Next Article in Journal
The Intestinal Barrier and Current Techniques for the Assessment of Gut Permeability
Next Article in Special Issue
The DNA Glycosylase NEIL2 Suppresses Fusobacterium-Infection-Induced Inflammation and DNA Damage in Colonic Epithelial Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Nuclear Envelope Proteins Modulating the Heterochromatin Formation and Functions in Fission Yeast
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Chromatin Response to Double-Strand DNA Breaks and Their Repair
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/cells9081907
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phosphorylation Targets of DNA-PK and Their Role in HIV-1 Replication

by
Andrey Anisenko
1,2,*,
Marina Kan
2,
Olga Shadrina
1,2,
Anna Brattseva
2 and
Marina Gottikh
1
1
Chemistry Department and Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
2
Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia;
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(8), 1907; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081907
Submission received: 5 July 2020 / Revised: 13 August 2020 / Accepted: 14 August 2020 / Published: 16 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Double-Strand DNA Break Repair and Human Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a trimeric nuclear complex consisting of a large protein kinase and the Ku heterodimer. The kinase activity of DNA-PK is required for efficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). We also showed that the kinase activity of DNA-PK is essential for post-integrational DNA repair in the case of HIV-1 infection. Besides, DNA-PK is known to participate in such cellular processes as protection of mammalian telomeres, transcription, and some others where the need for its phosphorylating activity is not clearly elucidated. We carried out a systematic search and analysis of DNA-PK targets described in the literature and identified 67 unique DNA-PK targets phosphorylated in response to various in vitro and/or in vivo stimuli. A functional enrichment analysis of DNA-PK targets and determination of protein–protein associations among them were performed. For 27 proteins from these 67 DNA-PK targets, their participation in the HIV-1 life cycle was demonstrated. This information may be useful for studying the functioning of DNA-PK in various cellular processes, as well as in various stages of HIV-1 replication.

1. Introduction

DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a heterotrimeric complex that consists of Ku70 (XRCC6), Ku80 (XRCC5), and DNA-PKcs (PRKDC). The last one belongs to the phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase-like kinases (PIKKs) family [1]. DNA-PK is a major component of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair system, which initiates the non-homologous end joining pathway (NHEJ). DNA-PK also participates in V(D)J and class-switch recombination [1]. More and more non-canonical functions of DNA-PK have recently been reported [2]; for instance, this complex has been shown to participate in ageing processes and metabolism regulation [3], transcription [4], and telomere maintenance [5,6].
NHEJ pathway begins with the recognition of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) by Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer. After that, DNA-PKcs is recruited to the DNA damage site and binds to the Ku70/Ku80-DNA complex, which triggers its kinase activity. The phosphorylating activity of this enzyme is crucial for efficient recruitment and activity regulation of DNA repair factors [1]. Activation of DNA-PK due to binding to DNA is a canonical activation mode, which is typical for such cellular functions of DNA-PK as DSB repair, V(D)J and class-switch recombination, and foreign DNA sensing [1,7,8].
However, it has recently been shown that DNA-PK activation is also possible under its interaction with RNA. This non-canonical activation has been described for RNA helicase A and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 phosphorylation [5,6,9].
One more example of the non-canonical activation of DNA-PKcs has been discovered by studying how the DNA-PK complex is involved in HIV-1 post-integrational repair (PIR) [10]. The integration of HIV-1 genome is vital for efficient production of new viral particles. However, this process is the key source of danger for further viral reproduction, because HIV-1 DNA integration into the cellular DNA causes its damage [11]. The integration of viral DNA results in the formation of proviral DNA with five-nucleotide single-strand gaps in genomic DNA on both sides of the viral DNA, and the unmatched dinucleotides located on the 5′ ends of the viral DNA (the so-called integration intermediate) (Figure 1). Cellular systems of DNA repair restore the integrity of this integration intermediate, which eventually results in the formation of a provirus—a template for the production of new virions [11].
Using a modified variant of gag-alu specific PCR [12], we found that DNA-PK components, Ku70, Ku80, and DNA-PKs, are involved in PIR of the integration intermediate [10]. Moreover, the recruitment of DNA-PK to viral DNA integration sites and the activation of its catalytic subunit is mediated by the direct interaction of HIV-1 integrase (IN) (the enzyme accomplishing the integration of viral DNA into the cell’s genome) and Ku70, a part of DNA-PK [10] (Figure 1). The impaired interaction between these proteins decreases the infectivity of VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-like particles. We also showed that the phosphorylating activity of DNA-PKcs is crucial for the efficient accomplishment of PIR, since the low-molecular specific inhibitor of DNA-PKcs kinase activity Nu7441 decreases both the PIR efficiency and the pseudovirus infectivity [10]. Thus, it is obvious, that DNA-PK as well as its targets, phosphorylated during PIR, are necessary for the efficient completion of this process. Importantly, there are no double-stranded DNA breaks in the product of viral DNA integration. In this case, DNA-PK activation is triggered by IN binding to Ku70, since IN mutations disturbing this binding significantly reduce the PIR efficiency and disrupt the pseudovirus sensitivity to Nu7441 [10]. Therefore, this is an example of non-canonical activation of DNA-PK due to protein–protein binding.
The necessity of DNA-PK phosphorylating activity has also been shown for some other cellular processes. For example, phosphorylation of TRIM28 by DNA-PK converts it to an elongation factor during transcription regulation [13]. Just recently, the necessity of RNA polymerase II phosphorylation by DNA-PK for the efficient transcription from the HIV-1 promoter and reactivation of the latent provirus has been clearly demonstrated [14]. However, the mechanism of DNA-PK activation during transcription remains obscure, since the DNA-binding component of DNA-PK, the Ku protein, has high affinity to DNA ends, whereas its ability to interact with internal DNA sequences is not proved clearly [15].
To date, there is a lack of systematic research of phosphoproteome alterations upon DNA-PK activation. In one of the most grand-scale studies aimed at finding DNA-PKcs targets, 26 proteins have been found to be extensively phosphorylated upon the activation of this kinase [16]. However, among these proteins, there are no some classical DNA-PK targets (e.g., p53), which indicates that this list is not complete. The lack of such systematic studies, unfortunately, complicates the understanding of details of regulation of DNA-PK-dependent processes including the further study of HIV-1 PIR and transcription regulation.
In the present study, we first performed a search and analysis of DNA-PK targets described in literature. We managed to collect information on 67 unique DNA-PK targets, phosphorylated in response to various stimuli in vitro and/or in vivo. The represented targets could be conventionally divided into the following functional groups: DNA-repair, cell response to heat, post-translational RNA processing, transcription regulation, and a less functionally homogeneous cluster with proteins involved in cell cycle regulation (e.g., TP53 and MDM2), RNA biogenesis regulation (e.g., Jun, POLR2A, and POU2F1), and response to exo- and endogenous stimuli (e.g., AKT1 and AKT2). We also separately analyzed the literature data on the involvement of the indicated DNA-PK targets in HIV-1 replication.

2. Cellular Functions of DNA-PK

DNA-PK is a huge heterotrimeric complex comprised of the Ku70 and Ku80 that form the Ku-heterodimer and a 470-kDa catalytic subunit DNA-PKcs. The involvement of the DNA-PK protein complex, as well as its DNA-binding component Ku, in various cellular processes is being studied quite extensively [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Nevertheless, the functional role of DNA-PK has been thoroughly described only for DNA double-strand break repair by NHEJ pathway [1].
DNA-PKcs as a member of PIKKs family, together with two other kinases from the same family called ATM and ATR, maintains genome stability through regulation of the cellular DNA damage response (DDR). These kinases are activated in response to DNA damage, which leads to cell cycle arrest and DNA repair due to phosphorylation of different protein targets [1]. When activated, DNA-PKcs preferentially phosphorylates protein targets at canonical for PIKK S/T-Q sites, but the phosphorylation within non-S/T-Q contexts has also been shown [1].
DNA-PK mediates DSB repair by NHEJ-pathway, which is a major cell cycle independent repair pathway for this type of DNA lesions. The less error-prone way to repair DSB is a homologous recombination (HR), which is orchestrated by ATM. It takes place only in late S-G2 phases of cell cycle, and here NHEJ competes with HR pathway. Despite the significant difference between HR and NHEJ mechanisms in the DNA integrity restoration, DNA-PKcs may also participate in negative regulation of HR [17]. This regulation depends on kinase activity of DNA-PKcs [18], and may be explained by phosphorylation of ATM [19].
In the NHEJ pathway several principal stages can be distinguished: (1) DSB sensing; (2) recruitment of repair factors to the damage site and synapsis of DNA ends; (3) processing of DNA ends; and (4) ligation of these ends together. Ring-shaped Ku-heterodimer rapidly binds DNA ends after DSB formation [20,21] and increases the affinity of DNA-PKcs to DNA ends [22], which results in DNA-PK complex assembly and the activation of the catalytic subunit [23]. DNA-PK complex acts both as a scaffold platform for NHEJ participants (XLF, XRCC4, APLF, Ligase IV, etc.) that are essential for synapsis formation, end-processing, and ligation and as a kinase that modifies chromatin around the DSB, regulates the activity of repair factors as well as promotes DNA-PK disassembly from DSB sites to allow DNA ends’ ligation [1,23,24,25]. Noteworthy, DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation is important for DNA-repair regulation. DNA-PKcs undergoes autophosphorylation in a DNA-damage dependent manner at multiple S/T-Q (S2056, T2609, S2612, S2620, T2638, T2647, and T3950) as well as non-S/T-Q site (S2624) in vivo [26]. Neither S2056 nor T2609 is required for DNA-PKcs kinase activity, but both are important for DNA repair. The current model suggests that their phosphorylation causes conformational changes that promote DNA-PK disassembly from DSB sites to allow DNA-end ligation [1]. Another phosphorylation site with a known effect on DNA repair is located in the kinase domain (T3950) and may act to switch off DNA-PKcs kinase activity when phosphorylated [1].
V(D)J and class switch recombination during B- and T-cell differentiation is another example of a cellular process involving DNA-PK. The DSBs are generated in a programmed enzymatic manner in both processes, and as a result, the NHEJ pathway is an integral part of both processes. The absence or mutation of NHEJ factors results in defective recombination leading to immune deficiencies and/or predisposition to cancers such as leukemias and lymphomas [8,27].
Recently, DNA-PK has been identified as a foreign DNA sensor in the cytoplasm that activates innate immunity. The DNA binding properties of Ku are obligatory for this activity [7,28]. For some viruses such as Vaccinia virus, Human adenovirus 5, and Herpes simplex virus 1, the mechanisms that counteract the DNA sensing by DNA-PK have been described [29,30]. Another cytoplasmic function of DNA-PK is its participation in translation regulation, in particular Ku has been found to bind p53 mRNA and this results in repression of p53 protein synthesis [31]. Of note, the need for phosphorylating activity of DNA-PK for this process has not been established.
In addition, there is a number of other cellular processes involving the components of the DNA-PK complex, however their role cannot be explained by the mechanical ability of DNA-PK to bind the ends of DNA. DNA-PK is shown to be implicated in the regulation of mitosis, telomere maintenance, hypoxic response, metabolism, and transcription regulation. Some of these issues are discussed in detail in other reviews [2,3,6,32]. The involvement of DNA-PK in the regulation of transcription of cellular genes and HIV-1 is discussed in detail below in Section 3 and Section 4, respectively.

3. Phosphorylation Targets of DNA-PK

As mentioned above, DNA-PK kinase activity is important for various cellular processes. Although the components of NHEJ pathway exposed to phosphorylation have been identified [16,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43] and are discussed below, the detailed role of DNA-PK catalytic activity in DSB repair and other processes is not yet completely understood, and our knowledge of phosphoproteome alterations upon DNA-PK activation is not complete.
We found and analyzed DNA-PK targets described in 63 articles, in which the relation between DNA-PK activation and phosphorylation of a human protein is revealed. These studies describe 67 unique human proteins phosphorylated by DNA-PK (Table 1). For 22 of them, phosphorylation has been described in vitro, for 25 of them only in vivo, and for 20 targets both in vitro and in vivo.
The kinase assay using [γ-32P]-ATP was the most frequent method to detect phosphorylation in vitro. In this case, a putative target protein was incubated with DNA-PK complex components under appropriate conditions including the activator of DNA-PKcs. Phosphorylation events were detected by 32P-incorporation into a band in SDS-PAGE that corresponds to the target protein (Table 1, 32P-incorporation). In the case of in vivo targets identification, phosphorylation of proteins was analyzed using Pro-Q Diamond, which is a specific dye for phosphoproteins, followed by mass-spectrometry (Table 1, ProQ-Diamond staining + MS). In this case, the protein that is differentially phosphorylated in the experiment vs. control can be identified, but the identification of phosphorylated peptides needs additional research, which is why phosphorylated amino acid residues have not been identified for some of the targets in Table 1. The site-directed mutagenesis was also used to confirm identified amino acid residues as phosphorylation sites (Table 1, mutagenesis). When it was possible to obtain antibodies against phosphorylated forms of targets, they were used to investigate the details of their phosphorylation (Table 1, WB (Western blot) and IF (immunofluorescence)). In rarer cases, protein phosphorylation was detected by changes in the mobility of the target protein in SDS-PAGE, which is applicable both for in vitro and in vivo studies (Table 1, changes in gel mobility of phosphorylated forms).
DNA end mimicking molecules such as Dbait32H (in vitro and in vivo studies), sheared genomic DNA (in vitro activation), etc. were commonly used as DNA-PK activators: upon their introduction, phosphorylation of the targets was observed (Table 1). Besides, DNA-PK targets were phosphorylated upon exposure to classical DNA-damaging agents: ionizing radiation (IR), UV, bleomycin, etoposide, camptothecin, doxorubicin, zeocin, calicheamicin γ1, and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) (Table 1). In some studies, DNA-PKcs activation and the subsequent phosphorylation of the targets were observed in response to non-canonical stimuli: C1D protein, heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein particle (hnRNP), and telomerase RNA component (hTR) (Table 1).
Phosphorylation sites were identified for 29 of the 67 described proteins (Table 1), most of them belonging to SQ or TQ motifs—sequences found in proteins phosphorylated by the members of PIKKs family: ATM, ATR, and DNA-PKcs [1]. Three (T2624, S3205, and S4026) out of nine DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation sites are not located in SQ or TQ sites [37]. The DNA-PKcs phosphorylation sites on Ku70, Ku86, and XRCC4 are also located in sites other than this consensus [35,40].
DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation of the proteins with the determined phosphorylation sites had various effects on their functionality. Thus, phosphorylation of well-known DNA-repair proteins NHEJ1 [40] and XRCC4 [40,43] was dispensable for DNA repair in vivo. In contrast, phosphorylation of such proteins as ATM [19], DCLRE1C [37], GOLPH3 [51], H2AFX [90], HSP90AA1 [63], NR4A2 [70], POU2F1 [75], PNKP [72], RPA2 [77], and WRN [39] was important for the DNA-repair regulation. Phosphorylation of ATM leads to its inhibition, which may explain how the cell makes its choice between homologous recombination, stimulated by ATM, and NHEJ, given that DNA-PKcs and ATM are both simultaneously recruited and activated at the same DSB ends [19]. C-terminal phosphorylation of Artemis increases its endonucleolytic activity that may affect DNA-end processing in NHEJ-pathway [37]. T7-phosphorylated Hsp90α is accumulated at the site of DNA damage, where it appears to be important for maintaining phosphorylated histone H2AX [63]. Mutations in WRN that impair DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation change the kinetics of WRN dissociation from DSBs and decrease the efficiency of DSB repair [39].
A well-known transcription factor POU2F1 (Oct-1) was phosphorylated by DNA-PK under IR or zeocin treatment, and this event regulated Oct-1 dependent transcription, leading to an increased cell survival after DNA damage [75]. The same effects on the cell survival were observed in the case of DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation of GOLPH3, that regulates Golgi dispersal [51]. Interestingly, the phosphorylation of another transcription factor NR4A2 promotes DSB repair, but NR4A2 transcriptional activity is entirely dispensable in this function. Instead, NR4A2 functions directly at DNA repair sites [70]. Human polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase (PNKP) has the dual function as 5’-DNA kinase and 3’-DNA phosphatase and plays a role in NHEJ and other DNA repair processes. The phosphorylation of PNKP on S114 and S126 in DNA-PK and ATM-dependent manner was demonstrated in vitro, and was confirmed on S126 in vivo. This phosphorylation promotes the retention of PNKP at sites of DNA damage, and may regulate its catalytic activity near DSB sites that helps to successfully complete the DNA repair process [72]. The phosphorylation events described above are important for the successful NHEJ. Moreover, the phosphorylation of RPA32 at S4/S8 by DNA-PKcs is essential for cell survival under replicative stress [77]. Even this shows that the role of the kinase activity of DNA-PK goes beyond the NHEJ-pathway.
In several reports, protein translocation after phosphorylation was detected, and this may be important for the cellular response to DNA-damaging agents [16,44,50]. For example, a cell treatment with antibiotic calicheamicin γ1, which causes DNA double-strand breaks, led to cytoplasmic accumulation of FUS, which depended on phosphorylation of its N-terminus by DNA-PK [50]. Besides, regulation of cell mobility and adhesion was observed in the case of DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation of VIM under Dbait32H treatment [16].
We performed a functional enrichment analysis of DNA-PK targets to elucidate the cellular processes, in which DNA-PK targets are involved. Annotation of 67 genes was performed using the DAVID online analysis tool v 6.8 [91]. Genes were divided into 17 functional clusters with enrichment score higher than 1.7 (Table S1). Most of them were enriched with following terms: DNA-repair (36 targets), nucleotide binding (26 targets), DNA-binding (26 targets), transcription regulation (23 targets), regulation of cellular response to heat (8 targets), RNA processing and splicing (8 targets), PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (8 targets), telomere maintenance (7 targets), cell cycle (7 targets), DNA-unwinding (7 targets), and cytoskeleton (6 targets).
To determine protein–protein associations of DNA-PK targets listed in Table 1, we used STRING database v. 11.0 [92] and revealed a network of directly interacting proteins. We excluded the “text mining” option from the active interaction sources because of the low level of reliability of this type of data, and also because our protein targets were retrieved by the articles’ analysis. It turned out that, among 67 proteins, 56 were directly interconnected (Figure 2A). The resulting network had meaningfully more interactions than expected (218 vs. 64 expected edges) with protein–protein interactions (PPI) enrichment p-value < 10−16. Markov Cluster Algorithm (MCL) analysis revealed five main clusters of the most interconnected nodes.
The proteins in these clusters could be divided according to their functions into DNA repair related proteins, transcription regulation, cell response to heat or unfolded proteins, RNA processing, and cell survival/signaling factors (Figure 2A). Of note, the mathematical approach to protein clusterization in the interaction network (MCL analysis) led to practically the same results as the functional classification.
Taking into account that our target list (Table 1) contained some proteins for which DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation has been confirmed only in vitro, we analyzed “in vitro” and “in vivo” target groups separately, 22 and 45 targets, respectively. The second group contained both in vivo and in vitro/in vivo confirmed targets. Analysis of the “in vitro” group showed significant PPI enrichment: p-value < 10−16, 43 vs. 7 expected edges. This group can be divided into three clusters containing at least four proteins. The clusters contain proteins with the following functions: DNA-repair, transcription regulation, and RNA-processing (Figure 2B). For the “in vivo” group (PPI enrichment p-value < 2.22 × 10−16, 80 vs. 27 expected edges), five clusters were identified. According to their functions, these proteins could be classified as DNA-repair, RNA processing, cell response to heat or unfolded proteins, and cell survival/signaling factors (Figure 2C). The full list of the enriched biological processes and molecular functions (GO) is presented in Table S2.
The analysis of Table 1 and Figure 2 demonstrates that most of the research of DNA-PK targets was focused on proteins anyway involved in DNA repair processes. This is not surprising, given that the role of DNA-PK in DNA repair is studied best. Furthermore, it was a priori assumed that DNA-PK is activated only upon binding to DNA ends forming as a result of a double-strand break. However, DNA-PK may also be activated in the absence of DNA ends [5,9,46]. For instance, hTR dependent phosphorylation of HNRNPA1 by DNA-PK is essential for telomere maintenance [5]. Although these studies are not numerous, the variety of systems with confirmed DNA-independent activation of DNA-PK lends credibility to these data. All these data additionally demonstrate that DNA-PK may regulate a broad spectrum of cellular processes. In particular, the ability of DNA-PK to become activated upon binding to RNA may explain the presence of a substantial number of target proteins involved in RNA processing in the “in vitro”, as well as in the “in vivo” group.
As shown in Figure 2B, among DNA-PK phosphorylation targets identified in vitro, there is a significant group consisting of proteins involved in transcription regulation, such as TBP, JUN, MYC, etc. Transcription regulation factors can also be found in the “in vivo” group (POU2F1, TRIM28, POLR2A, NR4A2, and RBBP7). Such targets seem quite plausible, given that the association between activation of DDR kinases (ATM and DNA-PKcs) and transcriptional regulation has already been demonstrated. On the one hand, transcription from certain promoters is initiated through the introduction of DSB by topoisomerase IIβ, and DNA-PK is involved in the repair of such breaks [93]. It was also shown that expression regulation of some stimulus-inducible and developmental genes can occur by RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) pausing and pause release [94]. Typically, RNAP II pauses at around +30–100 relative to the transcriptional start site until activating cellular signals induce elongation [95]. Interestingly, the DNA-repair factor TRIM28 is a main player that maintain RNAP II paused state. To release RNAP II, topoisomerase II should introduce the DSB at the regulated genes. This event activates DDR kinases ATM and DNA-PKcs, which phosphorylate protein targets including H2AX and TRIM28. The phosphorylated TRIM28 is no longer able to retain RNAP II near the transcriptional start, which results in processive elongation of RNAP II and effective synthesis of RNA [13,87,94]. Interestingly, these transcription-induced, topoisomerase II-mediated DSBs can also be exploited therapeutically and propose that, in hormone-dependent tumors such as breast and prostate cancers, a hormone-cycling therapy, in combination with topoisomerase II poisons or inhibitors of the DNA repair component DNA-PKcs, could overwhelm cancer cells with transcription-associated DSBs [96]. On the other hand, the occurrence of DSBs in a human gene transcribed by RNAP II is known to lead to inhibition of transcription elongation and reinitiation. Upon inhibition of DNA-PK (or ATM) activity, RNAP II bypasses the break and continues transcription elongation, suggesting that it is not the break per se that inhibits the processivity of RNAP II, but the activity of the kinases [97,98]. However, it is known that DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation of such NF-κB inhibitors as IκBα (NFKBIA) and IκBβ (NFKBIB) favors the association of NF-κB with DNA [68]. It has been shown in other studies that NF-κB is activated as part of the DNA damage response and is thought to orchestrate a cell survival pathway, which, together with the activation of cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair, allows the cell in cases of limited damage to restore a normal life cycle [99]. DNA-PK likely utilizes several mechanisms to regulate transcription and is capable of exerting both positive and negative effects.

4. DNA-PK Targets in HIV Replication

HIV-1 replication cycle is conventionally divided into early and late replication stages. The early stages are aimed at the formation of proviral DNA, i.e., that of the copy of the viral genome integrated into the genome of the infected cell. They include viral attachment and entry, reverse transcription, nuclear import, integration, and post-integrational DNA repair (PIR) [11,100]. The late stages include virion component biosynthesis and assembly of new viral particles [100]. The dependence of the HIV-1 replication on the DNA-PK-complex components has been previously shown by different groups [10,101,102,103,104,105,106,107]. We previously showed that the phosphorylating activity of DNA-PKcs was necessary for HIV-1 PIR [10]. To search for possible downstream proteins involved in this process, we analyzed the data on the role of DNA-PK targets in Table 1 in HIV-1 replication.
For 27 proteins out of 67 represented in Table 1, information on their involvement in HIV-1 replication cycle is available. Thus, 13 proteins favor HIV-1 replication, 6 proteins impair it, data for 3 proteins are controversial, and 5 proteins have opposite effects on HIV-1 replication, depending on the life cycle stage (Table 2). Table 2 also provides information on HIV-1 life cycle stages influenced by these factors.
It has been suggested that certain factors are involved in post-integrational DNA repair or integration (Table 2). Unfortunately, the discrimination of their effects on each of these two stages was not possible up until recently, since there were no methods allowing the quantitative assessment of post-integrational DNA repair. That is why the effects of cellular proteins on the repair were studied only by indirect methods, for instance, based on the decrease of integrated HIV-1 DNA levels 48 hpi vs. 24 hpi [108]. Only three proteins, DHX9, EIF4A1, and p53 (TP53), have been shown to participate in reverse transcription, the latter being also involved in other stages of viral life cycle (Table 2). However, the significance of phosphorylation of these proteins for their functionality in HIV-1 replication has not yet been demonstrated.
Here, we dwell on DNA-PK phosphorylation targets involved in post-integrational DNA repair, starting with DNA-PKcs (PRKDC) itself, as well as Ku70 (XRCC6) and Ku80 (XRCC5), which form DNA-PK complex together. Their beneficial effect on HIV-1 replication was shown in numerous studies [101,102,103,104,105,106]. It was speculated that DNA-PK complex is involved in PIR and our method of the quantitative assessment of PIR efficiency [12] allowed directly proving the involvement of this complex in this process [12].
Based on indirect data, kinase ATM was supposed to be involved in PIR [108]. Thus, the presence of small-molecule ATM inhibitor Ku55933 was shown to have no effect on the level of integrated viral DNA at 24 hpi; however, at 48 hpi, the levels of integrated DNA in inhibitor-treated cells drastically decreased, but remained practically unchanged in the control cell line [108]. The authors attributed this effect to the impossibility of post-integrational DNA repair with ATM being inhibited. The role of MRN complex components MRE11 and Nibrin (NBN), the main factors recruiting ATM to DNA damage sites [109], in the replicative cycle is controversial [106,110]. Thus, Smith et al. showed that the decreased levels of MRN complex components decreases the efficiency of transduction with an HIV-1-based vector [110], whereas, in the study by Sakurai et al., the transduction of cells with defective components of this complex was similar to that in control cell lines [106]. However, integration site sequencing revealed the higher mutation rate in integration sites in the absence of NBN and MRE11, which supports the dysfunctional repair in these cells [106]. It may indirectly support these proteins being involved in the PIR of proviral DNA.
PARP-1 is another DNA-PK target, the role of which in HIV-1 replication has been actively studied, but, to date, the results are rather controversial [153]. Some studies [130,131,132,133] show that PARP-1 plays an important role in HIV-1 integration. At the same time, the importance of PARP-1 for retroviral replication is doubted in other studies [134,135,136]. More recent research shows that PARP-1 is involved in HIV-1 replication in the step of repression of transcription from the provirus, but it does not affect the integration level [138,154]. Nevertheless, various studies describe the beneficial effect of PARP-1 on the transcription from the HIV-1 promoter [130,137,155], as well as its negative effect [138,154,156]. However, the data on the negative effect of PARP-1 on transcription were obtained in a chicken B lymphoblastoid cell system, whereas the beneficial effect was observed in human cells (HeLa, J111 and human primary monocyte-derived macrophages), which is a more relevant model for studying HIV-1.
Histone H2AX (H2AFX gene), another DNA-PK target, is phosphorylated upon retroviral integration; however, this event is not likely to be necessary for efficient replication [119], but can be used as a marker for PIR research.
Most proteins in Table 2 regulate transcription from the LTR promoter, i.e., one of late stages of the replication cycle. HIV-1 genes are transcribed by RNAP II (POLR2A is a part of this complex) from a viral promoter in the 5′LTR (long terminal repeat). Besides the promoter, the 5′LTR contains a modulator sequence and an enhancer, interacting with a number of transcription factors regulating the transcription of HIV genes. The provirus may be latent or actively transcribed. The latent state may be characterized by the absence of transcription from the LTR promoter or by synthesis of short abortive fragments of 60–80 nucleotides, forming a stable RNA hairpin TAR (trans-activation response element) [157]. After TAR RNA synthesis, RNAP II stops, being bound to factors repressing transcription elongation, namely NELF (negative elongation factor) and DSIF (5,6-dichloro-1-β-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole sensitivity-inducing factor) [158]. For the transition into the state of active transcription, the C-terminal domain of RNAP II needs to be hyperphosphorylated on S2. The key participant of this process is P-TEFb complex (positive transcription elongation factor), recruited to HIV-1 promoter by direct interaction with Tat viral protein bound to TAR RNA [159]. However, there is increasing evidence of DNA-PK involvement in this process.
In particular, it is known that DNA-PK may phosphorylate the C-terminal domain of RNAP II [74], and, along with the Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer, DNA-PKcs may be precipitated from human cells together with the RNAP II holoenzyme [160]. It has also been shown that the Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer may interact with hairpin RNA involved in transcription performed by RNAP II, HIV-1 TAR PHK and 7SK PHK [159,161,162], whereas the catalytic subunit of DNA-PKcs forms a complex with HIV-1 Tat [163] and may phosphorylate it [164]. These various data indicate the possible involvement of the DNA-PK DNA repair complex in the regulation of transcription from the HIV-1 promoter. Of note, S. Tyagi et al. demonstrated the parallel distribution of DNA-PKcs with RNAP II along the HIV-1 provirus before and after transcription activation with tumor necrosis factor alpha. Interestingly, when the provirus changes its state from latent to active, the levels of both DNA-PKcs and RNAP II associated with the HIV-1 promoter increase dramatically [164]. Finally, it has recently been shown that, in different cell lines, DNA-PK increases the phosphorylation of RNAP II C-terminal domain at S5 and S2 by directly catalyzing phosphorylation and by augmenting the recruitment of P-TEFb at HIV LTR. Thus, the DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation of RNAP II likely plays an important role in both transcription initiation and elongation [14]. Considering the role of Top II and DNA-PKcs in pause release of RNAP II through the DSB formation in cellular stimuli induced genes, one may assume that LTR-driven transcription may also be regulated in the same manner. Although this idea is more speculative and needs further testing, TRIM28, which is main maintainer of paused RNAP II, has been demonstrated to participate in HIV latency by SUMOylating CDK9 and inhibiting P-TEFb [149]. Moreover, DNA-PK utilizes the mechanism of the TRIM28 recruitment at LTR and its phosphorylation to release paused RNAP II, thus influencing different steps of transcription from the LTR promoter [14].
LTR is an intricate regulatory sequence of the HIV-1 genome. It contains binding sites of such transcription regulators as AP-1 complex (JUN), c-MYB, NFAT, GR (NR3C1), USF1, ETS1, LEF1, CEBP, NF-κB, SP1, TBP, UBP1, UBP2, CTF/NF1, and IRF [141]. Some of these factors, such as JUN, SP1, and TBP, may be phosphorylated by DNA-PK in response to various stimuli (Table 1). The phosphorylated TBP and TFIIB synergistically stimulate RNAP II basal transcription from adenovirus major late promoter, which means that DNA-PK can positively regulate the RNAP II basal transcription by phosphorylating TBP and TFIIB [52]. It has been shown that Sp1 forms a tight protein–protein complex with viral Tat, and both proteins in this complex are phosphorylated by DNA-PK. Importantly, it is the phosphorylation status of Sp1 and not the levels of LTR-promoter-bound Sp1 that affects HIV-1 transcription [165]. It was previously shown that DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation of NF-κB inhibitors IκBα (NFKBIA) and IκBβ (NFKBIB) promotes the association of NF-κB with DNA [68]. Therefore, DNA-PK associated with the LTR promoter may favor LTR-dependent HIV-1 transcription by promoting the binding of NF-κB with LTR.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we tried to systematize the literature data on proteins phosphorylated by DNA-PK, having two goals: to understand in which cellular processes the phosphorylating activity of this kinase may be important and to find potential participants of PIR among DNA-PK targets. The results of our work undoubtedly show the variety of DNA-PK’s functions, not limited by participation in DNA double-strand break repair by NHEJ pathway. In the case of HIV-1, it is involved in at least two stages of the replication cycle of the virus: post-integrational DNA repair and regulation of transcription from the LTR promoter. Unfortunately, the analysis of the targets of DNA-PK related to HIV-1 replication cycle (Table 2) does not clearly reveal the participants of the PIR process exposed to phosphorylation. Assuming PIR may involve proteins from other repair processes, the most likely candidates are ATM, Artemis (DCLRE1C), MRE11, NBN, and XRCC4. However, further research is clearly needed to exactly define the events of HIV-1 PIR occurring upon DNA-PKcs activation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/9/8/1907/s1, Table S1: DAVID functional annotation of DNA-PKcs targets, Table S2: Enriched biological processes and molecular functions in DNA-PKcs targets list.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. and M.G.; methodology, A.A. and O.S.; formal analysis, A.A. and M.K.; investigation, M.K., A.A., O.S., and A.B.; data curation, M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.; writing—review and editing, M.G., O.S., A.B., and M.K.; visualization, A.A. and M.K.; supervision, M.G.; project administration, A.A.; and funding acquisition, A.A. and M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by RSF grants 19-74-10021 (analysis of DNA-PK targets, analysis of proteins involved in all stages of HIV-1 life cycle except the transcription) and 17-14-01107 (analysis of proteins involved in HIV-1 transcription)

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Blackford, A.N.; Jackson, S.P. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response. Mol. Cell 2017, 66, 801–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Goodwin, J.F.; Knudsen, K.E. Beyond DNA Repair: DNA-PK Function in Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 1126–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chung, J.H. The role of DNA-PK in aging and energy metabolism. FEBS J. 2018, 285, 1959–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Goodwin, J.F.; Kothari, V.; Drake, J.M.; Zhao, S.; Dylgjeri, E.; Dean, J.L.; Schiewer, M.J.; McNair, C.; Jones, J.K.; Aytes, A.; et al. DNA-PKcs-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation Drives Prostate Cancer Progression and Metastasis. Cancer Cell 2015, 28, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ting, N.S.Y.; Pohorelic, B.; Yu, Y.; Lees-Miller, S.P.; Beattie, T.L. The human telomerase RNA component, hTR, activates the DNA-dependent protein kinase to phosphorylate heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 6105–6115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sui, J.; Zhang, S.; Chen, B.P. DNA-dependent protein kinase in telomere maintenance and protection. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2020, 25, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ferguson, B.J.; Mansur, D.S.; Peters, N.S.; Ren, H.; Smith, G.L. DNA-PK is a DNA sensor for IRF-3-dependent innate immunity. eLife 2012, 1, e00047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Malu, S.; Malshetty, V.; Francis, D.; Cortes, P. Role of non-homologous end joining in V(D)J recombination. Immunol. Res. 2012, 54, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, S.; Schlott, B.; Görlach, M.; Grosse, F. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) phosphorylates nuclear DNA helicase II/RNA helicase A and hnRNP proteins in an RNA-dependent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Knyazhanskaya, E.S.; Anisenko, A.; Shadrina, O.; Kalinina, A.; Zatsepin, T.; Zalevsky, A.; Mazurov, D.; Gottikh, M. NHEJ pathway is involved in post-integrational DNA repair due to Ku70 binding to HIV-1 integrase. Retrovirology 2019, 16, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Skalka, A.M.; Katz, R.A. Retroviral DNA integration and the DNA damage response. Cell Death Differ. 2005, 12, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Anisenko, A.N.; Knyazhanskaya, E.S.; Isaguliants, M.G.; Gottikh, M.B. A qPCR assay for measuring the post-integrational DNA repair in HIV-1 replication. J. Virol. Methods 2018, 262, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bunch, H.; Zheng, X.; Burkholder, A.; Dillon, S.T.; Motola, S.; Birrane, G.; Ebmeier, C.C.; Levine, S.S.; Fargo, D.; Hu, G.; et al. TRIM28 regulates RNA polymerase II promoter-proximal pausing and pause release. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21, 876–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zicari, S.; Sharma, A.L.; Sahu, G.; Dubrovsky, L.; Sun, L.; Yue, H.; Jada, T.; Ochem, A.; Simon, G.; Bukrinsky, M.; et al. DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) enhances HIV transcription by promoting RNA polymerase II activity and recruitment of transcription machinery at HIV LTR. Oncotarget 2020, 11, 699–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Dynan, W.S.; Yoo, S. Interaction of Ku protein and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit with nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 1551–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kotula, E.; Faigle, W.; Berthault, N.; Dingli, F.; Loew, D.; Sun, J.-S.; Dutreix, M.; Quanz, M. DNA-PK Target Identification Reveals Novel Links between DNA Repair Signaling and Cytoskeletal Regulation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Shrivastav, M.; De Haro, L.P.; Nickoloff, J.A. Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Neal, J.A.; Dang, V.; Douglas, P.; Wold, M.S.; Lees-Miller, S.P.; Meek, K. Inhibition of Homologous Recombination by DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Requires Kinase Activity, Is Titratable, and Is Modulated by Autophosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31, 1719–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhou, Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Jiang, W.; Crowe, J.L.; Zha, S.; Paull, T.T. Regulation of the DNA Damage Response by DNA-PKcs Inhibitory Phosphorylation of ATM. Mol. Cell 2017, 65, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Shao, Z.; Davis, A.J.; Fattah, K.R.; So, S.; Sun, J.; Lee, K.-J.; Harrison, L.; Yang, J.; Chen, D.J. Persistently bound Ku at DNA ends attenuates DNA end resection and homologous recombination. DNA Repair 2012, 11, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Britton, S.; Coates, J.; Jackson, S.P. A new method for high-resolution imaging of Ku foci to decipher mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 202, 579–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. West, R.B.; Yaneva, M.; Lieber, M.R. Productive and Nonproductive Complexes of Ku and DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase at DNA Termini. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 5908–5920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Davis, A.J.; Chen, D.J. DNA double strand break repair via non-homologous end-joining. Transl. Cancer Res. 2013, 2, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Scully, R.; Xie, A. Double strand break repair functions of histone H2AX. Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2013, 750, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wu, Q. Structural mechanism of DNA-end synapsis in the non-homologous end joining pathway for repairing double-strand breaks: Bridge over troubled ends. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2019, 47, 1609–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jette, N.; Lees-Miller, S.P. The DNA-dependent protein kinase: A multifunctional protein kinase with roles in DNA double strand break repair and mitosis. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2015, 117, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chang, H.H.Y.; Pannunzio, N.R.; Adachi, N.; Lieber, M.R. Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dempsey, A.; Bowie, A.G. Innate immune recognition of DNA: A recent history. Virology 2015, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scutts, S.R.; Ember, S.W.; Ren, H.; Ye, C.; Lovejoy, C.A.; Mazzon, M.; Veyer, D.L.; Sumner, R.P.; Smith, G.L. DNA-PK Is Targeted by Multiple Vaccinia Virus Proteins to Inhibit DNA Sensing. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 1953–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Burleigh, K.; Maltbaek, J.H.; Cambier, S.; Green, R.; Gale, M.; James, R.G.; Stetson, D.B. Human DNA-PK activates a STING-independent DNA sensing pathway. Sci. Immunol. 2020, 5, eaba4219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lamaa, A.; Le Bras, M.; Skuli, N.; Britton, S.; Frit, P.; Calsou, P.; Prats, H.; Cammas, A.; Millevoi, S. A novel cytoprotective function for the DNA repair protein Ku in regulating p53 mRNA translation and function. EMBO Rep. 2016, 17, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Mohiuddin, I.S.; Kang, M.H. DNA-PK as an Emerging Therapeutic Target in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Douglas, P.; Sapkota, G.P.; Morrice, N.; Yu, Y.; Goodarzi, A.A.; Merkle, D.; Meek, K.; Alessi, D.R.; Lees-Miller, S.P. Identification of in vitro and in vivo phosphorylation sites in the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase. Biochem. J. 2002, 368, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Matsumoto, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Namba, N.; Umeda, N.; Ma, X.J.; Morita, A.; Tomita, M.; Enomoto, A.; Serizawa, S.; Hirano, K.; et al. Cleavage and phosphorylation of XRCC4 protein induced by X-irradiation. FEBS Lett. 2000, 478, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Chan, D.W.; Ye, R.; Veillette, C.J.; Lees-Miller, S.P. DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Phosphorylation Sites in Ku 70/80 Heterodimer. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 1819–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, B.P.; Chan, D.W.; Kobayashi, J.; Burma, S.; Asaithamby, A.; Morotomi-Yano, K.; Botvinick, E.; Qin, J.; Chen, D.J. Cell Cycle Dependence of DNA-dependent Protein Kinase Phosphorylation in Response to DNA Double Strand Breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 14709–14715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ma, Y.; Pannicke, U.; Lu, H.; Niewolik, D.; Schwarz, K.; Lieber, M.R. The DNA-dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunit Phosphorylation Sites in Human Artemis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 33839–33846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Karmakar, P.; Piotrowski, J.; Brosh, R.M.; Sommers, J.A.; Miller, S.P.L.; Cheng, W.H.; Snowden, C.M.; Ramsden, D.A.; Bohr, V.A. Werner Protein Is a Target of DNA-dependent Protein Kinase In Vivo and In Vitro, and Its Catalytic Activities Are Regulated by Phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 18291–18302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kusumoto-Matsuo, R.; Ghosh, D.; Karmakar, P.; May, A.; Ramsden, D.; Bohr, V.A. Serines 440 and 467 in the Werner syndrome protein are phosphorylated by DNA-PK and affects its dynamics in response to DNA double strand breaks. Aging 2014, 6, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yu, Y.; Wang, W.; Ding, Q.; Ye, R.; Chen, D.; Merkle, D.; Schriemer, D.; Meek, K.; Lees-Miller, S.P. DNA-PK phosphorylation sites in XRCC4 are not required for survival after radiation or for V(D)J recombination. DNA Repair 2003, 2, 1239–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Leber, R.; Wise, T.W.; Mizuta, R.; Meek, K. The XRCC4 Gene Product Is a Target for and Interacts with the DNA-dependent Protein Kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 1794–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Critchlow, S.E.; Bowater, R.P.; Jackson, S.P. Mammalian DNA double-strand break repair protein XRCC4 interacts with DNA ligase IV. Curr. Biol. 1997, 7, 588–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Moghani, A.R.A.; Sharma, M.K.; Matsumoto, Y. In cellulo phosphorylation of DNA double-strand break repair protein XRCC4 on Ser260 by DNA-PK. J. Radiat. Res. 2018, 59, 700–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Dragoi, A.M.; Fu, X.; Ivanov, S.S.; Zhang, P.; Sheng, L.; Wu, D.; Li, G.C.; Chu, W.M. DNA-PKcs, but not TLR9, is required for activation of Akt by CpG-DNA. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 779–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Tu, Y.; Ji, C.; Yang, B.; Yang, Z.; Gu, H.; Lu, C.C.; Wang, R.; Su, Z.L.; Chen, B.; Sun, W.L.; et al. DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs)-SIN1 association mediates ultraviolet B (UVB)-induced Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation and skin cell survival. Mol. Cancer 2013, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Yavuzer, U.; Smith, G.C.; Bliss, T.; Werner, D.; Jackson, S.P. DNA end-independent activation of DNA-PK mediated via association with the DNA-binding protein C1D. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 2188–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Goodarzi, A.A.; Yu, Y.; Riballo, E.; Douglas, P.; Walker, S.A.; Ye, R.; Härer, C.; Marchetti, C.; Morrice, N.; Jeggo, P.A.; et al. DNA-PK autophosphorylation facilitates Artemis endonuclease activity. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 3880–3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Soubeyrand, S.; Pope, L.; De Chasseval, R.; Gosselin, D.; Dong, F.; De Villartay, J.-P.; Haché, R.J.G. Artemis Phosphorylated by DNA-dependent Protein Kinase Associates Preferentially with Discrete Regions of Chromatin. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 358, 1200–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ting, N.S.Y.; Kao, P.N.; Chan, D.W.; Lintott, L.G.; Lees-Miller, S.P. DNA-dependent protein kinase interacts with antigen receptor response element binding proteins NF90 and NF45. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 2136–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Deng, Q.; Holler, C.J.; Taylor, G.; Hudson, K.F.; Watkins, W.; Gearing, M.; Ito, D.; Murray, M.E.; Dickson, D.W.; Seyfried, N.T.; et al. FUS is Phosphorylated by DNA-PK and Accumulates in the Cytoplasm after DNA Damage. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 7802–7813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Farber-Katz, S.E.; Dippold, H.C.; Buschman, M.D.; Peterman, M.C.; Xing, M.; Noakes, C.J.; Tat, J.; Ng, M.M.; Rahajeng, J.; Cowan, D.M.; et al. DNA Damage Triggers Golgi Dispersal via DNA-PK and GOLPH3. Cell 2014, 156, 413–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Chibazakura, T.; Watanabe, F.; Kitajima, S.; Tsukada, K.; Yasukochi, Y.; Teraoka, H. Phosphorylation of human general transcription factors TATA-binding protein and transcription factor IIB by DNA-dependent protein kinase—Synergistic stimulation of RNA polymerase II basal transcription in vitro. JBIC J. Boil. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 247, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Park, E.-J.; Chan, D.W.; Park, J.-H.; Oettinger, M.A.; Kwon, J. DNA-PK is activated by nucleosomes and phosphorylates H2AX within the nucleosomes in an acetylation-dependent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 6819–6827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Rogakou, E.P.; Pilch, D.R.; Orr, A.H.; Ivanova, V.S.; Bonner, W.M. DNA Double-stranded Breaks Induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 5858–5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. An, J.; Huang, Y.C.; Xu, Q.Z.; Zhou, L.J.; Shang, Z.F.; Huang, B.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.D.; Wu, D.C.; Zhou, P.K. DNA-PKcs plays a dominant role in the regulation of H2AX phosphorylation in response to DNA damage and cell cycle progression. BMC Mol. Biol. 2010, 11, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Koike, M.; Sugasawa, J.; Yasuda, M.; Koike, A. Tissue-specific DNA-PK-dependent H2AX phosphorylation and γ-H2AX elimination after X-irradiation in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 376, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, H.; Wang, M.; Wang, H.; Böcker, W.; Iliakis, G. Complex H2AX phosphorylation patterns by multiple kinases including ATM and DNA-PK in human cells exposed to ionizing radiation and treated with kinase inhibitors. J. Cell. Physiol. 2005, 202, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Reitsema, T.; Klokov, D.; Banáth, J.P.; Olive, P.L. DNA-PK is responsible for enhanced phosphorylation of histone H2AX under hypertonic conditions. DNA Repair 2005, 4, 1172–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sui, J.; Lin, Y.-F.; Xu, K.; Lee, K.-J.; Wang, D.; Chen, B.P. DNA-PKcs phosphorylates hnRNP-A1 to facilitate the RPA-to-POT1 switch and telomere capping after replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 5971–5983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Berglund, F.M.; Clarke, P.R. hnRNP-U is a specific DNA-dependent protein kinase substrate phosphorylated in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 381, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Britton, S.; Froment, C.; Frit, P.; Monsarrat, B.; Salles, B.; Calsou, P. Cell nonhomologous end joining capacity controls SAF-A phosphorylation by DNA-PK in response to DNA double-strand breaks inducers. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 3717–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Walker, A.; Hunt, T.; Jackson, R.; Anderson, C. Double-stranded DNA induces the phosphorylation of several proteins including the 90 000 mol. wt. heat-shock protein in animal cell extracts. EMBO J. 1985, 4, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Quanz, M.; Herbette, A.; Sayarath, M.; De Koning, L.; Dubois, T.; Sun, J.-S.; Dutreix, M. Heat Shock Protein 90α (Hsp90α) Is Phosphorylated in Response to DNA Damage and Accumulates in Repair Foci. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 8803–8815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Lees-Miller, S.P.; Anderson, C.W. The human double-stranded DNA-activated protein kinase phosphorylates the 90-kDa heat-shock protein, hsp90 alpha at two NH2-terminal threonine residues. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 17275–17280. [Google Scholar]
  65. Bannister, A.J.; Gottlieb, T.M.; Kouzarides, T.; Jackson, S.P. c-Jun is phosphorylated by the DNA-dependent protein kinase in vitro; definition of the minimal kinase recognition motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21, 1289–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Mayo, L.D.; Turchi, J.J.; Berberich, S.J. Mdm-2 phosphorylation by DNA-dependent protein kinase prevents interaction with p53. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 5013–5016. [Google Scholar]
  67. Iijima, S.; Teraoka, H.; Date, T.; Tsukada, K. DNA-activated protein kinase in Raji Burkitt’s lymphoma cells. Eur. J. Biochem. 1992, 206, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, L.; Kwak, Y.-T.; Bex, F.; Garcia-Martinez, L.F.; Li, X.-H.; Meek, K.; Lane, W.S.; Gaynor, R.B. DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Phosphorylation of IκBα and IκBβ Regulates NF-κB DNA Binding Properties. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 4221–4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Yu, Y.; Mahaney, B.L.; Yano, K.-I.; Ye, R.; Fang, S.; Douglas, P.; Chen, D.J.; Lees-Miller, S.P. DNA-PK and ATM phosphorylation sites in XLF/Cernunnos are not required for repair of DNA double strand breaks. DNA Repair 2008, 7, 1680–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Malewicz, M.; Kadkhodaei, B.; Kee, N.; Volakakis, N.; Hellman, U.; Viktorsson, K.; Leung, C.Y.; Chen, B.; Lewensohn, R.; Van Gent, D.C.; et al. Essential role for DNA-PK-mediated phosphorylation of NR4A nuclear orphan receptors in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 2031–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Ariumi, Y.; Masutani, M.; Copeland, T.D.; Mimori, T.; Sugimura, T.; Shimotohno, K.; Ueda, K.; Hatanaka, M.; Noda, M. Suppression of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity by DNA-dependent protein kinase in vitro. Oncogene 1999, 18, 4616–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Zolner, A.E.; Abdou, I.; Ye, R.; Mani, R.S.; Fanta, M.; Yu, Y.; Douglas, P.; Tahbaz, N.; Fang, S.; Dobbs, T.; et al. Phosphorylation of polynucleotide kinase/ phosphatase by DNA-dependent protein kinase and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated regulates its association with sites of DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 9224–9237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Sastre-Moreno, G.; Pryor, J.M.; Moreno-Oñate, M.; Herrero-Ruiz, A.M.; Cortés-Ledesma, F.; Blanco, L.; Ramsden, D.A.; Ruiz, J.F. Regulation of human polλ by ATM-mediated phosphorylation during non-homologous end joining. DNA Repair 2017, 51, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Peterson, S.R.; Dvir, A.; Anderson, C.W.; Dynan, W.S. DNA binding provides a signal for phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II heptapeptide repeats. Genes Dev. 1992, 6, 426–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Schild-Poulter, C.; Shih, A.; Yarymowich, N.C.; Haché, R.J.G. Down-regulation of histone H2B by DNA-dependent protein kinase in response to DNA damage through modulation of octamer transcription factor 1. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 7197–7205. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Block, W.D.; Yu, Y.; Lees-Miller, S.P. Phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase-like serine/threonine protein kinases (PIKKs) are required for DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of the 32 kDa subunit of replication protein A at threonine 21. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ashley, A.K.; Shrivastav, M.; Nie, J.; Amerin, C.; Troksa, K.; Glanzer, J.G.; Liu, S.; Opiyo, S.O.; Dimitrova, D.D.; Le, P.; et al. DNA-PK phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 regulates replication stress checkpoint activation, fork restart, homologous recombination and mitotic catastrophe. DNA Repair 2014, 21, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Liaw, H.J.; Lee, D.; Myung, K. DNA-PK-Dependent RPA2 Hyperphosphorylation Facilitates DNA Repair and Suppresses Sister Chromatid Exchange. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shao, R.; Cao, C.; Zhang, H.; Kohn, K.W.; Wold, M.S.; Pommier, Y. Replication-mediated DNA damage by camptothecin induces phosphorylation of RPA by DNA-dependent protein kinase and dissociates RPA:DNA-PK complexes. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jackson, S.P.; Macdonald, J.J.; Lees-Miller, S.; Tjian, R. GC box binding induces phosphorylation of Sp1 by a DNA-dependent protein kinase. Cell 1990, 63, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, S.H.; Ma, J.T.; Yueh, A.Y.; Lees-Miller, S.P.; Anderson, C.W.; Ng, S.Y. The carboxyl-terminal transactivation domain of human serum response factor contains DNA-activated protein kinase phosphorylation sites. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 21147–21154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Komiyama, S.; Taniguchi, S.; Matsumoto, Y.; Tsunoda, E.; Ohto, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Yin, H.L.; Tomita, M.; Enomoto, A.; Morita, A.; et al. Potentiality of DNA-dependent protein kinase to phosphorylate Ser46 of human p53. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 323, 816–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lees-Miller, S.P.; Sakaguchi, K.; Ullrich, S.J.; Appella, E.; Anderson, C.W. Human DNA-activated protein kinase phosphorylates serines 15 and 37 in the amino-terminal transactivation domain of human p53. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12, 5041–5049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Shieh, S.-Y.; Ikeda, M.; Taya, Y.; Prives, C. DNA Damage-Induced Phosphorylation of p53 Alleviates Inhibition by MDM2. Cell 1997, 91, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Wu, L.; He, Y.; Hu, Y.; Lu, H.; Cao, Z.; Yi, X.; Wang, J. Real-time surface plasmon resonance monitoring of site-specific phosphorylation of p53 protein and its interaction with MDM2 protein. Analyst 2019, 144, 6033–6040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tomimatsu, N.; Mukherjee, B.; Burma, S. Distinct roles of ATR and DNA-PKcs in triggering DNA damage responses in ATM-deficient cells. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Bunch, H.; Lawney, B.P.; Lin, Y.-F.; Asaithamby, A.; Murshid, A.; Wang, Y.E.; Chen, B.P.C.; Calderwood, S.K. Transcriptional elongation requires DNA break-induced signalling. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Yannone, S.M.; Roy, S.; Chan, D.W.; Murphy, M.B.; Huang, S.; Campisi, J.; Chen, D.J. Werner syndrome protein is regulated and phosphorylated by DNA-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 38242–38248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Douglas, P.; Gupta, S.; Morrice, N.; Meek, K.; Lees-Miller, S.P. DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation of Ku70/80 is not required for non-homologous end joining. DNA Repair 2005, 4, 1006–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Podhorecka, M.; Skladanowski, A.; Bozko, P. H2AX Phosphorylation: Its Role in DNA Damage Response and Cancer Therapy. J. Nucleic Acids 2010, 2010, 920161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. DAVID Functional Annotation Bioinformatics Microarray Analysis. Available online: https://david.ncifcrf.gov/ (accessed on 28 March 2020).
  92. STRING: Functional Protein Association Networks. Available online: https://string-db.org/ (accessed on 28 March 2020).
  93. Ju, B.-G.; Lunyak, V.V.; Perissi, V.; Garcia-Bassets, I.; Rose, D.W.; Glass, C.K.; Rosenfeld, M.G. A Topoisomerase IIβ-Mediated dsDNA Break Required for Regulated Transcription. Science 2006, 312, 1798–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Bunch, H. Role of genome guardian proteins in transcriptional elongation. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590, 1064–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Rahl, P.B.; Lin, C.Y.; Seila, A.C.; Flynn, R.A.; McCuine, S.; Burge, C.B.; Sharp, P.A.; Young, R.A. c-Myc Regulates Transcriptional Pause Release. Cell 2010, 141, 432–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Haffner, M.C.; De Marzo, A.M.; Meeker, A.K.; Nelson, W.G.; Yegnasubramanian, S. Transcription-induced DNA double strand breaks: Both oncogenic force and potential therapeutic target? Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 3858–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Pankotai, T.; Bonhomme, C.; Chen, D.; Soutoglou, E. DNAPKcs-dependent arrest of RNA polymerase II transcription in the presence of DNA breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Iannelli, F.; Galbiati, A.; Capozzo, I.; Nguyen, Q.; Magnuson, B.; Michelini, F.; D’Alessandro, G.; Cabrini, M.; Roncador, M.; Francia, S.; et al. A damaged genome’s transcriptional landscape through multilayered expression profiling around in situ-mapped DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Janssens, S.; Tschopp, J. Signals from within: The DNA-damage-induced NF-kappaB response. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Sutton, J.; Dotson, D.; Dong, X. Molecular Events in Late Stages of HIV-1 Replication. JSM Microbiol. 2013, 1, 1004. [Google Scholar]
  101. Daniel, R.; Katz, R.A.; Merkel, G.; Hittle, J.C.; Yen, T.J.; Skalka, A.M. Wortmannin Potentiates Integrase-Mediated Killing of Lymphocytes and Reduces the Efficiency of Stable Transduction by Retroviruses. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 1164–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Daniel, R.; Katz, R.A.; Skalka, A.M. A Role for DNA-PK in Retroviral DNA Integration. Science 1999, 284, 644–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Daniel, R.; Greger, J.G.; Katz, R.A.; Taganov, K.D.; Wu, X.; Kappes, J.C.; Skalka, A.M. Evidence that Stable Retroviral Transduction and Cell Survival following DNA Integration Depend on Components of the Nonhomologous End Joining Repair Pathway. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 8573–8581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Jeanson, L.; Subra, F.; Vaganay, S.; Hervy, M.; Marangoni, E.; Bourhis, J.; Mouscadet, J.F. Effect of Ku80 Depletion on the Preintegrative Steps of HIV-1 Replication in Human Cells. Virology 2002, 300, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Waninger, S.; Kuhen, K.; Hu, X.; Chatterton, J.E.; Wong-Staal, F.; Tang, H.; Yang, X.; Tomov, V.; Kurteva, S.; Wang, L.; et al. Identification of Cellular Cofactors for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Replication via a Ribozyme-Based Genomics Approach. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 12829–12837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Sakurai, Y.; Komatsu, K.; Agematsu, K.; Matsuoka, M. DNA double strand break repair enzymes function at multiple steps in retroviral infection. Retrovirology 2009, 6, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Manic, G.; Maurin-Marlin, A.; Laurent, F.; Vitale, I.; Thierry, S.; Delelis, O.; Dessen, P.; Vincendeau, M.; Leib-Mösch, C.; Hazan, U.; et al. Impact of the Ku Complex on HIV-1 Expression and Latency. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Lau, A.; Swinbank, K.M.; Ahmed, P.S.; Taylor, D.L.; Jackson, S.P.; Smith, G.C.M.; O’Connor, M.J. Suppression of HIV-1 infection by a small molecule inhibitor of the ATM kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yang, J.; Yu, Y.; Hamrick, H.E.; Duerksen-Hughes, P.J. ATM, ATR and DNA-PK: Initiators of the cellular genotoxic stress responses. Carcinogenesis 2003, 24, 1571–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Smith, J.A.; Wang, F.X.; Zhang, H.; Wu, K.J.; Williams, K.J.; Daniel, R. Evidence that the Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein, an early sensor of double-strand DNA breaks (DSB), is involved in HIV-1 post-integration repair by recruiting the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated kinase in a process similar to, but distinct from, cellular DSB repair. Virol. J. 2008, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Borgatti, P.; Zauli, G.; Colamussi, M.L.; Gibellini, D.; Previati, M.; Cantley, L.C.; Capitani, S. Extracellular HIV-1 Tat protein activates phosphatidylinositol 3- and Akt/PKB kinases in CD4+ T lymphoblastoid Jurkat cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 1997, 27, 2805–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhou, H.; Xu, M.; Huang, Q.; Gates, A.T.; Zhang, X.D.; Castle, J.C.; Stec, E.; Ferrer, M.; Strulovici, B.; Hazuda, D.J.; et al. Genome-Scale RNAi Screen for Host Factors Required for HIV Replication. Cell Host Microbe 2008, 4, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Dehart, J.L.; Andersen, J.L.; Zimmerman, E.S.; Ardon, O.; An, D.S.; Blackett, J.; Kim, B.; Planelles, V. The Ataxia Telangiectasia-Mutated and Rad3-Related Protein Is Dispensable for Retroviral Integration. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 1389–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Espeseth, A.S.; Fishel, R.; Hazuda, D.; Huang, Q.; Xu, M.; Yoder, K.; Zhou, H. siRNA Screening of a Targeted Library of DNA Repair Factors in HIV Infection Reveals a Role for Base Excision Repair in HIV Integration. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Brady, S.; Singh, G.; Bolinger, C.; Song, Z.; Boeras, I.; Weng, K.; Trent, B.; Brown, W.C.; Singh, K.; Boris-Lawrie, K.; et al. Virion-associated, host-derived DHX9/RNA helicase A enhances the processivity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase on genomic RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 11473–11485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Boeras, I.; Song, Z.; Moran, A.; Franklin, J.; Brown, W.C.; Johnson, M.; Boris-Lawrie, K.; Heng, X. DHX9/RHA Binding to the PBS-Segment of the Genomic RNA during HIV-1 Assembly Bolsters Virion Infectivity. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 2418–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Ndzinu, J.K.; Takeuchi, H.; Saito, H.; Yoshida, T.; Yamaoka, S. eIF4A2 is a host factor required for efficient HIV-1 replication. Microbes Infect. 2018, 20, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Krasnopolsky, S.; Marom, L.; Victor, R.A.; Kuzmina, A.; Schwartz, J.C.; Fujinaga, K.; Taube, R. Fused in sarcoma silences HIV gene transcription and maintains viral latency through suppressing AFF4 gene activation. Retrovirology 2019, 16, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Daniel, R.; Ramcharan, J.; Rogakou, E.; Taganov, K.D.; Greger, J.G.; Bonner, W.; Nussenzweig, A.; Katz, R.A.; Skalka, A.M. Histone H2AX Is Phosphorylated at Sites of Retroviral DNA Integration but Is Dispensable for Postintegration Repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 45810–45814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Monette, A.; Ajamian, L.; López-Lastra, M.; Mouland, A.J. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Induces the Cytoplasmic Retention of Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein A1 by Disrupting Nuclear Import: Implications for HIV-1 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 31350–31362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Mizutani, T.; Ishizaka, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Iba, H. 7SK small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex is recruited to the HIV-1 promoter via short viral transcripts. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 1630–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Low, J.S.; Fassati, A. Hsp90: A chaperone for HIV-1. Parasitology 2014, 141, 1192–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Van Der Sluis, R.M.; Derking, R.; Breidel, S.; Speijer, D.; Berkhout, B.; Jeeninga, R.E. Interplay between viral Tat protein and c-Jun transcription factor in controlling LTR promoter activity in different human immunodeficiency virus type I subtypes. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 968–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Breton, Y.; Desrosiers, V.; Ouellet, M.; Deshiere, A.; Torresilla, C.; Cohen, É.A.; Tremblay, M.J. Expression of MDM2 in Macrophages Promotes the Early Postentry Steps of HIV-1 Infection through Inhibition of p53. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e01871-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Izumi, T.; Takaori-Kondo, A.; Shirakawa, K.; Higashitsuji, H.; Itoh, K.; Io, K.; Matsui, M.; Iwai, K.; Kondoh, H.; Sato, T.; et al. MDM2 is a novel E3 ligase for HIV-1 Vif. Retrovirology 2009, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Brès, V.; Kiernan, R.E.; Linares, L.K.; Chable-Bessia, C.; Plechakova, O.; Treand, C.; Emiliani, S.; Peloponese, J.-M.; Jeang, K.-T.; Coux, O.; et al. A non-proteolytic role for ubiquitin in Tat-mediated transactivation of the HIV-1 promoter. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5, 754–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sun, Y.; Clark, E.C. Expression of the c-myc Proto-oncogene Is Essential for HIV-1 Infection in Activated T Cells. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 189, 1391–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Jiang, G.; Espeseth, A.; Hazuda, D.J.; Margolis, D.M. c-Myc and Sp1 Contribute to Proviral Latency by Recruiting Histone Deacetylase 1 to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Promoter. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 10914–10923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Fernandez, G.; Zaikos, T.D.; Khan, S.Z.; Jacobi, A.M.; Behlke, M.A.; Zeichner, S.L. Targeting IκB Proteins for HIV Latency Activation: The Role of Individual IκB and NF-κB Proteins. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 3966–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Kameoka, M.; Nukuzuma, S.; Itaya, A.; Tanaka, Y.; Ota, K.; Ikuta, K.; Yoshihara, K. RNA Interference Directed against Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 Efficiently Suppresses Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication in Human Cells. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 8931–8934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Kameoka, M.; Nukuzuma, S.; Itaya, A.; Tanaka, Y.; Ota, K.; Inada, Y.; Ikuta, K.; Yoshihara, K. Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 is required for integration of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genome near centromeric alphoid DNA in human and murine cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 334, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Gäken, J.A.; Tavassoli, M.; Gan, S.U.; Vallian, S.; Giddings, I.; Darling, D.C.; Galea-Lauri, J.; Thomas, M.G.; Abedi, H.; Schreiber, V.; et al. Efficient retroviral infection of mammalian cells is blocked by inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 3992–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Ha, H.C.; Juluri, K.; Zhou, Y.; Leung, S.; Hermankova, M.; Snyder, S.H. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 is required for efficient HIV-1 integration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 3364–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Siva, A.C.; Bushman, F.D. Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 Is Not Strictly Required for Infection of Murine Cells by Retroviruses. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 11904–11910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Ariumi, Y.; Turelli, P.; Masutani, M.; Trono, D. DNA Damage Sensors ATM, ATR, DNA-PKcs, and PARP-1 Are Dispensable for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integration. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 2973–2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Baekelandt, V.; Claeys, A.; Cherepanov, P.; De Clercq, E.; De Strooper, B.; Nuttin, B.; Debyser, Z.; Brown, A.J.L.; Precious, H.M.; Whitcomb, J.M.; et al. DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Is Not Required for Efficient Lentivirus Integration. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 11278–11285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Yu, D.; Liu, R.; Yang, G.; Zhou, Q. The PARP1-Siah1 Axis Controls HIV-1 Transcription and Expression of Siah1 Substrates. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 3741–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bueno, M.T.D.; Reyes, D.; Valdes, L.; Saheba, A.; Urias, E.; Mendoza, C.; Fregoso, O.I.; Llano, M. Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 Promotes Transcriptional Repression of Integrated Retroviruses. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 2496–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Liu, Y.-Z.; Latchman, D.S. The octamer-binding proteins Oct-1 and Oct-2 repress the HIV long terminal repeat promoter and its transactivation by Tat. Biochem. J. 1997, 322, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Khan, S.; Iqbal, M.; Tariq, M.; Baig, S.M.; Abbas, W. Epigenetic regulation of HIV-1 latency: Focus on polycomb group (PcG) proteins. Clin. Epigenetics 2018, 10, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Colin, L.; Verdin, E.; Van Lint, C. HIV-1 Chromatin, Transcription, and the Regulatory Protein Tat. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1087, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Majello, B.; Napolitano, G.; Lania, L. Recruitment of the TATA-binding protein to the HIV-1 promoter is a limiting step for Tat transactivation. AIDS 1998, 12, 1957–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Raha, T.; Cheng, S.W.G.; Green, M.R. HIV-1 Tat Stimulates Transcription Complex Assembly through Recruitment of TBP in the Absence of TAFs. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Shi, B.; Sharifi, H.J.; DiGrigoli, S.; Kinnetz, M.; Mellon, K.; Hu, W.; De Noronha, C.M. Inhibition of HIV early replication by the p53 and its downstream gene p21. Virol. J. 2018, 15, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Kinnetz, M.; Alghamdi, F.; Racz, M.; Hu, W.; Shi, B. The impact of p53 on the early stage replication of retrovirus. Virol. J. 2017, 14, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Yoon, C.-H.; Kim, S.-Y.; Byeon, S.E.; Jeong, Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.P.; Park, J.; Bae, Y.S. p53-Derived Host Restriction of HIV-1 Replication by Protein Kinase R-Mediated Tat Phosphorylation and Inactivation. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 4262–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Bargonetti, J.; Chicas, A.; White, D.; Prives, C. p53 represses Sp1 DNA binding and HIV-LTR directed transcription. Cell. Mol. Biol. 1997, 43, 935–949. [Google Scholar]
  148. Chicas, A.; Molina, P.; Bargonetti, J. Mutant p53 Forms a Complex with Sp1 on HIV-LTR DNA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 279, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ma, X.; Yang, T.; Luo, Y.; Wu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Song, Z.; Pan, T.; Liu, B.; Liu, G.; Liu, J.; et al. TRIM28 promotes HIV-1 latency by SUMOylating CDK9 and inhibiting P-TEFb. eLife 2019, 8, e42426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Fernández-Ortega, C.; Ramírez, A.; Casillas, D.; Paneque, T.; Ubieta, R.; Dubed, M.; Navea, L.; Castellanos-Serra, L.; Duarte, C.A.; Falcón-Cama, V.; et al. Identification of Vimentin as a Potential Therapeutic Target against HIV Infection. Viruses 2016, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sharma, A.; Awasthi, S.; Harrod, C.K.; Matlock, E.F.; Khan, S.; Xu, L.; Chan, S.; Yang, H.; Thammavaram, C.K.; Rasor, R.A.; et al. The Werner Syndrome Helicase Is a Cofactor for HIV-1 Long Terminal Repeat Transactivation and Retroviral Replication. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 12048–12057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Mizutani, T.; Ishizaka, A.; Furuichi, Y. The Werner Protein Acts as a Coactivator of Nuclear Factor κB (NF-κB) on HIV-1 and Interleukin-8 (IL-8) Promoters. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 18391–18399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Anisenko, A.N.; Gottikh, M.B. Role of Cellular DNA Repair Systems in HIV-1 Replication. Mol. Biol. 2019, 53, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Gutiérrez, D.A.; Valdes, L.; Serguera, C.; Llano, M. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 silences retroviruses independently of viral DNA integration or heterochromatin formation. J. Gen. Virol. 2016, 97, 1686–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Rom, S.; Reichenbach, N.L.; Dykstra, H.; Persidsky, Y. The dual action of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase -1 (PARP-1) inhibition in HIV-1 infection: HIV-1 LTR inhibition and diminution in Rho GTPase activity. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Parent, M.; Yung, T.M.C.; Rancourt, A.; Ho, E.L.Y.; Vispé, S.; Suzuki-Matsuda, F.; Uehara, A.; Wada, T.; Handa, H.; Satoh, M.S.; et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 Is a Negative Regulator of HIV-1 Transcription through Competitive Binding to TAR RNA with Tat Positive Transcription Elongation Factor b (p-TEFb) Complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Roy, S.; Delling, U.; Chen, C.H.; Rosen, C.A.; Sonenberg, N. A bulge structure in HIV-1 TAR RNA is required for Tat binding and Tat-mediated trans-activation. Genes Dev. 1990, 4, 1365–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Kwak, H.; Lis, J.T. Control of Transcriptional Elongation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2013, 47, 483–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Shadrina, O.A.; Knyazhanskaya, E.S.; Korolev, S.P.; Gottikh, M. Host Proteins Ku and HMGA1 As Participants of HIV-1 Transcription. Acta Nat. 2016, 8, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Maldonado, E.; Shiekhattar, R.; Sheldon, M.; Cho, H.; Drapkin, R.; Rickert, P.; Lees, E.; Anderson, C.W.; Linn, S.; Reinberg, D. A human RNA polymerase II complex associated with SRB and DNA-repair proteins. Nature 1996, 381, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kaczmarski, W.; Khan, S.A. Lupus Autoantigen Ku Protein Binds HIV-1 TAR RNA in Vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 196, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Shadrina, O.; Garanina, I.; Korolev, S.; Zatsepin, T.; Van Assche, J.; Daouad, F.; Wallet, C.; Rohr, O.; Gottikh, M. Analysis of RNA binding properties of human Ku protein reveals its interactions with 7SK snRNA and protein components of 7SK snRNP complex. Biochime 2020, 171–172, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Chun, R.; Semmes, O.J.; Neuveut, C.; Jeang, K.T. Modulation of Sp1 Phosphorylation by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Tat. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 2615–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Tyagi, S.; Ochem, A.; Tyagi, M. DNA-dependent protein kinase interacts functionally with the RNA polymerase II complex recruited at the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) long terminal repeat and plays an important role in HIV gene expression. J. Gen. Virol. 2011, 92, 1710–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Tan, N.Y.; Khachigian, L.M. Sp1 Phosphorylation and Its Regulation of Gene Transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 2483–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cells 09 01907 g001 550
Figure 1. Model of HIV-1 post-integrational DNA repair based on our previously published data [10]. HIV-1 integrase (IN) that marks integration sites recruits the Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer by direct interaction with the Ku70 subunit; then, the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK (DNA-PKcs) binds to this complex and phosphorylates some unknown protein targets that results in DNA repair. This process strongly depends on the interaction between IN and Ku70.
Figure 1. Model of HIV-1 post-integrational DNA repair based on our previously published data [10]. HIV-1 integrase (IN) that marks integration sites recruits the Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer by direct interaction with the Ku70 subunit; then, the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK (DNA-PKcs) binds to this complex and phosphorylates some unknown protein targets that results in DNA repair. This process strongly depends on the interaction between IN and Ku70.
Cells 09 01907 g001
Cells 09 01907 g002 550
Figure 2. Protein–protein interactions network of DNA-PKcs targets described in Table 1 (A). PPI networks of DNA-PKcs targets identified only in in vitro experiments (B) and in in vivo or both in vitro and in vivo experiments (C). The most connected nodes are the same color and are grouped in a cluster using Markov Cluster Algorithm (MCL) with inflation parameter 3.1.
Figure 2. Protein–protein interactions network of DNA-PKcs targets described in Table 1 (A). PPI networks of DNA-PKcs targets identified only in in vitro experiments (B) and in in vivo or both in vitro and in vivo experiments (C). The most connected nodes are the same color and are grouped in a cluster using Markov Cluster Algorithm (MCL) with inflation parameter 3.1.
Cells 09 01907 g002
Table
Table 1. DNA-PK targets and effects of their phosphorylation.
Table 1. DNA-PK targets and effects of their phosphorylation.
Gene NameProtein NameType of ExperimentDNA-PKcs Activation MethodPhosphorylation Event ValidationIdentified Phosphorylation SitesEffect of Phosphorylation (In Vivo)Ref.
Akt1; Akt2; Akt3RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinasein vitro/in vivoCpG ODN, UVBPhosphorylated Akts activity; WB; 32P-incorporationAKT1: T308, S473; AKT2: T309Cell survival after UVB treatment, Akt translocation to nucleus after CpG ODN treatment[44,45]
ATMSerine-protein kinase ATMin vitro/in vivobleomycinWB; 32P-incorporation; mutagenesisS85/T86, T372/T373 and S1985/T1987/T1988Negative regulation of ATM[19]
C1DNuclear nucleic acid-binding protein C1Din vitroC1D, dsDNA32P-incorporation [46]
DCLRE1CProtein Artemisin vitro/in vivodsDNA, bleomycinMS; changes in gel mobility of phosphorylated forms; 32P-incorporation; WBS385, T410, S417, S503, S509, S516, S518, S572, S589, T601, S645, T676, S679, S688, T692Increase Artemis association with chromatin[37,47,48]
DHX9ATP-dependent RNA helicase Ain vitropoly(rG)32P-incorporation [9]
DSPDesmoplakinin vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond staining + MS [16]
EIF2B2Translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit betain vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [49]
EIF4A1Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-Iin vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond staining + MS [16]
FKBP4Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP4in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond staining + MS [16]
FUSRNA-binding protein FUSin vitro/in vivoCalicheamicin γ1, Dbait32HWB; changes in gel mobility of phosphorylated forms; mutagenesisS/T-Q located in N-terminal region of FUS (1–165 aa)Translocation to cytoplasm[50]
GOLPH3Golgi phosphoprotein 3in vitro/in vivoCamptothecin, doxorubicin, IRMS; 32P-incorporationT143Cell survival following DNA damage[51]
GTF2BTranscription initiation factor IIBin vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [52]
H2AFXHistone H2AXin vitro/in vivodsDNA, IR, Dbait32HWB; IF; changes in gel mobility of phosphorylated formS139Assembly of DNA repair proteins at the DNA-damage sites[16,53,54,55,56,57,58]
HMGCS1Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase, cytoplasmicin vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
HNRNPA1Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1in vitro/in vivodsDNA, hTR, hnRNP32P-incorporation; WB; mutagenesisS95, S192Essential for capping of the newly replicated telomeres and prevention of telomeric aberrations[5,9,59]
HNRNPCHeterogeneous nuclear ribo-nucleoproteins C1/C2in vitrohnRNP32P-incorporation [9]
HNRNPFHeterogeneous nuclear ribo-nucleoprotein Fin vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
HNRNPUHeterogeneous nuclear ribo-nucleoprotein Uin vitro/in vivodsDNA, etoposide, Calicheamicin γ1MS; WB; changes in gel mobility of phosphorylated formS59 [60,61]
HSP90AA1Heat shock protein HSP 90-alphain vitro/in vivodsDNA; Dbait32H; IRProQ-Diamond + MS; 32P-incorporation; WBT5, T7pThr7-HSP90α accumulates at repair foci, that is necessary for maintenance of γ-H2AX Foci and efficient DNA repair[16,62,63,64]
HSPA1AHeat shock 70 kDa protein 1Ain vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
HSPA4Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
HSPA8Heat shock cognate 71 kDa proteinin vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
HSPH1Heat shock protein 105 kDain vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
ILF2Interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2in vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [49]
ILF3Interleukin enhancer-binding factor 3in vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [49]
JUNTranscription factor AP-1in vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation; mutagenesisS249 [65]
LMNB1Lamin-B1in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
MDM2E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Mdm2in vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation; mutagenesisS17Mdm-2 Phosphorylation by DNA-PK Prevents Interaction with p53[66]
MRE11Double-strand break repair protein MRE11in vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [19]
MYCMyc proto-oncogene proteinin vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [67]
MYH9Myosin-9in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
NBNNibrinin vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [19]
NFKBIANF-kappa-B inhibitor alphain vitro 32P-incorporation; MSS36, T273 [68]
NFKBIBNF-kappa-B inhibitor betain vitro 32P-incorporation [68]
NHEJ1Non-homologous end-joining factor 1 (XLF)in vitro/in vivodsDNA, IRMS; WB; 32P-incorporationS245Dispensable for DSB repair[69]
NPM3Nucleoplasmin-3in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
NR4A2Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 3in vitro/in vivodsDNA, IRWB; MS; IF; mutagenesisS337Promotes DSB repair[70]
NSFL1CNSFL1 cofactor p47in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
PARP1Poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1in vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [71]
PLIN3Perilipin-3in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
PNKPBifunctional polynucleotide phosphatase/kinasein vitro/in vivoIRWB; MS; 32P-incorporation; mutagenesisS114, S126Regulates DSB repair[72]
POLLDNA polymerase lambda, involved in BER, NHEJ and HRin vitrodsDNAWB; 32P-incorporation; mutagenesisT204 [73]
POLR2ADNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB1in vitro/in vivodsDNA; unknown transcriptiona signal WB; 32P-incorporationHeptapeptide repeats of CTD; S2; S5Increase transcription efficiency[14,74]
POU2F1POU domain, class 2, transcription factor 1 (octamer transcription factor 1, Oct-1)in vitro/in vivodsDNA, IR, zeocin32P-incorporation Stabilizes Oct-1, decreases Oct-1 dependent transcription[75]
PRKDCDNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunitin vivoDbait32HWB; IF; MS; 32P-incorporation; mutagenesis S2056, T2609, S2612, T2620, S2624, T2638, T2647; S3205; S3821; S4046; T4102 [16,33,36,37]
RAD50DNA repair protein RAD50in vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [19]
RBBP7Histone-binding protein RBBP7in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
RPA2Replication protein A 32 kDa subunitin vitro/in vivoCamptothecin, UV, 4NQO, EtoposideWB; mutagenesis; 32P-incorporation; changes in gel mobility of phosphorylated formsS4, S8, T21Regulates fork restart, new origin firing, HR, mitotic catastrophe, and cell survival in response to replication stress. RPA2 hyperphosphorylation by DNA-PK in response to DSBs blocks unscheduled homologous recombination and delays mitotic entry.[76,77,78,79]
RPSA40S ribosomal protein SAin vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
SP1Transcription factor Sp1in vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [80]
SRFSerum response factorin vitro/in vivoIR32P-incorporation; two-dimensional separation of phosphopeptides on thin-layer cellulose platesS435, S446 [81]
TBPTATA-box-binding proteinin vitrodsDNA32P-incorporation [52]
TP53Cellular tumor antigen p53in vitrodsDNAWB; 32P-incorporation; SPRS6, S15, S37, S46, S166 [82,83,84,85]
TRIM28Transcription intermediary factor 1-betain vivoIR; Heat-shock induced gene transcriptionWBS824TRIM28 phosphorylation induces chromatin changes in response to DNA breaks. [13,86,87]
TRIM28 stabilizes Pol II pausing, and its release depends on the S824 phosphorylation.
TUBBTubulin beta chainin vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
TUBB2CTubulin beta-4B chainin vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
TUBB6Tubulin beta-6 chainin vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
UBQLN1Ubiquilin-1in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
VCPTransitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPasein vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
VIMVimentinin vitro/in vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS; WB; 32P-incorporationS459Regulates cell migration and adhesion[16]
WRNWerner syndrome ATP-dependent helicasein vitro/in vivodsDNA; bleomycin; 4NQOWB; MS; 32P-incorporation; mutagenesis S440, S467Inhibits both the helicase and exonuclease activities of WRN. Phosphorylation of S440 and S467 are important for relocalization of WRN to nucleoli, and that it is required for efficient DSB repair.[38,39,88]
XRCC4DNA repair protein XRCC4in vitro/in vivodsDNA, IRMS; 32P-incorporation; mutagenesisS260, S318, S320Not essential for DSB repair[34,40,41,42,43]
XRCC5XRCC5 X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 5 (Ku80)in vitrodsDNAWB; MS; 32P-incorporation; amino acid sequencingS577, S580, T715 [35,89]
XRCC6XRCC6 X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 6 (Ku70)in vitrodsDNAWB; MS; 32P-incorporation; amino acid sequencingS6 [35,89]
YWHAQ14-3-3 protein thetain vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
YWHAZ14-3-3 protein zeta/deltain vivoDbait32HProQ-Diamond + MS [16]
Table
Table 2. Effects of DNA-PKcs targets on HIV-1 replication.
Table 2. Effects of DNA-PKcs targets on HIV-1 replication.
Gene Name (Common Protein Name)Role in HIV Life CycleComments/Life Cycle StepPublications
AKTPositiveCell survival during HIV infection[111,112]
ATMPositivePost-integrational repair (indirect evidence)[101,106,108,113]
DCLRE1C (Artemis)PositiveNo data[114]
DHX9PositiveReverse transcription[115,116]
EIF4A1PositiveReverse transcription[117]
FUSNegativeLTR-dependent transcription[118]
H2AFX (H2AX)DispensableH2AFX is phosphorylated during integration, but not essential for HIV replication[119]
HNRNPA1ComplexHIV transcription, viral mRNA splicing, mRNA transport[120,121]
HSP90AA1PositiveTranscription, capsid core stability[122]
JUNComplexTranscription. c-Jun enhances Tat-mediated LTR transcription but suppresses basal LTR transcription without Tat[123]
MDM2Complex1. Positive regulator of early replicative stages in macrophages by inhibition of p53 activity;[124,125,126]
2. Negative regulation of Vif stability, removes its counteracting effect on the APOBEC3G restriction factor;
3. Positive regulation of Tat activity
MRE11ControversialIntegration, pre-integration steps, post-integrational DNA repair (indirect and controversial evidences)[106,110]
MYCComplex1. Positive regulation of cDNA nuclear transport; [127,128]
2. c-Myc and Sp1 contribute to proviral latency. Negative regulation of transcription from LTR promoter
NBN (Nibrin)ControversialIntegration, pre-integration steps, post-integrational DNA repair (indirect and controversial evidences)[106,110]
NFKBIA (IκBα)NegativeIκBα but not IκBβ suppress latent-active transcription transition[129]
PARP1Controversial1. Early replicative steps (integration and/or post-integrational DNA-repair (indirect evidence)[130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138]
2. LTR-dependent transcription
POU2F1 (Oct-1)NegativeRepress LTR-mediated transcription[139]
RBBP7NegativeLTR-mediated transcription[140]
SP1Positivec-Myc and Sp1 contribute to proviral latency[141]
TBPPositiveLTR-mediated transcription[142,143]
TP53 (p53)Negative1. Reverse transcription[144,145,146,147,148]
2. LTR-mediated transcription
3. Cell survival during HIV-infection
TRIM28NegativePromotes HIV-1 Latency. DNA-PKcs dependent phosphorylation reactivates LTR mediated transcription[14,149]
VIMPositiveNo data[150]
WRNPositiveLTR-mediated transcription[151,152]
XRCC4Positiveearly replicative stages[103]
XRCC5 (Ku80)Complex1. LTR-mediated transcription[10,101,102,103,104,105,106,107]
2. Integration, post-integrational DNA repair (direct evidence)
XRCC6 (Ku70)PositivePost-integrational DNA repair (direct evidence)[10]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anisenko, A.; Kan, M.; Shadrina, O.; Brattseva, A.; Gottikh, M. Phosphorylation Targets of DNA-PK and Their Role in HIV-1 Replication. Cells 2020, 9, 1907. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081907

AMA Style

Anisenko A, Kan M, Shadrina O, Brattseva A, Gottikh M. Phosphorylation Targets of DNA-PK and Their Role in HIV-1 Replication. Cells. 2020; 9(8):1907. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081907

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anisenko, Andrey, Marina Kan, Olga Shadrina, Anna Brattseva, and Marina Gottikh. 2020. "Phosphorylation Targets of DNA-PK and Their Role in HIV-1 Replication" Cells 9, no. 8: 1907. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081907

APA Style

Anisenko, A., Kan, M., Shadrina, O., Brattseva, A., & Gottikh, M. (2020). Phosphorylation Targets of DNA-PK and Their Role in HIV-1 Replication. Cells, 9(8), 1907. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081907

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop