Next Article in Journal
Histone Citrullination Mediates a Protective Role in Endothelium and Modulates Inflammation
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Deletion of Thorase Causes Purkinje Cell Loss and Impaired Motor Coordination Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Proteomics and Phospho-Proteomics Profiling of the Co-Formulation of Type I and II Interferons, HeberFERON, in the Glioblastoma-Derived Cell Line U-87 MG
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aberrant DNA and RNA Methylation Occur in Spinal Cord and Skeletal Muscle of Human SOD1 Mouse Models of ALS and in Human ALS: Targeting DNA Methylation Is Therapeutic
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 24
10.3390/cells11244067
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Paclitaxel Inhibits KCNQ Channels in Primary Sensory Neurons to Initiate the Development of Painful Peripheral Neuropathy

by
Zizhen Wu
,
Gabor Toro
,
Guoying Xu
,
Danny Dang
,
Charmaine Prater
and
Qing Yang
*
Department of Neurobiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(24), 4067; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244067
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 11 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection New Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Neurodegeneration)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cancer patients undergoing paclitaxel infusion usually experience peripheral nerve degeneration and serious neuropathic pain termed paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN). However, alterations in the dose or treatment schedule for paclitaxel do not eliminate PIPN, and no therapies are available for PIPN, despite numerous studies to uncover the mechanisms underlying the development/maintenance of this condition. Therefore, we aimed to uncover a novel mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of PIPN. Clinical studies suggest that acute over excitation of primary sensory neurons is linked to the pathogenesis of PIPN. We found that paclitaxel-induced acute hyperexcitability of primary sensory neurons results from the paclitaxel-induced inhibition of KCNQ potassium channels (mainly KCNQ2), found abundantly in sensory neurons and axons. We found that repeated application of XE-991, a specific KCNQ channel blocker, induced PIPN-like alterations in rats, including mechanical hypersensitivity and degeneration of peripheral nerves, as detected by both morphological and behavioral assays. In contrast, genetic deletion of KCNQ2 from peripheral sensory neurons in mice significantly attenuated the development of paclitaxel-induced peripheral sensory fiber degeneration and chronic pain. These findings may lead to a better understanding of the causes of PIPN and provide an impetus for developing new classes of KCNQ activators for its therapeutic treatment.

1. Introduction

Most patients with breast, ovarian, or lung cancer receive paclitaxel (Taxol®)-based chemotherapy [1]. Paclitaxel is so effective in cancer treatment that it is now included in the “WHO list of Essential Medicines” (WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016). However, the sensory peripheral neuropathy that is often associated with neuropathic pain after paclitaxel perfusion, termed paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN), is common and severe. The incidence and severity of PIPN is duration and dose-related such that nearly 88% of patients receiving paclitaxel manifest symptoms [2], resulting in reduced overall quality of life; in some instances, this leads to treatment suspension, which negatively impacts survival [2].
Despite its public health importance, the pathogenesis of PIPN is not well understood. Paclitaxel is known to stabilize microtubules, blocking mitosis and promoting cell death [1]; moreover, it binds to the β-tubulin of axonal microtubules, interfering with axonal transport [3,4,5,6]. Recent studies have demonstrated that paclitaxel disrupts the axonal transport of the mRNA encoding components of the mitochondrial fusion/fission machinery that controls mitochondrial dynamics [7,8], resulting in altered mitochondrial morphology and impaired mitochondrial function [7,9,10,11]. The interplay between mitochondria and oxidative stress can further compromise the survival and function of sensory neurons [12,13,14,15]. However, impairing microtubule assembly in vivo with TZT-1027, a derivative of dolastatin [16], failed to induce neuropathological alterations and chronic pain [17]. Additionally, both acetyl-L-carnitine (a mitoprotective drug) and glutathione (an antioxidant) failed to prevent PIPN in large clinical trials [18,19]. Thus, there must be an unexplored factor that works with the currently proposed mechanisms to induce PIPN.
Several clinical trials have revealed that cancer survivors usually have a high risk of developing peripheral neuropathy and chronic neuropathic pain if they experience acute pain during paclitaxel infusion [20,21], suggesting a link between the acute hyperexcitation of primary sensory neurons and the development of PIPN. Paclitaxel induces the immediate excitation of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons isolated from human tissue samples [22], as well as acute peripheral and visceral nociception in vertebrate animals [23]. However, the mechanism underlying such paclitaxel-induced acute effects is unknown. Our previous study indicates that decreasing neuronal excitability by systematic application of a KCNQ channel opener prevents the development of PIPN [24]. However, this study gives no clue as to whether paclitaxel-induced acute neuronal excitation results from alterations in the activity of KCNQ channels or other ion channels, and whether the protective effect results from decreased excitability of the peripheral or central nervous system.
In this study, we aim to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying paclitaxel-induced acute excitation of DRG neurons and its contribution to the development of PIPN. By combining a transgenic approach and electrophysiological recordings, we provide direct evidence that acute increases in the excitability of peripheral sensory neurons resulting from paclitaxel-induced inhibition of KCNQ channels initiates PIPN chronic alterations. This study thus leads to a better understanding of the mechanism underlying PIPN as well as delineating novel targets related to the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel.

2. Materials and Methods

Male, adult, Sprague-Dawley rats (200–300 g) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Rats were housed 2 per cage in a controlled environment (12 h reversed light/dark cycle, 21 ± 1 °C) with standard food and water. The rats were allowed to adjust to their environment for a week before the experiment.

2.1. Mouse Strains and Genotyping

To generate KCNQ2 flox mice, we purchased Kcnq2tm1a(EUCOMM)Wtsi embryonic stem (ES) cells from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. The ES cells were used to generate germline-transmitting chimeras, who were crossed with FLPeR mice (from the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) to remove the frt-flanked Laz-neomycin cassette. The following primers were used to genotype the KCNQ2flox allele: 5′-GGGAGAGGGAAACAGAGAGG-3′ and 5′-AAAGAACCAACTCCACGCTG-3′. Mice expressing two copies of LoxP-flanked alleles are here referred to as KCNQ2flx/flx mice. Advillin-Cre mice were kindly provided by Dr. Fan Wang [25]. The KCNQ2flx/flx mice were crossed with the Advillin-Cre mice to generate conditional knockout animals, which are referred to as KCNQ2flx/flx//Advillin-Cre or KCNQ2cko mice in this manuscript. Both male and female KCNQ2cko mice were used, and no obvious behavioral and morphological differences between the sexes were noted. The data from both sexes were thus analyzed together. In all cases, a Cre+ male was crossed with a Cre- female to ensure Cre transmission only from the male progenitor [25].

2.2. Administration of Paclitaxel

Paclitaxel (TEVA Pharmaceutical Inc., North Wales, PA, USA) was delivered intraperitoneally (i.p., 2 mg/kg in 0.9% saline, once daily) on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 (8:00 to 10:00 a.m.) [26]. Sham animals received an equal gradient of cremophor EL (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and ethanol of the same volume as that used in the paclitaxel group, which were administered at the same time that the experimental mice received paclitaxel (days 1, 3, 5, and 7, 8:00 to 10:00 a.m.).

2.3. Behavioral Tests

Animals were tested in the light phase. Animals underwent testing before and after paclitaxel administration on the indicated day/time. The staff who performed the behavioral tests were blinded to the genotypes of the mice and the drug treatments. After habituation of each animal in the testing chamber for either 20 min (for SD rats) or 60 min (for mice), a series of calibrated von Frey filaments (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL, USA) were pressed against the glabrous surface of the hind paws, and the thresholds of mechanical sensitivity were analyzed with the “up-down” method [27,28]. A conditioned place preference (CPP) device (Med Associates Inc., Fairfax, VT, USA) was used to test spontaneous pain as previously described [29,30]. The CPP device contained two chambers, one white, the other black. On the first day, each animal was placed in the CPP chambers for 30 min of habituation. On the following 3 days, each animal was conditioned with a twice daily conditioning injection of analgesic and vehicle, each of which became associated with a certain chamber. During the anesthetic conditioning session, the animal received retigabine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Five minutes after injection, the subject was kept in the white chamber for 1 h. In another conditioning session, the same animal was restricted to the black chamber for 1 h following a saline injection (i.p.). On the fifth day, the testing animal (without injection) was placed in the black chamber and allowed to freely access both chambers. The system recorded the time the animal stayed in each of the 2 chambers over a 30 min period.

2.4. DRG Neuron Dissociation and Culturing

After an i.p. injection of beuthanasia (75 mg/kg, Merck Animal Health, Kenilworth, NJ, USA), the animals were intracardially perfused with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the lumbar column was opened to harvest DRGs from lumbar vertebrae 4 and 5. The ganglia were then minced and incubated for 40 min at 34 °C in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 0.4 mg/mL trypsin (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ, USA) and 0.6 mg/mL collagenase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The cell-containing solution was then centrifuged (300 rpm for 5 min). The isolated cells were plated onto 8 mm cover glasses (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, USA) precoated with 50 mg/mL poly-L-lysine; they were then incubated (37 °C, 5% CO2) in DMEM without serum for 18–24 h prior to the electrophysiological recordings.

2.5. Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) Cell Transfection

Human Kcnq2 and Kcnq3 alone or in combination (1:1 ratio) were transiently expressed in CHO cells by transfection using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). The cells were dissociated 12 h after transfection, plated onto poly-L-lysine-precoated coverslips and incubated (5% CO2, 37 °C) for another 12 h prior to the electrophysiological recordings.

2.6. Electrophysiological Recordings of DRG Neurons and CHO Cells

A P-1000 micropipette puller (Sutter Instrument Co., Novato, CA, USA) was used to pull electrodes from borosilicate glass capillaries (BF150-110-10, Sutter Instrument Co., Novato, CA, USA), and electrodes with a resistance of ~2 MΩ were retained for use in the following experiments. Neurons were viewed using an Eclipse Ti inverted microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Both whole-cell current clamp and voltage clamp were performed with a MultiClamp 700B amplifier with an Axon Digidata 1550B data acquisition system (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). The resting membrane potential (RMP) and any spontaneous firing of DRG neurons were recorded by patching the cells at 0 pA. Both KCNQ-like currents and capsaicin-sensitive currents were recorded under a voltage-clamp model by patching cells at −20 or −60 mV, respectively. KCNQ-like currents in both DRG neurons and CHO cells were recorded by hyperpolarizing the cell from −20 to −60 mV. Signals were sampled at ≥ 10 kHz. The normal pipette solution contained (in mM) 134 KCl, 13.2 NaCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1.6 MgCl2, 3 EGTA, 9 HEPES, 0.3 Na-GTP, and 1 Mg-ATP (pH 7.2, 300 mOsM). The BAPTA-containing pipette solution included (in mM) 94 KCl, 13.2 NaCl, 1.6 MgCl2, 10 tetrapotassium BAPTA, 9 HEPES, 1 Mg-ATP, and 0.3 Na-GTP (pH 7.2, 300 mOsM). The bath solution included (in mM) 140 NaCl, 3 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 1.88 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose (pH 7.4, 320 mOsM). Paclitaxel, XE-991 (Tocris, Bristol, UK), α-dendrotoxin (Alomone labs, Jerusalem, Israel), phrixotoxin-2 (Alomone labs, Jerusalem, Israel), BDS-II (Alomone labs, Jerusalem, Israel), KT10 (Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA), wortmannin (Tocris, Bristol, UK), BAPTA (Life Tech, Carlsbad, CA, USA), U73122 (Tocris, Bristol, UK), and st-Ht31 (Tocris, Bristol, UK) were added to either bath solution (Paclitaxel, XE-991, α-dendrotoxin, phrixotoxin-2, BDS-II) or pipette solution (KT10, wortmannin, BAPTA, U73122, st-Ht31).

2.7. Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Staining and Quantification

Under deep anesthesia (75 mg/kg, euthanasia i.p., Merck Animal Health, Kenilworth, NJ, USA), a 3-mm (for rats) or 2-mm (for mice) glabrous skin biopsy punch was harvested from the hind paws. Tissues were placed in Zamboni’s fixative solution overnight (4 °C) and 20% sucrose for at least another 24 h before embedding in a frozen compound prepared at an optimal cutting temperature for cryostat (25 μm). Transverse sections were permeabilized and blocked with 0.5% Triton X-100 and 5% serum for 1 h. Free-floating samples were then incubated with a combination of anti-collagen IV (Southern Biotech, AL, USA; Cat# 1340) and anti-protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5) (Proteintech Group Inc., IL; Cat# 17430) antibodies overnight at 4 °C; the primary antibodies were omitted in negative controls. After 3 rinses in PBS, the samples were incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature; labeled samples were cover-slipped with Vectashield (Vector Labs) following washing in PBS. We used a Nikon confocal microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) to image the sections.
ImageJ software (NIH) was used to quantify the IENFs within a field of view as previously described [24]. Four to five slices from each subject were randomly selected. For each imaged slice, peripheral nerve fibers (stained with PGP9.5) that crossed the collagen IV-stained dermal/epidermal junction and the length of the epidermis within three fields of view were analyzed. IENF density was calculated as the total number of fibers per unit length of epidermis (IENF/mm). The staff member who performed IENF staining and counting was blinded to the genotypes of the mice and the treatment conditions.

2.8. Statistics

Transgenic mice were genotyped and assigned to experimental or control groups by a separate individual who was not involved in conduct of the experiments. Reagents for the experiments were prepared and numbered by an individual not involved in the direct conduct of the experiment. Animals were randomly assigned to different groups. All behavioral testing and histological experiments were blindly performed. Un-blinding occurred only after all data collection, data-entry, and database formatting were finished. Both Sigmaplot (version 14, Systat software, San Jose, CA, USA) and Prism (version 9.0, GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA) were used for data analysis. All data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. or percentage. The α level for all statistical tests was 0.05. One-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used to compare more than two groups. The correlation of DRG neuron responses for different blockers was tested using Spearman’s test. Two-tailed unpaired or paired t tests were used to compare results obtained before and after treatment in the same cohort. Results with p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). Detailed statistical information for all experiments is presented in the figure legends.

3. Results

3.1. KCNQ Channels Are Involved in the Paclitaxel-Induced Excitation/Depolarization of DRG Neurons

Because the activity of voltage-gated potassium channels (Kv) plays a pivotal role in sensory neuron excitation, we investigated whether any of these channels are involved in the paclitaxel-induced depolarization/hyperexcitability of DRG neurons. First, we investigated the relationship between the depolarization induced by various K+ channel blockers and that induced by paclitaxel using whole-cell current-clamp (0 pA) in DRG neurons dissociated from naive rats. Our data indicate that the depolarization induced by 100 nM α-dendrotoxin (a specific Kv1 blocker) [31], 1 μM phrixotoxin-2 (a specific Kv4.2 and Kv4.3 blocker) [32], or 1 μM BDS-II (a specific Kv3.4 blocker) [33] was not correlated with the depolarization induced by 3 μM paclitaxel in the same DRG cells following washout of the previous channel blocker with locally delivered bath solution (Figure 1A–C). However, tetraethylammonium (TEA), a nonspecific K+ channel blocker that blocks KCNQ channels [34,35,36,37], and XE-991, a specific KCNQ (Kv7 family) channel blocker [35,38], depolarized primary sensory neurons, both capsaicin-sensitive and capsaicin-insensitive, in a manner that was significantly correlated with the response induced by 3 μM paclitaxel in vitro (Figure 1D–F). These data strongly suggest that paclitaxel inhibits KCNQ channels in DRG neurons.
To directly investigate whether paclitaxel inhibits KCNQ channels, we then performed whole-cell voltage-clamping with DRG neurons isolated from naïve rats. While both XE-991 and paclitaxel inhibited currents induced by a standard protocol (hyperpolarization from −20 to −60 mV) in isolated DRG neurons, the inhibition induced by 10 μM XE-991 (90.45 ± 19.1 pA) was comparable to that induced by the combination of 3 μM paclitaxel and 10 μM XE-991 (81.7 ± 19.1 pA) (Figure 2A). These findings indicate that paclitaxel-inhibited currents in isolated DRG neurons are XE-991-sensitive, suggesting these currents are mediated by KCNQ channels.
KCNQ channels assemble as tetramers of five Kv7 members (KCNQ1-KCNQ5, also known as Kv7.1-Kv7.5) [39]; several of these members, including KCNQ2, KCNQ3 and KCNQ5, are expressed in rat DRG neurons, including capsaicin-sensitive nociceptors [40,41]. Notably, the KCNQ currents mediated by KCNQ2 homomultimers or heteromultimers (KCNQ2/3) [34,35,36,37], but not those mediated by KCNQ5 homomultimers [42], are highly sensitive to TEA and XE-991. Thus, to detect whether paclitaxel inhibits KCNQ2 or KCNQ3 channels, we overexpressed KCNQ2, KCNQ2/3, or KCNQ3 in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, in which endogenous KCNQ channels are undetectable [43]. Our electrophysiological recordings showed that the currents induced by a hyperpolarization protocol (from −20 to −60 mV) in these cells were XE-991 sensitive, since 10 μM XE-991 almost eliminated the currents (Figure 2B, upper panel). The inhibition induced by 3 μM paclitaxel was much stronger in KCNQ2/3-overexpressing cells (42.68 ± 2.87%) than in KCNQ2-overexpressing cells (16.02 ± 3.90%) or KCNQ3-overexpressing cells (3.82 ± 1.91%) (Figure 2B, bottom panel). Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of paclitaxel on CHO cells overexpressing KCNQ2/3 was dose dependent; at a threshold concentration of 0.1 µM, paclitaxel began inhibiting the XE-991-sensitive current, and maximal inhibition occurred at approximately 10 μM (Figure 2C). This experiment further confirmed that paclitaxel inhibits KCNQ channels.

3.2. Paclitaxel Fails to Induce Acute Neuronal Excitation in KCNQ2 Conditional Knockout Mice

Although KCNQ3 can form homomeric channels in Kcnq2 mutant mice [44], paclitaxel had a very weak effect on KCNQ3 channels (Figure 2). Thus, we generated KCNQ2flx/flx//Advillin-Cre+ mice, also called KCNQ2 conditional knockout mice (KCNQ2cko), in which Kcnq2 is specifically deleted from peripheral sensory neurons, as Advillin is exclusively expressed in sensory neurons [25].
We first verified the deletion of KCNQ2 from DRG neurons by electrophysiological recordings. Robust XE-991-sensitive currents were recorded in DRG neurons from control mice following hyperpolarization from −20 to −60 mV [45]; however, no such currents were detected in the majority of patched DRG neurons dissociated from KCNQ2cko mice (Figure 3A). We also investigated the effect of paclitaxel on the membrane potential of DRG neurons dissociated from KCNQ2cko mice, with age-matched Kcnq2flx/flx mice serving as controls. Similar to the results of a previous report [44], the baseline membrane potential of DRG neurons in the KCNQ2cko mice was not significantly different from that of the control mice (48.34 ± 1.58 vs. 49.57 ± 1.52 mV) (Figure 3B); however, the paclitaxel-induced depolarization was significantly lower in magnitude in the DRG neurons of KCNQ2cko mice than in those of the control group (Figure 3C). These data confirmed that KCNQ2 within sensory neurons mediates paclitaxel-induced acute excitation.

3.3. PIP2 Is Involved in the Paclitaxel-Induced Inhibition of KCNQ Channels

KCNQ channels are gated by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) [45]. Thus, we tested whether PIP2 is necessary in the paclitaxel-induced inhibitory effect. As PIP2 antibody (KT10) reduces the level of PIP2 in neuronal membranes [46], we compared the effect of KT10 (20 μg/mL) in the recording pipette solution on paclitaxel-induced inhibition on XE-991-sensitive currents with that of a normal pipette solution. Currents were produced in dissociated DRG neurons isolated from naive rats by hyperpolarizing the cells from −20 to −60 mV. The cells were exposed to 3 μM paclitaxel for 20 s followed by washout and another exposure to XE-991 (10 μM). Recordings obtained using the KT10-containing pipette solution showed baseline currents that were lower than those obtained using a normal pipette solution (from 147.65 ± 15.18 to 83.5 ± 14.11 pA), and the percentage of paclitaxel-sensitive currents was also significantly attenuated (Figure 4). These data suggest that PIP2 is necessary for the paclitaxel-induced inhibition of KCNQ channels in DRG neurons.
Notably, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) activation decreases local PIP2 levels [45], and paclitaxel activates the PI3K signaling pathway [47], and serves to bind a Ca2+-binding protein involving PIP2 trafficking, neuronal Ca2+ sensor-1 (NCS-1) [48,49,50]. Thus, to investigate whether PI3K and NCS-1 are involved in the paclitaxel-induced inhibition of KCNQ channels in DRG neurons, we included wortmannin (20 nM), a specific PI3K blocker [51,52], or BAPTA (10 mM), a strong Ca2+ chelator, in the pipette solution. However, neither the blocker nor the chelator altered the paclitaxel-induced inhibitory effect (Figure 4). Deletion of PIP2 by phospholipase C (PLC) is a main KCNQ channel-modulating mechanism [53], and A-kinase anchoring protein (AKAP) is another important modulator of KCNQ channels [54]. However, application of neither the PLC inhibitor U73122 (1 μM) nor the AKAP disruptor st-Ht31 (50 μM) attenuated the inhibition induced by paclitaxel (Figure 4).

3.4. Inhibiting KCNQ Channels In Vivo Induces PIPN-like Pathological Alterations

To evaluate the role of KCNQ channels in the development of PIPN, we examined whether XE-991 could simulate paclitaxel-induced chronic alterations in naive SD rats. It has been reported that paclitaxel accumulation in DRGs remains detectable 10 days after the last injection [10]. We administered naive rats XE-991 (1 mg/kg, twice per day) or vehicle (saline, 1 mL, twice per day) for a prolonged period of ten consecutive days and tested for mechanical sensitivity by the von Frey test 3 weeks after the final injection. In vehicle-treated rats, the hind paw withdrawal threshold at 3 weeks after the last injection was not different from that obtained prior to the treatment; however, the hind paw withdrawal threshold of XE-991-treated rats was significantly decreased 3 weeks after treatment was ceased (Figure 5A). The thresholds for von Frey tests 3 weeks after final injection between the vehicle-treated and XE-99-treated groups were also significantly different with XE-991 group showing decreased thresholds (Figure 5A).
One of the hallmarks of PIPN is degeneration of peripheral nerves in the epidermal region [55]. We thus performed immunostaining on peripheral nerve fibers in glabrous skin from rats after behavioral tests. Specifically, we fluorescently labeled protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5, staining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF), red) and collagen IV (basal lamina, green) in glabrous skin sections and counted all PGP9.5-positive IENF fibers crossing the basal lamina. The IENF density in the XE-991-treated rats was significantly lower than that observed in the vehicle-treated group (Figure 5B–D). These data suggest that inhibiting KCNQ channel activity alone can induces PIPN-like peripheral neuropathy and mechanical hypersensitivity.

3.5. Paclitaxel Fails to Induce PIPN in KCNQ2 Conditional Knockout Mice

We next aimed to further assess the extent of involvement of peripheral sensory neuron KCNQ channels in the pathogenesis of PIPN. We hypothesized that deleting KCNQ2 from peripheral sensory neurons would eliminate most paclitaxel-induced pathological alterations.
Both KCNQ2cko mice and their littermate controls received paclitaxel on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, for a total of four injections. Our data indicated that the paclitaxel-induced development of evoked pain tested by von Frey (Figure 6A) and spontaneous pain detected by CPP test (Figure 6B) was lower in Kcnq2 conditional knockout mice than in the littermate controls. While the difference in baseline (before paclitaxel treatment) mechanical behavioral sensitivity between the mutant and control groups was not significant, surprisingly, the baseline IENF density in KCNQ2cko mice was higher than that in the littermate controls. Furthermore, the IENF density in skin sections from the littermate control group was significantly impaired 4–5 weeks after treatment (Figure 6C,D), while that in sections obtained from paclitaxel-treated Kcnq2 conditional knockout mice was conserved (Figure 6E,F). Since selectively deleting KCNQ2 from primary sensory neurons greatly attenuates the PIPN pathological alterations, the data presented here suggest that KCNQ2 channels in primary sensory neurons play a critical role in initiating PIPN.

4. Discussion

Notably, patients who suffered acute pain during paclitaxel infusion usually had a high risk of developing PIPN [20,21], suggesting that paclitaxel-induced acute excitation of primary sensory neurons, especially nociceptors, underlies the pathogenesis of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Several studies have demonstrated that paclitaxel can induce an acute response in sensory neurons [23,56] and acute pain in rodents [57]. Our data indicated that the hyperexcitability of primary sensory neurons primarily resulted from paclitaxel-induced inhibition of KCNQ channels and that knocking out KCNQ2 from primary sensory neurons significantly attenuated the development of PIPN.
While we observed a correlation between the depolarization induced by paclitaxel and the KCNQ channel blocker XE-991, the latter has also been reported to block other channel types [58]. For example, 10 μM XE-991 has been demonstrated to inhibit Kv1.2 and Kv2.1 channel-mediated currents [58]. Both Kv1.2 and Kv2.1 are expressed in primary sensory neurons [59]; however, in our study, we noted that the specific Kv1 blocker α-DTX did not induce depolarization in some DRG neurons that responded to paclitaxel. Additionally, at the resting membrane potential of DRG neurons (−50 to −60 mV), Kv1.2 and Kv2.1 do not activate appreciably, as their activation threshold is approximately −45 to −40 mV [58]. We thus believe that the majority of the paclitaxel-induced depolarization of DRG neurons results from blockade of KCNQ channels.
We confirmed the above findings with experiments performed in DRG neurons dissociated from KCNQ2cko mice since paclitaxel failed to depolarize the majority of these cells. However, a few of these cells demonstrated XE-991-sensitive currents and paclitaxel-induced depolarization, which might have been due to inefficient expression of the Cre transgene in this subpopulation of cells and thus failure to delete KCNQ2 [60,61,62]. Alternatively, it is possible that other channels were involved in this residual response. It has been reported that paclitaxel inhibits Kv2.1 in H9c2 cells [63] and that Kv2.1 is expressed in DRG neurons [64,65]; however, as discussed above, the contribution from these ion channels should be minor, if at all present.
KCNQ channels are gated by PIP2 [45]. While our data indicated the involvement of PIP2 in the paclitaxel-induced inhibitory effect on KCNQ channels, the targeting of signaling pathways that potentially altered the local PIP2 levels—including the PI3K, PLC, NCS-1 signaling pathways—did not alter paclitaxel-induced current inhibition, despite reports indicating that some of these signaling pathways are modulated by paclitaxel [47,48]. Furthermore, decreasing PIP2 level only partially attenuates the paclitaxel-induced effect, suggesting that other mechanisms may be involved. We cannot exclude the possibility that paclitaxel directly binds to KCNQ channels to alter channel gating or channel interaction with/dependence on PIP2, as has been observed with zinc [66]. Further studies are warranted to determine this possibility.
While we did not observe detectable alterations in the mechanical sensitivity of Advillin-Cre-induced KCNQ2cko mice upon von Frey stimulation, the development of both mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia has been detected in Pax3-Cre-mediated KCNQ2cko mice [44]. In Pax3-Cre-mediated KCNQ2cko mice, however, no alteration in the resting membrane potential or firing threshold was observed in isolated DRG neurons, and the molecular components of myelinated fibers were well preserved [44]. Although DRG neurons from Pax3-Cre-mediated KCNQ2cko mice produced significantly more action potentials with less adaptation than did control neurons upon excitation, it is unknown to what extent such alteration in DRG neurons contributes to behavioral hypersensitivity. Unlike Advillin [67], Pax3 is indeed robustly expressed in brain tissue [44]. Thus, it is possible that deletion of KCNQ2 in the brain accounts for the hypersensitivity of both thermal and mechanical sensations observed in Pax3-Cre-mediated KCNQ2 mutant mice, based on the findings that (i) KCNQ channels are expressed in the spinal cord and brain [39,68] and (ii) intracerebroventricular injection of retigabine, a specific KCNQ channel activator [69], relieves inflammatory pain [70]. For the same reasons, KCNQ channels in the central nervous system could also at least partially contribute to repeated XE-991-induced chronic pain hypersensitivity. While mechanical sensation in Advillin-Cre-induced KCNQ2cko as assessed in behavioral tests did not change, an increased density of peripheral fibers was observed in this mouse line, which probably accounts, at least in part, for the compensatory alteration that was observed after KCNQ2 knockout. Such compensatory alterations usually cannot be induced by manipulating channels/proteins in the adult stage. Thus, inhibition of KCNQ channel activity alone in adult rats induced PIPN-like peripheral neuropathy, yet Advillin-Cre-induced KCNQ2cko displayed unaltered pain threshold.
Many molecules that are required for maintaining the function and structure of sensory fibers are generally considered to be synthesized in DRG neuronal cell bodies [71]. Sensory fibers that innervate hindlimb skin in humans are more than one meter in length, which is a long journey for transporting synthesized products from the somata to the periphery of DRG neurons [71]. Given that more than 90% of neuronal energy is used for maintaining membrane polarization during neuronal enhanced activity [72,73], the increased electrical activity of DRG neurons may result in rapid ATP depletion and peripheral fiber degeneration as proteins at the extremities fail to be replenished via energy-dependent transportation [74,75]. This effect could be especially obvious in unmyelinated nociceptors since unmyelinated axons consume approximately five-fold more metabolic energy than myelinated axons of the same volume [76]. In this regard, an acute loss of IENF was observed when capsaicin was applied to human skin [77], and prolonged systemic application of XE-991 induced PIPN-like alterations. In contrast, decreasing neuronal excitability by enhancing KCNQ channel activity during paclitaxel perfusion attenuated the development of PIPN [24]. There is high accumulation of paclitaxel in the DRGs but not in CNS tissue or ventral roots [10,78]. Accumulated paclitaxel thus inhibits KCNQ channels expressed in DRG neurons, resulting in consistent depolarization of these cells and the chronic alterations observed in PIPN. Thus, hyperexcitation of primary sensory neurons resulting from KCNQ channel inhibition after paclitaxel infusions, together with other proposed mechanisms [79], affects the longest sensory nerves to the extremities in a ‘stocking and glove’ distribution.
In this study, we used only male rats. While gender affects the gene regulation in primary sensory neurons after nerve injury [80], it has no obvious effect on the development of mechanical allodynia in rats following paclitaxel treatment [81]. The correlation between paclitaxel-induced acute pain and the risk of developing PIPN also occurs in female patients [21]. Such phenomena are consistent with what we observed in mouse in which no obvious behavioral and morphological discrepancies between sexes were detected (data not shown). Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms we observed in male rats in this study will be further confirmed in female rats in future.
KCNQ channel activator, retigabine, significantly attenuates the development of PIPN [24]. However, the use of currently available KCNQ channel openers in the clinic is limited by their side effects. Flupirtine and retigabine show different side-effect profiles. While flupirtine causes liver injury, long-term application of retigabine is linked to reversible discoloration of the skin and eye [82]. The disparity in side-effect profiles suggests that it is the compounds themselves, but not KCNQ channels, that cause these side effects. Several ligands targeting KCNQ channels are under development and are offering promising features [83]. It is thus possible that more specific activators with fewer side effects can be available soon for PIPN treatment.

Author Contributions

Z.W. and Q.Y. performed most of the experiments and data analyses. G.T., D.D., G.X. and C.P. carried out behavioral tests and immunostaining. Q.Y. and Z.W. supervised the experiments and participated in manuscript writing with significant input from the other authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by grants from National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants (CA208765 to Q.Y., DC016328 to Z.W.), Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs SCIRP (W81XWH-14-1-0593 to Q.Y.), and the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation (383428 to Q.Y.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Our procedures conformed to the guidelines of the International Association for the Study of Pain, and were approved by the animal care and use committee of the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (protocol 1711068A was approved on 11 June 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the leading corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dustin Green and Karon Cassidy who critically read and edited the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Crown, J.; O’Leary, M.; Ooi, W.S. Docetaxel and paclitaxel in the treatment of breast cancer: A review of clinical experience. Oncologist 2004, 9 (Suppl. S2), 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Argyriou, A.A.; Koltzenburg, M.; Polychronopoulos, P.; Papapetropoulos, S.; Kalofonos, H.P. Peripheral nerve damage associated with administration of taxanes in patients with cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2008, 66, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Komiya, Y. Changes of fast axonal transport by taxol injected subepineurally into the rat sciatic nerve. Neurosci. Res. 1992, 14, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. LaPointe, N.E.; Morfini, G.; Brady, S.T.; Feinstein, S.C.; Wilson, L.; Jordan, M.A. Effects of eribulin, vincristine, paclitaxel and ixabepilone on fast axonal transport and kinesin-1 driven microtubule gliding: Implications for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Neurotoxicology 2013, 37, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Nennesmo, I.; Reinholt, F.P. Effects of intraneural injection of taxol on retrograde axonal transport and morphology of corresponding nerve cell bodies. Virchows Arch. B Cell Pathol. Incl. Mol. Pathol. 1988, 55, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Theiss, C.; Meller, K. Taxol impairs anterograde axonal transport of microinjected horseradish peroxidase in dorsal root ganglia neurons in vitro. Cell Tissue Res. 2000, 299, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bobylev, I.; Joshi, A.R.; Barham, M.; Ritter, C.; Neiss, W.F.; Hoke, A.; Lehmann, H.C. Paclitaxel inhibits mRNA transport in axons. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015, 82, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, H.; Chan, D.C. Mitochondrial dynamics—Fusion, fission, movement, and mitophagy—In neurodegenerative diseases. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, R169–R176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Flatters, S.J.; Bennett, G.J. Studies of peripheral sensory nerves in paclitaxel-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: Evidence for mitochondrial dysfunction. Pain 2006, 122, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Xiao, W.H.; Zheng, H.; Zheng, F.Y.; Nuydens, R.; Meert, T.F.; Bennett, G.J. Mitochondrial abnormality in sensory, but not motor, axons in paclitaxel-evoked painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat. Neuroscience 2011, 199, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zheng, H.; Xiao, W.H.; Bennett, G.J. Functional deficits in peripheral nerve mitochondria in rats with paclitaxel- and oxaliplatin-evoked painful peripheral neuropathy. Exp. Neurol. 2011, 232, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Janes, K.; Doyle, T.; Bryant, L.; Esposito, E.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Ryerse, J.; Bennett, G.J.; Salvemini, D. Bioenergetic deficits in peripheral nerve sensory axons during chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain resulting from peroxynitrite-mediated post-translational nitration of mitochondrial superoxide dismutase. Pain 2013, 154, 2432–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Rose, S.; Frye, R.E.; Slattery, J.; Wynne, R.; Tippett, M.; Pavliv, O.; Melnyk, S.; James, S.J. Oxidative stress induces mitochondrial dysfunction in a subset of autism lymphoblastoid cell lines in a well-matched case control cohort. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Russell, J.W.; Golovoy, D.; Vincent, A.M.; Mahendru, P.; Olzmann, J.A.; Mentzer, A.; Feldman, E.L. High glucose-induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in neurons. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 1738–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Vincent, A.M.; Brownlee, M.; Russell, J.W. Oxidative stress and programmed cell death in diabetic neuropathy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 959, 368–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kobayashi, M.; Natsume, T.; Tamaoki, S.; Watanabe, J.; Asano, H.; Mikami, T.; Miyasaka, K.; Miyazaki, K.; Gondo, M.; Sakakibara, K.; et al. Antitumor activity of TZT-1027, a novel dolastatin 10 derivative. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1997, 88, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ogawa, T.; Mimura, Y.; Isowa, K.; Kato, H.; Mitsuishi, M.; Toyoshi, T.; Kuwayama, N.; Morimoto, H.; Murakoshi, M.; Nakayama, T. An antimicrotubule agent, TZT-1027, does not induce neuropathologic alterations which are detected after administration of vincristine or paclitaxel in animal models. Toxicol. Lett. 2001, 121, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hershman, D.L.; Unger, J.M.; Crew, K.D.; Minasian, L.M.; Awad, D.; Moinpour, C.M.; Hansen, L.; Lew, D.L.; Greenlee, H.; Fehrenbacher, L.; et al. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of acetyl-L-carnitine for the prevention of taxane-induced neuropathy in women undergoing adjuvant breast cancer therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2627–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Leal, A.D.; Qin, R.; Atherton, P.J.; Haluska, P.; Behrens, R.J.; Tiber, C.H.; Watanaboonyakhet, P.; Weiss, M.; Adams, P.T.; Dockter, T.J.; et al. North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Alliance trial N08CA-the use of glutathione for prevention of paclitaxel/carboplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cancer 2014, 120, 1890–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Loprinzi, C.L.; Reeves, B.N.; Dakhil, S.R.; Sloan, J.A.; Wolf, S.L.; Burger, K.N.; Kamal, A.; Le-Lindqwister, N.A.; Soori, G.S.; Jaslowski, A.J.; et al. Natural history of paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome: Prospective cohort study NCCTG N08C1. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 1472–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Reeves, B.N.; Dakhil, S.R.; Sloan, J.A.; Wolf, S.L.; Burger, K.N.; Kamal, A.; Le-Lindqwister, N.A.; Soori, G.S.; Jaslowski, A.J.; Kelaghan, J.; et al. Further data supporting that paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome is associated with development of peripheral neuropathy: North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial N08C1. Cancer 2012, 118, 5171–5178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Y.; Tatsui, C.E.; Rhines, L.D.; North, R.Y.; Harrison, D.S.; Cassidy, R.M.; Johansson, C.A.; Kosturakis, A.K.; Edwards, D.D.; Zhang, H.; et al. Dorsal root ganglion neurons become hyperexcitable and increase expression of voltage-gated T-type calcium channels (Cav3.2) in paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Pain 2017, 158, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Rossato, M.F.; Rigo, F.K.; Oliveira, S.M.; Guerra, G.P.; Silva, C.R.; Cunha, T.M.; Gomez, M.V.; Ferreira, J.; Trevisan, G. Participation of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 in Paclitaxel-Induced Acute Visceral and Peripheral Nociception in Rodents. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 828, 4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, L.; Li, J.; Zuo, Y.; Dang, D.; Frost, J.A.; Yang, Q. Activation of KCNQ Channels Prevents Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy and Associated Neuropathic Pain. J. Pain 2018, 20, 528–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. da Silva, S.; Hasegawa, H.; Scott, A.; Zhou, X.; Wagner, A.K.; Han, B.X.; Wang, F. Proper formation of whisker barrelettes requires periphery-derived Smad4-dependent TGF-beta signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3395–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhang, H.; Yoon, S.Y.; Dougherty, P.M. Evidence that spinal astrocytes but not microglia contribute to the pathogenesis of Paclitaxel-induced painful neuropathy. J. Pain 2012, 13, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Liu, X.; Liu, B.L.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Tang, S.J. Microglial ablation does not affect opioid-induced hyperalgesia in rodents. Pain 2022, 163, 508–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chaplan, S.R.; Bach, F.W.; Pogrel, J.W.; Chung, J.M.; Yaksh, T.L. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J. Neurosci. Methods 1994, 53, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Z.; Li, L.; Xie, F.; Du, J.; Zuo, Y.; Frost, J.A.; Carlton, S.M.; Walters, E.T.; Yang, Q. Activation of KCNQ Channels Suppresses Spontaneous Activity in Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons and Reduces Chronic Pain after Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2017, 34, 1260–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yang, Q.; Wu, Z.; Hadden, J.K.; Odem, M.A.; Zuo, Y.; Crook, R.J.; Frost, J.A.; Walters, E.T. Persistent pain after spinal cord injury is maintained by primary afferent activity. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 10765–10769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guan, D.; Lee, J.C.; Tkatch, T.; Surmeier, D.J.; Armstrong, W.E.; Foehring, R.C. Expression and biophysical properties of Kv1 channels in supragranular neocortical pyramidal neurones. J. Physiol. 2006, 571, 371–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Diochot, S.; Drici, M.D.; Moinier, D.; Fink, M.; Lazdunski, M. Effects of phrixotoxins on the Kv4 family of potassium channels and implications for the role of Ito1 in cardiac electrogenesis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 126, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Diochot, S.; Schweitz, H.; Beress, L.; Lazdunski, M. Sea anemone peptides with a specific blocking activity against the fast inactivating potassium channel Kv3.4. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 6744–6749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Shapiro, M.S.; Roche, J.P.; Kaftan, E.J.; Cruzblanca, H.; Mackie, K.; Hille, B. Reconstitution of muscarinic modulation of the KCNQ2/KCNQ3 K(+) channels that underlie the neuronal M current. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 1710–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wang, H.S.; Pan, Z.; Shi, W.; Brown, B.S.; Wymore, R.S.; Cohen, I.S.; Dixon, J.E.; McKinnon, D. KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel subunits: Molecular correlates of the M-channel. Science 1998, 282, 1890–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Hadley, J.K.; Passmore, G.M.; Tatulian, L.; Al-Qatari, M.; Ye, F.; Wickenden, A.D.; Brown, D.A. Stoichiometry of expressed KCNQ2/KCNQ3 potassium channels and subunit composition of native ganglionic M channels deduced from block by tetraethylammonium. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 5012–5019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Tinel, N.; Lauritzen, I.; Chouabe, C.; Lazdunski, M.; Borsotto, M. The KCNQ2 potassium channel: Splice variants, functional and developmental expression. Brain localization and comparison with KCNQ3. FEBS Lett. 1998, 438, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zaczek, R.; Chorvat, R.J.; Saye, J.A.; Pierdomenico, M.E.; Maciag, C.M.; Logue, A.R.; Fisher, B.N.; Rominger, D.H.; Earl, R.A. Two new potent neurotransmitter release enhancers, 10,10-bis(4-pyridinylmethyl)-9(10H)-anthracenone and 10,10-bis(2-fluoro-4-pyridinylmethyl)-9(10H)-anthracenone: Comparison to linopirdine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998, 285, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Jentsch, T.J. Neuronal KCNQ potassium channels: Physiology and role in disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2000, 1, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Passmore, G.M.; Selyanko, A.A.; Mistry, M.; Al-Qatari, M.; Marsh, S.J.; Matthews, E.A.; Dickenson, A.H.; Brown, T.A.; Burbidge, S.A.; Main, M.; et al. KCNQ/M currents in sensory neurons: Significance for pain therapy. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 7227–7236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rose, K.; Ooi, L.; Dalle, C.; Robertson, B.; Wood, I.C.; Gamper, N. Transcriptional repression of the M channel subunit Kv7.2 in chronic nerve injury. Pain 2011, 152, 742–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Schroeder, B.C.; Hechenberger, M.; Weinreich, F.; Kubisch, C.; Jentsch, T.J. KCNQ5, a novel potassium channel broadly expressed in brain, mediates M-type currents. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 24089–24095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Yu, S.P.; Kerchner, G.A. Endogenous voltage-gated potassium channels in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 1998, 52, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. King, C.H.; Lancaster, E.; Salomon, D.; Peles, E.; Scherer, S.S. Kv7.2 regulates the function of peripheral sensory neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 2014, 522, 3262–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Suh, B.C.; Inoue, T.; Meyer, T.; Hille, B. Rapid chemically induced changes of PtdIns(4,5)P2 gate KCNQ ion channels. Science 2006, 314, 1454–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kim, D.; Cavanaugh, E.J.; Simkin, D. Inhibition of transient receptor potential A1 channel by phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2008, 295, C92–C99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ling, X.; Bernacki, R.J.; Brattain, M.G.; Li, F. Induction of survivin expression by taxol (paclitaxel) is an early event, which is independent of taxol-mediated G2/M arrest. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 15196–15203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sanchez, J.C.; Ehrlich, B.E. Functional Interaction between Transient Receptor Potential V4 Channel and Neuronal Calcium Sensor 1 and the Effects of Paclitaxel. Mol. Pharmacol. 2021, 100, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Taverna, E.; Francolini, M.; Jeromin, A.; Hilfiker, S.; Roder, J.; Rosa, P. Neuronal calcium sensor 1 and phosphatidylinositol 4-OH kinase beta interact in neuronal cells and are translocated to membranes during nucleotide-evoked exocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115, 3909–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhao, X.; Varnai, P.; Tuymetova, G.; Balla, A.; Toth, Z.E.; Oker-Blom, C.; Roder, J.; Jeromin, A.; Balla, T. Interaction of neuronal calcium sensor-1 (NCS-1) with phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta stimulates lipid kinase activity and affects membrane trafficking in COS-7 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 40183–40189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stein, A.T.; Ufret-Vincenty, C.A.; Hua, L.; Santana, L.F.; Gordon, S.E. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase binds to TRPV1 and mediates NGF-stimulated TRPV1 trafficking to the plasma membrane. J. Gen. Physiol. 2006, 128, 509–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Ui, M.; Okada, T.; Hazeki, K.; Hazeki, O. Wortmannin as a unique probe for an intracellular signalling protein, phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1995, 20, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hernandez, C.C.; Falkenburger, B.; Shapiro, M.S. Affinity for phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate determines muscarinic agonist sensitivity of Kv7 K+ channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 2009, 134, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zhang, J.; Shapiro, M.S. Activity-dependent transcriptional regulation of M-Type (Kv7) K(+) channels by AKAP79/150-mediated NFAT actions. Neuron 2012, 76, 1133–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Xiao, W.H.; Zheng, H.; Bennett, G.J. Characterization of oxaliplatin-induced chronic painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat and comparison with the neuropathy induced by paclitaxel. Neuroscience 2012, 203, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Li, Y.; Adamek, P.; Zhang, H.; Tatsui, C.E.; Rhines, L.D.; Mrozkova, P.; Li, Q.; Kosturakis, A.K.; Cassidy, R.M.; Harrison, D.S.; et al. The Cancer Chemotherapeutic Paclitaxel Increases Human and Rodent Sensory Neuron Responses to TRPV1 by Activation of TLR4. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 13487–13500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Dina, O.A.; Chen, X.; Reichling, D.; Levine, J.D. Role of protein kinase Cepsilon and protein kinase A in a model of paclitaxel-induced painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat. Neuroscience 2001, 108, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhong, X.Z.; Harhun, M.I.; Olesen, S.P.; Ohya, S.; Moffatt, J.D.; Cole, W.C.; Greenwood, I.A. Participation of KCNQ (Kv7) potassium channels in myogenic control of cerebral arterial diameter. J. Physiol. 2010, 588, 3277–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ishikawa, K.; Tanaka, M.; Black, J.A.; Waxman, S.G. Changes in expression of voltage-gated potassium channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons following axotomy. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Murthy, S.E.; Loud, M.C.; Daou, I.; Marshall, K.L.; Schwaller, F.; Kuhnemund, J.; Francisco, A.G.; Keenan, W.T.; Dubin, A.E.; Lewin, G.R.; et al. The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo2 mediates sensitivity to mechanical pain in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaat9897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Geng, J.; Zhou, S.; Xiao, B. Mechanically Activated Piezo Channels Mediate Touch and Suppress Acute Mechanical Pain Response in Mice. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 1419–1431.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Zappia, K.J.; O’Hara, C.L.; Moehring, F.; Kwan, K.Y.; Stucky, C.L. Sensory Neuron-Specific Deletion of TRPA1 Results in Mechanical Cutaneous Sensory Deficits. eNeuro 2017, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kitamura, N.; Sakamoto, K.; Ono, T.; Kimura, J. The inhibitory effect of paclitaxel on (kv2.1) k+ current in h9c2 cells. Fukushima J. Med. Sci. 2015, 61, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Tsantoulas, C.; Zhu, L.; Yip, P.; Grist, J.; Michael, G.J.; McMahon, S.B. Kv2 dysfunction after peripheral axotomy enhances sensory neuron responsiveness to sustained input. Exp. Neurol. 2014, 251, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Bocksteins, E.; Raes, A.L.; Van de Vijver, G.; Bruyns, T.; Van Bogaert, P.P.; Snyders, D.J. Kv2.1 and silent Kv subunits underlie the delayed rectifier K+ current in cultured small mouse DRG neurons. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2009, 296, C1271–C1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Gao, H.; Boillat, A.; Huang, D.; Liang, C.; Peers, C.; Gamper, N. Intracellular zinc activates KCNQ channels by reducing their dependence on phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E6410–E6419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Hasegawa, H.; Abbott, S.; Han, B.X.; Qi, Y.; Wang, F. Analyzing somatosensory axon projections with the sensory neuron-specific Advillin gene. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 14404–14414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cai, J.; Fang, D.; Liu, X.D.; Li, S.; Ren, J.; Xing, G.G. Suppression of KCNQ/M (Kv7) potassium channels in the spinal cord contributes to the sensitization of dorsal horn WDR neurons and pain hypersensitivity in a rat model of bone cancer pain. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1540–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Main, M.J.; Cryan, J.E.; Dupere, J.R.; Cox, B.; Clare, J.J.; Burbidge, S.A. Modulation of KCNQ2/3 potassium channels by the novel anticonvulsant retigabine. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000, 58, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Xu, W.; Wu, Y.; Bi, Y.; Tan, L.; Gan, Y.; Wang, K. Activation of voltage-gated KCNQ/Kv7 channels by anticonvulsant retigabine attenuates mechanical allodynia of inflammatory temporomandibular joint in rats. Mol. Pain 2010, 6, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Devor, M. Unexplained peculiarities of the dorsal root ganglion. Pain 1999, 82 (Suppl. S6), S27–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Erecinska, M.; Nelson, D.; Yudkoff, M.; Silver, I.A. Energetics of the nerve terminal in relation to central nervous system function. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1994, 22, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Erecinska, M.; Silver, I.A. Ions and energy in mammalian brain. Prog. Neurobiol. 1994, 43, 37–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Duggett, N.A.; Griffiths, L.A.; Flatters, S.J.L. Paclitaxel-induced painful neuropathy is associated with changes in mitochondrial bioenergetics, glycolysis, and an energy deficit in dorsal root ganglia neurons. Pain 2017, 158, 1499–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Trevisiol, A.; Saab, A.S.; Winkler, U.; Marx, G.; Imamura, H.; Mobius, W.; Kusch, K.; Nave, K.A.; Hirrlinger, J. Monitoring ATP dynamics in electrically active white matter tracts. Elife 2017, 6, e24241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Neishabouri, A.M.; Faisal, A. The metabolic efficiency of myelinated vs unmyelinated axons. BMC Neurosci. 2011, 12, P100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Nolano, M.; Simone, D.A.; Wendelschafer-Crabb, G.; Johnson, T.; Hazen, E.; Kennedy, W.R. Topical capsaicin in humans: Parallel loss of epidermal nerve fibers and pain sensation. Pain 1999, 81, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cavaletti, G.; Cavalletti, E.; Oggioni, N.; Sottani, C.; Minoia, C.; D’Incalci, M.; Zucchetti, M.; Marmiroli, P.; Tredici, G. Distribution of paclitaxel within the nervous system of the rat after repeated intravenous administration. Neurotoxicology 2000, 21, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Carozzi, V.A.; Canta, A.; Chiorazzi, A. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: What do we know about mechanisms? Neurosci. Lett. 2015, 596, 90–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stephens, K.E.; Zhou, W.; Ji, Z.; Chen, Z.; He, S.; Ji, H.; Guan, Y.; Taverna, S.D. Sex differences in gene regulation in the dorsal root ganglion after nerve injury. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hwang, B.Y.; Kim, E.S.; Kim, C.H.; Kwon, J.Y.; Kim, H.K. Gender differences in paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain behavior and analgesic response in rats. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2012, 62, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Mathias, S.V.; Abou-Khalil, B.W. Ezogabine skin discoloration is reversible after discontinuation. Epilepsy Behav. Case Rep. 2017, 7, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kumar, M.; Reed, N.; Liu, R.; Aizenman, E.; Wipf, P.; Tzounopoulos, T. Synthesis and Evaluation of Potent KCNQ2/3-Specific Channel Activators. Mol. Pharmacol. 2016, 89, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 11 04067 g001 550
Figure 1. Relationship between the paclitaxel- and Kv channel blocker-induced membrane depolarization of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. (A) Membrane potential changes induced by 100 nM α-dendrotoxin and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = −0.509, p = 0.102, Spearman rank order test. (B) Membrane potential changes induced by 1 μM phrixotoxin-2 and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = 0.066, p = 0.838, Spearman rank order test. (C) Membrane potential changes induced by 1 μM BDS-I (blood-depressing substance-I) and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = 0.038, p = 0.882, Spearman rank order test. (D) Membrane potential changes induced by 25 mM TEA and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = 0.673, p = 0.011, Spearman rank order test. (E) Representative traces showing XE-991- and paclitaxel-induced membrane depolarization and cell firing in the same cell. (F) Membrane potential changes induced by 10 μM XE-991 and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = 0.930, p < 0.0001, Spearman rank order test. Capsaicin-sensitive cells are indicated as red dots. Each filled dot in the plots represents one neuron. N in each panel indicates the number of DRG neurons patched. MP, membrane potential; Pacli, paclitaxel; Caps, capsaicin.
Figure 1. Relationship between the paclitaxel- and Kv channel blocker-induced membrane depolarization of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. (A) Membrane potential changes induced by 100 nM α-dendrotoxin and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = −0.509, p = 0.102, Spearman rank order test. (B) Membrane potential changes induced by 1 μM phrixotoxin-2 and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = 0.066, p = 0.838, Spearman rank order test. (C) Membrane potential changes induced by 1 μM BDS-I (blood-depressing substance-I) and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = 0.038, p = 0.882, Spearman rank order test. (D) Membrane potential changes induced by 25 mM TEA and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = 0.673, p = 0.011, Spearman rank order test. (E) Representative traces showing XE-991- and paclitaxel-induced membrane depolarization and cell firing in the same cell. (F) Membrane potential changes induced by 10 μM XE-991 and 3 μM paclitaxel. r = 0.930, p < 0.0001, Spearman rank order test. Capsaicin-sensitive cells are indicated as red dots. Each filled dot in the plots represents one neuron. N in each panel indicates the number of DRG neurons patched. MP, membrane potential; Pacli, paclitaxel; Caps, capsaicin.
Cells 11 04067 g001
Cells 11 04067 g002 550
Figure 2. Paclitaxel inhibits KCNQ currents in isolated DRG neurons and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. (A) Representative traces and time course (left panel), as well as summary data (right panel), showing the effect of 10 μM XE-991, 3 μM paclitaxel, and their combination on the currents induced by hyperpolarization from −20 to −60 mV in isolated DRG neurons. Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual DRG neurons. XE-991-sensitive currents = a − b, Pacli-sensitive currents = c − d, Pacli + XE-991-sensitive currents = c − e. p = 0.3405, F(2,30) = 1.117. One-way ANOVA used to compare the data in the bar graphs. (B) Current traces (upper panel) and bar graph (bottom panel) showing 3 μM paclitaxel-induced inhibition of XE-991 (10 μM)-sensitive currents in CHO cells overexpressing KCNQ2, KCNQ3, or KCNQ2/3 (1:1). Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual CHO cells. p < 0.0001, t(11) = 3.025 for KCNQ2; p = 0.0387, t(13) = 2.3 for KCNQ3; p = 0.0002, t(13) = 5.266 for KCNQ2/3. Paired t test (two-tailed) used to compare the data in the bar graphs. (C) Scatter plot showing the effects of different concentrations of paclitaxel on the XE-991-sensitive current of CHO cells overexpressing KCNQ2/3 (1:1). The number above each point in the graph is the number of patched cells. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001. Pacli, paclitaxel.
Figure 2. Paclitaxel inhibits KCNQ currents in isolated DRG neurons and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. (A) Representative traces and time course (left panel), as well as summary data (right panel), showing the effect of 10 μM XE-991, 3 μM paclitaxel, and their combination on the currents induced by hyperpolarization from −20 to −60 mV in isolated DRG neurons. Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual DRG neurons. XE-991-sensitive currents = a − b, Pacli-sensitive currents = c − d, Pacli + XE-991-sensitive currents = c − e. p = 0.3405, F(2,30) = 1.117. One-way ANOVA used to compare the data in the bar graphs. (B) Current traces (upper panel) and bar graph (bottom panel) showing 3 μM paclitaxel-induced inhibition of XE-991 (10 μM)-sensitive currents in CHO cells overexpressing KCNQ2, KCNQ3, or KCNQ2/3 (1:1). Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual CHO cells. p < 0.0001, t(11) = 3.025 for KCNQ2; p = 0.0387, t(13) = 2.3 for KCNQ3; p = 0.0002, t(13) = 5.266 for KCNQ2/3. Paired t test (two-tailed) used to compare the data in the bar graphs. (C) Scatter plot showing the effects of different concentrations of paclitaxel on the XE-991-sensitive current of CHO cells overexpressing KCNQ2/3 (1:1). The number above each point in the graph is the number of patched cells. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001. Pacli, paclitaxel.
Cells 11 04067 g002
Cells 11 04067 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of KCNQ2 deletion from primary sensory neurons on the paclitaxel- and XE-991-induced response. (A) XE-991 (10 μM)-sensitive currents in DRG neurons from control and KCNQ2cko mice. p < 0.001, t(52) = 6.181, unpaired t test (two-tailed). Black symbols in columns represent one DRG neuron each. (B) Resting membrane potential of DRG neurons from control and KCNQ2cko mice. p = 0.593, t(30) = 0.541, unpaired t test (two-tailed). Black symbols in columns represent one DRG neuron each. (C) Paclitaxel (3 μM)-induced membrane depolarization of DRG neurons from control and KCNQ2cko mice. p = 0.0038, t(30) = 3.137, unpaired t test (two-tailed). Filled symbols in columns represent one DRG neuron each. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Effect of KCNQ2 deletion from primary sensory neurons on the paclitaxel- and XE-991-induced response. (A) XE-991 (10 μM)-sensitive currents in DRG neurons from control and KCNQ2cko mice. p < 0.001, t(52) = 6.181, unpaired t test (two-tailed). Black symbols in columns represent one DRG neuron each. (B) Resting membrane potential of DRG neurons from control and KCNQ2cko mice. p = 0.593, t(30) = 0.541, unpaired t test (two-tailed). Black symbols in columns represent one DRG neuron each. (C) Paclitaxel (3 μM)-induced membrane depolarization of DRG neurons from control and KCNQ2cko mice. p = 0.0038, t(30) = 3.137, unpaired t test (two-tailed). Filled symbols in columns represent one DRG neuron each. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Cells 11 04067 g003
Cells 11 04067 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of PIP2 and associated signaling pathways on paclitaxel-induced inhibition of XE-991-sensitive currents. (A) Current traces and time course showing the effect of paclitaxel (3 μM) and XE-991 (10 μM) on the elicited currents of DRG neurons with normal intracellular solution in the recording pipette. The neuron was hyperpolarized from −20 to −60 mV for 500 ms. Paclitaxel-sensitive currents = a − b. (B) Current traces and time course showing the effects of paclitaxel (3 μM) and XE-991 (10 μM) on elicited currents of DRG neurons when PIP2 antibody (KT10, 20 mg/mL) was included in the recording pipette. The neuron was hyperpolarized from −20 to −60 mV for 500 ms. Paclitaxel-sensitive currents = a − b. (C) Summary data showing the effect of KT10 (20 mg/mL), U73122 (1 μM), wortmannin (20 nM), BAPTA (10 mM), and st-Ht31 (50 μM) on paclitaxel-induced inhibition of hyperpolarization-induced currents of DRG neurons ((a-b)/a). Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual DRG neurons. Control vs. KT10, p = 0.0121, t(21) = 2.745; Control vs. U73122, p = 0.8633, t(21) = 0.1743; Control vs. wortmannin, p = 0.7366, t(25) = 0.3401; Control vs. BAPTA, p = 0.5771, t(19) = 0.5674; Control vs. st-Ht31, p = 0.8741, t(21) = 0.1604. Unpaired t test, two tailed. *, p < 0.05. Pacli, paclitaxel.
Figure 4. Effect of PIP2 and associated signaling pathways on paclitaxel-induced inhibition of XE-991-sensitive currents. (A) Current traces and time course showing the effect of paclitaxel (3 μM) and XE-991 (10 μM) on the elicited currents of DRG neurons with normal intracellular solution in the recording pipette. The neuron was hyperpolarized from −20 to −60 mV for 500 ms. Paclitaxel-sensitive currents = a − b. (B) Current traces and time course showing the effects of paclitaxel (3 μM) and XE-991 (10 μM) on elicited currents of DRG neurons when PIP2 antibody (KT10, 20 mg/mL) was included in the recording pipette. The neuron was hyperpolarized from −20 to −60 mV for 500 ms. Paclitaxel-sensitive currents = a − b. (C) Summary data showing the effect of KT10 (20 mg/mL), U73122 (1 μM), wortmannin (20 nM), BAPTA (10 mM), and st-Ht31 (50 μM) on paclitaxel-induced inhibition of hyperpolarization-induced currents of DRG neurons ((a-b)/a). Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual DRG neurons. Control vs. KT10, p = 0.0121, t(21) = 2.745; Control vs. U73122, p = 0.8633, t(21) = 0.1743; Control vs. wortmannin, p = 0.7366, t(25) = 0.3401; Control vs. BAPTA, p = 0.5771, t(19) = 0.5674; Control vs. st-Ht31, p = 0.8741, t(21) = 0.1604. Unpaired t test, two tailed. *, p < 0.05. Pacli, paclitaxel.
Cells 11 04067 g004
Cells 11 04067 g005 550
Figure 5. The effect of brief application of XE-991 (1 mg/kg, twice daily for 10 consecutive days) on the degeneration of IENFs and the development of chronic behavioral hypersensitivity. (A) Effects of XE-991 on the development of mechanical hypersensitivity in the hind paws (tested 3 weeks after the last XE-991 application). p = 0.5531, t(8) = 0.6191 for the vehicle group; p = 0.0107, t(8) = 3.309 for the XE-991 group, two-tailed paired Student’s t test. p < 0.0001, t(16) = 5.171 for postvehicle vs. postpaclitaxel, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. Colored symbols in columns represent one rat each. (B) The effect of XE-991 on skin IENF loss. Four to five sections from each rat were counted and averaged. Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual rats. Unpaired t test (two-tailed). (C) Images showing rat skin IENFs (labeled with PGP9.5, red) that crossed the basal lamina (labeled with collagen IV, green) after XE-991 and vehicle treatment. Scale bars, 100 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001. Veh, vehicle.
Figure 5. The effect of brief application of XE-991 (1 mg/kg, twice daily for 10 consecutive days) on the degeneration of IENFs and the development of chronic behavioral hypersensitivity. (A) Effects of XE-991 on the development of mechanical hypersensitivity in the hind paws (tested 3 weeks after the last XE-991 application). p = 0.5531, t(8) = 0.6191 for the vehicle group; p = 0.0107, t(8) = 3.309 for the XE-991 group, two-tailed paired Student’s t test. p < 0.0001, t(16) = 5.171 for postvehicle vs. postpaclitaxel, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. Colored symbols in columns represent one rat each. (B) The effect of XE-991 on skin IENF loss. Four to five sections from each rat were counted and averaged. Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual rats. Unpaired t test (two-tailed). (C) Images showing rat skin IENFs (labeled with PGP9.5, red) that crossed the basal lamina (labeled with collagen IV, green) after XE-991 and vehicle treatment. Scale bars, 100 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001. Veh, vehicle.
Cells 11 04067 g005
Cells 11 04067 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of KCNQ2 deletion from primary sensory neurons on the development of PIPN. (A) Development of mechanical hypersensitivity in the hind paws (tested 3 weeks after final paclitaxel/vehicle application) of control and KCNQ2cko mice. Control group: p = 0.5814, t(5) = 0.5890 for vehicle; p = 0.0166, t(6) = 3.293 for paclitaxel, two-tailed paired Student’s t test. KCNQ2cko group: p = 0.2592, t(4) = 1.314 for vehicle; p = 0.3944, t(3) = 0.9918 for paclitaxel, two-tailed paired Student’s t test. Colored symbols in columns represent one mouse each. (B) Comparison of CPP responses between control and KCNQ2cko mice that received vehicle or paclitaxel injections. Animals were tested 4 weeks after the last injection. Symbols in columns represent individual mice (control and KCNQ2cko). p = 0.0252, t(10) = 2.629, unpaired t test (two-tailed) for control group; p = 0.9694, t(6) = 0.03997, unpaired t test (two-tailed) for KCNQ2cko group. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; Pacli, paclitaxel. (C) Images showing skin IENFs (stained with PGP9.5, red) that crossed the basal lamina (stained with collagen IV, green) in control mice receiving vehicle or paclitaxel injections. Scale bars, 50 μm. (D) Summary data showing the density of IENFs in the epidermis of control mice that did and did not receive paclitaxel injections. Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual control mice. p = 0.0031, t(8) = 4.184, unpaired t test (two-tailed). (E) Images showing skin IENFs (red) that crossed the basal lamina (stained with collagen IV, green) in KCNQ2cko mice that underwent vehicle or paclitaxel injections. Scale bars, 50 μm. (F) Summary data showing the density of skin IENFs from KCNQ2cko mice that did and did not receive paclitaxel injections. Filled symbols in columns represent individual mutant mice. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p = 0.2762, t(7) = 1.181, unpaired t test (two-tailed).
Figure 6. Effect of KCNQ2 deletion from primary sensory neurons on the development of PIPN. (A) Development of mechanical hypersensitivity in the hind paws (tested 3 weeks after final paclitaxel/vehicle application) of control and KCNQ2cko mice. Control group: p = 0.5814, t(5) = 0.5890 for vehicle; p = 0.0166, t(6) = 3.293 for paclitaxel, two-tailed paired Student’s t test. KCNQ2cko group: p = 0.2592, t(4) = 1.314 for vehicle; p = 0.3944, t(3) = 0.9918 for paclitaxel, two-tailed paired Student’s t test. Colored symbols in columns represent one mouse each. (B) Comparison of CPP responses between control and KCNQ2cko mice that received vehicle or paclitaxel injections. Animals were tested 4 weeks after the last injection. Symbols in columns represent individual mice (control and KCNQ2cko). p = 0.0252, t(10) = 2.629, unpaired t test (two-tailed) for control group; p = 0.9694, t(6) = 0.03997, unpaired t test (two-tailed) for KCNQ2cko group. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; Pacli, paclitaxel. (C) Images showing skin IENFs (stained with PGP9.5, red) that crossed the basal lamina (stained with collagen IV, green) in control mice receiving vehicle or paclitaxel injections. Scale bars, 50 μm. (D) Summary data showing the density of IENFs in the epidermis of control mice that did and did not receive paclitaxel injections. Filled symbols in the bar graph represent individual control mice. p = 0.0031, t(8) = 4.184, unpaired t test (two-tailed). (E) Images showing skin IENFs (red) that crossed the basal lamina (stained with collagen IV, green) in KCNQ2cko mice that underwent vehicle or paclitaxel injections. Scale bars, 50 μm. (F) Summary data showing the density of skin IENFs from KCNQ2cko mice that did and did not receive paclitaxel injections. Filled symbols in columns represent individual mutant mice. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p = 0.2762, t(7) = 1.181, unpaired t test (two-tailed).
Cells 11 04067 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Z.; Toro, G.; Xu, G.; Dang, D.; Prater, C.; Yang, Q. Paclitaxel Inhibits KCNQ Channels in Primary Sensory Neurons to Initiate the Development of Painful Peripheral Neuropathy. Cells 2022, 11, 4067. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244067

AMA Style

Wu Z, Toro G, Xu G, Dang D, Prater C, Yang Q. Paclitaxel Inhibits KCNQ Channels in Primary Sensory Neurons to Initiate the Development of Painful Peripheral Neuropathy. Cells. 2022; 11(24):4067. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Zizhen, Gabor Toro, Guoying Xu, Danny Dang, Charmaine Prater, and Qing Yang. 2022. "Paclitaxel Inhibits KCNQ Channels in Primary Sensory Neurons to Initiate the Development of Painful Peripheral Neuropathy" Cells 11, no. 24: 4067. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244067

APA Style

Wu, Z., Toro, G., Xu, G., Dang, D., Prater, C., & Yang, Q. (2022). Paclitaxel Inhibits KCNQ Channels in Primary Sensory Neurons to Initiate the Development of Painful Peripheral Neuropathy. Cells, 11(24), 4067. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop