Next Article in Journal
Zika Virus and Host Interactions: From the Bench to the Bedside and Beyond
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue: “Inflammation, Oxidative Stress and Protein Aggregation; Any Links?”
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Autophagy Activated by Peroxiredoxin of Entamoeba histolytica

1
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200000, China
2
Institute of Metabolic & Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
3
Department of Infectious Diseases, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(11), 2462; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9112462
Submission received: 11 October 2020 / Revised: 1 November 2020 / Accepted: 3 November 2020 / Published: 12 November 2020

Abstract

:
Autophagy, an evolutionarily conserved mechanism to remove redundant or dangerous cellular components, plays an important role in innate immunity and defense against pathogens, which, in turn, can regulate autophagy to establish infection within a host. However, for Entamoeba histolytica, an intestinal protozoan parasite causing human amoebic colitis, the interaction with the host cell autophagy mechanism has not been investigated. In this study, we found that E. histolytica peroxiredoxin (Prx), an antioxidant enzyme critical for parasite survival during the invasion of host tissues, could activate autophagy in macrophages. The formation of autophagosomes in macrophages treated with recombinant Prx of E. histolytica for 24 h was revealed by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting in RAW264.7 cells and in mice. Prx was cytotoxic for RAW264.7 macrophages after 48-h treatment, which was partly attributed to autophagy-dependent cell death. RNA interference experiments revealed that Prx induced autophagy mostly through the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)–TIR domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon (TRIF) pathway. The C-terminal part of Prx comprising 100 amino acids was the key functional domain to activate autophagy. These results indicated that Prx of E. histolytica could induce autophagy and cytotoxic effects in macrophages, revealing a new pathogenic mechanism activated by E. histolytica in host cells.

1. Introduction

Entamoeba histolytica is a protozoan parasite that causes human amoebic colitis and amoebic liver abscess (ALA); it infects 50 million people annually, causing 40,000–100,000 deaths [1]. People are infected by ingesting food and water contaminated by amoeba cysts. Approximately 90% of infected individuals are asymptomatic but in 10%, amoeba trophozoites, driven by unknown stimuli, can penetrate the mucosal barrier of the colon and invade the intestinal lamina propria, leading to amoebic diarrhea and colitis, or even ALA if trophozoites disseminate through the portal circulation [2]. Peroxiredoxins (Prxs) are an evolutionarily conserved family of ubiquitously expressed antioxidant enzymes, which can effectively reduce peroxides, including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and peroxynitrite (ONOO) [3]. As a facultative anaerobic organism, E. histolytica requires high amounts of Prx to resist oxidative damage during invasion of host tissues and organs [4,5]. It was shown that ALA was alleviated by Prx downregulation [6], which implicates Prx in the pathogenesis of E. histolytica infection. There are more than 20 different transcripts of Prx in E. histolytica. In a previous study, we cloned and expressed a Prx of E. histolytica (XP_648522.1), which represents a typical 2-Cys Prx containing two catalytic cysteine residues in the active sites [7]. Considering that human Prx-1, which is also a typical 2-cys-Prx, has been shown to be secreted and to bind toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on macrophages to promote the inflammatory response [8], it is important to find out whether the Prx of E. histolytica can act as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) motif.
Autophagy is a housekeeping process necessary to remove damaged or redundant cellular components; it is executed through the function of autophagosomes and lysosomes and is essential for the maintenance of the metabolic balance in eukaryotic cells during nutritional restriction, infection, or other physiological/pathological conditions [9]. There are three forms of autophagy: microautophagy, chaperone-mediated autophagy, and macroautophagy [10]. Macroautophagy (hereinafter referred to as autophagy) is an evolutionarily conserved process involved in the stress response, during which it eliminates redundant or potentially dangerous cytosolic entities such as damaged mitochondria or invading pathogens [10,11]. Furthermore, it has been found that autophagy plays an important role in innate immunity, a process activated by TLRs and other pattern recognition receptors to eliminate pathogens [12].
Several protozoan parasites have been shown to interact with the autophagy machinery in host cells [9,13]. Thus, it has been reported that the number of light chain 3 (LC3)-positive phagophores in host cells gradually increases after infection with Trypanosoma cruzi, indicating a specific molecular exchange between parasites and host cells [14]. In the process of Leishmania donovani infection, macrophage autophagy was inhibited at the early stage but was activated 24 h after invasion, which proved to be beneficial for parasite survival [15]. However, the relationship between E. histolytica and macrophage autophagy has rarely been reported [16].
The aim of this study was to investigate whether E. histolytica Prx (Eh-Prx) is involved in the regulation of autophagy in macrophages. The results indicate that the recombinant protein (Eh-rPrx) could induce macrophage autophagy accompanied by autophagy-dependent cell death (ADCD) and that the C-terminal part of Eh-rPrx containing 100 residues is the principal domain responsible for autophagy activation. This study reveals, for the first time, that Eh-Prx is capable of inducing autophagy in immune cells, which is important for further understanding of E. histolytica pathogenesis and the role of autophagy in infection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

All animal experiments in our study were conducted in strict accordance with the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (1988.11.1) and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (Permit Numbers: 20160225-097). All efforts were made in our study to minimize the suffering of animals.

2.2. Cell Culture

RAW264.7 cells (ATCC, BFN607200597) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Corning, Manassas, USA, #10-013-CV) containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Beijing, China, SH30396.03), penicillin–streptomycin (100 U/mL; Gibco, #15140122) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Trophozoites of E. histolytica HM-1: IMSS were cultured in YIMDHA-S medium with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated adult bovine serum (Bersee, Beijing, China, B1059) at 36.5 °C.

2.3. Expression of Recombinant Proteins

Trophozoites of E. histolytica in the logarithmic growth phase were collected. Total RNA was obtained from trophozoites by the RNeasy Maxi Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany, #75162). Complementary DNA was then acquired from the total RNA above by the PrimeScript™ 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan, # 6110A) and used as a template to generate Prx fragments by PCR. Whole-length Prx (XP_648522.1) was amplified using the following primers:
sense-CCCATATGTCTTGCAATCAACAAAAAGAGT and
antisense-CCGGATCCTTTTAATGTGCTGTTAAATATT.
Three fragments, each encoding a 100-residue part of Prx, were obtained using the following primer pairs:
N-terminal sense-CCCATATGTCTTGCAATCAACAAAAAGAGT and
antisense-CCGGATCCTTTTATTGTCCTGCAAGTTCACTAT;
middle sense-CCCATATGAAGTTGACATTCCCATTAGTATCA and
antisense-CCGGATCCTTTTAATGTGCTGTTAAATATT;
C-terminal sense-CCCATATGGGAAAATATGTTGTATTGTTGTTT and
antisense-CCGGATCCTTTTAATCATCAATGATGACATATC.
The protocol for plasmid construction and protein expression was published previously [7]. His-Bind Resin (Novagen, San Diego, CA, USA, #69670) was used to purify the recombinant proteins, which were dialyzed against Tris-HCl (20 mM, pH 8.0), followed by filtration via a 0.22-µm membrane, and tested for endotoxin levels using the Toxin SensorTM Gel Clot Endotoxin Assay Kit (Genscript, Nanjing, China, L00351). The endotoxin levels of the recombinant proteins correspond to the national standard of the People’s Republic of China for medical products (GB/t14233.2-2005).

2.4. Detection of Autophagosomes by Laser Confocal Microscope

RAW264.7 cells were harvested in the logarithmic growth phase and 106 cells were seeded on sterilized cover slides (22 × 22 mm) placed in 35-mm cell culture dishes (Corning). After cell adhesion, the supernatant was discarded, cells were washed twice with warm phosphate buffered saline (PBS), incubated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) for 24 h, fixed with paraformaldehyde (4% in PBS), and permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.2%). After blocking with bovine serum albumin (3% in PBS), cells were treated with anti-LC3A/B monoclonal antibody (1:200; Cell Signaling Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, #12741) and with Alexa Fluor 488-labelled goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (1:200; Invitrogen, A11008). After counterstaining with 0.5 μg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), cells were preserved at 4 °C in a dark place temporarily or immediately observed under a laser confocal microscope (SP8, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.5. Construction of a Mouse Model of Peritonitis

Female C57 BL/6 mice (10–12 weeks old) were purchased from Shanghai Slake Laboratory Animal Company. Peritonitis was induced by intraperitoneal injection of Eh-rPrx (100 µg) in 500 μL Tris-HCl (pH 8.0); the control group received the same volume of Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). After 12 h of treatment, mice were injected with excess of 1% sodium pentobarbital and blood was collected from the heart. Mice were then intraperitoneally injected with 5 mL of cold PBS and massaged gently for 5 min and peritoneal cells were then collected as peritoneal macrophages.

2.6. Detection of Autophagy by Western Blotting

RAW264.7 cells were harvested in the logarithmic growth phase and seeded in 6-well plates (106 cells/well). After adhesion, cells were treated with serum-free medium containing recombinant protein (5 µg/mL) or Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) for 24 h, collected, lysed, and analyzed for protein expression by Western blotting using the following primary antibodies: anti-β-actin (ab8227, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Beclin-1, and anti-LC3A/B (Cell Signaling Technology, #3495 and #12741, respectively). After incubation with secondary horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (Abcam, ab6721), ImageJ 1.52a (Wayne Rasband National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used for signal intensity evaluation.

2.7. Analysis of Cell Morphology by Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

RAW264.7 cells were collected in the logarithmic growth phase and placed in 4-chamber glass bottom 35-mm dishes (In Vitro Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA, D35C4-20-1-N) with 2.5 × 105 cells/chamber. After the cells adhered and fully stretched, serum-free medium containing Eh-rPrx was added and real-time changes in cell morphology were immediately observed under a differential interference microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).

2.8. Evaluation of Cytotoxicity

RAW264.7 cells in the logarithmic growth phase were placed in 96-well plates (7.5 × 104 cells/well); pre-treated for 2 h with wortmannin (10 nM, 100 nM, 1 μM, and 10 μM; APExBIO, A8544); treated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) for 12, 24, or 36 h; and analyzed for cell viability using Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8; DOJINDO, CK17). Briefly, culture supernatant (100 μL) from each well was mixed with the working solution (100 μL) and incubated in a new 96-well plate protected from light at room temperature for 30 min. After addition of a stop solution (50 μL/well), the absorbance was measured at 450 nm.

2.9. Quantification of Autophagy by High-Content Screening Analysis

RAW264.7 cells were harvested in the logarithmic growth phase and placed in 96-well plates (105 cells/well). RAW264.7 cells were pre-treated or not with TLR4 inhibitor TAK242 (1 μM; APExBIO, A3850), incubated with recombinant proteins (5 μg/mL) for 24 h, and stained with monodansylcadaverine (MDC) (100 μM; Sigma-Aldrich, #30432) at 37 °C in the dark for 10 min. The cells were washed gently with warm Ca/Mg-containing Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (Gibco, #14025-092) and counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (1 μM) at 37 °C in the dark for 5 min. After repeated washing with the same buffer, cells kept in warm buffer were immediately observed and quantified using the Operetta High-content Screening system (Perkin-Elmer, Hopkinton, MA, USA).

2.10. SiRNA Treatment of RAW264.7 Cells

TLR4 siRNA (target sequence: CAATTCTGTTGCTTGTATA), TRIF siRNA (target sequence: GGGAAGACCACACCTATAA), MyD88 siRNA (target sequence: GACTGATTCCTATTAAATA), and control siRNA (sequence unknown) were synthesized by Guangzhou RiboBio Co., LTD. RAW264.7 cells in the logarithmic growth phase were placed in a 6-well plate (2.5 × 105 cells/well), treated with siRNA (50 nM) for 24 h, and then incubated with or without recombinant proteins (5 μg/mL) for 24 h.

2.11. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

An EIA/RIA 96-well plate (Corning, #3590) was coated with recombinant proteins (0.5 μg/well) in a coating buffer (35 mM NaHCO3, 15 mM NaCO3) overnight at 4 °C, then washed six times with PBS-Tween 20 (0.05%), blocked with 1% skim milk in PBS for 1 h, incubated with diluted (1:50, 1:100, 1:200) mouse ascites containing anti-Eh-Prx mAb 4G6 [17] for 1 h, washed as above, and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG heavey chain and light chain (H + L) for 1 h. After washing as described, chromogenic solution (24 mM C6H5Na3O7, 50 mM Na2HPO4, 0.05% H2O2, and 4 mM o-phenylenediamine) was added to the wells for 30 min. After terminating with 1 M H2SO4, the absorbance of the wells was detected at 490 nm.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Version 5.01, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The difference between treatment groups was analyzed by Student’s t-test and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Autophagosome Formation Was Induced by Eh-rPrx

Maturation of LC3 to the conjugated LC3-II form at the expansion stage of the phagophore is one of the markers of autophagosome formation [10]. After 24-h treatment with Eh-rPrx, aggregation of large LC3 particles in RAW264.7 cells could be observed by laser confocal microscopy, indicating the formation of autophagosomes (Figure 1A). In order to investigate the function of Eh-rPrx in vivo, a mouse peritonitis model was established by intraperitoneal injection of Eh-rPrx. Western blotting analysis of peritoneal macrophages after 12 h revealed that the ratio of LC3-II to LC3-I in the Eh-rPrx group was significantly increased compared with the control group (p < 0.05, Figure 1B), thus confirming autophagosome formation. These results suggested that Eh-rPrx could induce autophagy in macrophages.

3.2. Eh-rPrx Caused Autophagy-Dependent Cell Death

Real-time differential interference microscopy analysis showed that Eh-rPrx induced changes in RAW264.7 cell morphology: cells became larger, the number of intracellular vacuoles increased, and cell borders gradually became less distinct (Figure 2A). Furthermore, cell viability decreased over the time of Eh-rPrx treatment (Figure 2B). Thus, over 80% cells died 48 h after exposure to Eh-rPrx; however, an autophagy inhibitor wortmannin (10 μM) reduced this effect. These data indicated that Eh-rPrx caused macrophage cell death partly through induction of autophagy.

3.3. Eh-rPrx Activated Autophagy through the TLR4–TRIF Pathway

Quantitative assessment of Eh-rPrx-induced mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of MDC by high-content screening analysis did not reveal any difference between the treatment and control groups; however, intracellular aggregation of MDC-labelled vesicles was observed in the treatment group (Figure 3A). Measurement of the fluorescent spot area revealed that it was larger in the treatment group than in the control group, suggesting the formation of autophagosomes, which could be significantly antagonized by a TLR4 inhibitor (p < 0.001) (Figure 3A). To further verify the molecular mechanisms of autophagy induction by Eh-rPrx, we performed RNA interference experiments using TLR4-, MyD88-, and TRIF-specific siRNAs. The results showed that autophagy was activated by Eh-rPrx, mostly through the TLR4–TRIF pathway; the TLR4–MyD88 pathway implicated in NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation [18] could also play a role but the effect was not statistically significant (Figure 3B).

3.4. Eh-rPrx Activated Autophagy through Its C-Terminal Domain

Our previous results showed that the N-terminal of Eh-rPrx (XP_648522.1) was cysteine-rich and was longer than that of non-pathogenic Entamoeba moshkovskii Prx [7]. To determine whether the N-terminal of Eh-rPrx was required for autophagy activation, we cloned, expressed, and purified three recombinant fragments of Eh-rPrx, each comprising 100 residues of the N-terminal, middle, and C-terminal domains, respectively. Among them, the Eh-rPrx C-terminal fragment demonstrated a stronger effect on autophagy induction (Figure 4A,B). In addition, Eh-rPrx-activated autophagy was reduced by mAb 4G6 (Figure 4C), whose recognition site was confirmed by ELISA to be located at the Eh-rPrx C-terminal (Figure 4D). These results suggested that the 100-residue C-terminal domain of Eh-rPrx was crucial for autophagy activation.

4. Discussion

Host innate immunity acts against E. histolytica infection as a double-edged sword. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) plays an important role in macrophage-mediated killing of E. histolytica and mice lacking iNOS are prone to ALA and hepatocyte apoptosis [2]. However, the formation of ALA is not directly caused by amoebae but is rather related to the innate immune response of the host [19]. Therefore, it is important to study the interaction between E. histolytica and macrophages.
Prx can be abundantly produced following parasitic invasion of tissues and organs [20]. The interaction between Prxs of various parasites and macrophages has been reported in several studies. Thus, the Prx of Plasmodium berghei could act as a PAMP binding to TLR4 on the macrophage surface, which promoted inflammation [21], whereas the Prx of Schistosoma mansoni and Fasciola hepatica activated Th2 cells and macrophages [22]. In this study, we showed that the Prx of E. histolytica could also act as a PAMP that activated macrophage autophagy through the TLR4–TRIF pathway.
Microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-LC3 is a key biomarker of autophagy in mammalian cells. During autophagy, ATG4, ATG7, and ATG3 cooperate to cleave the precursor of the LC3-like protein into a mature form [10]. Cytosolic LC3-I is conjugated with phosphatidylethanolamine to form LC3-II, which is recruited to and integrated into the autophagosome membrane; autophagosomes then fuse with lysosomes to form autolysosomes [23]. There is no “gold standard” for measuring autophagy [24,25], which is traditionally evaluated based on LC3 expression determined by immunoblotting and fluorescence microscopy [26]. Immunoblotting is used to detect the transformation of LC3 from Type I to Type II, which is related to the number of autophagosomes [27], whereas immunofluorescence can identify cells undergoing autophagy by labeling LC3 spots [23]. In this study, we observed that treatment with Eh-rPrx stimulated the aggregation of LC3 spots in RAW264.7 cells, indicating the formation of autophagosomes (Figure 1A), and significantly increased the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio in mouse peritoneal macrophages, suggesting the upregulation of autophagosome production in vivo (Figure 1B). The complex containing Beclin-1 and VPS34, VPS15, AMBRA1, and/or UVRAG has Class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity, which can produce phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate to trigger autophagosome nucleation [10]. Therefore, some studies have shown that activation of autophagy is accompanied by the upregulation of Beclin-1 [28,29]. Consistent with these results, we also observed an increase in Beclin-1 expression in RAW264.7 cells after treatment with Eh-rPrx (Figure 3B).
Cell death can be classified into three types based on the molecular mechanism and cell morphology: Type 1 or apoptosis, Type 2 or autophagy, and Type 3 or necrosis [30]. Among these, autophagy is characterized by extensive intracellular vacuolization [30], which is consistent with our results (Figure 2A). Some studies have found that the loss of Bcl-2 (a Beclin-1 inhibitor) can lead to excessive autophagy, resulting in cell death [31]. Although cell death is usually accompanied by autophagy, ADCD can be considered only if it is suppressed by autophagy inhibitors (such as 3-methyladenine and wortmannin) or genetic ablation of essential autophagy genes [32]. In our study, the reduced viability of Eh-rPrx-treated RAW264.7 macrophages could be partly attributed to ADCD, as it was sensitive to wortmannin (Figure 2B).
It has been shown that autophagy is the downstream effect of TLR signaling [12]. In our study, the TLR4 inhibitor TAK242 significantly reduced the area of autophagy spots, indicating that Eh-rPrx is a TLR4 ligand (Figure 3A), which is consistent with similar results for P. berghei Prx [21] and human Prx-1 [8]. Autophagy induced by Eh-rPrx was shown to occur mainly through the TLR4–TRIF pathway (Figure 3B). The TLR4–MyD88 pathway, which is involved in activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome related to autophagy [18], may also contribute to Eh-rPrx-dependent stimulation of autophagy in macrophages, although the results did not reach statistical significance. The 100-residue C-terminal domain of Eh-rPrx was the key site responsible for Eh-rPrx binding to macrophage TLR4 and appeared to be also the recognition site of the Prx-specific monoclonal antibody (Figure 4).
In conclusion, this is the first study to show that Prx of E. histolytica activates autophagy in macrophages through the TLR4–TRIF pathway. The pathogenicity of E. histolytica is known to depend on its contact with macrophages; however, the results of this study show that E. histolytica is capable of inducing autophagy and cell death in a parasite–macrophage contact-independent manner through secretion of Prx. Our study provides further insights into the molecular mechanism underlying E. histolytica pathogenicity, which could aid in the identification of potential drug targets in the amoeba.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.C.; methodology, X.C., X.L., Y.Z. (Yuhan Zhang), Y.Z. (Yanqing Zhao), and K.Q.; software, X.L. and M.F.; validation, X.C., X.L., and M.F.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L., Y.Z. (Yuhan Zhang), Y.Z. (Yanqing Zhao), and H.Z.; writing—review and editing, X.C.; supervision, X.C. and H.T.; project administration, X.C.; funding acquisition, X.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0507304) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81630057) to X.C.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stanley, S.L., Jr. Amoebiasis. Lancet 2003, 361, 1025–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Begum, S.; Quach, J.; Chadee, K. Immune Evasion Mechanisms of Entamoeba histolytica: Progression to Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Knoops, B.; Argyropoulou, V.; Becker, S.; Ferte, L.; Kuznetsova, O. Multiple Roles of Peroxiredoxins in Inflammation. Mol. Cells 2015, 39, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jeelani, G.; Nozaki, T. Entamoeba thiol-based redox metabolism: A potential target for drug development. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2016, 206, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pacheco-Yepez, J.; Jarillo-Luna, R.A.; Gutierrez-Meza, M.; Abarca-Rojano, A.; Larsen, B.A.; Campos-Rodriguez, R. Peroxynitrite and peroxiredoxin in the pathogenesis of experimental amebic liver abscess. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 324230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sen, A.; Chatterjee, N.S.; Akbar, M.A.; Nandi, N.; Das, P. The 29-kilodalton thiol-dependent peroxidase of Entamoeba histolytica is a factor involved in pathogenesis and survival of the parasite during oxidative stress. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 664–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cheng, X.J.; Yoshihara, E.; Takeuchi, T.; Tachibana, H. Molecular characterization of peroxiredoxin from Entamoeba moshkovskii and a comparison with Entamoeba histolytica. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2004, 138, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Riddell, J.R.; Wang, X.Y.; Minderman, H.; Gollnick, S.O. Peroxiredoxin 1 stimulates secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by binding to TLR4. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ghartey-Kwansah, G.; Aboagye, B.; Adu-Nti, F.; Opoku, Y.K.; Abu, E.K. Clearing or subverting the enemy: Role of autophagy in protozoan infections. Life Sci. 2020, 247, 117453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Galluzzi, L.; Green, D.R. Autophagy-Independent Functions of the Autophagy Machinery. Cell 2019, 177, 1682–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Veras, P.S.T.; de Menezes, J.P.B.; Dias, B.R.S. Deciphering the Role Played by Autophagy in Leishmania Infection. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Delgado, M.; Singh, S.; De Haro, S.; Master, S.; Ponpuak, M.; Dinkins, C.; Ornatowski, W.; Vergne, I.; Deretic, V. Autophagy and pattern recognition receptors in innate immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 227, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Onizuka, Y.; Takahashi, C.; Uematsu, A.; Shinjo, S.; Seto, E.; Nakajima-Shimada, J. Inhibition of autolysosome formation in host autophagy by Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Acta Trop. 2017, 170, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Salassa, B.N.; Romano, P.S. Autophagy: A necessary process during the Trypanosoma cruzi life-cycle. Virulence 2019, 10, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Thomas, S.A.; Nandan, D.; Kass, J.; Reiner, N.E. Countervailing, time-dependent effects on host autophagy promotes intracellular survival of Leishmania. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 2617–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Betanzos, A.; Javier-Reyna, R.; García-Rivera, G.; Bañuelos, C.; González-Mariscal, L.; Schnoor, M.; Orozco, E. The EhCPADH112 complex of Entamoeba histolytica interacts with tight junction proteins occludin and claudin-1 to produce epithelial damage. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tachibana, H.; Kobayashi, S.; Kato, Y.; Nagakura, K.; Kaneda, Y.; Takeuchi, T. Identification of a pathogenic isolate-specific 30,000-Mr antigen of Entamoeba histolytica by using a monoclonal antibody. Infect. Immun. 1990, 58, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rathinam, V.A.; Vanaja, S.K.; Waggoner, L.; Sokolovska, A.; Becker, C.; Stuart, L.M.; Leong, J.M.; Fitzgerald, K.A. TRIF licenses caspase-11-dependent NLRP3 inflammasome activation by gram-negative bacteria. Cell 2012, 150, 606–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Campos-Rodriguez, R.; Gutiérrez-Meza, M.; Jarillo-Luna, R.A.; Drago-Serrano, M.E.; Abarca-Rojano, E.; Ventura-Juárez, J.; Cárdenas-Jaramillo, L.M.; Pacheco-Yepez, J. A review of the proposed role of neutrophils in rodent amebic liver abscess models. Parasite 2016, 23, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Angelucci, F.; Miele, A.E.; Ardini, M.; Boumis, G.; Saccoccia, F.; Bellelli, A. Typical 2-Cys peroxiredoxins in human parasites: Several physiological roles for a potential chemotherapy target. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2016, 206, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Furuta, T.; Imajo-Ohmi, S.; Fukuda, H.; Kano, S.; Miyake, K.; Watanabe, N. Mast cell-mediated immune responses through IgE antibody and Toll-like receptor 4 by malarial peroxiredoxin. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 134–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Donnelly, S.; Stack, C.M.; O’Neill, S.M.; Sayed, A.A.; Williams, D.L.; Dalton, J.P. Helminth 2-Cys peroxiredoxin drives Th2 responses through a mechanism involving alternatively activated macrophages. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 4022–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Pugsley, H.R. Quantifying autophagy: Measuring LC3 puncta and autolysosome formation in cells using multispectral imaging flow cytometry. Methods 2017, 112, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, X.J.; Chen, S.; Huang, K.X.; Le, W.D. Why should autophagic flux be assessed? Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2013, 34, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mizushima, N.; Yoshimori, T.; Levine, B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 2010, 140, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Wileman, T. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy 2012, 8, 445–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mizushima, N.; Yoshimori, T. How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy 2007, 3, 542–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cao, C.; Wang, W.; Lu, L.; Wang, L.; Chen, X.; Guo, R.; Li, S.; Jiang, J. Inactivation of Beclin-1-dependent autophagy promotes ursolic acid-induced apoptosis in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Roesly, H.B.; Khan, M.R.; Chen, H.D.; Hill, K.A.; Narendran, N.; Watts, G.S.; Chen, X.; Dvorak, K. The decreased expression of Beclin-1 correlates with progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma: The role of deoxycholic acid. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2012, 302, G864–G872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Galluzzi, L.; Vitale, I.; Aaronson, S.A.; Abrams, J.M.; Adam, D.; Agostinis, P.; Alnemri, E.S.; Altucci, L.; Amelio, I.; Andrews, D.W.; et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 486–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, H.D.; Qin, Z.H. Beclin 1, Bcl-2 and Autophagy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1206, 109–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shimizu, S.; Yoshida, T.; Tsujioka, M.; Arakawa, S. Autophagic cell death and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 3145–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Autophagosome formation was induced by recombinant E. histolytica peroxiredoxin (Eh-rPrx). (A) Eh-rPrx promoted light chain 3 (LC3) aggregation in macrophages. RAW264.7 cells were incubated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) for 24 h and analyzed by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Eh-rPrx could induce autophagy in vivo. Mice were intraperitoneally injected with Eh-rPrx (100 μg) and peritoneal macrophages were analyzed after 12 h for LC3 expression by Western blotting. A representative image is shown. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 6 or 11); ** p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test.
Figure 1. Autophagosome formation was induced by recombinant E. histolytica peroxiredoxin (Eh-rPrx). (A) Eh-rPrx promoted light chain 3 (LC3) aggregation in macrophages. RAW264.7 cells were incubated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) for 24 h and analyzed by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Eh-rPrx could induce autophagy in vivo. Mice were intraperitoneally injected with Eh-rPrx (100 μg) and peritoneal macrophages were analyzed after 12 h for LC3 expression by Western blotting. A representative image is shown. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 6 or 11); ** p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test.
Cells 09 02462 g001
Figure 2. Eh-rPrx caused autophagy-dependent cell death. (A) Eh-rPrx treatment induced morphological changes in RAW264.7 cells. Cells were treated with serum-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) and analyzed by differential interference microscopy at the indicated times. Cells treated with Eh-rPrx showed morphology alterations: large area, vacuolation, and indistinct membranes (black arrows). Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) Eh-rPrx-induced cell death was autophagy-dependent. RAW264.7 macrophages were pre-treated with wortmannin (10 nM, 100 nM, 1 μM, and 10 μM), then treated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL); cell viability was evaluated at the indicated times. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 5); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Eh-rPrx caused autophagy-dependent cell death. (A) Eh-rPrx treatment induced morphological changes in RAW264.7 cells. Cells were treated with serum-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) and analyzed by differential interference microscopy at the indicated times. Cells treated with Eh-rPrx showed morphology alterations: large area, vacuolation, and indistinct membranes (black arrows). Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) Eh-rPrx-induced cell death was autophagy-dependent. RAW264.7 macrophages were pre-treated with wortmannin (10 nM, 100 nM, 1 μM, and 10 μM), then treated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL); cell viability was evaluated at the indicated times. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 5); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Cells 09 02462 g002
Figure 3. Eh-rPrx activated autophagy via the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)–TRIF signaling pathway. (A) Eh-rPrx induced autophagosome formation through TLR4. RAW264.7 cells were pre-treated with the TLR4 inhibitor TAK242, incubated with Eh-rPrx for 24 h, and stained with monodansylcadaverine (MDC) (green) and Hoechst 33342 (blue). Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) was used for the negative control. The spot area of MDC fluorescence was quantitatively assessed by high-content screening analysis (n = 5). Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Autophagy induction by Eh-rPrx occurred through the TLR4–TRIF signaling pathway. RAW264.7 cells were pre-treated with TLR4-, MyD88-, or TRIF-specific siRNAs for 24 h, treated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) for 24 h, and analyzed for the expression of Beclin-1 and LC3 by Western blotting (n = 3). Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) was used for the negative control. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 by Student’s t-test; ns, not significant.
Figure 3. Eh-rPrx activated autophagy via the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)–TRIF signaling pathway. (A) Eh-rPrx induced autophagosome formation through TLR4. RAW264.7 cells were pre-treated with the TLR4 inhibitor TAK242, incubated with Eh-rPrx for 24 h, and stained with monodansylcadaverine (MDC) (green) and Hoechst 33342 (blue). Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) was used for the negative control. The spot area of MDC fluorescence was quantitatively assessed by high-content screening analysis (n = 5). Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Autophagy induction by Eh-rPrx occurred through the TLR4–TRIF signaling pathway. RAW264.7 cells were pre-treated with TLR4-, MyD88-, or TRIF-specific siRNAs for 24 h, treated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) for 24 h, and analyzed for the expression of Beclin-1 and LC3 by Western blotting (n = 3). Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) was used for the negative control. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 by Student’s t-test; ns, not significant.
Cells 09 02462 g003
Figure 4. The Eh-rPrx C-terminal was the principal domain responsible for autophagy activation. (A) The C-terminal of Eh-rPrx induced autophagosome formation. RAW264.7 cells were incubated with 5 μg/mL of full-length Eh-rPrx or its N-terminal, middle, or C-terminal fragments for 24 h and then stained with MDC (green) and Hoechst 33342 (blue). The spot area of MDC fluorescence was quantified using high-content screening analysis (n = 5). Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Eh-rPrx C-terminal fragment activated autophagy. RAW264.7 cells were treated as in (A) and analyzed for the expression of Beclin-1 and LC3 by Western blotting (n = 3). (C) Autophagy activation by Eh-rPrx was inhibited by mAb 4G6. RAW264.7 cells were pre-treated with different concentrations of mAb 4G6, incubated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) for 24 h, and analyzed for the protein expression of Beclin-1 and LC3 by Western blotting (n = 3). (D) Eh-rPrx C-terminal fragment contained the recognition site for mAb 4G6. The reaction of full-length Eh-rPrx or its N-terminal, middle, or C-terminal fragments with mAb 4G6 was analyzed by ELISA. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test; ns, not significant.
Figure 4. The Eh-rPrx C-terminal was the principal domain responsible for autophagy activation. (A) The C-terminal of Eh-rPrx induced autophagosome formation. RAW264.7 cells were incubated with 5 μg/mL of full-length Eh-rPrx or its N-terminal, middle, or C-terminal fragments for 24 h and then stained with MDC (green) and Hoechst 33342 (blue). The spot area of MDC fluorescence was quantified using high-content screening analysis (n = 5). Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Eh-rPrx C-terminal fragment activated autophagy. RAW264.7 cells were treated as in (A) and analyzed for the expression of Beclin-1 and LC3 by Western blotting (n = 3). (C) Autophagy activation by Eh-rPrx was inhibited by mAb 4G6. RAW264.7 cells were pre-treated with different concentrations of mAb 4G6, incubated with Eh-rPrx (5 μg/mL) for 24 h, and analyzed for the protein expression of Beclin-1 and LC3 by Western blotting (n = 3). (D) Eh-rPrx C-terminal fragment contained the recognition site for mAb 4G6. The reaction of full-length Eh-rPrx or its N-terminal, middle, or C-terminal fragments with mAb 4G6 was analyzed by ELISA. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test; ns, not significant.
Cells 09 02462 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Qiao, K.; Feng, M.; Zhou, H.; Tachibana, H.; Cheng, X. Autophagy Activated by Peroxiredoxin of Entamoeba histolytica. Cells 2020, 9, 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9112462

AMA Style

Li X, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Qiao K, Feng M, Zhou H, Tachibana H, Cheng X. Autophagy Activated by Peroxiredoxin of Entamoeba histolytica. Cells. 2020; 9(11):2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9112462

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xia, Yuhan Zhang, Yanqing Zhao, Ke Qiao, Meng Feng, Hang Zhou, Hiroshi Tachibana, and Xunjia Cheng. 2020. "Autophagy Activated by Peroxiredoxin of Entamoeba histolytica" Cells 9, no. 11: 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9112462

APA Style

Li, X., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Qiao, K., Feng, M., Zhou, H., Tachibana, H., & Cheng, X. (2020). Autophagy Activated by Peroxiredoxin of Entamoeba histolytica. Cells, 9(11), 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9112462

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop