Next Article in Journal
Influence of ROCK Pathway Manipulation on the Actin Cytoskeleton Height
Previous Article in Journal
Epiregulin as an Alternative Ligand for Leptin Receptor Alleviates Glucose Intolerance without Change in Obesity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Oncofetal Protein CRIPTO Is Involved in Wound Healing and Fibrogenesis in the Regenerating Liver and Is Associated with the Initial Stages of Cardiac Fibrosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/cells11030429
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Therapeutic Targeting of Intestinal Fibrosis in Crohn’s Disease

by
Giovanni Santacroce
,
Marco Vincenzo Lenti
and
Antonio Di Sabatino
*
First Department of Internal Medicine, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(3), 429; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030429
Submission received: 22 December 2021 / Revised: 21 January 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2022 / Published: 26 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms in Organ Fibrosis)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Intestinal fibrosis is one of the most threatening complications of Crohn’s disease. It occurs in more than a third of patients with this condition, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and surgery often represents the only available therapeutic option. The mechanisms underlying intestinal fibrosis are partly known. Studies conducted so far have shown a relevant pathogenetic role played by mesenchymal cells (especially myofibroblasts), cytokines (e.g., transforming growth factor-β), growth factors, microRNAs, intestinal microbiome, matrix stiffness, and mesenteric adipocytes. Further studies are still necessary to elucidate all the mechanisms involved in intestinal fibrosis, so that targeted therapies can be developed. Although several pre-clinical studies have been conducted so far, no anti-fibrotic therapy is yet available to prevent or reverse intestinal fibrosis. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the main therapeutic targets currently identified and the most promising anti-fibrotic therapies, which may be available in the near future.

1. Introduction

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic-relapsing immune-mediated disorder [1], with a prevalent gastrointestinal involvement and a constantly increasing incidence worldwide, especially in Western countries [2], representing a major concern for the healthcare system. The main symptoms experienced by CD patients include abdominal pain, diarrhea and fever, with a severe impairment of their quality of life [3,4]. One of the most common and threatening complications of CD is intestinal fibrosis, which occurs in more than a third of patients and leads to intestinal obstruction due to strictures [5]. Intestinal fibrosis results in increased morbidity and mortality, causing prolonged hospitalization and a need for surgery [6].
Fibrogenesis is a pathophysiological process through which one’s organism reacts to any type of damage due to noxious agents, such as physical, chemical and mechanical injury, infections, and autoimmunity [7]. The process of wound healing, which requires the intervention of a large number of molecular and cellular components, leads to the deposition of connective tissue in the extracellular matrix (ECM) in response to damage, resulting in tissue regeneration and repair [8]. However, when the stimulus to fibrogenesis becomes persistent or recurrent or even abnormal or exaggerated, as in the case of CD, this process may become uncontrolled [9], resulting in tissue fibrosis and scarring, with irreversible anatomical and/or functional alterations, eventually causing intestinal obstruction.
The mechanisms underlying gut fibrosis are only partly known and, although some pre-clinical studies have been conducted so far, currently there is no clinically feasible therapy to prevent or reverse fibrosis. The aim of this review is to provide a broad overview of currently known therapeutic targets and of most promising anti-fibrotic therapies that may shortly be available for clinical use.

2. Materials and Methods

In November 2021 we searched MEDLINE (PubMed) in a non-systematic manner by using the medical subject heading terms “fibrosis”, “strictures”, “intestinal fibrosis”, “anti-fibrotic therapy”, “target therapy” and “intestine”, “gut”, “inflammatory bowel disease”, and “Crohn’s disease” for all articles published since database inception. More than 270.000 papers were found, so we have restricted the search using the terms “fibrosis” and “Crohn’s disease”, finding 1.330 papers, most of which were either duplicates or non-original or not strictly related to the subject of this review. We selected only 145 studies (both non-human and human) exploring the mechanism of intestinal fibrosis (i.e., cellular, molecular, endoluminal, and molecular mechanism) in CD and the related therapeutic management, focusing on target therapy. We also searched the reference lists of pivotal review articles for additional papers that we judged to be relevant to this review. Figure 1 shows the flow-chart of our search strategy.

3. Overview of the Main Mechanisms of Intestinal Fibrosis in CD

As mentioned above, the abnormal inflammatory stimulus due to CD is associated with uncontrolled activation of mesenchymal cells, resulting in excessive ECM deposition [10]. In addition, an imbalance between matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), appears to be associated with increased ECM deposition and subsequent tissue fibrosis [11]. These mechanisms, together with the thickening of the muscle layer due to hyperplasia and hypertrophy of the smooth muscle cells [12], determine the development of fibrostenotic strictures in CD.
Here we will briefly outline the main players underlying the process of intestinal fibrosis, schematically represented in Figure 2. The correlation between these factors is in most cases unknown and elusive. Figure 3 shows some of these cellular and molecular players and their interaction in the fibrogenic process leading to intestinal stricture formation.

3.1. Main Cells Involved in Fibrogenesis

The main cells involved in the fibrogenesis process are mesenchymal cells, which are specifically committed to the production of collagen. The main players in this process are fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells [13]. In particular, the inflammatory stimulus associated with CD seems to determine the activation of tissue fibroblasts and the migration of non-resident fibroblasts at the site of damage. These fibroblasts, under the stimulus of growth factors such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, may differentiate into myofibroblasts, capable of producing ECM. Similarly, smooth muscle cells are able to differentiate into myofibroblasts and likewise myofibroblasts can differentiate into smooth muscle cells and lead to the thickening of the muscularis propria and the formation of strictures [14]. Finally, the possible role of inflammation-induced differentiation of epithelial and endothelial cells into ECM-secreting mesenchymal cells should be considered, according to the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) [15,16]. EMT is a constantly evolving process in which epithelial cells acquire a migratory function and develop fibroblast characteristics. Similarly, EndMT is a process in which endothelial cells acquire fibroblast characteristics.

3.2. Molecular Mediators of Fibrosis

It is assumed that several cytokines can actively participate into the fibrogenesis process. Among these, the role of TGF-β is certainly predominant [17]. More specifically, the TGF-β1 isoform promotes collagen synthesis and fibroblast contraction in the mucosa of patients with fibrostenosing CD, acting through the Smad2-Smad3 molecular pathway and the regulation of TIMPs. Other cytokines related to organ fibrosis and with an emerging role in intestinal fibrosis, besides their known pro-inflammatory properties, are those belonging to the interleukin (IL)-1 family, including IL-1, IL-33, and IL-36 [18,19,20,21]. CD4+ T cells play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of CD and several T helper (Th) subsets have been identified, with different roles. While T-regulatory cells prevail in normal conditions, the Th1 subset appears predominantly pro-inflammatory, whereas Th2 and Th17 subsets appear to have both pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrogenic roles [22,23]. In particular, Th17 cells produce both IL-17 and IL-22 with a possible contrasting effect on intestinal fibrogenesis [24]. The role of cytokines belonging to the IL-17 family is well established, especially that of the IL-17A, as it induces intestinal myofibroblast secretion of collagen and TIMPs and significantly inhibits myofibroblast migration [25]. A possible role in this process has also been ascribed to the IL-17E (also known as IL-25), whose production in the human gut is reduced by tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and enhanced by TGF-β1 [26]. However, the pro-fibrotic role of IL-17E in CD has been questioned by the finding of no-significant difference on IL-17E levels in strictured compared to non-strictured CD tissues [25]. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is another protein typically produced by activated fibroblasts during wound healing and implicated in the fibrotic evolution of tissue damage [27]. FAP has been shown to be highly overexpressed in the submucosa and the muscle layer of stenotic CD, compared to non-stenotic CD [28]. In addition, other growth factors have an established role in gut fibrosis, especially the basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which is overexpressed in patients with stricturing CD phenotype [29]. Concerning the role of TNF-α family members, there is growing evidence about the TNF-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), secreted from immune cells and binding the death domain receptor 3 (DR3) expressed on intestinal myofibroblasts [30]. TL1A is highly expressed in the fibrotic tissue of CD patients and a gene variant of the TL1A gene is associated with a higher risk of fibrotic strictures [31]. Finally, a possible role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) has recently emerged. NETs are large, extracellular, web-like structures extruded by neutrophils under various conditions, especially immune response towards pathogens, representing a defense mechanism that, if dysregulated, can contribute to the pathogenesis of immune-related disorders [32]. NETs have been shown to mediate the in vitro activation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts in fibrotic interstitial lung disease [33], and it has been suggested that this role may also be played in the gut [34].

3.3. MicroRNAs

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequences that interfere with mRNA, causing, in most cases, an inhibition of translation [35]. The role of miRNAs on intestinal fibrosis in CD is relatively poorly established. Two families of miRNAs, miRNA-29 and miRNA-200, appear to be involved in this process. Specifically, miRNA-29a, -29b, and -29c were found to be down-regulated in CD strictured mucosa, with a role for miRNA-29b in modulating in vitro the expression of collagen I and III [36]. The miRNA 200 family appears to play a protective role against the development of EMT [37,38].

3.4. The Role of Gut Microbiota

The human gut hosts a complex and abundant aggregation of microbes, collectively referred to as the gut microbiota, whose compositional and metabolic alterations, defined as dysbiosis, have a pivotal role in IBD pathogenesis [39]. All intestinal immune and non-immune cell types express the pathogen recognition receptors, such us Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors, which provide the ability to respond to pathogen-associated molecular patterns [40]. It has been reported that in primary human intestinal fibroblasts, the TLR5 ligand flagellin (present in all flagellated bacteria) induces a pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic phenotype [41]. More recently, it was confirmed that flagellin derived from adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC), a micro-organism frequently isolated in the ileal tissue of CD, could bind the TLR5 expressed in intestinal epithelium, determining the expression of the IL-33 receptor (ST2), which is crucial for the development of intestinal fibrosis [42]. Supporting the hypothesis of a causal role of microbiota on intestinal fibrogenesis, the recurrence of NOD2 variants in CD patients with fibrostenotic phenotype has been highlighted [43]. Finally, several studies on animal models of intestinal fibrosis have shown a pro-fibrotic activity of the gut microbiota [44,45].

3.5. Matrix Stiffness

Another novel mechanism associated with intestinal fibrosis in CD patients is matrix stiffness. Resistance to matrix deformation has been shown to be an important mediator of cellular behavior [46]. Cell proliferation and differentiation are assumed to increase with matrix stiffness. This is true even for human colonic fibroblasts, which have been proved to be activated to a profibrotic phenotype by matrix stiffness [47,48]. An increase in ECM stiffness would be associated with a morphological alteration of fibroblasts, actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion, promoting fibroblast proliferation and activation, even in the absence of inflammatory stimulation. This finding suggests that intestinal fibrosis would have a self-propagation mechanism independent of the inflammatory stimulus and matrix stiffness may have a role in this process.

3.6. “Creeping Fat”

Mesenteric fat and its hypertrophy, known as ‘creeping fat’, have an emerging role in the pathogenesis of CD fibrostenotic phenotype [49]. The role of creeping fat in intestinal fibrogenesis is associated with the production of adipokines that promote a shift of the macrophage compartment towards M2 macrophage dominance, resulting in increased production of TGF-β1 [50]. Furthermore, creeping fat has been shown to be associated with smooth muscle hypertrophy [51].

4. Diagnostic Tools

The diagnosis of intestinal fibrosis is usually established when the strictures become clinically manifest. With regard to diagnostic tools, biomarkers (such as fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein), non-invasive imaging techniques (barium contrast studies and cross-sectional imaging), and invasive techniques (endoscopy and histology) are worth mentioning. An expert consensus about the definition and diagnosis of strictures in CD has recently been published, showing that cross-sectional imaging or ileocolonoscopy alone are appropriate to diagnose a small bowel stricture [6]. Magnetic resonance (MR) enterography is, at present, considered the best imaging technique. Localized luminal narrowing (luminal diameter reduction of at least 50%), bowel wall thickening (25% increase in wall thickness relative to the adjacent non-affected bowel), and pre-stricture dilatation (luminal diameter greater than 3 cm) on cross-sectional imaging are considered the most accurate radiological findings for stricture definition.
A relevant diagnostic issue is the distinction between an inflamed or a fibrotic stricture, which is crucial for treatment: predominantly inflammatory strictures may benefit from medical anti-inflammatory treatment while predominantly fibrotic strictures need endoscopic or surgical approach [52]. Unfortunately, there is often an overlap between inflammatory and fibrotic components and currently we do not have a technique able to accurately distinguish between these two components, since both histology and cross-sectional techniques have not shown sufficient accuracy.
Another challenging issue is the diagnosis of stricture recurrence in the post-operative setting. The identification of patients undergoing early symptomatic CD recurrence could be useful for a timely treatment and possible relapse prevention [53]. Ileocolonoscopy represents the gold standard for assessing CD recurrence, but more recently a non-invasive procedure, namely small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS), has been proposed as a valid alternative. SICUS, which provides an extraluminal surface visualization, has in experienced hands shown comparable findings to endoscopy. Thus, its use may be useful for proper follow-up and treatment of patients after ileo-colonic resection for CD.

5. Therapeutic Approaches

To date, there are no medical therapies available to prevent or reverse intestinal fibrosis in CD. In patients with intestinal obstruction due to CD with a fibrostenosing phenotype, initial treatment consists of nasogastric decompression, bowel rest, intravenous hydration, and electrolyte replacement. Subsequent management is dependent on strictures’ inflammation degree and morphometrics, such as location and length, assessed by biomarkers (e.g., C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fecal calprotectin), endoscopy, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Current complications (such as phlegmon, abscess, dysplasia, or malignancy) and patient preferences should also be taken into account [5,54].

5.1. Current Medical Options

Strictures with a dominant inflammatory component may benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy, which could reduce wall edema and thus intestinal wall thickness. Data on corticosteroids are still limited and controversial. Although these drugs seem to provide short term relief of symptoms, they do not decrease the need for surgery over time, nor do they improve patient prognosis [55]. Moreover, chronic steroid use may increase the risk of developing fibrosis and scarring. Steroid-dependent or refractory patients may benefit from biological drugs. Currently, there are only few data on anti-TNF agents. At first, some evidence led to concerns about this approach, given the apparent worsening of stenosis due to anti-TNF, caused by the rapid healing of ulcers [56,57]. However, more recent data have overcome this old assumption, demonstrating the efficacy of anti-TNF in stricturing CD in up to about two-thirds of the patients [58,59]. In particular, a prospective multicentric observational cohort study (CREOLE) tested the effect of induction and maintenance therapy with adalimumab in patients with stenosing CD, demonstrating its safety and efficacy in maintaining surgery-free remission in half of the included patients over a 4-year follow-up [60]. However, the surgery-free interval is still short and data on a direct anti-fibrotic effect of anti-TNF therapy are still lacking. With regard to other biologic drugs, vedolizumab (anti-integrin α4β7) has been shown to be effective and safe in real-world studies even in stricturing CD [61], whilst a recent multicentre study showed that ustekinumab (anti-IL12/23) is associated with a lower likelihood to achieve remission at six months in these patients [62]. As for 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), it does not appear to have anti-fibrotic activity and fails to medically induce remission in CD [63]. There is currently no evidence that purine analogues may be effective for symptomatic stricturing CD.

5.2. Endoscopic and Surgical Management

If anti-inflammatory therapy is not effective in relieving obstructive symptoms or if symptoms recur within a short period, endoscopic therapy, strictureplasty, or bowel resection should be considered [5]. As mentioned above, the decision between these choices must be taken with a multidisciplinary approach, taking into account the features of the strictures, the accompanying complications, the length of symptom-free interval, and the patient preference [64].
With regards to the endoscopic approach, endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) is considered the preferred technique for selected CD strictures, as it has proven a high rate of short-term technical and clinical efficacy, with substantial long-term efficacy and acceptable rates of complication [65,66]. EBD is a minimal-invasive procedure that consists in placing a radial expanding balloon dilator (available in an array of designs, lengths, and calibers) in the stenotic tract and inflating the balloon as needed [67]. Experts have judged the following items relevant in practicing EBD: 18 mm as the maximal luminal diameter after dilatation in one or several sessions, a balloon inflation time of at least 1 min, and 5 cm as the maximum stricture length that should be dilatated [6]. Furthermore, such a procedure has been defined successful when it is possible to pass an adult ileocolonoscope through a previously non-traversable stricture with a reasonable amount of pressure applied.
When medical or endoscopic therapy fails or is contraindicated, surgery should be considered. According to an expert consensus, in stricturing disease both surgical resection and strictureplasty are valid options, with similar safety, efficacy, and long-term recurrence rates [68]. The preferred treatment of multiple fibrotic strictures of the small intestine, when technically feasible, are stricureplasties. According to the length and site of the stricture, multiple techniques for strictureplasty have been proposed, including Heineke-Mikulicz, Michelassi, and the Finney technique. In order to reduce fibrosis recurrence, multiple surgical strategies have been explored, including special anastomotic configurations, such as the antimesenteric functional end-to-end handsewn anastomosis, also known as Kono-S anastomosis [69], mesentery and lymph node excision [70], and the laparoscopic approach [71].

5.3. Promising Anti-Fibrotic Therapy in CD

Increasing knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying intestinal fibrosis has enabled the identification of anti-fibrotic therapeutic targets. At present, although there is no therapy capable of treating or reversing intestinal fibrosis in CD, several pre-clinical studies have been conducted in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro, with encouraging results. Herein, we report the most promising anti-fibrotic therapeutic targets known to date and the relevant target-specific molecules under investigation (Table 1).

5.3.1. Targeting TGF-β Pathways

The most promising target for anti-fibrotic therapy is TGF-β, the principal molecular mediator of fibrogenesis, and its signaling pathways.
  • Several studies on fibrosis of other tissues have shown that TGF-β1 production was strongly stimulated by the local activation of angiotensin II [72,73,74], the main effector of the renin-angiotensin system, whose activity is increased in the colonic mucosa of CD patients [75]. For this reason, it was assumed that angiotensin conversing enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and sartans (angiotensin II receptor antagonists), which typically act as anti-hypertensives, could also play a role in the process of intestinal fibrogenesis. The first ACE-inhibitor investigated was captopril, which showed to be effective in preventing colonic fibrosis in 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis in rats. Its anti-fibrotic action has been assumed to derive from blocking TGF-β1 overexpression and/or from a direct down-regulation of TGF-β1 transcripts [76]. Moreover, transanal administration of enalaprilat has been shown to be effective in preventing colonic fibrosis in a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis model [77]. More recently, losartan, an antagonist of the angiotensin II receptor, was investigated and exhibited a pleiotropic effect, reducing TGF-β1 concentration and significantly improving the macro- and microscopic scores of fibrosis in the colonic wall of rats [78];
  • Based on the known antagonistic relationship between the TGF-β/Smad pathway and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ, a member of ligand-activated transcription factors of nuclear hormone receptor superfamily [79,80], the effect of a novel 5-ASA analog (named GED-0507-34 Levo), able to activate PPARγ, has been investigated. GED-0507-34 Levo showed improvement of intestinal fibrosis in DSS-induced chronic colitis in mice, reducing the activation of myofibroblasts and the expression of the main pro-fibrotic molecules including TGF-β, Smad3, IL-13 and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) [81]. Similarly, it has been shown that other PPARγ agonists, usually employed in the treatment of diabetes, such as troglitazone and rosiglitazone, may be useful in counteracting the fibrogenic process by suppressing TGF-β1-induced synthesis of collagen, fibronectin, and α-smooth muscle actin in human primary intestinal myofibroblasts [82];
  • Another target signaling pathway induced by TGF-β1 but also by matrix stiffness is that of Rho/Rho chinase (ROCK) [83]. The first ROCK inhibitors studied were CCG-1423, CCG-100602, and CCG-203971, which, by inhibiting RhoA signaling in myofibroblasts, induced a significant anti-fibrotic activity [84,85]. These molecules, however, showed an unacceptable toxicity profile, especially with regard to cardiovascular side effects [86]. For this reason, the effect of a locally acting ROCK inhibitor (AMA0825) was investigated. This molecule prevented and reversed intestinal fibrosis in vitro and ex vivo by diminishing TGF-β1-induced activation of myocardine-related transcription factor and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and increasing autophagy in fibroblasts, with a good tolerability profile [87]. Combining AMA0825 with anti-inflammatory agents (such as anti-TNF-α) in vivo ameliorated inflammation but also prevented accumulation of fibrotic tissue, underscoring the importance of combination therapy;
  • Other compounds have been shown to downregulate the TGF-β signaling. These include cilengitide, which is an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-containing αVβ3 integrin inhibitor, that is able to decrease TGF-β1 activation and development of fibrosis in chronic TNBS-induced colitis [88]. More recently, anti-fibrotic intestinal efficacy has been proposed for two molecules approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, namely pirfenidone and nintedanib [89,90]. In particular, pirfenidone, an orally delivered pyridine derivative that suppresses TGF-β and TNF-α signals, inhibited, both in vivo and in vitro, intestinal fibroblast proliferation and motility and reduced collagen production through different TGF-β1 signaling pathways, including those of suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic (Smad), phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, MAPK, and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) [91,92,93,94]. Therefore, this molecule is of great interest and has important therapeutic potential, but needs further studies to better clarify its mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety [95]. No studies are yet available on the usefulness in intestinal fibrosis of nintedanib, a small oral molecule inhibitor of tyrosine kinase receptors, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors. Finally, an anti-fibrotic action of maggot extract was described by downregulating the TGF-β1/Smad pathway via upregulation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) expression [96].

5.3.2. Targeting TIMP/MMP Balance

Intestinal fibrosis in CD is mainly due to the imbalance of deposition and degradation of ECM, regulated also by MMPs and TIMPs [11]. Thalidomide, a molecule with anti-inflammatory activity and emerging as an alternative treatment for refractory CD [97], has been shown to inhibit in vivo intestinal fibrosis by regulating TIMP/MMP protein balance and degradation of ECM [98].

5.3.3. Targeting VEGF

The deposition of collagen causes chronic hypoxia, which in turn stimulates neo-angiogenesis through the upregulation of VEGF, thus favoring the deposition of further fibrotic tissue in a vicious circle [29]. VEGF has been supposed to be a therapeutic target of fibrosis, and its blockade through a monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab) has been investigated as a possible anti-fibrogenic strategy. However, this molecule showed a significant increase in fibrosis-related inflammatory cytokines in vitro [99] and, due to the possible side effects, could even worsen CD [100]. For this reason, targeting neo-angiogenesis does not currently seem to be useful, but rather harmful. Studies with anti-VEGF agents on models of intestinal fibrosis are still lacking.

5.3.4. Targeting FAP

The FAP protein, discussed previously, could be a unique therapeutic target as it is a marker of active fibroblasts [101]. Thus, treatment directed against FAP would have high specificity and minimal side effects. Ex vivo treatment of stenotic tissues with anti-FAP antibody induced a dose-dependent decrease in collagen, particularly type I collagen, and TIMP-1 production, without altering MMP-3 and MMP-12 secretion [28]. Another FAP inhibitor to be mentioned is talabostat mesilate (PT100), which in a murine model of pulmonary fibrosis showed an anti-fibro-proliferative effect [102], but has not yet been studied for intestinal fibrosis.

5.3.5. Targeting EMT

Another therapeutic target of recent interest is EMT, the complex process in which epithelial cells lose their phenotypic and functional characteristics and develop mesenchymal features [15]. In addition, it would appear that EMT may associate with intestinal fibrosis not only through direct production of myofibroblasts, but also through the release of crucial signals for myofibroblast differentiation [103,104]. Recent data from animal models of renal, hepatic, and cardiac fibrosis have demonstrated the anti-fibrotic effect of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-7 (rhBMP-7) [105,106,107]. BMP-7 is a member of the TGF-β superfamily with the ability to counteract the pro-fibrotic action of TGF-β1. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown the effect of rhBMP-7 in inhibiting TGF-β1 induced EMT associated with intestinal fibrosis [108]. In addition, a recent study showed that miRNA200b-containing microvesicles inhibited colonic fibrosis, thus suppressing the development of EMT by targeting zinc finger E-box binding homeobox (ZEB)1 and ZEB2 [109].

5.3.6. Targeting the Endogenous Cannabinoid System

The cannabinoid system comprises specific G-protein-coupled receptors (CB1 and CB2), a variety of exogenous (marijuana-derived cannabinoids) and endogenous ligands, and a machinery dedicated to endocannabinoid synthesis and degradation [110]. One of the main endogenous CB1 and CB2 agonists is anandamide (AEA) [111]. Given the evidence from experimental studies that the endocannabinoid system is involved in intestinal diseases and played a role in antagonizing fibrosis in chronic liver disease [112,113], the in vitro effect of the AEA analogue methanandamide (MAEA) on CD strictured myofibroblasts was investigated [114]. The CB2 agonist showed to reduce collagen production by strictured CD myofibroblasts and increase their migration ability. No further data are available about the anti-fibrotic role of cannabinoid receptor agonists.

5.3.7. Targeting IL-17

As mentioned above, the IL-17A is overexpressed in CD strictures and determines myofibroblasts production of collagen and TIMP-1 and reduction of their migratory ability [25]. However, IL-17 contribution to IBD is still controversial [115]. A recent study has demonstrated that treatment with the anti-IL17 antibody, in TNBS-induced intestinal fibrosis mice, not only significantly decreased profibrogenic cytokines (IL-1β, TGF-β1, and TNF-α) and intestinal inflammation, but also reduced fibrogenesis-related TIMP-1 and MMP-2 gene expression [116]. Another recent study demonstrated a similar function of IL-17 in intestinal fibrosis, showing that IL-17-driven fibrosis is inhibited by Itch-mediated ubiquitination of hydrogen peroxide-inducible clone 5 (HIC-5) [117]. However, previous clinical trials reported a contradictory effect of anti-IL-17 treatment in CD patients, as blocking IL-17 with specific antibodies (secukinumab and brodalumab) failed to relieve symptoms and even increased disease activity in active CD patients [118,119]. The reason for this conflict could lie in the unclear role of IL-17 in the intestine immune homeostasis [24]. Thus, more investigations on the effect of anti-IL-17 treatment in intestinal fibrosis and on the safety of this therapy are needed.

5.3.8. Targeting IL-36

IL-36 is a member of the IL-1 superfamily and consists of three agonists and one receptor antagonist (IL-36Ra) [21]. Endogenous agonists act as proinflammatory cytokines and the IL-36 signaling also promotes secretion of pro-fibrotic mediators. Thus, a potential role of IL-36R inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to treat pro-fibrotic disorders has been proposed [120]. Antibodies against IL-36R were investigated in DSS or TNBS-induced mice colitis and showed to significantly reduce established fibrosis [121]. Further studies are needed to ascertain the therapeutic potential of IL-36R signaling modulation in CD patients. A phase 2 trial is currently under way to evaluate the spesolimab (an anti-IL-36 receptor antibody) efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (NCT03482635).

5.3.9. Targeting TL1A

Accumulating evidence demonstrated the importance of TL1A in the pathogenesis of IBD and suggested a potential therapeutic role of TL1A blocking [30,31]. More recently, anti-TL1A antibody injection showed to ameliorate intestinal fibrosis by inhibiting the activation of intestinal fibroblasts and reducing collagen deposition in the T cell transfer model of chronic colitis in mice [31]. This effect may be related to the inhibition of TGF-1/Smad3 signaling pathway. A Phase 2a, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study demonstrated an acceptable safety profile for the anti-TL1A antibody (PF-06480605), which was effective in inducing endoscopic improvement in adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis [122]. A phase 2b trial with this drug is in progress (NCT04090411).

5.3.10. Targeting Both TNF-α and IL-17

ABT-122 is a novel bispecific dual variable domain immunoglobulin targeting human TNF-α and IL-17. It has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis [123,124]. The use of this molecule in immune-mediated intestinal diseases has recently been hypothesized, but no studies have yet been performed [125].

5.3.11. Targeting AXL Pathway

AXL is a receptor tyrosine kinase that has been implicated in fibrogenic pathways involving myofibroblast activation [126]. A recent study demonstrated a role of AXL pathway in models of intestinal fibrosis and suggested that the inhibition of AXL signaling through small molecule inhibitor (BGB324) could represent a novel target to antifibrotic therapy for intestinal fibrosis, inhibiting both matrix-stiffness and TGF-β1-induced fibrogenesis in human colonic myofibroblast [127]. In addition, AXL inhibition sensitized myofibroblasts to undergo apoptosis.

5.3.12. Targeting NETs

The potential role of NETs in intestinal fibrosis has already been mentioned, although data in the literature are still scarce and sometimes conflicting. In some studies, CD inflamed ileum has shown high expression of NETs [128,129], whereas in others no significant amount of NETs has been shown in CD when compared to ulcerative colitis [130,131]. The key process promoting NET formation is H3-citrullination-mediated by peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4), and studies in mice on pulmonary fibrosis have shown a reduction in fibrosis by suppression of PAD4 and consequently of NETs [132]. It has been suggested that PAD4/NETs inhibition may have a therapeutic role in CD as well [34], however no studies have yet been performed.

5.3.13. Targeting miRNAs

miRNAs are increasingly studied as potential targets of anti-fibrotic therapies but no drugs targeting miRNAs are currently available in clinical practice. As said before, there is a significant down-regulation of the miRNA-29 family in the mucosa of CD strictured gut and it has been observed that the TGF-β1-induced collagen expression is reversed by exogenous overexpression of miRNA29b [36]. In addition, the administration of miRNA200 has shown to partially protect intestinal epithelial cells from fibrogenesis in vitro, through the repression of ZEB1 and ZEB2 and the supposed inhibition of EMT [38]. In the near future, miRNA modulation may provide interesting new therapeutic options.

5.3.14. Targeting Matrix Stiffness

Modifications of physical environment can affect myofibroblast behavior and survival [41]. In vitro experiments showed that upon culture in a fibrotic environment, normal myofibroblasts increased the expression of MMPs, to counteract the mechanical force exerted by the matrix, by expressing increased levels of the collagen crosslinking enzyme lysyl oxidase (LOX), and inducing more ECM contraction [133]. LOX inhibition completely restored MMP3-activity in CD stenotic myofibroblasts and prevented ECM contraction, allowing to consider LOX a potential anti-fibrotic agent.

5.3.15. Targeting Intestinal Microbiota

Given the increasing emphasis on the pro-fibrotic impact of the gut microbiota, many in vitro and in vivo studies have been carried out to assess the effect of probiotics and prebiotics on intestinal fibrosis [134,135,136,137]. Among these, the most recent suggested that the soluble fraction of Vivomixx® formulation was able to inhibit collagen-I and α-SMA expression in human colonic fibroblast by interfering TGF-β1/Smad2-3 signaling [138]. All the data available are still preliminary and need to be confirmed and expanded.
Table
Table 1. Therapeutic targets studied for intestinal fibrosis in Crohn’s disease.
Table 1. Therapeutic targets studied for intestinal fibrosis in Crohn’s disease.
TARGETAGENTMECHANISMMODELREFERENCE
TGF-β
pathways		Captopril↓ TGF-β1 expression and/or TGF-β1 transcriptTNBS-colitis[76]
Transanal enalaprilat↓ TGF-β signaling pathwayDSS-colitis[77]
Losartan↓ TGF-β1 expressionTNBS-colitis[78]
GED-0507-34 LevoPPAR-γ activationDSS-colitis[81]
Troglitazone, RosiglitazonePPAR-γ activationHIFs[82]
CCG-1423,
CCG-100602,
CCG-203971		ROCK inhibitionCCD18-co
HIFs		[85]
AMA0825ROCK inhibitionDSS- and T-cell transfer-colitis, HIFs[87]
CilengitideαVβ3 integrin inhibitionTNBS-colitis[88]
PirfenidoneSmad, PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and mTOR signaling pathways inhibitionHIFs,
DSS-colitis,
RIF		[91,92,93,94]
Maggot extract↑ Nrf2 expressionDSS-colitis[96]
TIMP/MMP balanceThalidomideAltered TIMP/MMPs balance and ECM degradationTNBS-colitis[98]
VEGFBevacizumab↓ collagen depositionn.a.n.a.
FAPAnti-FAP AbFAP inhibitionHIFs[28]
EMTrhBMP-7EMT inhibitionTNBS-colitis[108]
miRNA200b-containing microvesciclesEMT inhibitionTNBS-colitis, IEC-6[109]
Endogenous cannabinoid systemMAEA↓ collagen production and ↑ myofibroblasts migrationHuman organ culture biopsies, LPMCs, and HIFs[114]
IL-17Anti-IL17 Ab↓ profibrogenic cytokines and MMP/TIMPs balance alterationTNBS-colitis[116]
IL-36Anti-IL36R Ab↓ collagen production, MMPs, IL6 signaling, and EMTDSS- and TNBS-colitis[121]
TL1AAnti-TL1A AbTGF-1/Smad3 signaling pathway inhibitionT-cell transfer-colitis[31]
TNF-αand
IL-17		ABT-122n.a.n.a.n.a.
AXL pathwayBGB324↓ matrix stiffness and TGF-β1-induced fibrogenesisCCD-18co, TNBS-colitis[127]
NETsPAD4 inhibitors↓ NETs-derived fibrosisn.a.n.a.
miRNAmiRNA29↓ TGF-β1-induced collagen expressionHuman fibroblasts cultures[36]
miRNA200↓ ZEB1 and ZEB2, EMT inhibitionIntestinal epithelial cells[38]
Matrix Stiffnessβ-aminopropionitrile↑ MMP3 activity and ↓ ECM contractionHIFs[133]
Gut microbiotaProbiotics and prebioticsModulation fibrotic pathwaysMouse and cellular models[134,135,136,137,138]
Abbreviations: Ab, antibody; CCD-18Co, noncancerous colon fibroblast; DSS, dextran sulfate sodium; ECM, extracellular matrix; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; EndMT, endothelial mesenchymal transition; FAP, fibroblast activation protein; HIF, human intestinal fibroblast; IEC, intestinal epithelial cell; IL, interleukin; LPMC, lamina propria mononuclear cell; MAEA, methanandamide; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; miRNA, micro ribonucleic acid; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; n.a., not available; NET, neutrophil extracellular trap; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; PAD4, peptidylarginine deiminase 4; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; rhBMP-7, recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-7; RIF, radiation-induced intestinal fibrosis; ROCK, Rho/Rho chinase; Smad, suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic; TGF, transforming growth factor; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; TL1A, TNF-like cytokine 1A; TNBS, 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; ZEB, zinc finger E-box binding homeobox; ↑, increase; ↓, decrease.

6. Major Challenges for Anti-Fibrotic Agents Development

There are numerous pitfalls in identifying anti-fibrotic drugs for CD. First, experimental fibrosis in cellular and animal models does not necessarily resemble human fibrosis [139]. Cells may behave differently in vitro and in vivo and single cell studies often do not reproduce the complex in vivo cellular network. For this reason, 3D models are under development to reproduce the natural microenvironment as closely as possible to that in vivo [140,141]. Moreover, the targeted molecules often represent a small component of the complex molecular maze underlying the fibrotic process. The target molecules may even have multiple functions on the intestinal tissue, with the risk of targeting processes implicated in physiological tissue remodeling, resulting in negative effects. In addition, to date there are neither fibrosis biomarkers, nor diagnostic tools that can be used to identify and quantify the overall fibrotic burden in CD patients, especially in the early stages, when anti-fibrotic therapy may be mostly effective [142,143]. Finally, there is an urgent need of end points that can be used to assess the efficacy of anti-fibrotic agents in clinical trials. For this reason, several groups of renowned IBD experts have reached expert consensus on this matter [6,144]. In particular, a core set of 13 end-points (i.e., complete clinical response, long-term efficacy, sustained clinical benefit, treatment failure, radiological remission, normal quality of life, clinical remission without steroids, therapeutic failure, deep remission, complete absence of occlusive symptoms, symptom-free survival, bowel damage progression, and no disability) were considered critical [144]. The combination of improved clinical, endoscopic and/or radiological features seems appropriate to define a successful treatment [6]. The need for intervention within 24-48 weeks from medical therapy has been proposed as the most accurate end-point to assess anti-fibrotic agents in pharmacological trials.
Despite the urgency for anti-fibrotic therapy and the numerous molecules identified as potential anti-fibrotics in CD, no phase III clinical trial is currently ongoing or recruiting to our knowledge (according to ClinicalTrials.gov, as of 19 January 2022).

7. Conclusions

Nearly half of all patients with CD will develop intestinal strictures along the disease natural history. At present, despite substantial progresses in our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying fibrosis, there remains a translational gap between the identification of putative anti-fibrotic targets and translation into effective therapies in humans [145]. Endoscopic and surgical approaches are currently the only options available and there is an urgent need for targeted anti-fibrotic therapy. Several molecules investigated in preclinical studies, which are awaiting clinical trials in humans, have proven effective in CD stricturing phenotype and may be available in the near future as additional weapons in preventing or reversing intestinal fibrosis. The development of experimental models that will be increasingly overlapping with human fibrosis, the identification of serum biomarkers and diagnostic tools that can identify and predict the evolution of fibrostenosing disease, and the finding of endpoints suitable for clinical trials, represent major challenges for the development of clinically available anti-fibrotic agents for CD strictures.

Author Contributions

G.S., M.V.L. and A.D.S. equally participated in the drafting of the manuscript or critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and provided approval of the final submitted version. A.D.S. is the guarantor of the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by “San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Internal Medicine research fundings”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baumgart, D.C.; Sandborn, W.J. Chron’s disease. Lancet 2012, 380, 1590–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kaplan, G. The global burden of IBD: From 2015 to 2025. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 12, 720–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Di Sabatino, A.; Rovedatti, L. Recent advances in understanding Crohn’s disease. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2013, 8, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Knowles, S.R.; Graff, L.A. Quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analyses-Part I. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2018, 24, 742–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rieder, F.; Fiocchi, C. Mechanisms, management, and treatment of fibrosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Rieder, F.; Bettenworth, D. An expert consensus to standardise definitions, diagnosis and treatment targets for anti-fibrotic stricture therapies in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 48, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shaw, T.J.; Martin, P. Wound repair at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122, 3209–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Xue, M.; Jackson, C.J. Extracellular Matrix Reorganization During Wound Healing and Its Impact on Abnormal Scarring. Adv. Wound Care 2015, 4, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pakshir, P.; Boris, H. The big five in fibrosis: Macrophages, myofibroblasts, matrix, mechanics, and miscommunication. Matrix Biol. J. Int. Soc. Matrix Biol. 2018, 68-69, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lenti, M.V.; Di Sabatino, A. Intestinal fibrosis. Mol. Aspects Med. 2019, 65, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Medina, C.; Santos-Martinez, M.J. Transforming growth factor-beta type 1 receptor (ALK5) and Smad proteins mediate TIMP-1 and collagen synthesis in experimental intestinal fibrosis. J. Pathol. 2011, 224, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, W.; Lu, C. Smooth muscle hyperplasia/hypertrophy is the most prominent histological change in Crohn’s fibrostenosing bowel strictures: A semiquantitative analysis by using a novel histological grading scheme. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2017, 11, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Rieder, F.; Fiocchi, C. Intestinal fibrosis in IBD-a dynamic, multifactorial process. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 6, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Speca, S.; Giusti, I. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of intestinal fibrosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 3635–3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, H.; Shen, J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in Crohn’s disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2018, 11, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rieder, F.; Kessler, S.P. Inflammation-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition: A novel mechanism of intestinal fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 179, 2660–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Di Sabatino, A.; Jackson, C.L. Transforming growth factor beta signalling and matrix metalloproteinases in the mucosa overlying Crohn’s disease strictures. Gut 2009, 58, 777–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dinarello, C.A. Overview of the IL-1 family in innate inflammation and acquired immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 281, 8–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Drygiannakis, I.; Valatas, V. Proinflammatory cytokines induce crosstalk between colonic epithelial cells and subepithelial myofibroblasts: Implication in intestinal fibrosis. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2013, 7, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lopetuso, L.R.; Scaldaferri, F. Emerging role of the interleukin (IL)-33/ST2 axis in gut mucosal wound healing and fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2012, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Elias, M.; Zhao, S. IL-36 in chronic inflammation and fibrosis—bridging the gap? J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e144336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tindemans, I.; Joose, M.E. Dissecting the Heterogeneity in T-Cell Mediated Inflammation in IBD. Cells 2020, 9, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Friedrich, M.; Pohin, M. Cytokine Networks in the Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Immunity 2019, 50, 992–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Latella, G.; Viscido, A. Controversial Contribution of Th17/IL-17 Toward the Immune Response in Intestinal Fibrosis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 1299–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Biancheri, P.; Pender, S.L. The role of interleukin 17 in Crohn’s disease-associated intestinal fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2013, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Fina, D.; Franzè, E. Interleukin-25 production is differently regulated by TNF-α and TGF-β1 in the human gut. Mucosal. Immunol. 2011, 4, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Rovedatti, L.; Di Sabatino, A. Fibroblast activation protein expression in Crohn’s disease strictures. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, 1251–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Truffi, M.; Sorrentino, L. Inhibition of Fibroblast Activation Protein Restores a Balanced Extracellular Matrix and Reduces Fibrosis in Crohn’s Disease Strictures Ex Vivo. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2018, 24, 332–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Di Sabatino, A.; Ciccocioppo, R. Serum bFGF and VEGF correlate respectively with bowel wall thickness and intramural blood flow in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2004, 10, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shih, D.Q.; Zheng, L. Inhibition of a novel fibrogenic factor Tl1a reverses established colonic fibrosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2014, 7, 1492–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barrett, R.; Zhang, X. Constitutive TL1A expression under colitogenic conditions modulates the severity and location of gut mucosal inflammation and induces fibrostenosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 180, 636–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Papayannopoulos, V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chrysanthopoulou, A.; Mitroulis, I. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote differentiation and function of fibroblasts. J. Pathol. 2014, 233, 294–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dragoni, G.; De Hertogh, G. The Role of Citrullination in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Neglected Player in Triggering Inflammation and Fibrosis? Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2021, 27, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Voglova, K.; Bezakova, J. Micro RNAs: An arguable appraisal in medicine. Endocr. Regul. 2016, 50, 106–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nijhuis, A.; Biancheri, P. In Crohn’s disease fibrosis-reduced expression of the miR-29 family enhances collagen expression in intestinal fibroblasts. Clin. Sci. 2014, 127, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mongroo, P.S.; Rustgi, A.K. The role of the miR-200 family in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010, 10, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, Y.; Ge, W. miR-200b is involved in intestinal fibrosis of Crohn’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 29, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nishida, A.; Inoue, R. Gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Rieder, F. The gut microbiome in intestinal fibrosis: Environmental protector or provocateur? Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 1–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Rieder, F.; Bhilocha, S. Activation of toll-like receptor (TLR) 5 induces a pro-fibrogenic phenotype on human intestinal myofibroblasts (HIF)—A novel pathway mediated by Caspase 1. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, S114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Imai, J.; Kitamoto, S. Flagellin-mediated activation of IL-33-ST2 signaling by a pathobiont promotes intestinal fibrosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2019, 12, 632–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Abreu, M.T.; Taylor, K.D. Mutations in NOD2 are associated with fibrostenosing disease in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2002, 123, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Grassl, G.A.; Valdez, Y. Chronic enteric salmonella infection in mice leads to severe and persistent intestinal fibrosis. Gastroenterology 2008, 134, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mourelle, M.; Salas, A. Stimulation of transforming growth factor beta1 by enteric bacteria in the pathogenesis of rat intestinal fibrosis. Gastroenterology 1998, 114, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wells, R.G. The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology 2008, 47, 1394–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Johnson, L.A.; Rodansky, E.S. Matrix stiffness corresponding to strictured bowel induces a fibrogenic response in human colonic fibroblasts. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013, 19, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Johnson, L.A.; Luke, A. Intestinal fibrosis is reduced by early elimination of inflammation in a mouse model of IBD: Impact of a "Top-Down" approach to intestinal fibrosis in mice. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2012, 18, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Chamaillard, M. Mesenteric fat in Crohn’s disease: A pathogenetic hallmark or an innocent bystander? Gut 2007, 56, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kredel, L.I.; Batra, A. Adipokines from local fat cells shape the macrophage compartment of the creeping fat in Crohn’s disease. Gut 2013, 62, 852–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mao, R.; Kurada, S. The Mesenteric Fat and Intestinal Muscle Interface: Creeping Fat Influencing Stricture Formation in Crohn’s Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2019, 25, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Bettenworth, D.; Bokemeyer, A. Assessment of Crohn’s disease-associated small bowel strictures and fibrosis on cross-sectional imaging: A systematic review. Gut 2019, 68, 1115–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Onali, S.; Calabrese, E. Endoscopic vs ultrasonographic findings related to Crohn’s disease recurrence: A prospective longitudinal study at 3 years. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2010, 4, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Lu, C.; Baraty, B. Systematic review: Medical therapy for fibrostenosing Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 51, 1233–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yaffe, B.H.; Korelitz, B.I. Prognosis for nonoperative management of small-bowel obstruction in Crohn’s disease. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 1983, 5, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vasilopoulos, S.; Kugathasan, S. Intestinal strictures complicating initially successful infliximab treatment for luminal Crohn’s disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2000, 95, 2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Toy, L.S.; Scherl, E.J. Complete bowel obstruction following initial response to infliximab therapy for Crohn’s disease: A series of a newly described complication. Gastroenterology 2000, 118, A569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Allocca, M.; Bonifacio, C. Efficacy of tumour necrosis factor antagonists in stricturing Crohn’s disease: A tertiary center real-life experience. Dig. Liver Dis. 2017, 49, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hanauer, S.B.; Feagan, B.G. Maintenance infliximab for Crohn’s disease: The ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet 2002, 359, 1541–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bouhnik, Y.; Carbonnel, F. Efficacy of adalimumab in patients with Crohn’s disease and symptomatic small bowel stricture: A multicentre, prospective, observational cohort (CREOLE) study. Gut 2018, 67, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Engel, T.; Ungar, B. Vedolizumab in IBD-Lessons from Real-world Experience; A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2018, 12, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ma, C.; Fedorak, R.N. Clinical, endoscopic and radiographic outcomes with ustekinumab in medically-refractory Crohn’s disease: Real world experience from a multicentre cohort. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 45, 1232–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gordon, M. 5-Aminosalicylates to maintain remission in Crohn’s disease: Interpreting conflicting systematic review evidence. World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 8, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Rieder, F.; Latella, G. European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation Topical Review on Prediction, Diagnosis and Management of Fibrostenosing Crohn’s Disease. J. Crohns Colitis 2016, 10, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hirai, F.; Andoh, A. Efficacy of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Small Bowel Strictures in Patients With Crohn’s Disease: A Nationwide, Multi-centre, Open-label, Prospective Cohort Study. J. Crohns Colitis 2018, 12, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bettenworth, D.; Gustavsson, A. A Pooled Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Long-term Outcome of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Therapy for Patients with Stricturing Crohn’s Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2017, 23, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Siddiqui, U.D.; Banerjee, S. Tools for endoscopic stricture dilation. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013, 78, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bemelman, W.A.; Warusavitarne, J. ECCO-ESCP Consensus on Surgery for Crohn’s Disease. J. Crohns Colitis 2018, 12, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  69. Katsuno, H.; Maeda, K. Novel antimesenteric functional end-to-end handsewn (Kono-S) anastomoses for Crohn’s disease: A report of surgical procedure and short-term outcomes. Dig. Surg. 2015, 32, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Coffey, C.J.; Kiernan, M.G. Inclusion of the Mesentery in Ileocolic Resection for Crohn’s Disease is Associated with Reduced Surgical Recurrence. J. Crohns Colitis 2018, 12, 1139–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sica, G.S.; Iaculli, E. Laparoscopic versus open ileo-colonic resection in Crohn’s disease: Short-and long-term results from a prospective longitudinal study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2008, 12, 1094–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Campbell, S.E.; Katwa, L.C. Angiotensin II stimulated expression of transforming growth factor-beta1 in cardiac fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 1997, 29, 1947–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Warner, F.J.; Lubel, J.S. Liver fibrosis: A balance of ACEs? Clin. Sci. 2007, 113, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Uhal, B.D.; Kim, J.K. Angiotensin-TGF-beta 1 crosstalk in human idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Autocrine mechanisms in myofibroblasts and macrophages. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007, 13, 1247–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jaszewski, R.; Tolia, V. Increased colonic mucosal angiotensin I and II concentrations in Crohn’s colitis. Gastroenterology 1990, 98, 1543–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wengrower, D.; Zanninelli, G. Prevention of fibrosis in experimental colitis by captopril: The role of tgf-beta1. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2004, 10, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Koga, H.; Yang, H. Transanal delivery of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor prevents colonic fibrosis in a mouse colitis model: Development of a unique mode of treatment. Surgery 2008, 144, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Wengrower, D.; Zanninelli, G. Losartan reduces trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid-induced colorectal fibrosis in rats. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 26, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wei, J.; Ghosh, A.K. PPARγ downregulation by TGFß in fibroblast and impaired expression and function in systemic sclerosis: A novel mechanism for progressive fibrogenesis. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ghosh, A.K.; Bhattacharyya, S. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma abrogates Smad-dependent collagen stimulation by targeting the p300 transcriptional coactivator. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 2968–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Speca, S.; Rousseaux, C. Novel PPARγ Modulator GED-0507-34 Levo Ameliorates Inflammation-driven Intestinal Fibrosis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Koo, J.B.; Nam, M.O. Anti-fibrogenic effect of PPAR-γ agonists in human intestinal myofibroblasts. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017, 17, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Bourgier, C.; Haydont, V. Inhibition of Rho kinase modulates radiation induced fibrogenic phenotype in intestinal smooth muscle cells through alteration of the cytoskeleton and connective tissue growth factor expression. Gut 2005, 54, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Sandbo, N.; Kregel, S. Critical role of serum response factor in pulmonary myofibroblast differentiation induced by TGF-beta. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009, 41, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Johnson, L.A.; Rodansky, E.S. Novel Rho/MRTF/SRF inhibitors block matrix-stiffness and TGF-β-induced fibrogenesis in human colonic myofibroblasts. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bian, H.; Zhou, Y. Rho-kinase signaling pathway promotes the expression of PARP to accelerate cardiomyocyte apoptosis in ischemia/reperfusion. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 2002–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Holvoet, T.; Devriese, S. Treatment of Intestinal Fibrosis in Experimental Inflammatory Bowel Disease by the Pleiotropic Actions of a Local Rho Kinase Inhibitor. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 1054–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Li, C.; Flynn, R.S. Increased activation of latent TGF-β1 by αVβ3 in human Crohn’s disease and fibrosis in TNBS colitis can be prevented by cilengitide. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013, 19, 2829–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Sathiyamoorthy, G.; Sehgal, S. Pirfenidone and Nintedanib for Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. South Med. J. 2017, 110, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ma, C.; Jairath, V. Targeting anti-fibrotic pathways in Crohn’s disease—The final frontier? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2019, 38-39, 101603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cui, Y.; Zhang, M. Pirfenidone Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Collagen I Production of Primary Human Intestinal Fibroblasts. Cells. 2020, 9, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y. Pirfenidone suppresses TGF-β1-induced human intestinal fibroblasts activities by regulating proliferation and apoptosis via the inhibition of the Smad and PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 3907–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Li, G.; Ren, J. Oral pirfenidone protects against fibrosis by inhibiting fibroblast proliferation and TGF-β signaling in a murine colitis model. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016, 117, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Sun, Y.W.; Zhang, Y.Y. Pirfenidone prevents radiation-induced intestinal fibrosis in rats by inhibiting fibroblast proliferation and differentiation and suppressing the TGF-β1/Smad/CTGF signaling pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 822, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Latella, G.; Viscido, A. Could Pirfenidone Also be Effective in Treating Intestinal Fibrosis? Cells 2020, 9, 1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, R.; Wang, D. Therapeutic Targeting of Nrf2 Signaling by Maggot Extracts Ameliorates Inflammation-Associated Intestinal Fibrosis in Chronic DSS-Induced Colitis. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 670159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhu, Z.; Li, M.; Shu, X. Thalidomide is a therapeutic agent that is effective in inducing and maintaining endoscopic remission in adult CD patients. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2017, 41, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chen, H.; Xu, H. Thalidomide Prevented and Ameliorated Pathogenesis of Crohn’s Disease in Mice via Regulation of Inflammatory Response and Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Chu, S.J.; Zhang, Z.H. Effect of bevacizumab on the expression of fibrosis-related inflammatory mediators in ARPE-19 cells. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 10, 366–371. [Google Scholar]
  100. Alkim, C.; Alkim, H. Angiogenesis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Int. J. Inflam. 2015, 2015, 970890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Juillerat-Jeanneret, L.; Gerber-Lemaire, S. The prolyl-aminodipeptidases and their inhibitors as therapeutic targets for fibrogenic disorders. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Egger, C.; Cannet, C. Effects of the fibroblast activation protein inhibitor, PT100, in a murine model of pulmonary fibrosis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 809, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hill, C.; Li, J. Autophagy inhibition-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition augments local myofibroblast differentiation in pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yao, L.; Conforti, F. Paracrine signalling during ZEB1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition augments local myofibroblast differentiation in lung fibrosis. Cell Death Differ. 2019, 26, 943–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Zeisberg, M.; Yang, C. Fibroblasts derive from hepatocytes in liver fibrosis via epithelial to mesenchymal transition. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 23337–23347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Zeisberg, E.M.; Tarnavski, O. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zeisberg, M.; Hanai, J. BMP-7 counteracts TGF-beta1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reverses chronic renal injury. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 964–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Flier, S.N.; Tanjore, H. Identification of epithelial to mesenchymal transition as a novel source of fibroblasts in intestinal fibrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 20202–20212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Yang, J.; Zhou, C.Z. miR-200b-containing microvesicles attenuate experimental colitis associated intestinal fibrosis by inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 32, 1966–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Muccioli, G.G. Endocannabinoid biosynthesis and inactivation, from simple to complex. Drug Discov. Today 2010, 15, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Petrosino, S.; Ligresti, A. Endocannabinoid chemical biology: A tool for the development of novel therapies. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Izzo, A.A.; Camilleri, M. Emerging role of cannabinoids in gastrointestinal and liver diseases: Basic and clinical aspects. Gut 2008, 57, 1140–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Julien, B.; Grenard, P. Antifibrogenic role of the cannabinoid receptor CB2 in the liver. Gastroenterology 2005, 128, 742–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Di Sabatino, A.; Battista, N. The endogenous cannabinoid system in the gut of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2011, 4, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Li, J.; Liu, L. Role of Interleukin-17 in Pathogenesis of Intestinal Fibrosis in Mice. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 1971–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Paul, J.; Singh, A.K. IL-17-driven intestinal fibrosis is inhibited by Itch-mediated ubiquitination of HIC-5. Mucosal Immunol. 2018, 11, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Hueber, W.; Sands, B.E. Secukinumab, a human anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease: Unexpected results of a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Gut 2012, 61, 1693–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Targan, S.R.; Feagan, B. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study of Brodalumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 1599–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhang, B.L.; Liang, T.S. Interleukin-17 as a Therapy Target in Intestinal Fibrosis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 3054–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Melton, E.; Qiu, H. Interleukin-36 Cytokine/Receptor Signaling: A New Target for Tissue Fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Scheibe, K.; Kersten, C. Inhibiting Interleukin 36 Receptor Signaling Reduces Fibrosis in Mice with Chronic Intestinal Inflammation. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 1082–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Danese, S.; Klopocka, M. Anti-TL1A Antibody PF-06480605 Safety and Efficacy for Ulcerative Colitis: A Phase 2a Single-Arm Study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 19, 2324–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Fleischmann, R.M.; Wagner, F. Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamics of ABT-122, a Tumor Necrosis Factor- and Interleukin-17-Targeted Dual Variable Domain Immunoglobulin, in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017, 69, 2283–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Mease, P.J.; Genovese, M.C. Phase II Study of ABT-122, a Tumor Necrosis Factor- and Interleukin-17A-Targeted Dual Variable Domain Immunoglobulin, in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis with an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018, 70, 1778–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Baker, K.F.; Isaacs, J.D. Novel therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: What can we learn from their use in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis? Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bárcena, C.; Stefanovic, M. Gas6/Axl pathway is activated in chronic liver disease and its targeting reduces fibrosis via hepatic stellate cell inactivation. J. Hepatol. 2015, 63, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Steiner, C.A.; Rodansky, E.S. AXL Is a Potential Target for the Treatment of Intestinal Fibrosis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2021, 27, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Gottlieb, Y.; Elhasid, R. Neutrophil extracellular traps in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Pathol. Int. 2018, 68, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. He, Z.; Si, Y. Phosphotidylserine exposure and neutrophil extracellular traps enhance procoagulant activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Thromb. Haemost. 2016, 115, 738–751. [Google Scholar]
  130. Angelidou, I.; Chrysanthopoulou, A. REDD1/Autophagy Pathway Is Associated with Neutrophil-Driven IL-1β Inflammatory Response in Active Ulcerative Colitis. J. Immunol. 2018, 200, 3950–3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Dinallo, V.; Marafini, I. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Sustain Inflammatory Signals in Ulcerative Colitis. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2019, 13, 772–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Suzuki, M.; Ikari, J. PAD4 Deficiency Improves Bleomycin-induced Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Fibrosis in Mouse Lung. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2020, 63, 806–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. de Bruyn, J.R.; van den Brink, G.R. Fibrostenotic Phenotype of Myofibroblasts in Crohn’s Disease is Dependent on Tissue Stiffness and Reversed by LOX Inhibition. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2018, 12, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Kashima, S.; Fujiya, M. Polyphosphate, an active molecule derived from probiotic Lactobacillus brevis, improves the fibrosis in murine colitis. Transl. Res. 2015, 166, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Park, J.S.; Choi, J. A probiotic complex, rosavin, zinc, and prebiotics ameliorate intestinal inflammation in an acute colitis mouse model. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Liu, M.; Zhang, X. Protective effects of a novel probiotic strain, Lactococcus lactis ML2018, in colitis: In vivo and in vitro evidence. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 1132–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Deng, X.; Zheng, C. Treatment with a probiotic combination reduces abdominal adhesion in rats by decreasing intestinal inflammation and restoring microbial composition. Oncol. Rep. 2020, 43, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Lombardi, F.; Augello, F.R. Soluble Fraction from Lysate of a High Concentration Multi-Strain Probiotic Formulation Inhibits TGF-β1-Induced Intestinal Fibrosis on CCD-18Co Cells. Nutrients 2021, 13, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Schuppan, D.; Pinzani, M. Anti-fibrotic therapy: Lost in translation? J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, S66–S74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Chen, Y.; Lin, Y. Robust bioengineered 3D functional human intestinal epithelium. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Giuffrida, P.; Curti, M. Decellularized Human Gut as a Natural 3D Platform for Research in Intestinal Fibrosis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2019, 25, 1740–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Giuffrida, P.; Pinzani, M. Biomarkers of intestinal fibrosis—One step towards clinical trials for stricturing inflammatory bowel disease. United Eur. Gastroenterol J. 2016, 4, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Steiner, C.A.; Berinstein, J.A. Biomarkers for the Prediction and Diagnosis of Fibrostenosing Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 21, S1542–S3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Danese, S.; Bonovas, S. Identification of Endpoints for Development of Antifibrosis Drugs for Treatment of Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Henderson, N.C.; Rieder, F. Fibrosis: From mechanisms to medicines. Nature 2020, 587, 555–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 11 00429 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow-chart of the search strategy.
Figure 1. Flow-chart of the search strategy.
Cells 11 00429 g001
Cells 11 00429 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the main players of intestinal fibrosis in Crohn’s disease. Abbreviations: CD, Crohn’s disease; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; EndMT, endothelial-mesenchymal transition; FAP, fibroblast activation protein; IL, interleukin; miRNA, micro ribonucleic acid; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; TGF, transforming growth factor; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase. Created with “BioRender.com”, 22 December 2021.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the main players of intestinal fibrosis in Crohn’s disease. Abbreviations: CD, Crohn’s disease; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; EndMT, endothelial-mesenchymal transition; FAP, fibroblast activation protein; IL, interleukin; miRNA, micro ribonucleic acid; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; TGF, transforming growth factor; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase. Created with “BioRender.com”, 22 December 2021.
Cells 11 00429 g002
Cells 11 00429 g003 550
Figure 3. Main molecular and cellular mechanisms, and their interaction, underlying the fibrogenic process leading to stricture formation in Crohn’s disease (CD). Intestinal mucosal infiltration of CD4+ T cells represents a key characteristic of CD. Multiple Th subsets have been identified, with different role in the fibrogenic process. The cross-talk between macrophage and T cells, sustained by Th1 pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interferon (IFN)-ɣ and interleukin (IL)-12, results in the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which promotes myofibroblast production of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1. The latter inhibits the production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and favors the production of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), which causes abnormal collagen deposition, with consequent fibrosis and stricture formation. In addition, Th2 and Th17 cells have a pro-fibrotic role through the production of pro-fibrotic cytokines, especially IL-17A, which induces intestinal myofibroblast secretion of collagen and TIMPs and significantly inhibits myofibroblast migration. The fibrotic process is also sustained by epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT), constantly evolving processes in which epithelial and endothelial cells acquire fibroblast characteristics. Abbreviations: EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; EndMT, endothelial-mesenchymal transition; IL, interleukin; IFN, interferon; T-bet, T-box transcription factor; TGF, transforming growth factor; Th, T helper cell; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; ↑, increase. Created with “BioRender.com”, 21 January 2022.
Figure 3. Main molecular and cellular mechanisms, and their interaction, underlying the fibrogenic process leading to stricture formation in Crohn’s disease (CD). Intestinal mucosal infiltration of CD4+ T cells represents a key characteristic of CD. Multiple Th subsets have been identified, with different role in the fibrogenic process. The cross-talk between macrophage and T cells, sustained by Th1 pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interferon (IFN)-ɣ and interleukin (IL)-12, results in the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which promotes myofibroblast production of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1. The latter inhibits the production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and favors the production of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), which causes abnormal collagen deposition, with consequent fibrosis and stricture formation. In addition, Th2 and Th17 cells have a pro-fibrotic role through the production of pro-fibrotic cytokines, especially IL-17A, which induces intestinal myofibroblast secretion of collagen and TIMPs and significantly inhibits myofibroblast migration. The fibrotic process is also sustained by epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT), constantly evolving processes in which epithelial and endothelial cells acquire fibroblast characteristics. Abbreviations: EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; EndMT, endothelial-mesenchymal transition; IL, interleukin; IFN, interferon; T-bet, T-box transcription factor; TGF, transforming growth factor; Th, T helper cell; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; ↑, increase. Created with “BioRender.com”, 21 January 2022.
Cells 11 00429 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santacroce, G.; Lenti, M.V.; Di Sabatino, A. Therapeutic Targeting of Intestinal Fibrosis in Crohn’s Disease. Cells 2022, 11, 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030429

AMA Style

Santacroce G, Lenti MV, Di Sabatino A. Therapeutic Targeting of Intestinal Fibrosis in Crohn’s Disease. Cells. 2022; 11(3):429. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030429

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santacroce, Giovanni, Marco Vincenzo Lenti, and Antonio Di Sabatino. 2022. "Therapeutic Targeting of Intestinal Fibrosis in Crohn’s Disease" Cells 11, no. 3: 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030429

APA Style

Santacroce, G., Lenti, M. V., & Di Sabatino, A. (2022). Therapeutic Targeting of Intestinal Fibrosis in Crohn’s Disease. Cells, 11(3), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030429

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop