Next Article in Journal
Complete Mitochondrial DNA Genome of Nine Species of Sharks and Rays and Their Phylogenetic Placement among Modern Elasmobranchs
Next Article in Special Issue
Ophthalmologic Manifestations of Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Autochthonous Austrian Varieties of Prunus avium L. Represent a Regional Gene Pool, Assessed Using SSR and AFLP Markers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Autoimmunity and Genetic Syndromes: A Focus on Down Syndrome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

IPEX Syndrome: Genetics and Treatment Options

by
Iwona Ben-Skowronek
Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
Genes 2021, 12(3), 323; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030323
Submission received: 21 December 2020 / Revised: 17 February 2021 / Accepted: 19 February 2021 / Published: 24 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autoimmune Disease Genetics)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked) syndrome characterizes a complex autoimmune reaction beginning in the perinatal period, caused by a dysfunction of the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3). (2) Objectives: Studies have shown the clinical, immunological, and molecular heterogeneity of patients with IPEX syndrome. The symptoms, treatment, and survival were closely connected to the genotype of the IPEX syndrome. Recognition of the kind of mutation is important for the diagnostics of IPEX syndrome in newborns and young infants, as well as in prenatal screening. The method of choice for treatment is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy. In children, supportive therapy for refractory diarrhea is very important, as well as replacement therapy of diabetes mellitus type 1 (DMT1) and other endocrinopathies. In the future, genetic engineering methods may be of use in the successful treatment of IPEX syndrome. (3) Conclusions: The genetic defects determine a diagnostic approach and prognosis, making the knowledge of the genetics of IPEX syndrome fundamental to introducing novel treatment methods.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome characterizes complex autoimmune reactions beginning in the perinatal period and caused by dysfunction of the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) [1,2,3,4]. It is a rare hemizygous disorder that may occur perinatally or later in life, but it is most common in the first year of life. FOXP3 plays a key role in controlling the regulatory T cell subset, and its dysfunction leads to autoimmunity [1,2,3,4,5]. IPEX syndrome is inherited in boys in an X-linked recessive manner. The FOXP3 gene is located in the centromeric region of X chromosome Xp11.23–Xq13.3. Mutations of this gene cause the deformation and malfunction of protein localized in the DNA-binding domain (forkhead domain). The abnormal protein cannot bind to its binding spot on the DNA, and in this situation, the development and function of T regulatory cells are impaired, with an observed loss of CD4 + CD25 + T regulatory cells and uncontrolled proliferation of activated CD4 + effector cells [6]. The immune system attacks its own tissues and organs as a consequence of uncontrolled T cell activation, resulting in inflammation, autoimmunity, and metabolic disorders [7,8,9,10,11]. IPEX syndrome is one of the autoimmune polyendocrine syndromes that lead to the dysfunction of multiple endocrine glands and multiorgan inflammation. The most common abnormalities are diabetes mellitus in the first month of life, extremely active atopic dermatitis (eczema), autoimmune thyroiditis, refractory diarrhea, hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and nephropathy [12]. A study performed by Gambinieri et al. showed the clinical, immunological, and molecular heterogeneity of patients with IPEX syndrome [6]. Only half of the examined children presented with a FOXP3 mutation, while the rest were diagnosed with an IPEX-like syndrome because of no identifiable FOXP3 mutations. Those patients presented an X-like syndrome connected to other phenotype dysregulation genes: STAT5b, STAT1, STAT3, IL2RA, CTLA4, LRBA, TTC7A, TTC37, LRBA, and DOCK8 [6].
An overview of the current knowledge about the pathophysiology, genetics, and therapeutic perspectives is very important for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with IPEX syndrome and for understanding the mechanisms of autoimmunity.

2. Genetics of IPEX Syndrome

Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), also known as scurfin, is from a family of proteins involved in immune system responses [13]. Scurfin is a member of the FOX protein family, the forkhead/winged-helix family of transcriptional regulators. FOXP3 presumably acts via similar DNA-binding interactions during transcription and is a pivotal regulator of the regulatory pathway in the development and function of regulatory T cells [1,2,3,13,14]. A deficiency in regulatory T cell activity in autoimmune diseases can allow other autoimmune cells to attack the body’s own tissues [15,16]. In regulatory T cell model systems, the FOXP3 transcription factor plays the role of promotor for genes engaged in regulatory T cell functions and may stop the transcription of key genes following the stimulation of T cell receptors [17]. Many transcription factors are shown to associate on these enhancers to regulate FOXP3 expression, one of those factors is runt-related transcription families (RUNX) and erythroblast transformation-specific (ETS) proteins.
FOXP3 is located in the short arm zone (Xp11.23) of the X chromosome [18]. FOXP3 consists of 12 exons in humans in a centromeric-to-telomeric orientation [12]. The full-length open-reading frame encodes a 431-amino acid (aa) protein. FOXP3 protein contains four domains: The N-terminal proline-rich region (PRR), the central zinc finger (ZF; aa 199–222), leucine zipper (LZ; aa 239–260), and the forkhead (FKH) domain (aa 335–418) [12,19]. The PPR, ZF, and LZ are involved in FOXP3 interactions. The FKH domain is necessary for DNA-binding activity [12,20]. The PPR is the repressor domain (aa 67–132) that mediates transcriptional activity by suppression of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) [21]. FKH domain mutations are the most common in patients with IPEX syndrome [6]. Binding FOXP3 with sequence GTAAACA motifs by the FKH domain leads to immunosuppression, because it initiates the transcription of promoted genes (CD25, CTLA-4, GITR, CD103, and TNFRSF18) and suppresses genes (interleukin, IL2, Interferon-γ, IL4, and PTPN22) [12,13,22,23]. FOXP1 assists FOXP3’s binding to DNA through heterodimerization. The deletion of FOXP1 causes a reduction in IL-2 action [23]. The interaction of FOXP3 and retinoic acid-related orphan receptor γ (RORγt) can repress (RORγt)in this way, and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) impairs TH17 cell differentiation [24]. The stability of transcriptional factor FOXP3 determines the character of regulatory T (Treg) cells. The epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and histone, have been described at the FOXP3 locus [21,25,26,27].
A novel element involved in the regulation of FOXP3 is noncoding RNAs. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are responsible for RNA silencing and post-transcriptional regulation. The proteins associated with the processing of miRNAs inhibit FOXP3 and remove suppressor capacity [28,29]. These proteins are knocked out in Treg cells [12].
Phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, methylation, and poly(ADP (adenosine-5′-diphosphate)-ribosyl)ation have been identified as pivotal post-translational regulation mechanisms [30,31,32]. The new therapeutic methods to control inappropriate immune responses in IPEX syndrome are based on different enzymes.
In the literature, over 70 FOXP3 mutations associated with IPEX syndrome have been reported, but the relationship between the genotype and phenotype of IPEX syndrome needs explanation. Similar genotypes can result in different phenotypes—severe or mild forms of IPEX syndrome have been observed in children from the same family. The signs and symptoms of IPEX syndrome are related to the genetic changes in FOXP3: nonsense variants, missense variants, small in-frame amino acid deletions or insertions, and splice site variants [12,33,34,35].
Half of the patients with typical clinical symptoms of IPEX syndrome present with no FOXP3 mutation, but have other gene mutations. These children are diagnosed with IPEX-like syndrome, in which the genetic effect is unknown or other mutations are diagnosed, such as IL2RA, STAT 5b, ITCH, STAT1, STAT3, CTLA4, LRBA, TTC7A, and TTC37 [6,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. These genes are related to Treg functions, as a classical clinical triad of symptoms; i.e., enteropathy, eczema, and endocrine disorders were observed in patients with IPEX-like syndrome [6].
The most common connections between the mutations and their effects on patients’ symptoms are described in Table 1. Recognition of the kind of mutation is important for the diagnostics of IPEX syndrome in newborns and young infants, as well as in prenatal screening. As shown by Gambineri and coworkers, stratification of IPEX patients for the mutation type is possible. The genotype may be correlated with signs and symptoms and with the severity of immune dysregulation [6]. The complete triad was mainly observed in patients affected by in-frame deletions and frameshift mutations [6]. Early detection of mutations connected with the severe IPEX syndrome form may contribute to intensification of therapy, earlier decision about hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and prediction of survival. The milder form of IPEX syndrome needs diabetes-type 1 insulin therapy or psoriasiform dermatitis treatment—HSCT in these patients may be considered at an older age.
Table 1. The connection between the mutations and clinical symptoms in immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome.
Table 1. The connection between the mutations and clinical symptoms in immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome.
Mutation.EffectPatients’ Symptoms
c.1150G >A [43]Missing FKH domainFetal onset and severe nonviable neonatal patients survived to adolescence
c.1189C >T [6,44]Located in the FKH domainFetal onset and severe nonviable neonates
c.384A >T mutation [22,45]Lying within a helix H3 can influence DNA contactSevere form of IPEX syndrome
c.319-32delTC [16]Deleting two-base pair in the N-terminal domainNeonatal death
c.227delT mutation [46]Frameshifts and premature stop codons
c.303_304delTT in exon 3 [46]
p.Glu251 del in LZ-FKH loop [47]The LZ region is important for forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) to form dimers that impairs FOXP3′s capability to inhibit IL-2 transcription
p. Glu251 delInfluences the inter-subunit salt bridge, leads to a disruption of FOXP3 homodimerization and an impaired inhibiting ability
p.Lys250del [48]
F371C, F373A, and p.R347H [49,50]The ability of FOXP3 to inhibit transcription can be impaired
Mutationsoccur in the promoter and5′untranslated region of FOXP3 [6] Milder form of IPEX syndrome
g.6247–4859del [51]Encompassing the upstream noncoding exon and the adjacent intron of FOXP3 accumulation of unsliced pre-mRNA and alternatively spliced mRNAEnteropathy, impressive allergic phenotype
p.Arg114Trp, p.Arg347His, p.Lys393Met, and c.1044 +5G >A [52] Insulin-dependent diabetes without other characteristics of IPEX syndrome
c.1150G >A [53,54]Changes in the DNA-binding sitePsoriasiform dermatitis and alopecia universalis
Alternativesplicing of FOXP3Exon 3 encoding blocking retinoic acid-related orphan receptors α and γt,
exon 8 encoding a LZ motif necessary to FOXP3 function
Milder IPEX phenotype
exon3 as exon 2 [55]
exon 8 as exon 7 [19]
The occurrence of the most common mutations is shown in Figure 1 [56].

3. Epidemiology

The occurrence of IPEX syndrome is below 1:1,000,000.
IPEX syndrome is a result of the X-linked recessive disorder of FOXP3 and usually affects boys. The diagnosis of IPEX syndrome is connected to several typical clinical symptoms. The confirmation of diagnosis needs the identification of a hemizygous pathogenic variant in FOXP3. In boys, FOXP3 allele profiles are observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), including naïve and conventional T (Tconv) cells; however, natural Treg cells express active wild-type (WT) FOXP3 [53]. In females, the mutation must occur in both copies of the gene to cause the immune disorder, and this is an extremely rare situation.
During pregnancy, the development of fetal tissue needs maternal tolerance. The occurrence of IPEX syndrome is associated with recurrent male miscarriage and fetal akinesia [54].

4. Clinical Features and Their Pathophysiology

IPEX syndrome is diagnosed in the first year of life in males as multiple autoimmune diseases syndrome. In some patients, a milder form of the disease appears after the first year as late-onset IPEX syndrome [55]. IPEX syndrome is characterized by three main clinical manifestations: enteropathy, endocrinopathy, and dermatitis. Park et al., after a systemic review of 75 articles and data from 195 patients, presented the occurrence of the clinical manifestations of IPEX syndrome: enteropathy (97.7%), skin manifestations (62.1%), endocrinopathy (53.3%), hematologic abnormalities (38.5%), infections (40%), other immune-related complications (22.1%), and renal diseases (16.4%) [56].

4.1. Enteropathy

The first symptom of IPEX syndrome is usually intractable autoimmune enteropathy. The infiltration of lamina propria and mucosa with activated T cells leads to villous atrophy, with B cells secreting large amounts of IgA and IgE, as well as producing antiharmonin autoantibodies (HAAs) and antivillin autoantibodies (VAAs) [57]. HAAs and VAAs may be used as specific markers of IPEX syndrome enteropathy. Damage to the intestines leads to malabsorption syndrome, maldevelopment, and weight loss; thus, children need parenteral nutrition [6]. In some cases, intractable diarrhea may develop during the first six months of life. Villin and harmonin are distributed in proximal renal tubules as well, and increased levels of HAAs and VAAs have been observed, as has nephropathy [43].

4.2. Endocrinopathy

Endocrinopathy occurs in the first year of life, and diabetes mellitus type 1 (DMT1) or autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) may develop, usually in the first month of life. These autoimmune diseases may develop as the result of extreme autoimmunological reactions of activated T cells [14,43,58]. DMT1 treatment is extremely difficult due to intractable diarrhea and problems with food intake. Treatment with individual pump therapy and continuous glucose monitoring is difficult due to skin eczema. AITD can occur as autoimmune thyroiditis with hypothyroidism or thyrotoxicosis.

4.3. Dermatitis

The most common form of dermatitis is eczema, with abnormal red patches. Psoriasiform or ichthyosiform dermatitis may be observed as well. Elevated levels of IgE in the skin may result in skin desquamation on the limbs, bullae, urticaria, and alopecia universalis [44,59].

4.4. Hematologic Disorders

Patients with IPEX syndrome may present autoimmune bone marrow diseases such as hemolytic anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. In children, splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy induced by autoimmune lymphoproliferation is observed [14,43].

4.5. Other Autoimmune Diseases

Children with IPEX syndrome may develop autoimmune hepatitis and nephropathy. In this situation, children are predisposed to developing invasive diseases: sepsis, meningitis, pneumonia, and osteomyelitis [43]. The outcomes of these patients are usually poor, potentially resulting in death in no less than two years. Children with IPEX syndrome usually present with the classical triad of eczema, DMT1, and enteropathy, but IPEX-like syndrome patients are frequently affected by autoimmune thyroid disorders and cardiovascular abnormalities [6]. The number of diseases in IPEX syndrome may increase with age [6,12,43].
The occurrence of IPEX clinical features is shown in Figure 2.

5. Diagnostic Methods

IPEX syndrome is a disease of immune dysregulation [60]. The diagnosis of IPEX syndrome is based on characteristic clinical symptoms in male patients. The combination of eczema and diarrhea as the result of enteropathy needs differentiating from carbohydrate malabsorption and food allergies, viral and bacterial infections, cystic fibrosis, congenital enterocyte defects, and abetalipoproteinemia.
In these patients, laboratory tests are performed: estimation of IgA, IgG, IgM, complement level, and IgE (in eczema). Eosinophilia and elevated IgE level are typical. Estimation of HAAs and VAAs is helpful. Decreased Treg lymphocyte subsets may be observed in flow cytometry, as the FOXP3 expression may be reduced. Treg cells are usually present [6]. In half of the patients, the T cell number, B lymphocyte function, polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis, and complement concentrations are normal. Genetic tests are pivotal [6]. Differential diagnosis is very important with other causes of neonatal diabetes (genetic tests). To confirm autoimmune processes glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies, IA2 antibodies, ZnT8 antibodies in children with DMT1 and thyroperoxodase (TPO) Ab, and thyroglobulin (TG) Ab in children with autoimmune thyroiditis may be estimated. Genetic tests for FOXP3 gene mutation should be performed in children with a triad of symptoms and elevated IgE, especially in patients with a decreased number of Treg cells. Neonatal diabetes is an important indication for genetic tests as well. Hwang et al. have shown that some FOXP3 variants result only in insulin-dependent diabetes such as p.Lys393Met and c.1044_5G > A [52]. A differential diagnosis between symptoms of IPEX syndrome and many other inherited immunological disorders is difficult. In this situation, exome sequencing and genome sequencing are recommended to confirm disease types.
The prenatal ultrasound findings of echogenic bowel and skin desquamation are associated with a diagnosis of IPEX syndrome. This broadens our knowledge about the phenotypic spectrum of IPEX syndrome and proves the feasibility of prenatal diagnosis [33]. This has especially been observed in patients with IPEX syndrome and antibodies against HAAs and VAAs [57].

6. Treatment for IPEX Syndrome

The treatment of IPEX syndrome has three directions: downscale of autoimmunity, reduction of inflammation due to autoimmunity disorders, and treatment of infections as complications of the destroyed immunity and therapeutic methods. Currently, the primary therapeutic approach for IPEX syndrome is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients without HSCT are considered for immunosuppressive therapy (IS) and long-term supportive care.
Before diagnosis, patients usually require supportive care in hospital. For patients with severe enteropathy, nutritional treatment, including total parenteral nutrition or elemental or low-carbohydrate-containing formula and fluids, is indicated. Patients with neonatal diabetes type 1 need insulin therapy and continuous glycemic control. L-thyroxin is necessary for patients with hypothyroidism due to AITD. Other replacement therapies with glucosteroids and platelet transfusion are used in thrombocytopenia. Autoimmune granulocytopenia and pancytopenia need special hematologic procedures. Eczema is treated with antiallergic ointments, balms, and steroids.
Human stem cells have the competence to differentiate into mature blood cells including Treg cells. Allogeneic HSCT is the therapy of choice for IPEX syndrome. Cells from either human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical siblings or other HLA-matched donors are used for HSCT [61]. Patients receive HSCT from cord blood, peripheral blood, or bone marrow [62,63]. The survival of patients after HSCT is strongly connected with patients’ manifestation before transplantation. The severity of a patient’s disease may cause a high death rate in the early years after transplantation. In a long-term follow-up conducted by Barzaghi et al., which evaluated 58 patients who received HSCT, the overall survival after HSCT was 73.2% [43]. In this study, the mortality after HSCT had poor correlation with the stem cell source, type of donor, and chimerism [43]. Only partial donor chimerism was sufficient for complete IPEX syndrome remission [64,65]. Immunosuppressive therapies are used with a combination of several immunosuppressive agents to control the acute autoimmune phase of IPEX syndrome. Patients after transplantation also receive immunosuppressive therapy, usually consisting of calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine A, sirolimus and tacrolimus, while some patients also receive steroids [66]. The current study considered rapamycin, a non-calcineurin inhibitor, as the primary choice of immunosuppressive drug, either used alone or in combination [43,65]. According to Barzaghi et al., the overall survival after immunosuppressive therapies is 65.1% [43]. Immunosuppressive therapies without transplantation do not change the disease progression, and the organ involvement score is decreased in long-term follow-ups, which has a negative impact on survival. In patients receiving chronic immunosuppression, disease recurrence or complications have been observed. HSCT results in disease resolution with a better quality of life, regardless of age, donor source, or conditioning regimen [43].
Long-term survival (30 years) has been indicated in 47.5% of patients with IPEX syndrome; however, it is higher in the IPEX group (52%) in comparison to the IPEX-like group (27%). The stratification of types of mutation in children with a 10-year survival can detect that the highest 10-year survival (87.5%) is connected with frame deletion and that 78% is connected with splice site mutations. The effect of HSCT according to 10 year follow-ups is the survival of 72.8% of patients with IPEX syndrome and 100% of patients with IPEX-like syndrome. Non-transplanted patients with IPEX syndrome survive in 57% of cases, but those with IPEX-like syndrome survive in 78% [6].

New Treatment Perspectives

The new treatment methods for IPEX syndrome are based on genetically reprogramed techniques. Genetic engineering allows the use of Treg-like cells from patients’ autologous cells after replacing or repairing the FOXP3 mutants with wild-type genes [67,68,69,70].
Functional human Treg cells can be developed by a lentivirus FOXP3 transfer to naïve and memory CD4 + T cells [69,70,71]. Nowadays, the development of gene therapies for IPEX syndrome by generating CD4 + T cells expressing wild-type FOXP3 is used. T-like cells CD4FOXP3 have potent suppressor functions, both in vitro and in the humanized murine model [67,68,69]. Successes in HSCT treatment, especially with genetically changed wild-type FOXP3-expressing hematopoietic stem cells, could be considered, but there is also a problem of FOXP3 overexpression, because it has a negative influence on hematopoietic precursors [72,73,74,75,76,77].
Genome editing uses a site-specific endonuclease to produce a DNA double-strand break (DSB), and sequences in the DSB can be repaired by a donor sequence, or nonhomologous end joining [12,78]. Genome editing is a promising method in the murine model and will probably have a better long-term therapeutic effect in comparison to gene transfer [78,79,80,81].
An innovative method of genome editing, i.e., clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems (CRISPR/Cas9 RGENs), is simple and has shown potent activity in a range of different cell types [82]. In this method, a wild-type FOXP3 complementary DNA (cDNA) is precisely inserted. Wild-type cDNA is expressed and regulated from the endogenous regulatory elements. The correct design of the donor construct is very important as well, and any splicing regulation can also be maintained. Finally, wild-type cDNA restitutes the function of endogenous genes. Current investigations are ongoing to test the advantage and feasibility of gene correction for IPEX syndrome [81,82]
Treatment with mTOR inhibitors, which can restore Treg cell function in IPEX syndrome, with decreased cytokine expression and elevated suppression ability is also a promising method [82].

7. Concluding Remarks

IPEX syndrome is clinically, immunologically, and molecularly heterogenic. Only half of the examined children presented FOXP3 mutations, while the rest were diagnosed with IPEX-like syndrome. For confirmation of the disease type, genomic testing (exome sequencing and genome sequencing) is recommended, because the symptoms, treatment, and survival are closely associated with the genotype of IPEX syndrome. Recognition of the kind of mutation is important for the diagnostics of IPEX syndrome in newborns and young infants, as well as in prenatal screening. The method of choice in the treatment of IPEX syndrome is HSCT and immunosuppressive therapy. In children, it is very important to include supportive therapy for refractory diarrhea and replacement therapy in DMT1 and other endocrinopathies. In the future, genetic engineering methods may be used in the successful treatment of IPEX syndrome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, visualization, supervision, and project administration, I.B.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Medical University of Lublin Poland, grant number DS 415.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The author wants to acknowledge Monika Lejman from the Laboratory of Genetics Diagnostics of University Children Hospital of the Medical University of Lublin for the support and valuable consultations.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ADPAdenosine-5′-diphosphate
AITDAutoimmune thyroid disease
cDNAComplementary DNA
CRISPR/Cas9 RGENsClustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems. CRISPR/Cas systems can be modified and redirected to become powerful tools for genome editing in many species.
CTLA4Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4
DMT1Diabetes mellitus type 1
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
DOCK8Dedicator of cytokinesis 8
DSBDNA double-strand break
ETSErythroblast transformation-specific (family of transcription factors)
FKH domainForkhead domain
FOXP3Forkhead box P3
GAD antibodiesGlutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies
GITRGlucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein (belongs to the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF))
HAAsAntiharmonin autoantibodies
HLA systemHuman leukocyte antigen system
HSCTHematopoietic stem cell transplantation
IA2 antibodiesTyrosine phosphatase-related islet antigen 2
IgEImmunoglobulin E
IgGImmunoglobulin G
IgMImmunoglobulin M
IL2RAInterleukin 2 receptor α chain (also called CD25)
IL2RGInterleukin 2 Receptor Subunit γ
IL4Interleukin 4
IPEX syndromeImmune dysregulation, polyendocinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome
LRBALipopolysaccharide (LPS)-responsive and beige-like anchor protein
LZleucine zipper
mncRNAsMicro-noncoding ribonucleic acids
mRNAMessenger RNA
ncRNAsNoncoding ribonucleic acids
NFATNuclear factor of activated T cells
PBMCPeripheral blood mononuclear cell
PRRN-terminal proline-rich region
PTPN22Protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 22
RORγRetinoic acid-related orphan receptor γ (master activator of cholesterol biosynthesis)
RUNXRunt-related transcription factors
SCID-XISevere combined immunodeficiency
STAT1Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1
STAT3Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
STAT5bSignal transducer and activator of transcription 5B
Tconv cellsConventional T cells that differentiate into effector cells during immune responses
TG AbThyroglobulin antibody
TGFTransforming growth factor
TNFRSF18Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 18 (known as GITR)
TPO AbThyroperoxodase antibody
TregRegulatory T cell
TTC37Tetratricopeptide repeat domain 37
TTC7ATetratricopeptide repeat domain 7A
VAAsAntivillin autoantibodies
WT-FOXP3Wild-type FOXP3
XCIX-chromosome inactivation
ZFCentral zinc finger
ZnT8 antibodiesZinc transporter 8 antibodies

References

  1. Fontenot, J.D.; Gavin, M.A.; Rudensky, A.Y. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fontenot, J.D.; Rasmussen, J.P.; Williams, L.M.; Dooley, J.L.; Farr, A.G.; Rudensky, A.Y. Regulatory T Cell Lineage Specification by the Forkhead Transcription Factor Foxp3. Immunity 2005, 22, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khattri, R.; Cox, T.; Yasayko, S.-A.; Ramsdell, F. An essential role for Scurfin in CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hori, S.; Nomura, T.; Sakaguchi, S. Control of Regulatory T Cell Development by the Transcription Factor Foxp3. Science 2003, 299, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Allenspach, E.J.; Finn, L.S.; Rendi, M.H.; Eken, A.; Singh, A.K.; Oukka, M.; Taylor, S.D.; Altman, M.C.; Fligner, C.L.; Ochs, H.D.; et al. Absence of functional fetal regulatory T cells in humans causes in utero organ-specific autoimmunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 140, 616–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gambineri, E.; Mannurita, S.C.; Hagin, D.; Vignoli, M.; Anover-Sombke, S.; DeBoer, S.; Segundo, G.R.S.; Allenspach, E.J.; Favre, C.; Ochs, H.D.; et al. Clinical, Immunological, and Molecular Heterogeneity of 173 Patients With the Phenotype of Immune Dysregulation, Polyendocrinopathy, Enteropathy, X-Linked (IPEX) Syndrome. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, X.; Jeker, L.T.; Fife, B.T.; Zhu, S.; Anderson, M.S.; McManus, M.T.; Bluestone, J.A. Selective miRNA disruption in T reg cells leads to uncontrolled autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 1983–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, X.; Bailey-Bucktrout, S.L.; Jeker, L.T.; Penaranda, C.; Martinez-Llordella, M.; Ashby, M.; Nakayama, M.; Rosenthal, W.; Bluestone, J.A. Instability of the transcription factor Foxp3 leads to the generation of pathogenic memory T cells in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhu, F.; Yi, G.; Liu, X.; Zhu, F.; Zhao, A.; Wang, A.; Zhu, R.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, B.; Fang, S.; et al. Ring finger protein 31-mediated atypical ubiquitination stabilizes forkhead box P3 and thereby stimulates regulatory T-cell function. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 20099–20111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, Y.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S.; Han, Z.; Zhu, F.; Ni, Y.; Liang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Leng, Q.; Wei, G.; et al. USP21 prevents the generation of T-helper-1-like Treg cells. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, Z.; Barbi, J.; Bu, S.; Yang, H.Y.; Li, Z.; Gao, Y.; Jinasena, D.; Fu, J.; Lin, F.; Chen, C.; et al. The ubiquitin ligase Stub1 negatively modulates regulatory T cell suppressive activity by promoting degradation of the transcription factor Foxp3. Immunity 2013, 39, 272–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Huang, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Li, D.; Li, B. Molecular feature and therapeutic perspectives of immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome. J. Genet. Genom. 2020, 47, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Seo, W.; Taniuchi, I. The Roles of RUNX Family Proteins in Development of Immune Cells. Mol. Cells 2020, 43, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wildin, R.S.; Smyk-Pearson, S.; Filipovich, A.H. Clinical and molecular features of the immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X linked (IPEX) syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 39, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Michels, A.W.; Gottlieb, P.A. Autoimmune polyglandular syndromes. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2010, 6, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bacchetta, R.; Barzaghi, F.; Roncarolo, M.-G. From IPEX syndrome to FOXP3 mutation: A lesson on immune dysregulation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018, 1417, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Verbsky, J.; Chatila, T.A. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) and IPEX-related disorders. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2013, 25, 708–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bennett, C.L.; Yoshioka, R.; Kiyosawa, H.; Barker, D.F.; Fain, P.R.; Shigeoka, A.O.; Chance, P.F. Chance X-Linked syndrome of polyendocrinopathy, immune dysfunction, and diarrhea maps to Xp11.23-Xq13.3. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 66, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Mailer, R.K.; Falk, K.; Rotzschke, O. Absence of leucine zipper in the natural FOXP3Delta2Delta7 isoform does not affect dimerization but abrogates suppressive capacity. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ziegler, S.F. FOXP3: Of mice and men. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 24, 209–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lopes, J.E.; Torgerson, T.R.; Schubert, L.A.; Anover, S.D.; Ocheltree, E.L.; Ochs, H.D.; Ziegler, S.F. Analysis of FOXP3 reveals multiple domains required for its function as a transcriptional repressor. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 3133–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wu, Y.; Borde, M.; Heissmeyer, V.; Feuerer, M.; Lapan, A.D.; Stroud, J.C.; Bates, D.L.; Guo, L.; Han, A.; Ziegler, S.F.; et al. FOXP3 Controls Regulatory T Cell Function through Cooperation with NFAT. Cell 2006, 126, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Konopacki, C.; Pritykin, Y.; Rubtsov, Y.; Leslie, C.S.; Rudensky, A.Y. Transcription factor Foxp1 regulates Foxp3 chromatin binding and coordinates regulatory T cell function. Nat. Immunol. 2019, 20, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, L.; Lopes, J.E.; Chong, M.M.; Ivanov, I.I.; Min, R.; Victora, G.D.; Shen, Y.; Du, J.; Rubtsov, Y.P.; Rudensky, A.Y.; et al. TGF-β-induced Foxp3 inhibits T(H)17 cell differentiation by antagonizing RORgammat function. Nature 2008, 453, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Lal, G.; Bromberg, J.S. Epigenetic mechanisms of regulation of Foxp3 expression. Blood 2009, 114, 3727–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kitagawa, Y.; Ohkura, N.; Sakaguchi, S. Epigenetic control of thymic Treg-cell development. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014, 45, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Floess, S.; Freyer, J.; Siewert, C.; Baron, U.; Olek, S.; Polansky, J.; Schlawe, K.; Chang, H.-D.; Bopp, T.; Schmitt, E.; et al. Epigenetic Control of the foxp3 Locus in Regulatory T Cells. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Qin, A.; Wen, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Luo, J.; Ren, T.; Xu, L. MicroRNA-126 regulates the induction and function of CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells through PI3K/AKT pathway. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2013, 17, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, X.; Robinson, S.N.; Setoyama, T.; Tung, S.S.; D’Abundo, L.; Shah, M.Y.; Yang, H.; Yvon, E.; Shah, N.; Yang, H.; et al. FOXP3 is a direct target of miR15a/16 in umbilical cord blood regulatory T cells. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2014, 49, 793–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Van Loosdregt, J.; Vercoulen, Y.; Guichelaar, T.; Gent, Y.Y.J.; Beekman, J.M.; Van Beekum, O.; Brenkman, A.B.; Hijnen, D.-J.; Mutis, T.; Kalkhoven, E.; et al. Regulation of Treg functionality by acetylation-mediated Foxp3 protein stabilization. Blood 2010, 115, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zemmour, D.; Pratama, A.; Loughhead, S.M.; Mathis, D.; Benoist, C. Flicr, a long noncoding RNA, modulates Foxp3 expression and autoimmunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E3472–E3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Brajic, A.; Franckaert, D.; Burton, O.; Bornschein, S.; Calvanese, A.L.; Demeyer, S.; Cools, J.; Dooley, J.; Schlenner, S.; Liston, A. The long non-coding RNA flatr anticipates Foxp3 expression in regulatory T cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Louie, R.J.; Tan, Q.K.; Gilner, J.B.; Rogers, R.C.; Younge, N.; Wechsler, S.B.; McDonald, M.T.; Gordon, B.; Saski, C.A.; Jones, J.R.; et al. Novel pathogenic variants in FOXP3 in fetuses with echogenic bowel and skin desquamation identified by ultrasound. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2017, 173, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Caudy, A.A.; Reddy, S.T.; Chatila, T.; Atkinson, J.P.; Verbsky, J.W. CD25 deficiency causes an immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked–like syndrome, and defective IL-10 expression from CD4 lymphocytes. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 119, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Passerini, L.; de Sio, F.R.S.; Porteus, M.H.; Bacchetta, R. Gene/Cell Therapy Approaches for Immune Dysregulation Polyendocrinopathy Enteropathy X-Linked Syndrome. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266570661_GeneCell_Therapy_Approaches_for[_Immune_Dysregulation_Polyendocrinopathy_Enteropathy_X-Linked_Syndrome (accessed on 9 December 2020).
  36. Sharfe, N.; Shahar, M.; Roifman, C.M. An interleukin-2 receptor γ chain mutation with normal thymus morphology. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 100, 3036–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Goudy, K.; Aydin, D.; Barzaghi, F.; Gambineri, E.; Vignoli, M.; Mannurita, S.C.; Doglioni, C.; Ponzoni, M.; Cicalese, M.P.; Assanelli, A.; et al. Human IL2RA null mutation mediates immunodeficiency with lymphoproliferation and autoimmunity. Clin. Immunol. 2013, 146, 248–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Cohen, A.C.; Nadeau, K.C.; Tu, W.; Hwa, V.; Dionis, K.; Bezrodnik, L.; Teper, A.; Gaillard, M.; Heinrich, J.; Krensky, A.M.; et al. Cutting Edge: Decreased Accumulation and Regulatory Function of CD4+CD25high T Cells in Human STAT5b Deficiency. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 2770–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Bernasconi, A.; Marino, R.; Ribas, A.; Rossi, J.; Ciaccio, M.; Oleastro, M.; Ornani, A.; Paz, R.; Rivarola, M.A.; Zelazko, M.; et al. Characterisation of immunodeficiency in a patient with growth hormone insensitivity secondary to a novel STAT5b gene mutation. Pediatrics 2006, 118, e1584–e1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kofoed, E.M.; Hwa, V.; Little, B.; Woods, K.A.; Buckway, C.K.; Tsubaki, J.; Pratt, K.L.; Bezrodnik, L.; Jasper, H.; Tepper, A.; et al. Growth Hormone Insensitivity Associated with aSTAT5bMutation. New Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 1139–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hwa, V.; Little, B.; Adiyaman, P.; Kofoed, E.M.; Pratt, K.L.; Ocal, G.; Berberoglu, M.; Rosenfeld, R.G. Severe Growth Hormone Insensitivity Resulting from Total Absence of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5b. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 4260–4266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lohr, N.J.; Molleston, J.P.; Strauss, K.A.; Torres-Martinez, W.; Sherman, E.A.; Squires, R.H.; Rider, N.L.; Chikwava, K.R.; Cummings, O.W.; Morton, D.H.; et al. Human ITCH E3 ubiquitin ligas deficiency causes syndromic multisystem autoimmune disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 86, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Barzaghi, F.; Passerini, L.; Bacchetta, R. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, x-linked syndrome: A paradigm of immunodeficiency with autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Nieves, D.S.; Phipps, R.P.; Pollock, S.J.; Ochs, H.D.; Zhu, Q.; Scott, G.A.; Ryan, C.K.; Kobayashi, I.; Rossi, T.M.; Goldsmith, L.A. Dermatologic and Immunologic Findings in the Immune Dysregulation, Polyendocrinopathy, Enteropathy, X-linked Syndrome. Arch. Derm. 2004, 140, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Zama, D. Late-onset of immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, x-linked syndrome (IPEX) with intractable diarrhea. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2014, 40, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Kobayashi, I.; Shiari, R.; Yamada, M.; Kawamura, N.; Okano, M.; Yara, A.; Iguchi, A.; Ishikawa, N.; Ariga, T.; Sakiyama, Y.; et al. Novel mutations of FOXP3 in two Japanese patients with immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X linked syndrome (IPEX). J. Med. Genet. 2001, 38, 874–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Li, B.; Samanta, A.; Song, X.; Iacono, K.T.; Brennan, P.; Chatila, T.A.; Roncador, G.; Banham, A.H.; Riley, J.L.; Wang, Q.; et al. FOXP3 is a homo-oligomer and a component of a supramolecular regulatory complex disabled in the human XLAAD/IPEX autoimmune disease. Int. Immunol. 2007, 19, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Song, X.; Li, B.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, C.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Berezov, A.; Xu, C.; Gao, Y.; Li, Z.; et al. Structural and biological features of FOXP3 dimerization relevant to regulatory T cell function. Cell Rep. 2012, 1, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, C.C.; Johnson, M.E.; Espinoza, C.A.; Edsal, L.E.; Ren, B.; Zhou, X.J.; Grant, S. DNA binding by FOXP3 domain-swapped dimer suggests mechanisms of long-range chromosomal interactions. Nucl. Acid. Res. 2015, 43, 1268–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Band, H.S.; Bandukwala, H.S.; Wu, Y.; Feuerer, M.; Chen, Y.; Barboza, B.; Ghosh, S.; Stroud, J.C.; Benoist, C.; Mathis, D.; et al. Structure of a domain-swapped FOXP3 dimer on DNA and its function in regulatory T cells. Immunity 2011, 34, 479–491. [Google Scholar]
  51. Torgerson, T.R.; Linane, A.; Moes, N.; Anover, S.; Mateo, V.; Rieux–Laucat, F.; Hermine, O.; Vijay, S.; Gambineri, E.; Cerf–Bensussan, N.; et al. Severe Food Allergy as a Variant of IPEX Syndrome Caused by a Deletion in a Noncoding Region of the FOXP3 Gene. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 1705–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hwang, J.L.; Park, S.-Y.; Ye, H.; Sanyoura, M.; Pastore, A.N.; Carmody, D.; Del Gaudio, D.; Wilson, J.F.; Hanis, C.L.; Liu, X.; et al. FOXP3 mutations causing early-onset insulin-requiring diabetes but without other features of immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome. Pediatr. Diabetes 2017, 19, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Di Nunzio, S.; Cecconi, M.; Passerini, L.; McMurchy, A.N.; Baron, U.; Turbachova, I.; Vignola, S.; Valencic, E.; Tommasini, A.; Junker, A.; et al. Wild-type FOXP3 is selectively active in CD4+CD25hi regulatory T cells of healthy female carriers of different FOXP3 mutations. Blood 2009, 114, 4138–4141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rae, W.; Gao, Y.; Bunyan, D.; Holden, S.; Gilmour, K.; Patel, S.; Wellesley, D.; Williams, A. A novel FOXP3 mutation causing fetal akinesia and recurrent male miscarriages. Clin. Immunol. 2015, 161, 284–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ge, T.; Wang, Y.; Che, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, T. Atypical late-onset immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome with intractable diarrhoea: A case report. Front. Pediatr. 2017, 5, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Park, J.H.; Lee, K.H.; Jeon, B.; Ochs, H.D.; Lee, J.S.; Gee, H.Y.; Seo, S.; Geum, D.; Piccirillo, C.A.; Eisenhut, M.; et al. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome: A systematic review. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lampasona, V.; Passerini, L.; Barzaghi, F.; Lombardoni, C.; Bazzigaluppi, E.; Brigatti, C.; Bacchetta, R.; Bosi, E. Autoantibodies to harmonin and villin are diagnostic markers in children with IPEX syndrome. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kadakia, S.; Farnaes, L.; Dimmock, D.; Chowdhury, S.; Ding, Y.; Anderson, E.J.; Kingsmore, S.; Newfield, R.S. Diagnosis and treatment of a boy with IPEX syndrome presenting with diabetes in early infancy. Clin. Case Rep. 2019, 7, 2123–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Halabi-Tawil, M.; Ruemmele, F.; Fraitag, S.; Rieux-Laucat, F.; Neven, B.; Brousse, N.; De Prost, Y.; Fischer, A.; Goulet, O.; Bodemer, C. Cutaneous manifestations of immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome. Br. J. Derm. 2009, 160, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bousfiha, A.; Jeddane, L.; Picard, C.; Ailal, F.; Gaspar, H.B.; Al-Herz, W.; Chatila, T.; Crow, Y.J.; Cunningham-Rundles, C.; Etzioni, A.; et al. The 2017 IUIS phenotypic classification for primary immunodeficiencies. J. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 38, 129–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hatzimichael, E.; Tuthill, M. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Stem Cells Cloning 2010, 3, 105–117. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lucas, K.G.; Ungar, D.; Comito, M.; Bayerl, M.; Groh, B. Submyeloablative cord blood transplantation corrects clinical defects seen in IPEX syndrome. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2006, 39, 55–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhan, H.; Sinclair, J.; Adams, S.; Cale, C.M.; Murch, S.; Perroni, L.; Davies, G.; Amrolia, P.; Qasim, W. Immune reconstitution and recovery of FOXP3 (forkhead box P3)-expressing T cells after transplantation for IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked) syndrome. Pediatrics 2008, 121, e998–e1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Horino, S.; Sasahara, Y.; Sato, M.; Niizuma, H.; Kumaki, S.; Abukawa, D.; Sato, A.; Imaizumi, M.; Kanegane, H.; Kamachi, Y.; et al. Selective expansion of donor-derived regulatory T cells after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in a patient with IPEX syndrome. Pediatr. Transpl. 2014, 18, E25–E30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Seidel, M.G.; Fritsch, G.; Lion, T.; Jürgens, B.; Heitger, A.; Bacchetta, R.; Lawitschka, A.; Peters, C.; Gadner, H.; Matthes-Martin, S. Selective engraftment of donor CD4+25high FOXP3-positive T cells in IPEX syndrome after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2009, 113, 5689–5691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bindl, L.; Torgerson, T.; Perroni, L.; Youssef, N.; Ochs, H.D.; Goulet, O.; Ruemmele, F.M. Successful use of the new immune-suppressor sirolimus in IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome). J. Pediatr. 2005, 147, 256–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Passerini, L.; Di Nunzio, S.; Gregori, S.; Gambineri, E.; Cecconi, M.; Seidel, M.G.; Cazzola, G.; Perroni, L.; Tommasini, A.; Vignola, S.; et al. Functional type 1 regulatory T cells develop regardless of FOXP3 mutations in patients with IPEX syndrome. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011, 41, 1120–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Passerini, L.; Baccheta, R. Forkhead-Box-P3 Gene Transfer in Human CD4+ T Conventional Cells for the Generation of Stable and Efficient Regulatory T Cells, Suitable for Immune Modulatory Therapy. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Passerini, L.; Mel, E.R.; Sartirana, C.; Fousteri, G.; Bondanza, A.; Naldini, L.; Roncarolo, M.G.; Baccheta, R. CD4+ T Cells from IPEX Patients Convert into Functional and Stable Regulatory T Cells by FOXP3 Gene Transfer. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 215ra174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Aarts-Riemens, T.; Emmelot, M.E.; Verdonck, L.F.; Mutis, T. Forced overexpression of either of the two common human Foxp3 isoforms can induce regulatory T cells from CD4+CD25– cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 1381–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Y.; Tran, D.Q.; Lindsey, J.W.; Rhoads, J.M. The Association of Gut Microbiota and Treg Dysfunction in Autoimmune Diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021, 1278, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Allan, S.E.; Alstad, A.N.; Merindol, N.; Crellin, N.K.; Amendola, M.; Baccheta, R.; Naldini, L.; Roncarolo, M.G.; Soudeyns, H.; Levings, M.K. Generation of Potent and Stable Human CD4+ T Regulatory Cells by Activation-independent Expression of FOXP3. Mol. Ther. 2008, 16, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Panchal, N.; Ghosh, S.; Booth, C. T cell gene therapy to treat immunodeficiency. Br. J. Haematol. 2021, 192, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Oswald-Richter, K.; Grill, S.M.; Shariat, N.; Leelawong, M.; Sundrud, M.S.; Haas, D.W.; Unutmaz, D. HIV infection of naturally occurring and genetically reprogrammed human regulatory T-cells. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2, E198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hombach, A.A.; Kofler, D.; Rappl, G.; Abken, H. Redirecting human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from the peripheral blood with pre-defined target specificity. Gene Ther. 2009, 16, 1088–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Brusko, T.M.; Koya, R.C.; Zhu, S.; Lee, M.R.; Putnam, A.L.; McClymont, S.A.; Nishimura, M.I.; Han, S.; Chang, L.-J.; Atkinson, M.A.; et al. Human Antigen-Specific Regulatory T Cells Generated by T Cell Receptor Gene Transfer. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kohn, D.B. Gene therapy for blood diseases. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 60, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Genovese, P.; Schiroli, G.; Escobar, G.; Di Tomaso, T.; Firrito, C.; Calabria, A.; Moi, D.; Mazzieri, R.; Bonini, C.; Holmes, M.; et al. Targeted genome editing in human repopulating haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 510, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Voit, R.A.; Hendel, A.; Pruett-Miller, S.M.; Porteus, M.H. Nuclease-mediated gene editing by homologous recombination of the human globin locus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 1365–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ousterout, D.G.; Perez-Pinera, P.; Thakore, P.I.; Kabadi, A.M.; Brown, M.T.; Qin, X.; Fedrigo, O.; Mouly, V.; Tremblay, J.P.; Gersbach, C.A. Reading frame correction by targeted genome editing restores dystrophin expression in cells from Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. Mol. Ther. 2013, 21, 1718–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Charbonnier, L.-M.; Cui, Y.; Stephen-Victor, E.; Harb, H.; Lopez, D.; Bleesing, J.J.; Garcia-Lloret, M.I.; Chen, K.; Ozen, A.; Carmeliet, P.; et al. Functional reprogramming of regulatory T cells in the absence of Foxp3. Nat. Immunol. 2019, 20, 1208–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hsu, P.D.; Lander, E.S.; Zhang, F. Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering. Cell 2014, 157, 1262–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The occurrence of most the common mutations of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) in patients with IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked) syndrome according Park et al. [56].
Figure 1. The occurrence of most the common mutations of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) in patients with IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked) syndrome according Park et al. [56].
Genes 12 00323 g001
Figure 2. The occurrence of clinical symptoms of IPEX syndrome [56].
Figure 2. The occurrence of clinical symptoms of IPEX syndrome [56].
Genes 12 00323 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ben-Skowronek, I. IPEX Syndrome: Genetics and Treatment Options. Genes 2021, 12, 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030323

AMA Style

Ben-Skowronek I. IPEX Syndrome: Genetics and Treatment Options. Genes. 2021; 12(3):323. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030323

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ben-Skowronek, Iwona. 2021. "IPEX Syndrome: Genetics and Treatment Options" Genes 12, no. 3: 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030323

APA Style

Ben-Skowronek, I. (2021). IPEX Syndrome: Genetics and Treatment Options. Genes, 12(3), 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030323

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop