Next Article in Journal
Cytokines Involved in the Pathogenesis of SSc and Problems in the Development of Anti-Cytokine Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Long Non-Coding RNAs Involved in Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease to Steatohepatitis
Previous Article in Journal
Chromothripsis—Explosion in Genetic Science
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hepatic Failure in COVID-19: Is Iron Overload the Dangerous Trigger?

1
Pathology Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Lazzaro Spallanzani”-IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
2
Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Lazzaro Spallanzani”-IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
3
Hepatology Unit “Lazzaoro Spallanzani”-IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
4
HIV/AIDS Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Lazzaro Spallanzani”-IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
5
Clinical Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Lazzaro Spallanzani”-IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
6
Department of Biology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(5), 1103; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051103
Submission received: 17 February 2021 / Revised: 30 April 2021 / Accepted: 3 May 2021 / Published: 4 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Governing Liver Pathophysiology)

Abstract

:
Liver injury in COVID-19 patients has progressively emerged, even in those without a history of liver disease, yet the mechanism of liver pathogenicity is still controversial. COVID-19 is frequently associated with increased serum ferritin levels, and hyperferritinemia was shown to correlate with illness severity. The liver is the major site for iron storage, and conditions of iron overload have been established to have a pathogenic role in development of liver diseases. We presented here six patients who developed severe COVID-19, with biochemical evidence of liver failure. Three cases were survived patients, who underwent liver biopsy; the other three were deceased patients, who were autopsied. None of the patients suffered underlying liver pathologies. Histopathological and ultrastructural analyses were performed. The most striking finding we demonstrated in all patients was iron accumulation into hepatocytes, associated with degenerative changes. Abundant ferritin particles were found enclosed in siderosomes, and large aggregates of hemosiderin were found, often in close contact with damaged mitochondria. Iron-caused oxidative stress may be responsible for mitochondria metabolic dysfunction. In agreement with this, association between mitochondria and lipid droplets was also found. Overall, our data suggest that hepatic iron overload could be the pathogenic trigger of liver injury associated to COVID-19.

1. Introduction

SARS-CoV-2 causes a wide spectrum of illness ranging from mild symptoms to severe presentation, and death. Usually COVID-19 causes pneumonia; however, clinical and epidemiological studies have established that COVID-19 presents as a spectrum of clinical manifestations [1,2], and studies performed on whole-body autopsies in patients who died of COVID-19 revealed that SARS-CoV-2 infection causes significant alterations in most body organs [3]. In patients with COVID-19, symptoms of gastrointestinal and hepatic involvement have been progressively recognized [4]. Derangement of ALT/AST levels represents the main indication of liver damage in COVID-19, accompanied by slightly elevated bilirubin levels. The incidence of hepatic injury ranges from 14.8% to 53%, but in severe COVID-19 patients the incidence of liver injury may increase to 58–78% [5,6]. Different mechanisms have been proposed that may be responsible for hepatic injury: SARS-CoV-2 direct damage on hepatocytes and biliary epithelium, or indirect damage induced by exaggerated cytokines storm, and/or drug-induced hepatoxicity. Nevertheless, the exact cause of liver injury has not yet been clarified [7].
Hyperferritinemia has been recognized as a hallmark of severe COVID-19 [8,9]. Excess iron is toxic and can damage tissues by free radical formation and lipid peroxidation. For this reason, the systemic iron levels should be strictly maintained. Ferritin is the most relevant cellular iron storage protein. The liver exerts a pivotal role in iron homeostasis and is the main organ for the iron storage as ferritin complex. Conditions of iron overload are established to be implicated in liver injury. Hereditary hemochromatosis is the classical example of a liver disease caused by iron [10], but iron-catalyzed oxidative damage plays a key role in the development of various forms of liver diseases [11,12].
This study aimed to explore a possible link between hepatic failure and iron toxicity in the course of COVID-19. Histopathological and ultrastructural changes were deeply investigated in the liver of COVID-19 survived and deceased patients who presented biochemical evidence of liver injury.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Cohort

Cases considered for the study included three COVID-19 patients, who were treated and deceased at the National Institute for Infectious Diseases (INMI) “Lazzaro Spallanzani” IRCCS Hospital (Rome, Italy), and three COVID-19 patients extracted from case records of patients who died and underwent complete post-mortem examination at INMI Lazzaro Spallanzani-IRCCS Hospital. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethic Board (IEB) of the National Institute for Infectious Diseases “L. Spallanzani” (approval number: 9/2020). All data were anonymized to protect the confidentiality of individual participants.
Exclusion criteria for cases were HCV chronicity, positive serology for hepatitis B and/or human immunodeficiency virus, history of liver transplant, alcoholic liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, or patients with other liver diseases. Alcohol or recreational drugs were also considered as exclusion criteria.

2.2. Liver Biopsies

Three confirmed cases of COVID-19 patients, admitted and treated at the National Institute for Infectious Diseases (INMI) “Lazzaro Spallanzani” in Rome, who developed hepatic failure during hospitalization, were enrolled for this study. Liver samples were obtained by liver biopsy performed on clinical indications in order to stage the liver injury.

2.3. Autoptic Liver

Liver tissue samples were obtained from complete post-mortem examination of three SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. All patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 by PCR-test for SARS-CoV-2 (using RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit 1.0 (Altona Diagnostic GmbH)) performed on nasopharyngeal swab and/or on autoptic samples.
Autopsies were performed according to guidance for post-mortem collection and submission of specimens and biosafety practices [3] to reduce the risk of transmission of infectious pathogens during and after the post-mortem examination.
Cases presenting severe hepatic autolysis and/or patients who died on arrival, which had either no or limited clinical data, were excluded from this study.

2.4. Clinical Evaluation

Patients were analyzed considering clinical features, laboratory parameters, and length of hospital stay. Abnormal liver function was defined as increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alanine aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and total bilirubin.

2.5. Histological Analyses

Liver specimens from liver tissues were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and routinely processed to paraffin blocks. Sections of tissues (4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), with periodic acid–Schiff–diastase (PAS-D), with Masson’s trichrome for collagen fibers to assess of liver fibrosis, and Perl's Prussian blue to highlight iron deposition. Each biopsy sample was evaluated according to the grading system for inflammation and necrosis, and according the staging system for fibrosis [13]. The grading of liver steatosis was based on the percentage of fat within the hepatocytes: grade 0 (healthy, <5%), grade 1 (mild, 5–33%), grade 2 (moderate, 34–66%), and grade 3 (severe, >66%). Hepatic iron was graded on a semi-quantitative scale in increasing order of severity, with 0 being absent, and 4 representing intensely clumped iron within the cells, according to Scheuer’s classification [14]. Quantification was performed by counting positive cells in 7–8 different fields at 200× magnification. Pathological assessment was performed by two pathologists who were blinded to the patient data.

2.6. Immunohistochemical Anlysis

Deparaffinized and rehydrated sections were used for immunohistochemistry. Samples were immersed in 10 mM sodium citrate pH 6.0, microwaved for antigen retrieval, and stained on the BenchMark ULTRA system fully automated instrument (Roche, Tucson, AZ 85755, USA) with antibodies directed against CD4 (Ventana SP35), CD8 (Ventana SP57), CD68 (Ventana KP-1), CD34 (Ventana QBEnd/10), vWF (Leica 36B11), aSMA (Ventana 760-2833), Coronavirus SARS-CoV Nucleoprotein (Sino Biological 40143-T62), and SARS Nucleocapsid protein (Novusbio NB100-56576). Immune-histochemical quantification was performed by light microscopy, counting the number of positive cells per at least seven different high-power fields (HPF, 40× magnification). Results were expressed as the mean of the values obtained from all patients and presented as mean + SD. Negative control stainings were performed by omitting the primary antibodies. In addition, sections of control liver, obtained from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded blocks of retrospective/archival samples (i.e., patient selection and liver biopsy were not for the purpose of the study) were used. Cases considered included one of primary sclerosing cholangitis, and one minimal hepatitis after HBV infection.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

Demographic, medical history, and clinical features of our cohort of patients are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. The three biopsied patients were male, with a median age of 42 years (range 40–46 years) (Table 1).
One of these patients was considered obese (BMI 33 kg/m2); the others had no co-morbidities, or any cause of immunosuppression, and were healthy prior to hospital admission. One of these patients had a long stay in the ICU and developed critical illness. Ages of the deceased patients ranged between 63 and 75 years; the median age was 69 years. Two of the patients were male and one was female (Table 2).
Laboratory data obtained during hospital stay are shown in Table 3. Fibrinogen and D-dimer levels were elevated already at admission. D-dimer remained elevated in survived patients even at discharge.
Liver enzymes, and AST and ALT levels, initially abnormal in three cases, increased in all patients during hospitalization. Ferritin levels were elevated in all patients (peak range 670–3292 μg/L). Some patients showed a cholestatic pattern (mild to moderate elevation of gamma glutamyl transpeptidase and direct bilirubin levels) (Table 3).

3.2. Liver Pathological Features in Survived Patients

Main pathologic findings are summarized in Table 4.
Histological analysis of liver biopsies showed mild lobular and portal inflammatory infiltrates (Figure 1A,B). Macrovesicular steatosis (Figure 1A) was found in all three patients (>33% in 2 patients; >5% in 1 patient), even in the absence of previous underlying conditions. The presence of ballooning degeneration, associated with lobular spotty necrosis and rare acidophil bodies, was observed (Figure 1B); no Mallory–Denk bodies were found. Kupffer cell hyperplasia was always observed, as demonstrated by PAS-D+ staining (data not shown). Sinusoidal dilatation mainly in centrilobular areas was present in two patients (Figure 1C). Fibrous expansion of portal areas with short fibrous septa was found only in the obese patient (Figure 1D). Infiltrating inflammatory cells (Figure 2) mainly consisted in T-lymphocytes, CD8+ (10.99 ± 2.18 CD8+ cells/field vs 3.39 ± 0.92 CD4+ cells/field), mixed with CD68+ macrophages (4.25 ± 0.36 cells/field) (Figure 2A,B). Immunohistochemical staining for CD68 also labelled Kupffer cells as sinusoids, recognizable for the star-shaped morphology (Figure 2B). Immunohistochemical staining for the vascular marker CD34 showed a positive reaction not only in the inflamed portal tract, but also extending beyond the periportal areas, suggesting the occurrence of an angiogenic process (Figure 2C,D). Alteration of vascular structures was further demonstrated by immune-staining of alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) (Supplementary Figure S2) as compared to control livers from non-COVID-19 patients (Supplementary Figure S1).

3.3. Liver Pathological Features in Deceased Patients

Histopathologic abnormalities observed in livers from deceased patients are summarized in Table 4. Severe macrovacuolar steatosis was the most common finding in two patients (Figure 1E,F). Hepatic sinusoidal dilatation was detected in all patients (Table 4), and extravasation of red blood cells into the Disse’s space was sometimes observed (Figure 1F). In two cases, this condition was associated with small vein congestion and zonal necrosis of the hepatocytes in the periportal area. Portal inflammation was mild in all cases, and lobular inflammation was focal in two patients (Table 4). Inflammatory cells, mainly found in the portal area, mostly consisted of CD8+ T lymphocytes (Figure 2E). Immunohistochemical labelling for CD34 showed positive staining of the portal tract vasculature and extending beyond the periportal regions, with centrizonal microvessels and sinusoids CD34+ positivity, indicative of vascular remodeling (Figure 2F).

3.4. Iron Deposition in the Livers of COVID-19 Patients

The presence of iron accumulation was histologically evaluated by Perl’s staining. The stain highlights ferritin and hemosiderin deposits as coarse blue granules, while dispersed ferritin is seen as diffuse faint blue cytoplasmic blush. Interestingly, ferritin deposition was found in the livers of our entire cohort of COVID-19 patients, both survived and deceased (Table 5). None of the patients showed absence of detectable iron residues; however, both the siderosis grading and the percentage of stained cells showed a trend of elevated values in livers of deceased patients (Figure 3C,D), compared to survived (Figure 3A,B) (Table 5).
Iron deposits were distributed into hepatocytes (Figure 3) (excluding the case of the obese patient, who also presented deposits in the Kupffer cells) and mostly found in cells in the area of liver acinus. Neither hepatocytes nor Kupffer cells showed iron deposits in control livers (Supplementary Figure S1).

3.5. Ultrastructural Analysis

Transmission electron microscopy analysis confirmed the presence of iron accumulation and revealed fine details of iron deposits in livers of COVID-19 patients. All cases (both livers from survived and deceased patients) showed the presence of ferritin into hepatocytes, as demonstrated by the clear presence of electron dense particles (Figure 4). Abundant ferritin particles were found scattered in the cytoplasm (Figure 4A,B). Other particles were enclosed in siderosomes, membrane-delimited organelles derived from lysosomes (Figure 4A–D). These were frequently in the form of complex bodies, in which other material (such as lipids) was present (Figure 4B). In addition, siderosomes also presented hemosiderin granules, a form of deposits in which ferritin particles cannot be individually resolved (Figure 4C). Hemosiderin large aggregates were also not enclosed into siderosomes and were often found in strict contact with damaged mitochondria (Figure 4E,F), suggesting iron pathogenic role. To further evaluate liver injury, ultrastructural analysis was primarily performed on liver biopsies, to avoid misinterpretation due to the appearance of after-death changes on post-mortem specimens. Two striking features were found, fat accumulation and the presence of condensed mitochondria (Figure 5), which were clearly visible even by light microscope in resin-embedded semithin sections (Figure 5A,B). Transmission electron microscopy analysis showed the condensed state of mitochondria with compacted matrix and larger internal cristae (Figure 5C,D), a type of membrane remodeling observed with increased intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress [15]. Of note, numerous mitochondria were in contact with lipid droplets (Figure 5C,D).

4. Discussion

Liver involvement in COVID-19 has been reported in severe cases of disease [1,16]. Elevation of hepatic enzymes as biochemical evidence of hepatitis has been reported, especially in patients with severe disease [17,18,19]. In critical COVID-19 patients, it has been proposed that liver dysfunction may occur as a consequence of hemodynamic alterations caused by cardiac failure and/or by mechanic ventilation, resulting in vascular pathology, endotheliitis and coagulopathy. However, histological examination of autoptic liver showed that not all cases presented hepatic vascular injuries [20]. Our results, obtained by CD34 immunostaining, indicative of vascular abnormalities, were associated with minimal congestion and dilatation of sinusoids and with mild fibrosis. Even a direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 on liver cells has not been proven with certainty. In our cases, PCR-test for SARS-CoV-2 performed on liver samples and immunohistochemical detection gave negative results; in addition, the electron microscopy analysis did not allow visualization of viral particles. SARS-CoV-2 uses the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) for the entry into host cells [21]. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are expressed in a variety of tissues including the liver; however, their expression extensively varies among the different cell types, being more highly expressed in cholangiocytes than in hepatocytes, and are expressed in the endothelial cells of blood vessels but not in the sinusoidal endothelium [22,23]. Hepatocyte and cholangiocyte organoids have been shown to be permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection [24], but whether SARS-CoV-2 can infect hepatocytes and/or cholangiocytes in vivo is still debated [25], and recent data on in-depth proteomic assessment of autopsy tissue revealed little evidence of viral replication in the liver [26]. Therefore, the exact pathophysiological mechanisms to explain hepatic dysfunction in COVID-19 is presently not fully understood.
A significant increase in ferritin has been reported in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients [27]. The liver is a major site for body iron storage, deposited in form of complex ferritin protein molecules or hemosiderin [28]. Under physiological conditions, iron plays primary biological roles in oxygen transportation and in numerous enzymatic activities [29]. Nevertheless, excess iron causes oxidative tissue injury through free radical generation and oxidative modification of molecules [30]. Thus, iron overload may induce liver toxicity and cellular damage [31].
The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that the liver of COVID-19 patients undergoes iron accumulation, providing a possible explanation for the occurrence of liver injury. Our results demonstrated that hepatocytes, in the liver of both survived and deceased patients, are sites of accumulation of both ferritin and hemosiderin, similarly to high-grade iron overload syndromes, when the capacity of ferritin to deposit iron decreases, and amounts of hemosiderin increases [32]. The results of semi-quantitative evaluation of hepatic iron underlined a trend to a more severe form of iron load in the liver of deceased patients, compared to survived, according to the emergent idea that imbalance of iron homeostasis may predict an adverse clinical course and increased mortality in COVID-19 [9]. Iron accumulation can drive hepatocytes to a form of cell death called ferroptosis, characterized by the presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and extensive lipid peroxidation [33]. ROS act as prime modulators of cellular dysfunction, contributing to many types of disease pathophysiology. In this regard, it has been recognized that oxidative stress is a major player in COVID-19 pathogenesis and severity [34]. Ferroptosis is morphologically characterized by the presence of ultrastructural changes in mitochondria, such as volume reduction and condensed mitochondrial membrane densities [35]. In our case, most mitochondria were in a condensed state, with compacted matrix and larger internal compartments, a configuration that is a manifestation of a functional state, with high oxidative capacity, coupled with marked phosphorylation [36]. Mitochondria play a central role in both processes of metabolism and oxidative stress; mitochondrial dysfunction and increased oxidative stress have been shown to play important roles in various human diseases [37]. We highlighted the association between iron deposits and mitochondrial damage. We also found an association between mitochondria and lipid droplets, suggesting that mitochondrial dysfunction may trigger LD biogenesis, by switching metabolic pathways to glycolysis and fatty acid biosynthesis [38]. In this regard, we also observed macrovesicular steatosis in all patients, despite the absence of underling predisposing conditions (except the patient with obesity). Interestingly, we previously described lipid droplets accumulation, mitochondria, and LD association in lungs from COVID-19 patients [39].
In conclusion, our results provide evidence that iron toxicity could be the cause of liver injury in COVID-19 patients. We hypothesize that iron loading of hepatocytes induces specific cellular damages, a pathogenic triangle of iron, mitochondria and lipids, which leads to liver damage. Despite the limitation represented by the small number of cases enrolled, this study enabled investigation of pathogenesis at the cellular level and described liver injury based on liver biopsies. Liver biopsies have rarely been performed on COVID-19 patients, but they are extremely important to understand the processes occurring in the liver at the time of the acute injury. A better understanding of the mechanisms contributing to liver injury will help to develop and implement early measures to prevent serious liver damage in patients suffering from COVID-19.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells10051103/s1, Figure S1: Immunohistochemical and Perl’s staining in control liver, Figure S2: vWF and αSMA expression in liver of COVID-19 patients.

Author Contributions

F.D.N., L.F., R.N., and D.C., investigation; U.V.-C., S.C., A.A., L.M., and G.D., resource; F.D.N. and L.F., writing the paper; M.P., supervision of the data analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Health, Ricerca Finalizzata (COVID-2020-12371817, COVID-2020-12371675), and by funding support given by “Associazione Unitaria Avvocati e Procuratori di Stato”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval number: n° 9/2020).

Informed Consent Statement

All biopsied patients gave informed consent for collecting samples and data for research purposes. Informed consent from autoptic patients was waived by the Ethics Commission due to public health outbreak investigation.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the excellent support of the INMI pathology team: Alessia Brenna, Roberta Chiappini, Marco Canali, Mario Moauro, Nicolina Rotiroti, and Wilfredo von Lorch, who risked SARS-CoV-2 infection in performing the autopsies and collecting the samples. Roberta Nardacci is a Professor at Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences in Rome.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Chen, N.; Zhou, M.; Dong, X.; Qu, J.; Gong, F.; Han, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wei, Y.; et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020, 395, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Chen, G.; Wu, D.; Guo, W.; Cao, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, H.; Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, H.; Yu, H.; et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease-2019. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2620–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Falasca, L.; Nardacci, R.; Colombo, D.; Lalle, E.; Di Caro, A.; Nicastri, E.; Antinori, A.; Petrosillo, N.; Marchioni, L.; Biava, G.; et al. Postmortem Findings in Italian Patients with COVID-19: A Descriptive Full Autopsy Study of Cases with and without Comorbidities. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 222, 1807–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mao, R.; Qiu, Y.; He, J.S.; Tan, J.Y.; Li, X.H.; Liang, J.; Shen, J.; Zhu, L.R.; Chen, Y.; Iacucci, M.; et al. Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, L.; Liu, J.; Lu, M.; Yang, D.; Zheng, X. Liver injury during highly pathogenic human coronavirus infections. Liver Int. 2020, 40, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Chen, Z.; Hu, J.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, D.; Xiong, M.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, K.; Wang, Y.M. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of liver injury in COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study from Wuhan, China. Hepatol. Int. 2020, 14, 723–732. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, D.; Ding, X.; Xie, M.; Tian, D.; Xia, L. COVID-19-associated liver injury: From bedside to bench. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sonnweber, T.; Boehm, A.; Sahanic, S.; Pizzini, A.; Aichner, M.; Sonnweber, B.; Kurz, K.; Koppelstätter, S.; Haschka, D.; Petzer, V.; et al. Persisting alterations of iron homeostasis in COVID-19 are associated with non-resolving lung pathologies and poor patients' performance: A prospective observational cohort study. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bellmann-Weiler, R.; Lanser, L.; Barket, R.; Rangger, L.; Schapfl, A.; Schaber, M.; Fritsche, G.; Wöll, E.; Weiss, G. Prevalence and Predictive Value of Anemia and Dysregulated Iron Homeostasis in Patients with COVID-19 Infection. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bacon, B.R.; Adams, P.C.; Kowdley, K.V.; Powell, L.W.; Tavill, A.S.; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Diagnosis and management of hemochromatosis: 2011 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2011, 54, 328–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bloomer, S.A.; Brown, K.E. Iron-Induced Liver Injury: A Critical Reappraisal. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Philippe, M.A.; Ruddell, R.G.; Ramm, G.A. Role of iron in hepatic fibrosis: One piece in the puzzle. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 4746–4754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ishak, K.; Baptista, A.; Bianchi, L.; Callea, F.; De Groote, J.; Gudat, F.; Denk, H.; Desmet, V.; Korb, G.; MacSween, R.N.; et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J. Hepatol. 1995, 22, 696–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Scheuer, P.J.; Williams, R.; Muir, A.R. Hepatic pathology in relatives of patients with haemochromatosis. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1962, 84, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mannella, C.A. Structure and dynamics of the mitochondrial inner membrane cristae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res. 2006, 1763, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhang, C.; Shi, L.; Wang, F.S. Liver injury in COVID-19: Management and challenges. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 428–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cai, Q.; Huang, D.; Yu, H.; Zhu, Z.; Xia, Z.; Su, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhou, G.; Gou, J.; Qu, J.; et al. COVID-19: Abnormal liver function tests. J. Hepatol 2020, 73, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bloom, P.P.; Meyerowitz, E.A.; Reinus, Z.; Daidone, M.; Gustafson, J.; Kim, A.Y.; Schaefer, E.; Chung, R.T. Liver Biochemistries in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. Hepatology 2020, 73, 890–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Phipps, M.M.; Barraza, L.H.; LaSota, E.D.; Sobieszczyk, M.E.; Pereira, M.R.; Zheng, E.X.; Fox, A.N.; Zucker, J.; Verna, E.C. Acute Liver Injury in COVID-19: Prevalence and Association with Clinical Outcomes in a Large U.S. Cohort. Hepatology 2020, 72, 807–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lagana, S.M.; Kudose, S.; Iuga, A.C.; Lee, M.J.; Fazlollahi, L.; Remotti, H.E.; Del Portillo, A.; De Michele, S.; de Gonzalez, A.K.; Saqi, A.; et al. Hepatic pathology in patients dying of COVID-19: A series of 40 cases including clinical, histologic, and virologic data. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 2147–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry De-pends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pirola, C.J.; Sookoian, S. SARS-CoV-2 virus and liver expression of host receptors: Putative mechanisms of liver involvement in COVID-19. Liver Int. 2020, 40, 2038–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chai, X.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Han, W.; Lu, Z.; Ke, A. Specific ACE2 expression in cholangiocytes may cause liver damage after 2019-nCoV infection. Bio-Rxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zhao, B.; Ni, C.; Gao, R.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Wei, J.; Lv, T.; Liang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, W.; et al. Recapitulation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and cholangiocyte damage with human liver ductal organoids. Protein Cell 2020, 11, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Philips, C.A.; Ahamed, R.; Augustine, P. SARS-CoV-2 related liver impairment—Perception may not be the reality. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 991–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nie, X.; Qian, L.; Sun, R.; Huang, B.; Dong, X.; Xiao, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, T.; Yue, L.; Chen, S.; et al. Multi-organ proteomic landscape of COVID-19 autopsies. Cell 2021, 184, 775–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bonkovsky, H.L. Iron and the liver. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1991, 301, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ganz, T. Systemic iron homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 2013, 93, 1721–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Salama, S.A.; Kabel, A.M. Taxifolin ameliorates iron overload-induced hepatocellular injury: Modulating PI3K/AKT and p38 MAPK signaling, inflammatory response, and hepatocellular regeneration. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2020, 330, 109230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Salama, S.A.; Al-Harbi, M.S.; Abdel-Bakky, M.S.; Omar, H.A. Glutamyl cysteine dipeptide suppresses ferritin expression and alleviates liver injury in iron-overload rat model. Biochimie 2015, 115, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zuyderhoudt, F.M.; Sindram, J.W.; Marx, J.J.; Jörning, G.G.; van Gool, J. The amount of ferritin and hemosiderin in the livers of patients with iron-loading diseases. Hepatology 1983, 3, 232–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, X.; Stockwell, B.R.; Conrad, M. Ferroptosis: Mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021, 22, 266–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Delgado-Roche, L.; Mesta, F. Oxidative Stress as Key Player in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) Infection. Arch. Med. Res. 2020, 51, 384–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dixon, S.J.; Lemberg, K.M.; Lamprecht, M.R.; Skouta, R.; Zaitsev, E.M.; Gleason, C.E.; Patel, D.N.; Bauer, A.J.; Cantley, A.M.; Yang, W.S.; et al. Ferroptosis: An iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell 2012, 149, 1060–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Benard, G.; Rossignol, R. Ultrastructure of the mitochondrion and its bearing on function and bioenergetics. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008, 10, 1313–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Javadov, S.; Kozlov, A.V.; Camara, A.K.S. Mitochondria in Health and Diseases. Cells 2020, 9, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, S.J.; Zhang, J.; Choi, A.M.; Kim, H.P. Mitochondrial dysfunction induces formation of lipid droplets as a generalized response to stress. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2013, 2013, 327167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nardacci, R.; Colavita, F.; Castilletti, C.; Lapa, D.; Matusali, G.; Meschi, S.; Del Nonno, F.; Colombo, D.; Capobianchi, M.R.; Zumla, A.; et al. Evidences for lipid involvement in SARS-CoV-2 cytopathogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Histopathological features of liver biopsies and autoptic liver. (AD) Liver biopsies show macrovesicular steatosis (A), and mild portal and lobular inflammation with spotty necrosis with presence of ballooning degeneration (arrows) (B). Sinusoidal dilatation in centrilobular areas is visible (C). Masson’s trichrome stain highlights mild fibrous expansion (arrows) (D). (E,F) Autoptic liver sections show macrovacuolar steatosis, and dilated but intact sinusoidal architecture; vascular fibrosis and spotty necrosis are visible (E). Hepatic sinusoidal dilatation and extravasation of red blood cells into the Disse’s space are visible; extensive steatosis is evident (F). Scale bars: A,D,E = 50 µm; B,C = 14 µm; F = 7 µm.
Figure 1. Histopathological features of liver biopsies and autoptic liver. (AD) Liver biopsies show macrovesicular steatosis (A), and mild portal and lobular inflammation with spotty necrosis with presence of ballooning degeneration (arrows) (B). Sinusoidal dilatation in centrilobular areas is visible (C). Masson’s trichrome stain highlights mild fibrous expansion (arrows) (D). (E,F) Autoptic liver sections show macrovacuolar steatosis, and dilated but intact sinusoidal architecture; vascular fibrosis and spotty necrosis are visible (E). Hepatic sinusoidal dilatation and extravasation of red blood cells into the Disse’s space are visible; extensive steatosis is evident (F). Scale bars: A,D,E = 50 µm; B,C = 14 µm; F = 7 µm.
Cells 10 01103 g001
Figure 2. Immune-histochemical findings. (AD) Immunostains of liver biopsies highlight the presence of numerous CD8+ T lymphocytes (A); CD68 labelling highlights the presence of macrophages in the portal areas (arrow), and numerous Kupffer cells into sinusoids (arrowheads) (B). CD34 immunolabeling shows a new angiogenesis process in periportal tracts (C) and centrilobular areas (D). (E,F) In autoptic liver sections, numerous CD8+ T lymphocytes are detected (E). CD34 positive staining is present in endothelial cells of the portal tract vasculature, and extending beyond the periportal regions with centrizonal microvessels and sinusoids positivity (F). Scale bars: A,C,DF = 50 µm; B = 14 µm.
Figure 2. Immune-histochemical findings. (AD) Immunostains of liver biopsies highlight the presence of numerous CD8+ T lymphocytes (A); CD68 labelling highlights the presence of macrophages in the portal areas (arrow), and numerous Kupffer cells into sinusoids (arrowheads) (B). CD34 immunolabeling shows a new angiogenesis process in periportal tracts (C) and centrilobular areas (D). (E,F) In autoptic liver sections, numerous CD8+ T lymphocytes are detected (E). CD34 positive staining is present in endothelial cells of the portal tract vasculature, and extending beyond the periportal regions with centrizonal microvessels and sinusoids positivity (F). Scale bars: A,C,DF = 50 µm; B = 14 µm.
Cells 10 01103 g002
Figure 3. Iron deposits histological evaluation. (A,B) Perl’s staining of liver biopsies show coarse blue granules of ferritin and hemosiderin in hepatocytes. (C,D) Autoptic liver sections reveal heavy iron deposition in hepatocytes. Scale bars: A,C = 50 µm; B,D = 7 µm.
Figure 3. Iron deposits histological evaluation. (A,B) Perl’s staining of liver biopsies show coarse blue granules of ferritin and hemosiderin in hepatocytes. (C,D) Autoptic liver sections reveal heavy iron deposition in hepatocytes. Scale bars: A,C = 50 µm; B,D = 7 µm.
Cells 10 01103 g003
Figure 4. Ultrastructural analysis of iron accumulation in biopsies and autoptic livers. (A) Transmission electron microscopy of liver biopsies shows ferritin electron dense particles scattered in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes (arrowheads). Other particles are enclosed in siderosomes (arrow). (B) The analysis of autoptic liver sections reveals the presence of hemosiderin aggregates (arrow) and numerous ferritin particles diffuse in the cytoplasm. (C,D) Some siderosomes, beside ferritin particles, also contain lipid droplets or membranous structures (arrows); hemosiderin granules (arrowheads) are enclosed into organelles which also contain tiny ferritin particles (magnified boxed area in D). (E,F) Hemosiderin large aggregates are also found not segregated into siderosomes; higher magnification of the boxed area shows close contacts between hemosiderin aggregates (arrows) and a damaged mitochondrion; m, mitochondria; LD, lipid droplet.
Figure 4. Ultrastructural analysis of iron accumulation in biopsies and autoptic livers. (A) Transmission electron microscopy of liver biopsies shows ferritin electron dense particles scattered in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes (arrowheads). Other particles are enclosed in siderosomes (arrow). (B) The analysis of autoptic liver sections reveals the presence of hemosiderin aggregates (arrow) and numerous ferritin particles diffuse in the cytoplasm. (C,D) Some siderosomes, beside ferritin particles, also contain lipid droplets or membranous structures (arrows); hemosiderin granules (arrowheads) are enclosed into organelles which also contain tiny ferritin particles (magnified boxed area in D). (E,F) Hemosiderin large aggregates are also found not segregated into siderosomes; higher magnification of the boxed area shows close contacts between hemosiderin aggregates (arrows) and a damaged mitochondrion; m, mitochondria; LD, lipid droplet.
Cells 10 01103 g004
Figure 5. Lipid accumulation and mitochondria changes. (A,B) Light micrographs of liver biopsies semithin sections show the presence of abundant lipid droplets into hepatocytes and dark blue stained mitochondria. (C,D) The ultrastructural analysis highlights the condensed state of mitochondria, which display compacted matrix and enlarged cristae; mitochondria in strict contact with lipid droplets are visible (D). m, mitochondrion; LD, lipid droplet. Scale bars: A,B = 7 µm.
Figure 5. Lipid accumulation and mitochondria changes. (A,B) Light micrographs of liver biopsies semithin sections show the presence of abundant lipid droplets into hepatocytes and dark blue stained mitochondria. (C,D) The ultrastructural analysis highlights the condensed state of mitochondria, which display compacted matrix and enlarged cristae; mitochondria in strict contact with lipid droplets are visible (D). m, mitochondrion; LD, lipid droplet. Scale bars: A,B = 7 µm.
Cells 10 01103 g005
Table 1. Demographics and clinical course of biopsied COVID-19 patients.
Table 1. Demographics and clinical course of biopsied COVID-19 patients.
Age/SexComorbiditiesSymptomsHospital Stay
(Days)
Oxygenation/Intensive CareTreatments
140/MNoneFever; headache; myalgia and arthralgia; bilateral interstitial pneumonia29Oxygen therapy with VMK; cPAPLopinavir/ritonavir; Hydroxychloroquine; Enoxaparin
246/MNoneFever; cough; myalgia and arthralgia; dyspnea; interstitial pneumonia31Oxygen therapy with VMK; NIVLopinavir/ritonavir; Hydroxychloroquine; Enoxaparin; Tocilizumab
342/MObesityFever; cough; dyspnea; bilateral interstitial pneumonia41Oxygen therapy with VMK 35%; NIV; cPAP orotracheal intubationLopinavir/ritonavir;
Hydroxychloroquine; SarilumabCeftriaxone; doxycycline
NIV = not invasive ventilation; VMK = mechanical ventilation; cPAP = continuous positive airway pressure.
Table 2. Demographics and clinical course of deceased COVID-19 patients.
Table 2. Demographics and clinical course of deceased COVID-19 patients.
Age/SexComorbiditiesSymptomsHospital Stay
(Days)
Oxygenation/Intensive CareTreatmentsPostmortem Causes of Death
176/MMalignancyBilateral pneumonia30Oxygen therapy with cPAPTocilizumabCardiorespiratory failure.
269/FSchizophrenia; staphylococcusFever; Dyspnea.28Oxygen therapy with VMK 35%Not knownCardiorespiratory failure.
363/MHypertension, cerebral ischemic vasculopathyFever; Dyspnea; Anosmia; Interstitial pneumonia.5Oxygen therapy with VMK 40%Clarithromycin Rocephin, morphine; RocuroniumDAD, cardiorespiratory failure.
NIV = not invasive ventilation; VMK = mechanical ventilation; cPAP = continuous positive airway pressure.
Table 3. Laboratory characteristics of biopsied and autoptic COVID-19 patients.
Table 3. Laboratory characteristics of biopsied and autoptic COVID-19 patients.
Biopsied
Patients
Laboratory Findings *
Temporal TrendFibrinogenD-dimerLDHALTASTTotal BilirubinFerritinPCRGGT
1Admission915815345120821.48116815.49146
Peak during hospital5255134797473300.7519131.84134
Discharge403220201134310.7510560.0766
2Admission88360317429180.9148811.8435
Peak during hospital 5376522154811020.666661.35185
Discharge23146426928210.68100<0.050.17
3Admission91580362628601.3167218.18111
Peak during hospital115917,7474911371765.33202836.77760
Discharge3821372254100441.119160.51109
Autopsy Patients N°
1Admission 70569721020310.418094.118
Peak during hospital13917,180>4500>3300>60001.315370.64125
Death19410693644306821820.861407<0.0555
2Admission25315,92030019380.393463.2712
Peak during hospital17,575-33783643.711654.9147
Death124244,55438632191.34-0.3780
3Admission 6481428-841210.57-11.0339
Peak during hospital--607---3292--
Death 726--60610.4--53
* Normal Values: D-dimer ng/mL (0–500); fibrinogen mg/dL (150–450); LDH U/L (120–246 U/L); ALT U/L (0–55); AST U/L (5–34); total bilirubin mg/dL (0.2–1); ferritin μg/L (20–300); PCR mg/mL (<1 mg/mL); GGT U/L (woman > 38, men < 45).
Table 4. Liver histopathological findings.
Table 4. Liver histopathological findings.
Group BIOPSIESGroup AUTOPSIES
N° 1N° 2N° 3N° 1N° 2N° 3
Steatosis>5%>33%33–66%33–66%>5%33–66%
Portal inflammationMildMildMildMildMildMild
Lobular inflammationFocal *Focal *Focal *Focal *Focal *
Pattern of necrosisSpotty SpottyZonalZonal
Portal fibrosisMildMildModerateMildMildMild
Sinusoidal dilatation+++++
* 2 to 4 foci per 10× objective. + present; − absent.
Table 5. Iron presence in the liver.
Table 5. Iron presence in the liver.
Group BIOPSYGroup AUTOPSY
n.1n.2n.3n.1n.2n.3
Pattern of iron stain (Percentage of cells with iron deposits) *MildModerateModerateMarkedModerateMarked
Siderosis (Hepatic iron graded according to Scheuer’s classification) #123434
* Percentage of stained cells was counted on Perl’s-stained liver sections. Minimal (<5%), Mild (5–33%), Moderate (34–67%), Marked (68–100%). # Siderosis was determined semi-quantitatively on Perl’s-stained liver sections according to Scheuer’s classification (Scheuer, PJ et al. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1962, 84, 53–64.): score 0, granules absent or barely discernible at a magnification of 400-fold (400×); 1, barely discernible at a magnification of 200× but easily confirmed at 400×; 2, discrete granules resolved at 100× magnification; 3, discrete granules resolved at a magnification of 25×; 4, massive granules visible even upon 10× magnification.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Del Nonno, F.; Nardacci, R.; Colombo, D.; Visco-Comandini, U.; Cicalini, S.; Antinori, A.; Marchioni, L.; D’Offizi, G.; Piacentini, M.; Falasca, L. Hepatic Failure in COVID-19: Is Iron Overload the Dangerous Trigger? Cells 2021, 10, 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051103

AMA Style

Del Nonno F, Nardacci R, Colombo D, Visco-Comandini U, Cicalini S, Antinori A, Marchioni L, D’Offizi G, Piacentini M, Falasca L. Hepatic Failure in COVID-19: Is Iron Overload the Dangerous Trigger? Cells. 2021; 10(5):1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Del Nonno, Franca, Roberta Nardacci, Daniele Colombo, Ubaldo Visco-Comandini, Stefania Cicalini, Andrea Antinori, Luisa Marchioni, Gianpiero D’Offizi, Mauro Piacentini, and Laura Falasca. 2021. "Hepatic Failure in COVID-19: Is Iron Overload the Dangerous Trigger?" Cells 10, no. 5: 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051103

APA Style

Del Nonno, F., Nardacci, R., Colombo, D., Visco-Comandini, U., Cicalini, S., Antinori, A., Marchioni, L., D’Offizi, G., Piacentini, M., & Falasca, L. (2021). Hepatic Failure in COVID-19: Is Iron Overload the Dangerous Trigger? Cells, 10(5), 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop