Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Agricultural Plastic Waste on the Vermicompost Process and Health Status of Eisenia fetida
Next Article in Special Issue
Fluopsin C: A Review of the Antimicrobial Activity against Phytopathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) to the Regional Characterisation of Vineyard Blocks Using Remote Sensing Time Series
Previous Article in Special Issue
Environment-Friendly Control Potential of Two Citrus Essential Oils against Aphis punicae and Aphis illinoisensis (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/agronomy12102546
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metschnikowia pulcherrima as a Biocontrol Agent against Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Pathogens

by
Aleksandra Steglińska
1,2,*,
Artur Kołtuniak
1,
Joanna Berłowska
1,
Agata Czyżowska
3,
Justyna Szulc
1,
Weronika Cieciura-Włoch
1,
Małgorzata Okrasa
4,
Dorota Kręgiel
1 and
Beata Gutarowska
1
1
Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Lodz University of Technology, Wólczańska 171/173, 90-530 Łódź, Poland
2
Interdisciplinary Doctoral School, Lodz University of Technology, Żeromskiego 116, 90-924 Łódź, Poland
3
Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Lodz University of Technology, Wólczańska 171/173, 90-530 Łódź, Poland
4
Department of Personal Protective Equipment, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Wierzbowa 48, 90-133 Łódź, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(10), 2546; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102546
Submission received: 7 September 2022 / Revised: 3 October 2022 / Accepted: 16 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Control as a Crucial Tool to Sustainable Food Production)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An increasing trend in protecting plants against phytopathogens is the replacement of chemical pesticides with environmentally acceptable biopreparations. This article focuses on the possible use of yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima as a biocontrol agent against potato pathogens. The scope included an assessment of the antimicrobial activity of 10 M. pulcherrima isolates against 10 phytopathogens: Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium sambucinum, Rhizoctonia solani, Alternaria solani, Alternaria, tenuissima, Alternaria alternata, Colletotrichum coccodes, Phoma exigua, Pectobacterium carotovorum, and Streptomyces scabiei, by the agar-well diffusion method. Pulcherrimin formation, enzymatic profiles detected by the API ZYM system, and metabolite formation evaluated by HPLC analysis were conducted for the most active M. pulcherrima isolates. Leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, α- and β-glucosidase, and esterases were the most noteworthy in the pattern of activity. In turn, ethanol, glycerol, and organic acids (acetic, succinic, lactic acids) were determined in the largest quantities. The isolate M. pulcherrima TK1 was selected and cultured on supplemented acid whey. An in situ experiment was carried out on the seed potatoes, which showed a 30%–100% reduction in nine phytopathogens; only P. carotovorum was insensitive to yeast treatment. Therefore, M. pulcherrima TK1 was proposed as the potential biological solution for seed potato protection against phytopathogens.

1. Introduction

The potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), which is grown on about 18.6 million hectares in 150 countries and yields 322 Mt annually, is the world’s fourth-most-important crop, after maize (637 Mt), rice (585 Mt), and wheat (549 Mt), and is consumed by billions of people [1]. Apart from its efficient yield per unit area, potato tubers are a valuable source of fibre, carbohydrates, and minerals such as calcium, potassium, magnesium, copper, and iron [2]. Leading countries in world potato production are China and India [3], whereas, in the European Union, about three quarters (76.8%) of the cultivated area of potatoes is concentrated in just six countries: Poland (21.6%), Germany (16.5%), France (12.9%), Romania (10.0%), the Netherlands (9.9%), and Belgium (5.9%).
Potato tubers’ post-harvest management is a large problem due to the invasion of pathogens. The sources of infections are frequently contaminated crop residues in the field after previous cultivation. Such residues can lead to diseases during storage caused by fungal agents, such as Fusarium, Alternaria, and Rhizoctonia genera. Dry rot of seed tubers, which results in crop losses up to 25%, is caused by Fusarium strains [4], whereas the presence of Alternaria spp. can lead to early blight, marked by dark spots with concentric rings on the leaves [5]. The latter, a soilborne fungus Rhizoctonia-related disease, is widely spread and destructive for the crops, lowering the yield by 30% or even 70% in the northern continental climate [6].
Farmers tend to apply several pesticides, including metalaxyl, mancozeb, and fluopicolide, to combat phytopathogens. These chemically synthesised chemicals have a powerful antimicrobial efficacy and represent numerous adverse effects on the natural environment. They have the potential to penetrate deep into the soil, disrupt microorganism populations, and pollute groundwater when in use [7,8,9]. These compounds irritate the skin and respiratory mucous membranes in humans, and their cytotoxic and genotoxic effects are also known [10]. Therefore, the European Union is moving away from chemical plant-protection products, especially in organic farming, which accounts for 13% of all potato holdings [11]. This approach to agricultural production prioritises environmental and wildlife conservation, avoiding synthetic chemicals such as fertilisers and pesticides in favour of biological and mechanical means, as well as cultural approaches such as hand weeding, pruning, and mulching [12].
Given the expected rise in pest outbreaks and the possible breakdown of present biological control agents as a result of global climate change, alternative techniques to biological control are required. Using augmentative releases of natural enemies to maintain high concentrations of biological control agents is one method for mitigating future pest damage [13]. Using biological control agents specific to an invading pest is an alternative for invasive pest control [14].
Metschnikowia yeasts can be considered as a potential agent for seed potato protection against phytopathogens. Metschnikowia yeasts are part of the natural microbiota of fruits, juices, and flower insects [15]. Their antagonistic effect is not connected with the production of toxins. Metschnikowia yeasts, apart from a typical mode of action, such as competition for nutrients and space, can secrete pulcherriminic acid, which forms a complex with Fe3+ ions, called pulcherrimin [16]. That is why the aggressive action of the yeast is based on the sequestration of iron—a crucial element for the growth of pathogens. In addition, Metschnikowia yeasts can produce extracellular lytic enzymes (chitinase and glucosidases), release microbial volatile compounds, and form a biofilm that supports the antifungal effect [16,17,18,19]. Recently, Sipiczki [20] proposed merging these species able to produce red pigment—pulcherrimin—into one unit, the clade of M. pulcherrima. Antimicrobial properties of M. pulcherrima yeasts against phytopathogens have been described in several works [18,21,22,23]; however, they mainly concern fruits.
Therefore, this work aimed to assess the potential application of yeasts Metschnikowia as a biocontrol agent against various potato pathogens. The most active yeast strain was selected, and then the growth medium was optimised based on the acid whey. The biocontrol activity of the selected strain was also assessed in situ on potatoes. This is the first report on the biocontrol potential of M. pulcherrima yeasts against potato phytopathogens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganisms Used in the Research

2.1.1. Yeasts from the Metschnikowia Clade

Eight isolates of M. pulcherrima clade from Polish fruits and flowers and two collection strains of M. pulcherrima from the National Collection of Yeast Cultures (Norwich, UK) were used in the research, in order to select the most effective antimicrobial agent against potato phytopathogens. Yeasts were cultivated on YPD agar (BTL, Łódź, Poland) for 72 h at 25 °C and then stored at 4 °C. All of the tested strains are presented in Table 1.
Identification of Metschnikowia sp. isolates was conducted using the MALDI-TOF MS method. Five most active strains of Metschnikowia sp. were grown at 25 °C for 24 h on Malt Extract Agar (MEA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) plates and analysed with the AXIMA-iD Plus Confidence MALDI-TOF MS system (Kratos Analytical Ltd. and Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) and SARAMIS PREMIUM software (Spectral ARchive And Microbial Identification System, bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France). The manufacturer’s direct smear plus formic acid method was employed. Briefly, microbial colonies were spread on dedicated, analytical metal plates with a sterile 1 µL inoculation loop. Then, 0.5 µL of 25% formic acid (FA) was spotted onto cells, mixed well, and left until almost dry. Finally, 1 μL of saturated α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (α-CHCA) solution in acetonitrile:ethanol: water (1:1:1 v/v) mixture containing 3% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was added onto the disrupted microbial cells, mixed well again, and air-dried at room temperature. The mass spectra were acquired and processed using Launchpad 2.9 software (Kratos Analytical Ltd. and Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) in the SARAMIS linear positive mode, with a laser frequency of 50 Hz in the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) ranging from 2000 to 20,000 Da (laser power 90, 200 per sample; 5 shots accumulated per profile) for each mass spectrum. E. coli DH5α (TAKARA BIO INC.) cells were used as a calibrator of the AXIMA-iD Plus Confidence MALDI-TOF MS system and internal control of the identification process, in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturer.
The results of the comparative analysis of obtained spectra with the reference spectra in the SARAMIS database were expressed as confidence score values (%) with associated colour codes. The score values highlighted in dark green were considered as excellent ID (>99.9% ID confidence), in light green and in yellow as good ID (from 90% to 99.8% and from 85.0% to 89.9% ID confidence, respectively), and in white as sufficient ID (with 70.0% to 84.9% ID confidence), as the analysed spectrum was sufficiently close to that of the reference spectrum. Results lower than 70% were automatically set to fail and were also shown in white, with 0% of the ID confidence.

2.1.2. Potato Phytopathogens

Pectobacterium carotovorum PCM 2056 was acquired from the Polish Collection of Microorganisms of the Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy of the Polish Academy of Sciences (Wrocław, Poland). Alternaria alternata ŁOCK 408 was obtained from the Collection of Pure Cultures of Industrial Microorganisms ŁOCK at the Lodz University of Technology (Łódź, Poland). Phoma exigua DSM 62040, Fusarium sambucinum DSM 62397, Colletotrichum coccodes DSM 62126, Rhizoctonia solani DSM 22843, Alternaria tenuissima DSM 63360, and the bacterial species Streptomyces scabiei DSM 40778 were purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). Fusarium oxysporum Z154 and Alternaria solani Z184 isolates were kindly provided by Jadwiga Śliwka from the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute (IHAR)—National Research Institute (Radzików, Poland).
Strains were cultivated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for bacterial strains and on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for moulds and stored at a temperature 4 °C. The suspensions of fungal strains were prepared by collecting spores from the surface of the pure culture on the PDA medium and resuspending in 0.85% NaCl with Tween (0.02%), for a final concentration of 106 CFU/mL. Bacterial suspensions were prepared from the pure culture on the TSA medium and adjusted to a final concentration of 106 CFU/mL.

2.2. Agar-Well Diffusion Method for In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity Determination

The agar-well diffusion method was used to perform the in vitro assessment of yeasts’ antimicrobial activity against potato phytopathogens [24]. Metschnikowia strains were cultured on YPD medium (for preliminary screening) or different variants of supplemented acid-whey-based media (for final selection of cultivation medium) for 72 h at a temperature of 25 °C on a shaker (Unimax 1010, Heidolph, Germany) at 160 rpm. Then, 100 µL of freshly prepared phytopathogens suspension were inoculated onto the PDA plates for mould strains and the TSA plates for bacterial strains. Next, 10 mm diameter wells were cut by a sterile cork bore, and 250 µL of yeast cultures were transferred into the wells. The plates were incubated at 25 °C for 2–5 days, depending on the phytopathogen. YPD and supplemented acid-whey-based media not inoculated with phytopathogens were used as control samples. The diameters of pathogen growth-inhibition zones were measured manually, excluding the well width. The results were expressed as the average of three independent repetitions for each Metschnikowia strain—phytopathogen combination with a standard deviation value.
Simultaneously, yeast cultures on YPD were filtrated through syringe filters (pore diameter 0.22 µm) and assessed in terms of antimicrobial activity, as described above.

2.3. Assessment of Pulcherrimin Production Profile by Selected Strains of Yeast Metschnikowia

Selected strains of Metschnikowia strains were cultured on YPD agar plates, supplemented with three different concentrations of FeCl3 (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland), 0.005, 0.01, and 0.2 mg/mL, for 96 h at temperature 25 °C. Then, the diameter of the coloured halo around the colonies was manually measured and expressed as an average of three independent repetitions with a standard deviation value. Additionally, the colour of colonies from the top and the bottom of the plate was assessed on a scale: white/creamy (no pigmentation), pink, red, and dark red.

2.4. Determination of the Enzymatic Activity of Selected Strains of Yeast Metschnikowia by API ZYM Test

Enzymatic profiles of selected strains of Metschnikowia yeast for 19 enzymes was assessed using API ZYM system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France), in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer.

2.5. Fermentation Byproducts of Selected Metschnikowia Yeast Strains by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Organic acids and alcohols used as standards were purchased from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA). Sulphuric acid (95%–98%) obtained from J.T. Baker B.V. (Deventer, Holland) was a “Baker instra-analyzed” reagent. HPLC-grade water was obtained using an Aquinity E60 Lifescience TI system (membraPure GmbH, Bodenheim, Germany). A Finnigan Surveyor liquid chromatograph with PDA and RI detectors (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used for the research. The compounds were separated using an Aminex HPX 87 H+ column (300 × 7.8 mm) from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). The eluent was 0.005M H2SO4. The elution rate was 0.6 mL/min; the detection was carried out in the range of 200–350 nm (for the PDA detector) for 40 min [25]. The acids were determined by comparing the retention times and UV spectra with a standard substance, alcohols (glycerol and ethanol), by comparing the retention times [25].

2.6. Optimisation of the Acid-Whey-Based Culture Media for Cultivation of Metschnikowia Pulcherrima TK1

Optimisation of the supplemented acid-whey-based culture media for cultivating Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 was conducted on a microscale using Multiskan GO Microplate Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with SkanIt RE for Multiskan GO 3.2 software (Thermo Scientific, USA). Then, 200 µL of 43 different variants of supplemented acid-whey-based media listed in 2.7. were transferred into 96-well plates and inoculated with 50 µL of M. pulcherrima culture. The control samples were YPD and Yeast Extract Peptone—YP (1% of yeast extract, 2% of peptone; BTL, Łódź, Poland). The plates were incubated for 72 h at a temperature of 25 °C, while the turbidity was measured every hour at a wavelength of 600 nm. The experiment was performed in triplicate. Biomass yield (Yx) was calculated according to Equation (1):
Yx = Amax − Amin
where Amax is the maximum absorbance value of inoculated culture medium, Amin is the minimum absorbance value of inoculated culture medium. The maximum specific growth rate (µmax) was calculated according to Equation (2):
µmax = (lnAmax − lnAmin)/∆t
where Amax is the maximum absorbance value of inoculated culture medium, Amin is the minimum absorbance value of inoculated culture medium, and Δt is the time difference.

2.7. Acid-Whey-Based Media for Yeast Cultivation

The acid whey was acquired from JOGO—Łódź Dairy Cooperative (Kraszewo, Poland). The supplements were yeast extract (BTL, Łódź, Poland) and peptone (BTL, Łódź, Poland) for 16 different variants of growth medium and, additionally, glucose (BTL, Łódź, Poland) for the following 27 variants of the acid-whey-based medium. Acid whey supplementation is presented in Table 2.

2.8. Characteristics of the Chemical Composition of Selected Acid-Whey-Based Media

YPD, pure acid whey, and selected Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium were analysed. Iron (test no. 8008, FerroVer), potassium (test no. LCK228), ortophosphates (test no. 8048, PhosVer), chloride (method no. 8113) and ammonium nitrogen (test no. 8038, modified Nessler method) concentrations were determined using DR6000 spectrophotometer (HACH-LANGE, Loveland, CO, USA), in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer. Lactose and lactic acid analysis was performed using enzymatic kits (Megazyme Ltd., Bray, Ireland), in accordance with the procedure of the manufacturer, and a UV-spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Multiskan Go, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Munich, Germany). The Kjeldahl method was used to assess the protein concentration [26]. Calcium and sodium were determined with flame photometers BWB-XP (BWB Technologies, Newbury, UK). Samples for phosphorus and nitrogen were mineralised using an LT200 thermoreactor (HACH-LANGE, Loveland, CO, USA). Total solids and volatile solids were assessed using standard methods [27].

2.9. In Situ Assessment of Antimicrobial Activity on Seed Potatoes

‘Impresja’ seed potatoes were acquired from Zamarte Potato Breeding (Zamarte, Poland). In situ antimicrobial assay on potatoes was conducted according to the method previously described in Steglińska et al. [28,29] research. Briefly, seed potatoes were cut 5 mm deep and 5 mm wide with a cork bore. Then, potatoes were dipped (about 500–2500 mL/kg potatoes, depending on the dipping container) in 72 h cultures of M. pulcherrima TK1 (about 107 CFU/mL) for 5 min and inoculated with 20 µL of each bacterial or fungal phytopathogen’s suspension (about 106 CFU/mL in 0.85% NaCl) in the cuts. Control samples were only inoculated with the phytopathogens’ suspension, and potato samples were incubated for 14 days at a temperature of 25 °C. The percentage of phytopathogen infestation was measured in comparison to the controls, according to Equation (3):
Inhibition (%) = (C − T)/C × 100
where C is the percentage of phytopathogen infestation on control potatoes, T is the percentage of phytopathogen infestation on potatoes treated with yeast cultures. The percentage of the infested area was measured after cutting the seed potatoes in half. The test was conducted in triplicate.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Statistica 13.1 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). The antimicrobial activity (phytopathogen growth-inhibition zones) of Metschnikowia yeasts and the production of fermentation byproducts was compared within the sample using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of 0.05. When a statistical difference was detected (p < 0.05), the means were compared using Tukey’s post hoc procedure at a significance level of 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Antimicrobial Activity of Metschnikowia Yeasts In Vitro

The potential use of Metschnikowia yeasts as an antimicrobial agent for plant protection against phytopathogens has already been widely described for Penicillium expansum [30,31,32,33] and Botrytis cinerea [18,34,35] biocontrol for fruits. These pathogens are mainly responsible for the spoilage of apples, grapes, pears, and strawberries. The potato biocontrol by Metschnikowia yeasts has not been of interest to researchers so far. This study is the first comprehensive report on the antimicrobial activity of Metschnikowia yeasts on potato pathogens in vitro.
The results are presented in Figure 1. The majority of the tested yeast cultures demonstrated a broad spectrum of antifungal activity. No antibacterial activity of Metschnikowia strains was, however, observed. The ability of Pectobacterium carotovorum to cause potato soft rot is regulated by the phenomenon of quorum sensing [36,37]. This could be the reason why this pathogen was insensitive to the yeast treatment. The solution would be to look for quorum sensing inhibitors, in order to inhibit P. carotovorum development. Environmental isolates turned out to be more active than collection strains, in terms of both spectrum of activity and diameter of inhibition zones. Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium sambucinum were the most susceptible pathogens; the growth-inhibition zones were equal to at least 7.0 ± 0.0 mm and 7.0 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Phoma exigua and Colletotrichum coccodes presented the highest resistance to collection strains of Metschnikowia yeast and isolates marked with J2, J4, TK1, TO1, and M3 symbols (Figure 1). Several works reported the antifungal activity of Metschnikowia yeast against notorious plant pathogen A. alternata [18,22,38,39] in in vitro experiments, and our work confirmed this observation. The growth-inhibition zones of this fungi ranged from 5.0 ± 0.0 to 8.0 ± 0.0 for the Metschnikowia isolates in the present study. Gore-Lloyd et al. [40] noted antifungal activity against F. oxysporum, which was also inhibited in our work by all tested Metschnikowia strains. No antimicrobial activity of the culture filtrates without yeast cells was observed, which confirms the Spadaro et al. [41] observation that living cells of M. pulcherrima yeasts are necessary for their biocontrol abilities.
Overall, Metschnikowia isolates marked with J2, J3, J6, TK1, and M4 symbols were identified as the most effective in potato biocontrol in vitro, based on their activity spectrum as well as the diameter of their inhibition zones, and selected for further experiments (Figure 1).

3.2. Determination of Pulcherrimin Formation, Enzymatic Activity, and Fermentation Byproducts of Metschnikowia Pulcherrima

The antimicrobial action of Metschnikowia yeasts is often described as a result of iron depletion by pulcherrimin formation. This observation is compatible with Gore-Lloyd et al.’s [40] work, where pulcherrimin-producing Metschnikowia strains were found to be more active against moulds than pigmentless mutants. Pulcherriminic acid, the secondary metabolite of M. pulcherrima clade, forms a chelate complex with iron ions present in the environment, which causes iron to be unavailable for other microorganisms. This chelate complex, called pulcherrimin, turns yeast colonies light pink to dark red, depending on the Fe3+ concentration in the medium. When secreted extracellularly, pulcherrimin forms coloured halos around the colonies [20]. Pulcherrimin itself does not exhibit antimicrobial activity [39].
In our work, pulcherrimin formation for the selected five M. pulcherrima strains was assessed on YPD plates supplemented with three different concentrations of FeCl3 (0.005, 0.01 and 0.2 mg/mL). The colony colour and diameter of halos for each yeast strain are presented in Table 3 and Figure 2. The halos diameter reached the widest level (1–6 mm) in plates with 0.005 mg/mL FeCl3 supplementation and decreased further as the FeCl3 concentration increased to 0.01–0.2 mg/mL. As the halos became smaller after exceeding 0.01 mg/mL FeCl3 supplementation, the colony colour turned red due to the high amount of accumulated pulcherrimin in the yeast cells (Figure 2, Table 3). Similar observations were reported previously by Sipiczki [20,42], where the intensity of colony pigmentation increased with the Fe3+ concentration. Both the widest “pulcherrimin halos” and the darkest colony colour were observed for M. pulcherrima TK1, which proves the highest production of pulcherriminic acid by this strain among other tested, and, in consequence, the highest potential as a biocontrol agent for potato protection. This observation is in convergence with the antimicrobial in vitro test (Figure 1).
Iron sequestration is not the only antimicrobial mechanism of M. pulcherrima yeasts. The secretion of enzymes that degrade cell walls, cell membranes, and other cellular components is often highlighted as the mode of action of yeast biocontrol [19,20]. The enzymatic activity of selected strains of Metschnikowia yeasts was assessed using the API ZYM test. The results are presented in the heat map (Figure 3). All tested strains exhibited enzymatic activity of α- and β-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, cystine, valine and leucine arylamidase, esterase lipase (C8), and esterase (C4). The highest activity was observed for leucine arylamidase. This enzyme is involved in the production of leucine, which is needed for cyclodileucine (cyclo(Leu-Leu)) formation—the precursor of pulcherriminic acid [43]. The level of α- and β-glucosidase activity was marked as low to high, depending on the yeast strain. These enzymes interfere with the fungal cell membranes [44] and cause the subsequent death of the pathogen. The highest enzymatic potential was observed for the M. pulcherrima TK1 strain. Similar enzymatic profiles were also noted for other strains of the M. pulcherrima clade isolated from Polish fruits and flowers [18,45].
In addition, the production of organic acids, ethanol, and glycerol can contribute to the overall antifungal effect of Metschnikowia yeasts [46]. Therefore, we also checked the metabolic profiles of selected yeast isolates (Figure 4). In HPLC analysis, ethanol was identified as the main fermentation product of Metschnikowia yeasts cultivated in YPD broth (Figure 4). The highest value was obtained for two strains: M. pulcherrima TK1 (835.27 mg/100 mL) and M. pulcherrima J2 (837.68 mg/100 mL). In addition to ethanol, HPLC analysis determined smaller amounts (<80 mg/100 mL) of glycerol and organic acids such as succinic, lactic, and acetic acid in post-culture YPD media. Glycerol was the second-most-abundant metabolite, ranging from 40.58 to 76.41 mg/100 mL for the J3 and TK1 strains, respectively. On average, the succinic acid level reached about 6.5 ± 1.8 mg/100 mL. The lactic acid concentration ranged from 11.28 to 45.71 mg/100 mL for the J2 and J6 strains, respectively, and the amount of acetic acid ranged from 2.16 to 24.67 mg/100 mL for the J3 and J2 strains, respectively (Figure 4). Acetic acid was reported previously as the main antifungal component, which was more effective than lactic acid [47]. With the effect of the external chemical alteration of and change in pH, the structure of cell membrane units such as proteins and phospholipids are altered. These alterations also affect the permeability of the cell membrane and may result in leakage of the internal cell metabolites. Additionally, acids penetrate the fungal cell and adversely affect intracellular activities such as DNA replication and protein synthesis [48].
M. pulcherrima TK1 was selected for further research, as the most active strain with the highest biocontrol potential based on its antimicrobial and enzymatic properties and metabolite profile.

3.3. Growth Medium Selection for M. pulcherrima TK1 Cultivation

In our work, acid whey was enriched with nitrogen sources (yeast extract and peptone) in 16 different concentration variants and with glucose as an additional carbon source in 27 other variants (including yeast extract and peptone). The naturally occurring lactose in the acid whey was the basic carbon source. The results of maximum specific growth rate (µmax) and biomass yield (Yx) are presented in Figure 5.
Among the variants with glucose supplementation, the highest level of biomass yield was achieved for media Y25 P25 G50, Y25 P12.5 G50, and Y12.5 P12.5 G50, ranging from 0.2286 to 0.2827 (Figure 5). The biomass yield for variants without glucose enrichment was lower. The three variants with the highest biomass yield ranged between 0.1680–0.2248 (Y12.5 P100, Y100 P100, Y25 P12.5). In the samples supplemented only with the yeast extract and peptone, the peptone concentration was more significant in achieving a satisfactory level of Yx than the yeast extract. Glucose concentration was critical in the other samples. Overall, the highest Yx was obtained in the model YPG medium, which is related to the previous adaptation of M. pulcherrima TK1 to these conditions (Figure 5).
M. pulcherrima TK1 cultures on six variants of the acid-whey-based medium (three with glucose, three without) with the highest Yx were selected for further antimicrobial activity assessment against potato phytopathogens. The results are presented in Figure 6.
Interestingly, the diversified spectrum of antimicrobial activity varied and depended on the kind of culture medium (Figure 6). The widest spectrum of activity was noted for M. pulcherrima TK1 cultivated in the broth Y12.5 P12.5 G50, with the lowest concentration of supplements among glucose variants. Tested strain TK1, after multiplication in this broth, inhibited the growth of all tested potato phytopathogens. The inhibition zones ranged from 0.3 mm (for S. scabiei and C. coccodes) to 14.0 mm (for Rhizoctonia solani). The most susceptible pathogens were R. solani, P. exigua, and F. sambucinum (Figure 6). Convergent results were observed for R. solani and F. sambucinum in experiments with the YPG culture; however, P. exigua was previously the most resistance strain (Figure 1). In this antimicrobial test, C. coccodes exhibited the highest resistance; it was inhibited by only three variants of the supplemented acid-whey-based cultures of selected yeasts. It is worth noting that the growth of both bacterial potato pathogens (P. carotovorum and S. scabiei) was inhibited by several variants of acid whey cultures of M. pulcherrima (Figure 6). At the same time, no antibacterial activity was observed for the strain cultivated in the YPG medium (Figure 1).
The acid-whey-based medium Y12.5 P12.5 G50 was finally selected for further cultivation of M. pulcherrima TK1 due to its broadest spectrum of antimicrobial activity and high level of µmax and Yx. The use of acid whey as a base for the culture medium allowed for an eightfold reduction in the concentration of peptone and yeast extracts and a twofold reduction in glucose concentration, while maintaining activity against mould pathogens and even the appearance of activity against bacterial pathogens.
Determination of the Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium chemical characteristic was performed. The results are presented in Table 4. The selected variant of culture medium contained higher concentrations of nitrogen (75.76 mg/L), iron (28.00 mg/L), potassium (104.50 mg/L), and calcium (289.00 mg/L). Lactose (9 g/L) from acid whey was the second carbon source, in addition to glucose.
The M. pulcherrima TK1 strain cultivated in the selected Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium showed slightly modified metabolite profiles, in favour of lactic acid and acetic acid production, and lowered the concentration of glycerol, ethanol, and succinic acid (Figure 7 and Figure 8). Probably over 28 higher concentrations of lactic acid in A100 M100 acid-whey-based post-culture medium of TK1 compared to YPD were caused mainly by the natural presence of this acid in whey.

3.4. In Situ Test of Biocontrol Potential of M. pulcherrima TK1 against Phytopathogens on Potatoes

The in situ antimicrobial activities of M. pulcherrima TK1 cultured in the acid-whey-based broth Y12.5 P12.5 G50 and reference YPG medium against the 10 phytopathogens were evaluated on ‘Impresja’ seed potatoes. The results are presented in Table 5 and Figure 9.
Several studies reported the biocontrol efficiency of Metschnikowia yeast in situ against brown rot in sweet cherries [49], anthracnose in mango fruit [50], and grey mould in strawberries [18] and grape berries [35]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that confirms the antimicrobial activities of M. pulcherrima against F. oxysporum, F. sambucinum, P. exigua, C. coccodes, R. solani, A. solani, A. alternata, A. tenuissima, and S. scabiei in situ on potatoes. It was observed that M. pulcherrima TK1 cultured on Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium completely (100% inhibition) or partially (30%–50% inhibition) reduced the potato infestation, with all of the tested fungal pathogens and one bacterial pathogen (Table 5, Figure 9). Only the development of P. carotovorum was not reduced, even though the in vitro experiment revealed the inhibition of this bacterium by M. pulcherrima TK1 culture in the Y12.5 P12.5 G50 variant (Figure 6). Cultivation of M. pulcherrima TK1 on enriched acid-whey-based medium achieved a higher or at least the same percentage of potato infestation as the YPG model medium. The most effective inhibition (100%) was achieved for all three Alternaria strains, F. sambucinum, C. coccodes, and P. exigua. Guo et al. study [38] also showed a positive effect of treatment with M. pulcherrima against A. alternata on winter jujube fruit after seven days of storage. However, the antimicrobial effect was observed to a lesser extent (26%). The least satisfactory level of inhibition was noted in our work for F. oxysporum (30%). In Türkel et al.’s research [23], Fusarium sp. growth was completely inhibited when co-inoculated with M. pulcherrima into artificially wounded apples.
Application of M. pulcherrima TK1 treatment was allowed to inhibit all tested fungal phytopathogens of potato. P. carotovorum (Gram-negative bacteria) was insensitive to yeast treatment in situ and S. scabiei (Gram-positive bacteria) was 40% inhibited. Therefore, it is essential to select a microorganism or other molecule that is active against fungi or bacteria (Gram-negative or Gram-positive). Biological control agent should exhibit a high specificity of action to be an alternative for chemical pesticides. Our previous research [29] on potato protection using lactic acid bacteria as a biocontrol agent confirmed the antibacterial activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KB2 LAB 03 against P. carotovorum and S. scabiei at a satisfactory level (90% and 85% growth reduction, respectively). Additionally, the garlic water extract completely inhibited the growth of S. scabiei development (growth reduction by 100%) but was ineffective against P. carotovorum [28]. The possible synergistic effect of these biopreparations could cover the need for comprehensive protection of potatoes against fungal and bacterial pathogens. However, more studies on mutual interactions are required.

4. Conclusions

The results from this study clearly showed that the selected isolates of M. pulcherrima could effectively control the diseases of potatoes mainly caused by fungal phytopathogens. The modes of potential mechanisms may include not only the iron depletion but also the enzymatic action and organic acid production of the active biocontrol agent. Interestingly, the metabolic profiles of M. pulcherrima can also be modulated by using an appropriate growth medium. The acid-whey-based broth with little supplementation was a cheap medium suitable for the multiplication of M. pulcherrima cells with strong biocontrol properties. The obtained results provided an impulse for further research involving the use of yeasts during the storage of potato seeds in cooling chambers. Such a strategy, based on combining the use of a selected biological agent and appropriately designated physicochemical parameters of the chamber, seems to be the key solution for significantly reducing losses during the storage of potato seeds.

5. Patents

No. P.441895: Method of bio-protection of seed potato tubers against the development of fungal phytopathogens, patent application at the patent office in Poland, 1 August 2022.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.S., J.B., D.K. and B.G.; formal analysis, A.S., A.C. and M.O.; funding acquisition, B.G.; investigation, A.S., A.K., A.C., J.S. and W.C.-W.; methodology, A.S., J.B. and J.S.; project administration, B.G.; supervision, D.K. and B.G.; visualisation, A.S.; writing—original draft, A.S. and A.K.; writing—review and editing, D.K. and B.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Agency for Restructuring and Modernisation of Agriculture, Poland, grant number 00010.DDD.6509.00016.2018.05. The APC was funded by Lodz University of Technology, Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Jadwiga Śliwka from the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute–National Research Institute, Poland, for kindly providing strains of potato pathogens. We also acknowledge the help of Anna Rygała with the antimicrobial activity experiments, and the help of Dawid Dygas with the culture media analysis. This article was completed while A.S. was a doctoral candidate in the Interdisciplinary Doctoral School at Lodz University of Technology, Poland.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Singh, H.P. Policies and Strategies Conducive to Potato Development in Asia and the Pacific Region; RAP Publication (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2008; pp. 18–29. [Google Scholar]
  2. Camire, M.E.; Kubow, S.; Donnelly, D.J. Potatoes and Human Health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 823–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. FAO. Top Countries in Potatoes Production. Potatoes Production—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Du, M.; Ren, X.; Sun, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, R. Characterization of Fusarium spp. Causing Potato Dry Rot in China and Susceptibility Evaluation of Chinese Potato Germplasm to the Pathogen. Potato Res. 2012, 55, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Adolf, B.; Andrade-Piedra, J.; Bittara Molina, F.; Przetakiewicz, J.; Hausladen, H.; Kromann, P.; Lees, A.; Lindqvist-Kreuze, H.; Perez, W.; Secor, G.A. Fungal, Oomycete, and Plasmodiophorid Diseases of Potato. In The Potato Crop; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 307–350. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tomilova, O.G.; Shaldyaeva, E.M.; Kryukova, N.A.; Pilipova, Y.V.; Schmidt, N.S.; Danilov, V.P.; Kryukov, V.Y.; Glupov, V.V. Entomopathogenic fungi decrease Rhizoctonia disease in potato in field conditions. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sukul, P.; Spiteller, M. Metalaxyl: Persistence, degradation, metabolism, and analytical methods. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 164, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, Z.; Wang, P.; Pu, Z.; Lu, L.; Chen, G.; Hu, X.; Fayyaz, A.; Gai, Y. Effects of mancozeb on citrus rhizosphere bacterial community. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 154, 104845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. OuYang, M.-N.; Liu, X.; Guo, H.-M.; Lu, Z.-H.; Zhou, D.-D.; Yang, Z.-H. The different toxic effects of metalaxyl and metalaxyl-M on Tubifex tubifex. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Saquib, Q.; Siddiqui, M.A.; Ansari, S.M.; Alwathnani, H.A.; Musarrat, J.; Al-Khedhairy, A.A. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of methomyl, carbaryl, metalaxyl, and pendimethalin in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2021, 41, 832–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eurostat. The EU Potato Sector—Statistics on Production, Prices and Trade. 2021. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=The_EU_potato_sector_-_statistics_on_production,_prices_and_trade (accessed on 28 June 2022).
  12. Eurostat, 2013: Glossary: Organic Farming. Statistics Explained. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Glossary:Organic_farming&oldid=122448 (accessed on 28 June 2022).
  13. Thurman, J.H.; Crowder, D.W.; Northfield, T.D. Biological control agents in the Anthropocene: Current risks and future options. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2017, 23, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van Lenteren, J.C. The state of commercial augmentative biological control: Plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. BioControl 2012, 57, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Mendonca-Hagler, L.C.; Hagler, A.N.; Kurtzman, C.P. Phylogeny of Metschnikowia Species Estimated from Partial rRNA Sequences. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1993, 43, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sipiczki, M. Metschnikowia pulcherrima and related pulcherrimin-producing yeasts: Fuzzy species boundaries and complex antimicrobial antagonism. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Banani, H.; Spadaro, D.; Zhang, D.; Matic, S.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Postharvest application of a novel chitinase cloned from Metschnikowia fructicola and overexpressed in Pichia pastoris to control brown rot of peaches. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 199, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pawlikowska, E.; James, S.A.; Breierova, E.; Antolak, H.; Kregiel, D. Biocontrol capability of local Metschnikowia sp. isolates. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019, 112, 1425–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Freimoser, F.M.; Rueda-Mejia, M.P.; Tilocca, B.; Migheli, Q. Biocontrol yeasts: Mechanisms and applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Sipiczki, M. Taxonomic Revision of the pulcherrima Clade of Metschnikowia (Fungi): Merger of Species. Taxonomy 2022, 2, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leverentz, B.; Conway, W.S.; Janisiewicz, W.; Abadias, M.; Kurtzman, C.P.; Camp, M.J. Biocontrol of the food-borne pathogens Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica serovar poona on fresh-cut apples with naturally occurring bacterial and yeast antagonists. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Saravanakumar, D.; Ciavorella, A.; Spadaro, D.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Metschnikowia pulcherrima strain MACH1 outcompetes Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria alternata and Penicillium expansum in apples through iron depletion. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2008, 49, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Türkel, S.; Korukluoğlu, M.; Yavuz, M. Biocontrol Activity of the Local Strain of Metschnikowia pulcherrima on Different Postharvest Pathogens. Biotechnol. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 397167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Balouiri, M.; Sadiki, M.; Ibnsouda, S.K. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Czyżowska, A.; Kucharska, A.Z.; Nowak, A.; Sokół-Łętowska, A.; Motyl, I.; Piórecki, N. Suitability of the probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains as the starter cultures in unripe cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) fermentation. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 2936–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. EN ISO 20483:2013; Cereals and Pulses—Determination of the Nitrogen Content and Calculation of the Crude Protein Content—Kjeldahl Method. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
  27. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. In APHA; Rice, E.W.; Baird, R.B.; Eaton, A.D.; Clesceri, L.S. (Eds.) American Public Health Association (APHA); American Water Works Association (AWWA); Water Environment Federation (WEF): Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. Steglińska, A.; Bekhter, A.; Wawrzyniak, P.; Kunicka-Styczyńska, A.; Jastrząbek, K.; Fidler, M.; Śmigielski, K.; Gutarowska, B. Antimicrobial Activities of Plant Extracts against Solanum tuberosum L. Phytopathogens. Molecules 2022, 27, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Steglińska, A.; Kołtuniak, A.; Motyl, I.; Berłowska, J.; Czyżowska, A.; Cieciura-Włoch, W.; Okrasa, M.; Kręgiel, D.; Gutarowska, B. Lactic Acid Bacteria as Biocontrol Agents against Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Pathogens. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Janisiewicz, W.J.; Tworkoski, T.J.; Kurtzman, C.P. Biocontrol potential of Metchnikowia pulcherrima strains against blue mold of apple. Phytopathology 2001, 91, 1098–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Spadaro, D.; Ciavorella, A.; Dianpeng, Z.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M. Effect of culture media and pH on the biomass production and biocontrol efficacy of a Metschnikowia pulcherrima strain to be used as a biofungicide for postharvest disease control. Can. J. Microbiol. 2010, 56, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Spadaro, D.; Lorè, A.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. A new strain of Metschnikowia fructicola for postharvest control of Penicillium expansum and patulin accumulation on four cultivars of apple. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 75, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Settier-Ramírez, L.; López-Carballo, G.; Hernández-Muñoz, P.; Fontana, A.; Strub, C.; Schorr-Galindo, S. New isolated metschnikowia pulcherrima strains from apples for postharvest biocontrol of penicillium expansum and patulin accumulation. Toxins 2021, 13, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Karabulut, O.A.; Smilanick, J.L.; Gabler, F.M.; Mansour, M.; Droby, S. Near-Harvest Applications of Metschnikowia fructicola, Ethanol, and Sodium Bicarbonate to Control Postharvest Diseases of Grape in Central California. Plant Dis. 2003, 87, 1384–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Agarbati, A.; Canonico, L.; Pecci, T.; Romanazzi, G.; Ciani, M.; Comitini, F. Biocontrol of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts in Vineyard against the Gray Mold Disease Agent Botrytis cinerea. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kalia, V.C. Quorum sensing inhibitors: An overview. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 224–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kalia, V.C.; Patel, S.K.S.; Kang, Y.C.; Lee, J.-K. Quorum sensing inhibitors as antipathogens: Biotechnological applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 68–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, D.; Zhu, L.; Hou, X. Combination of UV-C Treatment and Metschnikowia pulcherrimas for Controlling Alternaria Rot in Postharvest Winter Jujube Fruit. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M137–M141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kregiel, D.; Nowacka, M.; Rygala, A.; Vadkertiová, R. Biological Activity of Pulcherrimin from the Meschnikowia pulcherrima Clade. Molecules 2022, 27, 1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gore-Lloyd, D.; Sumann, I.; Brachmann, A.O.; Schneeberger, K.; Ortiz-Merino, R.A.; Moreno-Beltrán, M.; Schläfli, M.; Kirner, P.; Santos Kron, A.; Rueda-Mejia, M.P.; et al. Snf2 controls pulcherriminic acid biosynthesis and antifungal activity of the biocontrol yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima. Mol. Microbiol. 2019, 112, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Spadaro, D.; Vola, R.; Piano, S.; Gullino, M.L. Mechanisms of action and efficacy of four isolates of the yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima active against postharvest pathogens on apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2002, 24, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sipiczki, M. Metschnikowia strains isolated from botrytized grapes antagonize fungal and bacterial growth by iron depletion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 6716–6724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kregiel, D.; Pawlikowska, E. Kwas pulcherriminowy i jego znaczenie w inhibicji mikroflory zanieczyszczającej żywność oraz środowiska fermentacyjne. In Wybrane Substancje o Znaczeniu Biologicznym: Spojrzenie Młodych Naukowców, 1st ed.; Kwolek-Mirek, M., Mołoń, M., Eds.; Creativetime: Kraków, Poland, 2017; pp. 143–149. [Google Scholar]
  44. Adams, D.J. Fungal cell wall chitinases and glucanases. Microbiology 2004, 150, 2029–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pawlikowska, E.; Kregiel, D. Enzymatic profiles and antimicrobial activity of the yeast Metschnikowia. Acta Innov. 2017, 23, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  46. Muccilli, S.; Restuccia, C. Bioprotective role of yeasts. Microorganisms 2015, 3, 588–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Le Lay, C.; Coton, E.; Le Blay, G.; Chobert, J.-M.; Haertlé, T.; Choiset, Y.; Van Long, N.N.; Meslet-Cladière, L.; Mounier, J. Identification and quantification of antifungal compounds produced by lactic acid bacteria and propionibacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 239, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Coban, H.B. Organic acids as antimicrobial food agents: Applications and microbial productions. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 43, 569–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Oro, L.; Feliziani, E.; Ciani, M.; Romanazzi, G.; Comitini, F. Biocontrol of postharvest brown rot of sweet cherries by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Disva 599, Metschnikowia pulcherrima Disva 267 and Wickerhamomyces anomalus Disva 2 strains. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 96, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tian, Y.-q.; Li, W.; Jiang, Z.-t.; Jing, M.-m.; Shao, Y.-Z. The preservation effect of Metschnikowia pulcherrima yeast on anthracnose of postharvest mango fruits and the possible mechanism. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Agronomy 12 02546 g001 550
Figure 1. The antimicrobial activity of Metschnikowia sp. strains cultivated on YPD medium against potato pathogens, measured as growth-inhibition zones in the agar-well diffusion method. Pectobacterium carotovorum and Streptomyces scabiei are not presented in the figure due to the lack of Metschnikowia strains antimicrobial activity against these phytopathogens. Culture filtrates (without cells) are not presented in the figure due to the lack of antimicrobial activities. a–h results, with different letters within the sample, are significantly different (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05).
Figure 1. The antimicrobial activity of Metschnikowia sp. strains cultivated on YPD medium against potato pathogens, measured as growth-inhibition zones in the agar-well diffusion method. Pectobacterium carotovorum and Streptomyces scabiei are not presented in the figure due to the lack of Metschnikowia strains antimicrobial activity against these phytopathogens. Culture filtrates (without cells) are not presented in the figure due to the lack of antimicrobial activities. a–h results, with different letters within the sample, are significantly different (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05).
Agronomy 12 02546 g001
Agronomy 12 02546 g002 550
Figure 2. Halo formation and intensity of colony pigmentation of Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 cultured on YPD agar. (A)—without FeCl3, supplemented with (B)—0.005 mg/mL FeCl3, (C)—0.01 mg/mL FeCl3, and (D)—0.2 mg/mL FeCl3.
Figure 2. Halo formation and intensity of colony pigmentation of Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 cultured on YPD agar. (A)—without FeCl3, supplemented with (B)—0.005 mg/mL FeCl3, (C)—0.01 mg/mL FeCl3, and (D)—0.2 mg/mL FeCl3.
Agronomy 12 02546 g002
Agronomy 12 02546 g003 550
Figure 3. Enzymatic activity of the selected strains of Metschnikowia pulcherrima strains based on API ZYM system. 0—no enzyme activity; 5—the highest level of enzymatic activity; J2—M. pulcherrima J2; J3—M. pulcherrima J3; J6—M. pulcherrima J6; TK1—M. pulcherrima TK1; M4—M. pulcherrima M4.
Figure 3. Enzymatic activity of the selected strains of Metschnikowia pulcherrima strains based on API ZYM system. 0—no enzyme activity; 5—the highest level of enzymatic activity; J2—M. pulcherrima J2; J3—M. pulcherrima J3; J6—M. pulcherrima J6; TK1—M. pulcherrima TK1; M4—M. pulcherrima M4.
Agronomy 12 02546 g003
Agronomy 12 02546 g004 550
Figure 4. Fermentation products of the most active Metschnikowia pulcherrima strains cultivated on YPD medium. J2—M. pulcherrima J2; J3—M. pulcherrima J3; J6—M. pulcherrima J6; TK1—M. pulcherrima TK1; M4—M. pulcherrima M4. a–e results, with different letters within the sample, are significantly different (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05).
Figure 4. Fermentation products of the most active Metschnikowia pulcherrima strains cultivated on YPD medium. J2—M. pulcherrima J2; J3—M. pulcherrima J3; J6—M. pulcherrima J6; TK1—M. pulcherrima TK1; M4—M. pulcherrima M4. a–e results, with different letters within the sample, are significantly different (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05).
Agronomy 12 02546 g004
Agronomy 12 02546 g005 550
Figure 5. Biomass yield (Yx) and maximum specific growth rate (µmax) for Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 strain cultivated in different variants of acid-whey-based broth with glucose supplementation (YPG samples) and without glucose supplementation (YP samples). * laboratory broth, water-based; Y—yeast extract; P—peptone; G—glucose; Y100 P100—acid-whey-based medium supplemented with base 10 g/L of yeast extract and 20 g/L of peptone; Y50 P50 G50—acid-whey-based medium supplemented with base 5 g/L concentration of yeast extract, 10 g/L of peptone, and 10 g/L of glucose. The following numbers indicate supplementation with a certain percentage of the base concentration of Y, P, and G. The specific concentrations of each component are presented in 2.7. of Materials and Methodology section. a–m results, with different letters within the sample, are significantly different (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05).
Figure 5. Biomass yield (Yx) and maximum specific growth rate (µmax) for Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 strain cultivated in different variants of acid-whey-based broth with glucose supplementation (YPG samples) and without glucose supplementation (YP samples). * laboratory broth, water-based; Y—yeast extract; P—peptone; G—glucose; Y100 P100—acid-whey-based medium supplemented with base 10 g/L of yeast extract and 20 g/L of peptone; Y50 P50 G50—acid-whey-based medium supplemented with base 5 g/L concentration of yeast extract, 10 g/L of peptone, and 10 g/L of glucose. The following numbers indicate supplementation with a certain percentage of the base concentration of Y, P, and G. The specific concentrations of each component are presented in 2.7. of Materials and Methodology section. a–m results, with different letters within the sample, are significantly different (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05).
Agronomy 12 02546 g005
Agronomy 12 02546 g006 550
Figure 6. Antimicrobial activity of Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 strain cultivated on different variants of acid-whey-based media against potato phytopathogens measured as growth-inhibition zones in the agar-well diffusion method. Y100 P100—acid-whey-based medium supplemented with base 10 g/L of yeast extract and 20 g/L of peptone; Y50 P50 G50—acid-whey-based medium supplemented with base 5 g/L concentration of yeast extract, 10 g/L of peptone, and 10 g/L of glucose. The following numbers (50, 25, 12.5) indicate supplementation with a certain percentage of the initial concentration of yeast extract, peptone, and glucose. The specific concentrations of each component are presented in 2.7. of Materials and Methodology section. a–f results, with different letters within the sample, are significantly different (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05).
Figure 6. Antimicrobial activity of Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 strain cultivated on different variants of acid-whey-based media against potato phytopathogens measured as growth-inhibition zones in the agar-well diffusion method. Y100 P100—acid-whey-based medium supplemented with base 10 g/L of yeast extract and 20 g/L of peptone; Y50 P50 G50—acid-whey-based medium supplemented with base 5 g/L concentration of yeast extract, 10 g/L of peptone, and 10 g/L of glucose. The following numbers (50, 25, 12.5) indicate supplementation with a certain percentage of the initial concentration of yeast extract, peptone, and glucose. The specific concentrations of each component are presented in 2.7. of Materials and Methodology section. a–f results, with different letters within the sample, are significantly different (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05).
Agronomy 12 02546 g006
Agronomy 12 02546 g007 550
Figure 7. Fermentation by-products of the M. pulcherrima TK1 cultured on Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium.
Figure 7. Fermentation by-products of the M. pulcherrima TK1 cultured on Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium.
Agronomy 12 02546 g007
Agronomy 12 02546 g008 550
Figure 8. RI chromatogram of M. pulcherrima TK1 cultured on Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium; 8—succinic acid; 9—lactic acid; 10—glycerol; 11—acetic acid; 15—ethanol.
Figure 8. RI chromatogram of M. pulcherrima TK1 cultured on Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium; 8—succinic acid; 9—lactic acid; 10—glycerol; 11—acetic acid; 15—ethanol.
Agronomy 12 02546 g008
Agronomy 12 02546 g009 550
Figure 9. Inhibition of Alternaria solani (A) and Fusarium sambucinum (B) infestation of potatoes cv. Impresja treated with Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 cultured in the acid-whey-based medium Y12.5 P12.5 G50. (A1,B1)—control samples; (A2,B2)—tested samples.
Figure 9. Inhibition of Alternaria solani (A) and Fusarium sambucinum (B) infestation of potatoes cv. Impresja treated with Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 cultured in the acid-whey-based medium Y12.5 P12.5 G50. (A1,B1)—control samples; (A2,B2)—tested samples.
Agronomy 12 02546 g009
Table
Table 1. Metschnikowia yeasts used in the research.
Table 1. Metschnikowia yeasts used in the research.
StrainOrigin
Metschnikowia pulcherrima NCYC 747National Collection of Yeast Cultures (Norwich, UK)
Metschnikowia pulcherrima NCYC 2321
Metschnikowia pulcherrima J2*Isolate from apple fruit
Metschnikowia pulcherrima J3*Isolate from apple fruit
Metschnikowia sp. J4Isolate from apple fruit
Metschnikowia pulcherrima J6*Isolate from apple fruit
Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1*Isolate from strawberry flower
Metschnikowia sp. M3Isolate from raspberry fruit
Metschnikowia sp. TO1Isolate from strawberry fruit
Metschnikowia pulcherrima M4*Isolate from raspberry fruit
* species identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry; confidence score value range 96.2%–99.9%.
Table
Table 2. Variants of acid whey supplementation.
Table 2. Variants of acid whey supplementation.
Medium VariantsYeast Extract (%)Peptone (%)Glucose (%)Medium VariantsYeast Extract (%)Peptone (%)
Y50 P50 G500.51.01.0Y100 P1001.02.0
Y50 P50 G250.51.00.5Y100 P501.01.0
Y50 P50 G12.50.51.00.25Y100 P251.00.5
Y50 P25 G500.50.51.0Y100 P12.51.00.25
Y50 P25 G250.50.50.5Y50 P1000.52.0
Y50 P25 G12.50.50.50.25Y50 P500.51.0
Y50 P12.5 G500.50.251.0Y50 P250.50.5
Y50 P12.5 G250.50.250.5Y50 P12.50.50.25
Y50 P12.5 G12.50.50.250.25Y25 P1000.252.0
Y25 P50 G500.251.01.0Y25 P500.251.0
Y25 P50 G250.251.00.5Y25 P250.250.5
Y25 P50 G12.50.251.00.25Y25 P12.50.250.25
Y25 P25 G500.250.51.0Y12.5 P1000.132.0
Y25 P25 G250.250.50.5Y12.5 P500.131.0
Y25 P25 G12.50.250.50.25Y12.5 P250.130.5
Y25 P12.5 G500.250.251.0Y12.5 P12.50.130.25
Y25 P12.5 G250.250.250.5
Y25 P12.5 G12.50.250.250.25
Y12.5 P50 G500.131.01.0
Y12.5 P50 G250.131.00.5
Y12.5 P50 G12.50.131.00.25
Y12.5 P25 G500.130.51.0
Y12.5 P25 G250.130.50.5
Y12.5 P25 G12.50.130.50.25
Y12.5 P12.5 G500.130.251.0
Y12.5 P12.5 G250.130.250.5
Y12.5 P12.5 G12.50.130.250.25
YPG122
Table
Table 3. Pulcherrimin formation for selected Metschnikowia pulcherrima strains on YPD medium supplemented with various concentrations of FeCl3.
Table 3. Pulcherrimin formation for selected Metschnikowia pulcherrima strains on YPD medium supplemented with various concentrations of FeCl3.
FeCl3 Supplementation (mg/mL)Growth Features and Pulcherrimin FormationStrain
J2J3J6TK1M4
Without (control)Colony colour top/bottomwhite/creamywhite/creamywhite/creamywhite/creamywhite/creamy
Coloured halo (mm)0.50.50.54.00.0
0.005Colony colour top/bottomwhite/creamywhite/creamywhite/creamywhite/creamywhite/creamy
Coloured halo (mm)1.01.02.06.01.0
0.01Colony colour top/bottomwhite/redwhite/redwhite/redwhite/redwhite/red
Coloured halo (mm)0.50.00.01.50.0
0.2 Colony colour top/bottomred/redred/redred/redred/dark redred/red
Coloured halo (mm)0.00.00.00.00.0
J2—M. pulcherrima J2; J3—M. pulcherrima J3; J6—M. pulcherrima J6, TK1—M. pulcherrima TK1; M4—M. pulcherrima M4.
Table
Table 4. Characteristic of acid-whey-based medium selected for the cultivation of Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1.
Table 4. Characteristic of acid-whey-based medium selected for the cultivation of Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1.
Analytical AnalysisMedium
Acid Whey Broth
Supplemented Y12.5 P12.5 G50 		Acid Whey Broth
without Supplementation		YPG Broth
Phosphorus (mg/L)175.56181.90182.08
Nitrogen (mg/L)75.7638.2062.59
Iron (mg/L)28.000.505.00
Potassium (mg/L)104.575.0065.70
Calcium (mg/L)289.00324.559.20
Chloride (mg/L)32.8057.100.18
Sodium (mg/L)38.9062.850.26
Lactose (g/L)9.0014.550.20
Protein (g/kg)11.388.5032.64
Lactic acid (g/L)16.3015.851.22
Total solids (g/kg)78.7158.0058.18
Volatile solids (g/kg)69.3748.0555.04
Water content (g/kg)921.29941.10941.82
Table
Table 5. Inhibition of potato seed cv. Impresja infestation treated with Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 cultured on Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium and YPD against potato phytopathogens.
Table 5. Inhibition of potato seed cv. Impresja infestation treated with Metschnikowia pulcherrima TK1 cultured on Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium and YPD against potato phytopathogens.
PhytopathogensInhibition of Potato Infestation (%)
Acid Whey Broth
Supplemented Y12.5 P12.5 G50		YPD Broth
Fusarium oxysporum30 ± 1030 ± 5
Fusarium sambucinum100 ± 0 *80 ± 10 *
Alternaria alternata100 ± 0 *80 ± 5 *
Alternaria solani100 ± 0 *90 ± 5 *
Alternaria tenuissima100 ± 095 ± 5
Colletotrichum coccodes100 ± 0100 ± 0
Rhizoctonia solani50 ± 560 ± 5
Phoma exigua100 ± 0 *80 ± 5 *
Pectobacterium carotovorum--
Streptomyces scabiei40 ± 10 *20 ± 5 *
- no pathogen inhibition; * statistically significant differences between YPG medium and Y12.5 P12.5 G50 acid-whey-based medium for each pathogen (one-way ANOVA, α < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Steglińska, A.; Kołtuniak, A.; Berłowska, J.; Czyżowska, A.; Szulc, J.; Cieciura-Włoch, W.; Okrasa, M.; Kręgiel, D.; Gutarowska, B. Metschnikowia pulcherrima as a Biocontrol Agent against Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Pathogens. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102546

AMA Style

Steglińska A, Kołtuniak A, Berłowska J, Czyżowska A, Szulc J, Cieciura-Włoch W, Okrasa M, Kręgiel D, Gutarowska B. Metschnikowia pulcherrima as a Biocontrol Agent against Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Pathogens. Agronomy. 2022; 12(10):2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102546

Chicago/Turabian Style

Steglińska, Aleksandra, Artur Kołtuniak, Joanna Berłowska, Agata Czyżowska, Justyna Szulc, Weronika Cieciura-Włoch, Małgorzata Okrasa, Dorota Kręgiel, and Beata Gutarowska. 2022. "Metschnikowia pulcherrima as a Biocontrol Agent against Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Pathogens" Agronomy 12, no. 10: 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102546

APA Style

Steglińska, A., Kołtuniak, A., Berłowska, J., Czyżowska, A., Szulc, J., Cieciura-Włoch, W., Okrasa, M., Kręgiel, D., & Gutarowska, B. (2022). Metschnikowia pulcherrima as a Biocontrol Agent against Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Pathogens. Agronomy, 12(10), 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102546

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop