Next Article in Journal
Influence of Extraction Methods on the Phytochemical Profile of Sambucus nigra L.
Previous Article in Journal
Analyzing Evapotranspiration in Greenhouses: A Lysimeter-Based Calculation and Evaluation Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biodegradable Carboxymethyl Chitosan/Polyvinyl Alcohol Hymexazol-Loaded Mulch Film for Soybean Root Rot Control
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/agronomy13123060
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Applications in Enhancing Plant Stress Resistance: A Review

by
Zijun Wang
1,
Sijin Wang
2,
Tingting Ma
1,
You Liang
2,
Zhongyang Huo
2 and
Fengping Yang
1,*
1
College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crop/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(12), 3060; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123060
Submission received: 12 November 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 11 December 2023 / Published: 14 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nanomaterials in Pesticides: Pesticide Controlled Release Formulations)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biotic and abiotic stress factors are pivotal considerations in agriculture due to their potential to cause crop losses, food insecurity, and economic repercussions. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO nanoparticles) have gained substantial attention from researchers worldwide for their capacity to alleviate the detrimental impacts of both biotic and abiotic stress on plants, concurrently reducing dependence on environmentally harmful chemicals. This article provides an overview of methods for synthesizing ZnO nanoparticles, encompassing physical vapor deposition, ball milling, hydrothermal methods, solvothermal methods, precipitation methods, microwave methods, microbial synthesis, and plant-mediated synthesis. Additionally, it delves into the absorption, translocation, and biotransformation pathways of ZnO nanoparticles within plants. The emphasis lies in elucidating the potential of ZnO nanoparticles to safeguard plants against biotic and abiotic stress, enhance plant performance, and modulate various plant processes. The article also offers a preliminary exploration of the mechanisms underlying plant stress tolerance mediated by ZnO nanoparticles. In conclusion, ZnO nanoparticles present an environmentally friendly and cost-effective strategy for plant stress management, paving the way for the integration of nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture. This opens new possibilities for leveraging nanotechnology to bolster plant resilience against stress in the ever-changing climate conditions, ensuring global food security.

1. Introduction

With the continuous changes in the global climate and the increasing impact of human activities, agriculture is facing unprecedented challenges [1,2,3,4]. Climate change and global warming have led to an increase in extreme weather events, posing threats to crop yields and soil fertility [5,6]. Simultaneously, biotic stresses such as viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites, as well as abiotic stresses including drought, salinity, high and low temperatures, and heavy metal toxicity, have severely compromised the health and productivity of crops [7,8,9,10,11]. In order to overcome these challenges, the agricultural sector has been actively exploring innovative methods to bolster crop resilience, increase yields, and decrease dependence on chemical pesticides and fertilizers [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
In recent years, the emergence of nanotechnology has opened up new possibilities for addressing these challenges [19,20,21,22]. Specifically, zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO nanoparticles) have garnered considerable attention as a promising tool, demonstrating significant potential in effectively addressing both biotic and abiotic stresses [23]. The preparation methods for ZnO nanoparticles encompass various approaches, incorporating physical techniques such as vapor deposition and ball milling [24]. Chemical methods include solvothermal, hydrothermal, precipitation, and microwave procedures [25]. Additionally, there are biological synthesis methods that utilize organisms or their byproducts as mediums for nanoparticle synthesis [26,27]. These preparation techniques have their individual strengths and weaknesses but collectively furnish ample resources for employing ZnO nanoparticles in handling biotic and abiotic stresses.
Biotic and abiotic stresses stand as two primary limiting factors for crop growth and yield in agricultural production [28,29,30,31,32]. Biotic stresses encompass various invasions by viruses, bacteria, fungi, and pests, posing significant threats to crop growth [33,34,35,36,37]. Simultaneously, abiotic stresses primarily arise from environmental factors such as drought, high temperatures, low temperatures, salinity, and others, severely impacting plant growth and yield [38,39,40,41,42]. Recent research has underscored the significant potential of ZnO nanoparticles in mitigating biotic and abiotic stress in agriculture [43,44,45,46]. These nanoparticles have displayed the capacity to hinder the growth of different pathogenic microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, pests, and viruses [47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Additionally, the immune system of plants can be enhanced by ZnO nanoparticles, which reduces the incidence of diseases effectively [54]. More importantly, in addressing abiotic stress, ZnO nanoparticles play a crucial role in managing plant water balance and preserving cell osmotic equilibrium, resulting in heightened plant resilience against stressors (such as heavy metals, cold, drought, and salinity) [55,56,57,58,59]. Beyond stress mitigation, ZnO nanoparticles have also exhibited the capacity to stimulate root growth, diversify the population of microorganisms in the rhizosphere, and contribute to the enhancement of soil structure and fertility [60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. These combined effects create a more favorable growth environment for crops, ultimately promoting healthier and more productive agricultural outcomes.
Through continued research and practical implementation, ZnO nanoparticles are poised to emerge as a vital component of agricultural sustainability. The nanoparticles hold the potential to boost crop productivity while reducing dependence on environmentally harmful chemicals. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the synthesis methods of ZnO nanoparticles, clarify their uptake and transport mechanisms in plants, and extensively delve into their diverse applications in bolstering plant resistance against both biotic and abiotic stresses. This review can serve as a valuable reference for the safe and effective utilization of ZnO nanoparticles in agricultural production, thus paving the way for the integration of nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture.

2. Preparation of ZnO Nanoparticles

The methods employed for synthesizing ZnO nanoparticles encompass physical, chemical, and biological approaches, as depicted in Figure 1. During the synthesis process, ZnO nanoparticles may undergo contamination, such as the introduction of iron ions, resulting in a notable change in the solubility of ZnO nanoparticles. Impurities in ZnO nanoparticles can arise from factors like the purity of reactants or the type of reaction vessel utilized in the synthesis process. Utilizing diverse synthesis methods and reactants enables the production of nano zinc oxide with varying impacts on plants, even while maintaining consistent particle sizes and shapes [67].

2.1. Physical Methods

2.1.1. Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD)

Physical vapor deposition (PVD) is a procedure used for the preparation of ZnO nanoparticles. Common PVD techniques involve the cathode arc physical vapor deposition electron beam, physical vapor deposition, ion beam sputtering, and pulse laser deposition [68,69,70]. The process begins with the sublimation of the source material, typically zinc metal, where it is transformed into a vapor state through high temperatures, often achieved within a furnace. Subsequently, this resulting vapor is directed towards a substrate and deposited onto it. The substrate is maintained at a lower temperature compared to the sublimation process, which facilitates the formation of ZnO nanoparticles on its surface. The size and shape of these nanoparticles can be controlled by adjusting the deposition conditions, such as substrate temperature, pressure, and evaporation rate. This technique is suitable for the mass production of ZnO nanoparticles.

2.1.2. Ball Milling

Ball milling, a physical method for preparing ZnO nanoparticles, is a technique that refines particles and enables the acquisition of metastable materials [71]. In the specific case of ZnO nanoparticle synthesis using ball milling, ZnO powder is subjected to mechanical milling inside a ball mill. The milling process promotes the formation of ZnO nanoparticles with smaller sizes and improved crystallinity compared to the starting material. Moreover, ball milling can be combined with other methods, such as PVD, to strengthen the quality and uniformity of the ZnO nanoparticles. The mechanochemical procedure of ball milling is relatively simple and suitable for producing nanoparticles in large quantities [72].

2.2. Chemical Methods

2.2.1. Hydrothermal Synthesis

Hydrothermal synthesis is an efficient technique for the fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles, known for its relatively low process temperature requirement and the capability to regulate particle size and morphology [73]. In this technique, zinc precursor compounds are solubilized in a suitable solvent and exposed to elevated temperature and pressure in a closed reactor. Hydrothermal synthesis enables accurate manipulation of the size and morphology of the resultant ZnO nanoparticles by modifying reaction parameters like temperature, duration, and precursor concentrations [74,75]. It can also be combined with other methods, like ball milling to improve the quality and uniformity of the particles further [76]. The hydrothermal technique provides several advantages over other synthesis methods, including low cost, the utilization of simple equipment, uniform production, catalyst-free growth, ecofriendliness, and reduced hazards.

2.2.2. Solvothermal Synthesis

The solvothermal technique is derived from the hydrothermal method. In this approach, the reaction occurs within an enclosed system, such as an autoclave, where the initial mixture undergoes a reaction at a precise temperature and with the inherent pressure of the solution, employing organic substances or a nonaqueous solvent as the medium [77]. Typically, in solvothermal synthesis, zinc precursor compounds like zinc nitrate or zinc acetate are solubilized in an appropriate solvent and exposed to elevated temperature and pressure. The interaction of the zinc precursor with the solvent results in the generation of ZnO nanoparticles [78]. Solvothermal synthesis regulates the size and morphology of the resultant nanoparticles [79,80].

2.2.3. Precipitation Method

The precipitation technique is a widely employed chemical synthesis method for the fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles [81,82]. It involves adding a precipitant to a soluble salt solution that contains one or more ions, inducing the generation of insoluble hydroxides, hydrated oxides, or salts that form a precipitate in the solution. The resulting precipitate is then washed, and the desired oxide nano powder is acquired via thermal decomposition or dehydration. By adjusting the reaction parameters and choice of precursors, it is possible to obtain nanoparticles with desired properties such as size, morphology, and composition [83,84,85]. The precipitation method is convenient and widely adopted by researchers for synthesizing ZnO nanoparticles.

2.2.4. Microwave Synthesis

Compared to conventional heating methods, microwave radiation synthesis is widely acknowledged for its numerous advantages, including rapid heating, brief reaction times, minimal side reactions, high efficiency, exceptional reaction selectivity, environmental friendliness, and suitability for morphology control [86]. In their study, Wojnarowicz et al. utilized zinc acetate as the raw material, ethylene glycol as the solvent, and employed microwave-assisted synthesis to fabricate ZnO nanoparticles. Operating at 190 °C and 600 W, varying reaction times obtained ZnO nanoparticles with particle sizes ranging from 20 to 120 nm, achieving a remarkable yield of 94–98%. Notably, the sole by-products generated throughout the entire reaction were water and esters [87].

2.3. Biological Methods

2.3.1. Microbial Synthesis

Extensive research has been conducted on the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles through the biomineralization process, utilizing microorganisms such as bacteria or fungi. [88,89]. During biomineralization, the microorganisms uptake zinc ions from the growth medium and convert them into ZnO nanoparticles by secreting organic compounds. Enzymes synthesized or secreted by microorganisms play a crucial role in acting as nano-factories by reducing metal ions into metal nanoparticles. However, not all microbes possess the ability to synthesize nanoparticles due to variations in their metabolic processes and enzyme activities [90]. Therefore, careful selection of appropriate microbes is necessary for successful nanoparticle formation, irrespective of their enzyme activities and biochemical pathways. Typically, cultures are cultivated in a suitable culture medium, and metal precursors in the form of soluble salts are supplied. These precursors are then precipitated in suspensions comprising microorganism cells or biological compound extracts from the microbes. The synthesis process generally takes minutes to hours, contingent upon the culture conditions, and can be identified by visual changes such as the deposition of a white substance within the lower portion of the flasks or shifts in the color of the suspensions, indicating a positive transition. Numerous factors, including temperature, pH, metal precursor concentration, and reaction duration, influence the rate of production, yield, and morphologies of nanoparticles [91].

2.3.2. Plant-Mediated Synthesis

Plant-mediated synthesis is a biological method utilized for the fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles [92]. The existence of phytochemicals in plant extracts can act as potent reducing agents, enabling the transformation of metal precursors into metal nanoparticles [93]. Plant-secreted compounds, such as organic acids, can impact the dimensions and morphology of the nanoparticles [94]. Plant-mediated synthesis is not only a green and sustainable approach but also enables the functionalization of nanoparticles with biologically active compounds. Plant systems provide renewable and sustainable sources for nanoparticle synthesis and are recognized to contain various antioxidant secondary metabolites that have untapped potential for nanoparticle synthesis. Plant-based methodologies present multiple benefits compared to microbial systems, as the latter frequently involve expensive upkeep of cultures and subsequent processing, while plants offer a sustainable and renewable resource for nanoparticle synthesis [95,96].

3. Absorption and Transfer of ZnO Nanoparticles in the Plant

Nanoparticles, particularly those composed of ZnO, possess an array of diverse characteristics, including particle size, shape, and surface area, that render them highly significant in their interactions with plant tissues [97,98,99]. These interactions are influenced by the plant cell walls, which serve as natural barriers with pores spanning a size range of 3 to 8 nm and a thickness of 5 to 20 nm [100,101,102]. The size of nanoparticles is of paramount importance, as those smaller than the pore size can efficiently penetrate plant tissues. In the case of larger nanoparticles, there are two possible mechanisms through which they can enter plants. Firstly, the nanoparticles may induce the formation of new pores, which could be slightly larger than the usual ones [103,104,105]. Secondly, the loosening of cell walls induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) may enable larger nanoparticles to pass through [106].
Root application and foliar application are the most commonly employed methods for delivering ZnO nanoparticles to plants [107,108,109,110]. For root application, Arruda et al. reviewed research indicating several possible mechanisms [111]. ZnO nanoparticles may decompose directly in the soil, releasing ions that can be taken up by plants. Larger ZnO nanoparticles may decompose in the soil, forming smaller nanoparticles that can be incorporated into plant tissues. Alternatively, these smaller ZnO nanoparticles may further decompose, releasing ions that can be incorporated into plant tissues [112]. Upon exposure to plant tissues, nanoparticles can penetrate the cell wall and cell membrane of the root epidermis and cortex, undergoing a series of complex events to enter the plant’s vascular bundle (xylem) and move towards the stele (Figure 2B) [113,114,115,116,117]. A higher concentration of nanoparticle accumulation was observed in the epidermis, cortex, endodermis, cambium, and xylem compared to other plant tissues [118,119]. The uptake of these nanoparticles is believed to occur via an active transport mechanism involving various cellular processes, such as signaling, recycling, and regulation of the plasma membrane [120,121,122]. Meanwhile, ZnO nanoparticles can be taken up by root hair cells and transported through the endodermis and xylem vessel elements, eventually reaching the plant’s underground parts [98]. For instance, ZnO nanoparticles (20 ± 5 nm) nm can initially adhere to the surface of the root cap and occupy the epidermal crypts on the root surface [119,123]. Subsequently, they penetrate the endodermis and vascular cylinder, gradually spreading into other tissues. In the elongation zone of rice roots, larger-sized ZnO nanoparticles (<50 nm) can be observed in the intercellular space between cell walls and cytoplasm of cortical cells, indicating that ZnO nanoparticles can traverse the epidermis and cortex via the apoplastic pathway [124].
In the case of foliar application, ZnO nanoparticles are sprayed onto the leaf surface and can be absorbed through the stomata and cuticle (Figure 2A). Subsequently, they are further transported within the plant through phloem sieve tubes, facilitating their whole-plant conduction [125]. Zhu et al. demonstrated that ZnO nanoparticles can penetrate the epidermis through stomata, accumulate in plastid exosomes, and then translocate to chloroplasts [65]. Before applying nanoparticles to leaves, it is essential to consider their size to prevent the blocking of stomata, which can impact transpiration [126]. Additionally, an excessively thick cuticle can act as a barrier to nanoparticle penetration [102]. To effectively absorb and utilize nanoparticles, it is necessary to overcome or adapt to these defense mechanisms in plants. Therefore, more comprehensive research is essential to elucidate the intricate mechanisms underlying the absorption and movement of ZnO nanoparticles within plant tissues [127].
For ZnO nanoparticles, the particles undergo two primary transformations in the environment: dissolution and chemical modifications [128]. Dissolution involves the release of ions and chelation with organic matter, while chemical modifications encompass processes such as reduction, oxidation, and sulfidation [129,130]. Studies on cowpea have revealed that ZnO nanoparticles undergo rapid dissolution when introduced into the soil, with dissolved zinc primarily binding to compounds like citrate, histidine, and phytate [131]. Hernandez-Viezcas et al. have found zinc bound to oxygen in a form reminiscent of zinc-citrate, a common zinc complex found in soybean grains [132]. Regarding the secondary transformation process, zinc ions (Zn2+) can attach to the sulfur present in phytochelatins, thus alleviating the effects of excessive zinc stress [133]. High concentrations of zinc were observed in the roots and shoots of rice seedlings upon exposure to ZnO nanoparticles, likely due to the ongoing biotransformation of ZnO nanoparticles into soluble salts, which are more easily assimilated by plants [124]. In summary, ZnO nanoparticles can be absorbed and stored in plants through various pathways, exerting influences on plant growth and development. Nevertheless, there are still unresolved questions concerning the specific mechanisms through which ZnO nanoparticles penetrate the cell wall and subsequently undergo transformation within plants. This underscores the necessity for further research to enhance our comprehension of these processes.

4. Impact of ZnO Nanoparticles against Biotic and Abiotic Stress

Plants are consistently exposed to challenging environmental conditions from the moment of emergence. Various unfavorable factors impede the normal growth, development, and reproduction of plants, encompassing both biotic stress (diseases, pests, and weeds) and abiotic stress (high temperature, drought, salinity, low temperature, heavy metals, etc.) [134]. These adverse elements can result in considerable losses in crop yield and quality. Nanotechnology emerges as a powerful tool to counteract the detrimental effects of both biotic and abiotic stress on plants. In particular, ZnO nanoparticles exhibit considerable promise owing to their low cost, simple preparation methods, and environmental friendliness [135]. They hold substantial potential for mitigating the impact of both biotic and abiotic stress, offering a diverse range of applications and the prospect of addressing significant challenges in plant cultivation (Figure 3).

4.1. Impact of ZnO Nanoparticles against Biotic Stress

4.1.1. Pests

In recent years, nanotechnology has garnered considerable attention as biological pesticides for pest control to promote sustainable agriculture and delay the emergence of resistance. The fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) is an immensely devastating pest that inflicts substantial harm to crops globally, particularly maize and rice. Previous research has reported that the application of ZnO nanoparticles not only possesses the capacity to manage Spodoptera frugiperda but also can significantly reduce its abundance in ecosystems through various mechanisms, including physical distortion, diminished fertility, decreased egg deposition, and viability [136,137]. Senbill et al. demonstrated that ZnO nanoparticles can reduce the reproductive capacity and hatching rate of two-spotted spider mites, prolong their reproductive duration, and demonstrate significant insecticidal activity. More importantly, ZnO nanoparticles exhibit a high level of safety for nontarget mite species. In addition, ZnO nanoparticles can also be used for the control of stored grain pests. Malaikozhundan et al. reported that ZnO nanoparticles coated with Bacillus thuringiensis or Ongamia pinnata leaf extract exhibited significant insecticidal effects against the pulse beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus). Treatment with 25 μg/mL of ZnO nanoparticles not only caused a significant delay in the fecundity, hatchability, and larval and pupal development period of Callosobruchus maculatus but also led to complete mortality of Callosobruchus maculatus. Furthermore, ZnO nanoparticles can reduce the activities of midgut α-amylase, cysteine protease, α-glucosidase, and glutathione S-transferase (GST) in Callosobruchus maculatus, which are closely related to insect food digestion and pesticide detoxification [138,139]. In another study, ZnO nanoparticles have been proven to exhibit efficient insecticidal activity in the combined form with pesticides against insects [140]. Jameel et al. successfully synthesized nanocomposites of ZnO nanoparticles with thiacloprid. When fourth instar larvae of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were exposed to castor leaves treated with these nanocomposites at various concentrations (ranging from 10 to 90 mg/L), their mortality rates showed a significant increase, with the highest increase reaching 27%. Moreover, pupae and adult insects exhibited physical deformities, delayed pupation, reduced reproductive capacity, and diminished fertility. Concurrently, the biochemical parameters in the larvae, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were substantially impacted. Information in Table 1 describes the potential application of ZnO nanoparticles as insecticides. Consequently, ZnO nanoparticles have the potential to function as a viable substitute for pest control, presenting an effective alternative to conventional approaches.

4.1.2. Plant Pathogens

The antimicrobial properties of ZnO nanoparticles have been extensively studied and well documented, and they play a vital role in the management of plant pathogenic microorganisms. Keerthana et al. reported that ZnO nanoparticles synthesized using aqueous peel extract of Citrus medica have excellent antimicrobial potential against plant pathogenic organisms (including Streptomyces sannanesis, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger) [152]. Green tomato, as a substance rich in alkaloids and ascorbic acid, has been employed for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and used for the control of bacterial leaf blight in rice. ZnO nanoparticles exhibited effective antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae [153]. Soliman et al. utilized a one-pot wet synthesis technique to fabricate sub-5 nm ZnO-based nanoparticles, which showed excellent dispersibility and remarkable antibacterial activity against citrus huanglongbing (HLB) disease. The nanoparticles were capable of translocating within the phloem and xylem of citrus trees. Treatment with 400 mg/L of ZnO nanoparticles markedly decreased the severity of the disease in infected citrus plants, leading to an estimated 60% reduction in disease occurrence [154]. Qiu et al. utilized commercially acquired ZnO nanoparticles for the management of rice blast disease, observing their direct antifungal activity in inhibiting the formation of conidia and appressoria in the Magnaporthe oryzae [155]. Commercially purchased 30 nm zinc oxide has been proven to exhibit antifungial activity against Sclerotinia homoeocarpa. At a concentration of 200 μg/mL, there was a significant inhibition of mycelial growth, with an inhibition rate exceeding 60% [156]. ZnO nanoparticles, as a substitute for chemical fungicides, showed great potential in the field of preharvest preservation for strawberries. At a concentration of 5 × 10−3 M, these nanoparticles displayed a 16% inhibition rate on mycelial growth under dark conditions, while under light conditions, the inhibition rate increased to 80%. Upon application of ZnO nanoparticles in strawberry fields on sunny days, compared to the control, the incidence of gray mold disease decreased by 43%, crop yield increased by 28.5%, and the occurrence of decay during fruit storage was reduced by 8 days. The treatment was deemed safe for the plants themselves, demonstrating an efficacy equivalent to the conventional chemical fungicide fenhexamid [157]. The above studies reveal that phytogenic ZnO nanoparticles prove to be an efficient alternative to existing fungicides.
Several mechanisms have been postulated to elucidate their capacity to hinder the growth of fungi and bacteria and mitigate the intensity of infections and diseases. One proposed mechanism is the disruption of cell membranes and interference with metabolic processes in the pathogens. ZnO nanoparticles have the ability to penetrate bacterial cells and release Zn2+. These ions can exert toxic effects by inhibiting active transport, bacterial metabolic processes, and enzyme functionality. The toxicity of Zn2+ on bacterial cellular biomolecules ultimately leads to cell death [158,159]. Another mechanism entails the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon UV irradiation. ZnO nanoparticles possess the ability to generate ROS, such as superoxide anion (O2−), hydroxyl ion (OH−), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). These active species interact with cellular constituents like lipids, proteins, and DNA, resulting in cell impairment or mortality. The entry of ZnO nanoparticles into bacterial cells triggers oxidative stress and the generation of ROS, resulting in the disruption of the bacterial cell membrane and suppression of cellular proliferation [160,161,162,163,164]. Additionally, it has been revealed that ZnO nanoparticles can stimulate the immune system of plants and bolster their defense mechanisms against pathogens. These nanoparticles have the ability to trigger the expression of defense-related genes and promote the production of defense compounds, including phytoalexins and pathogenesis-related proteins. These substances play a crucial role in empowering plants to combat attacks from pathogens effectively [165,166]. In the case of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), ZnO nanoparticles have been noted to be internalized in the endoderm and vascular tissues. This internalization allows for efficient delivery of the nanoparticles to the site of infection or colonization by microbial pathogens. Once internalized, ZnO nanoparticles come into direct contact with the pathogens, interacting with their cell membranes or cell walls and resulting in membrane impairment and disruption of cellular mechanisms. Moreover, the aggregation of ZnO nanoparticles and the induction of phytochemical production in the endoderm and vascular tissue create a hostile environment for pathogens, inhibiting their growth and colonization. The reinforcement of physical barriers, such as additional cell wall materials and strengthened cell walls, further hinders pathogen penetration and spread within the plant. The antimicrobial effects of ZnO nanoparticles can contribute to a reduction in the abundance of pathogenic microorganisms, ultimately leading to increased crop yield. Additionally, the nutritional value of ZnO nanoparticles, providing essential micronutrients, can contribute to supporting host defense mechanisms [167]. Another potential mechanism underlying the antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles involves their adherence to the bacterial cell membrane via electrostatic forces. Due to the positive zeta potential of ZnO nanoparticles, they can easily bind to the negatively charged bacterial cell surface. This attachment enables the infiltration of ZnO nanoparticles into the bacterial cells, leading to subsequent intracellular effects and potential disruption of cellular functions [168]. Furthermore, the accumulation of ZnO nanoparticles within bacterial cells can interfere with their metabolic functions, ultimately leading to cell death. The bactericidal mechanisms exhibited by ZnO nanoparticles offer distinct advantages over conventional therapeutic agents. Therefore, the ability of ZnO nanoparticles to disrupt bacterial metabolism and induce cell death provides alternative and potentially more effective modes of action for combating bacterial infections. Table 2 summarizes the antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles against various phytopathogenic microbes.

4.2. Impact of ZnO Nanoparticles against Abiotic Stress

4.2.1. Drought Stress

Drought, a prevalent abiotic stress, can considerably diminish crop yields by inducing prolonged water scarcity. Water, functioning as a medium for plant survival and nutrient transportation, is pivotal for the robust growth of crops. Drought stress influences diverse physiological and biochemical processes in plants, thus jeopardizing their typical survival capabilities. The quest for innovative approaches to tackle drought stress has become significantly crucial. Previous research has reported that ZnO nanoparticles can enhance drought-stress tolerance in plants, mitigating the negative impacts of drought on crop yield and biomass accumulation. Sun et al. investigated the effect of ZnO nanoparticles on drought tolerance in plants and revealed their ability to stimulate the synthesis of the endogenous hormone melatonin. Alterations in the activity of antioxidant enzymes were also noted, including malondialdehyde, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase, thus activating the plant’s internal antioxidant system [173,174]. Dimkpa et al. investigated the effects of ZnO nanoparticles on sorghum development, nutrient acquisition, and grain fortification. The results indicated that ZnO nanoparticles can enhance the absorption of essential crop nutrients (N, K, Zn), expedite plant growth and development, boost crop yield, and augment the Zn content in sorghum [175]. Studies have also revealed that ZnO nanoparticles can enhance the activities of antioxidant enzymes, related metabolites, total chlorophyll, total proteins, soluble sugars, lysine, and arginine at the physiological level in wheat. At the molecular level, they can upregulate the expression levels of drought-related genes Wdhn13, CAT1, P5CS, and DREB2, thereby mitigating the damage caused by drought to plants and improving wheat yield under drought conditions [176]. In addition, ZnO nanoparticles can regulate plant carbohydrate metabolism and enhance the activities of enzymes associated with carbohydrate synthesis and glycolytic metabolism (UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, phosphoglucoisomerase and cytoplasmic invertase), thus enhancing plant drought tolerance [177]. ZnO nanoparticles can also function as seed priming agents to enhance wheat’s drought resistance. Rai-Kalal et al. reported that wheat seed pretreated with ZnO nanoparticles can prevent chlorophyll degradation under drought conditions, improve plant photosynthesis, and stimulate plant growth. Physiologically, wheat treated with nano zinc oxide significantly improved the efficiency of PSII primary photochemistry under drought stress, reducing the production of reactive oxygen species within the plant, thereby safeguarding the plant’s photosynthetic apparatus from oxidative damage during drought stress [178].

4.2.2. Heat Stress

In recent years, the increasing levels of carbon dioxide emissions have intensified the greenhouse effect, resulting in severe high-temperature weather conditions. When temperatures exceed the optimal range for specific time periods or when plants are exposed to prolonged high-intensity light, they undergo heat stress, which adversely affects the normal growth and yield of crops. The application of ZnO nanoparticles has been observed to effectively enhance the heat stress tolerance in a few plant species (alfalfa, mungbean, chickpea, and wheat). A sufficient supply of zinc under heat stress can regulate the PSII efficiency of plants, improve water relations, increase free proline in leaves, enhance antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, MDA, H2O2, and APX), and elevate the concentration of zinc ions in leaves. This can help mitigate the detrimental impacts of heat stress on plants, leading to improved plant growth and photosynthesis [179,180]. Furthermore, foliar application of ZnO nanoparticles not only increases chlorophyll content and gas exchange properties but also enhances the number of seeds per pod (SPP) and pods per plant (PPP), thus improving grain yield under heat stress [181]. Research has also indicated that heat stress primarily affects normal plant growth and physiological parameters by generating toxic reactive oxygen species. The application of zinc oxide is beneficial in enhancing plant yield and upregulating the plant’s antioxidant defense system. The 20 nm ZnO nanoparticles can be absorbed and translocated in alfalfa, leading to osmolyte accumulation, further upregulating chlorophyll content and IRGA properties to maintain membrane stability. This not only aids in the reconstruction of cellular osmotic regulation but also improves plant biomass, heat injury index, and electrolyte leakage [182].

4.2.3. Salinity Stress

Salt stress, as one of the most prevalent abiotic stresses globally, is exacerbated by various factors such as climate change, irrigation water contamination, and improper fertilizer application, resulting in soil salinization and subsequent crop yield reduction. Soil salinization typically disrupts plant osmotic balance, induces ion toxicity, and diminishes water availability, leading to disturbances in plant physiological and biochemical processes and causing structural damage to plant morphology. ZnO nanoparticles can enhance plant salt tolerance by improving membrane integrity, scavenging reactive oxygen species generated by stress, regulating cell division, nutrient and water transport, and modulating levels of carbohydrates, amino acids, protein metabolism, photosynthetic pigments, and osmoregulators. Extensive research has reported the potential of ZnO nanoparticles in mitigating the adverse impacts of salinity stress on various crops, such as safflower, wheat, tomato, pea, rice, rapeseed, and so on [183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190]. Faizan et al. revealed that the application of ZnO nanoparticles on tomato plants facing salt stress resulted in significant improvements compared to untreated salt-stressed plants. These improvements were observed in various growth parameters of tomato, including shoot and root length, biomass, and leaf area, as well as enhancements in chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics. Moreover, the levels of proline and protein content, along with the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT), were notably elevated [184]. Furthermore, the foliar administration of ZnO nanoparticles on salt-stressed rice led to a remarkable increase in the uptake of vital nutrients like phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and zinc (Zn) while concurrently reducing the absorption and adsorption of sodium ions. Additionally, the agronomic traits of rice, including plant height, panicle length, tiller number, grain weight, aboveground dry weight, and root dry weight, exhibited significant improvement. Physiological and biochemical parameters, such as chlorophyll content (91%), photosynthetic rate (113%), transpiration rate (106%), stomatal conductance (56%), and internal CO2 (11%), were also substantially enhanced compared to the control group under salt stress [191]. Research has also explored the role of ZnO nanoparticles in regulating plant hormone signaling pathways. El-Badri et al. examined the influence of ZnO nanoparticles on the expression of genes associated with brassinosteroids and abscisic acid in canola. These findings demonstrated that ZnO nanoparticles promoted the expression of brassinosteroid-related genes (nGA20ox, BnGA3ox, and BnCPS) as well as abscisic acid-related genes (BnCYP707A1, BnCYP707A3, and BnCYP707A4), thereby enhancing the salt tolerance of the plants [192].

4.2.4. Cold Stress

Cold stress hinders the growth and reduces the yield of crops by affecting their physiological, biochemical, molecular, and metabolic processes [193,194,195]. Some studies have reported that ZnO nanoparticles can alleviate the harm caused by cold stress in various plants [58,196,197]. At the physiological level, foliar application of ZnO nanoparticles can alleviate the inhibitory effect of low-temperature stress on the growth of rice seedlings (including plant height, root length, and dry biomass). At the physiological level, ZnO nanoparticles can restore rice chlorophyll accumulation under cold stress, increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT), and reduce intracellular H2O2, MDA, and proline content. At the molecular level, foliar application of ZnO nanoparticles can induce the expression of antioxidant systems (OsCu/ZnSOD1, OsCu/ZnSOD2, OsCu/ZnSOD3, OsPRX11, OsPRX65, OsPRX89, OsCATA, and OsCATB) and cold-responsive transcription factors (such as OsbZIP52, OsMYB4, OsMYB30, OsNAC5, OsWRKY76, and OsWRKY94) in young rice leaves under cold treatment. This leads to the restoration of the expression of all the mentioned genes to the control level after cold stress, effectively mitigating the harm of cold stress to plants [197]. Elsheery et al. reported the potential of ZnO nanoparticles in ameliorating the detrimental effects of cold stress in sugarcane. The study found that foliar application of ZnO nanoparticles enabled the plants to mitigate the adverse impacts of cold stress by increasing the content of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll and carotenoids), maintaining the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), maximum photo-oxidation of PSI (Pm), and photosynthetic gas exchange [196].

4.2.5. Heavy Metal Stress

The contamination of terrestrial soil by heavy metals (arsenic (As), Pb (plumbum), Cd (cadmium), mercury (Hg), and chromium (Cr)) has become a significant global environmental issue, adversely affecting ecological integrity, soil quality, and agricultural productivity [198,199,200]. The resulting food security concerns pose a substantial risk to ecosystems and human health. Consequently, the remediation or immobilization of toxic heavy metals in contaminated farmlands has become an urgent and critical issue [201,202]. Li et al. reported that the treatment of rice seeds with ZnO nanoparticles affects the physiological, biochemical, and molecular characteristics of plants under cadmium stress. At the physiological level, ZnO nanoparticles can increase plant fresh weight and root crown length. At the biochemical level, ZnO nanoparticles can enhance the activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD) in rice, as well as the content of metallothioneins (ROS scavengers) and chlorophyll (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, a + b, and carotenoids). At the metabolic level, ZnO nanoparticles primarily alleviate the harm of cadmium to rice by affecting the metabolism of amino acids (alanine, aspartate, and glutamate), taurine, subtaurine, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Additionally, the application of zinc oxide can effectively increase the activity of α and β-amylase (in seeds) and total amylase (in seedlings), which may be beneficial for seed germination [203]. In mung bean plants, ZnO nanoparticles reduce the harm of cadmium to plants by regulating cellular homeostasis. ZnO nanoparticles enhance the activity of ROS scavenging enzymes (such as CAT, APX, GR, glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and guaiacol peroxidase (GPOX)) to reduce plant toxicity caused by cadmium stress. ZnO nanoparticles also regulate redox enzymes (such as NADPH-dependent thioredoxin reductase (NTR), ferredoxin (Fd), ferredoxin-NADP reductase (FNR), and thioredoxin (Trx)), effectively improving plant growth under cadmium stress [203]. ZnO nanoparticles exhibit a high affinity for heavy metals, enabling them to bind and immobilize these toxic substances in the soil. This capability effectively mitigates the adverse effects of heavy metal pollution on plant growth and overall soil quality. At the molecular level, the expression levels of OsNRAMP1, OsNRAMP4, and OsNRAMP5 genes involved in cadmium transport in rice under cadmium stress decreased significantly with treatment using zinc oxide nanomaterials, while the expression of the OsZIP1 gene related to zinc transport exhibited upregulation. This suggests that zinc oxide nanomaterials can alleviate cadmium toxicity in rice by enhancing the expression levels of resistance-related genes [204]. Similarly, effects have been observed in soils contaminated with As, Pb, Hg, and Cr, where the application of ZnO nanoparticles has been found to promote the development of antioxidant defense systems in plants to counter the oxidative damage caused by heavy metals. Simultaneously, it mitigates metal toxicity in various plants, leading to an improvement in plant growth parameters (Table 3).

5. Conclusions

Nanotechnology offers a more cost-effective, efficient, and environmentally friendly approach to bolstering agricultural practices. This review outlines diverse methods for preparing ZnO nanoparticles and examines their absorption, translocation, and conduction mechanisms within plant systems. Furthermore, it explores the positive impact of ZnO nanoparticles in mitigating both biotic and abiotic stress on plants. At the physiological level, ZnO nanoparticles can enhance the agronomic traits of plants under stressful conditions, promoting increased plant growth and biomass. At the biochemical level, ZnO nanoparticles exhibit the ability to boost the activity of plant antioxidant enzymes, scavenge ROS generated under stress, regulate osmotic balance, and maintain cellular homeostasis, thereby alleviating the impact of both biotic and abiotic stress on plants. On the molecular level, ZnO nanoparticles can influence plant hormone signaling pathways, modulate stress-responsive genes, and enhance plant stress tolerance. Hence, the utilization of ZnO nanoparticles is anticipated to offer a novel, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective method to enhance agricultural productivity while mitigating the impact of various stressors on plants.

Author Contributions

Z.W.: conceptualization, writing-original draft. S.W.: investigation, supervision. T.M.: writing—review and editing. Y.L.: visualization. Z.H.: funding acquisition. F.Y.: project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1500404), the Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program (BE2020319), the Carbon Peak Carbon Neutral Science and Technology Innovation Special Fund of Jiangsu Province (BE2022424), the Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund (CX(22)1001), the Earmarked Fund for CARS (Rice, CARS-01-28), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gowdy, J. Our hunter-gatherer future: Climate change, agriculture and uncivilization. Futures 2020, 115, 102488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tian, Z.; Wang, J.-W.; Li, J.; Han, B. Designing future crops: Challenges and strategies for sustainable agriculture. Plant J. 2021, 105, 1165–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abbass, K.; Qasim, M.Z.; Song, H.; Murshed, M.; Mahmood, H.; Younis, I. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 42539–42559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zsögön, A.; Peres, L.E.P.; Xiao, Y.; Yan, J.; Fernie, A.R. Enhancing crop diversity for food security in the face of climate uncertainty. Plant J. 2022, 109, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Maharajan, T.; Ceasar, S.A.; Krishna, T.P.A.; Ignacimuthu, S. Management of phosphorus nutrient amid climate change for sustainable agriculture. J. Environ. Qual. 2021, 50, 1303–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nguyen, T.T.; Grote, U.; Neubacher, F.; Rahut, D.B.; Do, M.H.; Paudel, G.P. Security risks from climate change and environmental degradation: Implications for sustainable land use transformation in the Global South. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2023, 63, 101322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miller, R.N.G.; Costa Alves, G.S.; Van Sluys, M.-A. Plant immunity: Unravelling the complexity of plant responses to biotic stresses. Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gimenez, E.; Salinas, M.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Worldwide research on plant defense against biotic stresses as improvement for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 2018, 10, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nabi, R.B.S.; Tayade, R.; Hussain, A.; Kulkarni, K.P.; Imran, Q.M.; Mun, B.-G.; Yun, B.-W.J.E. Nitric oxide regulates plant responses to drought, salinity, and heavy metal stress. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, K.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, H.; Luo, S.; Luo, L. Silicon-based additive on heavy metal remediation in soils: Toxicological effects, remediation techniques, and perspectives. Environ. Res. 2022, 205, 112244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Islam, M.; Sandhi, A. Heavy metal and drought stress in plants: The role of microbes—A review. Gesunde Pflanz. 2023, 75, 695–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lamichhane, J.R.; Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S.; Kudsk, P.; Messéan, A. Toward a reduced reliance on conventional pesticides in European agriculture. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schröder, P.; Sauvêtre, A.; Gnädinger, F.; Pesaresi, P.; Chmeliková, L.; Doğan, N.; Gerl, G.; Gökçe, A.; Hamel, C.; Millan, R.; et al. Discussion paper: Sustainable increase of crop production through improved technical strategies, breeding and adapted management—A European perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 678, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bilal, S.; Shahzad, R.; Imran, M.; Jan, R.; Kim, K.M.; Lee, I.-J. Synergistic association of endophytic fungi enhances Glycine max L. resilience to combined abiotic stresses: Heavy metals, high temperature and drought stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 143, 111931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ramakrishna, W.; Rathore, P.; Kumari, R.; Yadav, R. Brown gold of marginal soil: Plant growth promoting bacteria to overcome plant abiotic stress for agriculture, biofuels and carbon sequestration. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 711, 135062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ashraf, S.A.; Siddiqui, A.J.; Elkhalifa, A.E.O.; Khan, M.I.; Patel, M.; Alreshidi, M.; Moin, A.; Singh, R.; Snoussi, M.; Adnan, M. Innovations in nanoscience for the sustainable development of food and agriculture with implications on health and environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 768, 144990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mansoor, S.; Kour, N.; Manhas, S.; Zahid, S.; Wani, O.A.; Sharma, V.; Wijaya, L.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Alsahli, A.A.; El-Serehy, H.A.; et al. Biochar as a tool for effective management of drought and heavy metal toxicity. Chemosphere 2021, 271, 129458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, D.; Saleh, N.B.; Byro, A.; Zepp, R.; Sahle-Demessie, E.; Luxton, T.P.; Ho, K.T.; Burgess, R.M.; Flury, M.; White, J.C.; et al. Nano-enabled pesticides for sustainable agriculture and global food security. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 17, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lowry, G.V.; Avellan, A.; Gilbertson, L.M. Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology in the agri-tech revolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rastogi, A.; Zivcak, M.; Tripathi, D.K.; Yadav, S.; Kalaji, H.M.; Brestic, M. Phytotoxic effect of silver nanoparticles in Triticum aestivum: Improper regulation of photosystem I activity as the reason for oxidative damage in the chloroplast. Photosynthetica 2019, 57, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arora, S.; Murmu, G.; Mukherjee, K.; Saha, S.; Maity, D. A comprehensive overview of nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 355, 21–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saritha, G.N.G.; Anju, T.; Kumar, A. Nanotechnology-big impact: How nanotechnology is changing the future of agriculture? J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 10, 100457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Prasad, A.R.; Williams, L.; Garvasis, J.; Shamsheera, K.O.; Basheer, S.M.; Kuruvilla, M.; Joseph, A. Applications of phytogenic ZnO nanoparticles: A review on recent advancements. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 331, 115805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gomez, J.L.; Tigli, O. Zinc oxide nanostructures: From growth to application. J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 48, 612–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Uribe-López, M.C.; Hidalgo-López, M.C.; López-González, R.; Frías-Márquez, D.M.; Núñez-Nogueira, G.; Hernández-Castillo, D.; Alvarez-Lemus, M.A. Photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles and the role of the synthesis method on their physical and chemical properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2021, 404, 112866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhardwaj, K.; Singh, A.K. Bio-waste and natural resource mediated eco-friendly synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their photocatalytic application against dyes contaminated water. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2023, 16, 100536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ragavendran, C.; Kamaraj, C.; Jothimani, K.; Priyadharsan, A.; Anand Kumar, D.; Natarajan, D.; Malafaia, G. Eco-friendly approach for ZnO nanoparticles synthesis and evaluation of its possible antimicrobial, larvicidal and photocatalytic applications. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2023, 36, e00597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, Y. Seed coating with beneficial microorganisms for precision agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Akhtar, N.; Wani, A.K.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Mukherjee, S. Insights into the beneficial roles of dark septate endophytes in plants under challenging environment: Resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. dos Santos, T.B.; Ribas, A.F.; de Souza, S.G.H.; Budzinski, I.G.F.; Domingues, D.S. Physiological responses to drought, salinity, and heat stress in plants: A review. Stresses 2022, 2, 113–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moustaka, J.; Moustakas, M. Early-stage detection of biotic and abiotic stress on plants by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging analysis. Biosensors 2023, 13, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wahab, A.; Muhammad, M.; Munir, A.; Abdi, G.; Zaman, W.; Ayaz, A.; Khizar, C.; Reddy, S.P.P. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in regulating growth, enhancing productivity, and potentially influencing ecosystems under abiotic and biotic stresses. Plants 2023, 12, 3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aslam, M.M.; Karanja, J.; Bello, S.K. Piriformospora indica colonization reprograms plants to improved P-uptake, enhanced crop performance, and biotic/abiotic stress tolerance. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 106, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hashem, A.; Tabassum, B.; Fathi Abd_Allah, E. Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pandey, S.; Gupta, S. Evaluation of Pseudomonas sp. for its multifarious plant growth promoting potential and its ability to alleviate biotic and abiotic stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kashyap, B.; Kumar, R. Sensing methodologies in agriculture for monitoring biotic stress in plants due to pathogens and pests. Inventions 2021, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, D.; Wang, H.; Chen, S.; Yu, D.; Reiter, R.J. Phytomelatonin: An emerging regulator of plant biotic stress resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gupta, A.; Bano, A.; Rai, S.; Mishra, R.; Singh, M.; Sharma, S.; Pathak, N. Mechanistic insights of plant-microbe interaction towards drought and salinity stress in plants for enhancing the agriculture productivity. Plant Stress 2022, 4, 100073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vancostenoble, B.; Blanchet, N.; Langlade, N.B.; Bailly, C. Maternal drought stress induces abiotic stress tolerance to the progeny at the germination stage in sunflower. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 201, 104939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, X.; Komatsu, S. The role of phytohormones in plant response to flooding. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.-K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Raza, A.; Charagh, S.; Abbas, S.; Hassan, M.U.; Saeed, F.; Haider, S.; Sharif, R.; Anand, A.; Corpas, F.J.; Jin, W.; et al. Assessment of proline function in higher plants under extreme temperatures. Plant Biol. J. 2023, 25, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Reddy Pullagurala, V.L.; Adisa, I.O.; Rawat, S.; Kim, B.; Barrios, A.C.; Medina-Velo, I.A.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Finding the conditions for the beneficial use of ZnO nanoparticles towards plants-A review. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 241, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rajput, V.D.; Minkina, T.; Kumari, A.; Harish; Singh, V.K.; Verma, K.K.; Mandzhieva, S.; Sushkova, S.; Srivastava, S.; Keswani, C. Coping with the challenges of abiotic stress in plants: New dimensions in the field application of nanoparticles. Plants 2021, 10, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Silva, S.; Dias, M.C.; Silva, A.M.S. Titanium and zinc based nanomaterials in agriculture: A promising approach to deal with (a)biotic stresses? Toxics 2022, 10, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mazhar, M.W.; Ishtiaq, M.; Maqbool, M.; Hussain, S.A. Foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles improves rice yield under biotic stress posed by Magnaporthe oryzae. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2023, 56, 1093–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jayaseelan, C.; Rahuman, A.A.; Kirthi, A.V.; Marimuthu, S.; Santhoshkumar, T.; Bagavan, A.; Gaurav, K.; Karthik, L.; Rao, K.B. Novel microbial route to synthesize ZnO nanoparticles using Aeromonas hydrophila and their activity against pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2012, 90, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cai, L.; Liu, C.; Fan, G.; Liu, C.; Sun, X. Preventing viral disease by ZnONPs through directly deactivating TMV and activating plant immunity in Nicotiana benthamiana. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 3653–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Das, S.; Yadav, A.; Debnath, N. Entomotoxic efficacy of aluminium oxide, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles against Sitophilus oryzae (L.): A comparative analysis. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 83, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mosquera-Sánchez, L.P.; Arciniegas-Grijalba, P.A.; Patiño-Portela, M.C.; Guerra–Sierra, B.E.; Muñoz-Florez, J.E.; Rodríguez-Páez, J.E. Antifungal effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) on Colletotrichum sp., causal agent of anthracnose in coffee crops. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 25, 101579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abdelaziz, A.M.; Dacrory, S.; Hashem, A.H.; Attia, M.S.; Hasanin, M.; Fouda, H.M.; Kamel, S.; ElSaied, H. Protective role of zinc oxide nanoparticles based hydrogel against wilt disease of pepper plant. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 35, 102083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zudyte, B.; Luksiene, Z. Visible light-activated ZnO nanoparticles for microbial control of wheat crop. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2021, 219, 112206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bouqellah, N.A.; El-Sayyad, G.S.; Attia, M.S. Induction of tomato plant biochemical immune responses by the synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles against wilt-induced Fusarium oxysporum. Int. Microbiol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nandhini, M.; Rajini, S.B.; Udayashankar, A.C.; Niranjana, S.R.; Lund, O.S.; Shetty, H.S.; Prakash, H.S. Biofabricated zinc oxide nanoparticles as an eco-friendly alternative for growth promotion and management of downy mildew of pearl millet. Crop Prot. 2019, 121, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Faizan, M.; Bhat, J.A.; Noureldeen, A.; Ahmad, P.; Yu, F. Zinc oxide nanoparticles and 24-epibrassinolide alleviates Cu toxicity in tomato by regulating ROS scavenging, stomatal movement and photosynthesis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 218, 112293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ali, B.; Saleem, M.H.; Ali, S.; Shahid, M.; Sagir, M.; Tahir, M.B.; Qureshi, K.A.; Jaremko, M.; Selim, S.; Hussain, A.; et al. Mitigation of salinity stress in barley genotypes with variable salt tolerance by application of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 973782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ajmal, M.; Ullah, R.; Muhammad, Z.; Khan, M.N.; Kakar, H.A.; Kaplan, A.; Okla, M.K.; Saleh, I.A.; Kamal, A.; Abdullah, A.; et al. Kinetin capped zinc oxide nanoparticles improve plant growth and ameliorate resistivity to polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced drought stress in Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek (Mung Bean). Molecules 2023, 28, 5059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Markarian, S.; Shariatmadari, H.; Shirvani, M.; Mirmohammady Maibody, S.A.M. Impacts of ZnO nanoparticles and dissolved zinc (ZnSO4) on low temperature induced responses of wheat. J. Plant Nutr. 2023, 46, 3435–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rukhsar Ul, H.; Kausar, A.; Hussain, S.; Javed, T.; Zafar, S.; Anwar, S.; Hussain, S.; Zahra, N.; Saqib, M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles as potential hallmarks for enhancing drought stress tolerance in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 195, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Raliya, R.; Tarafdar, J.C.; Biswas, P. Enhancing the mobilization of native phosphorus in the mung bean rhizosphere using ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by soil fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3111–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sun, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, R.; Zhang, P.; Ju, Q.; Xu, J. Physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses reveal zinc oxide nanoparticles modulate plant growth in tomato. Environ. Sci. Nano 2020, 7, 3587–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, F.; Fang, Q.; Yan, S.; Pan, L.; Tang, X.; Ye, W. Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on arsenic stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Germination, early growth, and arsenic uptake. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 26974–26981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yusefi-Tanha, E.; Fallah, S.; Rostamnejadi, A.; Pokhrel, L.R. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) as a novel nanofertilizer: Influence on seed yield and antioxidant defense system in soil grown soybean (Glycine max cv. Kowsar). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 738, 140240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhao, L.; Lu, L.; Wang, A.; Zhang, H.; Huang, M.; Wu, H.; Xing, B.; Wang, Z.; Ji, R. Nano-biotechnology in agriculture: Use of nanomaterials to promote plant growth and stress tolerance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 1935–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhu, J.; Li, J.; Shen, Y.; Liu, S.; Zeng, N.; Zhan, X.; White, J.C.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.; Xing, B. Mechanism of zinc oxide nanoparticle entry into wheat seedling leaves. Environ. Sci. Nano 2020, 7, 3901–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pejam, F.; Ardebili, Z.O.; Ladan-Moghadam, A.; Danaee, E. Zinc oxide nanoparticles mediated substantial physiological and molecular changes in tomato. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tymoszuk, A.; Wojnarowicz, J. Zinc oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles impact on in vitro germination and seedling growth in Allium cepa L. Materials 2020, 13, 2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lyu, S.C.; Zhang, Y.; Lee, C.J.; Ruh, H.; Lee, H.J. Low-temperature growth of ZnO nanowire array by a simple physical vapor-deposition method. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 3294–3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Thangadurai, P.; Zergioti, I.; Saranu, S.; Chandrinou, C.; Yang, Z.; Tsoukalas, D.; Kean, A.; Boukos, N. ZnO nanoparticles produced by novel reactive physical deposition process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 5366–5369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Raoufi, D. Synthesis and microstructural properties of ZnO nanoparticles prepared by precipitation method. Renew. Energy 2013, 50, 932–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Suryanarayana, C. Mechanical alloying and milling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2001, 46, 1–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Glushenkov, A.; Zhang, H.-Z.; Chen, Y. Reactive ball milling to produce nanocrystalline ZnO. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 4047–4049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Asjadi, F.; Yaghoobi, M. Characterization and dye removal capacity of green hydrothermal synthesized ZnO nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 27027–27038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lee, C.Y.; Tseng, T.Y.; Li, S.Y.; Lin, P. Effect of phosphorus dopant on photoluminescence and field-emission characteristics of Mg0.1 Zn0.9O nanowires. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 99, 024303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yang, G.; Park, S.-J. Conventional and microwave hydrothermal synthesis and application of functional materials: A review. Materials 2019, 12, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Rana, K.K.; Rana, S. Microwave reactors: A brief review on its fundamental aspects and applications. Open Acc. Lib. J 2014, 1, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Strachowski, T.; Baran, M.; Małek, M.; Kosturek, R.; Grzanka, E.; Mizeracki, J.; Romanowska, A.; Marynowicz, S. Hydrothermal synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using different chemical reaction stimulation methods and their influence on process kinetics. Materials 2022, 15, 7661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zhou, X.-Q.; Hayat, Z.; Zhang, D.-D.; Li, M.-Y.; Hu, S.; Wu, Q.; Cao, Y.-F.; Yuan, Y. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, modification, and applications in food and agriculture. Prosses 2023, 11, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ruba, A.A.; Johny, L.M.; Jothi, N.N.; Sagayaraj, P. Solvothermal synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticle. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 8, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Šarić, A.; Despotović, I.; Štefanić, G. Solvothermal synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles: A combined experimental and theoretical study. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1178, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sahai, A.; Goswami, N. Structural and vibrational properties of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by the chemical precipitation method. Phys. E 2014, 58, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kahouli, M.; Barhoumi, A.; Bouzid, A.; Al-Hajry, A.; Guermazi, S. Structural and optical properties of ZnO nanoparticles prepared by direct precipitation method. Superlattices Microstruct. 2015, 85, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chen, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, P.; Yu, B. Investigation of photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange by using nano-sized ZnO catalysts. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 1, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sabir, S.; Arshad, M.; Chaudhari, S.K. Zinc oxide nanoparticles for revolutionizing agriculture: Synthesis and applications. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 925494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. López-Cuenca, S.; Aguilar-Martínez, J.; Rabelero-Velasco, M.; Hernández-Ibarra, F.; López-Ureta, L.; Pedroza-Toscano, M. Spheroidal zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by semicontinuous precipitation method at low temperatures. Rev. Mex. Ing. Quim. 2019, 18, 1179–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wojnarowicz, J.; Chudoba, T.; Lojkowski, W. A review of microwave synthesis of zinc oxide nanomaterials: Reactants, process parameters and morphologies. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wojnarowicz, J.; Chudoba, T.; Koltsov, I.; Gierlotka, S.; Dworakowska, S.; Lojkowski, W. Size control mechanism of ZnO nanoparticles obtained in microwave solvothermal synthesis. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 065601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Alavi, M.; Nokhodchi, A. Synthesis and modification of bio-derived antibacterial Ag and ZnO nanoparticles by plants, fungi, and bacteria. Drug Discovery Today 2021, 26, 1953–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Murali, M.; Gowtham, H.G.; Shilpa, N.; Singh, S.B.; Aiyaz, M.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Shivamallu, C.; Achar, R.R.; Silina, E.; Stupin, V.; et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles prepared through microbial mediated synthesis for therapeutic applications: A possible alternative for plants. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1227951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ahmed, S.; Annu; Chaudhry, S.A.; Ikram, S. A review on biogenic synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using plant extracts and microbes: A prospect towards green chemistry. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2017, 166, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shaba, E.Y.; Jacob, J.O.; Tijani, J.O.; Suleiman, M.A.T. A critical review of synthesis parameters affecting the properties of zinc oxide nanoparticle and its application in wastewater treatment. Appl. Water Sci. 2021, 11, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chandra, H.; Patel, D.; Kumari, P.; Jangwan, J.S.; Yadav, S. Phyto-mediated synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles of Berberis aristata: Characterization, antioxidant activity and antibacterial activity with special reference to urinary tract pathogens. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 102, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shayegan Mehr, E.; Sorbiun, M.; Ramazani, A.; Taghavi Fardood, S. Plant-mediated synthesis of zinc oxide and copper oxide nanoparticles by using ferulago angulata (schlecht) boiss extract and comparison of their photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light irradiation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 1333–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Venkateasan, A.; Prabakaran, R.; Sujatha, V. Phytoextract-mediated synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using aqueous leaves extract of Ipomoea pes-caprae (L). R. br revealing its biological properties and photocatalytic activity. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2017, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Parajuli, D.; Kawakita, H.; Inoue, K.; Ohto, K.; Kajiyama, K. Persimmon peel gel for the selective recovery of gold. Hydrometallurgy 2007, 87, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Xiong, Y.; Adhikari, C.R.; Kawakita, H.; Ohto, K.; Inoue, K.; Harada, H. Selective recovery of precious metals by persimmon waste chemically modified with dimethylamine. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 4083–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Khan, M.R.; Adam, V.; Rizvi, T.F.; Zhang, B.; Ahamad, F.; Jośko, I.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, M.; Mao, C. Nanoparticle–plant interactions: Two-way traffic. Small 2019, 15, 1901794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Su, Y.; Ashworth, V.; Kim, C.; Adeleye, A.S.; Rolshausen, P.; Roper, C.; White, J.; Jassby, D. Delivery, uptake, fate, and transport of engineered nanoparticles in plants: A critical review and data analysis. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 2311–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hong, J.; Wang, C.; Wagner, D.C.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; He, F.; Rico, C.M. Foliar application of nanoparticles: Mechanisms of absorption, transfer, and multiple impacts. Environ. Sci. Nano 2021, 8, 1196–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Paulraj, T.; Wennmalm, S.; Wieland, D.C.F.; Riazanova, A.V.; Dėdinaitė, A.; Günther Pomorski, T.; Cárdenas, M.; Svagan, A.J. Primary cell wall inspired micro containers as a step towards a synthetic plant cell. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, H.; Goh, N.S.; Wang, J.W.; Pinals, R.L.; González-Grandío, E.; Demirer, G.S.; Butrus, S.; Fakra, S.C.; Del Rio Flores, A.; Zhai, R.; et al. Nanoparticle cellular internalization is not required for RNA delivery to mature plant leaves. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 17, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wu, H.; Li, Z. Nano-enabled agriculture: How do nanoparticles cross barriers in plants? Plant Commun. 2022, 3, 100346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Miralles, P.; Church, T.L.; Harris, A.T. Toxicity, uptake, and translocation of engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 9224–9239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Alemzadeh, E.; Dehshahri, A.; Izadpanah, K.; Ahmadi, F. Plant virus nanoparticles: Novel and robust nanocarriers for drug delivery and imaging. Colloids Surf. B 2018, 167, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Usman, M.; Farooq, M.; Wakeel, A.; Nawaz, A.; Cheema, S.A.; Rehman, H.u.; Ashraf, I.; Sanaullah, M. Nanotechnology in agriculture: Current status, challenges and future opportunities. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 721, 137778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sun, X.; Chen, J.; Fan, W.; Liu, S.; Kamruzzaman, M. Production of reactive oxygen species via nanobubble water improves radish seed water absorption and the expression of aquaporin genes. Langmuir 2022, 38, 11724–11731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Raliya, R.; Nair, R.; Chavalmane, S.; Wang, W.-N.; Biswas, P. Mechanistic evaluation of translocation and physiological impact of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles on the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plant. Metallomics 2015, 7, 1584–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yang, X.; Alidoust, D.; Wang, C. Effects of iron oxide nanoparticles on the mineral composition and growth of soybean (Glycine max L.) plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2020, 42, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Gao, X.; Kundu, A.; Bueno, V.; Rahim, A.A.; Ghoshal, S. Uptake and translocation of mesoporous SiO2-coated ZnO nanoparticles to solanum lycopersicum following foliar application. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 13551–13560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Khan, I.; Awan, S.A.; Rizwan, M.; Hassan, Z.U.; Akram, M.A.; Tariq, R.; Brestic, M.; Xie, W. Nanoparticle’s uptake and translocation mechanisms in plants via seed priming, foliar treatment, and root exposure: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 89823–89833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Capaldi Arruda, S.C.; Diniz Silva, A.L.; Moretto Galazzi, R.; Antunes Azevedo, R.; Zezzi Arruda, M.A. Nanoparticles applied to plant science: A review. Talanta 2015, 131, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Rajput, V.D.; Minkina, T.M.; Behal, A.; Sushkova, S.N.; Mandzhieva, S.; Singh, R.; Gorovtsov, A.; Tsitsuashvili, V.S.; Purvis, W.O.; Ghazaryan, K.A.; et al. Effects of zinc-oxide nanoparticles on soil, plants, animals and soil organisms: A review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2018, 9, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Tripathi, D.K.; Shweta; Singh, S.; Singh, S.; Pandey, R.; Singh, V.P.; Sharma, N.C.; Prasad, S.M.; Dubey, N.K.; Chauhan, D.K. An overview on manufactured nanoparticles in plants: Uptake, translocation, accumulation and phytotoxicity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 110, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Avellan, A.; Yun, J.; Morais, B.P.; Clement, E.T.; Rodrigues, S.M.; Lowry, G.V. Critical review: Role of inorganic nanoparticle properties on their foliar uptake and in planta translocation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 13417–13431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Khan, M.; Khan, M.S.A.; Borah, K.K.; Goswami, Y.; Hakeem, K.R.; Chakrabartty, I. The potential exposure and hazards of metal-based nanoparticles on plants and environment, with special emphasis on ZnO NPs, TiO2 NPs, and AgNPs: A review. Environ. Adv. 2021, 6, 100128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yadav, V.; Arif, N.; Kováč, J.; Singh, V.P.; Tripathi, D.K.; Chauhan, D.K.; Vaculík, M. Structural modifications of plant organs and tissues by metals and metalloids in the environment: A review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shi, J.; Yang, B.; Wang, H.; Wu, Y.; He, F.; Dong, J.; Qin, G. The combined contamination of nano-polystyrene and nanoAg: Uptake, translocation and ecotoxicity effects on willow saplings. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 905, 167291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dong, S.; Jing, X.; Lin, S.; Lu, K.; Li, W.; Lu, J.; Li, M.; Gao, S.; Lu, S.; Zhou, D.; et al. Root hair apex is the key site for symplastic delivery of graphene into plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 12179–12189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wang, X.; Xie, H.; Wang, P.; Yin, H. Nanoparticles in plants: Uptake, transport and physiological activity in leaf and root. Materials 2023, 16, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Etxeberria, E.; Gonzalez, P.; Pozueta, J. Evidence for two endocytic transport pathways in plant cells. Plant Sci. 2009, 177, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mittal, D.; Kaur, G.; Singh, P.; Yadav, K.; Ali, S.A. Nanoparticle-based sustainable agriculture and food science: Recent advances and future outlook. Front. Nanotechnol. 2020, 2, 579954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mukarram, M.; Petrik, P.; Mushtaq, Z.; Khan, M.M.A.; Gulfishan, M.; Lux, A. Silicon nanoparticles in higher plants: Uptake, action, stress tolerance, and crosstalk with phytohormones, antioxidants, and other signalling molecules. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 310, 119855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lin, D.; Xing, B. Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5580–5585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Chen, J.; Dou, R.; Yang, Z.; You, T.; Gao, X.; Wang, L. Phytotoxicity and bioaccumulation of zinc oxide nanoparticles in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 130, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Sánchez-Palacios, J.T.; Henry, D.; Penrose, B.; Bell, R. Formulation of zinc foliar sprays for wheat grain biofortification: A review of current applications and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1247600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. El-Shetehy, M.; Moradi, A.; Maceroni, M.; Reinhardt, D.; Petri-Fink, A.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Mauch, F.; Schwab, F. Silica nanoparticles enhance disease resistance in Arabidopsis plants. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Landa, P. Positive effects of metallic nanoparticles on plants: Overview of involved mechanisms. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 161, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Dutta, T.; Bagchi, D.; Bera, A.; Das, S.; Adhikari, T.; Pal, S.K. Surface engineered ZnO-humic/citrate interfaces: Photoinduced charge carrier dynamics and potential application for smart and sustained delivery of Zn micronutrient. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 10920–10930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Gonzalez-Moragas, L.; Maurer, L.L.; Harms, V.M.; Meyer, J.N.; Laromaine, A.; Roig, A. Materials and toxicological approaches to study metal and metal-oxide nanoparticles in the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4, 719–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Martins, N.C.T.; Avellan, A.; Rodrigues, S.; Salvador, D.; Rodrigues, S.M.; Trindade, T. Composites of biopolymers and ZnO NPs for controlled release of zinc in agricultural soils and timed delivery for maize. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 2134–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, P.; Menzies, N.W.; Lombi, E.; McKenna, B.A.; Johannessen, B.; Glover, C.J.; Kappen, P.; Kopittke, P.M. Fate of ZnO nanoparticles in soils and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 13822–13830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.; Castillo-Michel, H.; Andrews, J.C.; Cotte, M.; Rico, C.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Ge, Y.; Priester, J.H.; Holden, P.A.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. In situ synchrotron X-ray fluorescence mapping and speciation of CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticles in soil cultivated soybean (Glycine max). ACS Nano 2013, 7, 1415–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Thangavel, P.; Long, S.; Minocha, R. Changes in phytochelatins and their biosynthetic intermediates in red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) cell suspension cultures under cadmium and zinc stress. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ. Cult. 2007, 88, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhang, Q.; Ying, Y.; Ping, J. Recent advances in plant nanoscience. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2103414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Mandal, A.K.; Katuwal, S.; Tettey, F.; Gupta, A.; Bhattarai, S.; Jaisi, S.; Bhandari, D.P.; Shah, A.K.; Bhattarai, N.; Parajuli, N. Current research on zinc oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, and biomedical applications. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pittarate, S.; Rajula, J.; Rahman, A.; Vivekanandhan, P.; Thungrabeab, M.; Mekchay, S.; Krutmuang, P. Insecticidal effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Spodoptera frugiperda under laboratory conditions. Insects 2021, 12, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Pittarate, S.; Perumal, V.; Kannan, S.; Mekchay, S.; Thungrabeab, M.; Suttiprapan, P.; Sengottayan, S.-N.; Krutmuang, P. Insecticidal efficacy of nanoparticles against Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) larvae and their impact in the soil. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Malaikozhundan, B.; Vaseeharan, B.; Vijayakumar, S.; Thangaraj, M.P. Bacillus thuringiensis coated zinc oxide nanoparticle and its biopesticidal effects on the pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2017, 174, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Malaikozhundan, B.; Vinodhini, J. Nanopesticidal effects of Pongamia pinnata leaf extract coated zinc oxide nanoparticle against the Pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Mater. Today Commun. 2018, 14, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Jameel, M.; Shoeb, M.; Khan, M.T.; Ullah, R.; Mobin, M.; Farooqi, M.K.; Adnan, S.M. Enhanced insecticidal activity of thiamethoxam by zinc oxide nanoparticles: A novel nanotechnology approach for pest control. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 1607–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Velsankar, K.; Parvathy, G.; Mohandoss, S.; Sudhahar, S. Effect of green synthesized ZnO nanoparticles using Paspalum scrobiculatum grains extract in biological applications. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2022, 85, 3069–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Shukla, G.; Gaurav, S.S.; Singh, A. Synthesis of mycogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles and preliminary determination of its efficacy as a larvicide against white grubs (Holotrichia sp.). Int. Nano Lett. 2020, 10, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Iqbal, H.; Fatima, A.; Khan, H.A.A. ZnO nanoparticles produced in the culture supernatant of Bacillus thuringiensis ser. israelensis affect the demographic parameters of Musca domestica using the age-stage, two-sex life table. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 1640–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Asghar, M.S.; Sarwar, Z.M.; Almadiy, A.A.; Shami, A.; El Hadi Mohamed, R.A.; Ahmed, N.; Waghulade, M.S.; Alam, P.; Abd Al Galil, F.M. Toxicological effects of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles on the biological and life table parameters of Helicoverpa armigera (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Agriculture 2022, 12, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Thakur, P.; Thakur, S.; Kumari, P.; Shandilya, M.; Sharma, S.; Poczai, P.; Alarfaj, A.A.; Sayyed, R.Z. Nano-insecticide: Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of insecticidal activity of ZnO NPs against Spodoptera litura and Macrosiphum euphorbiae. Appl. Nanosci. 2022, 12, 3835–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Helmy, E.A.M.; San, P.P.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Adarkwah, C.; Tuda, M. Entomotoxic efficacy of fungus-synthesized nanoparticles against immature stages of stored bean pests. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Siddique, M.A.; Hasan, M.u.; Sagheer, M.; Sahi, S.T. Comparative toxic effects of Eucalyptus globulus L. (Myrtales: Myrtaceae) and its green synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) against Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2022, 42, 1697–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Biradar, W.; Nadagouda, S.; Aralimarad, P.; Hiregoudar, S. Entomotoxic effect of green nanoparticle an alternate strategy for stored grain pest management. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2021, 41, 2829–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Hamdy, E.; Al-Askar, A.A.; El-Gendi, H.; Khamis, W.M.; Behiry, S.I.; Valentini, F.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Abdelkhalek, A. Zinc oxide nanoparticles biosynthesized by Eriobotrya japonica leaf extract: Characterization, insecticidal and antibacterial properties. Plants 2023, 12, 2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Rebora, M.; Del Buono, D.; Piersanti, S.; Salerno, G. Reduction in insect attachment ability by biogenic and non-biogenic ZnO nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Nano 2023, 10, 3062–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Murugan, K.; Roni, M.; Panneerselvam, C.; Aziz, A.T.; Suresh, U.; Rajaganesh, R.; Aruliah, R.; Mahyoub, J.A.; Trivedi, S.; Rehman, H.; et al. Sargassum wightii-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles reduce the fitness and reproduction of the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi and cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 101, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Keerthana, P.; Vijayakumar, S.; Vidhya EV, N.P.; Punitha, V.N.; Nilavukkarasi, M.; Praseetha, P.K. Biogenesis of ZnO nanoparticles for revolutionizing agriculture: A step towards anti -infection and growth promotion in plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Abdallah, Y.; Liu, M.; Ogunyemi, S.O.; Ahmed, T.; Fouad, H.; Abdelazez, A.; Yan, C.; Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, B. Bioinspired green synthesis of chitosan and zinc oxide nanoparticles with strong antibacterial activity against rice pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Molecules 2020, 25, 4795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Soliman, M.; Lee, B.; Ozcan, A.; Rawal, T.B.; Young, M.; Mendis, H.C.; Rajasekaran, P.; Washington, T.; Pingali, S.V.; O’Neill, H.; et al. Engineered zinc oxide-based nanotherapeutics boost systemic antibacterial efficacy against phloem-restricted diseases. Environ. Sci. Nano 2022, 9, 2869–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Qiu, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wen, H.; Jiang, N.; Shi, H.; Kou, Y. The application of zinc oxide nanoparticles: An effective strategy to protect rice from rice blast and abiotic stresses. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 331, 121925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Li, J.; Sang, H.; Guo, H.; Popko, J.T.; He, L.; White, J.C.; Parkash Dhankher, O.; Jung, G.; Xing, B. Antifungal mechanisms of ZnO and Ag nanoparticles to Sclerotinia homoeocarpa. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 155101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Luksiene, Z.; Rasiukeviciute, N.; Zudyte, B.; Uselis, N. Innovative approach to sunlight activated biofungicides for strawberry crop protection: ZnO nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2020, 203, 111656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Chang, Y.-N.; Zhang, M.; Xia, L.; Zhang, J.; Xing, G. The toxic effects and mechanisms of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Materials 2012, 5, 2850–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Soren, S.; Kumar, S.; Mishra, S.; Jena, P.K.; Verma, S.K.; Parhi, P. Evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant potential of the zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by aqueous and polyol method. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 119, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Premanathan, M.; Karthikeyan, K.; Jeyasubramanian, K.; Manivannan, G. Selective toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles toward Gram-positive bacteria and cancer cells by apoptosis through lipid peroxidation. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2011, 7, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Vani, C.; Sergin, G.; Annamalai, A. A study on the effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles in Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2011, 2, 326–335. [Google Scholar]
  162. Sirelkhatim, A.; Mahmud, S.; Seeni, A.; Kaus, N.H.M.; Ann, L.C.; Bakhori, S.K.M.; Hasan, H.; Mohamad, D. Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles: Antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett. 2015, 7, 219–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Król, A.; Pomastowski, P.; Rafińska, K.; Railean-Plugaru, V.; Buszewski, B. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, antiseptic activity and toxicity mechanism. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 249, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Agarwal, H.; Menon, S.; Kumar, S.V.; Rajeshkumar, S. Mechanistic study on antibacterial action of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized using green route. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2018, 286, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Sharma, D.; Rajput, J.; Kaith, B.; Kaur, M.; Sharma, S. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and study of their antibacterial and antifungal properties. Thin Solid Films 2010, 519, 1224–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kairyte, K.; Kadys, A.; Luksiene, Z. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of photoactivated ZnO nanoparticles in suspension. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2013, 128, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Servin, A.; Elmer, W.; Mukherjee, A.; De la Torre-Roche, R.; Hamdi, H.; White, J.C.; Bindraban, P.; Dimkpa, C. A review of the use of engineered nanomaterials to suppress plant disease and enhance crop yield. J. Nanopart. Res. 2015, 17, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Seil, J.T.; Webster, T.J. Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: Methods and literature. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 2767–2781. [Google Scholar]
  169. Fowsiya, J.; Asharani, I.V.; Mohapatra, S.; Eshapula, A.; Mohi, P.; Thakar, N.; Monad, S.; Madhumitha, G. Aegle marmelos phytochemical stabilized synthesis and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles and their role against agriculture and food pathogen. Green Process. Synth. 2019, 8, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Şahin, B.; Soylu, S.; Kara, M.; Türkmen, M.; Aydin, R.; Çetin, H. Superior antibacterial activity against seed-borne plant bacterial disease agents and enhanced physical properties of novel green synthesized nanostructured ZnO using Thymbra spicata plant extract. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Jaithon, T.; Ruangtong, J.; T-Thienprasert, J.; T-Thienprasert, N.P. Effects of waste-derived ZnO nanoparticles against growth of plant pathogenic bacteria and epidermoid carcinoma cells. Crystals 2022, 12, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Badar, R.; Ahmed, A.; Munazir, M.; Asghar, M.; Bashir, F. Wheat leaf rust control through biofabricated zinc oxide nanoparticles. Australasian Plant Pathol. 2023, 52, 609–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Sun, L.; Song, F.; Guo, J.; Zhu, X.; Liu, S.; Liu, F.; Li, X. Nano-ZnO-induced drought tolerance Is associated with melatonin synthesis and metabolism in maize. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. El-Zohri, M.; Al-Wadaani, N.A.; Bafeel, S.O. Foliar sprayed green zinc oxide nanoparticles mitigate drought-induced oxidative stress in tomato. Plants 2021, 10, 2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Dimkpa, C.O.; Singh, U.; Bindraban, P.S.; Elmer, W.H.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; White, J.C. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate drought-induced alterations in sorghum performance, nutrient acquisition, and grain fortification. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 688, 926–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Raeisi Sadati, S.Y.; Jahanbakhsh Godehkahriz, S.; Ebadi, A.; Sedghi, M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in wheat via physio-biochemical changes and stress genes expression. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 20, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Sun, L.; Song, F.; Zhu, X.; Liu, S.; Liu, F.; Wang, Y.; Li, X. Nano-ZnO alleviates drought stress via modulating the plant water use and carbohydrate metabolism in maize. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2021, 67, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Rai-Kalal, P.; Tomar, R.S.; Jajoo, A. H2O2 signaling regulates seed germination in ZnO nanoprimed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds for improving plant performance under drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 189, 104561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Ullah, A.; Romdhane, L.; Rehman, A.; Farooq, M. Adequate zinc nutrition improves the tolerance against drought and heat stresses in chickpea. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 143, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Thakur, S.; Asthir, B.; Kaur, G.; Kalia, A.; Sharma, A. Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles influence heat stress tolerance mediated by antioxidant defense system in wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 2022, 50, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Kareem, H.A.; Saleem, M.F.; Saleem, S.; Rather, S.A.; Wani, S.H.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Alamri, S.; Kumar, R.; Gaikwad, N.B.; Guo, Z.; et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles interplay with physiological and biochemical attributes in terminal heat stress alleviation in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 842349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Kareem, H.A.; Hassan, M.U.; Zain, M.; Irshad, A.; Shakoor, N.; Saleem, S.; Niu, J.; Skalicky, M.; Chen, Z.; Guo, Z.; et al. Nanosized zinc oxide (n-ZnO) particles pretreatment to alfalfa seedlings alleviate heat-induced morpho-physiological and ultrastructural damages. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 303, 119069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Elshoky, H.A.; Yotsova, E.; Farghali, M.A.; Farroh, K.Y.; El-Sayed, K.; Elzorkany, H.E.; Rashkov, G.; Dobrikova, A.; Borisova, P.; Stefanov, M.; et al. Impact of foliar spray of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the photosynthesis of Pisum sativum L. under salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Faizan, M.; Bhat, J.A.; Chen, C.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ahmad, P.; Yu, F. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) induce salt tolerance by improving the antioxidant system and photosynthetic machinery in tomato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 161, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Singh, P.; Arif, Y.; Siddiqui, H.; Sami, F.; Zaidi, R.; Azam, A.; Alam, P.; Hayat, S. Nanoparticles enhances the salinity toxicity tolerance in Linum usitatissimum L. by modulating the antioxidative enzymes, photosynthetic efficiency, redox status and cellular damage. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 213, 112020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Yasmin, H.; Mazher, J.; Azmat, A.; Nosheen, A.; Naz, R.; Hassan, M.N.; Noureldeen, A.; Ahmad, P. Combined application of zinc oxide nanoparticles and biofertilizer to induce salt resistance in safflower by regulating ion homeostasis and antioxidant defence responses. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 218, 112262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Adil, M.; Bashir, S.; Bashir, S.; Aslam, Z.; Ahmad, N.; Younas, T.; Asghar, R.M.A.; Alkahtani, J.; Dwiningsih, Y.; Elshikh, M.S. Zinc oxide nanoparticles improved chlorophyll contents, physical parameters, and wheat yield under salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 932861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Singh, A.; Sengar, R.S.; Rajput, V.D.; Minkina, T.; Singh, R.K. Zinc oxide nanoparticles improve salt tolerance in rice seedlings by improving physiological and biochemical indices. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Lalarukh, I.; Zahra, N.; Al Huqail, A.A.; Amjad, S.F.; Al-Dhumri, S.A.; Ghoneim, A.M.; Alshahri, A.H.; Almutari, M.M.; Alhusayni, F.S.; Al-Shammari, W.B.; et al. Exogenously applied ZnO nanoparticles induced salt tolerance in potentially high yielding modern wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 27, 102799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Sarkar, R.D.; Kalita, M.C. Alleviation of salt stress complications in plants by nanoparticles and the associated mechanisms: An overview. Plant Stress 2023, 7, 100134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Ahmed, R.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Sabir, M.; Usman, M.; Rizwan, M.; Ahmad, Z.; Alharby, H.F.; Al-Zahrani, H.S.; Alsamadany, H.; Aldhebiani, A.Y.; et al. Differential response of nano zinc sulphate with other conventional sources of Zn in mitigating salinity stress in rice grown on saline-sodic soil. Chemosphere 2023, 327, 138479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. El-Badri, A.M.; Batool, M.; Wang, C.; Hashem, A.M.; Tabl, K.M.; Nishawy, E.; Kuai, J.; Zhou, G.; Wang, B. Selenium and zinc oxide nanoparticles modulate the molecular and morpho-physiological processes during seed germination of Brassica napus under salt stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 225, 112695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Manasa, S.L.; Panigrahy, M.; Panigrahi, K.C.S.; Rout, G.R. Overview of cold stress regulation in plants. Plants. Bot. Rev. 2022, 88, 359–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Soualiou, S.; Duan, F.; Li, X.; Zhou, W. Crop production under cold stress: An understanding of plant responses, acclimation processes, and management strategies. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 190, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Raza, A.; Charagh, S.; Najafi-Kakavand, S.; Abbas, S.; Shoaib, Y.; Anwar, S.; Sharifi, S.; Lu, G.; Siddique, K.H.M. Role of phytohormones in regulating cold stress tolerance: Physiological and molecular approaches for developing cold-smart crop plants. Plant Stress 2023, 8, 100152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Elsheery, N.I.; Sunoj, V.S.J.; Wen, Y.; Zhu, J.J.; Muralidharan, G.; Cao, K.F. Foliar application of nanoparticles mitigates the chilling effect on photosynthesis and photoprotection in sugarcane. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 149, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Song, Y.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, H.; Li, R. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate chilling stress in rice (Oryza Sativa L.) by regulating antioxidative system and chilling response transcription factors. Molecules 2021, 26, 2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Zhang, J.; Yang, R.; Li, Y.C.; Peng, Y.; Wen, X.; Ni, X. Distribution, accumulation, and potential risks of heavy metals in soil and tea leaves from geologically different plantations. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 195, 110475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Pescatore, A.; Grassi, C.; Rizzo, A.M.; Orlandini, S.; Napoli, M. Effects of biochar on berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrinum, L.) growth and heavy metal (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn) accumulation. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 131986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Tian, W.; Zhang, M.; Zong, D.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, Y.; Xiang, P. Are high-risk heavy metal(loid)s contaminated vegetables detrimental to human health? A study of incorporating bioaccessibility and toxicity into accurate health risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 897, 165514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Gong, Y.; Zhao, D.; Wang, Q. An overview of field-scale studies on remediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals and metalloids: Technical progress over the last decade. Water Res. 2018, 147, 440–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Chen, Y.; Liu, D.; Ma, J.; Jin, B.; Peng, J.; He, X. Assessing the influence of immobilization remediation of heavy metal contaminated farmland on the physical properties of soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 781, 146773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Li, Y.; Liang, L.; Li, W.; Ashraf, U.; Ma, L.; Tang, X.; Pan, S.; Tian, H.; Mo, Z. ZnO nanoparticle-based seed priming modulates early growth and enhances physio-biochemical and metabolic profiles of fragrant rice against cadmium toxicity. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Ghouri, F.; Shahid, M.J.; Liu, J.; Lai, M.; Sun, L.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Ali, S.; Shahid, M.Q. Polyploidy and zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviated Cd toxicity in rice by modulating oxidative stress and expression levels of sucrose and metal-transporter genes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 448, 130991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Jalil, S.; Alghanem, S.M.S.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Nazir, M.M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Ahmed, T.; Ali, S.H.A.; Abeed, A.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Jin, X. Zinc oxide nanoparticles mitigated the arsenic induced oxidative stress through modulation of physio-biochemical aspects and nutritional ions homeostasis in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chemosphere 2023, 338, 139566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Emamverdian, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Ding, Y.; Barker, J.; Mokhberdoran, F.; Liu, G. Zinc oxide nanoparticles improve Pleioblastus pygmaeus plant tolerance to arsenic and mercury by stimulating antioxidant defense and reducing the metal accumulation and translocation. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 841501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Bhat, J.A.; Faizan, M.; Bhat, M.A.; Sharma, G.; Rinklebe, J.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Bajguz, A.; Ahmad, P. Mitigation of arsenic stress in Brassica juncea L. using zinc oxide-nanoparticles produced by novel hydrothermal synthesis. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 163, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Banerjee, S.; Islam, J.; Mondal, S.; Saha, A.; Saha, B.; Sen, A. Proactive attenuation of arsenic-stress by nano-priming: Zinc oxide nanoparticles in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper trigger antioxidant defense response and reduce root-shoot arsenic translocation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 446, 130735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Hussain, F.; Hadi, F.; Rongliang, Q. Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on antioxidants, chlorophyll contents, and proline in Persicaria hydropiper L. and its potential for Pb phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 34697–34713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Raghib, F.; Naikoo, M.I.; Khan, F.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Interaction of ZnO nanoparticle and AM fungi mitigates Pb toxicity in wheat by upregulating antioxidants and restricted uptake of Pb. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 323, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Azim, Z.; Singh, N.B.; Khare, S.; Singh, A.; Amist, N.; Niharika; Yadav, R.K.; Hussain, I. Potential role of biosynthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles in counteracting lead toxicity in Solanum lycopersicum L. Plant Nano Biol. 2022, 2, 100012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Wang, R.; Sun, L.; Zhang, P.; Wan, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate cadmium stress by modulating plant metabolism and decreasing cadmium accumulation in Perilla frutescents. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 100, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Zhang, W.; Long, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Xiao, G.; Ye, X.; Chang, W.; Zeng, H. Impact of ZnO nanoparticles on Cd toxicity and bioaccumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 23119–23128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Venkatachalam, P.; Jayaraj, M.; Manikandan, R.; Geetha, N.; Rene, E.R.; Sharma, N.C.; Sahi, S.V. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) alleviate heavy metal-induced toxicity in Leucaena leucocephala seedlings: A physiochemical analysis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 110, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Priyanka, N.; Geetha, N.; Manish, T.; Sahi, S.V.; Venkatachalam, P. Zinc oxide nanocatalyst mediates cadmium and lead toxicity tolerance mechanism by differential regulation of photosynthetic machinery and antioxidant enzymes level in cotton seedlings. Toxicol. Rep. 2021, 8, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Pishkar, L.; Yousefi, S.; Iranbakhsh, A. Foliar application of Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviates cadmium toxicity in purslane by maintaining nutrients homeostasis and improving the activity of antioxidant enzymes and glyoxalase system. Ecotoxicology 2022, 31, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Adrees, M.; Khan, Z.S.; Hafeez, M.; Rizwan, M.; Hussain, K.; Asrar, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ali, S. Foliar exposure of zinc oxide nanoparticles improved the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and decreased cadmium concentration in grains under simultaneous Cd and water deficient stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Faizan, M.; Faraz, A.; Mir, A.R.; Hayat, S. Role of zinc oxide nanoparticles in countering negative effects generated by cadmium in Lycopersicon esculentum. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Basit, F.; Nazir, M.M.; Shahid, M.; Abbas, S.; Javed, M.T.; Naqqash, T.; Liu, Y.; Yajing, G. Application of zinc oxide nanoparticles immobilizes the chromium uptake in rice plants by regulating the physiological, biochemical and cellular attributes. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2022, 28, 1175–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Basit, F.; Shahid, M.; Abbas, S.; Naqqash, T.; Akram, M.S.; Tahir, M.; Azeem, M.; Cai, Y.; Jia, S.; Hu, J.; et al. Protective role of ZnO nanoparticles in soybean seedlings growth and stress management under Cr-enriched conditions. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 100, 703–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Mehmood, S.; Ou, W.; Ahmed, W.; Bundschuh, J.; Rizwan, M.; Mahmood, M.; Sultan, H.; Alatalo, J.M.; Elnahal, A.S.M.; Liu, W.; et al. ZnO nanoparticles mediated by Azadirachta indica as nano fertilizer: Improvement in physiological and biochemical indices of Zea mays grown in Cr-contaminated soil. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 339, 122755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Ramzan, M.; Naz, G.; shah, A.A.; Parveen, M.; Jamil, M.; Gill, S.; Sharif, H.M.A. Synthesis of phytostabilized zinc oxide nanoparticles and their effects on physiological and anti-oxidative responses of Zea mays (L.) under chromium stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 196, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Agronomy 13 03060 g001
Figure 1. Various strategies for the fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles.
Figure 1. Various strategies for the fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles.
Agronomy 13 03060 g001
Agronomy 13 03060 g002
Figure 2. Mechanisms of ZnO nanoparticles uptake and transport in plant tissues. Transverse cross-section of the leaf showing entry of nanoparticles through stomata, cuticle penetration (A). Transverse cross-section of the root showing entry of nanoparticles through the root epidermis and cortex or biotransformation into zinc ions (B).
Figure 2. Mechanisms of ZnO nanoparticles uptake and transport in plant tissues. Transverse cross-section of the leaf showing entry of nanoparticles through stomata, cuticle penetration (A). Transverse cross-section of the root showing entry of nanoparticles through the root epidermis and cortex or biotransformation into zinc ions (B).
Agronomy 13 03060 g002
Agronomy 13 03060 g003
Figure 3. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles reducing abiotic and biotic stress in plants.
Figure 3. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles reducing abiotic and biotic stress in plants.
Agronomy 13 03060 g003
Table 1. The insecticidal activity of ZnO nanoparticles against various pests.
Table 1. The insecticidal activity of ZnO nanoparticles against various pests.
Method of SynthesisParticle Size (nm)Target PestReferences
Commercial purchase25–50 nmSpodoptera frugiperda[136]
Synthesized using Paspalum scrobiculatum grains extract15–30 nmTribolium castaneum[141]
Synthesized using Aspergillus niger biomass76.2–183.8 nmHolotrichia sp.[142]
Synthesized using Pongamia pinnata leaf extract21.3 nmCallosobruchus maculatus[139]
Synthesized using Bacillus thuringiensis300 nm–1 μmMusca domestica[143]
Synthesized using Azadirachta indica leaf extract10–70 nmHelicoverpa armigera[144]
Synthesized using Zingiber officinale rhizome extract50–100 nmSpodoptera litura and Macrosiphum euphorbiae[145]
Synthesized using fungus Fusarium solani extract8–33 nmCallosobruchus[146]
ZnO nanoparticles with a thiamethoxam nanocomposite30 nmSpodoptera litura[140]
Synthesized using Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract186.7 nmRhyzopertha dominica[147]
Synthesized using Spinacia oleracea leaf extract87.94 nmCorcyra cephalonica[148]
Synthesized using Eriobotrya japonica leaf extract5–27 nmSitophilus oryzae and Tribolium castaneum[149]
Synthesized using Lemna minor hydroalcoholic extract10–20 nmNezara viridula[150]
Synthesized using Sargassum wightii leaf extract20–62 nmHelicoverpa armigera[151]
Table 2. The antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles against various phytopathogenic microbes.
Table 2. The antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles against various phytopathogenic microbes.
Method of SynthesisParticle Size (nm)Target PathogenReferences
Synthesized using Citrus medica aqueous peel extract29 nmStreptomyces sannanesis, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger[152]
Commercial purchase300–800 nmBotrytis cinerea[157]
Synthesized using lycopersicon esculentum aqueous extract31.3–88.9 nmXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae[153]
Synthesized using Aegle marmelos leaf extract18 ± 2 nmAspergillus flavus and Aspergillus niger[169]
Synthesized using one-pot wet-chemical method 2.5–5 nmCandidatus Liberibacter asiaticus[154]
Synthesized using Thymbra spicata plant extract426–540 nmC. michiganensis subsp. Michiganensis, Pseudomonas cichorii, Pseudomonas syringae pv. Phaseolicola and Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. Carotovorum[170]
Synthesized using Garcinia mangostana or Eichhornia crassipes extract50–100 nmXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, and Ralstonia solanacearum[171]
Commercial purchase30 nmSclerotinia homeocarpa[156]
Commercial purchase30 nmMagnaporthe oryzae[155]
Synthesized using Azadirachta indica leaf extract101.6 nmPuccini triticina[172]
Table 3. Examples of ZnO nanoparticle applications to confer heavy metal stress tolerance in different plant species.
Table 3. Examples of ZnO nanoparticle applications to confer heavy metal stress tolerance in different plant species.
Heavy MetalPlant Alteration in Plant ParametersReferences
AsOryza sativaEnhanced plant growth parameters, gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll content (SPAD value), fluorescence efficiency (Fv/m), and antioxidant enzyme activities[205]
As and HgPleioblastus pygmaeusIncreased antioxidant activity, proline content, glycine betaine content, tyrosine ammonia-lyase activity, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity, chlorophyll indices, and plant biomass[206]
AsBrassica junceaEnhanced plant growth, photosynthesis-related parameters, protein content, carbonic anhydrase, nitrate reductase, and RuBisCO[207]
AsVigna mungoEnhanced seed germination rate, germination rate, seedling vigor, plant biomass, shoot length, root length, antioxidant enzymes activity (SOD, CAT, POX, APX), and osmoregulators[208]
PbPersicaria hydropiperEnhanced plant growth, chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, free proline, phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidative enzymes (CAT, GR, GST, SOD) [209]
PbTriticum aestivumIncreased plant height, fresh weight, dry weight, total chlorophyll content, proline content, SOD content, CAT content, H2O2 content, and lipid peroxidation content[210]
PbSolanum lycopersicumIncreased germination rate, seedling vigor index, relative water content, chlorophyll content, protein, sugars, nitrate reductase, SOD, POD, and APX activity[211]
CdPerilla frutescensIncreased SOD, POD, nutrient elements contents, organic acids (citric acid, malic acid and maleic acid), and amino acids (arginine, glutamate and phenylalanine), root and leaf dry weight [212]
CdOryza sativaIncreased plant height, biomass, photosynthetic attributes, oxidative stress (MDA, H2O2), antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT, GSH. APX)[204,213]
Cd and PbGossypium hirsutum and Leucaena leucocephala Enhanced plant growth and biomass, level photosynthetic pigments, MDA, protein content, and oxidative enzymes (POD, SOD, POX, and APX)[214,215]
CdPortulaca oleraceaImproved the activity of antioxidant enzymes, the glyoxalase system, photosynthetic pigments, and the glyoxalase cycle[216]
CdTriticum aestivumIncreased the growth of wheat, chlorophyll content, zinc content, POD, and SOD[217]
CdOryza sativaEnhanced mean root fresh weight, root-shoot length, SOD, POD, metallothionein content, α-amylase, and total amylase activity[203]
CdLycopersicon esculentumEnhanced plant height, fresh and dry weight of plant, leaf area, SPAD chlorophyll, photosynthetic attributes, protein content, and activities of nitrate reductase and carbonic anhydrase[218]
CrOryza sativaIncreased biomass accumulation, antioxidants (SOD, CAT, POD), nutrient acquisition (zinc, ferrum), and brassinosteroids[219]
CrGlycine maxEnhanced biomass, antioxidant system, altered enzymatic (SOD, POD, CAT) and non-enzymatic antioxidant activities (GR, GSH, GSSH), and nutrient uptake[220]
CrZea maysIncreased fresh shoot weight, fresh root weight, shoot length, root length, chlorophyll content, total soluble sugars, proline content, POD, CAT, and APX enzyme activities[221,222]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; Ma, T.; Liang, Y.; Huo, Z.; Yang, F. Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Applications in Enhancing Plant Stress Resistance: A Review. Agronomy 2023, 13, 3060. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123060

AMA Style

Wang Z, Wang S, Ma T, Liang Y, Huo Z, Yang F. Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Applications in Enhancing Plant Stress Resistance: A Review. Agronomy. 2023; 13(12):3060. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zijun, Sijin Wang, Tingting Ma, You Liang, Zhongyang Huo, and Fengping Yang. 2023. "Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Applications in Enhancing Plant Stress Resistance: A Review" Agronomy 13, no. 12: 3060. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123060

APA Style

Wang, Z., Wang, S., Ma, T., Liang, Y., Huo, Z., & Yang, F. (2023). Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Applications in Enhancing Plant Stress Resistance: A Review. Agronomy, 13(12), 3060. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop