Next Article in Journal
Deficit Irrigation of Forage Cactus (Opuntia stricta) with Brackish Water: Impacts on Growth, Productivity, and Economic Viability under Evapotranspiration-Based Management
Previous Article in Journal
The Identification of the Peanut Wild Relative Arachis stenosperma as a Source of Resistance to Stem Rot and Analyses of Genomic Regions Conferring Disease Resistance through QTL Mapping
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antifungal Potential of Carnosic Acid from Salvia somalensis against Phytopathogenic Fungi

by
Valeria Iobbi
1,
Marta Lo Vetere
1,
Anna Paola Lanteri
2,
Jakob K. Reinhardt
3,
Ombeline Danton
3,
Morris Keller
3,
Matthias Hamburger
3,
Annalisa Salis
4,
Gianluca Damonte
4,
Olivier Potterat
3 and
Angela Bisio
1,*
1
Department of Pharmacy, University of Genova, Viale Cembrano 4, 16148 Genova, Italy
2
CERSAA Centro di Sperimentazione e Assistenza Agricola, Regione Rollo 98, 17031 Albenga, Italy
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
4
Department of Experimental Medicine, Biochemistry Section, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(7), 1444; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071444
Submission received: 27 May 2024 / Revised: 26 June 2024 / Accepted: 1 July 2024 / Published: 2 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Natural Products in Crop Pest Management)

Abstract

:
The aims of the present study were (i) to characterize the dichloromethane extract of the fresh aerial parts of S. somalensis, cultivated in Liguria (Italy), (ii) to quantify carnosic acid production and (iii) to find an eco-friendly alternative approach to control diseases caused by phytopathogenic fungi. The phytochemical investigation yielded several known terpenoids, as well as a diterpene, 4α,9α-epoxy-2H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-7(5H)-one, not previously described as a plant metabolite before. The results showed a noteworthy quantity of carnosic acid (113.90 µg/mg of dried extract). The potential antifungal activity of the plant surface extract and carnosic acid against five phytopathogenic fungi (Colletotrichum coccodes, Fusarium oxysporum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Botrytis cinerea and Rhizoctonia solani) was considered. A complete inhibition of C. coccodes, S. sclerotiorum and R. solani mycelium growth was observed by carnosic acid at 500 µg/mL. High inhibition values were observed against B. cinerea and F. oxysporum compared to reference active ingredients. Four different B. cinerea strains exhibited a pronounced sensitivity to carnosic acid, as well as those originating from agricultural crop scenarios where a high load of active ingredient for gray mold control was historically adopted. Additionally, the formation and development of the germinative tube in B. cinerea were greatly slowed down.

1. Introduction

Plant disease control is a tremendous challenge considering the annual losses of crops worldwide [1]. The massive use of bioactive synthetic compounds raises significant environmental concerns, resulting in the contamination of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and posing risks to environmental and human health [2]. Conventional agriculture has been characterized by the emergence and proliferation of microbial resistance, excessive use of mineral fertilizers, and the absence of suitable crop rotation [3]. Many researchers are actively collaborating to explore eco-friendly alternatives for sustainable farming practices, and to promote the responsible use of agrochemicals [4]. Plant pathogens and pests cause a loss of up to 40% of the yield of economically important crops every year [5]. Among them, fungi cause more economic damage than any other group of microorganisms [6,7]. These phytopathogens includes Colletotrichum coccodes, a species involved in solanaceous antrachnose diseases, Fusarium oxysporum, responsible for vascular wilt in several growing scenarios, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, causing basal and stem rot or white mold in a wide range of hosts, Rhizoctonia solani, a soil-borne pathogen leading to damping-off and basal rot in many crops, and Botrytis cinerea, the causal agent of gray mold and one of the most important plant pathogens of worldwide interest [8,9,10]. The damage caused by these fungi extends to cereals, legumes, vegetables, fruit and berry crops, ornamental and other crops with a massive impact on global agriculture. B. cinerea is a well-known necrotrophic phytopathogen that can infect a wide range of plants, including many economically important crops, ornamental plants and fruits [11]. In the Liguria region (Italy), B. cinerea is considered a key pathogen affecting aromatic protected and potted crops (i.e., Ocimum basilicum, Salvia spp., Thymus spp. (especially during the propagation phase), horticultural crops (i.e., Tomato cv Cuore di Bue), fruit crops (i.e., grapes in the viticulture of upcountry areas) and ornamental crops (cut flowers including Ranunculus asiaticus (Persian buttercup), Papaver nudicaule (Iceland poppy), Anemone coronaria, Rosa spp. and several ornamental potted species). Gray mold caused by B. cinerea is a fungal disease responsible for significant losses during the storage of fruit and vegetables, particularly problematic in vineyards, affecting grapes, but it can also impact strawberries, tomatoes, lettuce, flowers and more [12]. The management of gray mold disease has historically been achieved both by frequent application of synthetic fungicides and climate monitoring and management, particularly under protected crops [13]. Synthetic fungicides against B. cinerea available to date can be classified into five categories according to their biochemical modes of action: fungicides affecting fungal respiration, microtubule assembly, osmoregulation, methionine biosynthesis or sterol biosynthesis [14,15]. A wide array of fungicides that belong to several target-site-specific chemical classes, such as the anilinopyrimidines (Aps; FRAC 9), sterol biosynthesis inhibitors class III and SBIs class III (FRAC 17), phenylpyrroles (PPs; FRAC 12), quinone outside inhibitors (QoIs; FRAC 11), succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHIs; FRAC 7), benzimidazoles (MBCs; FRAC 1) and dicarboximides (DCs; FRAC 2), are available against the pathogen [16,17]. However, the use of them has been restricted because of resistance associated with target site modifications and the overexpression of efflux transporters [18,19]. The increase of synthetic substances production in the last decades has highlighted the need to develop sustainable disease control strategies by reducing toxicological risks [20]. Gray mold control under organic agriculture scenarios relies particularly on agronomical tools and strategies, biocontrol agents, natural extracts and climate monitoring and management [21]. Prior to 1950, B. cinerea management practices were restricted to cultural methods; for example, the avoidance of highly susceptible cultivars, short-term cropping to limit inoculum build up and limited use of nitrogen fertilizer to suppress canopy development. One promising alternative for gray mold management is the use of microorganisms as biocontrol agents (BCAs). BCAs may suppress B. cinerea via various modes of action, including competition for nutrients and space, antibiosis, parasitism and induced host-plant resistance [22,23]. Among alternative methods of gray mold control, the use of natural compounds as plant extracts is one which can be characterized by reduced toxicity for humans and environment, selectivity, biodegradable activity and a great variety of chemical composition, with a large variety of secondary metabolites [24,25].
The genus Salvia (Lamiaceae) [26,27] is a rich source of bioactive diterpenoids [28,29,30,31,32], many of them showing antibacterial and antifungal properties, with potential as biopesticides for plant disease control. Carnosic acid is an abietane-type diterpene [33,34,35], increasingly recognized for its antibacterial and antifungal properties, and it has been described as one of the major known constituents in Salvia species [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Carnosic acid has revealed potential against common crop fungal pathogens [44]. Limited studies have explored the use of natural compounds, including carnosic acid, for crop protection and as environmentally friendly alternatives to harmful synthetic pesticides [39]. Specifically, carnosic acid has been reported to inhibit some pathogenic fungi, which are known to cause significant post-harvest losses in crops, including B. cinerea, F. oxysporum, A. alternata, Aspergillus tubingensis and Penicillium digitatum [38,39]. Diterpenoids showing abietane skeletal types are mainly reported in the aerial parts of Old World Salvia species [45], and a recent study reported that S. somalensis Vatke is characterized by a relevant amount of carnosic acid [46]. S. somalensis [27,47] is a perennial shrub, native to Somalia, and recently introduced in the Ligurian cultivations of ornamental species for the ease of growth in the Ligurian climate, the fragrance and the color of the flowers. Generally, such species is grown in open field conditions, being better adapted for pots with a diameter higher than 16 cm. Due to the secretion of defense compounds onto the plant cuticular layer [48,49,50,51,52], the aims of the present study were (i) to characterize the dichloromethane extract of the fresh aerial parts of S. somalensis cultivated in Liguria, (ii) to quantify its carnosic acid concentration and (iii) to explore the potential of this compound as an agrochemical for the treatment of phytopathogenic fungi. For this purpose, five fungal species, i.e., C. coccodes, F. oxysporum, S. sclerotiorum, B. cinerea and R. solani, were considered. Taking into account the prominent evolution of B. cinerea resistance and lacking new antifungal compounds, a particular focus was given to B. cinerea, extremely affecting our region (Liguria, Italy), also considering the conidial germination and germ tube elongation assay.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The fresh aerial parts of commercial S. somalensis plants were obtained from the Centro Regionale di Sperimentazione ed Assistenza Agricola (CeRSAA), Albenga (SV), Italy (see cultivation technique of the species in Supplementary Materials). The plant material was identified by G.L.C. Bramley, and a voucher specimen (INTERREG III ALCOTRA, Progetto N° 074 “Sviluppo a Scopi Commerciali delle Potenzialità del Genere Salvia L.”) was deposited at the Kew Herbarium (K).

2.2. Extraction and Isolation

2.2.1. Chemicals

Solvents for extraction and purification were purchased from VWR International SRL (Milano, Italy). Ultra-pure acetonitrile, water, methanol and formic acid for LC-MS analysis were purchased from Romil Ltd. Pure Chemistry (Cambridge, UK). Deuterium oxide (D2O, 99.90% D), CD3OD (99.95% D) and 3-(trimethylsilyl)propionic-2,2,3,3-d4 acid sodium salt (TSP) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company (Milano, Italy).

2.2.2. General Experimental Procedures

TLC and MPLC were performed as previously described [53,54]. Pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for TLC. CHCl3-CH3OH-HCOOH (10:0.5:0.1) was used as mobile phase, and spots were detected by spraying 50% H2SO4, followed by heating. MPLC chromatography was performed on a Spot Liquid Chromatography system (Armen Instrument, Saint Ave, France) with Normal Phase Si60 Cartridges Supervarioflash and LiChroprep RP-18 (40–63 μm) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Normal Phase Si60 Cartridges Supervarioflash (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for MPLC. A linear gradient was used, with n-hexane/CHCl3/CH3OH at concentrations varying from 100:0:0 to 0:0:100 as elution mixture. Semi-preparative HPLC was carried out using a Waters W600 pump equipped with a Rheodyne Delta 600 injector, a 2414 refractive index detector and a 2998 photodiode array detector (all Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). A C18 SymmetryPrep column, 7.8 × 300 mm ID, 7 µm particle size (Waters) was used for semi-preparative HPLC, at room temperature, flow rate 2.0 mL/min, sample injection volume 100 µL. The mobile phase was composed of A: H2O, B: CH3OH, at various ratios. HPLC-PDA-CAD-ESIMS or APCIMS was conducted on an LC-MS 8030 chromatographic system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) consisting of a degasser, auto-sampler, quaternary pump (LC-20AD), a column oven (CTO-20AC), a PDA detector (SPD-M20A), a triple quadrupole MS and a Dionex Corona Veo RS CAD detector (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Germering, Germany). NMR data were recorded on a Bruker Avance III NMR spectrometer operating at 500.13 MHz for 1H and 125.77 MHz for 13C nuclei. 1H, 13C, COSY, HSQC, HMBC and NOESY NMR spectra were recorded in CD3OD (ARMAR isotopes, 99.8 atom% D) or DMSO-d6 (ARMAR isotopes, 99.9 atom% D) at 23 °C on a 5 mm BBO probe with a Z-gradient. ESIHRMS spectra were recorded on a LTQ Orbitrap XL hybrid ion trap—Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Optical rotations were measured with a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter (Perkin Elmer, Inc. Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a sodium lamp (589 nm) and a 10 cm microcell. UV and ECD spectra were recorded in MeOH (40–400 μg/mL) on a Chirascan CD spectrometer using 1 mm path precision cells (110 QS) (Hellma Analytics, Müllheim, Germany). Data analysis was performed with Pro-Data V2.4 software.

2.2.3. Chemical Investigation of Leaf Surface Constituents

For the isolation of leaf surface constituents, fresh aerial parts of S. somalensis (1.5 kg) were immersed in CH2Cl2 for 20 s, preventing the extraction of inner cell wall components. After filtration, the extraction solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The extract (16.2 g, 1.1% w/w of fresh plant) was treated with n-hexane to afford an n-hexane-soluble (12.1 g) and an n-hexane-insoluble portion (3.1 g).
The n-hexane-soluble portion was chromatographed in aliquots of 1.0 g on a Sephadex LH-20 column (53 × 2.5 cm), using CHCl3/CH3OH (7:3) as an eluent. The eluate fractions (20 mL each) were combined according to their TLC patterns to give five fraction groups (I–IV): group I (1.3 g) (up to 180 mL) with waxy compounds; group II (2.5 g) (from 180 to 220 mL); group III (3.6 g) (from 220 to 240 mL), and group IV (2.0 g) (from 240 to 320 mL). Each group was then separated by MPLC, and the compounds were purified by semi-preparative HPLC.
Fractionation of group I afforded 13 fractions (I1–I13). Semipreparative HPLC purification (65% CH3OH in H2O for 70 min, followed by 100% for 10 min) of fraction I4 (160 mg) afforded 1 (1.5 mg, tR 18.4 min) and 2 (1.2 mg, tR 19.7 min). Fraction I7 (69 mg) (HPLC method as fraction I4) afforded 3 (1.1 mg, tR 14.8 min). Fraction I9 (67 mg) afforded 4 (3.0 mg, tR 11.1 min). Fractionation of group II afforded 13 fractions (II1–II13). HPLC purification (HPLC method as fraction I4) of fraction II9 (320 mg) afforded 5 (4.7 mg, tR 29.7 min), 6 (0.8 mg, tR 30.2 min), 7 (1.1 mg, tR 44.4 min) and 8 (0.7 mg, tR 44.8 min). Fraction II10 (356 mg) was purified by semipreparative HPLC (linear gradient from 5% CH3OH in H2O to 100% CH3OH in 61 min and followed by elution with 100% CH3OH to 90 min), affording 9 (2.8 mg, tR 61 min), 10 (1.4 mg, tR 70.2 min), 11 (3.9 mg, tR 74.2 min), 12 (1.3 mg, tR 75.0 min), 13 (2.5 mg, tR 78.2 min), 14 (7.1 mg, tR 82.0 min) and 15 (9.3 mg, tR 83.0 min). Fraction II11 (387 mg) was purified as the previous one, affording 14 (47.5 mg, tR 82.0 min) and 15 (50.3 mg, tR 83.0 min). Fractionation of group III afforded 13 fractions (III1–III13). Fraction III7 (145 mg) was purified by semipreparative HPLC (65% CH3OH in H2O for 70 min, followed by 100% for 10 min), affording 16 (0.4 mg, tR 27.4 min) and 17 (3.1 mg, tR 64.2 min). Fraction III9 (156 mg) was purified by semipreparative HPLC (linear gradient from 5% CH3OH in H2O to 100% CH3OH in 61 min and followed by elution with 100% CH3OH to 90 min), affording 12 (1.0 mg, tR 75 min). Fraction III12 (347 mg) was purified by semipreparative HPLC (60% CH3OH in H2O for 30 min, and followed by 100% for 20 min), affording 18 (10.5 mg, tR 12.0 min) and 19 (20.1 mg, tR 16.1 min). Fraction III13 (451 mg) was purified by semipreparative HPLC (linear gradient from 5% CH3OH in H2O to 100% CH3OH in 61 min and followed by elution with 100% CH3OH to 90 min), affording 14 (20.5 mg, tR 82.0 min) and 15 (13.3 mg, tR 83.0 min). Fractionation of group IV afforded 15 fractions (IV1–IV15). HPLC purification (65% CH3OH in H2O for 70 min, followed by 100% for 10 min) of fraction IV8 (146 mg) afforded 17 (1.0 mg, tR 64.0 min), 20 (1.5 mg, tR 16.2 min), 21 (0.3 mg, tR 16.5 min), and 22 (0.4 mg, tR 24.5 min). Fraction IV9 (234 mg) (HPLC method as fraction IV8) afforded 23 (1.7 mg, tR 5.8 min), 24 (1.3 mg, tR 8.0 min) and 25 (1.1 mg, tR 25.3 min). Fraction IV10 (148 mg) (HPLC method as fraction IV8) afforded 26 (1.4 mg, tR 11.5 min), 27 (0.4 mg, tR 16.5 min) and 28 (0.4 mg, tR 19.5 min). Fraction IV13 (143 mg) (HPLC method as fraction IV8) afforded 29 (2.9 mg, tR 14.9 min) and 30 (10.2 mg, tR 18.2 min). Fraction IV15 (126 mg) (HPLC method as fraction IV8) afforded 31 (1.3 mg, tR 6.7 min), 32 (0.8 mg, tR 9.3 min) and 33 (1.4 mg, tR 23.2 min).
The n-hexane-insoluble portion chromatographed in aliquots of 1.0 g by Si gel MPLC eluting with n-hexane/ethyl acetate at concentrations varying from 91:9 to 76:24 to obtain 12 fractions (V1–V12). HPLC purification of fraction V9 (533 mg) was purified by semipreparative HPLC (60% CH3OH in H2O for 30 min, and followed by 100% for 20 min), afforded 19 (197.6 mg, tR 16.1 min). Fraction V10 (474 mg) was purified by semipreparative HPLC with the same method as the previous fraction, affording 18 (57.3 mg, tR 12.0 min) and 19 (142.7 mg, tR 16.1 min). Fraction V11 (498 mg) (HPLC method as fraction V10) afforded 18 (153.6 mg, tR 12.0 min). Fraction V12 (146 mg) (HPLC method as fraction V10) afforded 13 (28.4 mg, tR 16.2 min) and 18 (34.5 mg, tR 12.2 min).
4α,9α-epoxy-2H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-7(5H)-one (25): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): 6.83 (s, 1H), 2.93 (septet, J = 6.9, 6.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (d, J = 18.5 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (d, J = 18.5 Hz, 1H), 2.12 (td, J = 12.9, 12.8, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.96–1.94 (m, 2H), 1.82 (m, 1H), 1.78 (m, 1H), 1.66 (td, J = 13.7, 13.7, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 1.49 (m 1H), 1.46 (m 1H), 1.32 (m, 1H), 1.24 (m, 1H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.12 (m, 1H), 1.10 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.07 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD): 182.2, 143.9, 142.0, 140.2, 134.8, 83.3, 80.9, 45.9, 41.6, 40.9, 37.5, 35.4, 34.3, 31.1, 26.4, 23.3, 21.1, 20.5, 19.2, 18.7.

2.2.4. Computational Methods

Conformational analysis was performed with Schrödinger MacroModel 11.0 (Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA) employing the OPLS2005 force field in H2O for geometrical optimization in two steps. In the first step, a global minimum was searched using 30,000 steps. In the second step, the global minimum was used as input for a conformational search over 10,000 steps to choose five to seven conformers for ab initio calculations. These were subjected to geometrical optimization and energy calculation applying DFT with the Coulomb-attenuating method, Becke’s nonlocal three-parameter exchange and correlation functional and the Lee–Yang–Parr correlation functional level (CAM-B3LYP), together with the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) basis set, the SCRF method and the CPMC model for solvation (in MeOH) with the Gaussian 09 program package [55]. Excitation energy (denoted by wavelength in nm), rotator strength (Rstr), dipole velocity (Rvel) and dipole length (Rlen) were calculated in MeOH by TD-DFT/CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p). ECD curves were obtained based on rotator strengths with a half-band of 0.25 eV (if not otherwise noted) using SpecDis v1.71 [56]

2.2.5. HPLC Quantitative Analysis

The quantification of carnosic acid (19) in the leaf surface extract was carried out through μHPLC 1100 (Agilent Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with Symmetry C18 column (1 mm × 150 mm, 3.5 µm particle size, Waters S.p.A., Sesto San Giovanni, Italy), at room temperature, and gradient elution with a binary solution (eluent A: H2O/HCOOH 0.1% v/v, eluent B: CH3CN/HCOOH 0.05% v/v). The analysis started with 15% of B, then was increased to 100% over 35 min, then kept at 100% for 5 min and finally re-equilibrated to 15% B and held for 15 min. The flow rate was 30 µL/min, and the injection volume was 8 μL. UV detection was monitored at 280 nm. The calibration curve for 19 was obtained at a concentration range from 1 µg/mL to 6 µg/mL. The linearity of the instrumental response in the analyzed concentration range was confirmed, as inferred by the following fitting curve parameters: y = 8.1093 x + 2.6092; R² = 0.9996. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were determined by serial dilution of 19 until the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio was 3 for LOD and 10 for LOQ. The obtained values of LOD and LOQ were 1 pmol/µL and 3.6 pmol/µL, respectively.

2.3. Antifungal Assays

2.3.1. Fungi Strains

Strains of C. coccodes, F. oxysporum, S. sclerotiorum, R. solani and B. cinerea have been isolated at CeRSAA (Albenga (SV), Italy) from symptomatic plants of Solanum lycopersicum, Cyclamen persicum, Lactuca sativa, Ocimum basilicum and Fragraria x ananassa, respectively, and used in a first antifungal activity assay. The same B. cinerea strain was used in the conidial germination and germ tube elongation assay. Furthermore, four B. cinerea strains isolated from symptomatic plants of Solanum lycopersicum (strain 2), Fragraria x ananassa (strain 3), Ocimum basilicum (strain 7) and Lavandula angustifolia (strain 12) were tested together in a second antifungal activity assay. For the isolation portions, infected plant material was washed with water and cut into small pieces to be transferred into Petri dishes, containing approximately 30 mL of Potato Dextrose Agar (VWR Life Science, Milano, Italy) supplemented with 5 mg/L streptomycin sulphate (VWR Life Science, Milan, Italy) to prevent bacterial contamination. The Petri dishes were incubated for 7 days at 27 ± 2 °C in the dark. The plates were examined day-by-day to observe mycelium growth. Pure colonies of fungi strains were then isolated and incubated for 7 days at 27 ± 2 °C, in the dark. The fungi were finally identified using morphological and microscopic analysis and characterized by molecular sequencing of the ITS region, following the method reported by White et al. [57]. The pathogenicity of the strains was confirmed in vivo (Koch’s Postulates confirmation) [58,59].

2.3.2. Antifungal Activity Assay

Firstly, the inhibitory effect of S. somalensis surface dichloromethane extract and carnosic acid on mycelium growth of C. coccodes, F. oxysporum, S. sclerotiorum, R. solani and B. cinerea was tested. The bottles, containing culture medium with 39 g of Potato Dextrose Agar (Merck, Milan, Italy) and 1 L of distilled water, were autoclaved for 15 min at 121 °C and then cooled to 50 °C. S. somalensis crude surface exudate, carnosic acid and the four synthetic fungicides were added separately. Extract (solubilized in DMSO 1% v/v) was tested at 500 and 1000 μg/mL. Carnosic acid (solubilized in DMSO 1% v/v) was tested at the following concentrations: 5, 10, 50, 250, 500, 750, 1000 μg/mL. The fungicides concentrations are those recommended by manufacturers: Bavistin® FL (BASF, Rome, Italy) (carbendazim 41%), carbendazim 500 μg/mL; Rovral® FL (BASF, Rome, Italy) (iprodionee 25%), iprodionee 675 μg/mL; Ortiva® (Syngenta, Milan, Italy) (azoxystrobin 23%), azoxystrobin 250 μg/mL; Switch® (Syngenta, Milan, Italy) (cyprodinil 37% + fludioxonil 25%), cyprodinil 375 and fludioxonil 250 μg/mL, respectively. The obtained media were then supplemented with streptomycin sulphate (5 μg/mL) and solidified in 90 mm diameter Petri dishes. Mycelium agar plugs (<2 × 2 mm) were placed on the medium, in sterile conditions, directly in the center of the Petri dishes [60], which were incubated in the dark at 25 °C. Then, carnosic acid was tested on mycelium growth of four B. cinerea strains, following the same conditions previously described. The concentration of the employed fungicide is that recommended by the manufacturer: Switch® (Syngenta, Milan, Italy) (cyprodinil 37% + fludioxonil 25%), at 375 and 250 μg/mL, which is specific for B. cinerea [60]. Each test included the evaluation of growth radius on poisoned medium with DMSO 1% v/v and not poisoned medium (control). Three replicates were made for each concentration. The radial mycelial growth of the pathogens was assessed by measuring the colony radius in millimeters 5 days after the inoculation and the percentage of inhibition exerted by the test substances compared to the untreated control was determined. The experiments were repeated three times, and all three tests gave comparable results.

2.3.3. B. cinerea Conidial Germination and Germ Tube Elongation Assay

The effect of carnosic acid upon the germ tube elongation of conidia of B. cinerea were evaluated according to Leroux et al. [61]. An amount of 0.3 mL of a conidial suspension (2 × 105 conidia mL−1) was spread on the surface of an agar medium containing 10 g glucose, 2 g K2HPO4, 2 g KH2PO4, and 12.5 g agar for 1 L [62]. The bottles with the medium were autoclaved for 15 min at 121 °C and then cooled to 50 °C. Carnosic acid (solubilized in DMSO 1% v/v) and the four synthetic fungicides were added separately. Carnosic acid was tested at the following concentrations: 5, 10, 50, 250, 500, 750, 1000 μg/mL. The concentrations at which fungicides have been used are those recommended by manufacturers. The obtained media were then added with streptomycin sulphate (5 μg/mL) and solidified in 90 mm diameter Petri dishes. Each test was repeated three times. The phenotypic characterization was completed after an incubation of 24 h at about 21 °C. Then, the number of germinated conidia was counted, and this count was repeated after 48 h. The percentage of conidia germinated after 24 and 48 h on the substrates poisoned with the test substances compared to the untreated control was then determined, using a microscope Nikon Eclipse 55 (zoom 10×). After 48 h, mycelium agar plugs of each replication were transferred on PDA to verify the viability of the conidia. Each test included the evaluation of the conidial germination on medium poisoned with DMSO 1% v/v and not poisoned (control).

2.3.4. Statistical Analysis

The effect of treatments was assessed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey HSD test mean separation at p ≤ 0.05. Statistics were performed by using the “Statistica” software package, version 8.0, Statsoft Inc. Tulsa, OK, USA [63].

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Investigation of Leaf Surface Constituents

The dichloromethane extract of the plant surface of S. somalensis was analyzed by the chromatographic method, and afforded several known compounds (Table S1, Supplementary Materials), identified by spectroscopic NMR analysis, including DEPT, TOCSY, HSQC and HMBC experiments, ESIHRMS and ECD calculations, and comparison with literature data. The more lipophilic portion afforded several sesquiterpenoids named (-)-7-epi-isojunenol (1) [64], (+)-junenol (2) [65], (+)-ent-epicubenol (3) [66], teucladiol (4) [67], 4β,6β-dihydroxy-1α,5α(H)-guai-9-ene (11) [68], β-chaenocephalol (23) [69], 1β,6β-dihydroxy-4(14)-eudesmene (24) [70,71] and 3,11-dihydroxy-3,7,11-trimethyldodeca-1,6,9-triene (31) [72]. Triterpenoids, betulin (6) [73], uvaol (7) [74], betulinic acid (8) [73], oleanolic acid (14) [75], ursolic acid (15) [75] and one flavonoid, 5-hydroxy-7,4′-dimethoxyflavone (apigenin-7,4′-dimethyl ether) (12) [76], were also present. Diterpenoid compounds, 7,13-E-labdadien-15-ol (17) [77], the abietanes [33] pisiferol (5) [78,79], rosmanol (9) [80,81], rosmadial (10) [82], 12-methylcarnosic acid (13) [83,84], 12-O-methyl-acetylcarnosate (12-methoxy-11-hydroxy-8,11,13-abietatrien-2-oic acid methylester) (16) [85], 14-hydroxy-7-O-methylrosmanol (27) [86], 12-methylcarnosol (28) [87], galdosol (26) [88,89], carnosol (18) [84], carnosic acid (19) [84], 20-deoxocarnosol (20) [90], 11-hydroxy-12-methoxyabieta-8,11,13-triene (21) [91], ferruginol (22) [92], 11-hydroxysugiol (32) [93], formosanoxide (33) [94], and the icetexane brussonol (29) [91,95], demethylsalvicanol (30) [91] and 4α,9α-epoxy-2H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-7(5H)-one (25) [95] were isolated.
Spectroscopic data of compound 25 (Figure 1 and Figures S1–S6, Supplementary Materials) allowed it to be identified as an icetexane compound, previously described by Majetich and Zou [95] as a synthetic product obtained by treatment of an o-quinone intermediate of synthesis of (+)-brussonol with zinc chloride. To the best of our knowledge, this compound has never been isolated from a plant source before. In the study by Majetich and Zou [95], NMR data were not reported, and the absolute configuration of 25 was not established. To better describe compound 25, its absolute configuration was studied by electronic circular dichroism (ECD). The experimental ECD spectrum of 25 (Figure S7, Supplementary Materials) showed a pronounced positive Cotton effect (CE) at 309 nm, strong negative CEs at 214 and 353 nm, and a weak negative CE at 260 nm. The ab initio calculated ECD spectrum of 25 showed corresponding CEs for all four observed CEs. Thus, the absolute configuration of 25 was assigned as (5S,5R,10S)-4α,9α-epoxy-2H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-7(5H)-one.

3.2. HPLC Quantitative Analysis

The amount of carnosic acid (18) in the surface dichloromethane extract of S. somalensis was determined by HPLC-UV analysis (Figure S8, Supplementary Materials). The results showed that the content of 18 was 113.90 µg/mg of dried extract.

3.3. Antifungal Screening

S. somalensis crude surface exudate and carnosic acid were tested in vitro for antifungal activity against C. coccodes, F. oxysporum, S. sclerotiorum, B. cinerea and R. solani (Figure S9, Supplementary Materials). The antifungal activity was evaluated by the measurement of mycelial growth inhibition. A representative figure showing inhibition of growth of fungal mycelium after inoculation on poisoned medium with carnosic acid is reported in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S10). The results shown in Table 1 indicate that the S. somalensis exudate and carnosic acid affected mycelial growth of the five phytopathogens. The percentage of growth inhibition was determined by measuring the mycelial growth in the absence and presence of different concentrations of tested compounds. The activity was also compared with that of four conventional chemical fungicides. S. somalensis crude surface exudate showed a high percent of inhibition against all the tested fungi, ranging from 40% (at 500 µg/mL) to 85% (at 1000 µg/mL) with values comparable to the reference products used. Remarkably complete inhibition of mycelium growth was achieved by carnosic acid against C. coccodes, S. sclerotiorum and Rhizoctonia solani at 500 µg/mL as well as the reference product Switch® (cyprodinil 375 µg/mL and fludioxonil 250 µg/mL). Moreover, significant inhibition for C. coccodes and S. sclerotiorum was detected also at 50 µg/mL, similar to Bavistin® FL (carbendazim 500 µg/mL) and for C. coccodes at 5 µg/mL similar to Rovral® FL (iprodionee 675 µg/mL). Carnosic acid at 250 µg/mL gave results comparable to Ortiva® (azoxystrobin 250 µg/mL) and Rovral® FL (iprodionee 675 µg/mL) treatment when tested on F. oxysporum. High mycelium growth inhibition values were obtained with carnosic acid at 250 µg/mL against S. sclerotiorum compared to Bavistin® FL (carbendazim 500 µg/mL) treatment, while complete inhibition was observed at 500 µg/mL. Similar results were obtained against B. cinerea with carnosic acid at 250 µg/mL compared to the reference products Switch® (cyprodinil 375 µg/mL and fludioxonil 250 µg/mL) and Rovral® FL (iprodionee 675 µg/mL). In summary, from a statistical point of view, the activity of carnosic acid at 500 µg/mL against C. coccodes was comparable with cyprodinil and fludioxonil (375 µg/mL + 250 µg/mL), the activity of carnosic acid at 750 µg/mL against F. oxysporum was comparable with iprodione (675 µg/mL) and the activity of carnosic acid at 1000 µg/mL against S. sclerotiorum was comparable with carbendazim (500 µg/mL) and cyprodinil and fludioxonil (375 µg/mL + 250 µg/mL). On the other hand, the activity of carnosic acid at 500 µg/mL against R. solani was statistically comparable with iprodione (675 µg/mL), carbendazim (500 µg/mL) and cyprodinil and fludioxonil (375 µg/mL + 250 µg/mL). The activity of carnosic acid at the tested concentrations against B. cinerea was never comparable from a statistical point of view to the activity of synthetic fungicides. However, it must be noted that in the case of carbendazim and azoxystrobin, no efficacy against B. cinerea was observed, showing a possible evolution of resistance in the strain tested. Then, in vitro experiments were carried out to assess carnosic acid’s efficacy against four strains of B. cinerea sourced from different diseased crops. These crops exhibit diversity in permissible treatments for Botrytis, encompassing variations in both the active ingredients utilized and the frequency of application throughout the cultivation season. The percentage of growth inhibition was determined by measuring the mycelial growth in the absence and presence of different concentrations of tested compounds. The results shown in Table 2 indicate that carnosic acid affected at different levels the mycelial growth of the four strains of B. cinerea. Representative figures showing inhibition of growth of B. cinerea mycelium after inoculation on poisoned medium with carnosic acid are reported in the Supplementary Materials (Figures S10 and S11). Carnosic acid showed a dose-response effect with a level inhibition of growth greater than 50% starting from the dose of 250 µg/mL and reaching 80% inhibition at 1000 µg/mL. This is probably due to strains coming from crops with a high anti-botrytic defense load and a greater possibility of developing resistance phenomena (S. lycopersicum, strain 2 and F. x ananassa, strain 3). In case of strain 2, the inhibition values at 750 and 1000 µg /mL were statistically comparable to each other, while for strain 3 the percentage of inhibition at 500 µg /mL was statistically comparable with both the inhibition values at 750 and 1000 µg /mL. The treatment of strain 2 and strain 3 with the synthetic product showed an inhibition of 100% in the growth of the mycelium, not statistically comparable with the action of carnosic acid. On the other hand, strains isolated from crops that are treated infrequently, either because of legal restrictions (O. basilicum, strain 7) or because it is not economically viable (L. angustifolia strain 12), showed a high sensitivity to carnosic acid even at very low doses (5 µg/mL), resulting in 100% growth inhibition and fully comparable with the formulated product.

3.4. B. cinerea Conidial Germination and Germ Tube Elongation Assay

To better understand the mode of action of carnosic acid, in vitro tests have been set up to define the viability of B. cinerea conidia grown in poisoned medium [61]. Measurements taken 24 and 48 h after inoculation showed that carnosic acid effectively inhibits germination and tube formation at 1000 µg/mL as well as the reference product Switch® at the dose recommended by the manufacturer (cyprodinil 375 µg/mL and fludioxonil 250 µg/mL) (Table 3). At 24 h, many replicates showed no conidial development at 1000 and 750 µg/mL with an effect statistically comparable with Switch®. On the other hand, the results observed after 48 h showed an onset of germination in carnosic acid plates at a concentration of 1000 µg/mL and, as expected, a total inhibition by the product Switch® which has a recognized fungicidal activity. Nevertheless, the shape and development of the germ tubes with carnosic acid have maintained the characteristics indicated above, not comparable to any other plate containing the fungicides used as the control. To assess the conidia viability, agar plugs with conidial suspension were transferred on a solid non-selective substrate (PDA) after 48 h. The resulting mycelium growth from the agar plugs poisoned with carnosic acid, especially at high concentrations, was in all cases very slow. Moreover, several replicates showed no conidial development at 1000 and 750 µg/mL also after 48 h.

4. Discussion

New compounds to replace those that have become unavailable due to toxicity or resistance in target pathogens are urgently needed [96,97,98]. Directive 2009/128/EC [99] about the sustainable use of plant protection products contained several measures to reduce the risks and impacts of plant protection products on human health and the environment by promoting the use of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and alternative approaches or technologies, including non-chemical alternatives to plant protection products. Furthermore [40], Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 has set more stringent requirements for the approval of active substances. As a result, there are many regulatory restrictions on the use of fungicides. Natural products are recognized as valuable resources in the search for novel antifungal agents [100,101,102]. In the present study, the dichloromethane surface extract of S. somalensis cultivated in Liguria (Italy) was characterized and the content of carnosic acid has been determined. The surface extract showed the presence of several terpenoids, including constituents of the essential oil and non-volatile terpenoids, and flavonoids, characteristic of trichome secretion products. These compounds have a pivotal role in plant defense, and often show antimicrobial and allelopathic activity [51,103]. Abietane and icetexane diterpenoids were isolated. Abietanes and rearranged abietane skeletons are common in Salvia species [29,32]. The icetexanes belonged to the structural class 2 (barbatusol family) [104,105], and have been described as biogenetically related to abietane diterpenoids. As reported for other Salvia spp., a significant amount of carnosic acid (113.90 µg/mg of dry extract) was detected in S. somalensis. These data are consistent with those reported in the literature [40,43,106,107,108]. This hinted at the potential of utilizing S. somalensis as a viable source for extracting this bioactive compound, prompting further exploration for its formulation through new studies. Carnosic acid has been recognized as a potent antimicrobial constituent of several Salvia species [37]. Our results demonstrated the ability of carnosic acid to completely inhibit the mycelium growth of C. coccodes, S. sclerotiorum and R. solani already at 500 µg/mL. Moreover, 80% of inhibition was also observed against F. oxysporum and B. cinerea when tested at the same concentration. A very strong antifungal activity was observed against all the tested fungi already at 250 µg/mL. Relevant inhibition values were obtained at the lowest tested concentration (5 µg/mL) against C. coccodes, and to a lesser extent against F. oxysporum and B. cinerea. In fact, the frequency of resistance to carbendazim to B. cinerea due to mutations has reached high values [109]. S. somalensis crude surface extract showed good inhibition values, comparable to the classical chemical fungicides (iprodione and carbendazim). These results emphasize the potential of using natural compounds or extracts as fungicide and their crucial role in crop protection [110]. The effectiveness of the leaf surface extract of S. somalensis could be associated with a potential synergy between the constituents. Several studies have reported extracts from natural sources which exhibit antifungal activity against B. cinerea [111,112]. As some compounds create a membrane instability producing a permeability alteration of B. cinerea cytoplasmic membrane [113], while others completely inhibit conidial germination, to better investigate the mechanism of action, the efficacy of carnosic acid on B. cinerea conidial germination and germ tube elongation was assessed. Carnosic acid effectively inhibited germ tube formation at 1000 µg/mL after 24 h. Although the onset of germination has been observed at all other carnosic acid concentrations, the effect was comparable to the controls. Germ tube formation and development were greatly slowed down, confirming the great antifungal potential of carnosic acid. The reduction in the development of the germ tubes suggests a possible interference of carnosic acid in protein synthesis (as in the case of cyprodinil) or in the development and function of membranes (as in the case of carbamates and some plant extracts) which can usually lead to a decrease in the development of the mycelium [114]. In the Liguria region (Italy), B. cinerea stands out as a formidable threat due to its deleterious effects on a wide array of crops that form the backbone of agricultural and horticultural activities. This fungal pathogen’s presence is particularly felt in the cultivation of aromatic plants. Beyond them, B. cinerea’s reach extends to embrace horticultural staples, jeopardizing harvests and livelihoods alike. Our intent was to conduct a thorough investigation into four strains of B. cinerea isolated from symptomatic plants. In vitro experiments revealed that significant activity was displayed at minimal concentrations (5 µg/mL), leading to complete growth inhibition, comparable to the conventional product Switch®. Carnosic acid efficacy was particularly pronounced in treating strains isolated from O. basilicum and L. angustifolia, rarely tested.
Currently, the control of gray mold is heavily reliant on single-site fungicides [115]. However, because of their interactions with defined molecular targets, with a highly specific mode of action, they are at high risk of developing resistance due to specific mutations [18]. In this sense, being able to have new possible sources of active molecules against B. cinerea is of primary importance because it would allow the implementation of successful strategies to delay the evolution of resistance in pathogen populations. Given these possible outcomes and the good amount of carnosic acid, S. somalensis could be considered a new source of bioactive compounds useful in organic farming, with low environmental impact. Furthermore, these results hold good promise for the Ligurian region, where B. cinerea’s impact on various crops is keenly felt.

5. Conclusions

The phytochemical investigation of S. somalensis surface exudate afforded a compound (25) that has never been isolated from a plant source before, as well as several known compounds. A remarkable quantity of carnosic acid (113.90 µg/mg of dried extract) has been detected, emphasizing the potential of S. somalensis as a new source of bioactive compounds. This study also proposed the potential use of the plant surface exudate and carnosic acid as a valid eco-friendly strategy to control plant diseases. The dichloromethane extract of S. somalensis and carnosic acid exhibited notable efficacy against the tested pathogens giving interesting results in the antifungal screening. Four B. cinerea strains were identified as exhibiting a strong sensitivity to carnosic acid. These strains were isolated from agricultural crops, where they were found to have a high load of the active ingredient for gray mold control. Moreover, the results showed that the formation and development of the germinative tube in B. cinerea were greatly slowed down, highlighting the potential interesting use of new active ingredients to be used in organic farming. Further research is warranted to investigate the potential mechanisms of action in more complex agricultural scenarios, where the selection of naturally resistant individuals and their competition with the wild-type population may occur as a result of the intensive use of products on a large area.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy14071444/s1, Figure S1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) spectrum of compound 25; Figure S2. HSQC (500 MHz, CD3OD) spectrum of compound 25; Figure S3. HMBC (500 MHz, CD3OD) spectrum of compound 25; Figure S4. COSY (500 MHz, CD3OD) spectrum of compound 25; Figure S5. NOESY (500 MHz, CD3OD) spectrum of compound 25; Figure S6. ESIMS spectrum of compound 25; Figure S7. ECD spectra of compound 25; Figure S8. Representative chromatograms of the HPLC profiles of carnosic acid and of the dichloromethane plant surface extract of the fresh aerial parts of Salvia somalensis; Figure S9. Mycelial growth on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium of Colletotrichum coccodes, Fusarium oxysporum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Botrytis cinerea used in the antifungal activity assay; Figure S10. Representative inhibition of growth of fungal mycelium after inoculation on poisoned media; Figure S11. Inhibition of growth of Botrytis cinerea (strain 2) mycelium 5 days after inoculation on poisoned media; Figure S12. Inhibition of growth of Botrytis cinerea (strain 7) mycelium 5 days after inoculation on poisoned media; Table S1. Compounds isolated from the dichloromethane extract of the fresh aerial parts of S. somalensis; Cultivation technique of S. somalensis. References [47,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,116] are also cited in Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and V.I.; methodology, O.P., M.H., A.B., J.K.R. and A.P.L.; validation, A.B., A.P.L. and O.P.; formal analysis, V.I., A.P.L. and J.K.R.; investigation, V.I., J.K.R., O.D., M.K., M.L.V., A.P.L., A.S. and G.D.; resources, O.P. and A.B.; data curation, A.B. and V.I.; writing—original draft preparation, V.I., A.P.L. and J.K.R.; writing—review and editing, O.P., V.I. and A.B.; visualization, V.I.; supervision, O.P. and A.B.; project administration, A.B.; funding acquisition, A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article and Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Peng, Y.; Li, S.J.; Yan, J.; Tang, Y.; Cheng, J.P.; Gao, A.J.; Yao, X.; Ruan, J.J.; Xu, B.L. Research progress on phytopathogenic fungi and their role as biocontrol agents. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 670135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mitra, B.; Chowdhury, A.R.; Dey, P.; Hazra, K.K.; Sinha, A.K.; Hossain, A.; Meena, R.S. Use of Agrochemicals in Agriculture: Alarming Issues and Solutions. In Input Use Efficiency for Food and Environmental Security; Bhatt, R., Meena, R.S., Hossain, A., Eds.; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2021; pp. 85–122. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akanmu, A.O.; Babalola, O.O.; Venturi, V.; Ayilara, M.S.; Adeleke, B.S.; Amoo, A.E.; Sobowale, A.A.; Fadiji, A.E.; Glick, B.R. Plant disease management: Leveraging on the plant-microbe-soil interface in the biorational use of organic amendments. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 700507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Roell, M.-S.; Zurbriggen, M.D. The impact of synthetic biology for future agriculture and nutrition. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Venbrux, M.; Crauwels, S.; Rediers, H. Current and emerging trends in techniques for plant pathogen detection. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1120968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jing, L.; Lu, Y. Impact of Fungi on Agriculture Production, Productivity, and Sustainability. In Fungal Diversity, Ecology and Control Management; Rajpal, V.R., Singh, I., Navi, S.S., Eds.; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2022; pp. 401–413. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yu, Y.; Tan, H.; Liu, T.; Liu, L.; Tang, J.; Peng, W. Dual RNA-seq analysis of the interaction between edible fungus Morchella sextelata and its pathogenic fungus Paecilomyces penicillatus uncovers the candidate defense and pathogenic factors. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 760444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. de Lamo, F.J.; Takken, F.L.W. Biocontrol by Fusarium oxysporum using endophyte-mediated resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Derbyshire, M.C.; Newman, T.E.; Khentry, Y.; Owolabi Taiwo, A. The evolutionary and molecular features of the broad-host-range plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 1075–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kazartsev, I.A.; Gomzhina, M.M.; Gasich, E.L.; Khlopunova, L.B.; Gannibal, P.B. Biodiversity of Colletotrichum spp. on several wild and cultivated plants. Biol. Bull. Rev. 2023, 13, S59–S70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Gu, F.; Wu, R.; Yang, J.; Zhang, K.-Q. Phylogenomic evolutionary surveys of subtilase superfamily genes in fungi. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Romanazzi, G.; Smilanick, J.L.; Feliziani, E.; Droby, S. Integrated management of postharvest gray mold on fruit crops. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 113, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, Z.; Bi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Gao, T.; Li, X.; Hao, J.; Li, G.; Liu, P.; Liu, X. Multidrug resistance of Botrytis cinerea associated with its adaptation to plant secondary metabolites. mBio 2024, 15, e0223723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Leroux, P. Chemical Control of Botrytis and Its Resistance to Chemical Fungicides. In Botrytis: Biology, Pathology and Control; Elad, Y., Williamson, B., Tudzynski, P., Delen, N., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 195–222. [Google Scholar]
  15. Orozco-Mosqueda, M.d.C.; Kumar, A.; Fadiji, A.E.; Babalola, O.O.; Puopolo, G.; Santoyo, G. Agroecological management of the grey mould fungus Botrytis cinerea by plant growth-promoting bacteria. Plants 2023, 12, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fillinger, S.; Walker, A.-S. Chemical Control and Resistance Management of Botrytis diseases. In Botrytis—The Fungus, the Pathogen and its Management in Agricultural Systems; Fillinger, S., Elad, Y., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 189–216. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC). FRAC Code List©* 2024: Fungal Control Agents Sorted by Cross-Resistance Pattern and Mode of Action (Including Coding for FRAC Groups on Product Labels). Available online: https://www.frac.info/docs/default-source/publications/frac-code-list/frac-code-list-2024.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2024).
  18. Shao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, Z. Advances in understanding fungicide resistance in Botrytis cinerea in China. Phytopathology 2021, 111, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sofianos, G.; Samaras, A.; Karaoglanidis, G. Multiple and multidrug resistance in Botrytis cinerea: Molecular mechanisms of MLR/MDR strains in Greece and effects of co-existence of different resistance mechanisms on fungicide sensitivity. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1273193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tian, Z.; Wang, J.W.; Li, J.; Han, B. Designing future crops: Challenges and strategies for sustainable agriculture. Plant J. 2021, 105, 1165–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, H.; Godana, E.A.; Sui, Y.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, L. Biological control as an alternative to synthetic fungicides for the management of grey and blue mould diseases of table grapes: A review. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 46, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Altieri, V.; Rossi, V.; Fedele, G. Efficacy of preharvest application of biocontrol agents against gray mold in grapevine. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1154370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fedele, G.; Brischetto, C.; Rossi, V. Biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea on grape berries as influenced by temperature and humidity. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Șesan, T.E.; Enache, E.L.; Iacomi, B.; Oprea, M.; Oancea, F.; Iacomi, C. Antifungal activity of some plant extracts against Botrytis cinerea Pers. in the blackcurrant crop (Ribes nigrum L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2015, 14, 29–43. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiménez-Reyes, M.F.; Carrasco, H.; Olea, A.F.; Silva-Moreno, E. Natural compounds: A sustainable alternative to the phytopathogens control. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2019, 64, 4459–4465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Drew, B.T.; González-Gallegos, J.G.; Xiang, C.-L.; Kriebel, R.; Drummond, C.P.; Walker, J.B.; Sytsma, K.J. Salvia united: The greatest good for the greatest number. Taxon 2017, 66, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. POWO. Plants of the World Online. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org (accessed on 6 March 2024).
  28. Wu, Y.B.; Ni, Z.Y.; Shi, Q.W.; Dong, M.; Kiyota, H.; Gu, Y.C.; Cong, B. Constituents from Salvia Species and their biological activities. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5967–6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kabouche, A.; Kabouche, Z. Bioactive diterpenoids of Salvia species. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Rahman, A.-u., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 35, pp. 753–833. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodríguez-Hahn, L.; Esquivel, B.; Cárdenas, J.; Ramamoorthy, T.P. The Distribution of Diterpenoids in Salvia. In Advances in Labiatae Science; Harley, R.M., Reynolds, T., Eds.; The Royal Botanic Gardens: Richmond, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jassbi, A.R.; Zare, S.; Firuzi, O.; Xiao, J. Bioactive phytochemicals from shoots and roots of Salvia species. Phytochem. Rev. 2016, 15, 829–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bisio, A.; Pedrelli, F.; D’Ambola, M.; Labanca, F.; Schito, A.M.; Govaerts, R.; De Tommasi, N.; Milella, L. Quinone diterpenes from Salvia species: Chemistry, botany, and biological activity. Phytochem. Rev. 2019, 18, 665–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gonzalez, M.A. Aromatic abietane diterpenoids: Their biological activity and synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 684–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kang, J.; Quynh Le, T.; Oh, C.H. Recent advances in abietane/icetexane synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2022, 108, 154133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. San Feliciano, A.; Gordaliza, M.; Salinero, M.A.; Miguel del Corral, J.M. Abietane acids: Sources, biological activities, and therapeutic uses. Planta Med. 1993, 59, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Argüelles, A.; Sánchez-Fresneda, R.; Guirao-Abad, J.P.; Lozano, J.A.; Solano, F.; Argüelles, J.-C. Insight into the antifungal effects of propolis and carnosic acid—Extension to the pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata: New propolis fractionation and potential synergistic applications. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Birtić, S.; Dussort, P.; Pierre, F.X.; Bily, A.C.; Roller, M. Carnosic acid. Phytochemistry 2015, 115, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Exarchou, V.; Kanetis, L.; Charalambous, Z.; Apers, S.; Pieters, L.; Gekas, V.; Goulas, V. HPLC-SPE-NMR characterization of major metabolites in Salvia fruticosa Mill. Extract with antifungal potential: Relevance of carnosic acid, carnosol, and hispidulin. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2015, 63, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. López-Cabeza, R.; Rodríguez-Sabina, S.; Reyes, C.P.; Expósito, D.G.; Giménez, C.; Jiménez, I.A.; Cabrera, R.; Bazzocchi, I.L. Bio-guided isolation of aromatic abietane diterpenoids from Salvia canariensis as biopesticides in the control of phytopathogenic fungi. Pest Manag. Sci. 2024, 80, 2199–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pavić, V.; Jakovljević, M.; Molnar, M.; Jokić, S. Extraction of carnosic acid and carnosol from sage (Salvia officinalis L.) leaves by supercritical fluid extraction and their antioxidant and antibacterial activity. Plants 2019, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Loussouarn, M.; Krieger-Liszkay, A.; Svilar, L.; Bily, A.; Birtić, S.; Havaux, M. Carnosic acid and carnosol, two major antioxidants of rosemary, act through different mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 1381–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Iobbi, V.; Donadio, G.; Lanteri, A.P.; Maggi, N.; Kirchmair, J.; Parisi, V.; Minuto, G.; Copetta, A.; Giacomini, M.; Bisio, A.; et al. Targeted metabolite profiling of Salvia rosmarinus Italian local ecotypes and cultivars and inhibitory activity against Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1164859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Iobbi, V.; Parisi, V.; Bernabè, G.; De Tommasi, N.; Bisio, A.; Brun, P. Anti-biofilm activity of carnosic acid from Salvia rosmarinus against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Plants 2023, 12, 3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kanetis, L.; Exarchou, V.; Charalambous, Z.; Goulas, V. Edible coating composed of chitosan and Salvia fruticosa Mill. extract for the control of grey mould of table grapes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ramamoorthy, T.P.; Esquivel, B.; Sánchez, A.A.; Rodríguez-Hahn, L. Phytogeographical significance of the occurrence of abietane-type diterpenoids in Salvia sect. Erythrostachys (lamiaceae). Taxon 1988, 37, 908–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kallimanis, P. Study of Plants of the Lamiaceae Family for the Production of Metabolites That Inhibit the Action of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR), with Application to Skin Diseases. Ph.D. Thesis, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hedge, I.C. A revision of Salvia in Africa, including Madagascar and the Canary Islands. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 1974, 33, 1–121. [Google Scholar]
  48. Muravnik, L.E. The Structural Peculiarities of the Leaf Glandular Trichomes: A Review. In Plant Cell and Tissue Differentiation and Secondary Metabolites: Fundamentals and Applications; Ramawat, K.G., Ekiert, H.M., Goyal, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bisio, A.; Damonte, G.; Fraternale, D.; Giacomelli, E.; Salis, A.; Romussi, G.; Cafaggi, S.; Ricci, D.; De Tommasi, N. Phytotoxic clerodane diterpenes from Salvia miniata Fernald (Lamiaceae). Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bisio, A.; Fraternale, D.; Damonte, G.; Millo, E.; Lanteri, A.P.; Russo, E.; Romussi, G.; Parodi, B.; Ricci, D.; De Tommasi, N. Phytotoxic activity of Salvia x jamensis. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 1621–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bisio, A.; Fraternale, D.; Giacomini, M.; Giacomelli, E.; Pivetti, S.; Russo, E.; Caviglioli, G.; Romussi, G.; Ricci, D.; De Tommasi, N. Phytotoxicity of Salvia spp. exudates. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 1434–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Glas, J.J.; Schimmel, B.C.; Alba, J.M.; Escobar-Bravo, R.; Schuurink, R.C.; Kant, M.R. Plant glandular trichomes as targets for breeding or engineering of resistance to herbivores. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 17077–17103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bisio, A.; De Tommasi, N.; Romussi, G. Diterpenoids from Salvia wagneriana. Planta Med. 2004, 70, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dal Piaz, F.; Bader, A.; Malafronte, N.; D’Ambola, M.; Petrone, A.M.; Porta, A.; Ben Hadda, T.; De Tommasi, N.; Bisio, A.; Severino, L. Phytochemistry of compounds isolated from the leaf-surface extract of Psiadia punctulata (DC.) Vatke growing in Saudi Arabia. Phytochemistry 2018, 155, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Frisch, M.; Trucks, G.; Schlegel, H.; Scuseria, G.; Robb, M.; Cheeseman, J.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.; et al. Gaussian 09; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingfort, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bruhn, T.; Schaumlöffel, A.; Hemberger, Y. SpecDis, 1.64, v1.71; University of Würzburg: Würzburg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  57. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; Volume 18, pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  58. Agrios, G.N. Plant Pathology, 5th ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ross, L.N.; Woodward, J.F. Koch’s postulates: An interventionist perspective. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2016, 59, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Li, S.; Zhang, Z.; Cain, A.; Wang, B.; Long, M.; Taylor, J. Antifungal activity of camptothecin, trifolin, and hyperoside isolated from Camptotheca acuminata. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2005, 53, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Leroux, P.; Fritz, R.; Debieu, D.; Albertini, C.; Lanen, C.; Bach, J.; Gredt, M.; Chapeland, F. Mechanisms of resistance to fungicides in field strains of Botrytis cinerea. Pest Manage. Sci. 2002, 58, 876–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chapeland, F.; Fritz, R.; Lanen, C.; Gredt, M.; Leroux, P. Inheritance and mechanisms of resistance to anilinopyrimidine fungicides in Botrytis cinerea (Botryotinia fuckeliana). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 1999, 64, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Statistica for Windows (Data Analysis Software System), Version 8.0; Statsoft Inc.: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2008.
  64. Warmers, U.; König, W.A. (−)-7-epi-Isojunenol and (+)-7-epi-junenol, constituents of the liverwort Tritomaria quinquedentata. Phytochemistry 1999, 52, 1519–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shaligram, A.M.; Rao, A.S.; Bhattacharyya, S.C. Terpenoids XXXII: Absolute configuration of junenol and laevojunenol and synthesis of junenol from costunolide. Tetrahedron 1962, 18, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Connolly, J.D.; Phillips, W.R.; Huneck, S. (+)-ent-Epicubenol from the liverwort Scapania undulata. Phytochemistry 1982, 21, 233–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bruno, M.; de la Torre, M.C.; Rodríguez, B.; Omar, A.A. Guaiane sesquiterpenes from Teucrium leucocladum. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 245–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mahmoud, A.A. 7-Epi-eudesmanes, eudesmanoic acids, eudesmanolides and other sesquiterpenes from Pluchea dioscoridis. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Box, V.S.; Bardouille, V.; Chan, W. Enantio-eudesmane sesquiterpenes from Verbesina rupestris. Phytochemistry 1977, 17, 987–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Garcia-Granados, A.; Martinez, A.; Molina, A.; Onorato, M.E. Terpenoids from Sideritis varoi subsp. oriensis. Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 2171–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hu, J.F.; Bai, S.P.; Jia, Z.J. Eudesmane sesquiterpenes from Artemisia eriopoda. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 815–817. [Google Scholar]
  72. Stoessl, A.; Stothers, J.B.; Ward, E.W.B. The structures of some stress metabolites from Solanum melongena. Can. J. Chem. 1975, 53, 3351–3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ghosh, P.; Mandal, A.; Ghosh, J.; Pal, C.; Nanda, A.K. Synthesis of bioactive 28-hydroxy-3-oxolup-20(29)-en-30-al with antileukemic activity. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 14, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Siddiqui, S.; Hafeez, F.; Begum, S.; Siddiqui, B.S. Kaneric Acid, a new triterpene from the leaves of Nerium oleander. J. Nat. Prod. 1986, 49, 1086–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Seebacher, W.; Simic, N.; Robert, W.; Robert, S.; Kunert, O. Complete assignments of 1H and 13C NMR resonances of oleanolic acid, 18a-oleanolic acid, ursolic acid and their 11-oxo derivatives. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2003, 41, 636–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Talzhanov, N.A.; Sadyrbekov, D.T.; Smagulova, F.M.; Mukanov, R.M.; Raldugin, V.A.; Shakirov, M.M.; Tkachev, A.V.; Atazhanova, G.A.; Tuleuov, B.I.; Adekenov, S.M. Components of Artemisia pontica. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2005, 41, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Urones, J.G.; Marcos, I.S.; Cubillo, L.; Monje, V.A.; Hernández, J.M.; Basabe, P. Derivatives of malonic acid in Parentucellia latifolia. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 651–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yagatai, M.; Takahashi, T. Diterpenes of the ferruginol type fron Chamaecyparis pisifera. Phytochemistry 1979, 18, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yatagai, M.; Takahashi, T. New diterpenes from Chamaecyparis pisifera. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 1149–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. del Corral, J.M.M.; Gordaliza, M.; Salinero, M.; San Feliciano, A. 13C NMR Data for abieta-8,11,13-triene diterpenoids. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1994, 32, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fraga, B.M.; González, A.G.; Herrera, J.R.; Luis, J.G.; Perales, A.; Ravelo, A.G. A revised structure for the diterpene rosmanol. Phytochemistry 1985, 24, 1853–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pérez-Fons, L.; GarzÓn, M.T.; Micol, V. Relationship between the antioxidant capacity and effect of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) polyphenols on membrane phospholipid order. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2010, 58, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Oluwatuyi, M.; Kaatz, G.W.; Gibbons, S. Antibacterial and resistance modifying activity of Rosmarinus officinalis. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 3249–3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pukalskas, A.; van Beek, T.A.; de Waard, P. Development of a triple hyphenated HPLC-radical scavenging detection-DAD-SPE-NMR system for the rapid identification of antioxidants in complex plant extracts. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1074, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Djarmati, Z.; Jankov, R.M.; Csanádi, J.; Djordjevic, A. The Isolation of carnosic acid 12-methyl ether from Salvia officinalis L. and NMR study of its methyl ester. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1993, 58, 1919–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Takenaka, M.; Watanabe, T.; Sugahara, K.; Harada, Y.; Yoshida, S.; Sugawara, F. New antimicrobial substances against Streptomyces scabies from rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1440–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Miura, K.; Kikuzaki, H.; Nakatani, N. Antioxidant activity of chemical components from sage (Salvia officinalis L.) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) measured by the oil stability index method. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2002, 50, 1845–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Gonzalez, A.G.; Fraga, B.M.; Luis, J.G.; Ravelo, A.G. Constituents of Labiatae XIX—Structure of galdosol, a new diterpene from Salvia canariensis. Experientia 1973, 29, 1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Marrero, J.G.; Andrés, L.S.; Luis, J.G. Semisynthesis of rosmanol and its derivatives. Easy access to abietatriene diterpenes isolated from the genus Salvia with biological activities. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 986–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Kelecom, A. An abietane diterpene from the labiate Coleus barbatus. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 1677–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fraga, B.M.; Díaz, C.E.; Guadaño, A.; González-Coloma, A. Diterpenes from Salvia broussonetii transformed roots and their insecticidal activity. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2005, 53, 5200–5206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ryu, Y.B.; Jeong, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.M.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Park, S.J.; Chang, J.S.; Park, K.H.; et al. Biflavonoids from Torreya nucifera displaying SARS-CoV 3CL(pro) inhibition. Biorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7940–7947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Horvath, T.; Linden, A.; Yoshizaki, F.; Eugster, C.H.; Rüedi, P. Abietanes and a novel 20-norabietanoid from Plectranthus cyaneus (Lamiaceae). Helv. Chim. Acta 2004, 87, 2346–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hsu, K.-C.; Fang, J.-M.; Cheng, Y.-S. Diterpenes from pericarps of Chamaecyparis formosensis. J. Nat. Prod. 1995, 58, 1592–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Majetich, G.; Zou, G. Total Synthesis of (−)-barbatusol, (+)-demethylsalvicanol, (−)-brussonol, and (+)-grandione. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ivanov, M.; Ćirić, A.; Stojković, D. Emerging antifungal targets and strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lengai, G.M.W.; Muthomi, J.W.; Mbega, E.R. Phytochemical activity and role of botanical pesticides in pest management for sustainable agricultural crop production. Sci. Afr. 2020, 7, e00239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Barbaś, P.; Aslan, H.; Aslan, I.; Skiba, D.; Otekunrin, O.; Sawicka, B. Prospects for using pesticides in agriculture. Agron. Sci. 2023, 78, 97–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. European Parliament. Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, 309, 71–84.
  100. Matrose, N.A.; Obikeze, K.; Belay, Z.A.; Caleb, O.J. Plant extracts and other natural compounds as alternatives for post-harvest management of fruit fungal pathogens: A review. Food Biosci. 2021, 41, 100840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gwinn, K.D. Bioactive Natural Products in Plant Disease Control. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Rahman, A.-u., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 56, pp. 229–246. [Google Scholar]
  102. Ngegba, P.M.; Cui, G.; Khalid, M.Z.; Zhong, G. Use of botanical pesticides in agriculture as an alternative to synthetic pesticides. Agriculture 2022, 12, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kaur, J.; Kariyat, R. Role of Trichomes in Plant Stress Biology. In Evolutionary Ecology of Plant-Herbivore Interaction; Núñez-Farfán, J., Valverde, P.L., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 15–35. [Google Scholar]
  104. Simmons, E.M.; Sarpong, R. Structure, biosynthetic relationships and chemical synthesis of the icetexane diterpenoids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 1195–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Naeini, A.A.; Ziegelmeier, A.A.; Chain, W.J. Recent developments with icetexane natural products. Chem. Biodivers. 2022, 19, e202200793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kallimanis, P.; Magiatis, P.; Panagiotopoulou, A.; Ioannidis, K.; Chinou, I. Extraction optimization and qualitative/quantitative determination of bioactive abietane-type diterpenes from three Salvia species (common sage, greek sage and rosemary) by 1H-qNMR. Molecules 2024, 29, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bellumori, M.; Innocenti, M.; Congiu, F.; Cencetti, G.; Raio, A.; Menicucci, F.; Mulinacci, N.; Michelozzi, M. Within-plant variation in Rosmarinus officinalis L. terpenes and phenols and their antimicrobial activity against the rosemary phytopathogens Alternaria alternata and Pseudomonas viridiflava. Molecules 2021, 26, 3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kontogianni, V.G.; Tomic, G.; Nikolic, I.; Nerantzaki, A.A.; Sayyad, N.; Stosic-Grujicic, S.; Stojanovic, I.; Gerothanassis, I.P.; Tzakos, A.G. Phytochemical profile of Rosmarinus officinalis and Salvia officinalis extracts and correlation to their antioxidant and anti-proliferative activity. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. He, L.; Cui, K.; Li, T.; Song, Y.; Liu, N.; Mu, W.; Liu, F. Evolution of the resistance of Botrytis cinerea to carbendazim and the current efficacy of carbendazim against gray mold after long-term discontinuation. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 1647–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Kanti Santra, H.; Banerjee, D. Natural Products as Fungicide and Their Role in Crop Protection. In Natural Bioactive Products in Sustainable Agriculture; Singh, J., Yadav, A.N., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2020; pp. 131–220. [Google Scholar]
  111. Hou, R.; Shi, J.; Ma, X.; Wei, H.; Hu, J.; Tsang, Y.F.; Gao, M.-T. Effect of phenolic acids derived from rice straw on Botrytis cinerea and infection on tomato. Waste Biomass Valor. 2020, 11, 6555–6563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Mendoza, L.; Yañez, K.; Vivanco, M.; Melo, R.; Cotoras, M. Characterization of extracts from winery by-products with antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 43, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cotoras, M.; Folch, C.; Mendoza, L. Characterization of the antifungal activity on Botrytis cinerea of the natural diterpenoids kaurenoic acid and 3β-hydroxy-kaurenoic acid. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2004, 52, 2821–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. FRAC Fungicide Resistance Action Committee. FRAC Recommendations for SBI Fungicides. 2024. Available online: https://www.frac.info/frac-teams/working-groups/sbi-fungicides/recommendations-for-sbi (accessed on 25 May 2024).
  115. Weber, R.W.S.; Petridis, A. Fungicide resistance in Botrytis spp. and regional strategies for its management in Northern European strawberry production. BioTech 2023, 12, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Will, M.; Claßen-Bockhoff, R. Time to split Salvia sl (Lamiaceae)—New insights from Old World Salvia phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2017, 109, 33–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of compound 25.
Figure 1. Structure of compound 25.
Agronomy 14 01444 g001
Table 1. Percentage of mycelium’s growth inhibition of five phytopathogenic fungi after the treatment with different concentrations of carnosic acid (18) and S. somalensis crude extract by comparison with four conventional fungicides.
Table 1. Percentage of mycelium’s growth inhibition of five phytopathogenic fungi after the treatment with different concentrations of carnosic acid (18) and S. somalensis crude extract by comparison with four conventional fungicides.
TreatmentConcentrationC. coccodesF. oxysporumS. sclerotiorumB. cinereaR. solani
Carnosic acid5 µg/mL42.9 ± 10.6 c21.7 ± 5.8 bc0.0 ± 0.0 a16.7 ± 5.8 bc0.0 ± 0.0 a
Carnosic acid10 µg/mL54.6 ± 5.2 de35.0 ± 10.0 c3.3 ± 5.8 a23.3 ± 5.8 bcd0.0 ± 0.0 a
Carnosic acid50 µg/mL88.6 ± 4.2 g65.0 ± 8.7 e87.8 ± 3.8 cd46.7 ± 3.3 cdef25.6 ± 10.7 b
Carnosic acid250 µg/mL93.2 ± 0.3 h81.7 ± 2.9 fg94.4 ± 1.9 d75.6 ± 8.4 efgh93.3 ± 3.3 d
Carnosic acid500 µg/mL100 ± 0.0 i81.7 ± 2.9 fg97.8 ± 3.8 de81.1 ± 1.9 fgh100 ± 0.0 e
Carnosic acid750 µg/mL100 ± 0.0 i86.7 ± 2.9 g97.8 ± 1.9 de81.1 ± 5.1 gh97.8 ± 3.8 e
Carnosic acid1000 µg/mL100 ± 0.0 i86.7 ± 5.8 g98.9 ± 1.9 e86.7 ± 0.0 gh97.8 ± 3.8 e
Crude exudate500 µg/mL54.2 ± 5.9 de44.0 ± 2.0 de65.0 ± 1.7 b45.6 ± 3.3 cdef40.1 ± 3.8 bc
Crude exudate1000 µg/mL82.5 ± 0.9 f80.7 ± 0.2 fg84.5 ± 0.7 cd67.0 ± 3.3 def70.6 ± 3.7 c
Azoxystrobin250 µg/mL77.4 ± 3.5 f80.0 ± 0.0 fg96.7 ± 5.8 de0.0 ± 0.0 a31.1 ± 3.8 b
Cyprodinil + Fludioxinil375 + 250 µg/mL100 ± 0.0 i96.7 ± 2.9 h100 ± 0.0 e96.7 ± 3.3 h100 ± 0.0 e
Iprodione675 µg/mL54.8 ± 6.9 de85.0 ± 0.0 g97.8 ± 1.9 de95.6 ± 3.8 h100 ± 0.0 e
Carbendazim500 µg/mL86.4 ± 0.6 ga100 ± 0.0 i100 ± 0.0 e0.0 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 e
DMSO10 µL/mL4.2 ± 3.9 b0.0 ± 0.0 a0.0 ± 0.0 a4.4 ± 3.8 ab0.0 ± 0.0 a
Control-0.0 ± 0.0 a0.0 ± 0.0 a0.0 ± 0.0 a0.0 ± 0.0 a0.0 ± 0.0 a
Percentage of inhibition is correlated with standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant difference among treatments (p ≤ 0.05, Tukey HSD test). Control: not treated plates.
Table 2. Percentage of mycelium’s growth inhibition of four strains of B.cinerea after the treatment with different concentrations of carnosic acid (18) by comparison with the formulated product Switch® (Cyprodinil 375 µg/mL and Fludioxonil 250 µg/mL).
Table 2. Percentage of mycelium’s growth inhibition of four strains of B.cinerea after the treatment with different concentrations of carnosic acid (18) by comparison with the formulated product Switch® (Cyprodinil 375 µg/mL and Fludioxonil 250 µg/mL).
TreatmentConcentrationB. cinerea (Strain 2)B. cinerea (Strain 3)B. cinerea (Strain 7)B. cinerea (Strain 12)
Carnosic acid5 µg/mL18.5 ± 0.6 fg0.0 ± 0.0 ef100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a
Carnosic acid10 µg/mL22.9 ± 3.6 f10.0 ± 0.7 e100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a
Carnosic acid50 µg/mL35.4 ± 3.6 e43.8 ± 8.7 d100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a
Carnosic acid250 µg/mL52.1 ± 3.6 d51.8 ± 7.4 cd100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a
Carnosic acid500 µg/mL64.6 ± 7.2 c56.4 ± 10.3 bc100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a
Carnosic acid750 µg/mL79.2 ± 3.6 b75.9 ± 3.7 bc100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a
Carnosic acid1000 µg/mL83.3 ± 3.6 b78.1 ± 7.5 bc100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a
DMSO10 µL/mL0.0 ± 0.0 g0.0 ± 0.0 f0.0 ± 0.0 b0.0 ± 0.0 b
Cyprodinil + Fludioxinil375 + 250 µg/mL100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a100 ± 0.0 a
Control-0.0 ± 0.0 g0.0 ± 0.0 ef0.0 ± 0.0 b0.0 ± 0.0 b
Percentage of inhibition is correlated with standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant difference among treatments (p ≤ 0.05, Tukey HSD test). Control: not treated plates.
Table 3. Effect of carnosic acid (18) and reference fungicides on the B. cinerea conidial germination after 24 h and 48 h.
Table 3. Effect of carnosic acid (18) and reference fungicides on the B. cinerea conidial germination after 24 h and 48 h.
TreatmentConcentration24 h48 h
Carnosic acid5 µg/mL90.2 ± 6.6 de94.4 ± 6.9 e
Carnosic acid10 µg/mL82.5 ± 7.9 de89.0 ± 15.5 de
Carnosic acid50 µg/mL82.4 ± 11.2 cde80.8 ± 12.8 de
Carnosic acid250 µg/mL60.2 ± 20.2 bcd74.7 ± 5.7 de
Carnosic acid500 µg/mL48.4 ± 24.3 bc64.1 ± 10.7 cd
Carnosic acid750 µg/mL6.2 ± 6.3 a30.1 ± 24.6 b
Carnosic acid1000 µg/mL0.1 ± 0.2 a17.3 ± 10.1 ab
Carbendazim500 µg/mL99.9 ± 0.2 e100 ± 0.0 e
Iprodionee675 µg/mL47.3 ± 2.9 b39.6 ± 2.6 bc
Azoxystrobin250 µg/mL63.3 ± 21.2 bcd89.6 ± 4.3 de
Cyprodinil + Fludioxinil375 + 250 µg/mL0.1 ± 0.2 a0.4 ± 0.8 a
DMSO10 µL/mL98.2 ± 3.1 e100 ± 0.0 e
Control-98.2 ± 3.2 e100 ± 0.0 e
Results are expressed as the percentage of mean germination of the three repeated tests. Percentage of inhibition is correlated with standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant difference among treatments (p ≤ 0.05, Tukey HSD test). Control: not treated plates.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iobbi, V.; Lo Vetere, M.; Lanteri, A.P.; Reinhardt, J.K.; Danton, O.; Keller, M.; Hamburger, M.; Salis, A.; Damonte, G.; Potterat, O.; et al. Antifungal Potential of Carnosic Acid from Salvia somalensis against Phytopathogenic Fungi. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071444

AMA Style

Iobbi V, Lo Vetere M, Lanteri AP, Reinhardt JK, Danton O, Keller M, Hamburger M, Salis A, Damonte G, Potterat O, et al. Antifungal Potential of Carnosic Acid from Salvia somalensis against Phytopathogenic Fungi. Agronomy. 2024; 14(7):1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071444

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iobbi, Valeria, Marta Lo Vetere, Anna Paola Lanteri, Jakob K. Reinhardt, Ombeline Danton, Morris Keller, Matthias Hamburger, Annalisa Salis, Gianluca Damonte, Olivier Potterat, and et al. 2024. "Antifungal Potential of Carnosic Acid from Salvia somalensis against Phytopathogenic Fungi" Agronomy 14, no. 7: 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071444

APA Style

Iobbi, V., Lo Vetere, M., Lanteri, A. P., Reinhardt, J. K., Danton, O., Keller, M., Hamburger, M., Salis, A., Damonte, G., Potterat, O., & Bisio, A. (2024). Antifungal Potential of Carnosic Acid from Salvia somalensis against Phytopathogenic Fungi. Agronomy, 14(7), 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071444

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop