Next Article in Journal
Prevalent Pathogenic Variants of ATP7B in Chinese Patients with Wilson’s Disease: Geographical Distribution and Founder Effect
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Characterization of the APX Gene Family and Its Expression Pattern under Phytohormone Treatment and Abiotic Stress in Populus trichocarpa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Loss of ZmLIPOXYGENASE4 Decreases Fusarium verticillioides Resistance in Maize Seedlings

by
Alessandra Lanubile
1,2,*,
Virginia Maria Grazia Borrelli
1,
Mario Soccio
3,
Paola Giorni
1,
Lorenzo Stagnati
1,
Matteo Busconi
1,2 and
Adriano Marocco
1,2
1
Department of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy
2
Research Center for Biodiversity and Ancient DNA, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy
3
Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(3), 335; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030335
Submission received: 4 February 2021 / Revised: 19 February 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published: 25 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Fusarium verticillioides is one of the most relevant fungal species in maize responsible for ear, stalk and seedling rot, as well as the fumonisin contamination of kernels. Plant lipoxygenases (LOX) synthesize oxylipins that play a crucial role in the regulation of defense mechanisms against pathogens and influence the outcome of pathogenesis. To better uncover the role of these signaling molecules in maize resistance against F. verticillioides, the functional characterization of the 9-LOX gene, ZmLOX4, was carried out in this study by employing mutants carrying Mu insertions in this gene (named as UFMulox4). In this regard, the genotyping of five UFMulox4 identified the mutant UFMu10924 as the only one having an insertion in the coding region of the gene. The impact of ZmLOX4 mutagenesis on kernel defense against F. verticillioides and fumonisin accumulation were investigated, resulting in an increased fungal susceptibility compared to the inbred lines W22 and Tzi18. Moreover, the expression of most of the genes involved in the LOX, jasmonic acid (JA) and green leaf volatiles (GLV) pathways, as well as LOX enzymatic activity, decreased or were unaffected by fungal inoculation in the mutant UFMu10924. These results confirm the strategic role of ZmLOX4 in controlling defense against F. verticillioides and its influence on the expression of several LOX, JA and GLV genes.

1. Introduction

Globally, maize is the most widely grown cereal crop, with a world production of more than one billion tons from about 200 million ha [1]. However, the safety of maize as a food and feed component is under threat throughout the world. A large number of pathogens can attack and colonize developing maize ears and kernels, thus compromising the quantity and quality of grain production [2,3,4]. In recent years, the impact of climate change has exacerbated the occurrence of disease outbreaks as well as the increase of mycotoxin risks in maize [5,6]. Mycotoxin contamination is strongly influenced by environmental factors, and its presence varies greatly from year to year, even in small geographic areas, due to microclimatic variation [7].
F. verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg (teleomorph Gibberella moniliformis) causes severe diseases of maize ears, stalks and seedlings, and is endemic in nearly all maize fields during harvest [8,9]. F. verticillioides infection is crucial for the resulting production of fumonisins and their effects on animal and human health [10,11]. Fumonisins B1, B2 and B3 represent the most abundant forms, and due to their carcinogenic properties, the European Union has regulated them, setting maximum tolerable levels in animal feed and human food [12,13,14].
The development of resistant germplasm is one of the major components of the strategy of fungal disease and fumonisin management, but the quantitative nature of these traits and the many environmental variations make the achievement of resistant materials very difficult. For this reason, complete resistance to F. verticillioides infection and fumonisin contamination has not yet been attained [15,16,17,18,19,20]. The identification of candidate genes involved in the host plant resistance mechanisms to this fungus by means of quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping studies and transcriptomics analysis could provide new insights on the genetic basis of the maize-fungus interaction and hasten the production of resistant hybrids [16].
When maize is attacked by F. verticillioides, an intracellular signaling cascade is initiated, including the activation of hormones that in turn target transcription factor families, promoting the downstream switching on of defense responsive genes for pathogenesis-related proteins phenylpropanoid metabolism and lipoxygenases (LOX) [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Plant LOX enzymes synthesize several signaling molecules, named oxylipins, and depending on their regiospecificity, are classified in two major subfamilies, 9-LOX and 13-LOX [27]. In the 9-LOX pathway, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are converted to hydroperoxy-octadecadienoic acid (HPOD), hydroperoxy-octadecatrienoic acid (HPOT) and 9S-keto octadecatrienoic acid (9-KOT), most of them involved in defense against pathogens. On the other hand, 13-LOX catalyzes the conversion of PUFA into 13-HPOT, subsequently metabolized to jasmonates, as jasmonic acid (JA) and its derivatives, as well as green leaf volatiles (GLV).
In maize, a total of 13 different LOX genes (ZmLOXs) with varying functions, localization, and regulation have been reported [28,29]. Six genes encode 13-lipoxygenases (ZmLOX7, ZmLOX8, ZmLOX9, ZmLOX10, ZmLOX11 and ZmLOX13), the best-studied pathway, while the genes ZmLOX1, ZmLOX2, ZmLOX3, ZmLOX4, ZmLOX5, and ZmLOX12 encode 9-lipoxygenases. The plastidial ZmLOX6 represents a novel LOX subfamily, distinct from 9- and 13-LOX, able to metabolize fatty acid hydroperoxides derived from the 13-LOX pathway [30]. The role of each specific ZmLOX is still unknown. Various authors have attempted to clarify the involvement of oxylipins in host–pathogen interaction by deleting LOX genes in maize and pointed out their contribution to plant development and pest/pathogen resistance [31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
In this regard, in previous work by [37], the involvement of ZmLOX4 for normal JA biosynthesis in wounded kernels inoculated with F. verticillioides was shown by employing two lox4 mutants lox4-7 and lox4-10, respectively. In this study, five novel maize mutants carrying transposon Mu insertions in distinct regions of the ZmLOX4 gene (hereafter named as UFMulox4), together with inbred lines W22 and Tzi18, were tested for resistance to Fusarium seedling rot (FSR) caused by F. verticillioides, using an inoculation assay in germinating kernels. This method allowed a better evaluation of infection progress at both kernel and seedling stages [38,39,40]. UFMulox4 mutants were analyzed for the presence of Mu insertions in the ZmLOX4 gene along with its expression, and only the mutant carrying a mutation in the coding region of the gene and showing the absence of ZmLOX4 transcript was further assayed for the content of fumonisins, the expression of several selected genes involved in the LOX, JA and GLV pathways, and LOX enzymatic activity. Collectively, the results from this study provided new insights about the role of the ZmLOX4 gene, confirming not only its requirement for maize defense at the seedling stage against F. verticillioides but also supplying new information about how the altered expression of this gene could, in turn, reduce the transcriptional levels of several LOX and GLV genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Maize Inbred Lines and UFMuLox4 Mutants

The maize inbred lines W22 and Tzi18 belong to the “Goodman” maize association population [41,42] and were previously evaluated as moderately susceptible and resistant to F. verticillioides infection, respectively [38,39]. Seeds were obtained from the USDA-ARS-NCRPIS (Iowa State University, Regional Plant Introduction Station, Ames, Iowa, United States, 50011-1170). The UFMulox4 mutants (UFMu12283, UFMu06517, UFMu03075, UFMu10924 and UFMu03258) belong to the UniformMu population and are freely distributed by the Maize Cooperation Stock Center using online tools maintained at MaizeGDB.org. Mutator-transposable element insertional mutagenesis of UFMulox4 mutants was in the genetic background of the line W22. The UFMulox4 mutants were introgressed in W22 background with three backcrosses, and homozygous F3 mutant plants were used (BC3F3). Inbreds and mutants were maintained by sibbing at the Department of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.

2.2. PCR Confirmation and Genotyping of Mu Insertions

To confirm the presence of Mu insertions in the ZmLOX4 gene, genomic DNA was extracted from individual plants and analyzed by PCR using gene-specific primers as described by [43]. At least two gene-specific primers are required for each insertion (one upstream and one downstream of the insertion site), and these need to be compatible with a Mu TIR-specific primer available on MaizeGDB [43]. The gene-specific primers were designed with Primer3 [44] for 22–24 base oligomers with a predicted Tm between 55 and 60 °C (Table S1). Gene-specific primers that flanked the insertion site were first PCR-tested in pairs with the wild-type DNA from W22 in order to confirm the capacity of the selected primers to amplify the expected wild-type fragment. Thereafter, the specific primers were paired with the MuTIR specific primer TIR6 (Table S1). PCR was completed with Taq DNA polymerase and buffers from Promega (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA). The two-step PCR thermocycling conditions were: 1.94 °C for 1 min; 2.94 °C for 25 s; 3. 62 °C for 30 s; 4.72 °C for 1 min; 5.8–10 cycles of 2 to 4; 6.94 °C for 25 s; 7.56 °C for 30 s; 8.72 °C for 1 min; 9.26 cycles of 6 to 8; 10.72 °C for 10 min. For sequence validation of insertion sites, PCR reaction with TIR6 was carried out, PCR product was gel purified and sequenced using the TIR6 primer and/or gene-specific primer (Figure S1).

2.3. Inoculation Bioassay

The rolled towel assay (RTA) phenotyping method was used to artificially infect mature kernels of each inbred line (W22 and Tzi18) and the five UFMulox4 mutants [38,39,45,46]. Briefly, twenty seeds of a similar size and without visible damage were selected, 10 to be used as inoculated samples (F. verticillioides inoculation) and 10 to be used as control (mock inoculation). Six RTAs in total for mock (M) and inoculated (I) conditions were carried out for each inbred line and mutant. The seeds were surface sterilized as previously described in [38,39,45,46] and placed on two moistened towels of germinating paper (Anchor Paper, Saint Paul, MN, USA). The kernels were inoculated with 100 μL of 1 × 106 conidial suspension of F. verticillioides ITEM10027 (MPVP 294). The fungal cultures were maintained on Petri plates (9 cm diameter) in potato dextrose agar (infusion from potatoes, 200 g; dextrose, 15 g; agar, 20 g; H2O to 1 L) and incubated at 25 °C with a 12 h photoperiod for 14 days. After the inoculation step, the towels were rolled up and maintained for 7 days at 25 °C in the dark. Controls were prepared as above but replacing the inoculation step with water. For each seedling, Fusarium seedling rot (FSR) severity, seedling length (SL) and fresh seedling weight (SW) of inbred lines and UFMulox4 mutants in mock (M) and inoculated (I) conditions were calculated. The FSR was assessed on each seedling by a visual evaluation of the seedling size and visible colonization of F. verticillioides using a scale from 1 to 5, as previously reported [38,39,45,46]. On this scale, 1 corresponds to the complete absence of disease symptoms, and five corresponds to the entire rotting of the kernel. For further biological analysis, kernels at 7 days post-inoculation (dpi) were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

2.4. Analysis of Total Fumonisin Content

Five g of sample ground in liquid nitrogen with a pestle and mortar were weighed and placed in an extraction tube. Twenty-five mL of AQUA buffer (VICAM, Watertown, MA, USA) was measured with a graduated cylinder and poured into the extraction tube. The extraction tube was vortexed for 2 min at maximum speed. The extract was then filtered into a clean extraction tube. For the quantification of total fumonisins, 100 μL of filtered extract were transferred to the Fumo-V AQUA strip test (VICAM) by dropping (~1 drop/second) vertically into the circular opening. After allowing the strip test to develop for 5 min on a flat surface, the Fumo-V strip test was inserted into the Vertu reader, and the results were read. The values of fumonisins (B1 + B2 + B3) given in the text are expressed in mg/kg.

2.5. RNA Extraction and Real-Time RT–PCR Expression Analysis

Total RNA extraction and purification were performed according to [47,48]. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT–PCR) experiments were performed on kernels collected at 7 dpi using the 2× iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and the CFX-96 device (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). One µg of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit protocol (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Twenty ng of single-strand cDNA determined by fluorometric assay (Qubit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used for real-time RT–PCR. The relative RT–PCR conditions applied were: 95 °C for 3 min and 40 cycles at 95 °C 15 s, 57–63 °C for 30 s, followed by a melting curve analysis [47,48]. Three technical replicates (within each biological replicate) were employed for each tested sample and template-free negative controls. Gene-specific primers are listed in Table S2. The reference housekeeping gene β-actin was used to normalize the expression of the target genes, and FC values in gene expression were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [49].

2.6. Determination of Lipoxygenase Enzymatic Activity

The maize kernels were ground using a Retsch mixer mill with two 30 s cycles at 15 Hz. For each sample, 1 g of the ground powder was resuspended in 4 mL of 100 mM Na-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and placed in an ice-water bath, stirred for 1 h and then centrifuged twice at 25,000× g at 4 °C for 20 min. The obtained supernatant was stored in an ice-water bath and used daily to measure lipoxygenase activity. Protein content was determined according to the method of Lowry, as modified by [50], using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Total lipoxygenase activity was evaluated spectrophotometrically by means of a PerkinElmer λ 45 UV-vis spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Wellesley, MA, USA) according to [51] by monitoring the absorbance increase at 234 nm due to the conversion of linoleate into the corresponding hydroperoxide. The assay medium was 2 mL of 100 mM Na-acetate buffer (pH 5.5) containing 400 µM Na-linoleate and 1 µL Tween-20 per µmol linoleate. The reaction was started by adding 0.05–0.10 mg of protein extract. One unit of lipoxygenase corresponded to the formation of 1 µmol of conjugated diene per min.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

For analysis of the RTA phenotypic values, standard deviations of the means were calculated on 10 seedlings of three RTAs. For fumonisin content, gene expression and enzymatic activity analysis, standard deviations of the means were calculated on three biological replicates. One-factor ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05), was performed on the phenotypic values, fumonisin content, FC values of all genes and lipoxygenase enzyme activity to set significant differences among genotypes. For RTA phenotyping analysis, differences between mock and inoculated RTAs within the same line were performed using two-factor ANOVA and considered to be significant at * p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤  0.001.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Analysis for Transposon Mutagenesis in the ZmLOX4 Gene

Mu transposon insertions in the ZmLOX4 gene were confirmed by PCR amplification, followed by DNA sequencing (Figure 1, Figure S1). In a previous study by [37], two lox4 mutants, lox4-7 and lox4-10, had Mu insertion in exons 6 and 9, respectively (Figure 1). In this study, five novel UFMulox4 mutants were considered and the analysis of Mu element presence identified UFMu12283 as having an insertion at −204 bp from the ATG start codon, UFMu06517 at −52 bp from ATG in the 5′ UTR region, UFMu03075 and UFMu03258 at +717 and +1131 bp in introns 1 and 2, respectively, whereas UFMu10924 harbored a Mu element in exon 2 at +935 bp (Figure 1, Figure S1). The Mu transposon insertion in the coding region of the ZmLOX4 gene observed for the mutant UFMu10924 could lead to a higher probability of obtaining a truncated protein during translation. For this reason, even though further disease phenotyping analysis and the expression of the ZmLOX4 gene were carried out for all UFMulox4 mutants, the extensive molecular characterization and the enzymatic assay were performed on UFMu10924 only.

3.2. Phenotypic Analysis of Maize Inbred Lines and UFMulox4 Mutants

To determine whether ZmLOX4 contributes to the resistance of maize to mycotoxigenic fungi, the levels of infection caused by F. verticillioides were tested in the five UFMulox4 mutants and in W22 and Tzi18 inbred lines (Figure 2). Different types of response to FSR were found through the RTA screening. The FSR severity rates ranged from 1.65 ± 0.10 to 3.86 ± 0.23, with Tzi18 the most resistant line and UFMu10924 the most susceptible. The inbred line W22 showed FSR values of moderate susceptibility with severity scores not significantly different from those observed for the remaining UFMulox4 mutants (Figure 2A). Conversely, the occurrence of Fusarium seedling rot in mock RTA was null (1 = healthy), with seedlings having no visible sign of fungal colonization for all lines (Figure 2A).
Morphologically, no significant differences were reported in seedling weight (SW) and length (SL) among W22 and the Mu insertional mutants, considering both mock and inoculated RTAs (Figure 2B,C). Interestingly, Tzi18 displayed the highest values of SW, before and after treatment, and SL after fungal treatment (p < 0.05). These findings confirm the better performances of the inbred line in terms of disease resistance and seedling growth [38,39].
Total fumonisin (B1 + B2 + B3) content was evaluated in inoculated RTAs 7 days after inoculation for UFMu10924, Tzi18 and W22 lines. No significant differences in fumonisin production were measured between UFMu10924 and W22, with total fumonisin concentrations of 58.94 ± 10.48 and 55.46 ± 3.78 mg/kg, respectively, whereas fumonisin production was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced almost 11-fold on Tzi18 kernels (5.10 ± 1.44 mg/kg). These results collectively demonstrated the resistance of the latter line, as highlighted by the reduced FSR values and the low fumonisin content.
The expression levels of the ZmLOX4 gene were first assayed by real-time RT–PCR in all five UFMulox4 mutants, Tzi18 and W22 lines at 7 dpi with RTA bioassay (Figure 3). The expression profiles were reported as fold change (FC) of inoculated over-mock inoculated kernels. As expected, no discernable transcript was detected in the mutant UFMu10924, whereas the transcripts of ZmLOX4 were strongly expressed in Tzi18. Lower values of FC were detected in W22 that did not result significantly different from the other four UFMulox4 mutants (Figure 3). Besides the ZmLOX4 gene, the transcriptional changes of three selected 9-LOX genes, ZmLOX3, ZmLOX5 and ZmLOX12, four 13-LOX genes, ZmLOX7, ZmLOX8, ZmLOX10 and ZmLOX11, and the plastidial ZmLOX6 were analyzed considering only Tzi18, W22 and the UFMu10924 mutant (Figure 4).
The three lines showed differences in the expression of almost all genes. The upregulation of most of them occurred in the resistant line Tzi18, excluding ZmLOX11, which was slightly downregulated with a FC value of −1.75 (Figure 4G). The most highly induced gene was ZmLOX6, with an increase of up to 31.55-fold (Figure 4H), followed by ZmLOX3 with the induction of up to 5.30-fold (Figure 4A). Slightly lower FC values were reported for the other assayed genes in the same line, with FCs ranging from 3.88 to 2.17 (Figure 4). Overexpression was also detected for ZmLOX genes in the W22 line, albeit at more moderate levels, varying from 3.10 for ZmLOX11 to 1.10 for ZmLOX7 (Figure 4G,D, respectively).
In contrast to Tzi18 and W22, the expression of most ZmLOX genes decreased or was unaffected by F. verticillioides inoculation in the mutant UFMu10924 (Figure 4). Significant differences with both inbred lines were observed for the genes ZmLOX3, ZmLOX5, ZmLOX7 and ZmLOX8, where the lowest levels of expression were reached with the latter gene (FC = −2.52; Figure 4E).
Regarding the genes involved in the synthesis of jasmonates and green leaf volatiles encoding for allene oxide synthase (ZmAOS), 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (12-OPDA) reductase (ZmOPR8), OPC-8:0 CoA ligase 1 (ZmOPCL), acyl-CoA oxidase (ZmACX) and hydroperoxide lyase (ZmHPL), as well as those encoding for lipid transfer proteins, more precisely, phospholipase transfer protein homolog 1 (Zmplt1) and lipid-binding protein (ZmLBP), similar expression patterns were reported, even if a less marked reaction was observed as compared to ZmLOX genes (Figure 5).
The resistant line Tzi18 showed the strongest induction for all genes contrasting with W22 and UFMu10924. The most relevant difference was found for the gene ZmOPR8, for which F. verticillioides treatment triggered a response about 12 times higher in the resistant line than both the other lines (Figure 5B).
In contrast with the gene induction observed for the Tzi18 line, the expression of JA and GLV genes appeared to be not notably affected by the fungal inoculation in W22, whereas the levels of transcripts of all genes were decreased in mutant UFMu10924, with FC ranging from −4.12 to −1.51 (Figure 5).
Given the diversified transcriptional changes induced by F. verticillioides observed in Tzi18, W22 and UFMu10924 lines, the study was extended to lipoxygenase enzymatic activity. The assays were conducted on the same two inbred lines and the UFMulox4 mutant by comparing mock and inoculated kernels, and total enzymatic LOX activity was expressed as UE/g of dry weight (Figure 6).
In mock kernels, LOX results were not significantly different for all three lines (UE/g of dry weight = 1.11, 0.99 and 0.93 for W22, Tzi18 and UFMu10924, respectively). On the other hand, a significant increase of the LOX activity (p < 0.05) was elicited by fungal treatment in the Tzi18 resistant inbred line (UE/g of dry weight = 3.14). Albeit no significant, a mild higher LOX activity was reported for W22, whereas no change occurred in the mutant UFMu10924.
The lower LOX activity found in the W22 line and, more markedly, in the UFMulox4 mutant probably reflects the reduced FC values previously described for the LOX and GLV genes, and once again, it points out the relevance of the ZmLOX4 gene in the resistance mechanisms towards F. verticillioides.

4. Discussion

Plant oxylipins, including GLV and hormone JA, play a key role in signaling molecules to induce defense responses against pathogens [27]. To better elucidate the role of oxylipin-mediated crosstalk in the plant-fungal interaction of maize germinating kernels and F. verticillioides, a functional analysis was performed with maize mutants carrying mutator insertions in the ZmLOX4 gene in comparison with the wild-type inbred line W22 and the resistant genotype Tzi18.
In this study, the analysis of five novel Mu transposon insertions identified mutant UFMu10924 as the only one having an insertion in the W22 LOX4 gene coding region. Analysis of ZmLOX4 gene expression showed the absence of transcript in this mutant, whereas W22, Tzi18 and the remaining UFMulox4 mutants exhibited a higher induction after F. verticillioides inoculation. These results revealed that transposon insertion in exon 2 observed for UFMu10924 was the only one to cause lack of expression. Similar findings were previously reported in [52], where ZmLOX4 transcripts were strongly accumulated in wild-type plants and not for exonic insertion events in the lox4-7 and lox4-10 mutants, considered as null alleles of ZmLOX4.
The effects of transposon mutagenesis on kernel defense against F. verticillioides were further investigated to prompt the hypothesis of ZmLOX4 contribution to pathogen resistance. In this regard, the RTA screening method was employed to evaluate F. verticillioides establishment and growth in germinating maize kernels. This phenotyping bioassay has the capacity to score multiple uniformly grown seedlings for each tested genotype. The seedlings scored in the RTA grew simultaneously, in controlled conditions, and inoculated with a common stock of fungal conidia, avoiding possible external injury or stress effects. The UFMu10924 mutant was found to be the most susceptible to fungal infection compared to W22 and the other knockout mutants having the insertions in the non-coding regions of the ZmLOX4 gene, whereas Tzi18 was confirmed to be the most resistant line with the lowest FSR values. These findings were in line with a previous study, where F. verticillioides colonized more aggressively and produced a higher number of conidia on lox4 and lox5 mutant kernels compared to wild-type kernels [37]. Moreover, without a functional ZmLOX4 gene, seeds did not accumulate the JA hormone precursor, 12-OPDA, and JA itself at normal levels, suggesting that 9-oxylipin products from LOX4 are required for JA biosynthesis in F. verticillioides infected seeds [37]. Previous research investigated two independent Mu transposon insertions in the 9-lipoxygenase LOX4, UFMu01831 and UFMu03303, and reported a higher Spodoptera exigua caterpillar mass compared to wild-type W22, indicating that not only maize defense mechanisms to fungal infection were affected by ZmLOX4 Mu insertions, but also a defense to insect herbivory [53].
Because F. verticillioides represents the main pathogen producing fumonisins and mycotoxin contamination constitutes a significant agroeconomic threat, it was of concern to assay whether disruption of this gene had any effect on fumonisin production in the inoculated kernels. RTAs showed that UFMu10924 kernels were highly contaminated by fumonisins (B1 + B2 + B3), slightly more than the W22 line, albeit these differences were not significant. On the other hand, the significantly reduced levels of fumonisin contamination determined in Tzi18 demonstrated the superiority of this inbred line and its possible employment as a source of resistance. A low relationship between disease severity and production of fumonisins, as observed for UFMulox4 mutant and W22, could be an inherent factor of the pathosystem maize-F. verticillioides, hypothesis reinforced by several studies. It was suggested that genetic factors that affect grain infection might act independently of those affecting fumonisin production, and the quantitative genetic nature of these two traits could partly explain the presence of mycotoxins even in case of the absence of infection [54,55,56,57].
Regarding gene expression profile, the 9-LOX genes (ZmLOX3, ZmLOX5 and ZmLOX12), the 13-LOX genes (ZmLOX7, ZmLOX8 and ZmLOX10) and ZmLOX6 were always upregulated in the resistant Tzi18 line, followed a more moderate increment in W22, while lox4 mutant did not show any difference of gene expression or even a downregulation. Previous experiments reported an earlier and enhanced induction of LOX genes in maize kernels belonging to the CO441 resistant line at 3 and 7 dpi with F. verticillioides compared to the CO354 susceptible line [48].
A different trend was observed for the lox3 mutants as described in the works by [32,37]. In contrast to wild-type kernels, earlier and significantly higher levels of expression were observed for the ZmLOX4, ZmLOX5 and ZmLOX12 genes in lox3 mutant kernels in response to F. verticillioides. Moreover, lox3 mutants exhibited a reduced fungal colonization and fumonisin production, leading to the conclusion that ZmLOX3 can be considered a susceptibility gene in this pathosystem [32,37]. In this study, the lack of expression of ZmLOX4 in the UFMu10924 mutant caused downregulation of all ZmLOX genes, including ZmLOX3. The absence of transcriptional changes observed for this gene should have increased resistance against F. verticillioides, as reported in previous studies [32,37]. Conversely, a different behavior was described in this work. It could be speculated that the effect of the impaired ZmLOX3 gene expression and the possible consequent reduced levels of LOX3-derived oxylipins, as the linolenic acid-derived 9-HOD(T)E, were invalidated by the concerted underexpression of the other seven ZmLOX genes, more specifically ZmLOX5 and ZmLOX12. The function of these two genes, together with ZmLOX4, was already demonstrated to be fundamental for the normal production of jasmonate, the major hormone involved in the plant defense mechanisms against F. verticillioides [36]. This hypothesis will need to be better supported through the analysis of JA hormone content and 9-LOX oxylipin profile, as well as the employment of double lox3lox4 mutants, not currently available, could better clarify the contrasting roles of these two genes.
The expression profile of the 13-LOX ZmLOX11 differed from the other ZmLOX genes, showing downregulation of almost 2-fold in the resistant Tzi18 line, contrasting to that in W22, whereas the UFMulox4 mutant did not accumulate any transcript for this gene. ZmLOX11 was hypothesized to be involved in osmotic stress response, and it has been observed to be induced in maize leaves by abscisic acid [58]. Previous RNA-sequencing experiments found that ZmLOX11 was not significantly differentially expressed in maize interactions with toxigenic and atoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus, comparing resistant and susceptible inbred lines [29]. In addition, Dolezal et al. [59] reported a downregulation in the maize kernels of B73 at 4 dpi with the same fungus, suggesting a more marginal implication of this gene in kernel defense against pathogens.
This study also included the evaluation of genes for the production of jasmonates and GLV. JA biosynthesis starts from the AOS branch of the 13-LOX pathway with the conversion of (9Z, 11E, 15Z)-(13S)-hydroperoxyoctadeca-9,11,15-trienoate (=13S-HPOTE) to allene oxide by AOS, the formation of 12-OPDA by an allene oxide cyclase, the further production of oxophytoenoic acid by an OPDA reductase (OPR), followed by three reactions of β-oxidation [28,60]. The main genes implicated in JA biosynthesis, ZmAOS, ZmOPR8, ZmOPCL and ZmACX, were all downregulated in the UFMu10924 mutant; in contrast, the resistant line Tzi18 exhibited the highest FC values, and this was particularly pronounced for the gene ZmOPR8. Similar observations were reported for the lox12 mutants, displaying a reduced expression of the JA-regulating gene ZmLOX10 and the JA biosynthesis gene ZmOPR8 [36]. Furthermore, the analysis of double mutants opr7 opr8 showed a lack of JA production, strong developmental defects and severe disease symptoms to insects and pathogens, including F. verticillioides [34]. Additionally, a notable decrease of ZmOPR7 and ZmOPR8 gene expression was also ascertained in lox10 mutants, where the diminished levels of JA and compromised resistance to insect feeding demonstrated the central role of this hormone in resistance mechanisms against fungal and insect attack [35,36].
In a previous study, a different trend was described for the lox3 mutants that accumulated ZmOPR8 transcripts more abundantly in roots infected with root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita compared to the wild-type roots [33]. Furthermore, elevated levels of expression were reported for the ZmHPL gene in both mock and infected lox3 mutant roots [33]. In maize, GLV production is determined by 13-LOX LOX10 activity in conjunction with HPL, responsible for C18:2 or C18:3-derived 13-hydroperoxy fatty acids cleavage into C6 aldehydes and C12-oxo-fatty acids [28,61]. In the present work, the ZmHPL gene was downregulated in UFMu10924 to a greater extent than W22, while it was induced in the resistant Tzi18 line. It is tempting to speculate that the reduced transcript levels of HPL in the lox4 mutant could, in turn, impair the expression of genes involved in JA production. The connections between GLV and JA biosynthesis pathways after F. verticillioides infection need to be further determined to better understand the role of GLV in the regulation of JA production.
Lipid metabolism has multiple roles in defense against pathogens, plant cell physiology, growth and development [62]. LTPs belong to the most functionally important classes of plant proteins binding and transferring lipids. In this study, the expression analysis of two LTPs, Zmplt1 and ZmLBP, was investigated, and as for LOX, JA and GLV genes, a reduction of FC values was described for the lox4 mutant compared to W22, whereas a higher induction was observed in the Tzi18 only for the Zmplt1 gene. Both genes were differentially regulated in kernels of resistant and susceptible maize lines at seven dpi with F. verticillioides [48]. Furthermore, the expression of a nonspecific lipid transfer protein (ns-LTP-1) was enhanced in a resistant wheat line at 72 h post-F. graminearum infection [63].
Earlier investigations demonstrated that levels of LOX transcripts paralleled LOX activity in several host–pathogen combinations. Hwang and Hwang (2010) reported that infection with Xanthomonas campestris pv vesicatoria stimulated a more elevated expression of the CaLOX1 gene and a parallel more induced LOX activity during incompatible interactions in pepper leaves [64]. Similarly, LOX transcript accumulation and LOX enzymatic levels were coincident in potato-resistant plants after Phytophthora infestans treatment [65].
In this study, greater levels of LOX enzymatic activity were measured in the inoculated kernels of Tzi18. This trend was in line with the enhanced resistance to F. verticillioides, the lower fumonisin accumulation and the decreased LOX, JA and GLV gene expression values described for this genotype. In contrast, during compatible interactions between lox4 mutant/W22 lines and the fungus, no significant enzyme accumulation was observed, and this pattern could reflect the lower gene expression. Although the differences in ZmLOX transcript accumulation were more marked between the UFMu10924 and wild-type W22, no significant changes were found at an enzymatic level between the mutant and the inbred line. A possible explanation for the missing correlation between gene expression and enzyme activity could be due to the fact that only the measurement of total LOX activity, determined by several LOX genes and not the different LOX enzyme isoforms, was considered in this study. Moreover, the UFMu10924 mutant is in the same genetic background as the wild-type W22 that even did not show any induction of total LOX enzyme activity. Further experiments, including later times of infection and oxylipin analysis, will clarify these findings more accurately. In addition, backcrossing between the UFMu10924 mutant and the resistant line Tzi18 will allow to better evaluate the effect of the mutation in the ZmLOX4 gene in a resistant background.
In conclusion, the knowledge gained from the characterization of the ZmLOX4 gene in maize defense against F. verticillioides and its influence on genes of the LOX, JA and GLV pathways, together with additional investigations, as hormonal and lipid profiles, will allow the employment of LOX genes and resistant genotypes, as Tzi18, to hamper fungal infection in maize via marker-assisted selection and genome editing approaches.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/12/3/335/s1, Table S1: Primer sequences for UFMulox4 mutants genotyping, Table S2: Primer sequences for real-time RT–PCR analyses, Figure S1: UFMulox4 sequences for transposon insertion confirmation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and A.L.; methodology, V.M.G.B., P.G., A.L., and M.S.; formal analysis, A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, V.M.G.B. and A.L.; writing—review and editing, A.M., L.S., M.B. and M.S.; supervision, A.M. and A.L.; funding acquisition, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

V.M.G.B. was supported by the fellowship of the Doctoral School on the Agro-Food System (Agrisystem) of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Italy). The authors thank Paola Battilani for kindly providing F. verticillioides strain and Maura Laus for her contribution to the enzymatic analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. FAOSTAT Database Collections. 2019. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 10 January 2021).
  2. White, D.G. Compendium of Corn Diseases, 3rd ed.; American Phytopathological Society Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lanubile, A.; Maschietto, V.; Marocco, A. Mycotoxin Reduction in Grain Chains, 1st ed.; Wiley Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 37–58. [Google Scholar]
  4. Logrieco, A.; Battilani, P.; Camardo Leggieri, M.; Jiang, Y.; Haesaert, G.; Lanubile, A.; Mahuku, G.; Mesterhazy, A.; Ortega-Beltran, A.; Pasti, M.; et al. Perspectives on global mycotoxin issues and management from the MycoKey Maize Working Group. Plant Dis. 2021. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Juroszek, P.; von Tiedemann, A. Climatic changes and the potential future importance of maize diseases: A short review. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2013, 120, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Medina, A.; Akbar, A.; Baazeem, A.; Rodriguez, A.; Magan, N. Climate change, food security and mycotoxins: Do we know enough? Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Camardo Leggieri, M.; Lanubile, A.; Dall’Asta, C.; Pietri, A.; Battilani, P. The impact of seasonal weather variation on mycotoxins: Maize crop in 2014 in northern Italy as a case study. World Mycotoxin J. 2020, 13, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Munkvold, G.P. Epidemiology of Fusarium diseases and their mycotoxins in maize ears. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 109, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Battilani, P.; Pietri, A.; Barbano, C.; Scandolara, A.; Bertuzzi, T.; Marocco, A. Logistic regression modeling of cropping systems to predict fumonisin contamination in maize. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 10433–10438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nelson, P.E.; Desjardins, A.E.; Plattner, R.D. Fumonisins, mycotoxins produced by Fusarium species: Biology, chemistry and significance. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 1993, 31, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Marin, S.; Ramos, A.J.; Cano-Sancho, G.; Sanchis, V. Mycotoxins: Occurrence, toxicology, and exposure assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 60, 218–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gelderblom, W.C.; Marasas, W.F. Controversies in fumonisin mycotoxicology and risk assessment. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2012, 31, 215–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. European Commission (EC). Commission Regulation No 576/2006 on the presence of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and fumonisins in products intended for animal feeding. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, L229, 7–9. [Google Scholar]
  14. European Commission (EC). Commission Regulation No 1126/2007 amending Regulation (EC) No1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as regards Fusarium toxins in maize and maize products. Off. J. Eur. Union 2007, L255, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lanubile, A.; Pasini, L.; Lo Pinto, M.; Battilani, P.; Prandini, A.; Marocco, A. Evaluation of broad spectrum sources of resistance to Fusarium verticillioides and advanced maize breeding lines. World Mycotoxin J. 2010, 1, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lanubile, A.; Maschietto, V.; Borrelli, V.M.; Stagnati, L.; Logrieco, A.F.; Marocco, A. Molecular basis of resistance to Fusarium ear rot in maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maschietto, V.; Lanubile, A.; De Leonardis, S.; Marocco, A.; Paciolla, C. Constitutive expression of pathogenesis-related proteins and antioxydant enzyme activities triggers maize resistance towards Fusarium verticillioides. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 200, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maschietto, V.; Colombi, C.; Pirona, R.; Pea, G.; Strozzi, F.; Marocco, A.; Rossini, L.; Lanubile, A. QTL mapping and candidate genes for resistance to Fusarium ear rot and fumonisin contamination in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Santiago, R.; Cao, A.; Malvar, R.A.; Butrón, A. Genomics of maize resistance to fusarium ear rot and fumonisin contamination. Toxins 2020, 12, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stagnati, L.; Martino, M.; Battilani, P.; Busconi, M.; Lanubile, A.; Marocco, A. Development of early maturity maize hybrids for resistance to fusarium and aspergillus ear rots and their associated mycotoxins. World Mycotoxin J. 2020, 13, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lanubile, A.; Pasini, L.; Marocco, A. Differential gene expression in kernels and silks of maize lines with contrasting levels of ear rot resistance after Fusarium verticillioides infection. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 1398–1406. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Lanubile, A.; Bernardi, J.; Battilani, P.; Logrieco, A.; Marocco, A. Resistant and susceptible maize genotypes activate different transcriptional responses against Fusarium verticillioides. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 77, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lanubile, A.; Bernardi, J.; Marocco, A.; Logrieco, A.; Paciolla, C. Differential activation of defense genes and enzymes in maize genotypes with contrasting levels of resistance to Fusarium verticillioides. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 78, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lanubile, A.; Ferrarini, A.; Maschietto, V.; Delledonne, M.; Marocco, A.; Bellin, D. Functional genomic analysis of constitutive and inducible defense responses to Fusarium verticillioides infection in maize genotypes with contrasting ear rot resistance. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Campos-Bermudez, V.A.; Fauguel, C.M.; Tronconi, M.A.; Casati, P.; Presello, D.A.; Andreo, C.S. Transcriptional and metabolic changes associated to the infection by Fusarium verticillioides in maize inbreds with contrasting ear rot resistance. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Gao, J.; Wu, Y.; Xia, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wu, J. The mechanisms of maize resistance to Fusarium verticillioides by comprehensive analysis of RNA-seq data. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Viswanath, K.K.; Varakumar, P.; Pamuru, R.R.; Basha, S.J.; Mehta, S.; Rao, A.D. Plant lipoxygenases and their role in plant physiology. J. Plant Biol. 2020, 63, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Borrego, E.J.; Kolomiets, M.V. Synthesis and functions of jasmonates in maize. Plants 2016, 5, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Ogunola, O.F.; Hawkins, L.K.; Mylroie, E.; Kolomiets, M.V.; Borrego, E.; Tang, J.D.; Williams, W.P.; Warburton, M.L. Characterization of the maize lipoxygenase gene family in relation to aflatoxin accumulation resistance. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gao, X.; Stumpe, M.; Feussner, I.; Kolomiets, M. A novel plastidial lipoxygenase of maize (Zea mays) ZmLOX6 encodes for a fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase and is uniquely regulated by phytohormones and pathogen infection. Planta 2008, 227, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Isakeit, T.; Gao, X.; Kolomiets, M. Increased resistance of a maize mutant lacking the 9-lipoxygenase gene, ZmLOX3, to root rot caused by Exserohilum pedicellatum. J. Phytopathol. 2007, 155, 758–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gao, X.; Shim, W.B.; Göbel, C.; Kunze, S.; Feussner, I.; Meeley, R.; Balint-Kurti, P.; Kolomiets, M. Disruption of a maize 9-lipoxygenase results in increased resistance to fungal pathogens and reduced levels of contamination with mycotoxin fumonisin. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 922–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Gao, X.; Starr, J.; Gobel, C.; Engelberth, J.; Feussner, I.; Tumlinson, J.; Kolomiets, M. Maize 9-lipoxygenase ZMLOX3 controls development, root-specific expression of defense genes, and resistance to root-knot nematodes. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yan, Y.; Christensen, S.; Isakeit, T.; Engelberth, J.; Meeley, R.; Hayward, A.; Emery, R.J.; Kolomiets, M.V. Disruption of OPR7 and OPR8 reveals the versatile functions of jasmonic acid in maize development and defense. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1420–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Christensen, S.A.; Nemchenko, A.; Borrego, E.; Murray, I.; Sobhy, I.S.; Bosak, L.; DeBlasio, S.; Erb, M.; Robert, C.A.; Vaughn, K.A.; et al. The maize lipoxygenase, ZmLOX10, mediates green leaf volatile, jasmonate and herbivore-induced plant volatile production for defense against insect attack. Plant J. 2013, 74, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Christensen, S.A.; Nemchenko, A.; Park, Y.S.; Borrego, E.; Huang, P.C.; Schmelz, E.A.; Kunze, S.; Feussner, I.; Yalpani, N.; Meeley, R.; et al. The novel monocot-specific 9-lipoxygenase ZmLOX12 is required to mount an effective jasmonate-mediated defense against Fusarium verticillioides in maize. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 1263–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Battilani, P.; Lanubile, A.; Scala, V.; Reverberi, M.; Gregori, R.; Falavigna, C.; Dall’asta, C.; Park, Y.S.; Bennett, J.; Borrego, E.J.; et al. Oxylipins from both pathogen and host antagonize jasmonic acid-mediated defence via the 9-lipoxygenase pathway in Fusarium verticillioides infection of maize. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 2162–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Stagnati, L.; Lanubile, A.; Samayoa, L.F.; Bragalanti, M.; Giorni, P.; Busconi, M.; Holland, J.B.; Marocco, A. A genome wide association study reveals markers and genes associated with resistance to Fusarium verticillioides infection of seedlings in a maize diversity panel. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 2019, 9, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Stagnati, L.; Rahjoo, V.; Samayoa, L.F.; Holland, J.B.; Borrelli, V.M.G.; Busconi, M.; Lanubile, A.; Marocco, A. A genome-wide association study to understand the effect of Fusarium verticillioides infection on seedlings of a maize diversity panel. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 2020, 10, 1685–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Septiani, P.; Lanubile, A.; Stagnati, L.; Busconi, M.; Nelissen, H.; Pè, M.E.; Dell’Acqua, M.; Marocco, A. Unravelling the genetic basis of Fusarium seedling rot resistance in the MAGIC maize population: Novel targets for breeding. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Flint-Garcia, S.A.; Thuillet, A.C.; Yu, J.; Pressoir, G.; Romero, S.M.; Mitchell, S.E.; Doebley, J.; Kresovich, S.; Goodman, M.M.; Buckler, E.S. Maize association population: A high-resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. Plant J. 2005, 70, 1054–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zila, C.T.; Samayoa, L.F.; Santiago, R.; Butrón, A.; Holland, J.B. A genome-wide association study reveals genes associated with fusarium ear rot resistance in a maize core diversity panel. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 2013, 3, 2095–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. McCarty, D.R.; Suzuki, M.; Hunter, C.; Koch, K.E. Genetic and molecular analysis of UniformMu transposon insertion lines. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 1057, 157–166. [Google Scholar]
  44. Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Bernardi, J.; Stagnati, L.; Lucini, L.; Rocchetti, G.; Lanubile, A.; Cortellini, C.; De Poli, G.; Busconi, M.; Marocco, A. Phenolic profile and susceptibility to Fusarium infection of pigmented maize cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ciasca, B.; Lanubile, A.; Marocco, A.; Pascale, M.; Logrieco, A.F.; Lattanzio, V.M.T. Application of an integrated and open-source workflow for LC-HRMS plant metabolomics studies. Case-control study: Metabolic changes of maize in response to Fusarium verticillioides infection. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lanubile, A.; Logrieco, A.; Battilani, P.; Proctor, R.H.; Marocco, A. Transcriptional changes in developing maize kernels in response to fumonisin-producing and nonproducing strains of Fusarium verticillioides. Plant Sci. 2013, 210, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Maschietto, V.; Marocco, A.; Malachova, A.; Lanubile, A. Resistance to Fusarium verticillioides and fumonisin accumulation in maize inbred lines involves an earlier and enhanced expression of lipoxygenase (LOX) genes. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 188, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Harris, D. Spectophotometric assay. In Spectophotometry and Spectrofluorimetry: A Practical Approach, 1st ed.; IRL Press: Oxford, UK, 1987; pp. 59–61. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pastore, D.; Trono, D.; Padalino, L.; Simone, S.; Valenti, D.; Di Fonzo, N.; Passarella, S. Inhibition by a-tocopherol and L-ascorbate of linoleate hydroperoxidation and b-carotene bleaching activities in durum wheat semolina. J. Cereal Sci. 2000, 31, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Park, Y.S. Diverse Functions of the Two Segmentally Duplicated 9-Lipoxygenases ZmLOX4 and ZmLOX5 of Maize. Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  53. Woldemariam, M.G.; Ahern, K.; Jander, G.; Tzin, V. A role for 9-lipoxygenases in maize defense against insect herbivory. Plant Signal. Behav. 2018, 13, 4709–4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Afolabi, C.G.; Ojiambo, P.S.; Ekpo, E.J.A.; Menkir, A.; Bandyopadhyay, R. Evaluation of maize inbred lines for resistance to Fusarium ear rot and fumonisin accumulation in grain in Tropical Africa. Plant Dis. 2007, 91, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Munkvold, G.P.; Desjardins, A.E. Fumonisins in Maize: Can we reduce their occurence? Plant Dis. 1997, 81, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Picot, A.; Barreau, C.; Pinson-Gadais, L.; Caron, D.; Lannou, C.; Richard-Forget, F. Factors of the Fusarium verticillioides-maize -environment modulating fumonisin production. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 36, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rosa Junior, O.F.; Dalcin, M.S.; Nascimento, V.L.; Haesbaert, F.M.; Ferreira, T.P.S.; Fidelis, R.R.; Sarmento, R.A.; Aguiar, R.W.S.; Oliveira, E.E.; Santos, G.R. Maize genotypes cultivated in different environments. Toxins 2019, 11, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Nemchenko, A.; Kunze, S.; Feussner, I.; Kolomiets, M. Duplicate maize13-lipoxygenase genes are differentially regulated by circadian rhythm, coldstress, wounding, pathogen infection, and hormonal treatments. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 3767–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dolezal, A.L.; Shu, X.; Obrian, G.R.; Nielsen, D.M.; Woloshuk, C.P.; Boston, R.S.; Payne, G.A. Aspergillus flavus infection induces transcriptional and physical changes in developing maize kernels. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yan, Y.; Borrego, E.; Kolomiets, M.V. Jasmonate Biosynthesis, Perception and Function in Plant Development and Stress Responses; InTech Open Access Publisher: Rijeka, Croatia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  61. Matsui, K.; Sugimoto, K.; Mano, J.; Ozawa, R.; Takabayashi, J. Differential metabolisms of green leaf volatiles in injured and intact parts of a wounded leaf meet distinct ecophysiological requirements. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lim, G.H.; Singhal, R.; Kachroo, A.; Kachroo, P. Fatty acid– and lipid-mediated signaling in plant defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 505–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Giancaspro, A.; Lionetti, V.; Giove, S.L.; Zito, D.; Fabri, E.; Reem, N.; Zabotina, O.A.; De Angelis, E.; Monaci, L.; Bellincampi, D.; et al. Cell wall features transferred from common into durum wheat to improve Fusarium Head Blight resistance. Plant Sci. 2018, 274, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hwang, S.; Hwang, B.K. The pepper 9-Lipoxygenase gene CaLOX1 functions in defense and cell death responses to microbial pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 948–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kolomiets, M.V.; Chen, H.; Gladon, R.J.; Braun, E.J.; Hannapel, D.J. A leaf lipoxygenase of potato induced specifically by pathogen infection. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1121–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the genomic structure of the ZmLIPOXYGENASE4 gene showing the mutator element insertion sites. Blue boxes and black lines represent exons and introns, respectively. * indicates the mutator element insertional sites for lox4-7 and lox4-10 mutants as previously reported in [37].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the genomic structure of the ZmLIPOXYGENASE4 gene showing the mutator element insertion sites. Blue boxes and black lines represent exons and introns, respectively. * indicates the mutator element insertional sites for lox4-7 and lox4-10 mutants as previously reported in [37].
Genes 12 00335 g001
Figure 2. Phenotypic values of Fusarium seedling rot ((A), severity rate), seedling weight ((B), gram) and seedling length ((C), cm) in mock (black boxes) and inoculated (white boxes) RTAs for the tested maize inbred lines and UFMulox4 mutants. Asterisk (*) indicate significant differences between mock and inoculated RTAs within the same line, according to two-way ANOVA (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001). ns: not significant. Different Greek letters over the black histograms indicate significant differences among the mock RTAs of the tested lines, whereas different Latin letters over the white histograms indicate significant differences among the inoculated RTAs of the same lines, as resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Phenotypic values of Fusarium seedling rot ((A), severity rate), seedling weight ((B), gram) and seedling length ((C), cm) in mock (black boxes) and inoculated (white boxes) RTAs for the tested maize inbred lines and UFMulox4 mutants. Asterisk (*) indicate significant differences between mock and inoculated RTAs within the same line, according to two-way ANOVA (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001). ns: not significant. Different Greek letters over the black histograms indicate significant differences among the mock RTAs of the tested lines, whereas different Latin letters over the white histograms indicate significant differences among the inoculated RTAs of the same lines, as resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00335 g002
Figure 3. Real-time RT–PCR analysis of ZmLOX4 gene. Fold change (FC) of expression between inoculated and mock kernels of W22, Tzi18 and UFMulox4 lines at 7 dpi with F. verticillioides. Vertical bars indicate ± sd. Different letters over the histograms indicate significant differences among means of the three lines, resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Real-time RT–PCR analysis of ZmLOX4 gene. Fold change (FC) of expression between inoculated and mock kernels of W22, Tzi18 and UFMulox4 lines at 7 dpi with F. verticillioides. Vertical bars indicate ± sd. Different letters over the histograms indicate significant differences among means of the three lines, resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00335 g003
Figure 4. Real-time RT-PCR analysis of ZmLOX genes. Fold change (FC) of expression between inoculated and mock kernels of W22, Tzi18 and UFMu10924 lines at 7 dpi with F. verticillioides of (A) ZmLOX3, (B) ZmLOX5, (C) ZmLOX12, (D) ZmLOX7, (E) ZmLOX8, (F) ZmLOX10, (G) ZmLOX11 and (H) ZmLOX6. Vertical bars indicate ± sd. Different letters over the histograms indicate significant differences among means of the three lines, as resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Real-time RT-PCR analysis of ZmLOX genes. Fold change (FC) of expression between inoculated and mock kernels of W22, Tzi18 and UFMu10924 lines at 7 dpi with F. verticillioides of (A) ZmLOX3, (B) ZmLOX5, (C) ZmLOX12, (D) ZmLOX7, (E) ZmLOX8, (F) ZmLOX10, (G) ZmLOX11 and (H) ZmLOX6. Vertical bars indicate ± sd. Different letters over the histograms indicate significant differences among means of the three lines, as resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00335 g004
Figure 5. Real-time RT-PCR analysis of JA and GLV genes. Fold change (FC) of expression between inoculated and mock kernels of W22, Tzi18 and UFMu10924 lines at 7 dpi with F. verticillioides of (A) ZmAOS, (B) ZmOPR8, (C) ZmOPCL, (D) ZmACX, (E) Zmplt1, (F) ZmLBP and (G) ZmHPL. Vertical bars indicate ± sd. Different letters over the histograms indicate significant differences among means of the three lines, as resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Real-time RT-PCR analysis of JA and GLV genes. Fold change (FC) of expression between inoculated and mock kernels of W22, Tzi18 and UFMu10924 lines at 7 dpi with F. verticillioides of (A) ZmAOS, (B) ZmOPR8, (C) ZmOPCL, (D) ZmACX, (E) Zmplt1, (F) ZmLBP and (G) ZmHPL. Vertical bars indicate ± sd. Different letters over the histograms indicate significant differences among means of the three lines, as resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00335 g005
Figure 6. Total enzymatic lipoxygenase (LOX) activity expressed as UE/g of dry weight in kernels of W22, Tzi18 and UFMu10924 lines before (M, mock) and 7 dpi with F. verticillioides (I). Vertical bars indicate ± sd. Different letters over the histograms indicate significant differences among means of the three lines, resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Total enzymatic lipoxygenase (LOX) activity expressed as UE/g of dry weight in kernels of W22, Tzi18 and UFMu10924 lines before (M, mock) and 7 dpi with F. verticillioides (I). Vertical bars indicate ± sd. Different letters over the histograms indicate significant differences among means of the three lines, resulting from Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00335 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lanubile, A.; Borrelli, V.M.G.; Soccio, M.; Giorni, P.; Stagnati, L.; Busconi, M.; Marocco, A. Loss of ZmLIPOXYGENASE4 Decreases Fusarium verticillioides Resistance in Maize Seedlings. Genes 2021, 12, 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030335

AMA Style

Lanubile A, Borrelli VMG, Soccio M, Giorni P, Stagnati L, Busconi M, Marocco A. Loss of ZmLIPOXYGENASE4 Decreases Fusarium verticillioides Resistance in Maize Seedlings. Genes. 2021; 12(3):335. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030335

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lanubile, Alessandra, Virginia Maria Grazia Borrelli, Mario Soccio, Paola Giorni, Lorenzo Stagnati, Matteo Busconi, and Adriano Marocco. 2021. "Loss of ZmLIPOXYGENASE4 Decreases Fusarium verticillioides Resistance in Maize Seedlings" Genes 12, no. 3: 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030335

APA Style

Lanubile, A., Borrelli, V. M. G., Soccio, M., Giorni, P., Stagnati, L., Busconi, M., & Marocco, A. (2021). Loss of ZmLIPOXYGENASE4 Decreases Fusarium verticillioides Resistance in Maize Seedlings. Genes, 12(3), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030335

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop