Next Article in Journal
Tolerance of Brazilian Bean Cultivars to S-Metolachlor and Poaceae Weed Control in Two Agricultural Soils
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimized In Vitro Restriction Digestion Protocol for Preparing Maize and Barley ddRAD-Seq Libraries
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Nano-Bubble Irrigation on the Yield and Greenhouse Gas Warming Potential of Greenhouse Tomatoes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lentil Landrace Seed Origin and Genotype Affects Rhizosphere Microbiome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Agropyron mongolicum bHLH Gene AmbHLH148 Positively Involved in Transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana Adaptive Response to Drought Stress

1
Agricultural College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
2
Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China
3
College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(12), 2918; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13122918
Submission received: 13 September 2023 / Revised: 22 November 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published: 27 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Genetic Resources and Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
While bHLH transcription factors have been linked to the regulation of various abiotic stressors, research on drought-related bHLH proteins and their molecular processes in Agropyron mongolicum has remained limited. In this study, a bHLH gene from A. mongolicum, designated as AmbHLH148, was successfully cloned and isolated. AmbHLH148 was exclusively localized within the nucleus. Additionally, qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated a significant upregulation of AmbHLH148 in response to drought stress. When transferred into tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana), the heterologous expression of AmbHLH148 led to enhanced drought tolerance. Under drought stress conditions, AmbHLH148-OE transgenic tobacco plants exhibited increased activities of antioxidant defense enzymes, such as SOD (superoxide dismutase), POD (peroxidase), and CAT (catalase). These enzymes efficiently mitigated the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) compared to wild-type plants. Furthermore, AmbHLH148-OE transgenic tobacco showed elevated levels of PRO (proline) and reduced MDA (malondialdehyde) content, contributing to enhanced stability in the plant’s cell membrane system during drought stress. In summary, this study underscores that the overexpression of AmbHLH148 in transgenic tobacco acts as a positive regulator under drought stress by enhancing the plant’s antioxidant capacity. These findings shed light on the molecular mechanisms involved in bHLH transcription factors’ role in drought resistance, contributing to the discovery and utilization of drought-resistant genes in A. mongolicum for enhancing crop drought resistance.

1. Introduction

Drought stands as one of the main factors causing damage to plant growth and reducing crop yields [1,2,3]. To adapt to drought stress, plants have developed a series of defense response mechanisms to cope with drought stress, including changing root structure, reducing water loss, improved water use efficiency, accumulating compatible solutes, and improving antioxidant capacity [4]. Plant resistance is activated by modulating the activity of several transcriptional regulators, including DNA-binding transcription factors and their associated regulatory proteins. These factors reprogram transcription in plant cells to activate defense signals [5,6,7]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, drought-induced genes can be divided into two categories [8]. The first category consists of functional proteins, such as Aquaporin, detoxification enzymes, key osmolyte biosynthetic enzymes, and protease. The second category encompasses regulatory proteins, including transcription factors (TF), protein kinases, and protein phosphatases. The basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) protein family ranks among the largest transcription factor (TF) families and is prevalent in various plant species [9]. These bHLH transcription factors have been identified in plants like Arabidopsis thaliana, Capsicum annuum, Oryza sativa, Solanum tuberosum, Cucumis sativus, and Arachis hypogaea [10,11,12,13,14,15]. bHLH transcription factors play important roles in various processes of plant growth and development. For example, bHLH-TFs are involved in processes such as the growth and development process of plants [16,17,18,19,20,21,22], secondary metabolism [23,24,25,26,27], fruit color regulation [28], the response to adversity stress [29,30,31], the maintenance of iron steady state [32,33,34,35], and the regulation of hormone signaling [36,37].
As the discovery of bHLH transcription factors continues to expand, mounting evidence supports their significant role in plant responses to abiotic stresses. For example, the overexpression of EcbHLH57 from millet (Eleusine coracana) in tobacco significantly improved tolerance to both salinity and drought stress [38]. PebHLH35 from Populus euphratica, when expressed in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, bolstered drought resistance by regulating stomatal development and photosynthesis [39]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the overexpression of bHLH122 in transgenic plants induced heightened resistance to drought, NaCl, and osmotic stress [40]. In wheat, the TabHLH1 gene increased drought tolerance by regulating the ABA pathway [41]. Similarly, the overexpression of OsbHLH148 in rice led to increased drought tolerance through the regulation of the JA pathway [42]. Additionally, the transgenic expression of VvbHLH1 in grapes not only significantly increased flavonoid accumulation but also enhanced drought tolerance in Arabidopsis [43]. Collectively, these studies underscore the pivotal role of bHLH transcription factors in enhancing drought tolerance across diverse plant species, offering valuable insights into potential strategies for enhancing drought resistance in crops.
A. mongolicum Keng diploid (2n = 14) perennial grass is a common forage crop in the deserts and grasslands of China [44]. A. mongolicum is a valuable forage grass resource that holds significant ecological value for its attributes of drought resistance, cold resistance, salt tolerance, and disease and insect resistance. It is often cultivated to improve grassland, support soil and water conservation, and establish windbreak forests [45,46]. Some of its exceptional genetic resources for resistance have been harnessed for the genetic modification of grain crops such as wheat and barley [47]. Recent research on A. mongolicum has concentrated on genetic diversity, remote hybridization, and double breeding. For instance, the MwLEA1 gene, crucial for drought tolerance, was effectively extracted from A. mongolicum using the homologous sequence of wheat [48]. Genes associated with drought tolerance have also been discovered. Ao et al. employed RT-PCR and RACE techniques to extract the MwAP2/EREBP genes from A. mongolicum, suggesting their involvement in the physiological process linked to drought tolerance [49]. However, until now, there have been no studies exploring the drought-responsive bHLH family genes in A. mongolicum. In a previous investigation that leveraged transcriptome sequencing data obtained from A. mongolicum during different drought treatment periods (NCBI, PRJNA742257 [50]), 23 bHLH genes were identified through bioinformatics screening. Among them, A. mongolicum’s AmbHLH148 exhibited significant upregulation in response to drought stress [51]. To understand its potential role in drought tolerance, AmbHLH148 was heterologously inserted into tobacco plants. This research offers valuable insights into the function of AmbHLH148 in drought tolerance and offers genetic resources that could enhance drought resistance in other crops.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials and Growth Condition

A. mongolicum seeds with full seeds were carefully selected by peeling off the seed coat, followed by thorough seed sterilization. In detail, the seeds were put into a 2 mL centrifuge tube and washed with 1.5 mL of sterilized ddH2O for 30 s. This washing procedure was repeated 5 times, and the liquid was then discarded. Subsequently, the seeds underwent a 30 s wash with 1.5 mL of 75% ethanol, and the ethanol was then discarded. The seeds were washed again with 1.5 mL of sterilized ddH2O for 30 s, and this process was repeated 3 times before discarding the liquid. A solution comprising sterilized ddH2O and sodium hypochlorite at a 1:1.3 ratio was used for a 10 min wash, followed by rinsing with sterilized ddH2O for 30 s. This rinsing procedure was repeated 5 times, and the liquid was discarded. After these washing steps, the seeds were transferred to an ultra-clean bench, where they were left to dry on sterilized filter paper. The sterilized seeds were then sown in a germination box containing sterilized filter paper, which was moistened with water twice daily at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. The germination box was placed inside an artificial climatic chamber (RLD-1000D-4, Ningbo Ledian Instrument Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China), providing a controlled environment with 14 h of light and 10 h of darkness. The temperature was maintained at 25 ± 1 °C, with a relative humidity of 60% and a constant light intensity of 20,000 LX, until germination. Upon successful germination, the seedlings were transplanted into pots measuring 35 cm in length, 27 cm in width, and 10 cm in depth. These pots were filled with 3 L of 1/5 Hoagland’s nutrient solution for hydroponic growth.
N. benthamiana L. seeds were evenly sown in pots containing a substrate mixture (comprising nutrient soil, vermiculite, and perlite at a 3:1:1 ratio) within pots measuring 10 cm in diameter and 10 cm in depth. These pots were initially sealed with cling film to create a controlled environment. Following seedling emergence at 4–5 days, small air vents were introduced in the cling film. After approximately 10 days of seedling growth, individual transplanting was conducted. The transplanted seedlings were placed in an artificial climatic chamber (RLD-1000D-4, Ningbo Ledian Instrument Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China) with 14 h of light and 10 h of darkness. The chamber maintained a consistent temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, with a relative humidity of 60% and a light intensity of 20,000 LX. The cling film was removed when the seedlings reached a height of 3–5 cm. For subcellular localization experiments, N. benthamiana seedlings were grown for approximately 20 days, a stage deemed suitable for use as test material.
T1-generation transgenic tobacco seeds were subjected to sterilization procedures before being placed onto 1/2 MS solid medium containing 50 mg/L of kanamycin for positive screening. The transgenic tobacco plants that exhibited positive screening results were subsequently transplanted into pots, each measuring 10 cm in diameter and 10 cm in depth. In each pot, four transgenic plants were placed, and this arrangement was replicated across four pots for each transgenic strain. To serve as a comparative control, a selection of wild-type (WT) tobacco seedlings, closely matching the growth height of the transgenic plants, was chosen and placed in an artificial climate chamber under conditions identical to those described previously. Throughout the growth phase, the plants were watered every two days with 200 mL of water. Additionally, a water-soluble fertilizer, with a concentration of 1 g/L, was supplemented to the plants on a weekly basis.

2.2. Plant Drought Treatment

When the A. mongolicum seedlings reached the three-leaf, one-center stage of growth, a 25% PEG-6000 solution was added to the 1/5 Hoagland nutritional solution to induce PEG stress. Subsequent sampling involved the collection of 0.5 g of plant material from each individual. Leaves were collected at specific time intervals, including 0-day (CK), 1-day, 3-day, 5-day, 7-day, and fs24 h (fs24 h indicates the sample collected after 24 h of restoration in 1/5 Hoagland’s nutrient solution). These collected leaves were promptly placed in enzyme-free freezing tubes and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen at −80 °C until further analysis.
In the drought treatment experiment, both the WT and AmbHLH148-OE tobacco seedlings, which were cultured to approximately 5 weeks of age, were subjected to a drought treatment by withholding water for a duration of 7 days. Upon completing the 7-day drought treatment, tobacco seedlings were harvested and underwent a thorough wash with distilled water in preparation for subsequent analysis. The experimental procedure encompassed the following steps: (1) the selection of AmbHLH148-OE transgenic lines; (2) observation of the phenotype characteristics of the tobacco plants; (3) measurement of the root length and root surface area of tobacco subjected to drought stress; (4) assessment of proline (PRO) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content, the activities of antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT), as well as gene expression levels using the 3rd leaf (counted from bottom to top).

2.3. Homology Analysis, Expression Analysis and Cloning of the AmbHLH148 Gene

The AmbHLH148 gene sequence was searched for homology using the blastn tool available on the NCBI. Total RNA was extracted from A. mongolicum leaves using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Specific primers were constructed using Premier 5.0 software, based on the full-length Open Reading Frame (ORF) sequence of AmbHLH148 obtained from A. mongolicum transcriptome data (GenBank accession: OR786931). For the reverse transcription reaction, 1 μg of total RNA was utilized, and the cDNA was synthesized using the FastKing RT Kit (With gDNase) (TIANGEN KP116, Beijing, China).
A full-length sequence fragment encompassing the Open Reading Frame (ORF) of the A. mongolicum AmbHLH148 gene was successfully amplified from A. mongolicum. The PCR amplification system comprised of the following components: 1 μL of cDNA template, 1 μL of AmbHLH148-F, 1 μL of AmbHLH148-R, 10 μL of 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (Tiangen Co., Beijing, China), and 7 μL of ddH2O. The PCR amplification program involved an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles, each consisting of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 52 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. All PCR products were stored at 4 °C for further analysis. The PCR products were detected through 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Subsequently, they were purified and recovered following the operating instructions provided by the DNA Gel/PCR Purification Miniprep Kit (BIOMIGA, BIOMIGA Medical Technology, San Diego, CA, USA). The recovered products were ligated with a cloning vector (pEASY®-T1 Simple Cloning Vector, Beijing TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and sequenced (BGI, Shenzhen, China).
The A. mongolicum seedlings were cultivated for 30 d, and leaves were collected from untreated control (CK) and from seedlings subjected to simulated drought treatments for 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 7 d, and 24 h of rehydration. The expression of the AmBHLH148 gene under drought stress conditions was detected using qRT-PCR. The qRT-PCR was performed on a real-time quantitative thermal cycler (FTC-3000P, Funglyn Biotech Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada) using the MonAmpTM SYBR® Green qPCR Mix kit (Mona Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). The U6 gene was used as an internal reference gene. The qRT-PCR amplification system consisted of 10 μL of MonAmpTM SYBR® Green qPCR Mix, 0.4 μL of AmbHLH148-q-F, 0.4 μL of AmbHLH148-q-R, 1.2 μL of cDNA, and 8 μL of nuclease-free water. The reaction program consisted of an initial step at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 57 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. The relative expression levels of the genes were quantified using the 2−∆∆CT method [52].

2.4. Subcellular Localization of AmbHLH148

For subcellular localization studies, the pBI121 vector plasmid (Miao Ling Biotechnology Co., Wuhan, China) was digested using Xhol and SalI restriction endonucleases (Takara, Beijing, China). The pBI121-AmbHLH148-EGFP recombinant vector was constructed by ligating the AmbHLH148 product without a termination codon into the pBI121-EGFP vector fragment. The 25μL enzyme digestion system included 15 μL of pBI121, 1 μL each of Xhol and SalI, 1.3 μL of 10 × K buffer, and 6.7 μL of ddH2O. The digestion process was carried out overnight at 37 °C. The 10 μL ligation system included 1 μL of linearized pBI121 vector, 1 μL of AmbHLH148, 4 μL of Quick-clone Mix (Takara, China), and 4 μL of ddH2O. The ligation reaction took place in a water bath at 55 °C for 20 min and 30 °C for an additional 20 min that transformed the ligation products into E. coli receptor DH5α cells. Positive transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin for PCR analysis. The PCR amplification system and procedure were consistent with those described above, and the products were sent for sequencing (BGI, China). The correctly sequenced recombinant vector pBI121-AmbHLH148-EGFP and the empty vector pBI121-EGFP were transformed into Agrobacterium rhizogenes (GV3101, Shanghai Vidi, Shanghai, China). The positive bacterial solution was added to 20 mL of LB liquid medium, containing 100 μg/mL kanamycin, 100 μg/mL Rif, and 15 μmol/L As. The culture was incubated overnight at 28 °C with agitation at 200 rpm in a thermostatic oscillator (OD600:0.6). The culture was then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min to remove the supernatant. The bacterial pellet was resuspended in an equal volume of tobacco-specific infiltration solution (Beijing coolaber Technology Co., Beijing, China; Product No. SL0911) containing 100 μmol/L As, an appropriate amount of MgCl2, and MES. The resuspension was adjusted to OD600:0.6 and the suspension was left at room temperature for 2 h. The plasmid was introduced into tobacco leaves instantly by Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection. Tobacco infested with pBI121-AmbHLH148-EGFP was incubated in the dark for 1 day and then in a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle for the next 2 days. In contrast, tobacco infested with pBI121-EGFP broth required incubation in the dark for 1 day, followed by an additional day in a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle. Subsequently, the lower epidermis of the transfected tobacco was observed using a laser confocal microscope.

2.5. AmbHLH148 Vector Construction and Genetic Transformation

The pBI121 vector plasmid was digested with Xhol and SalI restriction endonucleases, and the AmbHLH148 product was subsequently ligated to the pBI121 vector fragment. The enzymatic digestion system was prepared in 25 μL volumes and consisted of the following components: 15 μL of pBI121, 1 μL of Xhol and SalI, 1.3 μL of 10 K buffer, and 6.7 μL of ddH2O. The digestion process was carried out at 37 °C overnight. For the ligation, a 10 μL system was prepared, comprising 1 μL of linearized pBI121 vector, 1 μL of AmbHLH148, 4 μL of Quick-clone Mix, and 4 μL of ddH2O. The ligation reaction was performed in a water bath at 55 °C for 20 min, followed by an additional incubation at 30 °C for another 20 min. The ligated products were subsequently transformed into E. coli receptor DH5α cells. Positive transformants were selected by plating on LB agar containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin, and PCR assays were conducted on these colonies. The PCR amplification system and procedure used were consistent with the methods described earlier. The sequences of the correctly assembled recombinant vector were verified through sequencing services provided by BGI, Shenzhen, China. The correctly sequenced recombinant vector was then transferred into GV3101 receptor cells (AC1001, Shanghai Weidi, Shanghai, China). After the identification of positively transformed Agrobacterium, tobacco plants were transformed using the leaf disk method. Leaves from positively transgenic tobacco seedlings were collected for DNA extraction using the Plant Genomic DNA Kit (DP305, Tiangen, Beijing, China). PCR assays were performed using the same PCR amplification system and procedure as described previously. The specific experimental steps for genetic transformation of tobacco were referred to Japelaghi et al. [53]. The primer sequences used in this experiment are shown in Table S1.

2.6. qRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from both drought-stressed and normally watered young tobacco leaves (WT and transgenic lines), and cDNA was synthesized following the previously outlined procedure. qRT-PCR was performed using the MonAmpTM SYBR® Green qPCR Mix kit (Mona Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) on a Real Time Quantitative Thermal Cycler (FTC-3000P, Funglyn Biotech Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada). Each treatment and control group were subjected to three biological replicates, with each biological replicate including three technical replicates. The L25 gene was used as the internal reference gene. The qRT-PCR amplification system consisted of 10 μL of MonAmp TM SYBR® Green qPCR Mix, 0.4 μL of forward primer, 0.4 μL of reverse primer, 1.2 μL of cDNA, and 8 μL of nuclease-free water. The amplification program involved an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles including denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 58 °C for 10 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. The relative expression levels of genes were quantified using the 2−∆CT method [54].

2.7. Determination of Physiological Indexes

Leaves weighing 0.2 g were collected from the corresponding parts of both WT and transgenic tobacco plants subjected to regular watering and those under 7 days of drought stress. These samples were rapidly frozen with liquid nitrogen and then placed in a −80 °C freezer. The assay encompassed three biological replicates, with each biological replicate consisting of three technical replicates. The activities of SOD (A001-3), POD (A084-3-1), and CAT (A007-1-1), were evaluated using specific test kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Research Institute, Nanjing, China). Additionally, the content of MDA (A003-1) and PRO (A107-1-1) was determined using test kits. To minimize errors introduced by variations in the external environment, the three biological replicates of each strain were combined at the time of testing. Detailed experimental procedures for each kit assay were followed in accordance with the provided instructions inside the kit.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2019 (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, DC, USA) and SPSS 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the significance of the samples, with a significance level of 0.05. In order to minimize errors and ensure the reliability of the results, the assay experiments were conducted with three biological replicates and three technical replicates. Standard deviation (STDEV) was used to quantify and calibrate for significant differences among the data sets.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of AmbHLH148 Gene Expression in A. mongolicum under 25% PEG-6000 Stress

The seedlings of A. mongolicum were subjected to a simulated drought stress treatment with 25% PEG-6000, and the expression of the AmbHLH148 gene was assessed at different time points along the stress gradients (Figure 1).
The expression of the AmbHLH148 gene exhibited significant variations between the A. mongolicum control (CK) and the various drought treatment periods. Importantly, it consistently surpassed the control levels during each treatment period. Notably, the gene expression displayed an overall increasing trend and reached its peak at the 5-day mark of drought stress, where it was approximately 2.9 times higher than the control sample. These results suggest that the AmbHLH148 gene in A. mongolicum is positively regulated in response to drought stress induced by the 25% PEG-6000 simulated treatment.

3.2. Homology Analysis of the AmbHLH148 Gene and Full-Field Amplification of ORF

The homology of the A. mongolicum DN27532_c1_g3 gene was examined using the NCBI Blastn tool to compare it with genes from other species. The results showed that the Aegilops tauschii AtbHLH148 gene (XP_020179773.1) and AmbHLH148 exhibited the highest similarity, and the similarity was 90.02%. As a consequence of this significant similarity, the gene from A. mongolicum was tentatively named AmbHLH148 (Figure S1).
The full-length ORF sequence of the AmbHLH148 gene was successfully amplified using the specific primers of AmbHLH148-F/R, and the resulting bands were detected through 1% agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure S2). The electrophoresis results revealed that the target band fell within the expected size range of 500–700 bp, which aligned with the projected 513 bp size. The band displayed a clear, well-defined appearance with no signs of smearing or trailing. This distinctive band, presumed to represent the AmbHLH148 gene, was subsequently purified and recovered. The isolated product was then ligated into the cloning vector, sequenced, and the sequencing results verified the successful acquisition of the A. mongolicum AmbHLH148 gene sequence.

3.3. Subcellular Localization of AmbHLH148 Gene

To verify the position of AmbHLH148 in the subcellular, a recombinant vector named pBI121-AmbHLH148-EGFP, which carried the green fluorescent protein (EGFP), was constructed. Subsequently, this recombinant vector was injected into tobacco epidermal cells. Observations made through confocal microscopy revealed that the GFP signals originating from the control pBI121-EGFP empty vector were distributed throughout all the cell compartments of the tobacco lower epidermal cells. In contrast, the pBI121-AmbHLH148-EGFP fusion protein was exclusively localized in the nucleus (Figure 2).

3.4. Production and Selection of AmbHLH148 Transgenic Plants

Agrobacterium tumefaciens (GV3101) containing the pBI121-AmbHLH148 recombinant plasmid was used to transform the sterile young tobacco leaves via the leaf disc method. Transgenic tobacco lines were subsequently obtained through shoot-induced differentiation and rooting culture (Figure S3). Positive transgenic plants were identified via PCR amplification, resulting in the acquisition of 11 AmbHLH148 overexpressing tobacco transgenic lines, denoted as OE lines. To investigate the potential role of the AmbHLH148 gene in enhancing drought tolerance in tobacco, the expression of AmbHLH148 in all 11 overexpressing tobacco transgenic lines was analyzed. Among these lines, OE6 and OE18 (as shown in Figure S4) were selected for further investigation due to their highest transcript levels.

3.5. Observation of Tobacco Phenotypes under Drought Stress

The natural drought treatment was initiated by discontinuing watering for both AmbHLH148-OE and WT tobacco, and the data were gathered during two time points, namely, at the initiation (0 day) and after 7 days of the drought stress period. We closely examined morphological variations between WT and AmbHLH148-OE tobacco under normal and drought stress conditions (Figure 3). Under normal growth conditions, there were no significant aboveground phenotypic differences between AmbHLH148-OE and WT plants. However, notable disparities emerged below the surface, with AmbHLH148-OE plants displaying an increased abundance of lateral roots compared to WT plants. Under drought stress circumstances, WT plants exhibited a high incidence of wilting leaves, including yellowed, wilted leaves near the base of the plant. In contrast, transgenic tobacco plants showed a remarkable reduction in wilted leaves, and they exhibited longer root systems, and greater root surface area compared to the WT plants. This phenomenon indicates that the overexpression of AmbHLH148 under drought stress conditions may positively regulate the drought tolerance of tobacco by increasing root growth, a speculation that requires further validation.

3.6. AmbHLH148 Affects the Expression of Stress Response Genes

Plants adapt to stress conditions by mobilizing the expression of a large number of stress-related genes. To investigate the expression of AmbHLH148 and stress-responsive genes to drought stress, a comprehensive analysis of their transcript accumulation levels was conducted. The transcript accumulation of AmbHLH148 and some classical stress-responsive genes, such as NtNAC2 [55] and NtHSP70-8 [56], was detected via qRT-PCR (Figure 4). Both AmbHLH148-OE6 and AmbHLH148-OE18 tobacco plants exhibited higher transcript levels of accumulation under drought conditions when compared to well-watered conditions (Figure 4A). Moreover, we found that the expression levels of NtNAC2 and NtHSP70-8 genes were significantly higher in the overexpressed tobacco (OE6 and OE18) compared to the WT under drought conditions (Figure 4B,C). These results collectively indicate that AmbHLH148 plays a pivotal role in regulating plant responses to drought stress, and the overexpression of AmbHLH148-OE enhanced the expression of stress-responsive genes (NtNAC2, NtHSP70-8). This coordinated upregulation contributes to the improved drought tolerance observed in tobacco plants.

3.7. Overexpression of AmbHLH148 Enhanced Antioxidant Capacity of Tobacco

In order to examine the involvement of the AmbHLH148 gene in the antioxidant defense mechanism of transgenic tobacco, we assessed the levels of MDA and PRO, along with the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, and CAT, in both AmbHLH148-OE and WT tobacco plants under conditions of drought stress (Figure 5). At the 7-day mark of drought stress, the SOD activities of AmbHLH148-OE tobacco (OE6 and OE18) were 1.09 and 1.06 times higher than those of WT tobacco, respectively. Similarly, the activities of POD in transgenic tobacco were 1.10 and 1.13 times those of WT, respectively. These results indicate that the membrane defense enzymes SOD and POD were more active in the transgenic plants, indicating that AmbHLH148-OE tobacco plays a more effective role in stress resistance under drought stress. The activities of CAT in transgenic tobacco were 1.18 and 1.17 times those of WT, respectively. Furthermore, the PRO content of transgenic tobacco was 1.50 and 1.35 times higher than that of WT, respectively. Proline, an important osmoregulator, plays a crucial role in maintaining osmoregulation and scavenging ROS to improve the stability of the cell membrane system when plants are exposed to adverse stress conditions [57]. In addition, the MDA content of WT tobacco was higher than that of transgenic tobacco at 7 days of drought stress, by 0.9 and 0.62 times, respectively. This suggests that the cell membrane of transgenic plants was less damaged under drought stress, while the membrane system of WT plants suffered severe damage. In conclusion, the results above strongly suggest that AmbHLH148-OE enhances the antioxidant capacity of tobacco, resulting in greater drought tolerance.

4. Discussion

The bHLH protein family, as the second largest transcription factor (TF) family, plays a crucial role in plant responses to drought stress. Cui et al. used Camellia sinensis transcriptome data and identified 39 differential CsbHLH genes showing various expression under drought stress conditions [58]. Further validation through qRT-PCR of nine selected CsbHLH genes, which corroborated the transcriptome data, suggested their responsiveness to drought stress. Myrothamnus flabellifolia’s MfbHLH38 overexpression, on the other hand, was shown to increase drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Additionally, it increased Arabidopsis thaliana’s sensitivity to mannitol and abscisic acid and increased ABA levels during drought stress [59]. Similarly, in Malus domestica, MdbHLH130 acts as a positive regulator of the water stress response by regulating tobacco stomatal closure and the scavenging of ROS [60]. Moreover, AtbHLH68 is involved in the regulation of lateral root extension and the response to drought stress by modulating ABA signaling and/or metabolism in a direct or indirect manner [61]. However, there is a dearth of information on the abiotic stress of the bHLH gene in A. mongolicum. This study bridges this knowledge gap by elucidating the isolation of the AmbHLH148 gene from A. mongolicum. Sequence analysis using the NCBI’s blastn tool revealed that AmbHLH148 exhibits a high degree of similarity with AtbHLH148 (Aegilops tauschii), TabHLH148-like (Triticum aestivum), and TdbHLH148-like (Triticum dicoccoides). Nevertheless, existing literature fails to provide insights into the functional characterization of these genes. Building upon previous research where we examined 23 A. mongolicum bHLH genes and 9 other bHLH genes known for their drought-resistant capabilities, we constructed an evolutionary tree and conducted sequence comparisons. These analyses showcased that AmbHLH148 from A. mongolicum forms a distinct branch with OsbHLH148 (O. sativa), demonstrating a kinship of 41%. Intriguingly, gene expression analysis revealed an upregulation trend of A. mongolicum bHLH genes with the duration of drought treatment [51]. In light of these findings, we hypothesized that AmbHLH148 might be related to drought stress. We then heterologously transformed this gene into tobacco and thoroughly examined its effects on overexpressed tobacco plants following drought stress conditions.
Numerous studies have consistently demonstrated that plant bHLH family proteins are predominantly localized within the nucleus. These nuclear regulatory proteins typically exert their influence by either activating or repressing the transcription of target genes, thereby regulating gene expression. Subcellular localization analyses of several bHLH proteins associated with drought resistance have consistently revealed their concentration within the nucleus. For instance, AbbHLH122 [62] and TabHLH49 [63] are noteworthy instances of such nuclear localization. In line with these findings, our study also identified the nuclear localization of the AmbHLH148 protein.
Plant root growth is closely related to drought tolerance. Studies have shown that plants with longer root systems and larger root surface areas exhibit enhanced tolerance to drought stress [64]. In this study, we selected two AmbHLH148 transgenic lines, OE6 and OE18, for drought stress experiments using transgenic tobacco. Our observations following the drought treatment revealed that the transgenic tobacco plants showed greater vitality. AmbHLH148-OE plants displayed longer roots and a larger root surface area when compared to their wild-type counterparts. This extended root system provides AmbHLH148-OE plants with a greater capacity to absorb water and nutrients from the soil, which may positively contribute to drought tolerance.
Furthermore, our results also show that under drought stress, AmbHLH148-OE plants had higher SOD, POD, and CAT activities than WT plants. In addition, AmbHLH148-OE plants displayed elevated levels of PRO and reduced levels of MDA when contrasted with WT plants, aligning with the results reported by Song et al. [56]. This suggests that overexpression of the AmbHLH148 gene enhances the antioxidant capacity of tobacco plants, thereby enhancing their drought tolerance. These observations collectively suggest that AmbHLH148 may be actively involved in osmotic regulation within tobacco plants during drought stress, thus contributing to an overall enhancement in the plant’s ability to endure such adverse conditions.
However, the precise mechanisms by which AmbHLH148 regulates drought stress warrant further investigation. For example, the OsbHLH148 gene has been shown to enhance drought tolerance in rice by regulating the jasmonic acid metabolic pathway and interacting with the OsJAZ protein [42]. In addition, OsbHLH148 positively regulates the expression of the Osr40C1 gene, conferring drought tolerance in rice [65]. In future studies, we aim to further identify the types of signaling and metabolic pathways engaged by A. mongolicum through techniques such as the ChIP-seq assay, gel electrophoresis migration assay (EMSA), yeast two-hybrid technique, and other experimental methods. We will also endeavor to screen potential downstream target genes of A. mongolicum, thereby gaining a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory network established by A. mongolicum with its downstream target genes and elucidating the regulatory mechanism of AmbHLH148 in response to drought.

5. Conclusions

AmbHLH148 is evidently a nuclear-localized protein that may be a key regulator during drought stress in plants. These findings contribute to the identification of crucial candidate genes for genetic engineering aimed at enhancing crop drought tolerance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy13122918/s1, Table S1. Primers sequence and usage. Figure S1. Homology analysis of the AmbHLH148. Figure S2. The electrophoresis detection of AmbHLH148 PCR amplification. Figure S3. The flow of genetic transformation of AmbHLH148 transgenic tobacco. Figure S4. Relative expression levels of the AmbHLH148 gene in transgenic plants.

Author Contributions

The study was conceived and designed by Y.M.; X.Z. and B.Q. conducted the experiments and analyzed the data; B.F. and Y.Z. (Yongqing Zhai) analyzed the data; Y.Z. (Yan Zhao) provided the seeds; X.Z. and Y.M. wrote the manuscript. B.Q., F.S., L.N., Y.F. and Z.Y. performed the editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31860670 and No. 32360338).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, B.F.; Ma, Z.H.; Yan, N.N. Agricultural Drought Mitigating Indices Derived from the Changes in Drought Characteristics. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 244, 111813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, X.Q.; Wei, X.; Wang, M.P.; Zhu, X.F.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, F.J.; Xia, Z.L. Overexpression of NtabDOG1L promotes plant growth and enhances drought tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Sci. 2019, 287, 110186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rosenzweig, C.; Elliott, J.; Deryng, D.; Ruane, A.C.; Müller, C.; Arneth, A.; Boote, K.J.; Folberth, C.; Glotter, M.; Khabarov, N.; et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 111, 3268–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Qi, J.S.; Song, C.P.; Wang, B.S.; Zhou, J.M.; Kangasjarvi, J.; Zhu, J.K.; Gong, Z.Z. Reactive oxygen species signaling and stomatal movement in plant responses to drought stress and pathogen attack. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 805–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Buscaill, P.; Rivas, S. Transcriptional control of plant defence responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 20, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Gene Networks Involved in Abiotic Stress Responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.Z.; Zhu, C.J.K. From laboratory to field. Using Information from Arabidopsis to Engineer Salt, Cold, and Drought Tolerance in Crops. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Joshi, R.; Wani, S.H.; Singh, B.; Bohra, A.; Dar, Z.A.; Lone, A.A.; Pareek, A.; Pareek, S.L.S. Transcription Factors and Plants Response to Drought Stress: Current Understanding and Future Directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guo, J.R.; Sun, B.X.; He, H.R.; Zhang, Y.F.; Tian, H.Y.; Wang, B.S. Current Understanding of bHLH Transcription Factors in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bailey, P.C.; Martin, C.; Toledo-Ortiz, G.; Quail, P.H. Update on the Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor Gene Family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2497–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Z.S.; Chen, J.; Liang, C.L.; Liu, F. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the bHLH Transcription Factor Family in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 570156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, X.; Duan, X.; Jiang, H.; Sun, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, J.; Liang, W.; Yin, J. Genome-Wide Analysis of Basic/Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor Family in Rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 1167–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, R.Q.; Zhao, P.; Kong, N.N.; Lu, R.Z.; Yue, P.; Huang, C.X. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the Potato bHLH Transcription Factor Family. Genes 2018, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, J.L.; Wang, T.; Han, J.; Ren, Z.H. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of Cucumber bHLH Family Genes and the Functional Characterization of CsbHLH041 in NaCl and ABA Tolerance in Arabidopsis and Cucumber. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, C.; Sun, J.L.; Wang, C.Q.; Dong, Y.M.; Xiao, S.H.; Wang, X.J.; Jiao, Z.G.; Chen, Z.H. Genome-Wide Analysis of Basic/Helix-Loop-Helix Gene Family in Peanut and Assessment of Its Roles in Pod Development. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kavas, M.; Baloglu, M.C.; Atabay, E.S.; Ziplar, U.T.; Dasgan, H.Y.; Ünver, T. Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Analysis of Common Bean bHLH Transcription Factors in Response to Excess Salt Concentration. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2016, 291, 129–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Groszmann, M.; Bylstra, Y.; Lampugnani, E.R.; Smyth, D.R. Regulation of tissue-specific expression of SPATULA, a bHLH gene involved in carpel development, seedling germination, and lateral organ growth in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 1495–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mertens, J.; Pollier, J.; Vanden Bossche, R.; Lopez-Vidriero, I.; Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; Goossens, A. The bHLH transcription factors TSAR1 and TSAR2 regulate triterpene saponin biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 194–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, J.Q.; Gu, K.D.; Sun, C.H.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Wang, J.H.; Ma, F.F.; You, C.X.; Hu, D.G.; Hao, Y.J. The apple bHLH transcription factor MdbHLH3 functions in determining the fruit carbohydrates and malate. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 19, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pires, N.; Dolan, L. Origin and diversification of basic-helix-loop-helix proteins in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 862–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qi, T.C.; Song, S.S.; Ren, Q.C.; Wu, D.W.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y.; Fan, M.; Peng, W.; Ren, C.M.; Xie, D.X. The Jasmonate-ZIM-Domain Proteins Interact with the WD-Repeat/bHLH/MYB Complexes to Regulate Jasmonate-Mediated Anthocyanin Accumulation and Trichome Initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1795–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, H.; Yang, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Wang, S.; Luo, Y.; Huang, Y.; Xin, Y.; He, N. Abnormal expression of bHLH3 disrupts a flavonoid homeostasis network, causing differences in pigment composition among mulberry fruits. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shen, H.; Moon, J.; Huq, E. PIF1 is regulated by light-mediated degradation through the ubiquitin-26S proteasome pathway to optimize photomorphogenesis of seedlings in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005, 44, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Paik, I.; Chen, F.; Ngoc Pham, V.; Zhu, L.; Kim, J.I.; Huq, E. A phyB-PIF1-SPA1 kinase regulatory complex promotes photomor-phogenesis in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, H.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Imaizumi, T.; Somers, D.E.; Tobin, E.M.; Lin, C. Arabidopsis CRY2 and ZTL mediate blue-light regulation of the transcription factor CIB1 by distinct mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17582–17587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, H.; Yu, X.; Li, K.; Klejnot, J.; Yang, H.; Lisiero, D.; Lin, C. Photoexcited CRY2 interacts with CIB1 to regulate transcription and floral initiation in Arabidopsis. Science 2008, 322, 1535–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, H.; Wang, X.; Zhu, D.; Cui, S.; Li, X.; Cao, Y.; Ma, L.G. A single amino acid substitution in IIIf subfamily of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor AtMYC1 leads to trichome and root hair patterning defects by abolishing its interaction with partner proteins in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 14109–14121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qi, Y.; Zhou, L.; Han, L.L.; Zou, H.Z.; Miao, K.; Wang, Y. PsbHLH1, a Novel Transcription Factor Involved in Regulating Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Tree Peony (Paeonia Suffruticosa). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 154, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, Y.; Yang, B.; Deyholos, M.K. Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis bHLH92 transcription factor in abiotic stress. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2009, 282, 503–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Waseem, M.; Rong, X.; Li, Z. Dissecting the role of a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, SlbHLH22, under salt and drought stresses in transgenic Solanum lycopersicum L. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, W.; Zhang, N.; Jiao, Y.; Li, R.; Xiao, D.; Wang, Z. The grapevine basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor positively modulates CBF-pathway and confers tolerance to cold-stress in Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 41, 5329–5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yao, P.; Sun, Z.; Li, C.; Zhao, X.; Li, M.; Deng, R.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Chen, H.; Wu, Q. Overexpression of Fagopyrum tataricum FtbHLH2 enhances tolerance to cold stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, X.Y.; Qiu, J.Y.; Hui, Q.L.; Xu, Y.Y.; He, Y.Z.; Peng, L.Z.; Fu, X.Z. Systematic analysis of the basic/helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor family in pummelo (Citrus grandis) and identification of the key members involved in the response to iron deficiency. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cai, Y.; Li, Y.; Liang, G. FIT and bHLH Ib transcription factors modulate iron and copper crosstalk in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 1679–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, F.; Itai, R.N.; Nozoye, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Nakanishi, H. The bHLH protein OsIRO3 is critical for plant survival and iron (Fe) homeostasis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Fe-deficient conditions. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 66, 579–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nakata, M.; Mitsuda, N.; Herde, M.; Koo, A.J.K.; Moreno, J.E.; Suzuki, K.; Howe, G.A.; Ohme-Takagi, M. A bHLH-type transcription factor, ABAINDUCIBLE BHLH-TYPE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR/JA-ASSOCIATED MYC2-LIKE1, acts as a repressor to negatively regulate jasmonate signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 1641–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Abe, H.; Urao, T.; Ito, T.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB)function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Babitha, K.C.; Vemanna, R.S.; Nataraja, K.N.; Udayakumar, M. Overexpression of EcbHLH57 Transcription Factor from Eleusine coracana L. in Tobacco Confers Tolerance to Salt, Oxidative and Drought Stress. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0137098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dong, Y.; Wang, C.; Han, X.; Tang, S.; Liu, S.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. A novel bHLH Transcription Factor PebHLH35 from Populus Euphratica Confers Drought Tolerance through Regulating Stomatal Development, Photosynthesis and Growth in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 450, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, W.W.; Tai, H.H.; Li, S.S.; Gao, W.; Zhao, M.; Xie, C.X.; Li, W.X. bHLH122 is important for drought and osmotic stress resistance in Arabidopsis and in the repression of ABA catabolism. New Phytol. 2013, 201, 1192–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, T.R.; Yao, S.F.; Hao, L.; Zhao, W.J.; Lu, W.J.; Xiao, K. Wheat bHLH-type Transcription Factor Gene TabHLH1 is Crucial in Mediating Osmotic Stresses Tolerance through Modulating Largely the ABA-Associated Pathway. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 2309–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Seo, J.S.; Joo, J.; Kim, M.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Nahm, B.H.; Song, S.I.; Cheong, J.J.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, J.K.; Choi, Y.D. OsbHLH148, a basic helix-loop-helix protein, interacts with OsJAZ proteins in a jasmonate signaling pathway leading to drought tolerance in rice. Plant J. 2011, 65, 907–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, F.B.; Zhu, H.; Chen, D.H.; Li, Z.J.; Peng, R.H.; Yao, Q.H. A grape bHLH transcription factor gene, VvbHLH1, increases the accumulation of flavonoids and enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2016, 125, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ao, T.G.B.Y.; Lang, M.L.; Li, Y.Q.; Wang, L.C.; Yang, X.J. Cloning and Expression Analysis of Cysteine Protease Gene (MwCP) in Agropyron mongolicum Keng. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 15, gmr.15017424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, X.T.; Fan, B.B.; Yu, Z.; Nie, L.Z.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, X.X.; Sun, F.C.; Lei, X.F.; Ma, Y.H. Functional Analysis of Three miRNAs in Agropyron mongolicum Keng under Drought Stress. Agronomy 2019, 9, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ma, Y.H.; Yu, X.X.; Zhuo, Y.; Sun, F.C.; Li, X.D.; Li, X.L. RNA-Seq of Agropyron mongolicum Keng in Response to Drought Stress. Grassl. Sci. 2018, 64, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Du, J.C.; Li, X.Q.; Li, T.T.; Yu, D.Y.; Han, B. Genome-Wide Transcriptome Profiling Provides Overwintering Mechanism of Agropyron mongolicum. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhao, Y.; Yun, J.F.; Shi, F.M.; Wang, J.J.; Yang, Q.C.; Chao, Y.H. Molecular cloning and characterization of agroup 3LEA gene from Agropyron mongolicum Keng. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 6040–6048. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ao, T.G.B.Y.; Gao, L.J.; Wang, L.C.; Li, Y.Q.; Zhao, Y.; Lang, M.L.; Yang, X.J. Cloning and Expression Analysis of AP2/EREBP Transcription Factor Gene (MwAP2/EREBP) in Agropyron mongolicum Keng. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2017, 9, 2031–2038. Available online: https://www.nstl.gov.cn/paper_detail.html?id=912f15371934bf7ddd34ba65c16344a3 (accessed on 23 November 2023). [CrossRef]
  50. Fan, B.B.; Sun, F.C.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, X.F.; Yu, X.X.; Wu, J.; Yan, X.X.; Zhao, Y.; Nie, L.Z.; Fang, Y.Y.; et al. Integrated analysis of small RNAs, transcriptome and degradome sequencing reveal the drought stress network in Agropyron mongolicum Keng. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 976684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, X.F.; Ma, Y.H.; Fan, B.B.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, X.J.; Lei, X.F. RNA-Seq-based analysis of bHLH transcription factor families in A. mongolicum. Mol. Plant Breed. 2023, 21, 1154–1163. [Google Scholar]
  52. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Japelaghi, R.H.; Haddad, R.; Valizadeh, M.; Uliaie, E.D.; Javaran, M.J. High-Efficiency Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). J. Plant Mol. Breed. 2018, 6, 38–50. [Google Scholar]
  54. Dheda, K.; Huggett, J.F.; Bustin, S.A.; Johnson, M.A.; Rook, G.; Zumla, A. Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. Biotechniques 2004, 37, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xu, X.Y.; Yao, X.Z.; Lu, L.T. Overexpression of the Transcription Factor NtNAC2 Confers Drought Tolerance in Tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2018, 36, 941026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Song, Z.P.; Li, Y.L.; Jia, Y.H.; Lian, W.L. An endoplasmic reticulum-localized NtHSP70-8 confers drought tolerance in tobacco by regulating water loss and antioxidant capacity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 188, 104519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Molinari, H.B.C.; Marur, C.J.; Daros, E.; Campos, M.K.F.; Carvalho, J.F.R.P.; Filho, J.C.B.; Pereira, L.F.P.; Vieira, L.G.E. Evaluation of the stress-inducible production of proline in transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum spp.): Osmotic adjustment, chlorophyll fluorescence and oxidative stress. Physiol. Plant. 2007, 130, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cui, X.; Wang, Y.X.; Liu, Z.W.; Wang, W.L.; Li, H.; Zhuang, J. Transcriptome-wide identification and expression profile analysis of the bHLH family genes in Camellia sinensis. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2018, 18, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Qiu, J.R.; Huang, Z.; Xiang, X.Y.; Xu, W.X.; Wang, J.T.; Chen, J.; Song, L.; Xiao, Y.; Li, X.; Ma, J.; et al. MfbHLH38, a Myrothamnus flabellifolia bHLH transcription factor, confers tolerance to drought and salinity stresses in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 542–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, Q.; Fan, Z.; Qiu, L.; Qiu, L.N.; Che, Q.Q.; Wang, T.; Li, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.Z. MdbHLH130, an Apple bHLH Transcription Factor, Confers Water Stress Resistance by Regulating Stomatal Closure and ROS Homeostasis in Transgenic Tobacco. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 543696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hir, R.L.; Castelain, M.; Chakraborti, D.; Moritz, T.; Dinant, S.; Bellini, C. AtbHLH68 transcription factor contributes to the regulation of ABA homeostasis and drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 160, 312–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, C.J.; Yan, C.X.; Sun, Q.X.; Wang, J.; Yuan, C.L.; Mou, Y.F.; Shan, S.H. The bHLH transcription factor AhbHLH112 improves the drought tolerance of peanut. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, H.; Yang, Y.; Liu, D.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L. Transcription factor TabHLH49 positively regulates dehydrin WZY2 gene expression and enhances drought stress tolerance in wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Manavalan, L.P.; Guttikonda, S.K.; Tran, L.P.; Nguyen, H. Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 1260–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sahid, S.; Roy, C.; Shee, D.; Shee, R.; Datta, R.; Paul, S. ZFP37, C3H, NAC94, and bHLH148 transcription factors regulate cultivar-specific drought response by modulating r40C1 gene expression in rice. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 214, 105480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Relative expression of AmbHLH148 gene. Note: lower case letters in the above graph represent significant differences at the 0.05 level. CK represents the pre-treatment sample, while 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, and 7 d correspond to samples taken at different time points following exposure to the 25% PEG-6000 stress treatment. Additionally, fs24 h indicates the sample collected after 24 h of restoration in 1/5 Hoagland’s nutrient solution. The values presented in the above column were calculated using the 2−∆∆CT method. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Figure 1. Relative expression of AmbHLH148 gene. Note: lower case letters in the above graph represent significant differences at the 0.05 level. CK represents the pre-treatment sample, while 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, and 7 d correspond to samples taken at different time points following exposure to the 25% PEG-6000 stress treatment. Additionally, fs24 h indicates the sample collected after 24 h of restoration in 1/5 Hoagland’s nutrient solution. The values presented in the above column were calculated using the 2−∆∆CT method. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Agronomy 13 02918 g001
Figure 2. Subcellular localization of AmbHLH148 in tobacco epidermal cells. The fusion protein (pBI121-AmbHLH148-EGFP) and the EGFP-positive control (pBI121-EGFP) were independently transiently expressed in tobacco cells. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 2. Subcellular localization of AmbHLH148 in tobacco epidermal cells. The fusion protein (pBI121-AmbHLH148-EGFP) and the EGFP-positive control (pBI121-EGFP) were independently transiently expressed in tobacco cells. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Agronomy 13 02918 g002
Figure 3. Characterization of AmbHLH148 transgenic tobacco under drought stress conditions. (A): Phenotypes of WT and transgenic tobacco under normal watering conditions. (B): Phenotypes of WT and transgenic tobacco under drought for 7 days. (C): Root phenotypes of WT and transgenic tobacco under normal watering conditions. (D): Root phenotypes of WT and transgenic tobacco under drought for 7 days. (E): Root length of WT and transgenic tobacco under normal watering and drought for 7 days. (F): Root surface area of WT and transgenic tobacco under normal watering and drought for 7 days. (G): Germination of WT and transgenic tobacco under 5% PEG stress for 7 days. (H): WT and transgenic tobacco were assayed for germination at 7 days of 5% PEG stress. Note: lower case letters in the above graph represent significant differences at the 0.05 level. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. (G): Three biological replicates were used in the experiment, and the number of seeds sown on each medium was 40.
Figure 3. Characterization of AmbHLH148 transgenic tobacco under drought stress conditions. (A): Phenotypes of WT and transgenic tobacco under normal watering conditions. (B): Phenotypes of WT and transgenic tobacco under drought for 7 days. (C): Root phenotypes of WT and transgenic tobacco under normal watering conditions. (D): Root phenotypes of WT and transgenic tobacco under drought for 7 days. (E): Root length of WT and transgenic tobacco under normal watering and drought for 7 days. (F): Root surface area of WT and transgenic tobacco under normal watering and drought for 7 days. (G): Germination of WT and transgenic tobacco under 5% PEG stress for 7 days. (H): WT and transgenic tobacco were assayed for germination at 7 days of 5% PEG stress. Note: lower case letters in the above graph represent significant differences at the 0.05 level. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. (G): Three biological replicates were used in the experiment, and the number of seeds sown on each medium was 40.
Agronomy 13 02918 g003
Figure 4. The expression levels of the AmbHLH148 gene and stress-responsive genes in both control and drought conditions (7 days) in AmbHLH148-OE plants. (A): Expression levels of the AmbHLH148 gene in transgenic plants in control and drought for 7 days. (B,C): Effects of normal watering and drought for 7 days on the expression levels of NtNAC2 and NtHSP70-8 genes in wild-type and transgenic plants. In tobacco, the L25 gene was used as an internal reference gene. Note: lower case letters in the above graph represent significant differences at the 0.05 level. The values presented in the above column were calculated using the 2−∆CT method. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Figure 4. The expression levels of the AmbHLH148 gene and stress-responsive genes in both control and drought conditions (7 days) in AmbHLH148-OE plants. (A): Expression levels of the AmbHLH148 gene in transgenic plants in control and drought for 7 days. (B,C): Effects of normal watering and drought for 7 days on the expression levels of NtNAC2 and NtHSP70-8 genes in wild-type and transgenic plants. In tobacco, the L25 gene was used as an internal reference gene. Note: lower case letters in the above graph represent significant differences at the 0.05 level. The values presented in the above column were calculated using the 2−∆CT method. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Agronomy 13 02918 g004
Figure 5. Analysis of the antioxidant capacity of AmbHLH148-OE transgenic tobacco under both control and drought conditions. (A) SOD activity of WT and transgenic plants. (B) POD activity of WT and transgenic plants. (C) CAT activity of WT and transgenic plants. (D) PRO content of WT and transgenic plants. (E) MDA content of WT and transgenic plants. Note: lower case letters in the above graph represent significant differences at the 0.05 level. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Figure 5. Analysis of the antioxidant capacity of AmbHLH148-OE transgenic tobacco under both control and drought conditions. (A) SOD activity of WT and transgenic plants. (B) POD activity of WT and transgenic plants. (C) CAT activity of WT and transgenic plants. (D) PRO content of WT and transgenic plants. (E) MDA content of WT and transgenic plants. Note: lower case letters in the above graph represent significant differences at the 0.05 level. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Agronomy 13 02918 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Ma, Y.; Fan, B.; Sun, F.; Zhai, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Nie, L.; Fang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Qi, B. The Agropyron mongolicum bHLH Gene AmbHLH148 Positively Involved in Transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana Adaptive Response to Drought Stress. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2918. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13122918

AMA Style

Zhang X, Ma Y, Fan B, Sun F, Zhai Y, Zhao Y, Nie L, Fang Y, Yu Z, Qi B. The Agropyron mongolicum bHLH Gene AmbHLH148 Positively Involved in Transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana Adaptive Response to Drought Stress. Agronomy. 2023; 13(12):2918. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13122918

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xuefeng, Yanhong Ma, Bobo Fan, Fengcheng Sun, Yongqing Zhai, Yan Zhao, Lizhen Nie, Yongyu Fang, Zhuo Yu, and Bingjie Qi. 2023. "The Agropyron mongolicum bHLH Gene AmbHLH148 Positively Involved in Transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana Adaptive Response to Drought Stress" Agronomy 13, no. 12: 2918. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13122918

APA Style

Zhang, X., Ma, Y., Fan, B., Sun, F., Zhai, Y., Zhao, Y., Nie, L., Fang, Y., Yu, Z., & Qi, B. (2023). The Agropyron mongolicum bHLH Gene AmbHLH148 Positively Involved in Transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana Adaptive Response to Drought Stress. Agronomy, 13(12), 2918. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13122918

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop