella Americana of the Pee Dee formation). The results of δ15N were expressed as δ15N (‰) relative to the δ15N air standard (0.3663%). The following formula was used:
δ   =   R sample R standard   R standard 1000
where δ: difference between the isotopic ratio of the sample and standard (‰), R sample: Isotopic ratio of the sample (13C:12C and 15N:14N), R standard (C): Standard isotopic ratio (PDB), and R standard (N): Atmospheric air.
Soil basal respiration (SBR) was assessed by quantifying the C-CO2 released by microbial respiration [20]. Microbial biomass C and N levels (C-mic and N-mic) were estimated by the irradiation-extraction method [21]. The dynamics of the microbial biomass C and N was discussed based on the ratio between C-mic and N-mic (Cmic: Nmic). The metabolic quotient (qCO2) was calculated by the ratio between SBR and C-mic [22], and the microbial quotient (qMIC) was obtained by the ratio between C-mic and the total organic carbon (TOC). The mineralization quotient (qM) is the ratio between the cumulated respiration and the SOC and is expressed in %. The quotient indicates the efficiency of micro-flora in metabolizing SOC [23].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the repeated measures mixed model analysis of variance, separately for each soil layer, and included nine treatments composed by the eight combinations of distance and species (agroforestry systems) and the single forage cactus treatment. The blocks were considered as random effects. Fixed effects included cropping systems, distances, and seasons. Data were checked for normality and homoscedasticity by assessing residual normality and variance. To contrast the cactus monoculture system with the agroforestry systems, the average value of the distances collected was used. To test the effect of distances, only the values of the agroforestry systems were used. When significant differences were found, the treatments were compared by Tukey’s test at the 10% significance level.

3. Results

3.1. Soil δ13C and δ15N

The values of δ13C (p = 0.0001) and δ15N (p = 0.0001) changed with the distance from the tree legumes in the 0- to 0.10-m layer. For the two agroforestry systems (leucaena and gliricidia), soil samples collected under tree canopies showed a more depleted value of δ13C (Figure 3), ranging from −22.69‰ (0 m) to −21.36‰ (4.5 m), while δ15N (Figure 3) values ranged from 10.96‰ (0 m) to 11.84‰ (4.5 m).

3.2. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Total Nitrogen (TN)

The different cropping systems favored an increase in soil TOC content. The average TOC levels in 2013 were 9.57 g·kg−1 in the 0- to 0.20-m soil layer [19]. In 2019, these values increased to 10.61 and 18.24 g·kg−1 in the 0- to 0.10- and 0.10- to 0.20-m soil layers, respectively.
The different cropping systems had different TOC levels in the dry and the beginning of the rainy season in the 0- to 0.10-m layer (p < 0.10). Nevertheless, at the end of the rainy season, the cactus monoculture system showed the greatest TOC levels (Figure 4). In the 0.10- to 0.20-m layer (p = 0.021), the soils of the different systems had greater TOC content (23.30 g kg−1) at the beginning of the rainy season in relation to the dry and final rainy season (8.91 and 13.15 g kg−1, respectively) (Figure 4). The different cropping systems did not differ significantly for N content and C:N ratio in the 0- to 0.10- (p = 0.627; 0.905) and 0.10- to 0.20-m (p = 0.178; 0.492) layers. The soil showed a greater TN content (around 26%) in the dry season than in the other seasons (p = 0.0001). In the dry season, there was also a lower C:N ratio (5.4:1) of the soil compared to the beginning (19.3:1) and end of the rainy season (9.6:1).

3.3. Microbiological Characteristics

Microbiological response variables were affected by cropping systems and seasons (Figure 5). Different cropping systems had different SRB in the dry season and the beginning of the rainy season at the 0- to 0.10- (p = 0.045) and 0.10- to 0.20-m (p = 0.007) layers (Figure 5). The soils of the agroforestry systems showed greater microbial activity in the dry season (41.14 and 21.31 μg C-CO2 g−1 day−1) and at the end of the rainy season (39.23 and 33.18 μg C-CO2 g−1 day−1) in comparison to the beginning of the rainy season (7.78 and 10.95 μg C-CO2 g−1 day−1) in the 0- to 0.10- and 0.10- to 0.20-m layers, respectively. However, for cactus monoculture, the greatest SBR occurred at the end of the rainy season (60.81 μg C-CO2 g−1 day−1) at the 0- to 0.10-m layers.
C-mic (p = 0.005) and N-mic (p = 0.025) changed depending on the cropping systems and seasons at the 0- to 0.10-m layer (Figure 5). The N-mic contents were statistically similar in the dry season and the beginning of the rainy season for the different cropping systems. In the dry period, the monoculture had higher C-mic (222.55 mg kg−1) than the agroforestry systems (158.56 and 153.00 mg kg−1). However, at the end of the rainy season, the soils of the agroforestry systems (C + L and C + G) showed greater C-mic (260.32 and 297.95 mg kg−1) and N-mic (40.52 and 54.03 mg kg−1) in relation to forage cactus in the monoculture (147.41 and 11.18 mg kg−1). The microbial biomass showed a lower C-mic:N-mic ratio in the dry season (5.2:1) than in the beginning and end of the rainy season (9.8:1 and 10.4:1, respectively).
N-mic also changed depending on the distance between trees in the 0- to 0.10- (p = 0.002) and 0.10- to 0.20-m (p = 0.002) layers, with a greater content of N-mic (47, 46 and 43.09 mg kg−1) under tree canopies, which decreased about 40% for the 0- to 0.10-m layer and 34% for the 0.10- to 0.20-m layer up to 4.5 m away.
The different cropping systems and seasons also significantly affected qCO2 (p = 0.0001) and qMIC (p = 0.001) in the 0- to 0.10-m soil layer (Figure 5). In the dry season, the greatest qCO2 occurred in the cropping systems C + L and C + G (0.35 and 0.36 μg C-CO2 g−1 C-mic day−1) in relation to cactus in the monoculture (0.18 μg C-CO2 g−1 C-mic day−1). The qCO2 was similar between cropping systems at the beginning of the rainy season. However, at the end of the rainy season, the soil of the cactus monoculture had a greater qCO2 (0.43 μg C-CO2 g−1 C-mic day−1), and the agroforestry systems had a greater qMIC (3.00% and 3.05% for C+L and C+G, respectively). In the 0.10- to 0.20-m layer, the season affected qCO2 (p = 0.0001) and qMIC (p = 0.0001). The smallest values of qCO2 and qMIC (0.05 μg C-CO2 g−1 C-mic day−1 and 1.03%) occurred at the beginning of the rainy season in relation to the dry and final rainy seasons (0.11; 0.12 μg C-CO2 g−1 C-micday−1 and 2.97; 2.18%) in the 0.10- to 0.20-m layer. The qM was significantly (p = 0.0001) affected by the seasons. The qM values were higher in the dry season (3.83; 2.35%) and at the beginning of the rainy season (4.26; 2.35%) compared to the end of the rainy season (0.92; 0.49%) in the 0- to 0.10- (p = 0.001) and 0.10- to 0.20-m (p = 0.001) layers.

4. Discussion

4.1. Soil δ13C and δ15N

In the agroforestry systems, organic carbon origin changed as a function of the distance from trees (Figure 3). The lower values of δ13C found under the canopies of trees indicate the influence of organic residues from tree legumes, since the δ13C of the C3 plants ranges between −20 and −34‰ [24]. As the distance from trees increases, the TOC probably originates from the forage cactus, as well as from weeds, since the δ13C values of the cactus (−14.43 and −13.22‰) and C4 plants (−13‰) are similar [25]. Plants with crassulacean acid metabolism deposit less litter. However, forage cactus contributes to root deposition and root exudates because it is a perennial plant, maintaining its root system as active over the years [26].
The soils under the canopies of the agroforestry systems also accounted for more depleted values of δ15N (Figure 3), which can be attributed to biological nitrogen fixation. It also indicates TOC accumulation under the canopy, resulting from the litter deposition of tree legumes. However, as the distance from trees increased, soil δ15N also increased (i.e., became more enriched), showing that the TOC originating from cactus and weeds is in an advanced stage of decomposition and that the soil far from tree legumes contains lower levels of N [27]. This is because the transformations from organic N to mineral N result in greater decomposition of the lighter isotope of N (14N), leaving the remaining organic matter enriched in 15N atoms [28].

4.2. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Total Nitrogen (TN)

In a previous study [19], these same agroforestry systems increased TOC levels after eight years of implantation. In the present study, TOC levels were greater than those observed by Iwata et al. [29], who evaluated an agroforestry system with tree and fruit species after thirteen years of implantation (21.9 g kg−1) in a Red-Yellow Argisol soil and sub-humid tropical environment. Lira Junior et al. [30] observed an increase of around 37% in TOC levels (41 g kg−1) in an agroforestry system with gliricidia and Urochloa decumbens in four years of evaluation in a sub-humid tropical environment, proving the efficiency of this system in increasing C storage. The similarity between cactus agroforestry systems and monoculture in increasing TOC levels (Figure 4) is attributed both to the perennity of forage cactus and to the growth and exudation dynamics of its root system [11]. A study by González et al. [26] proves that soils cultivated with forage cactus have similar TOC levels to native vegetation areas (grass-steppe). However, it is worth mentioning that agroforestry systems allow better soil coverage through the litter of trees. TOC enrichment in the 0.10- to 0.20-m layer (23.3 g kg−1) in relation to the 0- to 0.10-m layer (9.6 g kg−1) during the rainy season indicates that soil carbon is likely to leach during greater rainfall and become trapped in the subsurface layer (0.10–0.20 m). This increased organic C content can then be used as a substrate by soil microorganisms.
The 26% increase in TN in the dry season, on the other hand, can be explained by the greater deposition of litter from leguminous trees, common in this period of the year. As a mechanism to minimize water loss through evapotranspiration, these trees lose their leaves usually at the end of the rainy season and during the dry season [31]. The addition of this material with a low C:N ratio results in its rapid decomposition and mineralization [32], increasing the soil nutrient content, mainly N. However, less litter deposition occurs in the rainy season (beginning and end), which explains the lower TN levels. Another reason for the greater soil N levels is its addition through the symbiosis between leguminous species and N-fixing bacteria. Lira Junior et al. [30] attribute the greater soil N storage in silvopastoral systems with tree legumes, which can triple N stocks compared to Urochloa decumbens in monoculture, to the presence of free-living and symbiotic diazotrophic bacteria [33].
The high C:N ratio in the 0.10- to 0.20-m layer at the beginning of the rainy season can be attributed to the increase in TOC, as well as to the fact that the first rains have already occurred. These first rains likely led to mineralization of organic residues in the soil, leaving only the material with recalcitrant N. The soil C:N ratio tended to decrease at the end of the rainy and dry seasons, showing the effect of the litter of tree legumes (low C:N), which can be deposited mainly at the end of the rainy season and during the dry season [31]. The high C:N ratio in the 0.10- to 0.20-m layer of cactus in the monoculture can be explained by the production of thin, short-lived roots (rain roots) at the beginning of the rainfall period. These roots die at the end of the season and are quickly decomposed [34]. This study shows that regardless of season and cultivation system, mineralization is favored over immobilization (<20:1), indicating greater nutrient availability [35].

4.3. Microbiological Characteristics

In agroforestry systems, the dry season accounted for the greatest SBR (41.14 μg C-CO2 g−1 day−1), the greatest qCO2 (0.36 μg C-CO2 g−1 C-mic day−1), the least C-mic:N-mic ratio (5.2:1), and qMIC around 1.43%. The low C-mic:N-mic ratio shows that the microbial biomass was enriched with nitrogen originating both from the organic fertilization that preceded this study [36] and from the litter deposition of leguminous trees, common during the dry season. Due to the lower C:N ratio of this litter, it is rapidly decomposed and mineralized by microorganisms [37], which explains the greater microbial activity. The results found in this study are similar to those found in soils under native vegetation and pasture cultivation in the semiarid region of Pernambuco [38], indicating that agroforestry systems and cactus monoculture are sustainable and beneficial models for microbial biomass. In general, the dry season had a higher qM and lower C-mic:N-mic ratio, indicating a better efficiency of microorganisms in metabolizing organic matter [23].
Basal soil respiration (SBR), qCO2, and N-mic (Figure 5) decreased at the beginning of the rainy season in the different cropping systems. The reduction in qCO2 means less energy expenditure when using the available organic C, which remained constant from the dry season to the beginning of the rainy season. This can be attributed to the climatic conditions of tropical environments, which favor organic matter degradation [14]. The reduction in N-mic had the same trend found by Souza et al. [39] in soils cultivated with black oats and ryegrass. The authors propose that this decrease during periods of greater rainfall correlates with N uptake by plants and possible losses by leaching. In agroforestry systems, the closer the soil is to the canopies of trees, the greater the soil N-mic content. This means greater N immobilization, constituting one of the possible reserves of this nutrient in the soil, although its recycling and release are faster than those of other fractions of soil organic matter [40]. Yadav et al. [41] also identified greater microbial biomass N levels in a land use system based on Acacia leucophloea and Acacia nilotica in relation to a control treatment (without trees), which improved microbial activity due to the supply of this essential nutrient.
The high C-mic:N-mic ratio at the beginning and end of the rainy season favors the predominance of microorganisms that decompose recalcitrant organic matter, such as fungi and actinomycetes. This likely occurs by the production of extracellular enzymes responsible for degrading substrates with a high C:N ratio [40], although these enzymes have not been measured here. The change in the C-mic:N-mic ratio proves that the composition of the soil microbial community and, consequently, the level of immobilization and mineralization of soil nutrients are affected by climatic factors and cultivation systems [42]. The high C-mic:N-mic ratio associated with low qM and qCO2 values indicates that the labile SOM pool was used to synthesize stable humic fractions, which are more resistant to microbial decomposition [43].
The monoculture system showed a greater SBR at the end of the rainy season, which may have been caused by the deposition of mowed weeds. This result was also observed by Melloni et al. [44], who found greater basal respiration in soil submitted to manual weeding than in soil without weeding. At the end of the rainy season, agroforestry systems showed lesser SBR, greater C-mic content, and greater qMIC. This can be attributed to the greater litter deposition, since leucaena and gliricidia are deciduous [45]. Organic matter supply, along with rainfall, provides better soil microbiological conditions, since qMIC values were greater than 1% [46], favoring organic matter mineralization and resulting in greater carbon incorporation into microbial cells. The values found in agroforestry systems are like those observed by Guimarães et al. [47], who evaluated a fallow area for three years and observed that higher plant complexity favored the development of a more stable microbial population. These results also show the similarity between the leguminous plants used.

5. Conclusions

Although the isotopic composition of soil organic matter near the legume plants indicate a differential effect from these species, both agroforestry systems and cactus monoculture had overall similar effects in increasing soil C and N levels, indicating that all systems might be considered sustainable in this tropical semiarid region. Microbial carbon was greater in the agroforestry systems at the end of the rainy season, but not in other sampling dates. This resulted in greater efficiency of incorporating organic residues into the microbial biomass and that was likely a result of decreasing microbial metabolic stresses due to the supply of N and provision of shade by tree legumes.
Differences between both agroforestry systems and cactus monoculture in regard to microbial activity and biomass were accentuated at the end of the rainy season, likely due to the low C:N ratio of the legumes litter deposited at this time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.B.D.J. and M.A.L.J.; methodology, J.C.B.D.J., M.A.L.J., F.J.C.F., G.G.M.F.; software, M.A.L.J.; validation, J.C.B.D.J., D.C. and M.A.L.J.; formal analysis, J.C.B.D.J., D.C., M.V.d.C., G.G.M.F.; investigation, J.C.B.D.J., D.C., M.V.F.d.S.; resources, J.C.B.D.J.; data curation, D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, D.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C.B.D.J., D.C., M.A.L.J., G.G.M.F.; visualization, J.C.B.D.J.; supervision, J.C.B.D.J., M.V.F.d.S., M.V.d.C., G.G.M.F.; project administration, J.C.B.D.J., M.V.F.d.S., E.V.d.F.; funding acquisition, J.C.B.D.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by CAPES (financial code 001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors D.C., M.V.F.d.S. and M.A.L.J. thank the “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq (Brazil), and the author F.J.C.F. thanks the “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—CAPES (Brazil) for the assistantship and fellowship. All authors thank CAPES (financial code 001), for the partial financial support. The authors also thank the University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center (NFREC) for the laboratory analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Goveia, J.S.S.; Oliveira, V.S.; Santos, G.R.A.; Melo, K.A.; Oliveira, A.G.; Melo, M.V.A. Partial replacement of corn by forage cactus in the diets of lactating goats. Semin. Ciênc. Agrár. 2016, 37, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Sarto, M.V.; Borges, W.L.; Sarto, J.R.; Pires, C.A.; Rice, C.W.; Rosolem, C.A. Soil microbial community and activity in a tropical integrated crop-livestock system. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 145, 103350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schumacher, M.V.; Szymczak, D.A.; Trüby, P.; Londero, E.K.; Marafiga, J. Litter and nutrient input in seasonal forest in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul state. Ciênc. Florest. 2018, 28, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Souza, M.S.; Jardim, A.M.R.F.; Araújo Júnior, G.N.; Silva, J.R.I.; Leite, M.L.M.V.; Teixeira, V.I.; Silva, T.G.F. Nutrient cycling in tropical pasture ecosystems. Publ. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2018, 12, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Muir, J.; Dubeux Júnior, J.C.B. Arboreal Legumes for Multiple Uses. Legume Perspect. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. Herrera, A.M.; de Mello, A.C.L.; Apolinário, V.X.O.; Dubeux Júnior, J.C.B.; Cunha, M.V.; dos Santos, M.V.F. Potential of Gliricidia sepium (jacq.) Kunth ex Walp. and Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth. in silvopastoral systems intercropped with signalgrass [Urochloa decumbens (Stapf) RD Webster]. Agrofor. Syst. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lira Junior, M.A.; Fracetto, F.J.C.; Ferreira, J.S.; Silva, M.B.; Fracetto, G.G.M. Legume silvopastoral systems enhance soil organic matter quality in a subhumid tropical environment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2020, 84, 1209–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Couto, W.H.; Anjos, L.H.C.D.; Pereira, M.G.; Guareschi, R.F.; Assunção, S.A.; Wadt, P.G.S. Carbon, nitrogen, and natural abundance of δ13C and δ15N of soils under agroforestry systems. Floresta E Ambiente 2017, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Singh, R.; Bhardwaj, D.R.; Pala, N.A.; Kaushal, R.; Rajput, B.S. Soil microbial characteristics in sub-tropical agro-ecosystems of North Western Himalaya. Curr. Sci. 2018, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wardle, D.A. A comparative assessment or factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1992, 67, 321–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cruz, A.B.; Pablo, T.L.; González, F.L.; Zornoza, R.; Gallegos, V.M.; Ponce, M.M.; Sánchez, L.R. Cultivation of Opuntia ficus-indica under different soil management practices: A possible sustainable agricultural system to promote soil carbon sequestration and increase soil microbial biomass and activity. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bååth, E. Temperature sensitivity of soil microbial activity modeled by the square root equation as a unifying model to differentiate between direct temperature effects and microbial community adaptation. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 2850–2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cardinael, R.; Chevallier, T.; Cambou, A.; Beral, C.; Barthès, B.G.; Dupraz, C.; Chenu, C. Increased soil organic carbon stocks under agroforestry: A survey of six different sites in France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 236, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Onyekwelu, J.C.; Mosandl, R.; Stimm, B. Effect of land-use systems and seasonal variation on microbial biomass and population in tropical rainforest soils. Niger. J. For. 2011, 40, 60–68. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding, G.C.; Piceno, Y.M.; Heuer, H.; Weinert, N.; Dohrmann, A.B.; Carrillo, A.; Smalla, K. Changes of soil bacterial diversity as a consequence of agricultural land use in a semiarid ecosystem. PLOS ONE 2013, 8, e59497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). World Reference Base for Soil Resources: International soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. World Soil Resources Report No 106. 2014, p. 203. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2021).
  17. Almeida, B.G.; Donagemma, G.K.; Ruiz, H.A.; Braida, J.A.; Viana, J.H.M.; Reichert, J.M.M.; Passos, R.R. Standardization of methods for granulometric analyses in Brazil. Embrapa Solos Comun. Técnico 2012, 66, 11. [Google Scholar]
  18. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)—Centro Nacional de Pesquisas de Solos. Manual of Methods of Soil Analyses, 2nd ed.; Embrapa Solos: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2011; 230p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Miranda, K.R.D.; Dubeux Júnior, J.C.B.; Mello, A.C.L.; Silva, M.C.; Santos, M.V.F.; Santos, D.C. Forage production and mineral composition of cactus intercropped with legumes and fertilized with different sources of manure. Ciênc. Rural 2019, 49, e20180324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mendonça, E.S.; Matos, E.S. Soil Organic Matter: Methods of Analyses; UFV: Viçosa, Brazil, 2005; 107p. [Google Scholar]
  21. Islam, K.R.; Weil, R.R. Microwave irradiation of soil for measurement of microbial biomass carbon. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1998, 27, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anderson, T.H.; Domsch, K.H. The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activiy parameter to assess the effect of environmental condition, such as pH on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1993, 23, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moscatelli, M.C.; Lagomarsino, A.; Marinari, S.; Angelis, P.; Grego, S. Soil microbial indices as bioindicators of environmental changes in a poplar plantation. Ecol. Indic. 2005, 5, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Martinelli, L.A.; Almeida, S.; Brown, I.F.; Moreira, M.Z.; Victória, R.L.; Sternberg, L.S.L.; Thomas, W.W. Stable carbon isotope ratio of tree leaves, boles and fine litter in a tropical forest in Rondonia, Brazil. Oecologia 1998, 114, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crayn, D.M.; Winter, K.; Smith, J.A.C. Multiple origins of crassulacean acid metabolism and the epiphytic habit in the Neotropical family Bromeliaceae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 3703–3708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. González, F.L.; Ponce, M.H.F.; Cruz, A.B.; Pablo, T.L.; Juárez, H.C.; Sánchez, L.M.R. Cactus crop as an option to reduce soil C–CO2 emissions in soils with declining fertility. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Craine, J.M.; Brookshire, E.N.J.; Cramer, M.D.; Hasselquist, N.J.; Koba, K.; Marin-Spiotta, E.; Wang, L. Ecological interpretations of nitrogen isotope ratios of terrestrial plants and soils. Plant Soil 2015, 396, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Högberg, P. 15N natural abundance in soil-plant systems. New Phytol. 1997, 137, 179–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Iwata, B.F.; Leite, L.F.; Araújo, A.S.; Nunes, L.A.; Gehring, C.; Campos, L.P. Agroforestry systems and its effects on chemical attributes of an Ultisol in the ‘Cerrado’ of Piaui state, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2012, 16, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lira Junior, M.A.; Fracetto, F.J.C.; Ferreira, J.S.; Silva, M.B.; Fracetto, G.G.M. Legume-based silvopastoral systems drive C and N soil stocks in a subhumid tropical environment. Catena 2020, 189, 104508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alonso, J.M.; Leles, P.S.S.; Ferreira, L.N.; Oliveira, N.S.A. Litter input after establishment in areas of forestry reclamation, at different planting spacing. Ciênc. Florest. 2015, 25, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Apolinário, V.X.; Dubeux Jr, J.C.; Lira, M.A.; Ferreira, R.L.; Mello, A.C.; Santos, M.V.; Muir, J.P. Tree legumes provide marketable wood and add nitrogen in warm-climate silvopasture systems. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 1915–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Barros, F.M.R.; Fracetto, G.G.M.; Fracetto, F.J.C.; Mendes Júnior, J.P.; Araújo, V.L.V.P.; Lira Junior, M.A. Silvopastoral systems drive the nitrogen-cycling bacterial community in soil. Ciênc. Agrotecnol. 2018, 42, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Snyman, H.A. A greenhouse study on root dynamics of cactus pears, Opuntia ficus-indica and O. robusta. J. Arid Environ. 2006, 65, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brandani, C.B.; Santos, D.G. Soil C transformations. In Microbiologia do Solo, 2nd ed.; Andreote, F.D., Cardoso, E.J.B.N., Eds.; ESALQ: Piracicaba, Brazil, 2016; p. 221. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lisboa, C.C.; Lima, F.R.; Reis, R.H.C.L.; Silva, C.A.; Marques, J.J. Nitrogen mineralization rate of organic residues. Cult. Agron. Rev. Ciênc. Agron. 2018, 27, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arf, O.; Meirelles, F.C.; Portugal, J.R.; Buzetti, S.; Sá, M.E. Benefits of intercropping maize with grass and legumes and its effects on productivity in a no-till system. Rev. Bras. Milho Sorgo 2018, 17, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Araujo, J.K.S.; Ribeiro, M.R.; Corrêa, M.M.; Galindo, I.C.L.; Souza Júnior, V.S. Humic Haplustox under different land uses in a high altitude environment in the Agreste region of Pernambuco, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2014, 38, 1337–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Souza, E.D.; Costa, S.E.V.G.A.; Anghinoni, I.; Lima, C.V.S.; Carvalho, P.C.F.; Martins, A.P. Soil microbial biomass in a no-tillage integrated crop-livestock system under different grazing intensities. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2010, 34, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Horwath, W.R. The role of the soil microbial biomass in cycling nutrients. Microbial Biomass: A Paradigm Shift in Terrestrial Biogeochemistry. World Sci. 2017, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yadav, R.S.; Yadav, B.L.; Chhipa, B.R.; Dhyani, S.K.; Ram, M. Soil biological properties under different tree based traditional agroforestry systems in a semi-arid region of Rajasthan, India. Agrofor. Syst. 2011, 81, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bolat, İ.; Ömer, K.; Tunay, M. Effects of Seasonal Changes on Microbial Biomass and Respiration of Forest Floor and Topsoil under Bornmullerian Fir Stand. Eurasian J. For. Sci. 2015, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Pinzari, F.; Trinchera, A.; Benedetti, A.; Sequi, P. Use of biochemical indices in the Mediterranean environment: Comparison among soils under different forest vegetation. J. Microbiol. Methods 1999, 36, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Melloni, R.; Belleze, G.; Pinto, A.M.S.; Dias, L.B.D.P.; Silve, E.M.; Melloni, E.G.P.; Alcântara, E.N.D. Methods of weed control and their impacts on microbial quality of soil under coffee. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2013, 37, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aguiar, M.I.; Fialho, J.S.; Campanha, M.M.; Oliveira, T.S. Floristic and vegetation structure in Caatinga areas under different management systems. Pesqui. Florest. Bras. 2019, 39, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jenkinson, D.S.; Ladd, J.N. Microbial biomass in soil: Measurement and turnover. In Soil Biochemistry, 5th ed.; Paul, E.A., Ladd, J.M., Eds.; Marcel Decker: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 415–471. [Google Scholar]
  47. Guimarães, N.F.; Gallo, A.S.; Fontanetti, A.; Meneghin, S.P.; Souza, M.; Morinigo, K.P.; Silva, R.F. Biomass and soil microbial activity in different systems of coffee cultivation. Rev. Ciênc. Agrár. 2017, 40, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Monthly rainfall and temperatures (maximum, average, and minimum) at Caruaru Experimental Station (IPA) during the experimental period. Arrows indicate sampling dates. Source: Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco-IPA, Brazil.
Figure 1. Monthly rainfall and temperatures (maximum, average, and minimum) at Caruaru Experimental Station (IPA) during the experimental period. Arrows indicate sampling dates. Source: Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco-IPA, Brazil.
Agronomy 11 01558 g001
Figure 2. Layout of the soil sampling sites in the agroforestry systems using tree legumes and cactus; Caruaru-PE, Brazil.
Figure 2. Layout of the soil sampling sites in the agroforestry systems using tree legumes and cactus; Caruaru-PE, Brazil.
Agronomy 11 01558 g002
Figure 3. Isotopic natural abundance of δ13C and δ15N at different distances from the tree legumes intercropped with cactus, at the 0- to 10-cm layer. Different capital letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.10) by PDIFF adjusted to Tukey. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Figure 3. Isotopic natural abundance of δ13C and δ15N at different distances from the tree legumes intercropped with cactus, at the 0- to 10-cm layer. Different capital letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.10) by PDIFF adjusted to Tukey. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Agronomy 11 01558 g003
Figure 4. Total organic carbon (TOC) in the soil of different cactus cropping systems at different sampling dates. C + L: cactus + leucaena; C + G: cactus + gliricidia; C: cactus in monoculture. Different capital letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.10) within each period of the year; different small case letters indicate significant difference within each cropping system (p < 0.10) by PDIFF adjusted to Tukey. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Figure 4. Total organic carbon (TOC) in the soil of different cactus cropping systems at different sampling dates. C + L: cactus + leucaena; C + G: cactus + gliricidia; C: cactus in monoculture. Different capital letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.10) within each period of the year; different small case letters indicate significant difference within each cropping system (p < 0.10) by PDIFF adjusted to Tukey. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Agronomy 11 01558 g004
Figure 5. Soil basal respiration (SBR), soil microbial carbon (C-mic), soil microbial nitrogen (N-mic), metabolic quotient (qCO2), and microbial quotient (qMIC) in different cactus cropping systems and dates. C + L: cactus + leucaena; C + G: cactus + gliricidia; C: cactus in monoculture. Different capital letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.10) within each period of the year; different small case letters indicate significant difference within each cropping system (p < 0.10) by PDIFF adjusted to Tukey. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Figure 5. Soil basal respiration (SBR), soil microbial carbon (C-mic), soil microbial nitrogen (N-mic), metabolic quotient (qCO2), and microbial quotient (qMIC) in different cactus cropping systems and dates. C + L: cactus + leucaena; C + G: cactus + gliricidia; C: cactus in monoculture. Different capital letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.10) within each period of the year; different small case letters indicate significant difference within each cropping system (p < 0.10) by PDIFF adjusted to Tukey. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Agronomy 11 01558 g005
Table 1. Soil chemical and physical characteristics at the beginning of the experiment (Oct/2018).
Table 1. Soil chemical and physical characteristics at the beginning of the experiment (Oct/2018).
Soil DepthManagementDistanceSandSiltClayTextural ClasspHPCaMgNaKAlHNTTOCSOM
(m) (m)(g·kg−1) 1 (H2O) 2(cmolc/dm3) 2(g·kg−1)
0–0.10C + L0730170100Sandy5.1352.10.90.10.50.24.30.89.215.9
4.5730150120 5.1792.40.90.10.30.25.10.910.417.9
C + G0760140100 5.0312.00.90.10.30.24.50.99.716.7
4.5730170100 5.3662.80.90.10.30.14.21.011.820.3
C 780100120 5.01052.50.70.70.30.21.41.010.417.9
10–0.20C + L0730150120 5.2342.40.90.10.40.22.81.69.816.9
4.5760120120 4.9602.01.00.10.20.33.51.611.019.0
C + G0780120100 4.8321.60.90.10.30.33.31.48.815.2
4.5730150120 5.1572.20.90.10.20.23.11.88.314.3
C 740140120 5.1803.10.80.80.20.21.21.67.212.4
1 [17]. 2 [18]. TN: total nitrogen. TOC: total organic carbon. SOM: soil organic matter (TOC × 1.724). C+L: cactus + leucaena; C+G: cactus + gliricidia; C: cactus in monoculture.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Camelo, D.; Dubeux, J.C.B., Jr.; dos Santos, M.V.F.; Lira, M.A., Jr.; Fracetto, G.G.M.; Fracetto, F.J.C.; da Cunha, M.V.; de Freitas, E.V. Soil Microbial Activity and Biomass in Semiarid Agroforestry Systems Integrating Forage Cactus and Tree Legumes. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081558

AMA Style

Camelo D, Dubeux JCB Jr., dos Santos MVF, Lira MA Jr., Fracetto GGM, Fracetto FJC, da Cunha MV, de Freitas EV. Soil Microbial Activity and Biomass in Semiarid Agroforestry Systems Integrating Forage Cactus and Tree Legumes. Agronomy. 2021; 11(8):1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081558

Chicago/Turabian Style

Camelo, Dayanne, José Carlos Batista Dubeux, Jr., Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos, Mario Andrade Lira, Jr., Giselle Gomes Monteiro Fracetto, Felipe José Cury Fracetto, Márcio Vieira da Cunha, and Erinaldo Viana de Freitas. 2021. "Soil Microbial Activity and Biomass in Semiarid Agroforestry Systems Integrating Forage Cactus and Tree Legumes" Agronomy 11, no. 8: 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081558

APA Style

Camelo, D., Dubeux, J. C. B., Jr., dos Santos, M. V. F., Lira, M. A., Jr., Fracetto, G. G. M., Fracetto, F. J. C., da Cunha, M. V., & de Freitas, E. V. (2021). Soil Microbial Activity and Biomass in Semiarid Agroforestry Systems Integrating Forage Cactus and Tree Legumes. Agronomy, 11(8), 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081558

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop