Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Maize Intercropping with Peanut and Phosphorus Application Maintains Sustainable Farmland Productivity by Improving Soil Aggregate Stability and P Availability
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Trait Selection Index for Simultaneous Selection of Water Yam (Dioscorea alata L.) Genotypes
Previous Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Step-by-Step Guide to Using Data Science Tools in the Gestion of Epidemiological and Climatological Data in Rice Production Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Determination of Genetic Diversity of Some Upland and Sea Island Cotton Genotypes Using High-Resolution Capillary Electrophoresis Gel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Purple leaf (Pl) Alleles, Plw and Pli, Regulate Leaf Color Development Independently from the Pb Gene of Purple pericarp (Prp) in Rice

1
Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Biotechnology, College of Life and Applied Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea
2
Sunforce Inc., 208-31, Gumchang-ro, Yeungcheon-si 31882, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
4
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(11), 2845; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112845
Submission received: 3 October 2023 / Revised: 19 October 2023 / Accepted: 28 October 2023 / Published: 19 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Analysis in Crops)

Abstract

:
Color development in various rice organs results from the complementary expression of genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis. The Purple pericarp (Prp) trait and the Purple leaf (Pl) trait both display epistasis, relying on the complement of the Pb and Pp genes for pericarp coloration and the Pl and Pp genes for leaf coloration, respectively. However, there is still genetic uncertainty in identifying the genes responsible for the various color expressions and intensities of rice grain pericarp and leaves. In this study, we characterized the inheritance patterns of color development and the mode of anthocyanin pigments in rice by crossing two parental mutant lines. YUM051, exhibiting dark purple leaves (Plw) and purple pericarp (Prp), was crossed with YUM144, which displayed light purple leaves (Pli) and a white pericarp (prp). The F1 plants exhibited dark purple leaves with purple pericarps, indicating the dominant nature of the purple leaf (Pl) and purple pericarp (Prp) traits. The rice Prp traits display a complementary interaction, reflected in a 9:7 ratio of purple to white pericarp. However, the Prp trait followed Mendelian segregation with a 3:1 ratio of purple to white pericarp in this cross, indicating homozygous dominant Pp alleles in both parental plants. Meanwhile, the segregation of the purple leaf color in the F2 generation of this cross followed complementary inheritance, exhibiting a 9:7 segregation ratio between purple leaves and greenish leaves with purple leaf margins. Moreover, the co-segregation of Prp and Pl traits in the cross between YUM051 (Plw) and YUM144 (Pli) plants did not adhere to the Mendelian 9:3:3:1 independent assortment ratio, confirming that the Pl gene and Pb gene are linked on the same chromosome. Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G) was detected in the leaves of all progeny resulting from the Plw and Pli cross. However, C3G was exclusively identified in the seeds of offspring carrying the dominant Pb gene. Therefore, the Plw and Pli alleles are Pl genes responsible for purple leaf color, while the Pb gene is responsible for purple pericarp color in rice; these genes function independently of each other.

1. Introduction

In several rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars, a rarely observed phenotype of purple coloration appears on various organs, including leaf blades, leaf sheaths, palea, lemma, nodes, internodes, awns, hull, pericarp, stigma, and apiculus. This phenomenon is attributed to the accumulation of pigments, such as anthocyanins, resulting in the development of dark purple, light purple, or purple-washed leaves, as well as red, brown, black, or purple grain pericarp [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. To understand the fundamental principles of color genetics, rice geneticists have studied the mode of inheritance in rice since Mendel’s experiments in the 19th century. The anthocyanin pigmentation in rice is primarily governed by the dominant genes C (chromogen), A (activator), and P (regulator). Both C and A are crucial for pigmentation, while P serves as a tissue-specific regulator for both C and A [11,13,14,15,16]. According to the C-A-P system, genes such as OsC1, OsDFR, and OsB1 and OsB2 were individually identified as determinants of anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice, respectively [11,15,16]. Subsequently, OsKala1 (DFR) and OsKala4 (OsB2) have been described for colorization in rice [9,17].
The purple leaf (Pl) gene in rice comprises three alleles, Pl, PlW, and Pl+, at the Pl locus of rice chromosome 4, which regulates anthocyanin pigmentation in various tissues. The distribution effects of Pl and PlW are similar, showing coloration in the leaf blade, leaf sheath, collar, auricle, ligule, node, and internode. However, the intensity of coloration may vary. For instance, coloration attributed to PlW tends to fade out during the maturation stage, whereas coloration attributed to Pl does not show any noticeable change until maturity [11,18]. The Pl locus contains the Pb and Pl genes responsible for anthocyanin biosynthesis, producing purple pericarp and leaves, respectively [8,11]. The Pb gene is located on Os04g0557800, corresponding to the OsB1 gene encoding an R-type basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factor (https://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/; accessed on 25 December 2021) [8]. The Pl gene is located on Os04g0557500, corresponding to the OsB2 gene encoding a basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factor (https://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/; accessed on 25 December 2021) [11].
Diverse grain pericarp colors, ranging from white, brown, and red to black, have been reported in rice as Ra and Rc genes [19] and have been intensively reviewed [20]. Anthocyanin pigmentation and the purple pericarp (Prp) trait in rice are genetically determined by the complementary interaction of two dominant genes, Pb and Pp, which have been identified on chromosomes 4 and 1, respectively [8,21,22,23]. Subsequently, they were identified as Kala4 and Kala1, respectively, which determine the pericarp color of rice [9,24]. The Pp allele is dominant over the wild-type white pericarp pp allele [8,23]. The rice pericarp acquires a brown color when the Pb gene is present even in the absence of the Pp gene, whereas no coloration occurs in the absence of the Pb gene [8,23]. Moreover, the pericarp acquires black coloration in the presence of both dominant Pb and Pp alleles, i.e., Pb_Pp_ results in a purple pericarp, Pb_pppp results in a brown pericarp, and pbpbPp_ and pbpbpppp result in a white pericarp [8,25,26].
The demand for colored grains with a high anthocyanin content is increasing worldwide because of their significant functional attributes, including antioxidant properties, anticancer effects, retinal protection, antihypolipidemia effects, antiaging and health improvement properties, as well as their high nutritional value [26,27,28]. Breeders and consumers often prefer pigmented rice cultivars because they have commercial value, attributed to the antioxidant and health-promoting properties of pericarp anthocyanins [29,30]. Moreover, high levels of anthocyanins, amino acids, and free fatty acids in purple rice confer health advantages, such as protection and prevention against angiogenesis and cardiovascular diseases [31,32,33]. Leaf color mutants may be an important morphological marker in hybridization [34,35,36], which also provides defense against biotic and abiotic stresses [15,37], and they are a good source for studying pigment metabolism, chloroplast development, and differentiation [29,30,31,32,33,38], as well as for candidate gene identification [39]. Therefore, studying rice colorization has become a crucial objective in rice genetics and breeding to enhance agronomic traits [9,19,28,29].
Colorization in cereals is caused by the accumulation of carotenoids and flavonoids, such as anthocyanin, proanthocyanin, and phlobaphene, in the pericarp, aleurone, lemma, testa, and seed coat of grains and leaves [26]. Rice leaves can become purple, brown, or red because of the accumulation of various flavonoids owing to specific gene expression in various genotypes. Cyanidin-3-glucoside (C3G) and peonidin-3-glucoside are the two main pigments deposited in the pericarps of purple rice [7,8]. Therefore, we examined the C3G content in the leaves and seed pericarps of the colored leaf parents.
Inheritance studies on coloration commenced early in the field of rice genetics, and genes associated with color development in cereals have been extensively studied [1,26]. However, because the expression and distribution of anthocyanin pigmentation and concentrations of various colors in rice organs are strikingly variable, the determination of the genes involved in color development remains undetermined, and only a few functional and allele-specific markers for classical breeding have been reported thus far. Several studies have examined crosses between pigmented and non-pigmented leaf blades; however, very few have examined crosses between two pigmented leaf blade types. Therefore, in this study, we defined the inheritance patterns of associated genes among progenies derived from crosses between two mutant lines of Pl alleles exhibiting distinct color phenotypes in the leaves and pericarps.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Two purple leaf rice lines, YUM051 (Plw) and YUM144 (Pli), were cross-fertilized in a reciprocal manner and grown in the greenhouse and rice research field at Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea. The genotype YUM051 (Plw) had dark purple leaves, purple seed pericarps, internodes, and leaf collars, whereas YUM144 (Pli) had light purple leaves, white pericarps, and white leaf collars. Recombinant inbred lines of the crossbred progeny were obtained from subsequent generations.

2.2. Genetic and Phenotypic Characterization

A genetic study was conducted to analyze the inheritance patterns of color formation in various organs. The pigmentation of various organs in the experimental materials was documented, including the leaf sheath, leaf blade, leaf margin, stem, node, internode, auricle, ligule, collar, hull, and pericarp. The purple-colored genotypes YUM051 and YUM144 were hybridized, and the resulting F1 plants were allowed to self-fertilize to produce F2 and subsequent generations. The phenotypic data were visually assessed for 147 and 213 plants from the F2 generation of the YUM051(♀) X YUM144(♂) and YUM051(♂) X YUM144(♀) crosses, respectively. The segregation patterns of color development in specific organs were individually documented. The χ2 method was applied to validate the results. For genetic analysis, genomic DNA was extracted from young leaf tissues using the CTAB method, following a standard protocol [40]. Allelic differences in the Prp trait among the progenies were investigated using single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the Pb gene encoding OsB1 mRNA (NM_001060067) in the genome sequences of the O. sativa Japonica group (Os04g0557800). The allelic constitutions of the Pb gene were determined through the analysis of polymorphisms within the OsB1 DNA sequence (AB021079) via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [8]. Briefly, PCR, for amplifying the transcriptional activator Pb gene, was performed using a forward primer 5′-GGGAGAAGCTCAACGAGATG and a reverse primer 5′-GGGTGGCAGATTCATCACTT. For genotype analysis, PCR products were digested with BamH1 restriction enzyme (Promega Co., Madison, WI, USA), followed by gel electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose gel.

2.3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis of Anthocyanin Contents

Because the purple coloration of rice is caused by the accumulation of anthocyanins [7,8,41], we analyzed the anthocyanin content in the leaves and grains. Anthocyanin extraction and content analysis were performed following a previously described protocol with modifications [42,43]. Briefly, 10 g of rice leaf powder and 10 g of seed pericarp powder (obtained by milling brown rice with an automatic rice tester) were extracted individually using 50 mL of 70% ethanol as the extraction solvent for 24 h at 25 °C in the dark. Subsequently, the solution was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min and filtered through a 0.25 µm PVDF filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Ten microliters of the filtered samples were injected into an HPLC system (Sheseido, Tokyo, Japan). Separation was conducted using a CAP CELL PAK C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm; Sheseido) at 30 °C with the detection absorbance set at 520 nm. The elution system comprised 5% formic acid (solvent A) and 5% acetonitrile containing 5% formic acid (solvent B). Elution was conducted using a linear gradient of B to A at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min as follows: the elution began with 0–35.5% B at 0–23 min under isocratic flow, and increased from 35.5 to 100% B at 24–45 min. Kuromanin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a reference standard chemical for the measurement of C3G.

3. Results

3.1. Phenotypic Differences between Plw and Pli Mutants

In this study, we analyzed rice genotypes exhibiting color development in various organs. Plw and Pli are the two alleles of Pl-type purple-leaved rice that we studied intensively in the two parent lines. YUM051 had uniformly dark purple coloration in the leaf blade (Plw) with a deep purple auricle (Pau), internode, purple pericarp (Prp), and purple hull (Pr). In contrast, YUM144 showed a less intense purple coloration in the leaf blade (Pli) and stems, with a white pericarp (prp) and hull (pr) (Figure 1 and Table 1). Both the Plw and Pli parents were reciprocally hybridized to analyze color segregation in specific tissues. The coloration was segregated with various patterns in the different organs of the subsequent progenies. Because of the many patterns of color distribution, it was difficult to characterize the progenies in the F2 generation. Therefore, individual progenies showing a unique phenotype from self-pollinated populations were selected. Consequently, we analyzed seven generations of offspring with fixed alleles for the Pl and Prp traits of interest (Figure 1).

3.2. Differential Color Segregation on Progenies Crossed between Plw and Pli Allele Parents

Purple color segregation from two purple-colored parents was studied in a cross between YUM051 and YUM144. The color of the F1 plants generated from the hybridized seeds displayed purple phenotypes in the leaf blade, leaf sheath, auricle, ligule, collar, and internode, as well as on the hull and pericarp of the seeds developed in the F1 plant (Figure 1). Similar results were obtained from reciprocal crosses whenever Plw, as a female parent pollen receiver, was crossed with Pli, as a male parent pollen donor, or vice versa. This pattern of coloration indicates that the purple color traits in these crosses adhered to the dominant genetic characteristics.
The F1 plants were allowed to self-fertilize to produce the F2 segregating generation, and the development of various colors within them was analyzed. Among the 213 progenies from the F2 population, 114 plants had purple leaves and 99 plants had greenish leaves. The greenish leaves were light green specified with purple leaf margins. The absence of completely green leaves in this cross resembles the allelic relationship between Plw and Pli. The Chi-square (χ2) tests did not follow any significant ratio in the genetic pattern of segregation (χ23:1 = 52.40, P = NS, Table 2). The reciprocal cross also showed similar segregation patterns. However, the calculated χ2 fitness to the segregation ratio of leaf color, 9:7 (χ29:7 = 0.64, P = 0.90–0.10), for the cross between YUM144 and YUM051 supports the complementary inheritance of Plw and Pli (Table 2).
Conversely, in the context of the purple pericarp color, the F1 plants resulting from a cross between plants with purple and white pericarp exhibited a dark purple pericarp that separated in the F2 generation at a 3:1 (purple:white) ratio in reciprocal crosses (χ23:1 = 1.41 and 2.89, respectively, P = 0.90–0.10) (Table 3). This segregation ratio indicates the dominant nature of the Pb gene controlling the Prp trait. Moreover, the segregation analysis indicated that the Pl and Pb genes are linked in inheritance, as they did not follow the Mendelian 9:3:3:1 independent assortment ratio in the F2 generation [χ2(9:3:3:1) = 117.41, P = NS] (Table 4). Furthermore, four different groups of color patterns were distinguished in subsequent generations, constituting both parental and recombinant types. The parental type comprised plants with dark purple leaves bearing purple pericarps and light purple leaves bearing white pericarps. The recombinant type included plants with purple pericarps exhibiting either faintly purple or green leaves, with a purple leaf margin (Figure 1 and Table 4). In the F7 generation, the presence of a few recombinant types of plants demonstrated that the parental genes were linked to each other, that is, purple leaf-and purple pericarp-controlling genes (Pl and Pb) were linked in inheritance.

3.3. Anthocyanin Contents Were Related to Color Development in the Rice Organs

We analyzed the anthocyanin content in the leaf and seed pericarp. Leaf extracts from the green leaf control plant (Ilpoom), the dark purple (Plw), and diluted purple (Pli) parents, along with their two F7 progenies exhibiting purple and green leaf with purple leaf margins, were subjected to HPLC analysis. A prominent peak for C3G was observed in the Plw, Pli, and F7-03 offspring with dark purple leaves. In contrast, a small amount of kuromanin was detected in the F7-08 offspring, with green and purple leaf margins (Figure 2A). The presence of this negligible amount of C3G in F7-08 may have contributed to the pigmentation at the leaf margin (Figure 1). Control plants with green leaves showed no pigment signals (Figure 2A).
In another experiment, the anthocyanin content of the seed extracts from the parents and their progenies was measured. The Plw parent and F7-08 offspring with purple seed pericarps and one reference plant with black seed pericarps had significant amounts of C3G, as they produced relative signals, whereas the Pli parent and F7-03 offspring with white pericarps exhibited no C3G in their extracts, as no detectable peak was observed (Figure 2B).

3.4. Genetics of Pigment Segregation and Differential Expression of Pl and Pb Genes

We analyzed the genetic patterns of pigment segregation and development in various tissues between the parents and offspring in a cross between YUM051 and YUM144. Figure 3 demonstrates that the cultivar with purple pericarp seeds (YUC020) had purple color in all vegetative parts, including the leaf, leaf sheath, internode, ligule, auricle, and reproductive parts of the seed pericarp. The other cultivar with uncolored pericarp seeds (YUC044) did not show color development in any organ (Figure 3A). Color development was observed in the recombinant inbred lines (Figure 3A). In the offspring SGK07085-142-08-02-06-16, the leaves and leaf sheaths were green, but the internodes, ligules, auricles, and pericarps were purple, resembling the coloration of the recombinant type. In contrast, in the SGK07085-142-10-01-04-01 offspring, the leaf and leaf sheath were purple, but the internode, ligule, and pericarp were not, and they also appeared to be of the recombinant type. The SGK07085-142-10-01-10-02 offspring were similar to P1, but the leaf color was not as dark as that of P1. The SGK07085-142-08-02-01-01 F5-04 offspring also displayed a phenotype similar to that of P1, but it was still not completely pigmented in the internode. The other two offspring, SGK07085-142-08-02-01-07 and SGK07085-142-10-04-04-01, exhibited coloration similar to that of P1, but the leaf color differed in SGK07085-142-08-02-01-07, and a white pericarp was observed in SGK07085-142-10-04-04-01 (Figure 3A). The diverse and complex patterns of color segregation indicate that these genes may individually regulate color formation in different organs.
We also analyzed the composition of the Pb gene, which encodes the OsB1 transcription factor in the Prp trait [8,11]. The purple leaf trait is determined by the Pl gene, which encodes the OSB2 protein. The allelic constitutions of the inbred lines were analyzed through PCR-based polymorphism of the OsB1 DNA sequences (Pb gene). The OsB1 PCR products (Pb) were digested with BamH1 restriction enzyme. The dominant Pb allele contained 5′-GGATCC sequences in OsB1, which were cut by BamH1. The recessive pb allele was a 2-bp (GT) insertion in the sequence of the OsB1 DNA sequences, which resulted in a 5´-GGATGTCC sequence that was not cut by BamH1. The 1.2-kb fragments of the OsB1 (Pb) gene were successively differentially produced in the progeny (Figure 3). The recessive mutated alleles pb amplified the single band in the white pericarp parent (YUM144), white pericarp control (YUC044), and progenies in the F5 generation with white pericarp (SGK07085-142-10-01-04-01 and SGK07085-142-10-04-04-01), as they were not cut by BamH1 (Figure 3B). The dominant normal gene Pb was identified as two fragments in the parents (YUM051), control (YUC020), and progenies in the F5 generation having purple pericarps as they were cut by BamH1 (Figure 3B). Nonetheless, one offspring (SGK07085-142-10-01-10-02) with a purple pericarp produced three DNA bands, possibly because of heterozygosity.
Here, we demonstrated that the Pb and Pl genes are independent of genetic functions and are involved in the pigmentation of purple pericarps and leaves in rice, respectively. Moreover, Pl traits are controlled by epistatic gene interactions with Pl, Plw, and pl with Pp genes, leading to the purple coloration of the leaves.

4. Discussion

Anthocyanin is the pigment responsible for the purple color of grains, leaves, flowers, vegetables, and fruits [8,11,12,44,45]. Within rice, the various colors displayed by the organs are due to the accumulation of anthocyanins, which are traits associated with domestication. The pl locus, which contains two adjacent genes, is responsible for leaf coloration in rice [11]. Extensive genetic analysis has revealed that chromogen C, activator A, and regulator P are the key elements for tissue-specific coloration across various organs, with the intensity of coloration contingent upon various combinations of alleles from the C, A, and P loci [1,13,46]. However, a systematic understanding of the coloration of specific organs remains unclear. In this study, we studied the genetic relationship between Plw and Pli through crosses between two individually distinct colored parents and found that the leaf color of the Plw and Pli alleles showed complementary effects for their inheritance on further segregation, as they followed a Mendelian 9:7 complementary ratio (Table 2). The pattern of coloration of F1 indicated that dark purple color traits were dominant over light purple; however, progeny segregation did not follow the Mendelian 3:1 ratio for their inheritance. In contrast, the purple leaf trait plr4I is regulated by a recessive gene on chromosome 4 in rice [39]. Previously, three Pl alleles, Plj, PlW, and Pli, were identified with distinct pigmentation patterns in rice leaves upon the coexistence of the high-ranked alleles A and C. Thus, the allelic strength of purple leaf genes was reported as Pl>Plw>Pli>Pl+ [5]. The Plw allele activates dark pigmentation in the leaves, hull, and pericarp, excluding stem nodes, and Plj and Pli alleles exhibit pigmentation in the leaves, but not in the pericarp [11,18]. Nagao et al. [18] found that Pl and Plw are responsible for the development of numerous colors in leaf blades and sheaths upon coexistence with the A and C genes. Furthermore, the cross between Plw and Pli alleles was segregated following the Mendelian ratio PlwPlw:PlwPli:PliPli=1:2:1 in the F3 generation [3,5]. The colored leaf sheath in rice PSH1 was identified as the dominant complementary interaction between OsC1, and Rb1 and Rb2 control the purple leaf sheath [47]. A genetic analysis of the deep purple and light purple parents produced dark purple, light purple, and green offspring in the F2 segregating generation in a 39:12:13 ratio, suggesting that trigenic differences between purples suppress one of the genes’ function [4].
We also demonstrated the involvement of Pb and Pl in grain pericarp pigmentation. Individually, Pb produced purple grains, whereas Pl produced purple leaves. The rice purple pericarp (Prp) trait is controlled by complementary gene interactions between the dominant alleles of Pb and Pp genes to produce colored rice seeds [23]. The F1 plants, derived from a cross between purple and white grain pericarps, exhibited grains with dark purple pericarps. Moreover, the offspring segregated at a 3:1 ratio in the F2 generation (Table 3), indicating the dominant nature of the Pb gene controlling purple grain color. Furthermore, we found from the segregation analysis that the Pl and Pb genes are linked in inheritance.
The purple color of rice is attributed to the high level of accumulation of pigments such as anthocyanins, lending the leaves and seed pericarps a dark purple color [1,7]. Therefore, we measured the anthocyanin C3G content in the pigmented portion of rice as an important factor in determining the phenotype (Figure 2). These results are in accordance with the coloration of the materials. Moreover, the negligible amount of C3G in the green progeny may be owing to the pigmentation at the leaf margin. These results indicated the involvement of anthocyanins in color formation in rice. The accumulation of anthocyanins, such as C3G and peonidin 3-O-glucoside, determines the color of the leaf sheath (PSH1) in rice, which was identified as Rb1 and Rb2 [47]. However, previous genetic studies on the Pl trait may have provided insufficient phenotypic data for analysis by considering green leaves despite the presence of negligible amounts of anthocyanins. This assumption can be attributed to the limitations in the technological advancement of HPLC machines and DNA sequencing in previous decades. Although they could not accurately measure the depth of the purple coloration in rice, a genetic analysis of the complex Pl trait showed remarkable agreement with epistasis. Additionally, we previously demonstrated that a complementary genetic relationship of epistasis contributes to the depth of purple coloration of the seed pericarp color in rice [8].
Plant materials with colored leaves and pericarps are of potential interest because of their important nutritional functions and could serve as a good source of phenotypic markers in rice breeding [48,49]. In this study, using two distinctly individually colored mutant rice lines, we confirmed the initial hypotheses as follows: the Pb gene for OsB1 is responsible for determining the seed pericarp color (Prp) trait, but not the leaf color (Pl) trait in the Plw and Pli alleles. The Plw allele was found to be more dominant than the Pli allele. Therefore, understanding these genetic factors is crucial for understanding the purple coloration of rice leaves and pericarps.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that the Pl gene enables the accumulation of anthocyanin pigments in rice leaves, where the Plw allele produces dark purple leaves, while the pli allele regulates light purple leaves in rice. Genetic identification revealed that the Plw allele is dominant over pli allele. The Pl gene is independent of the Pb gene, based on a complementary analysis of crosses between Plw and pli allele plants.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of this study. Material preparation and data collection were performed by S.G.K., J.C., J.W.L. and K.E.L. The analyses were performed by S.G.K., M.N.M. and K.E.L. Writing, review, and editing were performed by S.G.K., G.S.D. and M.N.M. All activities were supervised and complemented by S.G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest even though one of the authors is affiliated with a company.

References

  1. Nagao, S.; Takahashi, M. Genetical studies on rice plant. XIII: Further studies on the gene PI responsible for the development of anthocyanin coloration in leaf rice. Jpn. J. Breed. 1951, 1, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Takahashi, M.-E. Analysis on apiculus color genes essential to anthocyanin coloration rice. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 1957, 50, 266–362. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nagao, S.; Takahashi, M.-E.; Kinoshita, T. Heterotic Effect of Alleles at Pl-locus in Rice Plant: Genetical Studies on Rice Plant, XXX. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 1968, 56, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ghose, R.L.M.; Butany, W.T.; Seetharaman, R. Inheritance of anthocyanin pigmentation in leaf blade of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Genet. 1963, 58, 413–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kinoshita, T.; Maekawa, M. Inheritance of purple leaf color found in indica rice: Genetical studies on rice plant, XCIV. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 1986, 62, 453–466. [Google Scholar]
  6. Reddy, V.S.; Dash, S.; Reddy, A.R. Anthocyanin pathway in rice (Oryza sativa L): Identification of a mutant showing dominant inhibition of anthocyanins in leaf and accumulation of proanthocyanidins in pericarp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1995, 91, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Abdel-Aal, E.-S.M.; Young, J.C.; Rabalski, I. Anthocyanin composition in black, blue, pink, purple, and red cereal grains. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4696–4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rahman, M.M.; Lee, K.E.; Lee, E.S.; Matin, M.N.; Lee, D.S.; Yun, J.S.; Kim, J.B.; Kang, S.G. The genetic constitutions of complementary genes Pp and Pb determine the purple color variation in pericarps with cyanidin-3-O-glucoside depositions in black rice. J. Plant Biol. 2013, 56, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oikawa, T.; Maeda, H.; Oguchi, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Tanabe, N.; Ebana, K.; Yano, M.; Ebitani, T.; Izawa, T. The birth of a black rice gene and its local spread by introgression. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2401–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, X.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, C.; Wu, W.; Ren, N.; Jiang, C.; Yu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, X.; Yang, Q.; et al. The C–S–A gene system regulates hull pigmentation and reveals evolution of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1485–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sakamoto, W.; Ohmori, T.; Kageyama, K.; Miyazaki, C.; Saito, A.; Murata, M.; Noda, K.; Maekawa, M. The Purple leaf (Pl) locus of rice: The Pl w allele has a complex organization and includes two genes encoding basic helix-loop-helix proteins involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 982–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sakamoto, W.; Murata, M.; Maekawa, M. Complex organization of the rice purple leaf locus involved in tissue-specific accumulation of anthocyanin. In Advances in Rice Genetics: (In 2 Parts); World Scientific: Singapore, 2003; pp. 475–477. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nagao, S. Takahshi M. The third gene in apiculus coloration. Genetic studies on rice plant, XIX. JPN J. Bot. 1956, 15, 141–151. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nagao, S. Genetical studies on rice plant, XXVII. Trial construction of twelve linkage groups in Japanese rice. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 1963, 58, 72–130. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zheng, J.; Wu, H.; Zhu, H.; Huang, C.; Liu, C.; Chang, Y.; Kong, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, G.; Lin, Y.; et al. Determining factors, regulation system, and domestication of anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice leaves. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Furukawa, T.; Maekawa, M.; Oki, T.; Suda, I.; Iida, S.; Shimada, H.; Takamure, I.; Kadowaki, K. The Rc and Rd genes are involved in proanthocyanidin synthesis in rice pericarp. Plant J. 2007, 49, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, D.H.; Yang, J.; Ha, S.H.; Kim, J.K.; Lee, J.Y.; Lim, S.H. An OsKala3, R2R3 MYB TF, is a common key player for black rice pericarp as main partner of an OsKala4, bHLH TF. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 765049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nagao, S.; Takahashi, M.-E.; Kinoshita, T. Genetical Studies on Rice Plant, XXIV: Mode of Inheritance and Causal Genes for One Type of Anthocyanin Color Character in Foreign Rice Varieties. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 1962, 52, 20–50. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeng, T.L.; Lai, C.C.; Ho, P.T.; Shih, Y.J.; Sung, J.M. Agronomic, molecular and antioxidative characterization of red-and purple-pericarp rice (Oryza sativa L.) mutants in Taiwan. J. Cereal Sci. 2012, 56, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xia, D.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Fu, P.; Wu, B.; He, Y. How rice organs are colored: The genetic basis of anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice. Crop J. 2021, 9, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Causse, M.A.; Fulton, T.M.; Cho, Y.G.; Ahn, S.N.; Chunwongse, J.; Wu, K.; Xiao, J.; Yu, Z.; Ronald, P.C.; Harrington, S.E. Saturated molecular map of the rice genome based on an interspecific backcross population. Genetics 1994, 138, 1251–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yoshimura, A.; Ideta, O.; Iwata, N. Linkage map of phenotype and RFLP markers in rice. In Oryza: From Molecule to Plant; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997; pp. 49–60. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, C.; Shu, Q. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of purple pericarp gene Pb in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chin. Sci. Bull. 2007, 52, 3097–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maeda, H.; Yamaguchi, T.; Omoteno, M.; Takarada, T.; Fujita, K.; Murata, K.; Iyama, Y.; Kojima, Y.; Morikawa, M.; Ozaki, H. Genetic dissection of black grain rice by the development of a near isogenic line. Breed. Sci. 2014, 64, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hsieh, S.C.; Chang, T.M. Genic analysis in rice. IV. Genes for purple pericarp and other characters. Jpn. J. Breed. 1964, 14, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lap, B.; Rai, M.; Tyagi, W. Playing with colours: Genetics and regulatory mechanisms for anthocyanin pathway in cereals. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2021, 37, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Olivas-Aguirre, F.J.; Rodrigo-García, J.; Martínez-Ruiz, N.D.R.; Cárdenas-Robles, A.I.; Mendoza-Díaz, S.O.; Álvarez-Parrilla, E.; González-Aguilar, G.A.; De la Rosa, L.A.; Ramos-Jiménez, A.; Wall-Medrano, A. Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside: Physical-chemistry, foodomics and health effects. Molecules 2016, 21, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mbanjo, E.G.N.; Kretzschmar, T.; Jones, H.; Ereful, N.; Blanchard, C.; Boyd, L.A.; Sreenivasulu, N. The genetic basis and nutritional benefits of pigmented rice grain. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Thanyacharoen, T.; Chuysinuan, P.; Techasakul, S.; Noenplab, A.N.L.; Ummartyotin, S. The chemical composition and antioxidant and release properties of a black rice (Oryza sativa L.)-loaded chitosan and polyvinyl alcohol composite. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 248, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ito, V.C.; Lacerda, L.G. Black rice (Oryza sativa L.): A review of its historical aspects, chemical composition, nutritional and functional properties, and applications and processing technologies. Food Chem. 2019, 301, 125304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Frank, T.; Reichardt, B.; Shu, Q.; Engel, K.-H. Metabolite profiling of colored rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains. J. Cereal Sci. 2012, 55, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tanaka, J.; Nakamura, S.; Tsuruma, K.; Shimazawa, M.; Shimoda, H.; Hara, H. Purple rice (Oryza sativa L.) extract and its constituents inhibit VEGF-induced angiogenesis. Phytother. Res. 2012, 26, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yao, S.-L.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Lu, Y.-H. Black rice and anthocyanins induce inhibition of cholesterol absorption in vitro. Food Funct. 2013, 4, 1602–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, C.Y.; Ahn, Y.O.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, H.S.; Catanach, A.S.; Jacobs, J.M.E.; Conner, A.J.; Kwak, S.S. The sweet potato IbMYB1 gene as a potential visible marker for sweet potato intragenic vector system. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 139, 229–240. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kortstee, A.J.; Khan, S.A.; Helderman, C.; Trindade, L.M.; Wu, Y.; Visser, R.G.F.; Brendolise, C.; Allan, A.; Schouten, H.J.; Jacobsen, E. Anthocyanin production as a potential visual selection marker during plant transformation. Transgenic Res. 2011, 20, 1253–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jin, F.; Li, S.; Dang, L.; Chai, W.; Li, P.; Wang, N.N. PL1 fusion gene: A novel visual selectable marker gene that confers tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in transgenic tomato. Transgenic Res. 2012, 21, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin-Wang, K.; Bolitho, K.; Grafton, K.; Kortstee, A.; Karunairetnam, S.; McGhie, T.K.; Espley, R.V.; Hellens, R.P.; Allan, A.C. An R2R3 MYB transcription factor associated with regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Rosaceae. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Choudhury, B.I.; Khan, M.L.; Dayanandan, S. Patterns of nucleotide diversity and phenotypes of two domestication related genes (OsC1 and Wx) in indigenous rice varieties in Northeast India. BMC Genet. 2014, 15, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, J.; Dai, G.; Zhou, W.; Liang, H.; Huang, J.; Qing, D.; Chen, W.; Wu, H.; Yang, X.; Li, D. Mapping and identifying a candidate gene Plr4, a recessive gene regulating purple leaf in rice, by using bulked segregant and transcriptome analysis with next-generation sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Matin, M.N.; Kang, S.G. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of lax1-6, a mutant allele of LAX PANICLE1 in rice. J. Plant Biol. 2012, 55, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yoshimura, Y.; Zaima, N.; Moriyama, T.; Kawamura, Y. Different localization patterns of anthocyanin species in the pericarp of black rice revealed by imaging mass spectrometry. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, F.; Cai, Y.-Z.; Bao, J.; Corke, H. Effect of γ-irradiation on phenolic compounds in rice grain. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Barnes, K.W.; Eisele, T.; Giusti, M.M.; Haché, J.; Hofsommer, H.; Koswig, S.; Krueger, D.A.; Kupina, S.; Martin, S.K.; Martinsen, B.K.; et al. Determination of total monomeric anthocyanin pigment content of fruit juices, beverages, natural colorants, and wines by the pH differential method: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 2005, 88, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mol, J.; Grotewold, E.; Koes, R. How genes paint flowers and seeds. Trends Plant Sci. 1998, 3, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kinoshita, T.; Takamure, I. Gene mapping of the first and second linkage groups in rice. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 1990, 64, 208–217. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nagao, S. Genie analysis and linkage relationship of characters in rice. Adv. Genet. 1951, 4, 181–212. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hu, W.; Zhou, T.; Han, Z.; Tan, C.; Xing, Y. Dominant complementary interaction between OsC1 and two tightly linked genes, Rb1 and Rb2, controls the purple leaf sheath in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 2555–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, R.; Pan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Nath, U.K.; Gan, Y.; Shi, C.; Akhter, D. RNA-Seq-Based Profiling of pl Mutant Reveals Transcriptional Regulation of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Matin, M.N.; Kang, S.-G. Morphological characteristics of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) with red pigmentation. J. Life Sci. 2010, 20, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phenotypes, gene segregation patterns, and allelic analysis of purple leaf parents and their recombinant inbred lines in the F7 generation used in this study. The pigmentation in various tissues of the materials is indicated. The P1 parent (YUM051) exhibiting dark purple leaf (Plw), purple auricle (Pau), purple hull (Pr), and purple pericarp (Prp), was hybridized with the P2 parent (YUM144) exhibiting light purple leaf (Pli), with white pericarp and no color on the hull. F1 showed a phenotype similar to that of the P1 parent. Pl: Purple leaf, Prp: purple pericarp, Pau: purple auricle, Pr: purple hull, prp: white pericarp, pr: wild-type hull.
Figure 1. Phenotypes, gene segregation patterns, and allelic analysis of purple leaf parents and their recombinant inbred lines in the F7 generation used in this study. The pigmentation in various tissues of the materials is indicated. The P1 parent (YUM051) exhibiting dark purple leaf (Plw), purple auricle (Pau), purple hull (Pr), and purple pericarp (Prp), was hybridized with the P2 parent (YUM144) exhibiting light purple leaf (Pli), with white pericarp and no color on the hull. F1 showed a phenotype similar to that of the P1 parent. Pl: Purple leaf, Prp: purple pericarp, Pau: purple auricle, Pr: purple hull, prp: white pericarp, pr: wild-type hull.
Agronomy 13 02845 g001
Figure 2. Anthocyanin profiles of the leaf and pericarp extract using high-performance liquid chromatography. (A) Anthocyanin profiles of the control, parents, and progenies of recombinant inbred lines of purple leaf and green leaf extracts analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. The peak is C3G (kuromanin) in standard. The retention time is indicated on the horizontal line, and the amount of absorption unit (mAU) is indicated on the vertical line. High amounts of C3G were detected in both parents and progeny (F7-03) with purple leaf. However, a negligible amount of C3G was detected in the progeny (F7-08) having green leaf with purple leaf margin. C3G was not detected in the control plant with green leaf. (B) The anthocyanin content of the seed extract of the parents and their progenies. Plw parent and offspring (F7-08) with purple seed, as well as the control with black seed contained high amounts of C3G, whereas the Pli parent and offspring (F7-03) with white seed did not contain C3G in their extracts. Retention time is indicated on the horizontal line, and the amount of absorption unit (mAU) is indicated on the vertical line.
Figure 2. Anthocyanin profiles of the leaf and pericarp extract using high-performance liquid chromatography. (A) Anthocyanin profiles of the control, parents, and progenies of recombinant inbred lines of purple leaf and green leaf extracts analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. The peak is C3G (kuromanin) in standard. The retention time is indicated on the horizontal line, and the amount of absorption unit (mAU) is indicated on the vertical line. High amounts of C3G were detected in both parents and progeny (F7-03) with purple leaf. However, a negligible amount of C3G was detected in the progeny (F7-08) having green leaf with purple leaf margin. C3G was not detected in the control plant with green leaf. (B) The anthocyanin content of the seed extract of the parents and their progenies. Plw parent and offspring (F7-08) with purple seed, as well as the control with black seed contained high amounts of C3G, whereas the Pli parent and offspring (F7-03) with white seed did not contain C3G in their extracts. Retention time is indicated on the horizontal line, and the amount of absorption unit (mAU) is indicated on the vertical line.
Agronomy 13 02845 g002aAgronomy 13 02845 g002b
Figure 3. Genetics of phenotypic variation of pigment formation across different rice tissues and restriction enzyme analysis of the purple-pericarp-specific gene Pb (OsB1) [8]. (A) Segregation of color development at various tissues in the control, parents, and recombinant inbred lines. Color development at the leaf, stem, seed, leaf sheath, ligule, auricle, and collar is demonstrated. Each panel row corresponds to its ID. (B) Tissue-specific single nuclear polymorphism analysis of the Pb (OsB1 DNA) gene in genotypic and phenotypic constitutions in the corresponding plants in panel A. PCR-amplified genomic DNA of OsB1 were cut with restriction enzyme BamHI. The genotypes were as follows: PbPb for the homozygous dominant allele exhibited two bands. Pbpb for the heterozygous allele exhibited three bands. pbpb for the homozygous recessive allele exhibited one band. Phenotypes are indicated by the pericarp colors, with P for purple and W for white; leaf color is denoted as follows: P for purple and P/G for green leaf with purple margin and G for green leaf. First lane: 1 kb DNA marker.
Figure 3. Genetics of phenotypic variation of pigment formation across different rice tissues and restriction enzyme analysis of the purple-pericarp-specific gene Pb (OsB1) [8]. (A) Segregation of color development at various tissues in the control, parents, and recombinant inbred lines. Color development at the leaf, stem, seed, leaf sheath, ligule, auricle, and collar is demonstrated. Each panel row corresponds to its ID. (B) Tissue-specific single nuclear polymorphism analysis of the Pb (OsB1 DNA) gene in genotypic and phenotypic constitutions in the corresponding plants in panel A. PCR-amplified genomic DNA of OsB1 were cut with restriction enzyme BamHI. The genotypes were as follows: PbPb for the homozygous dominant allele exhibited two bands. Pbpb for the heterozygous allele exhibited three bands. pbpb for the homozygous recessive allele exhibited one band. Phenotypes are indicated by the pericarp colors, with P for purple and W for white; leaf color is denoted as follows: P for purple and P/G for green leaf with purple margin and G for green leaf. First lane: 1 kb DNA marker.
Agronomy 13 02845 g003
Table 1. Pattern of color development in the two purple leaf-type parents and their progenies.
Table 1. Pattern of color development in the two purple leaf-type parents and their progenies.
Genotype.
ID
TypeLeafStemSpikelet
BladeSheathAuricleCollarLiguleNodeInternodePericarpHull
YUM051Plw++++++-+-+++++
YUM144Pli+++-+-+--
F7-03Pli+++-+-+--
F7-07Rec+++-+-+++
F7-08Rec-------+++
F7-13Plw++++++-+-++++
YUC044pl+---------
++: dark purple, +: light purple, -: no color/green, F7 is progenies from 7th generation of the cross between Plw and Pli parents. Rec: recombinant type.
Table 2. Segregation of the purple leaf color in the F2 generation from the reciprocal crosses between the YUM051 and YUM144 parents.
Table 2. Segregation of the purple leaf color in the F2 generation from the reciprocal crosses between the YUM051 and YUM144 parents.
Cross IDCross (Pollen Donor X Pollen Recipient)F1 Phenotype Segregation in F2χ2p-Value
PurpleGreenish/
plm
Total
SGK07086YUM144 × YUM051Purple leafObs.11499213χ2 (3:1) = 52.40NS
Exp.159.7553.25
Obs.11499213χ2 (9:7) = 0.640.90–0.10
Exp.119.893.18
SGK07086: lab cross ID, Obs.: Observed number, Exp.: expected number, χ2: Chi-square, p: probability value, Greenish/plm: greenish leaves with purple leaf margins.
Table 3. Segregation of the purple pericarp color in the F2 generation from the crosses between the YUM051 and YUM144 parents.
Table 3. Segregation of the purple pericarp color in the F2 generation from the crosses between the YUM051 and YUM144 parents.
Cross IDCross
Combination
F1 Pericarp
Phenotype
Segregation in F2χ2p-Value
PurpleWhiteTotal(3:1)
SGK07085YUM051 × YUM144 Purple Obs.104431471.410.90–0.10
Exp.110.2536.75
SGK07086YUM144 × YUM051Purple Obs.149642132.890.90–0.10
Exp.159.7553.25
SGK07085 and SGK07086: lab cross ID, χ2: Chi-square, p: probability value.
Table 4. Co-segregation of the Pl and Prp traits at the F2 generations from the dihybrid cross.
Table 4. Co-segregation of the Pl and Prp traits at the F2 generations from the dihybrid cross.
IDCross CombinationF1 PhenotypeF2 Segregationχ2p-
Value
Pl, PrpPl, prppl, Prppl, prpTotal(9:3:3:1)
SGK07086YUM144 × YUM051Dark purple leaf, purple pericarpobs.
exp.
99155049213117.41NS
(+, +) × (Pl, Prp) 119.8339.9339.9313.31213
SGK07085: lab cross ID, +, +: considering wild type normal for both characters, Pl: dominant for dark purple leaf color, pl: other leaf colors, Prp: dominant for purple pericarp color, prp: white pericarp color. obs., observed number: exp, expected number: NS, non-significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, S.G.; Lee, K.E.; Cho, J.; Lee, J.W.; Do, G.S.; Matin, M.N. The Purple leaf (Pl) Alleles, Plw and Pli, Regulate Leaf Color Development Independently from the Pb Gene of Purple pericarp (Prp) in Rice. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2845. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112845

AMA Style

Kang SG, Lee KE, Cho J, Lee JW, Do GS, Matin MN. The Purple leaf (Pl) Alleles, Plw and Pli, Regulate Leaf Color Development Independently from the Pb Gene of Purple pericarp (Prp) in Rice. Agronomy. 2023; 13(11):2845. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112845

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Sang Gu, Kyung Eun Lee, Jegeun Cho, Jeong Wook Lee, Geum Sook Do, and Mohammad Nurul Matin. 2023. "The Purple leaf (Pl) Alleles, Plw and Pli, Regulate Leaf Color Development Independently from the Pb Gene of Purple pericarp (Prp) in Rice" Agronomy 13, no. 11: 2845. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112845

APA Style

Kang, S. G., Lee, K. E., Cho, J., Lee, J. W., Do, G. S., & Matin, M. N. (2023). The Purple leaf (Pl) Alleles, Plw and Pli, Regulate Leaf Color Development Independently from the Pb Gene of Purple pericarp (Prp) in Rice. Agronomy, 13(11), 2845. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112845

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop