Next Article in Journal
Genomic Selection in Alfalfa Across Multiple Ploidy Levels: A Comparative Study Using Machine Learning and Bayesian Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Validation of KASP Markers Associated with Hydrogen Cyanide in Fresh Cassava Roots in Uganda Cassava Germplasm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytochemistry of Argemone ochroleuca Sweet Extracts and Their Inhibitory Effects on Maize Seed Germination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effective Control of Neofusicoccum parvum in Grapevines: Combining Trichoderma spp. with Chemical Fungicides

by
Aranzazu Gomez-Garay
1,*,
Sergio Astudillo Calderón
1,
Mª Luisa Tello Mariscal
2 and
Beatriz Pintos López
1
1
Research Group FiVe-A, Department of Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria—Spanish National Research Council, Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 2766; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122766
Submission received: 31 August 2024 / Revised: 18 November 2024 / Accepted: 19 November 2024 / Published: 21 November 2024

Abstract

:
Vitis vinifera is highly susceptible to grapevine trunk diseases, with Neofusicoccum parvum recognized as a highly destructive pathogen. This study investigates the biocontrol potential of five Trichoderma species (T. harzianum, T. viride, T. asperellum, and T. virens) against N. parvum, evaluating multiple biocontrol mechanisms (mycoparasitism, competition for nutrients, production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and antibiosis) as well as their compatibility with the fungicides copper oxychloride and sulfur. Results demonstrated that (1) Trichoderma harzianum effectively suppressed N. parvum through VOC production, mycoparasitism, and nutrient competition, significantly reducing pathogen growth in planta while showing compatibility with both fungicides, highlighting its suitability for integrated disease management; (2) Trichoderma viride showed high inhibition of N. parvum in vitro, but its phytotoxicity in planta limits its field application. These findings support T. harzianum as a promising agent within integrated disease management strategies, offering a sustainable alternative to reduce chemical fungicide reliance in controlling grapevine trunk pathogens.

1. Introduction

Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are among the most destructive fungal diseases affecting Vitis vinifera, becoming increasingly prevalent due to factors such as climate change [1,2]. GTD pathogens represent the largest group of grapevine pathogens, with up to 133 fungal species across 34 genera identified globally [3]. These diseases include Petri disease, Black foot, Eutypa dieback, Phomopsis dieback, Esca, grapevine leaf stripe disease, and Botryosphaeria dieback.
Among the pathogens responsible for GTDs, Botryosphaeria dieback is particularly concerning, with 26 species from the Botryosphaeriaceae family linked to this disease. Neofusicoccum species, particularly N. parvum, are recognized as the most virulent and fast-colonizing wood pathogens within this group [4,5,6]. Studies have shown that N. parvum causes significant grapevine damage, including dieback, cankers, and vascular colonization, which affect grapevine health and yield in regions such as Chile and Croatia [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Prevalence of N. parvum in affected vineyards ranges from 2% to 15% [10], emphasizing the need for effective management strategies.
The pathogenicity of N. parvum is attributed to its ability to colonize wood, produce phytotoxins, and degrade cell walls [13,14]. Its genome contains clusters of virulence-related genes, including those involved in secondary metabolite production and carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), which are expressed differentially during infection [15,16]. Additionally, N. parvum harbors a diverse mycovirome, potentially influencing its biological properties [17]. Experimental models demonstrate that N. parvum causes more severe lesions and foliar symptoms than other Botryosphaeriaceae species, correlating with plant stress responses [18]. Unlike other pathogens that may be exacerbated by abiotic stress factors like water deficit, N. parvum acts as a primary pathogen, independent of such stressors [19]. Its ability to infect multiple plant species in the same habitat, including alternative hosts, further facilitates pathogen persistence [19]. Timely detection and management of N. parvum are critical for maintaining grapevine health and productivity in affected regions.
GTD pathogens, including those responsible for Botryosphaeria dieback, are primarily spread by airborne spores and infected cuttings. Wounds and cuts incurred during propagation, especially in nurseries, create entry points for these fungal pathogens [13]. Currently, no curative measures exist for managing Botryosphaeria dieback in nurseries and young vineyards, highlighting the urgent need for alternative control strategies.
Integrated disease management (IDM) strategies, combining physical, chemical, and biological control measures, are essential for reducing fungal infections in nurseries [14]. Biocontrol agents, especially microbial antagonists, offer several advantages over chemical fungicides by being more cost-effective, safer, and environmentally friendly [15,16]. Among these agents, Trichoderma spp. have been extensively studied [20] and used in agriculture, with commercial formulations of species such as T. virens, T. harzianum, T. atroviride, and T. viride widely available [21].
Research on chemical and biological control agents for managing N. parvum, which also causes stem canker in blueberries, has produced mixed results. Chemical fungicides, including Luna Sensation (fluopyram and trifloxystrobin), thiophanate-methyl + myclobutanil, benomyl, tebuconazole, and iprodione, have shown efficacy in controlling N. parvum [22]. Biological control agents, particularly Trichoderma based treatments, are effective in protecting pruning wounds from N. parvum infection, as are biofungicides like Xenorhabdus szentirmaii [12,23]. However, inconsistencies in control outcomes, as seen with Bacillus subtilis, highlight the need for further research to improve biological control methods [22].
Trichoderma species utilize various mechanisms for pathogen suppression, including mycoparasitism, competition for nutrients, antibiosis, and induction of plant resistance [24,25]. Mycoparasitism involves the production of cell-wall-degrading enzymes like cellulases, glucanases, and chitinases, which enable Trichoderma to parasitize and degrade other fungi [26]. Additionally, Trichoderma strains produce antimicrobial secondary metabolites, siderophores, and plant growth factors that enhance biocontrol efficacy [24].
Trichoderma species also produce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with antifungal properties that inhibit pathogen growth without direct contact, offering a sustainable tool for integrated pest management [27,28]. These VOCs contribute to the success of Trichoderma in suppressing pathogens and promoting plant growth [29].
The multifaceted mechanisms employed by Trichoderma provide a significant advantage over chemical fungicides, offering enhanced and longer-lasting pathogen protection under varying environmental conditions [30,31]. In addition, Trichoderma species act as biofertilizers, benefiting agricultural practices [26]. Studies indicate that Trichoderma applications in nurseries can reduce fungal pathogens in rootstock cuttings and infected young plants [12,14,30,32,33,34].
This study investigates the compatibility of Trichoderma with chemical fungicides, an essential step for optimizing integrated disease management strategies. Trichoderma species show limited compatibility with some fungicides, particularly triazoles, but demonstrate better compatibility with copper-based fungicides and mancozeb [35,36]. Copper oxychloride and sulfur are widely used in viticulture, with contrasting properties: copper oxychloride is effective for fungal control, while sulfur is favored for its lower environmental impact. By evaluating these fungicides at their recommended concentrations, it is possible to assess their efficacy and compatibility with Trichoderma, which is known for its disease-suppressive potential. Furthermore, it is critical to evaluate lower fungicide concentrations, as they are typically more compatible with Trichoderma, whereas higher concentrations may reduce its efficacy [37]. Striking the right balance in fungicide use can minimize environmental impact, reduce fungicide resistance, and improve overall disease management strategies, particularly in combination with biocontrol agents like Trichoderma [38].
By investigating both the biocontrol potential and compatibility with chemical fungicides, this study aims to contribute to developing effective integrated strategies for managing Botryosphaeria dieback and other GTDs in grapevines.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain Collection and Culture Conditions

Trichoderma strains T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 were used for both in vitro and in planta experiments. These strains were sourced from the microbial collection of the FiVe-A Research Group at Complutense University of Madrid, from soil samples collected in agricultural fields in Spain. The soil samples used in this study were collected from agricultural fields in a region where grapevine cultivation is prominent and Neofusicoccum parvum is known to be prevalent. Due to confidentiality agreements, the precise location cannot be disclosed. However, the selection of these fields was based on their representativeness and relevance to the study objectives, ensuring the reliability of the results. Two strains of the phytopathogenic fungus Neofusicoccum parvum (JL396 and JL445 from the microbial collection of the Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Barcelona, Spain) were also included, originally from infected wood of Vitis vinifera vines, as detailed in [7]. The fungi were maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Pronadisa; Condalab, Madrid, Spain). Cultures on PDA were grown for 5 days at 22 °C ± 2 °C in the dark for assays and inoculum preparation.
To assess conidia production for each Trichoderma strain, 8 mL of sterile distilled water was added to a PDA plate with one week old cultures. Plates were gently agitated on an orbital shaker at 30 rpm for 5 min to dislodge conidia. The water containing conidia was passed through a sterile filtration process using a 40 μm filter to remove mycelial fragments. The filtrate was then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min to collect conidia, which were resuspended in 3 mL of sterile distilled water. Conidia concentration was determined using a Neubauer Chamber Cell Counting method to ensure accuracy. The final suspension achieved a concentration of 1 × 10⁶ conidia/mL, suitable for experimental inoculations. Each experiment was performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.

2.2. Species Identification and Strain Differentiation by Nuclear Ribosomal Internal Tran-Scribed Spacer (ITS) Region

DNA was extracted following Cenis, 1992 [39]. Briefly, strains were cultured in 500 μL of liquid Potato-Dextrose medium, started by inoculating some hyphal threads from five-day-old PDA plates, and allowed to grow for 72 h at 25 °C. The mycelial mat was pelleted by centrifugation for 5 min at 13,000 rpm in a microfuge, washed with 500 µL of TE buffer (Tris (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane) and EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and pelleted again. The TE was decanted and 300 μL of extraction buffer (200 mM Tris HCl pH 8.5, 250 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS) added. The mycelium was crushed with a conical grinder. Then, 150 µL of 3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2, were added, and tubes placed at −20 °C for about 20 min. Tubes were centrifuged (5 min at 12,000 rpm) and the supernatant transferred to another tube for isopropanol precipitation at room temperature. The precipitated DNA was washed twice with 70% ethanol, air dried, and resuspended in 50 μL of TE.
Two oligonucleotide fungal primers (ITS1: TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGC and ITS4: TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATTGC) described by White et al. [40] were used for amplification. The PCR assay was performed with 20 ng of DNA in a total reaction volume of 25 μL consisting of PCR buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.4], 50 mM KCl; 0.1 mM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 50 ng each primer; and 1 U of NZYTaq DNA Polymerase (NZYtech, Lisboa, Portugal). Forty cycles of amplification were performed in a Mastercycler Gradient thermocycler (Eppendorf) after initial denaturation of DNA at 95 °C for 5 min. Each cycle consisted of a denaturation step at 95 °C for 30 s, an annealing step at 55 °C for 30 s, and an extension step at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 3 min following the last cycle. After amplification, the products were stored at 4 °C until used.
DNA sequencing was performed at the Genomic Unit in the Complutense University of Madrid. PCR products were directly sequenced using the ITS1 and ITS4 PCR primers. Sequence analysis of the amplicons was performed by BLASTN comparison using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database’s best hit to confirm the identities of the strains. All fungal sequences were at least 98% identical to the best hit in the NCBI database. This value was considered sufficiently robust for species identification [41].

2.3. In Vitro Growth Rates

Five-millimeter diameter discs of each Trichoderma strain from five-day-old PDA plates were transferred to the center of PDA Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were then incubated for 7 days at 25 ± 1 °C, and colony growth of each fungus was recorded daily for a week. Growth rate was calculated by the formula:
φt = φ0 + μt
where φt is the radial length at measurement point t; φ0 is the radial length in the measurement point 0 and µ is the growth rate. Three repeats and three replicates were performed.

2.4. Antagonism Assays on PDA Plates

Confrontation assays (dual cultures tests) were conducted on PDA to evaluate the antagonistic activity of Trichoderma strains against Neofusicoccum parvum. Five mm diameter mycelial plugs from 7-day-old cultures of both fungi were placed 3 cm apart on PDA plates, with N. parvum alone serving as the control. Plates were incubated at 22 °C ± 2 °C and 80% humidity in the dark for 5 days. Fungal growth was measured daily, and inhibition was calculated relative to control plates.
The degree of parasitism was calculated according to the scale of Ezziyyani et al. [42]. Results were expressed as percentage of colony growth inhibition (PCGI). Each experiment was replicated three times.

2.5. Inhibitory Effects of Volatile Compounds Produced by Trichoderma spp. on N. Parvum

The effect of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by Trichoderma strains T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4 was evaluated following Schubert et al. [43] with minor modifications. Trichoderma strains were centrally inoculated by placing 5-mm discs on PDA media taken from the margin of 7-day-old cultures and incubated at 22 ± 2 °C and 80% relative humidity for 3 weeks. The top of each Petri dish was replaced with the bottom of the PDA plates inoculated centrally (5-mm discs) with each N. parvum strain. Plates without Trichoderma spp. were used as controls. Three replicates were maintained for each treatment. The pairs of Petri dishes were sealed together with paraffin tape and incubated at 22 ± 2 °C and 80% relative humidity. Colony diameter of N. parvum was measured daily for a week, and the inhibition of mycelial growth (PCGI) was calculated.

2.6. Compatibility Estimation of Trichoderma spp. with Fungicides

Stock solutions of agrochemicals were prepared by dissolving the required quantities of each into sterile distilled water. Increasing concentrations (1/8 R.D. (Recommended Dose), 1/4 R.D., 1/2 R.D., and; R.D. = 4 g/L) of Copper oxychloride (Cheminova Agro S.A.) and increasing concentrations (1/8 R.D., 1/4 R.D., 1/2 R.D., and Recommended Dose; R.D. = 2 g/L) of Sulfur (Fertiberia, S.A.) were then prepared and incorporated into the PDA culture medium kept molten at 50 °C and mixed thoroughly by gentle shaking. The mixture was then poured into Petri plates. PDA plates without any added compounds served as controls.
After solidification, the plates were inoculated with 5-mm discs of 5-day-old Trichoderma spp. strain cultures. Three replicates were used for each concentration of every tested fungicide. The inoculated plates were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C in the dark, and radial colony diameter was recorded daily for one week post-inoculation. Results were expressed as percentage of colony growth inhibition. Each experiment was replicated three times.

2.7. Plant Material and Experimental Design

Disease-free cuttings of a Garnacha cultivar of grapevine were used in all bioassays. They were processed and prepared as described by Amponsah et al. [44]. For incubation, the plants were grown in a closed greenhouse.

2.7.1. Cutting Bioassay

The principal treatments corresponded to the Trichoderma strains co-inoculated with the pathogen, and the control treatments consisted of (i) an uninoculated, untreated control (UUC), where samples were not inoculated with the fungus and not treated with Trichoderma, and (ii) an untreated control (UC), where samples were inoculated only with the fungus N. parvum.

2.7.2. Evaluation of Stem Necrosis

The incubation period was 21 ± 1 days post-inoculation (dpi), after which the stem of each plant was cut longitudinally in the middle, and the length of the internal vascular lesions (or necroses) in the cutting wood just under the bark was visually evaluated by measuring the necrotic lesions upwards and downwards from the wound-inoculation hole. Each experiment was replicated three times.
Similarly to the percentage of colony growth inhibition (PCGI), results were expressed as the percentage of lesion length reduction (PLLR):
P L L R = L 1 L 2   L 1 × 100
where L1 is the length of the lesion in the positive control (pathogen only) and L2 is the length of the lesion in the presence of the antagonist.
For quantitative results, lesions were measured in millimeters (mm) using a millimeter scale ruler with an accuracy of ±1 mm. A damage threshold of 5 mm lesion length was established to distinguish between minor lesions and more significant ones, which were considered indicative of severe pathogenic infection.
To confirm that the lesions were caused by the trunk pathogens, small pieces of wood from the margin of each lesion were surface sterilized for 1 min in 0.6% sodium hypochlorite solution, rinsed in three successive baths of sterile distilled water, and incubated on PDA. Koch’s postulates were satisfied according to the procedure described above for shoot inoculations.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data from in vitro assays were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test the effects of variation factors (different samples) on each variable. If significant effects were found at a 95% confidence interval, ANOVA was followed by Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) and Duncan’s post-hoc test with a 5% level for rejection of the null hypothesis to identify differences among groups.

3. Results

3.1. Antagonistic and Pathogenic Fungi: Species Identification and Strain Differentiation by Nuclear Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) Region

Species differentiation within the genus Trichoderma and Neofusicoccum parvum was achieved using the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a molecular marker. The ITS regions amplified from Trichoderma spp. and Neofusicoccum parvum were approximately 520 bp and 560 bp, respectively. The following identifications were obtained, along with their respective GenBank accession numbers corresponding to sequences with the highest similarity: Trichoderma harzianum (T1: HQ149776.1 and T3: KC819133.1), Trichoderma viride (T2: KP763495.1), Trichoderma asperellum (T4: JX677934.1), and Trichoderma virens (T5: KF150223.1). Both pathogen strains were confirmed as Neofusicoccum parvum (JL396: JN222970.1 and JL445: KP140964.1).

3.2. In Vitro Growth Rates

The growth rate of Trichoderma is directly linked to its ability to compete with pathogens. Faster-growing strains can colonize the plant surface more quickly, outcompeting harmful fungi for space and resources. This enhanced growth allows Trichoderma to more effectively produce antifungal metabolites and enzymes that inhibit pathogen development. Thus, measuring colony diameter helps identify Trichoderma strains with superior competitive abilities, which are essential for effective biocontrol.
Among the five Trichoderma strains tested, T5 (T. virens) exhibited the fastest growth rate, averaging 1 ± 0.09 cm per day (Figure 1). The growth rates of Trichoderma strains T1, T3, and T4 were similar, measuring 0.90 ± 0.1 cm per day, 0.89 ± 0.04 cm per day, and 0.86 ± 0.1 cm per day, respectively. In contrast, T2 (T. viride) showed the slowest growth rate, with a mean of ≤0.7 ± 0.05 cm per day.
Spore production varied significantly among the species. T5 produced the highest number of spores, reaching 9.21 × 107 spores per ml, which correlates with its faster growth rate. This was followed by T4, which produced 2.14 × 107 spores per ml, and T2, which produced 6.04 × 106 spores per ml. notably, no sporulation was observed under the tested conditions for T1 and T3, both identified as Trichoderma harzianum. These results suggest that faster-growing Trichoderma strains, like T5, may be more prolific in spore production, which could contribute to their biocontrol efficacy.

3.3. Antagonism Assay: Dual Plate Assay Results

All five Trichoderma strains effectively reduced the growth rate of Neofusicoccum parvum in the dual plate assay (Figure 2). Among them, T5 (T. virens) exhibited the highest suppression, reducing N. parvum growth by 48.0%. This suppression rate was significantly greater than that observed for the other strains: T1, T2, T3, and T4 reduced N. parvum growth by 9.4%, 17.1%, 22.2%, and 16.1%, respectively.
Additionally, the degree of parasitism for all Trichoderma strains against the two N. parvum strains was rated as 4 on the scale of Ezziyyani et al. [42], indicating a total invasion of the pathogenic fungal colony surface and sporulation on it.

3.4. Inhibitory Effects of Volatile Compounds Produced by Trichoderma spp.

Colony growth of Neofusicoccum parvum was inhibited when exposed to the trapped atmosphere from cultures of Trichoderma spp. After three and four days of co-cultivation, the mycelial radial growth of N. parvum was reduced by all the Trichoderma strains tested (Figure 3). However, the volatile compounds produced by T1 (T. harzianum) resulted in a PCGI of only 8.6%. In contrast, fungal growth rates for both JL396 and JL445 strains of N. parvum were significantly inhibited by exposure to volatile compounds from the T5 strain (T. virens), achieving a PCGI of 48.1%.
Based on these results, it can be concluded that volatile compounds released by all the tested Trichoderma species (T. harzianum, T. viride, T. asperellum, and especially T. virens) are capable of restricting the growth of the pathogen.

3.5. Compatibility of Trichoderma Strains with Chemical Fungicides

The effects of fungicides on the growth of Trichoderma strains are summarized in Table 1. Among the fungicides tested, Sulfur was found to be compatible with the Trichoderma antagonists up to the recommended dose of 2 g/L, with growth inhibition ranging from 3% to 9%. In contrast, Copper oxychloride exhibited varying levels of incompatibility. At the recommended dose of 4 g/L, Copper oxychloride caused complete suppression of vegetative growth in Trichoderma strains T1 and T2, and inhibited growth in T2 and T3 strains by 60% to 90%, respectively. However, Copper oxychloride allowed growth of the T5 (T. virens) strain. Overall, mycelial growth was reduced in all treatments compared to the untreated control, except for T5, where Copper oxychloride did not affect fungal growth.

3.6. Stem Disease Bioassay

Three weeks post-inoculation, cuttings inoculated with Neofusicoccum parvum strains JL396 and JL445 developed distinct brown external lesions that extended both upward and downward from the inoculation point. In contrast, negative control plants exhibited only a narrow necrotic area around the inoculation point. The percentage of lesion length reduction (PLLR) varied significantly between different inoculation treatments (p < 0.05; Figure 4).
Among the treatments, Trichoderma viride (T2) achieved the highest mean PLLR of 65.6%, showing a significant increase compared to other treatments. This PLLR was significantly greater than the 0% PLLR observed with Trichoderma asperellum (T4), which showed no reduction in lesion length. An exception was noted with Trichoderma virens (T5), where all inoculated shoots broke at the node above the inoculation site, preventing lesion measurement (Figure 5).
Re-isolation from plants inoculated solely with JL396 and JL445 resulted in the growth of white colonies with radially distributed aerial hyphae on PDA. For plants subjected to dual inoculation, re-isolation also yielded white colonies with radially distributed aerial hyphae, in addition to green colonies with aerial growth on the PDA surface. No pathogens were re-straind from negative control plants or from plants inoculated with T. viride (T2).

4. Discussion

The genus Trichoderma is renowned for its biocontrol capabilities, particularly in combating soil-borne and wood-decaying pathogens. This study focused on five Trichoderma strains, namely T. harzianum (T1, T3), T. viride (T2), T. asperellum (T4), and T. virens (T5), and their effectiveness against the grapevine pathogen Neofusicoccum parvum. The identification of these strains was confirmed through ITS sequencing, revealing that T1 and T3 are T. harzianum, T2 is T. viride, T4 is T. asperellum, and T5 is T. virens. The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region is a popular genetic marker (or “DNA barcode”) for identifying fungal species because it tends to vary significantly between species. This variability often allows to distinguish one species from another based on differences in their ITS sequences. However, the ITS marker has limitations depending on the fungal group being studied. For most fungi, ITS alone is enough to identify species, but for some groups, additional genetic markers are needed to make accurate identifications [45].
The Internal Transcribed Spacer consists of two sub-regions, ITS1 and ITS2, which perform similarly in distinguishing many species, especially within the Basidiomycota. However, some Basidiomycota genera (11 out of 113 studied) cannot be reliably identified with ITS alone, revealing the marker’s limits [45]. Furthermore, the high variability within the ITS region, while helpful for distinguishing species, can create challenges in data analysis and accurately defining species boundaries. Despite these challenges, ITS remains the most widely used marker for fungal identification, although research is ongoing to find additional or alternative markers that could improve accuracy for specific groups [46,47].
This species-level identification is crucial for accurately interpreting their biocontrol potential, as different Trichoderma species may exhibit varied mechanisms of action and efficacy against pathogens [48,49]. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region has proven to be a reliable molecular marker for identifying species within the Trichoderma genera. Espinoza et al. [50] successfully identified N. arbuti, N. australe, and N. parvum as causal agents of stem canker in blueberries through ITS sequencing. Similarly, ITS sequencing has been effective in distinguishing various Trichoderma species, including T. harzianum, T. asperellum, and T. virens [51,52]. Sánchez-García et al. [53] demonstrated high precision in identifying Trichoderma species using the ITS1 and ITS2 regions, emphasizing the role of accurate species identification for biotechnological applications. These findings highlight the robustness of ITS-based molecular identification for species in Trichoderma genera.
Different Trichoderma species exhibit varying levels of antagonistic activity against plant pathogens; for example, T. asperellum has shown superior antagonistic effectiveness compared to T. harzianum against root pathogens in beans [53]. Our findings emphasize the relevance of species-specific characteristics in Trichoderma biocontrol efficacy, corroborating the view that not all Trichoderma strains exhibit the same biocontrol potential. These differences may arise from inherent genetic and phenotypic variations that influence growth rate, competition, mycoparasitic abilities, and production of antifungal compounds. In particular, the faster-growing strains, like T5 (T. virens), showed substantial antagonistic capabilities. Faster growth rates allow certain Trichoderma species to outcompete pathogens through resource monopolization, a phenomenon highlighted in studies demonstrating a correlation between rapid colony expansion and biocontrol efficacy [54]. This advantage in rapid growth contributes to their effectiveness as biological control agents, especially in environments where timely pathogen suppression is crucial for crop protection [54,55]. This result aligns with Harman et al. [56], who observed that the ability to colonize and dominate the substrate quickly contributes significantly to the effectiveness of Trichoderma as a biocontrol agent.
The results of this study show significant variability in spore production among the Trichoderma strains tested. Strain T5, with its faster growth rate, produced the highest number of spores, which aligns with previous studies demonstrating a positive relationship between faster growth and higher spore production in Trichoderma species [48]. This suggests that faster-growing strains, such as T5, may offer enhanced biocontrol potential due to their ability to produce larger quantities of conidia, which are crucial for pathogen dispersal and infection. In contrast, strains T1 and T3, both identified as Trichoderma harzianum, did not exhibit sporulation under the tested conditions. This may indicate lower adaptability or efficiency under specific growth parameters, thus potentially limiting their effectiveness as biocontrol agents in certain environments.
These findings highlight the importance of considering both growth rate and spore production when selecting Trichoderma strains for biocontrol applications. Strains like T5, which are more prolific in spore production, may be preferred for specific disease management contexts. In support of this, various studies have explored optimal conditions for spore production in different Trichoderma species. For instance, maize husk has been identified as the best substrate for maximizing spore production in T. viride and T. harzianum [57], while broken corn seed medium yielded the highest spore count for T. atroviride [58]. Moreover, factors such as the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and glucose concentration significantly influence spore production and viability in T. harzianum, with optimal conditions identified for these parameters [59].
The dual culture assays provided insights into the competitive interactions between Trichoderma and N. parvum. T. virens (T5) was notably effective in suppressing the growth of N. parvum, achieving a 48.1% reduction. This strain’s superior performance could be attributed to its rapid growth rate and efficient colonization ability, which enhances its competitive edge over the pathogen. The high mycoparasitism grade (4) observed for all Trichoderma strains confirms their potential for direct antagonistic interactions with N. parvum [60].
The role of volatile compounds (VOCs) in Trichoderma’s antagonistic activity was further explored through the volatile compound assay. The results suggest that VOCs are a significant factor in the biocontrol mechanism, particularly for strains like T. viride (T2), which had a high PCGI despite its slower growth rate. VOCs such as 6-pentyl-α-pyrone, which has been previously associated with antifungal activity, may contribute to this phenomenon [61,62,63].
Endophytic fungi-derived VOCs have shown significant effectiveness in controlling postharvest diseases in fruits and vegetables, providing a safe and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional chemical fungicides [64]. However, despite the promising potential of VOCs as biocontrol agents, there are still challenges in scaling up these applications to an industrial level. More research is required to optimize the production, stability, and efficacy of VOCs, as well as to establish practical protocols for their widespread use. Additionally, fostering collaboration between researchers and farmers is crucial for the successful adoption of VOC-based biocontrol strategies in agricultural practice [29].
The Trichoderma species employed in this study exhibit diverse modes of action in biocontrol, including competition for resources, mycoparasitism, and production of antifungal compounds. The observed in vitro growth rates revealed significant variation among the strains. T. virens (T5) demonstrated the highest growth rate, which aligns with its potential for competitive exclusion in agricultural settings. Conversely, T. viride (T2) showed the lowest growth rate but still managed to produce a substantial percentage of colony growth inhibition (PCGI) in the volatile compound assay. This suggests that T. viride may rely more heavily on VOCs for its biocontrol activity [65].
The compatibility of Trichoderma strains with agrochemicals was assessed to ensure their practical applicability in agricultural settings. Sulfur, a commonly used fungicide, was found to be compatible with all Trichoderma strains at recommended doses, showing minimal growth inhibition. This supports its use in conjunction with Trichoderma for integrated disease management. In contrast, copper oxychloride showed varying degrees of inhibition across the strains, with some strains like T. virens (T5) exhibiting greater tolerance than others. This differential tolerance to copper oxychloride may be attributed to strain-specific responses, which could influence their effectiveness in field conditions [66,67,68].
Our findings align with the varied fungicide tolerance observed in Trichoderma strains. While some strains develop resistance when exposed to gradually increasing fungicide concentrations [69], others show inhibited growth in the presence of certain fungicides. Conversely, compounds like sulfur may even promote Trichoderma growth [70]. Additionally, some Trichoderma strains can successfully germinate in fungicide-contaminated environments, though their sensitivity can differ widely [71]. Notably, Trichoderma strains from wild plant endospheres demonstrate remarkable fungicide tolerance and bioremediation capabilities, with some strains removing up to 89% of specific fungicides from liquid media [72]. However, conventional pesticides may negatively impact indigenous Trichoderma strains in soil ecosystems [70]. These findings suggest that while some Trichoderma strains can adapt to fungicide-contaminated environments, their integration into pest management strategies should consider the compatibility and potential effects of agrochemicals to maximize their biocontrol efficacy, particularly in systems transitioning toward organic practices.
Research on Trichoderma species has shown promising results for controlling N. parvum and other grapevine trunk disease pathogens. For instance, other in vitro studies demonstrated that Trichoderma strains could inhibit N. parvum mycelial growth by up to 97.5% [12]. Greenhouse and field trials have also highlighted the efficacy of T. asperellum and T. gamsii in offering up to 100% disease control against N. parvum via pruning wound protection [73]. Native Trichoderma strains have shown similar potential, effectively controlling N. parvum in young grapevine plants [74]. In British Columbia, T. asperelloides, T. atroviride, and T. canadense demonstrated 70–100% control of Botryosphaeria dieback fungi in pruning wounds for up to 21 days [75]. These studies underscore Trichoderma species as effective biocontrol agents for N. parvum and other grapevine pathogens, offering a sustainable alternative to chemical fungicides.
The in planta bioassay provided a real-world assessment of Trichoderma’s biocontrol efficacy. The reduction in lesion length in plants inoculated with T. viride (T2) was significantly higher compared to other strains, aligning with its performance in in vitro assays. However, the negative impact observed with T. virens (T5) in the cutting bioassay, where shoots broke at the inoculation site, indicates a potential adverse effect that warrants further investigation. This unexpected outcome underscores the complexity of biocontrol interactions and highlights the need for comprehensive field trials to validate laboratory findings.
In the following summary table (Table 2), an overview of the biocontrol strategies and compatibility of various Trichoderma species with fungicides is provided. The table highlights the key biocontrol mechanisms of each species, such as the production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nutrient and space competition, and pathogen growth inhibition. Additionally, it presents the compatibility of these species with commonly used fungicides, including sulfur and copper oxychloride, and offers a brief evaluation of their effectiveness and applicability. While was chosen to include T. harzianum T3 in this summary due to its promising performance, it is important to note that T. harzianum T1 was not included. The specific strain plays a significant role in the biocontrol potential, and in this case, T3 was selected because it demonstrated superior effectiveness in the tests. While some species, like T. harzianum and T. viride, show high efficacy in in planta tests and are compatible with certain fungicides, others, such as T. asperellum, exhibit limited or no efficacy in field trials, and compatibility issues may hinder their practical application. Further studies are necessary to better understand the integration of T. viride into biocontrol strategies.
Future research should focus on elucidating the exact mechanisms behind the adverse effects observed with T. virens and exploring potential optimization strategies for its use. Additionally, investigating the synergistic effects of Trichoderma with other biocontrol agents and assessing long-term field efficacy will be crucial for developing effective integrated pest management strategies.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights Trichoderma harzianum T3 as a potent biocontrol agent against Neofusicoccum parvum, demonstrating significant potential for managing this pathogen in grapevines. Among the five Trichoderma strains tested, T. harzianum T3 showed particular promise due to its effective suppression of N. parvum through rapid growth, mycoparasitism, and the production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Additionally, T. virens T5 displayed strong inhibitory effects, although its potential phytotoxicity suggests a need for selective application. The study reinforces Trichoderma’s value in viticulture disease management, particularly as part of integrated pest management (IPM) strategies when compatible with certain fungicides. Future research should focus on optimizing VOC stability and efficacy in field conditions and exploring environmentally influenced interactions to enhance Trichoderma’s practical application, ensuring optimal field performance with minimal adverse effects on host plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.-G. and B.P.L.; Data curation, S.A.C.; Formal analysis, M.L.T.M.; Investigation, S.A.C.; Methodology, A.G.-G.; Project administration, A.G.-G.; Resources, A.G.-G.; Validation, M.L.T.M. and B.P.L.; Visualization, S.A.C. and B.P.L.; Writing—original draft, A.G.-G.; Writing—review & editing, A.G.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by INIA, Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Madrid, Spain, Project number RTA2015-0015-C02-02.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bertsch, C.; Ramírez-Suero, M.; Magnin-Robert, M.; Larignon, P.; Chong, J.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Fontaine, F. Grapevine trunk diseases: Complex and still poorly understood. Plant Pathol. 2013, 62, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khattab, I.M.; Fischer, J.; Kaźmierczak, A.; Thines, E.; Nick, P. Ferulic acid is a putative surrender signal to stimulate programmed cell death in grapevines after infection with Neofusicoccum parvum. Plant Cell Environ. 2023, 46, 339–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gramaje, D.; Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Sosnowski, M.R. Managing Grapevine Trunk Diseases with Respect to Etiology and Epidemiology: Current Strategies and Future Prospects. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 12–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Leavitt, G.M.; Guerrero, J.C.; Guevara, J.; Gubler, W.D. Identification and pathogenicity of Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Diplodia seriata, the causal agents of bot canker disease of grapevines in Mexico. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. van Niekerk, J.M.; Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Fourie, P.H.; Halleen, F. DNA phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species on grapevines. Mycologia 2004, 96, 781–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Serra, E. Grapevine Trunk Disease in Missouri Vineyards: Prevalence and Causality of Fungal Species by Cultivar; University of Missouri-Columbia: Columbia, MO, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Martos, S.; Andolfi, A.; Luque, J.; Mugnai, L.; Surico, G.; Evidente, A. Production of phytotoxic metabolites by five species of Botryosphaeriaceae causing decline on grapevines, with special interest in the species Neofusicoccum luteum and N. Parvum. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 121, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Gubler, W.D. Pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species straind from grapevine cankers in California. Plant Dis. 2009, 93, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guan, X.; Essakhi, S.; Laloue, H.; Nick, P.; Bertsch, C.; Chong, J. Mining new resources for grape resistance against Botryosphaeriaceae: A focus on Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris. Plant Pathol. 2016, 65, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Díaz, G.A.; Prehn, D.; Besoain, X.; Chávez, E.R.; Latorre, B.A. Neofusicoccum parvum associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Chile. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaliternam, J.; Milicevic, T.; Bencic, D.; Duralija, B. First report of Neofusicoccum parvum associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Croatia. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Otoya-Martinez, N.; Leite, L.G.; Harakava, R.; Touray, M.; Hazir, S.; Chacon-Orozco, J.; Bueno, C.J. Disease caused by Neofusicoccum parvum in pruning wounds of grapevine shoots and its control by Trichoderma spp. and Xenorhabdus szentirmaii. Fungal Biol. 2023, 127, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gramaje, D.; Armengol, J. Fungal trunk pathogens in the grapevine propagation process: Potential inoculum sources, detection, identification, and management strategies. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 1040–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Halleen, F.; Fourie, P.H. An integrated strategy for the proactive management of grapevine trunk disease pathogen infections in grapevine nurseries. South Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2016, 37, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Suprapta, D.N. Potential of microbial antagonists as biocontrol agents against plant fungal pathogens. J. ISSAAS 2012, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mesguida, O.; Haidar, R.; Yacoub, A.; Dreux-Zigha, A.; Berthon, J.-Y.; Guyoneaud, R.; Attard, E.; Rey, P. Microbial biological control of fungi associated with grapevine trunk diseases: A review of strain diversity, modes of action, and advantages and limits of current strategies. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marais, A.; Faure, C.; Comont, G.; Candresse, T.; Stempien, E.; Corio-Costet, M.F. Characterization of the mycovirome of the phytopathogenic fungus, Neofusicoccum parvum. Viruses 2021, 13, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reis, P.; Magnin-Robert, M.; Nascimento, T.; Spagnolo, A.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Fioretti, C.; Clément, C.; Rego, C.; Fontaine, F. Reproducing Botryosphaeria dieback foliar symptoms in a simple model system. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martos Arias, S. El Decaimiento de la Vid: Enfermedades de la Madera Relacionadas con Hongos de la Familia Botryosphaeriaceae; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona: Barcelona, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, S.; Gan, Y.; Xu, B. Biocontrol potential of a native species of Trichoderma longibrachiatum against Meloidogyne incognita. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 94, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Montesinos, E. Development, registration and commercialization of microbial pesticides for plant protection. Int. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Latorre, B.A.; Torres, R.; Silva, T.; Elfar, K. Evaluation of the use of wound-protectant fungicides and biological control agents against stem canker (Neofusicoccum parvum) of blueberry. Crop Prot. 2013, 40, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Blundell, R.; Eskalen, A. Evaluation of biological and chemical pruning wound protectants to control grapevine trunk disease pathogens Eutypa lata and Neofusicoccum parvum. Plant Health Prog. 2022, 23, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Benítez, T.; Rincón, A.M.; Limón, M.C.; Codon, A.C. Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Infante, D.; Martínez, B.; Peteira, B.; Reyes, Y.; Herrera, A. Identificación molecular y evaluación patogénica de trece aislamientos de Trichoderma spp. frente a Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Biotecnol. Apl. 2013, 30, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vivek Singh, V.S.; Shatrupa Ray, S.R.; Kartikay Bisen, K.B.; Chetan Keswani, C.K.; Upadhyay, R.S.; Sarma, B.K.; Singh, H.B. Unravelling the dual applications of applications of Trichoderma spp. as biopesticide and biofertilizer. In Advances in PGPR Research; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2017; pp. 364–374. [Google Scholar]
  27. Joo, J.H.; Hussein, K.A. Biological control and plant growth promotion properties of volatile organic compound-producing antagonistic Trichoderma spp. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 897668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Grahovac, J.; Pajčin, I.; Vlajkov, V. Bacillus VOCs in the context of biological control. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Razo-Belman, R.; Ozuna, C. Volatile organic compounds: A review of their current applications as pest biocontrol and disease management. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Di Marco, S.; Osti, F.; Cesari, A. Experiments on the Control of Esca by Thricoderma. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2004, 43, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fourie, P.H.; Halleen, F. Proactive control of Petri disease of grapevine through treatment of propagation material. Plant Dis. 2004, 88, 1241–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mounier, E.; Heysch, P.; Cortes, F.; Cadiou, M.; Pajot, E. Trichoderma atroviride, strain I-1237, reduces the impact of Pythium spp. in carrot crop production. In International Symposium on Carrot and Other Apiaceae 1153; International Society for Horticultural Science: Leuven, Belgium, 2014; pp. 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  33. Carro-Huerga, G.; Compant, S.; Gorfer, M.; Cardoza, R.E.; Schmoll, M.; Gutiérrez, S.; Casquero, P.A. Colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by the endophyte Trichoderma sp. strain T154: Biocontrol activity against Phaeoacremonium minimum. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Tomaselli, E.; Pollard-Flamand, J.; Boule, J.; Gerin, D.; Pollastro, S. Characterization of Trichoderma strains from southern Italy, and their potential biocontrol activity against grapevine trunk disease fungi. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2020, 59, 425–440. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kiran GV, M.; Thara, S.S.; Jyothi, K.R. Studies on compatibility of biocontrol agents with chemical fungicides for integrated management of Alternaria leaf spot of cabbage. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 2974–2977. [Google Scholar]
  36. Maheshwary, N.; Gangadhara Naik, B.; Amoghavarsha Chittaragi, M.; Naik, S.K.; Nandish, M. Compatibility of Trichoderma asperellum with fungicides. Pharma Innov. J. 2020, 9, 136–140. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rajesh, K.; Ramya, V.; Basha, S.A.; Pushpavalli, S.N.C.V.L.; Aravind, K. In vitro Compatibility of Trichoderma and Bacillus biocontrol agents with Different Fungicides. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Chang. 2023, 13, 3340–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ons, L.; Bylemans, D.; Thevissen, K.; Cammue, B.P. Combining biocontrol agents with chemical fungicides for integrated plant fungal disease control. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cenis, J.L. Rapid extraction of fungal DNA for PCR amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.J.W.T.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; Volume 18, pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  41. Taylor, D.L.; Houston, S. A bioinformatics pipeline for sequence-based analyses of fungal biodiversity. In Fungal Genomics: Methods and Protocols; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 141–155. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ezziyyani, M.; Sánchez, C.P.; Ahmed, A.S.; Requena, M.E.; Castillo, M.E.C. Trichoderma harzianum como biofungicida para el biocontrol de Phytophthora capsici en plantas de pimiento (Capsicum annuum L.). In Anales de Biología; Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia: Murcia, Spain, 2004; pp. 35–45. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schubert, M.; Fink, S.; Schwarze, F.W. In vitro screening of an antagonistic Trichoderma strain against wood decay fungi. Arboric. J. 2008, 31, 227–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Amponsah, N.T.; Jones, E.E.; Ridgway, H.J.; Jaspers, M.V. Identification, potential inoculum sources and pathogenicity of botryosphaeriaceous species associated with grapevine dieback disease in New Zealand. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 131, 467–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Badotti, F.; Fonseca, P.L.C.; Tomé, L.M.R.; Nunes, D.T.; Goes-Neto, A. ITS and secondary biomarkers in fungi: Review on the evolution of their use based on scientific publications. Braz. J. Bot. 2018, 41, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fajarningsih, N.D. Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as DNA barcoding to identify fungal species: A review. Squalen Bull. Mar. Fish. Postharvest Biotechnol. 2016, 11, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kauserud, H. ITS alchemy: On the use of ITS as a DNA marker in fungal ecology. Fungal Ecol. 2023, 65, 101274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Harman, G.E.; Howell, C.R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species—Opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nilsson, R.H.; Kristiansson, E.; Ryberg, M.; Hallenberg, N.; Larsson, K.H. Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom Fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol. Bioinform. Online 2008, 4, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Espinoza, J.G.; Briceño, E.X.; Chávez, E.R.; Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Latorre, B.A. Neofusicoccum spp. associated with stem canker and dieback of blueberry in Chile. Plant Dis. 2009, 93, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Miranda, M.D.S.; Mayorga, L.F.M.; Aguilera, L.A.P. Identificación morfológica y molecular de especies autóctonas Trichoderma spp., aisladas de suelos de importancia agrícola. Rev. Científica Cienc. Tecnol. Higo 2021, 11, 26–42. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rivero, M.V.; Maniscalco, D.P. Identificación de cepas del hongo Trichoderma spp. por métodos moleculares. Faraute 2016, 8, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sánchez-García, B.M.; Espinosa-Huerta, E.; Villordo-Pineda, E.; Rodríguez-Guerra, R.; Mora-Avilés, M.A. Identificación molecular y evaluación antagónica in vitro de cepas nativas de Trichoderma spp. sobre hongos fitopatógenos de raíz en frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. Montcalm. Agrociencia 2017, 51, 63–79. [Google Scholar]
  54. Filizola PR, B.; Luna MA, C.; de Souza, A.F.; Coelho, I.L.; Laranjeira, D.; Campos-Takaki, G.M. Biodiversity and phylogeny of novel Trichoderma isolates from mangrove sediments and potential of biocontrol against Fusarium strains. Microb. Cell Factories 2019, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Andrés, P.A.; Alejandra, P.M.; Benedicto, M.C.; Nahuel, R.I.; Clara, B.M. A Comparative Study of Different Strains of Trichoderma under Different Conditions of Temperature and pH for the Control of Rhizoctonia solani. Agric. Sci. 2022, 13, 702–714. [Google Scholar]
  56. Harman, G.E. Overview of Mechanisms and Uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yadav, L.S. Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma sp. and evaluation of various agro wastes for mass production. Indian J. Plant Sci. 2012, 1, 109–112. [Google Scholar]
  58. Panahian, G.R.; Rahnama, K.; Jafari, M. Mass production of Trichoderma spp. and application. Int. Res. J. Appl. Basic Sci. 2012, 3, 292–298. [Google Scholar]
  59. Said, S.D. Spore production of biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum: Effect of C/N ratio and glucose concentration. J. Rekayasa Kim. Lingkung. 2007, 6, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ezziyyani, M.; Sid, A.A.; Pérez, S.C.; Requena, M.E.; Candela, M.E. Control biológico por microorganismos antagonistas. Rev. Hortic. 2006, 191, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  61. Garnica-Vergara, A.; Barrera-Ortiz, S.; Muñoz-Parra, E.; Raya-González, J.; Méndez-Bravo, A.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.; López-Bucio, J. The volatile 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one from Trichoderma atroviride regulates Arabidopsis thaliana root morphogenesis via auxin signaling and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 2 functioning. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1496–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pascale, A.; Vinale, F.; Manganiello, G.; Nigro, M.; Lanzuise, S.; Ruocco, M.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma and its secondary metabolites improve yield and quality of grapes. Crop Prot. 2017, 92, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Guzmán-Guzmán, P.; Kumar, A.; de Los Santos-Villalobos, S.; Parra-Cota, F.I.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.D.C.; Fadiji, A.E.; Santoyo, G. Trichoderma species: Our best fungal allies in the biocontrol of plant diseases—A review. Plants 2023, 12, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ling, L.; Feng, L.; Li, Y.; Yue, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y. Endophytic Fungi Volatile Organic Compounds as Crucial Biocontrol Agents Used for Controlling Fruit and Vegetable Postharvest Diseases. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mutawila, C.; Vinale, F.; Halleen, F.; Lorito, M.; Mostert, L. Isolation, production and in vitro effects of the major secondary metabolite produced by Trichoderma species used for the control of grapevine trunk diseases. Plant Pathol. 2016, 65, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Siddiquee, S.; Aishah, S.N.; Azad, S.A.; Shafawati, S.N.; Naher, L. Tolerance and biosorption capacity of Zn2+, Pb2+, Ni3+ and Cu2+ by filamentous fungi (Trichoderma harzianum, T. aureoviride and T. virens). Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2013, 4, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ladi, E.; Shukla, N.; Bohra, Y.; Tiwari, A.K.; Kumar, J. Copper tolerant Trichoderma asperellum increases bio-efficacy of copper against Phytophthora infestans in dual combination. Phytoparasitica 2020, 48, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Anwar, S.; Ali, A.; Ullah, Z.; Binjawhar, D.N.; Sher, H.; Ali, R.; Iqbal, R.; Ali, B.; Ali, I. The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2023, 3, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chaparro, A.P.; Carvajal, L.H.; Orduz, S. Fungicide tolerance of Trichoderma asperelloides and T. Harzianum Strains. Agric. Sci. 2011, 2, 301. [Google Scholar]
  70. Mayo-Prieto, S.; Squarzoni, A.; Carro-Huerga, G.; Porteous-Álvarez, A.J.; Gutiérrez, S.; Casquero, P.A. Organic and conventional bean pesticides in development of autochthonous Trichoderma strains. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Cid, R.A.H.; Núñez, D.; Romera, N.; Besoain, X.; Pérez, L.M.; Andrade, J.R.M. Sensitivity of wild-type and mutant Trichoderma harzianum strains tofungicides. Cienc. Investig. Agrar. Rev. Latinoam. Cienc. Agric. 2012, 39, 569–576. [Google Scholar]
  72. Escudero-Leyva, E.; Alfaro-Vargas, P.; Muñoz-Arrieta, R.; Charpentier-Alfaro, C.; Granados-Montero, M.d.M.; Valverde-Madrigal, K.S.; Pérez-Villanueva, M.; Méndez-Rivera, M.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, C.E.; Chaverri, P.; et al. Tolerance and biological removal of fungicides by Trichoderma species isolated from the endosphere of wild Rubiaceae plants. Front. Agron. 2022, 3, 772170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Blundell, R.; Eskalen, A. Biological and chemical pruning wound protectants reduce infection of grapevine trunk disease pathogens. Calif. Agric. 2021, 75, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Langa-Lomba, N.; Martín-Ramos, P.; Casanova-Gascón, J.; Julián-Lagunas, C.; González-García, V. Potential of native Trichoderma strains as antagonists for the control of fungal wood pathologies in young grapevine plants. Agronomy 2022, 12, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pollard-Flamand, J.; Boulé, J.; Hart, M.; Úrbez-Torres, J.R. Biocontrol activity of Trichoderma species isolated from grapevines in British Columbia against Botryosphaeria dieback fungal pathogens. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Growth rate of Trichoderma strains on PDA at 22 ± 2 °C. Values presented are the mean of three replicates, with error bars showing the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups according to the Duncan Test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Growth rate of Trichoderma strains on PDA at 22 ± 2 °C. Values presented are the mean of three replicates, with error bars showing the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups according to the Duncan Test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02766 g001
Figure 2. PCGI (Percentage of Colony Growth Inhibition) of Neofusicoccum parvum produced by antagonistic Trichoderma fungi based on the dual plate assay. Values presented are the mean of three replicates, with error bars showing the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups according to the Duncan Test (p < 0.05). The inset shows the dual plate assay between JL396 and JL445 of Neofusicoccum parvum with Trichoderma asperellum (T4) and Trichoderma virens (T5).
Figure 2. PCGI (Percentage of Colony Growth Inhibition) of Neofusicoccum parvum produced by antagonistic Trichoderma fungi based on the dual plate assay. Values presented are the mean of three replicates, with error bars showing the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups according to the Duncan Test (p < 0.05). The inset shows the dual plate assay between JL396 and JL445 of Neofusicoccum parvum with Trichoderma asperellum (T4) and Trichoderma virens (T5).
Agronomy 14 02766 g002
Figure 3. Percentage of Colony Growth Inhibition (PCGI) of Neofusicoccum parvum produced by antagonistic Trichoderma fungi based on the volatile compounds assay. In this assay, Neofusicoccum parvum strains were exposed to the volatiles emitted by Trichoderma strains in a co-cultivation setup for five days. Values presented are the mean of three replicates, with error bars showing the standard deviation. Asterisks denote significance at p < 0.05 (Duncan Test).
Figure 3. Percentage of Colony Growth Inhibition (PCGI) of Neofusicoccum parvum produced by antagonistic Trichoderma fungi based on the volatile compounds assay. In this assay, Neofusicoccum parvum strains were exposed to the volatiles emitted by Trichoderma strains in a co-cultivation setup for five days. Values presented are the mean of three replicates, with error bars showing the standard deviation. Asterisks denote significance at p < 0.05 (Duncan Test).
Agronomy 14 02766 g003
Figure 4. Percentage of lesion length reduction (PLLR) of Neofusicoccum parvum produced by antagonistic Trichoderma fungi in an in planta assay. Values are the mean of three replicates for two different N. parvum strains co-cultivated with each Trichoderma strain for three weeks. The control treatment consisted of healthy, non-inoculated plants, which did not develop lesions. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05; Duncan’s test).
Figure 4. Percentage of lesion length reduction (PLLR) of Neofusicoccum parvum produced by antagonistic Trichoderma fungi in an in planta assay. Values are the mean of three replicates for two different N. parvum strains co-cultivated with each Trichoderma strain for three weeks. The control treatment consisted of healthy, non-inoculated plants, which did not develop lesions. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05; Duncan’s test).
Agronomy 14 02766 g004
Figure 5. Lesions observed in the shoots of Vitis vinifera cv. Garnacha co-inoculated with Neofusicoccum parvum strain JL445 and Trichoderma virens (T5). The figure shows the development of brown external lesions extending both upward and downward from the inoculation point.
Figure 5. Lesions observed in the shoots of Vitis vinifera cv. Garnacha co-inoculated with Neofusicoccum parvum strain JL445 and Trichoderma virens (T5). The figure shows the development of brown external lesions extending both upward and downward from the inoculation point.
Agronomy 14 02766 g005
Table 1. Effect of fungicides (Sulfur and Copper oxychloride) on the radial growth of Trichoderma strains (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5).
Table 1. Effect of fungicides (Sulfur and Copper oxychloride) on the radial growth of Trichoderma strains (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5).
Trichoderma StrainControl
(Radial Growth; cm)
Agrochemical (Radial Growth; cm)
Sulfur R.D.Copper Oxychloride R.D.
1/81/41/211/81/41/21
T13.7 ± 0.33.7 ± 0.13.7 ± 03.7 ± 0.13.6 ± 0.43.7 ± 0.1NG aNGNG
T23.6 ± 0.53.6 ± 0.33.6 ± 0.43.5 ± 0.43.3 ± 0.53.7 ± 0.32.6 ± 0.22.2 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.2 *
T33.9 ± 0.33.9 ± 0.33.9 ± 0.33.9 ± 0.13.8 ± 0.33.7 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.20.4 ± 0.1
T43.8 ± 0.43.8 ± 0.13.8 ± 0.33.8 ± 0.33.7 ± 0.43.8 ± 0.2NGNGNG
T53.9 ± 0.23.9 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.23.8 ± 0.23.4 ± 0.23.2 ± 0.3 **
a NG: No growth. Mean ± SD in centimeters. Four doses were tested: 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, and 1 × Recommended Dose (R.D.). * and ** denote significance at p < 0.05 (Duncan Test).
Table 2. Summary table of biocontrol strategies and compatibility for Trichoderma species.
Table 2. Summary table of biocontrol strategies and compatibility for Trichoderma species.
Trichoderma SpeciesBiocontrol MechanismsCompatibility with FungicidesEffectiveness and Applicability Comments
T. harzianum (T3)Highest VOCs effect, Nutrient and space competition, high pathogen growth inhibitionSulfur compatible; Copper oxychloride limited compatibilityHigh efficacy in planta, compatible with fungicides; promising for integrated management
T. virideModerate nutrient and space competitionSulfur compatible; Copper oxychloride limited compatibilityHigh efficacy in planta, further studies are needed for integrated management
T. asperellumNutrient and space competition, moderate VOCs effect Sulfur compatible;
Copper oxychloride incompatibility
No efficacy in planta, not suitable for further field trials
T. virensHighest Nutrient and space competition, moderate VOCs effects, high pathogen growth inhibition effect, high pathogen growth inhibitionSulfur compatible;
Copper oxychloride partially compatible
High in vitro inhibition, but phytotoxicity in planta limits field use
Legend: in vitro: Laboratory test results on pathogen growth inhibition. in planta: Tests performed on Vitis vinifera plants. VOCs: Volatile Organic Compounds. Compatible: No significant reduction in Trichoderma growth at recommended dose. Partially compatible: Moderate reduction in Trichoderma growth at recommended dose. Limited compatibility: Significant reduction in Trichoderma growth at recommended dose. Incompatibility: No Trichoderma growth at recommended dose.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gomez-Garay, A.; Astudillo Calderón, S.; Tello Mariscal, M.L.; López, B.P. Effective Control of Neofusicoccum parvum in Grapevines: Combining Trichoderma spp. with Chemical Fungicides. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2766. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122766

AMA Style

Gomez-Garay A, Astudillo Calderón S, Tello Mariscal ML, López BP. Effective Control of Neofusicoccum parvum in Grapevines: Combining Trichoderma spp. with Chemical Fungicides. Agronomy. 2024; 14(12):2766. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122766

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gomez-Garay, Aranzazu, Sergio Astudillo Calderón, Mª Luisa Tello Mariscal, and Beatriz Pintos López. 2024. "Effective Control of Neofusicoccum parvum in Grapevines: Combining Trichoderma spp. with Chemical Fungicides" Agronomy 14, no. 12: 2766. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122766

APA Style

Gomez-Garay, A., Astudillo Calderón, S., Tello Mariscal, M. L., & López, B. P. (2024). Effective Control of Neofusicoccum parvum in Grapevines: Combining Trichoderma spp. with Chemical Fungicides. Agronomy, 14(12), 2766. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122766

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop