Next Article in Journal
Intermittent Fasting Resolves Dyslipidemia and Atherogenesis in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice in a Diet-Dependent Manner, Irrespective of Sex
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Human Stem Cells to Model Genetic Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Meniere Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy and Hematopoiesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Protective Effects of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss of Rats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/cells12040532
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodellers in Inner Ear Development

by
Ilyas Chohra
,
Keshi Chung
,
Subhajit Giri
and
Brigitte Malgrange
*
Developmental Neurobiology Unit, GIGA-Stem Cells, Av. Hippocrate 15 B, 4000 Liege, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2023, 12(4), 532; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040532
Submission received: 10 January 2023 / Revised: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 1 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stem Cells and Hearing Loss)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
During transcription, DNA replication and repair, chromatin structure is constantly modified to reveal specific genetic regions and allow access to DNA-interacting enzymes. ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to modify chromatin architecture by repositioning and rearranging nucleosomes. These complexes are defined by a conserved SNF2-like, catalytic ATPase subunit and are divided into four families: CHD, SWI/SNF, ISWI and INO80. ATP-dependent chromatin remodellers are crucial in regulating development and stem cell biology in numerous organs, including the inner ear. In addition, mutations in genes coding for proteins that are part of chromatin remodellers have been implicated in numerous cases of neurosensory deafness. In this review, we describe the composition, structure and functional activity of these complexes and discuss how they contribute to hearing and neurosensory deafness.

1. Introduction

Eukaryotic chromatin is densely compacted in the nucleus through nucleosomes, an assembly of DNA wrapped around an octamer of two copies of the four histone proteins H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 [1]. Chromatin accessibility is the level to which DNA-interacting proteins can physically contact DNA regulatory elements and it is determined by the occupancy and topological architecture of chromatin [2]. During development, cells commit to strictly controlled programs that ensure each tissue and organ’s proper specialisation and function. The epigenetic profile of each cell defines these programs, and their transition is made possible by the elasticity of chromatin, which is safeguarded by several factors including, amongst others: histone chaperones, nucleosome post-translation modifications and chromatin remodellers [3,4].
Inner ear development is a heavily controlled process governed by dynamic epigenetic regulation, consisting of several mechanisms that ensure the spatiotemporal control of gene expression—one of the fundamental mechanisms to ensure chromatin remodelling. This ATP-dependent mechanism is carried out by a highly evolutionarily conserved set of enzymes belonging to the SNF2 superfamily called chromatin remodellers which are involved in many cellular processes such as transcription, recombination, DNA repair and replication [5]. They are categorised into four families according to their protein similarity and domain structure: CHD (chromodomain-helicase-DNA binding), SWI/SNF (switch/sucrose-non-fermenting), ISWI (imitation switch) and INO80 (inositol-requiring 80) (Table 1).
The inner ear is a multifunctional sensory organ responsible for hearing (cochlea), balance and orientation in space (vestibular system). Following a thickening on the ectoderm surface, the pre-placodal region will give rise to the otic placode at the end of the third week of human gestation. A series of signalling molecules such as FGFs highly regulate this process. The otic placode then invaginates to form the otocyst that goes on to morph into different structures of the inner ear through the modulation of gradients of morphogenic factors. An opposing gradient of Wnt and sonic hedgehog (Shh) defines the dorsoventral axis, a gradient of retinoic acid (RA) defines the anteroposterior axis and at least in part, FGF3 regulates the specification of the mediolateral axis [6]. The adult auditory portion of the inner ear (i.e., the cochlea) is composed of several cell types, that include sensory hair cells (HCs) of the organ of Corti, which are organised in one row of inner hair cells (IHCs) and three rows of outer hair cells (OHCs), surrounded by supporting cells (SCs) that play a crucial role in the development, function and maintenance of the HCs [7]. The HCs are characterised by their apical stereocilia bundle, disrupted in many hearing defects.

2. CHD Family

The CHD family consists of nine members (CHD1–CHD9). Their structure is characterised by two consecutive chromodomains in the N-terminal region and an SNF2-like ATP-dependent helicase domain positioned in the central region. They recognise and bind nucleosomes to contribute, in many cases, to the formation of heterochromatin typically marked by the presence of methylated histones and other repressive chromatin markers. CHD proteins can bind to methylated histones through their chromodomains and use their helicase activity to remodel the chromatin and contribute to the formation of heterochromatin, a fundamental feature of chromosomes that ensures genomic stability [8].
CHD proteins are classified into three subfamilies (Class I–III) (Figure 1), defined by significant structural motifs and their association with specific complexes. Class I comprises CHD1 and CHD2, characterised by an additional C-terminal DNA-binding domain with a preference for binding AT-rich DNA sequences [9]. CHD3, CHD4 and CHD5 are class II CHD proteins, identified by a pair of N-terminal plant homeodomain (PHD) zinc finger domains and a lack of a DNA-binding domain [10]. In addition, these three paralogues present two C-terminal domains of unknown function (DUFs), DUF1087 and DUF1086 [11]. CHD6, CHD7, CHD8 and CHD9 are class III CHD proteins unique to metazoans. They often include a C-terminal duplicated Brahma and Kismet (BRK) domain classically found in proteins involved in transcription and developmental signalling in higher eukaryotes [12].
Regardless of overall protein domain structure, the function of CHD superfamily proteins is directly connected to regulating gene expression by controlling chromatin states. They are mainly translational repressors [13]. Here, we describe only the CHDs showing evidence of implication in the inner ear.
Cells 12 00532 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of all nine human CHD proteins divided by their class, showing the approximate position of the main predicted domains, as described in Uniprot, SMART and InterPro [14,15,16].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of all nine human CHD proteins divided by their class, showing the approximate position of the main predicted domains, as described in Uniprot, SMART and InterPro [14,15,16].
Cells 12 00532 g001

2.1. CHD3/4

CHD3 and CDH4 share 71.6% of their amino acid sequences. Both proteins form distinct nucleosome remodelling deacetylase (NuRD) complexes with different but overlapping functionalities [17]. Mass spectrometry data show that CHD3 and CHD4 may form heterodimers within NuRD complexes [18]. CHD3 and CHD4 are the core subunit of the NuRD complex [19]. Their binding to this complex is mutually exclusive [20]. Normal NuRD complexes are essential for many developmental and cell differentiation processes, including maintaining embryonic stem (ES) cell pluripotency and regulating progenitor cell development in numerous organs such as the brain, hematopoietic system or kidney [21,22].
Snijders Blok–Campeau syndrome is a recently described syndrome that encompasses patients with variants in CHD3, characterised by intellectual disability, developmental delay (especially speech delay) and several dysmorphic features [23], with most of the mutations localising within the ATPase or the helicase domain [24]. A minority of these patients manifest neurosensory hearing loss (3 out of 24). More investigations are needed to understand further the implications of hearing deficit in this syndrome.
Mutations in the CHD4 protein result in Sifrim–Hitz–Weiss (SIHIWES) syndrome, an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disease. Symptoms identified include global developmental delay, mild to moderate intellectual disability, brain anomalies, congenital heart defects, dysmorphic features, macrocephaly and conductive and/or sensorineural hearing loss in 55% of the cases [25]. The mutations identified in hearing loss patients affect the ATPase domain, the PHD domain or the DUF1087 domain (Figure 2) [25,26].
In mice, Chd4 is present in the organ of Corti, starting at embryonic day 18.5 (E18.5) throughout most cells. It remains present during postnatal development, and its expression is restricted to SCs at the adult stage (postnatal P21) [27]. In the central nervous system, Chd4 is strongly expressed in both neural progenitors and mature neurons. Conditional knockout of Chd4 in nestin-positive neural progenitors in the mouse cerebral cortex leads to their precocious cell cycle exit and apoptosis, thereby causing microcephaly [28]. It has been suggested that Chd4 regulates neural differentiation by controlling the cell cycle through repressing the acetylation of p53 and possible transcription activation of neural differentiation genes [22]. Whether Chd4 has the same effect in the cochlea remains to be established.
Altogether, these findings on CHD4 mutations in hearing loss patients and the Chd4 pattern of expression in embryonic mice cochlea suggest that CHD4 may influence spatiotemporal gene expression regulation in the developing cochlea. This deficiency could lead to deafness. Further experimental evaluation is critical to decode the mechanistic role of CHD4 in otic development and how particular missense mutations can give rise to the deafness phenotype.

2.2. CHD7

De novo heterozygous mutations in the CHD7 gene are the leading causes of CHARGE syndrome, a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by ocular Coloboma, Heart defects, Atresia of the choanae, Retarded growth and development, Genital hypoplasia and Ear abnormalities, including mixed conductive/sensorineural hearing loss [29,30]. More than 500 heterozygous CHD7 mutations have been identified in CHARGE syndrome patients, most of which are nonsense, frameshift indels, splice site and missense mutations [31].
In mice, Chd7 is highly expressed throughout the developing otocyst starting at E9.5. Later during development, Chd7 is present in the cochlear epithelium both in HCs and SCs and in spiral ganglion neurons. Chd7 is still present postnatally but is decreased in the organ of Corti [32,33].
A Chd7 heterozygous mouse model was generated from Chd7-deficient, gene-trapped lacZ reporter ES cells (hereafter Chd7Gt/+ mice) that expresses β-galactosidase under the control of the Chd7 promoter [34]. Homozygous Chd7Gt/Gt are embryonic lethal. HC formation and cochlear innervation were normal in Chd7Gt/+ mice. However, Chd7Gt/+ animals present mild hearing loss with elevated auditory brainstem recordings (ABR) and reduced distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) [34]. Recently, a re-evaluation of Chd7Gt/+ suggests a new function in the development and maintenance of satellite glial cells in the spiral ganglia, as well as in the regulation of myelin sheaths surrounding type I spiral ganglion neurons that innervate the sensory epithelium of the cochlea [35]. In two ENU-induced mutations in Chd7—looper and trooper strains—having a nonsense mutation (c.5690C>A, p.S1897X) or a cryptic splice site mutation (c.3219-18T>A), respectively, middle ear and vestibular defects were found to be a prominent phenotype with early onset hearing loss [36,37].
Deficiency in Chd7 during development has also been reported to specifically impact neuronal development in the inner ear. In a Foxg1-Cre-driven conditional Chd7 knockout mouse, the otocyst had a reduced vestibulocochlear ganglion size. This smaller neuronal number is due to the reduced expression of the neuronal fate-specific genes Ngn1, Otx2 and Fgf10, leading to reduced neuronal cell proliferation [32,38]. A recent study has shown that Chd7 deficiency leads to IHC and auditory neurons being vulnerable to ototoxic stress, rapid postnatal degeneration and profound hearing loss [39].
Modulating retinoic acid signalling prevents inner ear defects caused by Chd7 deficiency [40]. Indeed, loss of the retinoic acid (RA) synthetic enzyme Aldh1a3 or treatment with citral—an inhibitor of RA synthesis—partially rescued the semicircular canal deformation phenotype in Chd7Gt/+ mice [41]. Upregulation or downregulation of RA signalling during embryogenesis leads to developmental defects similar to those observed in CHARGE. RNA-seq and qRT-PCR combined with ChIP experiments in inner ears demonstrate that Chd7 acts upstream of Aldh1a3 via direct binding and repression of Aldh1a3 [41].
To evaluate the Chd7 deficiency at single-cell resolution, Durruthy-Durruthy et al. performed single-cell multiplexed qPCR in Pax2Cre; mT/mGFP otocysts cells from Chd7+/+ and Chd7Gt/+ mice for 192 inner ear specific genes and reported a cellular identity shift towards neuroblasts in E10.5 otocysts [42]. This cell fate decision may arise through disruption in the pro-sensory and pro-neurogenic gene expression network and Notch signalling pathways.
To model the inner ear phenotypes in CHARGE syndrome in a human context, Nie et al. adopted a previously published human induced pluripotent stem (hiPS) cell/human ES cell-derived otic organoid model [43]. The study reported a complete loss of inner ear HC formation in the CHD7 knock-out line (CHD7−/−) or CHD7 patient-specific missense mutation (CHD7S834F/S834F) d70 otic organoids [44]. In contrast, the haploinsufficient/heterozygous otic organoids (CHD7S834F/+ or CHD7+/−) could generate HCs. To understand the molecular pathogenesis, the CHD7 mutations were created in a WA25 PAX2nGFP hESC line, which allows for the study of the transcriptome of PAX2+ otic progenitors from both CHD7+/+ and CHD7−/− d20 organoids. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) transcriptome data on those PAX2+ cells revealed a downregulation of several essential inner ear morphogenesis and developmental genes such as TBX1, LMX1A, SOX10, DLX5 and SIX1 and disruption in FGF, BMP, Notch, TGF-β and Wnt signalling pathways.
These effects on PAX2 otic progenitors were reflected in HC development. Indeed, scRNA-seq on POU4F3-nd tomato hair cells from CHD7+/− d70 organoids showed numerous dysregulated deafness genes compared with the WT counterparts. SIX1, USH1C and STRC were downregulated, giving potential explanations for hearing loss observed in patients with CHARGE syndrome. Co-differentiating both WT and CHD7−/− hESCs in a chimeric organoid system partially restored the expression of otherwise severely downregulated essential otic genes FBXO2, SOX10 and DLX5 but failed to generate any hair cells in the CHD7−/− background [44]. Altogether, this study described the critical role of CHD7 in otic lineage differentiation and hair cell development and, more importantly, in an in-vitro humanised experimental model.

2.3. CHD8

CHD8 is most prominently known for its association with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) [45]. CHD8 has two isoforms: CHD8L, a full-length version of the protein weighing 280 kDa, and CHD8S (Duplin), a 110 kDa protein of the NH2-terminal chromodomain region. However, the latter does not have a counterpart in humans [46]. CHD8 interacts with CHD7 and FAM124B (family with sequence similarity 124B) as a complex [47,48]. However, the functional implication of this interaction in the context of inner ear development and deafness remains elusive.
Chd8 has been found in the proteome of HCs from P4–P7 organs of Corti derived from a Pou4f3-eGFP transgenic mouse model [49]. It has been suggested as a candidate deafness gene (DFNA53) with a possible functional role in HCs. In another study, RNA-seq data showed that CHD8 knock-out hES cell-derived neuroectodermal cells are enriched in genes for “inner ear morphogenesis” gene-ontology terms such as PAX8, FGF9 and MYO15A [50]. This observed increase in “inner ear” genes might arise since CHD8 has been shown to interact directly with β-catenin and be recruited to the promoter regions of numerous β-catenin-responsive genes acting as a repressor of both β-catenin and the Wnt pathway [51,52]. Several identified genes (PAX8, DLX6, FGF9) are upstream or downstream effectors of β-catenin/Wnt pathway modulation [53,54].
In a recent study, the deletion of Chd8 in mice under the control of the Atoh1 promoter—expressed explicitly in HCs and spiral ganglion neurons—did not affect ABR [55]. Moreover, the development of HCs and auditory neurons seemed normal. Therefore, Chd8 does not appear to be necessary for cochlea development and hearing function in mice, while it seems essential in humans. The functional role of CHD8 in inner ear development and hearing loss remains to be established.

3. SWI/SNF Complexes

First discovered in yeast and further characterised in drosophila and mammals, switch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) are widely studied evolutionarily conserved protein complexes [56]. Three mammalian SWI/SNF complexes have been identified: BAF (BRG1/BRM-associated factor, also called Brahma-associated factor), PBAF (polybromo-associated BAF) and, very recently, non-canonical BAF (ncBAF or GBAF). BAF and PBAF co-exist in all cell types. They all contain a catalytic ATPase subunit—SWI/SNF-related, Matrix-associated, Actin-dependent Regulator of Chromatin, subfamily A, member 2—SMARCA2 (Brm) or SMARCA4 (Brg1)—that generates the energy for chromatin remodelling through the hydrolysis of ATP (Table 2). SWI/SNF complexes also contain several nucleosome-binding domains, including DNA-binding domains, such as AT-rich interactive domains (ARIDs), zinc-finger domains or high-mobility group box domains (HMGs). In addition, they have histone-binding domains, such as bromodomains (BRDs), plant homeodomains (PHDs) and chromodomains. SWI/SNF remodellers facilitate chromatin access as they slide and eject nucleosomes and are used for either gene activation or gene repression [57,58,59,60]. SWI/SNF complexes contain up to 15 subunits, and many of these are encoded by gene families and can be replaced by their paralogues. Therefore, hundreds of potential assemblies become a way to ensure complex specificity. Indeed, distinct subunit compositions occur at different time points during development and in various tissues. Many resulting complexes are unique to specific tissues or biological functions such as neural, heart or muscle development [61,62,63,64] or ES cell pluripotency [58].
Numerous SWI/SNF genes are mutated in a rare congenital developmental disorder, the Coffin–Siris syndrome (CSS), with variable degrees of hearing loss affecting up to 50% of patients [65,66]. With the advancement of next-generation sequencing genetic screening, mutations in other BAF/PBAF partner genes such as SMARCC2 (BAF170), SMARCG2 (DPF2) and PHF6 have been found in patients affected with CSS-like syndrome affected with hearing loss with varying degree [67,68,69]. These clinical and genetic findings demonstrate that the SWI/SNF complex subunits are imperative in chromatin remodelling activity and developing inner ear components, leading to hearing loss.
In the inner ear, in situ hybridisation experiments show that Brg1 and Baf170 mRNAs are highly expressed in the developing otic vesicle starting at E8.5 in mice, and in the cochleovestibular ganglion at E10 [59,70]. Later, at E14.5–16.5, mRNAs remain high in the spiral ganglion. No mRNA could be detected in the organ of Corti at these stages. Postnatally, histological data show that Brg1 is highly expressed in HCs and SCs—both in the auditory and vestibular portions of the inner ear and spiral ganglion neurons at P4 [59,71].
Conditional Brg1 deletion in HCs using the Atoh1-cre line leads to profound deafness and rapid cochlear HC degeneration [59]. In addition, confocal and scanning electron microscopy images have shown that Brg1 inactivation results in numerous HC apical morphology defects, including disorganised OHC stereocilia, a flattened form instead of V-shaped stereocilia bundles at P3, and round-shaped hair bundles at P8, resulting in the abolishment of the cell-intrinsic polarity of OHCs [59]. Similarly, Brg1 deletion in the vestibule resulted in hair cell death and abnormal stereocilia in surviving HCs [71].
The functional contribution of the SWI/SNF complex for otic development was shown to be dependent on a physical interaction between Brg1 and Baf170 proteins with Six1 and Eya1, two transcription factors essential for otic neuronal differentiation. Eya1 and Six1 may act by recruiting and interacting with the SWI/SNF complex to induce the transcription of Neurogenin 1 and Neuro D1, two bHLH transcription factors regulating spiral ganglion neurogenesis [72]. Indeed, ectopic expression of Six1 and Eya1 in combination with Brg1 and Baf170 in nonsensory epithelial cells of mouse cochlear explant (GER cells) resulted in the production of a majority of Tuj1+/Neurofilament+ neurons. Moreover, Sox2 was found to act synergistically with the combination of Six1, Eya1, Brg1 and Baf170 to induce 100% of GER cells reprogramming into neurofilament positive cells. Altogether, this work showed that the functional specificity of Brg1-containing BAF complexes is regulated by the tissue-specific transcription factors Eya1 and Six1 to regulate the initial activation of Sox2 expression specifically in the otic ectoderm to specify proneurosensory fate. Recently, it has been shown that conditional deletion of Brg1 at E8.5 in the mouse otocyst results in a loss of Sox2 expression and dysregulation of proneurosensory fate, leading to abnormal apoptosis within the otic ectoderm [70].
The evidence described above indicates a functional implication of Brg1 in mouse otic development. Nonetheless, integrative experimental analysis in a humanised model and/or hESC/hiPSC-derived otic organoid model for other component subunits of the SWI/SNF complex mutated in CSS or CSS-like disorders would potentially unravel a common molecular mechanism of hearing loss phenotypes.
Table
Table 2. Summary of SMARC genes present in chromatin remodelling complexes and disease-associated mutations.
Table 2. Summary of SMARC genes present in chromatin remodelling complexes and disease-associated mutations.
GeneProtein AliasComplexDisease MutationRefs
SMARCA2BRMBAF/PBAF/ncBAFCoffin–Siris syndrome, Nicolaides–Baraitser syndrome[73,74]
SMARCA4BRG1BAF/PBAF/ncBAFCoffin–Siris syndrome[74,75]
SMARCC1BAF155BAF/PBAF/ncBAF [76]
SMARCC2BAF170BAF/PBAF/ncBAFCoffin–Siris syndrome, Coffin–Siris syndrome-8[67]
SMARCB1BAF47cBAF/PBAFCoffin–Siris syndrome[74,75]
SMARCE1BAF57cBAF/PBAFCoffin–Siris syndrome[73,74,75]
SMARCD1, 2 or 3BAF60A, B and CBAF/PBAF/ncBAFCoffin–Siris syndrome-11[77]
SMARCG2DPF2BAF/PBAF/ncBAF [68]
SMARCA1SNF2LNURF/CERFCoffin–Siris syndrome-like phenotype; Rett syndrome-like phenotype[78]
SMARCA5SNF2HACF, CHRAC, RSF, NoRC, WICHNeurodevelopmental syndrome with mild facial dysmorphia[79]

4. INO80/SWR Complexes

INO80 and SWR are multi-subunit complexes that remove and incorporate, respectively, the H2A.Z histone variants [80,81,82]. These variants affect nucleosome stability and are essential for early mammalian development [83]. Indeed, both INO80 and SWR are essential for stem cell renewal and pluripotency [84,85]. INO80 consists of the INO80 complex, while SRCAP and P400/TIP60 make up SWR (reviewed by [86]).
Compared with the other ATP-dependent chromatin remodellers, information regarding the involvement of INO80 in hearing and the inner ear is limited. One study found a potential role of INO80 variants in early-onset Ménière’s disease, an inner ear disorder affecting both the cochlea and the vestibule [87]. An earlier study investigating neurogenetic disorders reported microcephaly and developmental delay in patients with mutations in INO80 [88], although hearing loss was not reported. However, as with other mutations associated with microcephaly, such as CDK5RAP2 [89], hearing loss might occur in only a subset of these patients. The loss of INO80 results in microcephaly due to unrepaired DNA breaks and increased apoptosis in neural progenitor cells undergoing symmetrical divisions. In contrast, asymmetric divisions—giving rise to a neural progenitor and a neuron—are unaffected [90]. While this loss of progenitor cells during development could explain microcephaly due to the loss of INO80, whether and how this affects the development of the inner ear and hearing function is not yet known.
The SRCAP complex is part of the SWR subfamily, and truncating mutations in SRCAP result in Floating–Harbor syndrome (FHS), in which some cases are associated with hearing loss [91,92,93]. SRCAP normally localises to the nucleus of cranial neural crest cells, while mislocalisation is observed in cells from FHS patients carrying SRCAP mutations [94]. The expression of cranial neural crest cell genes was additionally altered in these cells. Moreover, overexpression of an H2A.Z variant could rescue some of the defects observed in SRCAP mutants. A recent study found that SRCAP also localises to the centrosomes and midbody of cells during mitosis and that depletion of SRCAP in HeLa cells affected mitosis and cytokinesis [95]. In addition to its role in chromatin remodelling and stability, SRCAP could have additional roles in controlling cell division, which could help explain some of the observed symptoms in patients carrying SRCAP mutations. However, as with INO80, it is unclear if and how this could be linked to hearing loss.

5. ISWI Protein Complexes

The ISWI (imitation switch) protein was discovered in drosophila as the ATPase motor of the nucleosome and remodelling factor (NURF) complex [96]. In mammals, two homologues of ISWI comprise the closely related SMARCA1 and SMARCA5 genes that encode sucrose non-fermenting-like (SNF2L) and sucrose non-fermenting homologue (SNF2H), respectively (Table 2) [97]. There are two functionally essential domains in ISWI proteins: an N-terminal catalytic ATPase domain that mediates DNA interactions and a C-terminal HAND-SANT-SLIDE (HSS) domain, responsible for extranucleosomal DNA binding alongside H4 tail interactions [98].
Each of the two ATPase units SNF2L and SNF2H form heterodimers with either a BAZ-family transcription factor or a larger protein (BPTF, CECR2 or RSF1) capable of interacting with acetylated histones [99]. In mammals, SNF2H protein levels are copious and widespread, while SNF2L protein expression is more tissue-specialised and often less abundant [97]. Eight mammalian ISWI complexes have been identified thus far in humans and/or mice, in which SNF2L and SNF2H are present mutually exclusively to serve the function of the catalytic subunit [98].
Among these ISWI complexes, only CERF (Cecr2-containing remodelling factor complex) has been shown to play a role in inner ear development and neural tube closure [99,100]. CERF is composed of SNF2L and Cecr2. Cecr2 is detected from E8.5 in the entire otic vesicle and continues to be expressed in both the organ of Corti and the cochleovestibular ganglion. At E18.5, Cecr2 becomes restricted on the apical cochlear turn, where immature HCs are abundant, and gradually diminishes towards the basal turn, where most of the hair cells are mature, raising the potential involvement of Cerc2 and CERF complex activity for HC maturation and development [100]. Two distinct mutations in Cerc2 have been shown to cause inner ear developmental defects with smaller and wider cochlea and stereocilia disorganisation in hair cells in the organ of Corti [100].
The fact that these defects are reminiscent of the misregulation of planar cell polarity (PCP) mutants suggests a possible influence of Cecr2 on the PCP pathway. Surprisingly, microarray analysis of PCP genes shows that Cecr2 exencephaly is unlikely to directly impact the PCP pathway [100]. However, as the study was conducted on an Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430 2.0 microarray, which only includes PCP-specific probes and this technique’s associated sensitivity, further validation with a more sensitive method such as RNA-Seq needs to be carried out to evaluate the effect of Cecr2 deficiency towards PCP pathway disruption.

6. Conclusions

It has been shown time and again that ATP-dependent chromatin remodellers are of paramount importance in developmental processes and their involvement in disease, and increasing evidence suggests their implication in the inner ear. Among others, new omics, biophysics and bioinformatics technologies are providing valuable tools to study epigenetic modulation via chromatin remodellers. However, this subject needs to be further investigated in the context of human disease—notably using organoid models, which are rapidly developing, to realistically recapitulate the developmental pathways involved in the emergence of a bona fide inner ear organ, although some challenges remain to be overcome, namely generating actual cochlear-identity hair cells. This would ultimately allow the high-throughput screening of molecules, gene and cell-based therapies, which would accelerate the drug discovery process for diseases involving chromatin remodeller defects.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, I.C., K.C., S.G. and B.M.; writing—review and editing, I.C., K.C., S.G. and B.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS-PDR); Fonds Leon fredericq (FLF-005); University of Liège (FSR-R.CFRA.3775).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Horn, P.J.; Peterson, C.L. Molecular biology. Chromatin higher order folding—Wrapping up transcription. Science 2002, 297, 1824–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Klemm, S.L.; Shipony, Z.; Greenleaf, W.J. Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 20, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yadav, T.; Quivy, J.P.; Almouzni, G. Chromatin plasticity: A versatile landscape that underlies cell fate and identity. Science 2018, 361, 1332–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Atlasi, Y.; Stunnenberg, H.G. The interplay of epigenetic marks during stem cell differentiation and development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017, 18, 643–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Clapier, C.R.; Iwasa, J.; Cairns, B.R.; Peterson, C.L. Mechanisms of action and regulation of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 407–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Driver, E.C.; Kelley, M.W. Development of the cochlea. Development 2020, 147, dev162263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Groves, A.K.; Fekete, D.M. Shaping sound in space: The regulation of inner ear patterning. Development 2012, 139, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Langst, G.; Manelyte, L. Chromatin Remodelers: From Function to Dysfunction. Genes 2015, 6, 299–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Woodage, T.; Basrai, M.A.; Baxevanis, A.D.; Hieter, P.; Collins, F.S. Characterization of the CHD family of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 11472–11477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marfella, C.G.; Imbalzano, A.N. The Chd family of chromatin remodelers. Mutat. Res. 2007, 618, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Liu, X.R.; Ye, T.T.; Zhang, W.J.; Guo, X.; Wang, J.; Huang, S.P.; Xie, L.S.; Song, X.W.; Deng, W.W.; Li, B.M.; et al. CHD4 variants are associated with childhood idiopathic epilepsy with sinus arrhythmia. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2021, 27, 1146–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Allen, M.D.; Religa, T.L.; Freund, S.M.; Bycroft, M. Solution structure of the BRK domains from CHD7. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 371, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alendar, A.; Berns, A. Sentinels of chromatin: Chromodomain helicase DNA-binding proteins in development and disease. Genes Dev. 2021, 35, 1403–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. UniProt, C. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D480–D489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D493–D496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Blum, M.; Chang, H.Y.; Chuguransky, S.; Grego, T.; Kandasaamy, S.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Qureshi, M.; Raj, S.; et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D344–D354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hoffmeister, H.; Fuchs, A.; Erdel, F.; Pinz, S.; Grobner-Ferreira, R.; Bruckmann, A.; Deutzmann, R.; Schwartz, U.; Maldonado, R.; Huber, C.; et al. CHD3 and CHD4 form distinct NuRD complexes with different yet overlapping functionality. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 10534–10554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kloet, S.L.; Baymaz, H.I.; Makowski, M.; Groenewold, V.; Jansen, P.W.; Berendsen, M.; Niazi, H.; Kops, G.J.; Vermeulen, M. Towards elucidating the stability, dynamics and architecture of the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex by using quantitative interaction proteomics. FEBS J. 2015, 282, 1774–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lai, A.Y.; Wade, P.A. Cancer biology and NuRD: A multifaceted chromatin remodelling complex. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 588–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tong, J.K.; Hassig, C.A.; Schnitzler, G.R.; Kingston, R.E.; Schreiber, S.L. Chromatin deacetylation by an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling complex. Nature 1998, 395, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, H.; Han, Z.; Liu, X.; Gu, J.; Tang, F.; Wei, G.; Jin, Y. The chromatin remodeler Chd4 maintains embryonic stem cell identity by controlling pluripotency- and differentiation-associated genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 8507–8519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hirota, A.; Nakajima-Koyama, M.; Ashida, Y.; Nishida, E. The nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex protein CHD4 regulates neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by down-regulating p53. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Snijders Blok, L.; Rousseau, J.; Twist, J.; Ehresmann, S.; Takaku, M.; Venselaar, H.; Rodan, L.H.; Nowak, C.B.; Douglas, J.; Swoboda, K.J.; et al. CHD3 helicase domain mutations cause a neurodevelopmental syndrome with macrocephaly and impaired speech and language. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Drivas, T.G.; Li, D.; Nair, D.; Alaimo, J.T.; Alders, M.; Altmuller, J.; Barakat, T.S.; Bebin, E.M.; Bertsch, N.L.; Blackburn, P.R.; et al. A second cohort of CHD3 patients expands the molecular mechanisms known to cause Snijders Blok-Campeau syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2020, 28, 1422–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Weiss, K.; Lazar, H.P.; Kurolap, A.; Martinez, A.F.; Paperna, T.; Cohen, L.; Smeland, M.F.; Whalen, S.; Heide, S.; Keren, B.; et al. The CHD4-related syndrome: A comprehensive investigation of the clinical spectrum, genotype-phenotype correlations, and molecular basis. Genet. Med. 2020, 22, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Farnung, L.; Ochmann, M.; Cramer, P. Nucleosome-CHD4 chromatin remodeler structure maps human disease mutations. Elife 2020, 9, e56178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Layman, W.S.; Sauceda, M.A.; Zuo, J. Epigenetic alterations by NuRD and PRC2 in the neonatal mouse cochlea. Hear. Res. 2013, 304, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nitarska, J.; Smith, J.G.; Sherlock, W.T.; Hillege, M.M.; Nott, A.; Barshop, W.D.; Vashisht, A.A.; Wohlschlegel, J.A.; Mitter, R.; Riccio, A. A Functional Switch of NuRD Chromatin Remodeling Complex Subunits Regulates Mouse Cortical Development. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 1683–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Choo, D.I.; Tawfik, K.O.; Martin, D.M.; Raphael, Y. Inner ear manifestations in CHARGE: Abnormalities, treatments, animal models, and progress toward treatments in auditory and vestibular structures. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin Med. Genet. 2017, 175, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Van Ravenswaaij-Arts, C.; Martin, D.M. New insights and advances in CHARGE syndrome: Diagnosis, etiologies, treatments, and research discoveries. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin Med. Genet. 2017, 175, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Basson, M.A.; van Ravenswaaij-Arts, C. Functional Insights into Chromatin Remodelling from Studies on CHARGE Syndrome. Trends Genet. 2015, 31, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Balendran, V.; Skidmore, J.M.; Ritter, K.E.; Gao, J.; Cimerman, J.; Beyer, L.A.; Hurd, E.A.; Raphael, Y.; Martin, D.M. Chromatin remodeler CHD7 is critical for cochlear morphogenesis and neurosensory patterning. Dev. Biol. 2021, 477, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bosman, E.A.; Penn, A.C.; Ambrose, J.C.; Kettleborough, R.; Stemple, D.L.; Steel, K.P. Multiple mutations in mouse Chd7 provide models for CHARGE syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 3463–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hurd, E.A.; Capers, P.L.; Blauwkamp, M.N.; Adams, M.E.; Raphael, Y.; Poucher, H.K.; Martin, D.M. Loss of Chd7 function in gene-trapped reporter mice is embryonic lethal and associated with severe defects in multiple developing tissues. Mamm. Genome 2007, 18, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ritter, K.E.; Lynch, S.M.; Gorris, A.M.; Beyer, L.A.; Kabara, L.; Dolan, D.F.; Raphael, Y.; Martin, D.M. Loss of the chromatin remodeler CHD7 impacts glial cells and myelination in the mouse cochlear spiral ganglion. Hear. Res. 2022, 426, 108633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ogier, J.M.; Arhatari, B.D.; Carpinelli, M.R.; McColl, B.K.; Wilson, M.A.; Burt, R.A. An intronic mutation in Chd7 creates a cryptic splice site, causing aberrant splicing in a mouse model of CHARGE syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ogier, J.M.; Carpinelli, M.R.; Arhatari, B.D.; Symons, R.C.; Kile, B.T.; Burt, R.A. CHD7 deficiency in “Looper”, a new mouse model of CHARGE syndrome, results in ossicle malformation, otosclerosis and hearing impairment. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hurd, E.A.; Poucher, H.K.; Cheng, K.; Raphael, Y.; Martin, D.M. The ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzyme CHD7 regulates pro-neural gene expression and neurogenesis in the inner ear. Development 2010, 137, 3139–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ahmed, M.; Moon, R.; Prajapati, R.S.; James, E.; Basson, M.A.; Streit, A. The chromatin remodelling factor Chd7 protects auditory neurons and sensory hair cells from stress-induced degeneration. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Micucci, J.A.; Layman, W.S.; Hurd, E.A.; Sperry, E.D.; Frank, S.F.; Durham, M.A.; Swiderski, D.L.; Skidmore, J.M.; Scacheri, P.C.; Raphael, Y.; et al. CHD7 and retinoic acid signaling cooperate to regulate neural stem cell and inner ear development in mouse models of CHARGE syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 434–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Yao, H.; Hill, S.F.; Skidmore, J.M.; Sperry, E.D.; Swiderski, D.L.; Sanchez, G.J.; Bartels, C.F.; Raphael, Y.; Scacheri, P.C.; Iwase, S.; et al. CHD7 represses the retinoic acid synthesis enzyme ALDH1A3 during inner ear development. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e97440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Durruthy-Durruthy, R.; Sperry, E.D.; Bowen, M.E.; Attardi, L.D.; Heller, S.; Martin, D.M. Single Cell Transcriptomics Reveal Abnormalities in Neurosensory Patterning of the Chd7 Mutant Mouse Ear. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Koehler, K.R.; Nie, J.; Longworth-Mills, E.; Liu, X.P.; Lee, J.; Holt, J.R.; Hashino, E. Generation of inner ear organoids containing functional hair cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nie, J.; Ueda, Y.; Solivais, A.J.; Hashino, E. CHD7 regulates otic lineage specification and hair cell differentiation in human inner ear organoids. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sugathan, A.; Biagioli, M.; Golzio, C.; Erdin, S.; Blumenthal, I.; Manavalan, P.; Ragavendran, A.; Brand, H.; Lucente, D.; Miles, J.; et al. CHD8 regulates neurodevelopmental pathways associated with autism spectrum disorder in neural progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4468–E4477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nishiyama, M.; Oshikawa, K.; Tsukada, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Iemura, S.; Natsume, T.; Fan, Y.; Kikuchi, A.; Skoultchi, A.I.; Nakayama, K.I. CHD8 suppresses p53-mediated apoptosis through histone H1 recruitment during early embryogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Batsukh, T.; Schulz, Y.; Wolf, S.; Rabe, T.I.; Oellerich, T.; Urlaub, H.; Schaefer, I.M.; Pauli, S. Identification and characterization of FAM124B as a novel component of a CHD7 and CHD8 containing complex. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Batsukh, T.; Pieper, L.; Koszucka, A.M.; von Velsen, N.; Hoyer-Fender, S.; Elbracht, M.; Bergman, J.E.; Hoefsloot, L.H.; Pauli, S. CHD8 interacts with CHD7, a protein which is mutated in CHARGE syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 2858–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hickox, A.E.; Wong, A.C.; Pak, K.; Strojny, C.; Ramirez, M.; Yates, J.R., III; Ryan, A.F.; Savas, J.N. Global Analysis of Protein Expression of Inner Ear Hair Cells. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 1320–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ding, S.; Lan, X.; Meng, Y.; Yan, C.; Li, M.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Jiang, W. CHD8 safeguards early neuroectoderm differentiation in human ESCs and protects from apoptosis during neurogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Thompson, B.A.; Tremblay, V.; Lin, G.; Bochar, D.A. CHD8 is an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factor that regulates beta-catenin target genes. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 28, 3894–3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nishiyama, M.; Skoultchi, A.I.; Nakayama, K.I. Histone H1 recruitment by CHD8 is essential for suppression of the Wnt-beta-catenin signaling pathway. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 32, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. DeJonge, R.E.; Liu, X.P.; Deig, C.R.; Heller, S.; Koehler, K.R.; Hashino, E. Modulation of Wnt Signaling Enhances Inner Ear Organoid Development in 3D Culture. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wright, K.D.; Mahoney Rogers, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Shim, K. Cooperative and independent functions of FGF and Wnt signaling during early inner ear development. BMC Dev. Biol. 2015, 15, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kawamura, A.; Katayama, Y.; Kakegawa, W.; Ino, D.; Nishiyama, M.; Yuzaki, M.; Nakayama, K.I. The autism-associated protein CHD8 is required for cerebellar development and motor function. Cell Rep. 2021, 35, 108932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kadoch, C.; Crabtree, G.R. Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes and cancer: Mechanistic insights gained from human genomics. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1500447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lopez, A.J.; Wood, M.A. Role of nucleosome remodeling in neurodevelopmental and intellectual disability disorders. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ho, L.; Ronan, J.L.; Wu, J.; Staahl, B.T.; Chen, L.; Kuo, A.; Lessard, J.; Nesvizhskii, A.I.; Ranish, J.; Crabtree, G.R. An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5181–5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jin, Y.; Ren, N.; Li, S.; Fu, X.; Sun, X.; Men, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Xie, Y.; Xia, M.; et al. Deletion of Brg1 causes abnormal hair cell planer polarity, hair cell anchorage, and scar formation in mouse cochlea. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lazzaro, M.A.; Picketts, D.J. Cloning and characterization of the murine Imitation Switch (ISWI) genes: Differential expression patterns suggest distinct developmental roles for Snf2h and Snf2l. J. Neurochem. 2001, 77, 1145–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lessard, J.; Wu, J.I.; Ranish, J.A.; Wan, M.; Winslow, M.M.; Staahl, B.T.; Wu, H.; Aebersold, R.; Graef, I.A.; Crabtree, G.R. An essential switch in subunit composition of a chromatin remodeling complex during neural development. Neuron 2007, 55, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bachmann, C.; Nguyen, H.; Rosenbusch, J.; Pham, L.; Rabe, T.; Patwa, M.; Sokpor, G.; Seong, R.H.; Ashery-Padan, R.; Mansouri, A.; et al. mSWI/SNF (BAF) Complexes Are Indispensable for the Neurogenesis and Development of Embryonic Olfactory Epithelium. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lickert, H.; Takeuchi, J.K.; Von Both, I.; Walls, J.R.; McAuliffe, F.; Adamson, S.L.; Henkelman, R.M.; Wrana, J.L.; Rossant, J.; Bruneau, B.G. Baf60c is essential for function of BAF chromatin remodelling complexes in heart development. Nature 2004, 432, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. De la Serna, I.L.; Carlson, K.A.; Imbalzano, A.N. Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes promote MyoD-mediated muscle differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vasko, A.; Drivas, T.G.; Schrier Vergano, S.A. Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in 208 Individuals with Coffin-Siris Syndrome. Genes 2021, 12, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Santen, G.W.; Aten, E.; Vulto-van Silfhout, A.T.; Pottinger, C.; van Bon, B.W.; van Minderhout, I.J.; Snowdowne, R.; van der Lans, C.A.; Boogaard, M.; Linssen, M.M.; et al. Coffin-Siris syndrome and the BAF complex: Genotype-phenotype study in 63 patients. Hum. Mutat. 2013, 34, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Machol, K.; Rousseau, J.; Ehresmann, S.; Garcia, T.; Nguyen, T.T.M.; Spillmann, R.C.; Sullivan, J.A.; Shashi, V.; Jiang, Y.H.; Stong, N.; et al. Expanding the Spectrum of BAF-Related Disorders: De Novo Variants in SMARCC2 Cause a Syndrome with Intellectual Disability and Developmental Delay. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019, 104, 164–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Vasileiou, G.; Vergarajauregui, S.; Endele, S.; Popp, B.; Buttner, C.; Ekici, A.B.; Gerard, M.; Bramswig, N.C.; Albrecht, B.; Clayton-Smith, J.; et al. Mutations in the BAF-Complex Subunit DPF2 Are Associated with Coffin-Siris Syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018, 102, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. MacDonald, S.K.; Marshall, A.E.; Lemire, G.; Hartley, T.; Care4Rare Canada, C.; Kernohan, K.D.; Boycott, K.M. A novel intragenic DPF2 deletion identified by genome sequencing in an adult with clinical features of Coffin-Siris syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2022, 188, 2493–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xu, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, H.; Ramakrishnan, A.; Fritzsch, B.; Shen, L.; Xu, P.X. Chromatin remodelers and lineage-specific factors interact to target enhancers to establish proneurosensory fate within otic ectoderm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2025196118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jin, Y.; Gao, X.; Fu, X.; Li, S.; Sun, X.; Gao, J. Deletion of Brg1 causes stereocilia bundle fusion and cuticular plate loss in vestibular hair cells. Hear. Res. 2019, 377, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ahmed, M.; Xu, J.; Xu, P.X. EYA1 and SIX1 drive the neuronal developmental program in cooperation with the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex and SOX2 in the mammalian inner ear. Development 2012, 139, 1965–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wieczorek, D.; Bogershausen, N.; Beleggia, F.; Steiner-Haldenstatt, S.; Pohl, E.; Li, Y.; Milz, E.; Martin, M.; Thiele, H.; Altmuller, J.; et al. A comprehensive molecular study on Coffin-Siris and Nicolaides-Baraitser syndromes identifies a broad molecular and clinical spectrum converging on altered chromatin remodeling. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 5121–5135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tsurusaki, Y.; Okamoto, N.; Ohashi, H.; Kosho, T.; Imai, Y.; Hibi-Ko, Y.; Kaname, T.; Naritomi, K.; Kawame, H.; Wakui, K.; et al. Mutations affecting components of the SWI/SNF complex cause Coffin-Siris syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 376–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tsurusaki, Y.; Okamoto, N.; Ohashi, H.; Mizuno, S.; Matsumoto, N.; Makita, Y.; Fukuda, M.; Isidor, B.; Perrier, J.; Aggarwal, S.; et al. Coffin-Siris syndrome is a SWI/SNF complex disorder. Clin. Genet. 2014, 85, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chen, C.A.; Lattier, J.; Zhu, W.; Rosenfeld, J.; Wang, L.; Scott, T.M.; Du, H.; Patel, V.; Dang, A.; Magoulas, P.; et al. Retrospective analysis of a clinical exome sequencing cohort reveals the mutational spectrum and identifies candidate disease-associated loci for BAFopathies. Genet. Med. 2022, 24, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nixon, K.C.J.; Rousseau, J.; Stone, M.H.; Sarikahya, M.; Ehresmann, S.; Mizuno, S.; Matsumoto, N.; Miyake, N.; Study, D.D.D.; Baralle, D.; et al. A Syndromic Neurodevelopmental Disorder Caused by Mutations in SMARCD1, a Core SWI/SNF Subunit Needed for Context-Dependent Neuronal Gene Regulation in Flies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019, 104, 596–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Karaca, E.; Harel, T.; Pehlivan, D.; Jhangiani, S.N.; Gambin, T.; Coban Akdemir, Z.; Gonzaga-Jauregui, C.; Erdin, S.; Bayram, Y.; Campbell, I.M.; et al. Genes that Affect Brain Structure and Function Identified by Rare Variant Analyses of Mendelian Neurologic Disease. Neuron 2015, 88, 499–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, D.; Wang, Q.; Gong, N.N.; Kurolap, A.; Feldman, H.B.; Boy, N.; Brugger, M.; Grand, K.; McWalter, K.; Guillen Sacoto, M.J.; et al. Pathogenic variants in SMARCA5, a chromatin remodeler, cause a range of syndromic neurodevelopmental features. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabf2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Brahma, S.; Udugama, M.I.; Kim, J.; Hada, A.; Bhardwaj, S.K.; Hailu, S.G.; Lee, T.H.; Bartholomew, B. INO80 exchanges H2A.Z for H2A by translocating on DNA proximal to histone dimers. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Mizuguchi, G.; Shen, X.; Landry, J.; Wu, W.H.; Sen, S.; Wu, C. ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 2004, 303, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Papamichos-Chronakis, M.; Watanabe, S.; Rando, O.J.; Peterson, C.L. Global regulation of H2A.Z localization by the INO80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme is essential for genome integrity. Cell 2011, 144, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Faast, R.; Thonglairoam, V.; Schulz, T.C.; Beall, J.; Wells, J.R.; Taylor, H.; Matthaei, K.; Rathjen, P.D.; Tremethick, D.J.; Lyons, I. Histone variant H2A.Z is required for early mammalian development. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11, 1183–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Fazzio, T.G.; Huff, J.T.; Panning, B. An RNAi screen of chromatin proteins identifies Tip60-p400 as a regulator of embryonic stem cell identity. Cell 2008, 134, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, L.; Du, Y.; Ward, J.M.; Shimbo, T.; Lackford, B.; Zheng, X.; Miao, Y.L.; Zhou, B.; Han, L.; Fargo, D.C.; et al. INO80 facilitates pluripotency gene activation in embryonic stem cell self-renewal, reprogramming, and blastocyst development. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14, 575–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hota, S.K.; Bruneau, B.G. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling during mammalian development. Development 2016, 143, 2882–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Skarp, S.; Kanervo, L.; Kotimaki, J.; Sorri, M.; Mannikko, M.; Hietikko, E. Whole-exome sequencing suggests multiallelic inheritance for childhood-onset Meniere’s disease. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2019, 83, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Alazami, A.M.; Patel, N.; Shamseldin, H.E.; Anazi, S.; Al-Dosari, M.S.; Alzahrani, F.; Hijazi, H.; Alshammari, M.; Aldahmesh, M.A.; Salih, M.A.; et al. Accelerating novel candidate gene discovery in neurogenetic disorders via whole-exome sequencing of prescreened multiplex consanguineous families. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nasser, H.; Vera, L.; Elmaleh-Berges, M.; Steindl, K.; Letard, P.; Teissier, N.; Ernault, A.; Guimiot, F.; Afenjar, A.; Moutard, M.L.; et al. CDK5RAP2 primary microcephaly is associated with hypothalamic, retinal and cochlear developmental defects. J. Med. Genet. 2020, 57, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Keil, J.M.; Doyle, D.Z.; Qalieh, A.; Lam, M.M.; Funk, O.H.; Qalieh, Y.; Shi, L.; Mohan, N.; Sorel, A.; Kwan, K.Y. Symmetric neural progenitor divisions require chromatin-mediated homologous recombination DNA repair by Ino80. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hood, R.L.; Lines, M.A.; Nikkel, S.M.; Schwartzentruber, J.; Beaulieu, C.; Nowaczyk, M.J.; Allanson, J.; Kim, C.A.; Wieczorek, D.; Moilanen, J.S.; et al. Mutations in SRCAP, encoding SNF2-related CREBBP activator protein, cause Floating-Harbor syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 90, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nikkel, S.M.; Dauber, A.; de Munnik, S.; Connolly, M.; Hood, R.L.; Caluseriu, O.; Hurst, J.; Kini, U.; Nowaczyk, M.J.; Afenjar, A.; et al. The phenotype of Floating-Harbor syndrome: Clinical characterization of 52 individuals with mutations in exon 34 of SRCAP. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2013, 8, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. White, S.M.; Morgan, A.; Da Costa, A.; Lacombe, D.; Knight, S.J.; Houlston, R.; Whiteford, M.L.; Newbury-Ecob, R.A.; Hurst, J.A. The phenotype of Floating-Harbor syndrome in 10 patients. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2010, 152, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Greenberg, R.S.; Long, H.K.; Swigut, T.; Wysocka, J. Single Amino Acid Change Underlies Distinct Roles of H2A.Z Subtypes in Human Syndrome. Cell 2019, 178, 1421–1436 e1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Messina, G.; Prozzillo, Y.; Delle Monache, F.; Santopietro, M.V.; Atterrato, M.T.; Dimitri, P. The ATPase SRCAP is associated with the mitotic apparatus, uncovering novel molecular aspects of Floating-Harbor syndrome. BMC Biol. 2021, 19, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tsukiyama, T.; Daniel, C.; Tamkun, J.; Wu, C. ISWI, a member of the SWI2/SNF2 ATPase family, encodes the 140 kDa subunit of the nucleosome remodeling factor. Cell 1995, 83, 1021–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Goodwin, L.R.; Picketts, D.J. The role of ISWI chromatin remodeling complexes in brain development and neurodevelopmental disorders. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2018, 87, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Toto, M.; D’Angelo, G.; Corona, D.F. Regulation of ISWI chromatin remodelling activity. Chromosoma 2014, 123, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Banting, G.S.; Barak, O.; Ames, T.M.; Burnham, A.C.; Kardel, M.D.; Cooch, N.S.; Davidson, C.E.; Godbout, R.; McDermid, H.E.; Shiekhattar, R. CECR2, a protein involved in neurulation, forms a novel chromatin remodeling complex with SNF2L. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dawe, C.E.; Kooistra, M.K.; Fairbridge, N.A.; Pisio, A.C.; McDermid, H.E. Role of chromatin remodeling gene Cecr2 in neurulation and inner ear development. Dev. Dyn. 2011, 240, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 12 00532 g002 550
Figure 2. CHD4 structural domains and the location of SNPs identified in a cohort of SIHIWES patients. * Mutation position.
Figure 2. CHD4 structural domains and the location of SNPs identified in a cohort of SIHIWES patients. * Mutation position.
Cells 12 00532 g002
Table
Table 1. Main types of ATP-dependent chromatin remodellers.
Table 1. Main types of ATP-dependent chromatin remodellers.
SpecificFunctionShared
CHDChromoBinds methylated lysines in histone tailsATPase * domain (DExx and HELICc )
SWI/SNFBromodomain
and Helicase-SANT-associated (HSA) domain		Recognises acetylated lysines in histone tails
INO80HSA domainBinds actin-related proteins
ISWIC-terminus HAND, SANT, SLIDE (HSS) domainsRecognises nucleosomes and internucleosomal DNA
* The ATPase domain is constituted of two tandem RecA-like folds, a DExx box helicase and a HELICc (helicase superfamily c-terminal domain).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chohra, I.; Chung, K.; Giri, S.; Malgrange, B. ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodellers in Inner Ear Development. Cells 2023, 12, 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040532

AMA Style

Chohra I, Chung K, Giri S, Malgrange B. ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodellers in Inner Ear Development. Cells. 2023; 12(4):532. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040532

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chohra, Ilyas, Keshi Chung, Subhajit Giri, and Brigitte Malgrange. 2023. "ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodellers in Inner Ear Development" Cells 12, no. 4: 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040532

APA Style

Chohra, I., Chung, K., Giri, S., & Malgrange, B. (2023). ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodellers in Inner Ear Development. Cells, 12(4), 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040532

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop