Buffel Grass (Pennisetum ciliare) Ecotypes Suitable for Subtropical Livestock in the North Central Region of Mexico
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Site Descriptions
2.2. Experimental Design and Field Management
2.3. Measurements
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Correlation Analysis between All Characteristics
3.2. Vegetative Growing Stage Evaluation
3.3. Maturity Growing Stage Evaluation
4. Discussion
4.1. Weather Conditions during Evaluation
4.2. Correlation Analysis between All Variables at Two Growth Stages
4.3. Dry Matter Yield for Both Growing Stages
4.4. Crude Protein for Both Growing Stages
4.5. Quality Fibers in Both Growing Stages
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cooke, R.; Daigle, C.; Moriel, P.; Smith, S.; Tedeschi, L.; Vendramini, J. Cattle adapted to tropical and subtropical environments: Social, nutritional, and carcass quality considerations. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayasinghe, P.; Donaghy, D.; Barber, D.; Pembleton, K.; Ramilan, T. Suitability evaluation of three tropical pasture species (Mulato II, Gatton Panic, and Rhodes Grass) for cultivation under subtropical climate of Autralia. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berauer, B.; Wilfahrt, P.; Reu, B.; Schchardt, M.; Gracia-Franco, N.; Zistl-Schlingmann, M.; Dannenmannd, M.; Kiesed, R.; Kühnel, A.; Jentsh, A. Predicting forage quality of species-rich pasture grasslands using vis-NIRS to reveal effects of management intensity and climate change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 296, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brychkova, G.; Kekae, K.; McKeown, P.; Hanson, J.; Jones, C.; Thornton, P.; Spillane, C. Climate change and land-use change impacts on future availability of forage grass specie for Ethiopian dairy systems. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 20512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, J.; Dakheel, A.; Hussain, M. Genotypic variation for salinity tolerance in Cenchrus ciliars L. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Soqeer1, A.; Al-Otayk, S.; Motawei1, M. Molecular characterization of new buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris) genotypes. Plant Omics J. 2020, 13, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Innes, R. Pennisetum ciliare, buffelgrass. In Fire Effects Information System; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer); 2022. Available online: www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/pencil/all.html (accessed on 1 March 2024).
- Pedroza-Parga, E.; Velásquez-Valle, M.; Pedroza-Sandoval, A.; Sánchez-Cohen, I.; Yáñez-Chávez, L. The impact of vegetation cover on soil erosion and soil deposition due to runoff. Ing. Agrícola Y Biosist. 2022, 14, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajora, M.; Jadon, K.; Roy, P.; Patidar, M.; Bhatt, R. Forage yield performance of five elite genotypes of buffel grass in hot arid region of Rajasthan. Range Manag. Agrofor. 2021, 42, 197–204. [Google Scholar]
- Estrada, F.; Mendoza-Poncel, A.; Calderon-Bustamante, O.; Botzen, W. Impacts and economic costs of climate change on Mexican agriculture. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2022, 22, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siller-Clavel, P.; Badano, E.I.; Villarreal-Guerrero, F.; Prieto-Amparán, J.A.; Pinedo-Alvarez, A.; Corrales- Lerma, R.; Álvarez-Holguín, A.; Hernández-Quiroz, N.S. Distribution Patterns of Invasive Buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris) in Mexico Estimated with Climate Niche Models under the Current and Future Climate. Plants 2022, 11, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medina, G.; Salinas, H.; Rubio, F. Cultivo: Pasto buffel (Cenchrus ciliaris). In Potencial Productivo de Especies Forrajeras en el Estado de Zacatecas; Rumayor, A., Galindo, G., Amador, M., Eds.; Libro técnico No. 1; INIFAP-Campo Experimental Zacatecas: Zacatecas, Mexico, 2001; pp. 42–43. [Google Scholar]
- Morrone, J. Biogeographic regionalization and biotic evolution of Mexico: Biodiversity´s crossroads of the New World. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2019, 90, e902980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SIAP. Secretaria de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Sistema de Información Agroalimentario y Pesquero. Avances Mensuales por Estado. 2023. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/siap/es/archivo/documentos?filter_origin=archive&idiom=es&order=DESC&page=3 (accessed on 1 November 2023).
- Terrazas, J.; Chávez, C. Rendimiento y calidad de forraje de materiales sobresalientes de zacate buffel Cenchrus ciliaris en cinco estadios de crecimiento. In Resultados de Investigación Sobre Zacate Buffel Cenchrus ciliaris de Temporal en la Región Centro de Chihuahua; Baez, F., Ed.; Publicación Especial Num. 18; INIFAP-Campo Experimental Delicias: Delicias, Mexico, 2012; pp. 21–38. [Google Scholar]
- Beltrán, L.S.; García, D.C.A.; Loredo, O.C.; Urrutia, M.J.; Hérnandez, J.A.; Gámez, V.H.G. “Titán” y “Regio”, variedades de pasto buffel (Penisetum ciliare) (L.) Link para zonas áridas y semiáridas. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu. 2017, 8, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medina, G.; Casas, J.; Rodríguez-Moreno, V.M.; Ramirez, N. Estación: Tierra blanca, Tabasco. In Estadísticas Climatológicas Horarias del Estado de Zacatecas (Periodo 2002–2022); Chew, Y., Osuna, E., Sigala, J., Eds.; Publicación Especial No. 24; INIFAP-Campo Experimental Zacatecas: Zacatecas, Mexico, 2023; pp. 704–724. [Google Scholar]
- SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT 9.4; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Negawo, A.; Assefa, Y.; Hanson, J.; Abdena, A.; Muktar, M.; Habte, E.; Sartie, A.; Jones, C. Genotyping-by-Sequencing reveals population structure and genetic diversity of a buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) collections. Diversity 2020, 12, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanania, G. Effect of harvesting stage on yield and nutritive value of buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris linn) under irrigation at gewane district, North Eastern Ethiopia. J. Sci. Innov. Res. 2019, 18, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
- Alexis, P. Yield and nutritional value of buffel gramine (Cenchrus ciliares) at different cutting times. Rev. Saberes Apudep 2021, 4, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Kisambo, B.; Wasonga, O.; Kipchirchir, O.; Karuku, G.; Kirwa, E. Forage yields and quality of Cenchrus ciliaris and Panicum maximum ecotypes under varied harvest intervals in a semi-arid environment in Kenya. Int. J. Trop. Drylands 2023, 7, 102–111. [Google Scholar]
- Piipponen, J.; Jalava, M.; Leeuw, J.; Rizayeva, A.; Godde, C.; Cramer, G.; Herrero, M.; Kummu, M. Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2022, 28, 3902–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kisambo, B.; Wasinga, O.; Koech, O.; Karuku, G.N. Morphological and productivity responses of buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) and guinea grass (Panicum maximum) ecotypes to simulate grazing in a semi-arid environment. Grassl. Res. 2023, 1, 190–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbizan, M.; Lisboa, E.; Leonardi, M.; Antonio, S.; de Souza, E.; Barros, C.; Rocha, B. Balanced protein/energy supplementation plan for beef cattle on tropical pasture. Livest. Sci. 2020, 241, 104211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Franco, M.; Detmann, E.; Batista, E.; Rufino, L.; Paulino, M.; Valadares, S. Nutritional performance and metabolic characteristics of cattle fed tropical forages with protein ans starch supplementation. An. Acad. Bras. Ciancias 2021, 93, e20190487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, R.; Shapero, M.; Striby, K.; Althouse, L.; Meade, D.; Brown, K.; Horney, M.; Rao, D.; Davy, J.; Rigby, C.; et al. Forage quality and quality dynamics due to weathering over the dry season on California annual rangelands. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 76, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salazar-Cubillas, K.C.; Dickhoefer, U. Evaluating the protein value of fresh tropical forage grasses and forage legumes using in vitro and chemical fractionation methods. Animals 2021, 11, 2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, A.; Fonseca, L.; Brito, G.; da Silva, J.; da Silva, C.; Costa, G. Fibra para rumiantes: Aspecto nutricional, metodológico e funcional. Publicacoes Med. Veterinária E Zootec. 2016, 10, 7. [Google Scholar]
- Indah, A.; Permana, I.; Despal. Determination dry matter digestibility of tropical forage using nutrient composition. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 484, 012113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benaouda, M.; González-Ronquillo, M.; Avilés-Nova, F.; Vázquez-Carrillo, M.; Castelán-Ortega, O. Efecto de la digestibilidad de la fibra sobre la emisión de metano, producción y calidad de la leche en ganado bovino productor de leche. XXVII Reun. Asoc. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 2023, 31, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piñeiro-Vázquez, A.; Jiménez-Ferrer, G.; Chay-Canul, A.; Casanova-Lugo, F.; Díaz-Echeverría, V.; Ayala-Burgos, A.; Solorio-Sánchez, F.; Aguilar-Pérez, C.; Ku-Vera, J. Intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and energy utilization in heifers fed low-quality forage and Leucaena leucocephala. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2017, 228, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Singh, T.; Singh, K.; Srivastava, M.; Das, M.; Mahanta, S.; Kumar, N.; Katiyar, R.; Ghosh, P.; Misra, A. Evaluation of global Cenchrus germplasm for key nutritional and silage quality traits. Front. Nutr. 2023, 9, 1094763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Year | PH (cm) | DMY (kg/ha) | Leaf (kg/ha) | St (kg/ha) | CP (%) | NDF (%) | ADF (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | 23.33 c | 1310 b | 603 b | 707 b | 11.7 | 67.28 | 46.2 b |
2021 | 71.16 a | 1629 a | 756 a | 872 a | 10.85 | 66.5 | 50.2 a |
2022 | 40.27 b | 1134 b | 524 b | 609 b | 11.4 | 67.1 | 47.7 b |
Ecotypes | |||||||
E-42 | 40.1 b | 1336 | 697 | 638 | 12.02 a | 66.17 b | 47.9 b |
E-45 | 39.6 b | 1217 | 550 | 666 | 12.21 a | 66.45 b | 48.23 b |
E-66 | 48.6 a | 1302 | 572 | 729 | 9.68 c | 66.86 b | 47.44 b |
E-72 | 44.2 ab | 1372 | 621 | 750 | 11.29 ab | 66.87 b | 47.61 b |
E-S245 | 48.4 a | 1527 | 713 | 814 | 12.4 a | 63.44 c | 44.49 c |
Titan | 48.4 a | 1393 | 613 | 779 | 10.5 bc | 72.12 a | 52.67 a |
Year*ecotype | 0.465 | 0.399 | 0.365 | 0.491 | 0.923 | 0.246 | 0.314 |
R2 | 0.914 | 0.673 | 0.612 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.8 | 0.75 |
CV | 17.62 | 22.4 | 22.5 | 23.61 | 4.5 | 2.62 | 2.59 |
Year | PH (cm) | DMY (kg/ha) | Leaf (kg/ha) | St (kg/ha) | CP (%) | NDF (%) | ADF (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | 132 a | 8631 a | 5203 a | 3428 a | 3.44 b | 78.63 a | 59.45 b |
2021 | 135 a | 6641 b | 2801 b | 3840 a | 4.35 a | 75.74 b | 62.14 a |
2022 | 103 b | 3698 c | 2121 c | 1618 b | 3.58 b | 78.36 a | 60.25 b |
Ecotypes | |||||||
E-42 | 125 | 6005 | 3167 | 2837 | 3.72 bc | 76.29 d | 59.38 b |
E-45 | 124 | 6017 | 3183 | 2833 | 4.03 ab | 76.54 cd | 59.61 b |
E-66 | 127 | 7045 | 3789 | 3255 | 3.41 c | 78.47 a | 60.64 ab |
E-72 | 121 | 6317 | 3390 | 3009 | 3.89 abc | 78.13 ab | 62.22 a |
E-S245 | 114 | 6155 | 3387 | 2767 | 4.2 a | 77.39 bc | 59.89 b |
Titan | 129 | 6403 | 3333 | 3069 | 3.52 c | 78.66 a | 61.94 a |
Year*ecotype | 0.261 | 0.878 | 0.693 | 0.97 | 0.677 | 0.98 | 0.558 |
R2 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.862 | 0.72 | 0.699 | 0.739 | 0.65 |
C.V. | 10.12 | 23.17 | 21.55 | 26.21 | 6.04 | 1.37 | 1.56 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, R.A.; Gutiérrez-Bañuelos, H.; Álvarez-Holguín, A.; Ramírez-Segura, E.; Muro-Reyes, A.; Muñoz-Salas, L.C.; García-Cervantes, D.; Echavarría-Cháirez, F.G. Buffel Grass (Pennisetum ciliare) Ecotypes Suitable for Subtropical Livestock in the North Central Region of Mexico. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14061224
Sánchez-Gutiérrez RA, Gutiérrez-Bañuelos H, Álvarez-Holguín A, Ramírez-Segura E, Muro-Reyes A, Muñoz-Salas LC, García-Cervantes D, Echavarría-Cháirez FG. Buffel Grass (Pennisetum ciliare) Ecotypes Suitable for Subtropical Livestock in the North Central Region of Mexico. Agronomy. 2024; 14(6):1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14061224
Chicago/Turabian StyleSánchez-Gutiérrez, Ricardo Alonso, Héctor Gutiérrez-Bañuelos, Alan Álvarez-Holguín, Edith Ramírez-Segura, Alberto Muro-Reyes, Luis Cuauhtémoc Muñoz-Salas, Daniel García-Cervantes, and Francisco Guadalupe Echavarría-Cháirez. 2024. "Buffel Grass (Pennisetum ciliare) Ecotypes Suitable for Subtropical Livestock in the North Central Region of Mexico" Agronomy 14, no. 6: 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14061224
APA StyleSánchez-Gutiérrez, R. A., Gutiérrez-Bañuelos, H., Álvarez-Holguín, A., Ramírez-Segura, E., Muro-Reyes, A., Muñoz-Salas, L. C., García-Cervantes, D., & Echavarría-Cháirez, F. G. (2024). Buffel Grass (Pennisetum ciliare) Ecotypes Suitable for Subtropical Livestock in the North Central Region of Mexico. Agronomy, 14(6), 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14061224